HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/12/1984 P&Z MinutesDecember 12, 1984
Call to order and roll call
m
b
0
•H
.0
+:
',1 w
M a,
• • .r ro 0 O q
m co W 'H
N a) U 4
1-1 ro q U ^i 0
-M 0 m U
O N '1 0 N O N cti
ro 0 1 O N 0 H
0 0
0 x h q O
Lc) a U N U m
'U 00 ^i N H a0i A
O N ro 0 0 W U M
0 bi 0 0 1 0 N r0
O FC q
'H 4-)
q O H d 0 ,---) 01 'q
0
U ( m 00 00 m
di
M �M
Old Business
• •
• •
TO: Planning and Zoning Board Members
FROM: Pete Kluegel, Building Official
DATE: December 7, 1984
SUBJECT: REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board is scheduled to be held at
7:30, Wednesday, December 12, 1984.
Please inform me if you will be unable to attend so I can determine whether or not
there will be a quorum.
Planing and Zoning Board
December 12, 1984
The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was
called to order at 7:32 P.M. on Wednesday, December 12, 1984 by
Chairman McLean. Present: Goldade, Klaus, Ostlie, Prokop. Absent:
Doocy, Cody. Mr. Kluegel and Mrs. Foster were also present.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - October 10, 1984
85
Mrs. Klaus stated that note should be made for the record with regard
to the issue of approval of the amended conditional use permit request
for the House of Praise, which was discussed at the October 10 meeting
after having been approved by the City Council; that the P &,Z Board
does not care to handle items in the manner in which this item was
handled, The P & Z Board had been hurried into consideration of the
request, and the City Council considered the request without the
full participation and recommendation from the P & Z Board.
Mr. Prokop moved to approve the October 10 minutes as presented with
the note made by Mrs. Klaus. Seconded by Mr. Ostlie. Carried.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - November 14, 1984
Mrs. Klaus moved to approve the. November 14 minutes as presented. Mr.
Goldade seconded motion. Carried with Mr. Ostlie abstaining.
BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT
Mr. Kluegel reported the following items to the Board:
- The November 26 Council approved the metes and bounds conveyance
request by Mr. Morehouse, following the recommendations by the P
& Z Board.
- With regard to the issue of Centerville rezoning Larry Brokke's
land, which was discussed under New Business at the November 14
P & Z meeting, Mr. Kluegel had sent copies of our Ordinance with
regard to buffers in light industrial areas to the Centerville
Clerk.- Centerville has approved the rezone. Mr. Brokke's concern
about noise has been satisfied by the fact that business conducted
near his home will be handle indoors. His concern about buffer
was satisfied in that should trees be removed, a fence would have
to be constructed as a buffer.
- The Council will be interviewing planning consultants at their
January 14 meeting. After a candidate has been hired, the Mayor
has requested that the Council and P & Z Board have a joint break-
fast meeting with the consultant.
Mr. McLean was puzzled that the Council wishes to interview after
• the P & Z Board did interview and presented a recommendation. He
felt that the P & Z Board had spent considerable time and effort
in the interviewing process.
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
This item was listed on the agenda at this time, however, Mr. McLean
suggested moving it to the end of the agenda because it would take
quite a bit of time. Board agreed.
g6
DOG KENNEL LICENSE - John Udstuen
Planing and Zoning Pcird
December 12, 1984
Page Two
Mr. Kluegel said that since the Council had passed the 120 -day mora-
torium on August 13, 1984, said moratorium period was over on Decembe
11, and therefore the P & Z Board would have to consider requests for
dog kennel licenses under the old Ordinance. Mr. McLean made mention
that the Council was given the proposed revision to the dog kennel
Ordinance some time ago, and that should have been sufficient time
to act on the proposal.
Mr. Udstuen, 64th St. Lino Lakes presented his request for a dog
kennel license, explaining his plans for location of the kennel. He
also presented a letter of recommendation from Vadnais Heights where
he had been involved in the operation of a dog kennel, and explained
that all the dogs he keeps are 'debarked', and that this venture is
strictly done as a hobby. Some questions and discussion followed.
Mr. Prokop moved to recommend to Council approval of a request by
Mr. Udstuen, 64th St., Lino Lakes for the operation of a dog kennel
as proposed on his application of November 19, 1984. The request
meets the conditions of the .old Ordinance. P & Z would recommend
a limit of four dogs at any time. Motion seconded by Mrs. Klaus.
Mr. Goldade requested an editorial change to require that the appli-
cant submit evidence of vaccinations of all dogs before approval
and also annually thereafter. Editorial change accepted by Mr.
Prokop. Mrs. Klaus seconded motion with editorial change. Carried.
Mr. McLean explained to Mr. Udstuen that the P & Z Board is a recom-
mending body and that final approval would have to come from the
City Council at their next meeting on December 27.
ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
An interested party from the audience approached the Board asking
that they consider the accessory building issue at this time, since
he had taken off work tonight (just as he had twice previously) to
hear the outcome of the accessory building issue. He also pointed
out that overten other persons in the audience were present with
interest in this issue. The Board then decided to handle this issue
at this time.
The Board reviewed the draft proposal which they had put together
at their last meeting line by line, making changes as they felt
necessary. Mrs. Foster was asked to type up the corrected version
and forward to all members by the end-of Monday, December 17 with
a note to the members to be sure and review andreontact Mr. McLean
by Wednesday, December 19 with any concerns they may have.
