Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/10/1985 P&Z Agenda & MinutesC o ro a -H I v C ' a in ',--4 a ' in •^1 •H Rs to v O a to , ti W A W O a -H a -4.) -H 0 13 C4 a at w > •H .q C U 0) a •H b C u) 1 Q) In A h ( v a, $1 my • i i.l 0.4 En R w • v o, 0 0 o, C a, q ai "i C 'H C a •-1 ^s •H u) 1 H - . •H -. 0 O to ro ro N 'v v .q 1n S sn W 2 O U 0 •H U v '-•• ••i .q •- v H rn 0 a, 3 U a ro `-- m (4) U 2 •-s: '4 v F b+C -H •H C R O •-1 a. a Ti ti O 1.4 cn ti 0 ro A N ,c), O a, a 1 a•H El.) .g Q) Q) •H 2 0 c>~ Kg u) ssq W u) 4J .q 4J a-, ti W A ^i O - -H ro a ro v ro C7 2 0 'D • ro H 1 O a E E+ K^1 C C ro• sn v •H 'H 1■ RS m 'H v C I-4 ro ^I 4j P4 • L U , c ro A C a C Cl., ti C O •H •H O a a v c v •• R QI O N 4 h R CO 0 a o H N 4-4 4-1 O C Rf ' v v •-1 C 0 N F4 CO `0 'H •H •C ro ^1 to U ^i ttl O ^1 C '1 -H '--I N rts O rts a U U a) r■ N. •-i N r') Cr ul Lot Size PLANNING t District Ordinance Amendments Surfside 4-) -H E sy v Q) En ro ▪ •y C a v o +� •H b, v 4-1 C .H ro ro 1 1 0 -H a 4-) O • ro b u) (1.1 v C ro a ro C v • Q) •-4 E 'H •-I ✓ q v) v C U C b, a H 1-i • O Lc) A4 CC1 q & Bounds D 1\ division ro 0L O 3 W a, +, -H C ro I •.-I .y v - a 4 c=4 ^1 cn •H •H C E C a i1 ti DI v ry ✓ w a w E O v o, v x in 4-1 b E •r ^+ • v ro 1n v•yu• -, I zrosn-H I a a C 1 O 1n W v N 'H V) -1-) a U its C .H ro •H •H ro a+ 44 'n .0 Q) •C 0 C a, FC O Q) 'H C -C v U In In •H -1-1 -H v •-i •H .k H W v -H • ro 1=4 Kg ol ti v 04 Q.) 0 Conditional ShQreland Management Business Business rn O 2 .y N (•') ^f T'1 •1 1 X04 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Chairman McLean called to order the April 10, 1985 meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board at 7:04 P.M. Present: Goldade, Ostlie, Klaus, Prokop, Doocy. Absent: Cody, who joined the meeting about 7:10 P.M. Also present: Mr. Kluegel, Buiding Official; Mr. Kulaszewicz, Council Liaison; Mrs. Foster, Secre- tary; Mr. Johnson, City Planner. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - March 13, 1985 Mrs. Klaus suggested the following changes be made to the March 13, 1985 minutes: 1) Page Two, under "New Platting Ordinance ", change the word "basis" to "basic" in line two, 2) Page Four, under "Sign Ordinance - Amendment ", change the last sentence of the second paragraph to read "Portable signs are allowed for one thirty -day period per year at a single address. ". Mr. Doocy moved to approve the March 13 minutes as corrected above. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion. Carried unanimously. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT Mr. Kluegel reported the following action by City Council on issues recently before the Planning and Zoning Board: March 25 Council approved the pole barn application by Mr. Spetzman subject to the stipulations suggested by P & Z. Public Hearing was set for the Sampair horse breeding/ boarding application for April 22, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. City Council at April 8 meeting established a $160 park dedication fee per unit or 100 of land in lieu of cash. This was established as an interim policy until which time as a permanent policy can be established. The fee will be collected at the time of issuance of building permits. Council decided against the proposal of the City Planner with regard to "Platting Ordinance ". The Council felt that the P & Z should review all subdivisions rather than having the smaller subdivisions reviewed only by staff as proposed. OPEN MIKE No one appeared before open mike. AUDREY BURQUE - METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION Mr. Zack Johnson had submitted to the P & Z a two -page memo with regard to an road access plan as directed by the P & Z. This plan outlines his recommendations for a future road pattern for the Audrey Burque Metes and Bounds Subdivision application as well as the Paul Tubbs Metes and Bounds Subdivi- sion application. These recommendations will allow the City to require easements in the appropriate areas for future roads. 1 1 1 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Two Consideration of the Audrey Burque request is continued from previous meetings. The accesss plan presented by Mr. Johnson outlined an east/ west collector street and a north /south collector street through this section in the southeastern quadrant of the City. The concensus and recommendation of the Board was that the east/ west collector be 80' wide and the north /south collector street be 60' wide. Mr. Prokop voiced his objection to the fact that the Park Board has not decided to take land in this area of the City for future park property. He feels that this area is physically cut off from the rest of the City by 35E and the residents will not have access to City park facilities. The representative for the Audrey Burque application voiced the fact that the $160 per unit park dedication fee was accept- able to his client. Mr. Kluegel stated that he was satisfied with the plat with regard to minimum sizes, frontages, etc. Mr. Prokop made a motion to recommend to Council that the petition by Audrey Burque, 1709 Main Street, Centerville, to subdivide by metes and bounds a parcel of land as described in the application by said individual be accepted as presented with the following stipulations: 1) (Note: This first stipulation of the motion was very un- clear. The following is Mr. Zack Johnson's interpretation of the road easements.) A 60' road easement, 30' on either side of the east boundaries of Lots H, I and J, extending from 64th St. north to the south boundary of parcel G, and then continuing in a northeasterly curve to an intersection of an 80' east /west collector street as described by the planner. 