Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/10/1998 P&Z Minutes• Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DA, TIME START D ENDED MEMBERS fPRESENT • June == 10,1998 Corson, Dunn, Johnson, us ynson nning Coordinator= chaps, Schilling, and an conomic Tanning tree s I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL • Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:35 p.m., June 10, 1998. • II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 13, 1998 Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the minutes of the May 13, 1998, meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board, and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mr. Dunn noted that he would like to include clarification on the City's position regarding zoning request and site plans in the Discussion Items, VI, of the Agenda. Chair Schaps stated that Agenda Item VE has been deleted. The amended agenda was approved as submitted. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:39 p.m. There were no comments. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 2 Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:40 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 6 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. Highland Meadow, (Gusse Property), 77th Street, Rezone This item was table at the May 13, 1998, Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. The Planning and Zoning Board determined the issue would be revisited at the June 10, 1998, Planning and Zoning Board Meeting with the following conditions: 1. Applicant present a site plan. 2. Applicant resolve neighborhood's issues. 3. Applicant meet with City Engineer to assure right -of -way requirements are met. 4. Applicant submit a general concept plan illustrating future development option for the adjoining single family lots to the east and south. 5. Applicant waive the 60 day review period for development applications in writing. Ms. Wyland stated that the applicant has met with the City Engineer and the right -of -way issues have been resolved. The applicant does have a revised site plan. The applicant is asking for approval to rezone the southern portion of the property to R -3 Medium Density Residential District. The northern portion of the property would remain R -1 Single Family Residential District to provide the buffer the neighborhood wants. Mr. Bruce Kerber, General Manager for North Suburban Development, Inc., stated that as more property becomes available North Suburban Development will try to purchase the property. Their plans for development do fit into the City's Comprehensive Plan. They currently have a purchase agreement for the Gusse property. At this time, North Suburban Development is in negotiations with other property owners in the area. Mr. Kerber stated that the right -of -way issues have been resolved due to granted easements. North Suburban Development is asking to leave the front 135' of the property single family and to rezone the southern portion to R -3. Mr. Brixius stated that regarding plans for future land use the City does have a need for Medium Residential zoning. Progress is being made with the Comprehensive Plan but it has not yet been formally adopted. Mr. Brixius stated that some of the issues involved with this rezone request have been resolved. He stated he has asked for a general concept plan to be developed involving the entire parcel. He would like to see a site plan that • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 3 • shows limited access to Lake Drive. Mr. Brixius stated that he would like the following • questions answered: 1. How will the houses integrate with Highland Meadows? 2. What are the future options for redevelopment of Single Family Housing to the south and east? 3. How will the site be designed to buffer the Single Family Housing to the north? 4. What level of amenities are being offered? 5. What type of Medium Density Housing is being proposed? Chair Schaps stated that Mr. Brixius needed more information before he could make a recommendation. Mr. Brixius stated that he has not yet received the information he asked for at the May, 1998, Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Kerber stated that if the property is not rezoned North Suburban Development will not purchase any more property. Mr. Brixius stated that the City needs to know that other properties have been considered regarding the rezone. Mr. Kerber stated that they have already provided what Mr. Brixius is asking for regarding all properties on the south side of 79th Street. Single Family Housing will be developed on that portion of the property. Single Family Housing will be a nice blend for the neighborhood. Chair Schaps stated that there seems to be much disagreement between the applicant and Mr. Brixius. Mr. Kerber stated that is because he does not know how to provide Mr. Brixius with any more information. If North Suburban Development proposes three different options, and the property is not rezoned or they do not purchase the property, those options are useless. The purchase agreements are contingent on a rezone. Any development plans will still conform to City codes. Mr. Johnson asked why the maps provided show different street alignments. Mr. Kerber indicated different options are being presented due to ownership of property. Chair Schaps asked if it is common to review a rezone proposal and the site plan at the same time. Mr. Brixius stated that is common. The zoning needs to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. His concern goes beyond the property that the applicant owns. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 4 The City would like to see a rough concept to tie together all the property for future development. Chair Schaps indicated he did not think that request was unreasonable. Mr. Kerber stated that if he does not know where roads will be developed he cannot present the entire site plan. Chair Schaps stated that he should then acquire all property before presenting a site plan. Mr. Kerber stated that if he had some direction from the City he could present a site plan. Mr. Corson asked if the applicant presented a ghost plat that would be acceptable to the City. Mr. Brixius indicated that is what he is looking for. Because this is just a small triangular portion of land, he is not looking for a land survey. Mr. Brixius stated that he is asking for an idea about development that will preserve the rights of the current property owners. Mr. Corson asked about coaving. Mr. Brixius stated that coaving had been approved for Highland Meadows. Mr. Kerber stated that they are dealing with a very small property and are not going to do anything to dissatisfy current residents. At the neighborhood meeting one of the issues was the neighborhood did not want townhomes on 79th Street. The neighborhood wants a nice flow going into Highland Meadows. Mr. Kerber referred to a map showing 79th Street and possible access. He stated that there are many variables to work with. Mr. Corson asked if presenting a ghost plat would be a problem. Mr. Kerber stated that a ghost plat was done with Highland Meadows. A ghost plat is very difficult to do because the area is so small. Mr. Dunn stated that if the Board were reviewing this in January, 1999, the Comprehensive Plan would be in place. Conceptually, the Task Force is in agreement with what Mr. Kerber is presenting. Because the Planning and Zoning board is an advisory Board, Mr. Kerber will need City Council approval. The Planning and Zoning Board cannot guarantee the R -3 zoning. Mr. Dunn suggested that Mr. Kerber work with City Staff to address the City's issues. Mr. Kerber stated that adhering to the City's request would be just like adding lines to a piece of paper. It will have no meaning. Mr. Dunn indicated the City did not see it that way. North Suburban Development, Inc., is the ultimate benefactor from this effort. • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 5 Mr. Kerber stated that initially they had considered a ghost plat. They felt it was a useless tool. The critical tool regarding this development is the rezone. Chair Schaps stated that Mr. Brixius will work with North Suburban Development, Inc., to resolve the City's concerns. When Mr. Brixius is satisfied that these issues have been resolved, he will recommend approval to the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Brixius indicated he is looking for an assurance of quality development. Mr. Wessel stated that City Staff are available to work with the developer to complete this project. Mr. Kerber stated that he did not know how to satisfy Mr. Brixius. Chair Schaps directed Mr. Kerber to work with City Staff. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue Highland Meadows II (Gusse Property) Rezone to the July 8, 1998, Planning and Zoning Meeting, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Mr. Johnson asked when the Comprehensive Plan will be in place. Mr. Wessel stated that the target for the Comprehensive Plan is the end of 1998. Motion carried 6 -0. B. PUBLIC HEARING, Holly Estates, 1101 Holly Drive, Preliminary Plat/Planned Development Overlay Mr. Wessel announced that Mr. Tom Sohrweide, SEH Transportation Engineer, is present to answer any engineering questions regarding this plat as Mr. Ahrens is on vacation. Mr. Brixius stated that K.C. Development Corporation is requesting preliminary plat approval for an 11 lot single family subdivision entitled Holly Estates. The subject five acre site lies west of 12th Avenue, and north of Holly Drive. the site is zoned R -1X, Single Family Executive Residential District. To allow a degree of design flexibility within the subdivision, the applicant has requested a PDO, Planned Development Overlay. Mr. Brixius stated that the Park Board has recommended the following at its May 4, 1998, meeting. 1. A transportation trail be provided along Holly Drive eastward to the Trappers Crossing cul -de -sac. 2. The Park Board further decided they would like a cash dedication in lieu of land. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 6 Chair Schaps verified that what is needed from the P &Z is an endorsement of the PDO and formal action on the Preliminary Plat. Mr. Corson stated that the developer for Trappers Crossing paid for sewer and road improvement. He asked what this plat will dedicate. Mr. Brixius indicated that this issue will be raised with the City Council. Mr. Corson stated that he would like to see consistency. Mr. Trehus asked if it was possible to move the pond over to eliminate the need for the PDO. Mr. Brixius stated that the drainage function of the pond was best suited in the proposed site. Mr. Johnson asked what the City would be receiving to justify the PDO. Mr. Brixius stated that Trappers Crossing had a similar plan. The City will be getting a development that will fit into this site. The integrity of the zoning will be maintained. Mr. Schaps noted that most of the current members of the Planning and Zoning Board were not involved with Trappers Crossing. He stated that the narrowness of the two corner lots concerned him. Mr. Brixius stated that the lots can maintain the side setbacks. Mr. Dunn stated that Trappers Crossing involved more lots. He expressed concern regarding a precedence being set by the City. Although Trappers Crossing was granted a PDO, a broad scale for another development is not necessarily justified. He stated that the lot sizes are too small, there is a traffic hazard at the corner of Holly Drive, and ditch 25 could cause a problem. Chair Schaps asked about eliminating one lot. Mr. Brixius stated that if one lot is eliminated there is not the need for a PDO. Chair Schaps asked if eliminating one lot has been considered by the applicant. The applicant indicated he wanted to pursue the 11 lot PDO. Mr. Corson stated that Holly Drive reminded him of Ware Road because of children and bike traffic. He asked about possible trail options. Ms. Wyland indicated that the proposed trail along Holly Drive to Lot #1 is for the purpose of gaining access to Birch Park through Trappers Crossing. Mr. Corson asked about any comments from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Ms. Wyland indicated that the Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed a permit application and approval of the permit is pending. Mr. Dunn wondered why this item was already scheduled for City Council approval/denial when the Planning and Zoning Board has not given a recommendation. Mr. Brixius stated that it was on the schedule for a City Council Meeting. A recommendation is still required from the Planning and Zoning Board. • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 7 Mr. Chuck Lund, K.C. Development Co., stated that when the project began he was unaware of the 90' lot requirements. Because it is a small development, he would not like to lose even one lot. Financially, losing one lot would be a hardship because they still have to develop all the streets. The lots that overlook the creek will sell for a substantial amount of money. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 7:30 p.m. Ms. Sue Walseth, 1101 Holly Drive, came forward and stated that ditch 25 is 115' from her property. The 10 lots she owns would have a very small impact on ditch 25. She stated that there are currently trails on busy streets in the City. She indicated that Lot #8 is within 6' of the minimum specification. Ms. Walseth stated that there is not wetland on lot #1. The lot sizes on Lots #1 and #2 are larger than the minimum specifications. She stated that the corner lot width has been reduced the length is larger than what is required. Ms. Walseth encouraged the Board to allow the sale of her 10 lots to go through. She stated that City recommended development of her property many years ago. Mr. Dunn asked if she is the current owner of the property. Ms. Walseth stated that she is the current owner of the property. Chair Schaps asked for a motion to close the public hearing and indicated the Preliminary Plat would go before Council on June 22, 1998. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:40 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Dunn asked if Mr. Ahrens has looked at the safety of the corner road. Ms. Wyland stated that OSM and Dave Ahrens had reviewed the plat and indicated no concerns with the road configuration. Mr. Dunn asked if Mr. Ahrens said the road is not a hazard. Ms. Wyland stated any concern regarding the road would have been indicated in the report. Mr. Trehus asked what trails were developed for Trappers Crossing. Chair Schaps indicated a trail was developed and the end of the north cul -de -sac which is intended to access Birch Park. Ms. Wyland stated that future trails have also been indicated on the south end of Trappers Crossing. Mr. Trehus asked about the time frame for these trails. Ms. Wyland stated that the north trail is going to be constructed very soon. The Park Director is currently working on the development of that trail. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 8 Mr. Trehus asked what the developer dedicated for that trail. Ms. Wyland stated that the developer provided the land for the trail and rough grade and rock. Chair Schaps stated that Trappers Crossing needed 4 -5 meetings to obtain approval. Trappers Crossing started with 160 lots. The final number of lots was reduced by 20% for many reasons. He stated that he believes these lot sizes are too small and it would not be unreasonable to reduce the development by one lot. If the development is reduced by one lot, a PDO is not required. The preliminary plat could be reconfigured. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to deny the PDO request on the grounds that it does not meet the requirements, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -1 with Mr. Schilling voting no. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the Preliminary Plat with the R -1X requirement and subject to the following conditions: 1. Reconfigure Lots 9 and 11 to bring lot 8 to minimum district standard requirements. 2. The forthcoming final plat include ten foot wide utility easements centered on rear and other lot lines. Drainage easements should also be placed over the site's wetlands. This item should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. 3. The submitted grading and drainage plan is subject to review and comment by the City Engineer. 4. A utility plan is submitted subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. Trail corridors by provided along Holly Drive eastward to the Trappers Crossing cul -de- sac. 6. If applicable, a phasing plan is submitted subject to City approval. 7. Comments from other City Staff. Mr. Dunn made a friendly amendment adding that Mr. Ahrens review the safety of the corner road regarding traffic. The MOTION to amend was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -1 with Mr. Schilling voting no. C. PUBLIC HEARING, Lake Center Partners, I -35W and Lake Drive, Planned Development Overlay JADT Development Group, LLC is requesting planned development overly concept plan approval for a 144,500 square foot retail commercial development to the east and south of • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 9 Lake Drive and 77th Street. The proposed development is to be a mix of retail, restaurant and other commercial uses (i.e. bank) within 11 buildings for the first phase of the development. A second phase is intended to occur to the ease of Phase I, although no plans have been formalized for that portion of development. The approximate 28.5 acre parcel is zoned SC, Shopping Center District. Mr. Wessel stated that the proposed 144,500 square foot development to be constructed is generally consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Shopping Center and PDO provisions of he Zoning Ordinance from a Concept Plan perspective. Mr. Wessel asked the Board for an endorsement of the concept plan subject to the applicant addressing the following issues: 1. Redesign of the Site Plan in consideration of the following factors: Cluster stand alone buildings around shared parking lots. Reduce the number of access to the Apollo Drive extension. Consideration for the location of a proposed village bridge. Provide at minimum one loading area per structure. Provide sufficient stacking space and a by -pass in association with proposed drive - throughs. * Include more pedestrian circulation opportunities throughout the development. * Provide a 50 foot principal building setback from Apollo Drive. 2. Resolve location of Apollo Drive /77th Street Intersection. 3. Accesses to development from Lake Drive should compliment interior site circulation. 4. Reduce parking stall supply to a number more approximate to the estimated parking stall requirement outlined herein. 5. Explore alternative options for reducing the number of required parking stalls and methods of construction as suggested by the Environmental Board. • 6. Indicate provision of significant landscaping along north property line of Phase I to screen loading areas of the 72,000 square foot building. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 10 7. Address the infiltration issues identified by the Environmental Review Board. 8. Coordinate a tree preservation plan with the City Forester. 9. Comments of other City Staff. Mr. Wessel indicated he recommends approval of the concept plan pending approval of the Planning and Zoning Board and resident feedback. He stated that the applicant would like to go before the City Council in July, 1998. McDonalds would like to come before the Planning and Zoning Board in August, 1998, and begin construction in the fall. They would like to be operating by the end of 1998. Mr. Wessel stated that Tim Baylor, developer, Ron Krank, architect, and Dan Engstrom, a representative from McDonalds, are present to speak to the Board. Mr. Baylor came forward and stated that it has been a pleasure to work the City Staff of Lino Lakes. When the project began, they were just looking for a site for a new McDonalds store. The vision of Lino Lakes is much broader than anticipated. Putting the whole package together was very difficult. The group that has been put together to develop this project is top notch. He believes the project is in the best interest of the City. The timing is good in regards to the growth potential of the City. Mr. Baylor stated that interest from retailers and developers is already being generated regarding this project. Mr. Krank came forward and briefly discussed the architectural design of the project. He stated that K. K. Architects has much expertise in the design of shopping centers. Other projects they have developed include: Tamarack Village, Woodbury Village, Mall of America, Golden Valley Commons, McDonalds at Southtown Center, and the McDonalds at Miracle Mile Center. Mr. Krank stated that the project does include good visuals, traffic constraints, and the City vision of I35 -W south. He indicated that the site layout with current road configuration led to dialog for the retail interest. Mr. Krank then went over sketches for the proposed