The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/14/2003 Council Packet• WORK SESSION AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Wednesday July 9, 2003 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Community Room (not televised) 5:30 P.M. 1. West Shadow Lake Drive, Jim Studenski 2. Senior Housing Project on Lake Drive, Dave Crandall, Jeff Smyser 3. Livable Communities Grant Application, Mary Alice Divine, Michael Grochala 4. 62nd Street Road Improvements, Jim Studenski 5. Marshan Lane Utilities, Jim Studenski III6. Regular Agenda Items 7. Adjourn Revised 07/08/03 ajb 11:35 a.m. • PAGE 1 • AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday, July 14, 2003 Council Chambers City Council meeting 6:30 p.m. (Scheduled to be broadcast on Channel 16) Call to Order and Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Setting the Agenda: Addition or deletion of agenda items 1. Consent Agenda - A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) July 14, 2003 (Check No. 68464 through 68640 in the amount of • $319,442.61). ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 13839 through 13852 in the amount of $14,556.38). B) Consideration of Not Waiving Monetary Limits on Tort Liability Per Minn. Statute 466.04, Al Rolek C) Consider Resolution 03 -111, Approving Solicitors/Peddlers License for Monitronics International, Inc. D) Assessments -- Resolution No. 03 -72, Certifying Delinquent Water and Sewer Utility Charges, Shirley Kaye's 2. Open Mike 3. Finance Department Report, Al Rolek None. 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch None. Page 1 • • AGENDA 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A) Accept Grant from State of Minnesota for Compliance Checks B) Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 03 -96 Accepting Donation from the Lino Lakes Lions Club for LLPD Equipment - Tasers 6. Public Services Depai huent Report, Rick DeGardner A) None. 7. Community Development Department Report, Michael Grochala A) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -94, Authorizing application for a Development Grant through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program, Mary Alice Divine B) Elm Street Reconstruction Project i) Public Hearing, Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -97 Adopting Proposed Assessment Roll, Elm Street Reconstruction Project, Jim Studenski ii) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -98 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Elm Street Improvement Project, Jim Studenski iii) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -99 Approving Right -of -Way Acquisition, Elm Street Reconstruction Project, Jim Studenski iv) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -110 Accepting Permanent Easements, Elm Street Reconstruction Project, Jim Studenski C) Century Farms North i) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -100, Approving Development Agreement, Jim Studenski ii) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -101, Approving Final Plat, Jeff Smyser D) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -104, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Twilight Acres Watermain Extension, Jim Studenski • • • AGENDA E) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -105, Authorizing Final Payment for Ditch and Pond Cleaning Project, Jim Studenski F) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -106, Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Marshan Lane Utility Improvement Project, Jim Studenski (to follow on Friday) G) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -108, Calling for Hearing on Prairie Flower Surface Water Management Project, Jim Studenski (to follow on Friday) H) Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -109, Authorizing Distribution of Lakes Business Park EAW, Michael Grochala 8. Unfinished Business A) None. 9. New Business A) Approval of minutes ofJune 18, 2003 Council Work Session B) Approval of minutes ofJune 23, 2003 City Council Meeting 10. Community Calendar, July 15, 2003 through July 28, 2003: A) Council Work Session, Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 5:30 p.m. B) City Council Meeting, Monday, July 28, 2003, 6:30 p.m. 11. Adjourn Revised 07/09/03 MMG 8:35 a.m. Page 3 • EXPENDITURES JULY 14, 2003 • • Date: 06/20/2003 Time: 12:56:11 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3245 - 3245 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000200 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSUR, INC. 1 176.20 176.20 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 166.16 166.16 .00 .00 000755 BIESANZ, PHIL 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 000769 EXCELSIOR, CITY OF 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 001605 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC 1 415.00 415.00 .00 .00 002000 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGR 1 420.00 420.00 .00 .00 002551 ANDERSON, KAREN 1 22.00 22.00 .00 .00 002566 BADER, LINDA 1 39.00 39.00 .00 .00 002582 ECKERT, SCOTT 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00 002583 FOSTER, BRAD 1 18.50 18.50 .00 .00 0 8 KURAK, SUSAN 1 28.00 28.00 .00 .00 0 8 LEDIN, PAUL 1 16.50 16.50 .00 .00 002609 PAWLAK, KIM 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00 002610 RIES, PATTI 1 33.00 33.00 .00 .00 002612 ROISUM, ERIC 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00 003091 MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1 400.00 400.00 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 1,000.02 1,000.02 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 1 762.75 762.75 .00 .00 004575 UPS /UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 13.91 13.91 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 19 3,778.04 3,778.04 .00 .00* • Date: 06/26/2003 Time: 10:35:24 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal ,es: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3248 3248 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Sort: N Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000077 DEMARS, MITCH 1 13.04 13.04 .00 .00 000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 27.60 27.60 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 3,550.38 3,550.38 .00 .00 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 49.00 49.00 .00 .00 000155 O'DEA, MARY JO 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000157 ALL SEASONS RENTAL, INC. 1 38.34 38.34 .00 .00 000163 TOLER HALEN, PATRICE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000176 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 92.14 92.14 .00 .00 000190 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER, INC. 1 97.91 97.91 .00 .00 000227 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1 2,318.50 2,318.50 .00 .00 1,6 O'CONNELL, TERESA 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 3 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 98.66 98.66 .00 .00 000364 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION 1 5,795.67 5,795.67 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 24.37 24.37 .00 .00 000548 GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 000617 MICRO WAREHOUSE, INC. 1 325.00 325.00 .00 .00 000680 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. 1 100.17 100.17 .00 .00 000724 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. 1 80.00 80.00 .00 .00 000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 2 70.16 70.16 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 3 204.67 204.67 .00 .00 000988 NOBLE NURSERY RETAIL, INC. 1 454.76 454.76 .00 .00 001014 T/C BUILDERS, INC. 1 402.92 402.92 .00 .00 • Date: 06/26/2003 Time: 10:35:25 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount - 11111r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001050 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS 1 12.50 12.50 .00 .00 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 2,490.52 2,490.52 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 186.32 186.32 .00 .00 001329 DONLIN, AMY 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 1,221.02 1,221.02 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 2,362.80 2,362.80 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 168.30 168.30 .00 .00 001561 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 17.89 17.89 .00 .00 001618 GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC. 1 3,525.00 3,525.00 .00 .00 001771 HALVORSON CONCRETE, INC. 1 7,434.00 7,434.00 .00 .00 001940 K.E.E.P.R.S., INC. 1 113.22 113.22 .00 .00 002036 JACKSON- HIRSH, INC. 1 66.41 66.41 .00 .00 002225 ANDERSON, CALVIN 1 82.00 82.00 .00 .00 002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 1 1,350.71 1,350.71 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 11.32 11.32 .00 .00 0 9 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 01,0 LINO AUTO MACHINING 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 46.53 46.53 .00 .00 002565 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 1 382.97 382.97 .00 .00 002614 ANOKA COUNTY HOUSING /REDEVELOP AUTHORITY 1 7,000.00 7,000.00 .00 .00 002666 RICHARDS, BRIAN 1 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 002670 SKRAMSTAD, STEPHEN 1 72.00 72.00 .00 .00 002743 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY 2 400.00 400.00 .00 .00 003300 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LANDSCAPING 1 1,172.51 1,172.51 .00 .00 003868 S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. 1 19.99 19.99 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 164.75 164.75 .00 .00 004240 STREICHER'S, INC. 1 278.18 278.18 .00 .00 • Date: 06/26/2003 Time: 10:35:25 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount 1110r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004485 TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS INC. 1 7.67 7.67 .00 .00 004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 1 6,929.96 6,929.96 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 569.79 569.79 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC. 1 77.68 77.68 .00 .00 950061 KUKONEN, ROD 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 58 51,282.33 51,282.33 .00 .00* • • Date: 07/03/2003 Time: 09:49:51 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal ,es: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3271 3271 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 390.72 390.72 .00 Grand Totals: 1 390.72 390.72 .00 .00* • • Date: 07/03/2003 Time: 13:15:12 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal ,es: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3273 - 3273 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Sort: N Operator: JAL Page: 1 Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000110 A T & T WIRELESS 1 23.90 23.90 .00 .00 000408 AFSCME COUNCIL #14 1 609.68 609.68 .00 .00 000461 BONFE HOME BUILDERS, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000468 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1,171.45 1,171.45 .00 .00 000539 TARGET 1 26.20 26.20 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 110.88 110.88 .00 .00 000710 ROGGENBUCK CUSTOM BUILT HOMES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 000755 BIESANZ, PHIL 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 001301 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 1 3,034.00 3,034.00 .00 .00 001395 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1 1,452.89 1,452.89 .00 .00 0 0 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 1 834.34 834.34 .00 .00 0 82 US LINK 1 1,661.08 1,661.08 .00 " .00 002120 KELLY INSURANCENTER 1 249.00 249.00 .00 .00 002208 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. 1 777.00 777.00 .00 .00 002467 MAC MAY HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 28,168.12 28,168.12 .00 .00 002673 EWINGS, KIMBERLY 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 002685 MCLEAN, CLAIRE 1 76.00 76.00 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 21.28 21.28 .00 .00 004671 VERIZON WIRELES, BELLEVUE 1 32.34 32.34 .00 .00 900066 AVALON HOMES 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 900305 HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. 1 132.00 132.00 .00 .00 • Date: 07/03/2003 Time: 13:15:13 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount 41111r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost Grand Totals: 22 40,600.16 40,600.16 .00 .00* • • Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:24:01 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal es: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 3276 - 3276 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (A) Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000020 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, INC. 1 16.71 16.71 .00 .00 000080 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, INC. 1 104.09 104.09 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 489.28 489.28 .00 .00 000095 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. 1 286.34 286.34 .00 .00 000158 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 2 3,521.35 3,521.35 .00 .00 000165 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, INC. 1 168.00 168.00 .00 .00 000225 WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, INC. 1 44.75 44.75 .00 .00 000227 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1 1,712.49 1,712.49 .00 .00 000230 HEADSETS.COM 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 000232 AMERICAN IRON & SUPPLY COMPANY, INC 1 374.75 374.75 .00 .00 1/8 SWEENEY BROTHERS, INC. 1 58.44 58.44 .00 .00 3 WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. 1 110.25 110.25 .00 .00 000366 ORIENTIAL TRADING COMPANY, INC. 1 28.70 28.70 .00 .00 000465 MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTECH GROUP 1 37.00 37.00 .00 .00 000471 APITZ GARAGE, INC. 2 130.77 130.77 .00 .00 000522 INTERSTATE BATTERIES, INC. 1 147.32 147.32 .00 .00 000540 AUTO- MEDICS, INC. 2 193.46 193.46 .00 .00 000542 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. 1 36.21 36.21 .00 .00 000861 BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SERVICE 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000877 ST. LOUIS PARK PARK & REC 1 186.00 186.00 .00 .00 000891 ZYLSTRA HARLEY - DAVIDSON, INC. 1 377.19 377.19 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 19.70 19.70 .00 .00 • Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:24:01 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount ®r # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 124.82 124.82 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 109,312.75 109,312.75 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER, INC 1 4.26 4.26 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 3,245.03 3,245.03 .00 .00 001260 STANTON GROUP 1 181.25 181.25 .00 .00 001270 DALCO, INC. 1 205.58 205.58 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. 4 6,118.65 6,118.65 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 82.23 82.23 .00 .00 001396 INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, 1 696.00 696.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 6,040.94 6,040.94 .00 .00 001520 FLANAGAN SALES, INC. 1 3,140.69 3,140.69 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 319.58 319.58 .00 .00 001540 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 1 140.33 140.33 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 202.35 202.35 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 1 53.44 53.44 .00 .00 OltGOA COMPANY, INC. 1 261.41 261.41 .00 .00 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 263.50 263.50 .00 .00 001971 INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 161.99 161.99 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 95.57 95.57 .00 .00 002248 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR & CO., LLP 1 4,933.95 4,933.95 .00 .00 002270 LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, INC. 1 58.57 58.57 .00 .00 002340 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPHICS 1 1,415.19 1,415.19 .00 .00 002387 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 74.61 74.61 .00 .00 002686 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY /RESEARCH CENTER 1 350.00 350.00 .00 .00 002687 CMI, INC. 1 52.71 52.71 .00 .00 002694 SBC, INC. 1 33.93 33.93 .00 .00 002740 MITY -LITE, INC. 1 627.13 627.13 .00 .00 • Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:24:02 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 4,357.00 , 4,357.00 .00 .00 002777 MN. DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 280.11 280.11 .00 .00 002788 QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER 1 30.25 30.25 .00 .00 002790 TESSMAN SEED COMPANY 1 212.32 212.32 .00 .00 002816 USTA NORTHERN SECTION 1 57.00 57.00 .00 .00 002821 FETTING, SHARON 1 96.00 96.00 .00 .00 002839 MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION 1 125.00 125.00 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 1 42.25 42.25 .00 .00 002963 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ABORICULTURE 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 003180 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, INC. 1 228.87 228.87 .00 .00 003250 XCEL ENERGY 1 3,003.43 3,003.43 .00 .00 003300 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LANDSCAPING 1 24,363.72 24,363.72 .00 .00 003443 OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER, INC. 1 374.91 374.91 .00 .00 003500 PHOTO WORLD, INC. 1 34.60 34.60 .00 .00 003816 RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC. 1 3,100.00 3,100.00 .00 .00 0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 3 12,282.61 12,282.61 .00 .00 0 882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 6 1,018.62 1,018.62 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 31.95 31.95 .00 .00 004120 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 15.61 15.61 .00 .00 004125 ST. PAUL CITY OF 2 1,600.00 1,600.00 .00 .00 004150 STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 1 164.40 164.40 .00 .00 004172 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00 004340 T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 3 4,578.80 4,578.80 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 1,588.55 1,588.55 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 539.74 539.74 .00 .00 004562 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC. 3 2,126.62 2,126.62 .00 .00 • Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:24:03 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Journal er# Name Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004730 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 1 65.79 65.79 .00 .00 900217 ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 15,424.00 15,424.00 .00 .00 900223 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. 1 285.00 285.00 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 1 570.00 570.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 100 223,391.36 223,391.36 .00 .00* • • Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32:32 Operator: JAL • Ranges: Options: Page: 1 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (R) 3247 - 3278 Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name 68539 68464 68487 68465 68540 68466 68543 0 68498 68544 68468 68545 68470 0 072 473 68549 68474 68550 68551 68552 68475 0 0 0 68476 68477 0 68556 68478 68557 68479 0 68528 68531 0 • Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount AFSCME COUNCIL #14 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE A ANDERSON, CALVIN ANDERSON, KAREN AVALON HOMES BADER, LINDA BONFE HOME BUILDERS, I DELL MARKETING L.P. DELL MARKETING L.P. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M ECKERT, SCOTT EWINGS, KIMBERLY FOSTER, BRAD INTERSTATE BATTERIES, INTL UNION OF OPER ENG KURAK, SUSAN LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR LEDIN, PAUL MAC MAY HOMES MCLEAN, CLAIRE MEDICA MINN NCPERS GROUP LIFE MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE MN. DEPT OF HEALTH MN. DEPT OF NATURAL RE PAWLAK, KIM PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN QUICKSILVER EXPRESS CO RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN RIES, PATTI ROGGENBUCK CUSTOM BUIL ROISUM, ERIC SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK SKRAMSTAD, STEPHEN T/C BUILDERS, INC. WHITE BEAR LOCKSMITH, PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WITHHOLDING * * * * * * ** * * ** **** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /7995 H * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2327 T COMPURTER PURCHASE /TIM P COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRA DENTAL INSURANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PARTY WAGON REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC BATTERIES PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC PAYROLL WITHHOLDING REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMS BLDG ESCROW /7975 H REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING LICENSE TABS 2ND QTR STATE WATER FEE WILDLIFE PACKS REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC ADVERTISING DELIVERY SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMB BLDG ESCROW /603 HI REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC LAKE DRIVE TRAFFIC STUDY REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIM BLDG ESCROW /6497 LA KEYS ** * ** *** *** ***** ** **** ** **** ** ** * ** * ** ** * *** ** ** ***** *** * * * ** *** * **** * ** * ** ***** * ** ** * ** * **** *** * *** * * ** * **** *** * **** * ** ** ** ** ** * * ** ** ** * ** * * * ** ***** *** *** ** * ** *** ** *** *** * **** * ******* *** * **** * *** **** ** ** * *** * ** * ** ** * * **** ** * ** *** ** ** *** *** 609.68 176.20 82.00 22.00 500.00 39.00 500.00 1,712.49 2,318.50 1,763.32 33.00 20.00 18.50 36.67 420.00 28.00 777.00 16.50 500.00 76.00 6,265.34 400.00 42.25 4,357.00 280.11 37.00 103.20 30.25 837.52 33.00 500.00 37.00 12,282.61 72.00 402.92 44.75 Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32:32 Operator: JAL • Page: 2 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept O ZYLSTRA HARLEY- DAVIDSO OIL /FILTER /GASKET /SEAL /0 * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** O LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR AUDIT /FINANCIAL STATEMEN PROGRAM Total for Dept 200 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. T- SHIRTS /CAPS ADULT SP O BURGER, LUANN DANCE CLASSES ADULT SP 68517 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, UMPIRE BAGS /TENNIS BALLS ADULT SP Total for Dept 202 0 ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. T- SHIRTS O ORIENTIAL TRADING COMP PROGRAM REC SUPPLIES 0 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. PROGRAM REC 68526 RICHARDS, BRIAN PROGRAM REC PERFORMER 0 ST. LOUIS PARK PARK & PROGRAM REC Total for Dept 205 0 0 68467 68542 68547 0 68517 68527 0 • 68480 ALAUN DISTRIBUTING, IN ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BIESANZ, PHIL BIESANZ, PHIL HOMETOWN PIZZA, INC. KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, S & S WORLDWIDE, INC. USTA NORTHERN SECTION SUPPLIES T- SHIRTS /CAPS REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC SU PROGRAM REC PIZZAS SUPPLIES UMPIRE BAGS /TENNIS BALLS BUCKET FUSE BEADS TENNIS BALLS Total for Dept 207 TARGET FILM /CONTAINERS Total for Dept 208 68558 TARGET SUPPLIES O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 18 Total for Dept 401 68544 68469 68546 68552 68520 68477 68556 0 68538 68546 68520 68556 • DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EXCELSIOR, CITY OF FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. MEDICA NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN STANTON GROUP A T & T WIRELESS FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL SPECIAL YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH IN YOUTH SP MAYOR /CO MAYOR /CO DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINIST REGISTRATION /JEAN V E. AN ADMINIST LONG TERM DISABILITY INS MEDICAL INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY -JUNE ADVERTISING LIFE INSURANCE FLEXIBLE SPENDING Total for Dept 402 ADMINI MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY -JUNE RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS SENIORS Amount 377.19 35,751.00* 98.68 98.68* 838.00 570.00 21.19 1,429.19* 1,624.50 28.70 285.00 250.00 186.00 2,374.20* 168.00 779.25 100.00 200.00 132.00 95.57 191.60 19.99 57.00 1,743.41* 54.92 54.92* 21.95 433.74 455.69* 81.40 60.00 71.97 948.14 62.96 351.52 23.75 181.25 1,780.99* 18.36 4.63 124.98 4.75 Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32 :32 Operator: JAL • Page: 3 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 406 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 68471 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF CERTIFICATE OF REVIEW FE 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR AUDIT /FINANCIAL STATEMEN 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 0 MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS AS MEMBERSHIP /AL R 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 407 68488 68544 68546 68552 68556 ANOKA COUNTY HOUSING /R DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. MEDICA RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY MEDICAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 415 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 68477 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JUNE 9, 11 Total for Dept 416 8544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 46 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY 52 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 418 FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE P ECONOMIC ECONOMIC INS ECONOMIC ECONOMIC ECONOMIC PLANNING INS PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING Communit INS Communit Communit Communit 68483 A T & T WIRELESS MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY POLICE 68485 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, SIREN MAINTENANCE POLICE 68489 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE L CLASS /MELISSA H POLICE 68491 BLUE TOW SERVICE, INC. TOW /CHEV CAVALIER POLICE 0 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 68493 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 68494 CENTENNIAL SCHOOLS COFFEE /DARE GRADUATION POLICE O CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE CAR WASH POLICE O CMI, INC. SUPPLIES POLICE O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE POLICE 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE POLICE 68499 DEMARS, MITCH MEALS POLICE 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS POLICE O GALL'S INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES POLICE 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH PRINTING POLICE 68511 K.E.E.P.R.S., INC. NAME TAGS /BATTERIES POLICE O LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, PAINT /REFINISH '02 CROWN POLICE 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE POLICE 152.72* 91.70 46.37 415.00 1,973.56 1,135.80 125.00 14.97 3,802.40* 7,000.00 26.20 12.75 300.30 4.75 7,344.00* 52.40 24.71 600.60 74.18 9.50 106.00 867.39* 52.40 27.04 588.49 9.50 677.43* 49.00 3,550.38 400.00 80.00 19.70 84.23 12.50 4.26 52.71 15.98 339.60 13.04 315.24 53.44 355.55 113.22 58.57 8,888.46 Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32:32 Operator: JAL • Page: 4 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 68553 0 68556 0 0 0 68530 68480 68532 68481 68560 Description Dept Amount MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFE MN DEPT OF ADMIN /INTEC NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SHRED -IT, INC. ST. PAUL CITY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA STREICHER'S, INC. TARGET TARGET PIT COURSE /CLIFF R MAY USAGE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE IMPOUND FEE /TRANSPORATIO LIFE INSURANCE DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT COURSE CONNECT CHARGES /JUNE UNIFORM SUPPLIES FILM /CONTAINERS TAPES UPS /UNITED PARCEL SERV DELIVERY SERVICE VERIZON WIRELES, BELLE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE Total for Dept 420 POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE 0 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI FIRE DISTRICT BUDGET FIRE 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FIRE 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FIRE 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE FIRE 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE FIRE Total for Dept 421 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE BUILDING 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS BUILDING 68502 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES BUILDING 68508 INTERNATIONAL CODE COU MEMBERSHIP /PETE K BUILDING 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE BUILDING 556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE BUILDING Total for Dept 422 0 0 68490 0 68544 0 68546 0 68502 68506 68509 0 68520 0 68556 0 0 0 68535 0 • A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, AUTO- MEDICS, INC. BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS, I CONNEXUS ENERGY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS, NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PHOTO WORLD, INC. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SBC, INC. T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. XCEL ENERGY SOD TOWING /2 PADLOCK KEYED MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE DENTAL INSURANCE STREET SIGN LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES PARTS /SUPPLIES BENCH PADS /CURB RAMPS /CO BATTERIES SOLAR FLASHERS FOR BARRI MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY -JUNE FILM PROCESSING LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE ASPHALT SUPPLIES BATTERY /CUTTING WHEEL /VA MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS 350.00 37.00 1,452.89 374.91 128.25 54.95 1,600.00 390.00 278.18 111.24 24.37 13.91 32.34 19,253.92* 109,312.75 76.78 36.39 1,724.29 14.25 111,164.46* 104.80 46.21 2.00 100.00 2,023.70 17.34 2,294.05* 9.11 79.88 100.17 702.08 104.80 82.23 63.02 64.66 42.83 1,518.00 69.11 228.87 197.79 34.60 27.79 9.18 4,578.80 21.93 127.80 3,003.43 Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32:32 Operator: JAL • Page: 5 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 0 68492 0 0 68544 68501 0 68546 0 68502 0 0 68514 68515 0 68552 0 68556 0 0 0 0 68535 0 68493 68495 0 68496 0 68497 68546 68502 0 0 0 68509 68510 68548 68513 68552 68518 68521 68522 • Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 430 APITZ GARAGE, INC. AUTO- MEDICS, INC. BEE LINE ALIGNMENT SER BOYER TRUCKS, INC. CATCO PARTS, INC. DEHN OIL COMPANY, INC. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE T FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GOA COMPANY, INC. INTERSTATE BATTERIES, LEEF BROTHER, INC. LINO AUTO MACHINING LTG POWER EQUIPMENT, I MEDICA MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMP RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, SWEENEY BROTHERS, INC. THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. TRACER STICK TOW #234 FRONT END ALIGN #247 PARTS LAMP DIESEL FUEL DENTAL INSURANCE SPEAKER /STROBE TUBE PARTS /SUPPLIES LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES PARTS /SUPPLIES OIL /DRUM DEPOSIT BATTERIES SHOP TOWELS TURN ROTOR KEY MEDICAL INSURANCE SUPPLIES LIFE INSURANCE PARTS CLEANER PLUG /SEAL /WASHER GASKET /SEAL PARTS /SUPPLIES BATTERY /CUTTING WHEEL /VA Total for Dept 431 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF CONNEXUS ENERGY CORPORATE EXPRESS, INC DALCO, INC. DALCO, INC. FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE HEADSETS.COM IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONM INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY JACKSON - HIRSH, INC. KELLY INSURANCENTER LAKESIDE AUTO & PAINT, MEDICA MICRO WAREHOUSE, INC. NOBLE NURSERY RETAIL, SOLID WASTE /JULY GRAPHS /3 SQUADS OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE OFFICE SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES HEADSET PRINTING HVAC /BUILDING STUDY BATTERIES FORMS LINO LAKES ALARM /COMM BO REPAIR /REFINISH 355/356/ MEDICAL INSURANCE TONER CARTRIDGE FABRIC /MULCH NORTHERN AIR CORPORATI TECH SERVICE FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME 11,066.08* 130.77 113.58 50.00 70.16 124.82 6,118.65 26.20 17.89 319.58 12.77 8.31 2.90 261.41 110.65 11.32 50.00 74.61 1,489.39 36.21 5.46 270.02 15.61 58.44 1,588.55 127.80 11,095.10* 347.71 286.34 120.44 2,409.90 961.47 77.68 205.58 186.32 9.84 5.30 40.00 198.53 696.00 14.40 66.41 249.00 1,350.71 588.49 325.00 454.76 5,795.67 Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32:33 Operator: JAL • Page: 6 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description 68554 68556 0 68529 68558 68559 0 68536 0 68538 0 68486 68495 68544 0 68546 0 68502 68509 68552 68516 68517 68520 68523 68477 4111556 0 0 68535 68538 0 68541 68544 68546 68552 0 68520 68556 0 68534 Dept Amount OFFICEMAX, INC. COMP PAPER RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI DATA CART SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI DATA CART TARGET SUPPLIES US LINK MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. C -FOLD TOWELS WIPERS AND WIPES, INC. CAN LINERS Total for Dept 432 A & L SUPERIOR SOD CO, A T & T WIRELESS ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. ALL SEASONS RENTAL, IN CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FLANAGAN SALES, INC. FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY MEDICA MENARDS, INC. METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME SOD PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE PARKS SOLID WASTE /JULY PARKS SOD CUTTER RENTAL PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY PARKS DENTAL INSURANCE PARKS BENCHS /TABLES PARKS LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARKS PARTS /SUPPLIES PARKS PARTS /SUPPLIES PARKS BATTERIES PARKS MEDICAL INSURANCE PARKS POSTS /RAILS PARKS UMPIRE BAGS /TENNIS BALLS PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY -JUNE PARKS NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LA PIPE /COUPLING /CLAMPS PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE TESSMAN SEED COMPANY CHALK PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS SUPPLIES PARKS WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. BATTERY /CUTTING WHEEL /VA PARKS Total for Dept 450 A T & T WIRELESS ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. BERNSTEIN, BARRY DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. MEDICA MITY -LITE, INC. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE RECREATI T- SHIRTS RECREATI MILEAGE RECREATI DENTAL INSURANCE RECREATI LONG TERM DISABILITY INS RECREATI MEDICAL INSURANCE RECREATI SUPPLIES RECREATI MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY -JUNE RECREATI RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE STAR TRIBUNE, INC. ADVERTISING TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN FOAM ROLLER Total for Dept 451 RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE ENVIRONM 68500 DONLIN, AMY QUARTERLY STIPEND ENVIRONM 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ENVIRONM 68502 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES ENVIRONM • 21.28 4.75 31.95 164.75 4.25 1,661.08 110.25 98.66 16,486.52* 7.60 1.32 141.57 38.34 80.62 144.10 3,140.69 63.41 63.02 16.65 14.40 1,387.09 46.53 170.18 320.00 842.83 150.00 26.13 212.32 21.93 127.80 7,016.53* 4.22 279.60 110.88 57.64 36.28 418.00 627.13 317.50 15.20 164.40 7.67 2,038.52* 11.79 150.00 6.96 59.61 Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32:33 Operator: JAL • Page: 7 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 68505 GRUNDHOFER, CONSTANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND 68512 KUKONEN, ROD QUARTERLY STIPEND 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 68524 O'CONNELL, TERESA QUARTERLY STIPEND 68525 O'DEA, MARY JO QUARTERLY STIPEND 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 68533 TOLER HALEN, PATRICE QUARTERLY STIPEND Total for Dept 461 ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM 0 AMERICAN IRON & SUPPLY RECYCLING DAY SOLID WA 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS SOLID WA 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE SOLID WA 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE SOLID WA- 0 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL SOLID WA Total for Dept 462 68544 0 68546 0 68552 0 68556 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE FORESTRY FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, IN PAINT /TAPE /TAGS FORESTRY FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FORESTRY FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES FORESTRY MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF A MEMBERSHIP /MARTY A RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept 463 0 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, 484 ABLE HOSE AND RUBBER, 37 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI O CONNEXUS ENERGY 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. 68502 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE 68504 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA 0 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN 68507 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN 0 IMAGE PRINTING & GRAPH O INFRATECH TECHNOLOGIES O LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR 68552 MEDICA O NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I 68519 NATIONAL WATERWORKS, I 68520 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 68523 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LA 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN 0 SBC, INC. O VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS 68535 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 68482 XCEL ENERGY • ADAPTER BRASS ADAPTERS UTILILTY BILLING POSTAGE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE DENTAL INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS PARTS /SUPPLIES SPLICE CONNECTION CHEMICALS LIQUID PHOSPHATE /PUMP PRINTING FLAGS /PAINT AUDIT /FINANCIAL STATEMEN MEDICAL INSURANCE PAINT MOUNTING BRACKETS MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY -JUNE PIPE /COUPLING /CLAMPS LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE SUPPLIES BATTERY /CUTTING WHEEL /VA MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY Total for Dept 494 FORESTRY FORESTRY FORESTRY WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER 150.00 225.00 264.82 150.00 150.00 2.14 150.00 1,320.32* 374.75 2.62 1.55 58.85 .47 748.60 1,186.84* 11.79 140.33 6.96 57.57 264.82 20.00 2.14 503.61* 104.09 27.60 195.36 1,305.89 43.23 24.11 39.01 92.14 6,040.94 2,362.80 861.11 161.99 493.40 610.77 2,126.62 6,929.96 197.79 329.68 11.42 20.16 21.93 186.39 181.31 22,367.70* Date: 07/08/2003 Time: 09:32:33 Operator: JAL • Page: 8 City of Lino Lakes FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 68537 M CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI UTILILTY BILLING POSTAGE 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE 68544 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF M DENTAL INSURANCE 68546 FORTIS BENEFITS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE PARTS /SUPPLIES 0 LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR AUDIT /FINANCIAL STATEMEN 68552 MEDICA MEDICAL INSURANCE 68556 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURAN LIFE INSURANCE 0 SBC, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /JUNE 68482 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /MAY Total for Dept 495 0 0 68503 68506 0 0 0 68477 0 • ARNT CONSTRUCTION, INC FETTING, SHARON GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATI HALVORSON CONCRETE, IN KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN LARSON ALLEN WEISHAIR NORTHWAY IRRIGATION /LA DITCH /POND CLEANING IMPLEMENTATION SPECIAL A HIGHLAND MEADOWS PARK DE BENCH PADS /CURB RAMPS /CO LEGAL SERVICE AUDIT /FINANCIAL STATEMEN IRRIGATION /CLEARWATER CK PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING RO -SO CONTRACTING, INC REPLACE CULVERT Total for Dept 499 0 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN LEGAL SERVICE Total for Dept 500 SEWER 195.36 SEWER 259.61 SEWER 43.23 SEWER 24.13 SEWER 8.79 SEWER 493.40 SEWER 610.77 SEWER 11.37 SEWER 4.59 SEWER 818.71 2,469.96* OTHER 15,424.00 OTHER 96.00 OTHER 3,525.00 OTHER 5,916.00 OTHER 217.00 OTHER 1,874.91 OTHER 24,363.72 OTHER 83.85 OTHER 3,100.00 54,600.48* TIF ADMI 46.50 46.50* Grand Total 319,442.61* Centennial Fire District Check Register 7/9/2003 The disbursements listed below are submitted by the Centennial Fire District for your approval: DATE CHECK# NAME 7/3/2003 13839 7/3/2003 13840 7/3/2003 13841 7/3/2003 13842 7/3/2003 13843 7/3/2003 13844 7/3/2003 13845 7/3/2003 13846 7/3/2003 13847 7/3/2003 13848 7/3/2003 13849 7/3/2003 13850 7/3/2003 13851 7/3/2003 13852 • • Amoco Oil Company Aspen Mills Brad Racutt Centennial Firefighters Relief Assn. Centennial Utilities CenterPoint Energy City of Lino Lakes Hugo Feed Mill & Elevator Lynn Card Company McLeod USA Metro Fire Metrocall Milo Bennett Qwest 1 of 1 ACCOUNT 42100 - Fuel and Lube 42120 - Uniform Expense 41012 - Fire Prevention 43010 - Relief Association 42251 - Station 1 - Gas 42253 - Station 2 - Gas 43030 - Common Area Charge 42230 - Cleaning Supplies 42180 - Office Supplies 42240 - Telephone 42130 - Equipment Expense 42240 - Telephone 42000 - Vehicle Maintenance 42240 - Telephone AMOUNT 205.74 144.40 360.00 6,585.00 101.10 161.88 5,551.75 27.99 81.80 356.29 42.42 73.73 801.97 62.31 • • • Consent Agenda Item 1B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Al Rolek DATE: 07/14/03 TOPIC: Consideration of not waiving monetary limits on tort liability per MN Statute 466.04 BACKGROUND Each year, the City has the option of waving its monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. If the city does waive the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. If the city does waive the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. The city carries $1,000,000 in excess liability coverage ($1,000,000 per occurrence and annual limit). The City of Lino Lakes has never waived its' monetary limits on tort liability. OPTIONS 1. The City of Lino Lakes does not choose to waive its' monetary limits on tort • liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. 2. The City of Lino Lakes chooses to waive its' monetary limits on tort liability to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. RECOMMENDATION Recommend option 1. • • AGENDA ITEM 1C • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -111, Approving Solicitor's/Peddlers License for Monitronics International, Inc. VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority (3/5 Vote) BACKGROUND: Bradley Farr and Paul Behan, sales representatives for Monitronics International, Inc., submitted peddlers license applications to the city clerk's office. Mr. Farr and Mr. Behan will be going door to door offering Lino Lakes residents installation of home security alarm systems at no cost in exchange for a monitoring contractual agreement. Mr. Farr and Mr. Behan have complied with all of the provisions of the Lino Lakes City Code for obtaining the necessary license, including a background check. Sergeant Steve Mortenson of the Lino Lakes Police Department indicated that the background checks came back clear and there would be no reason to recommend denial of the license. The applications and all other required information are on file in the city clerk's office for review. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Resolution No. 03 -111 2. Deny Resolution No. 03 -111 RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 • • CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA RESOLUTION NO. 03 -111 RESOLUTION APPROVING SOLICITOR'S/PEDDLERS LICENSE WHEREAS, Bradley Farr and Paul Behan, sales representatives for Monitronics International, Inc., have submitted solicitors /peddlers applications to the city clerk's office; and WHEREAS, Mr. Farr and Mr. Behan have complied with all of the provisions of Ordinance No. 01 -89 of the Lino Lakes City Code for obtaining the necessary license for a profit business; and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes has conducted a background check on Mr. Farr and Mr. Behan; NOW, THEREFORE, by order of the Lino Lakes City Council, and virtue thereof, the said business, Monitronics International, Inc., is hereby authorized to solicit for a period of six - months beginning July 15, 2003 and ending January 14, 2003 subject to all conditions and provisions of said ordinance. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of July, 2003. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • AGENDA ITEM 1D STAFF ORIGINATOR Al Rolek MEETING DATE July 14, 2003 TOPIC Consider Resolution 03 -72 Authorizing the Certification of Delinquent Water and Sewer Utility Charges for collection with 2003 Property Taxes Payable in 2004 VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Simple Majority (3/5) Staff periodically brings before the City Council delinquent water and sewer utility charges for certification to the County Auditor for collection with the following year property taxes. Consideration of such certification was scheduled for this evening to give affected property owners an opportunity to address the City Council on this impending action. Affected property owners received mailed notice of this proceeding. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 03 -72 authorizing the certification of delinquent water and sewer utility charges to be collected with 2003 property taxes payable in 2004. OPTIONS 1) Adopt Resolution No. 03 -72. 2) Return to staff for further review. 3) Do not adopted Resolution No. 03 -72. RECOMMENDATION Option 1. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03-72 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER UTILITY CHARGES FOR COLLECTION WITH THE 2003 PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE IN 2004 WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 401.29 and Section 402.14, Subd. 5, the City Clerk has prepared a list of properties having delinquent water and sewer charges to be certified to the Anoka County Auditor for collection with the 2003 property taxes, payable in 2004, and WHEREAS, the City Council has met to consider the certification of such delinquent water and sewer charges, and WHEREAS, notice of such certification was mailed to affected property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify the delinquent water and sewer charges as indicated on the attached listing to the Anoka County Auditor to be collected with the 2003 property taxes, payable in 2004. • Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota this 14th day of July, 2003. Ann J. Blair, City Clerk • John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • July 8, 2003 Shirley Kay's 6810 Lake Drive P.O. Box 365 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Property Number: 00- 00 -00 -00 -0000 Account Number: 2159510 For Address: 6810 Lake Drive (Irrigation Meter) Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Total Amount Pending Certification $283.76. Dear Property Owner: You were recently notified of our intent to certify your delinquent water an /or sewer billings to your 2004 Property taxes. The dates listed in the original notification were incorrect. The correct date that the City Council will consider this is July 14, 2003, with the final certification to go to Anoka County for collection on July 15, 2003. If you have any dispute with the certification process, you may appear before the City Council on Monday July 14, 2003, or you may submit something in writing to City Hall by 4:00 PM July 14, 2003. If you have paid this bill, please disregard this notice. If you have further questions regarding your delinquent water and /or sewer utility billing, please feel free to call. You may reach me at (651) 982 -2412. Respectfully, (pin `6tc-n6r Lynn Francis Finance Department 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 - 932 -2400 • Fax: 651 -982 -2499 • TDD: 651 - 982 -2410 • July 8, 2003 Shirley Kay's 6810 Lake Drive P.O. Box 365 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Property Number: 19- 31 -22 -34 -0001 Account Number: 2159500 For Address: 6810 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Total Amount Pending Certification $4,352.55. Dear Property Owner: You were recently notified of our intent to certify your delinquent water an /or sewer • billings to your 2004 Property taxes. The dates listed in the original notification were incorrect. The correct date that the City Council will consider this is July 14, 2003, with the final certification to go to Anoka County for collection on July 15, 2003. If you have any dispute with the certification process, you may appear before the City Council on Monday July 14, 2003, or you may submit something in writing to City Hall by 4:00 PM July 14, 2003. If you have paid this bill, please disregard this notice. If you have further questions regarding your delinquent water and /or sewer utility billing, please feel free to call. You may reach me at (651) 982 -2412. Respectfully, Tv)? Guru S Lynn Francis Finance Department 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 Phone: 651 - 982 -2400 A Fax: 651 -932 -2499 0 TDD: 651 -982 -2410 • • • AGENDA ITEM 5 -A STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE July 14, 2003 TOPIC VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Request to accept grant dollars from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division. Simple Majority The Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division requires local liquor licensing officials to pursue civil penalties against licenses whose establishments sell alcohol to minors during underage compliance checks. The grant dollars will be used to defer the cost of payroll expenses in conducting the compliance checks and for any other cost related to these enforcement actions. OPTIONS 1. Accept grant dollars to conduct compliance checks. 2. Return to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 • • • AGENDA ITEM 5 -B STAFF ORIGINATOR David J. Pecchia, Public Safety Director /Chief of Police DATE July 14, 2003 TOPIC VOTE REQUIRED BACKGROUND Consideration of Resolution No 03 - 96 Accepting a Donation from the Lino Lakes Lions Club. Simple Majority The Lino Lakes Lions Club realizes the increased risks faced by police departments and the need for a greater push to use Less Lethal Tactics and have graciously donated $1,000 to defer the cost to purchase Tasers for use by the Public Safety Department. The purpose of Resolution 03 -96 is to accept and publicly thank the Lino Lakes Lions Club for their generous donation to the City of Lino Lakes. OPTIONS 1. Adopt Resolution No. 03 - 96 accepting the donation. 2. Return the Resolution to staff for further information. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 • Council Member and moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 - 96 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE LINO LAKES LIONS CLUB FOR TWO TASERS WHEREAS, WHEREAS, tasers are equipment used as Less Than Lethal Tactics by the police officers; and the Lino Lakes Lions Club has graciously made an offer to donate $1,000 toward the cost of these tasers, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lino Lakes City Council members, do hereby accept the $1,000 donation to purchase the two tasers and wishes to express its gratitude to the Lino Lakes Lions Club for the donation. John Bergeson, Mayor • Ann Blair, City Clerk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July, 2003. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • AGENDA ITEM 7A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 7/14/03 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -94 authorizing application for a Development Grant through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: As part of the city's participation in the Minnesota Livable Communities Act, funds are made available to cities to promote the purposes of the Act. In 1997 the Lino Lakes Council applied for planning funds through the Livable Communities Demonstration Account for the creation of compact, efficient, mixed use development. The city received $220,000 in funds to hire Calthorpe Associates to complete a master plan and design standards for the Town Center. The results from that process have been the foundation of the city's planning efforts to create a mixed use downtown on Lake Drive and 35W. The city has worked closely with developers interested in building this type of downtown project, and hopes to complete approvals on it by early next year. In 2000 the city received $450,000 to assist with implementation of the project. This year an application is being made for approximately $1.3 million in funding to assist with streetscape elements in the public realm, decorative lighting and planning /design costs for the community green. Thirty -six cities have applied for grants, totaling $48 million in requests. This year $7.9 million is available for development grants. The application process requires a resolution of support from the city council by July 31, 2003. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 03 -94 authorizing application for a Development Grant through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03-94 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT GRANT THROUGH THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2003 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account; and WHEREAS, the City has identified the proposed Woods Edge project within the City as a project that meets the Demonstrations Account's purpose and criteria; and WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Lino Lakes, Minnesota agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Demonstration Account application submitted on June 30, 2003; BE IT RESOLVED that the City Administrator is hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes and to execute such agreements as necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July, 2003. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION FORM 2003 Office Use Instructions: Submit form and attachments by 4:30 p.m. on June 30, 2003. Use font size 11. Use of bulleted lists is encouraged. Do not attach a coversheet, page(s), or use any graphic images on top of the application form. Limit application to 12 pages plus attachments, for a total of no more than 19 pages. Project Information: Project Name: Legacy at Woods Edge Applicant (Governmental Unit): City of Lino Lakes Project Location (city): Lino Lakes Address (street boundaries or Major intersection): SE Quadrant of 35W and County Road 23 (Lake Drive) Primary Project Contact: Name: Title: Mary Alice Divine Economic Development Assistant Address: 600 Town Center Parkway Phone: 651/982 -2423 Fax: 651/982 -2499 E -mail: mdivine @ci.lino- lakes.mn.us Authorized official(s) - (names and titles for contract execution) Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator Project Summary In the space below, summarize the project goals and components. (Limit 20 lines) • Combine a privately owned commercial site with city -owned land to create a 65 -acre, $150 million, mixed - use, walkable neighborhood in the heart of Lino Lakes, instead of big boxes that would typically occur. • Implement the Calthorpe Plan developed for the site to provide economic, cultural and recreational amenities within a human scale environment. • Leverage public /private commitments the city has made, including the completed Civic Complex and future YMCA, so they interact as part of a greater plan rather than become separated suburban destinations. • Demonstrate that new suburban development can provide the vital blend of all the classic components of Traditional Neighborhood Development — civic, residential, commercial and recreational uses —to create sustainable value in a community. • Provide physical connections to a nearby employment center, large suburban retail center, elementary and middle school and surrounding neighborhoods. • To make use of unparalleled opportunities for wilderness within the metro area through direct access to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. Those living in and coming to Woods Edge will be those seeking active living. They can enjoy miles of woods and wetlands, lakes and meadows, while still having convenient access to the rest of the metro area via 35W. Hiking, biking and canoeing can be an integral part of their lives. If developed conventionally, this site would instead be big boxes, loading docks and parking. • Major components include 450 units of lifecycle housing including owner and rental townhomes, apartments and condos over commercial, workforce and senior housing; more than 300,000 sq.ft. of commercial; a YMCA; a city hall /police station/community room; and a community green. Tree -lined streets and buildings sited at the sidewalk, with frequent entries and windows, will create an interesting pedestrian environment. End Date 0 0 N Start Date Spring 2004 the following section, listing project tasks and specific task details in priority order, requested amount of funds, and timelir eligible uses. For the Task/Eligible Cost, provide as much specificity and detail about the task as you can. Examples: If the the details might include information about location of parking structure if there is more than one, how many stalls and cosi tinn. the details might include number. type and location of buildings, or size of parcel; and if cost includes demolition and I $ Request O in N r+ 69 OO Coss, 69 CO O o 11111111 O N N 69 Inwino certinn_ if annlicable. list future phases of the project and estimated start and completion dates. I:' Public Realm/streetscape elements per Calthorpe Master Plan Decorative Lighting: 48 Domus Fixtures (amount beyond standard lighting) Park Planning and Desian. including water feature design 1 1 Total dollars requested and the start and completion date for the entire project or phase: Planning funds used to hire Calthorpe Associates for master plan and design standards, revisions, housing study and economic impact study. Approximately $10,000 remains for architectural (iecion review of final developer plans. All components of the development proposal are anticipated to be complete within two years from start date. •p , 0 r-1 N M d' v� ∎O l-- oo O� Q a� Cam, 4 2. Additional Project Information (limit one page) • • In the space below, provide additional project information or history of the site (not included in the project summary on page 1), including any plans to phase the project. (Limit 20 lines) • • City/Anoka County partnership finalized an unprecedented land exchange that gave the city the opportunity to build a Civic Complex and offer land to the YMCA • City committed $6 million to build the Civic Complex on the site • City purchased 14 acres of land and installed Phase I infrastructure. • City sold two parcels for Fairview Clinic and a community bank. • Calthorpe Associates developed Land Use and Regulatory Plans which concentrate development at