Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/11/1998 P&Z Minutes• • • Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:33 p.m., March 11, 1998. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1998 Mr. Johnson pointed out an omission on page 4, which was meant to refer to the freeway corridor not being available for use in installation of telecommunications antennas. Mr. Dunn pointed out a typographical error, where the word "with" should have been "wish ". Mr. Johnson then made a MOTION to approve the minutes of the February 11, 1998 meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board, and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried, 6 -0. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as submitted. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:35 p.m. There were no comments. Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 2 Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:35 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Herr. Motion carried 6 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, Civic Complex, XXX Town Center Parkway, Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. Mr. Kirmis explained that the City of Lino Lakes is requesting approval of a + 44,000 - square -foot civic complex within the Town Center "Village" located south of I -35W and east of Lake Drive. This complex is comprised of a 17,404 - square -foot City Hall, a 16,378 - square -foot police station, and a 10,037 - square -foot Early Childhood Learning Center (to be leased and operated by the Centennial School District). Mr. Kirmis stated that although this request is relatively straightforward, he wanted to highlight the fact that the processing of a subdivision will be necessary in order to accommodate this project. Staff recommended approval of the site and building plan/conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The City approve a subdivision of the property to provide public street access to the site and the creation of a lot which is in conformance with minimum PSP District lot requirements. 2. The civic complex meets applicable PSP District setback requirements. 3. Verification is made that the proposed structure does not exceed 45 feet in height. 4. A minimum of 35 percent of the subject site is reserved as green area. 5. Site and building plans are subject to review and approval by the town Center Architectural Review committee, City Forester, and CPTED Officer. 6. The site plan/landscape is revised to identify the following items and approved by City Staff: a. Handicap parking stalls b. Trash handling areas c. Loading spaces d. Exterior lighting locations e. Sizes of proposed plantings • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 3 7. All trash handling equipment is fully enclosed and screened from view of neighboring properties. 8. In compliance with Town Center design guidelines, site light fixture selection give attention to both function and aesthetics. 9. Site wetlands be specifically delineated and protected. (A delineation has been completed) 10. A grading and drainage plan be submitted which is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. (In process) 11. That all site signage comply with applicable Sign Ordinance requirements. Mr. Wessel addressed the group, explaining that the first phase of the subdivision was accomplished last year with the second phase delayed due to awaiting approval from the Metropolitan Council. Through use of visual aids, Mr. Wessel pointed out the proposed second -phase development. He pointed out the need to obtain Board approval at this time contingent upon subdivision approval in April, in order to keep the overall project on track. Mr. Johnson requested clarification regarding use of the Early Childhood Learning Center after it is no longer occupied by the School District. Mr. Wessel explained that this facility is intended to accommodate expansion needs following the School District's 10- year lease period. Chair Schaps asked about the difference between the size of the current City Hall and the planned facility. Mr. Wessel indicated that the new City Hall will be approximately three times as large as the current facility, allowing for consolidation of the majority of City services. Mr. Dunn asked about specific approval expectations. Mr. Wessel stated that overall response to the design has been favorable; however, there has been controversy about the architectural guidelines in general. He added that materials have been defined as brick, metal roof, and glass, with some wood accents. The specific brick, roof color, and wood finishes will be determined by the Town Center Committee. Mr. Dunn then asked about the architectural style. Mr. Wessel explained that the design is meant to feel more rural than urban; more informal than institutional. Mr. Reese of LPA stated that the Town Center design does not coincide with any particular style definition; but, if he had to make a comparison, it would be a vernacular, barn-like style, intended to be friendly and comfortable. He added that the proposed materials will be long - lasting and appropriate for a civic -type building. Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 4 Mr. Dunn also inquired as to the status of the architectural design guidelines for use by the Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Wessel explained that the guidelines are coming together, for published form by the end of this year. Mr. Johnson expressed concern about the chimney height. Mr. Wessel pointed out that the chimney has been redesigned. Mr. Reese explained that the smokestack is diamond - shaped, and will be rotated so that it stands adjacent to the building with a point closest to the building. Additionally, there will be a cap at the top, with a substantial portion being constructed of masonry with a transition to metal. Mr. Dunn asked about Item "e" under the "Conditional Use Permit Review" portion of the executive summary, which reads: e. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Mr. Wessel stated that, with respect to the Early Childhood Learning Center, the lease arrangement will pay for this project. Therefore, there is no foreseeable risk to the community with regard to funding. Chair Schaps asked about the approximate cost of the project. Mr. Wessel explained that the original budget is $6 million. Mr. Herr asked about the planned technology for the proposed Council chambers. Mr. Wessel stated that the present technology would be installed within the new facility, and that it is included in the budget. Mr. Gelbmann asked about the necessity for approving this portion of the project prior to approval of the subdivision. Mr. Wessel explained that approval of the present matter will keep the project on schedule. Mr. Gelbmann asked about seating capacity within the new Council chambers. Mr. Wessel explained that the total capacity is 92, and that expansion could be accommodated within the concourse area through use of monitors. Mr. Gelbmann asked how the size of this proposed facility compares to those of other cities. Mr. Wessel explained that it is average size, with some others being larger and some smaller. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:10 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried, 6 -0. • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 5 Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the site and building plan for the civic complex, Town Center Parkway, pursuant to the conditions presented, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the conditional use permit for the civic complex, Town Center Parkway, pursuant to the conditions presented, and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. B. PUBLIC HEARING, Collova Builders, 250 & 260 Linda Avenue, Rezone, Preliminary Plat and Interim MUSA Reserve Chair Schaps opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. Ms. Wyland explained this request by Collova Builders for a rezone, preliminary plat, interim MUSA reserve, and variance for lot depth for the property located on Linda Avenue between Hodgson Road and Lorraine. This property is currently zoned rural, and is outside the MUSA area. This request represents a rearrangement of the July, 1997 approval of a similar request at 250 Linda Avenue, together with the addition of the property located at 260 Linda Avenue. Staff also suggested and published an expansion of this request, which would add Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Arthur E. Thom Addition, and Lots 47 and 48, Block 1, Arthur E. Thom Addition, such expansion intended to avoid multiple applications in the future. There have been similar inquiries regarding Lot 48. Ms. Wyland added that the current Comprehensive Plan indicates the subject area as single- family residential. Property to the north, east, and west is zoned R -1, and located within the MUSA. Sewer and water utilities are in the street (Linda Avenue) to serve all of these parcels, if requested. The property immediately to the south (Rohavic Oaks) is zoned Rural, with lot areas averaging one acre in size. MUSA reserve for the lots fronting on Linda Avenue would total 5.8 acres. With respect to the preliminary plat, Ms. Wyland explained that this request would create six R -1 single - family building sites from two existing parcels, with lot requirements as follows: Lot width 80 feet Corner lot 100 feet Lot depth 135 feet Lot area 10,800 square feet exclusive of any wetland/watercourse /row All lots meet the minimum frontage and area requirements, with one lot being deficient in depth by 15 feet. Ms. Wyland explained that Staff suggested that Lot 6 could be reduced in width by 30 feet to allow additional depth for Lot 5; however, this may hinder home construction on Lot 6 due to the UPA easement. Should it be determined that the deficiency in depth for Lot 5 is warranted, a variance would be required. Planning & Zoning Board March I1, 1998 Page 6 Staff recommended approval of this preliminary plat, with the following conditions: 1. A grading plan be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Permits be obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District, if required. 3. A wetland delineation be prepared prior to final plat approval. 4. A park dedication fee be submitted based on the requirements of the City subdivision ordinance. 5. A developer's agreement be signed and financial guarantees posted as recommended by the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. 6. A determination is made as to the adequacy of depth for Lot 5. With respect to the rezone, Ms. Wyland explained that this request should apply to all of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 2, Arthur E. Thom Addition, and Lots 47 and 48, Block 1, Arthur E. Thom Addition, as it meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance. Ms. Wyland added that the request for allocation of interim MUSA reserve also applies to the aforementioned lots, and would total 5.8 gross acres. She stated that the subject property meets the criteria established for allocation of interim MUSA reserve. Mr. Johnson asked about the apparently insufficient depth of Lots 47 and 48. Ms. Wyland explained that there are homes already existing on these lots. Mr. Herr requested clarification regarding adequate depth for Lot 5. Ms. Wyland explained that this lot meets minimum area requirements. Connie Grundhofer, 235 Linda Avenue, asked how this project would effect her property. Ms. Wyland indicated that there should be no direct effect unless there arose the need to connect to City utilities. A resident then asked if the rezoning would allow for her to subdivide. Ms. Wyland responded that it would. She inquired as to the responsibility for utility hookups in that event, and Ms. Wyland explained that the property owner would be responsible for these hookups. Ms. Bruner asked about treatment of wetlands. Ms. Wyland explained that official wetland