HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/10/2003 Env Bd Packet•
City of Lino Lakes
Environmental Board Meeting
September 10, 2003
6:30 p.m.
Council Workroom*
(This meeting not televised)
*Please note location change.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 30, 2003
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. OPEN MIKE
• 5. ACTION ITEMS
A. EAW Comment Review, Marshan Lake Industrial Park
6. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Sketch Plan Review, Circle -Lex VFW
B. Sketch Plan Review, ProTerra
7. OTHER DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. Forestry
B. Solid Waste Recycling /Recycling Day
C. Environmental /Heron Issues
8. ADJOURN
•
•
•
Agenda Item 5A
Environmental Board Meeting Date: September 10, 2003
Topic: EAW Comment Review, Marshan Lake Industrial Park
Background:
The Environmental Board reviewed the EAW for the Panattonni site before the
comment period. Comments were received. The comments are included as
(Attachment 1). The EAW was determined to be complete, with comments and
suggested changes by the Environmental Board.
Analysis: Comments were received from MNDOT, MPCA, and Met Council. A
previous request from the Minnesota DNR for a rare plant survey is complete and
submitted as (Attachment 2). Again, the purpose of an EAW is to determine
whether an EIS is necessary. Based on the received comments it appears that
an EIS is not necessary.
Options:
1. Accept comments with the Environmental Board comments attached, forward
on to the City Council, and recommend that an EIS is not necessary.
2. Recommend an EIS.
Recommendation:
Option 1
Environmental Board Comments:
Attachments:
1. EAW Comment Response Document — Record of Decision
2. Tetra Tech EM Inc. Report
•
•
Record of Decision
LAKES BUSINESS PARK
(MARSHAN LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK)
Lake Drive (CSAH 23)- Approximately One - Quarter Mile South of 1 -35W /Lake
Drive (CSAH 23) Interchange
In the
City of Lino Lakes
Anoka County, Minnesota
Prepared for:
City of Lino lakes
Prepared by:
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
September, 2003
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
RECORD OF DECISION
ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND
The City of Lino Lakes is the responsible governmental unit (RGU) for this
project. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for
this project as prescribed by environmental review requirements. Lino Lakes
prepared the EAW.
The EAW was filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (MEQB) and
circulated for review and comments to the required EAW distribution list. A
Notice of Availability was published in the EQB Monitor on July 21, 2003.
The thirty -day comment period closed August 20, 2003. Written comments
received from agencies and citizens are summarized and responded to in this
report in the section "AGENCY COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ". Copies of the
comments are attached to the end of this document.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project consists of development of one 13.4 -acre parcel and future
development of three outlots totaling 16.2 acres of a plat called the Marshan
Lake Industrial Park in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The initial development includes
a 265,000 square foot building for light industrial /warehouse use.
Development of the initial site will include construction of a street connection to
Lake Drive (CSAH 23), extension of public and private utilities (sewer, water,
gas, etc.), installation of storm water ponds and/or infiltration basins and site
grading. In addition, a storm sewer system will be installed to replace an existing
ditch that conveys drainage to Anoka County Ditch No. 10. A conservation
easement will be secured along Anoka County Ditch No. 10 to preserve the
integrity of the ditch within the boundaries of the property.
The City of Lino Lakes anticipates future development of Outlots A, B, and C and
as the RGU has included them in the EAW document. Development of the three
outlots is expected to be for contemporary light industrial uses. Conceptual uses
are as follows:
• Outlot A (3.9 acres) - -Light mfg., Office, Retail Sales and Service
Establishment.
• Outlot B (5.4 acres) -- Professional Offices
• Outlot C (7.0 acres) - -Light mfg., Office, Retail Sales and Service
Establishment.
DRAFT
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
The conceptual uses are allowed in the LI, Light Industrial District of Lino Lakes.
The identified uses are only three of 15 allowable uses in the LI district. Other
permitted uses include building material sales, greenhouses, nurseries,
warehousing, and distribution facilities. Street and utility improvements for the
outlots will be installed with the initial phase of development.
The Lakes Business Park has approximately 23 acres (1,002,520 square feet) of
developable area with buildings, associated off - street parking and drive areas.
For the 13.4 -acre (586,753 square feet) parcel, approximately 9.83 acres
(428,400 square feet) is developable. Non - developable areas include existing
wetlands, Anoka County Ditch No. 10, and wooded buffer areas. Maximum
buildout will result in 70 percent impervious coverage, which is less than the
allowable threshold of maximum impervious coverage of 85 percent, as identified
in the City's zoning ordinance.
Initial site grading and construction is anticipated to begin in October 2003. Full
development of the site is expected to be completed in 3 to 5 years.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Land Use and Compatibility with Local Plans
The project is consistent with local and regional plans, which includes the
following:
• City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan (land use, sanitary sewer,
transportation, surface water management)
• City of Lino Lakes Subdivision and Platting Ordinance
• Rice Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Program
The proposed project, to varying degrees, satisfies each of the ten conservation
development principles outlined in the Lino Lakes Handbook of Environmental
Planning and Conservation Development.
