Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/10/1996 P&Z MinutesCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : April 10, 1996 TIME STARTED : 6:30 p.m. TIME ENDED : 8:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gelbmann, Herr, Johnson, Robinson, Schaps MEMBERS ABSENT: Schones ALSO PRESENT: Planning Coordinator Wyland, Economic Development Director Wessel, City Engineer Ahrens 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Page 15, First Full Paragraph: Gelbmann requested that a correction be made to read "He felt it was in the City's best interest to justify a signal light at Elm Streeet and Lake Drive. He expressed concern that the students would not use the light at 4th Avenue if it were installed." William Johnson made a MOTION to approve the minutes of March 13, 1996 meeting with the above correction and was supported by Gelbmann. Motion carried 5 -0 -1. (James Schaps abstained, as he was not present at the March 13, 1996 meeting.) 111. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chair Schaps noted that Mr. Carlson's site plan review and rezoning application was withdrawn from consideration at this meeting. IV. OPEN MIKE: Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:34 p.m. Hearing no public comments at this time, Al Robinson made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:37 p.m. and was supported by William Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. ACTION ITEMS: A. Taymark, 2300 Main. Street, Site Plan Review Economic Development Director Wessel stated that Taymark is a subsidiary of the Taylor Corporation from Mankato. They are currently located in White Bear Lake and have outgrown that facility. Eight other communities were considered for the project, and Lino Lakes was Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 fortunate to be selected. Taymark will have a new name at this proposed location which will be a spinoff from the original company. The site is a gateway to the entire Clearwater Creek area, and he is very pleased to be presenting this quality project. Planning Coordinator Wyland reviewed the staff report regarding Taymark's application to build a 138,400 square foot building with 108,800 square feet of future production expansion area on Main Street, just west of the Laborer's Training Facility. The company will be receiving tax increment financing (TIF). Ms. Wyland indicated that staff would recommend approval of the site plan review, subject to the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 1% of construction costs to insure completion of all site improvements. 2. The applicant sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading, utility and drainage plans. 4. The Developer receive access permits from Anoka County. 5. Roof top heating and ventilating units shall be screened and /or blended with the design and coloring of the building. 6. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped spaces as provided by the ADA Rules and Regulations. 7 Permits shall be obtained from the RCWD for grading and on- site ponding, if required. 8. Signage shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained. Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. Mr. Steve Peterson, President, Taymark, stated that the company used to be Anderson Party Supplies. The company serves high schools with 2 Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 decorating items for proms and homecomings and also sells specialty • advertising supplies to businesses. • Mr. Johnson asked if Taymark intends to use the building in White Bear Lake. Mr. Peterson explained that the decorating and printing functions will be split. The printing operation will move to Lino Lakes. Chair Schaps asked when construction would begin. Mr. Wessel responded that given approval at this meeting, a special Economic Development Authority and Council meeting will be called for April 29, 1996, at 5:00 p.m., when the Development Agreement will be prepared. As soon as the final documents are submitted and building permit review concluded, Taymark will be able to break ground, probably in early May. Mr. Gelbmann asked if traffic between the two sites is anticipated. Mr. Peterson stated that there would not be more than one truck per day between the two sites. The businesses are separate and little back -and- forth traffic is anticipated. Mr. Johnson asked if parking would be expanded to the west. Mr. Peterson stated that future parking expansion would continue on the south side of the site. Mr. Johnson asked for a review of the drainage plan for the site. Mr. Wessel stated that storm water management will be covered by the review of the Rice Creek Watershed (RCWD), who will issue a permit for the project. It is his understanding that a temporary pond will be provided on the south side of the site pending approval and construction of area wide ponding in the proposed Greenway Corridor along Clearwater Creek. Mr. Robinson asked how much further east Otter Lake Road will be moved with the realignment. Mr. Wessel stated that the question will be better answered with the presentation of Northern Wholesale, as it is directly related to that project. Mr. Herr asked for a description of the building exterior. • • Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 The Project Architect, stated that the entire building is concrete. The front of the building will be precast concrete panels. The back of the building, not visible from the highway, will be exposed aggregate panels. William Johnson made a MOTION to approve the Site Plan with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Mr. Herr seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. Motion carried. B. Northern Wholesale, 6810 Otter Lake Road, Site Plan Review & Minor Subdivision Mr. Wessel reported that Northern Wholesale is seeking to build a 100,000 square foot building at the corner of Cedar and Otter Lake Road. Freeway visibility is very important to the company which has been located in Maplewood at the intersection of Highways 36 and 61 for 20 years. This proposed site is a planning challenge with the growing nearby residential area. The land is zoned Light Industrial. In answer to Mr. Robinson's earlier question, the road realignment extends south of Taymark, to link up with Old Otter Lake Road. The realignment creates an opportunity to access lots from the realigned road and reorient the Business Park to take traffic pressure off Cedar. The plan is to access the Northern Wholesale both from Otter Lake Road and Cedar to minimize impact on the residential community to the south of Cedar. Otter Lake Road will remain a City street, and a utility corridor will be included with the realignment. Ms. Wyland reviewed the staff report and noted that retail, warehousing and manufacturing are all permitted in Light Industrial Districts. Staff has recommended approval of the minor subdivision as submitted and the site plan with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 1% of construction costs to insure completion of all site improvements. The applicant sign a development agreement and post financial guarantees as specified by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. 3. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading, utility and drainage plans. The Developer receive access permits from Anoka County. 5. Roof top heating and ventilating units shall be screened and /or blended with the design and coloring of the building. 4 Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 6. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped • spaces as provided by the ADA Rules and Regulations. 7 Permits be obtained from the RCWD for grading and on -site ponding, if required. 8. Signage shall comply with the City Sigh Ordinance and proper permits obtained. 9. The Developer shall participate in the reconstruction of Cedar Street at a cost to be determined by the City Engineer. 10. Delivery vehicles and truck traffic shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. when and if this traffic is allowed on Cedar Street, and this condition shall apply to tenants as well. 11. Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. Curb and gutter shall not be required on the northern access drive in the proposed expansion area. 12. The site plan shall be modified to reflect a 50 -foot setback from Cedar Street. Mr. Nick Gargaro, President of Northern Wholesale, stated that he has owned the business for 12 years. The present facility in Maplewood is 50,000 square feet which the company has outgrown. He is pleased to be moving to Lino Lakes and anticipates bringing an immediate 50 jobs to the community. Within a few years, he expects the company to employ between 75 and 100 people. The company sells equipment for RV's, snowmobiles, marine products, residential heating products and some mobile home products. Some products are on display. Chair Schaps asked the height of the berm. Ms. Wyland stated that the berm will be 4 feet. The developer has agreed to increase plantings on the southeast corner of the site to provide additional screening for residents to the south. The Project Architect stated that primarily evergreen trees will be planted on top of the berm for year -round color. Mr. Robinson asked if the existing house on the corner will be taken out. Mr. Gargaro answered, yes. Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 Chair Schaps asked if Northern Wholesale will own and lease the • building. • Mr. Gargaro stated that space will be leased on a short-term basis, as he believes Northern Wholesale will need most of the space within five years. Mr. Wessel noted that the City would review any tenant prospects to assure their appropriateness for the site. Mr. Herr asked which direction any future expansion would take place. The Project Architect stated that future expansion would be to the north. Mr. Herr asked if the temporary pond is similar to the one Taymark will have and if the design is the same as a permanent one. Mr. Ahrens responded that the ponding situation for Northern Wholesale is the same as with Taymark. The temporary pond design is the same as a permanent pond. The area will be excavated to handle appropriate volume runoff with approval and authorization permits from the RCWD. It is anticipated that the roadway and utilities will be built at the same time as this development. By the time the building is ready to be occupied, he expects that the City will have adequate ponding in place in the Greenway. If that occurs, a temporary pond will not be necessary, and runoff will flow to the Greenway pond and not take up site space. Mr. Robinson asked if the full length of Cedar Street will be upgraded. Mr. Ahrens answered that the portion of Cedar to be upgraded is from County Road 84 to the east property line of Northern Wholesale, just past Clearwater Creek Drive. Mr. Johnson asked if there will be a trail connection from the residential Clearwater Creek Development to the Greenway area. Mr. Ahrens stated that he anticipates a trail on the east side of Otter Lake Road. The City's Trail Comprehensive P•Ian indicates a trail along Otter Lake Road and Cedar Street to the Main Street right -of -way. Mr. Wessel added that trail options were discussed with the Park Board. Originally a park was planned to provide access from residential areas to the Greenway, as it is important to connect the two amenities. If a connection can be made for residential areas without using the roadway, it will be done. • • Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 Mr. Robinson asked Mr. Gargaro if he agrees to condition No. 9 regarding the Developer's cost participation in upgrading Cedar Street which is vague. Mr. Wessel responded that a cost has been determined under condition No. 9, which the Developer has accepted. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the site plan review with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Mr. Gelbmann seconded. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision as submitted. Mr. Herr seconded. All voted in favor. Motion carried. C. Emtech, 400 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review Ms. Wyland reviewed the staff report, noting a slight revision from the packet. The plan is to add a 5400 sq. ft. plastic shop addition and a 3600 sq. ft. machine shop addition. Staff would recommend approval with the following conditions, excluding No. 7, No. 8 renumbered to No. 7: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction on the site. The building permit shall include a deposit of 1% of construction costs to insure completion of all site improvements. 2. The City Engineer shall review and approve the grading, utility and drainage Plans. 3. Roof top heating and ventilating units shall be screened and /or blended with the design and coloring of the building. 4. The parking area shall be supplied with adequate handicapped spaces as provided by the ADA Rules and Regulations. 5. Permits be obtained from RCWD for grading and on -site ponding, if required. 6. Signage shall comply with the City Sign Ordinance and proper permits obtained. 7 Concrete curb, gutter and bituminous paving shall be provided for all access driveways and parking areas. Chair Schaps noted that the revision to the plan is to slice off a portion of the building so that it is aligned in a straight line. Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 Mr. Johnson asked if the driveway access on the west side needed to be • a joint access for further development. • Mr. Wessel stated that this was not necessary in this case as a ponding area exists to the north. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the site plan review with the conditions listed in the staff report, excluding No. 7 and renumbering No. 8 to No. 7. Mr. Robinson seconded the motion. All voted in favor. Motion carried. D. Thomas Vacha, 7702 Lake Drive, Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland reviewed the staff report indicating that the request is to split .31 acres from one parcel and add it to another. The rearrangement of lot lines would provide a lot .72 acres in size and 1.1 acres in size. Both lots are currently considered non - conforming as there are no utilities available and a 10 acre minimum is required by City Ordinance. Staff has recommended approval of the project with the following conditions: 1. Parcel B shall be legally combined with Parcel A and recorded as such with Anoka County. Parcel B shall not be considered a buildable lot. At some time in the future, when sewer and water become available to 77th Street, Mr. Vacha could then resubdivide the site and provide an additional building site if so desired. 2. The 10 -foot drainage and utility easement located on the west side of Parcel B shall be vacated by the City Council. 3. Ten -foot drainage and utility easements shall be provided on all property lines as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Chair Schaps asked if the property would be required to hook up to City utilities with further subdivision. Ms. Wyland stated that Parcel B could not be split from Parcel A without connecting to City utilities. Mr. Herr asked if Mr. Vacha intends to expand his business onto Parcel B. Ms. Wyland stated that it is her understanding that Parcel B will be used to provide a buffer until .sewer. and water are available. The existing site is zoned Rural and Mr. Vacha would n of be allowed to expand without rezoning to a business category. • Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 Mr. Vacha added that he has no intention of expanding to Parcel B at the present time. There are no current plans for water and sewer to be put in on 77th Street. If utilities are put in, he may consider expansion but would have to apply for a permit. Chair Schaps asked if this proposal increases the non - conforming status of the site. Ms. Wyland responded that the non - conformity decreases for one parcel and increases for the other. The non - conforming use, however, is not being expanded. Mr. Robinson asked if this action would allow Mr. Vacha to be able to homestead the property. Mr. Vacha answered, yes. Mr. Robinson asked if notification of neighbors for a public hearing is required. Ms. Wyland stated that a public is not required for a minor subdivision. Mr. Robinson asked if it is true that 77th Street is not in the proper location. Mr. Ahrens responded that the survey indicates that the existing roadway may have been shifted south 15 to 20 feet. Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision as requested with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the variance as submitted with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Mr. Gelbmann seconded. All voted in favor. Motion carried. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Mr. Wessel expressed his appreciation to the Board for their ongoing responsiveness and support of quality economic development projects. Ms. Wyland reminded members of a work session scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Board on Friday, April 12, 1996, at 7:00 a.m., at City Hall. Mr. Dick Mantina, 405 Ash, asked if a decision was made on the Rick Carlson application. 9 • • Planning & Zoning Board April 10, 1996 Chair Schaps responded that he announced at the beginning of the meeting that the Rick Carlson application was withdrawn from this agenda. It may be on the May or June calendar and urged Mr. Mantina to contact staff for further information. Mr. Mantina stated that his concern is about $200,000 worth of development near his property which would require road improvements. His property is only worth $85,000. He will be assessed for those road improvements, and he would like to see developers pay their share. Ms. Wyland stated that funding for road improvements to 62nd Street will be considered with Mr. Carlson's site plan. A notice will be published in the newspaper when the project is on the agenda. VII. ADJOURNMENT: William Johnson made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m. and was supported by Al Robinson. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 10