intensities that bring within walking distance a complementary mix of land uses. The standards require mixed use, and include a framework of required streets. They specify street standards, open space amenities, build -to and setback lines, pedestrian walkways and landscaping. • City/YMCA partnership will provide a community center for area residents. City contribution is $1.5 million towards construction, plus land and infrastructure. YMCA will provide discounted memberships, community events, teen center. The YMCA is in architectural design phase. A Redevelopment TIF District analysis was completed and a portion of the site qualifies. The schedule calls for establishing the district by December 2003. • Hartford Group has secured a purchase agreement with the private landowner. That has been a major obstacle in the past, and was key to moving the project forward. • An EAW is in process. • Hartford Group anticipates full buildout within two years of start date. • In the space below, state how LCDA funding will overcome obstacles or provide a catalyst. Describe any time constraints, financial hardship or complexity that requires LCDA funding. Address what could not be accomplished but for receipt of an LCDA grant. (Limit 20 lines) In 2000, LCDA request was for $1.5 million to write down the costs of the land purchase. The city received $450,000, which was not enough to fund the gap. The city has been working with the development community and financial consultants to find additional ways to leverage its investment to make the project move forward. The city has made a significant investment in this project to date, and additional investment will be required. Improvements to Lake Drive and the 35W overpass will be necessary. The privately owned land was zoned commercial, making it priced higher than the market for residential development. Tax reform significantly reduced the viability of TIF. Amenities that set a neighborhood apart from conventional suburban development and create a true sense of place are not TIF eligible and often are slashed from the development plan for lack of available funding. The amenities are crucial in a pedestrian environment. People walk when it is pleasant, safe and comfortable to do so. People stay because the setting draws them. People value what has value. The public realm the "outdoor rooms" that invite people to gather —does not happen in new Traditional Neighborhood Developments without public assistance. • 3. Regulatory Status A. Please check (X) the following if it will be needed, is underway or is completed, and briefly provide additional information as noted. If not applicable, place a `NA' in the box. Will be Needed Underway Completed X Will buildings be demolished? If yes, indicate the number of and type of buildings: The privately owned land has one home and a sandblasting business consisting of three pole type structures. X Comprehensive plan amendment. If needed, please describe: Will new buildings be constructed? If yes, list the percent mix of commercial, residential, public or other uses: 30 % Commercial 5% Public (already constructed) 60 % Residential 5 % Other Uses (YMCA) X Environmental Reviews — EAW, EIS, AUAR. If needed, please describe: An EAW is being prepared. The public hearing will be held in August, with Council declaration in September. X X . Zoning changes and variances. If needed, please list and include change to /from: The current zoning is Limited Business. The Comprehensive Plan designates it as mixed use. At the time of site plan approval it will be rezoned to a PUD. 4. Project Site and Components A. Proposed land use changes: (check appropriate box) Yes No 4 X Will buildings be rehabilitated? Briefly describe: X Will buildings be demolished? If yes, indicate the number of and type of buildings: The privately owned land has one home and a sandblasting business consisting of three pole type structures. X Will new buildings be constructed? If yes, list the percent mix of commercial, residential, public or other uses: 30 % Commercial 5% Public (already constructed) 60 % Residential 5 % Other Uses (YMCA) X Will new streets or other infrastructure be added? X Will any park land be converted? Briefly describe: X Will new pedestrian infrastructure be added? If yes, check type: X Sidewalks X— Bike paths X Trails 4 B. Mix and Type of Uses: List the number and types of commercial, retail, office, government /civic, arts /cultural, entertainment or other uses existing or planned in the project site. Type of Use Number of Existing Uses Square Footage or Acreage Number of Planned Uses Square Footage or Acreage Indicate if planned uses are new construction or rehab Single- family New Rehab Commercial /Retail & Office 1 3,000 Multi 334,115 X Restaurant Government/Civic 0 1 16,600 X 0 3 50,000 0 Other (list): Arts /Cultural 0 0 Entertainment 0 unknown Single- family 0 Open Space /Public Space 0 4 3 -acre park 7 -acre open X 91 Other (list) Clinic YMCA 1 3,000 1 40,000 X Duplexes Other (list): C. Type and Tenure of Housing: List the number of housing units by type and tenure (owner /renter) currently in the project site area and planned. Current Overall Density (units per acre — net) Total # of Units # Units Owner # Units Rental Distinguishing Features: (# of stories, architectural design) Existing Housing: Single- family 1 1 Townhouse 0 Apartments or Condominiums 0 Duplexes 0 Other (list): Planned Housing: Single- family 0 Townhouse • 272 181 91 Rear entry garages, distinct vertical building forms. bay windows, balconies, gabled roofs, reveals and recesses Apartments or Condominiums 178 178 Units in 2 to 3 stories over commercial, built to street, underground parking. Duplexes Other (list): Current Overall Density (units per acre — net) Planned overall density (units per acre — net) N/A ± 13 units .er acre 5 • • • E. Housing Affordability: List affordability levels for existing and planned housing in the following format: (Area median income - $75,300) F. Employment connections: Estimate the number of jobs within 2 miles of the project site and list major employers. Number of Jobs # of Units up to 50% of Area Median Income # of Units at 50- 80% of Area Median Income # of Units at Market Rate # of Affordable units to be demolished (if any) Existing housing 0 0 1 1,000 -3,000 Planned housing 91 0 359 N/A Less than 500 Yes No (Check appropriate box) X Are there mechanisms to ensure long -term affordability? If yes, what type? (Check any that aPply) Land trust Resale price indexing X Other (list): Low Income Housing Tax Credits (if approved) F. Employment connections: Estimate the number of jobs within 2 miles of the project site and list major employers. Number of Jobs Check appropriate number Major employers within 2 mile More than 5,000 Type 400 3,000 -5,000 X Target Superstore, Kohls, Synovis, Centennial Middle and Elementary School, State Prison, Molin Concrete 1,000 -3,000 500 -1,000 Less than 500 G. Creation of new jobs: Yes No (Check appropriate box) X Will this .ro'ect create an new obs? If es, how man and what .e? Number Type 400 Commercial /retail/office /apartment management/recreation 6 • H. Adjacent land uses and relationships: Describe any plans or opportunities to Zink adjacent land uses to the project site. Limit 8 lines • Immediate linkages will include pedestrian path along Lake Drive to connect new proposed business park, elementary and middle schools. Lake Drive will be reconstructed in 2004, at which time the trails can be completed. • County/city trail connections in the regional park open up pedestrian /bike opportunities, connecting the most populated residential areas to Woods Edge. • The other quadrants of the interchange include SuperTarget, Kohl's, new commercial /retail, a 100 -acre business park and the state correctional facility. Reconstruction of the overpass on Lake Drive will provide opportunities for safe and effective pedestrian /bike connections. I. Describe how the project links to transit, if transit is available. Limit 8 lines One express bus passes the site daily. The city is eager to work with transportation officials to provide a transit stop that will offer residents of Woods Edge direct bus access to 35W, plus a "kiss- and - ride" opportunity close to daycare, coffee shops, a bank and gas/convenience store. • J. Environmental protection and enhancement: Yes No (Check appropriate box) X Does this project include environmental protection practices and environmental enhancement measures? If yes, what kind? (Check all that apply) X Ecologically sensitive stormwater management practices - including draining, filtering and retaining storm water in innovative ways that maximize use of natural systems X Preservation or restoration of existing trees and other natural vegetation X Use of natural resources to create communities amenities, e.g. restoration of buried creeks and wetlands X Provision of green spaces for recreation and scenic value Other (describe): K. Replicability: State how you will use components of or processes developed for the project in other locations in your community, or in the comprehensive plan and zoning codes. Limit 8 lines Lino Lakes is a typical single family, large lot suburb. A success story is needed to change perception here, as well as in other suburban cities. This city has come a very long way to accepting, now championing, this type of development. More suburbs are now doing "Village Centers" which are mainly just prettied up shopping centers, but still little connectivity. Woods Edge will demonstrate that all the critical elements — residential, commercial, civic and recreational— within walking and biking distance, plus a transit stop, are vital to true sustainability. This will open the door to our city's understanding of what really makes neighborhoods work. Future development on 35E /Cty Rd. 14 calls for high and medium density housing, plus commercial, retail, office, and light industrial uses. One success story will make others so much easier, in Lino Lakes and in other cities. 7 5. Partnerships and Community Participation (Begin new page) A. Planning and Implementation Partnerships: List and briefly describe the type and nature of partnerships in the project among government, private, for - profit and non -profit sectors. Name of Partners Type of Partnership Hartford Group, Inc. Master Developers YMCA City is contributing 1/3 construction costs in exchange for resident discounts, teen center, all - city events etc. Centennial School District 10 -year lease in Civic Complex for ECFE Anoka County Collaborated in land exchange, joint parks and trails plan Metropolitan Council LCDA grants for planning and development Fairview Hospitals Clinic on site, joint programming with YMCA B. Community's role: Describe any public participation processes (including residents, businesspersons and others) in developing the proposal, including the process to date, and plans for future community involvement in project implementation. Limit 8 lines • Comprehensive Plan Task Force. Set direction for creation of a mixed use town center on the site. • Town Center Group. A citizen group led by consulting architect/planner created to establish principles for development and set standards for architectural design. • Economic Development Advisory Committee. Local business owners and residents with expertise in finance and development who have supported the project as the first priority for the city. • Calthorpe Associates held citizen /landowner discussion groups during master planning phase. • Approvals schedule has frequent updates to city council, P &Z and Environmental Board. Public hearings scheduled for PUD and EAW C. City's role: How has the city supported the project? Limit 8 lines Woods Edge is a city- initiated project. • Successful negotiation of land exchange for civic complex. City cost: $300,000 •. City purchase of 14 acres of property: $2,316,252 • City completion of Phase One infrastructure: $565,242 • Completion of the Civic Complex on the site: $6,100,000 construction cost. • YMCA/City partnership: City contribution is $1,500,000 in construction costs; 6.7 acres of land, plus costs of infrastructure. • Future creation of Tax Increment Financing District. 8 • • • 6. Regulatory And Implementation Tools and Strategies (Begin new page) A. City review /regulatory process: (check appropriate box) Yes No Were any new city review or regulatory processes or procedures used or developed for this project If yes describe them: (limit 6 lines) Review procedures: Because of the complexity of the project, a development team has been assembled. • Master Developer: Hartford Group and its team of architects and engineers • Short, Elliott, Hendrickson (SEH): all aspects of EAW, public improvements and site plan review • Springsted, Inc.: city financial analysts /tax increment financing • Additional consultants as needed. • Additional meetings are scheduled with city boards and for council review and approval. B. Zoning /regulatory changes: (check appropriate box) Yes No Were any zoning or other regulatory tools necessary for the project to be implemented as planned? State status of development or city adoption of them: (limit 6 lines) • Comprehensive Plan amendment to designate the site as high density mixed -use. • Exemption of the site from the city's growth management ordinance. • Future rezoning to PUD C. Design standards: (check appropriate box) No j X Were any design standards developed? Yes Eyes state status of adoption or inclusion in formal regulatory processes, and how the standards were or will be used: (limit 6 lines) Calthorpe Associates developed "Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide" which will be included in the developer's agreement as part of the PUD. 9 • 7. Developability (Begin new page) A. Market and feasibility studies: (check appropriate box) Yes No X Have market and feasibility studies been conducted for the project? • Market Assessment for Independent Senior Housing • Town Center Fiscal Impact Analysis • Building Condition Assessment (TIF Redevelopment Feasibility) • YMCA Market Research Study • Hartford Group is conducting its own market research studies B. Developer's role: (check appropriate box Yes No X X Is a developer(s) committed to the project? If yes - Name of Developer(s) Type of contract or commitment Hartford Group, Inc. Real Estate Purchase Agreement YMCA $5 million raised for construction 8. Readiness and Financial Aspects of the Project A. Yes No X Is the development site as represented currently within a designated development district, or an approved development (Le. PUD)? B. _ Describe the applicant's controls of the site, or sites represented in the proposal? (check appropriate box) X Under option (Developer has control of private land contingent upon final approvals) X Own (City owns a portion of the project site, has preliminary development agreement with developer Condemnation X Within a TIF District Will be .laced in a district durin: a. •royals •rocess) Other (list): • C. If the site is not under the applicant's control, what steps will need to be taken in order to do so? Limit 5 lines 10 • • • N/A D. Yes No X Are market studies or appraisals available for all components of the project (i.e. retail, office, ownership housing, rental housing)? E. Yes No X If the developer is acquiring the development site from the city, is the site being sold at fair - market value? F. Yes No X Has an architect/engineer been selected for the project? If yes what level of completion are the drawings at? (limit 4 lines) Planning stage, concept drawings G. How have costs been determined? (check appropriate box H. If commercial is proposed, provide as much specificity as possible regarding the type of tenants and projected rents. • Bidding Projected Rents Contracting estimates X Developer estimates X City estimates X Other (list): Consultant Infrastructure Estimates H. If commercial is proposed, provide as much specificity as possible regarding the type of tenants and projected rents. • Type of Tenant Projected Rents Restaurants 3 Market rate rents to be determined by owner Daycare 1 Office building Unknown n Retail 75,000 s.f. II . Service uses Unknown II Note: The master developer, Hartford Group, will be selling approved sites to various users and owners. I. Yes No X Does the applicant intend to apply for LCDA funds for this project in future years for additional phases or components? J. Provide project sources /uses budgets on the following page. 11 SOURCES AND USES Sources r $ Amount Status Approval Anticipated by: For Sale Townhomes $2,896,000 Planning Stage December 2003 Commercial Retail Pads 3,250,000 " " Apartments over Retail 936,000 " n Daycare 250,000 4,522,422 " Affordable Townhomes 1,092,000 96,000 " Senior Apartments over Retail 1,200,000 250,000 " LCDA 2000 450,000 Approved LCDA 2003 1,297,250 Requested Other public sources 3,481,509 Planning TOTAL: $14,852,759 Uses $ Amount $ Portion from LCDA Source $ Other Public Sources $ Other Private Sources Hard Costs: Land Acquisition $6,217,754 ($450,000 from 2000 grant) $1,700,000 • Infrastructure Costs 5,708,672 1,186,250 4,522,422 Decorative Street Lights 96,000 96,000 Traffic Signal 250,000 1 Total Hard Costs: $12,272,426 Soft Costs: Third Party Reports/Tests 135,000 Municipal /Development costs 450,960 Financing 1, 181,373 Commissions /Closing costs 798,000 Park design /water feature 15,000 15,000 Total Soft Costs: $2,580,333 OVERALL TOTAL $14,852,759 $1,297,250 $6,222,422 (2003 grant request) 12 AGENDA ITEM 7Bi • STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution No. 03 -97, Adopting Proposed Assessment Roll, Elm Street Reconstruction Project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: On June 23, 2003, the City Council set the Public Hearing for the proposed assessments for the Elm Street Reconstruction project. The necessary notices have been mailed to property owners indicating the amount of the assessment and the date of the hearing. Summaries of the project costs and assessments are attached. Project costs are as projected in the feasibility report at a total cost of $2,490,000.00. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution 03 -97, Adopting Proposed Assessment Roll for the Elm Street Reconstruction Project. 2. Not Adopt Resolution No. 03 -97. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 03 -97 be adopted. • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -97 ADOPTING PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the Elm Street Reconstruction Project, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part thereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2004, and shall bear interest at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 26, 2003. The owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of July, 2003. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor AGENDA ITEM 7Bii • STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -98, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract, Elm Street Reconstruction VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on June 3, 2003. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid F.M. Frattalone $1,513,221.79 Arcon Construction $1,515,506.97 Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. $1,576,445.70 Northdale Construction $1,738,903.49 Friedges Contracting $1,770,639.24 S.R. Weidema, Inc. $1,806,800.30 Engineer's Estimate $1,475,461.00 The low bid is approximately 3% over the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. This 3% overage falls within the 10% contingency budgeted for the project. The substantial completion date for this project is November 15, 2003, with a final completion date of June 6, 2004. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 03 -98, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract to F.M. Frattalone for the Elm Street Reconstruction project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 03 -98. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 03 -98. • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -98 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the EIm Street Reconstruction project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid F.M. Frattalone $1,513,221.79 Arcon Construction $1,515,506.97 Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. $1,576,445.70 Northdale Construction $1,738,903.49 Friedges Contracting $1,770,639.24 S.R. Weidema, Inc. $1,806,800.30 Engineer's Estimate $1,475,461.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that F.M. Frattalone is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with F.M. Frattalone, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the EIm Street Reconstruction project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14 ' day of July 2003. Ann J. Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS June 4, 2003 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Re: Elm Street Reconstruction City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Commission No. 12390 -03 ✓(/N OF [ /NO LAOS 1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 fax www.tkda.com Dear Mayor and City Council: Bids for the referenced project were received on June 3, 2003, with the following results. A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information. Contractor F.M. Frattalone Arcon Construction Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. Northdale Construction Friedges Contracting S.R. Weidema, Inc. Base Bid $1,513,221.79 $1,515,506.97 $1,576,445.70 $1,738,903.49 $1,770,639.24 $1,806,800.30 Engineer's Estimate $1,475,461.00 Recommendation We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest bidder, F.M. Frattalone, Inc., for their base bid of $1,513,221.79. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, i% Scott A. Brink, P.E. Project Manager zae SAB:art Enclosure An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity GIJMMIJJION VIU. IZ6tlu -U. ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE F.M. FRATTALONE ARCON CONSTRUCTION ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 0 0 O 00 00 0) to M I, r 49 64 $ 10,425.00 $ 7,660.80 $ 420.00 $ 462.00 $ 1,017.60 0 NCO 64 20,816.00 1,200.00 1,140.00 750.00 2,850.00 1,250.00 6 3,145.00 6 500.00 720.00 450.00 i 112,710.00 i 47,601.00 69,419.16 i 3,533.40 31.51 i 9,000.00 i 121,680.00 i 61,762.50 24,557.50 59,940.00 00 o h N E9 $ 1,188.00 $ 3,954.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 4,608.00 $ 66,302.58 0 IN N EA $ 26,410.56 ] 00 N 69 $ 2,100.00 $ 3,020.13 o ''I'01 NN 6 CO E9 o -c N 69 $ 38,630.46 -- _• v.. ..w EA E9 E9 E9 E9 EH 69 E9 :- -- E9 yr 09 E9 E9 $ 7,500.00 $ 100.00 $ 75.00 - 000000 14J c0 rM0)0 - - EA 69 69 1lY E9 O O -0 M EA E9 60.00 5.00 3.00 25.00 85.00 25.00 180.00 90.00 5.78 4.92 9.18 7.80 0.01 i 450.00 10.14 $ 30.50 $ 44.65 O CO N ui O to Co 64 $ 1.35 $ 659.00 $ 930.00 $ 9.00 $ 24.26 $ 25.93 $ 29.28 OOi�n p Onvv E9 1... E9 E9 64 $ 56.33 I cD 64 _. sr, 177 w era E9 - - Hi E9 E9 w yr .■ U $ 89,700.00 $ 13,900.00 $ 4,865.00 $ 6,384.00 $ 700.00 $ 924.00 $ 1,060.00 O f04 E9 $ 32,264.80 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 3,145.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 375.00 $ 178,425.00 $ 50,793.75 $ 80,535.30 $ 4,530.00 $ 7,089.75 $ 2,780.00 $ 81,600.00 $ 64,091.25 $ 21,477.50 $ 64,091.25 $ 15,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 3,750.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 3,072.00 $ 59,442.75 $ 19,712.50 $ 23,677.50 $ 4,000.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 4,229.70 $ 38,006.00 $ 26,359.00 1 a°o 0) co M 69 I $ 89,700.00 $ 100.00 $ 35.00 C0 N EA E9 C7 0 r E904_. ] $ 0.50 6 1.55 300.00 6 100.00 7.00 2.00 6 25.00 i 85.00 i 25.00 i 600.00 $ 75.00 O 0 .1 $ 5.25 $ 10.65 $ 10.00 $ 2.25 $ 139.00 $ 6.80 $ 31.65 $ 39.05 $ 31.65 $ 10.00 $ 2.50 $ 625.00 $ 825.00 $ 6.00 $ 21.75 $ 23.75 $ 26.25 $ 4,000.00 $ 220.00 $ 61.30 $ 61.30 $ 61.30 $ 61.30 _. or E9 E9 err yr 1000 C 000 O 0 c00 E9 O O u)11) CO Co N N 64 E9 $ 11,172.00 $ 1,120.00 O O O O 00 1. c0 1- O r E9 E9 ] $ 3,088.00 $ 37,468.80 $ 1,600.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 750.00 $ 2,850.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 136,500.00 0 00.9 (0 Na' N 1- E9 $ 90,744.00 $ 4,983.00 $ 5,356.70 $ 4,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 72,900.00 $ 19,800.00 $ 70,875.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 3,072.00 $ 71,058.00 $ 24,900.00 $ 30,668.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,380.00 $ 13,640.00 $ 10,320.00 $ 16,276.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 14.00 $ 4.00 $ 5.00 10.00 O al E 9 1.80 6 400.00 6 200.00 5.00 3.00 8.00 i 50.00 S 30.00 I 300.00 0 0 ON N E9 E964 0 $ 12.00 $ 11.00 $ 1.70 $ 200.00 $ 10.00 $ 36.00 $ 36.00 $ 35.00 $ 10.00 $ 2.50 $ 700.00 $ 800.00 $ 6.00 $ 26.00 $ 30.00 $ 34.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 60.00 $ 20.00 $ 22.00 $ 24.00 $ 26.00 _, E9 ER- - .�.1� cc JILL!)CDW W JJ ¢¢er W W W 000 U -I=HI-. -'F!Z- a W W JJJ JW W JJJ� '-M N00 r r n N 00 r r 1 1544 LE 09 056 091. 61 1' 9190? 0.147 o0 t0 0) r cn c^O 0) 7562 453 3151 20 12000 2025 550 2025 0051 880 6 2 512 2733 830 902 1 30 69 620 430 cD CD 1ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION MOBILIZATION ICLEARING GRUBBING 1REMOVE PIPE (CULVERT OR STORM SEWER) REMOVE CURB & GUTTER 1REMOVE FENCE REMOVE WATERMAIN REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN REMOVE CONCRETE APRON SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) SALVAGE FENCE SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT SALVAGE SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY) SALVAGE HYDRANT SALVAGE GATE VALVE & BOX COMMON EXCAVATION (P) POND EXCAVATION SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P) TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CRUSHED ROCK 6' DEPTH (TRENCH STABILIZING) EXPLORATORY DIGGING AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TYPE LV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (B) TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE FOR TRAIL (B) TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON - WEARING COURSE (B) TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE 2' THICK FOR DRIVEWAYS (B) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 15' RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 21' RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 4° PERF PE PIPE DRAIN (W/ SOCK) 15' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006 18' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006 21' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III DESIGN 3006 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SANITARY SEWER) 8 "X4" PVC WYE (SCHEDULE 40) 8' PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (10' -12' DEPTH) 8° PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (12' -14' DEPTH) 8" PVC. SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (14' -16' DEPTH) 8' PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (16' -18' DEPTH) 2021.501 2101.502 2101.507 2104.501 c01) 0) N ] 2104.501 10 4) O N 2104.503 2104.505 0 O N 0 O N 2104.511 2104.513 2104.521 2104.523 1 2104.523 2104.523 2104.523 2105.501 1 101) O N 2105.522 2105.525 2105.603 2123.610 2211.501 2350.501 2350.501 2350.502 2350.503 2357.502 2501.515 2501.515 2502.541 2503.541 1 1t0 in N 2503.541 2503.602 2503.602 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 1 N co et in C O N. CO 00 r N M V LO CO f, M CI) O N NN NMd'tn NN NN corN NN 0 ) N O MMM N CO MM e4 ct) 01 cOh MM cDO)O M CE) 'V' V N COMMISSION NO. 12390 -03 ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE F.M. FRATTALONE ARCON CONSTRUCTION ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 01 et CO N O000000 V' OR CO c O CD 0 0 0 V'Mhr. O(D O O M V M M C 4) It) N O r r (O (D r N0101t` W OhMOp V' MrN V' V! E9 fa EA fA fA E9 EA O O 0000(ri O eY C) 47 of E9 fA O O CV O r 4) I� M V'rrr EA 64 S M G9 0000000 O 0000 N r E9 O 0 Cn EA O N 4) rte fA O CO 64 O C 00 M hNrr� fA O 4) et C) EA O M V' (0 ER COCOON Cl r O n 000000N N CO 43 W O N W 01 T.- E9 fa (A 00 M O C) CO ED et 7(7 fa ER V N O tO E9 0 O ca O r EA 0 0 O O O O O M co_ M C) et EA E9 O C O N in N. IT Ea O O O N ( N U) 0 O O (D (0 64 O O O CO (O h EA 000 O 0041 0 'R N+- E9 O (0 R 69 O O r N N f i O O 0) n 0) EA Oreti■ 00000000000000003CO W'- (O M CO CO 00000000000000 CO 011-1-CO120 rC CO M (0 f. 03 .1.• V' rr E9 E9 f9 fR EA u) E9 4R 0004) Oet C) LID ai N EA EA ct ( N V' ER EA (0 h r EA • (O 4) EA • 4) V' EA 04104)().1-07 CO P fA CO C D fA CO o EA O) fA 4) EA V'NO(A r 4) C. 0 C4 T.. r E9 E9 EA CO Nr (C N fR EA 01 EA $ 79.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,555.00 O O 0 O_ N EA O O 0 CV EA $ 1,660.00I o d 4) CV EA $ 300.00 I oo m4J NO E9 CV EA o 0 fA 6 1,961.60 6 14,668.00 6 7,172.10 29,424.00 6 12,995.60 6 14,405.50 6 20,229.00 6 2,678.35 000000.0 0 0 0 0 C°_, W. M EA d) Lc) 0000 0 4) r N r4)N EA O 4) O 4) 0 O N i 1,580.00 5,220.00 8,000.00 5,115.00 0 W 4) (O m 1,911.00 32,786.00 15,980.00 0 0 0 N. co 0) EA E9 N CO V• fA O 0 CO N r EA O Q. O 0 0 N V' h ' ' (O (� M fA fA 0 pp (0 0) Ti r EA 0 0 CO. EA 0 r EA 0 O 0) 4) ER 0 0 (Op r EA $ 1,500.00I 0 0 NE et e- EA 0 0) CO C) fA ov ow 69 EA EA E9 eft w f a ea EA as If, EA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 074)(70101 01 01 0000 (OOtO CO CO (O (0000 E9 EA E9 EA V) E9 EA EA 0 0 01 Or 01 E9 E9... 6 85.00 525.00 2,500.00 6 250.00 O 8 o fA 6 790.00 870.00 4,000.00 165.00 6 118.00 O O O OO V' NNO i 50.00 18.00 0 N EA $ 90.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 1,240.00 $ 1,870.00 0 M N EA O r EA S O pz r E9 $ 200.00 $ 750.00 I $ 1,310.00 $ 90.00 Tx o: Ir7 or or w oa tn. fA E9 EA =- -- 896.00 $ 15,440.00 $ 3,393.00 $ 14,880.00 $ 6,996.00 $ 8,225.00 $ 12,210.00 $ 1,575.50 6,000.00 800.00 O 0 0 00pp (ODOR N O TT EA EA O 0 r �.. EA 6 1,000.00 - S 0 N(D r 0 o0op (0 4,000.00 - - 0 0 CO. 0 i 2,002.00 i 30,264.00 i 15,300.00 3,040.00 i 4,125.00 4,788.00 0 O OM) f9 $ 37,400.00 $ 8,400.00 0 0 O (O Ea 0 p0p 00 N 69 0 0 T r fA $ 6,000.001 $ 2,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 19,250.00 0 0 Or -0 fg -. EA E9 -' EA as m EA m $ 28.00 $ 10.00 $ 29.00 $ 31.00 $ 33.00 $ 35.00 $ 37.00 $ 0.50 0000 0 pOp O S CO EA) fR 0 0 N. O r EA EA I $ 1,800.00 S 0 40) fa $ 500.00 000 000 c00 EA 0 O r fA 0 S N fA $ 110.00 S O CO E9 $ 22.00 $ 24.00 $ 9.00 0 0 et N EA fR 0 EA S 0 f� E9 $ 1,100.00 $ 1,400.00 S O 00 N EA S O 000 N E9 S 0 Ef) S 0 0 N A S 0 00) E9 $ 700.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 100.00 JJ J J J J J J J WW WQ WWWWQQ nJJJJ�23 J W W W W W W J 32 1544 117 480 212 235 330 3151 r .- 1 13 10 r N V' N CO N 01010) O CO 0 r CO 4) I- CO 1596 I 7 r et (D M 01 r r 01 CO N r r 0 r 18" PVC. SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (18' -20' DEPTH) 4" SANITARY SERVICE PIPE (SCHEDULE 40) 8° PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (18' -20' DEPTH) 8' PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (20' -22' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (22' -24' DEPTH) 8' PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (24' -26' DEPTH) 8° PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (26' -28' DEPTH) TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS WATER METERING MR LOWER WATERMAIN 1ADJUST VALVE BOX CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN Z ¢J 0 m as w > >¢°d W ¢ J x 0 > > � 18" GATE VALVE & BOX 16" GATE VALVE & BOX 1' CURB STOP & BOX 1' CORPORATION STOP 6" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 8' WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE 16' WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL52 INSULATION (4° THICKNESS) I (n LL Z o CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -TYPE 402 EXTRA DEPTH (> 5' DEPTH) CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -TYPE 402 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 60' DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 72' DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE -TYPE 409 CONSTRUCT 60' DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE -TYPE 409 ADJUST EXISTING FRAME AND RING CASTING RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE (4' DIA. - TYPE 301) CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH (> 8' DEPTH) 01 0 CO MMM 0 4) N MM 0 CO 0 4) N 0 CD 0 (0 N M 0 CO M 0 4) N M 0 CO C7 0 4) N CO 0 CO M 0 10 N 0101 0 O (h 0 4) N 000 (O Met 0 4) N CO 0 4) N CO et 0 IA N N 0 CO 4 0 47 N N 0 CD V 0 ID N N 0 O K 0 (0 N N 0 (D V 0 43 N N 00 CO 4 0 10 N NN CO 4 0 01 N 0 CO et 0 0 N NN 0 CO of 0 (A N 000 CO V' 0 4) N NM (O 4 0 4) N 0101 0 COO V' V' 0 0 4) (0 N N 0 (D V' 0 4) N M 0 (D V' 0 4) N 4) 0 CD V' 0 N N co 0 (0 V' 0 (C N 0 4) (0 0 (0 N N 0 (0 (0 O (0 N 2506.502 2506.502 2506.502 2506.502 2506.502 01 04 CO CD N MIN 000 M 0 0 CD N N 2506.603 CO 'V '.V VO' VV'' CO Oet 100 (A ((0 Cg 01 LO (4A 41 IOC I(0 (MC (0 COD (r0 (NO CO ((0 ((00 CO O ((00 ((00 COO ^O n n h n ti n CO n UUMMISSIUN NO. iZ U -U:i ENGINEERS • ABG ITFCIS - PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE F.M. FRATTALONE ARGON CONSTRUCTION ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT p op oo CO N V' inrnmhrmh r CO di 69 pp to O er d9 op O M CD di 0000 U) 'V' QO 69 41 N d9 O7 N r di CO r7_OCOCDh0107v_r N d9 0000n000�rn oOhN to r 49 0 0 r 69 0 CD d9 to r d9 007CON O 69 O di CD CV 69 °vornpop0000colCDCDoo 7 r E9 N r d9 C7 N 69. C O LO. r d9 OOO O COtnhCO d9 O CO d9 In 0 d} N0O h r di N CD 69 0 .-° h 04 69 07 Co CD 69 o, h O ° CO 69 a t0 to tD r 6A 0000 ocmoo Oih CO C) 40 di di 0 C7) 69 1 $ 85.00 00 00 too N 0 r 49 49 1 $ 19.50 0 0 o on 00 N O 0 d9 d9 In N di 0007 03 N 419 007,mroe000oh 4707 CD C!) 69 619 r di N0 o 69 00 69 h 00000 O 000 r O ut. CI O N r CI di di di d9 40 di $ 125.00 1 0tC) cc! rr d9 69 0 o di $ 880.00 $ 75,888.00 $ 4,960.00 co 0 to CA d9 00'SPt'£ - $ 1 $ 625.00 $ 875.00 $ 2,184.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 37,800.00 � O CO CO 49 6 1,652.00 700.00 300.00 v CD O N d9 cc 'Cr 7 r di CV N 7_ r 63 6 2,131.92 625.00 345.00 6 6,200.00 i 19,750.00 i 14,418.60 i 3,920.00 i 27,000.00 i 6,993.00 h CD co. M di N N Ch r di .,, .,r or 49 w di E9 WS' d9 arr d9 $ 40.00 $ 7.20 $ 32.00 $ 35.60 6 85.00 6 125.00 6 25.00 '00,00 CD a) r O CI 21.75 i 28.00 i 35.00 i 50.00 $ 14.44 $ 0.32 CCOO otoo 00r000 N r 0 COON COOrr CD N N CO 4969 d9696i 49 C9 d) di di $ 790.00 .., .., d, 69. 69 lir or 69 dim 1,540.00 6 84,320.00 6 5,270.00 6 11,676.00 6 1,850.00 6 500.00 6 1,225.00 6 5,600.00 500.00 6 20,000.00 6 7,825.00 6 1,475.00 800.00 420.00 0 0 00 7 CO 010 OC+7 7r 1,422.00 i 3,240.00 775.00 480.00 i 1,000.00 i 19,750.00 i 13,732.00 i 1,960.00 I 37,500.00 i 19,980.00 0 0 0 O O. 7 69 0 O_ tD 7 U) 7 dT _, _, .,, .,, .,, or di err 69 69 w d9 or yr di 69 ar art rrt di $ 70.00 $ 8.00 $ 34.00 $ 42.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 35.00 6 50.00 10.00 6 20,000.00 6 25.00 6 25.00 6 40.00 70.00 i 28.00 0.30 0000000'410 I ^O C.-CD 41 NCh r O N r d9 d9 d9 69 69 di d9 d} 69 69 0 pO O r d9 _, _, wa .. di d3 Cr, di Q UJU)OW WJJJ-I V)C)W W LL LL JcoQJWCJ)cn Q LU 22 10540 155 278 37 c1 m T O r r 313 59 20 6 143 4520 9480 216 1 30 1 79 6866 49 15000 6660 4.3 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 6' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 8' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT INSTALL MAIL BOX SUPPORT MAIL BOX SUPPORT SALVAGE & REINSTALL STEEL PLATE BEAM GUARDRAIL WOODEN FENCE INSTALL SALVAGED FENCE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN PANELS TYPE C (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) SIGN PANELS TYPE D (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) INSTALL SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY) DELINEATOR TYPE (X4 -2) PVMT MARK. 24" STOP LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORMED PVMT MARK. 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT PVMT MARK. 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT ZEBRA CROSSWALK- WHITE POLY PREFORMED PEDESTAL FOUNDATION 1.25" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT RELOCATE CROSSWALK WARNING FLASHER SYSTEM TRANSPLANT TREE (3' CAL DECIDUOUS) SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED INLET PROTECTION SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SEEDING (INCL. SEED MIX 50B OR 60B, FERTILIZER, MULCH & DISC ANCHORING) TOTAL BID AMOUNT 2511.501 2531.501 2531.507 2531.507 2540.602 2540.602 2554.603 2557.603 2557.603 2563.601 2564.531 2564.531 2564.536 2564.550 2564.603 2564.603 2564.603 2564.618 2565.602 2565.603 2565.616 2571.541 2573.502 2573.602 2575.505 2575.604 O 0 CD tri h N N N M 7 COOO O CD to CO h CD CD O N M <f in CD h CO Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO on O co O rn O to co O W co co O) O) O r 0 r hNN 0) C CO (A .td'0 N h D ER OOCON'r,crom000atoco CO N N N N CO tR 63 O r •0 ‘3.. °CI C4 N"': 000n N Cm Or Orr NN CO N h '1'N. N CO N. CO CD O O CO r Co CO CO r h CO CO N rCO COr� C)' CA ER 69 69 EA EA 49 ER 69 ER ER $ 439.80 $ 7,545.76 $ 758.85 $ 172,185.00 $ 95,589.00 $ 82,652.66 $ 4,235.55 $ 22,340.59 $ 10,074.60 $ 150,120.00 $ 65,853.00 $ 19,332.50 O n O h h et ER $ 10,875.00I $ 2,481.60 $ 4,118.10 $ 1,621.66 $ 8,227.84 $ 82,290.63 $ 26,667.90 $ 1,588.381 $ 75,397.78 1 $ 264.19 CA 0 r c D r N r E9 ER 0 h h <1' 0 r V (D CC') N C CD r " Cn N c l 7 r Lc) N in m CCi O N N (V CC; O Ch hN r . N N CO EA 44. 69 E9 63 EA fR 69 di 69 ER CO rY h CO CO Cn et!� C O C C[). -CO aia N m to r r EA 69 ER EA fA CO Cn O) c, OC7Oh a) h ca r 0 O 69 ER 69 EA 12.51 32.52 i 35.15 N Co C n N h C) ER ER $ 2.82 $ 686.35 $ 810.83 $ 16.07 $ 30.11 $ 32.13 $ 34.90 $ 9,225.19 o M fR $ 23.02 1 N CO Cn r Cp NN CO Eli ER EA err err tn. COMMISSION NO. 12390 -03 BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT BARBAROSSA & SONS NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ 91,345.00 0 - CO 64 $ 20,850.00 1{j $ 7,980.00 $ 450.80 1,540.00 1,060.00 1,544.00 41,632.00 2,000.00 1,900.00 900.00 3,800.00 1,344.00 3,381.06 537.60 2,000.00 2,500.00 121,095.00 51,180.75 74,636.94 3,800.67 9,453.00 9,500.00 130,800.00 72,596.25 25,393.50 n 00. CD 0 m CO n +0' FR ER o Ov.N -0 CCO - - OCOD CD w. r� Cl o .-CO .-Er di ER ER 64 - - $ 32,490.04 $ 2,375.00 $ 5,458.50 $ 3,734.97 $ 36,363.00 $ 27,945.70 $ 46,630.74 _. _, or or sr" IR err err ER ER ER EA d! err err $ 91,345.00 1 $ 250.00 $ 150.00 $ 10.00 $ 1.61 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 1.00 $ 2.00 $ 500.00 $ 100.00 $ 6.00 $ 4.00 $ 26.88 $ 91.38 $ 26.88 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 6.21 $ 5.29 $ 9.87 $ 8.39 $ 3.00 $ 475.00 $ 10.90 $ 35.85 $ 46.17 $ 36.87 $ 10.54 $ 1.83 $ _ 560.02 $ 682.50 $ 7.97 $ 31.76 $ 36.02 $ 2,375.00 $ 181.95 $ 54.13 $ 58.65 $ 64.99 $ 74.49 ■■ $ 67,000.00 1 $ 7,645.00 0 0 00 Lo co O O CO h ER EA $ 560.00 $ 1,540.00 $ 1,060.00 $ 926.40 $ 27,060.80 $ 1,200.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 750.00 $ 2,850.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,110.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 250.00 $ 118,950.00 $ 50,310.00 $ 75,620.00 $ 3,624.00 $ 7,877.50 $ 3,000.00 $ 132,000.00 $ 64,800.00 $ 25,850.00 $ 62,775.00 $ 15,000.00 0 0 0 0 0 00000 Nat 0 T CO CO CO O r N e- Eli W 69 ER ER 69 E9 $ 27,390.00 1 $ 34,276.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 5,313.00 $ 47,740.00 $ 33,110.00 $ 48,202.00 I 180 OO O Cho 69 0 If) ER 0 0 CO EA $ 10.00 2.00 10.00 10.00 0.60 1.30 300.00 300.00 5.00 3.00 25.00 30.00 20.00 ; 300.00 50.00 6.10 5.20 10.00 8.00 2.50 150.00 00'01 $ 00'1£ $ 00'LP $ OOZ£ $ 00'11 $ $ 1.50 $ 440.00 $ 550.00 $ 10.00 $ 30.00 $ 33.00 1 $ 38.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 100.00 $ 77.00 $ 77.00 $ 77.00 $ 77.00 _. . . r or 69 err err or err ER to ER ER 69. err er J1. --�JJ JCp W JJJ W W W W OOOO SF -��1- CO 0W W JJ J JW W JJJJ '- C) C) N. r 280 154 106 1544 20816 4 19 150 950 50 37 20 4 5 19500 9675 7562 453 3151 20 12000 2025 550 2025 1500 880 6 2 512 2733 830 902 1 30 69 620 430 626 1ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION p 1•- NZZ maw OW) 200 Ur GRUBBING REMOVE PIPE (CULVERT OR STORM SEWER) REMOVE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE FENCE REMOVE WATERMAIN REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN REMOVE CONCRETE APRON SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) SALVAGE FENCE SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT 'SALVAGE SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY) SALVAGE HYDRANT SALVAGE GATE VALVE & BOX COMMON EXCAVATION (P) POND EXCAVATION U 0 OTC 0 m ¢ a Cr W -) TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CRUSHED ROCK 6" DEPTH (TRENCH STABILIZING) EXPLORATORY DIGGING AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TYPE LV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (5) TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE FOR TRAIL (B) TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON- WEARING COURSE (B) TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE 2" THICK FOR DRIVEWAYS (B) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 15" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 21" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN (W/ SOCK) 15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006 18" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006 { 21" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III DESIGN 3006 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SANITARY SEWER) 8 "X4" PVC WYE (SCHEDULE 40) 8° PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (10' -12' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (12' -14' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (14' -16' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (16-18' DEPTH) 0 in NO N Nh 0 Cn 0 N 0 In 0 N 0 C0 V' 0 N 0 0 V' 0 N 0 (0 d' 0 N 0 Ca sY 0 N Cr) 0 III '7 0 N (4)OOrM 0 In V 0 N 0 O V 0 N 0 O V 0 N Cn et 0 N c0 a{ 0 N N LC) at 0 N Cc) N LO V 0 N C+) N In d' 0 N C+) N U) 4 0 N C+) N II) 4 0 N 0 CO cfl 0 N 0 In Clf 0 N Ntn N In c4i 0 N N in Cn 0 N M0 0 CO cn 0 N CO Ch N N 2211.501 2350.501 2350.501 2350.502 2350.503 2357.502 2501.515 2501.515 V 0 N 0 N "7 413 c•) 0 N 2503.541 1 4 CO nO 0 N NN 0 0 CO CD vi C'6 0 0 N N CO 0 CO CO 0 N CO 0 CO Ci 0 N 2503.603 2503.603 r N C) at Lo CD h to O 0 r ..- r N r cc) r d- r 0 r CD r h r CO r- CO r O 01 01 N 01 (9 01 V N Cn N CD h N N CO N O N O CO CO N CO c9 CO cr CO in CO cD CO h co C) CO O) CO O <C t N $ 23,544.00 I $ 11,954.68 ON N 00 (A r EA (') N <r M EA I $ 1,638.52 I CO (1) ^ co EA I $ 4,586.58 W r N co (h E9 0 N r r (O" E9 1 $ 1,798.24 I $ 421.48 0 N 1A M N EA 1 $ 1,105.58 I N 1: O) 1A M <1 EA 0 M <} <t to" EA CO 1n n d' in N 69 to Nf: to O r 4/9 1!100 N co. r EA 00(*)0)CD O N N N EA v 10 N EA N to to r (0 E9 O (D M V (0 EA CO M (-. 1n E9 "' to N r EA d' r ( CO co" E9 <t N O CO r 0) E9 N O CO O t0 r 69 I- O 0) O CD N E9 vT to COD CO. r 69 0 r (OD to t0 E9 0 CDO)N 0 h C9 EA 0 0) 0 M 0 N CO r 69 E9 r r O t0 EA 0 vtoo EA EA I $ 67.34 $ 104.64 $ 0.52 a)) (000 O EA N d. EA $ 301.63 $ 811.21 1 $ 1,798.24 1 $ 210.74 $ 588.15 $ 552.79 $ 726.62 $ 3,222.15 $ 82.18 $ 33.75 $ 20.25 $ 20.00 $ 12.62 $ 41.57 $ 20.83 $ 3.58 C E9 $ 1,436.21 $ 1,531.54 $ 2,008.14 0 (OOD N 69 $ 1,568.54I $ 2,188.70 $ 464.45 $ 464.45 $ 1,659.39 ro V9 TABULATION OF BIDS ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF LINO LAKES COMMISSION NO. 12390 -03 BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT BARBAROSSA & SONS NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 $ 36,158.40 t0 0) CA (0f .O- V9 $ 21,422.60 $ 40,533.90 $ 4,222.34 $ 15,209.37 $ 3,248.30 $ 1,950.00 $ 14,537.50 $ 1,659.99 t0 T. 0) (0 E9 0 0 0 0 O1 N M to CD r N r 69 EA $ 4,491.18 $ 6,577.00 $ 6,531.70 $ 2,853.24 $ 3,172.26 I $ 47,627.97 $ 33,660.00 $ 4,430.04 $ 4,110.15 $ 6,415.92 $ 1,529.78 $ 47,833.92 I N n 0 M E9 N 0) co r EA $ 2,939.42I m VO r E9 $ 6,401.22 I $ 1,400.16 $ 1,532.50 $ 17,888.971 0 V, N r CA 1 $ 75.33 cc) to N. EA $ 91.16 6 122.83 $ 1.34 $ 15,209.37 6 3,248.30 6 150.00 6 1,453.75 6 1,659.99 000 CN VT 6 659.75 6 576.00 6 748.53 i 3,288.50 i 210.70 92.04 34.86 i 37.77 19.80 I 58.29 24.91 4.02 $ 109.27 $ 1,406.88I $ 1,484.62 $ 2,133.74 $ 2,939.42 $ 1,484.62 $ 2,133.74 $ 175.02 $ 766.25 $ 1,626.27 I 0 V. r 49 E _ _, .., EA sr" Err w w E9 E9 613. 69 EA E9 S O O O OV EA j$ 18,020.00 $ 19,975.00 $ 28,050.00 $ 3,151.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 1,690.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 1,800.00 O 0000 0 M 69 O O 0 0 N O Ch ,- 69. E9 $ 4,200.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 2,480.00 $ 775.00 $ 2,002.00 $ 31,525.00 $ 34,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 2,475.00 $ 3,192.00 $ 1,260.00 100'008'Oti $ $ 9,000.00 S 0 O N T EA S 00 (0 N wi $ 1,300.00 0 0 R to E9 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 16,500.00 0 0 0 O 69 O N 69 0 W EA $ 85.00 $ 85.00 $ 1.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 130.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,800.00 0 0 E9 $ 800.00 $ 500.00 $ 700.00 $ 3,200.00 $ 80.00 $ 25.00 $ 22.00 $ 25.00 $ 20.00 $ 50.00 $ 15.00 $ 2.00 0 O 0) E9 0 0 0 N r 69 0 O 0 O r EA $ 1,900.00 0 O M N EA O O (0 E9 0 0 m r E9 $ 250.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,500.00 0 0 0 E9. J - LLLLLLLL(AWWWWWWWW J J J J J J W WJJJJ(0m J W W W W W W WWW J 480 NN 1 01 EL 1918 055 SEZ 9691 991 9L OOLI 1921 16 15 15 9 *--. (0 CD [O r r M MN^ Or 18' PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (20' -22' DEPTH) 8' PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (22' -24' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (24' -26' DEPTH) 8' PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (26' -28' DEPTH) TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS WATER METERING MH LOWER WATERMAIN ADJUST VALVE BOX CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN HYDRANT INSTALL GATE VALVE & BOX INSTALL HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 8' GATE VALVE & BOX 16" GATE VALVE & BOX 1" CURB STOP & BOX 1" CORPORATION STOP 6' WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 8° WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 1 " TYPE K COPPER PIPE 16" WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL52 INSULATION (4' THICKNESS) DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -TYPE 402 EXTRA DEPTH (> 5' DEPTH) CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -TYPE 402 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 60" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 72° DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 48' DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE -TYPE 409 CONSTRUCT 60' DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE -TYPE 409 ADJUST EXISTING FRAME AND RING CASTING RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE (4' DIA. - TYPE 301) CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH (> 8' DEPTH) 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2504.601 2504.601 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.603 2504.603 2504.603 2504.603 2504.605 2504.608 O 0 O to N 2506.502 1 2506.502 2506.502 2506.502 2506.502 2506.502 2506.522 2506.602 2506.602 2506.603 tD <c h v 00 0) 0 N (0 (0 v v 1A 1n O 0 to (A t0 to t- 00 to (A at O. N M V to CD h 03 to co to to CD CD CD CD CD CD 0) CD 0 n h N n M n a n 0 n CD (0 t- N N. 0) n ldVrvuvuoQww IvW. ILJUV-.7 ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT BARBAROSSA & SONS NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION FRIEDGES CONTRACTING ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT CO CO r 49 1 $ 91,381.80 1 $ 6,155.05 1 0o ChN o Tr 49 "i 69 $ 294.20 $ 843.15 1 $ 2,403.521 COC) C7 U r 64 1 $ 25,273.93 I o 6 n CD 49 1 $ 1,545.80 I N CO 00) 69 $ 288.30 1 o t0 co or fR $ 5,695.201 NrN-4-N. CO c' CO ON 69 6 V' v 49 4 CD N 49 to 030 69 00))'-- co ) CO.. 49 N 0) M OpmN�N 69 U),-Oo O N. tD 69 cr) CO CO 69 o 0 V 64 0) h CO_ fA 00)) tp CO 0) () 49 N CO m CO 69 Tr CO CO 49 CDN CD 00 49 N. 0) my 69 LO C!) Eft 43.05 58.84 24.09 6 21.46 r.• C) 69 6 25,273.93 21.46 26.20 48.31 0+-N0 6'6 co "-.- 11.32 1 T.0) •NCO 64 � 49 "LP CO COO co_ r ffs fts $ 2.72( $ 58.84 C•)C7 69 r 69 $ 922.55 _. _. _. _. ... 69 ., w 69 69 49 69 m 0 0 N- •- fA $ 82,739.00 $ 5,713.30 $ 11,322.94 3,381.06 00), n co 69 6 3,762.50 6 2,347.52 G 1,559.00 LOn m O N M 0) o co O 1.: to cm MN. N. h r 322.50 CO 000 0) (0 c71M N r- 1,516.80 2,291.76 1 00'999 00'09L 7,471.25 1 $ 4,246.25 1 $ 12,564.78 $ 5,267.50 o or O N 69 m IA P. 49 n COD CO 49 $ 1,738,903.49I _. _. _. _. _. _. ... 69 69 69 en 4A 64 m CO. Cts CO vs I $ 80.00 $ 7.85 $ 36.86 $ 40.73 CO C7 CA 49 I $ 134.38 0 CO CO 0 CO 0 01 to a3 e-Cn C7r-CD n 0 N Cr) 0 t'. O N CO O N CO CO 03 69 49 69 49 69 64 f9 1$ 53.75 1 N V CO CL)0). C0 0 O r 69 69 69 C0 0 r 64 $ 750.00 I $ 18.50 $ 7,471.25 $ 53.75 CO (0 r 64 $ 107.50 1 47 0)r r 69 0) r to Cn N 0) N 69 $ 1,320.00 $ 80,104.00 $ 5,115.00 $ 10,286.00 $ 3,145.00 o Con CD EA $ 2,100.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 6,886.00 $ 1,770.00 $ 700.00 °0 o CO 4113. $ 2,431.00 $ 1,808.00 $ 1,896.00 $ 2,592.00 $ 300.00 $ 300.00 0 °0 00 00) 0 CD ''0 ys 69 $ 13,732.00 $ 4,900.001 $ 30,000.00 $ 7,992.00 10) CD Ch 64 $ 1,576,445.70I p O o 64694969QQ COO o 0 n m m 1$__85.00 0 m I- 6969 $ 60.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 22.00 $ 30.00 $ 35.00 1 $__- 50.00 $ 17.00 $ 0.40 $ 0.20 $ 12.00 $ 300.00 $ 10.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 110.00 $ 2.00 $ 100.00 1 o N r 6949 $ 850.00 C�J�N W W �J--IJ CAS W QQ W J -I-1CO QJ W CO CO 0 N 10540 155 278 37 O 35 112 50 1 313 59 20 CD 143 4520 9480 216 1 30 1 79 6866 O) 15000 6660 4.3 !RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 6' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 8' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT INSTALL MAIL BOX SUPPORT MAIL BOX SUPPORT SALVAGE & REINSTALL STEEL PLATE BEAM GUARDRAIL WOODEN FENCE INSTALL SALVAGED FENCE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN PANELS TYPE C (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) SIGN PANELS TYPE D (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) INSTALL SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY) !DELINEATOR TYPE (X4 -2) PVMT MARK. 24" STOP LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORMED PVMT MARK. 4' DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT PVMT MARK. 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT ZEBRA CROSSWALK- WHITE POLY PREFORMED PEDESTAL FOUNDATION 1.25" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT RELOCATE CROSSWALK WARNING FLASHER SYSTEM TRANSPLANT TREE (3' CAL DECIDUOUS) SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED INLET PROTECTION SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SEEDING (INCL. SEED MIX 50B OR 60B, FERTILIZER, MULCH & DISC ANCHORING) TOTAL BID AMOUNT 2511.501 2531.501 2531.507 2531.507 2540.602 O D N 2554.603 2557.603 2557.603 2563.601 2564.531 2564.531 2564.536 2564.550 2564.603 2564.603 2564.603 2564.618 2565.602 2565.603 2565.616 2571.541 2573.502 2573.602 1 2575.505 2575.604 2575.605 00 N CO CO 00 00 7' 00 O C%) CD I, CO Cn O N 00 CO Cp 0 O) o CA Ch 0 'ch in CO n o O) 0 0 0 CA rn o O CA (0 0 0 0 O r ULAWI IOOivry rvv. IL,] U -Ua ENGINEERS •ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT S.R. WEIDEMA INC ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT ER EA ER ER ER ER ER ER ER 69 ER ER 69696969 ER 69 ER ER K9 ER ER 69 ER ER ER ER ER 69 ER ER ER 69 ER ER 69 ER 69 ER EA ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ER 64 69 ER ER ER 69 ER ER ER ER ER EA ER ER 69 EA ER EA ER ER ER ER fA ER ER ER ER ER EA ER ER ER ER ER ER $ 88,250.00 0 O 10 T ER $ 5,560.00 o •- o 0�I f, ER 1,680.00 246.40 000 00 0) 00_ rNC ER v o v. ER co vi ER 1,000.00 0 0 (ri m N ER 787.50 2,517.50 262.50 1,165.50 420.00 0 O o 0 r 625.00 0 O 0 0 43,053.75 99,440.30 5,707.80 11,816.25 3,800.00 138,600.00 0 O 0 ti m O EA $ 24,805.00 $ 72,900.00 $ 29,325.00 00 v CO in rd' ER O o h m: ER $ 1,830.00 I- $ 5,734.40 $ 69,964.80 $ 23,074.00 $ 27,375.70 $ 8,285.00 1 0 0 o 0 N r ER $ 7,383.00 $ 66,340.00 000 o o0) OV 69 c'i m cci CD ER __ _. _. _. ... ..r 177 07 69 w EA yr 69 va 69 ER EA ER ER 1 $ 88,250.00 O 0 ER $ 40.00 0)O Oi 69. for ER COD,c0')100 ER � ER ,- ER $ 2.10 O N 69 $ 125.00 $ 5.25 $ 2.65 $ 5.25 $ 31.50 $ 21.00 _$ __. 250.0 $ 125.00 $ 5.00 $ 4.45 $ 13.15 $ 12.60 $ 3.75 0 rM 1- ER EA (n ER -0 t)i V 69 0 ) 0r EA 69 a00 ,- fA $ 745.00 1 $ 915.00 1 $ 11.20 $ 25.60 $ 27.80 $ 30.35 $ 8,285.0C 00000. O O d'O 69 O O 000 00 ER ER O EA O 0 EA - II-I -J J J JN� W 4-LL.(J J¢W W W UUUU -(S I• - I• -I- I- 0) 0W W JJ J JW 1.0 -I J JJ ,-00000 r M r CD ^ Cp N 154 O'' 0 Cr (4) 20816 _ CO 150 950 50 37 20_ 'V O 19500 9675 7562 453 3151 000Z I. OZ 2025 550 2025 1500 0 CO CD N 512 2733 830 902 r 000 M (D N CO 0 M d' 626 1 ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION REMOVE PIPE (CULVERT OR STORM SEWER) REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN REMOVE CONCRETE APRON SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT SALVAGE SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY) SALVAGE GATE VALVE & BOX COMMON EXCAVATION (P) SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) (P) ) CRUSHED ROCK 6" DEPTH (TRENCH STABILIZING) 3 3S 5 TYPE LV AGG. 3 WEARING COURSE (8) TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE FOR TRAIL (B) TYPE LV AGG. 3 NON - WEARING COURSE (B) TYPE LV AGG. 4 WEARING COURSE 2' THICK FOR DRIVEWAYS (B) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 15" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 21" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN (W/ SOCK) 15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006 18" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V DESIGN 3006 21" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS ID DESIGN 3006 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SANITARY SEWER) 8'X4" PVC WYE (SCHEDULE 40) 3" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (10' -12' DEPTH) 3" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (12' -14' DEPTH)_ 8" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (14' -16' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (16' -18' DEPTH) 2021.501 N O N 2101.507 2104.501 2104.501 2104.501 O N 2104.503 2104.505 2104.509 2104.509 2104.511 2104.513 2104.521 2104.523 2104.523 2104.523 2104.523 2105.501 2105.501 I 2105.522 2105.525 2105.603 2123.610 2211.501 2350.501 O N 2350.502 2350.503 2357.502 2501.515 2501.515 2502.541 2503.541 2503.541 2503.541 2503.602 2503.602 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 r N CO Cr co c0 n co O O r N M d' (o CD n m CO O r N M! O N N N N N N 0 N f,. N CO CO N N 0 CO M N CO M Co CD CO CO M M 1• CO CO CO O) 0 M 7 V' N 'a FR E9 E9 E9 E9 E9 E9 ER E9 69. E9 E9 E9 E9 ER. ER fit E9 Eft E9 69 ER E9 E9 E9 E9 1 E9 1 69 I E9 1 E9 1 VI 1 .9 1 E9 1 ei 1 63. I E9 1 69. GUMMISJIUN NU. 1ZJW -UJ ENGINEERS "ARGI BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT S.R. WEIDEMA INC ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE EA EFT CO 64 E9 E9 ER E9 E9 E9 E9 E9 E9 Eft E9 E9 69. E9 E9 69 E9 E9 E9 Efl E9 E9 1 E9 I E9 1 E9 1 69 I E9 I E9 1 GA E9 1 E9 1 E9 1 E9 $ 3,424.00 $ 15,594.40 $ 18,954.00 $ 77,760.00 $ 34,344.00 $ 38,070.00 $ 53,460.00 $ 1,733.05 0 0 O o T E9 1 $ 3,170.00 O O O CO N E9 oo o tD t`t C]r E9 to ti E9 1 $ 450.00 O V O C] a0 N 90 CV di 69. $ 4,200.00 $ 6,800.00 $ 775.00 $ 2,170.00 $ 2,288.65 32,029.40 00 to v r- CD T 64 $ 4,408.00 $ 4,372.50 $ 4,788.00 $ 1,260.00 q O 10 o 10 s' � $ 8,880.00I O O 10 t` 7- T �' $ 2,825.001 $ 1,495.00 0 IO o CI) O O o N 69 $ 1,690.00 $ Io n. O 64 o O O 0 64 0 o7 1.0 r 6464 $ 162.00 $ 162.00 $ 162.00 $ 162.00 O tO N O E9 Eft 9,000.00 OO d T CO o 1,075.00 O r i 225.00 720.00 510.00 4� O 04 Or t o d N 0 10 N "Eh. CO 69491.64 69640969E96364. C)Otoo o 00 N DM O 0 E9 $ 1,325.00 $ 1,480.00 $ 2,220.00 $ 2,825.00 $ 1,495.00 O N EA $ 250.00 $ 845.00 1 $ 1 ,795.00 1 O 0 E9 _. Vt E9 ... 6% 6.764 ow J J J J J J J J-J J W W W W W W W W W W J J J J C J W W W W W W W W J 32 1544 t.CN rCON 212 235 330 3151 Tr 1 13 OTN`CC04 T CON CD CD to CD MCI CA CO Oh CD CA .N -T r 40 T V r 34 J CD CO r T CO CONr r 8" PVC, SDR 35 PIPE SEWER (18' -20' DEPTH) 4' SANITARY SERVICE PIPE (SCHEDULE 40) 8" PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (18' -20' DEPTH) 8" PVC. SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (20' -22' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (22' -24' DEPTH) 8" PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (24' -26' DEPTH) 8° PVC, SDR 26 PIPE SEWER (26' -28' DEPTH) TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER MAINS CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 1_ INSTALL HYDRANT K K 1" CURB STOP & BOX 6' WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 8° WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON CL 52 16' WATERMAIN DUCTILE IRON C1_52 INSULATION (4" THICKNESS) DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -TYPE 402 EXTRA DEPTH (> 5' DEPTH) CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN -TYPE 402 CONSTRUCT 48" DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 60' DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 72' DIAMETER CATCH BASIN MANHOLE -TYPE 406 CONSTRUCT 48' DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE -TYPE 409 CONSTRUCT 60" DIAMETER STORM SEWER MANHOLE -TYPE 409 ADJUST EXISTING FRAME AND RING CASTING RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE (4' DIA. - TYPE 301) DONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH (> 8' DEPTH) z Q Q 0 i Z 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 2503.603 O 000 CD 10 CO CD CO CO t v O O O O LO t0 10 LO N N N N 2504.602 2504.602 1 CV CD v O t0 N CO st O to N 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.602 2504.603 2504.603 2504.603 2504.603 2504.605 2504.608 100 CO O t0 04 2506.502 1 2506.502 N LC) CO O 10 N N lO0 CD O 10 N N 100 CD O N N 2506.502 2506.522 2506.602 2506.602 0 COO CD O (I) N tI V V v O vv v 53251 50 d t0 t0 0 ti D Co CA CO i N ID V O o O n fD 0D O n 7.: to n C 1. CO n V VIVIIVIIJJIMY IVV. 1COOL-VJ ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JUNE 3, 2003, AT 10 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MN /DOT S.R. WEIDEMA INC ITEM SPEC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 49 69 Ea 49 49 64 E9 49 49 69 49 64 69 49 49 EH M 49 49 d} 49. 49 vi 49 E9 e 49 � 49 69 6944 4949: 9949 69. 1/3. 49 69 4 9 69 49 63 49 49 65 49 49 69 69 69 6.694949 49 6A 1 $ 1,760.00 $ 81,158.00 t` N 0 4R $ 12,259.80 SO 1 In r 69 0 C) 69. 6 1,925.00 6 2,352,00 6 1,575.00 6 21,000.00 0 (l7 CO V CD 6 1,486.80 i 1,000.00 300.00 3,753.75 I 1,808.00 I 1,990.80 I 2,840.40 OOOONO C00) r 63 COO 0 V' N V' 49 40p9 OV CD CV r 49 nN CO. r r 6:69 $ 3,920.00 f $ 31,500.00 $ 13,986.001 $ 3,397.00 $ 1,806,800.30 1. __ __ _. _. _. 49 E9 49 or 49 or 63 w p O O 0 69 (� 49 I $ 40.45 1 $ 44.10 1 $ 42.00 O O CO ER 1 $ 55.00 $ 21.00 1$ 31.50 0 0 OO .& 49 t0O 0 N 49 0 0 0 to 0 0 N (n W 49 49 fg $ 26.25 $ 0.40 $ 0.21 $ 13.15 $ 130.00 $ 16.00 $ 4,200.00 0 0 v- 6.3 1 OE L OO 0 O N 0 63 49 0 CV 49 $ 790.00 %-LL 0JCOu)W i- �-QQLt_LLLLCI) WJJJ_1CACALLIW U- ILQQ LL LL LL LLQLL s_wLLQ�� JJJCgWJ0 J CJ (/) LLI CC 0 N 1 10540 i to 1 278 C,tOMTO r1- 59 20 6 rr d'040On(0pr r ``V N V' CO O co 0 0 to N CO 0) RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT INSTALL MAIL BOX SUPPORT MAIL BOX SUPPORT SALVAGE & REINSTALL STEEL PLATE BEAM GUARDRAIL INSTALL SALVAGED FENCE SIGN PANELS TYPE C (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) SIGN PANELS TYPE D (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) INSTALL SIGN (INCL. POST & ASSEMBLY) DELINEATOR TYPE (X4 -2) PVMT MARK. 24° STOP LINE WHITE -POLY PREFORMED PVMT MARK. 