Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/26/2003 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting February 26, 2003 6:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. ELECTION OF OFFICERS 5. OPEN MIKE 6. ACTION ITEMS A. Anoka County Parks /Presentation /County Open Space Acquisition B. Dairy Queen Grill And Chill /PDO /Plan Review C. Mueller Office Facility /Plan Review 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Heron Rookery B. Open Space Public Education Project/RFP Submittal 8. DEPARTMENT REPORTS A. Forestry B. Solid Waste Recycling 9. ADJOURN • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD- 2003 3 YEAR TERMS Name & Address Amy Donlin 6100 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 H) 426 -6356 Rod Kukonen 647 Andall Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 1-1) 780 -6384 W) 293 -3275 rkeacbird(a,aol.com Teresa O'Connell 1000 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651-785-2378 W) 612 - 926 -9181 tere53(@,,aol.com Nikki Schneider 152 Palomino Lane Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651-784-1296 W) 651- 407 -5350 nrschneide(a aol.com Constance Grundhofer 235 Linda Avenue Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651- 766 -9357 grundy(a sihope.com Mary Jo O'Dea 1533 Broken Oak Court Lino Lakes, MN 55038 H) 651- 407 -3790 rmjodeaa,aol.com Patrice Toler Halen 777 Fox Road Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651-766-6957 pthalen@msn.com Updated 1/31/03 Misc \environmental \environ Date Appointed Term Expires Apr. 13, 1998 Dec. 31, 2000 Jan., 2001 Dec. 31, 2003 Apr. 13, 1998 Jan. 1, 2000 Jan., 2003 Jan., 2000 Jan., 2003 Dec. 31, 1999 Dec. 31, 2002 Dec. 31, 2005 Dec. 31, 2002 Dec. 31, 2005 Jan., 2002 Dec. 31, 2004 Jan., 2001 Dec. 31, 2003 Jan., 2002 Dec. 31, 2004 Jan., 2002 Dec. 31, 2003 (Dave Mach's Term) • • Agenda Item 6A Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 26, 2003 Topic: Anoka County Parks /Presentation /County Parks Open Space Acquisition Background: Anoka County Parks is seeking to acquire property buffering Rice Creek. This property is located along the Creek from I35W to Howard Lake. Please see Attachment 1. Anoka County Parks will be at the meeting to present their acquisition project. Analysis: This area is extremely important to achieving a Metropolitan Greenway connection North of the Rice Creek Regional Chain of Lakes Park. The controlled use of areas adjacent to Rice Creek will be very beneficial to the water quality of Lino Lakes lake- water. At least one unique -plant species is present in the acquisition site proposal. Walter's barnyard grass is present about 3600 feet north along the creek. There are many more sites in the proposed areas that still should be investigated for rare species. The area contains isolated soils and hydrologic indicators that would support rare plants. I have attached a model Resolution that might be used to support the greenway efforts of Anoka County. If agreeable, this ordinance would be forwarded on to the Lino Lakes City Council for adoption. Options: 1. Support The County Proposal 2. Do not support Recommendation: Option one, and pass a resolution of support on to the City Council. Environmental Board Comments: Attachments: 1. Anoka County Maps • 2. Model Resolution • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION Supporting Anoka County Metro Greenways Land Acquisition WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes contains numerous and unique natural resources AND WHEREAS, The greenways provide for the preservation of natural resources and linkages for plant, animal, and human connections, AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes desires to preserve the environmental qualities of the Rice Creek Corridor and the water that flows from this creek into the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes; AND WHEREAS, Creating this greenway will provide buffers and ponding areas adjacent to the creek to allow for protection of our water resource; AND WHEREAS, The Clearwater Creek Greenway would provide a means to restore, and maintain present unique biologic diversity in the animal and plant community along the greenway; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the Anoka County Greenway proposal to purchase land along Rice Creek be supported, in that this plan will provide for protection of natural resources in Lino Lakes, and provide for future access to resources to residents and wildlife for years to come. . Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2003 Ann Blair, Clerk- Treasurer Mayor John Bergeson • Attachment Opportunities for Protection and Restoration Mn County Biological Survey Communrties Natural Areas (cnnrrrtrae any for Anoka, Dakota. Ramsay and Wsuyngton carmes) Potential Natural Areas (mapped from *ena+ photon ) Potential Connections (Around .rays of NO blokrg;cal Otversiy) w Parks (k. rxuoation -and nal mai r moon >) niviagemon! arena) MetCouncil Growth Classification Urban Core Urban Area Urban Reserve [-- Permanent Rural/ Agriculture Area Opportunities for Protection and Restoration: This map represents a preliminary analysis of the relationship between the existing regional parks system and high quality natural areas, and how they might connect. After additional analysis and application of ecological, social and economic criteria, this map will be refined. • • • RICE R Lamprey Pass Wildlife Management Area Private Landowner Property St. Paul Regional Water Services Property Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve Boundary (under acquisition from St Paul Regional Water Services) 12 5 16 ACES :Kb SY 810,-4,t, Fti wy CAr'M. AAA 1113 O EA!3EN <NAFI,, MAPLEEtart.4,3D FOR E &s aAR6 t:ENtAAij %Ea 9EROEN * rCPL r) • TO NACAYgOC Oh.A1, PO'AEl, OrRAir Minnesota Biological Survey Natural Communities for St. Paul Regional Water Services Property 1 Q 1 Miles N r Agenda Item 6B Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 26, 2003 Topic: Dairy Queen Grill and Chill /PDO /Plan Review Background: The Lino Lakes Market Place plan review was completed in 2001. In 2001, the Environmental Board reviewed the Market Place without user definition. The Dairy Queen Grill and Chill is a proposed user for Lot 1, Bik 1 of the original proposal. Included as (Attachment 1) is the Land Use Application and submitted site proposal information, and (Attachment 2) is information on previous city discussion. Analysis: The original lot proposal was slightly larger in size. Please see (attachment 3) for the site landscape plan of 2001. The new plan has changed. Some of this is expected because at that time it was not known what specific user would be on the site. However, the original proposal featured parking lot islands large enough to plant shade trees. These islands are absent from the new proposal. On the new plan, the islands are smaller. The developer should incorporate shade trees into islands that would support growth. Shade trees were also proposed around the building. These tree plantings are absent from the new plan proposal. Trees should be included in areas that would reflect original proposal intentions. We have a potential to phase ourselves out of landscaping. For instance, the boarder areas to the north and South had several shade trees designed into the landscape in 2001. The present plan shows nothing. The proposed species choice along Apollo Drive is changed in this proposal. Continuity in design should be adhered to. Continuity in the landscape scale design is important. The original proposal shows a change from Annabelle hydrangea to Isanti dogwood. For the sake of design standards, this should not change. There were two Bicolor oaks proposed along Apollo Drive. A few more and larger shade trees should be incorporated into the design on this site and the other sites as they come in. Many Northern pin oaks were removed from this site. We are planting some additional Northern Pin oaks along the Street on the South side of Apollo Dr. The "street - scape" along Apollo Drive should be uniform. A few Northern Pin oaks should be included along the boulevard area of Dairy Queen. It also appears that the tree islands to the East may no longer be in the plan. I would suggest several more Oaks to be planted in the green space to the East of the building, if these tree islands have been removed. Photo metrics submitted seem to be ok. The Dairy Queen is proposing more lighting than allowed and should maintain the Lino Lakes standards for lighting in the new zoning code if possible, and the design standards set up for the Market Place. Engineering is reviewing surface water calculations to verify a not to exceed original design. The Dairy Queen business should follow the same sequencing planning and BPM plans post development that Target/ Kohl's agreed to. Ideally it would be best to have cooperative contracts between these businesses in contracting for site upkeep such as impervious parking lot sweeping and litter pick up. Environmental Board Comments: Options: 1. Approve with suggested environmental recommendations 2. Do not recommend approval Recommendation: Option 1 Attachments: 1. Land Use Application and Site Information 2. Environmental Board History of Market Place. 3. Original Landscaping Plan • jTrK.I . • PLEASE FILL OUT BO K SIDES wpm,' • • • Comprehenoiye Plan Amendment $ 500 Comet UOR'P t $ 350 IntedmiTan Permit $ 350 Site Pleats/view $ Sao Subdivisiorc Pnlimiamy Plat • $ 1,250 Pa Devdopmeit 1,250 P114311e4 Development Ovadey. 1+250 Minor Subdivision/ $ 250 Lot Split ..._, Rezoning $ 350 ..._. Vecadan dollop, street, utility 250 - . `_ Variance $ 250 • Faperty Minis (26 PDT• IND • • La - • Lot ,.Blak_AMNnn AD I K��- lar� 2r2-- . gal>�esadpaon. �P OM en Existinguaduseitahic Onkel t» # Existing zoning. 9 Do • DEsCRIMON OF REQUEST: 5i • axe re vCevJ far a-- f - '&11 \v • • Owner (if different n ): L LA OH SI I r ►� • �r� 'i,..h • • address -11o1 S't'• name addreas phone 51z1= 3y go phone f a x W t . - 221 - 3 i 8 • fax e-mail 01-an • WiU p m5Dr1c- rulpb. dim e-mail y r a Karvintys ri2.ACa3V34 cart\ Revised 1123102 • Pap 1 aft 0 ...01141711K • • .1.1. 117. • I PROJECT DIRECTORY I ARpNIG7NR. 02450'0436 CONSIRCTIONI 452-800.0443 ENV. 452460.0444 PROJECT 1W4MDV T. 024150MW. /NOM IMOD 6240 ,x"°" ' ARGMTEGT. INELHAN SPA ARCHITECTS ADORES& 5 500 11010 4ANDALE LAKE SOLLEVARD SURE SS GITf/STATETR L6.00MN6TDµ 1M 53451 RIONIS 452.446.4662 FM. GGNrAGT. NICK SPCODES E`NAI4 EN6D®t lGVIUI DM VORSB. 500!ROCKLIN S00.EVARD anySTATE/ZIF IRREAPGU! IM 55424 RCM 1654 6.0420 MN* CONTACT. TON CESARE 644A& TOSAASSEENEMLOH T65.343 -0421 6Y41194 PRAIA:NEM =WARM Ammo, 9101 ANT 78T4 STREET GITY/STATNZFS 0.001145TON, iM 55464 RISE. 434:4627.9450 PAX. CONTACT. DEAN Y'ILL1AMSSI 100 SEATS EXMOOR SEATS PROVIDED 22 SEATS TOTAL SEATS PROVIDED 122 SEATS males OP STORES -- PARKAS M UNN, WNRAW • 'D?A06NTA61® PARKINS PROVIDED 60 PERLAR STALLS NANDICAPIED STAYS PROVIDED 4 SPACES TOTAL PARKAS PROVDED • 54 SPAM LARDSCA IN5IEGURDe TS SEE EMT U 000OPANLY SSSUTI06RAI1116 WA NJ ....,...„:„.... '�' "..•t•_..Se. • i i • ' . • ....1 ■••••••••••••••••■■•••■ _�a�• -. �. :. ∎• ∎ ∎ ∎ ∎.�r .......�. ∎....W.41..� 1111111111111.111, X17? ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,.....„....„:„. / e .`•, i1i.,iYr -!::sn :.�.y.s ?' , +,. °. w.y wt• ... 111:::,.:,... •«'•S•,•:„.4 '•' „.- �'...,::- III...:.:-'' w�.o;^+- .R ... i ,a= ?ti'^yY.. •y... -1 +•Y, rg ��•... ••aws •� .,......./. •�......••••* ...... Milk • ❖. ❖.•: �< ►.4 • ► , ill , ZA•:, , ...., , ..,.:„......,. •: ...w t i 1•.0 • •'h•;,J iy.�iett .pi�ti.. . . ,i R; �� .� l ^T .h'"<• ,,,,„...„ n,v t ••• . e�Y -' te...:. w�.y ...:.. w•t,�:4.. j �'L'i� w't !^ ,C: .0 rt 'may 1t74: `t yt•„'G•.:. .• : }1, '+ih” '•'.. �' .. .yy =^-. - • T. +..,rte. r A 1„..„..„.4...„.s., _ ..`•�.•,� j•••"•�1.: •T. 6;:•jl't, ' IEL_ i +•. n1 .,i Ti ''' r•,• .; ro'v.'. :Y•:° �:.. .�i -.+••( w•:.;r w ^' . �p •� ^`v:ti '.�.0 "•— . 1•••••41 • 1••.. .�.........•►... ❖. ❖.•• ►.•.••♦ ∎. •;S`-l" '. " «. ti. •�r "•.e� , r. ;r ., ... . •T,., 4,!..7 : !.err. ai i :Y1.'Y;M;...y. s:a,•.z , ..: ... S,.�T . :p • 2^. w ". ••1'' YLi,`•'r �._.. ::a': � v re, Iiiimaito •.4 .4....Ir ............... ^I'. .a:••i ... ;..•ham,; °.: /. 11=1111 • • .•. • :,.....,4,7,.. £iiIAYi eliff t>AF N . , ..... e, Wil igg0 •ni' 1 ..,.....: ::-7% YY ....f.,..?.. ..,:4,:::‘,...: fi T " • \\***•-..-. I PROJECT DIRECTORY I ARpNIG7NR. 02450'0436 CONSIRCTIONI 452-800.0443 ENV. 452460.0444 PROJECT 1W4MDV T. 024150MW. /NOM IMOD 6240 ,x"°" ' ARGMTEGT. INELHAN SPA ARCHITECTS ADORES& 5 500 11010 4ANDALE LAKE SOLLEVARD SURE SS GITf/STATETR L6.00MN6TDµ 1M 53451 RIONIS 452.446.4662 FM. GGNrAGT. NICK SPCODES E`NAI4 EN6D®t lGVIUI DM VORSB. 500!ROCKLIN S00.EVARD anySTATE/ZIF IRREAPGU! IM 55424 RCM 1654 6.0420 MN* CONTACT. TON CESARE 644A& TOSAASSEENEMLOH T65.343 -0421 6Y41194 PRAIA:NEM =WARM Ammo, 9101 ANT 78T4 STREET GITY/STATNZFS 0.001145TON, iM 55464 RISE. 434:4627.9450 PAX. CONTACT. DEAN Y'ILL1AMSSI 100 SEATS ADO PHONE NI RS ARpNIG7NR. 02450'0436 CONSIRCTIONI 452-800.0443 ENV. 452460.0444 PROJECT 1W4MDV T. 024150MW. /NOM IMOD 6240 ,x"°" OPERATIONS 493.610-0390 mem 43.7.060.02151 ECM PPM 4 SEWS 432.650•0216 SER.Y, 02400.002! DEV6DISIRM 4324604/612 VICINITY MAP ZONIN5 INFORMATION- CITY OF LINO LAKES TOTAL 611E AREA 451502 S= ZONING DISTRICT MO. FLOOR AREA 119001FRINO 514615P. mason 56473 PROVIDED 100 SEATS EXMOOR SEATS PROVIDED 22 SEATS TOTAL SEATS PROVIDED 122 SEATS males OP STORES -- PARKAS M UNN, WNRAW • 'D?A06NTA61® PARKINS PROVIDED 60 PERLAR STALLS NANDICAPIED STAYS PROVIDED 4 SPACES TOTAL PARKAS PROVDED • 54 SPAM LARDSCA IN5IEGURDe TS SEE EMT U 000OPANLY SSSUTI06RAI1116 WA I SHEET INDEX ARCHITECTURAL T1 TTTLE seer GML CO TOPO5RAFNIG PLAN 6RADM6, DRAINA6G AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN O2 UTWTY PLM1 GS GML DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL U LANDSCAPE PLAN M SITE PLAN A2 FLOOR PLAN AS ENTERSOR ELEVATIONS A4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS SI6NA6E A6 PHOTOMETRIC.S CODE REVIEW 14Ne0rA STAR meows no 601671CGTION TYPE Y N INCREASE OVER ONE NCR! WON NM DRUM YIS 06aPACY CLASSIFICATION A5 INCREASE SE POR CRS SEIB 6 .,P SPRNpaO6Y NO males OP STORES -- legL.L.ORMIIROGR AREA 241500 SR06S DAMS AIWA SAES SF Nestswami wt. RAM WA BASIC ALLSWE ARM 6000 SF 000OPANLY SSSUTI06RAI1116 WA O y 1 .11 1 ipll i 111 A I'L 19 5%) Q x< - 1 N ✓ Y -I O NORTH Z CENH TOP - -12.70 AN N 907.76 E - 907.86 ,.: 84 - 907.66 019.1 708 - 972.78 9471 49 - 907,00 9MV5- 907.00 MN W4 TOP - .P/ - LX7• .1.10411• .4.764.. 6_1111.+2 ■ �� °a.IU PROPOSED BUILDING F.P.E. x15.50 :t 114'. •F11.4. .YJk!• 49 .74 74 • 7.24; =Y♦6 •YIEY YA:H.lj, .Mkt •NIP • 6E14 499/7 6EO1Ex77.E FE.19R MAORIK SHALL ! 96TALUM PER SILT AMC! DOTAL. MACMA4 DISTANCE BETWEEN POSTS A 4.. AN EXTRA pow MAY Bs ADDED D99 N EACH 5100 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN WOOD OR PETAL STAKE CATCH DANN 4• -24• l'e20. INLET SEDIMENTATION PROTECTION NOT TO SGAL.E POSTS WON COMM P05/8 SNALJ. re 2• e 2' HARDWOOD, P989 ow STANDARD STE& MICE POSTS. POSTS SHALL ! DRIVEN W ETD M IMMO. FABRIC EDSt PACE O• FECt MEW M EP! EP! TIRO .' 719OVCdi ANO BA6104LL 074EDA7SY. SILTATION FENCE NOT TO SCALE 4.1 81.08E PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS GONSTRUGTION LIMITS - - - - - - - PROPERTYLINE - ••- •• -••- PROPOSED CONTOUR ---®- SPOT ELEVATION .-® DRAINA6E ARROW STORM swot CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE • SANITARY SEY4ER GLEANOUT • SILTATION PENCE -x x- ROGK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ABBREVIATIONS BLD6 Building BM Bonen Mork GB Catch Eosin GO 09.anut GONG. GORCrt. ELEV El.vatlon EX. !xvthg PFE Finished Floor Elev. HOPE 16911rtDsnslty Poo .than. INV !ma MAX Maxlm.n MH Ma4ol. RCP Rohl, amid Contests Mpg TNH Top Nut 0? Hydrant TRUE NORTH 20 10 0 SCALE PLAN NORTH 20 40 II = 20' L ALL EAOSON CON111431. FACILITIES SHALL LSE !STALLED PPM TO ANY SRN Et AMP OPEtATIA! M 0177' Clef!®! AND PM1ER6Fm 018111167 MAT ! NOTIFIED UPON COMPLETION OP M INSTALLATION OP M ASSAF= 9R06ION CONTROL FACILITIES 140 PRIOR TO ANY 6RADINS ORRATION BONG G09+6410. M CONTRAC7oR S RE5WEIM9LE 70 9GEDIA2 A FIR- COISTRKTION WHAMS Mar!, ON-61R rem MTATY MOOR= AHD WATEREED DI9TRIGT. P DAM9m oR !move, WRING CoNSPEC77p/, ALL C.O510N CONTROL 14011.090 SHALL BE RESTORC AHD N 179..106E AT M 90 of FE014DAY. . 2. 144' EROSION YDN7ROL FAOL17I8 D@�.7 9064RY -Sf TI! CRY OR RATCR5m, Senate Mows OR AFTER M ENADIN8 AoTMTIES, SHALL SE N6TNLED AT M RE0L0T 01 M 0TY AND/OR YIA7CRSHm. 5. NO DEVIATIONS SHALL Cr MADE PROM M ELEVATIONS 51CFN OR M APPROVED NAACP! PLAN 1707407 PRIOR APPROVAL PROM M CRY. 4. FLOPS roam 011IEOION CNN.E.S IMPELS (TE PE:PA PA OR FO04ANET) HALL SE POUTED TO 9EDRlNrA71099 9846 OR MPROFRIATE 10Y DI9NPATERS TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF 5EDGNT TO =PLOW OR LATERAL COARrOE ND TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION 1IE4 WHOM FLOWS INTO M 0dKVSYORS 6. SITE ACCESS ROADS SHAL L SE ORADED OR O7IERWI59 mantas, WREN SILT PENCE! DIVE :40N covens, OR DARES 140 roes TO FREVCIT 11!080!7 room EOTN6 M 9917! VIA M ACCESS ROADS 909- ACCESS RDADS/DRIVE'o95 SHALL DE 8198,0020 rem CRUSHED DOCK WERE 14EY ADJOIN 968178 PAVED ROADWAYS. T. 509.5 TRACK® PROM M SITE 97' MOTOR VEHCLQS•OR 96611E T !HALL 9E CLEWED DAILY FROM PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES* OR MORE PROLNILY P 100,90TED or CAW OIR r4TER51ED, TM0U6440 T M DURATION OP 6@A1491T1014. O. DUST canna. PL•/WRE0 MNAU. 9 -PCIr0RE7 PCOODICALY Pem1 comma* 11!1!111! NIDAAOR AS DIIR07ED BY M CITY OR 44AT5WEO. . • 4. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES POLL SE USW ND MANTA 118217 FORM DIRA1TON 0 817E 6O4AIRLC74DN 1P 0O9A7R10710 9 °PIRATIC! DR NATURAL WISES DAMAGE OR N7ERPESEIS111 THESE 64064091 coma! NIMU GS, T7Cf SHALL VG RESTORED 70 SERVO TH OR N1EDE7 PASTTION AT -T! 9O OF EACH DAY OR M 50014 AS F ED CON0RIO6 ALLOW ACC!! 10. ALL CONS7RKT1099 AREAS DI9TIREED DURSO COMTRKT1011 PAWL DE R9T0NESP AS SOON AS PO9615LE ANY AREA& P6461414494! SIED1 FINISHED !WADED OR AREAS THAT HAVE rem OSTARED AND FOR YNKCII - SRAWN6 OR SITE DAUM. COIE71411110N O ERATION6 ARE NOT ACTIVELY UDMWAY SHALL SE • ED AND MAr.419 AS MT FORTH N M POLLOWN6 PARA6WML4MEW M' DAPS. • - A. M SEEDING CONTRACTOR MAT COTAGT THE CITY AND 1ATEWED PRIOR 7O ApPLICATION OP 9E AND MULCH. • S. ALL SEWED AREAS SHALL ! EITHER 14.11-C9 ,010.080 - ,017',061® OR COVEmD EY PERO! 9LANKET5 To F11o1ECT!WS ND LIMIT GROSIO 4. TEMPORARY OR 1ERWE9T MULCH SHALL SS DEC- ANCI4I® AHD APPLIED AT A %WORT RATE OP NDT LESS THAN T'D 7094 PER ACRE AND NOTLE99 T14414 508 GOVERN!. G r M 611,00!0. AREA 16- ANTI0PA7ED TOO! RE- DIS1Um20/DEVO.OF® WITHIN SIX MONTH! FROVI0E A'RM•0RARY V89E7AT1V9 COVER CONS8TIN6 OP MINNESOTA DEPARTS/4T OP TRANSPORTATION (MOOT) SEED . MXi1RO 1205 AT -ANATE Or 26 POUDS:I•ER AC - - D. P GRADED AREA WILL NOT I! DEVELOPED MR A MEDD 6110,07911 THAN MN WHOM PROVIDE A FE MANDP VE6ETATNE COVER OP SEW MIXTURE 96DOT 4O7 AT A RATE OP SO POUNDS PER ACNE E GRAM! 90100 OR M EPAV41.ER SOCLRMIESPHALL 0E IRTAano IWWIL 110M14.45 NIRMI4ATED AND SUPPINED A 60 -DAY 6RM IM6 MRCP. P. ALL AREAS TAT WILL tans 9E MOPED OR 14AIN7N4®b PART'OF -TINE LLTAMT9 DEMON VS.I. ! 19E944,1E4TLY R870RED 16146 !GOD MIXTURE MOOT SOB AT A RATS OP SD 80005 PER ACM.. - IL *449!4!11 OnDR EROSON ARO 51'04!11? GONio09. PRA6T1CC AR! 1NA0!doTE, T9TORARY'ON.TB SOM ENT 5A51! THAT CON"OR4 TO M CRITERIA PON ON -9119 DERNRg1 mew 54449. OE PROVO= • .. 0. RA401T WALL SO PREVIEWED PROM 191191118 ALL STORM SEER CATCH SAM! PROVIDING T!7' AIR NOT MEWED ' maim C0116TRC7I014. PEER' STORM SEIM CATCH OWNS AR 91OESSARRY PORE 51TO DRAINAGE DLRIN6 004814611094 A 5IL7 roman 011 DOIALE ROO OF RAKED BALED SACKED SY NEW F91G5 SHALL SE INSTALLED A00 MINTAA420 AROUND ALL CATCH 5A1R6.0411L M AREA TRIBUTARY 70 M CATCH MNN RESTORED. .: EL WADI! AC7MT 5 PROPOSED W'B06N'AP19R OCTOr9t 6 PILL RENEW AN APPROVED IN4A5010 5GEDLLE M AREA op LAND THAT M CRY WILL PLOW TO OE DISM7im Al' 1145'711.! OF YEAR Pei. Q SEVORE.Y LIMITED. M -CITY YELL ALSO ROOMS ADDR0NAL E RO5CN 0ONMOL DEVISER IE.TET0RARY SWIPER M498, DORMANT •5d'D.. INEAAHO PION RATES OF MPLCATON OP COIN SLID AND MACH. - - 14. PILT9R 5L/1N@7 AND PE'RNA HALL ! INSTALLED M4 M DOW87RL•N4 SID!! OP ALL 570544 • ER 0474.!16• ALL !PIMP SHALL OE 90546! D 140 NSTALL:W HI M A FILTER MATERIAL LETI!. M NEOT.' 5RYJPICATION6PpR RIFRAP'NW FILTER MATERIAL ...9. • 9RO510N CONTROL 1,004.97!5 9,0,01.E or P rALLED NO ~ammo A4ROUD T! 89119!190 or ALL LAKE, PONDS AND MEAN! mom OR AD.M6DT TD M AREA To ! GRADED 141l1 M AREA 1RIOTARY To M MIKE, POND OR Pen-N0 6 RIM ER= - . - - 16. TO MINIMIZE 9RO51OK'ALL 5.1 SLOBS •JLdJ. ! COVERED YE1111•TS01AL APPROVED EN" M 6171' S 916NE9RIN6 DMSION AW WATERSHED 0671167, MN AS FIERO 5 !Amcor,' oN emery 500. - T. ALL SEDIMENTATION COCWRIEH6 IN wow S9•ER9, D7TCC, LAWS, PONDS AND !!11,0105 SHALL ! R940VED Mom, TO, MAWS OR WIER COHTLO7CN OP SWAM, S A6TVRC , 18. 9005014 CO MM ITEMS A01090768 04404.0 Re REWID ONLY AS DIRECTED 9Y M. CITY AD7R 47,075!51!7. (1.RADIN6' MOTES? • . _ .. .• _ - i - I. M CONYRACT0R 16 To vier M 611E meet Au. 60 8499079049 170CUE45 AM MELD 71901'7' 79E.905TN6 6OHorrio 46 PRIOR TO 510106,0. HID ADornow. 1. COMPE8ATCN MU. ! 6VON FOR WORC TAT 60*8.0 7e • EWII DETIPED 9r A SITE VAR OR 942451UCTON D0O9EiT ROVER - • - _ . .. 2 rr A M CONTRACTORS RE9POA91LTT ' TO ASCSR7AN M LOCATION OF ALL P.105TN6 4779,77575. M OONTRAC7olt 5!,04.9.71!111.7' 7H! LOCATOR nNATION ND NNW ALL EXIST! Prom!! HCIAS 88011E • 6Od76LCT10N STARTS. M' ENSIMP R ARCHITECT 01e OWED D06+40T. GUARANTEE THAT 141 M UIILJTEb AIR MATED, OR P MAPPED. ARE SOME CORRl67U' CONTACT 60F11R 0911 AT 651-4540002 MR FIELD LOCATOR - EOST146 LRILRE6. 601TK.T NTILTY 0WIE04P DAMAGE OCl.URs CIE. TO 0OA1RWTIOIL 4. PROTECT ALL mama 5T ICT790 AND UTILITIES W4C/I ARE NOT 9961®14.90 FOR 1194071,0E . S. WOW 677' 61N.DNi 5*PO0TOR SE•049TRECINN6 AND EXCAVATION WORK cotta ECES.,M CONTRACTOR SHALL 06TAN ALL APPLICABLE P RM175 PRIOR TO STAIR OP PONS1*10CTCR . e. ALL War 604,051016 SSCY11 M AA, 1011211APPLL.ARB To SONOERSTOOD TO PLAN 49.•1. - 7. ND 54.088 ARO TO 5316 5.1 E FS7 NORUONTAL TO 1 MOT VERTICAL) WAL = N01ED OTHERWISE - .. . a HANDICAP meow* AREAS MALL Nor HAVE 5LOe5 IN ANY DEOOGT*ON THAT EXCEED 214. • , 4. 8 04102 /70547/12 MASKER FROM M E4LDIN6 AT ALL THESE. ' _. • - 10.1P0N COMPLETION OP M (RAD1! WORK. M DEv9.O1ER WALL CERTIFY THAT ALL 6RMWi WA6 powol eo 94 00O9DAN099 WI774 M APPROVED 6RADIN6 PEWIT. AN APOUIL7 &NADIRS PLAN WALL ! 519M17ED 70 Tip 6177 FOR MAW ARO oranuourtow. - . • .. 11 PRIOR 10.11SUAN69 CP 9,00146 150875, ALL 9109OARY 9R05IDN 60+47490. 01071108 MATEDE N RAGE Ado FU40TCNIIS. M arm. 140 44,0790490 FILL 5891750711895111100997190'049I'7189 ourrwo l7Y PORE E9DHS .V:7INTEES.. IPM 14IAL101TL0E! HAVE :Or Om4 INSTALLED AT THIS PORT, R MAY 9! r 'LL' SSARY TO WMCLD WILDS! 8504175 MR VARIES LOI8 TO N1O4 M COTRAOTPL ADESOTO. SPACE TO eE18C804 755' TDRK . LL ALL DOIRIO CREATED IN T451TOLES5 OP CEARIN8 AND WADING TIE 5471 1W.'L no loseveo pRO4 T! one 7146 mums 7825 Aro SNUBS. oast Ho cRCIS6TA78 emu_ THEE TYPE op MATERIAL Mt WPM OR WPM. ONM IMP . E. ALL TOPSOIL PALL DE 997R7T20 AND S :MASC FOR REWHAE L01N6 ON M 997E Pose *web Or 108701. - APr6R CoP4AG71o4 514,04.E so mospRew PRIOR To Repots ...to 94L6vee..ex0ES6 71018011. MAY ! 10.0,20 PROM M 5ITE 'REVIVES THERE S ADMS1A7R TOPSOIL RERAN! TO 14901O0LY FINISH M 517E A5 wow Apo!! M 758501E e7UTIN6, STOCKPILES AND IRE- 9PRMUIS SHALL. DO DO! IN Al.OIm*NO2 TO, AND 140IED 094 M APPROVED 6NADINS PAN AND 61[GPICA7CN6. M. ALL 6RA0NS OPERATIONS 5444L1. ! CONDUCT! N A MAKER To Hoene T! 4OTIXTW: FOR 517E 980610/1 !109644 comma_ WARMS SHE. ea INSTALLED 7O r4OVENr =mew room RAEN6 OP- .ONTO • • ALLIALE 1' Pooreen8. AHY DAMAGE To'M,AGET FROP9R45 NAT ! 970R4RCTID AND ROmmem A6 5001 As FOME6101 111 ANNE= PROM M PROPERTY CHNOWN. - -. • - AK mar Homo ieeme..❑gfux HWDCAP PARKINS AND ULOADIN6 ARRAS 141E NOT TO HAW SLOPES THAT OCm! a IN ANY DIRECTOR O PRIOR TO START OP CON•nsCTIO. M CONTRACTOR 670 7E0PY-5rd7 SNATIO8 1DQRIFIID ON M TINS AS 6 AND 9547L TENS. SPOT 6NAT1018.N E M ASSUED ELGVATCW OP M E457046 61/ITLR UNE AND BACK O! SIDEWALK. 0ON7RA6TOR Is 70 M•IDIATOLY'NDTIPY ARC97l0T IF TER IS .A DISCREPANCIES. - . ID EXSTB SIDEWALK AND DPW earodcB S Nor TO ee DI6'MR.® Ex0ET SERE NOTED. Hsi CONO0R2 CUB! ND carrot AND 91U4NOU8 PAVPE4r A10 70 MATCH INTO 9087156 GRADES. ND ABRUPT TRANSITIONS O0 PORNO* OP WATER WILL ! 14001171ED. - O C�.OKIILRAO .TD COOK MNAR MTH UTILITY 6ON7RACTOR TO V911F'F STORM SEIM WS1ARY SOPEt AND PMTE1 SERVICE ELEVATIONS. Sim • D CMaTACTOR 15 7D T .90711:TY10 00 PEDtl7RAN HANDICAP RAMS. CoN01RT1 awe ENTRANCE 5ID9MLK AND CMS AND 6arrER UE•4 - 6ONCREIE WALK AND CONCRETE GUNS 4 PPM ARE TO ! INSTALLED- TO MATCH 90577416. PoLLOW ALL CITY OP LINO LAKES STANDARDS AND 51CSFICA71O6. NO A0RP7' TRANSITIONS OR POEOEP CP WADE! WILL ! 904717ED. 00NIRACTOR 1 710 VEER PRIOR TO moms TO OMAN A CLEW IA0E STANDINE. oe WORK TO ! FES•O04ED. © EXETN6 CA7o+ mew IS NOT To! 0151tm .. - MINRtA4 TM CE FOOT MOH ROOK WM 001A6 04 71N6 OF 1 99 7D 2 1NC44 DIAMETER EARED nom 41 SLOPE O INTO °i•i•i�i•= •i•i•s ��� INCH TO 2 INCA ••i•i•i•i•i•i•R•i�b�i�i•i•i•i•• DINlTER WA51® ROCK 2 INCA 16 SO' NF0PLM 6EOR1TILE NAPO EM I. MN49.4 LOOM OP 150 FIST ND WIDTH 08 0 FOOT. 2. FOLLOW ALL CM, WATERSHED DISTRICT NO AIWA ST NDARD& S. LEAN STREETS ON A DAILY BANS OR 140111 wea E4TLY b• 110211157110 Of CAM WATORNIED 0671167 OR Prtw BERMED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MOT TO SCALE ND-D DONE Or.NFT11A E DRIVES ! PARKINS LOTS BUILDING SIDEWALKS t PLAZA CONCRETE DRIVE ENTRANCES CONCRETE SLABS LAND6GAPE AREAS 4' 10' 10' 14' 10' 4' APPROXIMATE -DISTURBED AREA IS 0.92 ACRES U a 099 MU •.0 Q 40 J a W ,uiul Ilim NORTH 796 . TAW 11011114 4171 *7741. MOO sni Am 06 ware6 J SHEET NO. d GI o C • EX. SAN 70P_ 912.80 WV _ 665.17 + / -I 1 09191 TOP _ 912.30 IN N A 907.36 E _ 907.36 SW A 607.96 OWN TOP _ 912.73 1 RN W _ 907.00 RN S _ 907.00 12' RCP SAN NH _ INF. ' •19 ECINO16�6UULTX91 urns �T+ -• . ,==,Tr +`t •7.-r 1 t-r . ■rr t7 SAN MET 709_9 919_ 89 Co if - SON ENE IN 9079 SILT FENCE TOP NV 913 190 84 PROPO5ED BUILDIN5 915.50 PPR RIDS • ,2W TOP _ 906,0 919 W _ 903.50 INN E _ 90269 9 43 74 74 .24 1 UTILITY PLAN I ".20' ABBREVIATIONS BLDG 801 BM Berleh G5 Catch Bash Co Gloarnut GONG, Goncrehe ELEV Elavat4n EX. Existing PPE Phlshed Floor Elev. HOPE HIgh Dorsky Polystherr INV Invert MH Manhole RCP R.NNoreed Concrete P. TNH Top Nut of Hytrmt yTILrrf NOTES, PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS PROPERTY LINE - ••- •. -••- CONSTRUCTION LIMITS - - - - - -- > i ii STORM SEWER SANITARY SEINER )> CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE • WATER SERVICE I 1 I REDUCER L COORDINATE SERVILE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AT TI! 9.01.1200 WRIT TIE 04YAW86AL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION PILL EE ALLOWS; FOR UNCOORINNATED MORK . 2. PROTECT ALL 005f916 5TICA:TAES A/O manes PIIICII ARE NOT 8r4E7A.LED TO 6E 9844011E2. S. ALL EEPER NO MATER OR015EN65 SHALL NAVE A 41900404 VERTICAL 4EMRATION OF 2 PEST AND NORIZONTAL 01 84 1 80 7 . 1 06 .1 . 06 4 01 1. 4 . 4 84 44 . 75 0 59 01 84 75 95 11 1 50P011 6TAIDNm6. 4.441 WATER MAIN SMALL EE DUCTILE IRON PIPE CLASS 52. 5. ALL WATER WAIN DOLL NAVE TN OF COVER OVER TOP OP MFG 6. SANITARY SWIM PPIN6 SHALL R SDR 95 PVC 193.'•0 MEM On6.RN6G T. STORM SWI! PIPS* SHALL EE CLASS V RCP M6.ES! NOTED 0TNERP66 . Mr22 4=2 ALL, KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY❑ ON PLAN. 0 REMOVE EXISTI AND INSTALL 6-INCH BY 4-INCH REDUCER AND 41-INCH DIP 40 RIS AND 11414/5T MOCK. ❑3 INSTALL 4-INCH DIP 90 DE6REE BE3m WITH THRUST BLOCK ❑6 STUB NEW 4-INCH GLASS 52 DIP 5 PEET FROM BUILDING. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION WITH FR'GHANIGAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. Q POTHOLE AND VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION OF EX1511466 6-INCH SANITARY 5598411 571)5. CONNECT NEIN1 4 -14014 SANITARY 5E'3"ER TO EXXISTIN S 4-INCH SANITARY 5EPER WITH GLEAN OUT PER DETAIL 571)8 NEW 4-INCH 5DR55 PVC SANITARY SEAM 51116 5 PEET PROM 8ALDIN6 AT INVERT ELEVATION 40530. COORDINATE EXAG7 LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, POTHOLE AND DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION, INVERT ELEVATION, SIRE AND MATERIAL OF EXI5T1H6 STORM SEWER 504. 00145007 STORM SEMI! TO NEW CATCH 5A5IWMAN4OLE. ❑j 517.0 NEW 6-INCH SORBS PVC STORM SEWER 5-PEET PROM BUILDING AT INVERT ELEVATION 409)1. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT ELEVATION WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO START OP CONSTRUCTION. TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION STRUCTURE DIMENSION (INCHES) NEENAH CASTING TOP ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION PIPE LENGTH. DIAMETER, SLOPE is NEXT UPSTREAM STRUCTURE EX. CB /1 N/A N/A N/A EX. STUB 907.25 -5 LF. OF 12" RCP 0 1.0%. CB /2 CB /2 24" X 36" R -3067 911.60 E. 907.31 5 907.64 6 LF. OE 12" RCP 0 1.0X, CB #3 CB j3 24" X 36" R -3067 911.70 N. 907.70 EX. CB /4 N/A N/A N/A . EX. STUB 907.25 5 LF. OF 12" RCP 0 1.0X, CB 15 CB /5 24 ".X 36`. R -3067 912.55 NE. 907.44 NW. 908.11 50 LF. OF 6" SDR35 PVC 0 2.0x. BLDG CO /1 N/A N/A 915.5 907.0 (VERIFY) 32 LF. OF 4" PVC SDR35 0 2.05. 5' FROM BLDG. I " =20' 0 1 0 UTILITY PLAN ��I�oi� �III61� NORTH Tr a Woe IRMM TO WM. moo R▪ R 4INI 'x'01459) 9 J BACK OF axe AA6K O' ORB I. R16NT INN) *RATE 8HOM1 IN PLAN Vet 2. RCIIrORCED PRECAST omen= GAT0I GAIN neonates BNALL COWORM 7O ABTM 0478 STANDARDS. 24" X 36" CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE 3-- R R1 D�r 1 1 • ; : 1- 24Tal =1- 1=1 1 =- 1 11 =11 -11= . —1=11=11: SEWER CLEANOUT NOT TO SCALE . LOPE 54' PER FOOT TO FIN0ED SPADE EXTOO A66RE6A1E EASE A 14110481 OF 12. PROM 306E OP *UTTER OR MATCH ME ASORESATE 8118E OP APPROPRIATE PAVEMENT SECTION V2' R ALL PLAN DR8684010 ARE TO 1808 OP CURB /6' TO BACK OF CUM/ 8' BACK O' CURS V2' R ICI SLOPE 2 MIN. DEPTH A6614115ATE 888E COMPACTED TO 1005 5TANDMm PROCTOR DLN81x I. DIRECTION Or TRANSVERSE 6UTTER SLOPE 70 MAT011 DIRECTION or ADJACENT PAVEMENT SLOPE. 2. CONSTRUCT ORB AND SUTTER E. ACCORDANCE WITH MIDST SPECIFICATION 2E04 B6I2 CURB AND GUTTER NOT TO SCALE • LOAD FACTOR ID Et LOAD FACTOR IS 8 CLASS 0-1 NAND SHAPED FROM FIRM UDETUREED SOIL 36/4 SIR NOT L136 THAN 6' NORMAL ESODI88 COARSE FILLER 866836810 0400T SPEC. 81412 N mom/ spgrBO 2'l SIDE 0IAMETER 1r IN • O. /ANEW PIPE BEDDING POW 111 ,.\\,_ _. ,. k.P<V''r`::4r1?•_ . i ?1r Vii; "'r`'r.x,„ / : <,..0. A1• 1Ai1t j1 , -4, W i itIAS. 1:.,H. DENOTES COMM DIAMETER OP PIPE BARREL `d' DIAMETER. OP PIPE (-L..ASS 0-2 NAND SHAPED PROW ISRMULAII 8801286 MATERIAL COITAG1ED BA•PILL PVC 4 MOPE PIPE BEDDING IN 6000 501L5 TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING NOT TO SCALE 884088 COURSE PER 14812019121. TYPE NA BINDER COARSE PER 144/DOT 280. 710E 515 TACK GOAT PER MOOT 25513P RCUBRED) b A 505.81! HO08 GRPJ ED). PER /N/DOT DM COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100S STANOARD PROCTOR DEWY 11- 11 =1 =11 =1 =11=11=1 =Ii- 11.- 11. -lL SCAMPI. AND RECOM1P80r SLB5RADE TO AT LEAST 1005 STMDARD PROCTOR DE817Y- PROOF 8011 PER 1,41/VOT 31H LIGHT -DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE 1/2 • EXPANSION JOINT PV FULL STN JOINT FILLER. 60' 0L. TOO .70881 •DES K 6ONCCR' !HALL BE PEER REINFORCED RITN 2' LOINS POLYPROPYLENE FIBRILLATED PIM AS MANUFACTURED ST PONTA CORP. 4' CONCRETE PRANK 6' 6RAMAN BASE REM TO SRCIPICATON0 COMPACTED 5706RADE RSER TO SPBCPIGATION6 NOTE. THIS SIDEWALK DETAIL 15 TO SE U5® ADJACENT TO W ILAINS. ALL SIDES ALK REYOVED ADJACENT TO swan ow IX PER CITY 01 LINO LAKES STANDARDS AND SP0GINCATIONS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION (1YP.)' NOT. r0 SCALE MANHOLE STEPS SIN. SE PLACE/ 80 THAT M CORSET VERTICAL. PORTION OF CONE 8 PACN6 17014451REAM FOR ALL LINES 2P TO 86' DIAMETER. PLACE STEPS OI RENT 1ANO SIDE PEEN PACIN6 DOY/C1REAM POET AU. LEES 86' AND OAR SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR N ENAH • (ASTMS IIVORNM,1ION SECTION STORM SEWER MANHOLE • MEHMAN O' 2, MAXIMUM OP 4 CONCRETE. ADJUSTMENT RI888 MANHOLE STEPS. NENH RM51J OR !COAL. E' 04. A4)MNIN4 STEPS APPROVED. FIRM SEER RUNS 81RA16141. THROWN A STANDARD MANHOLE. THE TOP 1/1 OPINE PPE SHALL 88 BROKEN OUT AMEX COM'LENON REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS SMALL 6058O,R 41To A5174 C476 ASTLL J PAR 5 IN MANGLE TO NAVE b' IONS RNSBER BASKETS PPE MALIAN CHIT OUT PL181 WUN woe PAGE OP MALL 6ROUT BOTTOM OP MANHOLE TD 1/2 DIAMETER OP PUT AND SLOPE SPEW 2' TOWARD INVERT. MNMUM SLAB 7)44640805 6' FOR M. 140581)4.84080458111640880 P FOR EVBRY 4' OF DPm GREATER THAN 14% NOT TO SCALE . 8/6' 8733. PLATE AT TOP, SLOPE DON MILD ALL SIDES METAL SION ACCORDN6 7O MN STATE STATUTE 164346 PRIM LEBEIC AND SONDEM O~ ewe . FILLY 8587. GTORISC 8718644 6' 302' VAN ACLtl61LE S AN TO POST P ATLCAELE TS 4' X 4' X. 878 STEEL 725E, FILL W1114 GONGRETE AND PAINT SMCRE CONCRETE OCCURS AT SASE USE 7422' EXPANSION MATERIAL AID URETHANE CALK 10.1 SLOPE CONCRETE avows 4' LONE STUDS POD AT MATER POINTS 6' ON CORM CONCRETE BASE HANDICAPPED SIGN d POST PLACEMENT IN CONCRETE NOT TO SCALE 7) 2 CONCRETE SLAB NOT TO SCALE COMRACIION A I RECEIVED FEB 1 0 200:f CITY OF LINO LAKES CONTRACTION JaN1 ■ ELEVATION OF RAMP Y-4' MIN auee aR cLwe AID "I II? r4ita SECTION A -A 6' CONE. 8444.K L SURFACE TREATMENT SHALL CONSIST O' AN EXPOSED A66RE5A7E FINISH TIE A86RP8A10 SHALL MEET 7NE IE'87RE88TS OF 4411001 SPEC. 517 CLASS C CA-10 1401711.1132 712 IOr PASSER THE 1/2' SIEVE. USE OP AND EPDXY BODED A66RESATE SUPAGE PEER 2. RC MERE RANT AREA WILL SE OUTLINED P81)4 A COITRA0TON JOINT. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP FOR THE HANDICAPPED NOT TO SCALE NORTH m we temi, FIa 80017. VAMP 03)801 m5T rarr O z G3J° 4 0 J North SITE PLAN AI SCALE, I• • 20'-0• SITE PLAN NOTES .1 — Maa Oj 'maw LOT STRIPt15 COLOR TO SE 14161~ WHI1V OR 'Wert Truce, KMIOIGIPISO STALL PICTOGRAM =COE PEE LOCAL CODE, VERIFY. S@ SPECS DECORATIVE METH. PEACE © commie CURBIN5 IS 6• WOE NO 16' DEEP 5TRMeM PROPt.E will 6' EPOS® A50VE MOONS SWAGE O ACCESSIBLE PARKINS SINKAGE • SIOSIALK C> LANDSCAPE* TO BE ?• mak TO met LOCAL ORDEWICE O DECOOAiM PA110 MIMING O STNTE7 COME PATIO AMA. SE: SPED SITE PLAN LE6ENP ARKlN6 LOT LIGHT 06 SINSL.E LU6HT 060 DOUBLE UBHT • PATIO IJ6HT O TRASH CAN r 6' IWUNS W/ FATE Q PLANTQL SITE AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. NON - IMPERVIOUS AREA: 561,30 51. 6,972 5l. TOTAL LOT AREA 451;02 5I. ■ O M FOOT WHOLE LIVE. • M PROPERTY Lt! ALD O KEW 51TEPJ SITU. NOT EXCISED F.C. LINT POLE l•_ LA MAIM caw. pre. LIGHT POLE DETAIL AI 1 RECEIVED FEB 1 0 2003 1E11 CITY OF LINO LAK S'-T 4• -T T4 0 N 0 O� w eourRD P81 w GONG. 26' x21( xls• 5Tm. AN5L! PRAh0 FV DIAS. BRACE t 2x6 TRW PO. PT. TO MATCH EN'S. PROVIDE j•1 DOP85 5'116. 4 BRACKET • MME. 5/4'• HOLM IN SLAB POR LATCH. w IL POST it D v V. N4:0' PIPE COLLARD PART TO HATCH 5ASE OF dY.OR• M. TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN AI SCALE. 