HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/18/2013 Env Bd Packet•
City of Lino Lakes
Environmental Board Meeting
December 18, 2013
6:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. CaII to Order
A. Recognition of Service and Presentation of Plaque to retiring board
member Mary Jo O'Dea
2. Approval of Minutes
October 30, 2013
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Open Mike
III 5. Action Items
A. NorthPointe
6. Discussion Items
A. Environmental Board Power Point/Environmental Board Discussion
B. Goals 2014
7. Adjourn
•
•
•
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MINUTES
DATE
TIME STARTED
TIME ENDED
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
STAFF PRESENT
: October 30, 2013
: 6:31 P. M.
: 7:38 P. M.
: Mary Jo O'Dea, Barbara Bor, Paula Andrzejewski, Nancie Klebba,
Nancy Morin
: Martha DeHaven, Steve Heiskary
: Marty Asleson
1. CALL TO ORDER
Ms. O'Dea called the Environmental Board meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. on October 30,
2013
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
July 31, 2013
Ms. Morin made a motion to approve the July 31, 2013 Meeting Minutes. Ms. Klebba
seconded the motion to approve the minutes. Motion carried unanimously.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Remove - Item B - tabled to next meeting
Add — now Item G- Residents' Concerns
Ms. Klebba made a motion to approve the amended agenda. Ms. Bor and Ms. Morin
seconded the motion to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
4. OPEN MIKE
No one present for Open Mike - closed at 6:37pm
5. ACTION ITEMS
A. Saddle Club
Mr. Asleson stated that the project site is 39.80 acre parcel. The parcel is proposed for
platting 55 single family lots. Public sanitary sewer and water utilities are available to
Environmental Board
October 30, 2013
Page 2
service the site. The total upland area for the site is 30.52 acres. The total wetland area
is 9.28 acres. Mr. Black was present for comments
Lino Lakes Environmental Board has the following recommendations concerning the
Preliminary Plat /PUD proposal for the Saddle Club:
1. It should be required that all top soils in hydric soil areas that are removed from the
buffer areas shall be returned to the same site as much as possible after grading is
done.
2. Given the Lino Lakes Environmental goals the board recommends an establishment of
a Homeowners Association for the ongoing maintenance and sustainability of
Conservation Easement areas.
3. Require use of a lower profile curb similar to the Foxborough development in order to
not create any more barriers to the Blanding turtle or any nesting turtle species
4. All Outlots should be deeded to the City of Lino Lakes
5. Buffer areas must be an average of 50' wide along the Wetland Management
Corridors
6. Signs indicating the location of all conservation easements must be placed on all
property lines similar to the ones in installed in Foxborough. Signs must be approved
by the City
7. Expanding the Outlots to the property lines as feasible to encompass more of the area
as per discussion between developer and city staff.
8. The developer should produce a handout that gives the new homeowner information
at the time of purchase about Conservation Easement. Use Foxborough as an example
9. Allow for the removal of Green Ash and Aspen in the buffer areas without mitigation
10. The storm pond /pretreatment pond should be lined where there is not adequate
separation from the groundwater.
11. The SWPPP must be specific to the site
12. There is no formal landscape plan and the final landscape plan including the pond
areas must be reviewed by the Environmental Board for recommendations.
Ms. O'Dea asked for a motion to approve this development with the 12
recommendations. Ms. Andrzejewski made a motion to approval the recommendations.
Ms. Bor seconded the motion. Motion carried.
DRAFT MINUTES
•
•
•
Environmental Board
October 30, 2013
Page 3
6. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. New Rare Species
Mr. Asleson stated the New Rare Species became a law in 1986 to protect endangered.
threaten and special concern species that were thought to be extinct are now being
found.
Ms. O'Dea asked how this affects the city. Mr. Asleson stated that additional plants
that have been added to the list and so in new developments we will have to watch out in
buffer area and transition areas for these plants.
Mr. Asleson stated that they will have to be careful and look over the area before using a
vibratory plow or when doing a burn.
Tabled to next month
B. Community Garden Update-
It was a great year for the gardeners.
Mr. Asleson stated that there was a concern about people driving in the area of the
gardens. Ms. O'Dea asked if it is possible that a barrier be built so that people can't drive
into the garden area. Mr. Asleson will look into a solution.
Ms. Bor questioned if a sign was still being looked into. Ms. O'Dea asked if getting
funding for the sign help. Mr. Asleson said yes.
Ms. Bor wanted to know if we need a garden advocate. Mr. Asleson stated not right now.
C. Blue Heron Days
Most of the Environmental Board will be on hand for parade clean up. It was noted that it
was an educational event with parents explaining to their children about recycling.
The board would like to have new shirts next year. Mr. Asleson will look into this.
DRAFT MINUTES
Environmental Board
October 30, 2013
Page 4
D. Recycling Updates
Intern Grant approved job description needs be approved by the city. Mr. Asleson is
inquiring if he can move the grant to 2014.
Mr. Asleson stated that the goal for the year is 1819 tons and the first half of the year we
are already at 1026. He also mentioned that the monthly recycling may have been doing
just as well as the annual one in May.
Ms. Klebba stated that American Recycles Day will be coming up. Ms. O'Dea mention
lets tie in the monthly recycle day with the America Recycles Day which is November
15, 2013. Ms. Morin will call and see if a newspaper article could be done about
recycling.
Mr. Asleson mentioned that the recycling cans at parks are doing good- more fund raising
for the parks and that the tubs for recycling cans are almost full.
E. Wollan Park-
Mr. Asleson stated that Nick Tomczik, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) was in
the process of working on a plant survey analysis.
F. EAB
Asleson stated that there is no sign of emerald ash borer in the city.
G. Resident Concerns
Ms. Bor had a call from a resident that is concern about Bill's Superette lighting. The
resident thought that the lighting was too bright. Mr. Asleson said that he would pass the
information on to the Planning and Zoning Department. But he knew that the lighting
calculation is standard.
Ms. Bor had a concern about Birch & Centerville road. Too many semis are parked in
the yard at Cardinal property. Mr. Asleson thought that maybe a dialogue with the
owners would help. Ms. O'Dea stated that they always had some semis parked there for
years. Mr. Asleson stated he would let the Planning and Zoning Department know of this
concern.
Ms. Morin brought up the semi storage at Lake Drive and Elm Street and Mr. Asleson
mentioned that is also a Planning and Zoning Department item and that the department is
dealing with it.
DRAFT MINUTES
•
•
Environmental Board
October 30, 2013
Page 5
7. ADJOURNMENT
It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on Wednesday
November 20, 2013 at 6:30p.m.
Ms. Andrzejewski made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:58 p.m. Ms. Morin
seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted by
Mary Fogarty
Office Tech 1
DRAFT MINUTES
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 5A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator
MEETING DATE: December 18, 2013
PROJECT NAME: NorthPointe
REQUEST: Rezone to Planned Unit Develpoment
PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat
APPLICANT:
AJE Companies
Attn Larry Olson
1875 Station parkway, NW
Andover MN 55304
OWNER: Builders Development and Finance, Inc.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The applicant is requesting preliminary plat review for a proposed residential
development. The developer is proposing to use the Planned Unit Development Process
to allow for site design flexibility and to accommodate a range of housing types and
densities. The land is located between County Road 54 and 35E and just south of Cedar
Street. The site and surrounding areas are currently zoned rural. The property is guided
medium density residential (4 to 5.9 units per acre) in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed development contains 93.53 gross acres.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Topography
The topography is relatively level with ground surface elevations at the boring locations
generally ranging from about 920 to 925 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL). However the
ground surface elevation in the southeast quadrant of the site dips to an elevation of about
914 feet.
Ground water
• From the" NorthPointe Soils Report; "Groundwater was encountered in soil borings B -1,
B -2, B -7, and B -8 while drilling at depths ranging from about 4 to 16 feet below the
1
ground surface. The water observed in the borings appears to be associated with sand
seam(s) within the glacial till soil while the water observed in B -8 appears to be perched
in the sandy soils above the underlying clays. Groundwater measurements were made as
noted and shown on the boring logs. Ground water was not encountered in borings B -3,
B -4, B -5, B -6 or B -9 while drilling or after removing the augers from the boreholes. See
attached map, (previous concept map) of boring locations.
Soils
Soils on this site are a heavier type of soil with lower infiltration rates and higher runoff
rates. It is interesting to note that this site is on the edge of Anoka County Sand Plain
with sandy soils bordering the site on the northwest. This is the start of the Anoka
County Sand plain to the west.
Because soil borings indicated sandy soil seams on the site, proof should be given that
wetlands in the vicinity will not be drained by opening up any sand seams, or a
contingency plan to seal off wetland draining seams.
Land Cover
Over the years the land cover has changed from cultivated to grassland or non - cultivated
vegetation on hydric and non - hydric soils.
Rare and Unique Resources
The AUAR requires a Rare Plant Inventory be performed if there are wetlands on the site
inside the AUAR. The Habitat is not suitable for rare plants on this site; however, in
order to satisfy the requirement of the AUAR, a letter from a company like Critical
Connections, Inc, stating that it is to suitable Habitat would suffice.
Wetlands
The NorthPointe wetland delineation report dated December 3, 2013 identified eight (8)
wetlands as shown on the existing conditions survey (Kjolhaug, Figure 3). The developer
is proposing to fill 11,784 SF of Wetland. The developer is proposing to mitigate filled
wetlands with 81,292 SF of new created wetland area. Since RCWD is the Regulating
Government Unit (RGU), any fill will require approval of the RCWD including a
mitigation plan.
A mitigation consideration that should be investigated is some form of hydrologic
restoration. Wetland mitigation credit can be obtained for this action. City staff
recommends a hydrologic restoration on this site be investigated for wetland mitigation
credit.
There is a "Natural Resource Conservation Areas" on this site. This area consists of a
wetland complex on the South East side. A portion of a "Wetland Preservation Corridor"
2
•
•
•
is located on the SE corner of the project, and bisects the SE area Natural Resources
Conservation Area. The buffering requirements for wetland preservation corridor apply
to the wetlands on the site in this area. A 50 foot buffer is required around all wetlands in
the corridor. A conservation easement must be placed over the wetlands and buffer; and
signage identifying the location of the buffer location along all property lines must be
installed. An educational brochure should be developed to give to property owners along
all conservation easement properties describing the conservation area and what can, and
cannot be done in the easement.
The developer is proposing (detail sheet 19) to perform restoration work in the wetlands
by removing 18 inches of wetland soil. It is doubtful that the Rice Creek Watershed
District would allow this and Lino Lakes Environmental recommends against this action.
The corps of Engineers considers this an impact.
