Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/04/2002 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting December 4, 2002 6:30 p.m. Scheduled to be televised on Channel 16 AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 30, 2002 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Century Farm North 1st through 7th Additions, Preliminary Plat (Formerly Behm's Century Farm 6th through 10th Additions) 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Metro Greenways Planning B. Heron Rookery Update 7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS A. Environmental B. Forestry C. Solid Waste /Recycling 8. ADJOURN ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES DRAFT MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Kukonen called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OCTOBER 30, 2002 October 30, 2002 . 6.34 P.M. : 10 :27 P.M. : Amy Donlin, Constance Grundhofer, Patrice Toler Halen, Rod Kukonen (departed at 10:16 p.m.), Teresa O'Connell (arrived at 7:17 p.m.), Mary Jo O'Dea, Nikki Schneider : None : Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson A. August 28, 2002 The following corrections were requested: Page 6, first paragraph: "The final category R -1XC changed to R -EC and would keep the minimal lot size the same and 30% of the lots would be equal to or less than 15,000 square feet." Page 6, fifth paragraph: "Chair Kukonen mentioned that it was disappointing that it was 20% open space in the R -EC, but it was better than before." Page 7, fourth paragraph: "Asleson stated that a critter corridor would help the Blandings Turtles, and thanked Mr. Biske for expanding the greenway corridor topic and for keeping it alive." Grundhofer moved to approve the August 28, 2002 meeting minutes with the above corrections. Donlin seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA • Move 5B Car Wash, Ray Benkler to 5A, and Eagle Brook Church to 5B. • Discuss Watchable Wildlife Conference in 6E. The agenda was approved unanimously. 4. OPEN MIKE Barbara Bor of 7707 20th Avenue Hugo, MN, a representative of HERON, challenged the Board to withhold recommendation until the end of the 30 day 1 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 reviewal period. She had pictures of the island with the rookery and a drawing of the area with the ponding. She redefined the church as a mega church due to its size, potential number of members, and the size of the purchased site of about 92 acres. She expressed concern that Art Hawkins had not ever been approached concerning the impact the development would have on the herons. Wayne LeBlanc of 1677 Peltier Drive, Centerville, MN, President of the Peltier Lake Association indicated that Peltier Lake was very sensitive. He stated everything should be done to improve the water quality. At present, there was no impervious, but it would become 16 acres of impervious with the new development. He was concerned over the potential salt and oil runoff, because the surface water went into Peltier Lake. Another issue was there was no municipal sewer service for 4 -6,000 people in church per week. He expressed concern that the land was so low that it would require imported soils that might fmd their way to the lake. The Northern part of Peltier Lake would go into the aquifer. The noise, traffic, and lights would impact the wildlife. Typically a church spire was illumined facing upward. Nesting materials were probably obtained from the site. He believed that a full Environmental Impact Survey was needed to address these issues. 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Car Wash, Ray Benkler, Lake Drive, CUP and Site Plan Review Asleson reviewed for the Board the background highlighting the recommendations put forth from the Board in August. He stated that unique things had been done in the site design with infiltration. On a commercial site, if the groundwater could potentially become polluted, the development should not use infiltration practices. He introduced William McCully, engineer for Rehbein. Mr. McCully stated that the site was 1.5 acres with runoff in all directions, and they had attempted to implement new technologies. The Board had approved grass parking. He introduced Netlawn and Netlawn grass, and rainwater gardens for the front, which could grow into swales for infiltration. Mr. McCully discussed the three -foot separation for septic systems as defined by the MPCA. The groundwater elevation of was 897 feet. He stated that there would be a three - foot separation between the seasonally high water table and the bottom of the pond. He did not believe that groundwater pollution was a concern, because Netlawn would be used and then sand beneath it. The sand to be used was the dredged sand from the Mississippi River, which would be located below the organic layer. The water would flow into the ponds when the system had become supersaturated. The front of the building, the islands were depressed instead of raised. In another site, the system had been implemented for two months, and no water had left the site. The car wash site, oil eating microbes would be in the organic layer. Flexpave 50 is engineered to flex so it can expand and contract. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 This plastic technology reduces the compaction of the soil when cars drive or are parked on it, as noted in the pink areas on the map. The swales were set at one half foot and would go into the infiltration system. He indicated that people were trying to move away from the ponds because it naturally reduces the mosquito breeding areas. Grundhofer inquired about the location of the example Mr. McCully used. Mr. McCully responded that the site was north of Highway 694, East of the railroad tracks, on Berkeley Road. Asleson stated that the question that could not be answered was the seasonally high water level and groundwater elevations on the west side. Mr. McCully answered that the borings were done by Braun Engineering and found that the elevation was 897 feet, with the groundwater at 890 feet and 894 feet. There were no borings on the West side, however. Chair Kukonen commended him on the innovative techniques he was proposing, but he expressed concern about aquifer contamination. Mr. McCully responded that the runoff would go through filters and swales. Grundhofer stated that the summer storms this year produced a lot at once. Mr. McCully indicated that the system could absorb 6 inches to 14 inches in an hour. Asleson inquired about the movement of water during the high water level. Donlin asked for clarification concerning the contents of the gravel. Mr. McCully answered by pointing out the black lines on the map. He stated that it was not a swale, but a slope that would reduce the impervious. The area would be used for overflow parking or driveway. In the winter months, snow would be stored there. Donlin indicated that the Board had been supportive of innovations, but expressed concern over the aesthetics. The area would quickly be exposed to cottonwoods and other seeds attempting to take root. She questioned how they would deal with the issue. Mr. McCully answered that they find the cleanest rock available, and it would be a gray color. He believed the details of the plan he had submitted should dispel all concerns. Donlin asked about the use of herbicides, and questioned the ability of the bacteria to inhibit weed growth. She discouraged the use of pesticides. McCully clarified the two systems. The Netlawn would be used in the grass surface in the swale. The areas of the map depicted in pink would have Flexpave 50 and did not have the organic layer, which would greatly reduce the ability of the weeds to take root. He believed the two systems qualified for public value credits, because they met every requirement on the list. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 Chair Kukonen inquired about the depth of the sand. Mr. McCully responded that the site was very low, so it would be about two to three feet deep. Grundhofer asked for an example of a site that was very low and the system worked. Mr. McCully answered that the bank on 35E was a good example. The water leaving the system into the sewer was clear and only a trickle. Mr. McCully stated that pervious paving areas would be vacuum cleaned once a year. He had used them in Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and in Wisconsin. Asleson stated that it was a well - designed treatment train, however his only question was the final destination of the water above the groundwater. Mr. McCully stated that another soil boring could be done on the west side and that it would not be a problem. The system needed to be verified. The species of trees needed to be changed such as the honeysuckle. The only other concern was lighting issues. Chair Kukonen requested that the new copies of the lighting codes be sent to the developer. He called for a motion per the approval of the City Engineer, a redesigning of the lighting plan, and the noted species changed. Halen made a motion to approve with the recommendations of staff and Board. O'Dea seconded the motion. Donlin reiterated her concern over the use of pesticides. Asleson indicated that the Best Management Practices were encouraged for storage and maintenance. He indicated that the site was on a sanitary sewer. There was filtration at the doors where any spills would occur. Halen accepted the friendly amendment. Schneider seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. Eagle Brook Church, EAW Comments Asleson introduced the topic by reviewing the background material. A citizen petition was submitted to the Environmental Quality Board to perform an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the development proposal. When the application was received, the project developer was required to supply all data to the Responsible Government Unit, which prepared the EAW using a standard form supplied by the Environmental Quality Board. The Responsible Government Unit was the City of Lino Lakes, with Jeff Smyser as the Lead Person in the review. The EAW was prepared by the information supplied, and was approved by the City Council for distribution. Copies had been sent to several review agencies for a comment period of 30 days. After the comment period, the Responsible Government Unit would respond to comments and DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 determine whether an Environmental Impact Study would be required. The comments made by other review agencies might require modifications to the project to mitigate environmental impacts. The Board received several copies of letters by residents concerning the site. Art Hawkins submitted on October 16, 2002 to the Members of Lino Lakes City Council. He discussed the need for protection for the birds, consultation of Joan Galli, Jeff Perry and himself, and an adherence to the Comprehensive Plan. A letter from Art Hawkins to Joan Galli, MN DNR and Jeff Perry, Anoka County Parks dated October 24, 2002, on challenging the assumption that the birds would not be disturbed by the proposed site. A letter and attachment from Wayne LeBlanc to the Lino Lakes Environmental Board dated October 29, 2002. He urged the No Wake Zone Ordinance to be continued beyond September 1, 2004, and that an Environmental Impact Study be performed. The following comments were made by the Board and citizens present on a page - by -page basis. • Page 2, Section 5: Asleson recommended adding National Wetlands Inventory and MLCC maps. Section 6B: Asleson indicated the need for detailed description of construction methods, operational features and project closure actions. In addition, Saint Paul Public Works proximity should be stated in last paragraph. Other issues needed to be addressed, including surface water information, the compaction of soils prevention, and sequencing under construction to prevent compaction. • Page 3, Section 6B: Ms. Bor submitted that "two consecutive seasons of nesting of herons would be affected." O'Connell added that no construction should take place during that time (the nesting seasons). O'Dea disagreed. She believed the statement should stay to show the reason for needing an EIS. Asleson noted that a 500 -foot buffer was based on one paper written in relation to road building and logging, and stated that the model cannot be automatically applied to nesting herons. He urged the monitoring of the birds' behavior, and cease and desist if the birds were negatively impacted (if constructing in the nesting period) Chair Kukonen indicated that this would be the first year the No Wake Zone Ordinance would be in effect during the nesting period. Asleson answered that they did not know if it would impact the birds. He further stated the birds were used to a certain amount of background and freeway noise and that no one knows DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 what the impacts to nesting herons would or could be for this type if activity at this range — particularly being a "new" type of disturbance. Donlin stated that the point was that the birds could be impacted. • Page 4, Section 6D: Donlin mentioned that the site should require more environmental review. Ms. Bor indicated under the statute they needed to submit all stages and allow plans for an environmental review. She stated that the Church probably had plans for summer camps that could impact the lake. There was also a barn and a farmhouse existing on the lot and it was unclear if those would be utilized and under what circumstances. O'Dea addressed "describing future stages," indicated that the expansion should have been included in that section. Section 7: Donlin stated that an 80 -foot spire would be offensive, in light of the building requirement of under 36- feet. Even though churches were exempt, the conditional use permit required the building be similar height to surrounding buildings in the neighborhood. O'Dea added that the spire could be 60 -80 feet high, and wanted the height clearly defined. Grundhofer recommended there be no lights on at the site at night, especially pointed upward at the spire. Donlin stated that a variance must meet nine criteria, and that it would not be required. There was precedence with a church. Rod Kukonen requested that site compatibility be further addressed. • Page 5, Section 8: Grundhofer noted that the table appeared incomplete. O'Dea indicated none of the permits were discussed, but merely identified. Ms. Bor stated that if the Environmental Assessment Worksheet did not go well, they might not use the plan. She believed that the project should be addressed in concept. If they asked the correct questions, the environment could be protected. Grundhofer requested to see the permits and approvals from Table I, and to postpone comments until the next meeting. Donlin questioned if by getting the permits, had they not gone beyond the approval process. Asleson clarified that they were listing the permits and agencies. Those agencies would be receiving a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Donlin stated that a Shoreline Management Review should take place. 6 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 Grundhofer indicated that at the November 20, 2002 meeting she would like to the comments from Table I. • Page 5, Section 9: Donlin stated that they had not discussed project compatibility with adjacent homeowners and nearby land uses. It was further stated that within a 1/2 mile there are 38 residents not directly on the property line as well as public utility property, and that the 1' paragraph is not accurate. • Page 6, Section 9: O'Connell noted that on 20th Avenue there were nine homes adjacent to the site. Ms. Bor indicated that 20th Avenue was zoned light industrial. She stated that her family had lived there for six generations. She found that in the text that the first paragraph was not accurate in the number of homesteads. In the third paragraph, the reference to the Comprehensive Plan was incorrect. In the fourth paragraph the Pig's Eye Wastewater Treatment Facility was used. In addition, the tile system from 1910 was inadequate and there was ponding in the Rehbein addition. O'Dea indicated that land use concerning Environment did not address the Minnesota Land Cover Classification. Chair Kukonen agreed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet was lacking in many areas. He asked for clarification in Section 10 where the numbers changed from 7.2 to 48.6 for brush/grassland classification. O'Connell stated that the concept of rainwater guards was good. She referred to page 12, and noted that all impervious needed to be addressed. Kukonen added that the number given was 15 acres, when on page 12 the number given was 50 acres. • Page 7, Section 11: Asleson noted that he had given the developers the cover type natural features map and information on the aquatic survey. These were absent from the discussion section. Grundhofer stated that she would like to see a MLCC map included in the document, and more detail in the Natural Features section. O'Dea indicated that they were unable to assess the impact because there was not enough data available. Asleson answered that the information and maps were available. He also mentioned that there were no construction limits indicated. He recommended that they add the City of Lino Lakes, and the Peltier Lake Association in the fifth paragraph. They should not state their assumption that the birds would not be impacted, if other experts could not. He urged a monitoring standard and a plan to stop contractors, should observers indicate it necessary. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 Donlin noted that in the first paragraph, wild turkeys and the Sandhill Cranes were omitted. O'Dea stated that a sequencing and a staging plan needed to be submitted. They had not described the measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. Asleson answered that they ran out of time. He had spoken to them and gave them information and contacts that were not used. In the last paragraph — developer should define which habitat on the western portion of the northeast property. So should the word "substantial" in substantial buffer be defined. Grundhofer posed the question concerning a substantial buffer. Schneider stated there was no mitigation plan for the protection of existing wildlife. Mr. Ron Marier of HERON, noted that they were supposed to identify the habitats near the site. It was stated that Peltier Lake would not be affected, however they initially had proposed trails. They had not addressed any potential trails and their impacts. Donlin stated that the easement was about 20 -feet wide, but they spoke as if it was a substantial open space. • Page 8, Section 11B: O'Dea questioned the amount needed for a natural buffer, and were the woodlands sufficient. Mr. Marier mentioned that the land was low, and because of that, the runoff and backup could possibly flood the soil and destroy the woodlands. The area had a tradition of flooding. In addition instead of the figure 500 acres, the area was closer to 1000 acres. The number of acres needs to be researched and restated if different. Chair Kukonen indicated that they had not addressed any adverse impacts to the wetland. Asleson stated there were eight rare species near that location. Additionally, in Section 12 the answer "no," was incorrect, because there would be changes in the hydrology of the site. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 Mr. Marier noted that for Wetland B the ponds would not hold the water that was only three feet deep and drains into an open ditch and into the lake. He predicted erosion problems. This needs to be addressed in the EAW. • Page 10, Section 12 under the Avoidance and Minimization of Wetland Impacts: O'Connell stated that it was inadequately addressed. Grundhofer added the area was degraded, and that it should be made better. Asleson indicated that the soil had clay so the soil'structure and any infiltration presently on the site could be easily destroyed. To prevent that, it helps to pull a ripper behind the equipment that is grading. It would take 100 years or more to restore the soil if restoration practices or preservation practices were not used. It would not cost any more money. A sequencing plan should be added as stated with the Best Management Practices. Schneider noted in the County Ditch System section that the tile system was very important to the adjacent owners. Asleson indicated that a surface water systems train should be better addressed for the impervious parking. They needed to analyze the hydrological changes that could occur. Chair Kukonen added that they needed staff comments. Asleson stated that there was no description of the surface water volumes before and after, or where the volume was going. Mr. Kevin Lawrence noted that there would be an overflow from the impervious to the mitigation pond, because the distance between them was not large enough. Asleson stated that the design of the Surface Water Management appeared confusing, and that the statement concerning discussions with the watershed district about drain tiles is inaccurate. In particular, that the existing drain tile alignment will remain in place or be replaced with new tile, and that this procedure is endorsed by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Marier cited a utility ditch to the drainfield location would be three feet over the high water level, and needed to clarify plans for mitigation. The water could rush over the berm into the lake. Donlin referred to Section 13, that at peak times, there could be 4,200 gallons released for 4,000 people. The project would need MUSA, not a septic system. Ms. Bor added that it would not only be on Sunday morning but there would probably be other programs and other uses. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 Donlin stated that the potential numbers were inappropriate for septic use. If the site was not sewered, it probably should not be at that location. Ms. Bor indicated that the MPCA would be contacted for review. Donlin added that septics had a thirty-year life, and expressed concern over the possible failure of that system. Asleson noted that the soils on this site infiltrate, but the speed was slow. They were proposing a mound system with sand. Mr. LeBlanc stated that the proposed well . needed further review, because it could cause drainage of 500 acres. Asleson answered that, in the report, they should address the proposed well and how it could affect the other wells. Donlin expressed concern for adequate water in case of fire, because they did not have city water. • Page 11, Section 14: Donlin noted that if Peltier Lake was a natural environment lake, the setback cited in the 6th paragraph was inaccurate. It should be 200 feet for non - sewered land. If the woodlands flooded, there would be no buffer for the heron colony. • Page 12, Section 14: Asleson stated that a floodplain map should be overlaid on their existing map. Donlin indicated the lake access needed to be addressed in Section 15. Asleson answered that they should be able to use the lake, but that they needed to be more descriptive about their intentions on use, such as types of water craft. Asleson stated for Section 16, that the soils and compaction needed to be addressed. Somewhere in the document protection measures and remedial measures to be taken to restore compacted soils should be addressed. Grundhofer asked for clarification if 50 acres was the amount disturbed included 15 acres of impervious. (See also page 6.) This clarification should address where the 50 acres is, and how it will be disturbed. The report should address the soils budget. • Page 13, Section 16: O'Dea indicated that more information was needed for slopes between 0 -12 %. Asleson answered that infiltration and filtration was under Section 17, but agreed that more detail was necessary in the areas of how, what and why there was no planned pervious overflow and pervious paving. The technology was available. Systems can be designed to trap and store the water, to give it time to go into the soil. 10 ,DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 • Page 14, Section 6: The last two sentences are blank statements. EAW guidelines indicate this has to be more specific. • Page 14, Section 17B: Chair Kukonen stated it would be necessary to cite details concerning treatment systems. O'Dea noted in the guidelines they were required to cite any water bodies that would be affected. For this item, more detailed information and analysis is necessary. Mr. LeBlanc questioned in Section 18A the assumptions used for the numbers averaging 2,800 gallons per day and 4,200 gallons per day at peak times. What method are they using to evaluate this and how did they come up with these numbers? • Page 15, Section 18B: Grundhofer stated that they did not indicate a mound system in the third paragraph. In addition, the proximity of the septic system to the woodland and the lake should be defined. Asleson referred to the Sandplane Model that takes the physical structure and gives the site a rating. This site was decades to a century for surface water to get into the groundwater, but that did not apply to the lake. If the soils were compacted, the infiltration rate changed, resulting in runoff. He recommended that they adequately address the soil density infiltration systems. He added that in Lake Protection Zones, development should not take place. Extraordinary measures should be taken to minimize impact if development does occur in Lake Protection Zones. Donlin inquired about the acreage of the red zone. Mr. LeBlanc answered that he had roughly estimated 600 acres. Donlin questioned the amount the church was paying for the land. Ms. Bor answered that they had paid 1.2 million dollars. Grundhofer inquired about details of the sub -grade correction and the need for the City to approve imported soils. • Page 18, Section 20: O'Dea posed a question concerning the location on the map and size of the diesel fuel tank. (That it is not shown on the map.) Halen inquired in Section 21, about at what point the Carbon Monoxide levels became significant. 