2) All particulars of the Lino Lakes Building Code, particu- larly Subdivision 35 be complied with, dealing with such things as future platting, etc. 3) For park land purposes, cash in lieu of land be accepted, however, recognizing that it may be necessary in the future with the development of the area and the area of tracts to the east, that land may have to be acquired to satisfy future park concerns. Motion was seconded by Mr. Cody and carried unanimously. Mr. McLean asked Mr. Johnson to graph for clarification this subdivision and the following subdivision for Paul Tubbs for the Council's convenience when they consider the two subdivi- sions. Mr. Doocy asked Mr. Johnson if he had a clear understanding of the road easement portion of Mr. Prokop's motion, since there was so much confusion and editorial changes taking place. Mr. Johnson assured the Board that he did. 105 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Three PAUL TUBBS - METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE TO LOT SIZE IN RURAL DISTRICT Note: Paragraph 1, 3, 4, and 8 under the "Audrey Burque - Metes and Bounds Subdivision" above relate also to this item. Mr. McLean moved that the P & Z recommend to Council approval of the application of Paul Tubbs, representing Al Augustine, Scandia, MN, for property described as Parcels A, B, C and D. The motion will address the subdivision by metes and bounds conveyance. P & Z recommends that Parcels A and B be accepted as drawn on the map except that the road easement be altered to 40' width on the south edge of Parcel B and a 40' width on the north edge of Parcel A; that the 7.8 acres that is in Parcel D be included with the parcel to the east that is owned by Steven Nice to which it adjoins before it is acceptable; that Parcel C (5.1 acres) be accepted and must be included by Robert Sorg in the 2.6 acre tract that fronts on 24th. That in all, the whole subdivision relationship to park dedication (since the Park Board did not see fit to recommend any specific park requirements in this area) that cash be accepted in lieu of land for parcels A, B, C and D. There must be compliance with all sections of Subdivision 35. This motion recognizes that it is granting a variance from the 10 -acre subdivision ordinance, in the cases of Parcels C and D, which are 5.1 and 7.8 acres respectively. By way of explanation for the variance in this case, we are improving on the situation of Robert Sorg which has only 200 feet frontage on 24th Ave. and it increases the frontage by 58' and brings it closer to com- pliance with frontage ordinance and brings the Steven Nice parcel into over 10 acres total. Therefore, our rationale is that we are improving the situations. An 80' roadway easement is included in this plat to serve as a future collector street from east to west from 24th Ave. to County 84. Motion was seconded by Mr. Prokop. Mr. Doocy wanted the fact that Parcels A and B are undersized because of the 40' road right -of -ways to be part of record. Motion carried unanimously. SIGN ORDINANCE It was stated to the audience that the City Council has asked the Planning and Zoning Board to address the sign ordinance, particularly the portion relating to portable signs. Eight to ten people in the audience were attending with interest in this issue. Mr. McLean asked that those wishing to be heard step forward at this time. Mr. Ernie Zelinka appeared voicing a concern of his own on behalf of Forjays and also on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce. The restrictions on portable signs by the City of Lino Lakes has been topic of discussion at recent Chamber of Commerce meetings, wherein several businesspersons from the community have asked that their input be considered in this issue. 