The seed banks in our wetlands are viable and cannot be purchased in a store. Removing
reed canary grass is best done by removing the thatch layer (shoots and stems that have
laid down over the wetland soil layer over time) and then starting a program to control
reed canary regeneration. This can be done with chemicals and/or burning.
There is an incidental Wetland in the center of the project. An incidental wetland is an
area excavated where there was no wetland and now is functioning as a wetland. The
Corps of Engineers does not differentiate incidental wetlands.
• The road proposed on the south side of the development that dead -ends under a "future
road" scenario should be relocated so that it does not run into a wetland.
•
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
The proposed development exceeds the mandatory threshold for preparation of an EAW;
however, the City completed an Alternative Urban Area -wide Review (AUAR) of the I -I-
35 W in 2005. Because of this, the site is subject to the AUAR mitigation plan, and no
additional Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is required.
Tree Preservation and New Tree Requirements
The Developer Submitted a Tree Inventory with tree removals indicated. The plan must
be revised in accordance to Section 3, Sub.4.Q.10 -Tree Preservation and Mitigation
Standards which requires identification of `Environmentally Sensitive Areas" and "Basic
Use Areas ".
Surface Water Management
Surface water from this site flows to Clearwater Creek. Clearwater Creek is in the Rice
Creek Watershed District.
Rule C of the Rice Creek Watershed District Rules, went into effect on July 1, 2013. The
rule sets standards to:
(a) Maximize water quality and flood control on individual project sites through
Better Site Design practices and stormwater management.
(b) Minimize land use impacts and improve operational and maintenance
efficiency by using stormwater BMPs, when needed, regionally unless local
resources would be adversely affected.
(c) Treat stormwater runoff before discharge to surface water - bodies and
wetlands, while considering the historic use of District water features.
(d) Ensure that future peak rates of runoff are less than or equal to existing rates.
(e) Reduce the existing conditions peak rate of discharge along Lower Rice Creek
and the rate of discharge and volume of runoff reaching Long Lake, to
preserve the remaining floodplain storage volume within Long Lake and
mitigate the historic loss of floodplain storage.
(f) Preserve remaining floodplain storage volume within the Rice Creek
Watershed to minimize flood potential throughout the District.
The development is required to meet both water quality and volume regulations
consistent with RCWD and City AUAR requirements. There must also be no net loss of
floodplain for the site. A watershed district permit is required for development on this
site.
Use of the PUD process allows for Better Site Design practices throughout the site. Key
provisions include the local roads within the development will have 50 and 60 foot right
of way widths and 28 and 32 foot wide paved road surface. By lowering the amount of
pavement surface area, the amount of impervious area and surface water runoff is
decreased.
In AUAR areas along the I35W corridor, Conservation Development design and/or low
impact development design principles will be required of new developments, with an
emphasis on ecological stormwater management and natural resource conservation. The
stormwater and conservation components of individual developments must integrate with
the CDF "Conservation Development Framework ".
A management plan will be required to ensure long -term perpetuation of the public
values conserved or restored in the natural open space and in the ecological stormwater
management system of the CDF. Ecological education, provided by the developer, may
be required for a specific development project (e.g., educational pamphlets, signage,
Home Owner Association workshops, etc.).
Recommend that the developer consider water reuse to irrigate park and berm areas. This
would help to achieve RCWD volume control requirements and surface water treatment
train requirements of the AUAR and help satisfy AUAR requirements.
4
•
•
•
•
Floodplain
The submitted information indicates that the 1982 FEMA Flood Insurance Rating Map
(FIRM) shows the southeast quadrant of the site is located within a designated Zone a
flood plain district. Per the Stormwater Management Plan, the 100 -year flood elevation
is 909.7 which according the RCWD, this would also be the 100 -year regulatory flood
elevation. With the exception of the ditch, the site is above this elevation and no
floodplain fill is proposed for this project.
A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) will need to be obtained from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) to verify the floodplain is not impacted by development.
Per the Floodplain Ordinance, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any floodplain
fill. The low floor freeboard shall be 2 feet above the floodplain elevation. The proposed
lowest floor elevations appear to meet this standard.
Wildlife Considerations in the AUAR
In reference to language in the AUAR, the developer should provide for turtle and other
wildlife passage by continuing to require surmountable curbing in new residential
developments and encouraging ecologically sensitive site design.
SWPPP
There was no Stormwater Pollution Plan (SWPPP) submitted for this project. The
Developer must submit a SWPPP before construction begins. The SWPPP must address
the following:
• Proposed erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to control the discharge
of sediment and /or other pollutants from the site, particularity at the point(s) of
intended discharge. All surrounding stormwater inlet drains within 200 feet of the
site that have water draining to them must have a city approved stormwater inlet
protection device installed prior to construction.
• Must provide the knowledgeable person/chain of responsibility information
before construction begins. We need the name of the person that is knowledgeable
and experienced in the application of erosion prevention before and during
construction. The owner must identify who will have the responsibility for long-
term operation and maintenance of the permanent stormwater management
system. The owner must include in the SWPPP a chain of responsibility with all
operators on the site, or if not known, the title or position of the responsibility of
responsible party, to ensure that the SWPPP will be implemented and stay in
effect until the construction project is complete, the entire site has undergone final
stabilization and a "Notice of Termination" has been submitted to the MPCA.
• The permitees must, before construction begins, provide training documentation
that the individuals listed as SWPPP overseers are certified by a MPCA approved
training method. With that, the City would need names of the person or persons
5
involved with SWPPP management, dates of training and the names of
instructors of entity providing training, and the content of the training course or
workshop including the numbers of hours training,
• Information must be submitted to the city on the location of the SWPPP on site
and the location of all required weekly, post - rainfall event inspections and follow -
up corrections. A hard copy must be kept on site and emailed to the city MS4
manager.
• The SWPPP must incorporate the requirements (MPCA Stormwater Discharge
Design Requirements) including calculations for the project.
• Site specific quantities must be included for all erosion prevention and sediment
control BMPs.
• Must include maps of all surface waters and wetlands and storm ponds or basins
that can be identified on maps such as a USGA 7.5 minute quadrangle map, the
NWI maps or equivalent maps within one mile (aerial radius) from the project
boundary that will receive stormwater associated with construction activity during
or after construction. This site is within one mile of a receiving lake.
• The SWPPP must describe a maintenance plan identifying who will be
performing future maintenance of permanent stormwater treatment systems on the
site.
• The SWPPP must identify if the project's stormwater flows to an impaired water
within one mile of the site (aerial radius), and whether or not there is USEPA-
approved TMDL for pollutants or stressors for the site. The permitee must
identify those TMDLs applicable to the to the projects stormwater discharge.
Landscape Plan
The landscape buffer along 20th Avenue S must be revised in accordance to Section 3,
Subd. 4, Q.6- Buffer and Screen Standards. Also, the "Open Area" calculations shall be
detailed in terms of area and number of plantings in accordance to Section 3, Subd. 4,
Q.5 -Open Area Landscape Standards.
Money should be escrowed for all boulevard trees. The City will choose the species and
location of these trees. The developer must design a section of the boulevard for the trees
that is clear of utilities and sidewalk.
Tree and shrub plantings required for mitigation and zoning requirements should not be
planted in utility easements or over storm pipes. The materials required for the project
should be positioned in open space areas, or on a berm to mitigate sound from the
freeway.
An appropriately sized (height) berm should be installed along the freeway on the East
side to mitigate sound. MNDOT has indicated they will not be placing a sound barrier in
6
•
•
and along this project. Mitigating freeway sound pollution is an AUAR issue. (AUAR
item 21.8).
Revised landscape plans must be approved by staff and brought back to the
Environmental Board for review.
A City approved native vegetation seed mix should be used in all ponds, water
treatment/filtration areas, and other surface water management areas. This is an AUAR
mitigation requirement.
The developer must supply 1 foot contours (if deemed necessary by the City Engineer)
and drain tile mapping for the project as per AUAR requirements.
AUAR Historic /Cultural
The adopted AUAR document states that if there are "Areas of High Ecological
Potential" identified by the AUAR Study on the site, further study must be given to
cultural investigation. There are no identified Areas of High Archaeological potential on
this site.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends changes and additions be made in reference to staff comments and
Environmental Board review comments.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Excerpts of the Plan Set prepared by Carlson McCain dated November 8,
2013 and received by the City on November 12, 2013.
2. AUAR Mitigation Plan Summary
3. Soil Survey
4. NWI Map
5. Soil Boring Map
6. NorthPointe Wetland Preservation Corridor and Natural Resources Area Map
7. Traffic Noise Analysis Results
•
NORTHPOINTE
LINO LAKES, 1{ MINNESOTA
r i
L
Fri
D :00 200 400
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Know what's below.
C81) before you dig.
SHEET INDEX
1. COVER
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
3. PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX
4 -8. PRELIMINARY PLAT
9. GHOST PLAT
70 -11. PRELIMINARY SITE &
UTILITY PLANS
12. GRADING INDEX
13 -78. PRELIMINARY GRADING &
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
19 -20. DETAILS
T1 -T7. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
L1 -L3. LANDSCAPE PLANS
re
W
0
u
NORTHPOINTE
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
AJE COMPANIES
REVISIONS
2.
T.
a.
5.
6.
DRAWN Be:
00
DESIGNED EY:
BON
ISSUE DATE:
1118IU
1 hare, 8Wy 00 m8 Wan. 582010uen
3ry 250aa3202.01 h,me w0523m,
5103 sweraam and that i ,5. 2W,
Umstd SthIc 2tW Englne3 vM3 the
v.a ar r>c smte m Nu.teeo
Name: Brian I. Krvsmfak. P.E
Due: 11rerU U¢nse
1
of
20
L i
1
et
escort.
OWNER:
Cmfaredle Yord LLC
OWNEIt
Rehbein Properties
aN690.ijE - ""
et U.TAaadT
0 ; 8 0 \L- r- '(�.s.m dr tr. meta
r iF.pO Xs..
J A b�•g11 , r• / �.( a. r+ I rte.2
OWNER 1 1 I 5 T -'fL / I
Pea er venter FYI . g� ^9 �,- ---- j
OWNER: E.. e ` ," �- /
James Warn Bunted / . / of �� * /
mw,l w oar /
• 2- r j / .-- i•-'' `.
// Y SusanFk ~-,,r
• / 1
// ,„,•e: Ethan A\Lang 3x3 % 1 vi
.5. /' N8819.38 °E 1 /'`' / `'�'
,} 720.18 r RSMma, I ,Cr.