delineation would be required. • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 7 Tom Bruner, 270 Linda Avenue, expressed concerned regarding drainage, as his property is on a septic system. Mr. Ahrens responded that an 8" sewer line, which is standard throughout the City, should accommodate the proposed growth. Mr. Ahrens further explained that during growing season a wetlands delineation will be accomplished, which will determine buildable area. Mr. Herr pointed out that typically buildable area is shown in a preliminary plat approval request. Ms. Wyland explained that the existing pond has been delineated, and that the surveyor was confident that there is adequate buildable area. Mr. Ahrens added that the wetlands do not change in area from year to year, regardless of the weather conditions. Mr. Kirmis suggested that approval be conditioned upon determination of ample buildable area on Lot No. 1. Mr. Dunn suggested that this request be postponed pending determination of adequate sewer capacity and wetland delineation. Tony Sampaire, representative of Mr. Collova, stated that there is not intent to go forward with this project if the conditions outlined above are not met. Chair Schaps asked Mr. Sampaire if there is any financial reason why this project must be approved at this time. Mr. Sampaire responded that there is not, but that the developer would like to go forward as soon as possible. Mr. Ahrens added that any sewer capacity issue was addressed through the addition of a new area lift station. However, he added that further investigation of this issue would take place. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:37 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to table this request until such time as adequate sewer capacity, wetland delineation, and adequate buildable area for Lot 5 are determined, and until such time as the applicant has conducted a neighborhood meeting, and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. C. Lakeland National Bank, North/West corner of Apollo Drive (extended) & Lake Drive, Site Plan Review Mr. Kirmis explained that Roger Kolstad has submitted a request to construct a 3,600 - square -foot bank on a + 35,400- square -foot parcel of land located north of the proposed extension of Apollo Drive and west of Lake Drive. The subject site is zoned GB (general business), which includes financial institutions as permitted uses. Mr. Kirmis highlighted Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 8 certain issues with regard to this request, one being processing. The GB zoning includes drive - through facilities as conditional uses. A formal request for a conditional use permit has not been made, due in part to a possible amendment to the present conditions allowing for drive - throughs as a permitted accessory use rather than a conditional use. Secondly, this facility has been designed in recognition of an extension of Apollo Drive. Therefore, all site setbacks, orientation, etc. is essentially geared toward that future construction. Finally, review of the drive -out revealed that approximately three vehicles may be in the teller drive at one time without blocking site access. In response to this issue, design modification is recommended to allow for at least three stacking spaces without encroachment upon access. Mr. Kirmis stated that Staff recommended approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Lake Drive access is terminated at such time southerly public street access (via Apollo Drive) is provided. 2. The landscape plan is subject to review and approval by the City Forester and CPTED Officer. 3. At such time as a southerly property access is available (and the Lake Drive access is terminated), the Lake Drive parking lot access drive is removed and restored as green area. 4. The proposed Lake Drive access location is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Anoka County Highway Department. 5. The City process and approve one of the following: a. A conditional use permit to allow the establishment of an accessory drive - through facility within a GB Zoning District. b. A Zoning Ordinance amendment establishing accessory drive - through facilities is permitted (rather than conditional) accessory use in the GB Zoning District. 6. The bank drive - through lane is expanded or redesigned such that the stacking of vehicles (three) does not encroach upon the adjacent parking lot drive aisle. 7. The site plan is revised to identify an off - street loading space. 8. All lighting used to illuminate off - street parking areas is arranged to deflect light away from adjoining properties. 9. A detailed sign plan is submitted subject to City approval. 10. The submitted utility and grading plan is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 11. Site and building plans are subject to review and approval by the town Center Architectural Review Committee. • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 9 Mr. Wessel explained that the Town Center architectural guidelines are being applied to the northern portion of this area, but with different circumstances due to the prominence of Lake Drive. Overall design will take into account existing landscape, and the bank facility is proposed for being set back to the rear of the site to allow for additional screening. Dan O'Brien, representing the architects on this project, spoke about the stacking issue. He suggested moving the drive - through canopy back to allow for additional space toward the front of the bank. He added that construction of Apollo Drive is essential to the bank project, and that with abandonment of the Lake Drive access additional landscaping will be added to that area. Mr. O'Brien explained that the bank building will resemble residential construction style. Mr. Wessel pointed out that this project must go through the architectural guideline process with the Town Center committee on March 19. Mr. Ahrens mentioned two projects: (1) the extension of trunk utilities