HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/30/2001 Env Bd Packet•
•
•
City of Lino Lakes
Environmental Board Meeting
Lino Lakes City Hall
May 30, 2001
6:30 PM
Agenda
1. Call To Order/Pass Sign -In Sheet 6:30 PM
2. Approval of Minutes (6:30 -6:35)
3. Approval of Agenda (6:35 -6:40)
4. Citizen Comments (6:40 -6:45)
5. Project Review
A. Ryan/Target /Target Super Store/ Update/Brian Wessel (6:45 -6:55)
B. Highland Meadows West 3rd Addition /Preliminary Plat (6:55 -7:15)
C. Lino Lakes Family Dentistry /Apollo Drive/ Site Plan Review (7:15 -7:25)
D. Land Holding Group /12th and Holly/Preliminary Plat (7:25 -7:50)
6. Environmental Board Business
A. Draft Comprehensive Plan Review/Update/DNR Comments (7:50 -8:10 )
B. Environmental Board Goals 2001 (8:10 -8:30)
C. Rules of Order (8:30 -8:35)
7. Program/Project Updates (8:35 -8:40)
A. Grant Updates
B. Minnesota DNR/Wildland Interface.
C. Solid Waste/Recycling Updates.
D. Other Discussion Items.
8. Close Meeting and Confirm Next Meeting Date
1
1
Natural Resource Inventory Report
S:98629:040999
Lino Lakes Town Genter
APPLIED
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
a•imPswim
mpror•
UkL 11
1
N
It. 17921 Smith Road
P.O. Box 256
Brodhead, Wisconsin 53520-0256
S:98629:040999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
METHODS 1
RESULTS 2
Northeast Quadrant 2
Southeast Quadrant 6
Southwest Quadrant 12
SUMMARY 13
ATTACHMENT 1. FIGURES 15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lino Lakes Town Center
Natural Resource Inventory Report
Introduction
Applied Ecological Services, Inc. (AES) was retained to examine the existing natural
resources found within the Town Center Planning and Development area for the City of Lino
Lakes, Minnesota. On December 13 and 14, 1998, we began this investigation. The primary
goals of the investigation included the following:
1. Characterize the existing ecological resources with a high degree of definition within the
northeastern and southeastern quadrants of the Main Street/Highway 35 intersection.
2. Refine previously defined land cover typing, with less definition in the northwest and
southwest quadrants of the intersection.
3. Map key features in the northeast and southeast quadrants using DGPS (High Definition
Global Positioning System) surveying.
4. Identify existing high - quality natural resource remnants that should or could be
integrated within a future development concept plan.
5. Identify ecological restoration opportunities for enhancing and restoring existing natural
resources within all quadrants.
6. Examine areas for potential threatened and endangered species and their habitat.
Methods
Two workers spent one and one half days in the northeast and southeast quadrants of
the study area, with a brief visit to the northwest and southwest quadrants to confirm cover
types. Field surveys were conducted by walking all of the properties and delineating cover
types and significant features on a color infrared aerial photograph (1:200 scale). In addition,
DGPS surveying was used to more accurately map the boundaries of key natural resources and
other features on the landscape within one -meter accuracy.
Descriptions of vegetation cover types were developed during the field investigation
using dominant species of each strata (tree, shrub, and herb layer) and their associates.
Ecological conditions of the strata within each plant community were also characterized during
the field visit.
S:98629:040999 1 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
Site conditions were photographed in 35mm color slide format to further document
existing conditions in all community types within the study area. Special attention was given to
capturing trends of deterioration, as well as ecological impacts associated with adjacent land
uses.
Refinements were also made to the land cover types and ecological conditions within the
northwest and southwest quadrants; however, this was done by quick visual inspection and
minor walking surveys of the area, with no DGPS surveying conducted in these quadrants.
General recommendations for restoration and management needs were developed for
all natural communities described within the project area.
Results
Descriptions of vegetation types, ecological conditions, and recommendations for
restoration and management needs are discussed below for each quadrant of the Main
Street/Highway 35 intersection.
Northeast Quadrant
Three general vegetation zones occupy the northeastern quadrant: the treed southwest
corner with old -field openings, the large central open field featuring the scraped area with spoils
piles, and the open and forested wetlands complex to the northeast.
Treed southwest corner with old -field openings
A variable old -field vegetation type (3dc/2c1) occurs in the southwest most corner
nearest the intersection of Main Street and Highway 35. It is dominated by cool- season, non-
native grasses, dominated by smooth brome (Bromus inermis), with quack grass (Agropyron
repens) and blue grass (Poa pratensis) also present. In the same location there are half a
dozen large, 24 -30 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH), bur oaks (Quercus macrocarpa)
and two large American elms (Ulmus americana), 12 -20" DBH. The balance of the deciduous
trees include boxelder (Acer negundo), and Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila), and one 15" DBH
cottonwood (Populus deltoides). Conifer tree species (3e) adjacent to this area include 7 -8" '
DBH red cedars (Juniperus virginiana). The ground cover beneath the conifer tree canopy
consists largely of smooth brome and blue grass.
The open field to the northeast of the comer labeled 2c1/6b consists of a ground cover
vegetation dominated by smooth brome. Patches of bush clover (Lespedeza sp.) and other dry
prairie species constitute the native dry prairie remnants occurring throughout the area. Of note
S:98629:040999 2 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
1.-
are scattered individuals of New Jersey tea (Ceanothus americanus) and grey goldenrod
(Solidago nemoralis). A scattering of young Siberian elm, green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica),
boxelder, and a juniper or two also occurs in this area.
Further to the northeast of the corner, the open field labeled 2c1 has a scattering of
many of the same dry prairie elements, including bush clover and native grasses. However, this
area has been heavily disturbed and is even more depauperate than the area identified
previously. In addition to smooth brome grass, butter - and -eggs (Linaria vulgaris), giant mullein
(Verbascum thapsus), and quack grass have become co- dominants. In some locations, bush
clover and sand drop seed (Sporobolus cryptandrus) are present, and in other locations, brome
grass, yarrow (Achillea millefolium), quack grass, and little else are found growing.
At the northeast end of the open field along the Highway 35 ROW there is another small
patch of open dry prairie (6b) with many of the same species previously mentioned, except in
this location there are additionally a few stems of white sage (Artemisia ludoviciana), showy
goldenrod (Solidago speciosa), patches of gum plant (Grindelia squarrosa), Canada tick trefoil
(Desmodium canadense), several small, suppressed clumps of big bluestem (Andropogon
gerardii), and several remaining clumps of New Jersey tea. Two junipers occupy this area, and
young oaks are encroaching from the savanna edge to the north.
Recommendation:
This comer area is a very high visual amenity for southbound traffic on Highway
35. Restoration and management of this intersection area would involve implementing a
prescribed buming and herbiciding program to reduce the existing non - native grasses
and to stimulate oak regeneration and expansion of existing dry prairie remnants,
followed by reintroduction of native grasses and forbs where necessary. Brushing of the
invasive Siberian elm and boxelders, and perhaps eastern juniper (although this is a
desirable native in this location), could also be a part of the potential restoration program
for this area.
A wetland area along the Highway 35 ROW is dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris
arundinacea) (4d) and includes a small pocket of cattail (Typha spp.) (4c) within the ROW of the
Highway. This area also includes such native plant species as blue vervain (Verbena hastata),
lake sedge (Carex lacustris), and giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea).
S:98629:040999
3 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
s°
Recommendation:
This is an area that could be restored to enhance wetland habitat quality and also could
be used as a final polishing system for stormwater management, receiving pre - treated
water from developed uplands and oak savanna remnants.
The larger magnificent oak savanna remnants (3d and 3dc) located to the north of the
open field and wetland are dominated by northern pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis), with
individuals varying in size from several inches DBH to 30 -35" DBH. Many of these trees are 70-
100 years of age and are at or near pathological maturity. Some individuals are beginning to
lose upper limbs and to fall over. Currently, there is substantial oak regeneration occurring •
around the margins of all the larger oaks, in particular at the interface of the old field and dry
prairie (3c- oaks). Most of the young - growth oak is less than 15 years of age.
Included in the oak canopy are occasional patches of eastem red cedar (Juniperus
virginianus), paper birch (Betula papyrifera) 3-4" DBH, and clones of quaking aspen (Populus
tremuloides), 8 -10" DBH. Also included in this young - growth sub - canopy are boxelder, wild
black cherry (Prunus serotina), smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), and red -osier dogwood (Comus
stolonifera).
Ground cover vegetation beneath the oak savanna canopy varies from areas of smooth
brome and blue grass to areas with a similar dry prairie component as found in the old fields,
including big bluestem, pinweed (Lechea intennedia), pearly everlasting (Anaphalis
margaritacea), and bush clover. In light gaps between oak trees are found red raspberry
(Rubus idaeus strigosus), New Jersey tea, love grass (Agrostis spectabilis), motherwort
(Leonurus cardiaca), smooth brome grass, and young saplings of boxelder and wild black
cherry. In heavily shade- suppressed areas the ground is essentially bare.
Recommendation:
The oak savanna community would respond quickly to brushing and tree removal to
reduce the over - stocked canopy, and to prescribed burning to reduce the dense shrub
layer and to stimulate oak regeneration and growth in the ground layer, particularly of
native fire- adapted herbaceous species that are currently present in the soil seedbank.
Planting and seeding of additional native herbaceous species might be desirable to
enhance species diversity.
S:98629:040999 4 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
Central open field
Throughout the large field are patches of dry prairie remnants (6B and 2C1/6B). Most of
are depauperate, but retain several key dry prairie species, including New Jersey tea, bush
clover, showy goldenrod, early goldenrod, patches of little and big bluestem, Indian grass
(Sorghastrum nutans), love grass, pearly everlasting, vervains (Verbena spp.), evening
primrose (Oenothera biennis), and prairie panic grass (Panicum linearifolium). Quack grass,
smooth brome, blue grass, giant mullein (Verbascum thapsus), and a variety of other native and
non - native plant species adapted to disturbance are abundant in this area.
In the east central portion of the old field there is an area that has been previously
scraped and includes piles of dumped materials that appear to include dredged peat substrates,
glacial till with gravels and sands, some demolition debris, and some cinders (2d- spoils piles).
Around the scrape, large areas of weedy disturbance vegetation have developed, including
horseweed (Erigeron canadensis), giant mullein, sweet clover (Melilotus spp.), and Russian
thistle (Salsola kali), with scattered bush clover also present.
Recommendation:
Because of its high visual display potential for south bound lanes of Highway 35, this
open field area should be restored (in desired areas) to native prairie using fire and
reintroduction of native species.
Forested and open wetlands complex
A large wetland complex occupies the northeastern -most portion of the northeastern
quadrant. The wetland varies from monocultures of reed canary grass to patches of native
wetland species including sedges, red osier dogwood, willows (Salix spp.), reeds (Juncus spp.)
and pink spiraea (Spiraea tomentosa). Invasion by boxelder, aspen, paper birch (Betula
papyrifera), red maple, and alder (Alnus rugosa) has occurred in historic wetland that continues
to be de- watered by the developing tree and shrub cover. Within the matrix of aspen, paper
birch, and red maple are old tamarack trees, remnants of a tamarack wetland system that was
present historically. In the understory, one finds various sedge species that are shade -
suppressed, along with invading canary grass, red maple seedlings (Acer rubrum), and
Epilobium sp. seedlings (glabra or glandulosum).
Recommendation:
Brushing and reintroduction of fire into the upland margins of this wetland would
invigorate the native groundstory vegetation. Management of the canary grass in areas
5:98629:040999 5 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
that have received sedimentation and that have been drained by ditching would be
required to restore species diversity to this area.
An area of young growth forest (3c) cover is found along the wetland margins beyond
the zone of aspen and birch. This zone includes red maple, black cherry, alder, red -osier
dogwood, and an occasional birch and aspen. Groundstory vegetation varies from bare ground
to patches of sedges (Carex sparganioides, C. blanda), red raspberry (Rubus idaeus), white
avens (Geum canadense), Agrimonia sp., giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea), and other
species. Wetland soils in this . area have been de- watered by woody invasion. Several debris
piles occur within the de- watered wetland and also within the wetland itself. Staghom sumac
(Rhus typhina) has invaded into an area along the gravel drive within the young growth forest
area, in an upland setting where the same tree species minus the alder occur. The ground
cover in this area includes little bluestem, bush clover, showy and early goldenrod, sizeable
populations of New Jersey tea, and many other dry prairie plant species.
Recommendation:
Reduction of woody invasion through brushing and tree removal would increase light
available to the ground story, increasing ground cover vegetation and thus stabilizing
soils. Reduction of woody growth in de- watered wetland soils would also allow recovery
of the shallow groundwater table to levels that would support hydrophytic vegetation,
thus restoring and expanding the wetland system. Additional activities in this area would
include removal of debris piles and re- vegetating bare soil areas with native species.
Southeast Quadrant
Oak forests
The largest percentage of the land base within the southeast quadrant is dominated by
historic oak savanna and forested systems, dominated by white oak ( Quercus alba), northern
pin oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis), bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa), and red oak (Quercus rubra).
Ground cover vegetation varies under the forest cover. Disturbed areas, such as recent canopy
openings due to blow -downs or clearings created by development of the Town Center, support
a dominance of black snake root (Eupatorium rugosum), along with a variety of agricultural
weeds, including motherwort (Leonurus cardiaca), giant mullein, thistles (Cirsium spp.), and
smart weeds (Polygonum spp.). Interspersed in some locations within the savanna are
populations of sizeable hackberry trees (Celtis occidentalis), >25" DBH. Boxelder, wild black
cherry, sumacs, grey dogwoods (Comus racemosa), raspberries and black berries (Rubus
S :98629:040999
6 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
1
r
i
t
1
1
1
1
1
occidentalis, R. strigosus, and R. allegheniensis) are also present along forested edges. Along
the periphery where forest grades into the adjacent wetland margin, red maple, aspen, and
occasional paper birch have invaded. White and green ash (Fraxinus americana and F.
pennsylvanica) and red elm (Ulmus rubra) are also invading the sub - canopy under the oaks. In
some locations native grasses and sedges have maintained or have re- established small
colonies associated with disturbed ground and canopy openings in the vicinity of the Town
Center construction project.
Recommendation:
The canopy of the oak savanna/forest areas has become over - stocked, resulting in
wide - spread shade suppression of the ground cover vegetation. Brushing, prescribed
burning, and re- introduction of species through seeding and planting will be necessary to
restore these communities. This management strategy will also begin to address the
need to regenerate the oak savanna/forest system, which is presently comprised of
pathologically mature trees with limited regeneration apparent.
Included in the oak savanna remnant to the left of the entrance drive into the new Town
Center, are dispersed seedlings of red, white, and Scotch pine. In addition, young growth forest
cover, including aspen and black cherry, has invaded into the site, along with young - growth
northern pin oak trees. Most of the older pines are 4 -15" DBH red, white, and Scotch pines,
concentrated on the south side of the oak savanna remnant.
Recommendation:
Prescribed burning and brushing within the oak savanna remnant would be the primary
management strategy. However, re- introduction of native plant species will also likely be
necessary.
The conifer plantations (3E) within the site are densely over - stocked with scotch and red
pine and with occasional spruce and white pine. Most are in the 5 -10" DBH size class.
Because of an absence of management, they are dense - growing and have developed a
continuous canopy, which has shaded out most of the ground cover vegetation. In addition, a
large percentage of the pines are in a pathological condition and will soon begin to decline.
Recommendation:
Selective thinning of the pine tree rows will increase available light to the ground story
and thus increase vegetative cover in that layer. Species diversity in the ground layer is
likely poor and would benefit from enhancement seeding of native species.
S:98629:040999
7 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
At the base of the savanna slopes along the southern perimeter of the project area is a
forested wetland system dominated by green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), with occasional
cottonwood (Populus deltoides), basswood (Tilia americana), silver maple (Acer saccharinum),
and American and red elm (Ulmus americana, U. rubra). The majority of the existing forested
wetland system consists of trees of a very young age. Dense thickets of prickly ash
(Xanthoxylum americanum) are present in slightly elevated areas. Thickets of hackberry (Celtis
occidentalis) and boxelder (Acer negundo) occur in other locations. Shrubs scattered within the
forested wetland, primarily in Tight gaps, include silky and red osier dogwood (Comus amomum,
C. stolonifera). In some locations there are dense patches of black and red raspberry (Rubus
occidentalis, R. strigosus).
The majority of the ground story vegetation in the forested wetland area is dominated by
reed canary grass, with stinging nettle as a co- dominant. In many locations, apparently in
association with seepage zones, canary grass has crept into the upland, where it mingles with
northern pin oak (Quercus palustris), Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica), wild black
cherry (Prunus serotina), and hackberry. Stands of ferns, such as hay- scented fern (Denstatia
sp.), and sensitive fern (Osmunda sensibilis), are often found growing in association with alder
(Alnus rugosa).
Historically, this area likely existed as a sedge meadow ecotonal area dominated by blue
joint grass (Calamagrostis canadensis) and a variety of sedges, ferns, and forbs. Slightly
elevated areas, created by root mounds of trees, may have supported paper birch (Betula
papyrifera), alder, American hazel (Corylus americana), silky dogwood, and other woody
species. Because of the heavy shading and de- watering of peat and muck soils effected by the
present young tree and shrub cover, not only has ground story vegetation declined, but many
species such as stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) and canary grass, favored in these nutrient -rich,
de- watered muck soils, have become dominants. This de- watering impact has also allowed for
more tree and shrub invasion and allowed for quicker growth by those trees and shrubs that are
present. In other words, tree and shrub cover has increased so substantially and de- watered
the site so substantially that now even upland species are invading into the former historic
wetland system.
Recommendation:
Restoration and management of this area would involve brushing, prescribed buming,
and herbicide treatment of canary grass and other weeds. Restoration of hydrology may
S:98629:040999
8 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
involve or necessitate further investigation of other causes, in addition to tree de-
watering impacts, for the changes in hydrology that have occurred.
Wetlands
Wetlands constitute the second major vegetation type in the southeast quadrant. There
are sizeable historic sedge meadow /wet prairie complexes in the large wetland area in the
eastern portion of the quadrant. The margins of these wetlands have become invaded in places
by recently- developed forest and shrub cover from adjacent forested uplands. Groundwater
seeps occurring along upland margins support wetland shrubs, such as red -osier dogwood,
Spiraea sp., and various willow species. Gradual invasion into the wetland interior by shrubs
has led to de- watering of hydric soils and enhanced conditions for woody growth and upland
weedy species.
Along the interface with the upland, the wetland edge has become shade suppressed, in
places by as much as 20 -50 feet. In other locations, there is an abrupt transition because of the
steep slopes adjacent to the wetland margin. With shade - suppression, many of the wetland
species have declined, and as in the shade - suppressed savanna, most species requiring high
light conditions are suppressed and found with greatly reduced stature.
Within the wetland, common plant species include woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus),
tussock sedge (Carex stricta), bluejoint grass (Calamagrostis canadensis), lake sedge (Carex
lacustris), Carex rostrata, marsh nettle (Cirsium muticum), marsh dock (Rumex orbiculata),
smartweeds (Polygonum spp.), Joe -pye weed (Eupatorium maculatum), boneset (Eupatorium
perfoliatum), willow herb (Epilobium coloratum), marsh fern (Thelypteris palustris), sensitive fern
(Onoclea sensibilis), and stands of tamarack (Larix laricina). Also commonly found within the
wetland and in the wetland margin or ecotone adjacent to upland savanna areas, are cinnamon
fern and interrupted fern (Osmunda cinnamomea, O. claytoniana).
In locations where upland runoff from developed landscapes has entered the wetland,
there are apparent sediment plumes that have been invaded by reed canary grass. Wetland
margins closer to human habitation and the highway have developed dense monocultures of
this species. This grass invades native vegetation, which subsequently declines due to heavy
shade suppression and root competition.
Recommendation:
With brushing and fire re- introduction, the sedge meadow/wet prairie complex would
gradually expand, possibly reaching its original extent, and grading, as it once did, into
the open savanna communities that surround it. Reed canary grass will likely require
S:98629:040999 9 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
intensive herbicide management to control its spread. (See also recommendation in
preceding discussion on forested wetland.)
The wetland area immediately down -slope from the construction site (4bf /3b) has been
drained by a ditch system at its outlet.
Recommendation:
Restoration of this area could be easily accomplished by back - filling the drainage ditch.
Off to the right of the entrance drive within the Town Center facility, there is a
depressional wetland that has become invaded by ash, boxelder, American and red elm, with
reed canary grass beginning to invade the understory. Native species that have persisted
include mad -dog skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora), lake sedge (Carex lacustris), wood nettle
(Boehmeria cyl nnddrica ), Joe -pye weeds ( Eupatorium perfollatum, Eupatorium rugosum), and a
few others. This site has also been de- watered by woody vegetation encroachment into the
historic wetland muck and peat soils.
Recommendation:
With brushing and fire re- introduction, this area potentially could become a sedge -
dominated wetland, a magnificent front -drop to the office facility. The site also
historically was surrounded by oak savanna remnants, which still occur. These could be
managed like the other degraded oak savannas to the overall improvement of the site.
A small wetland area adjacent to a new out -fall structure adjacent to the new Town
Center building has a major element of native sedges and a large population of reed canary
grass. The reed canary grass element should be disfavored through direct herbicide
management and prescribed burning.
Recommendation:
This little area associated with storm water out -fall could be managed for water quality
enhancement. This could be achieved by planting additional native wetland species,
such as river and soft stem bulrushes (Scirpus fluviatilis, S. validus), irises, and others.
These species can tolerate some of the water quality impacts associated with run off
from uplands, while beautifying the area.
S:98629:040999 10 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
Open fields
In the southeastern quadrant there are some very large areas dominated by dry prairie
remnant species. These areas vary from domination by little bluestem grass to areas with
domination by other grasses, such as purple love grass (Eragrostis spectabilis), in which little
bluestem is a scattered element. Throughout the dry prairie areas one finds other panic
grasses, prairie rose (Rosa carolina), thimbleweed (Anemone cylindracea), round headed bush -
clover (Lespedeza capitata), showy goldenrod (Solidago speciosa), old field goldenrod
(Solidago nemoralis), cliff cudweed (Gnapthalium obtusifolium), pinweed (Lechea intermedia),
Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), and bergamot (Monarda fistulosa). Many non - native
herbaceous species are also present, including yarrow, smooth brome, and quack grass.
Immediately south of 35W is an open old -field (2c1) with scattered trees and a sand
blasting operation. Numerous areas within the field have remnant prairie plants and
disturbances associated with earth moving (2c1 -old borrow site), including scraping, creation of
piles of excavated materials, some borrowing, and wind rowing. Large parts of the open field
areas are primarily dominated by smooth brome grass, blue grass, sand drop seed, wormwood,
several native panic grass species (Panicum spp.), sweet clovers (Melilotus spp.), and bush
clover, with scattered Indian grass (Sorgastrum nutans), white sage (Artemesia ludoviciana),
and little bluestem. An invasive non - native weed is abundant. An extensive moss (Nostoc sp.)
mat is found beneath areas of sparse grass and forb cover. Cottonwood, boxelder, red cedar
(Juniperus virginiana), and perhaps planted or blown -in seed of Scotch and red pine (Pinus
sylvestris, P. sylvestris) are also found in the old -field area. Siberian elm and cottonwood have
invaded into the area dominated by Kentucky blue grass and smooth brome. Occasional
patches of little bluestem are present as well.
Within the old field south of the road that leads to the sand blasting facility is a 24 -28"
DBH bur oak tree (3d) and a remnant patch of prairie cord grass. A historic depression is found
immediately north of the tree and grass colony and supports a patch of marsh hedge nettle
(Stachys tenuifolia hispida), a species of historic wetland swales.
Recommendation:
This depressiona! area provides an opportunity to restore a wet prairie /swale feature that
could be integrated with the storm water management system for the project. It is
currently dominated by brome grass, which would have to be herbicided. A tile survey
might be worth conducting to determine any drainage impacts. The area could then be
vegetated with native species such as cord grass. Old -field areas could be restored to
dry prairie as previously described.
S:98629:040999 11 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
In several openings within the oak savanna system and along the margin of the wetland
area west and north of the new Town Center there are interspersed dry prairie remnants (6b).
The dry prairies include sizeable populations of little bluestem, porcupine grass (Stipa spartea),
occasional big bluestem grass, prairie panic grass, and white sage. Also occurring are clumps
of the native American hazelnut (Corylus americana). Invasion by oaks from the abutting oak
savanna remnants and by aspen and red osier dogwood from the adjacent wetland margin is
occurring in these prairie openings.
Recommendation:
The prairie could be expanded greatly as part of a restoration program. Initially several
years of prescribed buming would be advisable to see what species might be derived
from the seedbank present on the site, followed by reintroduction of additional species.
Grass- leaved goldenrod (Solidago graminifolia), showy goldenrod, bush clover,
Pennsylvania sedge (and various other terrestrial sedges) are all pan' of system. Some
of the oak savanna remnants have large populations of often - continuous cover of
Pennsylvania sedge, along with several other sedges. The absence of native
herbaceous forbs may suggest a history of grazing on the site. Restoration would follow
the same general strategies as in the other oak savannas. In some of the locations,
along with the use of prescribed buming, seed reintroduction at some future point maybe
necessary; however, prescribed burning may be the principle strategy necessary.
Garbage piles are present in some locations in the savanna along the wetland margin
along the northwest edge of the property. These should be removed.
Southwest Quadrant
The savanna block adjacent to the school has some mesic forest elements within it,
including red maple, basswood, red oak, and a diverse fern and ground cover element.
Recommendation:
This area should become lush with fems and sedges and other native vegetation with
minor management that focuses on reintroduction of prescribed buming to the site. In
the areas that have been disturbed by construction activities, it is likely that focused
management of weedy species that are already present in some locations will be
necessary. Management of thistles and other species such as bittersweet nightshade
(Solanum dulcamara) will also be necessary.
S:98629:040999 12 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
Summary
The city center facilities located in both the northeastern and southeastern quadrants are
ideally located to be integrated with the magnificent remnant natural resource systems that are
present in these areas. In addition, extension of these degraded or historic systems into
locations of previous occupancy can also contribute significantly to the natural resource benefits
within the Town Center facility. Existing depressional areas can be integrated with restored
native upland vegetation to create Stormwater Treatment Train features. These alternative
treatment systems would provide opportunities for managing stormwater on -site utilizing low-
maintenance native vegetation, while improving the quality of water entering adjacent wetland
systems. The Stormwater Treatment Train concept would be essential to stabilize and offer
long -term protection to existing natural resource systems.
In short, the restoration of savanna, dry prairie, wet prairie, forested wetland, native
plantings within the context of a Stormwater Treatment Train, an upland buffer system, and
native landscaping integrated within the development proposals for the Town Center site all can
be integrated within the context of the historic Anoka Sand Plains and the adjacent lake and
wetland systems that distinguish the Lino Lakes community and Town Center site.
There is some urgency associated with some of the restoration management treatments
as follows:
1. Large pathologically mature oaks are starting to decline at a very rampant rate. In other
studies we have conducted around the region, the rate of decline, including limb
senescence, tree -fall, and simple mortality of trees has been measured at 20% per year.
Regenerating oaks is an imperative, if the community wants these magnificent oaks to
distinguish the Town Center.
2. Dry prairie remnants within the existing Town Center facility are invaded by non - native,
cool- season grasses (quack, brome, etc.). Restoration of these areas will occur very
rapidly with the introduction of prescribed fire and will, in all likelihood, require the
addition of native plant seeds to accentuate, diversify, and beautify the dry prairie
remnants. Seeding and plant introduction to the savanna remnants may be necessary
to diversify, beautify, and increase the opportunity for acceptance of these plant
communities within the context of the developing Town Center.
3. Wetland remnants within the Town Center facility are extremely vulnerable to water
quality and hydrologic modifications. Very careful integration of water quality and water
rate and volume delivery should be taken very seriously in the early design and planning
S:98629:040999 13 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
stages of the Town Center facility. In the absence of careful planning with a focused
ecological engineering effort, wetlands will convert to monocultures of reed canary grass
resulting from nutrient enrichment problems and hydrologic changes associated with
shallow ground water and seepage system modifications.
4. Water quality management In addition to the use of native vegetation to reduce fertilizer,
irrigation, and herbicide /pesticide use, source control of contaminants, including de -icing
materials and other types of contaminants that might be associated with city streets in
the new Town Center, needs to be taken very seriously. Sumps for collection and
pump -out of materials associated with parking Tots would be substantially better than
piping the materials to an out -fall and into the wetland systems that surround the Town
Center.
S:98629:040999 14 Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resource Inventory Report
Environmental
Memo
To: Lino Lakes Environmental Board
From: Marty Asleson
Date: May 30, 2001
Re: Ryan Target Update
There will be a short update on the status of the Ryan Target project. The City
Council now has the draft EAW and if authorized to be released on Tuesday, I will
bring copies to the Environmental Board on Wednesday.
I have attached the past- history track report.
I have also included the Lino Lakes Town Center Natural Resources Inventory report
completed by AES, per the request of an Environmental Board Member.
• Page 1
INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TRACKING SHEET
CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL
PROJECT #: 21 -14 Target
PROJECT: Target
DATE OF ORIGIN: 1/25/01
TO: Environmental Board Members
City of Lino Lakes
FROM: Marty Asleson
Environmental Coordinator
OVERVIEW STATEMENTS:
�.,�...ea+:...a sx �':usv a1x- w,3"r;,,.Y.k: k s.•., a4iu. xF .�r+;e,�..'Y,m-ti�.:5.w�iu'xe.
Information from previous meetings
1
PROJECT #: 2000 -1c...
PROJECT: NE /Quad/DelwoodLLC
DATE OF ORIGIN: 11/21/00
TO: Environmental Board Members
City of Lino Lakes
FROM: Marty Asleson
Environmental Coordinator
OVERVIEW STATEMENTS:
• Discussions of this area started in May of 1998. Records attached.
• Site Proposal includes large retail and several smaller retail stores.
17apzco_&c Pepcazzov_Boap5 Xtra oo Azvo Aaxeo-
There have been several meetings with the project representatives.
General overview to be given by Brian Wessel
STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION:
• Surface water treatment imperative
• Information from the Environmental Inventory, specific site inventory and recommendations from AES,
Tree Inventory from previous development proposal, as well as specific modals on surface water treatment,
and information on structural soil use has been given to the developers.
• Streetscape design and alternative transportation access need to be effective.
Very expensive commercial property
Developer has hired a reputable environmental consultant as part of their team.
Attraction of "Green Industry"
Greenway design
Environmental Issues: The following identifies potential impacts to Environment.
• large impervious surface/Lake water quality impact concerns.
Oak- woodland to south and miscellaneous recently developed tree areas to north.
Several prairie and savanna areas previously identified by AES on freeway side.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCES: Refer to the following references for information that may
affect discussions related to this issue.
Section 2 - Assessment of Needs
• Completed by Brauer AES and presently being studied by consultants.
Section 3 - Governing Polices
•Creating a sustainable landscape
requires a broader view that starts with
the big picture or vision and moves into
a physical plan and set of action steps
to achieve that vision.
The 20/20 Vision Plan established the philosophical vision for the community that
was the starting point for this study. Public response to the study clearly
reiterates the ideals defined in the 20/20 plan, which are as follows:
"Sustenance of the natural environment of Lino Lakes through the
17apKa &_Pe pearaov_BoapS X1TZ o0 Aavo Acucar
you on anything new.I
protection and management of the wildlife, habitats, and other natural
resources, and to pass on to future residents a community rich in these
resources. Future development is to include equal consideration of
economic development and environmental protection. ".
Section 5 - Administration
• Adopt a conservation development approach to planning as the working model for community
development. Example was established with the construction of the Civic Complex.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments made by the
January 31, 2001 Environmental Board:
Staff Update: No representatives from Ryan/Target present.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION/POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was
reached by the Board:
•Greensheet attached from January 31, 2001 Environmental Board Meeting.
•No further comments at this time pending a Watershed Report.
!Environmental Board Update 21- lc/February 28, 2001
have attached the Draft EAW and photos depicting some of the issues. I have also included some of my initial]
jeaction to the draft EAW. There is no further information at this time. Brian Wessel will be present to update
DATE
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
: January 3, 2001 (December meeting)
A. Dellwood LLC/ N.E. Quadrant of 35W and Lake Drive Update — Wessel explained that Mr. Payton had presented this
project at the last meeting. Since then, the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council have discussed it. A
neighborhood meeting has been held. The project is going through the informal discussion process prior to a formal
application. He then introduced Mr. Payton and Mr. Palmquist the Vice President of Research and Development of Ryan
Companies who was working on the SuperTarget concept.
Mr. Palmquist explained that recently, there had been a neighborhood meeting where the primary challenge to the project
was addressing the traffic needs. TKDA and Mr. Powell were dealing with the issue. The Environmental Board was
assured that the traffic could be managed with lanes and signals. Also discussed, was adequate buffering on the northern
part of the property. He noted an EAW would be done which would be finished in the first part of July.
Mr. Payton presented several maps and explained that the final topographic survey has been completed so more of the
spatial relationships have come together. He indicated that there was a small group of tamarack trees, which could be
protected by a retaining wall in the west. Asleson explained that the area has been disturbed more than once. He noted a
1953 topographic map that showed tamaracks throughout the area. The freeway went through in the 1960's and greatly
impacted the tamaracks.
Donlin inquired what plans Target had to address the tamarack trees in the area. Mr. Payton answered that the standing
water is only intermittent for 48 hours in a 100 -year event. He noted that there is an aquatic bench planned, with canary
grass plantings to reduce the presence of geese. He continued, they were waiting for the results of the soil reports to
Hamra & Pe%peartov Boap& Xtn o0 Atvo Awcco
determine the size of the ponds. The maps presented showed them at the maximum possible size, but in all probability
they would shrink. Target representatives were preparing to submit the plan to the City by January 15t.
Mr. Palmquist stated that they were working with staff on the site design and architecture using prototypes on the
elevations of the Target site. Describing the site, they were planning some articulations, bench plaza areas, and various
plantings in front of the store. There are also planned bays in 20 -foot increments. The whole project would be of similar
colors and materials. He continued there would be two doors, with the employee entrance in the center. As is typical, the
eastern part would be the grocery, while the western part would hold the discount store. There are plans to screen the
truck docking, and to bury the utility lines so that more plantings could be located there. He assured the Board that they
would have the elevations available next time.
Trehus indicated the land in the southern entryway that the City owns was mentioned last time, and inquired what were the
plans for the property adjacent to it. Mr. Palmquist answered that there would be no grading in the area, and there were
plans for a retaining wall to protect the trees. The specifics would be answered when the tree survey is overlaid with the
aerial photograph.
Trehus pointed out that it looked like a lot of parking and no trees, and suggested that a shift to the west may enable them
to make it appear more nestled among the trees. Mr. Payton stated that the building was pushed as far to the west as
possible within the required parameters because of site geometry problems.
Mr. Palmquist note that there were stall groupings of 68, 644, and 910 parking spaces, and indicated that the users could
share parking.
Donlin mentioned that it did not appear aesthetic, and advised that vegetation, billboards, signage, and lighting would
need to be addressed more specifically. Mr. Palmquist responded that there were no billboard requirements, and the
lighting would be explained further in the plan.
Donlin inquired about the role the Environmental Board would play. Mr. Payton answered that they wanted to know their
recommendations.
Wessel added that the proposal will be available at the January 31, 2001 meeting, and assured the Board that there were
several open issues remaining.
Donlin commented that it appeared the typical standards that Target was used to implementing were played out in this
plan concerning lighting and signage. Mr. Palmquist answered that there were many parties' interests to balance, that of
the City, the community, the developer, and Target which can be met to provide goods and services and civic pride.
Mach advised that environmentally speaking specific recommendations include:
• Increase the number of native trees in groupings not standing alone and decrease the number of parking places.
• Smaller form of Target, not Superstore.
• Location not so near the highway.
• Ponds should be fruitful; the water levels need to be controlled so that they could sustain diverse life.
• The City needed to set land aside designated as open space for every development approved.
Mr. Payton asked if this project would be used merely to change zoning, ordinances, and laws.
Trehus assured him that Target would be welcome in the community, then inquired about the percentage of impervious
surfaces.
Mr. Payton stated that if a Target would be on site it would be a Superstore, because that is the primary means of
expansion. Other regional locations would be Rochester, MN, Rogers, MN, Lakeville, MN, and Eau Claire, WI. The
reason given was economic, because it increased the store's bottom line by 50 %.
Mr. Palmquist stated that at the neighborhood meeting, 135 to 140 invitations were sent out with 36 residents in
17apxa_ &_Pexpeanov_Boap5 Xtri oq Aivo Aaxe6
attendance. There was no opposition. He noted that the land was zoned commercial.
Donlin commented that Vadnais Heights' residents protested Target with signs in their yards, and questioned the reason
there was no opposition in Lino Lakes.
Mr. Payton inquired, short of no development, what accommodations Target could make. Asleson noted that growing
larger trees would be possible through the use of structural soils.
Donlin offered that the wetlands needed to be more than a monoculture.
Trehus added that the areas in the west needed to be preserved.
O'Connell suggested bringing the building south and changing the configurations to make the building more narrow to
allow for more parking on the side. Mr. Payton indicated that people did not use side parking, and restated that the size
and shape of the building are configurations that will not change.
Mach asked about the possibility of removing a couple of the retail sites. Mr. Payton answered that Target needs a certain
number of retailers and square footage to attract customers. He continued that there would be issues on Lake Drive even
if Target would not be present, and Target would provide the funding and the tax base to initiate the upgrades needed.
Mr. Palmquist assured the Board that the project would be worked out with staff.
Donlin indicated that with each development, residents' taxes have increased so the businesses should have to pay more.
Wessel answered that Target would pay over one million dollars annually for taxes. The area was zoned commercial, and
would provide tax relief for residents. He indicated that Powell could also address the issue.
Wessel excused himself to bring Powell to the meeting at 8:48 p.m.
Donlin addressed the lighting, and stated that there should be an attempt to minimize the glare. She expressed her dislike
for the cream color chosen for the building.
Mach urged the Target representatives to use their services to improve other areas of the City. Mr. Palmquist offered that
if some wetlands were affected by the project, Target could contribute money for preserving trees or wetlands in the City.
Donlin noted that there were three school districts in the City, and submitted that Target could contribute money for
environmental education, specifically the Teachers of Vision program. Mr. Palmquist stated that the contribution would
flow from a financial model.
Donlin stated that there would be a need for upland and wetland mitigation.
Wessel stated that the discussion would continue and the specific recommendations from the Environmental Board were
helpful. He indicated that the City Council would ultimately make the decision. Asleson stated the question was how to
mitigate environmental impact.
Mach reiterated:
• Move the building to the west
• Avoid monoculture in the ponds
• Reduce bounce in the ponds
• Decrease the number of parking spaces and increase plantlife
Kukonen explained that one way to increase the plantlife would be through buffering.
Mr. Palmquist asked if a model existed, so they could work from that and put it into an economic model.
Mapco- &_PZpeanov_Boaps Xrn o Atvo Aaxso-
Donlin requested that minimal lighting be used, especially at night. Trehus agreed and asked if the lights would be turned
off at night.
Donlin inquired if the 38 -foot pole height was necessary, or if it could be reduced. Mr. Palmquist stated that if the pole
height was reduced, there would be an increase in the number of lights. The Board was assured that the lights would be
shoebox lights, to aim the light down, not out.
Mr. Payton noted that in the site plan, the nighttime team leader would have all the lights off, except for a corridor of
lights for the employees. After the employees left, all lights would be turned off except for security lights.
Trehus said that there should be a vote on the recommendations that include the following as well as the recommendations
previously stated by Mach:
• Set aside property off site for open space.
• Lighting issues were a major concern.
• Maximize the green in groupings, rather than in straight lines.
Mach moved to approve the recommendations of the Environmental Board. Trehus seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : January 31, 2001.
PROJECT REVIEW
A. Ryan/Target Project Submittal (Item 1 -01) — Asleson explained that the green sheet was to help
recall previous information relevant to present discussion. There was no green sheet given for this
item, because a formal submittal had been received. Asleson read the background section of the
agenda sheet item 1 -01. Several plans have been submitted including formal project submittal, a
grading plan, a tree inventory and preservation/restoration plan, surface water infiltration proposals, a
landscape plan, and a lighting plan. No response from the Rice Creek Watershed District has been
received. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) still needed to be completed and the
wetland mitigation area is still yet to be determined. Asleson asked for comments or
recommendations from the Board.
Chair Lanyon stated that the Board did not know the recommendations the Watershed District had
discussed. The tree inventory was the most important concern for the Board, specifically where the
tamarack trees would be planted.
Grundhofer asked if the size of the trees had been determined. Asleson answered that the trees would
be two inches in diameter.
Chair Lanyon noted that until the Board had comments and or recommendations from the Watershed
District the Board could not make any recommendations. Asleson confirmed that no comments were
received in his office from the Watershed District.
Chair Lanyon pointed out that other species had encroached in the area.
17aprco_ &_Pexpeazzov_Boap8 X117 o0 Alva Awcccr
Asleson addressed the surface water flow, stating concerns about the efficiency of installed
infiltration tubes in the low area before it leaves the site.
Donlin inquired about the preparation of the area, if they were going to grade and drill.
Asleson asked John Johnson if he could make some general comments about the subject.
John Johnson, Civil Engineer, stated that the infiltration tubes were typically 15'x 2'x 3' and worked
like a drain field in situations where there was above normal rain and below 100 year rain. The
concern was that the ponds would not work as well over time, because of build up of sediment. The
infiltration tubes are installed by building trenches with a backhoe, then covering them up.
Donlin admitted that she had reservations with the tamarack plantings, if the cottonwood and the
aspen were removed and the tamarack did not do well, it would be barren. She commented on the
beauty of the cottonwood and aspen which were planned for removal.
Asleson noted that the present state of the area was impacted, with most of the tamarack trees gone
after 1967 when the highway was put in. This was an attempt to bring it closer to its original state
prior to 1967.
Donlin said that by removing the aspen and cottonwood 70% of the significant trees on site would be
removed. She feared that if the tamarack plantings were unsuccessful, the area would remain
essentially treeless.
Asleson stated that the tamaracks were in a wet meadow before the highway went through.
Chair Lanyon asked if the Board could make a recommendation not knowing the water impact. Mach
stated that a restoration of the tamarack theme could be recommended, because aspen would probably
encroach fairly quickly, and tamaracks grow more slowly than cottonwoods and aspen.
Asleson noted that the Watershed District would probably not recommend the infiltration tubes.
Grundhofer inquired on the lighting of the pylons, if they met the code standards. O'Connell
mentioned that there was no reference to color in the ordinance.
Asleson indicated the lights were high intensity in the center, but were quickly reduced to reduce
glare.
Chair Lanyon offered that there had not been a response to the recommendations of the Board at the
January 3, 2001 meeting, and added the necessity of hearing from the Rice Creek Watershed District.
Donlin agreed and asked if their responses to the recommendations would be at the next meeting, in
addition to the proposed choices of vegetation.
Asleson indicated that the architect had called to ask for the list of recommended plantings. Donlin
urged that the plantings consist of those that would attract bird species, and have several textures and
colors including prairie gardens, would soften the big box appearance.
17apxo_ &_Perpeariov_Boap8 Xtrt o0 Aavo AaKCQ
Asleson noted that there were several lists, and assured the Board that the Ryan/Target representatives
would receive them. Donlin indicated that the Board members would like the lists to be sent to them
by E -Mail.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : February 28, 2001
PROJECT REVIEW
A. Ryan/Target Project Submittal (Item 1 -01) — Wessel stated the application was incomplete and
Ryan has asked for a respite. He advised that a staff review of the plan would be held the following
day and the process would need to be renegotiated and the regulatory process reinitiated. The new
plan was to be smaller scale and they still wished to break ground in July. At present the plan would
be revised by April, with the Environmental Board reviewing it at the March meeting. The response
from the community caused Target to drop the proposed three large commercial sites to the West.
The Target building would be moved over to the West of the initial site. There would be six to eight
smaller commercial sites with three to eight thousand square feet each. The wetland would be left
alone, and a strip north of 77th Street would remain undeveloped. Wessel asked for comments on
where to mitigate.
Trehus arrived at 6:40 p.m.
Donlin asked the number of parking spaces proposed, and was the swamp to remain
untouched. Wessel answered the number of parking spaces would be reduced, but he was unclear by
the number and did not know the plans concerning the area of the swamp.
Donlin asked if the plan proposed in March would be considered finished and approved.
Wessel responded typically a project similar in scope would require a year to go through the planning
stage, but for this project, it is a few months.
Chair Lanyon stated that they already know what to expect from the Board, but the Board could give
additional comments.
Wessel noted if the project did not break ground in July, the project would be discontinued.
Asleson mentioned that the building was moved over and the number of parking spaces was reduced.
Mach indicated that the plot was not protected and secure, and asked about the hydrology issues.
Asleson explained the hydrological issues were unknown, but the Watershed District was dealing
with them.
17aplco_& Pe%psaraov_Boap5 Xtra oq Aivo Away-
Kukonen questioned if the business failed in the proposed location, what were their plans for the site,
would the building be abandoned. Wessel answered the market studies were important to Target
since SuperTarget would compete with other nearby commercial sites.
Trehus asked what was the responsibility of the City if the site was abandoned.
Wessel noted there were two more meetings on the Comprehensive Plan before the end of March.
Donlin asked what the meeting scheduled for Saturday was dealing with. Wessel responded the
meeting would address the Comprehensive Plan in the City Council meeting.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : March 28, 2001
PROJECT REVIEW
A. Ryan/Target Update Review — Brian Wessel commented on the changes to the plan. The three
30,000 sq. ft. boxes were removed. The access remained the same with no access to 77th Street. The
present conceptual plan was presented three weeks ago, and will not have an official plan until April
25, 2001. The plan included 86,000 -sq. ft. with potential to expand, and off site mitigation similar to
the first plan. There was a meeting scheduled for Tuesday for staff review.
Donlin noted the plan appeared essentially impervious, and considered the revised plan a step
backward in terms of the goals of the Environmental Board.
Chair Lanyon pointed out that there were enough accommodations in Phase II to gain support. He
urged staff to address the runoff issues before the plans come to the Board.
Wessel indicated there had been a change in the groundbreaking from July to September.
Donlin expressed concern over the heavy traffic, which would be necessary to support a large Target
store. Wessel assured the Board that the two co- anchors believed it was economically feasible.
Donlin questioned if there was inadequate support and a loss occurred, would the building be
abandoned. Wessel responded that not many Target buildings had been abandoned.
Kukonen noted the store in southern Coon Rapids had been abandoned, and inquired if it was a
terrible burden to the city of Coon Rapids. Wessel answered that Target had the most solid record of
the big box stores.
Chair Lanyon identified the role of the Board was the environmental focus, and in that Ryan/Target
had backtracked, especially with the runoff mitigation issues.
Mach noted the off site mitigation which was proposed in the plan. The first priority is supposed to
flapKQ &_Pe%peanov_Boap6 Xcn o0 Atvo Aaxscr
be on site mitigation, then off site mitigation. He then asked about the options they were considering.
Wessel responded the County Board was discussing the options, but nothing was decided.
Trehus asked for information concerning mitigation on existing park land.
Chair Lanyon agreed that they needed to clarify that option.
April 25 Project Continued
1 New site plan and application submitted.
No new EAW information
1 No new watershed information ie.wetland mitigation plan, surface water
plan
• No petition for public improvements submitted yet.
STAFF COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION:
1 Surface Water issue is still a very critical issue. Proposal shows a
wet pond on the North side. There is no information at this time
whether sequencing criteria will be met for proposed project, wetland
mitigation, surface water management planning will be met.
Have requested the developer investigate vegetated depressional areas
through the parking lots.
1 Grading on the project should direct water to infiltration areas
• Have made a sugestion that the 6 foot walkway be changed to a vegetated
infiltration area. This should be tiled to allow for excess water to
pass on to the next sequential infiltration area
1 Lighting has not changed except for a change to less spill on the north
Environmental ISSUES:
1 See attached reports
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments
made by the Environmental Board:
I.Drainage plan should reflect drainage into infiltration areas and water
exit plan....
1 Pond water quality should be bio- remediated
• There should be a used oil recycle facility if the businesses are
retailing motor oil
HapKQ &_Pexpeartov -Boap5 Xzn o6 Aivo Aaxs6
9
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION /POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus
was reached by the Board:
17apKo= &_PpeanovBoap5 Xan o0 Aevo Ammo-
10
AGENDA ITEM 5B
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
DATE: May 30, 2001
TOPIC: Highland Meadows West 3`d Addition /Preliminary Plat
BACKGROUND:
Reviewed at the April 25 Environmental Board Meeting. The Following are the minutes
from that meeting.
Highland Meadows West 3rd Addition — Mr. Cooper stated that the
submitted plan was being withdrawn due to a needed plan modification. The
wetland delineation showed wetland where there was none noted previously, and
the area thought to be wetland was found to not be. He indicated there were six
existing homes on the plat, the newly found wetland would affect 4 -5 lots, and a
new access road would be necessary. The Wetland Conservation Act would no
longer be applicable to the site.
Asleson noted a tree inventory submitted needed the species and the impact on
each tree. The trees would be lost because of the walkouts but if the houses had
full basements, most of the Historic Oak Savanna trees could be saved.
Mr. Cooper indicated 75 -80% of the trees would be saved. Asleson stated most of
the trees would be lost. He disagreed with the number of trees saved until the tree
inventory was completed.
Grundhofer submitted that people were attracted to homes with trees on the lot.
Donlin concurred and discussed the vision was created to save the trees.
Asleson identified there were young oak woodlands throughout the site. If only
the oldest trees were to be saved, pine beetle issues and issues with the Fire
Department would probably result.
Mr. Cooper noted that to the consumer, graded elevation was desirable with
walkouts and trees. Most were split entry with drainage, so it would be above a
100 year flood and have an emergency overflow.
Trehus asked how much of the site was wetland. Mr. Cooper answered there was
.78 acres in the middle, and .25 acre in the corner.
Vice Chair Mach stated significant trees did not mean old trees, a diversity of ages
was needed.
Donlin explained that the plan appeared to be a cookie cutter approach and the
Board wanted to encourage conservation planning. Mr. Schmidt responded there
were six houses on 28 acres, and the development had to occur around those. He
noted there was no tree preservation ordinance.
Asleson indicated there was no ordinance, but there was a policy. Mr. Schmidt
responded his goal to keep as many trees as possible was acceptable to the City,
and to the potential residents. He agreed with the age diversity concept and
explained he wanted to work with people. Bluebill Ponds was graded, but he did
not want to match it because he will lose trees. Mr. Schmidt noted that many
species could be relocated.
A discussion of the concept of conservation subdivision was discussed, with
various members holding differing definitions of the concept. Asleson
recommended the Board begin with what the site could support and go from there.
Mr. Schmidt suggested the City make an ordinance. He predicted trouble with
developers if 50% of the land was to be saved and cited the housing shortage. He
believed the large areas needed to be preserved, not the small areas. Donlin
pointed out that both could occur if the development was reconfigured.
Mr. Schmidt stated the fire department did not want narrower streets and the City
Planners did not want smaller lots. Smyser confirmed the statement.
Mr. Schmidt urged the members of the Board to visit his past sites in St. Michael
and in Brooklyn Park. He noted the St. Michael site was the most successful
development except for one other with houses priced $150,000 and higher. The
Brooklyn Park site moved 450 Spruce and Norway pine, and planted hardwoods
and wildflower gardens.
The developer has submitted a tree inventory list with the species indicated. It
appears that the inventory sheet is incomplete relative to the survey map. I have
included a CIR (color infra red) comparison image so that you may see for
yourself where the pine trees and where the oak forests are located. I have used
the Lois Lane area (oak forest), and the area immediately to the north of the Lois
Lane Development(pine forest) as a visual indicator of the color characteristics of
both species.
I have asked our engeneering department to evaluate the groundwater/basement
elevation relationships for this site. The recommendation previously was to build
a different type of house in some of the areas to prevent a "clearcut" development.
I do not have this information at the time of writing this report. This may be a
situation where tree (native) replacement may be appropriate, if different house
types are not possible.
OPTIONS:
Same as last meeting /consider tree replacement as a condition
RECOMMENDATION:
If a different type of house is not possible, consider tree replacement.
JAMES R. HILL, INC.
2500 W. County Rd. 42, Suite 120
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
Phone (952) 890 -6044 FAX (952) 890 -6244
email: jrhinc@jrhinc.com
TO: City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
Shop Drawings
Copy of Letter
X
X
Attached
Prints
Change order
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
May 11, 2001
JOB NO.
20196
ATTENTION:
Jeff Smyser
10
Full size set of plans
RE:
Highland Meadows West 3rd Addition
2
11"x17" plans
FTUnder separate cover via
Plans
nSamples
the following items:
f-1 Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
10
Full size set of plans
2
11"x17" plans
1
Tree inventory
2
Drianage calculations & summary
1; ;;- „z
/
Z
(9f
j 1O0'
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
x
X
For approval
For your use
As requested
For review and comment
FOR BIDS DUE
Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Returned for corrections
Resubmit _ copies for approval
Submit _ copies for distribution
Return corrected prints
PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS: Mr. Smyser, on behalf of our client, TSM Development, please accept these revised preliminary
plat drawings and calculations for review. The layout of the site has been modified to eliminate
the wetland impacts after a delineation was done this spring. This revised layout package
goes along with the application and fee that were submitted to your office on or about
April 9, 2001. Please review the enclosed documents and contact me if you have any questions
or require any additional information.
Thank you.
COPY TO: Steve Schmitt - TSM Development
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
Troy D. Livgard
papeJ6aa oseJod pado naa
suaaae8 /euuanBs )jEO 01.10 !H
SITE
MAIN STREET –C.R.
HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST 3RD ADDITION
k,
LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA
PRELIMINARY PLAT EXHIBITS
FOR
TSM DEVELOPMENT
222 MONROE STREET, ANOKA, MN 55303
PHONE: (763) 576 -9121 FAX: (763) 576 -9122
Tr
/ 0
c5
/ (;)
(IT
a)
,, 1 //
1 /
1 /
/
- - -
I
- - -J l--
I
-- - - -
I
L__—
I
15— — —
TI I
SITE MAP
(NO SCALE)
jfl
C7
0I
0
HIGHLAND
I /
I /
1IEA nnur ,.,,.- /
IVI I_r-1 L/V YY
P
—
( ')
r.3
r
7>
.,. --_ �` \
0
SCALE IN FEET
100 200
1 inch = 100 fee(
300
RECEIVED
MAY 112001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
SHEET INDEX
1. TITLE SHEET
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS
3. PRELIMINARY PLAT
4. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
5. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PLAN
6. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
7. TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
8. EROSION CONTROL PLAN
9. EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP
10. PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP
11. DETAILS & NOTES
zA
x
DRAWN BY
TDL
DATE
02/12/01
REVISIONS
o,rniDI 11v. 1015 !MI KM
MMM riY LI=
CAD FILE
20196TS
PROJECT NO.
20196
FILE NO.
DRAWER
SHEET 1 OF 11
COUNTY ROAD 14
E0. NETIANO
9,645 S.t, -0.22 AC
NN
C
aki
E-�
MAR DON ACRES
HIGHLAND MEADO
- ___< !� 1
1
, —- -. \\ I \
\ I - —
0
NOTES:
AIDN
SCALE M FEET
100 200
300
1 inch =: 100 feel
1. ALL EXISTING SOILS ARE TYPE 'A' PER
ANOKA COUNTY SOIL SURVEY.
LEGEND
+800.00
SOIL BORING
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
WETLAND DELINEATION
EXISTING CONTOURS
TREE LINE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE
RECEIVED
MAY 112001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
CS
cc
OO
w 4
:
■ T-
V) m v
■
/�I W Si' 4,4
Ci
'O w o
CD En \ d
E EU�
Z
/!k
'▪ !ICL 0, 3 W
A
5
DRAWN BY
TOL
DATE
02/12/01
REVISIONS
CAD FILE
20196EX
PROJECT NO.
20196
FILE NO.
DRAWER
SHEET 2 OF 11
-50-
-50- n
-n AU v.
in
7v1
vv
- 204.00 S00 °37'02 "W
T1A /I I I /" I IT
- 1 VV I L. I\ 7 r 1 I
!'szJO 150.58
w
o0
0
0^
234.00
OUTj9T A
t 9 S.F.
- 204.00 N00 °37'02 "E
- 204.00 S00 °33'26 "W
M ='
M
o)
co
0 I
01 7F)
M
Li J w - =53.09
N 00
0 0 21o
Z �\\` 13205 57.
86.19
A5.
4
A
/ -\v1 \L_.:
663.91 S00 °37'02 "W
TI0 11 I /"I IT A / L)f -^
I VU IL -I \7r1 I /-1vl \L_.2
119.28
DRAINAGE & UTILTY EASEMENT
1
36235 SS.
• \02
�B\ .2.{
' - 0.7{ I 2 5 Q.
5
` -\ \ 11°15 Sr.
h
\ \ \\ 24,
\\
f% 23 \\
26457 3.,
22 \\
17153 SF.
C)
L�J
LL.
0
e IN
I J=
--ao--
u.1
w(4)-
w�
7�, V O1
! O
In
0
Z0
O
-50- -
w
- N � /
_ -) '3
0 °00
�) 00
-60-- -60--
C)
145.00 _ J.11
20 In
11547 SF. In
L -
145.00 - J
r
12565 S.F. Ir
-z68A
145.]5
18 1°
14797 Sr.
16j
/e.
/
\\* 3
21893 IF
108.04 73.32
t �� o
ti ;I I I
1 1095 +
5F. I
4
\ 12455 S.F.
73.26 40,66 '
40.88
80.00
1
6
11936 5F. I
1
9G
STREET 1 "A" 1
o
T -
--10
1 1
I 1
I 1
1L ?SF. I
33.50 50.77]°
�- I 69.47
6
f1170, SF.
9
13144
1m
,sod I 1Y32104i. 2 r -
L- - 194,74 J
14250 3.3.
73
W
S%
47� 20176 SF. -
64.34 y�
202.03
9.31
7-
13F
17
18991 5.F. 4.80
•
,35.27
-,-i+ DRAINAGE & U,1LI,Y
0
3 2 I
13,36 SF.
2 I
-12.8 1JB.94 J
L
69.4
32 SF.
135.00
24
L 135.00
18
12
r
„23F.
L 137.62 -
I\ I
L. 1 '4LJ
00 Lon
co
z
SCALE IN FEET
60 120
1 inch = 60 feet
S00 °37'02 "W
/,_ - 177.76 -
OUTLOT B \8
eao4 48 �3
48.92 7
O L -
-0 F -0
6
1 Ig Z °�(�
m I m 16493 SF.
MA `ILY 1°;7 -
51.ao 119.]11 60.23 ¢i \ \
bF IVE 'NOi x8'31"
8
1273, - - -
\ 4 1
27060 Sr. Vi.,„
_ 43.5' ,
24• %
11.67
1 1, 2S.
- 141.49
1
80.05
„2 15F.
L - 135.00
1
EASEMENT - +s'., - - - -- --
Y \�
3off \ 16397, ■
14 \
1 17337 S.F. \ \ J
• 1
F215.05 - - -1
1 20 1$
n974 sF.
--- -86.34 02/1.80 - -
1 16 1
1 25726 S.F. 1
1 11
41.06 34.80
‘55.Q° 1
3 =g -1_ 75.48
10
25.2].
al
-75.48
w
a
to
N
0
0
O
ril
I:L
\ ,:27.41
-60- --
- I8
/is
16 L 10`76
6 C J -
STREET "C" al
1
/ \ / 13
- / \J N /
16632 SF.
1
29274 S.F. /
//
?//
//
r_51-9-5 K
/ 14 \\
24717 SF. \\
J
20706 S.F.
260.92
ml
1 63
26.
,5957 S.F.
J9�33 ��1
1 12
I27523 S.F.
L 136.00
r-
9 14
13050 5.5.
•
''_ 75.01 - / VJ
1-
______________________________N DRAINAGE k UTILITY EASEMENT `
141.57 224.31 • 1 139.09
jl I I_- II 1 yin I\In�
L.L_VL_L.IL_.L_ \/INLJ�.:
\a\
197.07
8
65
NI
15$7
14618 57 5F
898.
180
1 (I') \
11.70 - ! '; i'_ N18395°.3000'01"_W Cg; 9:, - s' - 1: j _r- i).
2
3 F. Im zI
1 41 12
i--.7 _--- _756-6: i Erl _ _Th w....
4
�6
14575 SF
STREET "D"
23394 S.F.
7g^ 1740 55.
7 \
16418 SF. \\
8// \ \\
.�-
)6. L _
. 88 -
n
1292.48 S00 °33'22 "W
-------- _._DRAINAGE
-- 191.34
lz
_ a
J
• k UIIUTY
42.20
28. 19
1 ti
STREET "
_178 95
EASEMENT
1
In 11451 SF. 1
82.84
I 71 76
17012 SF.
213.49
)
0
0
203.34 -
30.00
-J
0
30 00
15Z68
9
0
z
-
30
60.23
trl
CP
tP
103.68
R=280.00
54.94
EXISTING CONDITIONS
EXISTING ZONING R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)
ACREAGE 33.68 ACRES
PROPOSED saE DATA
PROPOSED ZONING
TOTAL LOTS
DENSITY
LOTS
OuTLOTS
R-1
70
25.92 ACRES
6.53 ACRES
0.94 ACRES
OvERALL 33.39 ACRES
SMALLEST LOT AREA
LARGEST LOT AREA
AVERAGE LOT AREA
16,150 S.F.
MINIMUM SETBACKS
FRONT
REAR
SIDE YARD INTERIOR
SIDE YARD CORNER (STREET)
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 0 SETBACK
MINIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT AREA
30 FEET
30 FEET
10 FEET
30 FEET
80 FEET
DRAINAGE AND VDU TY EASEMENTS
ARE SHOWN THUS:
BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH ON ADJOINING
SIDE LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH
ON ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT
LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON
THE PLAT
PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The West 660.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter, Section 8, Township 31,
Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except Parcels
32, 33. 34. and 35, ANOKA COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY
PLAT NO. 25, Anoka County, Minnesota
And
The East 300.00 feet. of the West 960.00 feet of the
North 660.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range
22, Anoka County, Minnesota, Except Parcel 36,
ANOICA COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 25, Anoka
County. Minnesota
And
Outlot A. all in HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST 2ND
ADDITION. according to the plat thereof, Anoka
County, Minnesota,
And
That part of Outlot C, HIGHLAND MEADOWS WEST.
according to the plat thereof, Anoka County,
Minnesota, lying northerly and westerly of the
following described line:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said
Outlot C; thence South 00 degrees 33 minutes 22
seconds West, assumed bearing along the West line
of said Outlot C, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence
South 89 degrees 30 minutes 01 seconds East a
distance of 54.94 feet; thence northeasterly a
disance of 103.68 feet along a tangential curve,
concave to the northwest, having a central angle
of 21 degrees 12 minutes 55 seconds and a' radius
of 280.00 feet; thence northeasterly a disance of
60.23 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the
southeast, having a central angle of 21 degrees 12
minutes 55 seconds and a radius of 162.66 feet;
thence North 89 degrees 30 minutes 01 seconds
beginning.
EIVED
MAY 1 1 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
LAI
CC
LIJ
Lai
cn
cc ea
cn
rn
134 E.4
DRAWN BY
PLM
DATE
1/15/01
REVISIONS
4/6/01 layout
5/9/01 lovout
CAD FILE
PROJECT NO.
20196
FILE NO.
1-01-011
SHEET 3 OF 11
0TCRi-OF '"AA' P T 23
STREET (CSAH 14i
1— — —
ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
=_ ,, /'�
BENCHMARK
FROM CITY OF LINO LAKES:
1.) TNH 726 MAIN STREET
ELEV. = 918.82
2.) TNH WEST ENO LINO LAKES ELEMENTARY
ELEV. = 914.96
WETLAND DATA:
TOTAL WETLAND AREA ON SITE
42,081 S0. FT. = 0.97 ACRES
WETLAND FILL AREA
0 SQ. FT. = 0.00 ACRES
NURP POND NWL AREA
94,940 SQ. FT. = 2.18 ACRES
8
0
SCALE IN FEET
100 200
300
1 inch = 100 feet
NOTES:
1. ALL EXISTING SOILS ARE TYPE 'A' PER
ANOKA COUNTY SOIL SURVEY.
JFGFND
0
1000
EXISTING ELECTRIC METER
EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX
EXISTING AIR CONDITIONING UNIT
EXISTING GAS MARKER
EXISTING GAS METER
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE
EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED CONTOUR
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
TEMPORARY ROCK
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PROPOSED WETLAND FILL
RECEIVED
MAY 1 1 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
a)
W>-
Li"
CC
w
w
w
z
w
CC
w
—J
CL
z
DRAWN BY
CMR /TDL
DATE
02/12/01
REVISIONS
eIASM I01//((0Vpy1. 18 10 •180[y0e 0000
ro�M �FY Lui11001t
CAD FILE
20196PG
PROJECT NO.
20196
SHEET 4 OF 11
...
.. N .. HI H AZ RI H "Oi WAY WAT-M125 °'__
f..A1.4 STREET (CSAH" •0 _ 4i
I--e —I
1 F(zFND
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
> EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATER MAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
NOTE:
ALL SANITARY SEWER IS 8" PVC.
r —�
VA
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
L
/ /
\ //
\ /, /
r -,
1 i
I
L_..
--1 r - -- r - -r r ---
I I I 11 II II II
�� a wtss I
I II II II
I I 1 t „I I I I I I
II I I II JL— JL _JL__JL__
r -1
e nt,. I
L J
r
I II II I
I II II 1
I II II I
I II II I
I II II I
m
L___
l`' \ \ - -J- --
\ \
n
/
/
/
/
0
RECEIVED
MAY 1 1 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
SCALE IN FEET
100 200
1 inch = 100 feet
300
V
VI
O n
�Wy1 to
w CC v
= = = N
_ Vi 6
N i ii
■
z
CD
CO w a C-3 CR
cc co
• UJ
CU Z .E 33- x
d RN d
HIGHLAND
DRAWN BY
TDL
DATE
04/07/01
REVISIONS
t ■pN, ■r. user
CAD FILE
20196U
PROJECT NO.
20196
SHEET 5 OF 11
LEGEND
aP
W— TP— TP— W— W— TP —TP-
1000
NOTE:
SIGHNS SHALL BE PLACED APPROX. 50' APART
ALONG TREE PROTECTION FENCE INDICATING IT IS A
TREE PRESERVATION AREA, NO GRADING ALLOWED.
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES
EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
PROPOSED CONTOUR
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
0
SCALE IN FEET
50 100
150
1 inch = 50 feet
cN
\\ C7
°/
\\ y
\ /,i
ROCK CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE /CONCRETE TRUCK
CLEANOUT AREA
RECEIVED
MAY 1 1 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT
WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION
AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DATED THIS
DAY OF 2001.
JAMES 51URM, ASLA
REGISTRATION NUMBER 18380
DRAWN BY
TDL
DATE
04/09/01
REVISIONS
WW1. KV.. wart
CAD FILE
20196EX
PROJECT NO.
20196
FILE NO.
DRAWER
SHEET 6 OF 11
NOTE:
SICHNS SHALL BE PLACED APPROX. 50' APART
ALONG TREE PROTECTION FENCE INDICATING IT 15 A
TREE PRESERVATION AREA, NO GRADING ALLOWED.
OXP
LEGEND
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING TREE LINE /TREES
EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED
TP— TP —TP —IP —TIP —TP —TIP— TREE PROTECTION FENCE
1000 PROPOSED CONTOUR
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
SCALE IN FEET
50 100
1 inch = 50 feet
150
i
--I r
RECEIVED
MAY 11 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT
WAS PREPARED BY CAE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION
AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STALE OF MINNESOTA, DATED THIS
_DAY OF 2001.
JAMES STURM, ASIA
REGISTRATION NUMBER 18380
U
DRAWN BY
TDL
DATE
04/09/01
REVISIONS
NIMM KY. LAMP
CAD FILE
20196EX
PROJECT NO.
20196
FILE NO.
DRAWER
SHEET 7 OF 11
jlIDN
0
SCALE IN FEET
100 200
1 inch = 100 feet
� STREET "gam
afg ^
,e
►11 i
\,. \ /
7,\ //
_
RO
CONCK STRUCTION
ENTRANCE ._./
I y:
r
-101- -h ;TM
300
RECEIVED
MAY 112001
GM OF LIDO LAKES
ERDSION CONTROL NOTES
_ — TOPSOIL: ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE A
— — — —MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED.
FERTILIZER: APPLY 400 POUNDS PER ACRE OF
20 -0 -10 OR EQUIVALENT FERTILIZER. INCORPORATE
IT INTO THE TOP THREE (3) TO FOUR (4) INCHES OF
SURFACE BY DISKING OR SOME OTHER SUITABLE
MEANS.
SEEDING: SEED MIX SHALL BE MnDOT MIX
NO. 500.
ALL SLOPES THAT EXCEED 3:1 SHALL BE SEEDED
WITH A WOOD FIBER BLANKET.
MULCHING: STRAW SHOULD BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY
AT A RATE OF TWO TONS PER ACRE AN0 ANCHORED
WITH EITHER NETTING OR A STRAIGHT DISC.
ALL SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL. TAKE PLACE
WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS OF THE COMPLETED GRADING
OPERATION OR AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NEXT
SEEDING PERIOD PER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS.
+50000
4E100.00
1000
LEGEND
SOIL BORING
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
WETLAND DELINEATION
EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPOSED CONTOURS
TREE LINE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
HAY BALE CHECK DAM
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
TEMPORARY ROCK
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
5' METAL OR 2 "R2'WOOD FENCE POST
mamma WON N
BACKING
BACKFIU.
GEOTEXTILE TO
OVERLAP THROUGH
TRENCH.
IBN'
fi
NOTE : —SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO
MNOOT 3886, TYPE B.
— FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS
OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
SILT FENCE
TWO 2' X 2" WOOD STAKES OR
REINFORCING BARS IN EACH BALE
AND IMBEDDED IN THE GROUND
10" MINIMUM
STORM SEWER CATCHBASIN
F O� SILT FENCE INSTALLED AS
.f:(94, PER DETAIL
HAYBALE BARRIERS WITH SILT FENCE
YER 10P DT T.ES.
R1ER ¥18RK NEIXIMED
'M�U ONNEWK) INxu�
RRIO RAP REQUIRED
N m
B: o le J
MAW PIKED RP -RAP I 'our OUR
v HO EMAN F R CIMI EACH """
11105[ USED FOR CNMNND.
FLARED END SECTION WITH RIP RAP
6" MINIMUM DEPTH
1" - 2" WASHED ROCK
18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM
TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE
FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK
TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK,
M1N156
20
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
V
W
•E
V)
L�y1
CC
N
Cr)
W
w
LIU
N
W
—J
CL.
DRAWN BY
TDL
DATE
02/12/01
REVISIONS
OT/IS/m IEV. LOT" PCP RCWD
WORM NEY. UMW
WM/01 Fri. WOW
CAD FILE
20196EC
PROJECT NO.
20196
FILE NO.
DRAWER
SHEET 8 OF 11
250 POND AREA
SUBCATCHMENT
NOTE:
1. ALL EXISTING SOILS ARE TYPE 'A' PER
ANOKA COUNTY SOIL SURVEY,
RECEIVED
MAY 1 1 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
0
SCALE IN FEET
100 200
300
1 inch = 100 feet
C.)
V)
WO n
w
e�
= \ 1 ao
V) rn
m
CC
6d■■ W N a
r■■ Z — t..-
Cr) W o
V \ a i
cc co
W
E Z W v R
.,aka
DRAWN BY
TDL
DATE
REVISIONS
mMM CV. Wan Y alt,
CAD ALE
20196ED
PROJECT NO.
20196
SHEET 9 OF 11
.r m
_
N
L_
— — --
1000
LEGEND
WETLAND DELINEATION
EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPOSED CONTOURS
TREE LINE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
EXISTING ASPHALT SURFACE
EXISTING GRAVEL SURFACE
250 POND AREA
NOTES:
SUBCATCHMENT
1. ALL EXISTING SOILS ARE TYPE 'A' PER
ANOKA COUNTY SOIL SURVEY.
0
SCALE IN FEET
100 200
1 inch = 100 lest
300
RECEIVED
MAY 1 1 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
✓
i V1
O n
L� on L.I on
w
= • M g. g.
• - V) o
=,m
V) a
CC m
Cdiii• W
W N
Zc
HIGHLAND
DRAWN BY
TDL
DATE
02/12/01
REVISIONS
CAD FILE
20196PD
PROJECT NO.
20196
FILE NO.
DRAWER
SHEET 10 OF 11
GENERAL GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTE?.
1. SPECIFICATIONS WHICH APPLY ARE THE MOST RECENT 001110NS
OF THE CITY OF UNO LAKES AND THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OE TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY
CONSTRUCTION UNLESS MODIFIED HEREIN ON THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
2. IT IS THE RESPONOBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE THE
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" EXCAVATION NOTICE SYSTEM AS REWIRED UNDER
MINNESOTA STATUTE CHAPTER 2160, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY
EXCAVATION (PHONE 651- 454 -0002 IN THE TWIN 011ES METRO AREA OR
TOLL FREE 1 -800- 252- 1166).
3. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF
ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH 124E RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION AS CALLED FOR ON THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
SHALL BE PERFORMED 04 ACCORDANCE NTH AU. OSHA REQUIREMENTS.
5. ALL LOT AND EASEMENT DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL PLAT.
6. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CALLED FOR ON THESE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE FILTER FENCE.SEDIMENTATION
BASINS OR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS, 514ALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND
SERVICEABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER, AS REQUIRED.
a. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES
b. FILTER FENCE.
0. TEMPORARY CULVERTS
4. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND OUTFALL FACILITIES
.. STORM WATER POND CONSTRUCTION.
4. COMMON EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT (GRADING CONSTRUCTION).
6. STRAW BALE BARRIERS INOFINISHED GRADED AREAS
i. INLET AND OUTLET FACIUIIES SUBSEQUENT TO STORM SEWER
CONSTRUCTION.
7. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES AS 5MOYM ON THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND IMPLEMENT ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY.
8. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACIUAES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE
GRADING CONTRACTOR DURING GRADING OPERATIONS ANY TEMPORARY
FACILITIES WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED AS CALLED FOR ON THESE PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE GRADING CONTRACTOR
WHEN DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 111E GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL
THEN RESTORE THE SUBSEQUENTLY DISTURBED AREA IN ACCORDANCE
NTH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
9. IT I5 THE RESPON98IUTY OF THE GRADING CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE
OFF -SITE ALL TREES STUMPS, BRUSH, OR OTHER DEBRIS 114AT EXISTS
WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE
DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER
10. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SMALL SCHEDULE THE SOILS ENGINEER SO
THAT CERTIFICATION OF ALL CONTROLLED FILLS CAN BE FURNISHED TO
1140 OYMER WRING AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.
11. DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN TO EVALUATE THE COMPACTION WITHIN
THE STREETS, TRAVEL WAYS OR PARKING LOTS WI1141N THE UPPER 3 FEET
OF STREET SUB GRADE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT ALL SOILS
BE NOT MORE THAN ONE PERCENTAGE PONT OVER THE SOIL'S STANDARD
PROCTOR OPTIMUM 1.1015TURE CONTENT, AND 111AT COMPACTION TO A
MINIMUM OF 1000 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BE PROVIDED. IN
AREAS BELOW THE UPPER THREE FEET OF SUBGRAOE 00 THE STREETS,
TRAVEL WAYS OR PARKING LOTS, 114E CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE 1146T
ALL SOILS BE NOT MORE THAN THREE PERCENTAGE POINTS OVER THE
SOIL'S STANDARD PROCTOR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, AND THAT
COMPACTION TO A MINIMUM OF 950 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BE
PROVIDED. THE GRADING TOLERANCE FOR THESE AREAS SHALL BE
WITHIN 0.1'7.
12. LOT GRADING AND /0R T140 PREPARATION OF BUILDING PADS SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
THE GRADING TOLERANCE SHALL BE 0.25 ±. ALL EARTHWORK OPERATIONS
SHALL DE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HUD -MA DATA SHEET
79G *LAND DEVELOPMENT NTH CONTROLLED EMINWORK ", PROVIDING
FOR A MINIMUM 00 950 STANDARD DENSITY, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
BY THE GEO- TECHNICAL ENGINEER.
13. BUILDING PADS SHOWN ON EACH LOT ARE TYPICAL ONLY. 144E DEPTH OF 114E
PAD FROM FRONT TO BACK SHALL BE GRADED THROUGHOUT THE FULL WIDTH
OF THE LOT OR AS NECESSARY 70 ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING
AT THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACKS (REFER TO THE PLANS FOR SPECIFIC
SETBACK DISTANCES) IF UNSUITABLE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED
WITHIN A PROPOSED BUILDING PAD THAT CANNOT BE CORRECTED OR
REMOVED, IT IS THE RESPSONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY
THE ENGINEER OF THE CONDITIONS AND TO LOCATE THE LIMITS OF 140
UNSUITABLE AREAS.
14. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFICALLY NOTED, THE FOLLOWING STE
RE- VEGETATION TECHNIQUES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED. ALL DISTURBED
AREAS, EXCEPT STREETS. SHALL BE COVERED MTH A MINIMUM OF
6" TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED NM MnDOT 8500 MIX AT
100LB5. /ACRE. SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED WTI MnDOT TYPE 1
AT 2 TONS /ACRE AND DISC ANCHORED. SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL
BE COMPLETED WITHIN 2 WEEKS AFTER EARTH MOVING OPERATIONS
ARE COMPLETED. ALL SLOPES THAT EXCEED 3(H):1(V) SHALL BE SEEDED
WITH A WOOD FIBER BLANKET. FERTUZER SHALL BE 20 -0-10 OR
EQUIVALENT AND APPLIED AT 400 POUNDS PER ACRE. FERTILIZER 15
TO BE INCORPORATED INTO 114E TOP 3 TO 4 INCHES BY DISCING OR
SOME OTHER SUITABLE MEANS. WHEN SEEDING AFTER NOVEMBER 1,
OR WHEN TEMPERATURES 00 NOT EXCEED 40 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DORMANT SEED ALONG ALL DISTURBED AREAS.
DORMANT SEED BED PREPARATION, SEEDING RATES AND MULCH
REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE THE SAME AS THOSE DESCRIBED IN THIS
SECTION EXCEPT THAT NO SEED SHALL BE PLACED ON SNOW OR ICE
WHICH I5 GREATER THAN 2 INCHES IN DEPTH. ANY SEEDED AREAS WHICH
DO NOT BECOME ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RE-SEEDED AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
15. IT I5 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF 124E CONTRACTOR 70 KEEP PUBUC
STREETS, TRAVEL WAYS PARKING LOTS AND TRAILS FREE OF DIRT AND
012ER DEBRIS WHICH RESULTS FROM SAID GRADING CONSTRUCTION.
SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES
I. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND CONTOUR ELEVATIONS ON THE PLANS
WERE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AND THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. THE
DEGREE OF ACCURACY OF THE EXI571140 CONTOURS SHOWN ON THE PLAN
15 EQUAL TO 3 ONE HALF THE CONTOUR INTERVAL
FR0010N OIVTRO NO S
TOPSOIL: ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE A
MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED.
FERTILIZER: APPLY 400 POUNDS PER ACRE OF
20 -0 -10 OR EQUIVALENT FERTILIZER. INCORPORATE
IT INTO THE TOP THREE (3) TO FOUR (4) INCHES OF
SURFACE BY DISKING OR SOME OTHER SUITABLE
MEANS.
SEEDING: SEED MIX SHALL BE MnDOT MIX
NO. 500.
ALL SLOPES THAT EXCEED 3:1 SHALL BE SEEDED
WITH A WOOD FIBER BLANKET.
MULCHING: STRAW SHOULD BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY
AT A RATE OF TWO TONS PER ACRE AND ANCHORED
WITH EITHER NETTING OR A STRAIGHT DISC.
ALL SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL TAKE PLACE
WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS OF THE COMPLETED GRADING
OPERATION OR AT THE BEGINNING OF THE NEXT
SEEDING PERIOD PER CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS.
PLAN VIEW
I
QU W 1K1
•• A' 1RA860 COCO Pn14(TP.) I
I� 3
T.1o' MEA1e) TRIER (b RR) 12
R/W
BANK
OVS NM RAM • MN. of Y.
SKIMMER DETAIL
BANK
5'
10'
r
I►-
1
L J
10'
5'
TYPICAL DRAINAGE
& UTILITY EASEMENTS
BGo
HAYBALE BARRIERS
WITH SILT FENCE
TWO 2" X 2" WOW STAKES OR
REINFORCING BARS IN EACH BALE
AND IMBEDDED IN THE GROUND
10" MINIMUM
STORM SEWER CATCHBASIN
SILT FENCE INSTALLED AS
PER DETAIL
FLARED END SECTION WITH RIP RAP
60'
R/W
14'
16'
16'
14'
-4" TOPSOIL &
SW (BY OTHERS)
2.0x
D412 CONC. CURB
& GUTTER
-1.5" -2350 TYPE LV 4 BIT. WEARING COURSE
- TACK COAT
2" -2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 BIT. NON- WEARING COURSE
5" AGGREGATE BASE. CL. 5
(PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE)
24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
TYPICAL STREET SECTION
/ µ0�
vie t IY.2
NA
M1�LMUM
20
6" MINIMUM DEPTH
1" - 2" WASHED ROCK
18' MINIMUM CUT OFF BERN
TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE
FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK
TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPERTY LNNE
SURFACE DRAINAGE
LOWEST FLOOR ELEV.
(IF SPECIFIED)
SUGGESTED GARAGE SIDE
R114FiDGr5i1 8024
CENTERLINE
10' NUMBER
6
/ 920.5
LF 920.5
RWO
G 928.5
EXISTING CONTOUR
FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION
RECOMMENDED 440215E TYPE
TIRCAL FRONT YARD
NA SETBACK (HOUSE)
926.50 FINISHED 6 GRADE
3 +00 - lo0'0 STATION
TYPICAL LOT
CM -LOTS.
5' METAL OR 2 "a2"WOOD FENCE POST
GEOTEXTILE W08.MET.I /.
BACKING
BACKFLI. -\
GEOTEXOLE TO
OVERLAP THROUGH
TRENCH.
NOTE : -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO
MNDOT 3886, TYPE B.
- FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS
OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
SILT FENCE
PROPOSED BUILDING
STE
{
eg
-sn
eAarn�i i
35' (89889
CALMS
SETBACK OC
rr TOPSOIL
1 [8*8160 MAMKG PAGE
�UxSU ^ABLE ��
TDBu
910 -0TAIK CORRECTOR
UMI1S i
RCN- SEIEC? 7AaIFR1 MATERIAL
SMTAMAME 7 l
1gML ��11
eOTTMI Cr DNMATM5E MATENAL
110 ME VERNW0 SY SOILS ENMNFE9
PRIOR 10 PLAQRENT OE SELECT MATERIAL)
BUILDING SITE & STREET
SUB -GRADE CORRECTION DETAIL
R
RIO
SE
RECOMMENDED NOUSE TYPES
MRAwiL
MO, Ole,[M Fr It TIC ENV
due. a h rLmll[[M1 RA %iiYDxlM 7..I?OVA a
My won 1111 MOM a � e40IN RICU AT a MORN
VC M MOM TO ACCOMM1ATE MLA wont wo011oK6
ARE TLC MOW NNE POMO Al VC RA or M11nSE
FE2 a Im 7 PR Ar
NdaWani eu°� "TaK °�1 A,a suu rt i�'e�n
ragnITRWAXIVEF TA.I.CURARE.L.V146.1 ERR KM
6LYAlIPi 1 a1"e &M UM = ELL & wow
110
RAMO Of 1EMtp MOMO TORO M EILV TIOM Neat
RECOMMENDED HOUSE TYPES
-SEE STREET SECTION - 30'
memo PAD[
mass PAGE
PAD ELEV
50
SETBACKS
FRONT 30 FEET
SIDE (STREET) 30 FEET
SIDE (HOUSE) 10 FEET
SIDE (GARAGE) 10 FEET
10'
H"
11oLD D6TN
6' TOPSOIL-
LOAM RR MEN
11P
RAMBLER SECTION (R)
RAMBLER LOOKOUT SECTION (RLO)
-SEE STREET SECTION- 30' S0' 30
MAMA SRAM PAD ELEV.
12"
HOLD D0YM
LOR11 M
6" TOPS
TYR 7001M9
SPLIT ENTRY SECTION (SE)
SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT SECTION (SEWO)
LOT BENCHING DETAIL
NO SCALE
NOTE:
1. THERE SHALL BE NO SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
BENCHMARK
FROM CITY OF LINO LAKES:
1.) TNH 726 MAIN STREET
ELEV. = 918.82
2.) TNH WEST END LINO LAKES ELEMENTARY
ELEV. = 914.96
iw
MRRMWWI
E0
w �
N
CC
W
W
CSI
W
V)
CC
cyzi
x
DRAWN BY
CMR
DATE
02/12/01
0Evlctpnlc
<A MFi
Hai.
CITY
CAD FILE
20196D
PROJECT NO.
20196
SHEET 11 OF' 11
LARGE TREES ONLY
TREE
NUMBER
ELEVATION
TREE TYPE
DIAMETER (INCHES)
TREE
REMOVED
TREE
SAVED
1001
911.54
PINE
7
X
1002
910.72
PINE
7
X
1003
911.49
ASH
12
12
X
1007
913.32
ASH
12
X
1009
912.96
COTTONWOOD
42
X
1011
912.06
RED OAK
14
X
1029
912.52
BLACK CHERRY
12
12
X
1031
910.81
PINE
6
X
1502
906.71
PINE
12
X
1503
906.63
PINE
12
X
1504
906.68
PINE
12
X
1505
906.62
PINE
10
X
1506
906.55
PINE
9
X
1507
906.47
PINE
12
X
1508
906.62
PINE
12
X
1509
906.58
PINE
9
X
1510
907.63
PINE
7
X
1511
907.17
PINE
6
X
1512
906.98
PINE
6
X
1513
907.26
PINE
6
X
1514
907.39
PINE
7
X
1515
907.05
PINE
7
X
1516
907.13
PINE
6
X
1517
907.13
PINE
6
X
1518
907.01
PINE
6
X
1519
906.86
PINE
6
X
1520
906.75
PINE
6
X
1521
906.49
PINE
6
X
1522
906.20
PINE
7
X
1523
909.72
OAK
16
X
1524
909.03
SPRUCE
9
X
1525
908.77
SPRUCE
13
X
1526
907.96
OAK
13
X
1527
908.26
PINE
11
X
1528
907.90
PINE
9
X
1529
908.02
PINE
13
X
1533
906.65
PINE
7
X
1534
906.67
PINE
6
X
1535
907.09
PINE
6
X
1538
908.62
OAK
14
11
7
7
X
1543
909.15
OAK
18
17
14
X
1544
909.43
OAK
17
X
1548
909.63
OAK
12
X
1549
910.67
OAK
. 12
X
1550
910.63
OAK
22
X
1556
910.58
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
1569
908.27
OAK
13
11
X
1571
907.85
OAK
12
12
X
1573
907.60
OAK
13
10
8
X
f°` :. F <'
1574
907.76
OAK
12
8
X
`: k - ' ,_'.r-
1575
908.02
OAK
13
_
_
r
1576
907.95
OAK
12
X '
Z k
1577
908.15
OAK
13
X� ,`,;4
1585
911.17
OAK
12
12
X "<
1588
911.42
OAK
13
X n,
'
1594
908.98
OAK
13
6
X
" �
y*
1598
908.11
OAK
15
9
X
%°
1606
911.81
OAK
13
13
X
1607
911.57
OAK
12
X
1610
909.93
OAK
13
12
10
X
1617
908.74
OAK
12
12
6
X
1618
908.74
OAK
13
12
X
1620
909.15
BLACK CHERRY
13
X
1623
909.33
OAK
14
X
1626
912.16
OAK
12
X
1628
912.52
OAK
12
10
9
X
1631
912.15
OAK
14
13
9
9
X
1634
912.00
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
1636
912.53
OAK
12
9
6
X
1646
913.31
OAK
16
X
1657
911.37
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
1661
911.69
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
1670
910.83
OAK
12
X
1678
909.56
OAK
17
X
1686
911.13
OAK
14
X
1690
912.51
OAK
14
12
11
10
X
1694
911.51
OAK
13
13
X
1696
911.80
OAK
13
X
1697
911.81
OAK
20
20
X
1699
911.33
OAK
14
X
1700
912.02
OAK
15
14
12
X
1702
911.43
OAK
18
18
X
1705
911.41
OAK
14
11
X
1708
910.42
BLACK CHERRY
12
8
X
1713
910.81
BLACK CHERRY
13
X
1716
910.51
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
1718
910.24
SPRUCE
6
X
1719
910.36
SPRUCE
7
X
1720
910.35
SPRUCE
7
X
1721
910.58
SPRUCE
6
X
1722
910.74
SPRUCE
7
X
1723
912.30
OAK
12
12
X
1725
911.87
BLACK CHERRY
16
12
X
1730
910.96
OAK
13
X
1735
912.86
OAK
18
17
X
1737
913.03
OAK
12
X
1743
911.84
OAK
13
X
1746
911.82
PINE
13
X
1747
912.06
PINE
10
X
1749
911.46
PINE
8
X
1752
908.81
PINE
12
X
1753
909.83
PINE
13
X
1754
910.07
PINE
13
X
1755
910.32
PINE
24
9
X
1756
907.21
ASH
19
X
1757
906.81
ASH
15
X
1758
911.23
COTTONWOOD
32
X
1759
907.14
WILLOW
17
X
1760
907.90
PINE
6
X
1761
907.80
PINE
6
X
1762
907.73
PINE
6
X
1763
907.76
PINE
10
X
1764
908.02
PINE
8
X
1765
907.69
PINE
14
X
1766
908.07
PINE
14
X
1767
907.71
PINE
7
X
1768
908.01
PINE
7
X
1769
909.9
PINE
14
X
1770
909.93
PINE
13
X
1771
909.78
PINE
12
X
1772
909.8
PINE
12
X
1773
909.79
PINE
14
X
1774
909.88
PINE
13
X
1775
909.09
COTTONWOOD
17
X
1776
908.59
PINE
11
X
1777
909.10
PINE
14
X
1778
908.86
ASH
14
X
1780
910.55
SPRUCE
9
X
1781
910.52
SPRUCE
10
X
1782
910.47
SPRUCE
12
X
1787
910.75
PINE
7
X
1788
910.50
PINE
6
X
1789
909.36
PINE
6
X
1790
908.65
PINE
10
X
1791
907.23
PINE
9
X
1792
907.06
PINE
11
X
1793
908.15
PINE
6
X
1794
908.03
PINE
9
X
1796
908.85
MAPLE
16
X
1797
908.84
SPRUCE
10
X
1798
910.89
MAPLE
20
X
1801
911.27
SPRUCE
10
X
1804
906.92
PINE
8
X
1805
907.05
PINE
10
X
1806
907.36
PINE
8
X
1807
907.45
PINE
9
X
1808
907.23
PINE
9
X
1809
906.88
PINE
6
X
1810
906.98
PINE
9
X
1811
907.08
PINE
10
X
1812
907.22
PINE
7
X
1813
907.43
MAPLE
18
14
X
1814
907.32
MAPLE
14
X
1815
907.40
MAPLE
22
X
1817
907.19
PINE
10
X
1818
907.19
PINE
12
X
1819
907.03
PINE
10
X
1820
907.21
PINE
12
X
1821
906.87
PINE
8
X
1822
906.98
PINE
7
X
1823
906.93
PINE
8
X
1824
906.62
PINE
10
X
1825
906.57
PINE
9
X
1826
906.78
PINE
9
X
1827
906.57
PINE
11
X
1828
906.52
ELM
12
8
X
1829
906.76
PINE
10
X
1830
906.74
PINE
6
X
1831
907.99
PINE
6
X
1832
907.89
PINE
8
X
1833
907.93
PINE
10
X
1834
908.23
PINE
9
X
1835
907.83
PINE
8
X
1836
907.59
PINE
12
X
1837
907.21
PINE
10
X
1838
907.2
PINE
6
X
1839
907.29
PINE
12
X
2006
912.85
OAK
13
9
X
2008
911.92
RED OAK
13
X
2009
912.16
RED OAK
12
X
2013
914.97
HARD MAPLE
19
X
2014
907.03
RED OAK
14
10
X
2017
905.96
ASH
13
X
2019
906.14
RED OAK
16
X
2020
909.16
ASH
15
X
2021
907.39
ASH
18
22
X
2023
906.92
RED OAK
19
15
X
2024
906.46
ASH
12
X
2025
906.51
RED OAK
18
X
2029
905.99
RED OAK
14
X
2030
905.74
RED OAK
14
X
2032
906.30
POPLAR
12
X
2037
906.82
ASH
12
X
2041
906.82
PINE
6
X
2042
906.83
PINE
8
X
2045
907.27
PINE
11
X
2046
907.27
PINE
11
X
2047
906.89
PINE
11
X
2048
907.40
PINE
12
X
2056
907.11
RED OAK
25
X
2059
905.54
POPLAR
12
X
2060
906.95
RED OAK
25
X
2062
906.30
RED OAK
12
X
2063
906.35
RED OAK
14
X
2064
906.60
RED OAK
23
X
2067
911.88
RED OAK
16
12
7
X
2068
911.92
RED OAK
12
8
X
2069
912.00
RED OAK
13
X
2071
912.18
RED OAK
12
11
X
2073
911.96
RED OAK
14
X
2077
912.62
RED OAK
13
X
2078
913.15
RED OAK
15
X
2079
913.12
RED OAK
15
X
2080
912.96
RED OAK
15
X
2081
912.19
RED OAK
18
17
14
X
2083
911.86
RED OAK
24
X
2086
912.43
RED OAK
13
X
2088
912.21
RED OAK
14
14
X
2089
912.10
RED OAK
13
X
2090
912.21
RED OAK
13
X
2091
911.62
RED OAK
16
9
X
2092
911.43
RED OAK
14
12
X
2095
911.34
RED OAK
14
X
2096
911.46
RED OAK
14
X
2097
911.65
RED OAK
14
X
2098
911.66
RED OAK
15
15
X
2099
911.26
PINE
13
X
2100
910.6
PINE
8
X
2101
910.98
PINE
9
X
2102
910.77
CEDAR
14
X
2103
911.27
PINE
10
X
2104
911.08
PINE
15
X
2105
910.38
PINE
14
X
2106
910.40
PINE
14
X
2107
910.31
PINE
13
X
2108
910.07
PINE
13
X
2109
909.97
PINE
13
X
2119
912.35
ASH
13
X
2124
913.25
ELM
12
X
2133
913.07
BLACK CHERRY
13
X
2145
911.94
BLACK CHERRY
13
X
2146
911.42
BLACK CHERRY
17
X
2154
911.39
RED OAK
15
X
2156
910.91
HACKBERRY
18
X
2157
910.55
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
2163
911.88
RED OAK
22
X
2168
910.28
SPRUCE
11
X
2169
910.03
SPRUCE
9
X
2170
909.71
SPRUCE
8
X
2171
910.03
OAK
15
14
X
2173
909.68
OAK
22
X
2174
907.74
OAK
14
X
2175
907.66
OAK
13
X
2176
908.00
OAK
20
X
2184
908.79
OAK
15
X
2187
908.73
OAK
16
X
2188
909.46
OAK
12
X
2190
909.72
OAK
16
X
2194
909.84
OAK
12
X
2195
909.61
OAK
12
X
2196
909.81
OAK
16
X
2197
909.43
OAK
13
X
2199
908.56
OAK
17
X
2200
908.78
OAK
14
X
2205
908.51
OAK
15
X
2211
906.31
PINE
7
X
2212
906.65
PINE
8
X
2213
905.69
SRUCE
11
X
2214
906.29
PINE
14
X
2215
906.17
PINE
9
X
2216
906.86
PINE
10
X
2217
906.85
PINE
14
X
2223
907.00
PINE
12
X
2225
906.94
PINE
7
X
2226
907.03
PINE
6
X
2227
907.23
PINE
13
X
2228
907.34
PINE
14
X
2229
907.28
PINE
14
X
2230
907.63
PINE
10
X
2232
910.34
ELM
14
X
2244
912.05
SRUCE
6
X
2245
911.68
SRUCE
6
X
2250
913.00
OAK
26
X
2252
906.92
PINE
6
X
2258
906.87
SPRUCE
9
X
2259
907.07
PINE
9
9
X
2260
906.81
PINE
13
X
2261
907.37
PINE
7
X
2262
907.2
PINE
10
X
2263
907.48
PINE
17
X
2264
907.47
PINE
17
X
2265
907.45
PINE
11
X
2267
907.27
PINE
10
10
X
2268
906.77
PINE
10
X
2271
907.19
PINE
11
X
2272
906.96
PINE
13
X
2273
906.92
PINE
10
X
2274
907.02
PINE
10
X
2275
907.11
PINE
14
X
2276
907.13
PINE
10
X
2277
907.12
PINE
15
X
2278
907.22
PINE
14
X
2279
907.53
PINE
14
X
2280
907.87
PINE
10
X
2281
907.39
OAK
12
X
2282
906.97
PINE
7
X
2283
907.14
PINE
10
X
2284
907.14
PINE
10
X
2285
908.07
ELM
27
X
2287
910.39
MAPLE
20
X
2289
911.07
ELM
16
X
2290
910.39
ELM
15
X
2291
910.55
MAPLE
21
X
2294
907.06
MAPLE
14
X
2296
907.76
ELM
30
X
2298
907.20
PINE
12
X
2299
907.63
PINE
13
X
2300
907.13
PINE
12
X
2301
907.25
PINE
11
X
2302
907.53
PINE
14
X
2303
907.07
PINE
13
X
2304
907.32
PINE
9
X
2305
906.96
PINE
8
X
2306
906.95
PINE
7
X
2307
907.29
PINE
8
X
2308
907.34
PINE
10
X
2309
907.30
PINE
12
X
2310
907.54
PINE
12
X
2311
907.44
PINE
6
X
2312
907.72
PINE
10
6
X
2313
908.23
PINE
7
X
2314
908.20
PINE
7
X
2315
908.01
PINE
10
X
2316
908.00
PINE
10
7
X
2317
907.75
PINE
8
X
2318
907.51
PINE
12
X
2319
907.32
PINE
12
X
2320
907.17
PINE
14
X
2321
906.92
PINE
10
X
2322
906.81
PINE
10
X
2323
907.15
PINE
14
X
2325
906.64
PINE
13
X
2326
907.29
PINE
13
X
2328
907.37
PINE
9
X
2329
906.85
PINE
12
X
2330
906.59
PINE
14
X
2331
906.85
PINE
12
X
2332
906.49
PINE
13
X
2333
906.67
PINE
14
X
2334
906.82
PINE
14
X
2335
907.37
SPRUCE
9
X
2336
907.37
SPRUCE
7
X
2337
907.59
SPRUCE
7
X
2338
907.60
SPRUCE
6
X
2339
907.50
SPRUCE
10
X
2340
907.04
SPRUCE
6
X
2341
906.69
SPRUCE
7
X
2342
906.41
SPRUCE
7
X
2343
906.38
SPRUCE
8
X
2357
906.93
POPLAR
14
X
2358
906.72
PINE
10
X
2359
906.56
PINE
13
X
2360
906.65
PINE
8
X
2361
906.72
PINE
13
X
2362
906.67
PINE
9
X
2363
907.12
PINE
11
X
2364
907.83
PINE
12
X
2365
907.26
PINE
6
X
2366
906.90
PINE
12
X
2367
907.42
PINE
13
X
2368
907.44
PINE
14
X
2369
907.72
PINE
13
X
2370
907.38
PINE
13
X
2377
907.16
PINE
7
X
2378
907.39
PINE
10
X
2379
907.39
PINE
10
X
2380
907.49
PINE
9
X
2381
908.01
PINE
8
X
2382
906.95
PINE
9
X
2383
907.96
PINE
9
X
2384
908.05
PINE
7
X
2385
906.81
PINE
8
X
2386
906.96
PINE
8
X
2387
906.72
PINE
6
X
2388
906.64
PINE
6
X
2389
906.69
PINE
6
X
2392
906.56
PINE
8
X
2393
906.61
PINE
11
X
2394
906.66
PINE
6
X
2396
906.55
PINE
11
X
2397
907.49
PINE
10
X
2398
907.62
PINE
8
X
2399
906.64
PINE
10
X
2400
906.43
9
X
2511
909.59
_PINE
RED OAK
16
10
X
2512
910.03
RED OAK
16
X
2514
911.68
RED OAK
36
X
2515
911.04
RED OAK
15
X
2516
910.07
RED OAK
20
18
12
X
2518
909.73
RED OAK
20
X
2521
908.79
PINE
6
X
2531
908.54
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
2534
909.09
RED OAK
18
X
2535
910.07
RED OAK
30
X
2537
913.28
RED OAK
18
X
2538
913.3
RED OAK
22
X
2539
913.55
HARD MAPLE
12
X
2540
912.91
RED OAK
18
X
2543
912.73
RED OAK
22
X
2544
912.99
WHITE OAK
14
X
2545
912.39
RED OAK
22
X
2546
912.67
RED OAK
18
14
X
2547
912.70
RED OAK
14
X
2548
912.10
PINE
6
X
2554
907.97
HARD MAPLE
18
X
2557
909.57
HARD MAPLE
12
X
2559
910.43
HARD MAPLE
20
X
2560
910.35
PINE
7
X
2561
906.54
LOCUST
18
X
2562
906.84
LOCUST
14
X
2564
913.26
RED OAK
30
X
2565
913.14
PINE
6
X
2566
913.55
RED OAK
16
16
16
X
2567
913.26
RED OAK
12
X
2568
913.21
PINE
6
X
2569
912.52
PINE
12
X
2570
913.25
PINE
8
X
2571
913.74
RED OAK
22
20
X
2572
912.41
CEDAR
9
X
2574
912.72
CEDAR
9
X
2575
912.55
PINE
10
X
2576
912.99
PINE
7
X
2577
913.85
RED OAK
20
X
2578
913.32
CEDAR
7
X
2579
912.69
RED OAK
38
X
2581
912.59
RED OAK
24
X
2583
912.02
HARD MAPLE
12
X
2585
910.84
RED OAK
24
18
X
2586
910.24
RED OAK
26
X
2587
910.04
RED OAK
16
X
2588
909.95
RED OAK
20
X
2589
909.87
RED OAK
18
X
2590
910.67
RED OAK
22
X
2591
910.38
CEDAR
7
X
2592
910.41
CEDAR
8
X
2593
909.89
PINE
9
X
2594
910.51
PINE
6
X
2596
908.52
RED OAK
12
X
2598
907.82
PINE
9
X
2599
907.18
PINE
7
X
2615
906.53
ELM
18
X
2616
907.18
ELM
12
X
2624
907.58
PINE
9
X
2625
908.00
PINE
8
X
2626
908.31
RED OAK
23
X
2627
908.60
RED OAK
27
X
2628
908.71
RED OAK
26
X
2629
908.56
RED OAK
20
X
2631
909.28
RED OAK
18
X
2632
908.64
RED OAK
14
X
2633
907.92
RED OAK
14
X
2635
908.04
RED OAK
32
X
2636
908.11
RED OAK
14
X
2637
908.90
RED OAK
20
X
2638
909.67
RED OAK
28
X
2640
908.48
RED OAK
18
16
X
2641
908.37
RED OAK
22
X
2642
908.80
RED OAK
20
X
2643
909.54
PINE
6
X
2646
910.80
RED OAK
34
X
2648
911.35
PINE
7
X
2649
912.00
HARD MAPLE
12
X
2650
912.70
BOX ELDER
15
X
2651
911.93
PINE
9
X
2652
913.21
PINE
10
X
2654
913.68
PINE
8
X
2655
913.54
PINE
7
X
2656
913.66
PINE
6
X
2657
913.60
CEDAR
8
X
2658
913.57
PINE
6
X
2659
913.79
BURR OAK
15
X
2660
913.88
RED OAK
32
X
2661
914.41
RED OAK
15
X
2662
913.73
RED OAK
19
X
2663
913.56
RED OAK
15
X
2664.
913.50
RED OAK
15
15
X
2665
913.40
RED OAK
20
X
2671
912.90
RED OAK
29
X
2687
912.06
RED OAK
13
X
2691
913.17
RED OAK
26
X
2693
912.23
RED OAK
17
X
2694
913.10
RED OAK
19
16
15
X
2699
913.93
RED OAK
15
X
2700
914.11
RED OAK
14
X
2701
915.00
RED OAK
21
17
X
2702
914.33
RED OAK
16
X
2707
912.59
CEDAR
8
X
2708
912.29
CEDAR
6
X
2714
913.90
RED OAK
23
X
2715
913.93
RED OAK
20
X
2716
913.61
RED OAK
25
X
2717
912.63
OAK
18
X
2718
912.73
RED OAK
22
X
2719
912.53
OAK
22
X
2723
912.55
RED OAK
13
6
X
2735
913.51
BURR OAK
19
X
2740
912.27
OAK
16
X
2742
913.75
PINE
6
X
2762
912.88
RED OAK
14
X
2768
912.23
OAK
16
X
2772
910.96
RED OAK
12
6
X
2773
910.45
RED OAK
12
X
2774
910.68
RED OAK
12
X
2775
911.37
OAK
12
10
X
2778
910.92
RED OAK
16
X
2788
913.02
PINE
10
X
2790
911.82
RED OAK
14
X
2798
912.17
RED OAK
12
X
2804
914.47
RED OAK
20
20
X
2806
913.89
BURR OAK
20
X
2822
911.04
POPLAR
14
X
2838
913.29
BURR OAK
18
X
2839
914.65
RED OAK
14
X
2841
912.97
RED OAK
20
X
2842
912.66
WHITE OAK
28
X
2858
913.25
WHITE OAK
28
X
2859
912.22
PINE
6
X
2860
912.58
RED OAK
19
X
2861
912.76
WHITE OAK
20
X
2865
913.5
PINE
13
X
2866
915.01
BURR OAK
20
X
2867
915.18
RED OAK
36
X
2868
914.84
RED OAK
20
X
2869
915.35
RED OAK
20
20
16
X
2870
913.48
RED OAK ,
24
X
2871
913.07
RED OAK
14
X
2872
913.67
WHITE OAK
15
X
2873
913.58
RED OAK
26
X
2874
913.05
PINE
9
X
2876
912.75
WHITE OAK
14
X
2877
913.59
RED OAK
20
X
2878
913.47
RED OAK
18
X
2879
914.38
BURR OAK
12
X
2880
914.33
RED OAK
24
X
2894
914.14
WHITE OAK
14
X
2905
913.99
POPLAR
20
X
2906
912.96
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
2907
912.66
ASH
12
X
2908
912.50
BLACK CHERRY
14
X
2911
912.39
ELM
14
X
2919
911.75
BLACK CHERRY
12
10
X
2920
911.29
BLACK CHERRY
12
X
2921
911.34
ASH
12
X
2925
913.73
WHITE OAK
14
X
2927
914.2
BURR OAK
12
X
2932
914.71
RED OAK
14
X
2934
914.87
RED OAK
14
X
2935
915.06
RED OAK
18
X
2936
915.66
RED OAK
18
X
2953
914.96
OAK
14
X
X
2954
915.14
OAK
14
X
X
2961
911.60
RED OAK
32
7
X
X
2964
913.03
RED OAK
20
X
X
2965
914.71
RED OAK
16
X
X
2966
914.73
RED OAK
24
X
X
2970
915.22
BLACK CHERRY
14
X
X
2971
915.27
OAK
12
X
X
2975
915.86
RED OAK
14
X
X
2991
914.23
BURR OAK
15
X
X
2998
915.81
BURR OAK
20
12
X
X
GROUP A
1
PINE
8
X
2
PINE
7
X
3
PINE
8
X
4
PINE
7
X
5
PINE
6
X
6
PINE
6
X
7
PINE
6
X
8
PINE
7
7
X
9
PINE
7
X
10
PINE
8
X
11
PINE
7
X
12
PINE
7
X
13
PINE
7
X
14
PINE
7
X
15
PINE
7
X
16
PINE
8
6
X
17
PINE
7
X
18
PINE
7
X
19
PINE
8
X
20
PINE
7
X
21
PINE
8
X
22
PINE
9
X
23
SPRUCE
9
X.
24
PINE
10
X
25
PINE
9
X
26
PINE
8
X
27
PINE
6
X
28
PINE
7
X
29
PINE
7
X
30
PINE
6
6
X
31
PINE
9
X
32
PINE
8
X
33
PINE
8
X
34
PINE
7
X
35
PINE
7
X
36
PINE
6
6
X
37
PINE
7
X
38
PINE
8
X
39
PINE
6
X
40
PINE
7
X
41
PINE
8
X
42
PINE
8
X
43
PINE
6
X
44
PINE
6
6
X
45
PINE
7
X
46
PINE
10
X
47
PINE
8
X
48
PINE
6
6
X
49
PINE
10
X
50
PINE
8
X
51
PINE
7
X
52
PINE
6
X
53
PINE
7
X
54
PINE
8
X
55
PINE
7
X
56
PINE
6
X
57
PINE
6
X
58
PINE
7
X
59
PINE
8
X
60
PINE
9
X
61
PINE
6
X
62
PINE
10
X
63
PINE
7
X
64
PINE
6
X
65
PINE
11
X
66
PINE
8
X
67
PINE
7
X
68
PINE
9
X
69
PINE
6
X
70 _
PINE
6
X
GROUP B
1
PINE
10
X
2
PINE
10
X
3
PINE
12
X
4
PINE
9
X
5
PINE
9
X
6
PINE
10
X
7
PINE
10
X
8
PINE
12
X
9
PINE
6
X
10
PINE
9
X
11
PINE
9
X
12
PINE
11
X
13
PINE
12
X
14
PINE
12
X
15
PINE
7
X
16
PINE
12
X
17
PINE
9
X
18
PINE
10
X
19
PINE
10
X
20
PINE
10
X
21
PINE
10
X
22
PINE
12
X
23
PINE
13
X
24
PINE
11
X
25
PINE
12
X
26
PINE
11
X
27
PINE
12
X
28
PINE
10
X
29
PINE
13
X
30
PINE
10
X
31
PINE
10
X
32
PINE
12
X
33
PINE
11
X
34
PINE
13
X
35
PINE
13
X
36
PINE
13
X
37
PINE
12
X
38
PINE
13
X
39
PINE
10
X
40
PINE
9
X
41
PINE
11
X
42
PINE
8
X
43
PINE
11
X
44
PINE
10
X
45
PINE
8
X
46
PINE
10
X
47
PINE
10
9
X
48
PINE
9
X
49
PINE
11
X
50
PINE
10
X
51
PINE
11
X
52
PINE
6
X
53
PINE
10
X
54
PINE
9
X
55
PINE
9
X
56
PINE
6
X
57
PINE
10
X
58
PINE
9
X
59
PINE
6
X
60
PINE
7
X
61
PINE
11
X
62
PINE
9
X
63
PINE
9
X
64
PINE
12
X
65
PINE
11
X
66
PINE
12
X
67
PINE
9
X
68
PINE
9
X
69
PINE
11
X
70
PINE
13
X
71
PINE
11
X
72
PINE
11
X
73
PINE
10
X
74
PINE
9
X
75
PINE
9
X
76
PINE
9
X
77
PINE
9
X
78
PINE
9
X
79
PINE
9
X
80
PINE
7
X
81
PINE
9
X
82
PINE
10
X
83
PINE
7
X
84
PINE
8
X
85
PINE
9
X
86
PINE
12
X
87
PINE
11
X
88
PINE
10
X
89
PINE
6
X
90
PINE
8
X
91
PINE
8
X
92
PINE
12
X
93
PINE
9
X
94
PINE
7
X
95
PINE
6
X
96
PINE
10
X
97
PINE
10
X
98
PINE
6
X
99
PINE
9
X
100
PINE
8
X
101
PINE
7
X
102
PINE
10
X
103
PINE
9
X
104
PINE
6
X
105
PINE
7
X
106
PINE
9
X
107
PINE
12
X
108
PINE
7
X
109
PINE
6
X
110
PINE
6
X
111
PINE
11
X
112
PINE
11
X
113
PINE
10
X
114
PINE
12
X
115
PINE
11
X
116
PINE
8
X
117
PINE
8
X
118
PINE
9
X
119
PINE
10
X
120
PINE
13
X
121
PINE
14
X
122
PINE
14
X
123
PINE
13
X
124
PINE
10
X
125
PINE
12
X
126
ELM
9
X
127
PINE
6
X
128
PINE
11
X
129
ELM
12
X
130
PINE
11
X
131
PINE
9
X
132
PINE
10
X
133
PINE
11
X
134
PINE
10
X
135
PINE
9
X
136
PINE
13
X
137
PINE
10
X
138
PINE
11
X
139
PINE
10
X
140
PINE
10
X
141
PINE
13
X
142
PINE
9
X
143
PINE
12
X
144
PINE
7
X
145
PINE
12
X
146
PINE
11
X
147
PINE
11
X
148
PINE
15
X
149
PINE
9
X
150
PINE
14
X
151
14
X
152
_PINE
PINE
8
X
153
PINE
15
X
154
PINE
14
X
155
PINE
12
X
156
PINE
12
X
157
PINE
13
X
158
PINE
12
_
_
X
159
PINE
11
X
160
PINE
11
X
161
PINE
11
X
162
PINE
10
X
163
PINE
12
X
164
PINE
12
X
165
PINE
14
X
166
PINE
12
X
167
PINE
8
X
168
PINE
6
X
169
PINE
9
X
170
PINE
6
X
171
PINE
13
X
172
PINE
13
X
173
PINE
10
_
X
174
PINE
14
X
175
PINE
7
X
176
PINE
13
X
177
PINE
15
X
178
PINE
14
X
179
CEDAR
6
X
180
PINE
9
X
181
PINE
9
X
182
PINE
9
X
183
PINE
6
X
184
PINE
6
X
185
PINE
8
X
186
PINE
6
X
187
PINE
7
X
188
PINE
7
X
189
PINE
6
X
190
PINE
. 6
X
191
PINE
7
X
192
PINE
6
X
193
PINE
8
X
194
PINE
6
X
195
PINE
6
X
196
PINE
6
X
GROUP C
1
PINE
6
X
2
PINE
7
X
3
PINE
8
X
4
PINE
8
X
5
PINE
14
X
6
PINE
16
X
7
PINE
9
X
8
PINE
6
X
9
PINE
12
X
10
PINE
6
X
11
PINE
11
X
12
PINE
7
X
13
PINE
12
X
14
PINE
10
X
15
PINE
7
_
X
16
PINE
10
X
17
PINE
13
X
18
PINE
7
X
19
PINE
8
X
20
PINE
8
X
21
PINE
10
X
22
PINE
11
X
23
PINE
9
X
24
PINE
10
X
25
PINE
10
X
26
PINE
9
X
27
PINE
13
X
28
PINE
11
X
29
PINE
11
X
30
PINE
7
X
31
PINE
9
X
32
PINE
9
X
33
PINE
7
X
GROUP D
1
PINE
6
X
2
PINE
6
X
3
PINE
9
X
4
PINE
10
X
5
PINE
8
X
6
PINE
10
X
7
PINE
11
X
8
PINE
9
X
9
PINE
9
X
10
PINE
9
X
11
PINE
10
X
12
PINE
10
6
X
13
PINE
11
X
14
PINE
10
X
15
PINE
11
X
16
PINE
13
X
17
APPLE
6
X
18
PINE
11
X
19
PINE
6
X
20
PINE
9
X
21
PINE
7
X
22
PINE
6
X
23
PINE
6
X
24
PINE
6
X
25
PINE
10
X
26
PINE
6
X
27
PINE
7
6
X
28
PINE
13
X
29
PINE
10
X
30
PINE
10
X
31
PINE
12
X
32
PINE
11
X
33
PINE
9
X
34
PINE
10
X
35
PINE
11
X
36
PINE
10
X
37
PINE
10
X
38
PINE
11
X
39
PINE
10
X
40
PINE
6
X
41
PINE
8
7
X
42
PINE
11
X
43
PINE
9
X
44
PINE
10
X
45
PINE
9
X
46
PINE
10
X
47
PINE
12
X
48
PINE
11
X
49
PINE
10
X
1
50 1
IPINE
61 1 1 1 1 X I
TOTAL TREES: 1013
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES: 11871
TOTAL TREES SAVED: 495 48.9%
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES SAVED: 5425 45.7%
TOTAL TREES REMOVED: 518 51.1%
TOTAL CALIPER INCHES REMOVED: 6446 54.3%
NOTE:
THIS LIST CONTAINS ONLY CONIFEROUS TREES LARGER THAN SIX (6) CALIPER INCHES AND
DECIDUOUS TREES LARGER THAN TWELVE (12) CALIPER INCHES.
AGENDA ITEM 5C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
DATE: May 30, 2001
TOPIC: Plan Review /New Dental Building /Apollo Drive
BACKGROUND:
Please refer to attached letter of transmittal RE: Lino Lakes Family Dentistry.
All water leaving this site is routed to a pond on the NW corner of Lylac and Apollo
Drive.
Most of the trees are boxelder. There is one 8 inch oak on the site.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve with standard recommendations /additional Environmental Board
recommendations.
2. Do not recommend approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
Application received
Application determined complete
Review period extended on to
Application approved by City Council on
Application incomplete letter sent
CITY OF LINO LAKES - LAND USE APPLICATION
CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX
FEE ESCROW DEPOSIT
Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500
Conditional Use Permit $ 350
Interim Use Permit $ 350
__ Site Plan Review 2 $ 500
Subdivision:
Preliminary Plat $ 1,250
Preservation Development 1,250
Planned Development Overlay 1,250
Minor Subdivision/ $ 250
Lot Split
Rezoning $ 350
Vacation: drainage, street, utility $ 250
Variance $ 250
Property Address Y`k:4 `4 r -
PIN #
d412, 7 C
Legal Description: Lot / L' Block Addition
Existing Land Use V4... A'q T, Existing Zoning -
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: I v1,1i
q3,111L 2J LIk4.7
Applicant: Owner (if different than applicant):
name vez2 ' (.te a ( o name
address 77) j • L At at2.,v address
1)00 . 5S014
phone (p•51- 7 -71,30 phone
f a x / 4 7 1 - - 7 5 6 , — / 0 40,5' fax
1VED
MAY 1 4 2001
CiTY OF LINO LAKES
CITY OF LINO LAKES -LAND USE APPLICATION
PAGE 2
Your request will not be scheduled for public hearing or city review by city advisory
bodies until all required information has been reviewed and found to be adequate by city
staff.
MN Statute 15.99 allows a 60 -day review period for fmal action on an application, once
that application is found to be complete, unless the City extends the review period and so
notifies the applicant. To allow for full review that fits the City's meeting schedules, we
may send a letter extending the review of this project for a second 60 days as
allowed by state law
NOTE: In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable
provisions of the City Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation
and hereby agree to pay all statements received pertaining to additional application expense and city review.
Application Deadline M.,{�`� / 4.'
Environmental Board Meeting I � -2)(
Park Board Meeting U � C-3 +q1
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting ,,U U h e
h i
City Council Meeting �
Date 51-/ r 2/
NOTE: Permits may also be required from the Watershed District, Anoka County, DNR, Corp of Engineers, Others
May 14, 2001
Lino Lakes City Offices
1189 Main Street
Circle Pines, MN 55014 -2123
Attn: City Planning
RE: Lino Lakes Family Dentistry Narrative
PROGRESSIVE
Architecture
275 East Fourth Street
Suite 530
Saint Paul, MN 55101
(612) 292 -1061
Fax 292 -1819
Attached is our application for a new Dental office. The proposed location is on the
north side of Apollo Drive and West of Lake Drive. Lino Lakes Family Dentistry has
had a reputable practice in the city of Lino Lakes for many years. It is owned and
operated by Dr Mike Hyden and Dr. Craig Sulzdorf. If approved, they are planning to
move their practice to this new location.
The site is presently zoned GB "General Business ", and a Dental office is considered to
be conforming use. We are proposing a 5,067 square foot building. 4,039 square feet
will be used for office space and the additional 1,028 square feet is planned as storage
and or future office space. Parking requirements have been met for the proposed office
space and provisions have been made on the site to accommodate for the additional
parking requirements if and when the storage area is converted to office space.
The site location is divided into approximately two equal halves. The West side of the
parcel will accommodate the Dental office and the East side will remain for future
development.
Because of a restriction limiting the number of driveways on to Apollo Drive, our lot will
share a common driveway with the lot to the West. This will be located in the drive
easement previously approved by the city council. Our main and customer driveway will
quickly turn to parallel Apollo Drive. Parking will be on the East side of our building.
Future parking spaces will have a "green strip" between the existing and proposed. This
will break up the mass of asphalt and give more of a rhythm to building mass and vacant
or parking space.
We will also have a service drive directly down the parking easement. This is a
temporary drive and will service storage area and the trash receptacle. This service drive
is temporary and will only service minor traffic. Due to its low use, we would like to use
an asphalt curb in this area. The rest of our site will have a B 6/12 concrete curb.
The building will have faux stone material on all the "Gable End Walls ". Hardy Board
"Cement board" will be used on the remainder. The look of the contrasting materials will
give the end walls a solid or structural look with the Hardy plank giving a warm
agricultural feeling to the building. Overall, the appearance will be professional but with
a touch of the rural character and history of the area.
We have discussed the landscape requirements with Jeff Smizer and we are confident that
our plants cape surpasses the basic requirements of the city. The plantings have been
designed to enhance both the site and building when viewed from the road, to offer
privacy to the staff when using the exterior patio area, and to offer additional
enhancement for patients when approaching the main entrance.
Our signage will be a low monument type sign that conforms to the city's requirements.
We are excited about the new office and look forward to moving to this new location.
We feel that the proposed dental office will be a positive addition to the area and the
development that is coming to the new neighborhood.
Sincerely,
7.
Scott`Mower
Progressive Architecture
SM:so
Enclosures
CTIFICTE OF SURVEY
�
FOR: circle -sex VFW
r.
0
c0
CO
m
t
0
Lai
247.33
L_
4
lQ
IP Ge
CooV0NS
X911.51
6.1.15r
•
•
911.08
X912.71
91'.x3
X912.66
X913.30
X913.03
S. like of the N. 693 feet
5189°062'42"E
913.57
X913.76
X91.3442.81
• 10 pine'
'912.85
X ... ........................ x913.99 X914.39
914.00
412.07
915.20
6"pine 6 "pine
914.94
913.89
10 "cherry
914.58
912.92
•
•
X911.85
X911.75 X
912.4
X911.56
X911.87
X
912.14
oa-rt: 5 /t}Iol
PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC.
9180 LEXINGTON AVE. N.E.
CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014
(763) 785 -1043 FAX 786 -6007
RECEIVED
MAY 1 5 2001
WY OF LINO LAKES
PROPER DESCRIPTIeN-
The East 412.07 feet of Lot 16, Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County,
Minnesota, lying within the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, lying south of the North 693.00 feet and
Tying north of the 100.00 foot rood easement for Apollo Drive as per Doc.
(
'913..
912.41
912.31 10 "Box
10 "Box
10 "Box
10 Box
12.77
912.54
- -- -1B
8 ox 2.67
t::::)
912.14 ..........................
65.34
1.50
1 A , X911.0
1/1/ ••
I,
X911.25 r ,4
X912.84
16 "box
913.07 X
8 "oak X912.
12 "box
X911.23
CO
2.59
E. line of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 8. T.31, R.22
•
23 X91j.15
ox
911.74
6 "cedar
8 "Box
911.72
X911.99
X911.57 .. .
912.23
912.53
/ 9p4'
2.03
X911.62
911.12
8 "Box
X910.47
910.66
X910.57
X910.41
X910.116
X910
910.18 Sr"- .**-•
NORTH
/
/
/
945-
X9/.20
911.33
711195
R- 868.51
...............
. 910.99 911.20 911.58
917.#5' .... a( - .912.25
911.09
911.30
�•O 909.50
�XX 909.18'
909.65 ••••... son' MH
Inv.= 884,18±
10.63
•
909.64
909.11
Storm MN
Inv.�901.8g.-
VE
908.26
Inv.- 903.5*N
Inv. - 902.57E -W
.910,• .............
X
909.44,$8
910.31
.909•...
908.12 908.52
•
908.99
rn
In
•••••14911:13
909.77
O
O
\��
1 /
1 (- \
of -ZY) i-
Scale 1"= 50' Drawn By: CWS
o Denotes Iron Set • Denotes Iron Found
Project Manager: XXX
Job No.:
Bearings shown are on an assumed datum.
�
.IC AUD 4 SONS, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS
9180 LEXINGTON AVE. NO.
CIRCLE PINES, MINNESOTA 55014 -3625
TEL. 163 -186 -5556 FAX 163 -186 -6001
I hereby certify that this p /an, survey or report was prepored by me or under my
direct supervision and that / am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws
of the State of Minnesota. Dated this day of , 2001.
License No.
AREA
SQ.Fr.
%
HARD SURFACE
20,697
229
IMPROVED DEVELOPMENT
34,112
100
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
31,228
NA
LOOM 4201
TRASH /
nict.
NM
1 d0D
PMCnO sEreAx --7
N _ rr
pn�
,
ATIV E
ltPrommeera'i/wzr
4
I toc:
I I
r a
Z
1,4,"
FUTURE -I FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT I STRUCTURE
IMPpI80Hm
1
z�tirA;
�YY;Q
3�G
.._ ,.,4
d
�
,
0
0,
•
I
LL
J
O i ;
L J
IN 410 &MOM° *
MOM
ear,
• e.
J i s1LGAli areyiY
■ ■sc.
11■i'7C7.
PAW ON
A■■
_
--_
■11■■"
■IV'
"!
a:►NeA
1,
i
4- - -- —
_rY1,��
w . °
OR 1114111 / w �a�
_ _ _____ ________ _ __ . _
- -J
MONUMENT ONIN
TO NE PIELOGNMO NTH
.1L MUE OLVI OPPINT
OSITE1
PLAN
. -2va
LINO LAKES FAMILY DENTAL
I57NIr TO GONNOIN TO LOCAL 600155
L« SO POOOMM TD COMPOIDI TO
AL WOOS
ROOK Meg KOOK
r41111At*
O SIGNAGE
v4' -V.0
NOM OA7155
W r elm =UMW
POEM
. \LLr2 \DIM!! \LLF2A 1.A}wy, 83/ 1 1 /2ee 1 01.J 1.0
4 MOW 1
moor FLNK MOM
�TRASH RECYCLE ENCLOSURE
u4' -ra
�CONTECT PLAN
nn
a'8
REVISICrS:
RECE1
MAY 14
CITY OF LINt
DRANK BV: %XXX
CHECKED BY:
VED
2001
3 LAKES*
64
fwgb
o<
LINO
LAKES
FAMILY
DENTISTRY
A1.2
•
°GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN
r -2Da
Z: \LLF2\DWG \LLF2A1.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:31:50 AM
RECEIV
MAY 142
,iTY OF LINO
;
D
1
KES
DRAWN BY: %XXX
CHECKED BY:
•
•
•
•
1115? 5? 5EWER
1NV E1EV 905.02
14' RCP
25 LF
CL SAO%
O UTILITY PLAN
1• -zaa
Z: \LLF2 \DWG \LLF2A1.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:32:20 AM
A1.4
•
IVED
4 200 4)
JO LAKES
•
•
0 41h.
nl�
1A 0
■■`S/L..11.:! \ /7 ■ ■ ■■
REVISIONS:
REDEI\
MAY 14
CITY OF LINO
O LANDSCAPE PLAN
1' .'2'y
Z : \LLF2\DWG\LLF2A1.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:32:50 AM
DRAWN BY: XXXX
CHECKED BY
DESIGNATION
NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
QTY
SIZE
A
SUGAR MAPLE
ACER SACCHARUM'MAJESTY
2
2"
B
MARHALL'S SEEDLESS ASH
FRAXINUS PENSYLVANICA "MARSHAL'S SEEDLESS'
1
2"
C
RIVER BIRCH
BETULA NIGRA
1
2"
D
PAPER BARK MAPLE
ACER GRISEUM
1
*7 gal
E
MADONA FLOWERING CRAB
MALUS "MAZAM*
3
#15 gal
F
DWARF BURNING BUSH
EUONYOMUS ALATUS "COMPACTUS"
1
#5 gal
G
AMUR MAPLE
ACER GINNALA "BAILEY COMPACTUS" 'NOT BIGUS"
1
*10 gal
H
ERMERALD ARBORVIATE
THU]A OCCIDENTALIS "EMRALD"
14
*7 gal
I
JIM DANDY WINTERBERRY
L VERITILICALLATA "JIM DANDY"
8
*5 gal
7
HOLLY'S HONEY 'HOSTA'
13
#1/2gal
K
SNOW MOUND SPIREA
APIRAEA NIPPONICA "SNOWMOUND'
4
*2 gal
L
SUNGOLD FALSECYPRESS
CHAMAECYPARIS PISIFERA "FILIFERA SUNGOLD"
14
*2 gal
M
LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA
SPIREA JAPONICA 'LITTLE PRINCESS"
2
*5 gal
N
ANNUALS
O
MESCANTHIUS
9
#1/2 gal
D
01
KES
OPER
I®
OPER
L1
OFFICE
HALL
L
HALL
ECU
MATCH LINE
•
OPER
H�LL
OPER
11231
STORAGE ROOM
DARK
HAIL
Cio 1
LAB
LAU
STO
ENTRY
STORAGE
El
Z: \LLF2 \DWG \LIf2A2.dwg, 05/11/01 09:18:01 AM
1iio)
HALL
11331
HALL
i3o
OPER
GONF
112'1
0
OFFIGE
HALL
EMI
BATH
Eil
O
MENS
ise
ENTRY
COURT
FINANCE
BREAK
TANK
STOR
�i081
REGEPT
BUS
WAITING
AREA
1102]
AIR
LOCK
MATCH LINE
•
11
11
11
11
I1
li
I1
I 1
I I
11
II
11
11
II
A8
041
u
i,,,...�.
REVISIONS:
RECEIVED
MAY 14`:001•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
DRANK BY: XXX%
CHECKED 8Y:
Aga $
tiA Q ;
t =W
::::::
a
LINO
LAKES
FAMILY
DENTISTRY
A 2.2
•
•
O SOUTH ELEVATION
/+ - 1':P
TOP R M.L4'
P RI PLR NAV •
U
OEAST ELEVATION
Z : \LLF2 \DWG \LLF2A3.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:36:33 AM
II
II
II
II
:LIB
RV a OA
TOP.
07141 wAr
J.._.J.":.
F.1. •41 ,, jam•
»IEAWflM MOAK PUMP
PV IUIIIC NIL
L! :i :1:'�
L ■l; Z _
1 '1.-' T- J.': ■1 : -�
w. 1', :Aim
dor
REVISIONS:
RE E!V
MAY 1 4 20
TY 'Jr ... ) L�
DRAWN BY: XXXX
CHECKED EY:
0�1
,I:ES
LINO
LAKES
FAMILY
DENTISTRY
A 3.1
•
00
TOP CP ILAN
IVY OAP
TOP.
f...4 911.0cmlowsill-
dth-gfataiTotillH Inin.striver‘riart
11--
Frpiti2904-e
-017.464:1111111=:: .:10,4111 9L11114116111:7:11;11.----7:F'
'-"r-raindlitig
tPiiallinatihtgliii_
a =I reartkiritalail411111"2 P11411111111.111111111Ellailohl
raw Ta-.7.11117ihriza.' "
m■linimNiNE:1424111124.citzre■N araakzedziij
I 11111.1.■
fl
CjWEST ELEVATION
1pr -
ZALLF2\DWG1LLF2A3.dwg, 05/11/2001 02:36:04 AM
_J
r
0-
•
OoT OP MAPII)
10W4P
TOP OP ILAN to
ON W
TOP.
114*4 Or •
A3.2
•
•
if o Lakes Family Den
Data for Lino Lakes Dentistry /0 / 5 i 3)
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 2.75 IN (Z-p.)
Prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
WATERSHED ROUTING
Page 1
14 May 01
OSUBCATCHMENT E REACH
SUBCATCHMENT 1
SUBCATCHMENT . 2
SUBCATCHMENT 101
APOND
= Existing Area 1 - To West
= Existing Area 2 - To Ex. CB
= Proposed Area 101
LINK
ti
Data for Lino Lakes Dentistry
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 2.75 IN
Prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 2
14 May 01
RUNOFF BY SCS TR -20 METHOD: TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 2.75 IN, SCS U.H.
RUNOFF SPAN = 5 -20 HRS, dt= .05 HRS, 301 POINTS
SUBCAT AREA Tc• WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL
NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) -- GROUND COVERS ( %CN) -- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF)
1 .09 7.5 100 %61 61 - .03 12.01 0.00
2 .69 14.5 100 %61 61 .13 12.10 .01
101 .78 15.0 61 %98 39 %61 83 1.25 12.05 .07
Data for Lino Lakes Dentistry
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 2.75 IN
Prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
SUBCATCHMENT 1 Existing Area 1 - To West
PEAK= .03 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME= 0.00 AF
SO -FT CN
4050.00 61 Grassy Area
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
SUBCATCHMENT 2
Comment
Segment ID:
Page 3
14 May 01
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 2.75 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
Existing Area 2 - To Ex. CB
PEAK= .13 CFS @ 12.10 HRS, VOLUME= .01 AF
SO -FT CN
30062.00 61 Grassy Area
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Comment
Segment ID:
SUBCATCHMENT 101 Proposed Area 101
PEAK= 1.25 CFS @ 12.05 HRS, VOLUME= .07 AF
SO-FT CN
20697.00 98 Impervious
13415.00 61 Grassy Area
34112.00 83
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
7.5
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 2.75 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
Tc (min)
14.5
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 2.75 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
Data for Lino Lakes Dentistry
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 4.10 IN (10-r.)
Prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc. 11111
Page 4
14 May 01
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
WATERSHED ROUTING
SUBCATCHMENT 1
SUBCATCHMENT 2
OSUBCATCHMENT REACH A POND
LINK
= Existing Area 1 - To West ->
= Existing Area 2 - To Ex. CB ->
SUBCATCHMENT 101 = Proposed Area 101 ->
Data for Lino Lakes Dentistry
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 4.10 IN
Prepared by Piowe Engineering, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 5
14 May 01
RUNOFF BY SCS TR -20 METHOD: TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 4.10 IN, SCS U.H.
RUNOFF SPAN = 5 -20 HRS, dt= .05 HRS, 301 POINTS
SUBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL
NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) -- GROUND COVERS (CN)-- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF)
.09 7.5 100061 61 - .12 11.98 .01
2 .69 14.5 100061 61 .67 12.06 .04
101 .78 15.0 61098 39%61 83 - 2.39 12.05 .14
Data for Lino Lakes Dentistry
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 4.10 IN
Prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 6
14 May 01
SUBCATCHMENT 1 Existing Area 1 - To West
PEAK
SO -FT
4050.00
.12 CFS @ 11.98 HRS, VOLUME= .01 AF
CN
61 Grassy Area
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
SUBCATCHMENT 2
Comment
Segment ID:
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 4.10 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
Existing Area 2 - To Ex. CB
PEAK= .67 CFS @ 12.06 HRS, VOLUME= .04 AF
SO -FT CN
30062.00 61
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Grassy Area
Comment
Segment ID:
SUBCATCEMENT 101 Proposed Area 101
Tc (min)
7.5
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL = 4.10 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
PEAK= 2.39 CFS .@ 12.05 HRS, VOLUME= .14 AF
SO-FT CN
20697.00 98 Impervious
13415.00 61 Grassy Area
34112.00 83
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
14.5
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 4.10 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
Data for Lino Lakes Family Dental / `
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN L -W.J
Prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inca
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
WATERSHED ROUTING
Page 7
14 May 01
OSUBCATCHMENT REACH A POND
SUBCATCHMENT 1
SUBCATCHMENT 2
SUBCATCHMENT 101
= Existing Area 1 - To West
= Existing Area 2 - To Ex. CB
= Proposed Area 101
LINK
- >
- >
Data for Lino Lakes Family Dental
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by Plowe Engineering, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 8
14 May 01
RUNOFF BY SCS TR -20 METHOD: TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN, SCS U.H.
RUNOFF SPAN = 5 -20 HRS, dt= .05 HRS, 301 POINTS
SUBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL
NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) -- GROUND COVERS (%CN) -- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF)
1 .09 7.5 100 %61 61 - .29 11.97 .01
2 .69 14.5 100 %61 61 1.69 12.05 .10
101 .78 15.0 61 %98 39 %61 83 3.97 12.04 .24
14 R\ oush ? ?4;e4 coAd Fns L' ceeJ. ex, shn j Cori a, Evon. ,
Ot ikon a Nit,- o f-f- O- z.00 CfS 4"0 +ht.. C f's S iv (M Sew tr
m o I.
Data for Lino Lakes Family Dental
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by Piowe Engineering, Inc.
HydroCAD 5.11 001574 (c) 1986 -1999 Applied
Page 9
14 May 01
Microcomputer Systems
SUBCATCHMENT 1 Existing Area 1 To West
PEAK= .29 CFS @ 11.97 HRS, VOLUME= .01 AF
SO-FT CN
4050.00 61 Grassy Area
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Comment
Segment ID:
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
SUBCATCHMENT 2 Existing Area 2 - To Ex. CB
PEAK= 1.69 CFS @ 12.05 HRS, VOLUME= .10 AF
SO -FT CN
30062.00 61 Grassy Area
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
SUBCATCENENT 101
Comment
Segment ID:
Proposed Area 101
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
Tc (min)
7.5
PEAK= 3.97 CFS @ 12.04 HRS, VOLUME= .24 AF
SO -FT
20697.00
13415.00
34112.00
CN
98
61
83
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Impervious
Grassy Area
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
14.5
SCS TR -20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 5 -20 HRS, dt =.05 HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
AGENDA ITEM
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson
DATE: May 30, 2001
TOPIC: Land Holding Group /12th and Holly /Preliminary Plat
5b
BACKGROUND:
The 12th and Holly Proposal was Reviewed on January 31 St by the Environmental Board.
The following is the record of that meeting.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : January 31, 2001
TIME STARTED : 6:34 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 9:16 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Amy Donlin, Constance Grundhofer, Rod Kukonen,
Scott Lanyon, Dave Mach, Theresa O'Connell, and
Mike Trehus.
MEMBERS ABSENT : None.
Staff members present: Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson.
E. 12th and Holly Drive/Subdivision Application Review (Item 1 -05) — The
background for agenda Item 1 -05 was read by Asleson. The area on the northern side
had been impacted, and shows no evidence of rare or unique species. Staff visited the
site and made recommendations. Asleson asked for any new recommendations.
Grundhofer suggested shortening the road and removing Lot 5.
Donlin stated that with the possibility of rich fen on the site, there should be no
grading. In the past, the area was a wetland, a bog type landscape, and quite wet.
Asleson noted that he went to look at the site, it had been heavily impacted, and
ditched in the west.
Chair Lanyon asked what recourse the Board had to respond to the delineation of
the project plan, and if there was disagreement, could it be recommended that the
report be repeated.
Donlin indicated there is bias when a company hires another company to report
findings. Asleson continued that it had been impacted.
Chair Lanyon mentioned that there was a difference between the wetland
delineation of 20 years ago and that of today in the vegetation.
Mach pointed out that there was no plan for restoration, and submitted the
possibility the Board not approve. Donlin agreed in light of the ditches and the
past projects the company has worked on, they have not fulfilled the obligations of
those projects.
Chair Lanyon explained that the Board was concerned about those previously
unfulfilled obligations.
Mach indicated that the goal should be to raise the environmental quality of the
parcel, which would ultimately increase the value.
Chair Lanyon advised the applicable information should be reissued, because even
if the area was degraded, it may not take much to restore the area to increase its
value.
Asleson identified the parcel was the same size as Peregrine Pass at 80 acres,
where the streets were narrowed, retention ponds added. With no conservation
ordinance on the books, there seems to be no way to implement the same
procedure with 12th and Holly.
Trehus noted the plat map had been modified, and Smyser's report stated concerns
over multiple driveways that connect to 12th Street or Holly Drive. He explained
that there should be no driveways on arterial roads, because traffic congestion was
an environmental issue.
Chair Lanyon submitted that other groups would follow this example, Lots 1 and
8 with a driveway going onto 12th Street should be removed to retain open space.
Donlin stated that Smyser again supports it with the statement, "When 5 to 7 of
the 14 lots don't meet the standards..."
Grundhofer reviewed the recommendations to reduce the number of lots, which
were not attempted, but merely changed the street position. The present proposal
threatens the potential fen site. She then asked if the person in the existing house
was developing the property.
Chair Lanyon stated that the proposal was a step backwards in terms of efforts
promoting green developments.
A new Preliminary Plat was submitted on the 24th of May, 2001. Presently, we do not
have a tree inventory for the packet. The Developer did submit tree preservation
delineation. Without an inventory it is difficult to evaluate impacts.
I have attached a letter from residents of the Gemini Estates that concerns the
performance of Land Holding in the Gemini Estates Development.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve with Conditions/Tree Inventory/Replacement ? /Environmental Board
suggestions.
2. Delay review until information is submitted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Option 1
Tami Stennes
6416 Cassiopeia Court
Lino Lakes, MN 55038
Ph: 651- 407 - 7008
April 28, 2001
Jeff Bach
Land. Holding Group
4704 Highway 61
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Ph: 651- 762 -0928
Sandy & Bob Fabian
6424 Cassiopeia. Court
Lino Lakes, MN 55038
Ph: 651 -407 -1663
Marty .Aslesan, Environmentalist
City .ofLino Lakes
600 'Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Ph: 651- 982 - 2435, Cell: 61.2- 860-1453
Re Replacement of Trees on "mini Estates"
Sue Walseth
6408 Cassiopeia Court
Liao Lakes, _ 55038
Ph: 651 -426 -0887
Dear Jeff and Marty --
We are writing this brief letter to remind you that this past autumn, we did, NOT remove any of
the replacement trees as promised — which were to be delivered and planted in our lots around the end
of October 2000.
Various correspondent back and forth between yourselves, since the Spring of 1999 -- verifies
that "Land Holding Group" has repeatedly agreed to replace the mature maples and evergreens, which
were removed during the .grading; process. But, Jeff, there has not been any physical action yet, that we
have observed -= to complete this item.
1t is the "sprang planting season" now, and we would sincerely appreciate having timely
resolution taken on this issue — not constant verbal .promises, with no trees. This spring, we would like
to complete the final landscaping projects on our barren yards, which is impossible without having
these trees delivered.
Respectfully,
Sandy & Bob Fabian
Sue Walseth
Tami Stennes
cc: Linda Waite-Smith, C. ity Administrator of Lino Lakes
To All City. Council Members
To All Planning. & Zoning Board Members
To All Environrnental Board. Members
To All Park Board Members
�h MgRry —
Jus r 4 8 HoRT "tore
?o CET You W&ow 7W4r
the 4J54e 4avrBEa re SEAM
)inks (tarot To oT1ft4 City
QootRO$ -- 7%) ' 74k'E OtsE2
4O4a0 S 'Nr4Rt 1-144r1•44•4
141oc64rE raeowri K 410 Nor
Fo ctoM) Tt . oect4 oN Ft•hl tttiJC
?We TREE t3 E. ON "Geh141
ES1•41-es " sa T ity eMa PvT"
PRESsu4t e44Triem, Hew THEM.
Au o4e beVeCoetneAlta cote UP.
25 50
Preliminary Site Development Plan
for
NORTH
100
12th Avenue and Holly Drive
Lino Lakes, Minnesota.
Presented by
Land Holding Group, Inc.
S89'41' 26 "W
580.81
•
N
Po
O
z
F
d
it
7
.•
EASING HOUSE
GAR
3
4E1
•
1
11
10
9
12
13
s i 0104 58021. -
JiQ11, DRIVE mV =5135,45
S89'41 26 W
Site Plan
Dui YH.
fC4511.51
iNVf.ee7.1:4
I
O N
Q
o
au)
IT-
Land
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
Index of Sheets
1 Title Sheet
2 Preliminary Plat
3 Preliminary Grading Plan
4 Preliminary Utility Plan
5 Preliminary Tree Protection Plan
6 Traffic Control & Detail Sheet
7 Detail Sheet
OWNER /DEVELOPER:
Land Holding Group, Inc.
4704 Highway 61
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
PLANNER /ENGINEER:
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Phone: (763) 476 -6010
Fax: (763) 476 -8532
Contact: Jeff Elliott
Redsions
No. Date By Remarks
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
I am o duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Name
Date
Reqistrotion Number
Jeff Elliott
5/23/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed RI
Drown JHB
Dote 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 23rd Ausme Nar01 • filynoulh, Menneeoto • 55447
phone 763/476 -6010 • fox 763/476 -8532
E—MoI: mfroOnf e.com
Client
Holding Group
White Bear Lake, MN
Project
12th Avenue and
Holly Drive
Lino Lakes, MN
Sheet This
Title Sheet
Sheet
Revision
MFRA FlLE NO : 133116
CARVE 9
M. eox
S89'41'26 "W
85' 214 No 115' -
- - t27'- t- --,
�7 \1 I
L �
I-
/ /
/ I
- 1
I
/ N •Y 2" r
r - -,- --,
N /
HOLLY DRIVE 58081
S89'41'26 "W
O
1n
OF CM ELEV - 100.47_
25 50
NORTH
100
200
DEVELOPMENT NOTES
1. GROSS SITE AREA
2. PROPOSED
- ZONING
3. LOT TABULATIONS
-NUMBER OF UNITS
- MINIMUM LOT AREA
- AVERAGE LOT AREA*
- MINIMUM LOT W1DTH AT 40' SETBACK
- MINIMUM LOT DEPTH
- MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT CORNER
.EXCLUDES 0UTL0TS
348,488 SF OR 8.00 ACRES
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
13
12,830 SO FT
21,800 SO FT
90 FEET
135 FEET
115 FEET
4. EASEMENTS SHALL BE POONDED AS REQUIRED.
5. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT AND
ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST 100 SQUARE FEET.
8. STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL
7. LOT SIZE TABULARON/IMPERNOUS c0 ER,BUILDING COVER
IMPERVIOUS COVER BUILDING COVER
ULT.-SIZE 3-2E-1411 ts14 3 OF LOT
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 12,830 SF
LOT 2, BLOCK 1 15,720 SF
LOT 3, BLOCK 1 30,170 SF
LOT 4, BLOCK 1 30,900 SF
LOT 5, BLOCK 1 33,600 SF
LOT 6, BLOCK 1 24,070 SF
LOT 7, 81-000 1 13,510 SF
LOT 8, BLOCK 1 13,780 5F
LOT 9, BLOCK 1 13,620 SF
LOT 10. BLOCK 1 16,240 SF
LOT 11, BLOCK 1 23,750 SF
LOT 12, BLOCK 1 24.180 SF
LOT 13, BLOCK 1 30-980 SF
TOTAL LOT SIZES: 283,330 SF
3,830
3,840
4,320
3,640
3,980
3,590
3,590
3,810
3,600
3,580
3,810
3,540
3,58Q
48,870
30%
24%
14X
12X
12X
15X
27%
28X
28X
22X
18X
15X
173
17X
2,450
2,450
2,890
2,450
2,450
2,450
2.450
2,450
2,450
2,450
2,450
2,450
2.552
32,090
DRAINAGE AND UT1UTY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:
5
1
-5
L L 10
- _
BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,
AND ADJOINING LOT UNES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND
ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY UNES AND REAR LOT UNES,
AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT.
TYPICAL EASEMENTS
19X
18X
9X
8.1
7%
10X
18X
18X
18X
15X
10X
10X
B3
11X
Revisions
No. Dote By Remarks
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
I am o duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the lows of the State of Minnesota.
Nome
Dote
Registration Number
Jeff Elliott
5/23/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed RJE
Drawn JHB
Date 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
lank
Awed a fie.
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 23rd Avenue North • PUUmou6L Minnesota • 55447
phone 763/476 -6010 • fax 763/476 -8532
E -Ma8!' mfraanfreeom
Client
Land Holding Group
White Sear Lab, MN
Project
12th Avenue and
Holly Drive
Lino Lakes, MN
Sheet TM,
Preliminary Plat
„alt
2/7
Revision
NFR& RILE NO : 13306
EMERGENCY
OVERFLOW
ELEV.= ',909.8
N m
.916•.,_ G,
SILT FENCE
/
S8 '41.26"W
580'.$1
N;
X., TAW
TCAOT1,51
APA.15157.24
13
I
r
4 O
O
o p
O O
! O
<1 N
SILT FENCE
SILT FENCE
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WETLANDS
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL FENCE
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
DRAINAGE ARROW
DRAINAGE & UTWTY EASEMENT LIMIT
taw
NV. :888.95
S89'41'2 -6"W.- - - -- --
ROCK ENTRANCE
DRIVE
EXISTING DRIVEWAY
&15 " CMP TOBE
REMOVED
MN CB
X (/LIMN
x MOS
920
EXISTING DRIVEWAY
& 15" CMP TO BE
REMOVED
EMERGENCY
OVERFLOW
ELEV. =910.0
OUTLET STRUCTURE
ELEV. =909.5
SILT FENCE
t YEN OF OM EIIV . .1169.47.
1) f S
■Va597.SO
SILT FENCE
25 50 100
NORTH
200
ROOM UE
DEMOBS RROIIG ND SUKSE
NRO1 AT WOO WOE
(TEE ILO PM MOO ML)
MENLO
NOTES:
WO
920.5
�.90B/
PROPOSED mR1E0 come
MIT TIMER
USwW UMW
UM ROOK SEISMS
WW1 (10)
IXTAIM00ED MOIRE TUE LOOM 40)
SPUR UM MNKWT (SSW
FROM FLOOR ((11511 AS MED)
(ALSO OAHVWE FLOOR BEY. DI6PT AS 10104)
Ron Of MAT
® IWem E OWE
1W 5BTATNI
TYPICAL W?
A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID
PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE
CCNSTRUCIION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MIL BE
HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING 1HE CONSTRUCTOR PHASES OF TIPS
PRCLECT.
B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTUTY
COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST
EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF U11U1IES IT SHALL BE THE
RESPONSISUTY OF TIE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES WHICH CORFU CT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
SHOWN ON THE PLANS 1145 LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL
BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CAVING GOPHER STATE ONE
CALL (1- 800 - 252- 1186).
C. SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR
CONTROWNG ALL SLTATKN AND EROSION OF THE PROECT AREA.
ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION CONTROL MEASURES WILL
COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
AND THE CITY OF UNO LAKES' POUCY FOR EROSION AND SILTATION
CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS
NECESSARY TO CONTROL EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT
NOT UNITED TO STAKED STRAW BALES ROCK ENTRANCES
AND /OR SILT FENCES CONTROL SHALL CCMMENCE WITH GRADING
AND CONTRITE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF
THE WORK BY THE OWNER THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSBIUTY
INCLUDES ALL OESCN AND IMPLEMENTATION AS REWIRED
TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE
OWNER MAY. AT H1S/14ER OPTION, D9ECT THE CONTRACTOR N
HIS/HER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND
IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITND OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR
EXISTING PAVEMENT OR W EXIST1NG STORM SEVERS OR SWALES
SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND EFFECTED AREAS
CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE
OF TE CONTRACTOR THE SO FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE
SILT REMOVED FROA TIE PONDING AREAS BY TIE CONTRACTOR AFTER
1HE TURF IS ESTABUSIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSBLE FOR APPLYING FOR THE MPCA GENERA. STORM WATER
PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FCR COMPLIANCE MTH AND MONITORING THE
REOUIREMENT OF THE SPCA PERROT.
D. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE.
E THE CONSTRUCTION REQUREMENTS AND DEANITIONS OF TYPES OF
MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED N MN/DOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION' 2003 EDITIONS AND ALL
SUPPLEMENTS
F. THE EXISTING TOPSOIL ON T1115 SITE VARIES N DEPTH. IT 15
THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY THAT ALL SURFACE VEGETATION
AND ANY TOPSOIL OR OTHER LOOSE, SOFT OR OTHERWISE UNSUITABLE
MATERIAL BE REMOVED FROM THE STREET AND BUILDING PAD AREAS
PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY EMBANKMENT N ACCORDANCE WITH THE
SOILS REPORT.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL TO BE SPREAD TO
A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 INCHES BY THE CONTRACTOR IN AREAS THAT
ARE DISTURBED BY THE GRADING CONSIRUC110N.
G. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED N THE STREET, STREET
RIGHT -OF -WAY OR BUILDING PAD AREAS SMALL BE COMPACTED W
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REOUREMENTS OF THE GUAUTY COMPACTOR
METHOD AS OUTLINED N MN/DOT 2105.3E2.
H. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE CR
UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REWIRED BY THE SOILS
ENGINEER. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED N THE STREETS SHALL
BE COMPACTED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY
METHOD AS OUTLINED N MN/DOT 21013F1. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL
PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREA SHALL BE COMPACTED N
ACCORDANCE WITH 114E SOILS REPORT.
J. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, EXCEPT ROADWAYS. SHALL BE
RESTORED WITH MIMMOM a TOPSOIL AND SEEDED AND MULCHED
WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING. SEEDING SHALL
BE MN/DOT MIXTURE N0. 50A (OR APPROVED EQUAL). DORMANT
SEEDING AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED. MULCHED AND DISC ANCHORED.
STRAW MULCHING QUANTITY SHALL BE 2 TONS PER ACRE WHERE
SLOPES EXCEED 3:1. A POLYPROPYLENE NETTING OR WOOD RBER
BLANKET SHALL BE PROVIDED AND STAKED OVER THE MULCHED AREA
FERTUZER (15- 10-10) SHALL BE APPUED AT A RATE OF 400
POUNDS PER ACRE.
K. TOLERANCES
1. THE STREET SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL
NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, 017 0.10 FOOT
BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE
MEASUREMENT IS MADE.
2. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO
WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW TIE REWIRED ELEVATION,
UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.
3. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 NCI OF
114E SPECIFIED TRIMNESS.
M. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROWLING AND
MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES,
WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SONS, FLAGMEN AND UGHTS TO
CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT STANDARDS
N. ALL SOIL TESTING SMALL BE COMPLETED BY A SOILS ENGINEER
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL
RE0URED 50L TESTS AND INSPECTIONS VAN THE SOILS ENGINEER
c;.e.ceves)
MAC ? 4200'
Girl t..NO
•
•
Revisions
No. Dote By Remarks
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Name
Dote
Registration Number
Jeff Elliott
5/23/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed RJE
Drawn JHB
Date 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 23rd ANTVwe North • R meat, ¥ 1e.soto • 55447
phone 763/476 -6010 • lox 763/476 -8532
E -I/oi: mfoOn411c n
Client
Land Holding Group
White Bear Lake, MN
Probed
121h Avenue and
Holly Drive
Lino Lakes, MN
Sheet Title
Preliminary
Grading Plan
Sheet
3/7
Revision
MFRA FILE NO.: 13306
1
\
'1`••
os
zy
TO 1 q,
I
X., HAL
,C 11.51
IN •89729
I( 1I,, 1
I t1 1 11 i 2 1 I
I I,. 4 4' POLY 1UO a 0.58 —
28 IF 18' 50
• 0.50%
��
L zs LF le" RCP kik .
• 0.50%
i
/ vri e9e
-- Pro= --
CDMH 1
RIM -909.7
E4V- 907.38
THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHORN N M APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE
EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION CF ALL EXISTING UIULTIES BEFORE
COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WMICH MIGHT BE
OCCASIONED BY HIS FAUWE TO EXACTLY LOCATE MID PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTIJIIES.
25 LF 18" Rcp-
• 0.8gK
POND 11
_..Ape„ TEL 8011
Paaf1n 1041
.01 IMO
W11IMI x141
WORMY 9EM IRE —_
LEGEND
TYPICAL SERVICE DEwi,
1R SOU
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
DRAINAGE k UTIUTY EASEMENT OMIT
• I, u. 4 'TOP OF cat e1EY . 908.47
< - --e..
�ROET,Lni 9ss1.-- I ` 0t1 X H
PROPERTY UNE
Lt4 t
SEE
BEELJW
T.V.
O
TEL O OCAS
0
ELEC.
0-- -- Sr
..—Nat W 100
s0'
PROPERTY UNE
i
1
11
3:1 t T 1
1/4" FT-LI"'
T.V.
O
w5 0 O TEL
t A'
14'
OWN 2
RIM -809.7
NV- 907.24.
38 IF r PvC
e 0.400
NOTES:
1, AU. WATERMAN SHALL BE DUCTILE RON, CLASS 52, SITM 8.0 FOOT MINIMUM COVER.
2. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASTM 3034 Sat 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
3. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1" TYPE K COPPER.
4. SANITARY SERVICES AND CLEANOUTS SHALL BE 4' PVC SO4EDU LE 40.
INV"997.V9
ELEC.
O
ELEC.
STORM 15AN. I W.M.
O O
10 I 10' I
CURB
NOTE: WIGWAM R/W
GROSSING DEPTH 30 '.
URBAN STREET UTILITY LOCATION
NO SCALE
25 50 100
NORTH
200
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ALL CONSTRUCTION WHIN THE 910
PUT RIGHT OF WAY AND DESIGNATED AREAS. THE BUILDING PADS ARE NOT
TO BE DISTURBED .
8. REGRADE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO ORIGINAL GRADING PLAN.
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES
A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE •
"STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
(CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS.
1. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO CITY OF LINO LAKES, AND MNDOT
SPECIFICATIONS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP
WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE
CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE
UABIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR
3. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN
(BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS.
B. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN.
1. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.
2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR -35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
3. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, WITH 8.0 FEET MINIMUM COVER.
4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE WITH R -4 JOINTS, AND RUBBER GASKETS.
5. RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3.
C. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND /OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING
UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND,
WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING
EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48
HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTIUTIES SHALL BE OBTAINED
BY THE CONTRACTOR, BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002.
D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT
PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION
PHASES OF THIS PROJECT.
E. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES,
THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE,
INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT
WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER
OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT
INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR N
THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
F. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL
BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH
THE SOD.
G. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND UGHTS TO CONTROL THE
MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS AND THE ENCLOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL MAP AND
NOTES.
H. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE
PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS
ENGINEER. THE UTIUTY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS
ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND
SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE GEOTECHNICAL ARM WILL BE SELECTED BY THE OWNER.
I. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. A TEST ROLL WILL BE REOUIRED ON THE STREET AND PARKING
AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT
OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE
COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH
SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL
BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER.
J. THE TREES AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND /OR ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT
ARE OF PRIME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. HE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT THE TREES
WHICH ARE TO BE SAVED TO BE SURE THAT EQUIPMENT I5 NOT NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY
TREES AND SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN WORKING ADJACENT TO TREES. SHOULD ANY PORTION OF
THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT, HE SHALL
OBTAIN THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE
BEGINNING OF THE OPERATION. SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS' OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE BREAKING OF ANY
UMBS, THE BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO
MINIMIZE ANY AUTHORIZATION BY THE ENGINEER. COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. A PREUMINARY TREE
PROTECTION PLAN IS ATTACHED.
RECEIVED
MAY 2 4 2001
CITY OF Lir.O LAKES
Revisions
No. Dote By Remarks
I hereby certify that this pion was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
I am o duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Nome
Dote
Registration Number
Jeff Elliott
5/2.3/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed R,E
Drown JHB
Date 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 23rd Anew North • Pgmouth, Minnesota • 55447
phone 763/476 -6010 • /ox 763/476 -8532
E -Mai: mboOnho.com
Client
Land Holding Group
Whim Bur Lake, MN
Protest
12th Avenue and
Holly Drive
Uno Lakes, MN
Sheet Title
Preliminary
Utility Plan
Sheet
4/7
Revision
MFRIt FILE NO : 18906
j'
/
Jy
Preliminary Tree Protection Plan
for
12th Avenue and Holly Drive
S58 8 %41'26 "W
.r1
a ry
}
EL. Eat.
TC4D11 91
NVLan7.24
i3
6 O
O 0
co O
0
¢I V)
—
t POND 11
RIVE acv -saws saras81 > 5 c s
S89'41 "26 "W - - - - 1�
l.iy n97.96
T
6' MIN
WOODLOT
TREE PROTECTION DELINEATION
ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO
GRADING OR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.
STANDARD 48" HIGH SNOW FENCE OR ORANGE SAFETY FENCE SHALL
BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE DRIPLINE.
ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED AS A PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
WITHIN STREET RIGHTS —OF —WAY OR WITHIN DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS.
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WETLANDS
PROPOSED TREE FENCE
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
31.;
IW�_ S7 4 > _y 09
920
NORTH
25 50 100 200
`tECE
MAY 2 4 2001
CITY OF Lt►\;O LAKES
•
Revisions
No. Date By Remarks
I hereby certify that this pion was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Name
Dote
Registration Number
Jeff Elliott
5/23/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed RJE
Drown JHB
Dote 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 2}d Avenue North • P/)rnoufh, ¥,n#sato• 55447
phone 763/476 -6010 • fox 763/476 -8532
E —MOB.• mewl7;0a.carn
Client
Land Holding Group
Mae Bear Woe, MN
Project
12th Avenue and
Holly Drive
Lino Lakes, MN
Shed Toe
Preliminary
Tree Protection Plan
Sheet
Revisio
MFRA FILE NO.: 13306
•
RINGS (3 MIN., 1.0' MAX.
OF RINGS & MORTAR).
I/2'_ MORTAR ON OUTSIDE,
BEETTWWEEN RINGS, CASTING &
MANHOLE FINISH SMOOTH
ON THE INSIDE.
NO MORTAR ON INSIDE.
PRECAST COVER SLAB
(TYPE 2)
2 STRIPS BmiMASTIC
SEAL ON SLAB
JOINTS, NO CEMENT.
PRECAST BASE
MH
DIA.
SLAB
THICKNESS
8
54108 }-192'
120"
12'
WI-SHIELD. SEAL
OR EQUAL
•W I- SHIELD' SEAL
OR EQUAL
CENTERVLIE LAKE
WARDS
1/2" MORTAR ON
OUTSIDE. BETWEEN
RINGS, CASTING &
MANHOLE. FINISH
SMOOTH ON PRIDE.
NO MORTAR ON
ASOE.
R 0' 4491. OIF.,
RINGS &
MORTAR).
SECTION
A -A
NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FOR ABJURING COMM CEMQR MORTAR ONLY
CASE MOi KNOW PIMME t COVER AS PER SPFLi1GBIONC
PAROLE STEPS RAIL BE PST NN7". ALUMINUM DR SM. RENNIN= PLASTIC
PER ARM 0470. LOCOIDN SI1.LL RE AS NOTED N 11ff SPECIFICATIONS.
PRECAST REOINRC0 CONCRETE MANIPLE SMOG k BARE SUM PER ATM 04711.
FURNISH PRECAST MANHOLE SECTORS NN 0 -11IND PRms t uRAGA T POET
AS 01"ERMSE SPECIFIED.
A ir OR 114 BARREL SECTION SELL NE PISTOLED INFER TIN COLE PRITERN
1111 OPENING BETWEEN PPE k NH MALL TM CEMENT MORTAR
INSIDE SERF= SHALL BE TI MM SMOOTH.
STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
No SCALE
ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE
NO SCALE
1/21 MORTAR ON OUTSIDE.
BETWEEN RINGS. CASTING & �
RINGS (3 MN.. 1.0' CATCH BASIN. FINISH REM REMOVE VELCURB
MAX. OF RINGS SMOOTH ON INSIDE
AND MBAR). NO MORTAR ON ,ASIDE
48-
CEMENT
MORTAR
NOTE
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL RE INSTALLED
PRIOR 10 THE START OF ANY 210 MORR
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL E 4SPED1ED
TOLLOMNG EACH RAINFALL MAINTENANCE OF
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL NCI= A 10P
00EE r 1E* GRA ND OR REMOVAL A
AENJIQIOIT OF THE GRAVEL AS NEEDED 10
KFIP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECTED MUD.
IF PRECAST
BASE SLAB
ELEVATION
NO W000 011.1.1. RE 050510* ADJUSIMG mum CEMENT tom ONLY
PST IRON *mail FMME t COVER K PEN 104001110NS.
MARI=E SEEK SHALL BE CAST RRL ALUMNI OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC
PER APR 0478. LOCATOR SHALL RE AS NOTED N THE SPECIFICATIONS.
"V8IOEE5 20 DEEP NO PCB 10 BE C@615UC1E0 NOHOW STEPS.
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS AT BASE SUB PER ARTA C471
TI M611 PRECAST NV41004 SECTORS MIN 0 -14X0 CASKETS R LUBRICANT INCEPT
AS °THEMMSE SPECIFIED.
A 12' on 10• B41RL SECTION RILL SE NBVLLEB LASER TIE CONE
FOENDER POSSIBLE
TILL OPENING NEARER PPE k MN WALL MIEN CEMENT MORTAR
ANODE SURr9OF ROLL RE TIMED SMOOTH.
STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 407
NO SCALE
(PIPES 27" OR LESS)
1/2' MORTAR ON
OUTSIDE, BETWEEN
RINGS. CASTING &
MANHOLE. FINISH
SMOOTH ON INSIDE.
NO MORTAR ON
INSIDE.
RINGS 3 MIN., 1.0'
MAX. OF
AR). RINGS &
MORT
PROVIDE DRAIN ON BOTH SIDES OF C.B. LEAD IF AT LOW PONT
5:1
TRANSVERSE C.B.
LEAD (4' MIN. DEPTH
OF COVER)
02/://11"2
TOP OF 2' GRANULAR
5UBGRADE BORROW SUPCUI
- -y 1 BEG 10:1 TRANSRON--T.. 10:
CONTINUE SUBCUT
FROM BEGINNING OF
5:1 TRANSMON TO 4' SATURATED SOILS THROUGH
BELOW BOTTOM DOWNSTREAM C.B.S ' P.E.
OF DB■N PIPE
GEOTEX74LE SOCK
10:1
20'
(
1111111111111
KOR -N -SEAL
30LF -4' qA MNDOT 3278 CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE DRAINAGE
TUBING WBH MNDOT 3733 TYPE 1 GEOTEX1115 SOCK- PLACED
PARALLEL TO C.B. LEAD
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5 MODIFIED
2' MW. GRANULAR BORROW SUBCUT.
UPSTREAM END:
PVC PLUG
DRAIN PIPE CROWN
TO MATCH CROWN
OF C.B. LEAD
IPE DRAW
FE=
TIE SOCK
nonnnnnnnnnnonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnu *m n
nnnni '
IMMO&
BOTTOM OF SAND SUBCUT AT KOR -N -TEE CONNECTOR:
TRANSITION TO DRAIN PIPE INSERT DRAIN PPE INTO
13E11, PULL SOCK OVER
OUTSIDE
GRANULAR SUBCUT AND PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN
NO SCALE
LEGEND
• (2) "ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED AHEAD" SIGN
— (2) "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY' SIGN
• (2) TYPE III BARRICADE
TRAFFIC CONTROL MAP
NO SCALE
NOTES:
1. FURNISH AND PLACE ADDITIONAL BARRICADES, TRAFFIC CONES, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.. (INCIDENTAL)
2. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (MMUTCD), INCLUDING APPENDIX 'B" DATED NOV. 1992, OR MOST
CURRENT UPDATE.
3. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND WATER SERVICE LINE ON
12TH AVE., HOLLY DR. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC.
4. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWER, WATERMAIN AND SERVICES ON HOLLY DR., 12TH
AVE. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC.
5. THE ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ROAD BEING
CLOSED.
FI- SIELD' SEAL
OR EQUAL
PRECAST COVER SLAB
(TYPE 2)
u■�ur
II/`i1II
%74
00
PLACE 2 STRIPS WTUMASTIC
SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS.
CEMENT MORTAR
EBSi1NC
GR0 45
ROAD CLOSED
LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY
VAR.
4 MTN.
VARIABLE
3.0 POST ROOT 3CAWI)) �'
I` R oll
IIIFISTS —lb
N0. 2 GRADE
LIMBER
QR BETTER
ND 11000 VIAL E USED FOR ADASTMG CASTING; CF/ENT MORTAR ONLY.
CAST TARN PUN MSIN FRAME k COVER CASTINGS PER SPECIFICATIONS.
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CONE SECTION k PRECAST ROSE PP A5TM C47L
ELL OPOING EIVED4 PPE ME 141PROLE WALL WITH CEMENT MORTAR
PRIDE SURFACE ROIL E FAMED SMODTIL
• M44MUR PPE COVER CAN E REDUCE/ FROM 4' 10 2'-0" LAIN
NEMIAIDN OF 1EWORAI07 PPE DRAT P00 'OSNIIAAR uncut MD
F'ERFOMTED PPE ONO' DETAIL
CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402
NO SCALE
NO MOOD SHALL RC USED FOR ADJUSTING CASTING. CEMENT MORTAL ALLY.
CAST RON TRUE t ORIE CORMS PER SPECPICATDNS.
N,AN01E REPS STALE PST NM, ALUMINUM OR STEEL REARMED TIA5110 PER
9544 0171 LOCATION RILL BE AS M ED N 141E SPEC0MONS.
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SASE SLAB k CO101 SLAB PER 1504 COn,
PRECAST RBEORCED CONCRETE VANDLE SECTIONS PER ASTM 0478,
OR B' C011CRETE MANDIE EDEN WITH 1/2' UORWED 0)1140 4.
TOMS 4 PRECAST CONCRETE 41114101E SECTIONS NMI 0-MD GASKETS &
LIRRMNII EXCEPT AS 014474115E SPEDREG.
TILL OPENING BEnED4 PPE AND AMP= WILL Was CD4Ba MOMM.
MME moot MIL E NNSNED 01400114.
• MMYU1 PPE CORER CAN 00 REDUCED FRO4 4. 10 2' -S" 04111 S0TALU110N pr
PERGIAED PPE DARN PER IMAM MA= MD PERFORMED PPE DRMM DEAL
MI -3
60'4 30'
CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE, TYPE 406
NO SCALE
Revisk ns
No. Date By Remarks
I hereby certify that this plan wos prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Name
Date
Registration Number
Jeff Elliott
5/23/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed RE
Drawn JHB
Date 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
REFER TO ADVANCED ROAD CLOSED
SIGN FOR POST REQUIREMENTS
`(PROVDE 2 POSTS)
QILIERNATE MATERIALS FOR POSTS MAY BE USED WEN
APPROVED BY 1HE ENGINEER.
NOTE : -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO
MNDOT 3886, TYPE B.
-FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS
OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
SILT FENCE
NO SCALE
LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY SIGN
ND SCALE
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 23d ARMMB North • Plymouth, Mflnesote • 55447
phone 763 /476 -6010 • lox 763/476 -8532
E-Mok mfrodtmlno.com
Client
Land Holding Group
White Bear Lake, MN
ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGN
IO STALE
Pr4ect
12th Avenue and
Holly Drive
Lino Lakes, MN
NOTES:
DE BARRICADE BOARD FAQ SURFACES SHALL 8E FUCA REREC1RIIID N
ALTORMIE SILVER -'METE AND RED STRIPING, USING FE0EC1IYE MEMO
COMMAND TO TIE RFDIMBl1S OF MOOT SPEC, 33522A2b, STANDARD N0 2.
TYPE III BARRICADE
NO SCALE
=INN TOM
Traffic Control
& Detail Sheet
i \i
Sheet
6/7
Revision
MFRA FILE NO.: 13308
i
W
in
• b
•
1/2'
OMM
g
d
FT
NO WOOD SHALL BE USED FOR ABJURING COMM CEMQR MORTAR ONLY
CASE MOi KNOW PIMME t COVER AS PER SPFLi1GBIONC
PAROLE STEPS RAIL BE PST NN7". ALUMINUM DR SM. RENNIN= PLASTIC
PER ARM 0470. LOCOIDN SI1.LL RE AS NOTED N 11ff SPECIFICATIONS.
PRECAST REOINRC0 CONCRETE MANIPLE SMOG k BARE SUM PER ATM 04711.
FURNISH PRECAST MANHOLE SECTORS NN 0 -11IND PRms t uRAGA T POET
AS 01"ERMSE SPECIFIED.
A ir OR 114 BARREL SECTION SELL NE PISTOLED INFER TIN COLE PRITERN
1111 OPENING BETWEEN PPE k NH MALL TM CEMENT MORTAR
INSIDE SERF= SHALL BE TI MM SMOOTH.
STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 409
No SCALE
ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE
NO SCALE
1/21 MORTAR ON OUTSIDE.
BETWEEN RINGS. CASTING & �
RINGS (3 MN.. 1.0' CATCH BASIN. FINISH REM REMOVE VELCURB
MAX. OF RINGS SMOOTH ON INSIDE
AND MBAR). NO MORTAR ON ,ASIDE
48-
CEMENT
MORTAR
NOTE
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL RE INSTALLED
PRIOR 10 THE START OF ANY 210 MORR
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL E 4SPED1ED
TOLLOMNG EACH RAINFALL MAINTENANCE OF
THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL NCI= A 10P
00EE r 1E* GRA ND OR REMOVAL A
AENJIQIOIT OF THE GRAVEL AS NEEDED 10
KFIP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECTED MUD.
IF PRECAST
BASE SLAB
ELEVATION
NO W000 011.1.1. RE 050510* ADJUSIMG mum CEMENT tom ONLY
PST IRON *mail FMME t COVER K PEN 104001110NS.
MARI=E SEEK SHALL BE CAST RRL ALUMNI OR STEEL REINFORCED PLASTIC
PER APR 0478. LOCATOR SHALL RE AS NOTED N THE SPECIFICATIONS.
"V8IOEE5 20 DEEP NO PCB 10 BE C@615UC1E0 NOHOW STEPS.
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS AT BASE SUB PER ARTA C471
TI M611 PRECAST NV41004 SECTORS MIN 0 -14X0 CASKETS R LUBRICANT INCEPT
AS °THEMMSE SPECIFIED.
A 12' on 10• B41RL SECTION RILL SE NBVLLEB LASER TIE CONE
FOENDER POSSIBLE
TILL OPENING NEARER PPE k MN WALL MIEN CEMENT MORTAR
ANODE SURr9OF ROLL RE TIMED SMOOTH.
STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 407
NO SCALE
(PIPES 27" OR LESS)
1/2' MORTAR ON
OUTSIDE, BETWEEN
RINGS. CASTING &
MANHOLE. FINISH
SMOOTH ON INSIDE.
NO MORTAR ON
INSIDE.
RINGS 3 MIN., 1.0'
MAX. OF
AR). RINGS &
MORT
PROVIDE DRAIN ON BOTH SIDES OF C.B. LEAD IF AT LOW PONT
5:1
TRANSVERSE C.B.
LEAD (4' MIN. DEPTH
OF COVER)
02/://11"2
TOP OF 2' GRANULAR
5UBGRADE BORROW SUPCUI
- -y 1 BEG 10:1 TRANSRON--T.. 10:
CONTINUE SUBCUT
FROM BEGINNING OF
5:1 TRANSMON TO 4' SATURATED SOILS THROUGH
BELOW BOTTOM DOWNSTREAM C.B.S ' P.E.
OF DB■N PIPE
GEOTEX74LE SOCK
10:1
20'
(
1111111111111
KOR -N -SEAL
30LF -4' qA MNDOT 3278 CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE DRAINAGE
TUBING WBH MNDOT 3733 TYPE 1 GEOTEX1115 SOCK- PLACED
PARALLEL TO C.B. LEAD
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5 MODIFIED
2' MW. GRANULAR BORROW SUBCUT.
UPSTREAM END:
PVC PLUG
DRAIN PIPE CROWN
TO MATCH CROWN
OF C.B. LEAD
IPE DRAW
FE=
TIE SOCK
nonnnnnnnnnnonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnu *m n
nnnni '
IMMO&
BOTTOM OF SAND SUBCUT AT KOR -N -TEE CONNECTOR:
TRANSITION TO DRAIN PIPE INSERT DRAIN PPE INTO
13E11, PULL SOCK OVER
OUTSIDE
GRANULAR SUBCUT AND PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN
NO SCALE
LEGEND
• (2) "ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED AHEAD" SIGN
— (2) "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY' SIGN
• (2) TYPE III BARRICADE
TRAFFIC CONTROL MAP
NO SCALE
NOTES:
1. FURNISH AND PLACE ADDITIONAL BARRICADES, TRAFFIC CONES, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.. (INCIDENTAL)
2. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE "MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" (MMUTCD), INCLUDING APPENDIX 'B" DATED NOV. 1992, OR MOST
CURRENT UPDATE.
3. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND WATER SERVICE LINE ON
12TH AVE., HOLLY DR. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC.
4. DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWER, WATERMAIN AND SERVICES ON HOLLY DR., 12TH
AVE. MUST REMAIN OPEN TO LOCAL TRAFFIC.
5. THE ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ROAD BEING
CLOSED.
FI- SIELD' SEAL
OR EQUAL
PRECAST COVER SLAB
(TYPE 2)
u■�ur
II/`i1II
%74
00
PLACE 2 STRIPS WTUMASTIC
SEAL ON SLAB JOINTS.
CEMENT MORTAR
EBSi1NC
GR0 45
ROAD CLOSED
LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY
VAR.
4 MTN.
VARIABLE
3.0 POST ROOT 3CAWI)) �'
I` R oll
IIIFISTS —lb
N0. 2 GRADE
LIMBER
QR BETTER
ND 11000 VIAL E USED FOR ADASTMG CASTING; CF/ENT MORTAR ONLY.
CAST TARN PUN MSIN FRAME k COVER CASTINGS PER SPECIFICATIONS.
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE CONE SECTION k PRECAST ROSE PP A5TM C47L
ELL OPOING EIVED4 PPE ME 141PROLE WALL WITH CEMENT MORTAR
PRIDE SURFACE ROIL E FAMED SMODTIL
• M44MUR PPE COVER CAN E REDUCE/ FROM 4' 10 2'-0" LAIN
NEMIAIDN OF 1EWORAI07 PPE DRAT P00 'OSNIIAAR uncut MD
F'ERFOMTED PPE ONO' DETAIL
CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402
NO SCALE
NO MOOD SHALL RC USED FOR ADJUSTING CASTING. CEMENT MORTAL ALLY.
CAST RON TRUE t ORIE CORMS PER SPECPICATDNS.
N,AN01E REPS STALE PST NM, ALUMINUM OR STEEL REARMED TIA5110 PER
9544 0171 LOCATION RILL BE AS M ED N 141E SPEC0MONS.
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SASE SLAB k CO101 SLAB PER 1504 COn,
PRECAST RBEORCED CONCRETE VANDLE SECTIONS PER ASTM 0478,
OR B' C011CRETE MANDIE EDEN WITH 1/2' UORWED 0)1140 4.
TOMS 4 PRECAST CONCRETE 41114101E SECTIONS NMI 0-MD GASKETS &
LIRRMNII EXCEPT AS 014474115E SPEDREG.
TILL OPENING BEnED4 PPE AND AMP= WILL Was CD4Ba MOMM.
MME moot MIL E NNSNED 01400114.
• MMYU1 PPE CORER CAN 00 REDUCED FRO4 4. 10 2' -S" 04111 S0TALU110N pr
PERGIAED PPE DARN PER IMAM MA= MD PERFORMED PPE DRMM DEAL
MI -3
60'4 30'
CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE, TYPE 406
NO SCALE
Revisk ns
No. Date By Remarks
I hereby certify that this plan wos prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Name
Date
Registration Number
Jeff Elliott
5/23/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed RE
Drawn JHB
Date 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
REFER TO ADVANCED ROAD CLOSED
SIGN FOR POST REQUIREMENTS
`(PROVDE 2 POSTS)
QILIERNATE MATERIALS FOR POSTS MAY BE USED WEN
APPROVED BY 1HE ENGINEER.
NOTE : -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO
MNDOT 3886, TYPE B.
-FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS
OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
SILT FENCE
NO SCALE
LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY SIGN
ND SCALE
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 23d ARMMB North • Plymouth, Mflnesote • 55447
phone 763 /476 -6010 • lox 763/476 -8532
E-Mok mfrodtmlno.com
Client
Land Holding Group
White Bear Lake, MN
ADVANCE ROAD CLOSED SIGN
IO STALE
Pr4ect
12th Avenue and
Holly Drive
Lino Lakes, MN
NOTES:
DE BARRICADE BOARD FAQ SURFACES SHALL 8E FUCA REREC1RIIID N
ALTORMIE SILVER -'METE AND RED STRIPING, USING FE0EC1IYE MEMO
COMMAND TO TIE RFDIMBl1S OF MOOT SPEC, 33522A2b, STANDARD N0 2.
TYPE III BARRICADE
NO SCALE
=INN TOM
Traffic Control
& Detail Sheet
i \i
Sheet
6/7
Revision
MFRA FILE NO.: 13308
SEAL OR EOUAL
1/2" MORTAR
ON OUTSIDE.
BETWEEN RINGS.
CASTING AL AND
MANHOLE. FINISH
SMOOTH ON
THE NSIOE.
NO MORTAR ON
INSIDE
MANHOLE
SLEEVE
SEE DETAIL
SANITARY SEWER OUTSIDE DROP
RINGS (3 MAX..
1' MAX OF
RINGS 8:
MORTAR).
10
MIN
46'
SECTION A -A
FLEXIBLE
SLEEVE
MANHOLE SLEEVE
NO WOOD SMALL E USW IDR AON6ING CASING: CEMENT AORTA OILY.
CAST IRON 1141421E FMIE 11 COYER AS MR SPECIFICATIONS.
IIAIROLE STEPS WALL BE CAST OOH ALUMINUM OR WM. REINFORCED PU41IC, PER
*014 0470. SAP LOCATION MOLL E A NOTED N 1FE SPECIFIC/MONK
MANHOLES 20' DEEP NO OVER TO BE CONSTRUCTED WORM STEPS.
PRECAST ppMORC6 CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS PER A51M C47S, FWN511ED
WAN 0 -4A0 GASKETS NC LIIBBCNI EXCEPT AS ODERWISE 5PECPED.
A 12' OR 14' WW1 SECTION SARI E INSTALLED UNDER DE CONE WTEEYFA
P0591BIE
PETE CONNECTIONS TO IUAROIE SNAIL BE WOE TAMER 1ONT N CAST O0IACE
RUBBER BOOT AND CEMENT MORTAR PRIDE SURFACE SNARL E FRAMED SMOOTH.
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 301
NO SCALE
(PIPES 27" OR LESS)
A. WAY BALES OFFSET IN THE CENTER 9
.l
2
T m
PLAN VIF1y MO MUD DWG
B. HAY BALES END 70 END
rm PSE . 0. L MR
Ta r
. ""°
`.ems:
« MC
PLAN VIEW
C. SILT FENCE WITH ROCK DNi0510N MOUND
1.11101 wn
��L..
moor 1r
ran
1roIWMl Ttlfl'. W Om not I'm sc wen
PLAN VIEW
SPACING FOR ALL DITCH BLOCKS:
DITCH GRADE
S(
2
4
6
e
10
to.
100
7s
SD
4D
25
25
BALE DFTAII
DITCH BLOCKING
110 SCALE
2' s 2" HARDWOOD
MARKER W /SPIKE.
0.0.42'
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
(IN 006600NE SOILS
USE GRANULAR
ENCASEMENT)
•
DEPTH AS NEEDED 70
STABILIZE TRENCH
MIN. 0.41/4 BUT NOT
LESS THAN 10'.
SPECIAL FOUNDATION FOR
STABILIZING OR DEWATERING OF TRENCH
NO SCALE
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
• ASTM D2321
EMBEDMENT MATERIAL
(SEE SPEC.)
City Plate
ERO -6
GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING
.2,4111
=11!4 — 11111 _I'll_
GRANULAR MATERIAL ENCASEMENT
PIPE INSTALLATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 0 2321. TABLE 2.
013/4 (4' MIN)
" EMBEDMENT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM 70 ASTM 02321, TABLE 1.
'-6' METAL FENCE
OS PPA Nim 6HEEEN
GRANULAR BEDDING 45' BEND
MATERIAL (COMPACTED)
WITHOUT RISER
2' x 2' HARDWOOD
MARKER W /SPIKE
AIRTIGHT
PLUG OR
CAP
6' METAL FENCE
POST MARKER
PAINTED GREEN
DEPTHS GREATER THAN
14' WHERE RISER APPROVED
BY ENGINEER.
MAX. 45'
WITH RISER
MIGHT
PLUG OR
CAP
45' BEND
GRANULAR BEDDING
MATERIAL (COMPACTED)
SERVICE WYE TO BE
EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE
NOTE: SERVICE PIPE (ASTM D-2665).
2665)
SOLVENT WELD ALL JOINTS.
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
NO SCALE
GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING METHOD
NO SCALE
(FOR PVC PIPE)
WATERMAIN SIZE VARIES
F 1 7
TEE
COVER AS
SPECIFIED
CURB
PLAN
EARTH FOUNDATION
PIPE FOUNDATION DETAILS
NO SCALE
111
GATE VALVE BOX
GATE VALVE
1 1/2' WASHED ROCK ALL
, •.. AROUND. 6I71.1/3 C.Y.
ANN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS)
8"%6'X16' CONC. BLOCK
TIE RODS
MNDOT 3733 TYPE 3
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
MIN. 1 LAYER
ATTACH TO TOP OF BONNET
GATE VALVE INSTALLATION
NO SCALE
PROPOSED OR EXISTING
FENCE 5' STEEL
APOF BLLE
CORM AS SPECIRED
0' INN
COVER
SM. LENGTH NO 11PE
OF MATERIAL FOR SERVICE
/ //////�••������....��� UNE AS SPECIFIED
�
HORIZONTAL LOOP
CORP6RA1ON SOP
1' MAX.
WATER SERVICE DETAIL
110 SCALE
r6000 BOA 5'
L0110 AT FULL
EXTENSION
CONCRETE CRADLE
PIPE BEDDING DETAILS
NO WAIL
CEOTEXTLLE FABRIC
1ANDE OT 3 3733
TYP
CONCRETE
BLOCK
REACTION
BACKING
j 3/4' GALVANIZED
STEEL TIE R005
OR "MEGA LUG• BRAND THRUST
RETAINER GLANDS AT JCINTS
BLOCK SEE STD. DWG. 203
BOA WRN CONC.
BLOCK
8'X8"%16'
CONCRETE
01.0066
TYPICAL HYDRANT LAYOUT
10 SCALE
(VALVE IN BOULEVARD)
1 1/2" WASHED
ROC( ALL
Mtl1WN /3 C.Y.
(MIN. 1 C.Y. N
NAPERVKIUS
SOILS.)
PLAN
SECTION
jr4 6*
MIN.
COVER FITTING'S WITH
POLYETHYLENE (MAIL)
PRIOR TO POURING
CONCRETE.
2500 P.S.L CONCRETE
2B 0411 STRENGTH
CONCRETE REACTION BACKING
NO SCALE
(FOR TEES AND CROSSES)
NOTE:
COVER FITTINGS WITH PLASTIC
4 MIL 00108 TO POURING
ONCR
Revisions
No. Date By Remarks
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Name
Dote
Registration Number
Jeff Elliott
5/23/01
19174
Scale SHOWN
Designed RI
Drawn JHB
Date 5/23/01
Checked
Approved
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
15050 23rd AWMVa North • R)moufh, Minnesota • 55447
phone 763/476 -6010 • lox 763/476 -8532
(—Mot mfro4knfacom
client
Land Holding Group
White Bur Lab, MN
Project
121h Avenue and
Holly Drive
Lino Labs, MN
UNDISTURBED
504.
SECTION
CONCRETE REACTION BACKING
NO 5CRE
1
(FOR BENDS)
Sheet TIN
Deta Shaft Y 2 4 2001
GUY OF LW° LA E
2500 P51 CONCRETE
28 DAY STRENGTH
bet
1
MFRI1 FILE NO : 13306
•
Cl)
CZ >11
QO
Z
a) -0
> a
as ai
u)s
as vi.a
CD N
It %--
•
W
0.14 Miles
INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TRACKING SHEET
CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL
PROJECT #: 21 -5a
PROJECT: 2001 Goals/Environmental Board
DATE OF ORIGIN:
TO: Environmental Board Members
City of Lino Lakes
FROM: Marty Asleson
Environmental Coordinator
OVERVIEW STATEMENTS:
•Attached are the 1999 and 2000 goals.
•Review past goals
•Formulate 2001 goals
STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION:
•Urban Interface Program
'Staff Time
Board at the January 312001
•..Several Draft goals and the notion of focused review issues were discussed. Attached is the summary from
Chair Scott lanyon..
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments made by the
• nvironmental Board Members,
Here are our assignments for the next board meeting:
Amy— Vegetation; Lighting
Connie — Impervious Surfaces; Ground Cover
Dave —Tree Preservation; Vegetation
"Tamar _ &_Fe pearaov_Boap8
Xart orA Aavo Aaxw6
Mike — Stormwater Infiltration and Treatment; Lighting
Rod — Impervious Surfaces; Buffers
Scott—Tree Preservation; Stormwater Infiltration and Treatment
Tere —Soil Treatment; Buffers
What I intend to do is to go through this list for each project. I'll ask if
there are any additional recommendations or questions regarding TREE
PRESERVATION. Once we've dealt with that I'll move on to BUFFERS and so on. If
you have specific recommendations that you can write out in advance of the
meeting that would move things along even more quickly and efficiently.
To prepare for our new roles, I encourage all of you to follow Dave's advice and
take it upon yourself to learn more about the topics for which you have
volunteered.
Here is my attempt to summarize the goals that we discussed. You'll note that I
eliminated WEB SITE as a goal and instead made it one of the potential activities
that fall within GOAL #2. I welcome your feedback and editorial comments.
GOAL #1. Educate developers about the benefits of including prairie gardens in
their landscape designs.
Potential Activity – Provide developers with the opportunity to see examples of
blooming prairie gardens and to talk with the people who "maintain" them.
GOAL #2. Increase citizen understanding and appreciation Lino Lakes' unique
environmental qualities.
Potential Activities —create a web site
Pilot Restoration Project
Update Environmental Board Packet
Encourage landscaping companies to advertise in city
Investigate possibility of using the "City Wagon"
GOAL #3. Identify and pursue preservation of, unique environmental assets of the
city.
Potential Activity -- Promote the preservation of the property located on the north
side of Lino Lakes Elementary.
GOAL #4. Restructure monthly meetings to preserve 50% (one hour) of the meeting
to advance our proactive goals.
Potential Activity —assign responsibilities (e.g., tree preservation, buffers) to
individual board members
GOAL #5. Increase communication with analogous units in other metro -area cities
to avoid "re- inventing the wheel" and to look for collaborative opportunities.
17apic6 &_Pe psazaov_Boap5 Xtzr oq Aavo Aoxecr
Potential Activity — develop a list of cities that have groups focused on the
environment
Host a social event that brings these groups together to share ideas, goals, and
experiences.
GOAL #6. Investigate and promote the possibility of developing a conservation
development ordinance for the city.
Potential Activity —get examples of such ordinances from other cities.
GOAL #7. Develop and implement a strategy to obtain more resources (staff and
financial) to enable the city to establish itself as the leader in the metro area
in terms of development that is both economically and environmentally
intelligent.
GOAL #8. Communicate more regularly, and more directly, with City Council.
Once we've reached agreement about the wording of these goals, I would like to
request time at one of the City Council meetings to present these goals and to
ask the Council if they have any goals that they would like us to pursue.
Finally, Marty could you make certain that you include a copy of the Developer's
Guidelines that the Board wrote, with the next meeting packet?
Scott
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION/POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was
reached by the Board:
FINAL VOTE COUNT:
Board Member Yes No
FINAL VOTE DATE:
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION (IF NECESSARY):
17apxa_ &_Pe peanov_Boap8 Xiri oq Alva Aaxs6
•.... pending ....
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION DATE:.... pending ....
COUNCIL ACTION (IF NECESSARY):
•.... pending ....
COUNCIL ACTION DATE:.... pending ....
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS: The following defines staff observations related to actual
implementation. This includes issues raised (and resolved) during implementation, general observations, and
project outcome.
•.... pending ....
PROJECT FINAL COMPLETION DATE:.... pending ....
ENVIRONMENTAL Coordinator Date
I7aprccr &_Pexpeazcov_BoapS Xtzt oq Atvo Aaice6
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
2000 GOALS
1. Work with City staff and consultants to complete the Natural Resources Inventory and
management plan process. Work with Council, staff and other boards to disseminate this
information to the community and educate the community about its application and
importance. Identify potential areas of controversy and discuss these with City staff, City
Council, and stakeholders as needed. The intent of these discussions is to translate the
recommendations in our Environmental Planning Handbook into a workable policy that is
reflected in our City ordinances.
2. Utilize data in the ecological inventory to formulate a recommendation for a "green
infrastructure" in the City. The product would attempt to incorporate the City's lakes,
wetlands, and other high - quality areas into a continuous network of open spaces that would
preserve the ecological health of these areas and maintain vital wildlife corridors. This
proposal is intended to be a starting point for future discussions with all interested parties that
should eventually result in the adoption of an open space plan for the City.
3. Prepare a set of standard recommendations on the environmental issues that are common to
all development projects, and discuss these recommendations with City staff. Issues to be
considered might include lighting, use of native vegetation, buffers, stormwater management,
impervious surface, soil treatments, tree preservation, and open space issues.
4. In collaboration with City staff, devise a standard form for use by the Environmental Board
to evaluate development projects. The form should incorporate the issues identified in goal
number three (above). The intent of this form is to clearly communicate our priorities to
developers, streamline our evaluation procedures, and to provide a format for clear
communication with staff, P & Z and Council.
5. Encourage City Council and City staff to continue the process of educating developers on
"conservation development" issues. Participate in discussions aimed at establishing
standards and guidelines related to environmental issues. Encourage council and staff to hold
periodic Developers Forums to communicate with developers and convey information about
City objectives including environmental objectives.
6. Identify at least one environmental restoration project that requires participation of nearby
residents and begin planning the project. This will require recruiting and education citizen
volunteers and pursuing funding. The intent is to increase citizen ownership of the City's
environmental vision and to provide a demonstration of the appeal of effective environmental
practices.
7. Seek opportunities for continued education of the Environmental Board.
8. Continue efforts aimed at public education and awareness on environmental issues. Update
and revise citizen packets. Encourage participation by schools and private landowners in
wildlife habitat programs. Educate residents on issues of good land stewardship.
202. Council and Commission Procedures
202.01 Meetings.
Subdivision 1. Regular Meetings. The city council shall
have regular sessions on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month at
6:30 o'clock p.m., and if such Monday shall fall on a holiday shall
have its regular session the next following day, and adjourned and
special sessions at any other time the council may deem proper.
(Amended by Ordinance No. 06 - 90 passed May 29, 1990.)
Subd. 2. Special Meetings. Special meetings may be
called as provided by Section 3.01 of the charter. Notice of
special meetings shall be given to the official newspaper, and
shall be posted at city hall. Such public notice shall be given at
least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, except in cases of
emergency.
202.02 Presiding Officer - Appointment. The mayor shall
preside at all meetings of the council. In the absence of the
mayor, the acting mayor shall preside. In the absence of both, the
council members shall elect one of their number as temporary
chairman. The acting mayor shall have the same privileges as other
members.
202.03 Ouorum. At all meetings of the council a majority of
the council members shall constitute a quorum to do business.
202.04 Order of Business. At the hour appointed for meeting,
the members shall be called to order by the mayor, and in his
absence by the acting mayor, and in the absence of both, by the.
clerk - treasurer. The clerk - treasurer shall call the roll, note the
absentees and announce whether a quorum be present. In the absence
of the clerk - treasurer, the mayor shall appoint a secretary pro
tem. Upon the appearance of a quorum the council shall proceed to
business which shall be conducted in the following order:
(1) Call to order.
(2) Roll call.
(3) Approval of the minutes of the last meeting, which
if no corrections shall stand approved.
(4) Open discussion from audience in attendance.
(5) Presentations of petitions, memorials and demon -
trations.
(6) Reports of standing committees.
(7) Reports of special committees.
(8) Reports of officials.
6
(9) Notices and communications.
(10) Introduction of ordinances.
(11) Unfinished business.
(12) Motions and resolutions.
(13) Special order of business.
(14) Presentation of claims.
(15) Adjournment.
202.05 Presiding Officer - Powers. The presiding officer
shall preserve order and decorum and shall decide questions of
order subject to an appeal to the council. The presiding officer
may make motions, second motions or speak on any question provided,
however, that in order to do so, upon demand of any one council
member, he shall vacate the chair and designate a council member to
preside temporarily. The mayor shall be entitled to vote like
other members of the council.
202.06 Debate Procedure. Every member, previous to his
speaking, shall address the chairman and shall not proceed until he
has been recognized by the chair. He shall indulge in no
personalities, and shall confine his remarks to the matter under
debate.
202.07 Debate Limit. No member shall speak more than twice
on any question, nor more than five minutes each time without
unanimous consent of the council.
202.08 Point of Order. A member called to order shall
immediately suspend his remarks until the point of order is decided
by the chair.
202.09 Motions and Resolutions in Writing. Every motion
except to adjourn, postpone, reconsider, commit, lay on the table,
or for the previous questions, shall be reduced to writing if the
chair or any member requires it; when made and seconded, it shall
be stated by the chairman if amendment, or any disposition thereof
has been made, or a vote taken thereon.
202.10 Limit on Motions. When a question is under debate no
motion shall be entertained, unless to adjourn, to lay on the
table, to act on the previous question, to postpone, to commit, or
to amend, which several motions shall have precedence in the order
in which they are named, and the first three shall be decided
without debate.
202.11 Divisions of Ouestion. Any question shall be divided
at the request of any member when the same will admit thereof.
7
202.12 Voting. When a question is put by the chair, every
member present shall vote unless for special reasons the council
shall excuse him; but if interested he shall not vote. In doubtful
cases the chair may direct, or any member call for a division. The
yeas and nays shall be called upon a requisition of the chair or
any member, in which case the names of the members voting are
required to be recorded in the minutes.
202.13 Order of Consideration. All questions shall be put in
the order in which they are moved, except in case of privileged
questions.
202.14 Form of Question. The previous question shall be put
in these words: "Shall the main question now be put ?" It shall be
admitted on demand of any two members, and until decided shall
preclude all amendments and debate of the main question.
202.15 Committees. All committees including standing
committees shall be appointed by the chair, unless expressly
ordered by the council.
202.16 Ordinances. After an ordinance shall have passed, a
complete and accurate copy as amended shall be made by the clerk -
treasurer and shall be signed by the mayor or in his absence by the
acting mayor, and deposited with the clerk - treasurer, who shall
attest, seal, number, file, and record or place the same
permanently in the ordinance book. The affidavit of publication
shall be permanently inserted in the ordinance book after each
ordinance.
202.17 Petitions. Petitions and other papers addressed to
the council shall be read by the clerk - treasurer upon presentation
of the same to the council.
202.18 Open Meetings. All sessions of the council shall be
public to the extent provided by law.
202.19 Preservation of Order. The chief of police shall
attend meetings of the council when requested to do so by the mayor
and preserve order in the room.
202.20 Amendment of Rules. These rules, or any of them, may
be temporarily suspended by consent of a majority of all
councilmen, and shall not be repealed, altered, or amended, unless
by concurrence of a majority of the whole council, and upon notice
given at some preceding meeting.
202.21 Robert's Rules of Order. In all points not covered by
these rules the council shall be governed in its procedure by
Robert's Rules of Order.
202.22 Purpose. The foregoing rules are adopted to
facilitate the transaction of council business and functions. They
should not be permitted to defeat or hinder the plainly expressed
intent and desire of the council. Informal compliance and
8
substantial performance shall be sufficient under the foregoing
rules in the absence of objection seasonably taken. Objection is
hereby declared not to have been seasonably taken as to procedural
matters provided for herein if a council member present at a
meeting fails to object during the meeting and requests compliance
with these rules, and such objection shall not be seasonably taken
by an absent member later than the next regular meeting after the
proceedings to which the objection is made.
202.23 Recording Votes. The votes of the members on any
question may be taken in any manner which signifies the intention
of the individual members, and the votes of each member on any
action taken shall be recorded in the minutes. The vote of each
member shall be recorded on each appropriation of money, except for
payments of judgments, claims, and amounts fixed by statute.
202.24 Scope. The provisions of 202.01 - 202.24 shall apply
to the city council and, to the extent practicable, to all
commissions. As applied to commissions, references in this chapter
to the mayor shall be construed to refer to the chairman;
references to council members shall be construed to refer to the
members; and references to the clerk - treasurer shall be construed
to refer to the secretary.
9
Minn. Stat. § 412.191. subd. 2.
State v. Occhino. 572 N. W. 2d
316 (Minn. App. 1997), pet. For
rev. denied (Minn. Jan. 28,
1998).
Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 2.
CHAPTER 7
mayor, as presiding officer -- subject to overrule by the council -- should
order their removal from the room. If the presiding officer fails to act, the
council may, by motion, issue such an order. The council has authority to
preserve order at council meetings. The council can use necessary force.
including use of the marshal or police, to carry out the mandate. If a person
is excluded from a meeting, the council should provide an opportunity for
the excluded person to give his or her side of the exclusion to a designated
city staff member to satisfy any due process questions.
If the entire audience becomes so disorderly that it is impossible to carry on
a meeting, the mayor should declare the meeting continued to some other
time and place if necessary. The council may also move for adjournment.
No matter how disorderly a meeting may be, it is a legal meeting and any
action the council takes in proper form is valid. Questions have arisen as to
whether city councils can issue contempt citations against individuals
whose disorderly conduct disrupts or interferes with the transaction of city
business. The council cannot issue such contempt citations.
Rules of procedure
The city council has the power to regulate its own procedure. While many
councils have operated without written rules or regulations, written rules
facilitate the conduct of city business and reduce the risk of mishandling
important matters.
Council bylaws usually cover the place and time of regular council
meetings, the order of business, parliamentary rules governing council
procedures, minutes, and standing and special committees and their powers.
Many councils also include other provisions in their bylaws.
Agendas
The bylaws should establish an order of business and a process for placing
items on an agenda. Many councils have found the following order of
business convenient:
• Call to order
• Minutes of previous meetings
• Consent agenda
• Presentations of petitions and complaints
• Reports of officers, council committees, and citizen committees
• Reports from standing committees
153
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES
• Reports from special committees
• Reports from administrative officers (including, in Plan B cities. the
manager)
• Notices and communications
• Unfinished business
• Presentation of claims
• New business (including the introduction of ordinances and resolutions)
• Announcements
• Adjournment
Consent agenda
By council resolution, or through .its bylaws, a council may establish a
consent agenda containing routine, non - controversial items that need little
or no deliberation. The clerk, or person responsible for placing items on the
agenda, prepares the consent agenda. By a majority or higher vote, the
council can approve all actions on the consent agenda with one vote. If a
councilmember objects to an item being on the consent agenda, it should be
removed and acted upon as a separate agenda item.
Tips for shortening meetings
In addition to the consent agenda, councils may consider the following
suggestions to shorten meetings:
Council bylaws may set a closing date for the agenda. For example, the
clerk must receive all requests to include items on the agenda five days
before the meeting. This is especially important if councilmembers need to
review written material before the meeting. The council might make an
exception in emergency situations by a unanimous vote, for example. The
council should set a definite time for adjournment and observe this rule.
At some time during the meeting, often at the very beginning, many
councils establish a specific time when citizens can bring any concerns to
the council. In such an open forum, the mayor or presiding officer should
allot a limited time for each person who wishes to speak. No action should
be taken on any of the issues raised. Rather, if appropriate, they should be
placed on the agenda of a future council meeting.
154
CHAPTER 7
When the council is going to discuss a major public issue, the bylaws or the
council, by resolution, may allot a limited, specific amount of time for each
side to express its views. The council may also follow this procedure for all
items on the agenda.
Parliamentary procedure
Parliamentary procedure is a system of rules that make it easier to transact
business. They are designed to preserve order, expedite business, and
protect the rights of those involved in making the decision. The mayor, as
presiding officer, is responsible for guarding against abuse of the
procedures. But, the effective use of parliamentary procedures is the joint
responsibility of the mayor and of all councilmembers.
Parliamentary rules can be very simple or very complex. The complexity of
rules should vary in direct ratio to the size of the group; i.e., as the number
of people in the group increases, the complexity of the rules should
increase. Accordingly, the rules for city councils should be simple. Any
attempt to introduce a high degree of formality into the proceedings of a
city council will probably reduce its ability to operate effectively.
The rules of parliamentary procedure apply to council proceedings only if
the council formally adopts such rules in its bylaws. Roberts Rules of Order
were designed for meetings of large bodies. Rather than adopt these rules as
a formal procedure to always be followed, a council can agree to informally
follow these rules while conducting meetings. An informal application of
these rules, together with the common sense of the councilmembers, may
be the only guidelines many councils need in order to conduct their
business in an orderly manner. If a very controversial discussion is about to
occur, the mayor or some other councilmember could move to adopt more
formal rules for that particular discussion.
The following discussion introduces a few rules of parliamentary procedure
that can simplify the work of the council. These rules are contained in
Roberts Rules of Order. The council can adopt them by inserting the
following clause in the bylaws: "In all points not covered by these rules, the
council shall be governed in its procedure by Roberts Rules of Order (or
some other similar code of parliamentary procedure)."
Motions
The council transacts business through motions made by councilmembers.
These motions are seconded, at times, and subsequently passed or rejected
by council vote. Each motion has different rules. For example, councils can
155
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CmES
debate some motions while they must vote on others immediately. Some
motions require a simple majority for passage, others need a two - thirds
majority. (See Chart V for a summary of the motions councils use most
frequently and important information relating to them.)
These are the typical steps to make and act on a motion:
• A member of the council addresses the presiding officer.
• The presiding officer recognizes the member.
• The councilmember states his or her motion. (Usually in the following
form: "I move ... text of the motion. ") A motion should always be in
positive, rather than negative, terms. For example, if the motion is to
deny X a permit and the council defeats the motion, there may be some
confusion as to whether or not X has been granted a permit. Even if the
consensus of the council is to deny the permit, the motion should be to
grant the permit and the council should then vote it down. The
councilmember making a motion does not need to favor it or vote for it.
The councilmember may wish to put the issue before the council so a
decision can be made.
• If necessary, another councilmember then seconds the motion by saying:
"I second the motion." (Seconds are not needed for meetings of small
bodies like city councils unless required in the bylaws.) Neither the
making of a motion nor the seconding of a motion places it before the
council. Only the presiding officer can place the motion before the
council by stating the motion.
• The presiding officer repeats the motion or states the question to the
council. (When the presiding officer has stated the question, the motion
is pending and it is then open to debate.)
• A discussion follows, if the motion is debatable.
• A councilmember may make subsidiary motions in the same form as the
original motion. (See Chart V.)
• The council votes on the original motion or on any of the subsidiary
motions.
• The presiding officer announces the result of the vote on each motion
immediately after the vote count is complete.
156
CHAPTER 7
A councilmember may not make a second main motion while the council
is discussing the first one. Any councilmember may, however, make a
privileged motion even if a main motion is currently before the council.
A privileged motion is one to adjourn, to recess, or to ask a question of
privilege - -such as to restate the motion or ask for order. In this case, a vote
on the privileged motion precedes the one on the main motion.
Simultaneous motions
When several motions are before the council at the same time, the council
should vote on them in the following order.
• Adjourn
• Recess
• Question of privilege
• Postpone temporarily (lay on table)
• Vote immediately (previous question)
• Limit debate
• Postpone to a defmite or indefinite time
• Refer to committee
• Amend
• Substitute
• General main motion
Role of the presiding officer
In any group or assembly, the presiding officer has an extra measure
of power. As the chair of the meeting, the presiding officer has the
responsibility to guide the group toward the conclusion of pending business
in good time, while also giving major issues enough consideration. To
accomplish this, the presiding officer has two special powers:
The first power is to interpret and apply the rules of procedure. The
presiding officer must decide whether or not motions are proper, whether
motions are in order, whether the body should grant questions of special
privilege, and what procedure is proper in any given instance. The
presiding officer should maintain order and expel disorderly individuals
from the meeting.
157
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES
The presiding officer does not have complete freedom in exercising this
authority. Any member of the council may appeal the decision of the chair.
To do this, a councilmember must say: "I appeal the decision of the chair,"
immediately after the chair announces the decision. (Recognition from the
presiding officer is not necessary when making an appeal.) The appeal must
be seconded, is debatable, and cannot be amended. After the debate. the
assembly votes on the chair's decision. A majority of "yes" votes upholds
the decision of the presiding officer, and a majority of "no" votes overrules
the decision. A tie vote sustains the ruling. The presiding officer may vote
to uphold his or her own ruling. If no one appeals a ruling as soon as the
presiding officer makes it., it becomes the rule of the council.
The presiding officer's second power is to recognize speakers. The
presiding officer may not, however, refuse to receive a motion after
recognizing the maker, nor refuse to call for a vote on any motion that has
been properly made and seconded. The power to recognize speakers still
gives the presiding officer considerable influence over the course of the
discussion and, consequently, over the eventual decision on any matter.
When the council invites comments from the audience, the presiding officer
continues to recognize speakers.
In statutory cities, presiding officers play a dual role. They preside, make
and second motions, and vote on all questions before the council. The
presiding officer usually steps down from the position as chair in order to
make a motion. To do this, the presiding officer turns over the duties of
presiding officer to another member of the council. The mayor or other
presiding officer may then make a motion, and should not assume the
duties as presiding officer until the council has taken a final vote or
postponed the motion until another time.
Special motions
Several motions deserve special consideration. They include the following:
The motion to reconsider
This motion enables a council to set aside a vote it previously took, and to
consider the matter again as though it had not voted on the issue. If the
council uses Roberts Rules, only a person who originally voted on the
prevailing side may move to reconsider. Otherwise, any member may make
• -the motion by saying, "I move to reconsider ... stating the motion to be
reconsidered ..." The council may debate this motion. If the council passes
the motion to reconsider, it must then reconsider the original motion and
take another vote. If the council defeats a motion to reconsider, no further
action is necessary.
158
CHAPTER 7
A motion to postpone indefinitely
There is an important difference between the motion to postpone
indefmitely and the motion to postpone temporarily. The motion to
postpone temporarily is more commonly called a motion to "lay on the
table" or "to table." The motion to postpone, postpones consideration of the
motion until some undetermined future time. The council may consider a
tabled motion whenever a majority of the members decide to do so. A
motion to postpone indefinitely, however, is the equivalent to a negative
vote on the main motion. Thus, the issue can be raised again only by a
motion made by someone on the prevailing side of the vote on the motion
because, unless someone changes his or her mind, the motion to postpone
will once again prevail. A motion to permanently suppress any future
consideration of an issue is not binding on a future council.
A motion to limit debate
A council may limit debate by: placing a time limit on debate, such as a
limit of 15 minutes to consider a particular motion; limiting the number of
people who may speak for and against a certain motion, such as a limit of
three speakers in favor and three speakers opposed.
The motion to amend
Councilmembers may offer amendments to a main motion at any time. In
addition, it is possible to amend an amendment currently under
consideration. Beyond this, councilmembers can offer no further
amendments. When a member has made a motion to amend, the vote on the
amendment must precede the vote on the original motion. After the council
has accepted or rejected the amendment, another vote on the original
motion is necessary.
The motion to substitute
This is a motion to replace one motion with another on the same subject. A
councilmember may move to substitute a main motion or an amendment to
a main motion. One form for making a substitute motion is to say, "I wish
to introduce the following substitute motion ... present the substitute
motion ..." When a substitute motion is before the council, the council
_must decide which of the two.motions,.the original.motion or the substitute
motion, it wishes to consider. The council must vote on this question. A
"yes" vote favors considering the substitute motion. A "no" vote favors
considering the original motion. The council must then discuss and vote
upon the selected motion.
159
Minn. Stat. § 471.705, subd. 1.
Minn. Stat. § 412.02, subd. 2a.
Minn. Stat. § 412.151, subd. 1.
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES
Voting procedures
State law does not regulate council voting. The council may use whatever
procedures it prefers, subject to charter provisions in home rule cities. The
council's bylaws can include voting rules. Otherwise, the council may use
voice voting or standing vote unless a councilmember calls for a vote by
ballot. The bylaws can also set the order in which councilmembers vote.
Whether the vote is unanimous or not, the minutes must record the name of
each councilmember present and his or her vote. Occasionally councils may
vote by ballot, such as eliminating candidates for a city position, until only
two options remain. While the law allows for voting by ballot, the
procedure must ensure that each councilmember's vote is recorded in the
minutes and open for public inspection.
Role of the mayor and clerk
Mayors and Standard Plan city clerks have the same powers as
councilmembers to make, second, and vote on motions. The mayor does
not have a veto, nor may the mayor vote twice in order to break a tie. If,
however, there is a tie vote in filling an elective office, the mayor must fill
the vacancy by appointment. The mayor presides at council meetings and
the clerk keeps the minutes.
In cities operating under one of the optional plans, the clerk attends council
meetings and records the minutes, but may not make, second, or vote on
motions. In addition, unless the council extends the privilege, the clerk
Lacks the right to participate in discussions.
Minutes of council meetings
The council must keep a full and accurate record of its actions at every
council meeting. In statutory cities, the clerk records the council
proceedings in a minute book. In the clerk's absence, the council should
delegate the duty of taking minutes for that meeting.
The actual wording of the minutes is up to the clerk, unless the council
adopts a standard form by motion or specifically directs the clerk to change
the wording in the minutes. The minutes should be written in language and
terms that the average citizen can understand. Reference to numbers of
- -ordinances; resolutions; and other matters should include a brief
description.
160
A.G. Op. 470 -C (Feb. 18, 1959).
Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd.1;
Minn. Stat. § 15.17, subd. 1.
Minn. Stat. § 412.151, subd. 1.
Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 3.
Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 4;
Minn. Stat. §§ 471.697 -.698.
CHAPTER 7
If the council finds a mistake in the minutes of the previous meeting, the
clerk should change the minutes to reflect what actually occurred. If the
clerk declines, the council can order the change by motion and a vote. The
clerk must then make the change and show in the minutes that the change
was made by order of the council.
Once the council has formally approved the minutes of any meeting, the
minutes should not be changed under any circumstances. The council can
dispense with the reading of the minutes if all councilmembers have
received them prior to the meeting.
The council must provide books and stationery for keeping minutes. State
law requires all cities to keep minutes on a physical medium that is of a
quality that will ensure permanent records.
Because minutes are official papers of the city, the clerk should sign them.
Although the law does not require it, many cities also have the mayor sign
the minutes after the council has approved them. If the minute book
includes only a clipping from the published proceedings, the clerk should
sign the clipping even though the signatures of the clerk and mayor are
already printed on the clipping. Minute books are public records and must
be available for public view at any reasonable time.
Publication of council minutes
After every regular or special meeting, statutory cities with over 1,000
population must publish the official council proceedings or a summary of
the official minutes. The summary must include action on motions,
resolutions, ordinances, and other official proceedings. As an alternative to
publication, the city may mail, at city expense, a copy of the proceedings to
any resident upon request. Publication of the council minutes must occur
within 30 days of the meeting. Cities with a population of less than 1,000
according to the latest federal census, are not required but may choose to
publish the council proceedings. The publication requirement does not
cover home rule charter cities. Therefore, if a home rule city does not have
a charter requirement, it does not need to publish council minutes.
Whether or not the city publishes minutes, it must publish ordinances and,
in certain cases, the annual fmancial statement.
161
Minn. Stat. §§ 412.191. Subd. 3
and 331A.10, subd. 6.
Minn. Stat. § 471.705, subd. 1.
Minn. Stat. § 412.151, subd. 1.
Metro 500, Inc. v. City of
Brooklyn Park, 279 Minn. 294,
211 N.W.2d 238 (1973); Inland
Constr. Co. v. City of
Bloomington, 292 Minn. 379,
195 N.W.2d 588 (1972). Bank
of America v. City of st. Paul,
No. C7 -97 -1073 (Minn. App.
Feb. 17, 1998), pet. For rev.
denied (Minn. Apr. 30, 1998).
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CITIES
Content of council minutes
The clerk should include the following information in the minutes:
• The time and place of the meeting;
• The members present
• A summary of all decisions made by the council, including a copy of
each motion exactly as stated, whether or not the motion had a second
and if the motion was seconded, whether or not the council adopted it,
and the names of the people who made and seconded the motion; and,
• The names of the councilmembers and the mayor who voted either for or
against each motion.
Ordinances, resolutions, and claims considered by the city council do not
need to be fully detailed in the minutes if they appear in other permanent
records kept by the clerk and can be accurately identified by the description
given in the minutes.
Making an adequate record
It is very important to make an adequate record of council decisions and of
the factual information members base their decisions on Minutes are the
primary record of the decision - making process and are critical if council
actions become subject to judicial review.
Council actions are classified as either legislative or administrative in
nature. The establishment of general policies and procedures is legislative
and is subject to limited judicial review. Courts typically will not substitute
their judgment for a council's judgment.
Administrative or quasi-judicial actions involve the application of a general
policy to a specific person or situation. Administrative actions are subject
to greater judicial scrutiny and will be set aside if arbitrary, unreasonable,
or capricious. Therefore, it is important for the council to develop an
accurate record and findings.
For example, in order for a court to meaningfully review council actions,
the minutes must clearly and precisely state the council's finding of facts
and how those facts led to the council's decision. Findings of fact serve
not only to improve the decision- making process, but aid in judicial
review. The fmdings are part of the record. When a court reviews council
proceedings, they will rely on the records the city kept, not on the records
it might have maintained.
162
Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v.
FCC, 96 F.2d 554 (D.C. Cir.),
cert. denied, 305 U.S. 613
(1938).
CHAPTER 7
Parts of the record
When the city council or other governing body holds a hearing. the record
usually consists of two separate parts: the transcript, which preserves
testimony, and the final order or determination. Following is a sample final
order outline for a special use permit. The elements of the order reflect the
steps taken by a hearing body in arriving at a decision.
• A caption or title, such as, "In the matter of Ms. X's application for a
special use permit";
• A preamble that summarizes the council's actions at the hearing and
states the purpose of the application;
• Findings of fact (individually numbered);
• Conclusions or reasons;
• A decision;
• An opinion if any; and,
• A copy of the transcript, tape recording or, at a minimum, detailed
minutes that include all objections and rulings on them (if any).
The federal courts have suggested that a hearing body adhere to the
following sequence in arriving at a decision:
• Council takes and weighs the accuracy and credibility of evidence;
• After careful consideration of this evidence, the body makes a
determination of facts that are of a basic or underlying nature;
• From the basic facts, the body makes findings or conclusions often in the
language of the statute or ordinance; and,
• From this fmding, the council makes a decision following the statutory
criterion.
When a council prepares precise findings of relevant facts, a well- reasoned
decision results. When a council can demonstrate its conclusions are
consistent with all of the facts in the record, its decision is likely to be
_upheld if judicially. challenged. The record should_also demonstrate
compliance with all constitutional requirements, as well as with all
statutory and ordinance procedural requirements. (Often, due process
deficiencies, such as lack of notice, provide grounds for appeal).
163
Minn. Stat. § 471.705, subd. 1.
Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 4.
HANDBOOK FOR MINNESOTA CmEs
III. Motions, resolutions, and
ordinances
Passing ordinances and resolutions
City councils enact policies through ordinances and resolutions. Any
member of the council, including the mayor, may introduce an ordinance or
resolution. When ordinances or resolutions are before the council, the
council may act upon them at once, refer them to a committee for study and
recommendation, postpone consideration to some future time, or take any
of the other subsidiary or privileged motion actions. After the council has
completed all consideration and discussion of the matter, the presiding
officer should read the ordinance or resolution and call for a vote.
If the council decides to refer the matter to a committee, the committee may
conduct an investigation and recommend passage of the ordinance or
resolution in its original form or in an amended form, or reject the
ordinance or resolution. Debate on the ordinance or resolution may take
place at the time of introduction, while a committee is considering it, and
after the committee has reported its findings and recommendations.
For an action to be legal it needs a proper motion, an actual vote, and a
record of the councilmembers voting for and against the proposal. Many
clerks report the names of the members who take action at each of these
various steps, although the law only requires a record of the third step.
Most resolutions and other procedural motions of the council must have a
majority of the votes cast for adoption. (For exceptions, see Chart V.) To
illustrate: if two members of the council vote in favor of a resolution --one
votes against it, and two abstain from voting—the resolution passes.
Ordinances, on the other hand, must be enacted by "a majority vote of all
the members of the council," except where a larger number is required by
law. Therefore, on a five - person council, an ordinance would need at least
three favorable votes to pass.
Differences between ordinances, resolutions,
and motions
A motion is a matter of parliamentary procedure. Motions may introduce
ordinances and resolutions, amend them, and take any other actions
concerning them.
164
A- M E M O R A N D U M
DNR Forestry / 1200 Warner Road / St. Paul, MN 55106
(651) 772 -7562 / FAX: (651) 772 -7599 / E -mail: peggy.sand @dnr.state.mn.us
May 11, 2001 # of pages: 1
To: Lino Lakes Environmental Board
Lino Lakes City Council
Marty Asleson, Linda Waite - Smith, and Jeff Smyser
From: Peggy Sand Metro Region Forestry Manager
Re: Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Update - Development Framework
At the request of Marty Asleson and the Lino Lakes Environmental Board, the Wildland Urban
Interface Project's Local Unit of Government Work Group has reviewed the draft Development
Framework for Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan which we received (without any maps) in late
April 2001 and offers to you the following comments on that draft.
As you may know, this Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Project is a special project of the Metro
Region of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) intended to help DNR provide
more integrated natural resource guidance to local communities. This pilot work is being
developed in cooperation with two target cities of Lino Lakes and Hugo. The WUI Work Group
is an interdisciplinary team of DNR staff with representatives of the City of Lino Lakes and
Hugo and the Rice Creek Watershed District. All the following comments are offered as sound
advice from natural resource professionals with no official review nor regulatory status intended
by these comments.
Before making the specific comments on specific text in the draft framework, we would like to
offer these general comments:
• Lino Lakes is to be strongly applauded for including significant and quite comprehensive
natural resource sections throughout your development framework. The intent and scope of
natural resources elements in your draft plan could serve as a model for other communities.
Thus, the comments we offer are intended to build on the strengths of the document and help
refine it in order to improve its effectiveness.
• Common understanding of the development framework could be enhanced by consistently
using terms and including some agreed upon definitions. For example, have more consistency
in whether to use the term "environmental resources ", "environmental amenities" or
"environmental features" and whether to modify such terms with the adjective "sensitive" or
"significant ". Consider using "native plant communities" instead of "natural vegetation"
Specifically, consider developing and getting agreement on definitions for "open space ",
"greenways ", "natural areas" , "native plant communities ", etc. In some of these definitions,
be careful not to exclude non- native plants (e.g. conifer plantations) to the extent that they are
part of the natural resources the community wants to conserve.
• Please note that many of the comments below may apply to more than one section of the plan
and the care should be taken to check for consistency throughout.
ISSUES
4 -5 Environmental
Can the map referenced [not available for review by WUI group] also include native
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework
page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group
plant communities and wooded areas?
POLICY PLAN
Natural Environment
20 Goals
# 6. It is not possible to protect and maintain "natural" wetlands if they are integrated into
the storm drain system. The goal should be to identify which wetlands to set aside
from future stormwater systems.
Policies
20 -22 General
20 #1. While the inventory work and management recommendations done by Brauer and
Associates called Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation
Development (hereafter referred to as HEP &CD) is generally a very good basic
document, completing a more detailed inventory for the whole city (in particular the
Minnesota Land Cover Classification System that is being done now for much of Lino
Lakes) would be useful in both integrating information on listed plant species (rare,
threatened, and endangered species) and other valuable information from the
MnDNR's Natural Heritage program. Once this is complete the City is encouraged to
identify and rank sites for protection and develop more site specific management
plans. In other words, the Comp Plan should reference the HEP &CD but not imply
that it is complete nor in depth enough.
21 #3. Consider a goal by which new development preserves identified high quality natural
plant communities and critical wildlife habitat, which enhances the site's ecological
functions (or at least avoids damage to them), and manages the site to promote
ecological health.
21 -22 #5. No maps were available for this review. However, the City is encouraged to adopt
into its Comprehensive Plan a greenway map which incorporates areas identified in
the HEP &CD report, in the WUI wildlife report (provided to the Environmental Board
separately), and which links to greenways in adjoining communities. This greenway
map should show general alignments proposed for trail connections and which
greenways areas are for habitat conservation but not necessarily trails. As implied in
Goal 5(h) it is critical that trails not be located in sensitive plant communities or near
sensitive wildlife breeding areas which could be degraded by intrusion of trails,
people, and invasive species.
22 Vegetation
#1. Consider rewording to require the preservation of plant communities and wildlife
habitats with rare, endangered, and threatened species and to encourage the
preservation of other native plant communities (including protecting the soil, drainage
patterns, understory vegetation). Don't limit the type of native plant communities
preserved to those listed in the plan.
#2. What is the status of the City's landscape ordinance and the tree protection ordinance?
Consider explicitly referencing them here.
22 -23 Soils
2
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework
page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group
Consider adding a policy on the importance of cost - effective aggregate resources to
city's development.
#2. Such areas should be located and avoided as construction sites if at all possible. Only
if there is no alterative locations should drain tiles be required.
23 Storm Water /Wetlands Drainage
Please fix caption by adding punctuation between the words wetlands and drainage.
#1. The City is encouraged to examine their 1994 plan and determine if it is still current.
To the extent reasonable for Lino Lakes soil and water regimes, the City is encouraged
to integrate alternative stormwater management strategies incorporating on -site
filtration and infiltration that are sometimes referred to as "low impact development"
(LID).
#2. Again, this implies that the only reason for protecting wetlands is their future value for
stormwater management. Delete the 2' sentence.
#3. This provision is unclear. A clear policy to design development so that storm sewer
systems are unnecessary would make sense.
#8. Delete this policy. The City needs to comply with the 2 watershed district plans
anyway. Perhaps this policy could be to work closely with the districts in
development of future stormwater management plans.
24 -25 Growth Management
The City is encouraged to consider how its extensive wetlands, high water table (an
fluctuations in that), soil conditions, and implications of increased development on
storm water management (including impacts on existing development if water regimes
change) may limit sound development and to use that as a factor in determining how
much growth is reasonable. The City is also encouraged to add a goal that the extent
and pace of growth be consistent with the City's natural resource conservation goals.
26 -33 Land Use
26 -29 General Policies
In the general and/or residential sections, the City is encouraged to add policies related
to reducing the risk of property damage from wildfire. DNR can provide the City with
additional information on Firewise Communities (i.e. having development defensible
from wildfire through provision of alternative escape routes, buffers between highly
flammable vegetation and structures, fuel control, etc.).
28 -29 Rural Goals & Policies
Consider adding a policy on conserving working forests and tree farms. Note:
working forests are forest lands (be they native or plantations) which are actively
managed for uses e.g. Christmas trees, timber, fire wood, non - timber forest products,
etc.
29 -30 Residential Goals & Policies
#8. Does the city have adequate procedures for identifying, enforcing, and treating failing
septic systems? Perhaps the City should consider a study of the adequacy of the
existing on -site systems in order to identify areas where MUSA may need to be
3
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework
page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group
extended in the future.
30 -33 Commercial Goals & Policies
Consider adding a goal on avoiding destruction of natural features.
32 Industrial Goals & Policies
Consider adding a goal on avoiding destruction of natural features.
34 -37 Transportation
Both the goals and policies (Streets, #6) refer to "establish a street system that
connects isolated neighborhoods ", yet the inventory frequently refers to wetlands and
other natural features as being a primary factor which causes the isolation. Therefore,
is a statement needed on not impacting natural resources in the process of providing
connections.
38 -41 Community Facilities
38 -39 Parks & Open Space [Policies]
What is the City's policy about acquiring (via easements or fee titles) natural areas that
are priority for protection (not recreation)? More emphasis (commitment ?) is needed
on the City's role in managing and monitoring natural areas and native plant
communities which are under it's authority.
39 Schools
What can the City do to assure that natural resources are conserved and used as an
educational resource in schools
built in Lino Lakes?
40 -41 Utilities
Policies should be added that utilities be located and constructed to avoid damage to
natural resources including wetlands and trees.
4
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework
page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group
PLANS
Natural Environment
45 Lakes
Consider adding two strategies - one to work with the DNR Trails and Waterways
Division to assure adequate public access and one to work with DNR Fisheries, Anoka
County Parks, and the Watershed District to improve the habitat qualities of
Centerville and Peltier Lakes in order to enhance fishing opportunities.
#1. Since 1994, both Rice Creek and Vadnais Watershed Districts have adopted 2 "d
generation plans and that Lino Lakes will need to update their Water Plan to assure
consistency with the Watershed plans.
46 -47 Vegetation
See comments above - particularly related to updating inventory. Consider adding a
strategy on managing conifer plantations. Consider also adding a statement on oak
wilt and its control. Consider adding two strategies related to fire: one on the need to
reduce risk to properties from wildfire (see comments on pp. 26 -29 above) and one on
the need for prescribed burns for management of fire- dependent plant communities.
#5. Reword this strategy to update and refine the City's HEP& CD inventory, in particular
to include habitats with listed species and MCBS identified sites. Also, as part of the
subdivision and development review processes require the submission to include a
more detailed inventory of trees, native plant communities and wildlife (including
listed species), hydrological conditions, and other natural features.
47 Soils
See comments above on aggregate resources and consider whether to develop and
strategies.
48 Wetlands, Floodplain & Drainageways
See comments above.
#3. The primary goal of WCA is to avoid impacts to wetlands: only if those impacts
cannot be avoided does mitigation come into play.
#6. Soften or delete this statement.
48 -57 Greenway Corridors
See comment above on pp. 21 -22 on adopting a greenways map.
49 [purposel
#3. Identification of wildlife habitat should be stated in a more focused and pro- active
manner, e.g. identifying particular wildlife species, types of habitats, and strategies for
protection.
53 &57[implementation]
#2 In 2.b. expand the list of site qualities addressed in the performance standards (e.g.
protection and management of native plant communities adjoining greenways).
Consider having explicit reference and application of a tree protection ordinance and
native plant community protection measures in areas adjoining greenways. What does
2.c. mean? It needs to be reworded, e.g. as a statement on avoiding damage to
greenway corridors and their natural features by the location and construction of
5
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework
page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group
transportation and utilities?
#3. Develop criteria for where trails are not appropriate within greenways.
Land Use
64 -74 Growth Management / Growth Management Methods/ Growth Areas -MUSA
73 #9. While the Environmental Board's recommendation on an additional criteria on
dedication of a minimum of 50% permanent open space (noted here and in many other
places in plan e.g. p. 82) is appropriate, consider allowing areas with steep slope to be
included in this 50% open space in order to further encourage their appropriate
protection and management.
GENERAL LAND USE PLAN ELEMENTS
79 Rural Land Uses
79 Consider adding another objectives related to working forests, tree farms, and
landscape nurseries.
82 #1. Explicitly state that working forests qualify within the preserved open space areas
84 -88 [Residential]
88 #6cThe performance standards and site plan review processes for medium and high
density residential should give priority to natural open space conserved and managed
with native plant communities.
88 -93 Commercial
89 [Strategies]
#5. Consider including requirements to protect listed species and to avoid damage to
quality native plant communities.
89 -91 Interchange Commercial Areas
90 Consider adding a design objective on retaining and/or emphasizing natural
environment in landscaping and in applying LID principles (on -site stormwater
filtration and infiltration, etc.)
93 Neighborhood Commercial
Consider adding performance standards on retaining and/or emphasizing natural
environment in landscaping and in applying LID principles (on -site stormwater
filtration and infiltration, etc.)
93 -95 Industrial
94 #3. It should also reference compatibility/transitions to uses in adjoining communities
e.g. Hugo.
Transportation
99 How does the City's 1997 Transportation Plan incorporate these natural resource
concerns mentioned above?
Community Facilities
101 Water Plan
6
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework
page Page -by -Page Comments and Questions by WUI Work Group
The City should use its comp. plan as an opportunity to talk about their needed water
conservation efforts. The DNR will require the city to prove that they are making efforts
to promote water conservation and water conservation education before they are allowed
increases in water use.
102 Storm Sewer
See comments above on pp. 23 and 45. Include strategies to avoid impacts to natural
wetlands and incorporate LID concepts.
102 Parks & Trails
How adequate is the Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide (1992) in
addressing the conservation and ongoing management of natural resources and native
plant communities, including the City's role in acquisition of critical sites?
103 Schools
See comments above on schools.
PLANNING DISTRICTS
129 -135 Planning District 3 - Northwest
#16 Can the location (or not) of the streets be predicated on not impacting natural
features?
153 -159 Planning District 6 - Northeast
How does this plan relate to Hugo's plans, particularly concerning land use
compatibility, Clearwater and Hardwood Creeks, and greenway and trail
connections?
IMPLEMENTATION
167 -168 Environment
#1. How adequately does the HEP &CD cover a broad range of environmental
conservation efforts? E.g. how does it relate to City's Tree Ordinance? What more is
needed on management of non -fire dependent native plant communities? How is
DNR natural heritage information incorporated? How can wildlife elements be
strengthened (see above)? How are conifer plantations to be conserved and managed?
169 -171 Ordinances
169 -170 #1. The City is invited work with DNR to upgrade these ordinances to better carry out
the policies in this document.
171 #2 What does it mean to "re- examine the City's tree preservation standards "? I.e., what
direction is the city going in tree preservation? Also, consider a requirement that
developers be required to prove that every lot in a proposed subdivision has a
building site that is totally suitable for development. How can the City's subdivision
requirements incorporate LID practices?
7
City of Lino Lakes - Development Framework (received in April 2001)
page topic Items /Questions to be Reviewed/Discussed by WUI Work Group (5/8/01)
ISSUES
4 -5 Environmental
— Can map [not provided] also include native plant communities and wooded
areas?
POLICY PLAN
Natural Environment
20 Goals
6. re: wetlands & "community -wide storm drainage system"
— Are qualifiers needed related how to protect natural wetlands in relation to their
"use" for storm water management? [see also policy below]
Policies
20 -22 General
20 1. re: inventory, quantify, & rank "environmental resources"
— Has Lino actually used HEP &CD report to rank resources? Has DNR Natural
Heritage info been used?
— What is status of "an ecological restoration & management plan"? (Didn't
HEP &CD plan deal primarily with fire dependent plant communities ?)
— How can the plan acknowledge that HEP &CD inventory isn't complete & that
the inventory will be updated through MLCCS etc?
21 3. re: integration of new development
— Add stronger language to "preserve unique natural areas"? How defined?
21 -22 5. re: greenway planning
— Are areas id'd in HEP &CD report adequate?
— Should qualifiers be included about when trails are appropriate in greenways
and when not? [Check Environmental Board statement.]
22 Vegetation
4. Re: preservation of natural vegetation
— How should reference be made to preserving whole plant communities (i.e. the
understory vegetation not just the trees in woodlands)?
— [Ck Env. Bd. addition of aquatic plant communities.]
2. Re: ordinances
— What is the status of the landscape ordinance and the tree protection ordinance?
Should they be explicitly referenced here?
22 -23 Soils
2. re: requirement on drain tiles
— Is this requirement contrary to concepts of Low Impact Development (LID)?
How should alternative on -site storm water management be referenced? [Ck.
Env. Bd. Statement.]
1
23 Storm Water/Wetlands Drainage [note: this caption needs fixing in plan]
— Do the policies adequately protect wetlands from stormwater impacts?
1. re: Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan, 1994
— Is this plan still current? Does it appropriately integrate LID concepts?
3. "Prohibit development on or alteration of natural drainage system components where
storm water can be adequately managed without construction of storm sewer."
— What does this statement (above) mean? Is a separate statement on protecting
natural drainage systems be made? Should a more explicit reference to LID be
made?
7. re: Shoreland Ordinance
— Is the Shoreland Ordinance current? Does it adequately define buffers?
8. [Check Env. Bd. comment on lawsuits related to maintaining ditches]
24 -25 Growth Management
— Is it appropriate for WUI/DNR to comment on growth management? (i.e. the
draft plan proposes growth less than Met Council target, but Env. Bd. says that
is too fast & not enough controls are incorporated into the plan)
26 -33 Land Use
26 -29 General Policies
— What about a policy (general & /or residential) on applying firewise
communities principles? (i.e. having development defensible from wildfire
through provision of alternative escape routes, buffers between highly
flammable vegetation and structures, etc.)
28 -29 Rural Goals & Policies
— Should a policy be included on conserving working forests and tree farms?
29 -30 Residential Goals & Policies
8. Re: retaining existing unsewered single family land uses
— What are the implications of this on pollution etc? Should there be a qualifier
related to what happens in the event of septic failures?
30 -33 Commercial Goals & Policies
32 Industrial Goals & Policies
— Should a goal on avoiding destruction of natural features be added in both the
commercial and industrial sections? [See rec. of Env. Bd.]
34 -37 Transportation
— Both the goals and policies (Streets, #6) refer to "establish a street system that
connects isolated neighborhoods ", yet the inventory frequently refers to
wetlands and other natural features as being a primary factor which causes the
isolation. Therefore, is a statement needed on not impacting natural resources in
the process of providing connections?
36 Pedestrian/Bicycle Trails [Policies]
— Is this section adequate?
2
38 -41 Community Facilities
38 -39 Parks & Open Space [Policies]
— What is the City's policy about acquiring (via easements or fee titles) natural
areas that are priority for protection (not recreation)? Is more emphasis
(commitment) needed to the City's role in managing and monitoring natural
areas and native plant communities which are under it's authority?
39 Schools
— What can the City do to assure that natural resources are conserved and used as
an educational resource in schools built in Lino Lakes?
40 -41 Utilities
— Should policies be added that utilities should be located and constructed to
avoid damage to natural resources including wetlands and trees?
42 -43 Administration
Policy 10. re: intergovernmental communications
— [See Env. Bd.'s reference to DNR/WUI]
PLANS
Natural Environment
45 -46 Lakes
— See comment as above: are the Local Water Management Plan and Shoreland
Ordinance still adequate?
— What about Env. Bd's comment on accesses?
46 -47 Vegetation [should this section be renamed? See Env. Bd. comments]
— See comments above - particularly related to updating inventory.
— Should [strategy] be added on managing conifer plantations?
— Should explicit statement be added on oak wilt and its control?
5. re: HEP &CP on natural veg. preservation
— See Env. Bd. proposal on habitat and various species. How can this be better
worded to respond to concerns on listed species and MCBS identified sites and
on what's reasonable for development approval?
7. re: HEP &CP's strategies for invasive /exotic plant species control
— Does this plan adequately address woodland exotics?
47 Soils
48 Wetlands, Floodplain & Drainageways
— See comments above
1. re: wetlands inventory and management
— What guidance should be provided on wetlands management? [See Env. Bd.
comments.] What is appropriate level of detail in comp plan (vs. reference to
other document) and/or what needs to be complete before comp plan is
finished?
3
48 -57 Greenway Corridors
— [See Env. Bd. comments - What (if anything) about this section needs redoing?
— Does HEP &CD adequately define greenway corridors?
49 [purpose]
3. re: wildlife habitat
— How are they identifying what wildlife habitat and what wildlife movement they
want to "allow for "? Should this be stated in more focused and pro- active
manner, e.g. identifying particular wildlife species, types of habitats, and
strategies for protection?
53&57[implementation]
re: relationship with transportation corridors and utilities
— Should statement be added on avoiding damage to greenway corridors and their
natural features by the location and construction of transportation and utilities?
— What is mean by 2.c? How should it be reworded
2. re: regulations /zoning ordinances
— Should this explicitly reference the tree protection ordinance?
— re: 2b on performance standards - What additional topics are critical to be
included in performance standards (e.g. protection and management of native
plant communities adjoining greenways)?
3. See comments above - on criteria for where trails are not appropriate within
greenways.
Land Use Note: none of Land Use section included in plan copy for 5/8 discussion.
59 -64 Introduction / Regional Setting / Local Forecasts
64 -74 Growth Management / Growth Management Methods/ Growth Areas -MUSA
73 re: criteria for not approving a subdivision in MUSA reserve
— See Env. Bd. recommendation on need for dedication of a minimum of 50%
permanent open space (noted here and in many other places in plan e.g. p. 82).
Why should this open space be exclusive of slopes?
81 re: staged residential clustering
— Ck Env. Bd. comment that no community does this. What about the fact that
Met Council [recommends] this practice?
GENERAL LAND USE PLAN ELEMENTS
74 General Land Use Plan
79 Rural Land Uses
79 [Objectives]
— What are the City's objectives related to working forests, tree farms, and
landscape nurseries?
82 re: zoning performance standard for rural residential clustering
1. re: 50% of land preserved as open space
— Can working forests also be explicitly stated as open space use?
4
84 -88 [Residential]
88 6c. re: performance standards on maintenance etc of medium and high density residential
— Should site plan review and performance standards give priority to natural open
space conserved and managed with native plant communities?
88 -93 Commercial
89 [Strategies]
5. re: environmental concerns
— Should it also include requirements to protect listed species and to avoid
damage to quality native plant communities?
89 -91 Interchange Commercial Areas
90 re: design objectives
— Should objective be added on retaining and/or emphasizing natural environment
in landscaping and in applying LID principles?
93 Neighborhood Commercial
re: performance standards
— Should performance standards be added on retaining and/or emphasizing natural
environment in landscaping and in applying LID principles?
93 -95 Industrial
94 3. re: compatibility and transitions between adjoining uses
— Should it also reference compatibility /transitions to uses in adjoining
communities e.g. Hugo?
Transportation
99 It basically says that its covered in the City's 1997 Transportation Plan.
— See all comments above related to transportation and utilities. How does this
plan incorporate these natural resource concerns?
Community Facilities
101 Sanitary Sewer Plan
It basically refers to a separate Sanitary Sewer Plan which is being updated.
— See all comments above utilities. How does this plan incorporate these natural
resource concerns?
101 Water Plan
— Is the water supply proposed adequate?
102 Storm Sewer
It basically refers to a Local Water Management Plan (1994).
— See all comments above related to storm water. How does this plan avoid
impacts to natural wetlands and incorporate LID concepts?
102 Parks & Trails
It basically refers to a Comprehensive Park Plan and Development Guide (1992).
— See all comments above related to parks and trails. Does this plan adequately
address the conservation and ongoing management of natural resources and
native plant communities?
103 Schools
— See comments above on schools.
5
PLANNING DISTRICTS
113 -121 Planning District 1- Town Center
123 -127 Planning District 2 - CSAH 23 Corridor
129 -135 Planning District 3 - Northwest
16. re: hierarchy of streets to improve traffic circulation
— Can the location (or not) of the streets be predicated on not impacting natural
features?
137 -143 Planning District 4 - Southwest
145 -151 Planning District 5 - Southeast
153 -159 Planning District 6 - Northeast
— How does this plan relate to Hugo's plans, particularly concerning land use
compatibility, Clearwater and Hardwood Creeks, and greenway and trail
connections?
161 -165 Planning District 7 - Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park
IMPLEMENTATION
167 -168 Environment
1. re: HEP &CD
— Does this adequately cover environmental conservation efforts? E.g. how does
it relate to City's Tree Ordinance? What more is needed on management of
non -fire dependent native plant communities? How is DNR natural heritage
information incorporated? How can wildlife elements be strengthened (see
above)? How are conifer plantations to be conserved and managed? ETC
2. re: development regulations
— Is this list adequate?
169 -171 Ordinances
— See comment above on what should be in comp plan.
169 -170 1. re: zoning ordinance
— Is more guidance given in comp. plan or is it referenced here and done
subsequently, e.g. on la. greenway performance standards, LID concepts, 1 d.
parking lot standards, lf. rural zoning districts (& incorporation of working
forests), lh. natural open space in medium and high density residential, etc?
171 2. re: subdivision ordinance
— re: 2a: What does it mean to "re- examine the City's tree preservation
standards "? I.e., what direction is the city going in tree preservation?
— re: 2c: How can this be expanded to more generally promote LID practices?
— What other issues need to be addressed in the subdivision ordinance?