project. They are proposing a large retail building with smaller shops that will include a restaurant, ban, gas station, and drug store. They are proposing a series of small parking lots with common lighting and landscaping. The next step of the project is to take it to the market. The purpose of the presentation tonight is to share their vision with the Planning and Zoning Board. The developers must now take the concept to large retailers and test the concept. Mr. Krank stated that he is looking for concept approval from the Board. He stated he is aware that they must come back before the Board with detailed site plans. • • • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 11 Chair Schaps asked the location of the first tenant. Mr. Krank referred to a map and explained where the first retailer (McDonalds) will be located. Mr. Brixius stated that he is very excited about the project. He indicated that the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the long term zoning plan. He stated that Staff has reviewed the plan in detail. He noted that the access off of Lake Drive would be signaled. He also noted that zoning is place and is consistent. Mr. Corson asked about the landscaping and possible berming on 77th Street. He also expressed concern regarding Phase I and II regarding storm water ponding and the wetland indicated on the plat. Mr. Brixius indicated that landscaping options and berming on 77th Street will be included in Phase II of the project. The wetland and drainage issues will be addressed in the development phase. Mr. Dunn asked about the proposed grocery store square footage. Mr. Krank indicated that the proposed square footage for the grocery store is 35,000 - 40,000 square feet. That square footage is approximately half of a typical Rainbow Foods grocery store. Mr. Krank stated that market research has shown that the market would support a grocery store of this size. Mr. Dunn stated that the Cub in White Bear Lake was restricted regarding square footage. He believes that was a mistake. He asked if the market research accounted for population. He would like to see expanded vision regarding the square footage of the grocery store. Mr. Krank indicated that grocery retailers carefully analyze the market. The market research could possibly be shared with the Board when it is completed. Mr. Dunn asked if the concept plan is possibly setting a cap on what is being strived for. Mr. Krank explained that they go to the retailers and show them the market and the site. The retailers work within those boundaries. Mr. Dunn asked if a formula is used in the market research that reflects residential growth. Mr. Krank indicated that a formula is used and possibly that could be shared with the Board. Mr. Dunn asked if the concept plan allowed for flexibility on the square footage of the sites. Mr. Krank indicated that the concept plan did allow for flexibility. Mr. Dunn asked if the developer is receptive to working with the Town Center Committee. He also asked if 14,000 square feet would accommodate a typical Walgreens. Mr. Krank stated that he is going through the architectural designs with the architect for the Town Center. He indicated that 14,000 square feet is the prototype for all Walgreen stores. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 12 Mr. Dunn stated that the City has waited for a center for many years. He asked for Mr. Wessel's professional opinion of the project. He asked Mr. Wessel if he believes that this is what the City is looking for and why. Mr. Wessel stated that he is very comfortable with this project. He believes that this is what the City is looking for. He stated he is looking for flexibility in the concept plan. Every individual project will go through the Town Center Committee, Planning and Zoning Board, and City Council. The Apollo Drive extension is important regarding the consideration of this project. He stated that if the project is developed correctly, it will be a real contribution to the City of Lino Lakes. Mr. Dunn stated that he believes this project does support a PDO because of the creativity involved. He asked if there was a way to forego the tabling of the PDO and move to approve the concept plan this evening. Mr. Brixius stated that the Board could endorse the concept plan this evening. He encouraged the Board to listen to comments from the public. Mr. Trehus stated that the site plan appears to be user friendly to cars but not pedestrians. He also expressed concern regarding the residents in the area. He stated that unless there is a plan for redevelopment in the area the residents property is not valuable. Mr. Krank indicated that there are two residential and two commercial properties adjoining the site. He believes that the City will want to develop that land. The proposal leaves a 50' buffer between the property. Mr. Krank stated that the proposal is pedestrian friendly. The plan encourages people to park their cars and walk from business to business. With a more detailed plan, paths will be indicated from building to building. Mr. Trehus asked about the possibility of placing the buildings closer together, which would be consistent with the Village concept. Mr. Krank stated that was difficult to do as they are trying to create an edge for the property. Mr. Trehus asked if the phasing plans will be done in clusters. Mr. Baylor stated that the scale of the project will dictate where retailers will be placed. At this point, retailers have been placed where they are most appropriate. Mr. Baylor indicated that he is anticipating multiple site plans will be presented. Mr. Trehus asked how the architectural design compares to the Town Center. Mr. Baylor stated he has not yet seen the guidelines for the Town Center. The project will try to accommodate those guidelines. Mr. Wessel stated that the City has not yet given the design team any guidelines. The discussion regarding design will begin next week. Mr. Wessel stated that he anticipates a more commercial look for this project than the Town Center. All of these issues will come before the Planning and Zoning Board at a future date. • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 13 • Mr. Trehus expressed a concern regarding infiltration for the future pond. Mr. Krank stated that a Civil Engineering Firm will be hired to resolve the ponding issues. Chair Schaps asked if any consideration has been given to pedestrian rest areas. Mr. Wessel indicated a focus will be put on pedestrian movement. Chair Schaps asked how large the proposed retailer will be in Phase II. Mr. Krank indicated the retailer in Phase II will be 100,00 square feet. Chair Schaps asked if the representative from McDonalds would like to address the Board. Mr. Engstrom came forward and stated that he was available for any questions from the Board. He stated that he will be back to present to the Board the final plans in August, 1998. Chair Schaps asked if he was anticipating local ownership of the McDonalds and if there will be a playland. Mr. Engstrom stated that he was unsure if the McDonalds would be a franchise or a local ownership. He indicated there will not be a playland. The total square footage of this unit will be 6,000. 111 Mr. Corson asked if specific market driven units will see pad sites connected. Mr. Wessel indicated they will try to cluster the pad sites. Mr. Trehus expressed concern regarding drainage going across I35 -W. He believes they need to be very cautious so a large amount of water will not go into area lakes. Mr. Brixius stated that this will be reviewed in the future. Mr. Wessel stated that the Rice Creek Watershed District will be involved in the project. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 8:55 p.m. Mr. Wessel stated that he had received a letter from Ann Iota, who is not present. She expressed concern regarding the projects impact on Carol Drive and its residents. She asked about the possibility of a cul -de -sac on the south end of Carol Drive eliminating direct access from 77th Street. Mr. Wessel stated that he forwarded the suggestion to the City Engineer. Mr. Wessel indicated that Ms. Wyland had also received a call from a resident on Carol Drive with similar concerns. Roy Stanley, 700 and 702 77th Street, expressed concern regarding the widening of 77th Street for traffic accommodation, utilities and assessments regarding the project, and lighting at the end of 77th Street. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 14 Mr. Wessel stated that improvements to 77th Street will be made. He could not address Mr. Stanley concerns this evening. He stated that those concerns will be addressed in the future. George Palace, 7722 Marilyn, expressed concern regarding the lighting for the project. He asked the Board to consider how far the lighting will bleed over into the neighborhoods. Tom Vacha, 7702 Lake Drive, asked about Lake Drive being able to absorb all the traffic from 77th Street. Mr. Wessel stated that Lake Drive will be upgraded to a 4 lane road. He stated that he is securing a study from SEH explaining the ramifications of the development. He will receive the report in a few weeks. Mr. Vacha indicated that there is too much traffic already. He would like to see the road built before the project begins to accommodate the traffic. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 9:00 p.m.., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. Chair Schaps asked for a show of hands from the Board of those in favor of the project and endorsement of the concept plan. All Board members raised their hands. D. Paul Munoz, 55 Ash Street, Variance Ms. Wyland stated that Paul and Dorothy Munoz have resided at 55 Ash Street since the late 1970's and have experienced several changes along County Road J. /Ash Street. Their property is on the north/east corner of Ash Street (County Road J.) and Baldwin Lake Road. The most recent change experienced was the widening of County Road J. from Hodgson Road to the west. This widening resulted in the condemnation of approximately 17' of their property and the removal of a row of mature evergreen trees. Since the roadway improvement, several property owners across County Road J. have installed board on board 6' privacy fences on their rear property lines. These properties are located in Shoreview. With the completion of each fence installation, the noise experienced on the Munoz property has increased. They are now requesting permission to install a similar fence. Ms. Wyland indicated staff recommended approval of the variance subject to Anoka County Sight Line Standards as they relate to the intersection of Baldwin Lake Road and County Road J. Mr. Johnson asked where the fence will be located. Ms. Wyland stated the fence will be placed on the inside front row of pine trees toward the house. Mr. Trehus stated that additional right -of -way may be required if County Road J. is extended to a 4 lane road. He indicated that visibility is also a concern. Ms. Wyland • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 15 • stated that currently there is enough right -of -way to support a 4 lane road. Anoka County Sight Line Standards will apply to relate to any visibility concerns. • Mr. Johnson stated that any obstruction of visibility would come from the trees, not the fence. Ms. Munoz came forward and explained the location of the proposed fence. She stated that currently noise from the traffic is a real problem. Mr. Corson suggested the City Engineer review to ensure the sight line is adequate. Mr. Trehus asked if the applicant has considered a 4' fence. Ms. Munoz stated that she hoped the City would be more sympathetic to their problem and allow the 6' fence. She stated that they did not ask for the road widening. Mr. Dunn stated that he believes the variance is justified. A 6' fence is appropriate. He stated that he does not see a site line problem occurring. Mr. Dunn asked if the fence did conform to the Anoka County Sight Line Standards. Ms. Wyland indicated that she is unsure of the County's Sight Line Standards. If the Planning and Zoning Board recommends approval, the County will be notified. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve variance subject to Anoka County Sight Line Standards as they relate to the intersection of Baldwin Lake Road and County Road J., justified by the following circumstances: 1. County Road J. is a heavily traveled roadway. 2. The front property line has been reduced with the previous road construction. 3. A natural sound barrier has been removed. 4. An echo effect has been created with the fences across the roadway. Mr. Corson made a friendly amendment to have the City Engineer review to ensure the site line is adequate. Mr. Johnson accepted this as an amendment to his motion. The MOTION was seconded by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6 -0 E. Joan Tschida, 7090 21st. Avenue, Variance • This item has been temporarily withdrawn by the applicant. Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 16 F. James Brandl, 7057 Rice Lake Court, Variance Ms. Wyland stated that Mr. James Brandl, 7057 Rice Lake Court, is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a 32 x 28 detached garage 19' from the property line. The Zoning Ordinance requires a setback of 30', therefore, the variance requested is for 11'. Mr. Brandl's property is located on the corner of Rice Lake Lane and Rice Lake Court. The proposed garage will face Rice Lake Court. Mr. Brandl has recently removed two structures from his property, a 24 x 24 car port and a 12 x 20 barn that was located in the same position as the proposed garage. The total square footage proposed will be within the requirements of the Ordinance as will the number of accessory buildings allowed. Mr. Johnson stated that this is a very large lot. He asked if the lot could be subdivided. Ms. Wyland indicated the lot cannot be subdivided because of the wetland south of the home. Chair Schaps stated that there was a similar situation a couple years ago where a building was constructed too close to the property line. Ms. Wyland indicated that the Council determined there were unique circumstances and granted that variance. Mr. Trehus asked if the similar situation involved a shed. Ms. Wyland stated that it was an accessory building and the setbacks requirements are the same. Mr. Trehus asked if a building this size is permitted in an R -1 zoning. Ms. Wyland indicated one detached building this size is permitted. Mr. Trehus asked if the wetland was counted in the lot square footage. Ms. Wyland stated that the wetland was not factored in. Chair Schaps stated that in this case two buildings have already been removed. In the past similar situation, buildings had not been removed. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve variance as requested, and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS Mr. Dunn asked Ms. Wyland for a informational sheet regarding the City's position regarding zoning request and site plans. Ms. Wyland indicated she would provide the Board with that information. Mr. Trehus announced that there is a Focus Group Meeting on June 11, 1998, 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. He invited those present to attend. Mr. Trehus also noted that in the future the size of the maps in the packets will be l i x 17. • • • • Planning & Zoning Board June 10, 1998 Page 17 Chair Schaps noted there is a City Council Work Session regarding the Comprehensive Plan on Monday, June 15, 1998, 4:30 p.m., at Centennial Middle School. There is a Town Center Meeting Thursday, June 18, 6:00 p.m. Also, there is a Comprehensive Plan Task Force Meeting on Thursday, June 25, 1998, 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:27 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 6 -0. Respectfully Submitted, Kim Points, Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.