1 1 1 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Four Mr. Zelinka suggested that restrictions on portable signs address such things as setbacks, size and anchoring to make the signs comply with windload standards. He also felt that those businesses within the community which are now being affected by the sign ordinance as it relates to portable signs, should have been notified as part of the public hearing procedure when the sign ordinance was recently changed. A representative from the 49 Club said that he has permanently anchored his sign in cement and does not feel that he should have to remove it. The Board discussed the option of permanently anchoring the changeable signs as this person has done. It was the concensus of the Board that if a sign is permanently anchored, then it is no longer portable and is subject to the regulations of a permanent sign within the ordinance. Milt Jorgensen appeared saying that he, too, had anchored his changeable sign and the Board told him to check with the Build- ing Official as to what type of anchoring is acceptable. In summary, the Board reminded the audience that if they wish to permanently anchor their portable, changeable sign, they are still allowed to have only two signs for their business- - one on the building front and one ground sign. Permanently anchored signs are subject to a permit and a fee as has been the case for several years. Any questions with regard to any signs are to be referred to the Building Official. Mr. McLean stated that he felt that the Board had dealt with the issue of portable signs this evening, as directed by the City Council; and that the P & Z made their recommendations to the Council with regard to the sign ordinance and that the Council has the option of accepting or rejecting the P & Z's recommendation. Mr. Doocy asked what work has been done per the P & Z's request at their last meeting, as outlined in paragraph 3 under "Sign Ordinance - Amendment ", page four of March 13, 1985 minutes. Mr. Kluegel and Mr. Johnson stated that nothing has been done. The concensus of the Board was that any further review as had been discussed at the last meeting, need not take place- -the sign ordinance has been subjected to enough review. The Board took a recess at this time. BRUCE HANSON - SURFSIDE - AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW The specifics of Mr. Hanson's request were discussed resulting in the following motion. Mr. Cody moved to recommend to the City Council that the appli- cation of Bruce R. Hanson, 6980 Lake Drive, the owner of 107 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Five Surfside Seaplane Base, Inc., dated 12/3/84, for certain property located at 6980 Lake Drive consisting of a parcel of approxi- mately 7.5 acres legally described as set forth in his appli- cation, for an amended conditional use permit be granted. This conditional use permit would be subject to the following condi- tions: 1) Building be constructed in accordance with the building code. 2) No additional signage will be allowed. 3) All tires, barrels and miscellaneous materials will be re- moved or stored inside the building. 4) There will be no exterior storage of various parts. The basis of the recommendation would be in accordance with the terms and provisions of Subdivision 5 of the ordinance in that the conditions A - I of such ordinance are met. In addition, this motion recommends that the application which contains a site and building plan review for the same applicant also be approved as it complies with the terms and provisions of Subdivision 4 of our ordinance entitled "Site and Building Plan Review" and that according to the checklist accompanying the application, all terms and conditions of the application have been met. Mrs. Klaus seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. DONNEL REALTY - METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION Don Nelson represented Robert Lundgren is his application for a metes and bounds subdivision. This item is continued from previous meetings of the P & Z Board. Mr. Kluegel pointed out that the DNR, the City Planner, Rice Creek Watershed, City Engineer, and the Park Board have all addressed theapplication. The recommendations of each are included in each boardmembers packet. Some discussion of the issue took place resulting in the following motion. Mr. Ostlie moved that the P & Z recommend to City Council approval of the application by Donnel Realty, dated 12/20/84 on behalf of Robert Lundgren, located at 6266 Holly Drive for a metes and bounds subdivision of a parcel described in the application which is at 6266 Holly Drive with the condi- tions as set forth below: 1) The conditions as described by Mr. Zack Johnson in his 4/5/85 memo be followed, except for "5A" where it is recommended that the road easement of 60' is acceptable. 2) The recommendations of Mr. Davidson in his memo of 4/10/85 be followed, except for "Item 2 ". 3) Park dedication of cash in lieu of land per the present interim policy. 4) Include alternate "No. 2" in Mr. Davidson's 2/20/85 memo regarding curve center line in roadway. 5) There be a brush clean out at the north entrance along Holly Drive. Mr. Doocy seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Six Mr. Prokop made a motion that the road be 32' paved on Holly Court when constructed. Mrs. Klaus seconded the motion. Mr. Goldade voted no, motion carried. KEITH APITZ - SITE & BUILDING PLAN REVIEW - VIDEO REVUE Keith and Jan Apitz and Mr. Kluegel presented the application for Video Revue to add on to the present building. The Apitz' own the building and lease it to Video Revue. The Board ques- tioned specific points resulting in the following. Mrs. Klaus moved that tire P & Z recommend to the City Council approval of the site and building plan for Keith and Jan Apitz, dated 3/15/85, at 6011 Hodgson Rd., Lino Lakes, with the following stipulations: 1) Before building permit is issued; either to the satisfaction of the Building Official, or an actual plan of the storm water drainage be submitted. 