HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/13/1987 P&Z MinutesPLANNING & ZONING BOARD
May 13, 1987
Chairman Cody called to order the regular meeting of the Lino Lakes
Planning & Zoning Board at 7:00 P.M., Wednesday, May 13, 1987.
Boardmembers present: Prokop, Nelson, Averbeck, Joyer, Irwin.
Boardmembers absent: McLean. Also present were Mr. Kluegel,
Building Official; Mr. Miller, Interim City Planner; Mr. Marier,
Council Liaison; Mrs. Foster, Secretary.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - APRIL 4, 1987
Mr. Joyer asked that the 4/8/87 P & Z minutes reflect the fact that
Custom Contracting's change to their site and building plan (Page
4, 4/8/87 minutes) is being reviewed with this evening's agenda.
MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to approve the minutes of the 4/8/87
meeting with the addition above. Mrs. Nelson seconded the motion
which carried unanimously.
OPEN MIKE
No one was scheduled to appear under open mike.
BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT
Mr. Kluegel reported the following action taken at recent Council
meetings:
Site and Building Plan for Klosner Goertz addition to build-
ing in the Industrial Park was approved per P & Z recommend-
ations. (Application 87 -7)
Site and Building Plan for Klosner Goertz addition to mini -
storage facility was approved per P & Z recommendations.
(Application 87 -8), and public hearing set for the exterior
storage conditional use permit.
Minor subdivision for Glenn Rehbein (Application 87 -6) was
approved provided the deed contain language stating the
conveyed land is an unbuildable lot.
Mr. Kluegel informed the Board that a meeting will be held on
May 20, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. with the Metropolitan Council Planner
regarding the submitted comprehensive plan amendment.
Mr. Kluegel introduced John Miller, the interim planner and the
Board welcomed Mr. Miller.
CUSTOM MANUFACTURING
A consultant from Palmer Resources represented Custom Manufacturing
explaining that after further consideration, Custom Manufacturing
has decided to build their thermoplastics molding plant larger
than the design previously reviewed by P & Z. This change would
require moving the driveway over, but no other changes would re-
sult. Mr. Kluegel felt the larger building would have no affect
on the site and building plan; Mr. Miller has not had the oppor-
tunity to review the amendment to the site and building plan.
•
•
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
May 13, 1987
Page Two
MOTION: Mrs. Averbeck moved to recommend to Council approval of
the amendment to the site and building plan by Custom Manufacturing
(Lloyd McKinney), application #87 -4, to allow the additional area
for the proposed building as presented in the application. All
stipulations recommended by this Board in the initial review of
the site and building plan will remain, expanded only as necessary
to accommodate the larger building. Motion seconded by Mr. Joyer
and carried unanimously.
JOSEPH HILL - VARIANCE TO GARAGE SIZE
Mr. Hill and Mr. Kluegel explained that Mr. Hill wishes to build
a garage larger than allowed within the ordinance. He is request-
ing a 780 square foot, 16 foot high garage while the ordinance
allows 760 square foot, 14 foot high garage on his size lot. Mr.
Hill said that the reason for the request is to protect his auto-
mobiles and camper from vandalism. He stated that with Sunrise
Park across the street from his home, he suffers from vandals
attracted to the park.
Members of the Board explained to Mr. Hill the six findings of
fact required to prove the applicant's need for a variance, and
that these six findings of fact cannot be met in this instance.
MOTION: Mrs. Nelson moved to recommend to Council denial of a
variance to build an oversized garage as requested by Mr. Hill,
6933 Sunrise Ave., application 87 -15 because the P & Z Board is
unable to meet the findings of fact required in Section 5, Subd.
7 (1 - 6) of the City Code. Mr. Prokop seconded the motion which
carried unanimously.
Mr. Hill said that he could give instances of several oversize
garages and that he felt the Board was discriminating against him.
He also said he wanted to know how his lot, which is supposed to
be one acre, is less than one acre. Mr. Cody suggested that if
Mr. Hill could not find answers from the City staff, he could
appear before the next P & Z meeting under open mike to discuss
this matter.
STATE OF MINNESOTA - LINO LAKES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - SITE AND
BUILDING PLAN
Mr. Fritzke, Director of Anoka County Corrections Department
appeared before the Board explaining that the correctional facility
currently can house 44 individuals (mostly traffic offenders) for
their work program. Because of a backlog, the facility must pro-
vide housing for more individuals; these individuals are not
considered a security risk to the community. Therefore, the
correctional facility is requesting approval to put up a temporary
modular facility for 18 additional beds. The length of time neces-
ary is unknown at this time.
•
•
•
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
May 13, 1987
Page Three
MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to recommend to Council approval of a
site and building plan allowing Anoka County Corrections Department
(Application #87 -16) to construct, for an unknown length of time,
a temporary, modular facility to house 18 beds for individuals on
the work program. The proposed building appears to meet zoning
ordinance Section 6, Subd. 18 (6)(C) wherein the language "municipal
government" is understood to include the County. It is understood
that the Anoka County Corrections Department will oversee this
building project. Mrs. Averbeck seconded the motion which carried
unanimously.
HANSON BLOCK - REZONE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE AND BUILDING PLAN
Mr. Obernolte, consultant to Lonn Hanson, Hanson Block gave an in-
depth presentation as to how the proposed site location was deter-
mined, advantages /disadvantages of the project, etc. Mr. Cody
complimented Mr. Obernolte on a comprehensive, informative present-
ation. The Board then went through the Planner's and Engineer's
opinion letters point by point and found that certain aspects of
the plans had not been incorporated into the application. Lengthy
discussion took place after which Mr. Cody explained that he has
been directed by the City Council to provide only complete packages
when P & Z recommendations are forwarded to Council. Mr. Joyer
felt that this applicant had provided alot of information and
should not be delayed.
MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to table consideration of the applica-
tions by Lonn Hanson (rezone #87 -12, C.U.P. #87 -13, site & build-
ing plan #87 -14) until all the points of the engineer's letter
of 5/7/87 and the planner's letter of 5/4/87 are incorporated
into the applications, specifically the following:
landscape /screen on the outer perimeters include a minimum
of an inner row of larger trees (5' - 6') and an outer row
of smaller trees (3' - 4'),
drainage plan accepted by engineer and RCWD
building constructed with block other than smooth face
green areas by building and parking include shrubbery, etc.
outside storage no more than 12' high
berm 40' around perimeter
lighting plan detailed
procedure for removal of broken block
All of these items have been discussed this evening, and the appli-
cant has been given some guidance on each of these requirements.
Mrs. Averbeck seconded the motion which carried with Mr. Joyer
voting no.
•
•
•
PLANNING 6 ZONING BOARD
May 13, 1987
Page Four
EJM PIPE SERVICES - SITE & BUILDING PLAN
Mr. Allen Montgomery and Mr. Kluegel explained that the site and
building plan submitted by EJM Pipe Services is to construct an
office addition to the front of the existing building along Lake
Drive. The Board reviewed the submittal and asked particular
questions as to landscaping and screening.
Mr. & Mrs. Hayes were in attendance and stated that they are next
door to EJM Pipe Services in a single family home and feel that EJM
is not adequately screened bordering their property and they
have full view of trailers in EJM's rear yard and have also had
to remove fallen trees along the boundary which have died over
the years. In order to alleviate problems with the neighbors,
Mr. Montgomery volunteered to plant trees on the Hayes property
in order to screen the trailers since there is not enough room
on the EJM property to plant trees as a screen to the rear yard.
MOTION: Mrs. Nelson moved to recommend to Council approval of the
site and building plan of EJM Pipe Services, application 87 -11
with the following conditions:
trees be planted to fill the vacancy left from dead trees
along the east half of the north property line, creating
a tree line with approximately 15' on center,
the applicant comply with the stipulations of the condi-
tional use permit granted in late 1986,
with consent given this evening by Mr. & Mrs. Hayes, EJM
will plant trees on the Hayes' property to provide a
screen from EJM's rear yard.
Motion seconded by Mr. Joyer and carried unanimously.
EL REHBEIN & SON, INC. - REZONE
Mr. Cody asked if anyone was in attendance to speak to this issue.
Mr. Kluegel stated that he understood that this rezone is strictly
an administrative task to correct an oversight when the zoning
map was approved in 1983. There was confusion as to why E1 Rehbein
is named as the applicant if in fact, this is just housekeeping.
Mr. Cody said that he would not hear this issue without an EL
Rehbein representative or more information and guidance from
City administration. Mr. Joyer asked to step down to represent
El Rehbein & Son. Mr. Cody felt this would clearly be a con-
flict of interest on Mr. Joyer's part. Mr. Joyer said that he
felt he should have that right to step down to represent his
employer and abstain from participation on the Board for this
issue and said that he wanted the City Attorney's opinion on this
conflict of interest matter.
MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to table the El Rehbein rezone, applica-
tion 87 -17 until more information and guidance is available. Mrs.
Nelson seconded the motion which carried with Mr. Joyer abstaining.
•
•
PLANNING 6 ZONING BOARD
May 13, 1987
Page Five
KEVIN KRUELLS - HOUSE MOVE -IN PERMIT
MOTION: Mr. Joyer moved to table Kevin Kruell's application
for a house move -in permit since there is no one here this
evening to represent the application. Mr. Prokop seconded the
motion which carried unanimously.
AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE
Mr. Cody suggested that because of the lateness of the hour that
the zoning amendment issues - durable /dustless surface, surfacing
and drainage, and semi trailer parking be handled at the next
meeting and he asked Mr. Kluegel to compile the background on
these issues from their origination to the present for the next
meeting.
MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to table consideration of the zoning
amendments - durable /dustless surface, surfacing and drainage,
and semi trailer parking until the next P 6 Z meeting. Mrs.
Nelson seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS - 1 -ACRE LOT CRITERIA /HOUSEKEEPING /STREET NAMES
Mr. Joyer stated that because the comprehensive plan amendment
is in the approval process and the amendment would allow one -acre
lots, the City should have some criteria in place for one -acre
lots similar to the criteria for other lot sizes. Other Board -
members also felt that as a housekeeping item, Section 6, Subd.
18 (6) (C) should include language to clarify that "municipal"
and "County government" buildings are permitted uses in the PSP
district.
MOTION: Mr. Prokop moved to direct the interim City Planner,
Mr. Miller, to recommend criteria for one -acre lots and make
the housekeeping change to Section 6, Subd. 18 (6) (C) above.
Mrs. Averbeck seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
Mr. Cody asked Mr. Marier if the P 6 Z has the power to give
this direction to the City Planner and Mr. Marier said he would
back this direction.
Mr. Irwin stated that he felt that the City should have a plan
for naming streets, possibly a grid. Some members felt that there
is a numbered street scheme, but not an alphabetical street scheme.
MOTION: Mr. Irwin moved to recommend to Council that a street
naming scheme, both numeric and alphabetic be put in place. Mrs.
Averbeck seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned by unanimous decision at 10:13 P.M.