from the intersection of Apollo Drive and Lilac, north through the Apollo 3 alignment, and north along Lake Drive. He explained that designs are currently being prepared, and that construction is anticipated for June. (2) with respect to the Apollo Drive extension, a feasibility report has been completed. Regional ponding is being explored to address stormwater runoff issues. Road construction is anticipated for July. Mr. Johnson asked if the new facility would include a drive -up ATM. Mr. O'Brien responded that there will be an after -hour depository as well as a drive -up ATM. Mr. Dunn asked if there is a problem with traffic flow or access. Mr. Kirmis indicated concern regarding blockage of lanes and interim access from Lake Drive during peak levels. This situation will be alleviated somewhat with the termination of the Lake Drive access. Mr. Ahrens stated that construction should be complete within four to six weeks. Therefore, temporary access will not exist. Chair Schaps asked if a temporary facility is anticipated. Mr. O'Brien stated that the bank would not be operational until the new building is complete. Chair Schaps then asked about the potential for expansion of the drive - through lanes. Mr. O'Brien confirmed that there is allowance for a third drive - through lane, which should eliminate stacking problems. Mr. Johnson asked about the practical differences between changing the ordinance with respect to drive - through facilities and conditional use permits. Mr. Kirmis explained that the reason accessory drive - throughs are currently considered to be conditional uses in GB Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 10 districts is because they are typically located on the periphery of a property with a possibility of adverse impact on that property. Limited Business districts do not consider drive - through facilities a conditional use. He suggested that reference within the Zoning Ordinance to financial institutions should have included drive - through facilities, as it is a typical accessory use for banks. Mr. Johnson clarified that the question is one of consistency between business districts, adding the need to continue to scrutinize drive - through facility requests in general. Mr. Gelbmann suggested that facilities such as fast food restaurants necessitated conditional use. Ms. Wyland indicated that a text amendment is preferable. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the site and building plan for Lakeland National Bank, pursuant to the conditions presented, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -0, with Chair Schaps abstaining. D. Wargo Nature Center (Heritage Lab Building), 7701 Main Street, Building into City-Site Plan Review Ms. Wyland explained that the Anoka County Parks Department is requesting a site plan review to allow an existing 14 x 24 park building to be moved to the Heritage Lab of the Wargo Nature Center from a park in St. Francis, Minnesota. The property is located within the Anoka County Park Preserve and is zoned Public Semi - Public (PSP). County and State buildings are listed as permitted uses within this zoning district; however, the relocation of the structure requires a site plan review. Additionally, Ms. Wyland pointed out that the City's Comprehensive Plan indicates this site as "park ". Ms. Wyland stated that she and the building inspector visited the St. Francis site, and determined that the building to be moved is sound. She explained that the building has log exterior, and will be used for storage of educational materials. The Heritage Lab provides educational programs on Native American Indians, early settlers, voyages, and the like to school -age children as well as adults. Parking on the site is available. Ms. Wyland indicated that Staff recommended approval of this site plan review, with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction and the building be located according to the State UBC. 2. A fire extinguisher be located within the structure. 3. Trash receptacles be located within the structure if necessary. 4. The building setbacks conform to the City's Shoreland Management Ordinance as indicated on the site plan (150' from the OHW). 5. Screening and landscaping be provided consistent with the area and approved by the City Forester. • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 11 6. The CPTED Officer review the structure for proper security prior to issuance of any building permits. Deb Gallop, a representative of the Nature Center, explained that the building has no windows and log siding, and will blend well with the site usage. She explained that windows will be installed, primarily for light. Mr. Gelbmann asked if the building will have a frost - footing. Ms. Gallop responded that it will. Mr. Dunn asked about times of operation. Ms. Gallop explained that Heritage Lab takes place for two weeks in the Spring and three weeks in the Fall for living history, for first through eighth graders who are bussed to the site where they travel to different stations for various period scenes and activities. Chair Schaps indicated that the entire facility is excellent, and that the community is fortunate to have it available. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the site plan review to move the building to Wargo Nature Center, with the conditions presented, and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. E. Pierre Nadeau, 2968 Cedar, Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland explained that Pete Nadeau is requesting a minor subdivision of the property at 2068 Cedar Street, owned by Warren Solheid. The property in question is located in a rural zoning district, and indicated as such on the Comprehensive Plan. This request would create the following: Parcel A - a 2.38 -acre parcel (exclusive of roadway) containing an existing homestead constructed prior to 1992. (City Ordinance No. 93- 18 allows for reduction of lot size to a minimum of one acre where habitable single family homes were constructed prior to July 13, 1992, if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten acres.) Parcel B - a 2.09 -acre parcel (exclusive of roadway) that is to be added to an existing 10 -acre parcel for a total of 12 acres. This parcel would be owned by Mr. Nadeau who currently owns the existing 10 acres. Mr. Nadeau intends to hold this parcel for future development with the 2.09 - acre parcel providing the access to the rear 10 acres. Ms. Wyland added that there are eight adjoining lots, on Cedar and 21st Avenue, that are approximately two acres in size with this parcel being the largest homesite. Creation of two lots in this location would blend with the existing character of the neighborhood. Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 12 Staff recommended, however, that these two new parcels be more consistent with the adjoining parcels in lot width, suggesting that Parcel B be increased in size by approximately 15 to 20 feet. This would also allow for a future 60 -foot roadway and 145- foot -deep lots fronting this future roadway, should this area develop into an urban neighborhood. Approval was recommended, pursuant to the following conditions: 1. The surveyor determines that there is at least 20% upland on both Parcel A and Parcel B. 2. Drainage easements as provided over any and all wetland on both parcels. 3. Parcel B be increased in lot width to be consistent with the adjoining parcels. 4. Parcel B be attached to the 10 -acre parcel southerly of this site. Chair Schaps requested clarification that this request is to equal lot sizes. Ms. Wyland responded in the affirmative. She added that the reason one lot is smaller is due to the drain field, but that it could be expanded elsewhere should development become an issue. Mr. Dunn asked about existing utilities. Ms. Wyland explained that a water line extends down Cedar Street, but that no sewer is planned. The parcels are currently on septic systems. Pete Nadeau, 6644 Cedar, indicated that he approves of splitting the lots equally. Warren Solheid, owner of Lots A and B, also expressed favor with the proposed lot split. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision for Pierre Nadeau, 2068 Cedar Street, pursuant to the conditions presented, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Lake Business Park - Concept Plan Mr. Kirmis commented on the Lake Business Park Concept Plan, located south of Interstate 35W and west of Lake Drive. This project is within the Town Center area, overlaying approximately 35 acres of land, and calls for the creation of 11 lots ranging from approximately 1.7 acres to approximately 4.0 acres in size. The subject site lies within Planning District 1 (Town Center), and is subject to the applicable architectural guidelines. Mr. Kirmis explained that access has been adjusted to align with a future anticipated access to the west. Additionally, the concept plan calls for the creation of street extension • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 13 to the north, but includes a half - street. This presents a concern, according to Mr. Kirmis. He also explained that a southerly street extension would ideally go to the south line adjacent property; however, due to containment of wetlands, this is not possible. The result is a cul -de -sac, which requires the processing of a variance. Mr. Kirmis added that some wetland mitigation will be necessary, and Rice Creek approval will be required. Also 80 -foot right -of -way widths have been provided, as required for commercial and/or industrial developments. Mr. Wessel offered positive comments, and explained that this project is located within a TIF district. Kurk Corson, with the use of visual aids, presented the proposed business campus project, explaining that was originated about 1 -1/2 years. Certain topographical issues have been taken into account, particularly with respect to stormwater ponds. Some filling and excavation will also be required. Safety issues have been given considerable attention, especially with respect to trail systems. Mr. Dunn asked about the proposed timetable. Mr. Corson indicated that the desire is to begin construction this summer. Mr. Herr asked if the concept of a 1,200 -foot cul -de -sacs should be less desirable in a residential setting than in a light industrial district. Mr. Kirmis indicated equal concern, adding that in this case there is no other option. Mr. Wessel and Mr. Ahrens agreed. Mr. Johnson clarified that there would be adequate access for emergency vehicles. He then expressed concern about the appearance, given the long frontage along 35W. Mr. Dunn asked if this project would fall under the Architectural Guidelines, and Mr. Wessel explained that the Guidelines are committed only to commercial projects. Additional discussion will be necessary, and this matter will come before the Town Center group. Mr. Herr requested clarification of which school district this project lies within, and it was determined that it is Centennial School District. Mr. Wessel suggested that following further refinement this project be presented to the Planning & Zoning Board for review in April, and then on to the City Council. B. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment - GB Zoning District Ms. Wyland indicated that a Staff report including a proposed text amendment will be available for review at the April meeting, which will include language describing financial institutions with accessory drive- through facilities as being permitted within Planning & Zoning Board March 11, 1998 Page 14 general business, central business, and shopping center districts, leaving the remaining services as conditional uses. Mr. Wessel added that additional review will be completed prior to presenting a draft text amendment to the Board. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:59 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully Submitted, Judy Pope, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • • •