Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/10/1999 P&Z Minutes• • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT March 10, 1999 6:30 P.M. 11:33 P.M. Dunn, Johnson, Schilling, Corson, and Trehus Schaps and Robinson Planning Coordinator Wyland; City Planner, Smyser; and Consulting Engineer, Powell I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Acting Chair Johnson called the Lino Lakes Planning meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., March 10, 1999. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Januar Ms. Wyland distributed a me minute format will b- use public hearings wil o' 1 ty Administrator that indicated the modified oards. She noted that all public comments from minutes. Mr. Trehus made a ! TION to approve the minutes of the January 13, 1999, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 3 -0 with Mr. Corson and Mr. Schilling abstaining. February 10, 1999 Acting Chair Johnson noted that page 5, paragraph 2, should be corrected to "Acting Chair Johnson ". Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to approve the corrected minutes of the February 10, 1999, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board, and was supported by Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 4 -0 with Mr. Corson abstaining. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 2 IV. OPEN MIKE Acting Chair Johnson declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:36 p.m. No one appeared for open mike. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:37 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 5 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, Clearwater Creek Phase III, Rezone from Rural and Rural Executive to PDO /Single Family and Preservation Development Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Mr. Smyser stated the current application represents the product of discussions with staff, consultants, and numerous City boards. The application is for a prehensive Plan amendment including MUSA amendment, rezoning from Rura + ' ural -X to Planned Development Overly (PDO) for single family residential val of the preliminary development plan for the PDO. Mr. Smyser reviewed the analysis report i using a PDO noting that it includes the Mr. Mike Quigly, Develop range of $175,000 10, development. Acting Chair Johnso e o explained the new format tion. ter Creek, stated the houses will be priced in a ed he will take care of the trail paving within the declared the public hearing open at 7:43 p.m. Mr. Smyser distributed a letter from Jacqueline and Joe Jarosz, 5299 Grand Avenue future homeowner in the first or second phase, which expressed concerns regarding the rezoning of Clearwater Creek Phase III and request that it remain rural. He asked that the letter be entered into the public record. Mr. Curt Deppard, 6614 LaCasse Drive, came forward and asked for clarification on several issues. He asked if the PDO is the first try and if the street widths will be smaller. He asked how many homes will be priced above $250,000 and how many builders will be allowed in the development. Mr. Smyser indicated the PDO is the first step in approval for a development and the street width will be smaller to accommodate for more open space. • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 3 Mr. Quigly stated that the majority of homes built in the development will be priced above $250,000. The number of builders allowed in the development has not yet been set. He stated most builders will purchase a block of lots. At this time he anticipates approximately six builders within the development. He added he does have control over the architectural design. Mr. Deppard stated residents in the 1st and 2nd phase are concerned about low priced homes within the development. He asked about money being set aside for parks when a development goes in. He expressed concern regarding a park being developed for the first two phases. He asked if the 1st and 2nd phase homeowners will be part of the homeowners association and have to pay dues. Mr. Smyser stated the homeowners association will address ownership and stewardship of the open space. The park and trails will be owned by the City. Park equipment that is put in will be determined by the Park Board and input from the neighborhood when the neighborhood is built up. He added that park funding does come from land dedication or cash dedication from residential and industrial development. Ms. Wyland noted that if a cash dedication is made it is placed General Fund and not set aside for a particular park. When development is , ompleted, the Park Board will hold neighborhood meetings to Bete ;. • t ='park is developed. The 8 acre park in phase III will be for the wh • h meowners association will not be responsible for the park land. Mr. Deppard asked if funds from that if property taxes are go indicated she was xes go to the parks. The neighborhood feels k, they should have a park. Ms. Wyland xes go to fund parks. Mr. Deppard stated s c +nc ed about too many builders leading to a large mix of style. He asked the • eloper keep the number of builders to a limit. He stated there is a lot of freeway noise in the area and asked if the City or developer can do something about it. Mr. Smyser addressed some concerns of the residents. He stated the number of homes planned in this development is fewer than was originally planned. He stated that other conservation subdivisions around the country