/ y-
a
J3
OWNER:
John Jr,
Sham Planate
' ' � /So. n 1 a. �°°:r eel , 1 \
/' A ! Water :r scour nj5. a ) J
/' -J fir- -� /� I SrY ae •1 IN NVlwweprvtlN�\a
MOO '` J I /a N 'SC ri ten ll pR II
fd7a1NA( 702 /
/0 I `\) / _
(T , V� `) (
i1
/ / ) y ~\ __j/ J \ \ tr /,. �/ ,/
• •
\ L - --' -/ - -NA
\ 1 / // / / / , / , __1--''_ ' 1 / / i/'
r N
60.00-
S89°08'22-W
L..J
McNeely
OW
Jtlfe MtNady
OWNER:
Wiliam &
Bonnie Node=
OWNER:
Pierre k
Norma Nadeau
la
y� -1
\
/
1
■ r'
+
J„ J
v
PARCEL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL O02 0,0770* (Per Exhibit A of 7INe Commitment No. 713- 06024, with a commitment dale of Arne 3. 2013 of 8:00 A.M., prepared by Registered
Abstractors. Mc. as issuing agent far First American All. 00000. ee Company)
That port of the Southeast Duorler of the Northwest 0uortar, Section 25. Township 31. Range 22, Anoka County. Minnesnla. lying westerly of the westerly line
of Intersml• Highway No. 35E
AND
The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Sect /o, 25, Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County. Minnesota: e+eept the West 60 reel and also except the
South 795.00 feet of the West 822,00 feet.
AND
That part of the West 72000 feet of the Northwest Duarte, 01 the Northwest Curato, Section 25 Township 31, Range 22 Anoka County. Minnesota lying
southerly of the north 113000 feet.
AND
Mat part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 25, Township 31, Range 22 Anoka Courtly. Minnesota. Tying southerly of the north
560.00 feet and easterly of the west 720.00 feel.
AND
Mot part of the West 205.00 feet a/ the East 65000 feel of the North 56000 feet of the Northwest Wetter of N. Northwest Ouoler, 5eelkn 25, Township
31, Range 22 Anoka County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of the Northern Stales Power Company ownership through sold Northwest O.arter al the Northwest
O(orler sold arnu3Mp more piawled., described as follows:
A strip of land 50 feet in width and being 25 feet in width on each skis of a centerline desenbed ,, follows:
Commencing at a point an the north line of sold Northwest ataxia-. 15927 feet east of the northwest comer thereof,, running thence South 52 degrees 27
mk,utes W.I. 1987.3 feet to a point an the west line of saki Stratton. 1206 feel South of the northwest comer thereof. Subject to County Road No. 54 an
the west and Cedar Street on the north.
AND
The North 530 /eel af the South 795 lief 01 the Cost 762 feet of the West 822.00 feet al the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of 5aelbn 25.
Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota.
AA47
PARCEL OE577WA17•L• (Per Wbrronty 0000 per 001. No. 1390122 and all C1,im Deed 1502491, 1000(50.8 by owner)
The westerly 604.78 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Ouarler al Section 25. Tamrip 37, Range 22. Anoka County. Minnesota. EXCEPT that part
thereof winch lies northwesterly of the southeasterly line of the transmission right of way 05 descbed in Book 54 of Deeds Page 110
NW)
That part of the Northeast 7/4 el the Northwest 7/4 of Section 25, Township 31, Range 22 king northwesterly of a line parallel with and 25 /eel
northwesterly of the fatiowing described line 8egionkey at a point on the North line of said Section 15927 feet east of the northwest corner of said Section:
thence South 52 degrees 27 minutes West 1987.3 feet to a point on the West lino of said Section, 1206 feet South of said Northwest caner and there
tennwichng. EXCEPT road
OWNER[- J
Gary & L.....J
Cathleen Mirror
C:HOIW RK :/ ••
OWNER.
Richard Sr. &
k
Linda Sandberg (
MINER:
Arden k
r(r
drill
Kam GaCeri
BIRCH
STREET
I j
fi
/x.71
/0
_ If
//nil // ,' ,'\ I :'j 1
( `' L \ " ? i
. -11, \ � '. - / �,e=i J \ \ -� ` _l \
/w 70001 i ',I l`•l.w �l �e121 -� / �� / / //i
.ar,i \ `•.yam �-0I ,
/. , _ , r\ /
,, , j(('r a ,.' r-'' -'� 1 1
Fy-� -+ \
62!,.
yr (589°57r
W/
- -it.
/! J e /
014NER: 1
Rollo 'J Strand
-vim Hoke M.1of b.17.0...)
" °` T:
I li I
RWETLAND
0WNTJt
Fr.ces Barque
el in tw.n. Pass 22
NOTES
I. Bearings shown hereon band an the Anoka County Coerdrmle System MAO 83 - 96 Adjustment).
2. Wetlands shown hereon delineated by M):4w9 Environmental Services Company.
3. No title work was furnished for poreeb ,.,±aimed in Pared 0 No. 25- 31 -22 -21 -0007
4. Only MIN. improvements are shown hereon.
SITE DATA
TOTAL AREA
EXISTING ZONING
LEGEND
• - Denotes Anoka County Monument, as noted
• - Denotes Found km Monument. as noted
O - Denotes Set Con Pipe. Marked r410 RL5 40357
- Denotes Electric Box
V - Denotes rue Hydront
ba - Denotes Cate Valve
- Denotes Utility Pole
- Denotes Miscellaneous Ilmhole
- Denotes Sanitary Manhole
- Denotes Ma80os
- Denotes 503 Boring/Test Hole, by others
- Denotes Television era
- Denotes Miscellaneous Sign
- Denotes Telephone Box
- Denotes Underground Telephone line
- Denotes °warhead Utility Ines
- Denotes Underground Fiber Optic tine
- Denotes Existing Fence
- Denotes Existing Decline
- Denotes Existing 2 fl. Contour
- Denotes naming 10 ft. Contour
- Denotes Grovel Surface Area
O
a
a
(IN FEET)
- Denotes Bituminous Surface
±93.53 AC.
R (Rural)
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
Cedar 51
N
City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota
Section 25, Township 31, Range 22
BENCHMARKS i
1. 707 MIT HYDRANT APPROXIMATELY 218
R. NORTH OF THE 5090411EST CORNER
OF NE PROPERTY.
ELEVA00N: 92099 (MAW 88)
2, TOP NUT HYDRANT APPROXINATELY
(057 R. NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF ME PROPERTY
ELEVATION: 923.76 (CAW 88)
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
to m
1- 0
z
M C
O c
�
• W
Sy
re J
o
z�
Z d'
1.4 O
z
a ▪ 7D z
Z c
O °
U
m >
w
a
REVISIONS
0.
3.
6.
DRAWN BY:
a610NEa BY:
ISSUE DATE
alb
,000
1U0I33
hereby earn Nat Ms survey, plan or
report was artpated by ma or under my
atone supervision and that ( am a duly
Ikemed land Surveyor under the Was et
the Start of 0(mesoln.
Name: Thomas 0. &MMuff
5lgnatu0,..0.2 -4 '.7
Date: 11/0/13 License s: 40561
2
of 20
•
SHEET 6
1 r-- . i1
1 F
I 1 L___J
3 I
C� 75-7? 205.06 S-r RE_i - --- -- N@993H�
190.17
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT-..
(UPLAND)
tot
r�
In
r,.:I Bn
L`J
G;t
9
•
•
•
/
//.
/ - -
- T
/'
I counTY / '
/i' N8Hai9'3H "E
' 1
1
L__J
1
r1
1 3 I
_J
720.18
1 w�
OUTLOT G1
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
- (UPLAND)
era r
sir //
3n //
/' ,fryer
/ ' / a;
/ I , , + ea;
8.,
nmeeb -rl
rr7„:" '
In
/
ELY LOTS
4,,, /'19. ..E
T • 505.2
1
12
L_J
1
I I
13
I I
L_-I
r -1
-lz-1
L__J
L_J
1
L_J
-e-1
L__J
MIN
1
1127 1
I 8 I
I 6 I
I 5
ME
3 )
I 6 I
L - -
11 \` -�1
(� \ 19 \ \\ 18 1
1 -
1 20 \ iJ
t.
rl 21 ) ^1
/1// 22 11
\ / J
C_ 15
r ;Z -1J r 13 1
14
T1 J
r 1C 1
L__J
L - _ J
r -fi 1
L__J
ISM
r ig
L__J
r 19 1
L__J
r zo1
L__J
ipupgrip
r 23
I- 8 -=1
L __J
� 7
L__J
r6--
L_!
-
L__J
1- 3
L _ _ J
2 J.
(23\
1
r
1
__„Atiskiat
zs �
wok
27
BrAtmagirmAiiii
11 NM
net
-- - STREET
III
II
1 IJ,
▪ rl
_SHEET J
1
II
BIRCH J
STREET
II
mF
/ 20
/1 \
21 \ J
1 22
)
r
t9 I
r
18
L_J
r-
17
L_J
r -"1
L_J
L__J
1 23
1 24
L _ _ J
x261
27
r --
1 28
L.__
I • 29
r I
L - \
• 30 4
v.' 31
s 1 r-1
I I 4 1
J
I 6 I
1 2 1
L_J
- -- I
/1 9\ 10 (,
6 \\\ \\
34
L_J
r
(
12,1
1 'I
L
r -i
1 13 1
I I
L_J
31
1
_J
ra;. \ \" /AINt�.`.�� T�1iil'11111111M11111M lam.
3 II 2
II
_JL
w��s STREET C wrli
r
1141
R
• i 1
1/ 32 i 1 33 11 34
11 11
35 I
11 2 1 I�r
1 3 /1 4 i
// 77-
_ < � //
6 /
</8
73 -
76 .01
689'5 11"W
SHEET 5
OUTLOT
D/
l.`'
♦ /
rig
Ll.
SHEET 8
NeroEra2t
310.91
/'
^-
// %
\ ( 9 //
MET \ (`/
1
OUTLOT 8
W E T L 4
i
0I r
1
1129.09
589'5714 W
HEET 7
o
1
1
1
11
PARCEL DESCRIPTION
Abair-actors. Inc. as issuing agent for first American 171. insurance Company)
Thal part at the Southeast Warhr of the Northwest (Yaler. Section 25. Township JI, Range 22, Anoka Counts Minnesota,
INng westerly of the westerly Ike of Interstate Highway Na J5E.
AND
The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, See10. 25, Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County, Minn Ma; except the
Atst 60 feet and .00 except the South 795.00 feet of the Weld 822.00 feeL
AND
Mat port at the West 720.00 feet of the Northwest Wreter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 25, Township JI, Range 22,
Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the north 111200 feet.
AND
That part of the Northwest Quorter of the Northwest Warier. Section 25, Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County, Mnnesela.
lying southerly of the north 560.00 (eel and easterly of Ih west 720.00 feet.
AND
Thal part of the Weal 205.00 feet of the East 650.00 feel of the North 560.00 feet al the Northwest Warier of the
Northwest Quarter. Section 25. Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County, Minnesota. 44,q northwesterly of the Northern Slates
Power Company ownershyi through said Northwest Water of the Nerthwesl Wafter sold ownership more particularly descnbed
ae Wows.
