Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/10/1989 P&Z Minutes• PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 Chairman Charles Prokop called the regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board to order at 6:58 p.m., Wednesday, May 10, 1989 at the Lino Lakes City Hall. Members present were: Chairman Charles Prokop, Boardmembers Al Robinson, Sally Kuether, Robert King, Elmer Crohn, Alan Irwin, and Fred Chase. Also present were: Councilmember Harold Bisel; City Engineer, Ron Stahlberg; Building Official, Pete Kluegel; City Planner, John Miller; and Planning Secretary, Laura Elken. Mr. Prokop welcomed new member Robert King. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES Mr. Chase moved to approved the Minutes of April 12, 1989 as written. Mr. Irwin 2nd the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW FOR CHOMONIX GOLF COURSE ANOKA COUNTY APPLICANTS, APPLICATION #89 -09. (FROM TABLE OF APRIL 12TH). At the April Planning and Zoning Board meeting this item was discussed. At the request of the Anoka County Park Director the item was tabled. This was to allow the county to consider additional methods of improving the facade on the storage building. The Planning and Zoning Board received an architect's rendering of a facade for the side wall that would incorporate design elements from the club house. Also the board received a grading and drainage plan that show locations of berms to further screen the structure. Also the board received a landscaping plan. Attorney Palumbo, Anoka County Attorney addressed the board and stated that the county's park board members have reviewed the plans submitted, and felt they were acceptable. John Miller presented a memorandum to the P &Z board, and also a copy was sent to Anoka County. John Miller recommended the following: 1. Both ends and the side of the building facing the parking lot should be faced with cedar siding. 2. Building permit fees be increased in accordance with state guidelines for after -the -fact permits. 3. The county grant easements for drainage from the West Shadow Lake Drive area west into park property and from the Robertson Construction land north into park property. (actions protecting the quality of Reshanau Lake). Page 1 • • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 4. The county grant easements for sewer and water utilities and trail on the north end of Reshanau Lake. (Actions allowing better access to the golf course for local residents). 5. The county agree to accept utilities for the goundskeeper's house and city water as a back -up utility for the golf course. Attorney Palumbo stated that the Anoka County Park Board is agreeable with Mr. Millers recommendations. Anoka County is now waiting for information from the City of Lino Lakes as to the drainage easements from the West Shadow Lake Drive area west into park property, and from the Robertson Construction land north into the park property. John Miller stated that there is a redraft being completed in regards to the Robertson plat. Once that is complete, the city will be able to determine where the easements and drainage will occur. An additional access to the golf course would be beneficial to Anoka County, and also reduce traffic on West Shadow Lake Drive. Ron Stahlberg, City Engineer will present costs to Anoka County for installation of utilities to the golf course. Alan Irwin wanted to know how long it will take for Anoka County to install the landscaping and berms. Palumbo stated that once this is approved he is sure the work will be completed right away. Palumbo stated he would have no problem with the P &Z board recommending completion of the landscaping within 90 - 120 days. Charles Prokop stated that last month when the P &Z meeting was adjourned, discussion continued with Mr. Torkildson and staff members, and board members. It was reported to Charles Prokop that Mr. Torkildson was heard making a threat to one of the members of the P &Z board. Mr. Prokop shared this information with Margaret Langfeld, County Commissioner. Mr. Palumbo apologized for Mr. Torkildsons actions and stated that he hopes this situation never happens again. Harold Bisel stated that this issue still has to be presented at Council level, and to not be presumptions that this issue is resolved. Bisel went on to say that number 3, 4, and 5 of John Miller's recommendation would be a requirement to the county anyway. The city would still have to claim easements and utilities may still be installed. Mr. Bisel asked the board what their position will be if this were to ever happen again. Page 2 • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 Mr. Prokop stated the city has on record City Attorney, Bill Hawkin's recommendation stating we could not tear the building down, and stating that a pole barn at this site was feasible. Harold Bisel stated that in this situation we have one unit of government overiding another. Anoka County blatantly violated the cities ordinances. Mr. Irwin feels this situation will not happen again. He also stated that our pole barn ordinance did not apply to the park property. The park property was not zoned, that is why we cannot enforce this. Last Month the Planning and Zoning Board rezoned this area so it would never happen again. Mr. Bisel asked if zoning was not required for this land, then why is the city even doing this much to rectify this. Irwin stated that the true violation was the fact that a building permit was not issued. Pete Kluegel, Building Official, stated that pole barns in a rural district with five acres or more is allowed. And, with 0 land 20 acres or more you are allowed unlimited size. But...regardless of the structure a building permit was required and it was ignored. MOTION: Mr. Chase moved to table this issue, and move it back on the agenda while the board reviews the ordinances. Mr. King 2nd the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. REQUEST FROM EL REHBEIN AND SON TO REZONE LAND ON LAKE DRIVE. APPLICATION #89 -36. (FROM TABLE OF APRIL 12TH). This item was placed on the April agenda, but was tabled at the request of the applicant. John Miller visited with Jeff Joyer on May 3rd, and he indicated to Miller that he and Rehbein marketing the land and looking for an unobtrusive retail user. MOTION: Al Robinson moved to table Application #88 -36 until the applicant is able to come before the board when they have a user compatible with the neighborhood. Mr. Irwin 2nd the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE FOR 410 PARKVIEW ESTATES, KEITH EIBENSTEINER, APPLICATION #89 -11, AND #89 -20. Keith Eibensteiner purchased two tracts of land located immediately east of Sunrise Park. He wishes to subdivide Page 3 • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 them for single- family residential development. His proposed plat follows the concept plan for the area prepared by the city engineer and recently approved by the Planning and Zoning Board. The land is zoned R -1 Single - Family Residence. The minimum lot size is 80 x 135 for interior lots. Corner lots are required to be 25 feet wider. Minimum lot size is 10,800 square feet. Four of the corner lots do not meet the minimum width requirements of 105 feet. They are: 1. Lot 1 Block 1 - 92 feet 2. Lot 10 Block 2 - 91 feet 3. Lot 5 Block 3 - 91 feet 4. Lot 13 Block 3 - 83 feet The city's zoning ordinance states that a variance from the literal provisions of the ordinance is possible if the city can make the six following findings of fact: 1. That the property in question can not be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. 6. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Keith Eibensteiner asked if there is no intention of Glenview Drive to be installed all the way through. Ron Stahlberg stated that Glenview Drive will not be extended to the east. He stated that it would be expensive construction. Page 4 • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 Mr. Irwin stated that in order for us to grant a variance, the applicant has to show proof of a hardship to the land. He felt the only hardship here is economic. Based on the six findings of fact, you cannot grant a variance on economic hardship alone. He felt no variance is justified. Mr. Robinson stated that in his opinion, Lot 13 is not a buildable lot, it needs a considerable amount of fill. Ron Stahlberg suggested making the lots to the north smaller, then Lot 13 would be a larger lot, and you could build to the north end of the lot. Laura Elken, Planning Secretary stated that at the Park Board meeting on May 9th, the board felt that an easement should be granted for a walkway, giving the residents in Parkview Estates access to the park. The board felt the best place for this 15 foot trailway would be between Lots 8 and 9 of Block 2. MOTION: Alan Irwin moved to recommend to City Council denial of the variance, Application #89 -20, because there are no reasons for a hardship, other than economic reasons, the six findings of fact cannot be met. Mr. Chase seconded the motion, and the motion was approved with Elmer Crohn abstaining. Preliminary Plat: After considerable discussion regarding the city engineer's findings, and discussion regarding the streets, a motion was made. MOTION: Sally Kuether moved to recommend to City Council to table Preliminary Plat Review for Parkview Estates, Application #89 -11 until the streets are named, and until the city engineers recommendations were met, including checking