Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/13/1993 P&Z Minutesanning Consultant tor Wyland, EDAAB • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES near Schne. itts Dractor Wessel .............................. ............................... ............................. ............................... .............................. ............................... I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: John Landers made a motion and was supported by Al Robinson to approve the minutes of the September 8, 1993 as submitted. All voted aye. Motion carried. III. OPEN MIKE: No one was present to speak under Open Mike. IV. ACTION ITEMS: A. 93 -5 -P, Oaks of Lino, Aspen Lane Subdivision - Revised Plan Planning Consultant Brixius reviewed the staff report and indicated that Hokanson development has resubmitted this proposal, previously approved by the Planning & Zoning Board, because of problems encountered in getting approval of the grading plan by the RCWD. The new proposal provides for 9 buildable lots rather then the previously approved 11 and minimal filling of the wetlands. The proposal also requires variances for irregular lot shapes and cul de sac length. Recognizing the physical constraints to the subject property, staff would recommend approval of the sketch plan with the conditions outlined in the October 12, 1993 report from NAC. Mr. Corson, representing Hokanson Development, was present and indicated that he agreed with the staff report. Tom Mesich stated that the design presented was a better plan than the one previously approved. Chairman Schaps indicated that the concept was improved. Al Robinson did not think the additional cul de sac length would be a problem. Mr. Robinson • • • Planning & Zoning Board Minutes then made a MOTION recommending approval oft he sketch plan as presented. Tom Mesich seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. 93 -17 -V, Ruffed Grouse Road, Pierce & Assoc., Variance Planning Coordinator Wyland reviewed this request which is to allow a side yard setback of 4.3" (a variance of 7 "). A home was constructed on the parcel in question and upon completion of an as -built survey - the deficiency was discovered. Mr. Bill Pierce of Pierce & Associates is the builder and also the adjoining property owner. In order to provide a clear title to the property - this variance is necessary. Staff would recommend approval of the request with the following Findings of Fact as required by the ordinance: 1. The property in question cannot be put to use for other than single family purposes. 2. The plight of the landowner (actually the future landowner) is due to circumstances not of his making and the variance is necessary to provide clear title to the property. 3. The hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and a reasonable use of the property does exist under the terms of the ordinance. 4. Granting of the variance will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. The proposed action will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. 6. The proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance as the area is zoned for single family development. Mr. Pierce was present to answer any question. Al Robinson made a MOTION recommending approval of the variance for the reasons outlined above. Kathy Nordine seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. C. Perceptive Engineering, Apollo Business Park, SubdJSite Plan Review Mr. Brixius reviewed the staff report and indicated that this is a request to construct a 10,000 square foot manufacturing facility on two lots within the Lino Industrial Park. Perceptive Engineering specializes in the manufacturing of precision machine parts. The property in question is Zoned General Industrial and action involves a site plan review and minor subdivision to combine two existing lots of record. 2 • • • Planning & Zoning Board Minutes Staff recommended approval of the request with several conditions outlined in NAC's report dated October 12, 1993. Brian Wessel, EDAAB Director, was present and indicated that Perceptive Engineering has been located in Hugo for approximately 5 years. He stated that this particular project is important because it will be the first business going into the City's Industrial Park and added that we are on a fast track regarding development of this site as the applicant would like to move in before the first of the year. EDAAB has recommended approval of the request and is working with the applicant on the details of development. Mr. Fischer was present and indicated that his company is a tool and die business that does metal stamping, manufacturing and assembly, medical assembly and circuitry. Some questions raised by the Planning Board involved signage, hazardous waste, sprinkler system, truck delivery and trash handling. Mr. Fischer responded that they do not deal with toxic wastes, trash would be in an enclosed and screened vicinity and the sign would be a small identification sign approximately 3 1/2 ' x 6'. A sprinkler system would not be required at this time and truck delivery may involve one semi per week delivering steel. Tom Mesich then made a motion recommending approval of the minor subdivision request and was supported by Al Robinson. All voted aye. Motion carried to approve minor subdivision with recommendations outlined in staff report dated October 12, 1993. Rick Gelbmann then made a motion recommending approval of the site plan review with the conditions outlined in the staff report dated October 12, 1993 and the additional condition that the property be screened from adjoining properties. He was supported by Al Robinson. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. ACTION ITEMS: A. Clyde Rehbein Development - between Ware Road and Hwy 49 just south of Rehbein Bus Garage. Clyde Rehbein was present and stated that this is a concept look at a plat of approximately 55 lots. They are currently in the process of having the wetland delineation and a preliminary site review by RCWD revealed three possible wetland areas on the proposed plat. Mr. Rehbein stated that they would like to construct a 12 -14' berm between the Bus Garage (GB) property and the proposed plat, or possibly fencing the area to discourage children from playing in the bus area. 3 • • • Planning & Zoning Board Minutes Tom Mesich advised Mr. Rehbein that the P & Z would be looking for a minimum of 10,800 square feet above the wetland. There was some discussion regarding a transportation trail being located on the NSP easement - after some discussion Darrell explained that use of the power company easement for trail would cause minimum disturbance to that easement and should not be a hazard. Mr. Mesich indicated that this was a nice infill project with R -1 existing zoning. After more discussion the P & Z concurred that this proposed development looked favorable. B. Behm's Century Farms - Al Brixius reviewed the staff comments and indicated that the developer has requested that the Planning & Zoning Board informally discuss Behm's previous request for rezoning, comprehensive plan amendment and subdivision. No formal action is being requested at this time, however, the developer hopes to obtain a broader evaluation of the land use objectives for this area. Mr. Uhde was present and indicated that their original proposal provided for 163 lots, the new plan shows 153. He reviewed some data relative to tax base advantages the City would realize should the development proceed. This included a +$20 Million tax base, $400,000 increase in tax revenues, $76,500 in park fees and $137,000 in development fees to the City. He indicated that Option A provides for 2 1/2 acres of wetland to be filled with more in options B and C. Mr. John Johnson, Mr. Uhde's engineer, was present and stated that they are looking for direction for the Planning & Zoning Board. What are your concerns and future projections for this area. Mr. Mesich asked what the status of the City Growth Study was. Mr. Schneider replied that staff is still working on it. He indicated that we are seeing buildable area reduced and predicted less development than in previous years due to wetland constraints. Chairman Schaps indicated that this proposal has generated a tremendous outcry from adjoining property owners and asked if the developer would be willing to sit down at a work session and talk about the plans with the residents. Mr. Mesich stated that the P & Z was originally ready to deny this request - the majority of the property is zoned Rural - now it is back before us. He would like to see that area stay as it is - large, unsewered lots. Darrell stated that it is a fact on -site systems fail - he would recommend against allowing more on -site systems. That is a possibility for this area because it is already platted for large unsewered parcels. Mr. Uhde stated that he agreed with Darrell - he worked with the City on changing the comprehensive plan to prohibit any 4 • • • Planning & Zoning Board Minutes additional platting of unsewered lots and feels it would be a step backward for the City to encourage that type of development. Providing sewer to this area would be a plus for this development and also future extension of services to problem areas. Mr. and Mrs. Molitor, property owners immediately north of the western portion of the proposed development, were present to voice their support of the project. They indicated that they would be interested in developing their property and if this proposal is not allowed their opportunity to obtain utilities to serve their property will be severely diminished. After some discussion Mr. Robinson made a motion and was supported by Mr. Landers to hold a special work session, for informational purposes only, to discuss this development on Wednesday, October 27, 1993 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. All voted aye. Motion carried. Mr. Landers requested that the school district be invited to the meeting for their input on how this type of development would affect the schools. C. Other: Mr. Gelbman asked if the P & Z could promote the paving of Main street from the Hugo western boundary to I35 E. He indicated that roadway is in need of repair and paints a poor picture of Lino Lakes. Mr. Meisch asked if the City could consider licensing all septic systems and monitoring their useability. Kathy Nordine stated that Washington County has such a provision and she would provide a sample. D. 49 Club - Mr. Dave Nathe was present from the 49 Club and asked if his site plan review for a remodeling job could be reviewed. He was advised that he had to go through the proper channels with City Staff. The P & Z could not just review their item. VI. ADJOURNMENT: Upon the unanimous consent of the P & Z the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 P.M. 5