A strip of land 50 feat n width and being 25 feet in wkth an each side of o centerline desanbed cm follows
Commencing al a point on the north line oh said Northwest Quarter. 7592.7 that oast of the northwest corner thereof,
running thence South 52 degrees 27 minutes West. 1987.3 feel to a point on the weal roe of said Section. 1206 heel South
of- the northwest comer thereof Subject to County Road fla 54 an the west and Cedar Street an the north.
AND
The North 530 feet of the South 795 feet of the East 762 heel of the West 82200 feel al the Southwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township Jl, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota.
AND
PARC& ME503P1705 (Per Worranly Deed per Doc Na 1390173 and Wit Ooim Deed 1502491. furnished by owner)
The westerly 604.18 feel of the Northeast Quarter of fine Northwest Werler of Sect /on 25. Township 31. Range 22. Anoka
County. Minnesota. EXCEPT that part thereat which lies northwesterly of Iha southeasterly line of the transmission right at
way as described in Book 54 a/ 0eede Page 118.
AND
That port a/ the Northeast I/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 25. Township 31, Range 22 lying northwesterly of a One
parallel with and 25 feet northwesterly of the following Mambo: line: Beginning at a paint on the North line of said Section
15927 feet east al the northwest comer of sold Section: thence South 52 degrees 27 minutes West 1987.3 teat to a paint
on the Wee( tine of said Section. 1206 feel South of said Northwest corner and there terminating. EXCEPT rood.
SITE DATA
TOTAL SITE AREA - ±93.53 AC.
TOTAL ROW AREA *15.38 AC.
TOTAL OUTLOT AREA ±28.25 AC.
TOTAL LOT AREA ±49.87 AC.
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 313
PRE -PLAT SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 222
FUTURE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 6
FUTURE MULTI- FAMILY UNITS 85
SMALLEST LOT ±5,502 S.F.
LARGEST LOT ±21,923 S.F.
AVERAGE LOT SIZE ±9.789 S.F.
GROSS DENSITY 3.35 UNITS /AC.
NET DENSITY 4.01 UNITS /AC.
(TOTAL SITE AREA LESS EXEMPTION AREAS)
EXEMPTION AREAS ±15.54 AC.
WETLAND AREAS *9.56 AC.
CONSERVATION EMNT. (UPLAND) -40.68 AC.
CO. RD. ROW ±0.26 AC.
PARK ±5.04 AC.
EXISTING ZONING R (RURAL)
PROPOSED ZONING PUO
UTIUTIES AVAILABLE
MINIMUM HOUSE SETBACK DATA:
65 -70 FT. LOTS:
FRONT
SIDE (GARAGE)
SIDE (HOUSE)
SIDE CORNER
REAR SETBACK
50 FT. LOTS:
FRONT
90E
SIDE CORNER
REAR SETBACK
30 FT.
5 FT.
10 FT.
20 FT.
30 FT.
25 FT.
5 FT.
20 FT.
30 FT.
- - - OENOTES EXEMPTION AREA BOUNDARIES
BENCHMARKS
I. TOP NUT HYDRANT APPROXIMATELY 218
FT. NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF THE PROPERTY.
ELEVATION: 92699 (NAVD 88)
2 TOP NUT HYDRANT APPROXIMATELY
1057 FT. NORTH OF 1HE SOUTHWEST
COINER OF THE PROPERTY.
ELEVATION: 923.75 (NAM) 88)
PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS
1
I I
1 1
-J SL..
being 5 twat in .idl4• and ad4ntng aid. lot
lines and 10 feel N width od)anng rear lot
lines and right of .ay Inge unless otherwise
ndiested en Nth plot
CALL BleWTFE YOU D0
Know whars below.
Call before you dig.
N
00 75 150 315
(DI FEET)
.1
J
a
Q W
z
H z
IN
J
W
a
W
t•i > o
IQ fog
zip^
a f8 c Z
F
O ° m
W
^a
m
REVISIONS
2.
6.
DMWN BY:
ee
DESIGNED BY:
TAB
ISSUE DATE:
11 /05/13
4 hereby orrery 5..r an sway, wan or
port was mowed Ip me or ander my
dlrea ummldan One Not 1 am a MAY
Lkensed land Surveyor Prefer are laws of
the State of Nkmesora.
Name: Thames R. caw(
Signature: Y%Q4a,
Dare: 1118/13 11¢nsa e: 40361
' �1 _ I 1. ` " fi— l r v 1 - < " _ < , w>�❑ �_ �r� —m '—T-1 m �I 0L8T1/ l_
it SIP t111 rai ni
�
11 -i
owl I clla WOW"
.I C3 ❑ l=j ;i 11111 011" C,C€17 l 131,1101112111
VOA Ohl I �rr� f; .Ili Sul®
(II
�u i 1L N N [�JI�
� �,.� �� .�L�l ��'C' III
II A/I0%l14 rie I' r m1 alE
III ' ��'p1' ' tI (5 }�1;�(RP��3.eT••.,.�.L..��1+ r'1h���o�'��J� =- W�����®
FEW ih 11011 1 '1� '�tt 1 'V •; � ~` %c�l� ��� �1►
1 . f `��� ?I�1'�
E A- s �I. i
im p01- a dai i �!T n� Jr/''/ gat ( il 1ti A01\ �/ I j i
I/ ,/,1IR4Ug1l.'ldl,ulu l' i larLi " •=`-% �H u I 'i
jam') z•.�lc .,ell }Iy1�Il ��I�(/�� �1 1
� 7—
• Ali E � ; .F �I.�!..s = 4 -' 1g1 r +Iwil ��o, INNIN lli -�_.jj �i )
.I�Jitdilldl�ll'�IiL�`L"m�•. m: ri.l 1 i// �a�► / ��.� .w�.7,—,
r'— 141 1�1�� � {��� -� /�'�trtt�l�i 1 Diu • / �1�- ��I� -R�� t� :,'',,%,'
i :./ G\ /�1cS1111RJ11jd,S�iin���
' T"�111L'li4 "y��l �� / �[1 1 I, �w "1r°7ri°Rrtil� the.. /44, ,.�.•l�� , �" °- - i i�ri 1ti1- 1 11.6
������I brdl�il� _E�,,t�:�s��'l'�i�;;�t������ •�_�_..- /'�L� /N/f ^,1 .�
.� tE'�Gl�i�rl�Fr r
a I���I�,�� 'I fit' T T ',f'_ �!� �ii� l x%
t
f. �� ' LrILE�l�1t �J� 'N /� Q 6' �/ ; •` fir
! L 4 1-il; :1; i — — � �� r�l�� I�r1' � ' . � � �. \` �
i. NM 110---',=-- - �� �) r` � ..O
Ill�u ��F:- 1�hW�'i /�f'�7•s�
\u
n0,
100 200
LEGEND
EXISONG PROPOSED
PROPERTY UNE
FA•FMENT UNE -
CURB UNE -
011UMINOU5 C _ _ _ _ 7
CONCRETE
SANITARY SEWER - - - - -,-
STORM SEWER -- - - ->Y-
WATER MAIN - - - - -1—
OVERHEAD OTIUTY — -• —
5T0RM CATCH BASIN
510NL1 MANHOLE
OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
MANHOLE
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
TELEVISOR 00X
TELEPHONE 806 ❑
U71U1Y POLE
RETAINING WALL
FENCE —• —•-
10' CONTOUR — — —
Z' CONTOUR - - --
ODRA 01000 PLAIN
WETLAND UNE
SPOT ELEVATION
EAIERITNCY OVERFLOW
(5TANOAR0 0011. 2001)
TREE FENCE
TREEUNE
SOIL 8081NG
4taiR
O
00.0
E.O.E. •
PAY 45*
000.0
WETLAND SUMMARY
14='_ =1 WETLAND FILL
WETLAND MITIGATION
I'- '•'- ••• -' -' -1 BUFFER AREA
400
( IN FEET
= 11,784 SF
= 81,292 SF
= 244,131 SF
BENCHMARKS
1. TOP NUT HYDRANT APPROXIMATELY 218
FT. NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF THE PROPERTY.
ELEVATION: 928.99 (NAVEL 88)
2. 10P NUT HYDRANT APPROXIMATELY
1057 FT. NORTH OF 11:10 SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THE PROPERTY.
ELEVATION: 92176 (NAVO 88)
CALL EEFCFE YDU 010
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
•
•
-w�� /`' F
- tJ' „' i Y ` - / �1��
Eli% ,- ? ' ii!ih1 [ rimailiNii
x�
imrx, } ��� ''dill UTE
:_. Ike rim
7:,,,„1..47, �_ 7th*' ���
1 � ai l x - ' a w Iv figg
. o ;it `s .4 \ i _
GT .. = - _ :�
ri, N. �I
1
E '— rte'”" -' ir.Iarr.~at �.. �i�
rJ �f aFiOL�! fi FJ�n �
_c__.:_ ,, . t
ma Liittm,i'llift-rali
4 _
"°"`_:;
PROPERTY UNE
EASEMENT UNE
CURB UNE
BITUMINOUS
CONCRETE
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
WATER MAW
OVERHEAD unuTY
STORM CATCH BASIN
STORM MANHOLE
OUTSET CONTROL STRUCTURE
MANHOLE
HYDRANT
GATE VALVE
TELEVISION B0%
TELEPHONE Box
URUTY POLE
RETAINING WALL
10' CONTOUR - - - --
7 CONTOUR —
FD A FL000 PLAIN
WETLAND UNE — -- -•••
SPOT ET_EVAhltP CDS
NOTE
REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE
IOENIIFICAIION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT
INFORMATION.
Know what's below.
Ca[[ before you dig.
TREE PRESERVATION INDEX
NORTHPOINTE
ino Lakes, Minnesota
AJE COMPANIES
REVISIONS
3.
6.
DRAWN 611 IDN
DESIGNED OE
BI
ISSUE DATE
I hereby =DIN IOW (MS Plan, spe0(h. eon
or 61st[ was omEamdbym we+my
(Year sopervMOn and Eat t lam a duly
0sme1 Professional Engineer under Me
Inns of. SGtte Et MMCphp
Name: Brian 1. Krvst6Rak. 0.E
5lgnasve:� A -�{ET
Date: 11 /0/13 000016 A: 25063
7
;lt
/ ARn mantes- 9 al
a.0 /T V mmttaet.:oii i/1
tiiel E 1/ ,' /I,/ �',3z
G ] / ,{
toe maxi �a ous i , , y i 12 �' —',l
in in:
4RYeR gA1:T,LL '[' / /J ...
/ % /sT- t • V , --
■
NI lit* '] _ ffj^�
Nsmoswiliwwwmormzugii i r
<41,0,,TAirieglgat-r-MEi-01EIGN■aq-f-
1r Els.a
r i %r' �� ,, �j►� ''IL'1> E I �-rrlc -may t�7
� II-- �,IIII� Jtt JL .II�'�1LIT.I�IY >rat
41
Iji1'
Mr
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
KET 604VacaL NAME COIMat NM£ 517E ROM OD.
(MOJ005 102[5
4,1
i "`J
Acre saccharam BuMa'
FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE
2.r
88
-
.
II/
Aep X freeman; 'OFII •
FIREFALL NAME
2S
BB
-
4,
0uaras robes
Ace, X Ireemami 'Senn'
SIENNA GLEN .MAPLE
2.5
B8
-
Ma ammcana
Canis aceidontais
HACK8ERRY
2.5"
B8
-
0
Cotelpa speciosa
CATALPA
25'
B8
-
LANDSCAPE LEGEND ■ / \ _ 11
MET WDNIVL NAYS EDYYDY NAIL SIZE ROOT are.
=THOUS TAPES
.rk
..i
PspuWf Iremulatdes
QUAKING ASPEN
110
CENT
-
.
II/
Ouercus bicolor
SWAMP WHITE OAK
2S
BB
��,
0uaras robes
NORTHERN RED OAK
2.5"
BB
-
0
Ma ammcana
AMERICAN UNOEN
2.5"
BB
-
9abda nigro
RIVER BIRCH
25'
BB
-
®LANDSCAPE
LEGEND
03141fEROU5 TREES
CfRata
glouco densat°
BLACK HR.S SPRUCE
Rams Maim
AUSTRIAN PINE
.'
0. e
Mims me /alias
SCOTCH PINE
-
N.
m,wJa T ES
RIS
t/-.�
T )
Halos Red Jewel'
RED JEWEL CRAB
2
8B
-
Dates
�J�
Viburnum Malaga
NANNYBERRY WBURNUM
15
CONT.
-
/I\\1/
�7
Carnes series¢ 'Caninal'
CARDINAL DOGWOOD
15
COP.
-
SEE SHEET L3 FOR PLANT
SCHEDULE & CALCULATIONS
BLVD TREES TO BE INSTALLED
BY BUILDER @ TIME OF HOME
CONSTRUCTION
NOTES
LANDSCAPE WORK TO RE COMPLETED AFTER FINISH
GRADING 15 COMPLETED BY OTHERS.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL VISIT THE SITE BEFORE
SUBMITTING A BID TO FULLY UNDERSTAND SITE CONDITIONS.
ALL PLANTS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY OATH THE
LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR
NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN.
ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL 8E SURROUNDED BY A MINIMUM
OF 2 FOOT RADIUS WITH 3' THICK SHREDDED HARDWOOD
MULCH.
ALL PLANTS WILL BE GUARANTEED FOR FULL REPLACEMENT
A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST TWO FULL CROWING SEASONS
(600 DAYS) AFTER INSTALLATION ON SITE
IF THE CONTRACTOR FEELS THERE MAY BE AN ERROR,
HE /SHE IS REOUIRED TO CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT.
PLANT SYMBOLS SHOWN ARE FOR LOCATING THE POSITIONS
FOR PLANTING. SIZES SHOWN 00 NOT NECESSARILY
REFLECT THE TRUE PLANT SIZE EITHER AT TIME OF
INSTALLATION OR WHEN FULL GROIN.
LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO
PROPERTY FROM INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES AT NO ADDITION
EIIPENSE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
BEFORE PLANTING TREES AT STREET. DRIVEWAYS SHOULD
BE ADJUSTED SO TREES ARE NO CLOSER THAN 6' FROM
DRIVEWAY SURFACE
ADDITIONAL PLANTING NOTES
I. SCARIFY 001506 AND 510E5 OF HOLE PRIOR TO
PINNING
2. TRIM OUT OEM W005 AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED
TWIGS. 00 NOT CUT A LEADER. 50 NOT PANT CUTS.
3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR
THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 8ACKFILL SOIL INSTALL PLANT
50 THE ROOT FLARE 15 AT OR UP TO 2' ABOVE THE
FINISHED GRADE
4. PUCE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP ANO
WIRE BASKET, OF USED), INTACT. BACILFILL WRHIN
APPROXIMATELY 12 OF THE TOP OF R0000ALL. WATER
PLOT. REMOVE TOP I/O
OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS.
WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS
FROM TOP
I/3 OF THE BALL REMOVE ALL TWINE
5. PLUMB AND BACK0L1. WITH BACKNLL 50X..
6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS.
T. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INSTALIAITON.
WATERING MUST RE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY
SATURATE ROOT BALL MO PLANTING ROLE.
8. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND
WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE
L A' iDMA .TEDS LT .0
Landscape Alchee0Ur9
Pace Making
plum. G t 2.598.5706
0 100 200 400
11.4 FEET J
PLANTING PLAN NORTH
NORTHPOINTE
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
3
z a�
y >.
W as in
Z
Z a
p 0 c
V 00
W n 0
to
n
m
rl
REVISIONS
0.
a.
5.
0.
DRAWN eY:
KO
DESIGNED BY:
10
ISSUE DATE:
I hereby meaty iM Met am plan, soe0Otalm
or
ma by me 00 W,00r are
area suae0010, and Matt art. a 0.1!
unwed Landscape 011010¢ ender the
laws ame Su. ar NMresaes
Name: Kathleen O'Connell
510,0are:
Date 11 /8113 License X: 20862
L1
of L3
-10
0114
100111 09 - 912Nu -910.4
m'.I.n . 04 1030.)
29.!10
® LANDSCAPE LEGEND
KEY 1 DWAmvC BILE [p11 3 n4uE SZE POW art.
DECIDUOUS TREES
"mI
Ace, s000)14 um 'Bodslo'
FALL RESTA SUGAR MAPLE
2.5'
BB
-
..-
Mar X freeman; 'AFII'
RREFA(L MAPLE
2.5'
BB
-
rfr
Ji,
Aver X freeman;- 'Benno'
SIENNA GLEN MAPLE
2.0
BB
-
0
CeIUR a tidamaYe
KACKBERRY
2.5-
998
-
C)
Calalpo speciaso
CATALPA
2S-
BB
-
® LANDSCAPE LEGEND
KT 0001.41 NAPE COMM NINE 929 ROOT 001.
=own BEES
• v�
og•1
Podolia Vermicides
WAXING ASPEN
ila
CORE
-
:4)
�1.
Gumbos bicolor
SWAMP WHITE OAK
2.5-
BB
-
rfr
Ji,
ch.,., a am
NORTHERN RED OAK
2.5-
88
-
0
1)90 americana
AMERICAN UNOEN
2.5-
BB
-
�/
BaTula rngro
RNER BIRCH
2.5'
88
-
® LANDSCAPE LEGEND
Ca440la05 TREES
0 CRoca
gtauca Oracle
BLACK TOILS SPRUCE
Milne nigra
AUSTRIAN PINE
6'
HT.
-
I.
Pinus sylyeslris
SCOTCH PINE
4R APENTAL m83
'}
C(
ol)
Midas 'Red Jewel'
RED JEWEL CRAB
2-
BB
-
5 dS
''T
Viburnum anlogo
NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM
15
CORE.
-
C17
Corns 401)110 'Cardinal'
CARDINAL DOGWOOD
j5
CORE.
-
DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
SEE SHEET L3 FOR PLANT
SCHEDULE & CALCULATIONS
BLVD TREES TO BE INSTALLED
BY BUILDER CO TIME OF HOME
CONSTRUCTION
L. NDMATTERS LLC
Lan0scape Archlfecxure
Race MaAW19
prase 612:598.5:06
,SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAIL
Tar TO Su.1E
50 103
200
FEET )
K0TC sUJaY
OP0040.
Sur ama4 Acmn ASSURES PILL
101S
10 A P31 B Pp51004 tat
111E 00..099 Cr NE CaulaP EE
Tvau
Auway- le
arnR)maE m w1.1ETIRIDE
40 KU - /1' USE STRAP
(TYPI 2-10 0 S1N01 10 G
4440 1 -T ROILED 1110.
0.3 POSTS
MOM 3401) 0 1� 0L (SEE
4
MORE tteaVORM
IRESS AA0
A;¢
AK WN
FIPOOTIG-
4°414 bm suer
AT mar- 4 sru¢s� 0
010
CrUDE
1esAam 191 mom or ROW
50.4 WOWS (SEE
0.P Si.-2W
CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
PLANTING PLAN SOUTH
REVISIONS
2.
DRAWN 8Y:
DESIGNED 0Y:
ISSUE DATE
1110/4
1 n reaa
or hereby os11 Dr r� plan, spedflam
a
4 by me or under my
area supervision and Dal T urn a duly
licensed landscape ArtMO. under the
laws or die sole of Minnesota
Name: Kathleen O'Connell
Signature:
0094,: 11/0/43 license 1: 20962
L2
Of L3
1)
PLANT SCHEDULE FOR BOULEVARD TREES
®LANDSCAPE LEGEND.
LANDSCAPE LEGENDI
HET 1 6mANKN. was MINOR MANE SITE ROOT DIY. RTMMU6
KLT I Bm4n0L NAME COMMON NAME WE R001 OTT. IEMMA6
OE000011S TREES
DECIDUOUS 1805
10748(9
Mar aaccharum 'Basta'
FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE
2.5
BB
47
CEDIXXXIS MSS
;:J
Papules lremuloides
GUA INO ASPEN
010
CONT
-
••-
Aver X Ireeman,i 'AFj1'
f1REFALL MAPLE
25.
BB
18
6
ffi
Nereus bicolor
swoop WHITE OAK
2.5
BB
17
122
Ater % freeman(' 'Sienna'
SIENNA 01EN MAPLE
ZS"
BB
15
86
�1��
Ouercus rubs
NORTHERN ROD 040
Z5"
88
32
HT.
Ctllia ocadentolia
xAL0800(0 25'
.-
��
88
55
25"
1160 amencana
A.11610AN LINDEN
25
BB
42
2S"
Catalpa speciosa
Q
CATALPA
2.5'
8B
26
SCOTCH FINE
0
Belda nigra
RIVEN 61001
2.00
B8
-
PLANT SCHEDULE FOR REPLACEMENT TREES, BUFFERS & OPEN AREAS
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS / CALCULATIONS
1 BLVD TREE PER LOT FRONTAGE = 253
(TREE MITIGATION / REPLACEMENT REQ =228)
TREE MITIGATION & OPEN AREA TREES PROVIDED = 247
BUFFER TREES = 43
TOTAL TREES TO BE PLANTED
BLVD TREES TO BE INSTALLED
BY BUILDER ® TIME OF HOME
CONSTRUCTION
= 543 TREES
Ili_ LANDSCAPE LEGEND
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
LANDSCAPE
LOT BOANCAL ME
COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT
01T.