11 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 Mr. LeBlanc questioned the regulations for the Carbon Monoxide emission levels. Ms. Bor answered that the levels for cows were lower than the standards, and should have been noted for that section. • Page 23, Section 22: Asleson asked for clarification on how the numbers related to people and animals. • Page 28, Section 24: O'Dea noted there were no receptors (testing devices) placed near the herons, and therefore were unable to address the heron issue. Grundhofer stated that the level of noise disturbance was unknown for the birds, and that monitoring is needed by a trained observer. • Page 30, Section 24: O'Connell stated that the projected traffic with noise levels were above state standards in three out of the four receptor sites. Ms. Bor answered that Doug Fisher was a county road, and even though the standards were exceeded, it did not affect the road. • Page 31: Grundhofer inquired if comments were available from Rice Creek Watershed District. • Page 32, Section 25C: Grundhofer inquired about plans for a trail. Asleson answered that they had discussed a trail down to the lake. They may be willing to have a conservation easement, land trust, or have the area turned over to the county with a buffer, due to the heron habitat in the Southwest corner. This question should be addressed and answered in the report. Mr. LeBlanc submitted that the tree line could be extended across to form the buffer. Grundhofer added that there would be a need for signage. Grundhofer indicated that Section 25E needed to change the answer to yes and to explain their plans to minimize adverse impacts. Donlin inquired about the height of the Centerville water tower. Asleson answered about 100 feet high. • Page 33, Section 26: Grundhofer suggested night -time lighting in the building only, and no lights in the parking lot because of the lake when the building was unoccupied. Chair Kukonen indicated it would be helpful to have more information on lighting. Schneider questioned the basis for the statement in Section 27, third paragraph that the growth areas were not relevant. 12 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 O'Connell inquired about which aquifer they would be using. Schneider indicated that it was necessary to answer the questions how and why, to assure no impact. O'Connell noted a conditional use permit was necessary. Donlin stated that it was not a small matter. • Page 35, Section 27: Asleson stated that the Surface Water treatment train (management plan) was incomplete. Chair Kukonen inquired about the measures to be taken and plans for maintaining the buffer. Ms. Bor stated it would be helpful to address plans to compensate for he turn agricultural ditches that would be redone. Donlin indicated that it was necessary to add the word "known" to no foreseeable future projects, because it addresses adjacent property. Chair Kukonen called for a motion to pass on the recommendations from the Board, staff, and citizens. Schneider made a motion to pass on the recommendations from the Board, staff, and citizens in the attendance. Grundhofer seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Metro Greenways Focus Areas Asleson noted that according to the Metropolitan Wildlife Corridors Project, the entire Rice Creek area was identified as a focus area. He also indicated that to the North of Lino Lakes Elementary there were 21 rare species identified including a unique wild orchid that was still in bloom as recent as yesterday. He stated that the Department of Natural Resources had grant money available, and that he had submitted an application concerning the area. He was able to apply for the grant because the special areas were now designated. He contacted groups such as the Soil Conservation District and others to work together on the project. B. Zoning Task Force Update Chair Kukonen discussed the recent developments on the zoning ordinances. There were no new open space requirements. There could be no more than 65% ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 impervious on a property. The Lighting Ordinance was discussed. The next meeting will be on the Planning and Development Ordinance. C. Heron Rookery, Peltier Lake Mr. Wayne LeBlanc indicated that two letters had been sent to the City stating that the no wake zone was not working. He showed in pictures how the coontail had become detached specifically where the ski course was located. He concluded that a 2000 foot by 200 foot strip had been disturbed. He was in favor of maintaining the no wake zone in hopes that the disturbed coontail that was disturbed would reestablish itself. Asleson stated that he had written a protocol and a request to the University of Minnesota for a graduate student to help with observations, information development, and to print up testimonials. D. 2003 Meeting Dates This item was not addressed in the meeting, although the dates were distributed in the information packet. E. Watchable Wildlife Conference Grundhofer stated that the conference addressed the desire to not develop land, but to begin a Wildlife Tourism on the land. The speakers addressed the identification and listing of the species and sites, and beginning festivals for the purposes of conservation. . DEPARTMENT REPORTS A. Forestry This item was tabled to the November 20, 2002 Environmental Board meeting. B. Solid Waste Recycling This item was tabled to the November 20, 2002 Environmental Board meeting. 14 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING OCTOBER 30, 2002 8. ADJOURN It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board would be on November 20, 2002. There being no further business, Halen moved to adjourn at 10:27 p.m. O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Brigette Blesi TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 15 DRAFT MINUTES Agenda Item 5A Environmental Board Meeting Date: December 4, 2002 Topic: Century Farm North 1st through 7th Additions, Preliminary Plat Review Background: The Environmental Board passed recommendations on Behm's 6th through 10th additions at the July 31St, 2002 meeting. Please see attachment 1 for the staff review at that time. The following recommendations were passed on at that time: Recommendations: July 31, 2002. Lino Lakes Environmental Board • Detail a Tree Preservation Plan. Ask Developer to reevaluate the preservation of historic oak areas on the South side. • Integrate Tree preservation into Operations plan for protection of soil, pond, infiltration and swale areas. This would include a plan for fenced protection areas for these as well as siltation fence locations. • Preserve the wet meadow area to the North and West. Restore the hydrologic system supporting this meadow as much as possible to earlier, pre - ditch/tile situation. • Require City native seed mix specifications for all pond, swale, ditch, infiltration, and conservation easement areas where possible. Use transitional mix when transitioning sod yards areas. • Require city ownership of outlot and buffer areas. Use conservation easements under city ownership in other areas requiring buffering. • Require signage locating all conservation areas. • Require covenants in the Homeowner Association for no impacts in buffer areas. • Require a separate and distinct conservation disclosure brochure to be given to homebuyers before lot purchase. • Prohibit the removal or importing of soils off -site without approvals from the City. • Require the Developer to Escrow (1) 2.5 -inch boulevard tree per frontage. • Detail a Plan that sequesters park and greenway areas. • Require low impact, downward focused, low - spill, low- impact street lighting. Motion: Motion to Approve with the above considerations made by Halen, Second by Grundhofer. Motion passed. All were in favor Analysis: The last proposal submitted by the developer was reviewed with a proposed Carl Street extension. At that time, the extension of Carl Street was not approved. The developer now has permission to extend Carl Street. The new plan lays out a development proposal with Carl Street mapped. Attachment 1 is a Narrative for Century Farm North, describing the new proposal. Attachment 2 is the Site Plan Proposal John Johnson describes the amount of wetland in this area as 9.8 acres, and that the ditching system effectively drains the site. Before ditching, the majority of this site would have been cattail type of vegetation. It appears that restoration of any of the land in this project is not possible. There are two areas of resource