4'.P -O• FRISK 4R. MIL COPS16 W CONT. ICr1R OVER E ROVIG CEDAR SOW 2.46 TRW. PRAM* ETS TO MATCH SO6. EXMOOR SRADE PLYWOOD SWAMIS 166 111117. PONS • 46.OG NASOR1E PANE. PIT. TO NAM E•S 2Y6 TRID. WD. 511D • I6.OZ. MAX. 2x6 NETD. PO. SILL 0* .—e G. SLAB ON SPADE n TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL SECTION SCALE. NONE North SITE PLAN Ak..:111 SCALE, I' • 20'-0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL NOTES L LANDSCAPE CONTRACT/NE TO vENET ALL MTV LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY PITH TIE 6EERAL GOMRAGTO R AND 9Y CALMS 601161 STATE ONE EAU, PRIOR TO STAKING PLANT LOCATIONS. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY MTN 11C LATEST EDITION OF TIE MERMAN STANDARD FOR meat' STOOKG, MERGAN A5200IA11014 OF MMEECCPEL 5. CONTRACTOR E PEEPOR!!LE FOR ON-00146 M4IG4MNCE OF ALL MELT INSTALL 5 MATERIALS DAR. TIC 0P OER ACCEPTANCE. ANT ACTS Of VANDALISM OR DAMAGE MIMI MAY ' OCCLR PRIOR TO DICE ACCEPTMCY SHALL SE TIE I N ESPO MEILITY OF 146 GOITTAC 4. NO m.Aggr MAIZE& mammon RILL AGCE1.1E31 WTM0R' APPROVAL 8Y TIE 5. PROVIDE RAMC GRADE 1RBS 6. VORRANTT FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MALL MIN ON AEC DATE OF ACOE TAKE EY 11E T. CONTRAGIOR 9AALL 6UNUMES TEM 11.A1R MATE11A1 TIROIk11 ore CALEDAR TEAR • PROM TIE DATE Q DRIER ACCEPTANCE 1E114 ALL RE9.AGEPENTS TO EE MET ICED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO TIE GN4CIL A A LAiESCAPINE 446/5011014 PEE WALL EE PAD TO 11E CITY AT TIE TIC A SIL D6IS OR OVER MOST E E9!® FOR P_1VC TLT EE roe ON ME SATE PROPERTY' AS TIE LA DSGAPM6 VORIS AM AS A CONDITION TO THE ISWAICE W TIE PE@g1. 1. ROCK MOH W'M RIVER ROCK' riT.CCEC FEB 1 0 2003 err( OF L, NO LAKES PRE7R5 AREA MIL I NEE MIN or '� R00I6ALL n TREE INSTALLATION LI 17EGIDt1OUS TREE EALLED AND DURLAPPED SHRUB INSTALLATION LI DEGIDUOV5 OR CONIFEROUS 5IRUE PLANT SCHEDULE 614 CIT• TYPE SEE ROOT COMM NAIL LAM NAM! 6T . MOM= OVE STORY 2' ME SKN.NE NCtemocAIST ILEONSLA M AGANMOS SKTLIE' MP 2 OECD.= OVE STORY 2. BM ALmMI W AAm ICARS Acne A®AN s AMEN SLAB OE II O P G T O L O U I O Y E C S T O R Y 2. See • * MITE CAC GIEf46 9KAAR PP2 DSGIOUOIA OV7RSTCRY 7 545 MARSHALLS 5®L86 AEI MARLS PEf5TLVA1MGA'MARS ELLS !I.455 IM 40 TINE • 24' NSY. POT AMIA!$LE NYDRAN5EA IR0RAN65A AICORCSCEE'AMNe .LS' VL M sJNE 24' 16T. POT NANIYEERRY VIENEM VIEIMN4 LE TA60 W F V LQ �]e 1 • 6G241/10-MODIFIED NORTH RIR • aVIAle MIN qua MAN MEN 70 • x1°45 ODOM L___J DINING 1,803 s.f. KITCHEN 1,111 s.P. RESTROOMS 353 5.f. _l 1,;(1r..P FLOOR PLAN / EQUIPMENT PLAN \Z-1,1 5GALE. V4" r =.11 1 yvbo, GOOLE K -IN H REEZ =R H I RECEIVED FEB 1 0 2003 cry OF LINO LAKES n • iE � I . f a, ;thk r .,„:.i 7 d 40*J _J Q. W E el I- J z E. m a V< 2 E x O 3 Wf n Y- e J NORTH , „ .71. Z ii; N0. r2 A2° 2 0 0 r r (Th EAST ELEVATION T. l :saes off o smomummmuummiiiieuusimmol AS.I SCALE: I/4" - I'-O'' EXMOOR ELEVATION NOTi5 OSUUA,® STONE. SUPPLE!. MIKAN STONE, INC SME, LIS. STO6103Q4 MpNTAN STACK MT MATIONS SILL OAPs • POPO MA rims SYSiEN U M WLP AG TMC6 DRY aT COLOR. NUS AW WLLO Tf6TE MI: SAD MILE tZRAMC TILE SIPFLIE6 MARK EPRMONS STYLE WOMEN LE6RRS m'xm• COLOR. AMR GROUT. ?NAPE' M4 STRAIT O CAP MARINER, OVEIROW . SOPE COLOR. I64A'CLAD, 24 mA. N14241 MONK MBAR 500 OMETAL PNEL. MMRIFACTU1E5. AL.E•OUC WALE& WORM PRODWTS. NG COLOR. PRISMATIC R® GI TOTAL PNEL SUPPLER. 10-P01 4 PROD C.T% NC COLOR. DNbCLAD, 24 6A. BLACK PNBK KTRAR SOO • TOTAL PNE. SUPPLER. R4PORM PRODDGTBI 6Y. COLOR. 3RMCi AP. D40 ANDD= Ault P55e14 CLEAR SATIN OTOTAL PALE, WMIPACIIRERs AL.POLK. SPRIEN. *WORM PRODUCTS 110 COWL ~AMR BLUE PAE5RNA CANOPY. MA6PAORMIL AMP CMIORI WPM. PERM COASIDE PLUS COLOR. *3776 MO PRAMS F S3 AM 11E . CLEW SAM FMEI VELD ALL JDOITS OPI DOF'I PRAM MANPACT1mi. CM ARCMTC.TLRAL PRODUCTS. RC PIDNb 000554 -535 COLOR. 143N54 -1f2' CLENe AROD ALIN PNEK SATIN &LAZRl6. CLEAR DOIRE RELATED PROVIDE 5LDPW PRA! COVER • DRIVE1M5I FRAtS O5LL CA* 2 CLLVS MOO= ALUMNA, SATN P111154 ODRIVE -T IW WNVOM, WIMPY OFE IRS SITE PITH MR PRIOR TO FABRLGATON or PRASE N NEON ((� E.BYa. N SID BIM 00.01. VOLT NZ MN= FA 0.06.6 (08 510N AT RADIUS STOREROOM E'RCA D5 POR SOU MO161T110 AT =DM FLAIR, COORORNATC W 5101 INSTAL= aQ winos uses mum Set EL EC O law two O41C4' emuss AMA STASLE36 ST'S OMM. DOOR I PRAM PANT TITTS R6SS PARRY .516• CCM PMTS O17 M66N RACK ANODI>?9 ALIM ADORES meets ,ILL Z 0 lU 0 iu ILI W V 1 V d I 01 4 w Xi gi 14 NORTH . Zordilart ._3 J WE PIM W41EET ND. T A3 z a k. <•,: '•fit•.. T. l :saes off o smomummmuummiiiieuusimmol AS.I SCALE: I/4" - I'-O'' EXMOOR ELEVATION NOTi5 OSUUA,® STONE. SUPPLE!. MIKAN STONE, INC SME, LIS. STO6103Q4 MpNTAN STACK MT MATIONS SILL OAPs • POPO MA rims SYSiEN U M WLP AG TMC6 DRY aT COLOR. NUS AW WLLO Tf6TE MI: SAD MILE tZRAMC TILE SIPFLIE6 MARK EPRMONS STYLE WOMEN LE6RRS m'xm• COLOR. AMR GROUT. ?NAPE' M4 STRAIT O CAP MARINER, OVEIROW . SOPE COLOR. I64A'CLAD, 24 mA. N14241 MONK MBAR 500 OMETAL PNEL. MMRIFACTU1E5. AL.E•OUC WALE& WORM PRODWTS. NG COLOR. PRISMATIC R® GI TOTAL PNEL SUPPLER. 10-P01 4 PROD C.T% NC COLOR. DNbCLAD, 24 6A. BLACK PNBK KTRAR SOO • TOTAL PNE. SUPPLER. R4PORM PRODDGTBI 6Y. COLOR. 3RMCi AP. D40 ANDD= Ault P55e14 CLEAR SATIN OTOTAL PALE, WMIPACIIRERs AL.POLK. SPRIEN. *WORM PRODUCTS 110 COWL ~AMR BLUE PAE5RNA CANOPY. MA6PAORMIL AMP CMIORI WPM. PERM COASIDE PLUS COLOR. *3776 MO PRAMS F S3 AM 11E . CLEW SAM FMEI VELD ALL JDOITS OPI DOF'I PRAM MANPACT1mi. CM ARCMTC.TLRAL PRODUCTS. RC PIDNb 000554 -535 COLOR. 143N54 -1f2' CLENe AROD ALIN PNEK SATIN &LAZRl6. CLEAR DOIRE RELATED PROVIDE 5LDPW PRA! COVER • DRIVE1M5I FRAtS O5LL CA* 2 CLLVS MOO= ALUMNA, SATN P111154 ODRIVE -T IW WNVOM, WIMPY OFE IRS SITE PITH MR PRIOR TO FABRLGATON or PRASE N NEON ((� E.BYa. N SID BIM 00.01. VOLT NZ MN= FA 0.06.6 (08 510N AT RADIUS STOREROOM E'RCA D5 POR SOU MO161T110 AT =DM FLAIR, COORORNATC W 5101 INSTAL= aQ winos uses mum Set EL EC O law two O41C4' emuss AMA STASLE36 ST'S OMM. DOOR I PRAM PANT TITTS R6SS PARRY .516• CCM PMTS O17 M66N RACK ANODI>?9 ALIM ADORES meets ,ILL Z 0 lU 0 iu ILI W V 1 V d I 01 4 w Xi gi 14 NORTH . Zordilart ._3 J WE PIM W41EET ND. T A3 z a • L illallIM111111•1 -- MEMIUMI n WEST ELEVATION .2.2 SCALE. I/4• - NORTH ELEVATION A52 SCALE: 1/4" - I' -0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTE5 OSIMLAT795TOI6 KR UM IgNMS MTOE DIG . SRrib LIR 5701e-TLfe59E MOINRAN STACK IV MATCHES S01 CAPS • ME Oex1E5aR maw= PIN& Sf51E4 _ ' DIMPAC RDE 5RY•+VIT =OIL 4E IWARI LO PER1E PRIM SAW MILE Me OCERAMIC TILE 54TPLE4 GERAMIf. 03I106IOI6 • 146017 -x•96 Ma /CRIME LEE 69m' COLOR. MICE MGM 'MME' M4 ERNE OGAP PLASHES, ONAO'lOV4 SOIPPEI4 G0 . ION -GLAD, 24 RJR 5454010 PDW6 KY141R 30O O1eTAL PATE, • MMIPACIIMER.PGI.IG SWUM 1H -POI•I FRO00015 DG GOLOR: PR5MATIG 140 OMRN. PATE, EMIR M14•0104 PRCLOGTSI DC C0.0IL IRIAOLAD. 24 6A, SLACK PESO 1011AR 500 OMRM PINE. SWUM 104.0164 mom DC COLOR, IRI•GIM, 040 ANO017ED Nut EWE CLEM SATE OORAL PAWL. MM,PA IIPER, ALPOLIG &P. NFPORM PROMOS, NO Gage 141104101 DUE • OPAM GA1GP6 VAMPAGTIAIM AVIV. CAMPY SMe, MELON COMICS! PLUS COLOR, 0176 DEFT I® E'RAM' r 361. MW 5&, CLEM SATE! MEN IE.D ALL .54555 OC PRIOOI PRAM, • MNEPAf,11R®S 04 ARCRIMO RAH. MUM N ECM 11wo-6544140 GAOR. 1-6/4`444/2' DIED R NHOD MW PDWL SATIN SLAM& GLIDAR DOME mama PROVIDE SLOPED PRAM DOVER • DNVE -TNU PR ©SILL GA?, r CLEAR ANODMISP NuEIM RATS PION O1OVE -TIRE VEVIEW OP0190196110 M 310 171E Df1R PRIOR 154 m PAORIGATION OP EWE OMON (NE ErO% SIZE 0 4 - COWL wo-ELIe YOmoue* ma 6114 AT RA061mI 5 SINIEN PROVIDE PAR 5614 MOIRITN6 AT EpA46 PLANE, GOOR011itOR EV SON INSTALLER O maim wor rte a n.aa O MOUE SATE - D TADS O GDH6ER WAND' 6 4X4' NWT STADLE56 SIM O14,17001 W M.PRN MDR DR TITT5EN6N PANS• UI6 5054E 1 4iS .0 Ir /614 E.a K ■CDID9 ALM mm4S5R5 6629/I0- MODIFIED- GRILL NORTH • 61411/2• SNNMA65 AT VOSTOLLIS 546StI' -S• (NOMINAL) PAINT nom LO60 (LIJM) SCUT. (•ROPI LJJ • 5340 SOPT. (61LTANMLAR) • 46.10 seaaaQrkoQa) 211. MIN 10X NLLMJ 501T. (,mrLS) • 2400 50PT. 6QCTAN61LAR1 • 2.114 a A DAIRY WWI L000 (1104) Darr. (FlTOPIAL .• 4614 Darr. (IZTANYL.W • 6550 • STaQQ CAM 52. 54644 500 4411)41 .OPT. I1,140rI.5) • 4020 SOM. (006TANSILAR) • tir MI. ! ' PROMO BOARD LOFT. (RO 1L5) • 1414 Darr. (QrirA4NLLAR) • 500 n SUILPING SIGNAGE 3S 9GALE. VY • r -o 1 50' X IT 11OAOR 00. NALNM) IUMT. (IROrLL.S) • 24460 I0rT. OTNOTANOLAN) • 2500 tr X sr P.T. MEW IXIMCD 66A 50. PT. (6LLIMATNI ) SNIN//S AT YINITI AJS 56•x1P-T LANNY a6a1 Lobo (UM/ 521T. ('ROFlI.1) • 55)0 • IGrr. (RITTANILAV • 46.10 ,seamenilaa' 211. SINN PDX NLM) *APT. )PROr1L5) • 2.1.01, NWT. (RL'C.TAWLAR) • 2,14 64' E WHAM AT CNN! NM/ 0 MAR 644)464?. 41+1'516. (NOMINAL DART MINN Low (..UM/ Darr. U'R01 IL5) • 1414 SCUT. (Q6TAN61LAR) • 2714 9-5• syllaaaCIE: F N• DAM/ 005 (11)54) 5art. & 0PILM) • rr21 scum RGTAN/U AX) • 11a4 5I6NA6E TOTAL - RECTANGULAR LOGO'S • 161.2* BOX 516445 • 1059* BLDG. EYEBROW • 36.4* PROMO BOARD (15.0* x 6) • q0.0* TOTAL • 401.1* 516NA6E TOTAL - PROFILE L0605, • 116.1* BOX 516N5 • 403.6* BLDG. EYEBROW • 36.4* PROMO BOARD (14.64 x 6) • 61.64 TOTAL • 54634 OBI IA• 56• X54• r60VIB7 WAND d6 SG. PT. (5.444NA1501 16'x29 ,./1'X25' DMEcTN D614OT0NAL PION• 2.0 .0 5 a. PT SIGN• 11, 50. rr. (IJJMINATED) P N 9) 1L6INA71 5 2V• IEo PYLON SIGN n SITE SIGNAGE 3 WALE. V1• • 1•-O- DIRECTIONAL 5IGN D REGTIONAL SIGN DRIVE THRU MENU BOARD PRE -VIEW MENU BOARD RECEIVED FEB 1 0 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES (1 4- 45 rE 6629/I0- MODIFIED SI6NA6E MATRI 0 K 1111/1 1 N " - 1 ii PLANE , PARKING LOT RE CElvEI FEB 1 0 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES POINT SPACING POINT SPACING LEFT -T- -RIGHT = 8 ft LOWER LEFTHAND CORNER OF PLANE, X = 599 Y= 1400 Z = 0 "- UPPER RIGHTHAND CORNER OF PLANE, ! -p - jiI$II,�� X =802 Y = 1626 Z =0 LIGHT METER IS NORMAL TO PLANE AVERAGE fc = 2. B9 MINIMUM fc .74 III MAXIMUM fc - 5. 48 AVERAGE /MINIMUM 3.91 _ - --- ---- -- n T O I ry E in N �y Z % °" `® "' "" 4. `. Na >m ... as ... .« .•_ MAXIMUM /MINIMUM = 7.41 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS = 410 PROPERTY LINE CALCULATION ... .« ... ... .„ .., .., ... c. j 1--1 Q W Q J . 1134 ,� AVERAGE fc = ~43 M MAXIMUM fc = 1. 19 MINIMUM fc = .07 AVERAGE /MINIMUM = 6.14 MAXIMUM /MINIMUM ■ 17 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS = 107 - HUBBELL LIGHTING MAGNUSOUARE SERIES - TYPE PA C /O, - (21 MSV- A400H- FPX- 1A4 /SSP- 5256- C2 -M51 • TYPE PB C /O, - MSV- A400H- FPX- 1A4- HS /SSP- 5256- A2 -M51 ALONG DRIVE THROUGH, - SINGLE 400 WATT VERTICAL BURN FULL CUTOFF FIXTURE WITH HOUSE SIDE SHIELD MTD. AT 26' ABOVE GRADE PARKING LOT, SHIW 400 WATT VERTICAL OVEN FULL CUTOFF FIXTURE SHOWN. MOUNTED AT 26' ABOVE GRADE 132 u. >s w DM a w US w w w W 3a7 to 231 NO PB APOLLO DRIVE Uc Ma w tae 131 iia .w,: 1 1M L'• 1A aU a41 - '•••�•�' BM so o sae 1N nA ma sw aA a n w as as N4 Na an v m elf MN OM jiminaiaLisi an au ea an an us 227 4\ IN u zs — • Q 13 o ■ • I/ r ■ ��� �� �EI g g 9 6J k. 1? I d4n7e pi8 B�' 41 • EeiI ik ,.� � �° • V — = ---- - - - -- -- - -- - -� - / eo pa `■ '•:•.• <»;'+• ;•'::-a• >., +.•,.,• _� . 4 +•' `• •• ` •4 .' •, _ �� '•' "'a ` - __ - ,. Qi4,� 111 AM MO - , ■ '- au an '° 4s •' 1A '+' w ' • •1a an '"' 42 as MI �� NI, a Air: aw aw - t. i� ao aN La r 314 - sA •a w .v an •' eu u ao Ne 1 ,I r ,n .. se rI� 4a 4A m aA 2.11 an as av 13e aaa m we w ae WI ax at as am u 414 aL■ 4111 4 1 41 ea an an au an w as m m ■ _ m a■ 122 ao 4a _ 141 177 - as w al an QM I* g ■ 4E11 he ell 412 42 42 1Y 4N a» 441 01 1A A! aA Mt s 3111 an W 116 atl 132 172 aA W :r 112 402 m • a 4• 4111 4N 4.11 Me w 3m 431 N _ aA 424 MI w 22 Ne 1N M3 1A Ya MS 120 MI 3m 177 N NM 1ee 141 aN .. —nrol a» 219 �� 4.. 44' 1A 144 .m 1A Y4 A >n 4.37 233 a an 4.15 w 193 321 as 3777 a * » Q A n 1A as 171 10 aN 1A M3 14a a• - 6G241/10-MODIFIED- GRILL 4 GHILL Pi- 4OTOMETRIG PLAN L,lI V J X W itill Z •••••• • an 312 3.10 351 an 411 1 147 311 7.1. 143 a= e.• 4« .4. Olt aA 111 ail Na Mt aN 2.44 M1 en an W 2.11 Mt 641 aU LP 17e to an tae aA eN O» 4N W M4 SIN la BA 1.41 US W In Ln 1a Las W 112 M U. 175 Na US LA sn . UM 1111 ka W a.1i Mt IN Nl an . u NORTH MR O1 TM' "JJ ��T�. [JOB N0. 02-061 IVID'CTR JLCTTRACKIN SHEE CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT #: 21 -14 Target PROJECT: Target /Site Plan Review /Variance Request DATE OF ORIGIN: 4/25/01 TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: Information from previous meetings PROJECT #: 2000 -1c... PROJECT: NE/Quad/DelwoodLLC DATE OF ORIGIN: 11/21/00 TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: • Discussions of this area started in May of 1998. Records attached. • Site Proposal includes large retail and several smaller retail stores. IlapKO_& PzpeaziovBoapS Xtzl 1zvo Aarea There have been several meetings with the project representatives. General overview to be given by Brian Wessel STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: • Surface water treatment imperative • Information from the Environmental Inventory, specific site inventory and recommendations from AES, Tree Inventory from previous development proposal, as well as specific modals on surface water treatment, and information on structural soil use has been given to the developers. • Streetscape design and alternative transportation access need to be effective. Very expensive commercial property Developer has hired a reputable environmental consultant as part of their team. Attraction of "Green Industry" Greenway design Environmental Issues: The following identifies potential impacts to Environment. • large impervious surface/Lake water quality impact concerns. Oak- woodland to south and miscellaneous recently developed tree areas to north. Several prairie and savanna areas previously identified by AES on freeway side. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCES: Refer to the following references for information that may affect discussions related to this issue. Section 2 - Assessment of Needs • Completed by Brauer AES and presently being studied by consultants. Section 3 - Governing Polices •Creating a sustainable landscape requires a broader view that starts with the big picture or vision and moves into a physical plan and set of action steps to achieve that vision. The 20/20 Vision Plan established the philosophical vision for the community that was the starting point for this study. Public response to the study clearly reiterates the ideals defined in the 20/20 plan, which are as follows: "Sustenance of the natural environment of Lino Lakes through the I7aplccr_& _PeZpearcov _Boapii_ Xin_O¢ittvo_Aarcecr protection and management of the wildlife, habitats, and other natural resources, and to pass on to future residents a community rich in these lair— es re sd op to is f � c equa consideration o� ecort, o Section 5 - Administration • Adopt a conservation development approach to planning as the working model for community development. Example was established with the construction of the Civic Complex. _Ilinvironmental Board Update 21- lc/February 28, 2001 II have attached the Draft EAW and photos depicting some of the issues. 1 have also included some of my =tall reaction to the draft EAW. There is no further information at this time. Brian Wessel will be present to update you on anything new.' DATE CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES : January 3, 2001 (December meeting) A. Dellwood LLC/ N.E. Quadrant of 35W and Lake Drive Update — Wessel explained that Mr. Payton had presented this project at the last meeting. Since then, the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council have discussed it. A neighborhood meeting has been held. The project is going through the informal discussion process prior to a formal application. He then introduced Mr. Payton and Mr. Palmquist the Vice President of Research and Development of Ryan Companies who was working on the SuperTarget concept. Mr. Palmquist explained that recently, there had been a neighborhood meeting where the primary challenge to the project was addressing the traffic needs. TKDA and Mr. Powell were dealing with the issue. The Environmental Board was assured that the traffic could be managed with lanes and signals. Also discussed, was adequate buffering on the northern part of the property. He noted an EAW would be done which would be finished in the first part of July. Mr. Payton presented several maps and explained that the fmal topographic survey has been completed so more of the spatial relationships have come together. He indicated that there was a small group of tamarack trees, which could be protected by a retaining wall in the west. Asleson explained that the area has been disturbed more than once. He noted a 1953 topographic map that showed tamaracks throughout the area. The freeway went through in the 1960's and greatly impacted the tamaracks: Donlin inquired what plans Target had to address the tamarack trees in the area. Mr. Payton answered that the standing water is only intermittent for 48 hours in a 100 -year event. He noted that there is an aquatic bench planned, with canary grass plantings to reduce the presence of geese. He continued, they were waiting for the results of the soil reports to 17ap,ccr &_e%pearzov _BoapL Xzrz_oO_.Azvo_lazcea determine the size of the ponds. The maps presented showed them at the maximum possible size, but in all probability they would shrink. Target representatives were preparing to submit the plan to the City by January 15'". Mr. Palmquist stated that they were working with staff on the site design and architecture using prototypes on the elevations of the Target site. Describing the site, they were planning some articulations, bench plaza areas, and various plantings in front of the store. There are also planned bays in 20 -foot increments. The whole project would be of similar colors and materials. He continued there would be two doors, with the employee entrance in the center. As is typical, the eastern part would be the grocery, while the western part would hold the discount store. There are plans to screen the truck docking, and to bury the utility lines so that more plantings could be located there. He assured the Board that they would have the elevations available next time. Trehus indicated the land in the southern entryway that the City owns was mentioned last time, and inquired what were the plans for the property adjacent to it. Mr. Palmquist answered that there would be no grading in the area, and there were plans for a retaining wall to protect the trees. The specifics would be answered when the tree survey is overlaid with the aerial photograph. Trehus pointed out that it looked like a lot of parking and no trees, and suggested that a shift to the west may enable them to make it appear more nestled among the trees. Mr. Payton stated that the building was pushed as far to the west as possible within the required parameters because of site geometry problems. Mr. Palmquist note that there were stall groupings of 68, 644, and 910 parking spaces, and indicated that the users could share parking. Donlin mentioned that it did not appear aesthetic, and advised that vegetation, billboards, signage, and lighting would need to be addressed more specifically. Mr. Palmquist responded that there were no billboard requirements, and the lighting would be explained further in the plan. Donlin inquired about the role the Environmental Board would play. Mr. Payton answered that they wanted to know their recommendations. Wessel added that the proposal will be available at the January 31, 2001 meeting, and assured the Board that there were several open issues remaining. DonIin commented that it appeared the typical standards that Target was used to implementing were played out in this plan concerning lighting and signage. Mr. Palmquist answered that there were many parties' interests to balance, that of the City, the community, the developer, and Target which can be met to provide goods and services and civic pride. Mach advised that environmentally speaking specific recommendations include: • Increase the number of native trees in groupings not standing alone and decrease the number of parking places. • Smaller form of Target, not Superstore. • Location not so near the highway. • Ponds should be fruitful; the water levels need to be controlled so that they could sustain diverse life. • The City needed to set land aside designated as open space for every development approved. Mr. Payton asked if this project would be used merely to change zoning, ordinances, and laws. Trehus assured him that Target would be welcome in the community, then inquired about the percentage of impervious surfaces. Mr. Payton stated that if a Target would be on site it would be a Superstore, because that is the primary means of expansion. Other regional locations would be Rochester, MN, Rogers, MN, Lakeville, MN, and Eau Claire, WI. The reason given was economic, because it increased the store's bottom line by 50 %. Mr. Palmquist stated that at the neighborhood meeting, 135 to 140 invitations were sent out with 36 residents in 17apxa_& _Pezpsanov _BoapL Xtrt_Oilrvo_ Awcecr attendance. There was no opposition. He noted that the land was zoned commercial. Donlin commented that Vadnais Heights' residents protested Target with signs in their yards, and questioned the reason there was no opposition in Lino Lakes. Mr. Payton inquired, short of no development, what accommodations Target could make. Asleson noted that growing larger trees would be possible through the use of structural soils. Donlin offered that the wetlands needed to be more than a monoculture. Trehus added that the areas in the west needed to be preserved. O'Connell suggested bringing the building south and changing the configurations to make the building more narrow to allow for more parking on the side. Mr. Payton indicated that people did not use side parking, and restated that the size and shape of the building are configurations that will not change. Mach asked about the possibility of removing a couple of the retail sites. Mr. Payton answered that Target needs a certain number of retailers and square footage to attract customers. He continued that there would be issues on Lake Drive even if Target would not be present, and Target would provide the funding and the tax base to initiate the upgrades needed. Mr. Palmquist assured the Board that the project would be worked out with staff. Donlin indicated that with each development, residents' taxes have increased so the businesses should have to pay more. Wessel answered that Target would pay over one million dollars annually for taxes. The area was zoned commercial, and would provide tax relief for residents. He indicated that Powell could also address the issue. Wessel excused himself to bring Powell to the meeting at 8:48 p.m. Donlin addressed the lighting, and stated that there should be an attempt to minimize the glare. She expressed her dislike for the cream color chosen for the building. Mach urged the Target representatives to use their services to improve other areas of the City. Mr. Palmquist offered that if some wetlands were affected by the project, Target could contribute money for preserving trees or wetlands in the City. Donlin noted that there were three school districts in the City, and submitted that Target could contribute money for environmental education, specifically the Teachers of Vision program. Mr. Palmquist stated that the contribution would flow from a financial model. Donlin stated that there would be a need for upland and wetland mitigation. Wessel stated that the discussion would continue and the specific recommendations from the Environmental Board were helpful. He indicated that the City Council would ultimately make the decision. Asleson stated the question was how to mitigate environmental impact. Mach reiterated: • Move the building to the west • Avoid monoculture in the ponds • Reduce bounce in the ponds • Decrease the number of parking spaces and increase plantlife Kukonen explained that one way to increase the plantlife would be through buffering. Mr. Palmquist asked if a model existed, so they could work from that and put it into an economic model. 17apxa_&_°eepeanov_BoapfL XirLolulzvo Acacea Donlin requested that minimal lighting be used, especially at night. Trehus agreed and asked if the lights would be turned off at night. Donlin inquired if the 38 -foot pole height was necessary, or if it could be reduced. Mr. Palmquist stated that if the pole height was reduced, there would be an increase in the number of lights. The Board was assured that the lights would be shoebox lights, to aim the light down, not out. Mr. Payton noted that in the site plan, the nighttime team leader would have all the lights off, except for a corridor of lights for the employees. After the employees left, all lights would be turned off except for security lights. Trehus said that there should be a vote on the recommendations that include the following as well as the recommendations previously stated by Mach: • Set aside property off site for open space. • Lighting issues were a major concern. • Maximize the green in groupings, rather than in straight lines. Mach moved to approve the recommendations of the Environmental Board. Trehus seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : January 31, 2001 PROJECT REVIEW A. Ryan/Target Project Submittal (Item 1 -01) — Asleson explained that the green sheet was to help recall previous information relevant to present discussion. There was no green sheet given for this item, because a formal submittal had been received. Asleson read the background section of the agenda sheet item 1 -01. Several plans have been submitted including formal project submittal, a grading plan, a tree inventory and preservation/restoration plan, surface water infiltration proposals, a landscape plan, and a lighting plan. No response from the Rice Creek Watershed District has been received. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) still needed to be completed and the wetland mitigation area is still yet to be determined. Asleson asked for comments or recommendations from the Board. Chair Lanyon stated that the Board did not know the recommendations the Watershed District had discussed. The tree inventory was the most important concern for the Board, specifically where the tamarack trees would be planted. Grundhofer asked if the size of the trees had been determined. Asleson answered that the trees would be two inches in diameter. Chair Lanyon noted that until the Board had comments and or recommendations from the Watershed District the Board could not make any recommendations. Asleson confirmed that no comments were received in his office from the Watershed District. Ilap ar & PLzpwariov_BoapL Xtrc_o��livo_llaxsQ Chair Lanyon pointed out that other species had encroached in the area. Asleson addressed the surface water flow, stating concerns about the efficiency of installed infiltration tubes in the low area before it leaves the site. Donlin inquired about the preparation of the area, if they were going to grade and drill. Asleson asked John Johnson if he could make some general comments about the subject. John Johnson, Civil Engineer, stated that the infiltration tubes were typically 15'x 2'x 3' and worked like a drain field in situations where there was above normal rain and below 100 year rain. The concern was that the ponds would not work as well over time, because of build up of sediment. The infiltration tubes are installed by building trenches with a backhoe, then covering them up. Donlin admitted that she had reservations with the tamarack plantings, if the cottonwood and the aspen were removed and the tamarack did not do well, it would be barren. She commented on the beauty of the cottonwood and aspen which were planned for removal. Asleson noted that the present state of the area was impacted, with most of the tamarack trees gone after 1967 when the highway was put in. This was an attempt to bring it closer to its original state prior to 1967. Donlin said that by removing the aspen and cottonwood 70% of the significant trees on site would be removed. She feared that if the tamarack plantings were unsuccessful, the area would remain essentially treeless. Asleson stated that the tamaracks were in a wet meadow before the highway went through. Chair Lanyon asked if the Board could make a recommendation not knowing the water impact. Mach stated that a restoration of the tamarack theme could be recommended, because aspen would probably encroach fairly quickly, and tamaracks grow more slowly than cottonwoods and aspen. Asleson noted that the Watershed District would probably not recommend the infiltration tubes. Grundhofer inquired on the lighting of the pylons, if they met the code standards. O'Connell mentioned that there was no reference to color in the ordinance. Asleson indicated the lights were high intensity in the center, but were quickly reduced to reduce glare. Chair Lanyon offered that there had not been a response to the recommendations of the Board at the January 3, 2001 meeting, and added the necessity of hearing from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Donlin agreed and asked if their responses to the recommendations would be at the next meeting, in addition to the proposed choices of vegetation. Asleson indicated that the architect had called to ask for the list of recommended plantings. Donlin urged that the plantings consist of those that would attract bird species, and have several textures and colors including prairie gardens, would soften the big box appearance. fIapKr_&_Pexpearrov _Boap5_ XirLo ,tivo_Aarcev Asleson noted that there were several lists, and assured the Board that the Ryan/Target representatives would receive them. Donlin indicated that the Board members would like the lists to be sent to them by E -Mail. CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : February 28, 2001 PROJECT REVIEW A. Ryan/Target Project Submittal (Item 1 -01) — Wessel stated the application was incomplete and Ryan has asked for a respite. He advised that a staff review of the plan would be held the following day and the process would need to be renegotiated and the regulatory process reinitiated. The new plan was to be smaller scale and they still wished to break ground in July. At present the plan would be revised by April, with the Environmental Board reviewing it at the March meeting. The response from the community caused Target to drop the proposed three large commercial sites to the West. The Target building would be moved over to the West of the initial site. There would be six to eight smaller commercial sites with three to eight thousand square feet each. The wetland would be left alone, and a strip north of 77th Street would remain undeveloped. Wessel asked for comments on where to mitigate. Trehus arrived at 6:40 p.m. Donlin asked the number of parking spaces proposed, and was the swamp to remain untouched. Wessel answered the number of parking spaces would be reduced, but he was unclear by the number and did not know the plans concerning the area of the swamp. Donlin asked if the plan proposed in March would be considered finished and approved. Wessel responded typically a project similar in scope would require a year to go through the planning stage, but for this project, it is a few months. Chair Lanyon stated that they already know what to expect from the Board, but the Board could give additional comments. Wessel noted if the project did not break ground in July, the project would be discontinued. Asleson mentioned that the building was moved over and the number of parking spaces was reduced. Mach indicated that the plot was not protected and secure, and asked about the hydrology issues. Asleson explained the hydrological issues were unknown, but the Watershed District was dealing with them. Ilapxa_ & _Pezpsanov _Boap&_ XtrLo¢_AtvollaxCQ Kukonen questioned if the business failed in the proposed location, what were their plans for the site, would the building be abandoned. Wessel answered the market studies were important to Target since SuperTarget would compete with other nearby commercial sites. Trehus asked what was the responsibility of the City if the site was abandoned. Wessel noted there were two more meetings on the Comprehensive Plan before the end of March. Donlin asked what the meeting scheduled for Saturday was dealing with. Wessel responded the meeting would address the Comprehensive Plan in the City Council meeting. CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : March 28, 2001 PROJECT REVIEW A. Ryan/Target Update Review — Brian Wessel commented on the changes to the plan. The three 30,000 sq. ft. boxes were removed. The access remained the same with no access to 77th Street. The present conceptual plan was presented three weeks ago, and will not have an official plan until April 25, 2001. The plan included 86,000 -sq. ft. with potential to expand, and off site mitigation similar to the first plan. There was a meeting scheduled for Tuesday for staff review. Donlin noted the plan appeared essentially impervious, and considered the revised plan a step backward in terms of the goals of the Environmental Board. Chair Lanyon pointed out that there were enough accommodations in Phase II to gain support. He urged staff to address the runoff issues before the plans come to the Board. Wessel indicated there had been a change in the groundbreaking from July to September. Donlin expressed concern over the heavy traffic, which would be necessary to support a large Target store. Wessel assured the Board that the two co- anchors believed it was economically feasible. Donlin questioned if there was inadequate support and a loss occurred, would the building be abandoned. Wessel responded that not many Target buildings had been abandoned. Kukonen noted the store in southern Coon Rapids had been abandoned, and inquired if it was a terrible burden to the city of Coon Rapids. Wessel answered that Target had the most solid record of the big box stores. Chair Lanyon identified the role of the Board was the environmental focus, and in that Ryan/Target had backtracked, especially with the runoff mitigation issues. Mach noted the off site mitigation which was proposed in the plan. The first priority is supposed to Ilapxa_ &PezpsanovBoap&. Xrn. oLlrvo_laKeo be on site mitigation, then off site mitigation. He then asked about the options they were considering. Wessel responded the County Board was discussing the options, but nothing was decided. Trehus asked for information concerning mitigation on existing park land. Chair Lanyon agreed that they needed to clarify that option. t New site plan and application submitted. t No new EAW information t No new watershed information ie.wetland mitigation plan, surface water plan • No petition for public improvements submitted yet. STAFF COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: t Surface Water issue is still a very critical issue. Proposal shows a wet pond on the North side. There is no information at this time whether sequencing criteria will be met for proposed project, wetland mitigation, surface water management planning will be met. Have requested the developer investigate vegetated depressional areas through the parking lots. tt Grading on the project should direct water to infiltration areas • Have made a sugestion that the 6 foot walkway be changed to a vegetated infiltration area. This should be tiled to allow for excess water to pass on to the next sequential infiltration area t Lighting has not changed except for a change to less spill on the north Environmental ISSUES: tiE See attached reports ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments made by the Environmental Board: 17apxcr_&_Pezpeartov _Boap5_ Xirzo ltvo_Aareso- ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION /POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was reached by the Board: INAL VOTE COUNT: Board Member Yes No FINAL VOTE DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments made by the Board: • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION /POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was reached by the Board: FINAL VOTE COUNT: Board Member Yes No FINAL VOTE DATE: Planning and Zoning BOARD ACTION CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES C. Dellwood LLC Mr. Smyser stated they were still talking with them and were expecting a packet possibly next week. So far discussions had been largely positive. However, there had been some concerns with the Environmental Board. FJapKo &Jezpsariov_BoapL Xcr_o livallarceo- 10 CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES B. PUBLIC HEARING, Ryan Companies US, Inc. (Target) Lake Drive, PDO Rezone, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use & Site Plan Review. Chair Schaps declared the public hearing opened at 6:44 p.m. Staff presented the application by explaining staff had been working with Ryan Companies, US Inc. on a proposed retail development located in the northeast quadrant of Lake Drive/I -35W Interchange. The main issue raised by staff and discussed by the City Council and Planning and Zoning Board related to the site layout and design and the departure from the Town Center vision. The direction provided through the concept process was to incorporate special pedestrian- oriented design features, as well as some special architectural elements into the proposal with the goal being an "above average shopping center ". Staff presented its analysis of the request, noting the site was currently zoned SC, Shopping Center District. This designation anticipated the development of a single center generally under one ownership. There was no provision in the SC Ordinance to allow zero lot line setbacks for buildings and parking as proposed. In order to accommodate the development as proposed, it was necessary to process the application under the PDO, Planned Development Overlay District. Section 3, Subd. 3 of the Zoning Ordinance required a PDO to allow subdivision of lots for a single building. This process allowed . greater flexibility and consequently a more creative and imaginative design. It allowed flexibility in the internal setbacks and in parking for combined uses and was the appropriate means for review of a development of this size and scope. Access to the site was proposed via an extension of Apollo Drive, from Lake Drive through the site to 77th Street. An additional access was proposed to Lake Drive approximately 520 feet north of the Apollo access. All accesses with Lake Drive (County Road 23) were subject to the approval of Anoka County. The City Engineer was in the process of conducting a traffic study that would identify which improvements were necessary to accommodate the development. Improvements may include, but were not limited to turn lanes, by- pass lanes and signalization. Design alternatives to deter traffic from using Carole Drive needed to be examined and implemented if necessary. 17apxo -& pearzov_Boap3_ Xn _o n'o-A Wcsc 11 Staff explained detailed plans had been submitted for sanitary sewer, water and storm water management. The City Engineer had reviewed the information submitted. With respect to natural features, there was a large wetland located on the eastem portion of the site that was proposed to be impacted. There were 752 trees on the site and 566 of those were significant based on their size and species. The grading proposed on the site would result in the removal of 437 significant trees for a total of 458 trees. Most of the trees on the property were concentrated in around the wetland or on the southwest portion of the site. The site design had incorporated a sidewalk layout along Apollo Drive and throughout the site along the storefronts. There were sidewalk connections shown at both accesses proposed with Lake Drive. Additionally, different pavement treatments were proposed at significant crossing points within the development. Green space . on the site was concentrated around the perimeter of the site and surrounding ponding and wetland areas. The landscaping plan called for plantings within parking lots along drive aisles and surrounding the site. The overall plan was well done and provided a variety of plantings. Some plantings were shown within MnDOT right -of -way, which would require cooperation from MnDOT. The critical portion of the landscaping proposed was along the northern edge of the site, which was adjacent to existing residential lines. The plan as proposed would provide a visual break, but it would not provide a complete screen. Staff explained the exterior of the buildings were proposed to be a combination of masonry materials including brick and rockface block with EIFS (stucco) sign bands and accenting. The decorative rock elements included standing seam metal that complemented the roof designs in existing Town Square buildings. Awnings were proposed over the storefront areas. The Target Superstore used a combination of brick and stucco on the front which transitions to stucco and rockface block on the sides. The rear elevation was proposed to be painted CMU (concrete masonry unit). With the surrounding land uses, more attention needed to be paid to the architecture on the rear of the building. It would be very visible from 77th Street. There was a screen wall shown on the rear of the building, but materials to be used were not identified. This should be constructed of materials to match the building and should be of sufficient height to screen the dock area. Trash enclosures had not been identified on the site plan. The applicant had proposed the City accept outlots that included ponding and right -of -way in lieu of park dedication. This would not be consistent with City Ordinance or policy. Cash fees in lieu of land dedication should be provided at the rate in effect at the time of the final plat. Based on the size of the proposed project, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet was mandatory. This process was designed to identify significant environmental effects that may require a more detailed environmental impact statement. The sign Ordinance allowed one pylon sign per street frontage, up to 200 square feet, with 25% of the sign designated for the Center name. The applicants were proposing two pylon signs with a sign face of 285 square feet plus the center name, which was approximately 35 square feet in area. On the retail buildings, wall signs were proposed over each tenant space and on the rear of the buildings. Staff did not support signs on the rear of the building unless it was incorporated into some enhanced design. The Target facility proposed a number of signs on three sides of the building. There was no signage proposed on the rear of Target. The total square footages allowed were based on the wall area; up to 20% of the wall area or 100 square feet, whichever was less. In this case, the wall areas were very large and 100 square feet was not adequate area for signage. The front of the building was approximately 9836 sq. ft. in area, which allowed up to 1967 sq. ft. of signage. Target was proposed to have a total of 1320 square feet of signage on the front elevation, which was within the 20% allowed. 17apx6 &_Pcpearaov_Boapo_ XcrLo¢i_ltvo_laxWQ 12 Staff recommended the Planning and Zoning Board discuss the site plan, building design and signs proposed, provide direction to the applicant and then continue the public hearing until such time as the EAW process was completed and wetland fill and mitigation plans were approved by Rice Creek. Staff stated the retail, other than the Target Store, would probably be downsized and the plans would be resubmitted once they were changed. Chair Schaps asked about the timeline for the closing of the public hearing. Mr. Smyser responded they expected this item to be back next month. Because of the size of the project, an Environmental Assessment Work would need to be done and that had to be completed before the City could approve the project. Mr. Corson asked if the EAW application had been made, or if that be applied for in the final process. Ms. Sherman replied the EAW had not been submitted or completed yet. Steve Baker, 77th & Carroll Drive, stated his concern was that 77th Street was going to be cut in half. Mr. Powell responded the City vacated 30 feet of right -of -way and had given it back to the property owners on the north side. Mr. Powell indicated the City was very concerned about the traffic patterns and Apollo Drive would not connect to 77th Street. Mr. Baker stated he had moved to this area to have quiet and now there was going to be a store in his neighborhood with bright lights. He also asked if there would be enough economic support for a Target Store in this area. Mr. Smyser replied with respect to the lighting, it was a very important concem and they were aware of the potential effects this project would have on the resident's near -by. He stated the lighting would only be on in the parking lot when the store was open. He stated this project was a huge investment on the part of Target Corporation. It would be a Target Superstore and that kind of an investment would not have been made lightly without a lot of market research. He stated Target Corporation would not invest that kind of money if they did not believe it would survive in this area Resident, 874 Oak Lane, was concerned about the traffic issues. He asked what was going to be done about the traffic. Mr. Powell responded they were taking this development and assigning traffic generation to that use. He stated Lake Drive in its current state was not the future. He indicated there would be signals added, and they were in the evaluation process to determine what would be needed for this project. Sue Miller, 7780 Lois Lane, stated she came to this area for peace and quiet. She asked why they needed a Target Store in this area when there was one 10 miles down the road. She stated it did not fit with the City's concept. Tom Vacca, 77th and Lake Drive, asked if the City agreed with the Anoka County's findings on traffic with respect to Apollo Drive being the only entrance. Mr. Powell stated Target Corporation had proposed another connection to Lake Drive and that would be evaluated and discussed with the County. They had not received any answers from Anoka County. However, Anoka County had indicated Apollo Drive would be the main entrance, but Target Corporation wanted another connection, which the City would need to evaluate. Ilapxo &J'ezpeariov _BoapS_ Xtrz_o LAcvo_Aarcea 13 Dave Moss ( ?sp), 7785 Lois Lane, stated Target Corporation tried to build a Superstore in the City of Blaine, and the City of Blaine did not let them build in that City because of the grocery store. Mr. Moss stated he had a vested interest in this because he worked at Festival Foods and was in the union. He saw Target Corporation simply going up the freeway to build their store. He stated most stores stock their stores at night and asked that a curfew being put on the noise and activities at night. Mr. Smyser replied a curfew would be taken into consideration. John Herman, 7859 Lois Lane, stated another Target Store was not needed in the area. He stated he moved up here to get out of the City and get peace and quiet. He indicated he did not want this to become another Woodbury where there were stoplights at every corner. He stated he hoped the City would look at the traffic concerns the citizens had on Lake Drive. He indicated he did not want to see the City keep developing without looking at the traffic impacts that would be made. He stated the roads were not there to support this project, and he wanted to see improvements to the road before any construction would be started. He indicated Tanger Mall was a very similar situation, and they had only one entrance and did not have a problem with having one entrance. Wendy , 849 77th Street, expressed her concern regarding Apollo Drive. She stated she did not think people on Apollo Drive realized they had a stop sign to get on to Lake Drive. She stated this area was a disaster waiting to happen. She realized that something was going to eventually be put on the land that Target Corporation proposed to put their store on. However, she was concerned about the access off of 77th Street to the Target Store. She stated Target Corporation had indicated the City wanted the access. She indicated she did not want access off of 77t Street into Target. Mr. Powell responded the City wanted some sort of a connection from 77th Street to Target Store; not from Target Store to 77th Street. He stated they originally had discussions for an access for emergency vehicles only, not for traffic to go from Apollo Drive to 77th Street. He stated the way the development was proposed, they were looking at Target Corporation's proposal for another access, but the Target Corporation was still revising their plans and nothing had been decided on. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue the public hearing until such time as the EAW process was completed and wetland fill and mitigation plans were approved by Rice Creek, and was supported by Ms. Lane. Motion carried 5 -0. 17apKQ &Pezpearzov_BoapL Xtrr_o izvo_Aaxww 14 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Ryan Companies US, Inc. (Target), Lake Drivel CONTINUE TO 4/11/01. Staff stated at the February 13th meeting, the Planning and Zoning Board continued the public hearing related to the proposal by Ryan Companies for a mixed commercial site located north of Lake Drive, adjacent to I -35W. Staff recommended that the hearing be continued until April 11, 2001. Mr. Wessel presented a status of the project since the last meeting. He stated the site plan was changing and therefore, so was the schedule. He stated the problem was that the market did not support the building of the large three pads. He stated the development team had presented the three pads to the market, but could not get any interest in it. Therefore, one option would be to downsize the project to eliminate the three large pads. The other option would be the replacement of the pads and go with a development that was similar as to what they were originally looking at. He stated they could not respond until they receive something official. He indicated they did not expect a proposal until just before the May 2001 Planning & Zoning meeting. He stated more likely they would be breaking ground in the fall rather than in the summer, if this project received approved. Chair Schaps asked if there was any update regarding the road. Mr. Powell replied applicant still wanted two accesses to the site. They had prepared an impact study of that second access and how it would function and had submitted it to the County for initial review. He stated the plan would need to be reevaluated with the change of the site plan. Mr. Lyden asked looking at Plan A vs. Plan B economically, was there a more economic advantage to one plan over the other Plan. Mr. Wessel replied the plan with the three larger pads was a larger project and therefore, it would a more economically advantageous project for the City. Mr. Lyden asked if they could allow the. Target to be built and wait for the remainder of the development for sometime in the future. Mr. Wessel replied this could be a possibility, but Ryan ane 17apica & _Pezpeanov _BoapS XirLOgi.A:vo_ cacwQ 15 Target were committed to having this as one development and completing the whole project. He stated Ryan and Target were not interested in purchasing the land and holding it for future development. John Obrestad, 7738 Carole Drive, stated he was concerned where the two roads were going to be and where it would put the traffic. Mr. Powell replied the access would be off of Lake Drive. There would be no access off of 77th Street with the recent concept plan submitted. Tim Graf, 7757 Carole Drive, asked if there would be streetlights going from the new Target onto Lake Drive. Mr. Powell replied in the Lake Drive corridor there would be lights added once it was developed as warranted. He stated they did not anticipate lights on 77th Street, but there would be gaps in the traffic to allow traffic on 77th Street to get out onto Lake Drive. Mr. Graf asked about a buffer around Target. Mr. Powell stated there would be some type of a buffer, possibly some type of landscaping. Mr. Wessel reminded there was no official plan submitted yet. Deb Graf, 7757 Carole Drive, stated they had three banks and convenience stores within a few blocks and she did not believe they needed more banks. She asked if this was staying with the old town village look. Mr. Wessel replied the question of another bank and convenience store was a decision ultimately to be made by the Council, but the market supported another bank and convenience store. He stated the developer was looking at the architectural aspects of the Target and the developer was aware they needed to give it a "village feel ". There had been an effort made to put together something with the appropriate architectural design. Mr. Lyden stated Ms. Graf s comment about the bank was well taken. He indicated even though the market may absorb the bank, it might not be an asset to the City. Chair Schaps stated the architectural design they had seen did not look like the typical Target Store. Ms. Graf asked when they submit their final proposal, did Planning and Zoning have the final say. Chair Schaps replied the function of Planning and Zoning was to review the plan and make a recommendation to the Council. The Council could either agree or disagree with P &Z's recommendations. The final decision would be up to the Council. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to April 11, 2001 to allow time for additional information to be submitted and reviewed, and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. 17apxcr_& _Psxpsanov_BoapLL Xtrt_o tvo_laxs6 16 PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES D. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Ryan Companies US, Inc. (Target), Lake Drive. Mr. Smyser stated the design issues had not been resolved and recommended the public hearing be continued to May 9, 2001. They had received the plans this week and this would be presented at the May meeting. He stated Target would still be there, but instead of the smaller sites, this was proposed for a Kohl's store. He indicated he had received positive feedback with the proposed Kohl's store. Mr. Rafferty made a MOTION to continue the public hearing to May 9, 2001, to allow time for additional information to be submitted, and was supported by Mr. Lyden. Motion carried 5 -0. DESIGN MINN BOARD ACTION DATE: .... pending .... COUNCIL ACTION (IF NECESSARY): •.... pending .... • COUNCIL ACTION DATE: .... pending .... PROJECT INPLEMENTATION STATUS: The following defines staff observations related to actual implementation. This includes issues raised (and resolved) during implementation, general observations, and project outcome. •.... pending .... PROJECT FINAL COMPLETION DATE: .... pending .... ENVIRONMENTAL Coordinator Date llapxcr_ct_Pezpsanov_BoapS_ Xzrz o ltvo_lairs6 17 -.-----. -4111Fair gLo !Ito 410#) Lp_cmgAist-404:67-1".. ,440 um amid Kitornmourams.., RETAIL A 6,000 SQ. FT. na GT last orrA.. tUUUK I ETAIL RETAIL 6,000 SQ FT. I ef).4 SOD � :: fiek - i o Id r m` ii ,, MI J.:I Alaawl____,_______,..____,.__., ___12.....:_41.,........1„ t • © Ea-lr e .o,, �.` . �' i -e I/,. /...... A o evo E3 It Liam li GS :R) ••••■� /1 LIMITS OF IRRIGADOIL_ (TYP.) _ANT SCHEDULE UOUS TREES / SHRUBS LIGHT (TYP.) /1 11 PYLON SIGN (TYP.) DECIDIUOUS TREES / SHRUBS / ORNAMENTAL GRASSES CODE QTY QTY COMMON NAME LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS 5 ALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRY 1.5" B &B CLUMP FORM -4)-- AMELANCHIER LAEVIS CAL. 1.5" AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER 61 ACER FREEMANNI X AUTUMN BLAZE CAL. AND FULL CROWN 32 'DER BIRCH 10' B &B CLUMP FORM 2" BETULA NIGRA HT. QUERCUS BICOLOR CAL. 23 _ THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN. 1.5" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER CRATAEGUS CRUS -GALLI VAR. INERMIS CAL. MR AND FULL CROWN 15 . COMMON HACKBERRY 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER CAL. CELTIS OCCIDENTALLIS • CAL. REDMOND LINDEN AND FULL CROWN 9 GRAY DOGWOOD (TREE FORM) 1.5" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER 21 CORNUS RACEMOSA CAL. AND FULL CROWN 53 ISANTI DOGWOOD 24" POT FULL FORM #1 CORNUS SERICEA 'ISANTI' HT. HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS 'SAPPHIRE' CONT. 61 GREEN ASH 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA CAL. AND FULL CROWN 34 MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS ASH 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA 'MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS' CAL. AND FULL CROWN 2 BLACK ASH 2" _ B &B STRAIGHT LEADER FRAXINUS NIGRA CAL. AND FULL CROWN 69 HONEYLOCUST 2" B &B LEADER GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS 'SKYLINE' CAL. .STRAIGHT AND FULL CROWN 52 • 6' B &B STRAIGHT LEADER lb LARIX LARICINA HT. AND FULL FORM MISS KIM LILAC #5 POT FULL FORM SYRINGA PATULA 'MISS KIM' CONT PYLON SIGN (TYP.) DECIDIUOUS TREES / SHRUBS / ORNAMENTAL GRASSES CODE QTY COMMON NAME /LATIN NAME SIZE VL 3 NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM 24" VIBURNUM LENTAGO HT. 1 PA 3 AMERICAN PLUM 1.5" PRUNUS AMERICANA CAL. VT 61 AMERICAN CRANBERRYBUSH 18" VIBURNUM TRILOBUM HT. QB 29 SWAMP WHITE OAK 2" QUERCUS BICOLOR CAL. QP 54 PIN OAK 2" QUERCUS PALUSTRIS - CAL. MR 30 RED BARRON CRAB 2" MALUS 'RED BARRON CRAB' CAL. TA 12 REDMOND LINDEN 2" TILLIA AMERICANA 'REDMOND' CAL. HA 21 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA 24" HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANNABELLE' HT. HS 1300 HELICTOTRICHON SAPPHIRE #1 HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS 'SAPPHIRE' CONT. MS 416 PORCUPINE GRASS #1 ' MISCANTHUS SINENSIS VAR. STRICTUS CONT. ZNAMENTAL GRASSES NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS ROOT 24" POT FULL FORM BLACK HILLS SPRUCE HT. B &B FULL FORM 1.5" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER HT. CAL. AND FULL CROWN T,� �' 18" POT FULL FORM FULL FORM HT. PINUS NIGRA '.' 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER 37 CAL. - 6' AND FULL CROWN FULL FORM , 2-" B &B. STRAIGHT LEADER HT. CAL. AND FULL CROWN 11 2" B &B FULL FORM FULL FORM CAL. PINUS STROBUS HT. 2" B &B STRAIGHT LEADER 301 CAL. #5 AND FULL CROWN FULL FORM 24" POT FULL FORM ANNABELLE' HT. PGC 18 Jf1 POT SPACED 2' ON CENTER :NS 'SAPPHIRE' CONT. TILL SOIL MIN.6" HT. # 1 POT SPACED 2' ON CENTER STRICTUS CONT. 6' TILL SOIL MIN.6" EVERGREEN TREES / SHRUBS ALL UIJ I UKtStU LAWN AKLAS ISLANDS TO BE • IF CONSTRUCTION OF DEPRESSED ISLAND OC CONTROL BLANKET SHOULD BE USED UNLES • REFER TO SITE INFILTRATION PLAN SHEET #1 • ALL EXISTING ASPENS AND COTTONWOODS T( • ALL OVERSTORY AND UNDERSTORY TREES PL MULCHED W/ A 4' DIA. MULCH CIRCLE TO • ALL SHRUB BEDS TO BE MULCHED AND EDC UNLESS LOCATED ADJACENT TO A CURB OR • PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHE • PROVIDE TRANSITIONAL AREA FROM SODED E DISTANCE OF 5' TO 10' WILL VARIES WITH CODE QTY COMMON NAME /LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS PG 29 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6 B &B FULL FORM PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA HT. PN 14 AUSTRIAN PINE 6' B &B FULL FORM PINUS NIGRA HT. PP 37 COLORADO SPRUCE - 6' B &B FULL FORM PICEA PUNGENS HT. PS 11 WHITE PINE 6' B &B FULL FORM PINUS STROBUS HT. JS 301 SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 POT FULL FORM JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS SEA GREEN CONT. PGC 18 BLUE SPIRE SPRUCE _ 6' B &B SINGLE LEADER _- PICEA GLAUCA 'COERULEA' HT. AND FULL FORM PR 6 NORWAY COMPACT PINE 6' B &B SINGLE LEADER PINUS RESINOSA 'NORWAY COMPACT' ` HT. AND FULL FORM (1) -o O r' r U7 O 11 z N 1l N W -P O n 0) C) 30 O C) O (11 0 N GI 03 z N 03 U1 v r N z c N 0 0 z N Ui 0 X n z D S D a) S0 co r- 5-> rn N z 0 N N z m O E 0 r- 0 O N 0 co 03 c E 03 n N 03 Ro CO z c cn m z z -NC z D D 30 r- (/) 0) m rn v r m N 0) n r N co R3 co X_ z c N v m z z r- < z D n r O 30 m m z S N co CO 0 0 30 z 0) N m 30 c) z S D v 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 z c 30 0 rrn 0 N D r 30 0 0 0 0 03 03 C) r 03 03 c) D m 0 c 0) 30 c D r r z rn 30 r co C z 3 D S —i O CO 03 m 30 rn 30 m m z z D c c z W m D r C z 03 rn D r- m 03 03 D m z m 30 n E D 3- 3- P1 S rn z V) rn 50 ,n m co m 50 3D Ui co W O 0-3 r m z 0 m z 0 -q c r r 30 z z 0 rn c 3- 3- () 0 z z 0 c 3- 3- c) z D i r 0 m 30 z v rn c r r 30 0 z D 0 r 0 m -n r r O 3D z 0 m c r r 30 z D r 0 rn 30 z 0 m 3- r- 0 0 z -4 D r- D 0 rn 30 z 0 rn r r 7o z 0) 0 D r 0 rn 30 z 0 m c r r 7o z i -1 r- 0 m 3D r c -n 0 t 111121HS saa L snonlaiaa' i��T1� � ►� _i MAGNUSQUARE® II SERIES Vertical Lamp Flat Glass MSV Job Type Dimensions Catalog Number SERIES MSV Specifications CP" NRTL/C Housing Rugged, one piece aluminum, formed and welded, allows no access to weather. Lens / Door Frame Extruded aluminum door with sealed tempered flat glass lens. Door is hinged and has gasketed seal to housing when secured with two Hubbell Gard® Fasteners. Ballast Mounted to a galvanized steel end support, which ties into arm for secure support. Optical Full cutoff performance with maximum uniformity. Segmented reflector system produces excellent pole spacing capability. Additional Features Lektrocote® powder coat finish provides protection to aluminum construction and lasting appearance. All units supplied with lamp for installation convenience. UL and CSA NRTL/C certified for wet locations. Multiple optical capabilities and mounting accessories are available. Ordering Information series mounting wattage source distribution voltage finish options MSV I A I 1 1 1 Magnusquare® II Series Vertical Lamp - Flat Glass MOUNTING A 'Arm mount WATTAGE 1 SOURCE 400 H Metal Halide 1000 H Metal Halide 1000 P Pulse Start 400 S High Pressure Sodium Note: E.P.A. -2.8 Sq. Ft. (Fixture only) DISTRIBUTION Fl Type I FP Type 111 FT Forward Throw FW Type V sq. VOLTAGE 5 480V 6 347V 8 QuadTap® (120, 208, 240, 277V) E 50 Hz 220/240V 1. Substitute voltage for "X" ( 1- 120V; 2- 208V ;3- 240V;4-277V;5.480V;8347V) 2. Must select option Al cr A4 Accessories must be ordered separately. See Accessories. LEKTROCOTE FINISH 1 Bronze 2 Black 3 Gray 4 White OPTIONS Al 10" arm shipped in fixture carton A4 4" arm shipped in fixture carton PCR(X)1 Twist -Lock photocontrol receptacle (specify voltage) (photocontrol ordered separately) F(X)1 Fusing (specify voltage) R42 4" round pole adapter shipped in fixed carton R52 5" round pole adapter shipped in fixed carton Comments See back for Photometrics Submitted by: Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christlansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382 -6111 • Fax (540) 382 -1526 Architectural Cutoff OTD 2- 5/01 MSV /Flat MAGNUSQUARE® II SERIES Vertical Lamp Flat Glass MSV Ordering Information ACCESSORY - Must be ordered separately Catalog Number Description Weight EPA Ibs kg ft2 m2 MAL -FM FLUSH MOUNT HARDWARE Flush mount hardware - must order when no arm or adapter is desired on a pole. ARMS .25 .1 MSV -4 -X 4" rigid arm MSV -10 -X 10" rigid arm MAL -KF -X Adjustable arm for flat surfaces. (10" Length) KNUCKLE 2 .9 .2 .02 5 2.3 .5 .05 5.7 2.6 .5 .05 MAL -K -X 23/8" OD tenon slipfitter for one fixture. MAL -TK -X 23/8" OD tenon slipfitter for two fixtures 180° TENON ADAPTERS SSP -90 -X Square - slipfitter for 2 3/8" or 2 7/8" OD tenons - drilled for four fixtures (10" arm required for 90° configurations) RSD- 3120 -X 2 3/8" - 2 7/8" OD slipfitter for max. three fixture (120 °) (10" Arms Required). RSD -90 -X For 10" arms only - four fixtures max. 90° - 4" OD (must order RSD-04 for each luminaire) 2 3/8" or 2 7/8" OD tenons. 5 2.3 - 7 3.2 - 20 9.0 20 9.0 20 9.0 WALL PLATE MAL -WP -X Cast wall plate wfth fixture hardware, mounts over recessed 4" outlet boxes - lag hardware by others. 5.7 2.6 - POLE ADAPTER RSD -04 -X Nominal 4" OD pole adapter provides a flat surface for arm of fixture mounting. 1.5 .7 RSD -05 -X Nominal 5" OD pole adapter provides a flat surface for arm of fixture mounting. 1.7 .8 1.1 .11 GLARE SHIELD MSV - FGGS -2 Extreme glare shield for flat areas units only. Mounts to housing. Restricts Ilghitng to any one 1.8 .8 1.1 .11 side of fixture. Black finish is standard. Note: Specify Finish - Replace X -1 Bronze, 2 - Black, 3 - Gray and 4 - White AfErT ihozi MAL -FM 1 SSP -90 -X MSV -4 -X MSV -10 -X MAL -WP -X MAL -KF -X RSD- 04/05 -X MAL -K -X MAL -TK -X MSV - FGGS -2 Lighting, Inc. Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382 -6111 • Fax (540) 382 -1526 • http:/lwww.hubbell- Itg.com/ Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, Ontario L1W1Z8, (905) 839 -1138 • Fax (905) 839 -9108 • http: //www.hubbeil- canada.com/ MAGNUSQUARE® II SERIES Vertical Lamp Flat Glass MSV Photometrics TEST NO.: CAT. NO.: LUMINAIRE SOCKET POS.:FIXED REFLECTOR:ALUMINUM SPECULAR ENCLOSURE:CLEAR, FLAT GLASS HP -08635 MSVA1000H -FWx -x LAMP TYPE: 10001W MET. HAL. ANSI: M1000 /U/8T37 1.D.: 0S -11 ENVELOPE: BT 37 L.C.L.:7.0 INCHES 1 LAMPISI at LUMENS /LAMP: 110000 LIGHT FLUX VALUES H.it r27 LUMENS PERCENT OF LAMP STETSIDE 38981 35.4 DOWNWARD HOUSESIDE 38981 35.4 6.10 0 0.0 STREETS! DE FOlSSIESICE 0 0.0 TOTAL 77963 70.9 DATE: 2 -21 -2001 CLASSIFICATION DISTRIBUTION: SHORT TYPE: V -SO CONTROL: FULLCUTOFF GENERAL JEST DISTANCE: 36 FEET To approximate performance for similar lamps with different Lumens, multiply Lumens, Lux and Footcmdles by this ratio: RATIO :SELECTED LAMP LUMENS 110000 I SOLUX DIAGRAM MOUNTING HEIGHT: 10.67 METERS -- - - -Half Maximum Candlepower Trace • Maximum Candlepower MAXIMUM AT H =45.2° V =64.6° 0 7B .z 3 0 180 Norms name initial. E. 1111ffil WRIV kr.wg.ft MEM ISOFOOTCANOLE DIAGRAM MOUNTING HEIGHT: 35 FEET -- - -- Coefficient of Utilization Curves 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 07 EME\E.\`I I I' W`7UNMI ITI ■EMMO111111O\t ■MENTAr"i'iui'■ ERIMMUMWARN VEMBRAMMMEMN ■ ■EMMI II iui■ ■■■UMMUMMIR iiallmMeNEMW earamwsommu `:.cis .mm .O■_. /2 . M InallEaM MN 4' 3 ' 2 1 0 0 3.75 2.23 0° RATIO OF LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE TO MOUNTING HEIGHT 2 MOUNTING HEIGHT CORRECTION FACTORS H.it r27 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 H. ,,fit y..,.. 6.10 7.62 9.14 10.67 12.19 13.72 15.24 Factor 3.06 1.96 1.36 1.00 0.77 0.60 0.49 TESTED TO CURRENT 1ES AND NEMA STANDARDS UNDER STABILIZED LABORATORY CONDITIONS. VARIOUS OPERATING FACTORS CAN CAUSE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAB DATA AND ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS. Lighting, Inc. Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christlansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382 -6111 • Fax (540) 382 -1526 • httpJ /www.hubbeli- Itg.com/ Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, Ontario LIW1Z8, (905) 839 -1138 • Fax (905)839 -9108 • httpJ/www.hubbell- canada.com/ MAGNUSQUARE® II SERIES Vertical Lamp Fiat Glass MSV Photometrics TEST NO. CAT. NO. LUMINAIRE • • • SOCKET POS.:FIXED REFLECTOR:ALUMINUM SPECULAR ENCLOSURE:CLEAR, FLAT GLASS HP -08637 MSVA1000H -FPx -x LAMP TYPE: 1000W MET. HAL. ANSI: MI000 /U/BT37 1.0.: 0S-11 ENVELOPE: BT 37 L.C.L.:7.0 INCHES I LAMPISI at LUMENS/LAMP: 110000 LIGHT FLUX VALUES H.I N+t a i «e LUMENS PERCENT OF LAMP DOWNWARD 40 STREETSIDE 3 9091 35.5 DOWNWARD 9.14 HOUSESIDE 33052 30.0 a 0 0.0 STREET DE UPWARD HDUSESIDE 0 0.0 TOTAL 72143 65.6 I SOLUX DIAGRAM o$ 75 F.3 b 0 4 5 MOUNTING HEIGHT: 10.67 METERS - - - - -Half Maximum Candlepower Trace + Maximum Candlepower MAXIMUM AT H =56.2• V =65.5- DATE: 2 -22 -2001 CLASSIFICATION DISTRIBUTION: SHORT TYPE: 111 CONTROL: FULLCUTOFF GENERAL JEST DISTANCE: 36 FEET To approximate performance for similar lamps with different Lumens, multiply Lumens, Lux and Footcandles by this ratio: RATIO : SELECTED LAMP LUMENS 110000 ISOFOOTCANOLE DIAGRAM MOUNTING HEIGHT: 35 FEET -- - -- Coefficient of Utilization Curves 180• 0.1 0.2 0 3 0.4 0.5 OS 0.7 5 ELINIMILIMION ■1:111111\=\ ■'' 1I1LIt1N111I1 :E AUI1k1&1I1III111I %iQINIM1111l11 ttt % % /�% //1 MI Mil ft! Mal erati .1.592111 rITIORE go -wow- 4 3 12 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 3.75 2.25 0• RATIO OF LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE TO MOUNTING HEIGHT TESTED TO CURRENT IES AND NEMA OPERATING FACTORS CAN CAUSE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAB DATA AND ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS. MOUNTING HEIGHT CORRECTION FACTORS H.I N+t a i «e I M 25 30 40 45 norm 1I1v1rdIr1r, HellA Yt" , . 6.10 7.62 9.14 ,,.. 12.19 Millifer naball irm. a 1 a' PIM : Se -• 41. px 1.00 la- - 0.49 5 ELINIMILIMION ■1:111111\=\ ■'' 1I1LIt1N111I1 :E AUI1k1&1I1III111I %iQINIM1111l11 ttt % % /�% //1 MI Mil ft! Mal erati .1.592111 rITIORE go -wow- 4 3 12 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 3.75 2.25 0• RATIO OF LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE TO MOUNTING HEIGHT TESTED TO CURRENT IES AND NEMA OPERATING FACTORS CAN CAUSE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LAB DATA AND ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS. MOUNTING HEIGHT CORRECTION FACTORS H.I N+t a i «e 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 HellA Yt" , . 6.10 7.62 9.14 10.67 12.19 13.72 15.24 Factor 3.06 1.96 1.36 1.00 0.77 0.60 0.49 7 Lighting, Inc. Hubbell Lighting, Inc., 2000 Electric Way, Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, (540) 382 -6111 • Fax (540) 382 -1526 • http://www.hubbell-Itg.com/ Hubbell Canada, Inc., 870 Brock Road South, Pickering, Ontario LIW1Z8, (905) 839 -1138 • Fax (905) 839 -9108 • http: //www.hubbell- canada.coml • • Agenda Item 6C Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 26, 2003 Topic: Mueller Office Facility /Plan Review Background: The Mueller site is located on James Street and Lake Drive. See site Location Map (attachment 1). Application information is submitted as (attachment 2). The MLCCS and Pre - settlement Vegetation is submitted in (Attachment 3). Vegetation on the site is classified as Non - native dominated long grasses with 4 to 10 percent impervious cover. Natural Resource Protection Zones are shown in (Attachment 4). Soils types and Permeability are depicted in (Attachment 5). Estimated surface water flow direction, flood plane and private wells are shown in (Attachment 6). Existing Trees are located on the Grading Plan (Attachment 2). Analysis: • There are no unique or remnant vegetation types on this site or around the site. Pre - settlement vegetation in this area is classified as Oak openings and Barrons. New Landscape materials should use Oaks for shade trees as much as possible. • There are no unique protection Zones associated with this site. • Soils on this site are very permeable. Infiltration rates range from 6 to 20 inches of water per hour. Because of the nature of Soderville soils, water tables tend to be very shallow. Surface water seems to go to the NW for the most part. There are many shallow (57' deep) in this area. Because of the nature of these soils, care must be taken to ensure proper infiltration design on the site. At least 3 feet, preferably 4 feet of separation between the seasonally high water table and the bottom of infiltration ponds and swales must be accomplished. Soil borings must demonstrate this separation. • City specifications for seed mixtures in swale and pond area should be used. • All sodded areas should be shown as irrigated. Four inches of topsoil should be thoroughly incorporated into the subsoil. • A sequencing plan should be submitted indicating soil and tree protection measures. All infiltration swale, pond, (and sod areas if possible) should be fenced of to traffic after construction. • A complete tree inventory should be submitted. The submitted Landscaping and Tree preservation Plan, shows existing 15 -inch trees (no indication of Species), on the south near a proposed infiltration swale. • • A BMP plan for post- construction site maintenance should be submit. BMP's should include pond and swale maintenance, and parking lot sweeping schedules. • There were no submitted lighting fixtures. Light intensities on the residential side exceed limits. Building lighting is unknown. Developer should submit a lighting plan that conforms to City standards. Options: 1. Approve with suggested analysis, and Environmental Board comments. 2. Do not approve. Environmental Board Comments: Recommendation: Option 1 Attachments: 1. Site Location Map 2. Application Information 3. MLCCS and Pre - settlement Vegetation 4. Resource Protection Zones 5. Soil Types and Permeability 6. Surface Water Flow Direction /Flood Plane and Wells • • coc 0 cao. v 0 0 J V L d Attachment O O • PLEASE FILL OUT BOTH SIDES OF FORM CITY OF LINO LAKES - LAND USE APPLICATION CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX: FEE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500 Conditional Use Permit $ 350 Interim Use Permit $ 350 Site Plan Review $ 500 Subdivision: Preliminary Plat $ 1,250 Preservation Development 1,250 Planned Development Overlay 1,250 Minor Subdivision/ $ 250 Lot Split Rezoning Vacation: drainage, street, utility Variance $ 350 $ 250 $ 250 ESCROW DEPOSIT: RECEIVED Property Address PIN # rco 1 0 2003 CITY OF LINO LAKES Legal Description: Lot Block Addition 1 E MP dit' 1 I c /,-7i ak..1 Existing Land Use Existing Zoning DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: //k'av 4�l�ir' 6 �.; /2 rf j Applicant: name address phone fax e -mail 44/ /'.Bn i% creRes,L, /" `7 Y^"d���r �►.�. 5-544 74> 3 - s -74, be) -76-3-3:3-14-4) I - e.*0• - r?J Owner (if different app 'cant: name e/ �� ' • ,V. , %,'- address I "-' .1/2 i)1/7 n/ /f', phone 76;?-.17,5— fax rv�.5 /- 77G-01.3 5 e -mail Revised 1/23/02 Page 1 of 2 s0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ROBERT A. MUELLER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That part of the north half of the north half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, T. 31, R. 22, Anoka County Minnesota described as beginning at the intersection with the south line of said tract and the easterly right -of -way line of C.S.A.H. No. 23 (old highway No. 8) as now established;( said one -half right -of -way being 50 feet); thence east along said south line 288.70 feet; thence north at right angles 146.02 feet; thence west parallel with first described course 211.87 feet to said easterly right -of -way line of C.S.A.H. No. 23; thence southwesterly along said line 165 feet to the point of beginning. Except the north 77 feet of the east 62 feet thereof. Subject to easements, conditions, or restrictions of record. SIGN James Street clY P.P. Tel Box SIGN S89•47122 "E -211.87-- X 149.70 W a 0 M 0 r O z 0.73 Ac. xisting, Bldg ; co x 6 2. 00 x i i i x S89'47'15NE X S89'47'23 "E X X South line of N.1/2 of N 1/2 of NW 1/4 of Sea 9. 0 0i co � W to O N cd '-o /z o Denotes Iron Pipe Set • Denotes Iron Pipe Found Denotes Fence SCALE: 1 inch = 30 feet Bearings shown are on on assumed datum. Job No.: 02523 Book Page _ I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of o survey of the boundaries of the above describe land and of the location of aU buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this . day of f & ' 1 / 2 0 0 3 By ' i i i C O / 1 Kytbwh Minn. Reg. No. 18213 8651 NAP=S sr NZ. IBNHFAPOUS. 181 55449 PH (763) 784 -0657 FAX (763) 784 -6001 ( REVISIONS BB\ /1 Oft �NEREBY CERTIFY MAT 1NYS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY WE OR UNDER NY DIREOT SUM:: MBM MO 1*MT 1 AM A DULY REQS1EAED PROFESSIONAL DRw0ER U110FR 11E LAMS OF DIE STATE CO' NNESOTA 909.0 GRADONG.. PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE • • • 909.6 / / 909.0 D ail / o cf ' 909.3 BC WEIR (SEE ND DETA FOIj/ELEV110N (M nil. 3 I TRAY " OO 11. , kk / / 1 j 1 01 57 TNH I . cv 909 1 909.5 909.9 -x -x-- - James Street GRADING NOTES AND SEQUENCING SILT-FENCE TO BE INSTALLED DOWNHILL FROM ANY GRADING ACTIVITY SOME TREES AND DEAD FALL ARE TO BE CLEARED BEGIN STRIPPING TOPSOIL SITEWORK SHALL BEGIN ONCE SILT FENCE IS INSTALLED CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OFF JAMES STREET SILT FENCE TO BE MAINTAINED DURING GRADING SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF FINAL DISTURBANCE GRASS AREAS AND BERMS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH THE CITY OF UNO LAKES SEED SPEC. #5, SHORT/DRY MIX SEEDING, SUPPLEMENTED WITH BLUEGRASS, CAN BE BROADCAST AT 0.5LBS PLS /1000 SF OR DRILLED AT 10LBS PLS /ACRE. MULCH RATE SHALL BE TWO TONS PER ACRE STORMWATER POND SHALL BE SEEDED WITH THE CITY OF UNO LAKES SEED SPEC. /2, CAN BE BROADCAST AT 40Z /1000SF EQUIVALENT SEED MIXTURES MAY BE USED RECOMMENDED SEEDING DATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: OPTIMUM: MAY 20TH -JUNE 20 RANGE: SPRING THAW TO AUGUST 10 SEPTEMBER 20 TO FREEZE UP SITE :DRAINS TOWARD .LAKE. DRIVE: DITCH AND .THEN . HEADS . TO THE SOUTH MIN. BSMT. OR FLOOR ELEV. SHALL BE A MIN. OF TWO FEET ABOVE 100 YEAR POND/LAKE ELEVATIONS ANY RIPRAP SHALL BE CLASS II CONTACT 1MLUAM MCCULLY, P.E. AT GLENN REHBEIN COS. O (763) 784 -0657 "'NO GRADING TO BE DONE OFF SITE 910.8 -x 910.4 ROCK CONST. TRANCE -910.0 PAVEMENT SECTION '`--rs Bn -wEmrl 1.5" BIT. ASE 6" CL V R�CY1ED 911.8 x I I x 912.4 < -0.0 24' FLAT CURB TYP.) 1 908.6 908.2 ,Q; , x i 909.4 +n9• Bldg TUFF - LNEO S1 x 907.7 x 907.3 4- 1 / 9109.0 911.3 LEGEND SILTFENCE SF DRAINAGE ARROWS ems* EXISTING CONTOURS - X EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 909.2 PROPOSED CONTOURS PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS SF IMP/ Winn MDR MN& -909- ® X909.5 IN"MN MINI Moo IMMO, C=3� i -iIl l_i i1t 1 I�T T' n 1 I =11 =.1=n = l - 1 I- Ii nII -1 - -u. MAIMMMW TOP %W WEIR DATA POND 2P NM. 107.3 TOP 107 1011. 107.0 SILL 007.0 ON= WERT M mono two' (tea 0. INNATI 1o►R1 r -Y"Aso ROCK or IMAM OUT OFT OEM 70 rRNRN NNW NNW ow NNITMI RRLx D nRMIa • 500010 ORM ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE •.A.L MCCIRLY ND.23Ly / • MORI DRL WATM 1 03 TERM& MAX ?OM. BOOK JOB N0. 02523 PAGE war �oF 3 saws} • SITE AND UTILITY PLAN • 4 / CAIMIE 1 AP. $M WE / 12 1..F. 4' ZO LF.4' INV. EL 13 L.F. w GRAPHIC SCALE w (IN PRr) I Nee R0 11. GY 1><1EX- 5511423 TC:909.02 NV: 090.45 0 *911.57 TNH EX. E9T. James Street 6' TE VALVE 66Lf 6' 27' EXUC 5.0' CURB (TIP.) CURB CUT FOR NANpCAP RAMP BUILDING 5.766 SF FFE:910.3 (SEE / P / 4 FOR PARKING STALL 9118' (TYP.) 24' FLAT CURB TIP.) BOC RAO 1.25' BOC 5.0' 6612 CURB (TIP.; BOC RAD 15.0' • ._.... ....«:.�.._._ «:.,......»- .i�fE. TION SWALE 10' EX- 5sw122 TC:907.97 INM BB9.67 Existing Bldg EXISTING FENCE X UTILITY NOTES WATERMAIN CONNECTION TO BE WET TAPPED INTO EXISTTNG 12" UNE ALONG LAKE DRIVE DOMESTIC AND FIRE -FLOW SHALL BE SPUT IN THE BUILDING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE EXTENDED FROM EXISTING SEWER SERVICE ALONG LAKE DRIVE NO TREES TO BE PLANTED OVER UTILTY UNES OR IN ANTICIPATED EXPANDED ROW SITE NOTES TOTAL SITE AREA:0.73AC TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 0.39AC /16.804SF OR 52.8X TOTAL PARKING SPACES: 31 (BASED ON USABLE FLOOR SPACE) FLAT CURB USED WHERE SHOWN TO CONVEY WATER TO INFILTRATION SWALES BY HAVING WIDER CURB OPENINGS RUNOFF NALL BE BETTER DISTRIBUTED OVER SWALES. THUS RESULTING IN A HIGHER QUAUTY AND BETTER FUNCTIONING INFILTRATION SWALE AND REDUCING OR ELIMINATING AREAS OF CONCENTRATED SEDIMENT BUILD -UP LEGENQ EXISTING 21" SANITARY SEWER > > > EXISTING SANITART SEWER MANHOLE QS EXISTING 12" WATERMAIN —I I I I EXISTING HYDRANT 74 EXISTING STORM SEWER — sT sr ST ST — ROAD CENTERUNE ---'----- --- --- EDGE OF BITUMINOUS 'REVISIONS BY` /1 oRL CIERMET CERTIFY 1NAT 1M5 PLAN CR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY M OR UNDER MY DIRECT SIPERNSON AND ETAT 41 A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSION/I. ENGINEER UNDER 1NE LADS OF DE STAN OF MINNESOTA NAT. Me1111LY ga 0423L3ii oDRARrLN *ems WATM BITE 02/01 03 1ER11G11 1':201 JOB N0. 02523 BOOK PAGE war 2 ar 3 SHEETS.' LANDSCAPING & TREE PRESERVATION PLAN KEY 8eleti6c Name Casaas ama Habiba" Comma& AO Awera4Ata: jrm.d{Rore 'Aaems BB'dese• Adam Badman Sarviecimm MD Chum form AR Aces rabaw'Narlhwoob' Naeiwoode RadMewl• M Beadsman Rive/ BMA MD Cheap farm Cyr Crawler gx►gdl var. e.v.k 11mrs1em Hewdom MD Drought tamed CO CM* sandufdi Hmkbary MD MP Maaw'14r(elis' MSD MMus 'S adrift' Praindxe Plowaiag Crabapple Sewdrit ClabaePM M M Mow alone dmrat Bleak HiWSpam MD Pear mare Ameba Nee MD Soh tamed PR Paw r.tewra Noway mite& Piet MD Pf Ponders trandoioln Quokka Mee MD Plant in monea. OS Qawareeda. Swami W%MMOW MD SRl *shwa :Windage leafy Silk' Seesaw Ten Liao M SHRUBS Key Seiargifia Name Comae same Habitat Comsela Cemmeme AI AxLpfag saewma MD MW CS Caner awecea'Nandi' bassi Dogwood MW Moisture tolerant MD 01 Tokees dro.abl EM Ramatertenaseedaten JBC huetprms'Bios CYip' Blue Clip la.ipr MD Creeping FPO Plow pawns 'Okbosa' Dwarf Hie Spmm MD 4•4' RC Rom'Chemplae Cimvbe Illeab Rem M Rod 23.3' evabloomeg Pick2-3'.v.Nlomi.g Red 3' RC Rose 'CmeBmWeadr' Caen* Weeder Sim* Rem M ROY Rose 'Gerge Va.00ava' Owego Vasoomer Mai Rom 16 RH Rom Teary Hmdma• Homy Halm Minh Rom M White 3' RHH Rate 'Hope for Ham oky' Hart torHammity Mr TM Rene M Red 23- 3',...&L moR RW Rose Wereeee Pala' Winnipeg Parks Seth Rosa M Red 2-2.3 evaidoomea SO Seaaee'(kljmud• Gobhammd8aima DM Compact 811 SyreraxIOwdanhglfaw 'Pomheatee P.c boatuLiao M 10-12' SP System patdo %me Kim' Mina Kim Wee M 64' PERENNIALS AND PRAHt>B PLANTS (SORBS) KEY Scientific N. Cemarm keno Habitat See Cemmeme AI AxLpfag saewma Swap Milkweed MW 2S' Widely adaptable CV CarmprkwrneWra 'semis' Zagreb Creeps MD 01 Tokees dro.abl EM Ramatertenaseedaten lea PysWeed MW 2.5' 1-2' Might EP Salaam Hamm* Aryls Coeslower MD 4" Telerate. wet eke. HPM NawwoaaA6 'Peden Ma' r 'Baja' Daley 'Pardee Me' M 11 Deep Red HSD Reantree MS'SW6 is Oro'r St4&Ow Deyliy M 01 GU yaisw•r Egle IS Iris sewn: 'Reel Velvet' Ried Va ra Maim Iris M d1 1V Ins wrskokr Blue Meg ie MW ' 4" MF Moaod.J(mdose wad Bsr.aat MWD 2S" NW Nap*Xjaaneg 'Wares Low' Wade Lew Cabala MD 01 Tete.W drought RG Raba:kis VulJ.1w ' Galilean. 3. badk r Brews Eyed Seem MD 4' KEY Woad a Name Cemw see limbed Sans Commas CA Cdaeegrods x aaq(ma reed Fawner' Pettier Ra d Grass M 4" Widely adaptable 8H 8parebaefbaMrelwis PrairieDroomd M 4" KM xa art eeer■.dm Rases is M 4" 1-2' Might 8P Seamier pectinate Prrie Car/grams MW 2.5" Telerate. wet eke. 8S 3chfo.Ayresm seoprer sidle BhrarYm MD 4" preface . dry skald. Moak -plant prefers a site that is moderately. bet wit massively meet, V" pleat preen a moat loatierd 101MM:eta e pails .I as4. Awa tererm ode ratelylongperiedaofmawatlymastsell c .Felice. REQUIREMENTS FOR TREES, SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND PRAIRIE PLANTS: • All deciduous trees are to be 2" in diameter r'teeter (measured at 6' from pound) and mot systems hal and burl.pped (B&B) and supported is a sturdy who basket that holds the root ball in a firm, rigid con&doo (See pp. 5-6, item 1.3.1 through 1.4 ofAAN Standards for Nursery Stock). • AB evergreen (coniferous) trees am to be S'-6' in height and trees dug and processed using B&B method with sturdy wire basket mound root bell. Minimum soot bell diameters sisal be the same as thou specified for deciduous lrem (item 13.1 through 1.4 and pp 14 -.1S, item 3.2.1). hGnimmdrmmurte.ltia rioraiaonifatl2"tinimma.foraCOe. ' - .. • All shrubs. evergreen and deciduous, are to be of 4-5 gallon coat:ince size (m 03 or NS pot sizes). • AB perennials and prairie plants as to be in Coaosi.em.o smaller 16aa what is specified in pent list Comtsiner sizes specified in motes refer b dm diameter or width of container or pot A 41 size refers b. l gallon lib container. OTHER REQUIREMENTB: • March all trees and drubs with 4" of bardw ood shredded bark malah. Mulched areas around tree hunk should be 4' is dismeta. • Mold all perennial beds with 2" of hardwood shredded bak mukh • Alter planting and before notching. apply a granular pro -mmget herbicide (much as Preen) around all pleats. • Edge all beds with Black Dimmed Vinyl ed8iag Of equivakof. • Water phase thoroughly alts pleating. Also wet down mulch thoroughly so moisture pe.etr tes into soil below in order to aetink hmhidde. REQUIREMENTS FOR SEEDING AREAS: • Infiltration basins &a11 be seeded with the City of Liao Lakes Seed Spec 03, mixed height/Mask Wildflower send adz. Seeding shall be broadcast at a 4 oz./1000 SF. • Oros areas ad berms shall be seeded with the City of Lino Lake Seed Spec NS. Short/Dry seed mite. Seeding an be broadest at a 0316. PLS/1000 SF or drilled at 10116 PLS/acn. • Rain water sedans shall be planted with banti Dogwood, Red Twig Dogwood and Pussy Willow shroba In u1&tion Swamp Milkweed, Msnh Marigold, Joe Py Wad. Blue Flag Iris. Black Eyed Sumo and Big Blue Scam Clumps will be used. A pleat shall be pbad every 25 oboe fat. • Provide four inches onto* dirk tilled seven inehm into sub-grade throughout landscape areas ' • Provide decorative mulch amd/r foundation planting ender beidsg roof overhang • W atom pod -4590 it 5 rainwater garden -851 of e GRAPHIC SCALE III w w (MtREF ) I Ieh . Do a 4/EDGING (13bSF WOOD / MULCH) LEGEND SWAMP WHITE OAK • PINE IL GRASS CLUMP SHRUBS AND a Q PERENNIALS GV *911.57 TNH SIGN 3 -CO WIERAL LANDSCAPING NOTES SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DONE BY OTHERS SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND BERMS MATH SPECWIED SEED ALL TREES TO BE BALL AND BURLAPPED ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED AND GUYED PER NURSERYMAN'S STANDARDS LANDSCAPER TO INSTALL EDGING MATERIAL AROUND SHRUBS. FILLED NTH MULCH OR ROCK PER DEVELOPER'S CHOICE PRESERVE AS MANY TREES ALONG EAST AND SOUTH PROPERTY UNES AS POSSIBLE TREE SPECES ALONG LAKE DRIVE MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SALT TOLERANT SPECIES NO LANDSCAPING TO BE PLANTED OVER UTIUTY UNES OR IN ANTICIPATED ROW James Street O 1 4 els EXISTING FENCE Stj SEE ARCHTECIURE PLANS FOR DUMPSTER DETAILS AND SCREENING PRESERVE EXISTING 12' PINE TREES t1 viz � N. Box Exist Gdq PRESERVE TOTING 15' TREES X FENCE �� NG FENCE (HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 11N15 PLAN OR SPEGFlCAnON WAS PREPARED BY IC OR 155135 MY DIRECT SVPERMSION ANO THAT 1 AM A DULY I2.QSTERED PROFESSIONAL MERCER UNDER DE LAWS OF DE STATE OF MINNESOTA W.A.T. MeOULLY V / V& REC. Mme/ • 1 DRAM OHL oEt2tED WAIN 02/01 03 %DRAG . SCNE HOMZ, J08 NO. 02523 BOOR PAGE SHEET 3 \ ...or 3 stiETS/ 1 1 1 VOCE REVIEW MUELLER OFFICE FACILITY LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA I INSPECT AND TEST REQUIREMENTS SEE SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 01420 DESCRIPTOR OF WORK U.B.C. SEC110N 1701 1. CONCRETE 2. BOLTS INSTALLED N CONCRETE 3. DUCTILE MOMENT- TIC CONROE FRAME 4. REINFORCING STEEL NID PRESTRESSING STEEL 5. WELDING 5. HIGH-STRENGTH BOLWNG 7. STRUCTURAL MASONRY 5. REHFORCED GYPSUM CONC. 9. INSULATING CONCRETE FILL 10. SPRAY - APPLIED RREPROOOFING 11. PUNK. DRILLED PIERS NA CAISSONS 12. SNO1CREIE 13. SPECIAL GRADING, EXCAVATING MD RUING 14. SPECIAL CASES SPEC. INSP. YES NO TESTING YES NO EINE MOM MIME :moss MI `'' - ---- ---- III - - -- ---- MINN MEM DRAMS mBOUs SYMBOL DESCRIPTION //.l 1J MANAGERS NORTH ARROW ROOM NAME ROOM NUMBER SECTION REFERENCE ELEVATION REFERENCE DETAIL REF BUBBLE ELEVATION REFERENCE EXIST. ELEVATION REF PARTITION TYPE REF KEYNOTE REFERENCE WINDOW TYPE REFERENCE REVISION REFERENCE OFFICE Tar r MICE? I E› 4— O"' 0 O 0 I PROJECT TEAM GENERAL CONTRACTOR RAI CONSTRUCTION 5455 HIGHWAY 159 PLYMOUTH. MN 55442 753T JOHN PATIFAgaq ARM= OF RECORD 12 PN � AVE S. sum 155. BUR NSIALLLE. MNPOR1 5337 RATE CENTER CONTACT. BRIAN JOHNSON (952) 508 -2605 C1ML ENGINEER aQN RENNIN COMPANIES � MN 554445 63 MCCIA.LY STRUCTURAL DIMMER MA ASSOCIATES. NC. I LOCATION MAP GENERAL WES 1. 