Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/27/2004 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting October 27, 2004 6:30 p.m. This meeting is not televised. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 25, 2004 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Fox Den Acres /Preliminary Plat/PUD - Jeff Schoenbauer /CD Staff B. Amendment to the Growth Management Ordinance - Jeff Schoenbauer /Mike Grochala C. Mike Vaughan Subdivision D. Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses E. Friends of the Mississippi River Storm Water Management Ordinance Review F. Friends of the Mississippi River Water Quality Workshop G. AUAR /Appointments to an AUAR Advisory Panel - Michael Grochala 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Hardwood Creek Restoration B. FireWise Update C. Solid Waste Recycling Update 7. OTHER DEPARTMENT REPORTS /ADJOURN • • Agenda Item 5A Environmental Board Meeting Date: October 27, 2004 Topic: Fox Den Acres /Preliminary Plat/PUD Background: This proposal was reviewed at the July 28, and March 28 Environmental Board Meeting. Both times a recommendation was made to look at a different approach to developing this site, a Conservation Development Approach. Since, July 28, staff has met with our consultant Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer and Associates, Mike Black of Royal Oaks Realty, and the Rice Creek Watershed District to pursue a Conservation Development approach to the Fox Den application. Timing is an issue with this project. The proposal went to the October 13, 2004 P & Z for consideration. I have attached Staff Report by Jeff Smyser to this report. Analysis: The report presented to the P & Z lays out the issue analysis. In addition, this project is geographically located at a critical point to greenway establishment, on the south end of the City. To repeat previous discussions of this area, Fox Den is one of our most biologically diverse sites. Conservation Development of Fox Den Acres can save high quality open space in this important area, It can also establish a way to successfully achieve the objectives of the City Handbook For Conservation Development, The Wild Land Urban Interface Project, and the recently approved Parks, Open Space and Greenway Plan. If we are not able to achieve success on this site, it is doubtful that we will ever be able to achieve any kind of quality success elsewhere. Some details for this project were not available in time for packets. Surface water treatment details will be completed shortly. Emmons & Oliver Resources is working on this. The Technical Evaluation Panel still needs to approve of the changes, and a stewardship program needs to be developed. Planning and Zoning recommended option 1 on October 13. I would strongly recommend the same. Options: 1. Approve Fox Den Acres Conservation Development including • Rezoning to residential planned unit development • Preliminary Plat with conditions listed in the P & Z report, with additional condition of development of an approved Stewardship Plan. 2. Do Not Approve • Recommendation: Option 1 Attachments 1. P & Z Report • • AGENDA ITEM V. A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: October 13, 2004 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING (continued) •Rezone to Residential Planned Unit Development •Preliminary Plat Fox Den Acres Royal Oaks Realty BACKGROUND Royal Oaks Realty has requested approval of single family residential development called Fox Den Acres. The comprehensive plan guides the site for low density residential use and it is zoned R -1. The site is within the existing MUSA. The Fox Den Acres project offers a good opportunity to implement the new parks and open space plan through the use of a conservation development. Staff have worked with the Watershed District and Royal Oaks to pursuit these goals. The redesign includes such things as filling and moving lower quality wetlands in order to preserve and increase higher quality wetlands and upland areas. The overall gain in public value will be positive. This conservation development approach, while often discussed in Lino Lakes, has not previously been pursued to the extent we are doing so here. Standard zoning requirements often do not accommodate natural features in this way, and this is an example of that shortcoming. Therefore, a planned unit development is being used. A PUD is not allowed in a single family zone, so a rezone to PUD would be needed. Staff acknowledges that there are a number of details and specifics that normally are resolved by this point in the process. However, staff is comfortable that there is ample time fore these details be addressed. Additional design parameters will be reached before City Council approval. This project has been and will continue to be a learning process for players in several organizations and agencies. Though the design is not at the normal level of detail, there has been more design communication among the players than on any previous project. The discussions have centered not on asking "does this meet the requirements ?" Rather, we have been working to determine what is the best design? The importance of this opportunity to create a first step toward achieving the overall greenway vision for the community warrants the needed flexibility. • Fox Den Acres page 2 We have utilized the review extension allowed by law, and we are facing a deadline of November 19th for City Council action on the rezoning and preliminary plat. Therefore, a recommendation by the P & Z is necessary. Jeff Schoenbauer of Brauer and Associates has provided invaluable assistance on this project . Mr. Schoenbauer has been intimately involved in working directly with the developer on behalf of the City. His project memo is attached. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan, Land Use and Zoning: The table below identifies the existing land use and zoning as well as guided land uses for the area. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use Existing Zoning Site vacant 40 acres: Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 North radio tower and other communication facilities Low Density Unsewered and Sewered Residential R -1 South wetland Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural East wetland Low Density Unsewered Resid. Rural West single family residential Low Density Sewered Resid. R -1 The following is a summary of the of•the proposal's density: Gross Site Area 50 acres Upland Area 38 acres Total Lots 57 Gross Density 1.14 units /acre Net Density 1.50 units /acre The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area and within the existing MUSA. Public water, sanitary sewer, and a public street are stubbed to the site. This site has been guided and zoned for development for many years, even previous to the current comprehensive plan adopted in 2002. The design fits within the Low Density range of up to three units per acre. If the areas outside the MUSA, about ten acres, are subtracted from the upland, the density would be about two units per acre (57/28 = 2.04). Growth Management: • • • Fox Den Acres page 3 MUSA Reserve: The comprehensive plan and the growth management policy establish a specific number of MUSA acres for residential growth for stage one (prior to year 2010). The area of the site to be built on is within the current MUSA. Growth Management, Units /Year: There are no lots available for 2004. As seen in the table at the end of this report, 164 lots have been approved for year 2005. No more than 12 more lots could be allowed for year 2005 to bring the total to 176, which includes the 20% discretionary flexibility. This lot restriction creates an obstacle for this project to proceed as a conservation development. It will be vital for the developer to be able to final plat enough units to make the project financially viable. This issue is not a surprise. It has been part of the growth management discussion for some time. Proactive planning must accommodate the long term as well as the short term. Viewing the future in one -year increments should not be the main method for planning the future of the community. Just as mother nature is not easily described by arithmetic lot size dimensions, growth over time cannot be planned and managed primarily with annual lot totals. Such a method acts as an obstacle to sound planning when considering longer term goals. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT Lots: In order to preserve as much open space as possible, lot dimensions have been adjusted. A handful of lots have less area than the R -1 minimum. Many lots are less deep than normal zoning requires. However, the additional area behind these lots is greater than a normal lot would include. In much of the plat, the open space behind the lots extends for several hundred feet. The feeling of openness is greater, though the actual lot line depth is less than normal. Another means of increasing the common open space is the use of decreased setbacks from the street. The setbacks in this project will be 25 feet from the right of way rather than the normal 30 feet. (Remember that the right of way included more land than the actual paved street.) This 25' setback is allowed by the PUD standards. Streets, Access, Parking: The rights of way for the internal streets is 50 feet. This is less than the normal 60 feet. The pavement width, back of curb to back of curb, is 28 feet rather than the normal 32. These are two more ways of increasing the open space in the project: narrowing the rights of way allows for more open space behind the lots. The narrower pavement reduces impervious surface. The PUD standards specifically allow the pavement to be reduced in this way. The comprehensive plan for the community includes this as an area to be developed. One road is stubbed to it in a previous development project, as are water and sewer. In the past, many neighborhoods were created with only one access, but now we want to provide more than one . Therefore, we must look for another access option if the comprehensive plan is to be implemented here. • • Fox Den Acres page 4 The 500' radio tower on the north is likely to stay. The proposed road stub to the north of the plat avoids the tower property. Land to the north of the stub does have on it several communication facilities such as satellite dishes and the like, but it would not require major physical effort to remove the existing facilities. It is possible that a road could extend to the north where pictured if these facilities were removed in the future. That area includes upland, though it is impossible to know how much without a delineation of that property. A "ghost plat" of the area shows it will be possible to fit in a road and some lots. (see attached) Fox Road is the only current access point for this site. An extension of Fox Rd. to a future outlet/connection to the north is included in the design. Wetland extends to the east and south of the project for more than 1000', so a road cannot go in those directions. There is no possible additional connection on the west because the existing homes of Reshanau Lake Estates South 4th Addn. Hindsight shows that Deerwood Lane should have been designed to provide a connection to the east at its southern end instead of curving west into a cul de sac. This is no longer an option, however. We will prohibit parking on the stretch of Fox Road between the existing Deerwood Lane and the new internal circular street in the plat. This will allow for clearer passage between the intersections. In the future, when land to the north develops, this new road can be connected. This would provide not only a second access for this site, but an additional access alternative for the neighborhoods that exist now. Traffic: The developer submitted a traffic study with the previous application for 64 lots. The original study did not recognize the completion of West Shadow Lake Drive through to 62nd. St. or the reconstruction of 62nd St. Staff made the developer's consultant aware of this, and an amended study takes into account the current and planned roadways. The result is that the Birch St. approach and intersection will continue to operate at a level of service C. Existing residents have voiced the concern that they do not want additional traffic on the roads. Utilities: City water and sanitary sewer service will connect to existing facilities in Fox Road. Both are adequate to serve the project. Grading and Stormwater Management: The redesign includes relocating smaller wetland areas of lesser quality and mitigating (recreating) them in areas that will increase the higher quality wetlands. The design also includes infiltration methods that will help filter water prior to running into ponds or wetlands. We did not have a completed grading plan for this report due to the recent redesign (October 5) that resulted from consultation among the developer, Rice Creek Watershed District, and the City staff. Fox Den Acres page 5 Existing residents have expressed concern about stormwater ponds that serve their neighborhoods. The existing, natural drainage of the site includes a relatively small area that drains to the northwest. The remainder of the site currently drains to the north, east, and south. Drainage patterns will not change to any significant degree. No increase in runoff rate is allowed. This is a standard requirement for all development which is enforced both the Watershed District and the City. Parks, Open Space: The comprehensive plan envisions a conceptual greenway on part of this site. In addition, the City approved a new "Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trails System Plan." Creating greenways to implement the concept presented in the comprehensive plan is the first priority of the new parks and open space plan. This will require the use of a variety of strategies, the most important of which is greater reliance on a conservation development approach to land development. There are 40 acres within existing MUSA and growth area. About 18 acres of this, or 45 %, will be permanent open space. All 10 acres of the plat that are outside of the MUSA will be part of the permanent open space. The total site is 50 acres and the permanent open space will include 28 acres, about 56 %. A PUD requires at least 50 %. The preservation of open space on this site will be an important step in the implementation of the greenway vision. This is along the edge of a high value natural feature area that includes a major drainage through the southern part of Lino Lakes. A city trail would be created as part of the plat. The land around the trail likely would be owned by the homeowners association and maintained as perpetual open space through a conservation easement over the area . The specifics, including the easement holder and the terms of the management plan will require more detailed legal documents, which will be worked out prior to City Council approval. REZONING TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Rezoning: As stated in Section 2, Subdivision 1 of the zoning ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgment shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The comprehensive plan guides the site for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. The site is within the Stage 1 (pre -2010) growth area. The project implements the Parks, Trails and Open Space plan through conservation development to provide an important greenway. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. • • Fox Den Acres page 6 Single family residential development exists to the west. It is unlikely that development can occur to the east or south due to extensive wetlands. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. With the conditions of approval, the project will conform to the requirements of a planned unit development as stated in the zoning ordinance. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Municipal water and sanitary sewer are available to the site and sufficient capacity exists. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The existing roads have the capacity for the additional development. PUD: Section 2, Subd. 10.A. of the zoning ordinance discusses the purpose of a planned unit development (PUD). In addition, Subd. 10.D. lists the purposes of an urban PUD. The application should be compared to these purposes in order to justify any flexibility requested by the applicant. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide for the grouping of lots or buildings for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, or sporadic approach to development. This section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of lots, buildings and activities, which promote the goals outlined in the Comprehensive Plan or serve another public purpose. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint and common use and maintenance of parking, open space and other similar facilities, and harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. The PUD, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Ordinance related to setbacks, heights, lot area, width and depths, yards, etc., by conditional use permit or a mixture of uses by rezoning to a PUD District, is intended to encourage: 1. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. • • • Fox Den Acres page 7 2. Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 3. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of varying land uses in close proximity to each other. 5. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 6. Promotion of a desirable and creative environment that might be prevented through the strict application of City zoning and subdivision regulations. Urban PUD Purposes: a. Preservation of wildlife habitat and unique natural resources. b. Reduction of negative impacts on the environment. c. Creation of common open space that provides a unified landscape for the use and enjoyment of the neighborhood community and/or the general public. d. A variety of urban residential lot sizes, configurations, and neighborhoods. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD The Environmental Board reviewed the project on July 28. The recommendations include pursuing a conservation development, with design flexibility, to facilitate a greenway corridor. OPTIONS 1. Approve the project including: *Rezoning to residential planned unit development, and •Preliminary plat, with conditions as listed below. 2. Deny the project. • Fox Den Acres page 8 RECOMMENDATION Option 1, with the following conditions of approval to apply: 1. Grading and utility plans must obtain approval by the City Engineer prior to City Council approval of the final plat. 2. A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District must be obtained prior to City Council approval of the final plat. 3. The entire project can be final platted in 2005, subject to City Council approval of amendments to Ordinance 01-03. 4. Park dedication shall be cash with credit for construction of trails. 5. A homeowners association shall be created. The association shall maintain a stewardship fund to manage the open space areas of Outlots A, B, and C, according to a stewardship plan to be approved by the City. Association documents shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. 6. A conservation easement shall be created over all of Outlots A, B, and C to make them permanent open space. 7. A temporary cul de sac must be constructed on the northern stub street. 8. The project as redesigned must obtain a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to final approval by the City Council. • • LOTS /UNITS D) O 0 O O O ti O O N CD O O N O O N 0 O N E 0 (0 0 O co ti N O 0) O N ti ai N ti O O 1.c) CV CO N T T(0 0 CO Lo N T N r r r N O N CO CO N CO r 561 co CO 0 0 CO CO CO V M V" N r N LO r L0 0 T N CO r CO N CO r r r co ti r LO T T Tr N N r N LO CO LO r 0 T CO N (V N r T .COO V ,c- 51 ..-- L0 1.03' 249 r CO L0 0 r CO N LO r N O r r d' N O r N CO r CO r 561 IStoneybrook 12nd Addn Century Farms North Keefe: prel plat, not final plat Morton (minor subdiv) 1Ravens Hollow Haley Manor (10 new Tots) ICrystal Cove Millers Crossroads 'Lakeview Estates (2 new) Snell (minor subdivision) Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th Justin's Preserve IMarshan Estates (Rice Creek Church duplex (Rice Church: Oakwood View Junes Addn Highland Meadows East 2nd !Highland Townhomes 2nd 'Pheasant Hills 12th island a) 0) O Q O Q West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add (Fox Den Acres (resubmittal) 1 total O co ti N O 0) O N ti ai N ti O O Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes Conservation Development Public Value Statement and General Agreement Parameters for the Fox Den Development (A Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. Development Project) Date: October 7, 2004 From: Jeff Schoenbauer, Vice President Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Planning Consultant to the City of Lino Lakes To: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director Jeff Smyser, City Planner Overview The following summarizes the key development parameters associated with the Fox Den development proposal. Each of these is in keeping with the conservation development planning principles that have been discussed in recent months with the Environmental Board, Park Board, Planning and Zoning Board, and City Council. ap Context Using the conservation development approach for this project is an outgrowth of the recently completed Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenway and Trail System Plan. As part of that project, Fox Den was identified as private development of significant importance to achieving the goals of the system plan. With consent of the Developer, the project serves as a prototype for a collaborative approach to development, with a specific focus on maximizing public values within the context of an economically viable and marketable development. Opportunities for Increased Public Values Under the new Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenway and Trail System Plan, a number of specific public values are being sought from the Fox Den development. These include: • Preserving more natural open space (through a conservation easement) • Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint • Restore /enhance ecological systems on the site as part of the development process • Protect off -site ecological systems through increased buffering • Ensure long -term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program sponsored by the Developer • Provide public park and trail opportunities consistent with the System Plan • Manage stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration approaches • Preserve the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become accustomed. • Maintain natural buffer between established and new developments As defined in this statement and the development package, the collaboration between the City, Developer, and other public agencies has resulted in a development plan that achieves these public values to a much higher degree than would be achievable under a conventional development approach. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 1 Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes 41) Developer and Public Agencies Commitment to the Project All prototype processes require a good faith working relationship between all parties to be successful. In this instance, the representatives from Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. have participated at the highest collaborative level. This is especially noteworthy in that their previously submitted plan did meet (or would have with minor modifications) the various requirements of the City and other regulatory agencies and would likely have been approved. Without their involvement, the proposal now being considered would not have been possible. It is also noteworthy that various regulatory agencies have played an active and important role in shaping the development proposal to be consistent with their and the City's larger goals. This is especially the case with Rice Creek Watershed District, whose representatives are assisting in key aspects of the natural resources and storm water management planning. Agreement Parameters The following establishes the agreement parameters for each key aspect of the development package. A number of exhibits are also included to illustrate the evolution of the plan. (Each of the headings relate to the previously defined public values.) Preserving Natural Open Space (Conservation Easement) The overall development site consists of 50 acres. The final development proposal (Exhibit C) sets aside 28.47 acres, or about 57% of the site, in a conservation easement that will be perpetually preserved as natural open space. Currently, City staff and the City Attorney are considering if outright ownership of the easement is in the best interest of the City, or if it should be held by some third party. However that is resolved, the conservation easement would, at the very least, be legally protected through a Developer's agreement between the Developer and City of Lino Lakes. The proposal also includes approximately 4,400 lineal feet of trail, which is approximately 0.80 miles. The following graphic illustrates the conservation areas and trail corridor that are part of the final development proposal. Total Acres: Developed Acres`: Conservation Area Acres**: 50.0 21.53 28.47 Percent of Property Protected as a Natural Area: 57% Total Miles of Public Trail: 0.80 • Refers to land under private ownership. •. Refers to and that is permanently protected and falls under the stewardship pro'wa Exttlsrr C - FINAL PROPOSAL Fox DEN DEVELOPMENT Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 2 Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes illFor comparison, the proposal that the Developer already submitted following a conventional approach (Exhibit A) sets aside 10.98 acres for open space, which is 22% of the site. An initial proposal under the conservation development approach (Exhibit B) resulted in 27.18 acres of open space, which is 54% of the site. The key difference between the two conservation development proposals is that the cul -de -sac in the southwest corner of Exhibit B has been removed to preserve more high quality natural areas as shown under Exhibit C. Although one lot has been added under the final proposal (to cover the lost value of the higher priced cul -de -sac lots that were removed), it still resulted in more open space due to the elimination of the cul -de- sac itself. The following graphics illustrate the conservation areas and trail corridors that are part of these two development proposals. 50.0 39.02 10.98 Percent of Property Protected as a Natural Area: 22% Total Miles of Public Trail: 0.80 ' Refers to land under private ownership. •' Refers to land that is permanently protected. Note: There is no stewardship program under this proposal. Exi1BR A - CONVBd11ONAL PROPOSAL Fox DEN DEVaOPMENr 50.0 22.82 27.18 Percent of Property Protected as a Natural Area 54% Total Miles of Public Trail: 0.55 • Rem to land under private ownership. Refers to land that is perrranenity protected. Not There is no stewardship progam under this proposal. EXHIBIT B - INnw. PROPOSAL Fox DEr1 DEVELOPMENT Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 3 Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes Reducing the Extent of Impervious Surfaces and Size of the Development Footprint To preserve as much natural open space as possible, the development size and scale was reduced to the smallest possible footprint while still meeting the Developer's marketability and economic requirements. This includes reducing the roadway widths from 32' to 28' to minimize the extent of hard surfaced areas. The roadway right -of -way is also reduced to 50' Flexibility on the front yard setback is also proposed to reduce the overall size of lots and increase the size of the conservation area. Currently, a 30' setback is required. The plan allows this to be reduced to 25', although the Developer will often be at or near the 30' mark on many lots. The flexibility is provided for instances where it is mutually beneficial to do so and where the setback does not interfere with parking in driveways. Restore /Enhance On -Site Ecological Systems The development proposal includes restoring and enhancing on -site ecological systems in a couple of ways: • Through the use of natural infiltration systems to manage stormwater (as defined below). This ensures that contaminants associated with hard surface stormwater runoff are trapped before they reach on and off -site surface and groundwater systems. • Through restoration of degraded ecological systems both during development and as part of the long -term stewardship program (as defined below). Note that the City staff and Rice Creek Watershed District representatives have taken the lead role in working with the Developer to prepare a natural resources plan for the site. This approach was used to ensure that natural resource restoration and management efforts that occur on the site are in sync with long -range City and watershed district practices in this regard. Protect Off -Site Ecological Systems Through Increased Buffering / Maintain Natural Buffer Between Established and New Developments As the previous illustrations define, the extent of buffering proposed under the final conservation development plan (Exhibit C) is significantly greater than the other plans. From an ecological perspective, the increased size of the buffers on the north, west, and east sides offer greater protection of high quality off-site ecological systems. From an adjacent property perspective, the buffers on the west side provide a substantial separation between existing homes and the new ones in this development. Ensure Long -Term Natural Resource Stewardship The development proposal includes a stewardship program and fund agreement that will ensure that all lands within the conservation easement will be perpetually managed and maintained as natural areas. The program will be funded through an endowment established by the Developer, along with annual fees paid by homeowners. The following outlines estimated* funding levels over a 20 year time horizon: Endowment Fund: Initial desired investment *: ' $100,000 (investment made by the Developer.) Estimated interest per year *: $4,000 at 4% and $8,000 at 8% Yearly Homeowner's Assoc. Fees* $5,700 ($100 /year per lot) Total available each year (approx.) *: $9,700 to $13,700, depending on interest rates. Value of fund over 20 year horizon: $194,000 to $274,000 ** ** Note: Funding levels are estimates and subject to some adjustments as the project is finalized. * Does not include a built -in reinvestment factor that stipulates reinvesting 10% of the interest earned each year and 5% of the yearly association fees. Over 20 years, the total value would go up considerably if this reinvestment was factored in. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Additional value: $40,000 budget for initial restoration work in the conservation easement during development. (The extent of this work will be defined as part of final development package. It will include work associated with natural infiltration systems, restoring native plant communities to disturbed areas during construction, and ecological restoration work on select natural areas within the easement as defined by City staff and Developer as part of development agreement.) Total value of endowment fund and related ecological stewardship: $234,000 to $314,000 (over 20 year horizon) 4 • Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes The stewardship program will also include a general covenant that ensures that all homeowners are accountable for protecting the conservation easement. Activities within the conservation easement will be strictly limited to natural resource stewardship. The easements will also have signs placed along its perimeter at each property to control encroachment. The sign locations will be recorded and periodically checked using CPS technology. Provide Public Park and Trail Opportunities Consistent with the System Plan The final conservation development proposal as defined under Exhibit C meets or exceeds the goals established for parks, trails, and open space in this area. The proposed trail is a significant part of the overall trail corridor through this area of the city, ultimately linking the development to neighborhood parks and the regional park system. As the previous graphic illustrates, the total length of public trail under the final development proposal is approximately 0.80 miles. Manage Stormwater Using Natural Infiltration Approach Through an unprecedented collaborative effort, the City, Rice Creek Watershed District, and development are working collaboratively on using natural infiltration techniques to manage stormwater from the development. The basic approach is to emulate some of the practices used for the City Hall campus, which includes rain gardens and a variety of other systems to control stormwater flow rates and