Wildlife and Vegetation Impacts
A search of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Natural
Heritage Database for rare plant and animal species or other significant natural
features known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the proposed
project was conducted. The search identified the Lance - Leaved Violet (Viola
lanceolata), a Threatened species documented approximately a quarter -mile
southwest of the proposed project site. Other plants species include the
Endangered Tubercled Rein - Orchid (Platanthera flava), the Threatened Twisted -
Eyed Grass (Xyris torta), and species of Special Concern, the Autumn
Fimbristylis (Fimbristylis autumnalis) and Marginated Rush (Juncus marginatus)
recently been documented throughout the Blaine and Lino Lakes areas. The
DRAFT
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
DNR has requested that a botanical survey be conducted in the project area. It
is recommended, the survey be conducted by individuals with previous
experience and when the plant species are in bloom.
Mr. Jason Huseth, Senior Biologist at Tetra Tech EM Inc., and Mr. Marty
Asleson, Environmental Specialist for the City of Lino Lakes completed a
botanical survey at the proposed project site on July 17, 2003. In summary, a
thorough field review by Mr. Huseth and Mr. Asleson encountered none of the
above species mentioned in the above paragraph. The proposed project site
was primarily maintained as non - native herbaceous old -field vegetation,
dominated by Smooth Brome (Bromus inermis), Kentucky Blue Grass (Poa
pratensis) and Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Anoka County Ditch
10 and several smaller laterals along its extent contained primarily second
growth woodland vegetation dominated by Box Elder (Acer negundo), Elm
(Ulmus americana), Buckthorn (Rhamnus carthartica) and Hackberry (Celtis
occidentalis).
Focused searches were conducted in isolated depressions for suitable habitat for
such species as Lanced - Leaved Violet (Viola lanceolata), Autumn Fimbristylis
( Fimbristylis autumnalis), Tubercled Rein - Orchid (Platanthera flava), Marginated
Rush (Juncus marginatus), Clinton's Bulrush (Scripus clintonii; State Special
Concern), and Cross Leaved Milkwort (Polygala cruciata; State Endangered).
No rare species were found within the limited suitable habitat.
Based on the findings of July 17th, 2003 field survey of the proposed project area
and the absence of state - listed plant populations on the site, it was concluded
that no rare plant populations would be directly impacted by the proposed
development activities on -site.
Wetland Impacts
The proposed plan will not require the alteration of the wetlands on the site. In
the event future development does encroach upon on -site wetlands, under the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) the Rice Creek Watershed District
(RCWD) acts as the LGU for wetland impacts. The RCWD will assume wetland
alteration permit authority over any wetland impacts.
Anoka County Ditch No. 10 will be preserved in its existing condition.
Water Related Land Use (Shoreland and Floodplain Impacts)
The very eastern portion of the site is located within the designated shoreland
zoning district for Marshan Lake. The City has adopted a shoreland and a
floodplain ordinance that regulates development within these designated areas.
The DNR has approved these ordinances. The proposed development will be in
compliance with the standards of these ordinances.
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
• There are no floodplain impacts associated with the proposed project.
Water Quality Impacts
The creation of new detention facilities will address the increased quantities of
runoff resulting from increases in impervious surfaces. Surface water runoff will
first be conveyed by new storm sewer and then discharged into storm water
ponds prior to discharge into receiving water bodies. Storm water ponds will
provide for rate control as well as treatment.
The City of Lino Lakes has storm water policies and design standards that will
need to be satisfied by the proposed development to reduce the introduction of
pollutants to wetlands and the area waterbodies (i.e. Anoka County Ditch No. 10
and Marshan Lake). Furthermore, the storm water treatment system will need to
incorporate standards and rules of the Rice Creek Watershed District that also
governs surface water planning within the project area. The proposed treatment
and retention system includes the creation of water quality ponds, vegetative
filter strips, drainage swales, and infiltration basins. Before construction can
proceed, both the City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD)
must issue permits to satisfy surface water runoff regulations.
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit will be
required for this project. Erosion prevention and sediment control best
management practices (BMP's) will be used in accordance with the NPDES
permit. BMP's will include an erosion control plan and BMP's used in the
Minnesota Department of Transportation's (Mn/DOT) standard specifications,
details, and special provisions. Temporary and permanent erosion control
measures will include timely revegetation of disturbed areas, hay bales, silt
fencing, flotation silt curtains, and sedimentation ponds.
Hazardous Waste
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was completed for the
proposed project in June 2003. A copy of the Phase I report is on file at the City
of Lino Lakes Government Center. Based on records review, on -site
reconnaissance, and interviews the following suspect environmental conditions
were identified on and in the vicinity of the proposed development area:
• An adjacent closed LUST (leaking underground storage tank) site
located south adjacent to the proposed project area was identified, as
currently and historically, to likely have involved the use of significant
quantities of hazardous substances and /or petroleum products. The site
historically and currently was observed to have poor outdoor
housekeeping practices.
With the exception of the closed LUST listing, no releases related to the
historical or current uses have been reported for the adjacent site.
DRAFT
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
Based on information obtained from the MPCA regarding the LUST, this
site is not suspected to have potential to impact soil or groundwater
beneath the proposed project area. Additionally, given the planned
development of the proposed project does not include the construction of
buildings in the vicinity of the south adjacent site, this finding is not
considered to constitute a recognized environmental condition.
• Historical activities likely involved the application of herbicides and /or
pesticides to proposed project area as part of historical crop cultivation.
Given that this historic crop cultivation chemical use was stopped
decades ago, and the bulk storage of chemicals were not observed on
the proposed project area in available historic aerial photographs, this
finding is not considered a recognized environmental condition.
• Crushed concrete was reportedly placed on the south /southeastern
portion of the proposed property area.
Potential on -site disposal of demolition debris from demolition of two to
three structures historically associated with the former adjacent
farmstead located near the southwest corner of the proposed project
area.
Surface disturbance located in the north- central portion of the proposed
project area in the 1980 aerial photograph; the cause of the disturbance
unknown.
The potential for encountering buried debris exists for the proposed
project area, which includes excavating activities. These findings are
considered to constitute recognized environmental conditions. Although,
these findings are considered to constitute recognized environmental
conditions, based on the potential for encountering buried debris during
redevelopment activities, no additional investigation is recommended at
this time. However, it is recommended that soils be screened as part of
geotechnical investigations to be conducted on the proposed project
area in preparation for future development activities.
No hazardous wastes will be generated by the proposed project. Temporary fuel
storage tanks for construction equipment may be located in the project area to
allow ready access for equipment refueling. The size and location of these tanks
is unknown at this time.
•
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
Traffic
The only mitigation measure necessary will be a southbound right turn lane from
Lake Drive to the development. A northbound left turn lane will be desirable in
the future as volumes increase and Lake Drive is improved to the north.
Dust and Noise Impacts
Dust will be generated during construction. Construction activities will disturb
existing vegetative ground cover and allow soil material to become airborne. This
will be a temporary impact primarily associated with grading activities. Odors
may be generated by exhaust from engines engaged in construction activities.
Any equipment will be properly equipped to control odor emissions.
Construction noise will be controlled by periodic inspections to ensure that
equipment is properly muffled. Construction noise will be regulated by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and standards set forth by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
Air Quality Impacts
The project does not meet state thresholds for requiring an Indirect Source
Permit.
Visual Impacts
The Lakes Business Park development will be designed to enhance visual
experiences for site users and roadway neighbors.
Historic and Archaeological Resources
A Phase I archaeological survey was conducted in July 2003. A copy of the
report is on file at the City of Lino Lakes City Government Center. A field survey
was conducted from July 8 to July 9, 2003. Two archaeological sites were
identified during the investigation as having a high potential for intact precontact
archaeological resources. Shovel tests in these two areas revealed no cultural
materials and no further archeological work is recommended for the proposed
development area.
yl•
DRAFT
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
AGENCY COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
Written comments received from agencies addressing the EAW were as follows:
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) reviewed the EAW
and had the following comments:
Mn /DOT Comments:
1. The Transportation System Plan (TSP) covers a 20 -year timeframe and
allocates limited funding. At this time there are no plans listed in the TSP
to upgrade the interchange and ramps at I -35W and Lake Drive (CSAH
23). Mn /DOT is concerned about the level of proposed development
surrounding the interchange of I -35W and Lake Drive (CSAH 23).
Mn /DOT has repeatedly advised the City of Lino Lakes that a detailed
traffic analysis encompassing I -35W and Lake Drive (CSAH 23)
interchange must be performed. At present, no acceptable analysis has
been submitted by the City or by a developer. Concerns and
recommendations in a letter dated May 25, 2001 and earlier letters remain
in effect.
2. The proposed development area will impact the surrounding transportation
infrastructure by increasing demand on roadways, which are currently
congested. It is recommended the Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EAW) reflect the traffic analysis needs discussed in the previous bullet.
Timing the completion of future phases of development so that they
happen concurrently with area transportation improvements will assist in
minimizing congestion. The City should deny plats, site plans, or permit
applications, until transportation issues and needs associated with the
proposed project area and development are addressed to the satisfaction
of the city and Mn /DOT.
3. Mn /DOT Metro District computation of Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
estimated to generated by the proposed development determined that
light industrial portion of the development would generate ADT of 1,847,
while the proposed warehousing portion of the development would
generate an additional 1,314 ADT, for total ADT of 3,161.
4. A Mn /DOT drainage permit may be required for this project. The
proposed development will need to maintain existing drainage rates (Le.
the rate of storm water is discharged from the site must not increase). To
determine whether a drainage permit will be required, the City or project
developer will be required to submit before and after for both 10 and 100
year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and
systems affecting Mn /DOT right -of -way. Storm water rate runoff will not
be allowed to increase to Mn /DOT right -of -way. Review material will
DRAFT
•
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
include drainage area maps for proposed and existing conditions, as well
for proposed and existing conditions, as well as proposed grading plans
for the project area site. The hydraulic calculations need to correspond to
the drainage area maps.
5. Mn /DOT owns access control along I -35W, and also for approximately 100
feet along Lake Drive (CSAH 23).
6. Any work on Lake Drive (CSAH 23) must meet State Aid rules and
policies. Anoka County must review any changes to its County State Aid
system so that they stay within its system limitations. Lake Drive (CSAH
23) is Anoka County's jurisdiction and must have the opportunity to
comment on the proposed development.
City of Lino Lakes Responses:
1. The City of Lino Lakes understands that the upgrading of the interchange
of I -35W and Lake Drive (CSAH 23) is not in the TSP. The City has been
working with Anoka County and with Mn /DOT to find alternate methods of
improving the interchange or to justify inclusion of the interchange
improvements into future editions of the TSP. The City understands the
concern Mn /DOT has relative to the level of proposed development and
acknowledges receipt of several letters. The most recent letter, a copy of
which Mn /DOT attached, and the others specifically reference the Town
Center Development, which is the major proposed development in the
area. The City of Lino Lakes has authorized an updating of all previous
studies along the corridor, specifically to include the analysis of the impact
of the Town Center Development. The previous studies were sent to
Mn /DOT. The City anticipates that this will be done within the next month.
This EAW Mn /DOT reviewed was for the Lino Lakes Business Park and
not the Town Center Development. The developers for Town Center and
the developer for Lino Lakes Business Park are different. A separate
EAW for Town Center will be prepared.
2. The City of Lino Lakes has reviewed the impact the proposed
development will have on the surrounding transportation infrastructure.
The EAW contained a detailed analysis of the impact of the 265,000
square foot light manufacturing and warehouse building. We have
subsequently added the maximum development possible on the three
outlots and included that in the detailed traffic analysis, and sent a copy of
the letter report to Mn /DOT. The City anticipates the traffic study for the
corridor, being developed in conjunction with Town Center, will address in
more detail the impacts of the Town Center growth and background
growth, which will be significantly higher than that from the Lino Lakes
Business Park. The proposed Lino Lakes Business Park development will
DRAFT
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
not have a significant impact on the transportation infrastructure and,
therefore, the City would have difficulty in denying the proposal on a basis
of lack of traffic infrastructure sufficient to handle future developments
from other parcels, this parcel and background traffic.
3. Mn /DOT computed ADT from the site at 3,161 trips. This is significantly
higher than the calculations for either the 265,000 square foot building or
for the entire site with maximum outlot development. As requested,
Mn /DOT was contacted and it was found that the ADT of 1,847 was for the
entire site if it was light industrial and the ADT of 1314 was for the entire
site if it was warehousing. The number should not have been added
together. This shows that the City is clearly looking at "worst case" or
"maximum possible" traffic from the Lino Lakes Business Park.
4. Mn /DOT indicated that a drainage permit might be needed for this
development. This is also the City's understanding and as the
development proceeds, if it is approved, proper drainage calculations will
be made and permit applications submitted.
5. The City understands that Mn /DOT owns access control near the I -35W
interchange. The City does not intend to request access through any of
the area controlled by Mn /DOT. The Lino Lakes Business Park is several
hundred feet south of the interchange.
The City submitted a copy of the EAW to Anoka County for their review.
The City is working with Anoka County in reviewing the traffic impacts of
this development and other developments, which may be proposed in the
future.
As the City of Lino Lakes continues in the process, copies of plat or other
documents will be provided as needed.
The Minnesota Pollution Agency (MPCA) received copies of the EAW,
however, due to limited resources did not provide any specific comments in
regard to the proposed project.
MPCA Comment:
1. The decision not to review the EAW does not constitute a waiver by the
MPCA of any pending permits required by the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the
responsibility of the project proposer to secure any required permits and to
comply with any requisite permits.
City of Lino Lakes Response:
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
1. The City of Lino Lakes concurs with the MPCA comment. Prior to
construction of the proposed project the developer /contractor will submit
and obtain NPDES and sanitary sewer permit applications and permits.
The Metropolitan Council offered the following comments:
Metropolitan Council Comments:
1. The proposal will remove 0.8 acres of wooded vegetation and increase the
lawn /landscaping from 0 to 9.0 acres. Re- landscaping as much of the
proposed lawn /landscaping area in native vegetation will benefit water
quality and potentially replace some bird and wildlife habitat that will be
lost due to the proposed development. Replacing the lost wooded area in
native landscaping in the native landscaping areas is also desirable.
2. The restoration of the stream banks and an appropriate buffer along
County Ditch #10 with native vegetation will benefit water quality.
3. The project is just up stream from Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional
Park Reserve. Preserving and restoring habitat and water quality in the
areas surrounding the park will benefit the ecological values in the park
reserve, particularly in and around Marshan Lake.
4. Staff review concludes that the EAW is complete and accurate with
respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency
with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes.
Lino Lakes Responses:
1. Vegetative filter/buffer strips will be used around portions of the site.
According to the Lino Lakes Handbook for Environmental Planning and
Conservation Development, filter/buffer strips provide an important
function in minimizing erosion, reducing direct runoff of storm water into
vulnerable ecological resources, and help sustain wildlife through suitable
habitat.
2. County Ditch #10 has side slopes approaching 12 percent, therefore,
erosion would present a potential hazard to water quality. The stream
bank area along County Ditch #10 will not be disturbed by construction,
and as noted in #3 will be protected by a conservation easement.
3. The proposed development will have the opportunity to minimize impacts
to the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Chain of Lakes. A
conservation easement will be dedicated along the County Ditch #10 to
preserve the integrity of the drainage corridor. The proposed development
•
•
•
Record of Decision
City of Lino Lakes
will also incorporate storm water treatment best management practices to
minimize water quality impacts to County Ditch # 10.
4. The City of Lino Lakes concurs with the Metropolitan Council's comment.
The City of Lino Lakes • stating
its approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet and its acceptance of
the findings of fact for Lakes Business Park, also known as Marshan Lake
Industrial Park.
DECISION ON NEED FOR EIS
Because the potential adverse impacts due to the proposed project will be
minimal, the City of Lino Lakes has determined that the environmental review
requirements have been met by the Environmental Assessment Worksheet
prepared for this project, and that an Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
Community Development Director, City of Lino Lakes
Date
x:UroUinoA030600\ reports &specs\eawrecordofdecisioadoc
•
• N r�
:s Minnesota Department of Transportation
1"1 ,., 01 Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
August 19, 2003
Mr. Mike Grochala
Director of Community Development
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
SUBJECT: Lakes Business Park development EAW
Mn/DOT Review # EAW03 -014
Southwest quadrant of I -35W and Lake Drive (CSAH 23)
City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County
C.S. 0280
Dear Mr. Grochala:
The Metro District, Minnesota Department of Transportation ( Mn/DOT), has reviewed the above
referenced EAW. Please consider the following points prior to further development:
The Metro District of Mn/DOT uses the Transportation System Plan (TSP) to determine the
investment into the Trunk Highway system in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The TSP
covers a 20 -year timeframe and allocates limited funding. Please be aware that there are no
plans listed in the TSP to upgrade the interchange or ramps at Interstate Highway I -35W and
Lake Drive. Consequently, Mn/DOT is concerned about the level of proposed development
surrounding the interchange of I -35W and Lake Drive. Mn/DOT has been exchanging
letters with the City of Lino Lakes concerning this interchange since 1995. We have
repeatedly advised the City (most recently on May 25, 2001; copy of the letter enclosed) that
a detailed traffic analysis encompassing the I -35W and CSAH 23 (Lake Drive) interchange
and ramps must be performed. As of this date, no acceptable analysis has been submitted by
the City, or by a developer. The concerns noted in our May 25, 2001 letter, and earlier
letters, have not been addressed, and our recommendations remain in effect.
The proposed development will impact the surrounding transportation infrastructure by
increasing demand on already- congested roadways. Therefore, the City should revise the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) to reflect the traffic analysis needs outlined
above. Timing the completion of future phases of development so that such developments
happen together with area transportation improvements can help minimize, or alleviate
congestion. Therefore, any plats, site plans or permit applications proposed or submitted for
development should be denied by the City until such time as all transportation issues and
needs associated with the proposed land use and development are addressed to the
satisfaction of the City and Mn/DOT. Please direct questions concerning these issues to
Brigid Gombold, (651) 582 - 1378, of the Mn/DOT Metro District Program Management Unit.
An equal opportunity employer
Mike Grochala
Page 2
August 19, 2003
• A Mn/DOT Metro District computation of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) estimated to be
generated by the proposed development determined that the light industrial portion of the
development would generate ADT of 1,847, while the proposed warehousing portion of the
development would generate an additional 1,314 ADT, for total ADT of 3,161. For questions
on this point, please contact Gene Hicks, Metro District Traffic Forecasts Engineer, at (651)
582 -1402.
• A drainage permit may be needed for this development. The proposed development will need
to maintain existing drainage rates (i.e., the rate at which storm water is discharged from the
site must not increase). To determine whether a drainage permit will be required, the City or
project developer will need to submit before /after hydraulic computations for both 10 and 100
year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting
Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. The storm water rate of runoff will not be
allowed to increase to Mn/DOT Right of Way. This material will need to include drainage
area maps for proposed and existing conditions, as well as the proposed grading plans for the
site. The hydraulic calculations will need to correspond to the drainage area maps. Please
direct questions concerning these issues to Eric Kasa, (651- 634 -2076) of Mn/DOT's Water
Resources Engineering Section.
• Mn/DOT owns access control along I -35W, and also for approximately 100 feet along Lake
Drive (CSAH 23). For questions on this point, please contact Ms. Ia Xiong, Mn/DOT Metro
District Right of Way Area Manager, at (651) 582 -1266.
As a reminder, Lake Drive is CSAH 23 (County State Aid Highway) Route 23. Any work on
a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. Also, the County must review any
changes to its County State Aid system so that they stay within its system limitations. Please
note that CSAH 23 is Anoka County's jurisdiction and the County must have the opportunity
to review and comment on the development as well. You may obtain additional information
regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways:
D http : //www.dot.state.mn.us /stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the
Mn/DOT State Aid Manual.
• Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5- 892200 for information regarding
standards and policies.
D Please go to http: / /www.revisor.lej.state.mn.us /arule /8820/ for information regarding
State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820.
D For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design
Manual (English) Table 5 -3.04A and Figure 5 -3.04A for guidance and policies.
Driveway widths, other than those recommended, up to 50 feet will be permitted only by
special permission of the Commissioner of Transportation or designee.
Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582 -1389 with any additional
questions.
Mike Grochala
Page 3
August 19, 2003
Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will
make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development
proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of
copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals.
Feel Free to contact me at (651) 582 -1462 if you have any questions regarding this reveiw.
Sincerely,
Mary McNeff
Transportation Planner
Copy: Doug Fischer, Anoka County Engineer.
Larry Hoium, Anoka County Surveyor
Kate Garwood, Multimodal Transportation Planner, Anoka County
Bob Rogers, SEH, Vadnais Heights, MN.
Mark Vargo, Glen Rehbein Companies, Blaine, MN
Gerald Larson, Mn/DOT Environmental Services
Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council
•
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
May 25, 2001
City of Lino Lakes
Attn: Mary Kay Wyland
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
Dear Ms Wyland:
SUBJECT: Town Center
Minnesota Department of Transportation Review #P01 -018A
NE Quad of I -35W & CSAH 23
Lino Lakes, Anoka County
C.S. 0280
The Minnesota Department of Transportation has reviewed the Town Center plat in compliance with
State Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Please address the following issues prior to final plat
acceptance:
• As stated in previous correspondence regarding development projects in this location, a detailed
traffic analysis regarding the CSAH 23 / 35W intersections and ramps must be completed. We will
need either a Synchro5 or HCS Model traffic volume study in order to determine what our traffic
comments will be. The analysis must specifically include the CSAH 23 / 35W ramps and
interchange. This analysis must be completed before Mn/DOT will issue any permits. If you have
any questions regarding these traffic concerns please contact Wayne Lemaniak in our Traffic section
at (651) 634 -2147.
• No work will be allowed within Mn/DOT right of way, this includes any landscaping. If you have any
questions regarding this concern please contact Keith VanWagner in our Permits section at
(651) 582 - 1443.
• A Mn/DOT stormwater drainage permit will be required for this development. The permit
application must include hydraulic computations and drainage area maps showing existing and
proposed conditions along with addressing 10 and 100 year storms. One foot of freeboard over high
water elevation will also be required. Existing drainage patterns and rates of runoff affecting
Mn/DOT right of way must be perpetuated. The sites stormwater discharge rate must not increase. If
you have any questions regarding these drainage concerns please contact Marty Korthank in our
Water Resource Engineering section at (651) 634 -2077. You may contact Keith VanWagner in our
Permits section at (651) 582 -1443 to obtain the proper permit forms and guidelines.
An equal opportunity employer
City of Lino Lakes
May 25, 2001
Page 2
• At such time the "triangular piece" of this plat is developed, this parcel will need to obtain access
from the Apollo Drive extension (whether public or private). The current plans must be modified so
that access is indicated on this future piece from Apollo Drive recognizing that no access will be
allowed within Mn/DOT right of way where we have access control.
The Apollo Drive entrance as stated previously, should be aligned with Lilac Drive. If you have any
questions regarding these concerns please contact Robert Evbayekha in our Design section at
(651) 582 -1314.
• Please send a copy of the fmal plat to Mark Beatty in our Surveys section at
3485 Hadley Ave., N., Oakdale, 55128. If you have any questions you can contact Mark at
(651) 779 -5450.
• As a reminder, Lake Dr. is CSAH 23 and Apollo Dr. is MSA 115. Any work on a CSAH or MSA
route must meet State Aid rules and policies. Also, the City must review any changes to its Municipal
State Aid system so that they stay within its system limitations. You may obtain additional
information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways:
> http: / /www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT
State Aid Manual.
Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5- 892.200 for information regarding standards
and policies.
> Please go to http: / /www.revisor leg.state mn.us/arule /8820/ for information regarding State Aid
Operations Rules Chapter 8820.
> For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual
(English) Table 5 -3.04A and Figure 5 -3.04A for guidance and policies. Driveway widths, other
than those recommended, up to 50 feet will be permitted only by special permission of the
Commissioner of Transportation or designee.
Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651)582 -1389 with any additional questions.
If you have any additional questions regarding this review please call me at (651) 582 - 1468.
Sincerely,
Arda,40/r
Sharon Anderson
Transportation Planner / Local Government Liaison
Cc: Larry Hoium / Anoka County Surveyor
Jon Olson / Anoka County Engineer
Jane Pemble / Anoka County Traffic Engineer
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
Blind copies sent via GroupWise:
Wayne Lemaniak / Traffic
Marty Korthank / Water Resource Engineering
Keith VanWagner / Permits
Robert Evbayekha / Design
Mark Beatty / Oakdale Surveys
Jim Deeny / State Aid
Blind copies to be filed:
Division File / CS 0280
LGL File / Lino Lakes
August 19, 2003
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Mr. Mike Grochala
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes MN 55014
RE: Lakes Business Park
Dear Mr. Grochala:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has received copies of the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) prepared for the Lakes Business Park,
prepared by the city of Lino Lakes, Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU). Due to
limited resources available to the MPCA, we have not reviewed the EAW for this project.
Therefore, the MPCA has no specific comments to provide the RGU regarding the
accuracy and completeness of the material contained in the EAW, the potential impacts
that may warrant future investigation before the project is commenced, and /or the need for
an Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed project.
This decision by the MPCA not to review the EAW does not constitute waiver by the
MPCA of any pending permits required by the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the responsibility
of the project proposer to secure any required permits and to comply with any requisite
permit conditions.
We remind the RGU that, pursuant to Minn. R. 4410.1700, subp. 5 (Environmental Quality
Board Rules), a copy of the RGU's decision on this EAW needs to be sent to the MPCA.
Sincerely,
Aci PtC(7-e-K-7
Eric Kilberg
Project Manager
Operations and Environmental Review Section
Regional Environmental Management Division
EK:gs
cc: Mark Vargo, Glenn Rehbein Companies
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155 -4194; (651) 296 -6300 (Voice); (651) 282 -5332 (TTY)
St. Paul • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Duluth • Mankato • Marshall • Rochester • Willmar; www.pca.state.mn.us
Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20% fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
•
Metropolitan Council
AllA Building communities that work
August 18, 2003
Mr. Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
RE: Lino Lakes — Lakes Business Park Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
Metropolitan Council District 11 (Natalie Haas Steffen, 763 - 753 -4298)
Referral File No. 18987 -1
Dear Mr. Grochala:
The Lakes Business Park Development proposes a 265,000 square foot light industrial/warehouse use with three
outlots of light manufacturing, professional offices, retail sales, and service establishment planned for later
development. The proposed project is 31.2 acres and located north of Elm Street, west of Lake Drive, east of
Interstate 35W and south of the Lino Lakes City Hall. The staff review finds the EAW is complete and accurate with
respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary
for regional purposes. However, staff provides the following comments for your consideration:
Recreation Open Space (Michael McDonough 651- 602 -1054)
Item 10 — Cover types.
The proposal will remove 0.8 acres of wooded vegetation and increase the Lawn/landscaping from 0 to 9.0 acres.
Re- landscaping as much of the proposed lawn/landscaping area in native vegetation will benefit water quality and
potentially replace some bird and wildlife habitat that will be lost due to the proposed development. Replacing the
lost wooded area in the native landscaping areas is also desirable.
Item 16 — Erosion and sedimentation.
The restoration of the stream banks and an appropriate buffer along county Ditch #10 with native vegetation will
benefit water quality.
Item 25- Nearby resources.
The project is just up stream from Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve. Preserving and restoring
habitat and water quality in the areas surrounding the park will benefit the ecological values in the park reserve,
particularly in and around Marshan Lake.
This will conclude the Council's review of the EAW. The Council will take no formal action on the EAW. If you
have any questions or need further information, please contact Christy Stark, principal reviewer, at 651- 602 -1750.
Sinc
•
Phyllis I-rlson, Manager
Planning and Technical Assistance
cc:
Natalie Haas Steffen, Metropolitan Council District 9
Ann Braden, Sector Representative
Christy Stark, Principal Reviewer
Cheryl Olson, Referrals Coordinator
V: \reviews\ communities \Lino Lakes \Letters \Lino Lakes 2003 EAW Lakes Business Park 18987 -1
Metro Info Line 602 -1888
www.metrocouncil.org
230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TTY 291 -0904
Tetra Tech EM Inc.
11300 Rupp Drive, Suite 100 ♦ Burnsville, MN 55337 • (952) 736 -2770 • Fax (952) 736 -2774
July 29, 2003
Mr. Marty Asleson
Environmental Specialist
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014
Subject: Rare Plant Survey
Marshan Lake Industrial Park
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
1" [EMI Project Number S1290.001
Dear Mr. Asleson:
The following is a summary of the rare plant survey conducted on the Marshan Lake Industrial
Park proposed development site in Lino Lakes on July 17th, 2003, by Tetra Tech EM Inc.
BACKGROUND
Tetra Tech EM Inc. was retained by the City of Lino Lakes to conduct a survey for rare plant
species within the Marshan Lake Business Park proposed development site in Lino Lakes. The
36 -acre proposed development site is located in the western half of Section 17 of Township 31N,
Range 22W in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The site is bounded by Interstate 35W to the north, Lake
Drive and residential and commercial properties to the east and south, and Centennial Middle
School to the west (Figure 1). Mr. Jason Husveth, Ecologist with Tetra Tech EM Inc., surveyed
the site with Mr. Marty Asleson, Lino Lakes Environmental Specialist, on Thursday July 17t,
2003.
METHODS
Prior to conducting the on -site survey, Mr. Husveth and Mr. Asleson reviewed recent aerial
photographs, the Anoka County digital soil survey, hydrologic information, and land cover data
to assess the most likely areas that rare species "of interest might inhabit within the proposed
development site In addition, Mr. Asleson and Mr. Husveth reviewed the location and site
characteristics of a nearby lance leaved violet population they discovered in 2002 at the adjacent
Lino Lakes Elementary School Property (approximately U.4 miles to the southwest).
C, 'contains recycled fiber and is recyclable
July 29, 2003
Page 2 of 2
On Thursday July 17th, 2003, Mr. Husveth and Mr. Asleson met on site and conducted meander
surveys within appropriate habitats for the species of concern. The surveys lasted for three hours
and the entire site was walked and assessed for the presence /absence of rare species with focused
ground surveys.
A thorough field review by Mr. Husveth and Mr. Asleson revealed that most of the site was too
disturbed and too densely vegetated with primarily non - native forage grasses and weeds to
support the rare species of interest. However, in isolated shallow depressions with sparse
vegetation, focused searches were conducted for suitable habitat for such species as lance leaved
violet (Viola lanceolata; State Threatened), autumn fimbristylis (Fimbristylis autumnalis; State
Special Concern), tubercled rein orchid (Platanthera flava var. herbiola; State Endangered),
cross leaved milkwort (Polygala cruciata; State Endangered), Clinton's bulrush (Scirpus
clintonii; State Special Concern), marginated rush (Juncus marginatus; State Special Concern),
and several other species of concern.
No rare plant populations were encountered during the July 17th surveys of the subject property.
The site was primarily maintained as non- native herbaceous old -field vegetation, dominated by
smooth brome (Bromus inermis), Kentucky blue grass (Poa pratensis), and reed canary grass
(Phalaris arundinacea). A deep ditch transects the site from north to south through the center of
the site, and from east to west at the north end of the site The ditch also has several smaller
laterals along its extent. The vegetation along the ditch was primarily second growth woodland
vegetation dominated by box elder (Acer negundo), elm (Ulmus americana), buckthorn
(Rhamnus cathartica), and hackberry (Celtis occidentalis). Furthermore, a pronounced fill pad
was encountered at the southeast corner of the site This area was dominated by smooth brome
and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa), a Minnesota noxious weed. Most of the site was
too disturbed and too densely vegetated with primarily non- native forage grasses and weeds to
support the rare species of interest. Furthermore, no rare species were found within the limited
suitable habitat that did occur on the site
Based on the findings of the July 17th surveys of the Marshan Lake Business Park proposed
development site and the absence of state- listed plant populations on the site, we conclude that
no rare plant populations will be directly impacted by the proposed development activities on the
site If you have questions regarding the information contained within this letter or the project in
general, please feel free to contact me at (952) 736 -2770 Ext. 22.
on Husveth, , .S.
Senior Ecologist
Enclosures
Proposed Site Boudary (Approximate)
Sections 17 and 18
Marshan Lake Industrial Park Proposed Development Site
Site Location of Rare Species Survey
Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota
Township 31 N, Range 22W, Western 1/2 of Section 17
TTEM I Project 1290.001
July 29, 2003
Figure 1.
Agenda Item 6A
Department Reports
Environmental Board Meeting Date: September 10, 2003
Topic: Sketch Plan Review, VFW
Summary: Attachment 1 is a sketch plan submitted by the VFW to build a new
facility on their existing site. No formal action is needed at this time.
Comments:
Attachments:
1. Sketch Plan, Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583
Agenda Item 6B
Department Reports
Environmental Board Meeting Date: September 10, 2003
Topic: Apollo Market Place, Proterra Sketch Plan
Summary: Please find a sketch plan for a "Market Place" development on
Apollo Drive (Attachment 1). Site location map is included as (Attachment 2). I
will bring resource information to the meeting. This is quick, first look at ideas of
a developer.
Comments:
Attachments:
1. Market Place Sketch Plan
2. Site Location Map
enriching
communities
through
architecture
&Nth • olrgkk •grand rapids • tv
wou•Agreaw
NEW BUILDING FOR
CIRCLE - LEX
VFW
POST #6583
7868 LAKE DRIVE
LINO LAKES,
MINNESOTA
poNae e
dab
Ely line Lot 7
CO
03098
JULY 7, 2003
file sees 03098 circ lexvfw.dwg
draan by MIT
cheehd by MIT
nano MICHAEL J. THOMAS, AIA
reg. a 23592
sign dab xxxxx xx, 2003
79TH STREET
200.00
I hereby certify that 84 pW,
spseffuakn, or repen taw ta
prepared y we or saw my
direct anpno4kn and that
am a dal, Crossed Architect
ander the kw of the State of
Mamas.
NW Cor. Lot 9
rs
N89 °05'08 "11" ; 189.89
NE Cor. Lot 9
r
SITE SUMMARY
ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
LOT SIZE = 97.755 5F OR 2.24 ACRES
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 65,356 SF (66.9X)
PERVIOUS SURFACE = 32,399 SF (33.1 %)
REQUIRED PARKING
BAR 10/1,000 SF + 1 /STAFF =
1,350/1,000 = 20 + 8 STAFF = 28
morh reo4knAaeu dab
DANCE HALL 20 + 1/200 OVER 2,000 SF
4.500 - 2.000 = 2,500
2.500/ 200 = 12.5
20 +13 =33
OFFICE AREA 3 + 1/200
960/200 = 4.8 THEREFORE 8
TOTAL REQUIRED = 28 + 33 + 8 = 69
i
i
r
PROVIDED PARKING
REGUALAR STALLS = 94
HDCP STAUS = 4
TOTAL 98
J.
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
1' -0" = 50' -0"
sheet
stag
Duet
number
PREPARED FOR
REGISTRATION'
I hereby ce tlfy drat this
Plan. speaficalnn.
report was prepared by
mode under my direct
superweak and Mal I
am a duly L.cunsed
PANesslonal Engineer
under the laws el Ilne
slate el Mmesola.
wr.r.oww .
•
PREPARED BY
No Mt «m
dt
1 _ [sa iw< le
ieiA.n�ruA .°y a. M
M-C Trsr�t jay
CrttA -rAae .rfri�e
IgBlnA.ew
life Crook Urlo t•VS Cfflfrunlf
Sunnte lVA� �'
�
sT ? '4."Au .' ran ta.e ;
� 1� If
at :.ai [rk�aA� •,� Park
l.ke[ Burs SI 'Y
Nrt 'Creek T it. -� 8
J fort lu.. IN
yeexAruA
rre<A
PRELIMINARY
FOR REVIEW ONLY
LINO LAKES. MN
s
3
Proved No'
03127
Doom IN.
SPF
Ducked I
AAK
834.113
swat
C
d
• co
N
d
0
a