10748(9
KEY BOAMCr1 IONE
COULON NMIE
SIZE ROST alt.
LEGEND
CEDIXXXIS MSS
DECIDUOUS TREES
CONIFEROUS TREES
Acer saccharum 'Balsta'
FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE
2.00
8B
6
kV 'A
'.
P ua tremuwido
opal
OIIAiONC ASPEN
p 10
CONE
122
Picea prima densata
�a
BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
6'
HT.
86
�/
``
Pima ni9m
AUSTRIAN PINE
5
HT.
41
.-
��
Acer X (rectum-TB 'AFJ1'
ASREFALL MAPLE
25"
B8
3
��
TIC
0uemas bicolor
$WARP WHITE ON(
2S"
BB
10
0
Paws ,ylveatria
SCOTCH FINE
5
HT.
ORNAMENTAL TREES
MMus 'Rod Jewel'
RED JEWEL al/8
2"
BB
6
CLUMP FORM
Acer X Romani; 'Benno'
STERNA GLEN MAPLE
2.5"
B8
9
at:
II,`
000,17a Mara
NORTHERN RIO OAK
2.5"
86
74
SERUM
Cabs accidentaue
NACKBERRY
Z5"
BB
4
r(jj��� 11
'I I'
Tito amcrcona
p40010)1) UNOEN
1.5"
BB
-
Vburnum Tentage:
NAN14080081' VIBURNUM
B5
CONT.
24
)
Camas sericea 'Cardinal'
CARDINAL DOGWOOD
i✓5
CONT.
46
//a
,/
Catalpa speciaso -
CATALPA
2.5"
BB
i
�.�
BeWla nigry
RIVER BIRCH
2.5"
BB
13
INIMISI PLANTING NOTES
1. AU. PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY, 10108)0715 MATERIAL FREE OF
PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND
01041.PPEO AS INDICATED IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND.
2. ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT 1RUNKED AND HILL HEADED AND
MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED.
3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 810009E5 THE RIGHT TO REJECT
ANT PLANTS WIY01 ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE.
DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION.
4. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL 01811 BE ACCEPTED
UNLESS APPROVED N WRITING BY 010 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
5. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM 10 THE "AMERICAN
STANDARD FOR NURSERY 5TOCK ANSI-060, LATEST moos. 0
THE AMERICAN A550OADON OF NURSERYMEN, INC AND STALL
CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY 0100(8 MENT5 FOR PLANT
MATERIALS.
6. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED
TO THE DRIP LNE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. STORAGE 0
(151018015 ETC. MTh 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING
AO007041LY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS IT 0.1. MAXIMUM
SPAONG.
7. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES. SHAPES OF BEDS AND
LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE CO4RAO OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT
SPACING SHOWN AN0 ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT
CONOITIONS OF THE SITS THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL
APPROVE 148E STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT 401001AL5 PRIOR
TO INSTALLATION.
8. ALL TREES MUST BE PLANTED, MULCHED. AND STAKED AS
9101* IN THE DETAILS
G9G..p 8C1.J1F. FPT11A�NTNG AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS
TO.EMLULT31: SHREDDED 1AR0W000 MULCH. DEAN AND FREE OF
500035 WEEDS on OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL N ALL MASS
PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES. UNLESS INDICATED AS R001
MULCH ON DRAWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE 880(10101
PRIOR TO DELIVERY ON -SITE FOR APPROVAL DELIVER MULCH ON
DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4" FCR TREES 511698 BE05. AND Y
FOR PERENNIAL /GROUND COVER BEOS, UNLESS 018ER05E
DIRECTED.
11. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER 111E UNOSCAPE LEGEND
F DISCREPANCIES COST. 148E SPECIFICATIONS TARE 08100ENco
OVER 010 PLANTING NOTES MO GENERAL NOTES
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES
AND PLANTING SOL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK 0101W1 010
148E PUN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON 111E 1 805CAPE
LEGEND.
11 10NFIER1 STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE
1MLL NOT BE ALLOWED.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS. PLANTERS AND
BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND 0HILIE
ACCESS TO BE M0NTANED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY
PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED
IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN
1185 MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING
050110E5 SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE
15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPUTING
8104 ALL APPLICABLE CODES REGULATIONS AND PERMITS
GOVERNING THE WORK
16. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL 0101005. INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES.
YATH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY 5111(1E5 AND GOPHER STATE
ONE CALL AT 454 -0002 (TWIN CITIES MEMO AREA) OR
800 -252 -1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION ANTI
REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME NOTIFY 1HE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICT5 TO FACIUTATE PUNT RELOCATION.
17. USE ANTI - DESICCANT (101108UF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON
OEODU09S PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AN0 FOR EVERGREENS 110VE0
ARYANS APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALL
EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOP WINTER
PROTECTION DURING WARRANTY PER100.
18. PUNTNG SOL FOR TREES SHRUBS ANTI GROUND CO9R4
FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUMUS
AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PUNT GROWTH. IT SHALL
COMPLY WITH AIN/00T SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE 8 SELECT TOPSOIL
MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HAROPACK SUBSOIL STONES
CHEMICALS. NOXIOUS 0.4005. ETC 500. 141111101 SHALL HAVE A PH
BETWEEN 5.1 AN0 7.5 MO IO -10 -10 FERDUZER AT THE RATE OF 3
P0UN05 PER CUBIC TARO. N PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS
MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILUNG INTO THE
TOP 12" 0 SOL.
19. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE COMPLETE
0006ING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1). UNLESS OTHERWISE
SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF
REPLACEMENT IN0.00NG LABOR AND PUNTS
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT
LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF MORNING PUNT INSTALLATION.
21. SEASONS /TIME OF PLANTING: NOTE THE CONTRACTOR MAY
ELECT TO PLANT IN 0E- SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK
DE00005 POTTED PLANTS:
APRIL 1 -.,LINE 1: AUG. 21 -NON. 1
DECIDUOUS B&B:
APRIL 1 -JJNE 11 090. 21 -NON. 1
EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS
APRIL 1 -0UNE is AUG. 21 -0CT. 1
EVERGREEN 868:
APRIL 1 -NAY 15: AUG. 21 -SEPT. 15
22. MAINTENANCE SHALL 8E411 IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION
OF 111E WORK IS IN PUCE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED
AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF 111E PLANTS IS
COMPLETE. NSPE000N HAS BEEN MADE. 6110 PLANTINGS ARE
ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANIES MAINTENANCE SHALL
N0.UDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD
MATERIAI.S. RE- SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AN0 KEEPING
PLANTS N A PLUMB 005I110N. AFTER ACCEPTANCE. 148E OWNER
SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSMIUPE5. HOWEVER. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE
TREES PLUMB 'X0001017 THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.
23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL N11101 DIES. TURNS BROWN. OR DEFOJAIES
(PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF 111E WORK) SHALL 8E PROMPTLY
REMOVED FROM THE SITE ARO REPLACED W1TH MATERIAL 0 THE SAME
SPECIES. QUANTITY. AND SIZE AN0 MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE 11GEND
SPECIFICATIONS.
24. WATERING MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WALL
THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK IN EXTREMELY HOT.
ORY WEAINER. WATER MORE OFTEN .5 REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF
HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES CHECK MOISTURE UNDER
LORAN PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER.
25. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WTODNG. A FINAL ACCEPTANCE
INSPECTION.
26. SEE SHEET 2.01 FOR PROPOSED IRRIGATION 555TEM.
27. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4" TOP
SOL SEED. MULCH. AN0 WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS
OBTAINED.
ENTRY PLANTING AREA
(to be refined for final submittals)
1:30
LAJ TDM 1 HERS LLC
Landscape Ardule1T1W8
Pace Malang
phone 6(2.598.5706
Z
> Z co
PLANTING PLAN NORTH
A]E COMPANIES
Z
ro
>. O
3 m
3 in
� N
10z
a �
:N
>
In V
C
Q
co
REVISIONS
5.
DRAWN ICO
KO
DESIGNED BY:
CO
ISSUE DATE:
11/0/13
I hereby (1x910 Mat Ibis plan, s1100/4dan
wree by me Bruner MY
alma �stmervIslm a that e e duM
licensee LAMscape�Ar Mleamder the
I.WS al the Slam W Wanes.
Name: Kathleen OWCannell
Signature:
Date: 11/0/13 License 0: 20862
L3
of L3
ITEM 11. FISH, WILDLIFE, ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE RESOURCES
AUAR MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY
The following list is intended to summarize, in the form of a list, the mitigation strategies
required or recommended by the AUAR. This summary may seem lengthy at 11 pages.
However, the complete mitigation plan is 29 pages long. This summary list is intended as
an aide, a shortcut, and is not to be considered the complete list of requirements for
development in the 4660 -acre AUAR area. In order to understand the mitigation
strategies, potential developers should spend time reading the AUAR, especially the
mitigation plan. In addition, all applicable zoning, subdivision, and other requirements
apply.
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF, see Figure 10 -3), which
includes conservation of "Core" and "Outlier" habitat areas, buffering these
natural resources, and establishing greenway corridors throughout the AUAR area
to provide connectivity for ecological and wildlife corridors, regional stormwater
collection and conveyance, and passive recreational opportunities.
Implementing the CDF within a Proposed Development Project Site
To achieve the objectives outlined in the CDF, the City will require future
project proposers to do two things simultaneously:
1) plan for ecological stormwater management and natural resource
conservation within the development project site, and
2) provide land, finances, and/or construction activities to implement
components of the CDF.
Conservation development design and/or low impact development design
principles will be required of new developments with an emphasis on
ecological stormwater management and natural resource conservation. The
stormwater and conservation components of individual developments must
integrate with the CDF.
A management plan and stewardship fund will be required to ensure long-
term perpetuation of the public values conserved or restored in the natural
open space and in the ecological stormwater management system of the CDF.
Ecological education, provided by the developer, may be required for a
specific development project (e.g., educational pamphlets, signage, Home
Owner Association workshops, etc.).
•
11.2 Add the "Core" and "Outlier" habitat areas to the City's Parks, Natural Open
Space /Greenways, and Trail System Plan map.
11.3 Require public land dedication of priority natural open space areas through the
subdivision process.
11.4 Require that cash in lieu of public land dedication for subdivisions within the
AUAR area be spent within the AUAR area to purchase, restore, and /or maintain
priority natural open space areas.
11.5 Consider provisions for conserving "Other" habitat areas (see Figure 10 -2) during
the development review process.