00 NOT SCALE ORMANOS 2. WW1' 05511NO SITE CONDITIONS. F ANY OED COST, CONTACT ARCHITECT BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. 3. SUBMIT ALL COLOR SIMPLES TO 0.0. FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COGSIRUCl10N. ALLOW AMPLE ME FOR SELECTION AND APPROVALS 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUB - CONTRACTORS 94M. PERFORM WORK N CONFORIIAIJCE WI1N ALL APPLICABLE OUTLOOK) CODES AND LAWS. S F ANY DESCREPCipES COST BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCRIRAL. OR CIVIL DRANAIOS. BEFORE COMMENCING VIM CONSTRUCTION CONSULT NTH ARCHITECT 7 DESIGN -BUILD SUB- CONTRACTORS ARE 10 VERIFY THAT ALL APPUCABLE WORK 15 N THEIR SCOPE OF WORK AND THERE- FOR N THEIR PFRSPECME BID. IT IS TIE 5ONSIB5JTY OF THE DEA4- BI11LD SUB - CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THIS WITH OTTER SELECTED 0ESION -BUILD SUS- CORMACTORS l DRAWING mon ARCHITECIURAL Al TITHE SLEET GRADING PLAN UTILITY PLAN DETM SURWY LANDSCAPE PLAN L -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN S TE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ARCINIECRIRAL A2 A3 PREIMNARY FLOOR PLAN & EI EVA1IONS A4 A5' Ad SAL BY OWN BUILD SUB- CONTRACTOR ELECTRICAL BY DEIGN FUND SUB - CONTRACTOR RJM 5455'JIWY 169 PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 763- 383 -7600 (TEL) 763 - 383 -7601 (FAX) tip i di tili Pail 111 3 11 1 Tar r MICE? I 11111111111111111SIIIISSI:?1 341 ?IIISS1t11111i411_1 111Tli1111111111 S111111111111111iT IIM1111111111t1l1 ' " I " __ ' 11 I1ffil 1111:1l111111111!l111 Si111119111�= --; 1 1! li�l �i1' iliililSS' ! °Slili,llllS.fS,SlSlaiu�utStlS �917tiS1'ittl a's "it1'31111it1l.I'liillll !___ I1 11l 7iiilSl til iliSiSlil iC111ll lliiih��et :S.ilinillii:M1111311111111S1 EAST ELEVATION • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: ROBERT A. MUELLER PROPERTY DESCRIPTION That part of the north half of the north half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, T. 31, R. 22, Anoka County Minnesota described as beginning at the intersection with the south line of said tract and the easterly right -of -way line of C.SA.H. No. 23 (old highway No. 8) as now established;( said one -half right -of -way being 50 feet); thence east along said south line 288.70 feet; thence north at right angles 146.02 feet; thence west parallel with first described course 211.87 feet to said easterly right -of -way line of C.SA.H. No. 23; thence southwesterly along said line 165 feet to the point of beginning. Except the north 77 feet of the east 62 feet thereof. Subject to easements, conditions, or restrictions of record. / \S0 CIZ / T Tel. M.H. / /4:99 : &• Caf 0 S6 / ? • y o •cOco. 1 �Q1 / Ica, SIGN a: Sp ti James Street P.P TeL Box Existing Bldg SIGN S89'47'22 "E -- 211.87-- X 149.70 0.73 Ac. 0 0 N x xisting5 Bldg x 62.00 x i i S89'47'15 "E N O) (0 RECEIVED FEB 1 0 Z003 CITY Of LINO LAKES o Denotes Iron Pipe Set i • Denotes Iron Pipe Found X X X X ( "� — x — x— Denotes Fence -- 2`8.70 - x S89'47'23 "E South line of N 1/2 of N 1/2----- ----- - - - --' of NW 1/4 of Sec. 9. SCALE: 1 inch = 30 feet) Bearings shown are on an assumed dotum. Job No.: 02523 Book Page I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above describe land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Irl Dated this day of F142003 By $dska.a Y I j2 s i,vv Minn. Req. No. 18213 8651 NAPLES ST. N.E M1NN 4POUS. MN 55449 PH (763) 784 -0657 FAX (763) 784 -6001 0 P.P. w' 0 James Street 149.71 Proposed Buildin 5665 S.F. Ss b. Ss Ss 3s wa lHCb, b b1 iHC 17 S, Ss Is SA bs Sa 6 7e st7 1.s Is b. Ss Sr b.1 b 1. to 1u Ss Ss Ss Existing Bldg leml.e Owirr Pr4MC► M ProJecti Lobel M U. LL. luooiro + 2 � 4 4 15 IMECI 418011 IMO Pc 17•5 ♦ ! 15F781.I ON= NON 1.10 VWrle lsintw- pole Typo N NORM . ..' Existing Bldg leml.e Owirr Project M Mq►e.e Lobel 1 1 I a+rgs• " "-'' u�w11we Not IS *1511 IlwAin Mork R • il..+riee Pc 17•5 'S. 'i w 1673 Ls S, w 10 Ls Ls 1af_jkLitt to tt3 2 . 2 . b s. 2 . b�'- 2 - Iss 55 iY Is Ss 17 62 -3s- -oSr b is' bt+—its,,Ssr Ss Ss b.1 14 at Ss 141 1u 1as 172 12 14 L 14 I bs 1u 1ss 17s lb L►7 1s4 17 to bo 1m St SA b SS 11e a7 1a its SA 17 17 bs Ss 1. So 3S SA b b 1.1 tr Ss 1s 1n 10 Box %Mire 288.70 Vlslonalre Lighting Photometric Study' #PB021003T1 Mueller Office Building Date'02 /10/03 RJM 5455I -IWY 169 PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 763- 383 -7600 (TEL) 4 763- 383 -7601 (FAX) 1 1 I 11.-0' — 11.-0' 5.7.111 S.F. TYPICAL SIDE AND REAR PREFINISHED M11. CAP FLASHING CHAIN WIC GATES w/ SATS PREFIOSIED MIL. CAP FLAsiNG SOLDER COURSE FACE BRICK NOTE TOTAL SON S.E. ONE FACE W/ BASE IS 143 SF. sth.'34-7 ATION .111721Z L-_ 4E1. 110 -0' `�EER.a tGE-tY TIP. LOW SFFT. 12 4EL. LM ELEVATION TYP. 0 HIGH SOFFIT OE�I. , .1-0 ,►/►TIOlI PREFHISNED MTL CAP FLASHING SOLDIER COIF SIGN CAB. - 52 SF. DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURE FACE BRICK PRECAST CONC. SILL CULTURED STONE BASE aL- ASPHALT SINGLES FACE BRICK SOLDIER COURSE ALUM GLAZING SYSTEM W/ INSUL GLASS PRECAST CONC SILL BLK. 0ECORATNE UGHT FIXTURE CULTURED STONE BASE 40d 110- 0 100 RJM 5455 HWY 169 PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 763 - 383 -7600 (TEL) 763- 383 -7601 (FAX) j 1 i g 2 1 . ..- z Z ELEVATION ....V£RIFY FOOTING DEPTH NHS ELEVATION PER C ROIDSNG REOUItETMENTS REVISIONS DATE ISSUED SCALE .IOU .•• • w 0 s c 2 1. E) 111, 4k- • 11 (i) -J 2 441.raleid ;am 0 0 ci a) 0 N t� 0 cn 0) V 0 L • N 2 0 co L- TD 2 w a. • 2 (I) '5 d WEI 0 as 02 co O .1.1fru 1 , . tee f • 11111.1 _0"i I, 106,1ffied .., iv 13111111rIliralrar.irarg MIN ElEir.dhear.ir iil.._.: . 1111111•111Le C • lo WAIIIMIL MIFT■iiiell rill1110-smi KAM' =A. ell WIC Im ' • II M. III • Ilh. • 11■69% IlL1 OPIPm" TIMM 41 I 1101:11: LIIPb. 111 %AOC". ilele1/4 CPIEL' m. 11•11--11111MECW v r rAiirAllr NI VA' i' OIL" ei .0' Rto ,ieref 1.91 4 .01. %gala, ile1/4 rI in NIZSir is. guar. 2 li Le; I EA I i kliiit,' . *Aloe' ; • • Memo To: Lino Lakes Environmental Board From: Marty Asleson CC: Michael Grochala Date: February 26, 2003 Re: Minnesota League of Voters /Education Fund /Grant Submittal Discussion Item 7B Please find attached a Request for Proposal to the Minnesota League of Voters. This RFP was submitted at the 11th hour. Should the League of Minnesota Voters be interested in this RFP, we would need to obtain City Council approval to move forward. • Page 1 w. INUts lamps 111 0.44000, lamormataYstart dilloMNe fNi 360 North Robert Street • Sal to 415 St. Paul, MN 552ot 651.2913-1977.651-229-o623 (hr.) www.Wte EndmnmentMInnesota.o rg Open Space Public Education Project Request for Proposals Proposals Due: — February 17, 2003 Description of Assistance Available The Minnesota League of Conservation Voters Education Fund (MNLCV Education Fund) has technical assistance available to help communities prepare communications materials to educate and activate Minnesota citizens around open space protection at the local level. MNLCV Education Fund has designed high- quality, four -color communication materials that can be tailored to highlight natural areas, protection strategies and contact information for different local projects. This includes printed materials and website content. A copy of printed materials developed for Dakota County is included for your review. Website material can also be viewed online at: www .VoteEnvironmentMinnesota.org. We are currently accepting proposals from open space advocates who could benefit from the development and distribution of similar communications pieces. Eligible applicants include local activists, nonprofit organizations, government agencies and/or partnerships. Background The mission of MNLCV Education Fund is to strengthen the capacity of the environmental movement to mobilize citizens as informed voters and advocates for sound environmental policies. Our approach encourages collaboration and coalition building using opinion research, new communications technologies, leadership training, and public education to promote responsible governance on environmental issues. Many Minnesota communities are facing threats to their quality of life due to rapid growth. While local activists are working to protect key open and green spaces, they do not always have the resources needed to produce the high quality education materials that the public demands. The goal of our Open Space Public Education Project is to effectively utilize MNLCV Education Fund's communications expertise by partnering with local open space protection groups to create and distribute high quality materials. Sample Projects • Local community groups interested in preserving specific open spaces and would like to educate the public and/or officials about the importance of open space to preserving clean water, quality of life, etc. • Watershed or soil and water districts with public education program interested in adding a printed mailing piece(s) to their plan to connect the importance of open space to water quality. • County or city planners interested in educating the public about open space as part of a larger comprehensive plan. Priority Selection Criteria Priority will be given to applicants who: • Have a plan in place, or in process, for implementing an open space protection initiative at the city, county or watershed level. • Demonstrate a commitment to citizen education and involvement. • Can provide, if possible, a portion of costs. Please Note • This project is not designed to assist efforts that promote ballot referenda or election activities. • Applicants would be expected to work with MNLCV Education Fund communications staff to tailor printed materials and/or website content using the basic template already developed. Application Procedures Please fill out and submit the attached Proposal Information Sheet and a narrative that provides the following information: 1. Background information on applicant organization or partnership. 2. Geographic focus area. 3. Description of current and planned activities to protect open space (including a timeline). 4. Role of public involvement in open space protection efforts. 5. Description of current public education activities and needs. Please limit proposal narratives to four pages. Feel free to attach relevant materials. For More Information Contact: Lisa Doerr at 651- 229 -0621 ext. 1 or lisadoerr @VoteEnvironmentMinnesota.org Proposal Deadline: February 17, 2003 Open Space Public Education Project Proposal Information Sheet Proposal Deadline: February 17, 2003 Applicant Organization: City of Lino Lakes Contact Person: Marty Asleson Natural Resources Specialist City of Lino Lakes Address: 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN. 55014 Phone: 651- 982 -2435 Fax: 651- 982 -2499 Email: masleson @ci.lino - lakes.mn.us Website: http: / /www.ci.lino- lakes.mn.us/ Geographic Focus Area: City of Lino Lakes Approximate Number of Residents: 19,000 Proposal Summary (three sentences or less): This is a request for assistance in promoting natural resource and open space, preservation and restoration efforts in the City of Lino Lakes. The City requests help from the Minnesota League of Conservation Voters Education Fund to develop a public information bruchure, and to enhance the current City web site. Historic information presented in a bruchure, and real -time resource information on our City web site, would help our residents to understand past and current natural resource issues in the City. Background Information The City of Lino Lakes adopted the first Parks and Trails Plan in 1992. In 1995, a "20/20" Focus Group identified the preservation of significant open space and greenways as a priority issue. Because of the 20/20 Vision process, a City Environmental Board was established. This Board meets on a monthly basis. The City hired Applied Ecological Services and Brauer and Associates in the Spring of 1998 to develop a Handbook For Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. One of the outcomes of this study was the completion of an initial GIS land cover type map. This project defined the Citie's concept of Conservation Development. The project also developed tools on how to proceed with Conservation Development. One of these tools is the conservation development process. A large development was planned with all Board and Council Members invited to participate. The project produced a greenway system within the development and about 50% open space dedicated to the City. In 2000 -2001, the City participated with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in the Wild Land Urban Interface Project. With the help from the Minnesota DNR the City was able to re- classify the existing GIS maps for two thirds of the City under the MLCCS, identify significant resource areas, and evaluate and make suggestions for future management of development. In 2001 -2002 the City participated with the Anoka County Soil Conservation District under a Metro Greenways Grant program to classify the rest of the City under MLCCS, suggest specific tools for conservation in specific areas, and establish a working relationship with the Conservation District. The City is presently concluding two years of residential building moratorium. Durring this moritorium, a Task Force met on a continual basis to rewrite Zoning Codes, and the Subdivision Ordinance. These new City Codes should help to enable conservation development. Geographic Focus Areas The City's new geographic information has enabled us to discover, and doccument high - priority and sensitive areas. Several fairly rare ecosystems are doccumented, and new remnants continue to be discovered. The City is taking an active hands -on approach to manage these areas on public lands. The City is activly pursuing open space preservation in areas that have these unique natural resource communities on private lands. We have solicited the assistance of The Anoka Soil Conservation District, the Rice Creek Watershed District, The Minnesota Land Trust, working with Private Development Interests. One such area is Section 5 of Lino Lakes. This area is proposed for development within 3 to 5 years, is in a Phase One Growth Area, and has many newly discovered unique and rare or threatened natural comunities. The City has the second largest Great Blue Heron Rookery in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. We are in danger of loosing this colony. The Colony has • abandonded nesting for the last three years. The Cities of Lino Lakes and Centerville have reacted to this issue by jointly adopting joint powers and ordinances controlling use around Peltier Island in Lake Peltier where the birds nest. A Task Force consisting of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Wild Life Managers, The Rice Creek Watershed District's Biologist, Local wildlife experts and advocates, have met several times to determine the cause of abandonment. A University of Minnesota Student has just been hired to help with this issue. The Heron is our City Symbol, and a new ellementary school has just been named Great Blue Heron Ellenentary. Our public education, and our research and monitering efforts concerning the Herons would greatly enhanced if we had a web cam that could moniter the birds behavior. There are also three nesting eagles in this area that could be monitered. The City also has several osprey nesting sites. Current And Planned Activities Described in Background and Geographic Focus Areas to some extent. Our Environmental Board meets on a monthly basis. One of the responsibilities of the Environmental Board is to review new proposals for development that are applied for. Recommendations from the Environmental Board are forwarded on to the Lino Lakes Planning and Zonning Board and the City Council . The Environmental Board is also responsible for Environmental Education, and natural resource planning and management, and as a public contact/involvement facilitation mechanism. Public Involvement The City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board has a history of promoting public involvement. The Board has a monthly public meeting. The board has in the past used a very limited education budget to assemble information packets for new residents, and to publish articles in the City News Letter. With your help, the City Environmental Board would be able to promote, educate, inform, and thereby involve the public in a very substantial way. Current Public Education As stated above the City Environmental Board has assembled information packets, writes City News Letter Articles, participates in a yearly Quad City Earth Day Celebration, and holds a monthly public meeting. With the critical decisions the City will be making in the future, and with the Cultural issues that surface from the potential loss of unique natural resources, the Lino Lakes Environmental Board is looking for education tools that can adequatly address the public's need for information. Please mail proposals to: