Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/27/2002 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting March 27, 2002 6:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Stoneybrook, Preliminary Plat, Rezone,MUSA/Comp Plan Amendment 6. Discussion Items A. Development Regulations Task Force Update B. Goals /2003 C. Earth Day /Arbor Day D. City Newsletter E. Environmental Board Ordinance and Job Description 7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS A. Forestry B. Solid Waste Recycling C. Environmental 8. ADJOURN ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES DRAFT MINUTES FEBRUARY 27, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Kukonen called the meeting to order at 6:36 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. September 26, 2001 Donlin moved to approve the September 26, 2001 meeting minutes. O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. November 28, 2001 Grundhofer moved to approve the November 28, 2001 meeting minutes. Donlin seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. January 30, 2002 - The following corrections were requested: Page 5, fifth paragraph: "The results showed there were five general areas: the Chain of Lakes up through a Duck Pass duck pass..." Grundhofer moved to approve the January 30, 2002 meeting minutes as amended above. O'Dea seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved unanimously. 4. OPEN MIKE No citizen comments were made. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING 5. ACTION ITEMS None. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Development Regulations Task Force Update FEBRUARY 27, 2002 Chair Kukonen recapped the meeting for the Board. He stated that the task force reviewed the background including by -laws and policies, and tried to answer the question, "What constitutes a premature subdivision?" A plat could be denied if it was considered premature. He explained they had not seen the final draft of the document, but roads could be moved to a lower class if development occurred in some areas. Other factors affecting roads were traffic, water supply and waste disposals. Final plat growth would be controlled by MUSA allocation. Asleson stated that people were working together, and the meeting was productive. Donlin agreed. She was encouraged that the issues were in manageable parts, and that there would be no leapfrogging of MUSA. Asleson indicated that Grochala had done a good job. B. Goals /2003 Asleson distributed copies of the goals for 1998, and referred to the goals from 2002 which were in the packets. Since the 2002 budget had been fixed, Grochala recommended the Board work on setting 2003 goals. Reviewing the previous goals, many had grown more detailed, or had already been accomplished. He explained that some of the recommendations the Board had put forth had set the stage for activities. Chair Kukonen stated that the Board members should bring in ideas for the 2003 goals next month. He indicated that several of the duties in the job description could be made into goals. Asleson pointed out hat a website had been established with a link to the Bell Museum, and could be added to in the future. O'Connell noted that Earth Day would be an opportunity to add to the website concerning Earth Day activities. Donlin suggested some of the new information resulting from the Urban Interface could be identified. Asleson mentioned that some interesting activities had begun in some neighborhoods. Chair Kukonen continued to review the 2002 goals, and commented that for #5 the Board had been weak on collaborating with other similar boards. 2 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 O'Dea asked for a listing of analogous bodies in the Twin Cities area. Asleson indicated he would raise the issue at a conference he would soon be attending. Concerning getting help, Asleson recently went to a job fair, and stated there might be a possibility for sharing an intern. Chair Kukonen stated the first joint meeting with Council took place in October. The Board acknowledged Councilperson Carlson's presence. Chair Kukonen noted that #9 had been accomplished. An environmental landscaping packet was developed. Asleson indicated that some of the information could be put on the link with the Bell Museum. Donlin inquired about the webmaster. Asleson answered the webmaster was Dan Tesch. C. Earth Day /Arbor Day Asleson sent out a letter concerning Earth Day. He reported that he received a response from Ray Herman, the osprey person, and there is an individual who has carrier pigeon. Wargo now had the food permit, and would be getting it to O'Connell. In the past, Ms. Bowman had been organizing the volunteers. Jane Luntz was willing to do it this year, but did not have good means of communication. The contact for volunteers would need to take names, send out information, and organize logistics. Anyone with ideas should contact him. Chair Kukonen asked about waiver forms. Asleson responded if the volunteers got hurt, the City wouldn't be liable. Activities worth noting were the City looking cleaner, and that someone had donated wood duck houses and would be putting them up. In addition, kids from a nearby school were putting seed packets together with native grasses that would cover a 3 -foot square area. The Environmental Board could promote it and Anoka County was putting together a touch and feel exhibit. Donlin stated that a follow -up contest in the upcoming years could give impetus for cultivating the seeds and encouraging sound management. Grundhofer suggested people receiving a seed packet could sign a guest book. O'Dea inquired about the location and time of the celebration. Asleson responded it started at 8 a.m. at Wargo. He added that Scott Mars was planning to come. O'Connell asked about the critters, if they were to be at the celebration. Asleson answered that he left a message, but would be following -up on it. Grundhofer stated she called Data Resources with the DNR endangered and threatened species, but she needed detailed information. Asleson stated he could get the needed information, and added that a map could be made. 3 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 Donlin stated she was going to clean her 3 miles of ditches, in the past she had not asked for help because the roads were busy and the work was dangerous. Asleson indicated that Ace had said that they would help clean up ditches along the roads on certain days. O'Dea inquired about homeowner projects. She suggested contacting the crime watch groups to open up possibilities right outside their doors. Asleson mentioned one year, with the Adopt -A- Highway program, it was sleeting and people had done a great job. The group included Margaret Langfeld and they were standing by the fire station on Civic and Lake Drive, when a truck went by releasing papers all the way down Lake Drive. He noted that May 5, 2002 is Arbor Day and there would again be a celebration at the Elementary School. It was important for the next generation and to keep the Tree City USA status. Chair Kukonen called for ideas for Earth Day, and stated the starter kits should be included. Asleson stated he would check with the crime watch groups. Chair Kukonen indicated he would contact the National Wildlife Federation, and the Quad on the backyard wildlife information. Donlin inquired about the heron exhibit, and if it should include the remains of the chicks that were abandoned. She stated that Mr. Lanyon had them. Asleson noted he was going to call Mr. Lanyon concerning an Egret mound. O'Connell stated she would be in International Falls on March 12, 2002. City News Letter — Chair Kukonen suggested the Board become a regular contributor, and thanked staff for providing the schedule of deadlines for submission in the packet. Donlin suggested the recreation section be reduced. Asleson responded that they needed to promote their programs. Chair Kukonen stated that he had information on septic system care and recycling which might be of interest. Donlin indicated a background on the heron colony rookery could raise public awareness. Asleson mentioned a statement, like washing the car on a grassy area instead of the driveway would reduce pollution, could make an impact. D. Environmental Board Ordinance and Job Description Asleson stated he wanted to meet with the new members and give them background information. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS A. Forestry Asleson stated that forestry was a separate section from environmental because they had separate budgets. Ms. Smith with the Trade -A -Tree program had submitted a news release to the Quad. In addition, Xcel Energy was already beginning to top the trees, but Ms. Smith had contacted Xcel Energy and stopped them until the program could contact the affected homeowners. Some of the extra trees could be used to spruce up the elementary school. The program was entirely volunteer. The oak wilt contracts budget had come in. They did not get the plow in the fall, so it would be done in the spring. B. Solid Waste Recycling Asleson distributed the final SCORE recycling report, which included the oil and filter recycling at the maintenance building. He indicated that the costs had increased, and the only funding came from tonnages, and not for the actual recycling costs. The goal was to break even, and to reduce the overhead to reduce the necessary SCORE funding. The issue of battery recycling was mentioned. Finally, staff stated that the County -wide tonnage requirements were exceeded. Asleson suggested a program called Trish and the Tunes which is a recycling program for children using puppets. He suggested that the program could be presented for one of the elementary schools. Donlin stated that if people did not have a place to put their waste it would go in the ditches. Asleson explained he believed that much of the waste in the ditches comes from outside the City. May 5 would be the next Recycling Day. On the last Recycling Day, the City and residents filled three 4 -yard dumpsters with steel. The electronics industry was beginning to offer recycling services. They would probably add to the cost of the products, and offer the recycling for free. Asleson stated he would be interested in bringing the recycling program Trish and the Tunes to Rice Lake Elementary because one of the teachers was environmentally aware, and even won the National Teacher of the Year. O'Connell indicated teachers who might not be environmentally conscious might benefit from having the program in their school. Donlin responded it depended on the teachers, since some use a program and springboard off of it, while others use the time for other pursuits and do not even hold a follow -up discussion about the presentation. She suggested Lino Lakes Elementary as a possibility. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 Grundhofer stated that they have an Arbor Day celebration. C. Environmental Asleson began with update on Clearwater Creek and referred to the map, pointing out the goal for what was once called Wetland Q was to restore it to what was natural in the early 1900's. Box elder trees have entered the area since it had been cleared. Staff informed the engineers working for the developer that the box elder trees would die, and that the residents would lament the removal of the trees unless the developer explained the plan. The homeowners did not receive a notice before the trees were removed, and were angry. There were some invasive species in the development, and he suggested that some of the money for restoration could be shifted. One species that could survive was the woody white swamp oak. A meeting was scheduled that could fund a seeder. The neighborhood meeting needed to be in the spring. Asleson stated he had been encouraged that the developer has had burns and seedlings. Asleson stated they have followed through with the plan, and this was an area where good things were happening. Donlin pointed out that in another area of the site, there was no buffer between the development and the industrial park. Asleson stated some things were taking place that were encouraging, but take a while to become established. He mentioned that he was now seeing songbirds returning to City Hall. Asleson noted the greenway grant, which was applied for by the City and the Watershed District, had been approved in the Minnesota Land Classification System. Asleson addressed the blue heron population, and stated that the process was called by some as misguided, unsubstantiated, and secretive. The one piece that had not been observed was the direct effect of water skiing on a course and its effects. The timeline for the joint ordinance was fast. The State and the County had tried to meet with the skiers, but the skiers had cancelled, and another meeting could not be scheduled. Any factor could have caused the herons to leave. It is difficult to prove causal effect in biology, so professional judgment needed to be made. Phosphorus testing could take place if the skiers did not ski north of the island during nesting season, and if they indicated when they were going to ski so that testing could be done before and after. Many had tried to find out the reason for the herons' departure. Donlin pointed out that the DNR had invited the skiers to every meeting, and tried to make sure they werz not excluded. It cannot be proven that it was the course, and so there would probably be threats. Asleson explained that with an increase in population, there is an increase in use. There were State laws on fairness of use, but it was left to the governing bodies to decide what was fair. Asleson stated that he had lived in the City for about 20 years and had never observed anyone skiing north of the island, which was a change that had taken place in the last 2 years. It appeared to staff that there was no more peaceful co- existence with the 6 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 birds or between the people. He urged that the debate needed to be from an environmental standpoint, and not an emotional one. Grundhofer stated the birds chose to live on islands, and not on the shorelines which had been their traditional habitats. Asleson indicated that there was the cultural aspect of the issue which was the idea the person had in their mind when they moved to the area. Donlin stated she was afraid for her father's safety. He was to begin monitoring the area in conjunction with the DNR, and she believed there was risk. Chair Kukonen indicated that Centerville was still supporting a joint ordinance. Asleson concurred, and continued that the City of Centerville was going to send out information to all the people in the City. Donlin mentioned that the new elementary school was to be named Blue Heron Elementary, and we do not want to lose the resource so that it would be the Late Great Blue Heron Elementary. The Blue Heron was the City's one identity. Asleson agreed, and pointed out that Mr. Lanyon had stated that we have one or two more chances to save the habitat. Donlin stated that the area should not be disturbed. Asleson noted that lakes were all unique, and in most cases a model is developed through time. In order to develop a model, the ski club would need to cooperate. This item would be on the work session next Wednesday. Donlin asked if it would be a work session or a public hearing. Grundhofer answered the work session for Lino Lakes would be on March 6, 2002, with the first public hearing on March 11, 2002, and the second on March 25, 2002. Centerville would be having their first public hearing on March 13, 2002, and the second public hearing on March 27, 2002. Asleson noted all that could be done was to get the correct information out to the public. O'Connell inquired about the developer trying to develop the island. Asleson responded that there was a meeting of the Environmental Quality Board where a petition was received. They have addressed all the recommendations from the Environmental Board. Staff had met with the Watershed District and now they were in the public education process. O'Connell asked if there were the same number of homes. Ms. Carlson answered that there was an eighth house on the cul -de -sac. Asleson explained that they have complied with owner's covenants and the recommended non - disturbance areas. 7 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2002 Grundhofer inquireit if people would show up for the two meetings about the blue heron rookery. Ms. Carlsdn responded that they would. 8. ADJOURN It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on March 27, 2002. There being no further business, Donlin moved to adjourn at 8:30 p.m. O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Transcribed by: Brigette Blesi TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. DRAFT MINUTES Agenda Item 5A Environmental Board Meeting Date: March 27, 2002 Topic: Stoneybrook/Preliminary Plat/Site Plan Review Background: Stoneybrook is a 78 Acre Parcel of Land located on the South side of Birch Street, just West of Centerville Road. Figure 1. This property is guided for low- density sewered residential development in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and planned as a future growth area. The developer is requesting MUSA allocation, and formal rezoning of the property from R -Rural to R -1 x -Low Density Residential. The developer requests approval for a 111 -lot subdivision. Preliminary Plat information is included as Figure 2. The site contains approximately 19.2 acres of wetland, and 58.87 acres of upland. Of these 19.2 acres of wetland, 2.06 acres will require mitigation. The developer proposes to accomplish this on site. Analysis: This is a very wet site. Although soils on this site for the most part have moderate filtration capacity, a good amount of them are hydric, water saturated, in spite of historic artificial drainage. Figure 5 and 6. Because of this saturated nature of the soils, infiltration techniques are limiting. Attention can be given to water quality design. Water basin areas should be protected from compaction and planted with a buffer of native plants. Basin filtration capacities could be enhanced with organic bed establishment in flow areas. Most of the site surface water is in the Rice Creek Watershed District and travels to Wards/Reshaneau Lakes. A small portion of the Preliminary Plat on the South Comer is in the Vadnais Lake Water Management Area. Figure 7. Stoneybrook soils for the most part are glacial till, yellow brown, and oxidized. Oxidized means the soils have been water saturated. The soils are also very insensitive to ground water pollution, except for a small section on the South East comer that is in the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed District. Figure 8. Soil compaction is problem on all construction sites. Maintaining natural surface and ground water is important and though these soils are saturated, care must be given to minimize additional water volume discharges. Yard areas where possible, and wetland areas, natural or created, should be protected from construction traffic and fenced off. A sequencing plan and management plan should be submitted. The management plan should include a 3 -year contract with a landscape company knowledgeable and experienced in native vegetation management. Seed mixes should be consistent with the City of Lino Lakes seed mixtures. Escrow dollars should be received ensuring native mix and maintenance compliance. No soils should be hauled off the site or brought on to the site with out permission from the City of Lino Lakes. All soils if brought in must be consistent with existing soils. Management plan should specifically state the preexisting soil conditions, and address a plan for no- change, or restoration. Escrow dollars should be allocated for restoration. There are a number of oak trees on the South side of the development and one on the North. There would be no tree Toss as a result of this project. Although a fence area is shown around the tree areas on the site, a more detailed description of tree preservation should be submitted. This could be part of the sequencing plan and should state no traffic, or material stockpiling in these areas, and avoidance of utility installation in these areas. Fences must be placed at a distance from the trees equal to one -foot radius for each inch of tree trunk diameter measured at 4.5 feet above the ground. All in these areas and fencing should be up before soil disturbance and remain in place throughout the construction process. Sequencing should also define an area for construction and concrete truck cleanup, and define responsibility for clean up after the last house is completed. The plan should also state specifically a time when all silt and tree preservation, and soil preservation fence will be removed. Escrow dollars should be received for assurance. A cattail marsh encroaches from the west on the North West Side of the development. This cattail marsh is surrounded by a Historic Oak Savanna to the North/West/South, but only abuts up to the East property line of the proposed plat. To the West of the Oak Savanna is a Shrub thicket area, mixed into an area that is typical of the fen area (although this one is highly disturbed with mostly reed canary grass) to the North of Lino Lakes Elementary. There should be care taken to ensure that no changes to the surface or ground water occurs in the area to the west of Stoneybrook. The oak savanna may be impacted by such changes and there may be opportunity to restore the wetland areas in the future if surface and ground water changes do not occur. Figure 3. A Lake Protection Zone covers the SE comer of the property. This zone surrounds Lake Amelia. A Zone -2 Protection Area is included in the marsh area on the North and West Side of the property. This zone changes to Zone -1 immediately to the West. Figure 4. This area is the Eastern portion of the oak savanna and wetland complex in Figure 3 /Figure 4. Buffering/and no changes to ground water or surface water should be allowed in this area. A landscape screening plan should be submitted for along Birch Street. Plant materials should be sufficient to meet P&Z standards, be native, planting zone 3 hardiness, meet American Nurseryman Standards, have a one -year guarantee, and be site suitable. City Staff must approve a plan. Escrow dollars should be acquired for assurance. This proposed plat is presently under review with the Rice Creek Watershed District. A suggestion has been made to the developer to inform the Vadnais Lake Watershed District of the small area involved in their District on the South side of the property. The only "greenway" consideration in this area is confined to more of a trail/connection area that has been proposed on the Waterworks Pipeline easement on the Eastem Edge of the property. Options: 1. Approve with above stated recommendations. 2. Recommend denial of Preliminary Plat Recommendation: Option 1. Attachments: Figure 1: Location Map Figure 2: Preliminary Plat & Grading Plans Figure 3: Significant Resource Considerations Figure 4: Area Protection Zones Figure 5: Area Soils Figure 6: Area Surface Water Figure 7: Area Floodplain Figure 8: Soil Characteristics • ti 0 ti 0 F-1 Lk RE 2 L v�� s 1 T1 _11 SHERMAN LAKE ROAD _T -1 — I 1 PHEASANT HIU.S DRIVE r - -Ewt ew el Oa Z I/O N Sea 27 PRELIMINARY PLAT • d' STONEYBROOK 17.753 qh 17,313 soh 15 13.302 soft 13.500 soh 11.510 w1.. 21.1425 4h 22.115 .0.0. DENOTES PROPOSED SEILAN0 AREA DENOTES PROPOSED P0INOINO AREA DENOTES PROPOSED BUTTER EASEMENT GRAPHIC SCALE 100 200 ( DI P302 ) I leek . 100 it Ma Imerr vo,.M11 14.r111/ra00e LOT DATA (NOT TO SCALE) mow LOT DEPTH 135 FI YARD 1BACK a 30 CT. �- -1..N lbw Eed Net et tN SE 1/4 et leer LOT AREA COINER N/A S0. FT. OTTERIOR t2.1325 AREA (2.25 S0. PT.) YARD SE18A0C NOISE 10 PT. GARAGE 5 TY. ER 30 PT. MNMIM LOT 111011 AT SETBAOC UNE S0 P7. AT CORNER 115 FT. AT R/W LINE 3/4 PT. 1 k••er ..wary INt Mw plan a.o •••erad by ..a or under toy Orel onananI.t.* end lad 1 non • any T .a.a Land Sur.e• nod.. 111 Iona of P. Sol. N N1n...1.. —O. STREET FRONT YARD SETBAOC 30 R. kwn. sea. no 20005 cat. 1 -14•a7 2642.81 N00'40'SO'M DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 5-1 _e -R- J. _. - -3 4— I-5 0 1 1 bairn; 5 feet In width, one. odJaIntng lot Nnsa, ..d 10 feet In width and odloIning street tines and rear lot Ilnee unless Otherwise Indicated on the plat TOTAL AREA SITE DATA OUTLOT AREA LOT AREA R.O.W. AREA UPLAND AREA NUMBER OF LOTS LARGEST LOT SMALLEST LOT AVERAGE LOT EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING UTIUTIES LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East No1f (1/2) of the Southeast Quoin. (t /4). Section 27. Teendlp 31, Range 22. except the Eaet 1 1/2 rods thereof, according le the United States Government Survey thereof and situate In Anoka County Mlnne.ota. 78.07 AC. 21.44 AC. 32.92 AC. 23.71 AC. 54.73 AC. 102 48,360 S.F. 12,828 S.F. 14,042 S.F. AGRICULTURE R -1X AVAILABLE LOCATION MAP SHEET INDEX r 1. PREUMINARY PLAT 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PREUMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 4. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 8. PREUMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 8. GRADING DETAILS Leal 03/06/02 0 SHEET TITLE PREUMINARY PLAT 0*NERTOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 17271 KENYON AVENUE. SUITE 103 LAKEVILLE. MINNESOTA 55044 PROJECT STONEYBROOK orl 8 wars 201132PRP.OWC 8 09 [1-00647 ..................... GRAPHIC SCALE (nrner) 1 mat . 100 N. oe1TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT. INC. 17271 KENYON AVENUE. SURE 102 LAK N PANNE IOTA 03044 STA E. 890.3 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET WETLAND �/:.'11L: ■���LI,Il 1JE1 ■1_•1 •S 1 ■!: WETLAND OUILOT B TLANO ttlt� �ir� vein +Iw IU N occomer 1/{.1111/.11111-• _! 11 Il ,t:IH;■ E�1�11:'•71 E1 �L.JI1_l� �•L_ l U 1•t:1I 1•LlMI al _!,/_L/l:i. 1I. 11 ----------- •. L•E_ilMMM ∎l_IL+ • t. JL4Il _l!'_i<I•l 11 JL..... 1 •N (1L;_•UE1E111J[1 m.E! 1U.•' 111:1I':I1::1 l ' 11 111::'J[Al1 � f• own 1• mime. moon mom f• 11■■AI■■/ ■� 1_- .1111R ..8( 11 IL I1 ..C.EE• •1L1/ =[.. 11 51: J.l1 J ll:l' AIM l 5 ••. ti' .,..ILJLJ 111:.l'JEJ ■F:11J11 1LJlt It 51:.# 11 A IIi''J[F,, <k.l••.JL1:1FS+IL.L Il1JIF•1 l'..'12. 71.1.1- 115.'7[_ Ie 51 .I:II Il:'•1_III.I E�1!:11F 1(1:IL +:Ii J(_.1{F_IIl11•' ■ ■'_1I:1/ 1ISL[' 18_8I-'.11 11:1+- -II!_■ EE�11.1S• •I lLl :I' ILIJV:.1 •itt'•E1.lU)•':1lSJl[1_J1 1a • •I t,II ..I It t 7EEEEEE�11:1/1:7LJ111.1 LL1l:t..ILJI. 11•_•■S.EUI■ _1lSLl! 111. •: ,II .11:1:!:111+( ��1F_1C .11,11. •:.`14 f. If 51IU'1•'..' .I I1'':• ■• ,l! I� 18.''.18 -._1(11,11(..11 •111111■15 MINIM NM ■� 1.. M I •IS it F.Jlf 1LI I.I :li., /888 81141/1 1l' I[1 li Al 1.11 Il _,it 1 /t•■� 1!:1E. all llll..41.1.1.1i - I:'.,,iFIC.1•L:7L !' . •IJL 11 .1l •11 lli II•_;) ■� 1 F:1ELJl1_1{S Il 11 1. !U'1C:•U' •1l• 1t'JIi 11t 11 F.11. 