Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/08/1997 P&Z Minutes• • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT October 8, 1997 6:33 P.M. 10:40 P.M. Dahl, Dunn, Gelbmann, Herr, Johnson and Schaps Robinson Planning Coordinator Wyland, City Engineer Ahrens, Economic Development Director Wessel, Planning Consultant Brixius I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Schaps called the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:33 p.m., October 8, 1997. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 10, 1997 Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the minutes of the September 10, 1997 meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board, and was supported by Ms. Dahl. Motion carried, 6 -0. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Schaps suggested continuance of Item V.G., Continuation of Public Hearing, Telecommunication Ordinance. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to continue Item V.G., and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried, 6 -0. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:35 p.m. There were no comments. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:36 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Dahl. Motion carried 6 -0. • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. Public Hearing, Molin Concrete, 415 Lilac Street, Amended Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Rezoning and Street Vacation Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 6:37 p.m. Mr. Brixius explained that the public hearing on Molin Concrete's proposed development plans was continued from the September 10, 1997 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board so that the applicant would have an opportunity to respond to various issues raised at that time. He reminded the Board that Molin Concrete is requesting a number of applications for use of on -site open and outdoor storage, utilizing its 20 -acre undeveloped parcel of land north of 77th Street. Additionally, Molin Concrete seeks to pursue various improvements to its existing plant located south of 77th Street. Mr. Brixius added that in order to accommodate these development plans, the following approvals by the Planning & Zoning Board are necessary: 1. A zoning ordinance amendment establishing open and outdoor storage as an interim use in the LI Zoning District. 2. An interim use permit to allow open and outdoor storage as an interim use in the LI Zoning District. 3. Conditional use permit to allow the following: A. The expansion of a concrete product plant within a General Industrial Zoning District. B. A building (batch plant) greater than 45 feet in height (80 -foot height proposed) within a General Industrial Zoning District. 4. Vacation of the segment of 77th Street which bisects the Molin property. Mr. Brixius stated that two neighborhood meetings have been held for the purpose of gathering input from affected property owners regarding this proposed conditional use permit. The following issues were reviewed: Outdoor Storage as an Interim Use. Recognizing that a rezoning of the northern portion of the property would have the result of allowing high- intensity industrial uses adjacent to residentially -zoned property, an alternative means of accommodating the applicant's request was presented. As an alternative to rezoning, the City could approve an amendment to the current zoning ordinance which would establish open and outdoor storage as an interim use in the City's Light Industrial District (applicable to the northern portion of the Molin property). • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 3 Screening/Landscaping. In response to concerns over site landscaping and buffering, the applicant has submitted a planting plan which details screening efforts to be provided along the site's northern and western boundaries. According to the draft Ordinance amendment, outdoor storage areas must be set back at least 75 feet from residentially -zoned property with a minimum 20 -foot buffer yard being provided. According to the submitted site and planting plans, the outdoor storage area is to be set back 150 feet from the neighboring residential property to the north with a 40- foot -wide buffer yard being provided. The planting plan calls for a wide variety of tree plantings including pine, ash, dogwood and oak intended to provide a year -round screen. Additionally, a five- foot -high berm is to be provided along the northern property line. The proposed landscape plan has been found to comply with applicable Ordinance requirements and should successfully screen the outdoor storage area from adjacent residential uses. Noise. In response to noise - related concerns voiced at the Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the applicant has proposed the following: 1. Concrete product (precast wall panels) will be stored parallel to the northerly buffer yard to act as a sound barrier. 2. The outdoor storage yard will be arranged such that truck backing maneuvers toward residential properties will be minimized. 3. Strobe lights will replace truck back -up beepers during the night time hours (6:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m.). The preceding sound mitigation measures are considered responsible and should reduce possible adverse impacts. Truck Traffic. In response to truck traffic concerns associated with the use, the applicant has submitted a traffic flow diagram. As shown on the diagram, trucks are proposed to enter the site from the south (via Lilac Street), and exit to the west via 4th Avenue and travel southward. Recognizing that land directly west of the subject site is residentially zoned, consideration should be given to accommodating southbound truck traffic internally (on site). This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. Additionally, the City should consider the prohibition of on- street truck parking along Lilac Street. • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 4 Air Safety Zone. In response to concerns over the air safety zone of the nearby Lino Airpark, the applicant has submitted a plan which superimposes the Airpark's approach zone upon the subject site. Based on this plan, it is concluded that the proposed batch plant height (80 feet) will not encroach into the required Airpark approach zone. Darin Burckhard, Structural Engineer for this project, stated that additional information not included in the packets before the Board, had been provided immediately prior to this evening's meeting. This additional information addressed issues discussed at the most recent neighborhood meeting held on Thursday, October 2, 1997. Chair Schaps indicated that the Board did not have that information before them. Mr. Burckhard proceeded to review this information verbally, stating that agreement had been reached to place the planting buffer at the 150 -foot setback line. Chair Schaps requested clarification that this placement would result in 110 feet of undisturbed area. Mr. Burckhard responded in the affirmative, adding that the proposed placement had been marked with yellow stringline, and that the berm would curve around the existing planting at the 150 -foot line. Mr. Brixius asked about change to the existing landscape plan. Chair Schaps asked about attendance at the most recent neighborhood meeting. Mr. Burckhard responded 13 individuals had signed the attendance register. Mr. Burckhard indicated that a resident had requested that a row of evergreens be planted along with deciduous trees to ensure year -round visual appeal. In response to Mr. Brixius's question regarding the landscape plan, Mr. Burckhard indicated that there should be ample time to make the recommended adjustments to the proposed schedule. Mr. Gelbmann asked if an irrigation system is proposed for the berm. Mr. Burckhard responded yes, and that a maintenance program is also proposed. Mr. Herr asked Mr. Ahrens about the suitability of 4th Avenue to handle the additional truck traffic. Mr. Ahrens explained that 4th Avenue is a collector route, constructed to 9- ton design strength (although it is posted as having a 7 -ton limit). Mr. Johnson suggested that approval recommendation Condition 5 might contain a contradiction in terms as worded. Mr. Brixius explained that reference to "permissible exterior lighting" is intended for any lighting that might be determined to be necessary on the remainder of the site beyond the outdoor storage area (north of 77th Street). Mr. Johnson also asked about the intended hours of operation. Randy Molin, facility manager, responded that current operation activity begins at 4:00 a.m. With specific reference to Condition 12.c., Mr. Molin indicated that strobe lights would replace backup • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 5 beepers whenever equipment operation would take place before 8:00 a.m. or after the customary evening cleanup crew's work is concluded in the evening. Mr. Johnson requested clarification of the need for separate references in the proposed amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance to the seventy -five setback and the twenty -foot buffer yard. Mr. Brixius explained that although the two are defined separately, the buffer yard fits within the setback area. Mr. Herr stated that he would prefer to see Condition 8 worded to specifically prohibit on- street parking of trucks along Lilac Street. Mr. Ahrens explained that although right - of -way is included, a request could be put to Molin that on- street parking on Lilac Street be prohibited. Mr. Brixius added that staging is currently proposed for areas other than on Lilac Street. Mr. Dunn asked if the applicant has indicated willingness to park trucks so that they do not encroach on the street itself, pointing out that at present the trucks park about three feet into the street. Mr. Ahrens indicated that this matter has been raised at the County level, and that a recommendation may be to create a right turnout lane in order to avoid this situation. Mr. Dunn asked if the street is wide enough to accommodate such a turnout lane, to which Mr. Ahrens responded that he would have to wait for a response from the County on that matter. Mr. Burckhard assured the Board that if the proposed project is approved, the trucks will not be staged on Lilac Street. They will enter the property from Lilac and be staged within Molin's property boundary. Mr. Dunn requested assurance that under no conditions would parking be forced onto Lilac Street, to which Mr. Burckhard responded that it would not. Mr. Dunn asked about consideration to posting signage indicating "no thoroughfare ", preventing a right turn (north) exit from Molin Concrete as opposed to a left turn (south) by an errant truck driver. Mr. Ahrens indicated that the City cannot control truck traffic on a State - funded route, but that the proposed traffic plan seeks to alleviate this problem. Mr. Dunn asked if the applicant had offered specific resolution to this issue. Mr. Molin explained that a specific in -house would be in place prohibiting trucks from causing traffic problems in the area. Doug Miller, 7780 Lois Lane, proposed the following questions: Height of the berm (seven or eight feet), hours of operation, use of storage area, and availability of minutes from previous meetings at which this matter was discussed. Chair Schaps responded that requested copies of minutes would be provided. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 6 Mr. Burckhard confirmed that the height of the berm is proposed to be eight feet; that although hours could not be officially restricted, Molin has agreed to the stated hours of operation; the last rows of the storage area will be used for wall panels only. Mr. Burckhard added that although he could not guarantee forklifts would be operated before or after regular hours, such use was highly unlikely. Mr. Miller also recommended that the shrubs used in landscaping be of a size and variety which would deter destruction by rabbits. Mr. Johnson added the more troublesome problem of deer. Mr. Miller requested citizen input with respect to future changes to Molin's current plans. Chair Schaps indicated little likelihood of significant change in Molin's operation, adding that Mr. Brixius might elaborate on the perameters of a conditional use permit and why this project is proposed for such a permit. Mr. Brixius explained that by definition an "interim use permit" can place limitations such as a sunset clause in its terms, and that any modifications to the uses contained in the permit would require an official amendment which would, in turn, result in implementation of the notification process. Mr. Miller indicated concern over apparent absence of leverage for the citizenry. Chair Schaps reassured Mr. Miller that Molin's history suggests nothing but the highest degree of integrity and positive neighborhood participation. He added that any future concerns should be brought before the City as they arise. Brad Lindgren, 388 Thomas Street, expressed concern over the trees already planted along 4th Avenue by the City of Lino Lakes. Chair Schaps asked about discussion of this issue at the previous meetings. Mary Kay Wyland explained that these trees, located on the boulevard, are the responsibility of the City, which must replace and /or maintain them. Ms. Wyland further indicated that she would check with the City Forester regarding certain of these trees which require replacement. Mr. Brixius explained that additional plantings along 4th Avenue to 77th Street have already been addressed by Molin. Mr. Ahrens added that certain of the trees at the end of the airport runway may have to be removed. Gordon Cable, 426 Greenwood, expressed concern over the possibility of Molin Concrete operating equipment at odd nighttime hours. Mr. Brixius indicated that the current ordinance, by which this project must be evaluated, contains no restriction on hours of operation. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 7 Chair Schaps pointed out that historically Molin Concrete has not conducted work activity round the clock, and that there is no reason to believe they will begin to do so as a result of the improvements encompassed by this proposed project. Mr. Cable remained concerned that they may at some future time decide to increase their operating hours. Mr. Dunn suggested that a dissatisfied citizen might find recourse through the nuisance ordinance. Mr. Brixius indicated that any complaints would be thoroughly investigated. Chair Schaps reiterated the value to the community of Molin Concrete. He concluded by reminding Mr. Cable that this hearing was continued in order to allow for response to all outstanding citizen concerns. John Herman, 7859 Lois Lane, suggested that the following issues had not been resolved to his satisfaction: (1) the traffic flow on Lilac Street and 4th Avenue; and (2) limitation of hours of operation. Mr. Herman stated that the majority of the neighboring property owners desire to have Molin's trucks enter and exit by way of Lilac Street. He stated that he was awaiting the results of a traffic survey; and that, in his opinion, the issue was far from resolved. With respect to the hours of operation, he suggested a limitation of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. for activity north of 77th Street. Mr. Herman acknowledged that the expectation is not to run multiple shifts. However, in his opinion south of 77th Street this would not be a problem; but he wanted to see something in writing as part of the conditional use permit limiting hours north of 77th Street. Mr. Ahrens referred to correspondence from SEH which recommended 4th Avenue as the most advantageous means of access to and from Molin Concrete, primarily because this use would direct the traffic into an established controlled intersection. Mr. Herman expressed concern that the intersection would experience considerable traffic jams with trucks passing through. Chair Schaps asked Tom Molin for additional information regarding hours of operation. Although it is very difficult and unrealistic to put such limitations in writing, he indicated that Molin Concrete's master plan for the next five to ten years addresses no late hour shifts. Mr. Molin stated that his company is sensitive to the needs and concerns of its neighbors. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 7:25 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 6 -0. Brian Wessel stated that the Economic Development Committee is proud of the quality of the businesses which have been attracted to Lino Lakes over the past several years. He indicated that Molin Concrete has been offered as an example of community commitment and participation. Mr. Brixius suggested that prior to action on the items presented for approval in connection with this project, certain of the conditions for approval should be amended. With respect to Condition 7, Mr. Brixius recommended addition of reference to the 40- • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 8 foot buffer which will be located within the 150 -foot setback along the subject site's northern boundary, as well as to the berm not being more than 7 feet in height. Mr. Brixius also suggested addition of a 14th condition, being that a solid row of conifer trees along the south edge of the buffer yard, as well as irrigation system, and maintenance plan be provided. Condition 8 should be amended to specifically prohibit truck parking on Lilac Street. Ms. Dahl requested a copy of the conditions, as amended. Mr. Johnson requested that Section 1.B. of the ordinance amendment be changed to reflect inclusion of the buffer yard within the minimum setback area. Mr. Dunn suggested that the duty of the Planning & Zoning Board is to review proposals based upon ordinances as they presently exist. As written, the present ordinance allows for 24 -hour operation of a business; and Mr. Dunn wanted to clarify that the Board is limited to review of proposals on that basis. Mr. Johnson requested clarification that limits can be incorporated into a conditional use permit. Mr. Brixius responded that limitations can be set, and reviewed in the event of changes in circumstances. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the amendment of Section 1.B. of the ordinance establishing open and outdoor storage as an interim use in the City's Light Industrial Zoning District to read as follows: "A buffer yard not less than twenty (20) feet in width is provided along residentially zoned properties as part of the minimum setback in compliance with Section 3, Subd. 4.S.4 of this ordinance. ", and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the interim use application which would incorporate all conditions outlined by Staff and entered into the record, and was supported by Ms. Dahl. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to vacate 77th Street pursuant to Staff report and applicant's site plan, and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the conditional use permit for expansion of the Molin Concrete plant within the General Industrial District contingent upon the conditions outlined above, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve a variance for a berm not to exceed 7 feet in • height, and was supported by Ms. Dahl. Motion carried 6 -0. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 9 Chair Schaps pointed out that this item will go before the Lino Lakes City Council on Monday, October 27, 1997. B. Continuation of Public Hearing, Highland Meadows, Rezoning, Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat Chair Schaps declared the public hearing reopened at 7:37 p.m. Mr. Brixius explained that at its September 10, 1997 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Board continued consideration of the Highland Meadows rezoning and preliminary plat request pending resolution of various issues identified in Northwest Associated Consultants' August 5, 1997 planning report, comments of the Planning & Zoning Board, and public testimony. In response to comments received, the applicant has submitted a revised preliminary plat which incorporates the following changes: 1. All lots have been expanded from 70 feet to 80 feet at the front setback line. 2. All single - family residential lots measure not less than 10,800 square feet in size (R -1 District minimum). 3. Several lots bordering the subdivision's park area have been reconfigured. 4. The 79th Street jog condition has been reconfigured as a full 90- degree intersection. 5. An east /west street has been added to the townhome portion of the project. Such street segment results in a reduction of cul -de -sac length and the omission of 8 multi - family units (within 2 structures). 6. A "mini- park" has been added directly south of Lots 10 and 11, Block 3. 7. Two single residential lots have replaced two townhome units directly south of 79th Street. 8. Triangular lots have been eliminated. Mr. Brixius added that generally speaking the revised preliminary plat responds to documented subdivision design concerns. there are, however, a number of items which should be addressed, as follows: CSAH 14 Access. Lot 24, Block 6 is provided access to both the subdivision's interior cul -de -sac and CSAH 14. Consistent with City policy, direct single- family lot access to high volume streets should be discouraged. So as to fulfill City policy and avoid the platting of a "flag lot ", CSAH 14 access should be prohibited. As a result, the northerly extension of Lot 24 should be reestablished as an outlot or possibly a trail corridor which would provide a connection to the neighboring elementary school. This issue should, however, be subject to comment by the Park Board. Additionally, the side lot line between Lots 23 and 24, Block 6 should be reconfigured to emanate from the center point of the adjacent cul -de -sac. • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 10 Outlot A. To simplify future platting of adjacent property, it is recommended that the southern 117 feet, more or less, of Outlot A be combined with adjacent Lot 24, Block 6. Townhome Remnant Parcel. To avoid the creation of an oddly- shaped remnant parcel and allow for possible future street extension into the adjacent easterly property, the right - of -way of the east /west townhome street should be extended to the eastern border of the site. Mini -Park. As shown on the revised preliminary plat, a 0.8 -acre mini -park has been proposed along the subdivision's east /west trail corridor. The acceptability of such park dedication should be subject to comment and recommendation by the Park Board. Park Access. The easternmost access to the 4.8 -acre park (via 79th Street) has been significantly reduced in width (from 50 feet to 10 feet). This access provision is considered less desirable than that which was previously proposed, as the visual connection to the park has been eliminated. In this regard, a more preferable park access location may be between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4. Exception Access. As shown on the submitted preliminary plat, a lot of record lies directly north of Outlot C, which is not provided public street access. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, public street access to the parcel must be provided. Triangular Lots. As noted previously, the triangular lots proposed as part of the previous plat submission have been eliminated. The solution, however, has resulted in rear yard areas of questionable use (reference to Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 6, Block 6). Such lots are considered less desirable than the previous triangular lots. Medium Density Residential Use. At the September 10, 1997 Planning & Zoning Board meeting, the question was raised as to the acceptability of the medium density residential (townhome) component of the project. Provided all applicable planning- related issues can be satisfactorily addressed, the Planning and Zoning Board voiced general support of the use. 79th Street. As a condition of subdivision approval, the developer will be held responsible for the upgrade of 79th Street to the east of the subject site. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. Based upon all information gathered to date, Mr. Brixius stated that if the City deems medium density residential development appropriate within this area of the community NAC would recommend approval of the following: 1. A Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Plan) amendment to change the suggested land use of the medium density residential component from single- family to multi - family residential use. • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 11 2. The rezoning of the medium density residential areas of the development from R -1, Single Family Residential to R -3, Medium Density Residential designation. 3. A Planned Development Overlay (PDO). 4. The Highland Meadows preliminary plat/PDO subject to the following amended conditions (based on revised preliminary plat): A. The City approve the necessary Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning to accommodate the proposed use of the property. B. If a base /unit lot platting technique is to be utilized upon the townhome component of the project, the preliminary plat is revised accordingly to identify base and unit lot numbers. C. The City finds the proposed "coved" setback concept to be acceptable and variable setbacks are established via plat easements. D. The following street - related conditions are satisfied: i. The preliminary plat is revised to provide immediate access from the north. If such access is determined not possible at this time, the northern one -third of the subdivision (north of 79th Street) be established as a future phase (outlot) until such time as a northerly access is available. ii. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard to the acceptability of the proposed "private driveway" widths associated with the townhome portion of the project. iii. Off - street parking along designated townhome "driveways" is prohibited. E. Park dedication shall be determined by the Park Board. Specific recommendation should be provided regarding the acceptability of the subdivision's parks (4.8- and 0.8 -acre parks) and trail system. F. A grading and drainage plan is submitted which illustrates the street layout depicted upon the preliminary plat and is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. G. A utility plan is submitted which illustrates the street layout depicted upon the preliminary plat and is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. H. Direct single- family lot access to CSAH 14 is prohibited. Resultantly, the northerly extension of Lot 24, Block 6 (to CSAH 14) is established as an outlot or a trail corridor. I. The side lot line between Lots 23 and 24, Block 6 is reconfigured to emanate from the center point of the adjacent cul -de -sac. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 12 J. The southern 117 feet, more or less, of Outlot A be combined with adjacent Lot 24, Block 6. K. The right -of -way of the east /west townhome street be extended to the eastern border of the subject site. L. Consideration is given to relocating the easternmost access to the 4.8 -acre park (from 79th Street) between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4. M. Public street access is provided to the excepted lot lying north of Outlot C. N. The developer is responsible for the upgrade of 79th Street east of the subject site. This issue should be subject to further comment by the City Engineer. Mr. Johnson inquired as to responsibility for a cone - shaped portion of land on the west side of the project. Mr. Brixius was unable to provide the requested information, but suggested that perhaps the lot lines should be extended making the property owners responsible for that section. Bruce Kerber, representing the developer, explained that the trail system was planned to run all the way to 4th Avenue. Next to the pond, park benches are proposed. The open area referred to previously is proposed for use as a "tot lot ". With the use of a detailed map, Mr. Kerber explained revisions to the original plan, addressing previous issues. Mr. Kerber indicated that the home located at 686 Main Street cannot be rearranged in accordance with the balance of the properties. Additionally, he stated that he would rather Outlot A remain an outlot, as it may be needed at some point for a utility easement. Mr. Kerber mentioned the limitation of not being able to go beyond the area designated for this phase into that designated for Phase 3. With respect to the triangular lots, Mr. Kerber indicated that there are no plans to reconfigure those areas at this time. Chair Schaps asked if the 79th Street road upgrade would extend to Highway 23. Mr. Ahrens responded in the affirmative. Mr. Johnson asked what the Comprehensive Plan suggests for the area between the townhomes and Highway 23. Ms. Wyland explained that the existing Plan designates that area as residential. Mr. Johnson expressed the opinion that the townhomes would present a good case for medium - density residential in that segment, if not commercial along Highway 23; but that single- family residential would be inappropriate. Ms. Wyland indicated that careful consideration would be given to these issues. Ms. Wyland asked for clarification as to the proposed trail. Mr. Kerber responded that at present the trail is designed to stop short of Main Street with use of an easement until the development progresses into the next phase. Mr. Brixius stated that this plat cannot show • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 13 the final trail system, and agreed that the best solution may be an easement to allow for extension of the trail in the interim. Debbie Palace, 7772 Marilyn Drive, stated that she has done a considerable amount of research with respect to this project. She expressed two main concerns: (1) that the townhomes will create an urban sprawl atmosphere for their neighborhood; and (2) the probable necessity for public utilities. Ms. Palace asked about street names (specifically 78th Street). She indicated concern about additional traffic from the townhomes, requesting a copy of a recent trip study from Mr. Ahrens. Ms. Palace questioned the necessity for residents in her area to connect to the proposed sewer system. Mr. Ahrens explained that availability would be limited to the areas shown on the plat, within which Ms. Palace's residence is not situated. According to Mr. Ahrens, unless there is a system failure creating a need to connect, the utility would not be considered "available ". Mr. Gelbmann requested clarification regarding Ms. Palace's MUSA question. Mr. Ahrens explained that sewer would not be extended outside the MUSA absent system failures. Additionally, he stated that he was not aware of a requirement to connect within a specific amount of time. According to the City Charter, connection is optional, and assessment would occur at that time. Mr. Kerber added that "availability" of utilities is defined by the Metropolitan Council. Chair Schaps asked about improvement of Marilyn Drive. Mr. Ahrens indicated that the possibility is slim, although he agrees that traffic will likely double. He added that 500 trips per day is not unreasonable for that road. Chair Schaps asked about construction traffic. Mr. Ahrens indicated that construction traffic would be routed along 79th Street. He added that signage as well as a barricade at Lois Lane could be used, thus prohibiting truck traffic where necessary; however, it is difficult to guarantee that construction traffic will be completely eliminated from Marilyn Drive. Ms. Palace then asked about an environmental impact statement, which she was advised might be required for an area composed of 100 single - family homes. Mr. Brixius stated that the Comprehensive Plan will have to be changed to accommodate high- density housing, explaining that an environmental impact statement is not presently mandatory. He added that the requirement referred to by Ms. Palace was for an area composed of 100 detached single - family homes and /or 150 attached single family homes. The subject area includes 52 condominium units. Ms. Palace requested that the governing body for the condominiums be required to implement a crime -free housing program. She indicated that an addendum should be • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 14 attached to each purchase agreement allowing for background checks on prospective tenants. Chair Schaps expressed his feeling that a homeowners' association would prohibit rentals. Mr. Brixius stated that rentals in such developments were quite common. Mr. Kerber added that the units would ultimately be sold, then being subject to the wishes of the owners. The question was raised as to whether this development would be condominiums or town homes. Mr. Kerber stated they will be town homes. Mr. Dunn explained the difference between a condominium and a town home as the owner of a condominium does not own the land on which his residence stands, while a town home owner also owns the actual land as well as the structure. Mr. Brixius explained that a town home is a type of building. Reference to condominium defines the ownership pattern; i.e., a condominium apartment, a condominium town home, a condominium single - family home. "Condominium" means the owner owns the air space and everything else is owned in common. A town home is a specific housing unit, in this case side -by -side units having separate entrances, separate driveways and garages, etc. It is not uncommon for someone to buy such a unit and later rent it. Mr. Brixius could not see any way to guarantee that the units would never be used as rentals. Ms. Palace expressed concern about the proximity of the Lino Lakes correctional facility, suggesting that relatives of inmates might rent the units. She further explained that the crime prevention program prefers one way in and one way out of a neighborhood. At the present time, the neighborhood is arranged in that manner. She also expressed concern about the proposed angular lots. Ms. Palace asked for a demographics study, suggesting that the town homes would not be appropriate for senior citizens as had been suggested to her. Ms. Palace also indicated desire to remain outside of the MUSA. Dan Keger, next door neighbor to the Palaces on Marilyn Drive, referred to the map, showing the location of approximately 20 existing homes. He indicated that the increased traffic created by the proposed development would pose considerable difficulty for present residents. Tom Rayburn, last house on Marilyn Drive cul -de -sac, expressed concern that the neighborhood would be completely changed following completion of this project. From his perspective, living on the cul -de -sac, the absence of traffic is a significant asset, and he doesn't wish to see that change. He suggested additional cul -de -sacs, including • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 15 turnarounds. Chair Schaps stated that such an arrangement would probably present too large a problem for emergency service providers. Mary Lee, 7782 Marilyn Drive, asked about the proposed ponds. She expressed concern that the berms might not be high enough, as the ponds are proposed to abut existing residential properties. Mr. Ahrens indicated that a safety factor is taken into consideration when ponds are proposed, so the berm as planned must meet such specifications. Mr. Rayburn returned to the podium, asking about the plan for the existing turnaround. Mr. Ahrens indicated that with a through- street the turnaround would most likely be removed and returned to a yard area. George Palace, 7722 Marilyn Drive, stated that he first became aware of the proposed development when it was presented for discussion after having been planned. He explained that the residents have a lengthy list of questions because there was not sufficient time for the neighborhood to address their issues prior to finalization of the plan. Chair Schaps explained that, with respect to installation of improvements, this process should take place at the time of construction in order to avoid having to tear up a street at some later date to install utilities after completion of a new development. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:37 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Dahl. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Dunn indicated that a considerable amount of information and questions had been presented by residents, such as the environmental impact study, and that he did not feel there were sufficient answers to questions for this project to go forward. Mary Kay Wyland explained that, with respect to an environmental impact study, such a study is not a requirement for this development. She added that approval from Rice Creek Watershed would be necessary. Chair Schaps asked about the time limit within which to act on this matter following the close of the public hearing. Ms. Wyland responded 60 days. Chair Schaps then asked Mr. Kerber what his expectations are with respect to progress on the development. Mr. Kerber indicated that he did not intend to begin construction before the end of 1997. Chair Schaps then asked about revisiting this matter in November. Mr. Kerber expressed confusion, as he felt that sufficient input had been invited through the previous neighborhood meeting. Mr. Brixius indicated that the applicant would have to be formally notified that the review is extended to 120 days; otherwise, the 60 -day time period would remain in effect. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 16 Chair Schaps expressed reluctance to go forward without additional inquiry into the issue of Marilyn Drive. Mr. Ahrens indicated that there should be sufficient time to look into this matter prior to November 27. Mr. Kerber pointed out the financial ramifications of proceeding with the project absent reconstruction of Marilyn Drive. Mr. Ahrens suggested that overlay, as opposed to reconstruction, of Marilyn Drive be a condition of approval of this project. Mr. Johnson asked if 77th Street would be subject to the same condition. Mr. Ahrens indicated that it would. Mr. Brixius suggested that limitation of construction traffic on 79th Street, implementation of a crime prevention program, and overlay of Marilyn Drive and 77th Street be added as conditions of approval. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of medium - density residential component from single- family to multi - family residential use, and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to rezone the medium - density residential area from R -1 to R -3, and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Mr. Brixius asked that the motion be amended allowing for formal rezoning to take place at the time of final plat so that a legal description could be developed including that zoning district. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to approve the Plan Development Overlay, and was supported by Mr. Johnson. Motion carried 6 -0. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the Preliminary Plat, with conditions outlined in staff's report and the additional conditions of limitation of construction traffic on 79th Street, implementation of a crime prevention program, and overlay of Marilyn Drive and 77th Street, and was supported by Mr. Herr. Motion carried 6 -0. Chair Schaps stated that this item goes before City Council on October 27, 1997. Chair Schaps called a recess at 8:45 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:55 p.m. C. Public Hearing, American Legion Post 566, 415 Lilac Street, Conditional Use Permit IIIChair Schaps opened this public hearing at 8:56 p.m., excusing himself from the balance of the meeting. • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 17 a. Ms. Wyland presented the following background for this item: American Legion Post 5466 is requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for the property located at 415 Lilac Street. The site is zoned General Industrial (GI) and, according to the Zoning Ordinance, Section 8, Subd. 2F Permitted Uses include any use listed as a permitted use in the Commercial District and Light Industrial District that will not interfere with the proper development of the General Industrial District. In Section 7, Subd. 2, LB, Limited Business, H. Conditional Uses, include 1. Private lodges and clubs. Should the Planning and Zoning Board decide that this use "will not interfere with the proper development of a General Industrial District ", the above - mentioned sections of the Ordinance do allow this use via a conditional use permit. Planning Coordinator Wyland reviewed the staff report which recommend approval of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits prior to any construction. The building permit shall include a 1% escrow for site improvements including paving of the parking area and access drives, and site landscaping. In lieu of a cash escrow, a letter of credit may be submitted. 2. Sewer and water utilities shall be connected to the building prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The applicant shall also agree to be assessed for said utilities at a rate to be determined by the City Engineer. 3. The parking area and access drive shall be surfaced with bituminous and concrete curb and gutter provided per City standards. This surfacing shall be completed prior to occupancy of the new addition. If the addition is not constructed within 12 months, the surfacing shall be completed at that time. 4. Any change in the submitted site plan shall require a new review by the City Council. 5. The trash handling area shall be screened from adjacent properties. 6. Parking shall be provided for 32 vehicles as well as handicapped spaces according to ADA Rules and Regulations. 7. A landscaping plan shall be supplied indicating plantings on the north, east and west sides of the building. The plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Forester. 8. The CPTED Officer shall review and approve the lighting plan. 9. Construction shall be initiated within 6 months of the date of this approval and completed within 18 months. 10. Other conditions as suggested by the Board. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 18 Mr. Dunn asked where this Post is presently located. Ms. Wyland stated that the Post had previously been located Blaine. Mr. Dunn asked if any information was available from Blaine as to the Legion's history and /or performance while in that area. Ms. Wyland indicated that the Post's history had not been researched. Mr. Johnson requested clarification that the proposal is to occupy an existing building, and that there had been no conditional use permit for this property prior to this time. Ms. Wyland indicated that this statement is correct. Marty Erickson, Commander of the American Legion Post, explained that there had been no problems in the previous location. He added that the City Staff had checked with the Police Department on the Post's past record, and that his desire was to supply community services. Mr. Dunn asked the size of the Post. Commander Erickson indicated membership of approximately 355. Mr. Dunn asked about membership requirements. Commander Erickson indicated that the only requirement is that a member served in the armed forces. John Herman, 7859 Lois Lane, asked if the proposed facility would be open to the public. He explained that his past experience with a similar fraternal organization near his home was negative. That facility conducted a variety of public activities, resulting in litter, poor driving practices, and insufficient parking area. Mr. Hermann requested information as to the Post's proposed activities. Mr. Johnson clarified that parking requirements are based upon the number of people the facility can accommodate. Commander Erickson responded that the Post's practice is to hold wedding receptions, public dining, etc. He explained that although there are 355 members, many do not frequent the Post. He added that there had never been a parking problem at the previous location, and reiterated that the Post's only desire is to be an asset to the community. Mr. Herman asked how many people the facility could accommodate. With respect to parking, Ms. Wyland explained that the square footage of the dining area determines the number of parking spaces, which computes to one car per 100 square feet of dining. Mr. Herman asked how many people typically attend a wedding reception. Commander Erickson stated that the local Fire Marshall would determine the maximum number of people allowed in the facility. Ms. Wyland added that additional space might be available on the site of the building. Mr. Hermann asked if specific conditions could be attached to the conditional use permit. Mr. Gelbmann asked if the Post had met the requirements for issuance of a liquor license. Ms. Wyland indicated that the liquor license had been obtained through the City Clerk. • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 19 Kevin Grales, 7839 Lois Lane, echoed Mr. Herman's concerns, stressing the obvious parking problem. He added that additional traffic of the magnitude proposed would be undesirable for his neighborhood, although he had no objection to the Post being in the community. Mr. Brixius reiterated the conditions for issuance of a conditional use permit within this area, which is zoned General Industrial, and that the proposed use of the subject property falls within the conditions. Mr. Grales asked how the liquor license could have been issued when the determination had not been made as to the facility location. Additionally, reference was made to taking the Legion into account with respect to proposed utility improvements. Mr. Grales expressed concern about visitors to Lino Lakes prison inmates frequenting the Post. Mr. Johnson asked if security services are proposed. Commander Erickson indicated that historically there had been no need for security services. Mr. Herr asked Ms. Wyland if Lino Lakes requires Police Department security services for certain activities within the City. Ms. Wyland stated that she was not familiar with the City's requirements. Mr. Johnson asked about normal hours of operation. Commander Erickson said that in Blaine the hours were 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., during which time the Post was open to members and guests. Mr. Herr asked if a member had to accompany a guest. Commander Erickson indicated that generally that was the case. He added that general dining services were offered. Mr. Herr inquired as to sufficiency of the parking area of the proposed facility. Commander Erickson indicated that he did not see that as a potential problem. Mr. Grales requested clarification of specifications for parking if the facility is just a bar. Ms. Wyland reiterated the dining area criteria, with the dining adjacent to the bar being taken into consideration. Mr. Grales asked if there was space on the property to provide additional parking, if necessary. Ms. Wyland indicated that there is, but that she did not have a precise number of additional spaces that might be available. Mr. Ahrens stated that approximately 55 spaces were possible. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 9:29 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 5 -0. • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 20 Mr. Dunn, while not against the addition of the Post to the community, expressed concern about all of the issues presented by neighboring residents. He added that the applicant's plan for Post activities was not sufficient to make an informed evaluation for approval. Mr. Wessel asked Commander Erickson if continuing consideration of this matter would pose a problem for the Post, to which Commander Erickson responded that it would. Mr. Dunn indicated that timing is not sufficient reason to approve this proposal. Mr. Wessel stated that his objective was to point out the importance of the time element, not to endorse approval of the project. Ms. Dahl asked where in Blaine the previous Post was located. Commander Erickson stated 3860 Flowerfield Road. Mr. Gelbmann asked about the size of the Blaine facility. Commander Erickson could not recall precisely, but that the actual floor space seems equivalent to the proposed facility in Lino Lakes. Mr. Johnson asked about comparison between the proposed facility and the VFW currently located in Lino Lakes. Ms. Wyland indicated that the two are comparable. Mr. Johnson asked how many cars can park at the VFW. Ms. Wyland indicated that she was not certain of the exact capacity. Mr. Herr stated that the City should review this proposal based upon use of the facility beyond dining; i.e., weddings, receptions, etc. Mr. Brixius suggested that the parking issue be incorporated into the conditional use permit. Mr. Gelbmann asked if parking would be adequate even with the addition of spaces totaling 55; and, what would then be the possibility for off -site parking. Mr. Brixius stated that the current City Ordinance provides for off -site parking pursuant to certain conditions. However, Mr. Brixius could not endorse the off -site parking concept. Mr. Johnson asked if input from the Fire Chief could be helpful in establishing parking capacity. Mr. Johnson suggested that Condition No. 6 to approval of this conditional use permit be amended to state that parking shall be provided for sufficient number of vehicles as determined by the rated capacity of the building. Mr. Dunn repeated his concern about lack of conclusive data. Ms. Dahl expressed her desire that the questions raised by the neighboring residents be answered. Mr. Gelbmann expressed his agreement. • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 21 Mr. Herr expressed agreement that more information could be available, but that he was not sure that obtaining it would be helpful. He added his feeling that there is a place in the community for the American Legion, and that there is not a better place than the proposed location. Mr. Herr stated that the questions raised by residents could be sufficiently answered by the City Council. Mr. Hermann returned to the podium, asking about conditions for issuance of a liquor license, and whether or not licensees were sufficiently monitored. Mr. Gelbmann stated that the Legion does many positive things for a community, and asked that focus be returned to the Planning and Zoning Board's responsibility at this time. Absent complete information, Mr. Gelbmann expressed his feeling that a determination regarding this item should be tabled. Mr. Herr made a MOTION that a determination on the American Legion's conditional use permit request be tabled for one month to allow for a neighborhood meeting, after which the matter can come before the Planning and Zoning Board for public hearing. Mr. Dunn and Mr. Gelbmann rescinded the previous motion to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5 -0. Ms. Wyland asked that the applicant be given direction as to whom he should include in the proposed neighborhood meeting. Further discussion resulted in agreement that the neighborhood meeting should include households in the Sherwood Green Development, Lino Air Park and Behm Century Farm. Mr. Johnson added that issues which must be clarified are parking, security, and recourse if liquor license is misused. Ms. Dahl supported the motion by Mr. Herr to continue this proposal. Motion carried 5- 0. D. Public Hearing, Lino Lakes Blacktop, Inc., 502 Lilac Street, Conditional Use Permit Mr. Johnson opened the public hearing at 9:54 p.m. Ms. Wyland explained that the owners of Lino Lakes Blacktop Inc. are requesting a conditional use permit and site plan review to allow for the expansion of an existing pole barn. According to the Zoning Ordinance, Section 3 Subd. 4., B.2.b.2. "As an expansion of a Pole Barn. The expansion shall not be more than fifty (50) percent of the gross area of the pole barn as of the passage of the Ordinance dated 24 August 1987. The City may attach conditions to the expansion to maintain and enhance the appearance and function of the building including landscaping and building exterior requirements." • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 22 In summary, Ms. Wyland stated that Staff would recommend approval of this Conditional Use Permit to expand a pole barn and site plan review with the following conditions: 1. Building permits be obtained prior to any construction. 2. If additional lighting is provided, a plan be reviewed by the CPTED Officer. 3. Two parking spaces be provided for each employee. Currently 22 spaces are provided on the site plan. 4. Trash handling areas be screened from adjoining property owners. Tom Ramsden of Lino Lakes Blacktop explained that neighbors to the subject property are in favor of the proposal. Mr. Johnson asked about the activity within the pole barn. Mr. Ramsden explained that some small mechanical work is done, as well as storage. The proposal would provide for one -half of the building to be devoted to office space with the balance for additional storage. Mr. Herr asked if additional parking would be required. Ms. Wyland indicated that • sufficient parking was available on the proposed site. Mr. Gelbmann asked to see the letters from neighbors. He then asked if any hazardous materials would be involved. Mr. Ramsden indicated that gasoline and diesel pumps are located outside the pole building, but nothing indoors other than parts cleaner, which is property handled. Mr. Dunn asked if the applicant had given any thought to enhancing the site to make it compatible with the Apollo industrial park. Mr. Ramsden indicated that the plantings already done were on his own volition. Ms. Wyland added that considerable work had been done in that regard. Mr. Herr made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 10:04 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Gelbmann expressed favor with the project. Mr. Herr agreed. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the Lino Lakes Blacktop Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review with the conditions outlined above, and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 5 -0. • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 23 E. James Speiser, 441 and 453 Birch Street, Minor Subdivision Mr. Wyland provided the following background for this item: Mr. James Speiser and his daughter, Jill Paulus, are requesting a minor subdivision that would allow a 1.2 -acre parcel containing the existing homestead to be split from a 21.4+ acre parcel at 441 Birch Street. The 21 -4 acres are currently farmed by Mr. Speiser. This property is zoned R -1, and indicated as residential on the City's Comprehensive Plan; however, it is not currently within the MUSA, and Mr. Speiser has indicated that he is not interested in development at this time. The 21 -4 acres could, however, be developed residentially at some future date. Utilities are available from Birch Street to serve a future development. Ordinance No. 93 - 18 provides as follows: "Habitable single family homes constructed prior to July 13, 1992 may reduce their lot size to a minimum of one (1) acre if the balance of the property results in a parcel of ten (10) acres ..." Staff would recommend approval of this minor subdivision, but commented that the existing outbuildings will be considered pre - existing non - conforming uses and, therefore, if destroyed by more than 75% will not be allowed to be rebuilt. As a 1.2 -acre parcel, the newly created lot would be allowed a total of 2,020 square feet of accessory buildings. The site currently contains 4,300 square feet of accessory buildings. For Planning and Zoning Board information, there will be no park dedication fee as no new dwelling units are proposed. Should the larger parcel ever develop, park dedication would be required at that time. Ms. Wyland indicated that Staff recommended approval of this request. Mr. Herr asked about future access to this property. Ms. Wyland indicated that consideration would be given to access at the time of future development. He also requested clarification of outbuilding status. Ms. Wyland explained that the proposed parcel could not add outbuildings without a residence; but, since the property already contains the outbuildings, they would be allowed to remain. Mr. Herr asked if approval of this project could be contingent upon conditions for future elimination of those outbuildings which would at that time no longer be appropriate. Mr. Brixius pointed out that existing buildings are obvious to potential purchasers. He stated placing such a contingency upon approval of the project would not be advisable. Tom Paulus, currently renting at 441 Birch, indicated that the area behind the buildings is heavily wooded, screening them from the area that might be developed in the future. Mr. Herr maintained that backyards might abut the existing outbuildings. • Ms. Dahl suggested that in the future the outbuildings might not be necessary or desired by the renter. • • • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 24 Mr. Herr remained concerned about the future development of the property. Mr. Dunn asked if extending a property line might be appropriate. The tenant stated that straightening the lot line would bisect the existing outbuildings. Mr. Brixius proposed that the proposed lot configuration is the most efficient use of the property. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the Speiser minor subdivision, and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried, 4 -1 with Mr. Herr opposing. Mr. Johnson stated that this matter would go before the City Council on October 27, 1997. F. Rice Industries, 424 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision Mr. Wessel stated that considerable effort has gone into bringing Rice Industries into Lino Lakes. This proposal encompasses the last parcel in the Apollo Business Park owned by the City, and Staff has worked closely with Rice Industries to attain the desired objectives for both parties. Mr. Brixius explained that Rice Industries has submitted a request to construct a two - phase 22,675- square -foot warehousing facility on a 1.9 -acre site located east of Apollo Drive at 4th Avenue. Phase One of the proposal would entail the construction of a 10,000- square -foot structure on the northern one -half of the subject site, which is zoned General Industrial (G -I). Staff recommended approval of both the minor subdivision and of the site and building plans, subject to the conditions outlinedin the staff report. A seventh condition to approval of the site and building plans would be that the easement encroachment agreement be negotiated. Ken Nordby, NAAI Architects, supplied samples of the block and the metal proposed for use in construction of the building. He added that Rice Industries' policy is to house trash handling within the building, so there will be no need for outdoor preparation. Mr. Dunn asked when groundbreaking would take place. Mr. Nordby indicated as soon as possible, with wallraising continuing into the winter as weather permits. June 1 is the target date for start of operation. Jill Vass of Rice Industries indicated that their facility is currently located in Shoreview. Rice Industries is primarily a wholesale distributor of metal casting supplies, but has recently expanded to include an odor control product as well as certain supplies to the concrete industry. Ms. Vass added that Rice Industries is a long- standing family business. • Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 25 Mr. Dunn asked how many people are employed by Rice Industries. Ms. Vass responded that there are currently 11 employees, 6 salespeople (2 out of Milwaukee), and 5 office staff in the Shoreview facility. Mr. Johnson clarified that no manufacturing would take place at the proposed location. Ms. Vass responded that it would not at present, but expansion is planned to light assembly. Mr. Gelbmann made a MOTION to approve the Rice Industries Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision according to the conditions outlined above, and was supported by Ms. Dahl. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Johnson indicated that this matter will go before the City Council on October 27, 1997. G. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING, Telecommunication Ordinance This item was continued for further consideration. H. Public Hearing, Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment(s) • Mr. Johnson opened the public hearing on this matter at 10:32 p.m. Ms. Wyland reminded the Board that it approved a conditional use permit for an automobile and truck repair use at 7313 Lake Drive with the condition that an ordinance amendment be considered which would allow the parking of vehicles waiting for repair. The proposed ordinance amends Section 7, Subd. 3, H.6.i which currently reads as follows: "All outside storage shall be prohibited. The storage of damaged vehicles, vehicles being repaired and vehicle parts and accessory equipment must be completely inside a principal or accessory building." The proposed language would allow customer vehicles to be parked outside but prohibit other exterior storage. The proposed language is as follows: "Outside storage shall be limited to customer vehicles waiting for repair, all other outside storage is prohibited. The storage of damaged vehicles, vehicle parts and accessory equipment must be completely inside a principal or accessory building." Mr. Johnson expressed concern about reference to storage of "damaged" vehicles. • Following discussion, the proposed language was changed to read as follows: • • 0 Planning & Zoning Board October 8, 1997 Page 26 "All outside storage shall be prohibited except customer vehicles waiting for repair." Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment concerning automobile and truck repair, as stated above, and was supported by Mr. Gelbmann. Motion carried 5 -0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS All discussion matters were deferred until such time as all Board members are present. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Herr made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 10:40 p.m., and was supported by Ms. Dahl. Motion carried 5 -0.