11.6 Establish mechanisms for ecological restoration, management, stewardship, and
education.
11.7 Provide for turtle and other wildlife passage by continuing to require
surmountable curbing in new residential developments and encouraging
ecologically sensitive site design.
11.8 Consult with the DNR and /or US Fish and Wildlife Service to determine
appropriate mitigation strategies for activities near the Bald Eagle's nests within
the AUAR area before development occurs within the vicinity of the nests,
including reviewing recommended disturbance limit guidelines developed by the
DNR.
11.9 Continue to enforce the Peltier Lake No -Wake Zone ordinance and establish
buffers to protect the Peltier Lake Heron Rookery.
11.10 Require rare plant surveys, by qualified personnel, prior to development in
wetland areas.
11.11 Encourage ecologically sensitive design and construction practices for the
proposed northerly bypass.
2
•
•
ITEM 13. WATER USE
•
•
•
ITEM 12. WATER RESOURCES: WETLANDS
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
12.1 Delineate wetlands in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual and classify wetlands according to Wetlands of the United
States (Circular 39) and Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States.
12.2 Follow sequencing process of wetland avoidance, minimization, rectification, and
mitigation as outlined in the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) if wetlands area
altered.
12.3 Apply for applicable wetland permits to obtain authorization for wetland
alterations under WCA and Section 404 prior to project construction if
development activities will impact a jurisdictional wetland.
12.4 Mitigate areas of wetland impacts according to the requirements of the Wetland
Conservation Act.
12.5 Submit wetland permit applications and replacement plans, as appropriate, to the
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Rice Creek Watershed District,
and the City of Lino Lakes.
12.6 Follow the requirements for wetland alterations delineated by the Rice Creek
Watershed District (RCWD).
12.7 Minimize or avoid totally any filling of public waters through careful design.
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
13.1 Monitor water usage and do not permit new development to proceed if it exceeds
the capacity of the water supply and distribution system.
13.2 Construct the water supply and distribution system in accordance with Minnesota
Department of Health standards and with the goals, policies, and
recommendations set forth in the city's Comprehensive Water System Plan.
13.3 As necessary, amend the city's Comprehensive Water System Plan and Capital
Improvement Plan to be consistent with an future amendments or updates to the
Comprehensive Plan that would necessitate expansions or alterations to the water
system.
13.4 Prepare a Wellhead Protection Plan amendment for new wells and follow the
adopted wellhead protection plans for Lino Lakes and Centerville.
13.5 Require abandoned private wells to be sealed in compliance with the Minnesota
Department of Health regulations.
13.6 Require that the installation of any private individual wells be constructed and
installed in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health regulations
(Minnesota Well Code).
13.7 Continue to implement the City's adopted water conservation policies which are
intended to attenuate peak water demands throughout the City.
ITEM 15. WATER SURFACE USE
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
15.1 Consider restricting individual lake access and dock construction along public and
private shorelands by encouraging the use of clustered access and dock facilities.
ITEM 16 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
16.1 Require project proposers to acquire NPDES /SDS General Stormwater Permit for
Construction Activity from the MPCA prior to initiating earthwork.
16.2 Require project proposers to meet the erosion and sediment control regulations in all
applicable regulations, ordinances and rules of the city and MPCA, and Rice Creek
Watershed District.
16.3 Require project proposers to minimize runoff, improve the quality of runoff, and
provide erosion control through BMPs and other low impact development techniques.
including:
• Reduce impervious surfaces (e.g., use narrow roads, efficient road layout,
permeable pavement);
4
ITEM 17 WATER QUALITY: SURFACE WATER RUNOFF
•
•
• Break up impervious surfaces to allow opportunities for infiltration;
• Use ecological stormwater management techniques, such as vegetated swales,
infiltration systems, and biofilter wetlands;
• Provide energy dissipation and outfall stabilization; and
• Establish and maintain vegetated buffers around aquatic resources.
16.4 Provide construction oversight to ensure designed sediment and erosion control
measures are being implemented.
16.5 Implement the Conservation Design Framework (CDF, Figure 10 -3).
which is designed to help mitigate erosion and sedimentation caused by surface
water runoff. Components of the CDF that help mitigate erosion and
sedimentation include conservation of natural open spaces, buffering, and an
ecological stormwater management system.
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
17.1 Work with project proposers to establish a regional stormwater management
system within the Conservation Design Framework (CDF, see Figure 10 -3) that
consists of vegetated swales, wet prairies, and wetlands oriented in series to
effectively retard runoff rates, reduce stormwater volume, and enhance water
quality.
17.2 Work with project proposers to disperse collection, conveyance, and management
of stormwater runoff as much as possible throughout the AUAR site through the
use of bio- swales, rain gardens, and infiltration areas.
17.3 Require stormwater management systems to be developed in accordance with
Rice Creek Watershed District Rules.
17.4 Require project proposers to design stormwater management areas (SMAs) to
support native vegetation and maintain runoff rates at or below pre - development
conditions.
17.5 Require project proposers to design stormwater management systems that can
achieve proposed conditions runoff volumes that are no less than 80% and no
greater than 150% of existing conditions runoff volumes.
17.6 Encourage project proposers to use techniques that produce no net increases in
total phosphorus content of proposed conditions runoff relative to existing
conditions runoff.
17.7 Require project proposers to provide detailed topographic information with a
contour interval of 1 -foot and drain tile mapping.
17.8 Require project proposers to disperse outflow from stormwater management
facilities to prevent erosion and failure of outlet structures. Make attempts to
simulate sheet flow at these locations as opposed to concentrated flows.
17.9 Require project proposers to use conservation development design and /or low
impact development techniques, and ecological stormwater management
techniques.
17.10 Require project proposers to limit the amount and connectedness of impervious
surfaces and direct runoff into vegetated landscape areas including swales,
prairies, and other infiltration.
17.11 Require project proposers to use stormwater management techniques that
encourage infiltration of stormwater runoff and groundwater recharge, whenever
possible, to maximize the infiltration potential of the site.
Sizing criteria for SMAs are designed to support large infiltrating surfaces or
wetland complexes. To create conditions appropriate for these two types of
stormwater management features, SMAs within the AUAR area must have:
• no more than 20% of their surface area as permanent open water; the
remaining surface area of each SMA shall contain mesic prairie or wet
prairie plant communities to maximize the infiltration and water quality
treatment capacities of the system.
• design high water levels (100 -Year) less than or equal to 2.5 feet above the
normal water level or lowest outlet invert.
• side slopes that are less than or equal to 6:1, horizontal to vertical, and a
10:1 safety bench at the normal water level per RCWD requirements.
The following is a list of additional stormwater management
recommendations:
• Adhere to surface area recommendations for stormwater management
(Figure 17 -3).
• During site design, follow low impact development practices, such as
increased open space, disconnected and minimized impervious surfaces,
capitalizing on high infiltration capacity soils, and dispersed stormwater
management.
• In residential development areas, use of a combination of side and rear lot
drainage easements that are no -mow zones planted with formal or
informal native landscaping. The rear lot areas would be designed for
infiltration, and side lot areas would be designed for effective drainage and
conveyance of water from around foundations to ensure no standing water
remains adjacent to the houses.
• Route driveway, sidewalk and gutter downspout waters into rain gardens
and infiltration areas. This can be accomplished without compromising
6
•
•
•
safe and effective drainage and dewatering needs around foundations and
road subgrades.
■ Route road runoff into parkway and road ROW swales, rain gardens, and
infiltration areas.
• Route parking lot runoff into bio- swales, parking lot islands, and other
suitable locations that support infiltration.
ITEM 18 WATER QUALITY: WASTEWATE'
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
18.1 Monitor wastewater flows and not permit new development to proceed if it
exceeds the capacity of the wastewater system.
18.2 Construct the major infrastructure improvements needed to expand the capacity of
the wastewater system (i.e. lift stations, forcemains, and upgrades to the existing
systems) in accordance with the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital
Improvement Plan.
18.3 Adequately phase capacity improvements.
18.4 Amend the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement Plan to
be consistent with any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that would
necessitate expansions or alterations to the sanitary sewer system and regional
capacity needs.
ITEM 19 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
19.1 Require the removal of all tanks and associated underground piping in accordance
with applicable state and federal laws.
19.2 Require that any party that may discover residual petroleum contamination shall
follow state law and report the information to the MPCA for further investigation
and potential remediation.
ITEM 21 TRANSPORTATION
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
21.1 Create a monitoring program that closely evaluates traffic impacts from proposed
developments within the AUAR area.
21.2 Implement traffic mitigation measures as development occurs within the AUAR
area. Specific mitigation measures for the three development scenarios are
discussed in Item 21 and depicted on Figures 21 -8, 21 -9, and 21 -10. These
mitigation measures improve overall traffic operations for the respective
development scenarios. The improvements are intended to represent the
minimum level of infrastructure investment that would be needed to meet
acceptable level of service standards. Additional roadway and non - motorized
improvements, beyond the minimum level, may be identified to accommodate
specific development needs that are identified within the AUAR area." Primary
improvements, regardless of land use scenario, include:
21.2.1. Develop frontage road system in compliance with local, county and state
access management guidelines to serve local and regional traffic.
21.2.2 Work with appropriate road authorities to reconstruct and provide
additional capacity for CSAH 21.
21.2.3 Work with appropriate road authorities to construct Northerly Bypass with
new interchanges at I -35W and I -35E (80th Street East) to improve traffic
operations and access to and within the AUAR area. As recommended by
FHWA and Mn/DOT, a phasing plan should be established to construct
each piece of the Northerly Connector as it becomes necessary to maintain
the serviceability of the transportation system.
Phase Improvement
1. CSAH 14, I -35W to I -35E (funded and programmed for construction)
2. CSAH 14, I -35E Interchange
3. CR 140 (80th Street )/I -35E Interchange
4. CSAH 14 across Peltier Lake (Northerly Bypass /Connector)
5. CSAH 14 /I -35W Interchange
As part of these improvements, the following steps should be taken as the
opportunity is presented:
• Inclusion of the northerly bypass and proposed interchanges in future
transportation and comprehensive plans
• Preservation of right of way through official mapping or other process
• Right of way dedication through the platting process
8
•
•
21.3 Require a traffic impact analysis for all development projects within the AUAR
area. The traffic impact analysis will assist the City and other road authorities in
determining the appropriate mitigation measures that are required to mitigate
impacts of a specific development proposal.
21.4 Work with appropriate road authorities to mitigate the impact of the additional
traffic on the on the regional system, specifically Interstates 35W and 35E, by
reconstructing each to provide a six -lane cross - section consistent with the
recommendations outlined in the I -35 IRC. It should be noted that it was
determined that an expansion will be necessary even without the development
scenarios used in this analysis. As the interstates serve a much larger area, the
projected growth of the entire Twin Cities region should warrant expansion by the
year 2030.