significance left of the site, and one area immediately off the site on the NW corner. Previously, the Environmental Board made the recommendation to try to preserve the two historic oak areas on the South. It appears that it was not possible to accomplish this. The other area that is of concern is an area just off the site in an area that will most likely be developed in the future. The developer should demonstrate that this area would not be affected by any more hydrologic changes. Please take some time to look at the July 31, 2002 Environmental Board packet information and maps, so that you can see the differences in proposed development. Options: Options may be discussed further with the Developer and his Engineer at the meeting. Recommendation: I am assuming that the recommendations of the Environmental Board will be similar to the July Meeting recommendations. Additionally, the developer should demonstrate that there will be no hydrologic impacts to adjacent significant resources. Environmental Board Comments: Attachments: 1. Narrative for Century Farm North, Lino Lakes, MN 2. Preliminary Plat Plans for Century Farm North 1st Addition thru 7th Addition • • NARRATIVE FOR CENTURY FARM NORTH LINO LAKES, MN I RECFIV D NOV 2 2 2002 CITY OF L,,,vc) LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN /DENSITY The CENTURY FARM NORTH project contains 95.122 acres and is located adjacent to and north of the existing Behms Century Farm subdivision and the Lino Air Park. The recently adopted land use plan resulted in the guiding of 78.222 acres as medium density (3 -6 unit/acre) with the balance of 16.900 acres guided low density (1 -3 units/acre). The net developable area (total area less existing wetlands) is 13.870 acres of low density and 71.390 acres of medium density. This results in an allowable density of 228 units to 469 units. The proposed project contains 250 units. The low density area contains 27 units at a net density of 1.95 units /acre and the medium density area contains 223 units at a net density of 3.12 units /acre. The overall net density is 2.93 units /acre. EXISTING SITE CONSTRAINTS The existing site offers several site design challenges. The southem portion is covered with wooded areas with wetlands and a county ditch. The southeast edge of the site abuts the existing Lino Air Park with a private grass runway. The west edge of the site abuts and accesses to Sunset Road (County Road 53). The northern portion of the site is open meadow with scattered brush and trees. The east side of the site abuts a private ditch. The site contains 9.845 acres of scattered wetlands. The county ditch effectively drains the site and connects to the ponding system designed into the Behm's Century Farm project. The land to the north and east of the site is currently being used as sod fields. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT In order to integrate the proposed residential uses with above constraints and meet the required density of the Comprehensive Plan, it is proposed to use the PDA overlay zone. It is proposed to incorporate four distinct housing types and a significant park and open space area. The southwest portion of the site uses traditional single family lots to transition from the existing single family areas of the Behms Century Farm project into the town home portions of the northern part of the site. 15 larger air park lots are used adjacent to the air park runway to provide both a physical buffer to the runway and to provide land use compatibility next to the Air Park. Single family detached town homes are used as a transition between the traditional single family lots and the attached town homes clustered around the major central amenity of the 22.6 acres of park and open space. PHASING PLAN The project is proposed to be developed in 6 phases starting in the southwest and progressing to the north and east and ultimately connecting to Sunset Road in the northwest comer of the project. The Phases range in size from 30 units to 61 units. The 1st addition contains the ls` phase of the park/ open space and three housing types: 34 traditional single family lots, 6 air park lots and 21 single family detached town home lots for a total of 6 lunits. The second addition provides the connection to existing Carl Street and includes 9 air park lots, 19 single family detached town homes and 12 attached town homes. Additions 3, 4, 5 and 6 continue the medium density plan and includes the 2nd phase of the park and the east -west minor collector road included in the Comprehensive Plan. Grading will also be phased. The remaining pond excavation started as part of the Behms Century Farm 2nd project will be completed together with the ponds along the north edge of the Lino Air Park and the pond north of block 9. The central pond area will be constructed as part of the 3`d and 4th Phases. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SRF completed a traffic analysis on the project and the adjoining properties. The 250 units in the project together with the adjoining parcels located on the west side of the site were estimated to generate 1,952 trips per day with the A.M. peak hour generating 120 trips out and the P.M. peak hour generating 124 trips in. The report concluded that the existing road system will adequately handle this traffic. An important factor in the project design was to incorporate as many "traffic calming" features as possible. The curvilinear roads, offset intersections, private alleys and cul -de -sacs were the tools used to discourage through traffic. The Carl Street connection was designed as a "Tee" intersection to discourage traffic from going to the east from the project as requested by the existing Carl Street residents. Extensive street landscaping was used to further reduce vehicle speed. The following four road cross sections were used within the plan: 1. The Minor Collector road is a 66 foot right of way with 34 foot F -F paving. It is proposed to construct an 8 foot trail along the south side of the road. 2. Century Trail, which traverses most of the site has a 60 foot right of way with 32 foot F -F paving with a 6 foot concrete sidewalk along the south side from Sunset Road to Carl Street. The centerline of the paving has been offset to the north by 2 feet to provide additional boulevard space between the curb and the sidewalk. 3. The other public streets would have 60 feet of right of way and 32 feet F -F paving. 4. The attached town homes would have 16 to 18 foot wide private alleys for garage access, which would be owned and maintained by the home owners association. The front door of the attached town homes would be accessed from private sidewalks between the buildings. 5 Connections to the county road will be designed to meet Anoka County criteria and most likely have acceleration and deceleration lanes similar to those constrtucted along Lilac Street. At this time the county does not have any plans to upgrade Sunset Road. UTILITIES Trunk sanitary sewer and water main has been extended to the southwest portion of the site in Pinto Lane. The project will require installation of a lift station as part of the 1st phase. This lift station will be designed to serve all of the property within the project and other adjacent parcels the as determined by City in its feasibility study. The feasibility study prepared as part of the Behms Century Farm project concluded that the trunk sanitary sewer and water main would serve all of the parcels within and adjacent to the project and lying south of Main Street. The water main will need to be looped. The feasibility study will determine the best location and the timing for the water main looping. Since the start of the Behms Century Farm project surface water management has been of utmost concern. The project contained a county ditch that effectively drained the entire area. The work to date has focused on creating significant enhancements to the drainage system and at the same time reduces the downstream impacts to the County Ditch system. The new system further reduces the long term maintenance needs of the county ditch system. The Century Farm North project continues this plan. Control manholes constructed as part of the 1S`, 2"d and 5`h Additions of Behms Century Farm provide all of the rate control of the entire project. Numerous ponding areas provide for additional sediment control and allow additional infiltration opportunities. Whenever possible swales were used to convey runoff to the pipe system. PARKS /OPEN SPACE /TRAILS One of the key elements of the Century Farm North project is to provide significant park and open space amenities. The plan has over 22.5 acres of Public Park and open space (23.6 %) with another 4 - 5 acres of private open space for a total of over 27.8 % of park and open space areas. The plan includes over 1.7 miles of public trails and sidewalks. Outlot D in ls` Addition and Outlot C in 6th Addition contain the public park area. These two outlots contain 16.45 acres, of which, 7.29 acres is contiguous upland in the middle of the outlots. LANDSCAPE PLAN & TREE PRESERVATION The project proposes to preserve a significant amount of the existing tree mass on the southern portion of the site. Street and home construction will require removal of a large number of trees. The Landscape plan proposes to provide over 500 trees spread throughout the site. These trees will be supplemented with additional ornamental trees and foundation plantings as part of the detached and attached town home construction. Two entrance monument signs will be installed at street connections to Sunset Road. These monument signs will be located off the right of way and will be similar the signs constructed as part of the Behms Century Farm along Lilac Street. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS & HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION The entire project will have protective covenants to regulate the building style, height and location. These covenants will also regulate building activities near the air park within the transition and approach zones. There will be three homeowners associations with in the project area. The air park lots will become part of the Lino Air Park property owners association. The detached and attached town homes will be part of a master homeowners association, which be responsible for maintenance of common areas and snow removal. The detached town homes will have a relatively low maintenance association and the attached town homes will have a high maintenance association. There will also be a neighborhood homeowners association that will handle structural, roof and other building maintenance requirements. CENTURY FIRM NOR7N 100 A00. THRU 7Df ADO. ANDOVER ] PRELIMINARY PLAT CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST ADDITION THRU CENTURY FARM NORTH 7TH ADDITION 1 HAM LAKE SITE ?°"1, CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA COLUMBUS TOWNSHIP FOREST LAKE TOWNSHIP COON RAPIDS LINO .MPLIN BLAINE HUGO LAKES 2 BROOKLYN PARK SHOREVIEW FRIDLEY NORTH OAKS WHITE BEAR TOWNSHIP BEILW'OOD ARDEN HILLS VADNAIS HEIGHT ROSEVILLE GOLDEN VALLEY MAPLEWOOD ST. LOUIS PARK 0 MINNEAPOLIS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: STREET 10.00--1 1 1 t 10.00 10.00 1 - - -1-1 I L10.00 10.00 ' -- 10.00 t REAR LINE I BONG 10 FEET IN WIDTH ADJOINING SIDE LOT UNES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH ADJOINING STREET LINES AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN INDICATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT INDEX: C1 81 L1 SI PHI LS1 LS2 P1 PP1 01 G2 01 U1 W1 COVER SHEET PRELIMINARY BOUNDARY SURVEY LAND USE PLAN PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PHASING PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE DETAIL PRELIMINARY PLAT PRELIMINARY PARK PLAN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN DETAIL SHEET PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN C. \Pro lots \Daps- Grep- 2\140.ITOR PARCEL630- 001 \revise0 base 10- 20- 02 \670001bd10- 30aRprep- basedg 11/19 /2007 0*•8.52 NI CST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ,h• South.et Oere of the Northwest Mare M 00.200. 7. Toeddy 31. Range 22. Ando Cauntp Meuab MO The Southwest 0.t. of the NvUh4t 0uv10 of S.0O0. 7. Township 31. Range 22. 0400 th• parade •••••• Moi.i.a w the Northwest oewn a the Southwest Oasis a Me North.* Oivlr of Smite 7. awned.` 31. Mango 22. -Rune. South long the Went tin .l odd S..0..•t Charter of We Northwest Ouster of Section 7; !New a 120 Not thanes Eel p.rdld .RI. Mu Note. Ike a 11.. Southwood C.vte a the Northwest Corte • MINN a 350 Not; thew North parallel with to WM Kw a Ow Southeast 0uorl.r of to Northwest Charter to o point a 0l...liee .R. to North M* of Mu mid NrM....t Ou*Ir: the... Mte ly Wang the Nora 6e of an Swth.wt Owe w M North..l 1Ml�jetmop n00q .0 the Me Ssul...s1 pure of IM Norlhwt mortar of Soda, 7. tMN Eel distance of dong .oN Mama Quote is 75 00*. atbem *N with the 5eoth Me of the MIN UAW Owner of the a • milt of NtrsedIe with to Mal MM of sold NMt.eM Ouse; theme Swill day to West W of nil Mewed tarter M the pdt of b•00I00 8. cob dso welt Met M of the Southwest Ouster of the Waimea Omer of Section 7. Township 31, Ray 22. demand M Mem liege i. et • point en the Mot 6..• of sold Saugmet Owe of the N.d ..M Charter dhNM 536 Mt South of M Mama an.r of a4 Southwest Wrlr of the Northwest Ouorer; then Eat pale with the North Kea said Southend Oahe M the Ne th.a1 Owlet a di.0.... of 1047 Not the.... Soup parallel with the MM Tee of .M Southwest Owe of to Northwest Crave • dialed. of 206 Net them Mat 6.1.1 NW the North Me of .old Satlral O.ml.r of We Northwood Ouse o *tens a 1047 Net to the WM R.e of so4 Southend 0004*. of the Naa..M Owe; thew Mr0o nary mid WM M . Wawa* of 206 Mt to Re pane a b•pboty. wed eso, met flat pet of to SeuthweM Wafter of M. M•rth..a Oahu of Seats. 7. To..l.p 31. Rey. 22. d0ar0•d a NRO.m t me dl adid Southwest MCwwir said w 011ie Ifar0na 0e•rrtten d EMI d.«4. W. Mh 4• South of Southwest Whale of the North.al O.ee • distance of 1047 Not 9.d. South 6*04 with to MM M of .aid Southwest Owe of We teN...st Ourlr a Ode.... of 208 Not thee* Wed panda with the North M of mid Swthwe•t C.rter of the Northwood Cure • WMeew a 1047 Not to We MM We N .a4 Sathw.w Chair of the Northwest Mae; team N..6. el•y .id Mot M • d.e.e ef 206 NM to to point of e•ga'•'i•9. Men County. Mists AND M.. Southeast Quarter ol 00 11rtkved Man. of 5eolbn 7. 7o.N0p 31. Nay 22. And.o Comm Meneb. EXCEPTING Mee Mean Melba pawM of impels Toot pert el Seethe 7. Temehp 31, Rory. 22. Ada 0../p lelar..ate daar0d es Mews degrees 2277 .10.n 22 w. West en en t orio%W g the WM M .4 ..4 Sa6....0 Wr Um. North a the °D Northest fleeter a Sate. 7 • dawn a 17600 Not l the pdnl of 0.i••lex t.e.oe oenI...0. g on ale bowing of 11.11. 60 •arm 27 N minutes 22 T Nmem% WM Wens WM Sow et the Southwest Rude el the MOM Wrtr a R7 Norm 32 mist•• 14 seems Fort Wang • We penile with We South M of ma 56.6..* Garter of Me Ner6aal Wester of S.olNn 7 a Meow el 7593 Not thou:* Seth 00 d.pw 27 .holes 22 acne Eat aging • tine pale Nth veld Mt Na of the Sauthast Oahu el w Wartime Quarter of see. 7 • dao.a of *50.00 Net t...... South 67 demos 32 .lath 14 wads Mt any • Ow Weald sal south n.. of the Sloane t Omar el the N.Y..d Odder N satin 7 • Mang el 759.50 Ml N IM peat ef epfity. Want le • goody .env err to Mt 33 Not wN .sotdiy 2.50 .ewe feet of a4 Coed, n0. AND 1Mt pert el S•e0e. 7. Toa.akp 31, R..y 22. Ando Cate Minne.0e darted a NS...e Co.nwang et au Southwest coot a a4 5ou6hweM Cmre of the MMhent Ou•rlr of S•0Gw. 7•, then* North 00 Mors 27 Mew 22 .wield. MM on an enema Meo•Nth demo the Mal M of said Swiftest Core of the Mahe* 0w1e of Saab. 7 • reed. of 32000 Mt to the pant of I.pi nlew Man sold b•r9.9 a Noah 00 doyen 37 .late. 22 loan Ma Mg e•4 Mao One a Me Shama Charter a old a Owarte w S•len 7 a distance of 150.00 Net dune North 07 degrees 32 minutes 14 .peas DM dam • IM peal with M Seth M a said Southwest Ouse of the N.06..* Mader of S.Uan 7 • Wsen of 759.50 tat the• South DO ••■• 27 Motes 22 Meade East day a awe panda site ate Mal Nee of the Southwood Cheter a to *neat ChM. of Seethe 7 • Wol.n ef 150.00 Mt t.ar.. south 67 dpa• 32 .lath 14 .comas Mt Mon . Ka pone with sold Sat. fine of M Sath..ot O.ate el We Northwest ouvie el Section 7. • Mama. a 759.50 feet to the pia of beginning. .4.j* he . evenly wad ewer the MM 33 MI end ael.H.g 2.50 new Eat of add may road. AND Lots 12.13.14.15 ad 16. Mac. 1. SUNSET OARS ea let 5. wrh 1. SUNSET WOKS. met the West 164.10 Nst..00.dng le M recorded pal On O• end of word N the ORa of the Conti Read., Ada O0r4• 10ar•••4 Nf0 Let �, Me a. mean a IM r•aN.l pot en No mod w mord M M Office a the O.My RecaMr. MD Lets 15. 16. 17. 14 19 ea 20. 41*0 1. 0.000 MR PARK NORM rar4mg N to receded pia en We ad d need N M 0110.. of M County Meade. Mona Come Mu oto. AND eta. 4 0. •ed 4 ID0'S 0017007 n al 51N NOTION, aouorrng be the regarded pia on 1d and of wad M the Moe of to Cowie Made. Make, formals. neea4e AND That pad of .eMd CM. STREET INN .eee1y of the Norranp Menem of the East 1Me of led 14 wed 1. LINO AR PPM NNW. e*owdi.g N the nailed pew an M and of word N the Ones ef to Ca[i07 Reed., Mho Mety, 45nne•.t• end ...sly et Mu Eel wgohw -.o7 Ra ef County Rod Re. 33 NOTES PROPOSED PLAT. ZONING EXISTING PLAT ZONING MINIMUM LOT DEPTH MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM LOT AREA BUILDING SETBACKS TOTAL AREA CROSS DENSITY NET AREA NET DENSITY R -1 R 135 FEET 80 FEET 10.800 S.F. FRONT . REAR SIDE NOT z, 2002 .30 FEET 30 FEET 10 FEET 95.12 ACRES 2.63 U /AC. 85.23 AC. 2.93 U /AC. 9 Vf rc 8 0 C1 N87a09'26 "E 360.00 t0 ho 1047.00 S87'09.26 "W I ;1 f8_ ,S86"53'46 "�1' coos Nro you iEi n. I...I 1047%00 " N87'09 26"E S87'05' 13 "W 759.50 caiti Nap 00 N87'05'f8'E 474.00 N87•02' 22"E 561.62 L ., 371.83 S86'50'52 "W cb vtv l N82220.60 "E Si 05'13 "W N87'05'13 "E 16 cr C.