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW -PAINT PVMT MARK. 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -PAINT ZEBRA CROSSWALK- WHITE POLY PREFORMED 1.25" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT RELOCATE CROSSWALK WARNING FLASHER SYSTEM TRANSPLANT TREE (3° CAL DECIDUOUS) SILT FENCE, TYPE PREASSEMBLED SODDING TYPE SALT RESISTANT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ED MIX 50B OR 60B, FERTILIZER, MULCH & 7 2511.501 2531.501 2531.507 2531.507 2540.602 2540.602 2554.603 2557.603 2557.603 I 2563.601 M t1) CO 11) N 2564.531 2564.536 2564.550 2564.603 2564.603 2564.603 2564.618 2565.602 1 2565.603 2565.616 2571.541 r 2573.502 2573.602 I 2575.505 2575.604 2575.605 1� O CO 0 N CO (7 0 V CO to W CO O (� CO CO (O O) W 0 O N M 0) O) (A tO (O h (O CA 0 0) O (A Q) O) a, 0 0 0 0 0 co AGENDA ITEM 7Biii STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -99, Approving Right -of- Way /Easement Acquisition, EIm Street Reconstruction Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Due to the deteriorating condition of EIm Street between Sunset Road and Grey Heron Drive, the City Council authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the EIm Street Reconstruction project. As part of this project, acquisition of additional right -of -way and drainage /utility easements is necessary for the completion of the street and storm sewer construction. City Staff was authorized payment of acquisition up to and equal to the amount detailed in the attached appraisal dated April 22, 2003 for a total amount of $153,415.00 on May 12, 2003. After the properties were re- appraised and negotiations complete the total amount for acquisition resulted in a $3,775.00 increase for a total amount of $157,290.00. The increase resulted in revisions to the following properties: Property Address Previous Total Settlement 11 Elm Street $1,550.00 $2,200.00 7181 Sunrise Drive $1,600.00 $1,975.00 7180 Sunset Avenue $4,950.00 $7,000.00 17 EIm Street $1,800.00 $2,500.00 City Staff is requesting authorization for payment of acquisition for a total amount of $157,290.00. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution 03 -99, Approving Right -of- Way /Easement Acquisition, EIm Street Reconstruction Project. 2. Not Adopt Resolution No. 03 -99. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 03 -99 be adopted. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -99 RESOLUTION APPROVING RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENT ACQUISITION - ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted May 14, 2001, a study has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of Elm Street Reconstruction by constructing Street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain extensions, and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted October 28, 2002 and January 13, 2003, authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the Reconstruction of Elm Street, and WHEREAS, the improvement consisting of construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street improvements is herein determined necessary to provide for safety of the public, and WHEREAS, permanent easements and fee simple interests over certain lands are required to provide for said construction, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has authority to acquire right -of -way for said improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Authorizes the payment of acquisition of right -of- way /easements for a total amount of $157,290.00. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July 2003. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk 0 N O "O ig 0.4 o C/2 Review Appraiser Value I000`68$ el �p in S i� 69 •+P O .-i 6Q I• .1 �(1 Cj' p /y�/ �J wr • ' • SO re "' ' i9 , O 4, . . i�� 041 d3 . O O N . 6A n�i tel ti 69 'b N C� r+ iZ 0 At 00 69 g N co • 49 O O 'Q' iR O y� •,: 69 outs 1 69 O N 49 , O O e w 69 O' O• eI '. d9 649 vO� • �p ' 69.. O '.. 4'. O. : . f g •4 • G C • to N 90 !P i3 202 Elm St. • t its • mi g 8851 Hastings Circle NE Blaine MN 55449 7164-Sunset Avenue .Circle Pines, MN 55014 171 EIm St. PO Box 187 Circle Pines, MN 55014 11 Elm Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 . 1 7181 Lakeview Drive- Circle Fines, MN 55014 7181:Sunrise Drive Circle Pines, MN 55014 7180 Sunset Avenue Circle Pines, MN 55014 . 17-Elm Street . . =Lino takes, -MN-55014 ._ .7172 Sunset Avenue . • Circle Pines, Ml`I 53014. • Circle pines, MN 55014 298 Elm Street • • Lino Lakes; MN 550i4 Bob Evianika . 414-Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 • 183122430019 193122220023 193122120002 . 183122330050 193122220039 o 193122220020 193122220021 183122330051 CS 0 p tvl ON r 183122330059.- • di• 111 a. z 10 4 Ra › • �o . Ot. , v� En 1 P4 C7 173 • t v • Cottage Homestead of Willow Ponds SUB TOTAL:• • • Z0 3Jtld f 2S d0'13A3a NOS1IM 9L968t' t9 93 :VI £003 /33/1,0 AGENDA ITEM 7Biv STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -110, Accepting Permanent Easements, Elm Street Reconstruction Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: Due to the deteriorating condition of Elm Street between Sunset Road and Grey Heron Drive, the City Council authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the Elm Street Reconstruction project on October 28, 2002. As part of this project, negotiations with all the property owners for the acquisition of additional right -of -way and drainage /utility easements necessary for the project have been completed. City Staff is requesting acceptance of all easements required for the completion of the sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer construction detailed in the attached summary table dated March 6, 2003. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution 03 -110, Accepting Permanent Easements, Elm Street Reconstruction Project. 2. Not Adopt Resolution No. 03 -110. 3. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 1 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 03 -110 be adopted. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -110 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PERMANENT EASEMENTS - ELM STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted May 14, 2001, a study has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of EIm Street Reconstruction by constructing Street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain extensions, and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted October 28, 2002 and January 13, 2003, authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the Reconstruction of Elm Street, and WHEREAS, the improvement consisting of construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and street improvements is herein determined necessary to provide for safety of the public, and WHEREAS, permanent easements and fee simple interests over certain lands are required to provide for said construction, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has authority to acquire right -of -way for said improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Accepts permanent easements required for the completion of the sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer construction detailed in the attached summary table dated March 6, 2003. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July 2003. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ann Blair, City Clerk • W • Z CC Q W N 0 Z Z O J N O 5 _ ✓ 0 ▪ m 1-- F Z W Z 2 O W0 Q W W cc }• W �F- N W 2 O F- W C'3 1 TKDA COMMISSION # 12390 -03 M 0 0 a W CC a 851 C D �� r lf) r 52423 2282 1680 crt; r 1882 329 2426 D °' 324 623 1246 01 83521 TYPE Permanent Drainage Easement Permanent Drainage Easement Permanent Drainage Easement Property Acquisition (Storm Pond) Right of Way Acquisition ' Right of Way Acquisition Right of Way Acquisition Temporary Construction Easement Temporary Construction Easement [Temporary Construction Easement Permanent Drainage Easement Right of Way Acquisition Temporary Construction Easement Permanent Drainage Easement Temporary Construction Easement TOTAL ACQUISITION (S.F.) ADDRESS 11 Elm Street 17 Elm Street (Lot 11, Block 1, Willow Ponds Addn. No Address 202 EIm Street 210 EIm Street 298 Elm Street 7180 Lakeview Drive 7181 Sunrise Drive '7180 Sunset Road 7172 Sunset Road 7164 Sunset Road 7181 Lakeview Drive_ PARCEL 118-31-22-33-0050 118-31-22-33-0051 118-31-22-33-0059 118-31-22-43-0019 119-31-22-12-0002 119-31-22-12-0003 119-31-22-12-0035 119-31-22-22-0001 119-31-22-22-0020 19- 31 -22 -22 -0021 119- 31 -22 -22 -0022 1 co N O O N CV N N 'En- 6 r 119- 31 -22 -22 -0039 1 AGENDA ITEM 7Ci STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -100, Authorizing Execution of Development Agreement, Century Farm North Vote Required: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The City Council approved the preliminary plat of Century Farm North on April 28, 2003 and authorized execution of a grading only development agreement on May 27, 2003. Century Farm North Addition consists of 249 units of residential development. In accordance with the preliminary plat approval and City policy, staff has prepared a Development Agreement the Century Farm North Development. The agreement provides for the following: 1. Submittal by the developer of a Letter of representing 150 percent of the development improvement costs to insure completion of the project in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Deposit of a cash escrow to reimburse the City for costs incurred by the City related to the development and improvements of the site and developer improvements. Century Farm Development, Inc. has reviewed the contract and is aware of the conditions set forth. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 03 - 100, Authorizing Execution of Development Agreement, Century Farm North. 3. Not adopt Resolution Number 03 — 100. RECOMMENDATION: • Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution Number 03 - 100 be adopted. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -100 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, CENTURY FARM NORTH. WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Century Farm North on April 28, 2003, and a grading only development agreement on May 27, 2003, and WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution of a development contract, between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes, prior to commencement of site construction activities and final plat approval to insure satisfactory completion of public improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves the Development Contract with Century Farm Development, Inc., for Century Farm North Subdivision and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the city. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July, 2003. Ann J. Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • nc DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Century Farm North THIS AGREEMENT made this 14th day of July, 2003, is by and between the City of Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, 55014, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and Century Farm North Development, Inc. whose address is 3157 Berwick Knoll, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443 hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ". WHEREAS, the Developer has received preliminary plat approval from the City Council for a plat of land within the corporate limits of the City known as Century Farm North, hereinafter called "Subdivision ", said land is legally described to -wit Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 1, LINO AIR PARK NORTH, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, AND Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, Block 1, SUNSET OAKS, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, AND Lot 5, Block 1, SUNSET OAKS, except the West 184.18 feet thereof, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, AND Lot 1, Block 1, HIDDEN POND, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 AND Outlots B, C, and D, BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka, County, Minnesota. AND The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND That portion of vacated Pinto Lane which lies northwesterly of the centerline of Pinto Lane together with that part of said vacated Pinto Lane which lies southeasterly of the centerline of Pinto Lane as dedicated in BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION, and was accrued by Outlot C, said BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat on file in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota. That portion of said vacated Pinto Lane is described as follows: That part of Pinto Lane dedicated in BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat on file in the office of the County Recorder, which lies easterly of a line commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 21, Block 3, BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION; thence North 0 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the westerly line of said Lot 21, 24.80 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 0 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds East, 80.61 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left, 91.12 feet, said curve having a radius of 330.00 feet and a delta angle of 15 degrees 49 minutes 12 seconds, to the westerly line of said Pinto Lane; thence northerly along said westerly line of Pinto Lane to the northerly line of BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 5TH ADDITION and there terminating. AND That part of vacated CARL STREET lying westerly of the Northerly extension of the East line of Lot 17, Block 1, LINO AIR PARK NORTH, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota and easterly of the northerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot 16, Block 1, SUNSET OAKS, according to the recorded plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND That part of vacated Laurie Avenue which lies within the above described properties. Said vacation per Document No. 1462634. page 2 • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 AND The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, except those parcels described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, thence South along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7; a distance of 120 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 360 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to a point of intersection with the North line of the said Northwest Quarter; thence Westerly along the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the point of beginning, and also except: That part beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 7, thence East along the South line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 285 feet; thence North and parallel with the West line of the said Northwest Quarter a distance of 175 feet, thence West and parallel with the South line of the said Northwest Quarter to a point of intersection with the West line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South along the West line of said Northwest Quarter to the point of beginning; and also except: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 536 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1047 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 208 feet; thence West parallel with the North line; of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1047 feet to the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North along said West line a distance of 208 feet to the point of beginning, and also except: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distance 328 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence East parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1047 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 208 feet; thence West parallel with the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1047 feet to the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North along said West line a distance of 208 feet to the point of beginning, Anoka County, Minnesota. AND Excepting the following described parcels of property: That part of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: page 3 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7; thence North 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West on an assumed bearing, along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing on said bearing of North 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West along said West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds East along a line parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 759.5 feet; thence South 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds East along a line parallel with said West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 150.00 feet; thence South 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds West along a line parallel with South line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 759.50 feet to the point of beginning, subject to a county road over the West 33 feet. AND That part of Section 7, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7; thence North 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds West on an assumed bearing, along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 325.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing on said bearing of North 00 degrees 37 minutes 22 seconds West along said West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds East along a line parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 759.50 feet; thence South 00 degrees 27 minutes 22 seconds East along a line parallel with said West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7 a distance of 150.00 feet; thence South 87 degrees 32 minutes 14 seconds West along a line parallel with said South line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 759.50 feet to the point of beginning, subject to a county road over the West 33 feet. WHEREAS, the Developer requested that the City construct and finance certain improvements to service the subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Developer is to be responsible for the installation and financing of certain private improvements within the subdivision; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 429 provides a method for assessing the cost of City installed improvements to the benefited property. WHEREAS, the City Subdivision Ordinance and Minnesota Statute 462.358 authorize the City to enter into a performance contract secured by cash escrow or other security to guarantee completion and payment of such improvements following final approval and recording of final plat; and page 4 • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO: that the I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Improvements to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "Developer Improvements ". B. Improvements to be installed by the City and financed by the Developer are hereinafter referred to as "City Improvements ". II. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS A. The Developer's Engineer shall prepare, at the Developer's expense, a grading plan, street including CSAH 53 and utility plan, and a surface water management plan. The Developer shall secure a contractor to install these improvements; said contractor shall be approved by the City at its ABSOLUTE discretion. All Developer Improvements shall require City inspection and approval and, where appropriate, the approval of any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. The Developer will construct and install at Developer's expense the following improvements according to the following terms and conditions: 1. Grading Plan a) A final site grading plan, including certified wetland delineation, with maximum two -foot contours and cross sections as necessary shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to commencement of any site grading. 2. Erosion Control Plan a) The Developer shall submit an erosion control plan, detailing all erosion control measures to be implemented during construction. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. b) The Developer shall submit a turf establishment plan which details topsoil placement, seeding, sodding, mulching, fertilizing and watering. Said plan shall be approved by the City prior to the commencement of site grading or construction. page 5 Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 3. Tree Preservation Plan a) Developer will provide a tree preservation plan prior to any site grading which shall be in accordance with the City Tree Preservation Policy. Developer shall escrow for boulevard tree planting for each side of a lot which abuts a street. The City Forester shall determine species, size and location. b) The Developer shall remove, dispose of, or treat all dead and diseased trees in accordance with the City Forester's recommendation before building permits will be issued. 4. Grading and Erosion Control Construction & Maintenance a) Prior to the commencement of site grading and erosion control, the Developer shall complete items II.A.l, lI.A.2, and II.A.3 as listed above. b) The Developer shall grade the site to within 0.2 foot of the grades shown on the approved grading plan. No deviations will be allowed unless a revised plan is submitted and approved by the City and all other regulatory agencies. c) All development shall conform to the natural limitations presented by the topography and soil of the subdivision in order to create the best potential for preventing soil erosion. d) Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated with the different stages of development. Appropriate control measures as required by the City shall be installed prior to development when necessary to control erosion. e) Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such that adequate erosion and siltation controls can be provided as construction progresses. The smallest practical area of land shall be exposed at any one period of time. f) Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient arable soil shall be set aside for respreading over the developed area. The topsoil shall be restored to a depth of at least four (4) inches and shall be of a quality at least equal to the soil quality prior to development. • B) The Developer shall install four (4) inches of topsoil on all boulevards and seed or sod as approved by the City. The Developer page 6 • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 shall make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops to bring them flush with the topsoil prior to occupancy. h) All disturbed areas shall be seeded. i) The front 50 feet of the lots, the street right -of -way, storm water storage ponds, and surface water drainage ways shall be graded prior to commencement of utility construction. j) Drainage swales, ditches, storm water storage ponds and other high risk erosion areas shall be protected from erosion. k) All remaining grading must be completed prior to issuance of building permits. 1) Protect streets from erosion deposits. This should include a combination of roadside silt fences, roadside sod strips, catch basin rock bale inlet protection, rock construction entrances, straw mulch, and/or street sweeping. m) The Developer's engineer shall certify, in writing with an as -built survey, that all grading complies with the grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Final street grading, subbase, gravel base, bituminous binder course, and concrete curb and gutter. 6. Storm sewers when deten iined to be necessary by the City Engineer, including all necessary laterals, catch basins, inlets and other appurtenances. 7. Sanitary sewer, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services and other appurtenances. 8. Water, laterals or extensions, including all necessary building services, hydrants, valves and other appurtenances. 9. The Developer shall place iron monuments at all lot and block comers and at all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron monuments shall be placed after all street and lawn grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. Lot corner irons on the back property line shall be installed so that the top of the iron corresponds to the finished ground elevation in accordance with the approved grading plan - guard stakes shall be appropriately installed to mark these irons. • 10. The Developer agrees to maintain, at all times before acceptance of the streets by the City, an access road suitable for use by emergency, police and page 7 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 fire department equipment. The adequacy of such road shall be the sole determination of the City. Furthermore, such access road shall be located no more than 150 feet from any structure built within the Subdivision. 11. The Developer shall promptly clear dirt and debris, within public right -of- ways, and drainage and utility easements, resulting from construction by the Developer, its purchasers, builders and contractors within five (5) days after notification by the City. The Developer or its assigns shall be responsible for all necessary street and storm sewer maintenance including street sweeping, storm sewer cleaning, ditch cleaning and pond dredging, resulting from the accumulation of said dirt and debris, until all Certificates of Occupancy are issued. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when the streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth, hard driving surface and adequate drainage on all temporary streets. 12. Street Lighting: a) Residential street lighting shall be owned by the City. Such street lighting system shall be installed, operated, and maintained by the electric utility company. City and electric utility company may enter into a contractual agreement on the rate and maintenance of the street lighting system. b) It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to pay for street lighting operation charges for the initial 15 months of operation of the system. 13. The Developer shall dedicate to the City, prior to approval of the final plat, at no cost to the City, all permanent or temporary easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer Improvements. All such easements required by the City shall be in writing, in recordable form, containing such terms and conditions as the City shall determine. 14. The Developer shall be responsible for securing all site grading and development approvals and permits from all appropriate Federal, State, Regional and Local jurisdictions prior to the commencement of site grading or construction and prior to the City awarding construction contracts for public utilities. 15. The Developer shall make provision that all gas, telephone, cable TV and electric utility designs be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to construction of the streets. Following review and approval by the City, the Developer shall insure that all installations comply with applicable City, page 8 • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 County and State design standards and show proof of security arrangements with said utility companies. 16. Cost of Developer Improvements, description and completion dates are as shown on Attachment A. 17. Construction of Developer's Improvements: a) The construction, installation, materials and equipment shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. b) All of the work shall be under and subject to the inspection and approval of the City and, where appropriate, any other governmental agency having jurisdiction. c) Prior to the acceptance of Developer Improvements by the City, the Developer shall obtain final plat approval and record the final plat which will dedicate all permanent easements necessary for the construction and installation of the Developer and City Improvements as determined by the City. d) All construction debris and trash shall be properly disposed of at the Developer expense and in a timely manner as determined by the City. 18. CSAH 53 improvements shall be at the Developer expense. The Developer must obtain all necessary approvals from Anoka County. The Developer is responsible for acquiring any necessary right -of -way, temporary easements, or permanent easements for the construction of the CSAH 53 improvements. 19. The Developer shall construct and pay for all improvements as described in the landscaping plan. 20. The Developer shall make an application to FFMA for a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to revise the existing Flood Plain maps consistent with the proposed grading plan. 21. Guarantee a) Faithful Performance of Construction Contracts and Letters of Credit (1) The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer Improvements and hereby guarantees the page 9 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the City's final acceptance of the Developer's Improvements. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on one hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's Improvements. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the purpose of guaranteeing the terms and conditions of this contract. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future expiration dates unless thirty (30) days prior to such the City Clerk or Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail that the Letter of Credit will not be renewed. b) Reduction of Escrow Guarantee. (1) The Developer may request reduction of the Letter of Credit, or cash deposit based on prepayment or the value of the completed improvements at the time of the requested reduction. Prior to the final acceptance of the Developer Improvements the City shall require a Performance Bond or Cash Escrow to cover the one -year warranty provisions of the agreement. The amount shall be determined by the City Engineer. III. CITY IMPROVEMENTS A. The City shall credit the Developer for the following described improvements to serve the Subdivision on the terms and conditions herein set forth: 1. Storm sewer trunks. 2. Sanitary sewer trunks. 3. Water trunks. page 10 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for the following described improvements to serve the Subdivision on the terms and conditions herein set forth: 1. Sanitary sewer trunks. C. Construction Procedures 1. AU City Improvements above shall be instituted, constructed and financed as follows: The City shall commence proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429 and City Charter providing that such improvements be made and assessed against the benefited properties. After preparation of preliminary plans and estimates by the City Engineer, an improvement hearing, if required by law, will be called by the City Council for the purpose of ordering such City Improvements. After preparation of the final plans and specifications by the City Engineer, bids will be taken by the City and contract awarded for the installation of City Improvements under the City's complete supervision. D. Security, Levy of Special Assessments and Required Payment Therefore. 1. Prior to the preparation of final plans and specifications for the construction of said City Improvements, the Developer shall provide to the City a cash escrow or letter of credit in an amount equal to thirty -five (35 %) percent of the total estimated assessments as established by the City Engineer. (See Attachment B) 2. Said letter of credit or cash escrow including accrued interest thereon, may be used by the City upon default by Developer in the payment of special assessments pursuant hereto, whether accelerated or otherwise. Developer must receive written notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure before City draws on cash escrow for special assessments. That such cash escrow or letter of credit shall remain in full force and effect throughout the term of the special assessments, except, the amount of such escrow or letter of credit may be reduced, upon the request of the Developer, at the City's option, but in no event shall be less than 35% of the outstanding special assessments against all properties within the Subdivision. The entire cost of the installation of such City Improvements, including any reasonable engineering, legal and administrative costs incurred by the City, shall be assessed against the benefited properties within the Subdivision in accordance with City policy existing the date of this agreement, in equal annual principal installments plus interest on the unpaid installments at a rate not to exceed the maximum allowed by law. page 11 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 3. All related special assessments levied hereto shall be payable to the City Clerk in semi- annual installments over fifteen (15) years commencing on April 15 of the year after the levy of such assessment and on each September 15 and April 15 thereafter until the entire balance plus accrued interest is paid in full unless paid earlier. In the alternative, the City, at its option, may certify the entire assessment roll to the Anoka County Auditor for collection with the Real Estate Taxes. In the event any payment is not made on the dates set out herein, the City may exercise its rights granted hereunder for such default. The Developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the City Improvements and the special assessments, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the property. In the event the total of all City Improvements is less than originally estimated by the City Engineer in his feasibility report, Developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. 429.081. E. Required Payment of Special Assessments by Developer. 1. Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns hereby agrees that within thirty (30) days after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a residence on a lot located within the Subdivision which is assessed for the cost of such City Improvements, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns, agrees, at its own cost and expense, to pay the entire unpaid Cost of City Improvements whether assessed or to be assessed under this agreement against such property. 2. If a certificate of occupancy is issued before the special assessments have been levied, the Developer, its heirs, successors or assigns shall pay the City the sum of cash equal to one hundred twenty percent (120 %) of the Engineer's estimate of the special assessments for such City Improvements that would be levied against the property. Upon such payment the City shall issue a certificate showing the assessments are paid in full. Notwithstanding the issuance of said certificate, the Developer shall be liable to the City for any deficiency and the City shall pay the Developer any surplus arising from the payment based upon such estimate. Developer will be paid interest on all assessments paid before the levy of such assessments by the City at the bond interest rates paid by the City. F. Acceleration Upon Default. 1. In the event the Developer violates any of the covenants, conditions or agreements herein contained to be performed by the Developer, violates any ordinance, rule or regulation of the City, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota or other governmental entity having jurisdiction over the Subdivision, or fails to pay any installment of any special assessment levied page 12 • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 pursuant hereto, or any interest thereon, when the same is to be paid pursuant hereto, the City at its option, in addition to its rights and remedies hereunder, after ten (10) days' written notice to the Developer, may declare all of the unpaid special assessments which are then estimated or levied pursuant to this agreement due and payable in full, with interest. The City may seek recovery of such special assessments due and payable from the security provided herein. In the event that such security is insufficient to pay the outstanding amount of such special assessments plus accrued interest the City may certify such outstanding special assessments in full to the County Auditor pursuant to M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3 for collection the following year. The City, at its option, may commence legal action against the Developer to collect the entire unpaid balance of the special assessments then estimated or levied pursuant hereto, with interest, including reasonable attorney's fees, and Developer shall be liable for such special assessments and, if more than one, such liability shall be joint and several. Also, if Developer violates any term or condition of this agreement, or if any payment is not made by Developer pursuant to this agreement the City, at its option, may refuse to issue building permits for any parcel with the Subdivision for which the assessments have not been paid. IV. RECORDING AND RELEASE A. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Development Contract shall be a covenant on any and all property included in the Subdivision. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Development Contract with the Anoka County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. This shall be recorded against the Subdivision described on Page 1 hereof. City shall provide to Developer upon payment of all the special assessments levied against a parcel, a release of such parcel from the terms and conditions of this Development Contract subject to provisions contained in this contract. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS A. The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the City in an amount determined by the City Administrator or his designee for the payment of all costs incurred by the City related to the development of the Subdivision and the Developer Improvements including, but not limited to, the following (See Attachment B for breakdown of costs): 1. Plat Review Fee 2. Planner Review Fee 3. Administration - 3% Construction Cost 4. Engineering page 13 • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 a) Administration 5. Legal - Plat Review 6. Publications 7. Park Dedication Fee 8. Tree Preservation Policy 9. Street Lighting - Install/Operate 10. Traffic Signing Improvements 11. Boulevard Tree Planting 12. Street - Storm Sewer - Pond Maintenance 13. Sealcoating Fund 14. Aerial Photo Recovery Cost B. If the above escrow amounts are insufficient, the Developer shall make such additional deposits as required by the City. The City shall have a right to reimburse itself from the Escrow upon notice to the Developer, with suitable documentation supporting charge. VI. BUILDING PERMITS A. The Developer agrees that building permits may be issued upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council at which time all required Financial Security shall be in place with the City. B. The Developer further agrees that City Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer, and Bituminous Base Construction of the Streets, temporary street signs, gas, electric, and telephone will be completed prior to the issuance of building permits. C. The Developer further agrees that an as -built survey certifying that all the grading complies with the grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. D. The Developer further agrees to make an application to rEMA for a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to revise the existing Flood Plain maps consistent with the proposed grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. E. Each lot must comply with erosion control measures to prevent any material from leaving the lot. The City of Lino Lakes will not perform any requested inspections on the lot until it complies to the erosion control requirements. page 14 • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 F. Each lot must have a City approved Certificate of Grading showing the as -built survey prior to an issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer, its purchasers, builders or contractors to ensure compliance with the grading plan. VII. PHASING PLAN A. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the approved phasing plan as follows: 1. A total of 55.0 acres of MUSA shall be allocated for the project, and the project's 249 residential units shall be developed in accordance with the following phasing plan, which is illustrated on Attachment C: Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 total MUSA acres to be Allocated 15.3 11.4 13.5 5.4 9.4 55.0 Lots to be final platted 5 6 6 5 5 2 4 3 3 3 2 4 9 VIII. HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY A. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours as follows: Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Holidays No working hours allowed IX. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this contract and acceptance by the City, the improvements lying within the public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. X. INSURANCE A. Developer or all its subcontractors shall take out and maintain until one (1) year after the City has accepted the Developer Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of his subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than Five Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($500,000.00) Dollars for one person and One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less then Two page 15 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 Hundred Thousand and no /100 ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City, its employees, its agents and assigns shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer or all its subcontractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. XI. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE A. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this contract, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action. XII. VALIDITY A. If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this contract is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Development Contract. XIII. GENERAL A. Binding Effect 1. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Subdivision and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. B. Notices 1. Whenever in this agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notice given as above. C. Final Plat Approval 1. The City agrees to give final approval to the plat of the Subdivision in accordance with section VII upon execution and delivery of this agreement page 16 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 and all required petitions, bonds, security, and documents including the following: a) Review and approval of a Homeowner's Association agreement, which includes provisions for the operation and maintenance of all signage and buffer areas. b) Review and approval of informational brochure including Best Management Practices with regard to buffer and wetland area requirements. c) Receipt of warranty deeds or dedication of all outlots proposed to be conveyed to the City. d) Detail of proposed wetland and buffer area signage. e) Receipt of permanent easements covering temporary cul -de -sacs lying outside dedicated right -of -way. f) Receipt of Conservation Easements covering wetland buffer areas. g) A total of 55.0 acres of MUSA shall be allocated for the project. The phasing plan will have 15.3 acres of MUSA in 2003 for 56 dwelling units. h) The applicant provides documentation to the City that all applicable runway safety requirements have or will be satisfied. The runway safety zone requirements are hereby established as a zoning restriction. i) Specific hanger designs be submitted subject to City approval prior to consideration of the final plat approval of the lots with the hangers. j) The project is subject to all requirements of Anoka County regarding access to Sunset Road/CR 53. k) Additional right -of -way for Sunset Road/CR 53 shall be dedicated, to total 60' from centerline, within all areas of the plat. 1) The airplane hangers in Lots 1 -4 and Lot 9, Block 4 (Phase 1) shall be built on the runway side of the houses, with the houses fronting on the road rather than the houses on the runway side of the lots. page 17 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 m) Signs shall be installed along all wetland buffer /easement areas. Wetland easements shall extend, at a minimum, 10 feet outward from the delineated wetland boundary. XIV. VIOLATIONSBUILDING PERMITS A. In the event that Developer violates any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Development Contract and to be performed by the Developer, the City, at its option, in addition to the rights and remedies as set out hereunder may refuse to issue building peanuts and/or Certificate of Occupancies to any property within the Subdivision until such time as such default has been corrected to the satisfaction of the City. XV. PARK DEDICATION A. Park dedication for Century Farm North shall consist of both land dedication and a $103,821.00 park dedication fee. XVI. PROPERTY TAXES A. Should the recording of the Final Plat occur after July 1, any and all property taxes on any public property dedicated as a part of this plat shall be the responsibility of the Developer. Dollars shall be incorporated into the escrow agreement to cover the cost of said property taxes. page 18 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 DEVELOPER CITY OF LINO LAKES By Developer STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA ) By Mayor ATTEST: By Clerk On this day of , 20_. before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Mayor) and (Clerk), to me known to be respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that they executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary public page 19 • • • Development Contract Century Farm North 7 -11 -2003 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF ANOKA ) On this day of , of 20_, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared (Developer), to me known to be the , of , a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they/he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public page 20 ATTACHMENT A SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT COSTS DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS • PROJECT NAME: Century Farm North NUMBER OF REU's: 56 APPLICANT: Century Farm North Development, Inc. ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 24.5 BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) 1 SITE GRADING bid e $303,520 2 EROSION CONTROL Estimate e $11,250 3 SITE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Estimate e $80,000 4 LANDSCAPING Estimate e $10,000 5 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT $0 e 6 STREET CONST. A. Subgrade /Base Course Estimate e $202,080 B. Wear Course Estimate e $69,570 C. CSAH 53 (Sunset Avenue) Estimate e $25,000 7 STORM SEWER CONST. A. Trunk Estimate e $3,300 B. Lateral Estimate e $182,420 C. Surface Water Mgmt. Charge (s.f.) $0.050 a $50,060 SANITARY SEWER CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) $2,203 a $53,975 B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) $955 a $53,480 C. Lateral Estimate e $464,450 D. Lift Station (13.5 %) $28,990 9 WATERMAIN CONST. A. Trunk Area Charge (ac.) $2,350 a $57,575 B. Trunk Unit Charge (REU) $1,541 a $86,296 C. Lateral Estimate e $207,360 SUBTOTALS: $1,558,950 $330,376 $0 Sanitary Trunk Credit $190,677 Watermain Trunk Credit $17,230 TOTALS $122,469 See Attachment B for security amounts to be posted NOTE: a: Cost by City policy b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City c: Previously Assessed d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board • e: Provided by Developer f: Estimate by Feasibility Study 7/11/03 attachments 7-1 1-03.xls ATTACHMENT B CITY FEES DEVELOPER INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS up PROJECT NAME: Century Farm North NUMBER OF REU's: 56 APPLICANT: Century Farm North Development, Inc. ASSESSED AREA (ac.): 24.5 BUDGET DEVELOPER CITY ESCROW ITEM NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS COST NOTE IMP. (X) IMP. (Y) AMOUNT (Z) 1 PLAT REVIEW FEE $7,500 b $7,500 2 PLANNER REVIEW FEE $7,500 b $7,500 3 ADMINISTRATION -3% OF CONST. 3% of const. a $28,400 4 ENGINEERING A. Plan /Plat/Grading Review $0 b $10,000 B. Preparation of Plans & Specs. $0 b C. Construction Services $0 b $50,000 D. Construction Staking $0 b E. City Engineering $0 b $20,000 5 LEGAL PLAT REVIEW FEE $1,000 b $1,000 6 PUBLICATIONS $1,000 b $1,000 7 PARK DEDICATION FEE $1,665 d $103,821 8 TREE PRESERVATION POLICY $960 b $4,480 Alli STREET LIGHTING INST. & OPER. $1,680 b $11,760 TRAFFIC SIGNING IMPROV. $6,000 b $3,000 11 BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING $15,600 b $16,800 12 STREET, ST. SWR. & POND MAINT. b $5,049 13 SEALCOATING FEE a $24,450 14 FEMA Processing Fee N/A $3,000 15 AERIAL PHOTO COST RECOVERY a $5,040 16 OTHER - Property Tax Escrow b $5,000 TOTALS: $3,000 0 $304,800 Less previous grading deposit $47,000 Total $257,800 SECURITY AMOUNTS TO BE POSTED Att. A Att. B Total X = DEV. IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 1.5 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $2,338,500 $4,500 $2,343,000 Y = CITY IMPROVEMENT COSTS X 0.35 (LETTER OF CREDIT) $42,900 $0 $42,900 Z = CITY FEE COSTS X 1.0 (CASH ESCROW) $0 $257,800 $257,800 NOTE: a: Cost by City policy b: Estimated Cost or Budget by City c: Previously Assessed d: Cash Requirement per Agreement with Park Board e: Provided by Developer f: Estimate by Feasibility Study 7/11/03 attachments 7- 11- 03.xls • • • COMM FIRM NOflM AS3 WA,. KAM. AoGtM PMN, W AN 00000 0 0 0 0 0 ■.1 CA LA A 1.4 1 1 1 1 S 'O L -V 13 'G - r W N 3 N • {A A 1A0 W EN N LA GNx 0 0 0 0 0 O D 0 0 0 PHASING PLAN u:,rosNx CENRIRY FARM NORTH 18T ADD ,r=ut THRU CENTURY FARM NORTH 6111 ADD su1.1.340. 150 LAKES, MINNESOTA • • AGENDA ITEM 7 C (ii) STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution 03 -101: Final Plat, Century Farm North VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 The final plat is being considered by the Planning & Zoning Board at the July 9 meeting. The P & Z report is attached, for information purposes. It is possible that the staff recommendation and conditions will be amended after the discussion at the P & Z meeting. A complete report, including the resolution, will follow on Friday. AGENDA ITEM 7 C (ii) STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution 03 -101: Final Plat, Century Farm North VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND The preliminary plat for Century Farm North was- approved by the City Council on April 28. The developer has submitted the final plat for phase 1. Under the new subdivision ordinance, final plats are to be reviewed by the P & Z. This is the first final plat to which the new requirement applies. It was reviewed by P & Z on July 9. The developer has requested that the City Council approve the final plat on July 14. At the time of writing this report, some issues were unresolved pending direction from the City Council. The submitted final plat includes individual lots for units in phase one of the approved phasing plan. This includes 56 units: 17 single family detached townhomes and 39 single family lots. Of the 39 SF lots, nine of them in Block 4 will be airpark lots. ANALYSIS As required by the subdivision ordinance, the following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council: a. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. b. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building perniits have been issued for forty (40) percent of lots in the preceding phase. This paragraph applies only when the preceding phase consists of forty (40) or more lots. c. City Attorney approval of the status of title /property ownership related to the final plat. d. Completed development contract including all required financial securities and timeframe for final plat and final grading completion. Century Farm North Final Plat page 2 e. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. f. All fees, charges, and escrow related to the preliminary or final plat shall be paid in full. Conformance With Preliminary Plat (a): The submitted final plat includes the phase one lots with the remainder of the site in outlots. The final plat is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat. Completion of Preceding Phase (b): This is the first phase of the project, so the `minimum completion' clause doesn't apply. However, it will apply to subsequent phases. It is expected that the final plat for phase two will be submitted for approval early in January 2004. With construction beginning in mid -2003, it is unknown if 40% of phase one (22 units) will be sold and have building permits issued. Title (c): The title commitment and the final plat must be submitted to the City Attorney in time for an opinion for the City Council meeting. Among other things, the City Attorney compares the title commitment with the signature page of the plat to ensure all persons with property interest are represented on the signature page. As of July 9, the City Attorney had not received the title commitment and plat. As of Friday, July 11, I have no further information from the City Attorney. The City should not approve the plat without a complete and acceptable title commitment. Development Agreement and Fees (d) and (f): Agenda item 7 C (i) addresses this item. Conditions of Approval (e): Resolution 03 -60 approved the preliminary plat and lists conditions of approval (see attached). The development agreement often includes conditions that cannot be met prior to construction. For example, the phasing plan is an ongoing requirement. Location of airplane hangars and wetland easement signs are other examples. However, other conditions should be met prior to final plat approval to ensure they get done. Condition #7 requires review of airplane hangar design prior to final plat approval. The attached drawings show the proposed hangar design. In addition to the drawings, the draft homeowner covenants include the restrictions listed below. Airplane Hangars. Airplane hangars are permitted on Air Park Lots subject to the Lino Air Park North Declaration, the Permit and the following additional restrictions: (a) Any airplane hangar constructed upon an Air Park Lot shall be built in conformance with all building codes and regulations of the City and other governmental and quasi - governmental entities having jurisdiction over the Air Century Farm North Final Plat page 3 Park Lots and over Outlot B, Lino Air Park North, and its use as a private air strip. (b) Aircraft hangars and their construction and location upon an Air Park Lot, are subject to prior approval by the Committee. (c) Airplane hangars must meet the following minimum criteria: (i) Architectural compatibility with living units located upon the Air Park Lot including color (earth tones only) and architectural style, although they may be constructed with metal sidewalls. (ii) Must not exceed 3200 square feet. (iii) Sidewall height of not less than twelve feet nor more than eighteen feet. (iv) Not less than one entry door. (v) An overhead clear span door a minimum of ten foot wide and eight foot high. (vi) 3/12 maximum roof pitch. (vii) Roof color coordinated with sidewall color. (viii) Minimum 24 inch and maximum 36 inch sidewall overhang, and minimum 12 inch and maximum 18 inch gable overhang. (ix) A forty foot minimum clear span door on the gable end facing the applicable taxi way. (x) Such additional aesthetic detail as the (Air Park Architectural Control) Committee may designate including, but not limited to, windows and window treatments, louvers and landscaping. (xi) Any improved apron fronting the taxi way door of the airplane hangar not to extend with ten feet of the lot line. (d) Commercial use (including space rental) of any airplane hangar is not permitted. These (or a revised version) would be included in the covenants on the property. However, the City has no authority to enforce private covenants. If the City wants to enforce specific conditions, it would have to be done through a separate mechanism. Condition #8 requires City review of the homeowner association documents. Drafts have been submitted and forwarded to the City Attorney. Condition #10 refers to the unresolved park dedication question. A new plan illustrating park dedication has been received. It indicates 4.7 acres of contiguous upland and another 3.1 acres of upland that is not contiguous. This acreage is acceptable. However, the subdivision ordinance requires that dedicated upland, at a value of $28,000 per acre, be subtracted from a total cash amount calculated at $1665 per dwelling unit. Other credits can be subtracted as well. In discussion with the Public Services Director, the following park dedication scenario is proposed: Century Farm North Final Plat page 4 TOTAL CASH CONTRIBUTION previously total new cash per total units platted units unit total 249 8 241 $ 1,665 VALUE OF LAND DEDICATION _ upland acres 7.813 addl. acres for east trail 0.060 addl. acres for north trail 0.250 per acre total dedication credit 8.123 $ 28,000 OTHER construction of concrete sidewalk (5') and bituminous trail (8') balance: cash dedication 401,265 (227,444) (70,000) 103,821 That is, the land indicated on the "Preliminary Park Plan" of June 23, 2003 would be dedicated. Upland would be credited toward the park dedication as would two small additional pieces to preserve the potential for future trail connections. Construction of the sidewalk and trail would be credited. The listed cash balance would be dedicated as well. The developer has agreed to the land dedication and to escrow the cash, but wants to investigate the justification of the formula and the land values being used in the dedication policy. Condition #15 requires additional right of way for Sunset Road. This is supplied on the final plat. OPTIONS. 1. Approve Resolution 03 -101 approving the final plat for Century Farm North. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION At the time of writing this report, the title commitment and homeowner association documents have not received City Attorney approval. The City Council must decide if it is acceptable to rely on the homeowners association to enforce the airplane hangar design elements. If the issues listed above are satisfactorily resolved, staff recommends Option 1. Century Farm North Final Plat page 5 If the above issues are not resolved, staff does not recommend approval. This report is based on the following: Final Plat, Century Farm North, received July 9, 2003. Preliminary Park Plan, June 23, 2003 Hangar drawings, June 20, 2003 Century Farm North Final Plat page 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03-101 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR CENTURY FARM NORTH WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a final plat, and WHEREAS, review and approvals of plats are governed by state statutes and City ordinances, and WHEREAS, the site is included in the Century Farm North preliminary plat approved by the City Council on April 28, 2003, by Resolution 03 -60, and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat approval included phasing of the development over several years, and WHEREAS, the final plat for Century Farm North received by the City July 9, 2003 is consistent with that phasing plan and other City requirements, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby approves the final plat for Century Farm North. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor , 2003. SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS N N o<— z _1 ON OHO r�0 '- O w i'I 00A lk Ilh4pi Ip� 1" (S.1.331-IS $ 30 £ 133HS 33S) d 2NIl HOlYW :b " tsae, e a L. S ,r;, ;� II,Sa,LSAON 3 :a•inS UMW! 1 9E O M N MI 41 Ns ml MI A Sal ldl / = rm .i, * w SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS .II 'al 't tlt I0 dl • 104 a e/1 E 00 a Nil IM - -- r.LlsI.00S - - -- orrss, SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS V1 Q Z 10r 01-0 Z� mow U U U, IC 0 z ILL '4 7R A • /Ixx axl L 3/330 aw <aMlaxa II,LI ,6 LOOS oe'S69I - - -- w W et MATCH LINE C _1 a a O 1 e (SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS) gavYta'[ C .` I1 • o0'oal Y,Z1,LZ.DON JO IOWA AIN G 2 0 i a N f N O ^\ 00'90Z Y„Z1.4Z.00N 0091Y °0 aoc �, Y,Z1.LZ400111 8 �j 8 1L 1 1 w a If; 3� � x pp - - --1—� n O mwa 903 S9'801 161,4.1 poop 00'SL1 1 II,ZI,LZ.00N II,Zl,LZ.00N 14'M1p2 4/1 414 34 3 4n,wwu3/343033 naw, uy,-•." w z —J 2 (SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS) • • A's CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03-60 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MUSA RESERVE ALLOCATION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN FOR CENTURY FARM NORTH WHEREAS, the City has received applications for developing an area known as Century Farm North; and WHEREAS, the development requires approval of the allocation of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) reserve and approval of a preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on December 11, 2002 and was continued to January 8, 2003 and February 12, 2003; and WHEREAS, the proposed MUSA allocation and preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan meet the requirements of the City's Growth Management, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 12 -03 rezoning the site to Planned Unit Development for residential development; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the MUSA allocation and preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan for Century Farm North with the following conditions: 1. A total of 55.0 acres of MUSA shall be allocated for the project, and the project's 249 • residential units shall be developed in accordance with the following phasing plan, which is illustrated on Attachment A: year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 total MUSA acres to be Allocated 15.3 11.4 13.5 5.4 9.4 55.0 Lots to be final platted 56 65 52 43 33 249 2. A cul de sac will be constructed at the east terminus of the new Carl Street within Century Farm North. Carl Street will not be connected to the existing Carl Street as part of the Century Farm North development. 3. The driveway of Lot 7, Block 6 be shifted eastward to the extent possible. • 4. The submitted townhome housing types and building elevations be modified to specify finish materials and be subject to City approval. Side walls facing public streets shall include windows or other architectural features to avoid the appearance of a blank wall. 5. Lots 1 -3, Block 4 shall be "airpark" lots. If these or other designated airpark lots are to be converted to non - airpark lots, in the future, depending on the extent of changes to the design or configuration of the lots and roads, this could require replatting and a PUD amendment, at the City's discretion. 6. The applicant provide documentation to the City that all applicable runway safety requirements have or will be satisfied. The runway safety zone requirements are herebay established as a zoning restriction. As shown on the preliminary plat, the restricted area is measured from the edge of a 200' wide strip centered on the runway. At 126' from the edge, the maximum structure height is 18'. At 175' from this edge, the maximum structure height is 25'. The structure height maximum limit shall follow the slope of this imaginary surface and shall continue to extend over the development. 7. Specific hanger designs be submitted subject to City approval prior to consideration of the final plat approval of the lots with the hangers. 8. All homeowner association by -laws be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney prior to consideration of the final plat for lots where the association applies. 9. The wetland mitigation plan be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. All conditions imposed by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be satisfied. The filling of land intended to be upland for park dedication must be accepted with the mitigation plan. 10. Park dedication shall include cash as well as land, shall include the trail across the 2°d Addition to the eastern plat boundary, and include rough grading of the park land. Generally, park land shall be as indicated on the "Parks /Open Space" plan submitted in the April 2003 booklet. However, a new preliminary plat shall be submitted that clearly shows the park dedication lands, along with upland data for all areas intended to be dedicated as parkland. This data shall be reviewed to ensure acceptability prior to final plat approval. There must be a minimum of 4.5 (four and one -half) acres of contiguous upland useable for active recreation uses as determined by the Public Services Director, and a minimum of 7.0 (seven) acres total upland. The cash dedication may, at the City's discretion, be reduced by the cost of trail construction or other in -kind activities by the developer. Trail locations within the park areas shall be determined by the overall park design. The final park dedication shall be included in the development agreement, which must be reviewed by the City Council for approval. 11. Grading, drainage and utility related modifications and comments as recommended by the City Engineer in the attached memorandum (dated April 16, 2003) shall be addressed and incorporated into the plans. 12. The project is subject to the results of the sewer feasibility study. 13. The project is subject to the City's determination of the number of residential units to be allowed to connect to the City water system, based on the system's ability to provide adequate service, prior to the construction of the infrastructure needed to provide service to the units. 14. The project is subject to all requirements of Anoka County regarding access to Sunset Road/CR 53. 15. Additional right of way for Sunset Road/CR 53 shall be dedicated, to total 60' from centerline, within all areas of the plat. 16. The City formally vacate the segment of Carl Street as needed for developing this plat. 17. The airplane hangers in Lots 1 -4 and Lot 9, Block 4 (Phase 1) shall be built on the runway side of the houses, with the houses fronting on the road rather than the houses on the runway side of the lots. 18. Signs shall be installed along all wetland buffer /easement areas. Wetland easements shall extend, at a minimum, 10 feet outward from the delineated wetland boundary. 19. This resolution shall not be effective until the rezoning approved by Ordinance 12 -03 is in effect. 20. Elements of the project not specifically designed or addressed in the plans and supporting documents are subject to the standards of the zoning ordinance. R -1 standards will apply to single family detached portions, the R -3 standards to the multi - family attached portions. 21. Prior to consideration of a final plat, a revised preliminary plat shall be submitted for City review to ensure that it reflects approved revisions. 22. This approval is based on the following plans and information, and supporting documentation: Existing Conditions Plan, received January 31, 2003 Preliminary Plat, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 Preliminary Site Plan, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 Phasing Plan (data April 18, plan sheet April 23, 2003) Preliminary Landscape Plan, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 Preliminary Grading Plan, dated March 20, received March 28, 2003 Preliminary Utility Plan, dated March 20, received March 28, 2003 Townhome Building Elevations, received April 2003 Alternative Airpark Lot Layout, received January 31, 2003 City Engineer Comments dated April 16, 2003 Public Services Director Comments (Park Board) dated August 6, 2002 and December 4, 2002 23. Prior to commencing site work on Century Farm North, the developer must supply a plan that includes pond reconfiguration, tree planting, landscaping, and buffering for the pond south of the air park which incorporates neighborhood concerns and is acceptable to the City as approved by the City Council. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2003. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk 19 taiNit 4-- .o 94 ID k4cZ n1753aan51X1r1 omt OOV HLA HIHON Y'k!7'd A41111N30 NHL tic ABl 1411U0N WHVi AIMED NVId ONFLVHd Otte an YWa aaxow 1/131c101300 WIKM IWiA4flllH0 oamoaWaaaa 0 0 0 0 0 0 F I-- m— 1 o -- o-- l m— H N b h M 0 N C.— N M V I/) m m o o m .N 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q_ a 0 .0 0. 0. 0. CI Coo.] cea :u 6,2 LU a- te ct CITY OF LINO LAKES 0) 0) 00 0. 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N . • , • *.i."5„5'45.:;.',1 -`• • 1'4:k • 3 • ;■• It 1. (1) LU 0 u_ 0 5 Ln 8 ... INNS NM MI 0 w� LLJ C7 1:11 • . I J 0 Q4 Lu Lug Uy c O_ d > a Li +, v cu s GI m 0 0 N n IN Elevation Cu cu v V3 STAFF ORIGINATOR: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM V. E. Jeff Smyser TING DATE: July 9, 2003 Final Plat: Century Farm North BACKGROUND The preliminary plat for Century Farm North was approved by the City Council on April 28. The developer has submitted the final plat for phase 1. Under the new subdivision ordinance, final plats are to be reviewed by the P & Z. This is the first final plat to which the new requirement applies. The developer has requested that the City Council approve the final plat on July 14. This leaves only three business days between the P & Z and Council meetings. Staff has agreed to schedule these meetings, though at the time of writing this report several issues remain, as described below. A final plat submitted June 23 includes platting individual lots for units in phase one of the approved phasing plan. This includes 56 units: 17 single family detached townhomes and 39 single family lots. Of the 39 SF lots, nine of them in Block 4 will be airpark lots. ANALYSIS As required by the subdivision ordinance, the following requirements shall be met before consideration of the final plat by the Planning and Zoning Board or the City Council: a. The final plat shall substantially conform to the approved preliminary plat and phasing plan. b. For plats that consist solely of individual single family residential lots, final plat applications for subsequent phases shall not be approved until building permits have been issued for forty (40) percent of lots in the preceding phase. This paragraph applies only when the preceding phase consists of forty (40) or more lots. c. City Attorney approval of the status of title /property ownership related to the final plat. d. Completed development contract including all required financial securities and timeframe for final plat and final grading completion. e. Conditions attached to approval of the preliminary plat shall be fulfilled or secured by the development agreement, as appropriate. f. All fees, charges, and escrow related to the preliminary or final plat shall be paid in full. Conformance With Preliminary Plat (a): The submitted final plat includes the phase one lots with the remainder of the site in outlots. Outlot I creates a lot around an existing single family home. This was not included in the approved preliminary plat or phasing plan: this home was to be removed. It adds an extra dwelling unit beyond the approved phasing plan, and creates a lot that has no road frontage (or access), no sanitary sewer or water service, and that is only 7954 sf. While it may or may not be worthwhile retaining this existing house, if it is to be retained it must be on a lot that meets the minimum requirements. No lot without sewer and water can be less than 10 acres. Staff suggested combining Outlots I, D, and E. This would leave the house on an outlot of 18+ acres. Dividing this outlot could be resolved in the future, perhaps with a new preliminary plat that incorporates the house. At the time this report was written, this issue is unresolved. Staff and the developer will discuss this prior to the meeting. A new final plat must resolve this prior to staff recommending approval. Completion of Preceding Phase (b): This is the first phase of the project, so the `minimum completion' clause doesn't apply. However, it will apply to subsequent phases. It is expected that the final plat for phase two will be submitted for approval early in January. 2004. With construction beginning in mid -2003, it is unknown if 40% of phase one (22 units) will be sold and have building permits issued. Title (c): The title commitment and the final plat must be submitted to the City Attorney in time for an opinion for the City Council meeting. Among other things, the City Attorney compares the title commitment with the signature page of the plat to ensure all persons with property interest are represented on the signature page. Development Agreement and Fees (d) and (f): The City Engineer is assembling the development agreement. This requires cost estimates that serve as the basis of the financial securities. In addition, trunk utility fees and outstanding charges are collected along with the securities. Conditions of Approval (e): Resolution 03 -60 approved the preliminary plat and lists conditions of approval (see attached). The development agreement often includes conditions that cannot be met prior to construction. For example, the phasing plan is an ongoing requirement. Location of airplane hangers and wetland easement signs are other examples. However, other conditions should be met prior to final plat approval to ensure they get done. Condition #7 requires review of airplane hanger design prior to final plat approval. The attached drawings show the proposed hanger design. In addition to the drawings, the draft homeowner covenants include the following restrictions: Airplane Hangers. Airplane hangers are permitted on Air Park Lots subject to the Lino Air Park North Declaration, the Permit and the following additional restrictions: (a) Any airplane hanger constructed upon an Air Park Lot shall be built in conformance with all building codes and regulations of the City and other governmental and quasi - governmental entities having jurisdiction over the Air Park Lots and over Outlot B, Lino Air Park North, and its use as a private air strip. (b) Aircraft hangers and their construction and location upon an Air Park Lot, are subject to prior approval by the Committee. (c) Airplane hangers must meet the following minimum criteria: (i) Architectural compatibility with living units located upon the Air Park Lot including color (earth tones only) and architectural style, although they may be constructed with metal sidewalls. (ii) Must not exceed 3200 square feet. (iii) Sidewall height of not less than twelve feet nor more than eighteen feet. (iv) Not less than one entry door. (v) An overhead clear span door a minimum of ten foot wide and eight foot high. (vi) 3/12 maximum roof pitch. (vii) Roof color coordinated with sidewall color. (viii) 36 inch sidewall overhang and 18 inch gable overhang. (ix) A forty foot clear span door on the gable end facing the applicable taxi way. (x) Such additional aesthetic detail as the (Air Park Architectural Control) Committee may designate including, but not limited to, windows and window treatments, louvers and landscaping. (xi) Any improved apron fronting the taxi way door of the airplane hanger not to exceed ten feet in length. (d) Commercial use (including space rental) of any airplane hanger is not permitted. • • These (or a revised version) would be included in the covenants on the property. However, the City has no authority to enforce private covenants. Therefore, the City should consider including such requirements in the development agreement. Condition #8 requires City review of the homeowner association documents. Drafts have been submitted and forwarded to the City Attorney. Condition #10 refers to the unresolved park dedication question. A new plan illustrating park dedication has been received. It indicates 4.7 acres of contiguous upland and another 3.1 acres of upland that is not contiguous. This acreage is acceptable. However, the subdivision ordinance requires that dedicated upland, at a value of $28,000 per acre, be subtracted from a total cash amount calculated at $1665 per dwelling unit. Other credits can be subtracted as well. In discussion with the Public Services Director, the following park dedication scenario is proposed: TOTAL CASH CONTRIBUTION previously total new cash per total units platted units unit total 249 8 241 $ 1,665 $ 401,265 VALUE OF LAND DEDICATION upland acres 7.813 addl. acres for east trail 0.060 addl. acres for north trail 0.250 per acre total dedication credit 8.123 $ 28,000 $ (227,444) OTHER construction of concrete sidewalk (5') and bituminous trail (8') $ (70,000) balance: cash dedication $ 103,821 That is, the land indicated on the "Preliminary Park Plan" of June 23, 2003 would be dedicated. Upland would be credited toward the park dedication as would two small additional pieces to preserve the potential for future trail connections. Construction of the sidewalk and trail would be credited. The listed cash balance would be dedicated as well. Staff has not discussed this proposal in any depth with the developer. The developer and city staff will meet prior to the P & Z meeting to discuss this proposal to resolve the park dedication. Condition #15 requires additional right of way for Sunset Road. While the right of way is shown on the plat, the dedication statement on the signature page does not include it. This must be corrected. Other Final Plat Requirements: The subdivision ordinance includes specific requirements for all plats. One is that monument locations be shown on the final plat. The submitted plat includes a statement that monuments will be located in the future. Monuments are needed for setback measurements for new homes new structures, and fences. Because monument location and placement is vital to locating property lines, the City requires that these must be shown on the plat. Easements have been included over stormwater facilities in phase one areas. Additional easements will be necessary over future phases when they are final platted. OPTIONS. 1. Approve the final plat. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION At the time of writing this report, the above issues remained unresolved. Staff will meet with the developer prior to the P & Z meeting and bring additional information to the meeting. If the above issues cannot be resolved, staff will not recommend approval. Assuming the issues listed above are satisfactorily resolved, staff recommends Option 1. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03-60 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MUSA RESERVE ALLOCATION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN FOR CENTURY FARM NORTH WHEREAS, the City has received applications for developing an area known as Century Farm North; and WHEREAS, the development requires approval of the allocation of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) reserve and approval of a preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on December 11, 2002 and was continued to January 8, 2003 and February 12, 2003; and WHEREAS, the proposed MUSA allocation and preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan meet the requirements of the City's Growth Management, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 12 -03 rezoning the site to Planned Unit Development for residential development; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the MUSA allocation and preliminary plat/planned unit development stage plan for Century Farm North with the following conditions: 1. A total of 55.0 acres of MUSA shall be allocated for the project, and the project's 249 • residential units shall be developed in accordance with the following phasing plan, which is illustrated on Attachment A: year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 total MUSA acres to be Allocated 15.3 11.4 13.5 5.4 9.4 55.0 Lots to be final platted 56 65 52 43 33 249 2. A cul de sac will be constructed at the east terminus of the new Carl Street within Century Farm North. Carl Street will not be connected to the existing Carl Street as part of the Century Farm North development. 3. The driveway of Lot 7, Block 6 be shifted eastward to the extent possible. 4. The submitted townhome housing types and building elevations be modified to specify finish materials and be subject to City approval. Side walls facing public streets shall include windows or other architectural features to avoid the appearance of a blank wall. 5. Lots 1 -3, Block 4 shall be "airpark" lots. If these or other designated airpark lots are to be converted to non - airpark lots in the future, depending on the extent of changes to the design or configuration of the lots and roads, this could require replatting and a PUD amendment, at the City's discretion. 6. The applicant provide documentation to the City that all applicable runway safety requirements have or will be satisfied. The runway safety zone requirements are herebay established as a zoning restriction. As shown on the preliminary plat, the restricted area is measured from the edge of a 200' wide strip centered on the runway. At 126' from the edge, the maximum structure height is 18'. At 175' from this edge, the maximum structure height is 25'. The structure height maximum limit shall follow the slope of this imaginary surface and shall continue to extend over the development. 7. Specific hanger designs be submitted subject to City approval prior to consideration of the final plat approval of the lots with the hangers. 8. All homeowner association by -laws be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney prior to consideration of the final plat for lots where the association applies. 9. The wetland mitigation plan be subject to comment and recommendation by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. All conditions imposed by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be satisfied. The filling of land intended to be upland for park dedication must be accepted with the mitigation plan. 10. Park dedication shall include cash as well as land, shall include the trail across the 2nd Addition to the eastern plat boundary, and include rough grading of the park land. Generally, park land shall be as indicated on the "Parks /Open Space" plan submitted in the April 2003 booklet. However, a new preliminary plat shall be submitted that clearly shows the park dedication lands, along with upland data for all areas intended to be dedicated as parkland. This data shall be reviewed to ensure acceptability prior to final plat approval. There must be a minimum of 4.5 (four and one -half) acres of contiguous upland useable for active recreation uses as determined by the Public Services Director, and a minimum of 7.0 (seven) acres total upland. The cash dedication may, at the City's discretion, be reduced by the cost of trail construction or other in -kind activities by the developer. Trail locations within the park areas shall be determined by the overall park design. The final park dedication shall be included in the development agreement, which must be reviewed by the City Council for approval. • • 11. Grading, drainage and utility related modifications and comments as recommended by the City Engineer in the attached memorandum (dated April 16, 2003) shall be addressed and incorporated into the plans. 12. The project is subject to the results of the sewer feasibility study. 13. The project is subject to the City's determination of the number of residential units to be allowed to connect to the City water system, based on the system's ability to provide adequate service, prior to the construction of the infrastructure needed to provide service to the units. 14. The project is subject to all requirements of Anoka County regarding access to Sunset Road/CR 53. 15. Additional right of way for Sunset Road/CR 53 shall be dedicated, to total 60' from centerline, within all areas of the plat. 16. The City formally vacate the segment of Carl Street as needed for developing this plat. 17. The airplane hangers in Lots 1-4 and Lot 9, Block 4 (Phase 1) shall be built on the runway side of the houses, with the houses fronting on the road rather than the houses on the runway side of the lots. 18. Signs shall be installed along all wetland buffer /easement areas. Wetland easements shall extend, at a minimum, 10 feet outward from the delineated wetland boundary. 19. This resolution shall not be effective until the rezoning approved by Ordinance 12 -03 is in effect. 20. Elements of the project not specifically designed or addressed in the plans and supporting documents are subject to the standards of the zoning ordinance. R -1 standards will apply to single family detached portions, the R -3 standards to the multi - family attached portions. 21. Prior to consideration of a final plat, a revised preliminary plat shall be submitted for City review to ensure that it reflects approved revisions. 22. This approval is based on the following plans and information, and supporting documentation: Existing Conditions Plan, received January 31, 2003 Preliminary Plat, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 Preliminary Site Plan, dated January 20, 2003, received January 31, 2003 Phasing Plan (data April 18, plan sheet April 23, 2003) Preliminary Landscape Plan, dated January 20, 2003, received. January 31, 2003 • Preliminary Grading Plan, dated March 20, received March 28, 2003 Preliminary Utility Plan, dated March 20, received March 28, 2003 Townhome Building Elevations, received April 2003 Alternative Airpark Lot Layout, received January 31, 2003 City Engineer Comments dated April 16, 2003 Public Services Director Comments (Park Board) dated August 6, 2002 and December 4, 2002 23. Prior to commencing site work on Century Farm North, the developer must supply a plan that includes pond reconfiguration, tree planting, landscaping, and buffering for the pond south of the air park which incorporates neighborhood concerns and is acceptable to the City as approved by the City Council. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of 2003. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor NPR Wag Y10SJII1aI 'WW 1 MO QCV H19 HLHON 1`RIVd AMMO O 'OOV 191 H1FlON rand maws? NY1d ONBVHd Mil AI ',WI n1s001111 1100 MOM Lite All .11HIdOTIVO Mal VIM 1.1111N32 aI4'L1NI .LN 0 0 0 0 0 0 - h1E 1 SO Ill N II M Cl 111 LO N f MI N N M Y N •III 0 sos 0 0 0 0 0 L L L O O. a a a a a I w w v 0 N GV CL. CC uj IJI g A J lL 0 Q tal 10 11 0 0 0 0 O O O O O N N N N v3053W., Y3.W1 DPI1 'OOV H19 H.WON 11121yi Art,LN30 ,Ik141 'GOY H1}JON MOW AMMO NV'Id 3ll8 ANYN17'HHJ PM .w 41. wanes 1' wi ale L8W81B0 W1tlN/iiV�lf1111® Iu on t- i1C 0 Z 4 CE 11U# 'r 3 i 5 1 P a 8 5. S 3 1 1 8 3" s 1 3 g al - S gi s ik s 5 31 25 I; 1 8 1 k a 1 1 1 2 i 1 1 1 11 I 8 s s5 Eg 1 g e a 1151 ff da i$ 8 8 5 a 3 S a Se .G dA i g - aY 6L 5 QeIIS •5 •9i, 5 °P_ 1! 8° 1 1. 3 °6E. if . iii F°6 t6- $gai3_ ,I;11 1 11 Saba 1 56 °5a iii: 153° L�Sg° ya 5$II g 3 9 °- 1 °5 y.3 5'a '6 eL y3a i53 y1 s i:. �65= -e a� a 1 s,Y S3: 'S $ i b 2j5_ 95 -yya se „:1 6g,J�`°e 1 ! 8 1 $_ _h :53, aF 15dS 6.i2�6a 63!.0,5°,: €, i 1 1 1 $ 3 WF ' 3ai s° a:Ea ''Fs ggaae� 1 8581 12 3 1�as � -F5 5� !Ili aIIS�• aga° 5 _a 5$ 53 Jul $ Ili! 506^ t 5 ii a 5$Yfig � 513 5e 6�a° 6°�a° �• °N' a r¢6 b gi 1 F) 5 ��$$; Vime, ca5 5pa 3fis $6b_ L }5 ^aa 5 p ° 9 s 54.i. Fg 10 331 °5a. _`aF G° -11 1% -jay 3i s a s i 5 6 .sgg a At- Li. €g: 'F:a °a=5 > Sf!`8; ^i aa5 I s • s ▪ g�9 asbp3 13 X # nit ;15 ill 1 -L 3 21,... 5: Fyldaa i "' iiii! a "3i iii 11 511= 1511 - a -? :'b _ .s 5 1 6 5 -la 3 L °¢y 6i_.. 6 ,qc $8L1iS -° La is "g xa m t d �i O 7 �a 1 1 !iii 5 1 a55L �a a�L3 YS° i� $L�i a g s �• �.° o ° sJ$ p'ps2 e'S i i_a g g EgbF�6 gyi'3� s°saa_F 5°i°a3 ^y s saa d a 5 $d5i� adsAi ^sSbF "65 °i5 qG ° $ 5 s 5 "d3 asi8 _L$ g i 5i- ,6 gill n aE 1a15si $aaa- 1: fi Y 8 c g 5 3 l�SO] ^ill 1 iEd „f ba a a$ i 55 J°1-': - 3 9 2 i_a_E s 8°_- �° E s $ s 5 ga r5= FeFs aoSF 315_1F1 115 a3a55s e • ya si j1i_3 1 111.9 1 -be =is5s 6s1€ a all!, a bNF353: q }� t dy :� 3•g ° We 5 D-� it °a6 d "5y a 111;1;1: 5 �. 65 5 8 - Y Y c 56r it Y� ZE S a35ad5 iy•3o k 59 SSu� Sa s i4a 5s r 5 F F1� �qe gF_ ;L y Y a 5 .: a - 71;1 Y 1 Ni 5? ,: = ia1 ade`ca CC g5 @ a Y i 2. p iii 99E 111 7 D 1a1i I! 1Fia: 8!.8h i 410 4 3 55SN°gs 's5 Y3 Y ia'aq i� Sis' ayp_F{°F li;x i 1 3 „F5 sa5x gainS =RFa 1 ai3s$I° 1 e1 :gs yy. i/t 5 a 6 i ag n^ I =�J t` 1 -s° 5 151.8 e5 -5 k !! b -5 i+l $ - 5 n 3 �'..d' n lei 7 D•u�D F °� ,ai a °'6 OYS ijfi oY G,a 153 41 c 1 1 ; g 1 S Lrsa S a 5 33E a°65a 1111 ssi° Pie . ks° a a 1 E 5 5 31E ,gal pp a 1 F a °° i F-i °; 8 2 a ¢1 I N) _.gi 1 1 �° s Sa3 F:°ra LL ° °3 t f 5�:.i3- s 56 -•i g 1 5 ¢ 4 3 1 €i . °s a s^ 15s ,sb;s' xj�, f '3 "s� 3 �; "a ,S _ $ 1$�i "11�z �.s .I 3g ts• Eats �1 - a i5gesg° �.iiaaa: i :8 J aie b y _ 5, = S 5II_ =i a fi.s z 5e.7 6t 5 s i t`- 3qi Y° 9 2 -351 1s "L5„ -01g. i 1111': 1314 § -d ge 1 -la . V] e_rs Flt` 1II i a5 g U . "' ; sg saza s D E3l a i °si _A. F;B "a 5-55s ,° 5aa1s a ^ e EiC - 1 1 11 s q m � §aga Y fi E b 5555 ,1111 :s sbi5 G ^i a•", aX '�- 5 1 1 Ys° a II °v 5 a sP°°.. i '3i 5 5•FQ ^a° 5 5•L L"'E° " ^_ _ _ a =s ds ei s°i a 2 s1 18ti a i "5;Ii^.i 3 _411:16 J t • fii! a5j a 1 a$5L Iv Al eS Fs a5F5d 8^Ss 8^ s �a = x 9a 1 m 1;1 L .s as2._ 5 a '°�e a3= a "a aC : ❑ as B o 3 gi5 iiiel �gtg 3 Iii- a� $a,3iF $ .. 3 € 6g41121; 1 Ufa it A 3 9 3 -s1 i 3 1 a 3 5 3 !is Mil 1 i$3 1 1 1 5 .a',1 Illi Hid Iii11 1 1 1 ,Wilt= ? 1 as al SHEET 1 OF 4 SHEETS 24 2/1 arn.~~ SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS r,sa,or.aas l•66C C) w w V W ce CITY OF LINO LAKES m.m z p:w3u s v: a P41 Ai 11.11.81.00s — as•sss; krett al aiuwm WI kilt +13 4.4100$0 w,N a. 0 z 0 w z J 2 Q (SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS) (S133HS b 30 Z 133HS 33S V DMA HOIVW CS14TUR''r ___ new. 'L ATP ♦ /1 eM vc.ccsa. wrn 00.02'1 r1.Z1,LZ.00111 M P (11 41.21.61.005 09•x691 - -- LL 1 !s C0 11 W z J 2E tl 1I e!, 4wAL.ION.J,.lj?n8r'3"4N1-74 ea ,k (SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS) 4, a 112.103 . • 0o'80Z A.Z1,LZ.00N 00'91P A.Z1.4Z.00N 1 Iii b art- , I i n as. 58 tS bg 0 4 1 001w 99'901 • /1.Zl,LZ.00N L'p It/ 1,3S Pr/I• IaP./I...P0101— w pt k . ssoilm■�t t 8S as t -$ .41. VS, I ZAON „. 0 0 0 w 0 w 0 � OI 0 1 voevs 16,41 !I P"P 00'941 1 41.Z1,LZ.00N 7t r` O C FA esw 0/I n 3 (SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS) SHEET 4 OF 4 V1053.111 IDIV1 ONf1 'OOV 1419 HUM Yklvd AH(WB Y 1St H111ON NAY I AFYllN33 Wel AlVd AHVNWfBHd co W 0 x 0 9 • • Lil 2 0 111 2 r• . ..4 :;:p.. •....... • • • CITY OF LINO LAKFC • AGENDA ITEM 7D STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -104, Accepting Bids and Awarding Construction Contract, Twilight Acres Watermain Improvement Project VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: Sealed bids were received and publicly opened at 10:00 a.m. on June 7, 2003. The results of the bid opening are presented below. City Council action is required to award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Contractor Amount of Bid C & L Excavating, Inc. $165,192.50 BNR Excavating, Inc. $169,350.00 Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $173,097.00 Redstone Construction Company, Inc. $179,183.82 Friedges Contracting $179,596.22 Meyer Contracting, Inc. $184,566.00 Penn Contracting, Inc. $184,586.40 Northdale Construction, Inc. $193,853.18 Engineer's Estimate $154,616.00 The low bid is approximately 7% over the Engineer's Estimate for this project. A copy of the complete bid tabulation is attached. This 7% overage falls within the 10% contingency budgeted for the project. The substantial completion date for this project is September 1, 2003, with a final completion date of September 23, 2003. The project is to be funded by the City's trunk funds and reimbursed through utility connection charges. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 03 -104, Accepting Bids and Awarding a Construction Contract to C & L Excavating, Inc. for the Twilight Acres Watermain Improvement project. 3. Not adopt Resolution No. 03 -104. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends adoption of Resolution Number 03 -104. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -104 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — TWILIGHT ACRES WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Twilight Acres Watermain Improvement project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Contractor Amount of Bid C & L Excavating, Inc. $165,192.50 BNR Excavating, Inc. $169,350.00 Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $173,097.00 Redstone Construction Company, Inc. $179,183.82 Friedges Contracting $179,596.22 Meyer Contracting, Inc. $184,566.00 Penn Contracting, Inc. $184,586.40 Northdale Construction, Inc. $193,853.18 Engineer's Estimate $154,616.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that C & L Excavating, Inca is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with C & L Excavating, Inc., in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the Twilight Acres Watermain Improvement project according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July 2003. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ann J. Blair, City Clerk TKDA • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS July 8, 2003 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Re: Twilight Acres Watermain Improvements City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota TKDA Commission No. 12278 -05 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140 (651) 292 -4400 (651) 292 -0083 Fax www.tkda.com Dear Mayor and City Council: Bids for the referenced project were received on July 7, 2003, with the following results. A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information. Contractor Base Bid C & L Excavating, Inc. BNR Excavating, Inc. Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. Redstone Construction Co., Inc. Friedges Contracting Co. Meyer Contracting Co. Penn Contracting, Inc. Northdale Construction, Inc. $165,192.50 $169,350.00 $173,097.00 $179,183.82 $179,596.22 $184,566.00 $184,586.40 $193,853.18 Engineer's Estimate $154,616.00 Recommendation We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest bidder, C & L Excavating, Inc., for their low bid of $165,192.50. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Scott A. Brink, P.E. Project Manager SAB:art Enclosure An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity I $ 1,600.00 0 0 o 0) CO c E9 0 0 o CO CO co 0 0 o O (O N V! 0 0 0 0 o o M O (n 40 r (G 03 EA 0 0 o O CO t: 69 0 0 0 0 O o O O 0 0 (O cr Vi E9 0 0 o O O N V► 0 0 'v N N E9 0 0 o O 60. r VE 0 0 et O CO. /R 0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ri o cci ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 00 (O O CO O O O O (n O CO CO O (n 0) CO (n v r 00 r M N co- 0 V' V' fR f9 Vi fit E9 ER Ea fa Vf E9 E9 $ 1,200.00 I 0 0 c0 el ti oi fA $ 169,350.00 I 1 lWI lr JIV11V11JJi V1Y IYV. 1LL1U -UiJ ENGINEERS • ARCI BIDS OPENED: JULY 7, 2003, AT 10:00 AM • *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE " C & L EXCAVATING BNR EX ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE $ 800.00 O 0 0) N V! $ 24.00 $ 650.00 $ 510.00 $ 2,200.00 0 0 0 r V! $ 240.00 $ 200.00 $ 2.50 0 O e- V} 0 0 r ffl $ 8,500.00 $ 1,013.00 $ 160.00 $ 4.80 $ 5.00 $ 2.00 $ 13.80 $ 44.00 $ 15.00 $ 2.20 $ 1.00 0 O o co f9 $ 900.00 0 O CO o O cfh V} $ 1,400.00 0 0000 0 o ' c Vi 0 0 0 0 (1) 0 0) n r CO. Vi E9 0 cD N. 0) Vi $ 1,250.00 $ 1,875.00 0 0 0 0 CO N f9 0 0 0 N r e- V► 0 0 0 O 00 er V! 0 0 (0 Is r h 49 $ 7,200.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,227.50 $ 1,239.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 31,500.00 0 0 00000 (/) 0 N E9 0 0 0 N V} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d' (1) V► E9 0 0 0 01 1 E9 0 10 cc; 0 co N 49 0 IC) N 0) e (100 f9 $ 450.00 $ 20.50 I$ 35.00 $ 850.00 $ 650.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 19.20 0 0 00 CO ti V! V! $ 3.50 0 0 E9 $ 3.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 2.75 $ 3.00 $ 18.00 0 0 s V3 $ 41.50 $ 14.00 0 0 (000 N V; f9 0 0 d' V? 0 0 O 0 O r E9 $ 41,860.00 960.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 5,700.00 - - - $ 1,875.00 $ 3,750.00 0 0 0 O Nr N 69 0 0 cV N. co E9 0 0 o 0 er N f9 $ 76,377.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,025.00 $ 1,239.00 $ 1,875.00 $ 21,000.00 0 0 0 O OOO 00 N Vi 0 0 0 O M Eli $ 6,000.00 $ 200.00 0 0 O O N1• N Vi 0 O Oi M N CO Is W $ 154,616.00 $ 500.00 0 0 N 49 1 $ 24.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 75.00 $ 150.00 0 0 ci 49 0 0 ci 69 0 (0 e- V! $ 10,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 2.50 $ 3.00 $ 7.50 $ 10.00 $_ 40.00 0 co o r 49 $ 3.00 $ 2.00 0 O 0 0) FR W 1 LF 1 LF W W LF W W LBS u. fn LF AO Al AS 331:11 Sl Si TON Is V (1) J W N CO '�f ('O 780 N N 800 224 (00 r DIVISION 11- STREET CONSTRUCTION AND RESTORATION r r 10 810 413 250 2,100 0 00£ 001, 000'Z 00 1DIVISION I - WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 8" DIP WATERMAIN (CL 52) 6" DIP WATERMAIN (CL 52) • 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX FIRE HYDRANT 11" COPPER SERVICE PIPE (TYPE K) 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX 0 o INSULATION (4" THICKNESS) TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK SUBTOTAL DIVISION I MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL CLEAR AND GRUB REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) COMMON EXCAVATION (STREET AND DRIVEWAY) AGGREGATE BASE (CL 5) 100% CRUSHED 2350 TYPE LV 3 WEAR COURSE B TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) SOD - LAWN TYPE EROSION CONTROL FENCE ADJUST SANITARY MANHOLE SUBTOTAL DIVISION 11 TOTAL TWILIGHT ACRES WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1 +- N M 4 (n c0 1- 00 0) O r- " r N M d' *0 (0 I\ 00 0) Or " el 11\Vll VVIVIIVIIIJIJIVI• IVV. IGG/ V'VV ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JULY 7, 2003, AT 10:00 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION FRIEDGES CONTRACTING CO ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 0 M O () e- T." $ 37,770.60 $ 814.80 $ 2,882.28 st M 0 t0 r $ 5,302.17 $ 9,820.20 $ 766.75 $ 1,917.00 $ 2,912.00 $ 1,550.08 $ 16.00 N I) O r 10 H) CO 69 $ 4,295.53 $ 700.00 $ 2,158.35 $ 3,645.00 $ 2,304.54 $ 2,200.00 0 O 0 N M T' 69 $ 35,455.00 $ 4,893.00 $ 9,980.00 0 0 ti CD CO 69 $ 3,529.28I O ti 1n CO O M T- 69 $ 179,596.22 $ 569.65 $ 23.46 $ 20.37 $ 720.57 CO M 10 E9 $ 1,767.39 $ 12.59 $ 30.67 $ 76.68 $ 3.64, $ 6.92 $ 0.01 $ 4,295.53 $ 700.00 $ 431.67 $ 4.50 CO O to CO In CO. 69 69 O CD N 69 10 r 0) CO CO CO 10 0 CD �t 69 69 69 O CO CO 69 $ 441.16 $ 1,904.28 - $ 928.80 $ 4,151.84 1 $ 2,070.60 $ 6,622.41 $ 17,409.60 $ 3,961.75 $ 5,286.00 $ 8.00 $ 788.48 $ 16.00 to 0 M N r � 69 co r a CO CO N. 69 $ 500.00 $ 875.00 • $ 1,620.00 • $ 1,032.50 I O 00000 C7 00000 O M 69 O C7 d' N 69 O O O G C O LO 0) 0) M or m 69 69 69 $ 400.00 0 N CM CO N N 69 00 CO O) Cp O w N CO, O r r 69 $ 952.14 - $ 23.22 $ 1,037.96 N N CO 69 $ 2,207.47 $ 22.32 $ 158.47 $ 211.44 $ 0.01 $ 3.52 $ 0.01 a- 0) CD CO 69 $ 500.00 $ 175.00 $ 2.00 $ 2.50 0 01 69 0 r 69 $ 45.00 $ 13.00 $ 2.45 0 'V' CO $ 282.90 $ 1,200.00 0 0 O CO O 69 0 0 0 0 0 O 04 0 CO N M 69 69 $ 1,800.00 $ 6,600.00 $ 14,040.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 800.00 0 0 0 0 CC) O cc}} 0 NI' O CO 69 69 $ 77,538.00 0 0 O 0 010 N r 69 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,620.00 0 0 a) M N r 69 0 0 O 0 4) et 48 0 0 O 0 sf 0) N E9 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 at ti N N M M 69 69 69 $ 200.00 1 0 0 O- 0 0 ' 69 O O 0) IA 10 IC) CO 69 O O CA ct. M n r 69 • - - O 0 N 69 $ 23.00 $ 800.00 1 $ 600.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 18.00 $ 50.00 $ 90.00 $ 1.00 $ 2.00 $ 5.00 0 0 O p 01 r• 69 $ 500.00 $ 200.00 $ 2.00 ooc $ 0 0 - 69 $ 14.00 $ 50.00 $ 8.00 $ 1.85 0 0 N 69 0 0 0 10 to W J LF EA Q W W J (�,� co 6 m J SF LF J LS TREE CO J AO TON AS AO NOl J 40 N .- r a 3 3 780 25 25 800 224 1,600 DIVISION 1I - STREET CONSTRUCTION AND RESTORATION r r 0 O CO CO _ 'V O N p N 700 300 2,000 100 _1 O DIVISION 1- WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 18" DIP WATERMAIN (CL 52) 6" DIP WATERMAIN (CL 52) 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX 16" GATE VALVE AND BOX FIRE HYDRANT 1" COPPER SERVICE PIPE (TYPE K) 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX DIP FITTINGS INSULATION (4" THICKNESS) TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK SUBTOTAL DIVISION 1 MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL CLEAR AND GRUB REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) } ce 0 D Z Q W ce F- cn Z O H U 6 Z O 2 2 O U AGGREGATE BASE (CL 5) 100% CRUSHED 2350 TYPE LV 3 WEAR COURSE B ,TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) SOD - LAWN TYPE EROSION CONTROL FENCE ADJUST SANITARY MANHOLE SUBTOTAL DIVISION II TOTAL TWILIGHT ACRES WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS I r N M- V' 10 CO n CO 0) O r 01 CO d' C0 CO 4, CO O) O r, ENGINEERS- ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: JULY 7, 2003, AT 10:00 AM "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MEYER CONTRACTING CO PENN CONTRACTING NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 0 0 O O C9 I $ 38,318.00 $ 971.20 $ 2,825.68 $ 1,613.94 $ 5,268.45 COD c O CD EA I $ 1,671.75 • -- 0 10 V Vi 69 0 C1) O 49 O (IS U! $ 82,531.68 $ 17,000.00 0 O O Ch E9 0 N r 0-1 64 0 CO•) C0 N 69 $ 2,271.50 I $ 3,750.00 •• -- 0 O 0 co- co E9 $ 4,650.00I O OV O 1` E9 $ 500.00 I $ 4,400.00 $ 111,321.50 $ 193,853.18 0 O o v. 64 $ 23.80 $ 24.28 $ 706.42 $ 537.98 I $ 1 ,756.15 � N 64 '• . .- $ 134.74 $ 4.32 O1 `t E9 0 O E9 $ 17,000.00I 0 ci 0 VI- CO $ 625.00 I 10 C) E9 0 1 E9 0 Ci `' 69 $ 13.50 O o0 `� E9 $ 15.50 I 0)) ei E9 0 CCl 49 $ 550.00 0 0 0 O CD (0 E9 $ 49,910.00 $ 1,120.00 $ 3,480.00 $ 2,130.00 0 O N I, E9 0 CC) 'V: h 49 0 O .- 69 1 $ 2,875.00 00'080'Z $ I 0 v Elio 0 a0 E9 0 0 0 et N E9 0 "0' Oi CO 1� ( w 00'005'£ I00'000'£ S_f 0 0 oui 0 CO .- E9 0 0 M CO CV E9 $ 1,652.00 0 0 0000000 O CO E9 0 0 O CD M E9 0 0 O CO co M 69 0 0 O r CC7 49 0 0 O 0 6* 49 0 0 O M 49 0 0 CD r N. ER o 0 1: 0) ti ti 0) 49. O a co CO Y) (0 r CO 1000 O O CD CV 49 $ 31.00 $ 28.00 $ 870.00 $ 710.00 0 0 0 .4' N E9 0 CO O 69 $ 68.00 { $ 115.00 O CO N E9 1 $ 3.60 0 M r 69 1 oo -oo '£ S $ 3,000.00 0 0 0 co CO 0 CD CM E9 0 O d' E9 $ 18.00 0 to .- fPr $ 48.00 O O ,- Cf} 0 CO CV 69. 0 O C•i 19 $ 270.00 I $ 900.00 O O O O 00000 0 0 0 0 CO O N CD N CD M 1,- o r V.- N 64 69 69 E9 O 0 0 CO n 69 I $ 13,416.00 O 0 0 0 O CCl E9 O 0 0 CO N CO 69 $ 4,000.00 0 00 er 0 I,- '.t 69 0 O CO 0 co- E9 O 0 O CO tr � N 1 00•005'L $ O 0 O 0 CO .-- E9 $ 875.00 1 $ 1,296.00I O 0 10 CD 0 N E9 O 0 0 0 M d' E9 $ 30,450.00 I O 0 0 O C.) r- N E9 O 0 0 0 N 'V- E9 O 0 0 0 0 <O E9 O 0 0 0 C+) 69 $ 1,800.00 I O O Co CO P ti co E9 O O Co ID CO of 3 r 69 I$ 450.00 $ 25.00 $ 40.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 920.00 0 0 C5 0 CO CV 44 0 N a- E9 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 5.00 i $ 21.00 $ 3.80 $ 7,500.00 0 0 00 CO r E9 0 0 n .- E9 0 0 r 69 0 0 N iR 0 0 CD 69 $ 14.5 0 0 M E9 $ 14.00 I 0 0 M 69 0 0 !'d E9 $ 225.00 I JJ W W W LF LBS u. CnJ LS J TREE 1 coJUOODUJ f" F- N O O V' M CO V' r M 780 0 CO 224 1,600 DIVISION II - STREET CONSTRUCTION AND RESTORATION r r O 0 OD 413 250 I 0 N 0 � 0 M 0 O N 0 O tO DIVISION I - WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 8" DIP WATERMAIN (CL 52) 6" DIP WATERMAIN (CL 52) 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX (FIRE HYDRANT Y W D.. W a. E. w U r W co r W IL tL O U 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX DIP FITTINGS INSULATION (4" THICKNESS) TRENCH STABILIZATION ROCK SUBTOTAL DIVISION I MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL CLEAR AND GRUB REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (ALL DEPTHS) COMMON EXCAVATION (STREET AND DRIVEWAY) AGGREGATE BASE (CL 5) 100% CRUSHED 2350 TYPE LV 3 WEAR COURSE B TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) SOD - LAWN TYPE EROSION CONTROL FENCE _ ADJUST SANITARY MANHOLE SUBTOTAL DIVISION 11 TOTAL TWILIGHT ACRES WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS I .- N co et O CD t� 0) Of r N- .-- N M NI' Cn CO ti CO 0) Or r •.N- AGENDA ITEM 7E STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City. Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -105, Authorizing Final Payment for Ditch /Pond Cleaning VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 Vote Required BACKGROUND: Quotes were received and publicly opened on December 10, 2002. Arnt Construction Company, Inc. was the low bidder at $49,731.70. They have completed the work and city staff has approved it. A copy of the invoice is attached. Payment in the amount $47,245.11 for work completed was issued to the contractor previously. The funding for this work is provided by the Surface Water Management Fund. This fund was established in 1992 as a revenue source in order to meet the "administrative, planning, ponding, mitigation, and water quality needs" of the City. It is reimbursed through assessments to new subdivisions and is also collected as property owners connect to City utilities. Staff recommends final payment to Arnt Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $2,486.59. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Approve Resolution 03 -105 Authorizing Final Payment for the Ditch /Pond Cleaning project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution 03 -105 be approved. • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -105 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE DITCH /POND CLEANING PROJECT WHEREAS, the construction of the Ditch /Pond Cleaning Project has been completed by Arnt Construction Company, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Final Payment in the amount of $2,486.59 is approved for a total contract amount of $49,731.70. Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of July 2003. Ann J. Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor ARNT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. P.O. BOX 549 HUGO, MINNESOTA 55038 OFFICE: 651/426-1296 FAX: 651/426-3760 Bill To: Invoice City of Lino Lakes Number 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes 1LIN 55014 P.O. Number 9795 Date 03/07/03 Terms General Info DUE UPON RECEIPT 1.5% INTEREST AFTER 30 DAYS Description Amount RE: Lino Lakes Pond and Ditch Ditch and Pond Cleaning 49, 731.70 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $49,731.70 An Equal Opportunity Employer • • AGENDA ITEM 7.H STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala C. C. MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution 03 -109 Approving Distribution of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Lakes Business Park ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Glenn Rehbein Companies is proposing to develop a 32 acres Business Park, east of Lake Drive to create a site for a potential light industrial user, and three additional lots for future development. The size of the development, which could potentially exceed 300,000 square feet of light industrial development, triggers the need to prepare and Environmental Assessment Worksheet. The City retained the services of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., (SEH) to prepare the EAW. The EAW is being reviewed by the City's Environmental Board on July 9, 2003. Pending the Environmental Boards review and recommendation, staff is anticipating City Council authorization to distribute the document for public review and comment at the July 14, 2003 council meeting. A revised staff report, including the Environmental Board's comments and staff recommendation, will be completed for the Friday update. ATTACHMENTS 1. Environmental Assessment Worksheet • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TOPIC: VOTE REQUIRED: AGENDA ITEM 7F James E. Studenski, City Engineer May 12, 2003 Resolution No. 03 -106, Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Marshan Lane Utility Extension. Simple majority BACKGROUND: On October 8, 2001 the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility study, following a petition from residents, for the extension of sanitary sewer and water on Marshan Lane, east of Lake Drive. The Council received the feasibility study on January 14, 2002. Following a petition submitted by four of 10 residents, to construct the utilities, the City held a public hearing on July 8, 2002. Following the public hearing, the city received a petition against the proposed improvements and the project has not moved forward. However there is still interest by some of the residents for the extension of utilities. Opponents of the improvements have indicated that the proposed cost of the utilities and additional charges are their primary concern. Staff is aware of on -site septic system issues developing along Marshan Lane and believe that it is beneficial for the city, from a public health standpoint, to further evaluate the extension of utilities. Staff is requesting authorization to prepare plans and specification for the utility extension. The completed plans will provide a more up to date and accurate estimate of the project costs and allow the city to address, more accurately, the possible financing scenarios. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 03 -106. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 03 -106 • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -106 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS — MARSHAN LANE UTILITY EXTENSION. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted October 8, 2001, a report has been prepared by TKDA, the City's Engineer for the extension of water and sanitary sewer improvements to Marshan Lane, and this report was received by the council on January 8, 2002; and WHEREAS, the council finds that it is in the best interests of the City to prepare plans and specifications for the improvements to further evaluate the making of such improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement and he is directed to prepare plans and specifications for the Marshan Lane Utility Extension. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July, 2003. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor • AGENDA ITEM 7G STAFF ORIGINATOR: James E. Studenski, City Engineer COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution No. 03 -108, Calling for a Public Hearing on Prairie Flower Road Surface Water Management Project VOTE REQUIRED: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: At the April 28, 2003, City Council meeting, a feasibility study was ordered to evaluate storm drainage improvements on Prairie Flower Road, west of West Shadow Lake Drive and south of Birch Street. The report is currently being completed. The study will address, on a preliminary basis, design, cost, assessment, schedule, and other issues as they relate to providing storm drainage improvements. Improvement options will be discussed with the • property owners. The next step in the process will be to hold a Public Hearing on the proposed improvements at which time a detailed review of the report will be presented. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 03 -108, Calling for a Public Hearing on Prairie Flower Road Surface Water Management Project. RECOMMENDATION: Option No. 2 - Staff recommends that Resolution No. 03 -108 be adopted. • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03 -108 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PRAIRIE FLOWER ROAD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Council adopted April 28, 2003, a study has been prepared by the City Engineer, with reference to the improvement of Prairie Flower Road west of West Shadow Lake Drive and south of Birch Street by constructing storm drainage improvements and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, WHEREAS, the City proposes to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota States, Chapter 429, and Chapter 8 of the Lino Lakes City Charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That a Public Hearing be held for the proposed storm drainage improvements. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July, 2003. Ann Blair, City Clerk John J. Bergeson, Mayor AGENDA ITEM 7.H STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala C. C. MEETING DATE: July 14, 2003 TOPIC: Resolution 03 -109 Approving Distribution of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Lakes Business Park ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Glenn Rehbein Companies is proposing to develop a 32 acres Business Park, east of Lake Drive to create a site for a potential light industrial user, and three additional lots for future development. The size of the development, which could potentially exceed 300,000 square feet of light industrial development, triggers the need to prepare and Environmental Assessment Worksheet. The City retained the services of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc., (SEH) to prepare the EAW. The EAW was reviewed by the City's Environmental Board on July 9, 2003. The Environmental Board recommended approval of the EAW for Distribution with the changes outlined in the attached letter from SEH, dated July 10, 2003. Rules written by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board describe the requirements for the environmental review. These rules were written to implement MN Statute 116D, the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act. Environmental review starts with an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW). An EAW is defined as a brief document which is designed to set out the basic facts necessary to determine whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is necessary. The EAW form was created by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB). It is a list of questions that must be completed based on the project specifics. Approving the EAW for distribution means that the City is comfortable that the document is accurate and complete to the best of its knowledge. Approving the EAW for distribution does not mean that the City is approving the project. On the contrary, once the EAW process has been initiated, the project cannot be started and no governmental entity can make a final decision on the project until the environmental review process is completed. After the public comment period, the City decides if it has enough information to determine if the project will cause significant environmental effects. If it will not cause such effects, the City makes a "negative declaration" meaning that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not necessary. If the review process reveals, in the judgement of the City, that the project will cause • significant environmental effects, the City makes a "positive declaration" meaning an EIS is necessary. It should be noted that the EAW process does not replace nor eliminate the need for the required review and approval of detailed plans, for a specific project, in accordance with City, County, Watershed District, or State requirements. An EAW is defined as "a brief document which is designed to set out the basic facts necessary to determine whether an EIS is required for a proposed action" RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 03 -109 authorizing distribution of the Lakes Business Park EAW with the modification noted in the July 10, 2003 letter from SEH. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 03 -109 2. July 10, 2003 SEH letter CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03-109 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE LAKES BUSINESS PARK WHEREAS, MN Rules 4410 establishes the requirements for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAW); and WHEREAS, the City has initiated an environmental review to determine if a project has the potential for significant environmental effects, as required by MN Rules, Chapter 4410.4300, Subpart 14.; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared the EAW based on data submitted by the project proposer and determined to the best of the City's knowledge that the EAW is complete and accurate; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lino Lakes City Council approves the distribution of the Lakes Business Park EAW for public comment. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 14th day of July, 2003. John J. Bergeson, Mayor ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk ff5EH July 10, 2003 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110 -5196 651.490.2000 651.490.2150 FAX architecture engineering • environmental • transportation Mr. Mike Grochala Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Dear Mr. Grochala: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Lakes Business Park EAW Summary of Document Changes SEH No. A- LINOL0306.00 14.00 After meeting with the City's Environmental Board on Wed nesday, July 9, 2003, the draft EAW for the Lakes Business Park will be modified as follows: 1. An additional figure will be included. The figure represents the existing MLCCS data for the site. Figure numbers will be adjusted to account for the additional figure. 2. Question #10 (cover types): Acreage calculations will be modified for before and after categories of each cover type. 3. Question #11 (Fish, Wildlife...): Narrative will be modified to indicate the project site has marginal wildlife habitat, as cited in the City's Wild Urban Interface Study. 4. Question #12 (Physical impacts on water resources): Narrative will be modified to indicate that all storm sewers will be routed through onsite holding ponds and /or infiltration basins. 5. Question #17.a (Water quality: surface water runoff): Narrative for the second paragraph will be modified to clearly show that surface water runoff is to be managed onsite. 6. Question #25 (Nearby resources): Narrative will be modified to include reference to a letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). 7. Question #26 (Visual impacts): Narrative will be deleted in its entirety. Please call me at 651.490.2147 if you have questions. Sincerely, fri,rAg(/ Robert L. Moberg, PE Project Manager nm \lspfiles I \spli\ko \liuol\ 030600 \corres \grochala071003.doc Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. • Your Trusted Resource • Equal Opportunity Employer