21.5 Prioritize alternative travel modes within the AUAR study area and require
project proposers to address alternative travel modes (e.g., buses, bicyclists, and
pedestrians) by identifying appropriate accommodations.
21.6 Consider the need for additional infrastructure improvements (see item #21.2) in
future updates or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Submit the plan
update to the appropriate agencies (i.e., FHWA, MnDOT, Met Council, etc.).
21.7 Require project proposers to follow all appropriate guidelines and policies related
to traffic nose and noise walls.
21.8 Require that site plans for each of the developments include measures such as
appropriate setback distances, earthen berms, noise walls, and appropriate site
design to reduce the impact of traffic noise to residential areas.
21.9 Continue to require the implementation of the conditions of approval for the Eagle
Brook Church relating to mitigating traffic impacts.
21.10 Achieve effective traffic operations within the city by requiring that site plans
make use of access management practices to promote sate, effective traffic flow.
21.11 Require project proposers to follow the Anoka County Highway Department
Development Review Process Manual (dated December 2003.)
21.12 Continue to coordinate capital improvement programming with applicable
transportation authorities.
ITEM 25. UNIQUE FARMLANDS
ITEM 25 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Strategies
The City will:
25.1 Consult the map that shows areas with a high potential for archaeological sites
when development applications are submitted for review. Given the sensitive
nature of this information, this map cannot be included in the AUAR document,
nor can it be made available to the public. If a development application falls
within an area that is considered to have a high potential for archaeological sites,
the city will require that the following steps and procedures involved in the
identification and analysis of any archaeological sites is followed prior to
development:
• Conduct a Phase I archaeological survey within the area of potential effect
(APE). The objective of the archaeological fieldwork is to determine if there
are archaeological sites in the areas identified as having high potential for
such, and define the extent of those sites that may be impacted by
development plans.
• Conduct a Phase II archaeological survey. If archaeological resources are
uncovered within the APE that may be eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP) a Phase II survey should be conducted.
The objective of the investigation is to determine whether archaeological
resources are eligible for listing on the NRHP.
• Plan for avoidance or conduct Phase III data recovery. If a significant
archaeological site is identified that will be impacted by development,
avoidance is recommended. If this is not possible, then a data recovery of the
site should occur.
• If human remains are recovered at any time during archaeological
investigation or development, all activities must stop and consultation initiated
with the Office of the State Archaeologist and Minnesota Indian Affairs
Council.
Mitigation Strategies
The city will:
25.2 Consider preservation of agricultural heritage sites by implementing thoughtful
interpretive planning.
10
•
•
•
ITEM 27. COMPATIBILITY WITH PLANS
Mitigation Strategies
The city will:
27.1 Use the information contained in the AUAR during future considerations of
updates or amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance. Any future consideration of amendments or updates to the
Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances would follow the city's set procedures and
guidelines for such amendments.
27.2 Require that tools such as clustering, buffering, and /or screening be incorporated
into future development plans to mitigate potential land use conflicts.
GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS:
• All development must comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive
Plan will guide the permitted land use, zoning, utility extensions, and other
development activities.
• Approval of future planned unit developments (PUDs), together with the
development agreements, which include specific requirements.
• Execution of future developer's agreements under the City of Lino Lakes's
subdivision ordinances.
• Enforcement of the permitting requirements of all applicable local, state, and federal
agencies.
• Update the AUAR in five years, or earlier, if certain conditions or assumptions
change in accordance with Mn Rules 4410.3610, subp. 3.
Enforcement of the City's premature subdivision regulations (Section 1002 -6) to
ensure that adequate public facilities are available to mitigate potential impacts. The
premature subdivision requirements follow:
11
•
Note: Site boundaries on this figure are
approximate and do not constitute an
official survey product.
Bm - Blomford loamy fine sand (Predominantly hydric)
BtB - Braharn loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes (Predominantly nonhydric)
Du - Dundas loam (Predominantly hydric)
HdB - Hayden fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (Predominantly nonhydric)
HdC2 - Hayden fine sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded (Nonhydric)
HdD - Hayden fine sandy loam, 12 to 24 percent slopes (Nonhydric)
NeA - Nessel fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes (Predominantly nonhydric)
Rf - Nessel fine sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes (Hydric)
Wb - Webster loam (Hydric)
ZmB - Zimmerman fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes (Predominantly nonhydric)
Figure 4 — Soil Survey Map
Northpointe (ICES No. 2013-067)
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COb1PANY 4 N 1 inch - 578 feet
wti.�
•
•
•
Note: Site boundaries on this figure are
approximate and do not constitute an
official survey product.
Site Location
Figure 3 - NWI Map (USGS Centerville Quadrangle)
1 LJOL1IA G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY
Northpointe (KES No. 2013 -067)
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
TN 1 inch 609 feet
Off
[YFT PLAN 01
ATURE iHFW ESTATES
B -1
1
rf
s
t
= Approximate Soil Boring Location
Haugo GeoTechnical
Services.
13570 Grove Drive #278
Maple Grove, MN
Soil Boring Location Sketch
Proposed Residential Development
Nature View Estates
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
silkka
Figure #: 1
Drawn By: JLW
Date: 7/19/13
Scale: None
HGTS # 13 -335
•
•
Ws
, • . , , Ilv — . .1,
, ..'' J • Vol. 4 !■°,
■ t
4, t A
..s.
. , ,.',- , --
r' * ' . • d - . .
kJ -4 #-
_ .
...... . i, ,
44 ,1) ' ;
.
,4'..
• P X. ,
, - -
. _...„ ,,,. - •
.% ril**,•4 ,''' .
Pk.. .
0 . p• .
tr• : 7 Al 44 6"
,...•0"‘ "A.= .....
e _ ' r •
..
or J....,
r :
s.-
t • „,
tr, dls*"
41.
1
r/t
• 4./MI
1."
fr
11. „ '7% ,1
• ,renrerAta.
J
411)
6.1
EI?
g..401.7461..16,‘,Nza
r
w
r
tr
• I 17'
North Point
•
•
I36W 136E
WaCounty nty
Anoka 1 C
County 1
Nolte
Model rg
Site 3
C.V. as (La. Onvo) mu.Mn4e p kMea
.pprorm.kH fro moes redo' Sae If
Maxi Strad
)CSAN 14)
Nola
Modeling j
Site 1
Roadway System and Noise Analysis
Prtr..gd Artral
'a- tier=MN -.
=`Ibis. 441 ..=..m®..s
Load Rrar.y
Proem.. Or UN,. Ra.N
len SIMISIMMEMMEMIME
Hoist v■co6.2sne DSNm4 Noise :lima*
�- -� Ana one 41 NN Net14 eNdsa Sian..
or Mro iv...a b row.
MNpexro P4� �tm tar. Fer.rO. ..
*le netre Son. M RMamew.uua ler. .. t.rms.
re trpeeamM p.. W rM me et., on* 6.N 4r ME
nod., me n+rny Comma rrnmxharow rosem. 7.
apmm.. crew
eee
ear♦NONMry Bypas
•......a••ee4n
Noise
Modeling
SRe2.,_.
20th
Menke
CSAN 2
Bektrre¢1M -a
111==re (LM •M O
IMA....prNNIE r .- ---..-
OaMbe B.lq•a
. 1001. e1145E
MIM ▪ 1,400 0N) - M
Boy.
x601 •M
<ajo4 WCSN121 O
eln-a
<14BDe.w CSA121 0
Pallier Lake
73rd Straei
lllllllM
Maxi Street ICSAH 14)
35E
West
Fronde
21n,.•ss.
Avwe N.
CentsrvMe .k rewar
Rees Caller Nnel
(CSAN 21)
URS A
2411
Avenue
(CR 54)
dad•r Sired
Nee
City
ArtH
= •••
Bktli Sliest Nix a&Nam<
•
I36E
[bat
sae••
4
eel E. ICR 140)
7e ` CSAH11
• Otter Lake
a Rose •
k �
County
•
Anoka 1
County
0 Map is not b Swk
Figure 21 -13.
Traffic Noise Analysis Results
SOURCE: UR
Carpo.anon
2013 Environmental Goals
• Promote environmental stewardship with the citizens of Lino Lakes by
communicating environmental initiatives in the city using various means of
communication such as:
• City /County Web Pages
• Newsletter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter
• Homeowner's association meetings and publishing on their websites.
• Press Coverage
• Earth Day
• Arbor Day
• Recycling Day — (May 4th)
• Partner with Anoka County and the School District with a focus on
Recycling
• Participate in Blue Heron Days (August), providing public service educational
material to the public if the opportunity presents itself
• Participate in Earth Day (April) activities in the community, promoting
environmental awareness and collaboration with other environmental focused
organizations. Offer Build Your Own Rain Barrel Workshop.
• Communicate with our residents for conservation workshops offered in our
area. Coordinate with RCWD outreach and education coordinator.
• Monitor any activity in the AUAR as well as other proposed development
areas, focusing on the values Lino Lakes citizens have expressed in the
vision for our city and the unique ecological aspects of our wetlands, lakes
and streams and subsurface waters. Apply mitigation plan as defined for that
area. Be involved in any review /updates of the AUAR.
• Perform an evaluation of past Environmental Board recommendations for
development projects. Review a sampling of a variety of projects by site
visits, discussion with city staff, and landowners, neighbors, on the outcomes
of the Board's recommendations. If necessary, submit a summary of
significant findings resulting from the review in writing to the Community
Development Director.
• Promote conservation development within the City incorporating the Open
Space/Trail Plan and Handbook for Environmental Planning and
Conservation Development within the scope of the new Resource
Management Plan, and the Resources Management Plan RMP -3. Review
rule changes, SAMP documents and Surface Water Management Plan
updates as they occur.
1
• To meet or exceed our City recycling goal of 50 (1777 tons) percent or
greater of our Municipal solid waste. Find innovative ways to promote and
encourage recycling as a city. Inventory city facilities for recycling and look
into ways for school facilities to reduce waste and increase recycling. Apply
for recycle grants. Create a Champion Recognition Day.
• Maintain the Community Garden site and establish a preparatory gardening
group. Work to get a sign for the gardens. Continue to monitor the soil
quality at the Community Garden site.
• Implement the Lino Lakes Preparedness Plan for EAB as needed.
• Work on Wollan's Park Wetland Banking.
• Continue to monitor the Heron rookery and water quality in the northern one
third of Peltier Lake and to support the protection of resources in that area.
Update Council on these matters.
• Update Surface Water Management Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. That the 2013 goals of the Lino Lakes Environmental Board be adopted.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this _ Day of , 2013
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed,
adopted and approved by the City Council on date.
2
•
•
•