• S86•53'48 "W 81.90 - est 1:: h at O - - 07nL0T 0 211.:3 ,, o ,487'03 39 "W I S87'266'3;2389" W 1 /off 1 1 / -,(1 • Li 21 _L- -1�-4 / 1 :5 NOTE: NO FIELD WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED PRIOR TO PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY DATED 11/19/02 2277.78 1709.38 '.6 1.9•10 ihiR .mama.. MDR T • sy 131. ()CI,: 1 1663.10 S87'os'38 "W 584'1330_ gym g The 1.w Southeast quarter N the Northwest (Maier of Section 7, T..a0Jp 31. Rage 22 Nab COWAN 00mmot . (miles th.wl quarter M U. Northwest Warta. al SmNao 7. T.wnai.p 31. Rang 22. asap( game pad. d0vbed a MagimOg .2 the Noland earner of to South.. quarter N the Northwest Werth of Soda. 7. ToanAb 31. Rapp 22. theme South alma the test Ike of .aid Southwest Warta d U. Northwest quarter N Section 7, • 2 7... of 120 Net theme Feet parallel Nth to Werth R. N the South.. Wok, of to Northwest Wort. • items of 340 I7* Mme Nora parallel .Rh the West R. el the Sauthweg part. M the Northwest Wort. b . pent .1 Interne :0aa .0e to Nat. Ikea the IMO N"Mw000 G..0yt"; then.. M stoly .o w North Me of w 7*00. at Omega That pert begg1 y "a 0.e Squ uthou0weet o el el SwM..N Water *wept Northwest marl. of Sae0N. 7. then ffistence of Ent effin 00. of theth..11Naid South weet MI"st a� a Net theme � and porelllel with North hee awl Me el lM said NerMwt Paster to • pelt N i.leres .. with the Mal R. ef odd Northam( quart.: thaw. South stop awe Whet line of .WC Nrlhwnt Carler le the pkt N beeffidow end Men wool; Res part ef to Southwest Ouorla of the N 0..20 6uoryr al Saar 7. Team., 31. Moth 22. /neka n lams the Nat . l't awl a oak SwMant qurl• N.o07* Worla _l East fluster Nth IM Math IM of Smyth porelki with the West the of mid Soutthrost Quarto.. el the Northwest Wager • distance of 1047 kat gad Southwest Gamier el the N.anwl Charter a Mgahc. ef 205 lest then NW pore./ •702 the North a., a sold Sw0na.t quart. N 0.e Nedneel Curter • *knee of 1047 tat to the MN. M N gek Southwest Quad. M NN N.Mwesl Owlet: (boom North Wong said Nest im a totem* el 206 0th to the pot. of 2. i..7.. and else. 07+pt The( port N the Sesthwa Werffir of the Northwest Maier el Soothe 7. Tema.. 31. Raw. 22. 4ar404 es (00.1.0 0. t • welt n ton Mel area .ad Toyama &.0ter el the Northwest Wargo distance 326 Mt South of the maw el mid 5ou0w0l Wavier .f the Nerthw01 Onrbr. thew Coat p.0M MO the Werth are M . aid Southwest quarter el the NorMOI Quarter • fobs.* * N 1047 Nat thanes South pa ild with to Nth the el .std 5outhwa Quarter a the Narthml quarter • *70.0 M 206 Net then Tog /wad war the Nara M M sok Southwa Wert. N the Northwest glum(. • &ta.m N 1047 het to the Nag 6. of est/ Southwest owl, ef the Northwest 7*4*. then Math Mae said West area aide. el 206 Mt to the pint N 50400201. Path. f 1% 1Ywhmeta MO Res 5eghesel Quarto. of the Neraeat Wale. of %Mkn 7. T.m dp 31. Rae. 22. Nora Camay. lows.(.. EXCEPTING the Na.aa da.eled parcels el prapw040 Mel port .f Safe. 7. Tema* 31, Rase 22, pt.. Cant% lints ote deserted es fare Commoven6 et to Swayed oars N nld Swthm01 Gawk, N the Na0nnt pwlor M Slam 7: theme Nara 00 d..0 27 .2000. 22 emend. test n n omw0.d 2wwi.g. thong the Met M of geld mu0ma &carlm el the Northwest (Marko d 50.00. 7 • istnes ef 175.00 Ng N the point N inwhii.h47s Mon.. m gad Mori. M Nwa 00 d. oo 27 mw2. 22 emnde vast thmg said war R. ef 8.°~i5.0*0. g qualm N N.iw4.a a Quarbr a Ssllba. 7 a 2T.bwe. N 15000 lout then Nora 07 avow 32 .iuM 14 s.7* feet Mm a IM h A these. South 000 down 2fa4"k.b. 22 has Ent Me.. 4 the amid ..074 0. to of Me 509.7* Quarter N q of aes Narthw.t Wort" ef Seca. 7 • rain.. M 15000 Nat Ohm.. South 67 dorm 32 .bale. 14 peak. t.00 101, there e w p470M .IM South 1t. ef w Swam! 0.arla el M NMeml p.ar4r of Seaton 7 a iota..» el qo 75 .50 Net le w pelt el i.gimkg. 754(.01 r • arN7 nth ewe W oust 33 MI W .77.taMa 250 owes Em of said County mod. O wO MD Gi 'Mt pert ef Swath 7. Tm0Jp 31. Rowe 22, /wt. Cwnl% ith'.m1e dww0e4 es Mem Can.." is et M. Southweet o"." a self Southwest Wert. of M. Noland owl. of Seca. 7. then. North OD dere. 207Dminutes 22 monde t0 0 n n .owned Mooing dmg to NMatIEeniuhB�ef amiid Southwest gMQ.uwler _a IM beerim Owerk 'r el 57*00 7 . Atha a el 150 amends 002.7Mm.. 0.n dyee 32 .004.0 77 East th00.9 74i4 =paMid bile M. South it. of mid Southwest °mote, a to N.7tmwt &sorter M Section 7 e Asthma of 730.50 let 0.... South 00 Apo 27 wiwaies 22 maws. Font thaw • Res penal .the sold Re the N the S0.Oh.7. Gumbo M.• at" 0. npenOW NM geld Sot Am of Geom. M. 5wt met °molt d M Nw0weet N Sag. 7. MMah e ef Ng le the pokt a Mywsg. Mj.07 le • cam. reed h. W Meg 33 het and mMkke 250 a"• test o f gold aunty m..0. 00 Ids 0273.14.15 end M Moth 1. 81NQET ONES end to 5, Meek 1. SUNSET 0082 .mcpt the .a 16.10 Nat woman M the recorded pal en Re W N rem. N M 061a. M 1t. Cww.ty Reader. Make Canty. 000204.. t.0 tot 1. Oath 1. MOEN P oaawao le the 7alr0.d yet m M and el news k the Office N a.. County aped., t.0 lab 15. M 17. O. 19 M 20. Mock 7. WO NR PARK NORM. a... 0 le the nca4ed Mat an M and M m cod 00 the Os.. M the Canty Rp.rder. Mob Calaty. 0km00770. MD W0.4. 0. C. and 0. 11EW5 CFNMR7 Flak 591 400111011. .Oast.. b the reeed• Mot n N aid el recd. In the O0ce e1 the Canty Reaua". Moo. Cant, 0Rmm1. AND IMt pert N wad CARL STREET Wag .0.047 M the Nashely extension M M feet M ef lot 10. Mimi 1. MD MR PARR NORM .020 y le M reamWd Mot n R. with .f nod 0 the Office et the County Recorder. Mde •ant% IRaweOb one ewM7 d IM Dna 0M.bahmy Rr N G.Ny Reed R. 53 a • 11. TOOK cv 0 i3 \3Q ,% Nh II'p "..3NO //� // / / / , / / // / / / / / / / / T / , / / / / / / we n GRAPHIC SCALE 2002 (00750?) 7 Oak - 100 ft 11 0 B1 CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST ADO. TMRU 7TH App. C \4101. eF \Oegs ..g- 2 \MOLITOR PARCEL690- 001\eevb14 boss 10- 30- 02\63000Ibtl10- 30- 02gre9- beseAwg X/19/2002 0.:10022 PM CST LAND USE MAP MEDIUM DENSITY (R -3) TOTAL 78.222 AC. WETLAND 6.832 AC. NET 71.390 AC. LOW DENSITY (R -1) TOTAL 16.900 AC. WETLAND 3.013 AC. NET 13.87 AC. TOTAL SITE NET SITE CARL STREET 95.122 AC. 85.277 AC. no Novak BLOCK PAR.•. NORTH EA (200% RUNWA DISPLA OVER D MR UNWAY AREA N/ OLD 1 NOT TO SCALE L1 CENTURY FARM NORM 1ST 000. 1000 710 A00. C \ProJects \ARR- Greg-2\MOLITOR PARCEL630- 001\re0CW base 10- 3 0-02■63000Ibd10- 30- 0Egs0'bosetl■0 11/19/2002 004422 PM CST OUTLOT B GRAPHIC SCALE (02FELT> 0 Inch - 100 IL Wit ti. tea_ IS Cy .T 6 << 2002 1 VIIINI ill 04 iT 1..;?"- STREET 1 0) V an 0 yy_N dp Et, n = dij. 14 11 – RUNWAY - SAFETY AREA (200 = X2600) 6 fEla �o� RUNWAY (122'X2200) — €� _ CENTERLINE__ -- -_ - -_ SAFETY ZONE A ;;T; ry ;; (240•)(1707 ') • \\\_\\.\\\_\\.\: \ \\ \\ RUNWAY OVERRUN/ DISPLACED THRESHOLD RUNWAY SAFETY AREA S1 CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST ADD. TNRU 71H A00. G\PraJests \Nos- Greg- 2 \01LITOR PARCEL630- 03hreNSed base 10- 30- 02 \63000Ibd10- 30- 02greg- Geseekg 11/19/2002 04HORD PH CST OUILOT B NUMBER OF LOTS CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST ADDITION. CENTURY FARM NORTH 2N0 ADDITION CENTURY. FARM NORTH 3RD ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 4TH ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 5TH ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 6TH ADDITION TOTAL LOTS SINGLE AIR DETACHED TOWNHOUSE TOTAL FAMILY PARK SINGLE FAMILY UNITS 34 6 21 61 9 19 12 40 30 30 9 .34 4.3 5 .38 43 21 12 33 34 15 75 126 - 250 12 .NO AIR lb ARK NON J -- --15(1TL \\\ OT BB 1 RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (200'X2600') SAFETY ZONE A OUTLOT (240'X1707') i 1111111111 RUNWAY 022_X2200) \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\\\\l� \ \ \ \ll \ \ \ \ll RUNWAY OVERRUN/ DISPLACED THRESHOLD // 20 I 21 I 1 f L— —J —_ 5 i L RUNWAY SAFETY AREA . —.� 1 0 0 55 PH1 CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST ADM 8001 701 ADD. 6 \Pre. is\ . -Ewe • 2 \1QITOR PARCEL630- 001\r•vked base 10- 30- 62 \630001bd10 -00-, • •• -pose. 11/19/2002 014822 PH CST aJ:• rrrrlm/ maYaaslrr' laaoaimllYao�l�a�raaY��oaaaaaso i .10. \' !titt*4I i i�•'_ r!