Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/10/1995 P&Z MinutesPLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : May 10, 1995 TIME:STARTED : 6 :30 p.m. TIME ;ENDE1 : 1°110 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gelbmann, Herr, Robinson, scha MEMB SENT ALSO PRESENT Bill John ones son Plant ng Coordinator Wyland, Planning Consultant Br xius, Economic Development Coord; nat;or Wessel Consulting City Eng veer Powell. I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Commissioners Herr and Gelbmann were absent at roll call. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the minutes of the April 12, 1995 meeting as submitted and was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion was carried. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve the agenda as presented and was supported by Ed Schones. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioners Rick Gelbmann and Guy Herr arrived at 6 :32 p.m. IV. OPEN MIKE: Chair Schaps recognized Kim Sullivan from 20/20 Vision. Ms. Sullivan gave a brief update as to the actions of the Community groups. Ms. Sullivan indicated the last town meeting is available on video cassette at City Hall. Ms. Sullivan indicated the next step in the process would be for the citizens to work with City Staff on a detailed plan for the community. Ms. Sullivan indicated if there are any questions from the Board or citizens, Mr. Dan Tesch could be contacted also. Mr. Schones inquired in regards to growth, has the community group made any specific recommendations or goals. Ms. Sullivan indicated no, the community will continue to work with the City Staff, the real concern is to keep flexibility in terms of growth. Hearing no further questions or comments, Chair Schaps thanked Ms. Sullivan for the information. . PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 III Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:36 p.m. Hearing no public comment, Al Robinson made a MOTION to CLOSE the Open Mike portion of the meeting and was supported by Rick Gelbmann. All voted aye. Motion carried. The Open Mike portion was CLOSED at 6:41 p.m. • • V. PLANNING ITEMS: A. 95 -12 -P, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Minor Subdivision Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request to create a 2.4 acre lot in the Apollo Business Center. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated staff has reviewed this request and would recommend approval of the minor subdivision as requested with the condition that a 50' utility easement be provided over the existing sewer and water main on the eastern portion of the site. Mr. Johnson inquired if the triangular portion of the lot is included in this site. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated it is not included. Mr. Johnson inquired as to who is responsible for the maintenance of this area. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated although this has not been identified, it would most likely be the responsibility of the City. Economic Development Coordinator Wessel indicated the process of this project began nearly three years ago. He indicated the goal is to break ground by July of this year. He highly recommended approval of this project. Mr. Johnson expressed concern for the portion of the site that would need to be maintained, he felt this area should be landscaped. Consulting Engineer Powell indicated he believed this area would be considered an amenity and would be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain. Mr. Dan Richmann, developer for the project, indicated there is a landscaping plan in the area of concern, and it would be in the best interest of the company to maintain this area. Mr. Richmann anticipated that there would be future expansions. Chair Schaps inquired if the developer anticipates that they will be doing the maintenance of this area. Mr. Richmann indicated they would if requested, also they • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 would not want that area to grow unsightly in front of their building. Chair Schaps asked about the underground sprinkling system for the landscaping. Mr. Richmann indicated the sprinkling system would extend up to the corner of Apollo Drive. Economic Development Coordinator Wessel indicated although this area is not in the site plan, the Board can be assured that this area will be maintained. Consulting Engineer Powell also indicated a portion is maintained by the County. Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95 -12 -P, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Minor Subdivision with a 50 inch utility easement over existing sewer and water main on eastern border of site and was supported by Al Robinson. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. 95 -13 -S, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request for a Site Plan Review involving construction of a 20,196 square foot building containing 6,720 square feet of office and 13,440 square feet of warehouse. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated staff has reviewed the submitted site plan and would recommend approval with the following conditions. 1. Proper building permits shall be obtained prior to construction. 2. The proposed construction shall meet all building and parking setback and height requirements. 3. A minimum of 10% green are shall be provided. 4. Landscaping shall be provided according to the site plan dated 5/7/95. A sprinkler system shall be provided for maintenance of all green areas. The City Forester shall review said Landscaping plan to insure suitability of selected species. 5. The exterior construction will be rock face block with breakoff design. 6. An interior sprinkling system will be provided per State Fire /Building Code. 7. B6 -12 curbing shall be provided around perimeter of parking area and access drives. 8. Parking areas shall be surfaced and stripped with handicapped parking provided per ADA requirement. Adequate parking has been provided on site (50 spaces shown). • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 1O, 1995 9. Trash shall be stored behind seven foot masonry enclosures which match the building. 10. Screening to match building shall be provided for rooftop heating /ventilating equipment. 11. All drainage, utility and grading plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 12. Access to the site shall be provided by one shared access drive. The developer shall sign a "shared driveway agreement" prior to occupancy. 13. A development agreement shall be signed by the developer and made a part of this site plan review. Planning Coordinator Wyland noted the City Staff and the EDAB Board have reviewed this request and would recommend approval with the outlined conditions. Mr. Richmann outlined the project, detailing the materials proposed for construction. Chair Schaps inquired if the developer has had any commitment for spaces in the building as of yet. Mr. Richmann stated there has been interest, but they did not want to finalize any action until receiving City approval. Mr. Robinson indicated on the site plan only 47 parking spaces have been noted, and the requirement would be 50 spaces. Mr. Richmann indicated this issue has been resolved and additional spaces have been gained to meet the requirement. Mr. Schones inquired as to the green space, is it 105 or 25 %. Mr. Richmann indicated the requirement is 10 %, but the project is actually at approximately 20% to 25 %. Mr. Mesich asked about a lighting plan. Mr. Richmann indicated a lighting plan will be submitted to Staff, the developer would like the lighting to be congruent with the others on Apollo Drive. Ms. Wyland noted the lighting requirement is minimal and can be achieved with Staff review. Mr. Johnson inquired as to where the sign would be. Mr. Richmann indicated the monument sign plan is usually submitted to Staff at a later date. Mr. Wessel indicated a sign permit is required, so the size, etc. will be reviewed prior to issuance. Chair Schaps request to add condition number 14: 14. Lighting requirement be fulfill prior to a building permit being issued. • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95 -13 -3, Blue Heron Project, 3XX Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review with stated conditions and was supported by Guy Herr. All voted aye. Motion carried. Planning Coordinator Wyland indicated regarding Tax Increment Financing, if any board members have any questions Mr. Wessel would be glad to answer them. Mr. Schones indicated he had spoken with Mr. Wessel prior to the meeting and Mr. Wessel indicated he would be willing to hold a one hour informational class regarding Tax Increment Financing for those interested. Mr. Wessel indicated he would schedule this class and notify Board members. C. 95 -14 -S, Willow Ponds Senior Cottages, Elm Street, Site Plan Review Planning Consultant Brixius briefly reviewed a request to construct a 48 unit elderly residential development upon a 13.6 acre site located east of Sunset Road between Interstate 35W and Elm Street (County Road 12). The development itself consists of four 12 unit multiple family structures and ten single family residential lots. Mr. Brixius indicated in August of 1992, the City approved an elderly multiple family development that included 90 units upon the subject site upon condition that final site plans be submitted and approved by the City. The proposal now being considered has been downscaled from that conditionally approved development proposal. Mr. Brixius indicated that a 10 lot subdivision for a portion of this site will be reviewed by the P & Z in June. Mr. Brixius indicated based on review, his office recommends approval of the submitted site and building plans subject to the following conditions: 1. "Typical" building elevations and floor plans are submitted which identify structure height, exterior finish materials, and proposed dwelling unit areas. 2. A landscape plan be submitted which identifies the location, variety, and size of all proposed site landscaping. Specific attention should be given to that portion of the site abutting Interstate 35 and area east of the proposed single family homes. 3. To provided an assurance that parking supply shall meet parking demand, the following condition should be upheld through deed restriction: PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 • • A. The dwelling units are occupied only by elder residents (55 years and over). B. All garage spaces are provided without fee. C. There shall be no dwelling unit conversion for family use. D. No outdoor storage be allowed in the designated parking spaces. 4. Deadend driveway concerns are resolved. 5. No parallel parking is allowed on the private streets narrower than 28 feet on the site. 6. The off street parking areas, driveways, and private streets are surfaced in bituminous material. 7. A perimeter curb is provided around all off - street parking area driveways and private streets. 8. The site plan is revised to illustrate required handicapped parking stalls. 9. The site plan is modified to illustrate exterior lighting locations. 10. The proposed site access locations are subject to review and approval of Anoka County Highway Department. 11. If applicable, the site plan is revised to illustrate proposed trash handling areas. 12. All site signage comply with applicable provisions of the City Sign Ordinance. 13. All restrictive covenants are submitted for City review and approval. These covenants must include the provision that limits occupancy to elderly residents. 14. The applicant enter into a development agreement with the City. 15. Comments from other City Staff. Mr. Roger Derek, from Cottage Homesteads of America, Inc., indicated this is for low and moderate housing, financed by tax credits. Mr. Derek indicated NSP will be receiving tax credits and will be funding this project. Mr. Derek indicated there are areas in which the developer would like flexibility: 1. The developer would like a waiver on required curbing. 2. The developer would like the capability to rent out the garages not in use to other tenants. 3. The developer would like a release of restriction to garage fees, this would give them a capability of not exceeding the rental cap. • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Mr. Derek expressed concern for the issue regarding the time frame of the covenants, the government mandates 15 years and they would like 30 years. Mr. Johnson inquired if an elderly person over 55 could have a grandchild living with them. Mr. Derek indicated no, that would not be allowed. Mr. Brixius addressed the flexibilities requested; 1. Mr. Brixius indicated it is his feelings that the curb requirement should not vary, the Staff reviews a project for the lifetime of the project and the curbing would enhance the looks of the project and be consistent with other developments in the City. 2. Mr. Brixius indicated he would not be concerned with rental of garages if the tenant did not own a car, but he was concerned with outside parking. 3. With regards to garage fees, Mr. Brixius indicated parking requirements are met for the units by including the garages, if the garages were added by choice, the requirement would not be met and also the concern for outside parking would arise. Mr. Mesich expressed concern for delivery truck traffic and the ability to turn around. Mr. John Johnson, engineer for the development indicated this could be easily resolved. Chair Schaps inquired if the Fire Marshall had reviewed this project. Ms. Wyland indicated he had, and indicated no concerns. Mr. Bill Johnson inquired if there would be a buffer between the development and I35W. Mr. John Johnson indicated a three to four foot berm would be added for buffering the development. He also noted another buffer between the single family homes and the elderly development. Mr. Mesich inquired if part of the 30 year covenant indicates that there will be single ownership of the development. His concern was that units would be sold to individuals, such as townhomes and the development would become inconsistent with varying owners. Mr. Derek indicated through the covenant there would be single ownership. Mr. Brixius indicated in the PDO it could indicate that this is for single ownership and any changes to the subdivision would have to be reviewed by the City. • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Mr. Schones inquired about buffering for the single family homes to the Freeway. Mr. Derek indicated they would not be developing the single family homes, but just grading the site and selling the lots. Mr. Herr inquired if there is a mechanism to make sure future owners are aware of the view of Highway 35. Mr. Schones expressed concern that if the developer did not received the waiver on the curbing would the rents be raised. Mr. Derek indicated no the rents would not be raised, there is enough room in the project for adjustments. Mr. Powell indicated the City has worked with the developer in other areas, but does not wish to vary in regards to the curbing. The curbing better defines the roadway and is more attractive. Mr. Brixius indicated the curbing would be around the perimeter, and parking bays, but not on the individual driveways. Mr. Mesich inquired if pets would be allowed. Mr. Derek indicated no pets would not be allowed. Mr. Mesich inquired if rent was based on income. Mr. Derek indicated that HUD sets the guidelines and it would be based on income. Mr. Mesich inquired as to the reason for the substandard street. Mr. Brixius indicated due to configuration of site, the elderly occupancy and the private street, Staff felt it was acceptable. Mr. Powell indicated the street would be 28 feet and the requirement is 32 feet. Mr. Mesich expressed concerns regarding the narrower street, the fire truck ability to turn around and no circulation trail for the elder to walk within the development. Mr. Powell indicated there is a trail to the north side of Elm Street and around the perimeter of the development. Mr. Mesich reiterated his concern for a narrow street and the elderly walking on that street. Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95 -14 -S, Willow Ponds Senior Cottages, Elm Street, Site Plan Review subject to conditions outlined by Staff, and was supported by Bill Johnson. Vote: 6 aye, 1 nay (Mr. Mesich). Motion carried. • • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Chair Schaps requested item I be reviewed at this time. I. 95 -18 -V, Bill Green, 6693 East Shadow, Variance Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the application. She noted Mr. Green has applied for a building permit to add approximately 755 square feet to his property. Mr. Green's property became nonconforming in 1982 when the City adopted its current Flood Plain Ordinance. Therefore he would need a variance to add to an existing nonconforming structure. Ms. Wyland indicated Staff would recommend approval of a Variance to allow construction of the proposed addition at an elevation of 886.53, the elevation of the existing structure. Mr. Mesich indicated perhaps an added condition could state, Mr. Green and future owners would hold the City harmless in the case of flooding. Bill Johnson made a MOTION to approve application 95-18 - V, Bill Green, 6693 East Shadow, Variance with the condition that the City be held harmless of damages due to flooding and this condition be a restriction registered with the deed and was supported by Guy Herr. All voted aye. Motion carried. D. 95 -15 -S, Lino Lakes Correctional Facility, 7545 Fourth, Site Plan Review Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request for Site Plan Review for the Lino Lakes Correctional Facility located at 7545 Fourth Avenue And Zoned Public /Semi Public (PSP). Ms. Wyland indicated Staff would recommend approval of the proposed construction /remodeling with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. 2. The City engineer review and approve all utility and drainage plans. Chair Schaps inquired as to an anticipated start date. Mr. Rich McCarthy indicated this summer. Ed Schones made a MOTION to approve application 95 -15 -S, Lino Lakes Correctional Facility, 7545 Fourth, Site Plan Review with stated conditions and was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion carried. Chair Schaps called a brief recess at 8:30 p.m. • • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Chair Schaps reconvened the meeting at 8:38 p.m. F. 95 -17 -C, PUBLIC HEARING, Rehbein Transit, 6298 Hodgson Road, Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review Chair Schaps OPENED the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m. Planning Coordinator Wyland briefly reviewed the request for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow the construction of a 24,075 square foot metal sided pole barn for the storage of buses. Ms. Wyland indicated City Staff would recommend approval of the application with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and indicated that a sprinkler system will be required for the new building. 2. All buildings on site must be coordinated to color scheme and brick treatment. Plans to be submitted at time of building permit review. 3. A 15 foot easement for trail purposes is to be provided along the front property line connecting with the Fox Trace Trail immediately south of the Rehbein Transit Site. The trail shall be graded and rocked per City Trail standards. The City will provide bituminous surfacing in the Fall of 1995. 4. Landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the City Forester prior to issuance of building permits and shall include treatment of the fuel area and front property line. The plan shall be modified to provide screening that coordinates with the trail system. It is suggested that plantings be grouped rather than evenly disbursed. 5. The additional parking area noted on the plan dated 5 -26 -94 shall be provided with a dustless, durable surface (gravel is acceptable). 6. Grading of the site shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Future increases in impervious surfaces shall require review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Timing of the proposed construction must be coordinated with the trunk watermain project to be constructed this summer. Mr. Schones inquired about the trunk water main. Ms. Wyland indicated the east side of Hodgson Road will be torn up. Mr. Powell indicated there is a temporary easement the City would like to maintain until all the improvements are completed. 10 • • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Mr. Mesich inquired if the applicant is resistant to hooking up to sewer. Ms. Wyland indicated sewer is not available, just water. Mr. Gelbmann indicated screening is critical for this project. Ms. Wyland indicated Staff has given the applicant various suggestions and the applicant will be working with Staff on the landscape plans. Mr. Gelbmann inquired if there would be berming along Highway 49. Mr. Powell indicated a two to three foot berm could be accomplished. Mr. Robinson inquired if improvements to Highway 49 are planned in the near future. Mr. Powell indicated some improvements are set for this year. Al Robinson made a MOTION to CLOSE the Public Hearing and was supported by Tom Mesich. All voted aye. Motion carried. The Public Hearing was CLOSED at 8:53 p.m. Chair Schaps requested to add condition number eight: 8. A berm be constructed along Highway 49 conforming with the ditch and topography of the area. Al Robinson made a MOTION to approve application 95 -17 -C, PUBLIC HEARING, Rehbein Transit, 6298 Hodgson Road, Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review including all eight stated conditions and was supported by Bill Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried. E. 95 -16 -S, Marshan Condominiums, Lake Drive /Aqua Lane, Site Plan Review Planning Consulting Brixius briefly reviewed the request for site plan approval of a 112 unit town home development entitled Marshan Lake Condominiums. Mr. Brixius also noted that the subject property is zoned R -4, High Density Residential and lies within the Shoreland Overlay District of Marshan Lake. R -4 District provisions list multiple family dwellings such as that being proposed as permitted uses. Mr. Brixius indicated his office recommends approval of the Marshan Lake Condominium site plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Typical building plans (floor plans and elevations) are submitted for City review and approval. The submission of such plans is necessary to determine compliance with City height and dwelling unit area requirements. 11 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 • • • 2. Either buildings /off - street parking areas or the proposed loop street right -of -way are relocated such that all applicable 30 foot front yard setbacks are satisfactorily met. If such options are not viewed as viable, a setback variance may be pursued. 3. The City Engineer provide comment/ recommendation in regard to street construction standards, street lighting and signage. 4. The Fire Chief provided recommendation in regard to preferable fire hydrant locations. 5. No off - street parking is to be allowed along the development's private parking area drive aisles. 6. The site plan is revised to designate required handicap parking stalls. 7. The City Park Board provided comment /recommendation in regard to the adequacy of the proposed park land dedication. 8. A landscape plan is submitted which identifies the location, variety and size of all proposed plantings. Special emphasis (landscaping treatments) should be place along the site's northern and western borders. 9. The site plan could be revised to either relocate structure #11 within the confines of the subject site or the property exception be aided to the proposed development site via minor subdivision. 10. If applicable, the site plan is modified to identify all trash handling locations. 11. The applicant submitted a snow removal plan which identifies snow storage areas upon the subject site. 12. The grading /drainage and utility plan is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 13. Detailed plans for the proposed lake access (i.e., docks) are submitted subject to City review and approval. 14. If any outdoor activities (i.e., lake access, tennis courts, swimming pool, etc.) are proposed upon the subject site, detailed plans for such activities be submitted subject to City review and approval. 15. Any covenants governing the use of the property's open space (i.e lake access) be subject to City review and approval. 16. All signage erected upon the site comply with applicable provisions of the City's Sign Ordinance. 17. The applicant enter into a development agreement with the City which provides an assurance that all proposed improvements will be completed within a time frame specified by the City. 12 • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 18. Comments from other Staff. Chair Schaps inquired if the applicant had asked for a review from the Park Board. Mr. Brixius indicated they had gone before the Park Board who recommended approval of 3 acres of park land, a trail along the lake side, grading of the park, and grading of a trail along Aqua Lane. Mr. Schones expressed concern that there might be large piles of dirt on the site for long periods of time, as with the other development of this developer. Mr. Brixius assured the Board that this would be monitored. Mr. Powell also indicated grading would be minimized to prevent this concern. Mr. Gelbmann inquired as to the open space. Mr. Brixius indicated there is 75% open space. Mr. Mesich inquired if the site plan review covered the entire site, or can the applicant come back and request a change to add more homes. Mr. Brixius indicated they could come back, but there would be a number of standards the site would have to meet. Chair Schaps inquired as to how many more units could be built. Mr. Brixius indicated he had not researched this. Mr. Bill Johnson expressed concern for the request of approval with outstanding questions. Mr. Kirk Corsan, briefly reviewed the site plan. He indicated there would be approximately 110 feet between the single family development to the north and the nearest condominium in this development. Mr. Corsan indicated the applicant has met with the DNR and this is the maximum allowed by the DNR, unless additional sites were purchased. Chair Schaps inquired as to how long it would take Staff to review and identify how many units could possibly be added. Mr. Brixius indicated not very long, but the site indicates there would be 25% available to develop. Mr. Corsan indicated the applicant would like to retain the right to put a dock in so those owners could have access to the lake. This access would be for canoe use only. Discussion was held regarding the dock. Mr. Brixius indicated under condition number 15, it could be expressed to limit access solely to the Home 13 • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 Association, by pedestrian traffic for canoe use. This would need to be posted as such. Mr. Bill Johnson indicated if this development is built to the maximum DNR regulations, the whole development should be moved to the south, so as to even out the green space. Mr. Corsan indicated even though there is no current plans, the applicant would like to have the area in the south open. Chair Schaps inquired if rental units could be added to the south. Mr. Brixius indicated that would need City review. Mr. Brixius indicated the applicant has addressed all the City's concerns presented by Staff with this proposal, his recommendation would be to approve this application. Mr. Herr reiterated the concerns of others on the Board and felt the development should be moved to the south. Mr. Corsan indicated the development would not meet the DNR requirements if it was moved, the DNR has established tiers and the move would change the density of those tiers. Mr. Mesich inquired if the developer was aware of their responsibility for improvement to Lake Drive and Aqua Lane. Mr. Corsan indicated they were aware. Mr. Powell also indicated staff had held discussions with the applicant regarding this issue. Ms. Karen Hoppe of 497 Forshan Lake Drive, expressed concern regarding the open space to the south and future development. She felt the units were too close together. Ms. Hoppe inquired as to the difference between townhomes and condominiums. Mr. Brixius explained this is just in reference to ownership. The units will be owned by the occupants. Mr. Brixius indicated any addition would come before the City for review. Mr. Richard Hermans 7200 Stage Coach Trail, also expressed concern for the unidentified open space, and suggested to the Board to table until further information is given, due to all the unanswered questions. Mr. J.P. Houchins, 7284 Stage Coach Trail, indicated he calculated only 45,000 cubic feet of permanent water storage, but the utility plan denotes 55,000, he 14 • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 suggested someone might want to review this. He inquired if there was a possibility of extending the pond a bit to the north and suggested that if the storm water inlet were to come to the north end of the pond it would function better. He also expressed concern for the unidentified space to the south. Mr. Houchins inquired as to the ordinance and limitations. Mr. Brixius indicated this site is under a tiered arrangement, but any subsequent additions would be viewed under the City's Shoreland regulations. Ms. Ann Woodmeir, 440 Post Road, indicated the density is noted as 5.7 units per acre, she inquired as to the density if the open space was not included. Mr. Powell inquired as to the response of the residents regarding the trail. Mr. Hermans indicated the trail is closest to his lot. He believes it would increase traffic but feels it is important to include in the plan. Ms. Wendy Anderson 7246 Stage Coach Trail, inquired as to the type of material that would be used on the trail. Mr. Powell indicated it would be an asphalt trail. Mr. Houchins indicated he is in support of the trail, he enjoys using the trails. Mr. Brixius indicated with the conditions and comments of Staff he would hope the Board would move the application forward. Mr. Gelbmann inquired if the Staff was to review the remaining portion of the site, what kind of development could be allowed. Mr. Brixius indicated anything that would be allowed in a R -4 designation. Mr. Gelbmann indicated he would rather see the buildings spread out on the site. Mr. Mesich inquired if there are any other outstanding issues with the City and this developer that have not been resolved. Mr. Powell indicated he was not aware of any concerns that are not being worked on currently. Mr. Schones inquired about the feasibility study. Mr. Powell indicated the feasibility has been initiated and did not foresee any problems. Chair Schaps indicated he would like to add a condition 411 that the developer provide specific disclosure to buyers 15 • • • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD May 10, 1995 that any bylaws would be subservient to the City's approval. Mr. Brixius indicated additions could be made to condition number 15 to reflect this. Mr. Bill Johnson indicated he would be concerned with approving of a long range plan that the Board does not have details to. Continued discussion was held regarding concerns for unanswered questions regarding the open space to the south. Bill Johnson made a MOTION to deny application 95 -16 -S, and was supported by Ed Schones. Mr. Brixius indicated rather than denial of the application, perhaps the item could be tabled. The denial would need reasons and the applicant has complied with the requirements. Mr. Bill Johnson removed his motion. Rick Gelbmann made a MOTION to table application 95 -16 -S, Marshan Condominiums, Lake Drive /Aqua Lane, Site Plan Review until the June meeting when additional information can be provided regarding the open space to the south and was supported by Ed Schones. All voted aye. Motion carried. Chair Schaps directed the applicant to provide answers for the question posed at the meeting and give specific plans for the unidentified area. G. PUBLIC HEARING, Flood Plain Management Ordinance Chair Schaps OPENED the Public Hearing at 10:47 p.m. Al Robinson made a MOTION to continue the Public Hearing, Flood Plain Management Ordinance until June 14, 1995, and was supported by Ed Schones. All voted aye. Motion carried. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Chair Schaps reminded Board members to hand in their Conflict of Interest forms and Beneficiary Forms. VII. ADJOURNMENT: Guy Herr made a MOTION to adjourn and was supported by Rich Gelbmann. All voted aye. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. 16