2) There be a parking agreement between the adjacent establish- ments because there is not the full parking spaces required by ordinance. 3) A buffer of 50% or more on the rear property line be erected. 4) Comply with the building code. 5) Because side yard setback is not met, Building Official shall see that the fire code is met. The motion was seconded by Mr. Goldade, and carried unanimously. MIKE ASKAY - NEW HOME INSULATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Mr. Askay and Mr. Kluegel presented this application. Some discussion and questions followed resulting in the following: Mr. Cody moved that the P & Z recommend to City Council that the application of Kemacell Clean Air Systems, Inc., doing business as New Home Insulation, by its owners Nancy and Michael Askay, dated 4/1/85 for certain property located at 416 Lilac St., Lino Lakes (parcel described as about 46,500 square feet; Lot 5, Block 1 Lino Industrial Park) for a site and building plan be approved based on the following conditions: 1) The topography and storm water drainage plan be as set forth in April 2, 1985 letter from R. Nelson and Associates in that certain erosion control measures must be taken as soon as practical after grading. 2) Landscape plan be amended to included increased land- scaping in the front of the building as discussed in the course of this particular application. 3) The truck and trailer be at all times as practical parked in the rear of the building. 4) Any signs which are established on the property be in accordance with the ordinance. 109 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Seven In addition, this recommendation is that the application by the same applicant for an on -site sewer conditional use permit be approved subject to the recommendations of Mr. Davidson, dated 4/10/85; in particular his recommendations relative to soil borings, percolation rate measurement tests and the design of the septic tank and drainfield in conform- ance with PCA rules, etc. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion. Motion carried. MARLIN HANSEN - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SHORELAND MANAGEMENT Mr. Hansen and Mr. Kluegel presented this application by Mr. Hansen seeking approval of a storage building to store his boat(s) and other various things. Mr. McLean explained that because he is related to the appli- cant, he would step out of his position for this agenda item. He did not take part in the voting process. Mr. Cody moved to recommend to Council that the application by Marlin Hansen, 2060 Otter Lake Drive, dated 4/3/85, for a certain described property as attached to the application, for a shoreland conditional use permit for the construction of a detached rural storage building be allowed with the following conditions: 1) That Mr. Hansen consolidate the two parcels that he currently owns so as to create one contiguous lot which would qualify for a detached rural storage building under the terms of our ordinance. 2) That the detached rural storage building not be used for habitation. 3) That the detached rural storage building not have any sanitary facilities in it. The basis for such recommendation would be the terms and condi tions of Subdivision 5, particularly the standards set forth in Paragraph 2, Subdivision 5, A - I in regard to the granting of a conditional use permit. Mr. Doocy seconded the motion. Discussion followed relative to whether the request should be for a "detached rural stor- age building" or a "boathouse ". The shoreland management ad- dresses "boathouse ", but not "detached rural storage building ". It was felt that the basic concern addressed within shoreland management was that of sanitary facilities; and since Mr. Cody's motion outlined that no sanitary facilities were to be included, the motion addressed the intent of the shoreland management. Mr. Cody made no changes to his motion. Motion carried, with Mr. McLean abstaining. OLD BUSINESS Mr. McLean stated that the Comprehensive Plan would have to be an agenda item for an extra work session and that this subject 1 1 1 1 1 1 Planning and Zoning Board April 10, 1985 Page Eight will probably require work over the next eight or nine months. He asked the boardmembers for suggestions for a meeting date for a work session. Mrs. Foster stated that she would be unable to attend on Wednesdays other than the regularly scheduled meetings and therefore minutes would not be taken of the meeting. The meeting date was set as Wednesday, May 15, 1985 at 7:00 P.M. Mr. McLean asked that Mr. Kluegel see that a notice be sent out as a reminder to boardmembers closer to the meeting date. The meeting adjourned at 11:00 P.M.