quality. Importantly, stormwater flows will be managed to avoid any increased flows onto or through nearby developments to the west. Preserve the Open Space Aesthetic By setting aside more and for natural open space than previously envisioned and implementing a long -term stewardship plan that ensures that this land is cared for, the open space aesthetic qualities to which community residences have become accustomed will be preserved to a much higher degree than would typically be the case following a conventional approach to 0 development. A comparison of Exhibits A and C illustrates this point. • Additional Agreement Parameters: Commitments to the Developer Inherently, realizing the public values associated with the final development proposal affects the economics of the development. Throughout the process, a good faith effort has been made to balance the interests of the City with those of the Developer. To be successful for all parties, the project has to be economically viable. It must also be recognized that the proposal is a package deal, meaning that each aspect of it is intricately related to everything else. Changing one thing inherently affects another. The agreement parameters defined above, along with the development proposal package, have addressed most aspects of the physical development plan and establishing funding for the stewardship program. There are, however, a number of additional agreement parameters that are very important to the development proposal that have not been covered thus far. The following defines each of these. Amendment of the City's Growth Management Policy Under current policy, yearly growth limits preclude the Developer from getting approval to build the entire development in one year under a single proposal. This significantly affects development costs due to the loss of economies of scale, additional remobilization costs, longer marketing and build -out period, etc. For the Developer to provide the public values as previously defined, it will be necessary to give them approval for the entire project in order to make the economics of the project feasible. This will require an amendment to the growth management policy of the City. Note that without this approval, the development proposal will become invalid in its current form. This is especially the case with the endowment fund, which, in a large part, is funded through the economic savings associated with approval for developing the entire project under one proposal. This would entail a direct economic loss to the City of $194,000 to $274,000 over a twenty year period. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Conservation Development Planning City of Lino Lakes Reduction of Infrastructure Costs As previously stated, the reduction in roadway widths (from 32' to 28') and the use of natural infiltration systems are motivated by trying to preserve more open space and reduce ecological impacts due to runoff from hard surfaces. On the Developer's side, this also results in less development costs. As part of the agreement, much of these savings have been relocated to fund the endowment fund and other public values. As with the growth management issue, the economies of the project rely on the City approving these aspects of the development package. Park Dedication and Storm Sewer Related Fees As with all developments, park dedication and storm sewer - related fees apply to the development. In this case, the total charge for park dedication is approximately $94,000. For storm sewer, the charge is approximately $125,000. As part of the development proposal, City staff is recommending that the development costs for the new trail be credited against park dedication fees. This amounts to approximately $62,000. With respect to the storm sewer fees, City staff is recommending a credit of $58,000 due to the additional costs associated with using a natural infiltration approach to storm water management. This approach is also expected to reduce the City's Tong -term maintenance cost since their will be fewer storm sewers to maintain, thus providing additional justification for providing a credit to the Developer. As with the other items listed above, the economies of the project rely on the City approving the fee credits as part of the development package. Gaining Unified Consensus One of the goals of the collaboration is to gain strong consensus and approval from all of the boards and agencies that review and approve development projects. Every attempt was made to understand and address the best interests of the following public entities: • Environmental Board • Park Board • Planning and Zoning Board • City Council • TEP Committee • Rice Creek Watershed District It is the belief of all participants that the development package as proposed achieves the highest expectations for the project and will result in superior development to which both the Developer and citizens of Lino Lakes can take pride. Sincerely, Jeff Schoenbauer Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 6 RESHANAU Lrj"— LIa 7 IB m 2 2 T 8 IRV �40 ,K �° Q 22 t 14 14141e;i247:4116:- : o %'% • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN En Mil I= MIMS NMI gar ii Low Density Severed Residential Stage 1 (pre-2010) Low Density Unsewered Residential ZONING MAP DETAIL „.. • PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN WITH GREENWAYS (DETAIL) LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NIIRWIIKST =WM SEMEN 33 J341*00A =NNW 1.100741314) N8 S8d°52'gr E /450.00\ 11•1N AIR P1-41' OF: FOX DEN ACRES FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (OWNER & DEVELOPER) 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 PHONE. (651)-483-5518 IN8954562.0261"W f -• WM. ME Cr V. NW /14 ROM 33 .3 04 000000 00C1l0lS3 WM= (tems'io i / tee or /4 or 00 ww1/4 ------ ' .. _._.,.. . ...t.,..-...tt--^ . k PONIVXL /UMW LAMM" 00CIMCW7 00. WWII 01 143133 OF DE C11+ Or I140 1.32EIM \se. N •-• N csi 1.0 3 Prepared By: LG. U! SIS O I-EX1Na- -N A4vENUE NE. j 550I4-3e2B Tel. 163-1864996 Fax 16.2.106-6001 4.84 5895933W SOWN UWE Of NW /14 OF SWIM 33 4. EXISTING PROPERTY aeSCRIPTIONS, 6• e152 801.152U.5 A OF CliCAGO TITLE SI3L8241.C5 =PAW corwamEar NO.13190) P arcel ic (31131 Acres) The Northweet Ouarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 34. Tosmehlo 31, Ranee 22, Anoka County, 80nes0ta. P arcel 01 (6.79 Acres) That port of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 33, Townthip 31. Range 22, Anoka Coon* Ilinneeota described as beginning 0) 330 Northwest earner of sold Northeast Ouarter of the Northwest Cluarter of Section 11 thence South 59 degrees 52 minutes 21 secant. East. omen.5 hearing, along the north Una of sob Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 0 &stance 04 451100 feet; theme South 15 degrees 58 minutes 24 seconds West 1008.32 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52 1031.40.0 21 emends West 161100 lest to the wart fine of said Northman Wader of the Neville. Quarter theme North 00 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds Week thaw said west the 0 distance of 070.11 test to the point of beginning. Oared Q (160 Acres) That part of dm Soutthreet Ovarlit, 04 0*. Northwest Water of Section 33. Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County. Minnesota deoarbed ae beginning at the Northwest earner 00 sold Southwest Quarter of the Northemst Warta of Section 33; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 28 seconds Ea.), assumed bearing, ethng the north !the of sold Southwest Quarter 04 the Northwest Quarter n dietanee 011304.74 40.0 00 the Northeast corner of said Southweet Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 25 degree • 18 minute. 53 seconds West 387.05 feet bunco North 22 degrees 00 minute. 26 seconds West a <Mance of 377.02 0.1 00 sold north On thence North 89 degree. 