• � ouTLOT B ji :fir �• 40. It tithing P4 'ir mon� imui iiI NATIVE SEEDING AREAS: WETLAND AND MEADOW XCEL ENERGY APPROVED STREET UGHT IN ORDER TO PRESERVE EXISTING TREES AND WETLAND ALONG SUNSET ROAD, NO ADDITIONAL BERMING AND LANDSCAPING WILL BE INSTALLED. TOWNHOMES BOTH ATTACHED AND DETACHED SHALL HAVE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING PER ATTACHED TYPICAL DETAIL AV-04.140o � mo:11j° __ ■a ,....00,,,,,,r„...„.„,... �' A `∎olae1e1e1i1TI ENI101v,1lcelel -� - -J 40- ay' 111 hi TYPICAL TREE PALETTE 0OVERSTORY TREES AMERICAN LINDEN SUGAR MAPLE SWAMP WHITE OAK NORTHERN PIN OAK IRONWOOD GREEN ASH STREET TREE COUNT UNITS (sf & det th) 124 STREET TREES (sf & det th) ® UNDERSTORY TREES CRAB APPLE THORNLESS HAWTHORN SERVICEBERRY O EVERGREEN TREES BLACK HILLS SPRUCE WHITE PINE AUSTRIAN PINE it!!!1eiii�!! i1!!i!rii - I ul .IC's �mPllr + \I nIl�nLallllla I I!`�I. \ \N \N IILI��I ►7il �II�� III�� u � II�II I ! t�III�II�IILll�lll2� IIf111 t V`` I'\ + CENTERLINE _ __ SAFETY ZONE A .z,;_ •-, I 1, (2ao'xno7') ... DISPLACED THRESHOLD i I I / 1 / ' j _- rRUNWAY SAFETY AREA (200'X2600') L RUNWAY SAFETY AREA CENTURY BARN. NORTH 1ST ADD. THRU 71H ADO. DRIVE STAND PORCH DRIVE DRIVE i ViiiiiZZIWIiiiii OAFi OAR oAR e / / / / / %i� / %� HOUSE HOUSE / ;� HOUSE HOUSE law / / iiiiiiiii� iiiiiuii/ 1/T % STAND % 'C 1 / / /� "SW/ PORCH / / /' / / / /// PORCH / _i. / i UPGRADED PORCH /9, -1 ! /i /ip /i /!, it, V; • 3 -PGD CPS TYPICAL TOWNHOUSE DETAIL 171LaK11701192 SYMBOL PLANT NAME AJ JUNIPER. ANDORRA CPS CRAB, PINK SPIRE POO POTENTIU.A. GOLD DROP SG SPIREA. OO DF.AME SJW SPIREA. JAPANESE WH1E ROCK AIUwcH CYER 4 1A L. POLY TYPICAL AT ALL PLAMNG SEW P\Projetts \Dwgs- Greg- 2\ POLITER PARCEL630- 0O1\ravkea base 10- 30- OE \620001M110- 30- 02- eg- eose.tlwg 11n9/2002 014®2 PM CST • a ` TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED TOWNHOUSE DETAIL LS2 CENTURY FMM NORTH 1ST A00. TRU 710 CAPro,tects \O.gs- Geg- 2 \MOLITOR PARCEL630 001vev1sed Eau 10 30 02\630001040 30 02greg- boseAg 11/19/2002 04482E PM CST NUMBER OF LOTS SINGLE AIR FAMILY PARK SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED .TOWNHOUSE TOTAL UNITS 6i1:i1 '. 'i<tRi£iwiiiwAit 4ii i£itii: d6{. ...' - CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 2ND ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 3RD ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 4TH ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 5TH ADDITION CENTURY FARM NORTH 6TH ADDITION 34 6 9 21 19 9 5 21 12 30 34 .38 12 61 40 .30 43 43 33 TOTAL LOTS TOTAL AREA GROSS DENSITY NET AREA NET DENSITY 34 15 75 126 9512 ACRES 2.63 U /AC. 85.23 AC. 2.93 U /AC. 00ANACE AND anon EASEAENTS ARE SHORN AS THUS: L10.00 1000 I REAR uNEf REM 10 FEET 04 1,011 ALUM=HO ODE OOT LINES. NO 10 FEET 04 MOM A0A00014 STREET IH0S /FO REM 10T ONES. UNLESS 011ERNSE MOM IMAM) AS SHORN ON ME PLAT 1TFlCAL LATMIMS 3.100 SF. 2010 S.F. GRAPHIC SCALE a s r (01 PMT) 1 look - 100 1E FM TO VACATED P, STREET t r� 27- ! 13_4, , 1 JJ If '11{ - :mac- •'-..w -� �-.: 0^ CEIITER�RIE _ _ �.......... -•• \024.0 X17 - 7-9- - -_ - -... i• 5,. : y . - \ ��\ ,\\\\ \_'' 1 _ 11R_ .- - - -'_' RUNWAY. OVERRUN/ - �^ __- .._- - --.,, \ ! -,/ DISPLA�€D THRE HOLD s_.•rr r•2._ �f!d•AiIC�� •�..� -' %ri! +'• -.... � ..��' \. !, .•Tf-..•,•ij�.' ti yRUNWAY P E� • AREA / V41 / 11 i ! -'T.. • OUTLOT 8 GRAPHIC SCALE PUBUC PARK /OPEN SPACE 22.013 AC. CONTIGUOUS PARK 7.287 AC. STREET RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (200'X2600') SAFEcE TY NZONE 'A :_ , ;Y- ;i on ' i _1 RUNWAY OVERRUN / / / DISPLACED THRESHOLD / c•: RUNWAY SAFETY AREA CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST AOC. 1NRU 77H ADO. CAProJects \Ovgs- Greg- 2\HELIUM PARCEL630- 001\ revised boy. IO- 30- 02\630001bd10- 30- 02gryg- Nes.Awp 71/192002 04402E PM CST OUiLOT B GRAPHIC SCALE 00 IGO i. >i�SitC'it[i\ Ytt#t'Si�F•' '�� ( DI FEET) I Inch - 100 n 2.100 AF. t ainf+ iu; ti; t ,{,+i;'�t, � I{ I ' & ' 'ti' vi1iI{1l�i1{l� 6-i1dil'i�, �i s{ {e+- at .-ut.!' ■e+-,a ' � i I i rilliM' r sa. :i■;iaIs���tai; :{;.;lj�' 1{,' { i i�- H I.Ii1c lli1 RLi +«.��'.�i+= ;xc.+i,H�■� ■! i1 ' . M sl{ �. {.21.0,7 ;+E;'; i {:• •rt:1i >ry u•� us •47 n.; iii \e ;:_ , , ' III. _......1.0.7..7114-1,741.7.4IIIIIMIIIM■111,7 ■Cl L`�tll1�1. x ■ I%/1- 119i11iemi!�G 7 /1,` tA1i .► 1p � \ � _ •� � ��� ...c .37 - j `.Fritl.ftra .,rte �.:III r[ �--i. a ! flat. ��'� QQA t �t [ ■ �s - 1 1?{ -- - v/ /l — f _.; i � q ns1 t- - \ 1 = .RTPg1tY� 1143 fial id • 1 1 i Lt. u■ 1 11l�Ji • 111 1111t. 3 i" �� � dull � ,i��li►•_ � � �l��" � ,� -rs� �— � :i ' }1� v.r� ` F?�'�Ya7�- � rRUNV�AIL_SA�TY\ aC����C� ram.. �`_°�•�► �,_ „ , i u 11 EA (200'X2600) ROMA _tea - — --- RUNWAY OVER N/ DISPLACED THREHOLD \ .1 � }; i r." ij i / ;:tt: :III \'U �rY - • - i. ." f u\RUNWAY ag-541 AREA \ii f m a G1 CENTURY FARM NORTH 1ST A00. 1NRU 7111 ADD. • kOT `air II 1111 1 _ Int �• � I s� �Il�i;ilYi '� .. 1J1,_.Ei ii ;III I('� '►" —°�/ .. 1�j�� 4' ►' � 11�R / % r ,I�'�I�iI'� Ja'r �_-�; �.� 111[ �._ , ���yyy'' � III► 1111 t►T� ��1 r. ^— �; '� i � ,��'a —��I ir• l /E 4.0:11,111: 1— �_._����__ � r. /101 ` — • l 1• ;LAW:,iMMEMIAMPleAVY G \WaytcMD. �t�tA-2\MOLITOR PAR(1i630-010 \rrvhetl haw 10- 30- 02\6700010E10- 30 -0E}peg- EOSrtlr9 11/19/2002 0448,2E PM CST ! \"OIY 2 2 2,1'02: IM 2.160 S.F. GRAPHIC SCALE o 8 CENTURY F NORTH 1ST ADD. THRU 7111 ADO. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NO SCALE RT TREES PLANTED 6' TO 11' FROM BACK OF CURB 60' ROW 13' 32' B -el 2 16' --I b 16' f07 r I 2.0X 412 SMAOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 1-1/2'. 2341 BIT. BEAR COURSE r- 2331 BIT. BASE COURSE 8' - 100% CRUSHED 14iDOT 2211 CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE CENTURY TRAIL TYPICAL ROAD SECTION NO SCALE 6' CRETE E�WA PROPEX "SILT STOP" FABRIC OR EQUAL - FASTEN TO STAKES 2 "x2 "x4' WOOD STAKES 04' O.C. EXISTING GRADE 10' HIN BACKFILL BURY BOTTOM 6" OF FABRIC PROPOSED EMBANKMENT SILT FENCE 30 TREES PLANTED 6' TO 11' FROM BACK OF CURB 60' ROW 3218 -8 16' 16' 2.05 30' 14' p SUR1A E*JNTAB 1 CURB & GUTTER 1 -1/2" - 2341 BIT. BEAR COURSE 2' - 2331 BIT. BASE COURSE 8' - 100X CRUSHED W OOT 2211 CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE TYPICAL ROAD SECTION NO SCALE CMr *Jrcts \Dees- Greg- 2\lOTLITOR PARCEL630- 001 \rrvkrd base 10- 30- 02\63000Ibdl0- 30- 029rrg GRAPHIC SCALE w r. 100 4.9 11/19/2002 04'08,22 PH CST 2,160 S.F. ( e1 PUT ) Inch _ 100 16. 66' ROW 33' 9' 6' - 341F-F 6' B' 0.61 -r• — _ 17 1 - 1 7 _ —0.61 B-612 TYPICAL MINOR COLLECTOR SECTION NO SCALE I 1' 5- 0 6 D1 CENTURY TARN NERDS 1ST ADD. TNRU 71H ADD. C. \P.oJects \Dsgs- Dreg''2\Nd_ITDR PARCE1.630- 001 \eevised base I0- 70-02 \630011bd10- 30- 02g-.g-bsse.d.g 11/19/2002 044022 P14 CST OUTLOT GRAPHIC SCALE 106 100 200 NI NM ND ( 01 Isar ) 1 blab- 100 R. wY 4e011 �__•• _—..__. 44-44. .10 :,,,/t-f--••••,--vi, ii, 6 a ki ili LIAM 111M t. �-,�y INOIT ,� / \v -. "r'--- -„-■� _74 44kt lirW:e.......-;...---=" 1 = c�►" '� .� i!` :jai■ r ---;_1 12 _ 6ENTERLINE -- SAFETY ZONE A ,•- . ;- \\\\\\ \(240'X1707'')\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ RUNWAY OVERRUN/ DISPLACED THRESHOLD RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (200'X2600') RUNWAY (122_X2200') L RUNWAY SAFETY AREA m s rc :6 / i!S (1=3! 0 r U1 WRY FARM NORTH 1ST ADO. 1HRU 71H ADD. \Pru,Iects \OARS- F+eg- 8•111311TOR PARCEL630- 001\ revised hose 10- 30- 02 \6300010d10 30 02gre0-0osedeg 11/19/2000 0/0822 PH CST �C 1CtI�4iitFtBS#it[�R". -' ,.1:. sat GRAPHIC SCALE ee 101 � ; ::: •iii;: �a��rs�rl�rr��r�r��u�r1���r� "rI, ��~ • t �� �� _I � �;�� ._._ r. . ice.' 6 ;l�• -�� I "/4 ai . �– 11�• :WTI • ` / �ri���l1F • Mira 11..1– t;�. /� IMP IG I1,4►sI♦ _ j !���_ 4147 rli. v �� , - - -$ .,I inn � �'��'�$� ;‘r:, „7/7„, 441,7,141! : 4 , • _s—r�— — ■ Ti1:IITI(1i L ve.50-osoits awe. -*maw OW � Ilogiois 774 ticilrt Warm. �,�r�r�a►�xr.�ar�s Est wi .•; is • t di sit.,%°. 0, 1 VI i-Wr IP-- If`, pi saw Nais Pi: tiny (rrser) 0 IoeD . 100 IL NOTES MITIGATION WETLAND FILL TOTAL FILL 25,096 S.F. AVAILABLE MITIGATION 334,707 S.F. Egg 5, Ito: LL Ie. • STREET 1 1[______ �'f-r [ _ . _ ...•• —off 1jrRUNVfIA ..SA.EIiT _ --.N. •._ -_ ! .. ,1 R5144kAJ 2.2:X220II_ _> _ _ — _. EA (200'X2600') I:> . . 1a s f f C'C2eai07; RUNWAY OVER N/ " _ — — `• DISPLACD THR HOLD • : I- . AREA \RUNWAYSA.F.E • ikt i 1 W1 C1:11714RY FARM NORTH 1ST ADO. DIM 7111 ADO. Nero Sects Dess-Greg-0\ MOLITOR PARCEL630-001\nvIse4 base 10-30-02v6300011x110-30-02creq-bou dog 11/19/2002 0441422 Ple CST GRAPHIC SCALE 1 e Se las see ( IN MET ) 1 Inch 100 ft, / /- • • / V 2 , , • I. •• 6 eark / t • . '--th.,;0 • „, CARL STREET 12 EA (200'X2600') -....— -----....-- c.f.t24007079.--- •-...., "--. ---------:',---. \ RUNWA4( OVER — DISPLACtD THR ....---------- ---: 1 .... 1 1, 1 Nil • —.;;;;;m...N-3,............-.....,,....,r/...,r4...........f 10/ F1011A,A ea .11 1 15 / .. .. ..... • RUNWAY SAttI14 AREA ‘N, r --I 1 / 6 rn- s te'c'