the road width. Mr. Robinson seconded the motion, and the motion was approved with Mr. Irwin objecting. After considerable discussion, City Engineer, Ron Stahlberg, asked for a recess in order to meet with Keith Eibensteiner and make the recommended changes on the plat. 8:37 recess 8:55 p.m. the P &Z meeting was reconvened. The City Engineer presented his changes to the P &Z board, the board was in agreement of those changes. MOTION: Al Robinson moved to remove the table on the Preliminary Plat and Variance for Parkview Estates, Page 5 • • • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 Application #89 -11, and Application #89 -20. Alan Irwin 2nd the motion, and the motion was approved with Mr. Crohn abstaining. Keith Eibensteiner stated that the homes built in this subdivision range from $90,000 to $130,000, and felt the area would look better as the original plat shows. The plan now shows 90 - 100 feet between houses, the bigger the lot, the more room they would have for clutter, and he feels it may look more uniform with the smaller, original planned lots. MOTION: Fred Chase moved to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat of Parkview Estates, Application #89 -11 contingent upon eliminating one lot in Block 3, Lots 1 thru 5, one lot in Block 1, Lots 1 thru 5, and one lot in Block 1., Lots 6 thru 10, and all lots must conform to no less than the minimum size. In addition, Lots, 6,7,8,9,10,11 & 12 of Block 3 be reduced from 83' wide to 80' wide, and Lot 13 of Block 3 be changed to 104' wide. Also approval is contingent upon the applicant meeting the requirements set by the City Engineer per his letter dated May 3, 1989 as follows: Preliminary Plat 1. A 20 foot utility easement should be dedicated between Lots 7 and 8, Block 3, for the purpose of providing sewer and service to the existing home east of Glenview. The developer's surveyor should locate the existing well and septic system and show this on the preliminary plat. 2. A 20' utility easement should be dedicated between Lots 14 and 15, Block 2, for the purpose of constructing a trunk watermain. 3. A 30 foot utility easement should be dedicated between Lot 9 and 10, Block 2, for the purpose of construction of sewer and water service to the park shelter in Sunrise Park. 4. The proposed Second Avenue right -of -way does not match the existing Second Avenue right -of -way within the Sunrise Meadows Plat. A similar situation exists within Sunrise Meadows. There were no provisions made for street dedication when Ulmer's Rice Lake Addition was platted; therefore, Second Avenue (Rice Lake Drive) is not centered on the east boundary line. The proposed plat dedicates 33 feet for Second Avenue and will require additional right -of -way from the property to the east. 5. No street names were given for the proposed east- Page 6 • • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 west roads within the plat. 6. The proposed lot widths for Lots 1 and 10, Block 1; and Lot 5, Block 3, do not meet the requirements for corner lots. 7. There is no area given for the drainage and utility easements in Lot 14, Block 3. TKDA recommends that all of the area below the 890.5 elevation be shown as a drainage easement. Grading Plan 1. Approximately 4,000 square feet of Lot 13, Block 3, is in the 100 -year flood plain and will be filled. Necessary permits from the DNR or the Corps of Engineers will be the responsibility of the developer. 2. The intersection of Glenview Drive and Glenview Lane should be revised for drainage to the catch basins adjacent to Lots 11 and 12, Block 3. 3. Storm sewer construction within Second Avenue, adjacent to the two 1.25 acre lots is not feasible because the soil borings in this area indicate approximately 17 feet of muck. Acquiring a drainage easement from the Billek property to the east will be necessary. Utility Plan 1. Proposed utilities for Sunrise Park should be shown between Lots 9 and 10, Block 2. 2. The proposed sanitary sewer line on the northern most east -west road should be extended to the west to provide service to Lot 17, Block 2; and Lot 10, Block 1. 3. The proposed 16" DIP watermain should be shown extending from the bubble cul -de -sac to the west between Lots 14 and 15, Block 2. Alan Irwin amended the motion by adding: Block 2 be reduced by one lot to allow for a walkway and extra width on the road. 410 Al Robinson Seconded the motion. Charles Prokop amended the motion by adding: Page 7 • • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 At the east end of the plat the 33' roadway be widened to 40' so that it would line up with Second Avenue, and along the east end of Block 2 be widened to 50 feet. The southwestern corner of the plat a 27' road easement originally indicated be extended westerly through the park property to meet with a northernly extension of the west side of Rustic Lane, this would give a 60' wide roadway coming through Glenview Drive, entering into the plat. Al Robinson 2nd the motion. Alan Irwin amended the motion by adding: On Glenview Drive line east of the western edge of Lot 13 be vacated because it is unbuildable. Al Robinson 2nd the motion, and the motion was approved with Mr. Crohn abstaining. MOTION: Alan Irwin moved to remove Site and Building Plan Review for Chamonix Golf Course, Application #89 -09. Mr. Chase reviewed the City Zoning Ordinances. The Zoning Ordinance addressed commercial and industrial uses, but does not address public areas. Mr. Chase stated that in his opinion, the pole barn built may be a conforming building, and the only mistake the county made was the fact that they did not obtain a building permit. MOTION: Mr. Chase moved to approve the Site and Building Plan Review for Chomonix Golf Course, Application #89 -09. as presented. Motion fails from lack of a second. MOTION: Mr. Irwin moved to recommend to City Council approval of the after the fact building plan and site plan for the area approximately 200' south of the parking lot, with the following requirements: 1. Both ends and the side of the building be faced with cedar siding to the height of 12' and a wood facade approximately 60'long should be built approximately 4' out from the front of the building. 2. Building permit fees be increased in accordance with state guidelines for after - the -fact permits. 3. The county grant easements for drainage from the West Shadow Lake Drive area west into park property and from the Robertson Construction land north into park property. (actions protecting the quality of Page 8 • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 Reshanau Lake). 4. The county grant easements for sewer and water utilities and trail on the north end of Reshanau Lake. (Actions allowing better access to the golf course for local residents). 5. The county agree to accept utilities for the groundskeeper's house and city water as a back -up utility for the golf course. 6. The work will be completed within 120 days. Mr. Chase seconded the motion, and the motion was approved with Sally Kuether voting no. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW FOR ROHAVIC OAKS II. ROHAVIC PARTNERS APPLICANTS. APPLICATION #89 -20. At the April Planning and Zoning Board meeting the boardmembers approved a concept plan for the area north of Woodridge Estates and Rohavic Oaks. City utilities will be extended through the area to serve Woodridge Estates and this preliminary plat represents in part a replatting of a portion 0 of the large -lot Rohavic Oaks subdivision. 15 lots will be located on 7.3 acres of land giving an average lot size of 17,250 square feet. This parcel of land is zoned R -1X Single - Family Executive. Minimum lot dimensions are 90 x 135 feet and minimum lot size is 12,825 square feet. Corner lots are required to be 25 feet wider than interior lots. The City Engineer submitted a letter to the board with his recommended changes. Pete Rosenthal had grading questions that were answered by the City Engineer. Based on the City Engineer's letter, Pete Rosenthal asked that the north -south connection road between Linda Avenue and Town Road be called Waterworks Road. John Miller stated that the city passed a policy stating that all east and west streets should be named after plants, and all north and south streets named after animals. It was decided that Linda Avenue, Town Road and the extension • will be named White Pine Road. After further discussion a motion was made. Page 9 • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 MOTION: Alan Irwin moved to recommend to City Council approval of Preliminary Plat for Rohavic Oaks Second Addition, Application #89 -23, contingent upon meeting the city engineers recommendations. It was moved to change the name of Town Road and Linda Avenue, and the north -south connection road to White Pine Road. Mr. Crohn seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. 