57 minutes 28 seconds Weed along sold north line o &Mance of 332.74 feet; thence Smith 64 degree< 53 minutee 35 seconds %et 0 distance of 729.37 feet to the west the of mid Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Wort, thence North 00 degrees 50 minutes 22 seconds Mud Meng sold mat ithe 310.00 feet to the point of beginning. zmhs, - Parcel A is Zoned R-1 VICINITY MAP - Parcel B and C ore Zoned R. PARTS OF SEC. 32. TWP. RNG 22 - Rezoned to o Planned Unit Development (PUD) fo... MUSA! - Parcel A fell within the MUSA. - Parcel 19 and C are outside of MUSA - No MUSA amendment proposed DEVELOPMENT DATA. - Totol Plot area - 50 Acres - Upland within plot = 38.16 Acres (76X) - 57 Proposed Single Family Lots - Single Family Lots = 16.54 Acres (33.08X) - Streets = 4.99 Acres (9.982) - Outlet A = 20.73 Acres (41.46X) - Outlet 9 = 4.52 Acres (9.04X) - Oudot 0- 3.22 Acres 0.44X) - All Outlets to be covered by Wetland Conservation Easement - Average Lot Size = 0.29 Acres - Density = 1.14 Lots / Acre LOT AREAS/ MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK& Wetland 10 feet (decks allowed in this setbock) Front = 25.00 feet Rear = 20.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lot Area = N/A Lot Depth = hi,/A Lot VAdth = 80.00 feet Lot Kfidth 100.00 feet (comer) Denotes Set 1/2 inch by 18 inch Iron ° Pipe Marked by R.LS. number 25341 • Denotes found monument Denotes County Cost iron Monument -.- Denotes Fen. Line per Aerial Photo. Denotes Existing Trees per Aerial Photo; see Tree Inventory for actual tree locations. I.. .1 Denotes Wetland located by Earth Science Inc. ---- Denotes Edge of Wetland by Earth Science Inc. Denotes Existing 2 foot contour interval completed by Markhurd - • - •- Denotes Setback line i•ESZA Denotes Wetland Fill Area Denotes Pending and Flowage Easement per document . - no. 595478 in favor of the City *0 Line Lakes. This easement covers some existing high ground. NOTES. - Bearing's shower, are on NAD 83 datum. - Contours are at 2 foot intervals. - Wetland located by E.G. Rod & Sons inc. (763)-786-5556 on 11-24-03. - Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. (051)-674-6210 on 9-24-03. - Topography provided by Morkhurd (763)-420-9606 on 12-17-03. - This survey was prepored with Title Commitment by Chicogo Title /neuron. Company. Commitment No. 231913. - No buildings allowed in wetland setbocks or droinoge & easements. ANOKA coLwr. MINNESOTA • (NOT TO WALE GRAPHIC SCALE Is,„ c, • r, I 3) 700 00010) Isch w 30 O. TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTILITY EASEMENTS. J 4. Being 5 feet in width, unless othenvise indicated, and adjoining side lot lines, and rear lot fines and 10 feet in width and adjoining street lines, os shown on the plat. Drainage and Utility easements to be dedicated over, EOrs, wetlands and pending areas, and 10 fee on either side of all storm, sanitary, or woterrnoin not within public R/Ws To be determined upon final site design. _ • - • - • - _ • - • - • - • - • - • - GUIDN\IG, - Parcel A guiding Low Density Single Family. - Parcel B and C guided Rural BENCHMARK, Top Nut Hydrant at the Northwest comer of Trappers Crossing and Holly Drive. Elevation = 913.54 CERTIFICATION0 O hereby certify that this eurveb plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct euperviston and Mot I 501 - • - - duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. .;A$ /0..a... DANIEL W. OSERMILLSP Date: 54 License No. 75341 ODITER 336,1011 33 t‘l 10 a; r),) 0,11 cr) to-o7-0c *emcee 030941P0 Weal* won e 1 NO. DATE DESCRIPIMN 81 ANOKA coLwr. MINNESOTA • (NOT TO WALE GRAPHIC SCALE Is,„ c, • r, I 3) 700 00010) Isch w 30 O. TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTILITY EASEMENTS. J 4. Being 5 feet in width, unless othenvise indicated, and adjoining side lot lines, and rear lot fines and 10 feet in width and adjoining street lines, os shown on the plat. Drainage and Utility easements to be dedicated over, EOrs, wetlands and pending areas, and 10 fee on either side of all storm, sanitary, or woterrnoin not within public R/Ws To be determined upon final site design. _ • - • - • - _ • - • - • - • - • - • - GUIDN\IG, - Parcel A guiding Low Density Single Family. - Parcel B and C guided Rural BENCHMARK, Top Nut Hydrant at the Northwest comer of Trappers Crossing and Holly Drive. Elevation = 913.54 CERTIFICATION0 O hereby certify that this eurveb plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct euperviston and Mot I 501 - • - - duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. .;A$ /0..a... DANIEL W. OSERMILLSP Date: 54 License No. 75341 ODITER 336,1011 33 t‘l 10 a; r),) 0,11 cr) to-o7-0c *emcee 030941P0 Weal* won e 1 • • • Fox Den Acres and Surrounding Properties • Legend • stormpnts stormline • • f i 1 de :il ----- k k ., ,I q 0 \_ . ; G? Q Q \'\ Biro§ .N \' Q . n.: X47 D6-'.t) • . ' • Y ..,,u.°b.'H,"n °io'w, 4 • ShC. �Qry f`rrcf- -- •r t „S zz. ..os •••••-- - • • ti \_ tri if X,3 o- \. ---_---", s;‘, \ '..•- •;"` i y ri ' arm • ch. • Agenda Item 5B Environmental Board Meeting Date: October 27, 2004 Staff Originator: Marty Asleson Topic: Amending Growth Management Policy Background: Please refer to Attachment 1, Staff Report, Jeff Smyser, P &Z Meeting of October 11, 2004; and Attachment 2, City of Lino Lakes Ordinance NO. 01 -03, Ordinance Creating a Growth Management Policy. Analysis: This may be the biggest incentive we have to promote the conservation development of Lino Lakes. With conservation development, we are able to exactly create the vision of a City with preserved open space, and maintain a very low loss of unique natural resources. In fact, conservation development enables us to reverse the losses that have occurred over the last 100 years by creating opportunities to restore eco- systems. Controlling growth by trying to control house numbers will not allow us any opportunity to develop the greenway system that surrounds our unique resources. Developers will simply choose to develop the traditional "cookie- cutter" way and get in line for the first opportunity to phase in houses. At the October 13, 2004 meeting of the P &Z, the P &Z recommended approval of Option 1, included in Jeff Smyser's report. believe that this is a very important issue. The City of Lino Lakes Growth Management Ordinance needs to be adjusted. Options: 1. Recommend approval 2. Not recommend approval Recommendation: Option 1 Attachments 1. Staff Report, Jeff Smyser, P &Z Meeting of October 11, 2004 • 2. City of Lino Lakes Ordinance NO. 01 -03, Ordinance Creating a Growth Management Policy. • • • AGENDA ITEM V. B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser P & Z MEETING DATE: October 13, 2004 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING Amending Growth Management Policy BACKGROUND The City adopted Ordinance 01 -03 in January 2003. This ordinance lists the specifics of the growth management policy, including the annual limits on the number of MUSA acres to be allocated and the number of units /lots to be platted. The policy requires a phasing plan for projects of 50 units or more. We maintain the inventory required in Section 2, paragraph 11 using tables tracking the allocation of MUSA and the approval of units/lots in preliminary plats. These tables are attached at the end of the report. The general approach to amending the ordinance is to add a section that gives the City Council more discretion in approving housing units in any given year above the stipulated growth limits as defined in Section 2 — Growth Management Policy. This discretion would only be applied in cases where the developer of property successfully collaborates with the City and submits a conservation development proposal that includes public values that exceed those achievable under a conventional development approach. The determination as to whether this threshold is reached will be at the sole discretion of the City Council. In this context, "conventional development" is defined as a development proposal that meets the minimum requirements of the City's ordinances regulating subdivision and platting, zoning, street standards, and other pertinent requirements. "Conservation development" refers to a collaborative process in which certain stipulated public values are sought in exchange for greater flexibility on general development requirements and the growth limits defined under this policy. OPTIONS FOR AMENDING THE POLICY The adopted ordinance is attached, with amendment options added. Language amending the ordinance is shown in underlined text. We have added a finding recognizing the importance of the public values and allowing flexibility to achieve them. After that, we have presented two options. Both are presented in a new Section 3 of the ordinance. • Amending Growth Management Policy page 2 • Option 1 would exempt conservation development from the growth restrictions. That is, a conservation development would be subject to neither the MUSA allocation limit (36 acres per year) nor the units restriction (147 per year). • Option 2 allows a conservation development to final plat lots /units two years in advance of its approved phasing plan. That is, it would still have a phasing plan but the number of lots /units in the phasing plans could be moved ahead by two years. In effect, the first three years of units could be final platted in year one. OPTIONS 1. Amend the ordinance Option 1, which exempts conservation developments from growth limits. 2. Amend the ordinance with Option 2, which allows conservation developments to advance the phasing plan but does not exempt them from growth limits. 3. Do not amend the ordinance. • RECOMMENDATION Open public hearing, take comments, close hearing. Make a recommendation on ordinance amendment. • • • Amending Growth Management Policy page 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES ORDINANCE NO. 01 -03 ORDINANCE CREATING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY The City Council of Lino Lakes hereby ordains: Section 1 Findings The Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings: 1. The City of Lino Lakes adopted a comprehensive plan that includes goals and policies to guide planning and the growth of the city. 2. Managing growth through the orderly provision of infrastructure and other means promotes the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. It is in the best interests of the public to create rational, cost effective means of managing growth so that it will be orderly, efficient, and environmentally sound. 3. Unplanned growth does not meet community needs and is injurious to the public health, safety, and welfare. Inadequately planned growth has created and may create or aggravate negative conditions such as: a. overburdened public facilities b. underutilized public facilities resulting in wasteful investment of public resources c. an inadequate variety of housing choices that does not meet community needs d. environmentally detrimental development projects and patterns 4. The comprehensive plan establishes future land uses, staged growth areas, growth goals, and a Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) reserve for the city. 5. The Stage 1 growth area is the geographic limit for growth prior to year 2010. The Stage 2 area is for growth from 2010 to 2020. 6. The MUSA reserve obtained with the comprehensive plan includes 359 acres for Stage 1, and 909 acres for Stage 2. The MUSA reserve also includes a balance of 15.7 acres designated for residential use left over from the 1995 MUSA reserve. The total Stage 1 MUSA reserve therefore is 374.7 acres. 7. There is undeveloped land within the existing MUSA. 8. A growth management policy is necessary, in addition to official controls such as the zoning and subdivision ordinances, to implement the comprehensive plan and promote the public health, safety, and welfare. • • • Amending Growth Management Policy page 4 9. The comprehensive plan designates the area in the southeast quadrant of the I- 35W/Lake Drive interchange as "The Village." The intent of the Village is to create a focus for community and civic identity through the integration of a mix of land uses. In doing so, the Village will provide for intense land use, for compact and efficient development, and increase the range of housing opportunities. The Village has received funding under the Livable Communities program, established by MN Statute 473.25 — 473.255, because of its intent to fulfill numerous goals of that program. 10. The growth management policy should allow the City Council reasonable discretion to approve housing units in any given year above the stipulated growth limits in cases where the development proposal results in significant and discernable public values above and beyond those achievable under conventional development. Section 2 Growth Management Policy The Lino Lakes City Council hereby establishes a growth management policy with the following provisions: 1. Promoting development within the existing MUSA is preferable to expanding the developing area of the City by granting MUSA reserve acres. This preference is intended to promote the cost - effective use of public investment by maximizing the utilization of existing infrastructure. 2. New growth prior to year 2010 shall occur only in a Stage 1 growth area. However, a Stage 1 growth area does not grant rights to MUSA reserve acres and development approval. 3. Premature development shall not be allowed. This applies to all development proposals, inside the existing MUSA as well as those needing MUSA reserve. The development is premature if it does not meet the conditions established in Section 1002 -6 of the Subdivision Ordinance (Chapter 1000 of the City Code). 4. The 374.7 acres of MUSA reserve for Stage 1 (pre -2010) shall be designated for new residential, commercial and industrial development as follows and as shown in Attachment A: a. Residential: A total of 300.7 MUSA reserve acres is designated for residential development. The annual target is to allocate no more than 36 acres annually in the years 2003 through 2009. While this is the target, it is an annual average. At the discretion of the City Council, the MUSA reserve acres allocated for any one year may vary by 20% over or below the target. Exceeding the MUSA reserve target will necessitate reducing MUSA allocation for future years. • • Amending Growth Management Policy page 5 b. Commercial /Industrial: A total of 74 MUSA reserve acres is designated for C/I development. These C/I MUSA acres can be granted at any time prior to year 2010. There is no annual limit for C/I MUSA. 5. The goal is to limit new growth in the city to an average of 147 new housing units per year: 1029 units in the seven years including 2003 -2009, inclusive. This includes all residential growth: both within the existing MUSA and in areas that would need MUSA reserve. While this is the target, it is an annual average. At the discretion of the City Council, the number of lots approved for any one year may vary by 20% over or below the target. Exceeding the new growth target will necessitate reducing the number of lots available for future years. This 147 growth target refers to units in future plats, not to units on lots in final plats approved prior to 2003. 6. No single development project should be awarded an entire year's number of new housing units. This requirement is intended to: a. avoid or minimize potential monopoly price effects b. promote timely development: one project often will not be able to build all 147 in one year c. promote housing diversity d. avoid inefficient concentration of infrastructure expansion that could impede financial return on investments elsewhere in the city e. distribute and minimize potential negative impacts of development f. promote fairness by distributing growth among several projects while observing the goal for new growth 7. An amendment of the comprehensive plan shall be required if, in order to accommodate a specific development project, the annual target for new growth (units /year) or residential MUSA reserve allocation (acres /year) would be exceeded by more than 20 %. The City Council shall consider such an amendment only if the specific development project will promote a clearly identified public purpose. The public purpose may include but is not limited to: a) provision of housing unit variety that contributes toward meeting housing goals, such as medium density, high- density, and mixed -use developments in locations designated for them in the comprehensive plan b) provision of infrastructure that will provide benefits beyond the project site, in accordance with City transportation, sewer, or water plans, that is not financially feasible without exceeding the target c) preservation of environmental features that would not occur without exceeding the target • d) provision of economic benefits to the City that would not occur without exceeding the target Amending Growth Management Policy page 6 II/ 8. Use of Stage 2 MUSA reserve acres prior to year 2010 shall require amendment of • • the comprehensive plan. 9. All preliminary plats and residential development greater than 50 lots/units must have, as condition of approval, a phasing plan that establishes: a. a schedule for final platting a specified number of lots /units on an annual basis b. specifies the location of and number of lots /units in each phase (final plat). 