Mr. Prokop moved to recommend. to Council approval of the accessory
building portion of the City Code as revised and corrected, subject
to final review of corrections by all P & Z board members before
Wednedsay, December 19. Motion seconded by Mr. Goldade. Carried.
2cn;nc
December 12, 1984
Page Three
Mr. Goldade voiced his opinion for the record, that he felt that
a major change to the City Code, such as the accessory building
changes, could be better and more fairly handled by ballot open
to all voters than by the P & Z Board acting upon the wishes of
a handful of people from the community.
The Board took a five - minute break at this time.
KENNEL CODE ORDINANCE
87
In response to questions which arose when the City Council considered
the kennel code ordinance changes, the P & Z Board had the following.
With respect to the minimum size lot requirement - the P & Z Board
felt that there is a need for a minimum of five acres of land where
there will be three or more dogs, and that the five acre requirement
is consistent with the zoning district lot size requirements.
With respect to the question of nuisance as raised by Mr. Reinert -
the P & Z Board felt that the concern over the possibility of a dog
kennel operation causing a nuisance is equal to the concern over
the possibility of it causing a health, safety and welfare problem,
and asked that the City Attorney make any necessary language changes
to reflect that concern.
With respect to questions about pre- existing dog kennels, they would
Ibe covered under the 'grandfather clause'.
The Board felt that the particulars in the revised dog kennel ordin-
ance and been given due consideration and the particulars recommended
were appropriate.
REZONE ER TO LI - Joe Spetzman
?r. Spetzman reviewed his appearance before the City Council on
November 26. Details of this are in'the 11/26 Council minutes.
Basically, Mr. Spetzman wants to build a storage accessory building_
on his land which abutts his son's _land. His land is ER and his
son's land is LI. Mr. Spetzman presented his request and referred
to a letter from the City Planner, Mr. Chapman which suggested
some alternative ways of handling the situation.
The Board felt that Mr. Chapman has not addressed the problem of
how to split off 2.8 acres of land with no frontage, as is proposed
by Mr_ Spetzman. They also pointed out that to allow a non- conform-
ing use would set a poor precedent, and that Mr. _Spetzman .should"
consider building the storage accessory building on his son's LI
land, to which Mr. Spetzman replied that he did not want to pay for .
a building on his son's land, even -though it was -a partnership
type business.
The Board asked Mr. Kluegel to request of Mr. Chapman an alternative
which would satisfy the parameters of the Ordinance.
Mr. Prokop moved to table this issue until the January meeting pending
review by the City Planner. Seconded by Mr. Goldade. Carried.
88
Planning and Zoning Board
December 12, 1984
Page Four
GROUP W CABLE - METES AND BOUNDS CONVEYANCE
Jim Szurek represented Group W and introduced Mary Jane Thompson,
who is replacing Steve Nierengarten of Group W. Mr. Szurek, showed
proof of Mr. McDonald's signature as seller of the parcel of land
Group W has contacted to purchase. Mr. Szurek also referred to a tine
"triangle" of land, which if purchased would satisfy the requirement
of frontage. He said that the land belongs to a trust and he had
spoken to the trustees and had negotiated and agreed upon a price for
the land and that he could purchase that tiny triangle_ piece imme-
diately.
Mr. McLean told Mr. Szurek that the triangle would be necessary to
satisfy the frontage requirement, and that a public hearing and
notification of the neighboring residents would also take place be-
fore final approval.
Mr. Szurek explained that with regard to screening, the area is very
heavily wooded which would create a natural screen, and the building
proposed is a 30' X 25' building, and that the area would be fenced.
Mr. Prokop moved to recommend to Council approval of the application
by Group W Cable, 737 E. River Road, Anoka, MN and Leslie McDonald
as owner, dated December 7, 1984 for metes and bounds subdivision
for ten acre parcel as described in application and also a triangula
piece of land (which is required to satisfy frontage requirements)
be included within the application. Approval is recommended subject
to Group W showing evidence of obtaining ownership. Motion seconded
by Mr. Goldade. Carried.
Mrs. Klaus moved to recommend to Council approval of theCUP application
by Group W Cable, 737 E. River Road, Anoka, MN and Leslie McDonald
as owner, dated December 7, 1984, to construct one 150 foot antenna
and two satellite dishes and one block building for cable TV trans -
mission•purposes. The approval would be limited to a 30' X 25'
block building, a 15' wide roadway with a small (2 -3 car) parking
lot, antenna and dishes enclosed with a 6' chain link fence. This
approval is contingent upon approval of the metes and bounds convey-
ance application. Motion seconded by Mr. Ostlie. Carried.
OLD BUSINESS
Mrs. Klaus noted that the House of Praise has still not begun their
construction which was - presented as a situtation which needed to be
done immediately.
Mr. Goldade and Mrs. Klaus reported on their attendance at the Annual
Planning Seminar. Some of the items discussed included soil erosion
as the number one pollutant, handicapped people being allowed to liv
together in single family residences, and a checklist to be used by
Board members in decision - making. The checklist will be copied and
sent to members.
Mr. McLean thanked the group as Chairman, for their effort .and dedi-
P1anning and
December 12, 1989
Page Five
cation over the past year. He told the Board that he had expressed
to the administration his desire to continue his service.
Mr. Prokop moved to adjourn at 11:00 P.M. Motion seconded by Mr.
Goldade. Carried.
89