Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/09/1982 P&Z MinutesJune 9, 1982 Call to order and roll call Approval of minutes - May 12, 1982 • rl N Report of Council Actions 4) a) a) 0 x .x a) Wu al ,•• .1-1 04 a •r+ ..0 cd W .0 -H 4 cd 4) .. Z =0.)04-10m �� p,o l uv an N u 0 p. •H (n W c �iai•° �,a a 0) ou z a) Z 0 4-$ ri t ' - , - 0 - 3 a (1) a 'Cl 4-1 •H 44 4-I 4-$ .0 rl 0 a) O a) a) .n 0 4-4 .,-1 f) O O $-1 CC) l ,.- a) ,_ a) cd N w Ja ) 1J 1 4) •H $4 Q) •rl H cd a) 0 aaas0 c d c, • • -4 cd •r l rl aw Special Use Permit Ln O U'1 O cr1 .1' 0 H M .1' n O 00 00 O Old Business New Business • L) o c 1/4.0 DATE : June 3, 1982 TO All Planning and Zoning Board Members FROM Peter Kluegel, Building Official SUBJECT: Regular Planning and Zoning Board Meeting sJ 0 The regular Planning and Zoning Board meeting will begin at 7:30 P.M., Wednesday, June 9, 1982. If you cannot attend, please let me know so that it can be determined if there will be a quorum. Thank you. • • • June 9, 1982 Planning and Zoning Board The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 7:40 P.M., June 9, 1982 by Chairman Johnson, with the following members present; Goldade, Juleen, Krause, Johnson, Prokop, Doocy. Absent, McLean. Mr. Klugel and Mrs. Sarner were also present. MINUTES - MAY 12, 1982 Mr. Juleen moved to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Mr. Prokop. Motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL ACTIONS The Task Force as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board was approved with the addition of Mr. Peter Rosenthal to fill out the list. The Klosner° /Goertz request was approved with the setting of a time table for the landscaping. Mr. McDermott's variance was approved. The request for a Kennel License by Mr. Barry was approved. The WCCO Special Use Permit was approved. There had been questions on radiation fallout whcih Mrs. Elsenpeter will research. There was discussion of the Task Force with the positions of Chairman, Vice - Chairman and Recording Secretay being decided by that body as unnecessary. If there are modifications or recommendations for changes, they will be taped. The Clerk discussed the new State Law which gives the City control on the transfer of property if it is less than the whole parcel. This requires that the Deed be stamped with an approval stamp and signed by the Clerk and it must also have the City Seal, otherwise the County Auditor will not transfer title. The general consensus of the Planning and Zoning Board was this is a good law. SPECIAL USE PERMIT - NIEMCZYK This is for the operation of a Beauty Shop in a resident. Residents within 350' have been notified and there was no one present to speak on this request. There was discussion on parking with Mrs. Niemczyk noting that she will only have one chair, therefore the parking would be liminted to, at the most two at any one time. Mr. Juleen moved to approve this Special Use Permit for a Beauth Shop in a residence with the stipulation that this operation be limited to one chair. Seconded by Mr. Doocy. Motion carried unanimously. VARIANCE - LOT SUBDIVISION - HENRIKSEN This is to allow the subdivision of a parcel of land that had been started several years ago. The deeds for drainage easements have been corrected and signed and the survey has been completed. • • June 9, 1982 Planning and Zoning Page Two Mr. Henriksen noted that all the Park Fees have been paid. There was discussion on the Westerly lots which do not have an easement across the back lot lines. These lots had been split and title trans- ferred in 1977 before the restrictions on subdivisions had been applied. Mr. Juleen moved to recommend approval of this Variance noting that this application had been filed before Ordinance #78 went into effect. Seconded by Mr. Goldade. Motion carried unanimoulsy. LOT SPLIT FEASIBILITY - LINDQUIST. Mr. Lindquist presented a sketch for the splitting of his land located on Bald Eagle Boulevard. Mr. Lindquist noted that he had discussed this with Mr. McLean. He also asked the Board to note that the land to the South is platted, as is the land to the North and there is the Lake across the street. There is 9.75 acres of land that he is proposing to split. Mr. Prokop noted that the Southeast corner is a developing area and the proposed R zoning may have to be reconsidered. There is also property on either side of 64th Street that a possibility of development exists. Mr. Prokop also noted that this split would not require any new road construction. He felt these were positive points as to the feasibility of this split. Mr. Lindquist noted that he has a buyer for this land but, if is divided,; he can obtain a better price for the land. Mr. Prokop noted the ordinance placing a moratorium on the subdividing of land until the zoning Ordinance and map has been adopted. He suggested that Mr. Lindquist delay action until these documents are in place. The general consensus of the Planning and Zoning Board was that this land split should be delayed until the discussion of the zoning in the area has been cleared through the revision of the zoning ordinance and map. Mr. Johnson said he had had a call from Mr. Neff on the building of a 2500 square foot pole building on land just North of Main Street abutting Lake Drive. He asked Mr. Kluegel about this and Mr. Kluegel said he had talked with Mr. Neff and reported that he is talking about storage and an upholstery shop, etc. The general consensus of the Board was that Mr. Neff should appear before the Board to explain this operation. FEASIBILITY LOT SPLIT - HOWE. Mr. Howe reported that this is a three acre parcel = he is proposing to split this in a one acre parcel abutting Bald Eagle Boulevard and a two acre parcel abutting Hobe Court in White Bear Township. He said he had appeared before that Council and he had agreed to grant a 15' • June 9, 1982 Planning and Zoning Page Three easement to White Bear Township for the installation of water and sewer when it is installed in that area and he would connect. He plans to construct two homes, one on each parcel, and sell the parcel abutting Bald Eagle Boulevard. Mr. Prokop asked for clarification on the wording of the application - asked Mr. Howe if he planned to move in a house and Mr. Howe said, No, he plans to construct two homes. Mr. Prokop pointed out the moratorium on the splitting property and Mr. Howe said he had appeared before the Board in February and this is his seventh meeting. Mr. Howe was told that he could construct one house on this property, with a variance for a long driveway. It was suggested that this be done and, perhaps when the zoning map and ordinance is completed, there could be a possibilty this split could be considered. Mr. Prokop questioned the roadway in White Bear Township, how does this affect Lino Lakes, who maintains the roadway, who plows the street, how does the Police and Fire get to his house - through White Bear Township? is that legal? Mr. Prokop said all these things should be discussed and agreed upon and this should be in writing. Mr. Howe said he had discussed this with White Bear Township and he felt that these points had been cleared. Mr. Prokop said that may be but he personally, would need to see this in writing. It was suggested that Mr. Howe attend the Public Hearings on the Zoning Ordinance and the Zoning Map. These meetings will be held sometime in August or September and there will be published notices. VARIANCE - ZERO LOT LINE - ZASTROW Mr. Zastrow is proposing to split the front of his cabinet shop and lease for a Pizza Shop. This proposal had been cleared through Anoka County Health Department for this use. There are several requirements that must be adhered to before the use can be approved. The Planning and Zoning Board referred to the letter from the Anoka County Health Department noting there are 15 items that more information is required. The Board wanted a letter stating that Mr. Zastrow has met all the requirements. j Mrs. Krause asked if this is a variance or a Special Use Permit? Mr. Goldade suggested that if a letter is provided to the Building Inspector before the next Council meeting, could this be forwarded on that assumption? The matter of providing adequate parking - Mr. Prokop wondered if the nine spaces provided would be enough. The matter of the proposed service drive being used for parking was discussed. Mrs. Roberta Strandness of 885 Orange Street, was present in reationship • • June 9, 1982 Planning and Zoning Page Four to the potential traffic on that street. She felt this is a residential area and there is enough commercially generated traffic with United Tire on one corner already, pointing out Orange Street is a dead end on the West. Mrs. Zastrow pointed out that they live on Orange Street and she felt the people who live on Orange Street create their own traffic hazards with the number of cars using that street at illegal speeds. Mr. Prokop felt there are four things that need to be resolved; 1) the overall approval from the Anoka County Health Department; 2) parking, including the surfaces; 3) landscaping, screening, etc. 4) Planning and Zoning needs an overall diagram of the entire area to include all existing buildings, screening, parking, etc., to include the entrance and exit from the parking area. This sketch should be done to scale. Mr. Prokop moved Mr. Zastrow application for a variance be tabled for the completion of 1) Anoka County Health. Department final approval be obtained in writing; 2) the question of parking, entrance, exit, surface,, direction of parking - a scale drawing of this be provided; 3) sketch for landscaping screening:Ibe provided; 4) signs on building, indication of general appearnce of building. Seconded by Mrs. Klaus. Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS Mr. Schumacher asked to discuss a policy for the placement of persons on the agenda. He outlined the requirements that staff follows for this procedure. He pointed out that at this time, a feasibility may be pre- sented to the P$Z. At this point in time there is no fee required for a feasibility,but, if the Board is to be informed, there must be staff time involved to document the request. The Board was concerned that there are requests put on the agenda and the packets were incomplete. The suggestion that perhaps a blue -line drawing should be required. Mr. Schumacher pointed out that this is an expensive proposition. The Board felt that a drawing to scale would be adequate. The general feeling of the Board members was that if the persons have not provided all the requested information as set forth on the reverse of the application, then they are not put on the agenda. The did not feel that staff should hand carry anyone through the requirements. Mayor Benson suggested having the check -list printeduon an envelopewith all the necessary information to be put in the envelop and checked off the front. If it is brought in incomplete, it is not accepted and the person is not put on the agenda. The general consensus of the Board was this was a good idea. The Check List will be put together and then , the printing can be ordered. Meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. CORRECTION TO MINUTES OF JUNE 9, 1982 VARIANCE - E. R. HENRIKSEN 4110Kluegel explained that everything that was requested at the previous Planning and Zoning Board meeting was now in the file. Park fees are paid, all road easements are here and in order. A Certificate of Survey is in the file also. Mr. Prokop asked why there were no easements on lots 1, 2, 3, 14, 15,and 16. Mr. Kluegel explained these lots were sold in 1977 prior to our restrictive ordinance. Mr. Prokop explained at that time it was permissible to divide lots into 22 acres with a minimum of 150' of frontage without City approval. Mr. Juleen asked if this drawing indicates that the jog in the road easement has been removed. He was told the easement was straight. Mr. Juleen asked Mr. Henriksen if he wanted the Planning and Zoning Board to give him an 0 K to clear all the existing lots for sale. Mr. Henriksen said yes, and Mr. Johnson and Mr. Prokop said that this was correct. Mr. Juleen asked for clarification regarding if the City accepts the easement does this make it a City street. It was explained that it would not become a City street until the street is constructed to City specs and dedicated to the City. The street would probably end at the west end in a cul -de -sac. No building permits would be issued before the City accepts the street. There was a question regarding the 60' width of the easement. Mr. Kluegel expained this was acceptable for a City street. llikGoldade moved to grant a variance on the Henriksen property at this time. (This is atim from the tapes) Mr. Juleen seconded the motion. Mr. Prokop asked if this motion should be clarified because Mr. Henriksen has been in the process of doing this for some time before our present restrictive ordinance. He said this was to complete some business that was started some time ago and he would be happy to have it completed. Mr. Goldades response was not audible and I could not understand if there was an addition or correction to the motion. On voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. •