11 .4:1.1.[ 1L•.1 ■: II,:llL1LJl4JIL1t•1l:!JLI /F 1I- '.:1!111118' L'll II'11_ /!•3■ fit' 14 1111.11 /'ll :' )! l/!tl C'•l_1 11 • 1I.. 1..( ■1 1! -'s' /C '11 11:ItI`■ •_� WHIM/ IN ��� E■c.1■ •1•JI!.1IS1i II :l L•1 /•'•■/.•U 1■ ■t.. I,! l! MI. !,11 L11 :1[1.:1 1171■. •IS_!IG:1IJl 1, J1 I•S1•'J1111• •I' 1/' AIM >•I', 711■ • Il ':1:IES:I � 1■ ■1 .)1l. 1L If Il I:1{�SMtn*, :111(■ 1[' 1I' I1■11I '•I■ 11M11•! ••� Ea701.. �i1aue�t�� AEU - '•47(8.11': l.S.Il. ■IIU11:!1•..a! _•Il• •l.11_ lt�l : /Jl :1 Il .F4llI I 11:1 ■1:11+ 11' II IL 111:11 ' .'17 !1U 11 ■U!:ll[J8 /I ,.,11 ■ /- '.1:88!:8 �1i_14I14•11.11 1111∎11111 I ■lb■U11' ■LC,IU)11[1l luI - Il.d'1 MEI WIN ��I• ��I8��1� �115a��� 1:_1•L 118 11 /VILLA It.ILLlUI11S11s. ■IJU' .111 t:1LC ,8 EI. •.II 4ll,3.ID' 1 1F-14�l LFILL Jl C1l!.f iS:lUl i•'•!!-1U111:[FIFt.11: 1I.iI11I :A 'tl_ %l:l[I', 1111•[[ ON ��W J 15lii 111(040( al• 6/■1111M wrelrennrr►a�9rrr+rrr+N WECI.•immos1SJI .MN�E' UI 11 .1 IL IICILL11= :I1_'.II EEEEEEEA • NF MI ,. -11 m�E /LLJ1 :E /�E'_71f1L' 7f'_IliI i•: 1C�}.7L=1:-.11[1:5_1 LJ L'1E_,_1��E1t1JlSJE /IC I!MI IIN_1C_ +�1lSLW[_'..1D .II '_IL41 EuI E UPI ����I�ML !. LlNiL_ H N 1L11L•[SJI!LI!Jf_'IL'lfi LI L I<L:IUI/_JlI[t I_ __MI :" ENMILJ EE /E■E�E>♦EEEEt E1•/1••IEEE 'aEI•EEI /EEEE■l ��E)♦ 11.11i.11Ir1,IrII' i'JLFi/l JEL.E!ill_1• :1CSJI' 88...1.8_! Ilyl.it_ICL.1 .::!•A.. I'::LJ.! L- 1LI[_JL!DRI. LIIIII 1C4i1L_l! 7♦[L7[= 1LaCJCS7 tI� 1U11L 1•!' !_il.! I ..IIFi11!JC'1 ■/1•8..•':111 it. --It fl:__11 1 1. 1i11.111I. : :.' : 11..I ! /E!LIE /r•l!S' Dl 111 I )•C -1.Il IL,L IF'_1 �IfL :1 I.1:!,lJLJIf 1IIIC'1•-:■ ILI MAJ•IS11,!. I1 •I. •JI_ILILIIL:I iL'l><L •I! JI'..I!1l3LILJIi.t!UD'. l l•'. I •.:DI:15LI1 :11 ' 11.' Id 5, a,'•LICS:11' JLSII1 :I[!11L /t•:1U1 /1.71f.S.11 5 1 'ILL 11 IL1 tl �tfi�ll'IF I[' 11 J! JUI]E1 [LS..7E:1/ 11ft [Lit: [= JI1_111 • 1:1. �fi111/yl iL I!I .. • LLII' ,I '.ESl[l' 1F:1<LJf?S111I.' IMF 1 11 L!.l 1I- 1/:.71..1(414! 1IJF+JUIIE1111 -1 D EL., 1f: 1[d'I1: 11:11:11..' X8.1 MINIM fIL`7L'Z LS•IF[ 1[' 7•L1,DW F:1lF:1C..1I r" MIMI C/, IIIl1 'lIL � =W 1 .. M 551111MM: 5L11.1L 11_:ILSJLktil'.11.'ICL•EJI:IL /I 7,.:=11:11:1_11 ' Il 1!IJ • • •II 1... ILS11L JLFIE1fli.7U1•Llp_7I' 78 M1_/ I It-•;' 1:' . 11,. /lF JIt- IFJL'JL'J,:l1 ES1E1.• MINIM LJIF_I<`II I- 7111••• � MINIM llu 1D' I �1 11 1" 8:.11 •l Il,'_'1(J15:IISJL'Sl•t.l'JIJ•' DIL- I11_1�11:_ll L 11 :111.1 X8::11 J1 1131l.,88111('_ilU'_.0 •E, Il lkt/I'•Il:l 8!_711:11 .11 I II ZI' 1(.:11(:112 I[ li' I/ 1: '1•11111∎Ut•_•Cl:IISJ1lJl.�/•IL 1 11 •SJI! 1 E� ��1 �V1115 51���� �C•L •II1,4.1:1 Il .IUSlc1E':•wL1e Il'LIEE_!•l_:L11, 1 1Li„J1 _I J[CJ11:1.! ' I !I lI:L.E11C1iDI •' )[yllt.1•. •I .l 11LI/ 11 1(-11 :l �1:�1•.' /iL�LSf i[EJ[LILLI{:FI•11111∎WCL1lSJE JMINIII ll_IlIM NM TYPICAL TEARDROP CUL -DE -SA SHEET ITU TE____ 'M11ER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. & UTILITY PLAN 17271 NDIYON AVE.c SUITE 103 LAK£Y21L W A 55044 STONEYBROOK WETLAND FILL (1.84 AC.) • •F WEIIAND EXCAVATION (0.22 AC. TOTAL IMPACT (208 AC.) Ma WETLAND MITIGATION (2.70 AC.) 1 i IPP PP -7- , I I 'N- I (--,� EX. NOUSE �\ ' i , \ ( EX 8 i • G I •■•-.••••••;,.. ••■••■•,1. RIM 0.- 909.78 _ 904_ 1 -, — 908- : POND 9 NW 897.7 10012 H. 900.7 1 I/ •• 1 DIST m*4 / WETLAND NO. 8 1 \\ I `� /�� NWL 895.5 OVERFLOW • ` 200YR HWL 898.9 • 900.5 `�\ \ 1 •••.__._ \ \J \ j 6—/ ti-- eeeg.77a 1 .�* PHAM 1194 ** * a/ ee ...__ rue._ 100 897.0 HWl 898.1 I1 •a••r eatty an aU - .as wow. by •a a• •.•a my Oval •aa. l.a dU' i 1a. • M Uwee.ir.....1.ea D111 a.nsr IM 1... M-M llele MMaw.1• 1. A NEW rum NG • aRrnra KEY WETLAND TYPE CHANGE (0.20 AC.) R..Men. . 1 /l/02 /b2 e. SAO SHEET TITLE PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN ONNER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. PROJECT 17271 KENYON AVENUE, SUITE 103 LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55044 STONEYBROOK POND 200 NWL 597.0 100YR H. 900.7 WILMS 0.01 AO. L- ante 300 9.0 11. 901 MAYA • PHEASANT HILLS DR. \" \�stte� WILMS ILL 071 Ae WETLAND NO. 6 TOP H ELEV.-8 92. °51 P onsrporing It EMT \ MCC (TJ POND 5 m. 100YYR H . 899.3 —894— 1 1 bony Drily Oral Mb pion we e.eDr.d by eo or under ms dIvet ...penis's. end uel 1 on • •Al Uon..s+.wnr.r [nq.er maw . Ieo• of 1M SM• r Ub.e•ele Iqm It•o. !IS 7304! a, L MEW 9t[ WOW • CRAM* I. ASO rOIA uc A••••• 1 3 5/07 Or SAO SHEET THLE PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN \ 0%E- NWY \ \ OWNER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 17271 KENYON AVENUE, UITE 103 LAKEVMUE. MINNESOTA 55044 war we As i / / >RS PETAL 06_1 PROJECT //„ WETLAND FILL (1.84 AC.) WETLAND EXCAVATION (0.22 AC.) TOTAL IMPACT (2.06 AC.) SIMI WETLAND M0flGAT1ON (2.70 AC.) STONEYBROOK WETLAND TYPE CHANGE (0.20 AC.) 5 of 8 SHEETS / / Ex FENCE % ,\ . ..,/ �" _- -_=— - - =_-_= _may- -/` �w ,fr �.�..,�...�- «..r.....�.��. -{� _ __ _{}- - -------- - - - - -- -..i ` �� �i �..�1 ---1----- r %..-- /s�''nr� =- - .. 3.w.. \ \-9°8-...--- / • -ff .-- -. 3? - OAK _ . 1 • GRAPHIC SCALE IN FELT INSTALL MCC 1M2 EX. BUILDING 18 OAK AK eEUILDING OAK 1�UILDjN4 OAK 8. / • M.n. 7jw1�L_. la+ II. 2600 Dot. •%M0 ILL 614 Ac A=MT mammas i s 1 oorul® 11. ADD ID MU1A1 1 • GRADING A•MAbn• i 13',V,612 - . • • MOTEL WEI POE APEX OMEN III COMPUTE TO 031NCT 0010011I011O1 TRA/NO EMI (T ) KEY NERAND FI.1. (1.84 AC.) WETLAND EXCAVATION (0.22 AC. TOTAL IMPACT (2.06 AC.) WETLAND MITIGATION (2.70 AC.) WETLAND TYPE CHANCE (0.20 AC. SHEET "II PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN OWNER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. 17271 KENYON AVENUE SUITE 103 LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55044 STONEYBROOK MOM PILL 0.22 AC. OVERFLOW oW ! ELMO NA. 0.a At GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Ski ���` --- - -� 201* ▪ PI *,.111 411.11111 • GM ▪ =MR / i�- \ ,. - - - -- 1 / A •K \ \\ .,...----/ �k/ I heir erUy that MU elr, eee'wand by or r moor my *set •pr44 e• Set 1 an • w LleweoPnl•• •r,y Englarm endV or Ieee e1 w. lleb. el 1leneesle �\ \./ roam (NV /*-- �� - -/ _.\ \ I ` \ ( `C � J J ' ..\2)42, � i Re} 11s 10.1. o 1 2. IKV Olt unuT • aAOq 1. A00 MIA TAIL 0.4/1.70 2 ViehbO WE1I.AND FILL (1.84 AC.) WETLAND EXCAVATION (0.22 A . TOTAL IMPACT (2.00 AC.) ® WETLAND 14I11GATION (2.70 AC.) WETLAND TYPE CHANGE (0.20 AC.) SNEEr nnE PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN ow1ER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. PROJECT 17271 KENYON AVENUE, SUITE 103 LAKENLLE, MINNESOTA 55044 STONEYBROOK ',Err 7 i 8 SHEETS," P-tu.P.L 3 1••.:. ... ,,.al ' , ♦1► I ► ■ rm.. 10 MIN Pit pii,12P4,07 I iiit,T:ic. ,41 iiii•■i// 1•• Stonybrook Significant Resource Considerations 0 O N� C O C •— O N O C 0 0 0a CD s. -NC 2 ca a. _....■ni; I Put, .,„ ,llulllllll ■r C III 41,�tr,1111111111 keTi f it I IT N 0 N 0 O a Mlogi. . i 11111 -IN ►E � 1I1I1 G �tlf I r 11n11if�fu I 1' hn�� II� IIjI�f �l1 Will nnnl � f" ltitf,1lll I .IL 11111111 '1 t1 al'I�- III!�_I ffr�t, !l�A��till[11111t__ "`'� ":'• 11111111 1111,`- ���113 "���II�f111(Ift' i1tI11 t :III ll I11111IIIIIIIIII!I 'I 1, i ,1d :111 f dis I11111I1 ,�tt�I��t► k a., El itlf��lf` „11,110;700:40.41 ( `f p pr • • 1 >0. m 0 0 N O • W v w N .T' Itib ii clzi %- e- N CI 0000 ?0. ()et�)(0t-C1C)d'11) > e- N1h N OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO�a I() 11) 117 In Q) i grIgggiiiiiiiiN N N N'1• 0514:91§ 0 c 1HhIUIHE 1 IILLL_ _ 0 kg a) 4- O O. Characteristics StonyBrook Soi • MEMORANDUM March 22, 2002 to: Environmental Board from: Jeff Smyser subject: Draft Ordinance: Premature Subdivision Section Rod Kukonen asked for the piece of the draft ordinance that the task force has reviewed and approved. I have enclosed that portion, as received from our consultant this morning via e-mail. I have done some additional editing by hand to clarify some meanings or fill in some missing words. Please remember that this is still a draft of a work in progress. The final edit will not occur for several months yet. 1002 -6 -1 Conditions for Establishing a Premature Subdivision A subdivision may be deemed premature should any of the following conditions not be met: 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan including any of the following: a. Land use plan. b. Transportation plan. c. Utility (sewer and water) plans. d. Local water management plan. e. Capital improvement plan. f. Growth management policies including MUSA allocation criteria. 2. Consistent with Infill Policies. A proposed urban subdivision shall meet the City's infill policies: a. The urban subdivision must be located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) or the staged growth area as established by the City's Comprehensive Plan. b. The cost of utilities and street extensions must be covered by: An immediate assessment to the proposed subdivision. ewe, etr,,1or-C o 444/ +_IM► /ale One hundred (100) percent of the street and utility costs are privately financed by the developer. The cost of regional and/or oversized trunk utility lines can be financed with available City trunk funds. 'sfef The cost and timing of the expenditure of City funds are consistent with the City's capital improvement plan. c. The cost, operation and maintenance of the utility system are consistent with the normal costs as projected by the Water and Sewer Rate Study. d. The developer payments will offset additional costs of utility installation or future operation and maintenance. Roads of Highways to Serve the Subdivision. A proposed subdivision shall have adequate roads or highways when: 1002.3 Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance General Provisions let 1 Roads or highways providing access to a subdivision are functioning at a level of service (LO , as defined by the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. b. Traffic generated by a proposed subdivision will maintain the levels of G �� service (LOS) of any street providing access to the subdivision to a L044—** O / defined by the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. c. Existing roads providing access to the subdivision have the structural capacity to accommodate projected traffic from the proposed subdivision or the developer will pay to correct any structural deficiencies. jot kepi be d. The traffic generated from a proposed subdivision shall implement City street y► y7'y�'r improvement ith the Lino Lakes Capital Improvement Plan or t e eve oper shall pay to correct any street deficiencies. 4. Water Supply. A proposed subdivision shall be deemed to have an adequate water supply when: a. The City water system has adequate wells, storage, or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision. The water utility extension is consistent with the Lino Lakes Water Plan and offers the opportunity for water main looping to serve the urban subdivision. c. The extension of water mains will provide adequate water pressure for personal usepffiire protection. Jo Rural subdivision can demonstrate that each of the proposed lots can be provided with a potable water supply. 5. Waste Disposal Systems. A proposed subdivision shall be served with adequate waste disposal systems when: a. The urban sewered subdivision is located inside the City's MUSA and is consistent with the MUSA allocation criteria. The City has sufficient MUSA or pipe capacity to serve the subdivision if developed to its maximum density. The subdivision will result in a sewer extension consistent with Lino Lakes Sewer Plan and Capital Improvement Plan. Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance 1002.4 General Provisions A rural subdivision can demonstrate that each lot can be served by an adequate sanitary sewer disposal system. e. A rural subdivision with a proposed communal sanitary sewer or water 04 ,t 1,41/e system an effective long range management and maintenance program e with proper financing. 1002 -7 MUSA ALLOCATION 1002 -7 -1 MUSA Availability and Commitment The City shall determine MUSA availability as part of the review of a submitted preliminary plat/phasing plan. City approval of the plan shall constitute a commitment by the City to allocate MUSA at the time of final plat approval according to the phasing plan. The criteria in Section 1002 7 -2 shall be considered in the review of the preliminary plat/phasing plan. 1002 -7 -2 MUSA Allocation Criteria The following criteria shall be considered to determine if MUSA will be allocated to a preliminary plat/phasing plan: 1. A finding is made that the development of the property is not premature. 2. The existing or proposed zoning of the property is consistent with the proposed use. 3. Development of the subdivision will meet environmental design standards of the Lino Lakes Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. The allocation is applied only to net buildable acreage. 5. A utility extension can be made to the subject property. A roadway extension can be made to the subject property. Development of the property shall not adversely affect the health, welfare, and general safety of the community. Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance 1002.5 General Provisions 9. The area of the MUSA allocation is consistent with the growth management policy established by the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance 1002.6 General Provisions Item 6B Memo Environmental To: Lino Lakes Environmental Board From: Marty Asleson Date: March 2002 Re: Agenda Item Goals Last month Environmental Board Chair Rod Kukonen suggested Environmental Board members review past goals before the March meeting. Rod requested that Board Members generate a list of suggestions for goals 2003. I would make a suggestion that any goals that involve the use of funds; the Environmental Board recommends a dollar figure for budget setting. Funding requests might be in the areas of environmental education, promotional, conference, and physical improvements (ex Restoration), or staffing. Please bring your thoughts and recommendations to the meeting. • Page 1 Saturday, April 20th 2002 9:00 a.m. -11 :00 a.m. Volunteer to clean up in your community or restore a wetland prairie. Grab your friends, neighbors or scout troop! CaII your City Coordinator to sign up for a project in your area by April 15th: City Coordinators City of Centerville: City of Circle Pines: City of Lexington: City of Lino Lakes: Teresa Bender 651- 429 -3232 Peggy Bauman 763- 784 -5898 Linda Pitchford 763 -784 -2792 Patrice Halen 651- 766 -6957 If you would like to participate in prairie restoration or would like to volunteer at Wargo Nature Center contact Jane Lutz at 651- 486 -8034. 11:00 a.m. -2:00 p.m. Enjoy the afternoon at the Wargo Nature Center, 7701 Main Street, Lino Lakes, 651 - 429 - 8007. Returning by popular demand: Walton's Hollow Petting Zoo Kids' Crafts Face Painting Environmental Exhibits Raptor Resource Center Reuse Center Lino Lakes Police Auction New Events and Exhibits: Wildlife Rehab Snake Exhibit Heron Display Free bus service is available from the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Campground to the Wargo Nature Center. Last bus leaves the Nature Center at 3 p.m. 2002 Earth Day Medallion Hunt *AII hunting will be on Centerville, Circle Pines, Lexington and Lino Lakes Park Property. *No digging will be required *No underwater equipment required BRING YOUR IMAGINATION! 1st 3 clues for the medallion hunt will be published in the Quad Community Press on April 9, 2002. 2nd 3 clues for the medallion hunt will be published in Quad Community Press on April 16, 2002. Final clue will be posted at the Centennial Fire station in Lino Lakes (where you pick up your Earth Day trash bags). Prize: Mountain Bike and helmet, donated by the Lino Lakes Lions. The prize will be presented during the Earth Day Celebration at the Wargo Nature Center on April 20, 2002. So, come on over to celebrate Earth Day! (Members of the Lino Lakes Linos, Earth Day Committee and their families are not eligible to win.) Item 6D Memo Environmental To: Lino Lakes Environmental Board From: Marty Asleson Date: March 27, 2002 Re: Newsletter Just a reminder that information for the next newsletter is due April 1. This is a Summer Brochure so we need to be thinking of articles that relate to that period of time, although this is not a prerequisite. • Page 1