have shown the lots selling at equal or higher than standard subdivision price because of the open space. He stated this project was put together with the City's environmental consultants and they feel the plan protects a larger part of the environment. He stated he will discuss a buffer for noise with the developer in the next stage. Ms. Tracy Kuny, 6706 Clearwater Drive, stated she was one of the first buyers in phase I. She stated the billboard on Otter Lake Drive advertised executive homesites. She stated she was shocked when phase II was developed. She indicated residents are concerned about the changes that occur midway through development. She asked if there is a way to • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 4 set the standard and then enforce it. She stated there is a difference in the covenants between the phases and a lot of confusion. She asked that the confusion be eliminated. She also asked about the discussions that were held with residents. Acting Chair Johnson advised that "executive" is a marketing term that anyone can advertise. Covenants are attached to the lots. Covenants are not enforced by the City. The developer provides a list of lots sizes but there is no guarantee regarding the prices. Mr. Quigly noted that nothing has changed between phases. Pricing has always been consistent. The covenants were the same between phases. There is confusion regarding a basketball hoop. A resident put one in. The only way to enforce the convenants is to go through the court system. He noted they discourage fencing but cannot prohibit it. He stated the standards are published and distributed in the packets. All builders receive the packets. Mr. Deppard asked when the plan becomes cast in stone. Acting Chair Johnson advised that if the plan is approved tonigh City Council on March 22, 1999. Mr. Smyser added that the fi the Planning and Zoning Board again. There may not be this project. will go before the n will come before hearing regarding Mr. Smyser stated that a public notice go a s 1 dents within 600 feet of a project. An earlier public hearing on th .r. as held in September, 1998. There was very little public response. lithe ':; ,lot of public interest staff will suggest the developer set up neighborh eet A special neighborhood meeting relating to this project was not help is. land ed there was a lot of public interest when the project originally c Ms. Kuny stated that e standard of notifying residents within 600 feet is only 20 homes in their case. The bulk of the homes are further than 600 feet. She stated the lack of interest from residents was because of the lack of notice. Mr. Smyser stated great efforts are made to notify the public. Typically, the City Council will not hold another public hearing. However, the Council is willing to listen to residents. He stated the notification process is a difficult process. Ms. Dory Martinez, 2316 LaCasse Court, asked if the park will be connected to the 3rd phase. Ms. Wyland stated there is too much wetland to connect the property so no trailway was planned. Ms. Martinez asked how many park lands were dedicated for phase I and phase It Ms. Wyland stated two areas were dedicated for park land. The land will not necessarily be developed for play area. They may remain open area. When the development is more complete there will be a neighborhood meeting. • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 5 Ms. Martinez stated that it is not out of line to expect that 151 homes in the area be notified of the project. A mailing of the whole area could have been done. Mr. Dunn suggested staff develop guidelines for R -1 and R -1X within a PDO. That will determine the size of the houses and garage. It will also set the price of the homes. A policy should be set for future projects. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:37 p.m., and was supported Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Corson indicated a condition regarding R -1 minimum house size be added as a condition of approval. Mr. Schilling stated when the plan first came forward he was sensitive to residents concerns. He stated those concerns have been cleared up tonight. Mr. Quigly has done a good job and the project should move forward. Mr. Dunn stated he feels good about the new process. Great i have been shown. The plan meets the City's objectives. and this project will add to that. ents in the plan eek is a fine area Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve se d MUSA amendment of the existing Comprehensive Plan for the so cres of the site. The MUSA allocation would become effective only at final plat approval. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Dunn. Acting Chair Johns oul: vote no to the project. He is very happy with the preservation plan. •ev=r, t s is a very large development for homes over $250,000. The City needs a var y of housing. The enjoyment of this project should not be limited to a specific price range. Townhomes and club homes in the price range of $125,000 would be desirable. The City has young families, single people, and older residents who cannot afford homes in that price range. Mr. Dunn agreed that the City needs a variety of housing. Planning for a mix needs to come at the beginning of a project, not mid stream. He suggested a note to staff be made regarding more affordable housing. Mr. Corson stated he agrees the City needs variety. This plan is too far down the trail to change it now. Mr. Trehus stated this area is not suitable to the type of housing Acting Chair Johnson is referring to. Lino Lakes is not keeping up with the average price for new homes. He stated he will vote no to the plan because he is against the expansion of MUSA. He Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 6 • added the City should receive more of a trade off for the PDO. The City needs more open • space. MOTION carried 3 -2 with Acting Chair Johnson and Mr. Trehus voting no. Mr. Corson made a MOTION for approval of the rezoning to Planned Development Overlay for single family residential use based on the findings in the report, and was supported by Mr. Schilling Motion carried 4 -1 with Acting Chair Johnson voting no. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the preliminary development plan based on the following conditions: 1. Eliminate Greenway E as open space and use a typical drainage easement over the wetland. The wetland will then be within platted lots with an easement over it. 2. A buffer detail for the strip of land between Otter Lake Road and Lot 4 Block 12 should be provided. 3. Staff recommends that the developer pave the trails and wit .4 acres, the park dedication requirement would be fulfilled. 4. Developer will move trail alignments near . S •ck 1 and Lots 1 and 2 Block 5 if possible to allow a better conn t' '' • r trail segments. Exact trail alignments throughout the development; ill .blished with Parks staff. 5. The developer will nee Otter Lake Drive. additional ROW on m Anoka County for the new road access to will need to meet any County requirement for oad "CR 81). 6. A tree preservatio plan must be submitted for review by the City Environmental Specialist. 7. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 8. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 9. The City Engineer's comments in his memo of March 4, 1999, must be addressed to his satisfaction. 10. Drainage and utility easements to be held by the City shall cover all wetlands and drainage ways subject to approval of the City Engineer. This includes lot line easements as required by the City Subdivision Regulations. Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 7 11. A development agreement will be required. 12. In addition to normal City requirements, the development agreement will require that a homeowners' association be created. Association by -laws shall be subject to review by the City. The homeowners' association will own the open space areas. Deed restrictions must be included to address protection of the common open areas. A management plan for the homeowners' association will be required. 13. R -1 minimum house size will be part of the development project. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Schilling Motion carried 3 -2 with Acting Chair Johnson and Mr. Trehus voting no. The Planning and Zoning Board directed staff to work with the developer to address the noise abatement. This item will go before the City Council Monday, March 22, 1999, 6:30 p.m. Acting Chair Johnson recessed the meeting at 8:40 p.m. for a s The meeting reconvened at 8:50 p.m. B. PUBLIC HEARING, Behm's Cy `r " th Addition, Revised Preliminary Plat Ms. Wyland stated Mr. Gary Uhde =° quested review of a revised preliminary plat for the Behm's Centu 5th AdditioP. Acting Chair Johns r i + ec re s ''he public hearing open at 9:04 p.m. Mr. Trehus asked if the additional MUSA was approved by the Metropolitan Council. Ms. Wyland stated special approval was obtained from the Metropolitan Council to use the MUSA reserve on this project. The exact amount needed will be determined with the final plat. Mr. Corson asked about the safety issues regarding the Williams Pipeline. Mr. Powell stated Williams Pipeline has reviewed the plan. The plan does meet all their requirements. Mr. John Johnson, Civil Engineer for Mr. Uhde, came forward and reviewed the area of the pipeline noting the high points, low points, and drainage patterns. He stated the changes in the plan is a result from discussion with the Corp. of Engineers, Rice Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County Soil, and City staff. • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 8 Mr. Gary Uhde, Developer for Behm's Century Farms, introduced himself to the Board. He stated a neighborhood meeting was held and the issues of the residents were addressed. Mr. Johnson explained that the lot depth variance for Lots 1 and 2 was brought on by the trail placement in the rear of the lots. There is enough room on the property for two lots without a trail. City staff encouraged the placement of the trail on the back of the lots. He stated that if the variance is not approved, he will request the elimination of the trail. He stated the developer supports all conditions recommended by staff, except for combining Lots 1 and 2. Mr. Powell suggested the trail be considered as part of the drainage and utility easement. Therefore, a variance would not be needed. Ms. Maureen Orvik, 195 Appaloosa Court, came forward stated she moved here from St. Paul. The view from her house is currently piles of dirt. The true nature of why people moved to Lino Lakes is being lost. With the development she will see the backs of houses. The development was not part of the original plan. She ted she is fearful Mr. Uhde will revise the plan again. She asked that before the pla :i', . •roved, the developer finish what he has started. The pond is only ha l ' ``, tated