9:50 p.m. Elmer Crohn removed himself from the board. REQUEST FROM ELMER CROHN FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND A VARIANCE FOR LAND HE OWNS ADJACENT TO MAIN STREET. APPLICATION #89 -19, #89 -22. Elmer Crohn is working at subdividing the 120 acre parcel he purchased north of Main Street. At issue with the subdivision is the extension of sanitary sewer to the property. The applicant and several of his neighbors have petitioned for the utilities and the city engineer has completed a feasibility report for the area. The applicant wishes to subdivide approximately one acre from 410 the parcel. The parcel has a pole building with access to Main Street. This parcel would not interfere with subdividing the remaining 119 acres. Elmer Crohn stated that if this parcel was to have utilities available, he would remove the pole building. In the meantime, if sewer cannot be installed to this area, the pole structure wouldn't be a problem. After further discussion a motion was made. MOTION: Mr. King moved to recommend to City Council approval of a request from Elmer Crohn for a Minor Subdivision, application #89 -19 adding that this is an intermediate step towards Mr. Crohn's subdividing. Mr. Chase seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. Variance Request: Mr. Crohn requires a variance from the 2 1/2 acre minimum lot size in the SR -X zoning district. All minimum setback requirements will be met. Mr. Crohn is requesting an undersized lot pending the arrival • of city sewer and water. City Planner suggests this is a unique situation, and an intermediate step until he has the option to develop his land. Page 10 • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 Mr. Miller added that the applicant has shown good faith in the development of his land. He has petitioned for sewer and he has exhibited patience in waiting for the city to extend the utilities to his land. MOTION: Mr. Robinson moved to recommend to City Council approval of Elmer Crohn's request for a Variance, Application #89 -22 for a substandard size lot and the board feels that the six findings of fact have been met. Sally Kuether seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. The board was concerned about the use of the pole barn. Mr. Crohn stated that he would just lock up the pole barn and let it sit there. He agreed not to rent or use the pole barn. Once development of the subdivision occurs, the building will be removed. City staff will contact Bill Hawkins, City Attorney, and find out the legal view point regarding the assessments once city sewer does reach this area. Staff feels that if Mr. Crohn has petitioned for sewer now, the new owners will have to adhear to that, and be required to hook up. 110 Findings will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN FOR LAURENE STREET AREA. (ORAL REPORT BY RON STAHLBERG). Paul Howard submitted a proposal to the P &Z board requesting a rezoned to allow for an expansion of the Baldwin Lake Trailor Court. This request was denied. Ron Stahlberg prepared layouts of the area bounded by T.H.49, Linda Avenue, Laurene Ave, and Baldwin Lake Mobile Home Trailer Court. He has met with several of the affected property owners. Paul Zak objected to an east -west road connecting Laurene to Highway 49 because it would be very close to his home. He prefers a cul -de -sac with an exit on T.H. 49 and no connection to Laurene. The Planning and Zoning Board was in favor of this alternate. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN FOR LARRY PRIEM PROPERTY ON 77TH STREET NEAR COUNTRY LANE Larry Priem owns a parcel of land that is 165 feet wide and • 1320 feet deep. Mr. Priem has a single - family residence located near 77th Street. Mr. Miller feels that the ideal lay -out of the land would Page 11 • • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 require Priem to work with his neighbors in the two adjacent large -lot subdivision. Land swaps would be required to fully utilize Priem's land, the rear yards of the Carole's Estates homeowners, and the rear yards of the Mar -Don Acres. In trying to promote this better utilization of scarce land, Ron Stahlberg, Laura Elken and John Miller met with the Priems and his neighbors. There was little interest in working with Priem to subdivide. Mr. Priem approached the board with a proposal to subdivide his land. His proposal shows nine single - family lots with a minimum width of 146 feet and a depth of 104 feet. This would leave a 60 foot right -of -way for the road plus a one -foot outlot between the road and Priem's neighbors to the east. The board felt this was a feasible design. Mr. Crohn abstained. CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ROBERT SIMONSON FOR A GARAGE AT 8121 LAKE DRIVE. (OLD LUTHER'S BLDG.) APPLICATION #89 -21). The applicant wishes to move his auto repair business from 8121 Lake Drive to the vacant Luther's Marine building at 7860 Lake Drive. The land is zoned "GB" General Business. The Zoning Ordinance requires that the city make the following findings: 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. 2. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific plans and policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the city and this ordinance. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and /or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. 4. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies Page 12 • • • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. 5. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 6. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 7. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. 8. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. 9. Will conform to specific standards of this ordinance applicable to the particular use. It is the City Planners opinion that with a little work the Luther's building could become a reasonably attractive location for Simonson's Garage. After discussion by the board a motion was made. MOTION: Al Robinson moved to recommend to City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Robert Simonson for a Garage at 8121 Lake Drive, Application #89 -21, providing the following recommendations by the City Planner are met. 1. Removal of the free - standing sign at the southwest corner of the property. 2. Removal of the fuel tanks and pump island from the west side of the site. Any disturbed areas presently covered with asphalt to be repaired and covered with a minimum of two inches of asphalt. 3. Any sign to promote the business be flush - mounted to the Lake Drive side of the building. 4. Repair of the brick facade (approximately 12 inches) on the west side of the building. 5. Painting of the concrete block addition to the structure. 6. Removal of trash from the site including but not Page 13 • PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 limited to oil, banels, pallets, batteries, fuel barrels, and wood. 7. Reconstruction of the pump house on the south side of the building. 8. Repair of the concrete blocks and windows in the rear or east wall. 9. Construction of a six foot high wood fence along the rear lot line. Fence to be 90 per cent opaque. 10. Painting of repaired parcels on western -most garage door. 11. No outside storage of car parts or car or truck bodies. 12. No parking on the Lois Lane side of the building. 13. Planting of six 5 foot b and b Black Hills Spruce adjacent to the fence extending south of the building. 14. Painting of the mansard roof. Mr. King seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. Mr. Bisel added that a CUD is good for one year, and if there is a problem, that could be taken care of at that time. FINAL ACTION ON TABLED ITEMS BILL HOULE PETITION TO REZONE LAND IN NORTHEAST LINO LAKES FROM "R" RURAL TO "L -I" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, APPLICATION #88 -11. MOTION: Mr. Irwin moved to deny Application #88 -11. Mr. King seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. WESLEY BEACH APPLICATION FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR LAND ON LAKE DRIVE NEAR RICE LAKE, APPLICATION #88 -22. MOTION: Alan Irwin moved to deny Application #88 -22. Mr. Chase seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. BEATRICE SALBERG APPLICATION FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR LAND LOCATED ON 20TH AVENUE, APPLICATION *88-34. This applicant was advised of the need to provide the city with a resubdivision plan for his ten acre parcels. He left the meeting angry. Later his attorney called, but to date Page 14 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING May 10, 1989 • has failed to follow up. MOTION: Mr. King moved to table Application #88 -34 pending attorneys actions, Mr. Robinson seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. REQUEST FROM KLOSNER - GOERTZ FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #89 -24 /ROCKY GOERTZ At the P &Z meeting in April Mr. Goertz approached the board and ask for their response to an auto body shop. Mr. Goertz felt their response was favorable. Mr. Miller stated that he would be in favor of issuing this Conditional Use Permit if the following conditions were met: 1. No outside storage 2. No temporary signs 3. Removal of construction equipment (with the exception of Franklin Excavating's backhoe, panel truck and dump truck) 4. Installation of a paint booth No changes will be made to the outside of the building. MOTION: Mr. Crohn moved to recommend to City Council approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Klosner - Goertz, Application #89 -24. Mr. King seconded the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Chairman Charles Prokop recommended that a work session be planned for the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council in the near future. The Planning and Zoning Board should discuss the lengths of cul -de -sacs in the near future. OLD BUSINESS There was no Old Business ADJOURNMENT Sally Kuether moved to adjourn the meeting. Mr. King seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned at 11:42 p.m. Page 15