she had revision after revision with the builder regarding well � ; p rchased her home in May, 1998. She stated she did see a plan of th- t iti ®m . he plan always included the trees. She stated her development wil .,n r ,, sible park until her kids have outgrown it. She stated the pond maxi , " $ .3 . ,'' be 8 feet. The pond is now 20 feet. There is a very dangerous deep e pond in the backyards. Ms. Wyland noted ee it > • : removed. Mr. Johnson referrer . `a 'ap the development and stated the map was in every homeowners packet. " he change in the plan is the character of the cul -de -sac. The new homes are actually further away from existing homes than in the original plan. He stated the original plan was to remove the dirt from the pond when approval for the 6th Addition is received. The pond was to be completed at that time. Brandon Almich, 183 Appaloosa Lane, stated that parks are very important to residents. He indicated he is aware that they may not get the park developed right away. He asked if there are funds set aside for trails and if there is a timeline for the trails. Mr. Powell stated the paving of the trails is funded through Park Funds. The developer is required to develop an 8' trail. Trail paving is prioritized each year. He indicated he does not have a timeline for the trails. Mr. Almich stated he is concerned about the trails being overcome with weeds. He indicated the residents are willing to help with trail funding in this area. He indicated he understands Mr. Uhde's position regarding the pond. He asked if the City can approve the 5th and 6th Addition so work can begin as soon as possible to complete the pond. • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 9 Acting Chair Johnson explained that the staging of projects is up to the developer. Ms. Wyland added that the City Council did establish a limit regarding the number of homes built per year. Mr. Smyser stated the residents are not concerned with phasing. The pond completion is a big issue. Completion of the pond should be discussed. People should not have to live in a construction zone. A solution should be worked out to complete the pond this year. Mr. Almich added he is willing to look for a solution to work with the City and the developer regarding pond completion. Mr. Steve Dahl, 7625 Appaloosa Lane, expressed concern regarding safety issues. He stated there are many children in the neighborhood. The pond has a steep slope with a drop off. The pond needs to be completed. He stated the date regarding tree planting has been changed many times. Mr. Uhde brought forward disclosure booklets for each addition. ` e read the first item regarding ponds. He noted that it states the pond configuratio pth will change until the final excavation. He stated the pond cannot be il approval on the 6th Addition is received. He indicated grading on the art ej1 i o is anticipated to be done this fall. He noted the 6th Addition may Mr. Almich stated he understands M Mr. Smyser's suggestion be expl Mr. Corson made aay ! TI by Mr. Schilling. City level. on regarding the pond. He asked that l.the public hearing at 9:54 p.m., and was supported 5 -0. It was the consensus the Planning and Zoning Board to eliminate condition #5. Mr. Powell stated condition #3 would cover the trail issue. Mr. Dunn suggested residents go to the Park Board with their concerns regarding the park. The park issue and project are two separate issues. He stated something needs to be done regarding the pond. There is an immediate safety issue. He indicated he is supportive of Mr. Smyser's suggestion. Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to approve variance for Lot 7, Block 4, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to approve variance for cul -de -sac length on Palomino Lane, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -0. • Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the revised preliminary plat based on the following conditions: • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 10 1. Permits are obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District, the US Army Corps of Engineers and Anoka County for access to Sunset Road. 2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are approved by the City Engineer. 3. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines and placed over designated wetland and drainage areas subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. A variance is granted lot width on Lot 7, Block 4 and the cul -de -sac length for Palomino Lane. 5. A detailed landscape plan and tree preservation plan is submitted which addresses screening at the periphery of the plat and reduces the visual impact of the subdivision from adjacent properties outside the plat. 6. The developer shall provide a disclosure statement for all pro ies abutting trails. 7. The developer must submit a specific schedule for the site grading in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th additions. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Schi It was noted that approval was b working with the develope f the remaining understanding that staff is committed to and the City Council meeting on March 22, 1999, to develop a du g completion. MOTION carried 5- This item will go before the City Council Monday, March 22, 1999, 6:30 p.m. C. PUBLIC HEARING, Fogerty Investment, 524 Apollo Drive, Rezone from GB, General Business to PDO/Light Industrial Mr. Smyser stated the applicant has submitted a new application to rezone the property to Planned Development Overlay. The current applications include the rezoning to PDO, and the PDO development plan. Because the only reason a PDO is needed is that there will be more than one building on a lot, staff is combining the preliminary and final PDO development plans into one. Mr. Powell added he is working with the County to trade a roadway access for a driveway access because the number of accesses allowed on Apollo Drive is limited. Acting Chair Johnson declared the public hearing open at 10:22 p.m. • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 11 Mr. Smyser entered into the record a letter from Ms. Debbie Lawrence, Health Partners. The letter strongly requested the City deny the rezoning. Mr. Smyser entered into the record a letter from Dr. Patrick Courneya, North Suburban Family Physicians. The letter asked that the City deny rezoning. Mr. Smyser entered into the record a letter from Dr. Steven Slatten, Dr. Douglas Berg, and Dr. Julie Zimmerman, North Suburban Family Physicians. The letter asked that the Planning and Zoning Board deny the rezoning. Ms. Debbie Lawrence, HealthPartners Services, Inc. stated HealthPartners was very involved with picking the site for North Suburban Family Physicians Clinic. The City at that time was very concerned about the clinic being the gateway to the City. She stated they had asked for another access to the site and were denied. She expressed much concern about truck traffic in the area. Light Industrial has very broad uses. She explained they have a clinic that is located next to a Pot Pourri business which has caused many problems from the smell. Four buildings doing manufactu • and air conditioners will cause a lot of noise. The noise issue needs to be addresse stated the clinic's customers are still trying to locate the clinic. She stated shs . o c cerned about parking. Light Industrial use can be densely employee based Thchave another clinic that is located next to a Fed Ex business. There have been tnerous problems there with overflow parking. Ms. Lawrence continued stating Light Industrial zoning cannot limit the type of development. She noted t ti goes in there now may not be there in three years. She stated they came to it eg. -:.in their concerns over this site, compatible uses, and the shared drivewa . new plan would result in construction work for a long time. She stated she is ve disappointed that the City may approve the rezone. Dr. Doug Berg, Physician at North Suburban Family Physicians, stated he has the same concerns as Ms. Lawrence. He stated they have been in the community for 12 years. The property is zoned as a business zone. He stated there are health concerns regarding fumes. There is no criteria regarding what can go in there. Public image is very important to the clinic. Mr. Bill Fogerty, Fogerty Investment, came forward and reviewed the plan. He stated the City had the same concerns as the clinic. He reviewed the building plan and noted the loading docks will not be visible. He stated building A and B will be built this year. Occupancy permits will be obtained in 1999. Building C and D will be built in 2000 or he will lose the T.I.F. He stated he has interest from a company that distributes for Medtronic's. They manufacture Germane stints and are very clean. • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 12 Acting Chair Johnson asked what the City will get for the PDO. The City needs to protect the clinic because they were there first. Shared access will cause too much congestion. More landscaping is needed along the freeway. Mr. Schilling agreed with Acting Chair Johnson adding he is not satisfied with the parking. Mr. Trehus expressed concern regarding truck traffic. Diesel trucks produce too many fumes. Mr. Smyser noted the applicant is willing to work with the City to address the issues of the clinic. The PDO will not come before the Board again. He suggested the applicant and clinic work together. Mr. Fogerty stated a lot of money is involved. He stated that if Building D is eliminated a PDO will not be required. Staff has recommended the rezoning to Light Industrial. Ms. Lawrence stated she encourages growth in the City. Howev the City made a commitment to them. There is a conflict regarding more lands a =+ $ . The clinic does not want to lose visibility to the freeway. Previous histo t is easier to come to the City before there is a problem than after the .r• ". c urred. She stated the applicant does not have a good plan. Acting Chair Johnson noted that Gener e,ss, zoning could cause a problem also. Ms. Lawrence asked the B o add re s the parking issue. Dr. Berg stated he u possibility of meetin clinic has an investm ro t also. e urgency for the applicant. He asked about the There are too many unanswered questions and the Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 10:57 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Dunn stated he believes the rezone should be approved. The Council has to deal with the political issues. Mr. Schilling stated he would like to see a continuance based on a drop dead date. Mr. Fogerty indicated the plan has to go before City Council. There is not time for a continuance. Dr. Berg asked for a clarification regarding the rezone. Mr. Smyser stated the issue of a • rezone was initiated by an application for the rezone. • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 13 Dr. Berg stated they were told one thing and then a change was made. He stated the clinic has made a commitment to Lino Lakes and have been here for 12 years. He indicated he is not opposed to business growth in the City. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the rezoning from General Business to Planned Development Overlay based on the finding listed in the report, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the PDO development plan based on the following conditions and the understanding that the clinic, City staff, and the applicant will meet this week to resolve any other problems. 1. Only uses that are permitted uses in an LI zoning district will be part of this PDO. 2. A new landscaping plan, which includes significant screening along the clinic property boundary, must be submitted and obtain approval from City staff and must also be worked out by the applicant, clinic, and City staff. 3. A lighting plan must be submitted and obtain approval fro taff. 4. Trash areas must be screened. Plans for the fencin st be submitted and approved by City planning and building staff b • di _`ermits are issued. 5. A minimum of 20% of the site shall green space. 6. Prior to issuance of buil % building and lighting plans must be reviewed b g g g P by the City CSO for C E 7. Any si na e shal the sig n ordinance and proper permits obtained. 8. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. 9. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 10. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 11. The parking area shall be paved with curb and gutter and construction plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 12. Park dedication fee shall be required as described by City regulations. • 13. All comments from the City Engineer in memo dated March 4, 1999, must be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 14 14. All roof mounted mechanical equipment be screened visually and where necessary for sound. 15. Sole access shall be provided from the Southern edge of the site off of Apollo Drive, no shared access on North end The MOTION was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 3 -2 with Mr. Trehus and Mr. Schilling voting no. It was noted that the Planning and Zoning Board is concerned about compatible business uses next to the clinic. This item will go before the City Council Monday, March 22, 1999, 6:30 p.m. D. Contract Hardware, 374 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland stated Contract Hardware is requesting a site plan subdivision to allow the construction of an 18,000 squar office /warehouse /manufacturing facility in the Apoll and minor nter. Mr. Gary Nordness, a representative for ar e °. e, stated he is working on a joint driveway agreement. He indicates e, `. greed to all the staff conditions. He noted a small change in the faca• a or. He stated they are working with staff regarding the enclosure for Mr. Dunn made a pprove the Minor Subdivision and Site Plan review based on the followi co iti _ s: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. 2. A development agreement shall be signed which includes a shared driveway agreement. 3. Park Dedication shall be collected based on the size of the proposed structure and in accord with the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. One additional parking space shall be provided to meet parking requirements. Handicapped parking shall be in accord with the ADA Rules and Regulations. 5. Drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer with proper easements shown on the site survey document. Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 15 • 6. Trash handling shall be indicated on the plans and properly screened from adjoining properties and public roadways. • • 7. The parking area shall be paved with a bituminous material and concrete curb and gutter provided around its perimeter and the access drive. 8. Roof top heating and ventilating units shall blend with the exterior of the building. 9. Final building, lighting and landscaping plans shall be subject to the review and approval of City staff including the building inspector, CPTED Officer and City Forester. 10. A signage plan shall be submitted to City Staff for their review and approval prior to issuance of any sign permits. 11. Permits shall be obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District and Anoka County prior to any site work. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried This item will go before the City Council Monday, Marc •�• 3a,. °30 p.m. E. PUBLIC HEARING, Sign Ordinance ertaining to service stations /convenience stores It was the consensus of the Plan . ning Board to address this issue at the April 14, 1999, meeting. Acting Chair Johns e public hearing open at 11:31 p.m. Mr. Trehus made a TION to continue the public hearing and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 5 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Private Clubs/Lodges - Zoning Category It was the consensus of the Planning and Zoning Board to address this issue at the April 14, 1999, meeting. Mr. Smyser asked Board members to be prepared at the next meeting with ideas and suggested conditions regarding this issue. VII. ADJOURNMENT Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 16 • Mr. Corson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 11:33 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 5 -0. • • Respectfully Submitted, Kim Points, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.