10. The target for the maximum number of lots in each phase is 50. 11. The City will maintain an inventory of approved phasing plans indicating the number of units /lots scheduled for fmal plat approval in future years. 12. The City will not approve a new project's preliminary plat if, according to the phasing plan inventory (final platting schedule), a new project could not final plat its first phase within one year of preliminary plat approval without exceeding the MUSA or new growth goals. 13. An approved phasing plan is a commitment by the City to approve final plats and grant MUSA reserve acres according to the phasing plan. MUSA reserve is actually granted at the same time as final plat approval. The phasing plan does not in any way eliminate the requirements of the subdivision ordinance, zoning ordinance, and other official controls, as may be amended. 14. MUSA reserve acreage to be granted shall be the acres of buildable area only. 15. Allocating or granting MUSA reserve within the Stage 1 growth area in accordance with a phasing plan for the project is an action that implements the comprehensive plan: it is not an amendment of the comprehensive plan. Allocating MUSA reserve shall require the same majority vote by the City Council as is required for a rezoning. 16. This growth management policy shall not apply to the area of "The Village," in the southeast quadrant of the I -35W /Lake Drive interchange. 17. The City shall review this growth management policy on an annual basis. Section 3 — Growth Management Policy for Conservation Development The Lino Lakes City Council hereby establishes a policy to promote the use of conservation development as a means to achieve the goals of the Growth Management Policy; Comprehensive Plan, Parks, Natural Open Space /Greenways and Trail System Plan; and the Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. The provisions of this policy include: • • Amending Growth Management Policy page 7 1. For the purposes of this ordinance, "conventional development" is defined as a development proposal that meets the minimum requirements of the City's ordinances regulating development including but not limited to subdivision and platting (Ordinance No. 04 -03), zoning (Ordinance No. 08 -03), street construction standards (City Code Chapter 302, and other pertinent requirements. 2. For the purposes of this ordinance, "conservation development" is defined as a collaborative process which results in a development plan, typically a planned unit development, in which certain stipulated public values are achieved in exchange for greater flexibility on general development requirements and the growth limits defined under Section 2 of this policy. Amendment Option 1: 3. The growth management policy allows the City Council reasonable discretion to approve housing units in any given year in excess of the stipulated growth limits of Section 2, paragraphs 4, 5, and 7 of this ordinance in cases where a conservation development proposal results in significant and discernable public values above and beyond those achievable under conventional development. These public values include, but are not limited to: • Preserving more natural open space than required under current ordinances and development policies • Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint • Restoring /enhancing ecological systems on the site as part of the development process • Protecting off -site ecological systems through increased buffering • Ensuring long -term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program sponsored by the Developer • Providing public park and trail opportunities consistent with or in excess of the System Plan • Managing stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration and ecologically -based approaches • Preserving the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become accustomed • Maintaining natural buffer between established and new developments • Amending Growth Management Policy page 8 4. If, at the discretion of the City Council, a development proposal does not demonstrate that significant public values are being realized above and beyond those achievable under a conventional development approach, then the provisions of Section 2 apply. 5. Recommendations to approve a development proposal by the Environmental Board, Park Board, and Planning and Zoning Board will be part of demonstrating that significant public values are being realized. Amendment Option 2: 3. The growth management policy allows the City Council reasonable discretion to approve housing units in any given year in excess of the stipulated growth limits of Section 2, paragraphs 4, 5, and 7 of this ordinance in cases where a conservation development proposal results in significant and discernable public values above and beyond those achievable under conventional development. The project must still have a phasing plan, but the final platting of lots /units can be advanced by two years so that phases one, two and three could be final platted in year one, phase four units then could be final platted in year two, and so on. The maximum number of lots /units in the City for Stage 1 shall still apply. • The public values include, but are not limited to: • Preserving more natural open space than required under current ordinances and development policies • Reducing the extent of impervious surfaces and size of the development footprint • Restoring /enhancing ecological systems on the site as part of the development process • Protecting off -site ecological systems through increased buffering • Ensuring long -term natural resource stewardship through an endowment program sponsored by the Developer • Providing public park and trail opportunities consistent with or in excess of the System Plan • Managing stormwater (flow rates and quality) using natural infiltration and ecologically -based approaches • • Preserving the open space aesthetic to which community residences have become accustomed Amending Growth Management Policy page 9 • • Maintaining natural buffer between established and new developments 4. If, at the discretion of the City Council, a development proposal does not demonstrate that significant public values are being realized above and beyond those achievable under a conventional development approach, then the provisions of Section 2 apply. 5. Recommendations to approve a development proposal by the Environmental Board, Park Board, and Planning and Zoning Board will be part of demonstrating that significant public values are being realized. Section 4 Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision, or part thereof to the extent that if any section, provision, or part of this Ordinance shall be held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not invalidate any other section, provision, or part thereof. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall judge invalid the application of any provision of this Ordinance to a particular property, building, or structure, such judgment shall not affect other properties, buildings or structures. • This ordinance shall be in force and effect upon its adoption and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of January, 2003. ATTEST: Ann Blair, City Clerk • John J. Bergeson, Mayor • • • Amending Growth Management Policy page 10 ATTACHMENT A CITY OF LINO LAKES GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICY The following tables describe how the annual MUSA reserve target was derived and indicate the result for year 2003. MUSA reserve need, as calulated for the comprehensive plan unmet demand existing need residential 635 350 285 commercial /industrial 274 200 74 909 550 359 residential MUSA reserve total acres resid. C/I remaining balance pre -2002 new for Stage 1 15.7 15.7 359.0 285.0 74.0 total 374.7 300.7 74.0 Clearwater Creek 5th Addn 20.8 -20.8 Stoneybrook 54.7 Stoneybrook 2002 27.0 -27.0 Stoneybrook 2003 27.7 balance annual residential MUSA (2003 to 2009 is 7 years) 252.9 74.0 36.1 2003 allocation Stoneybrook 2003 36.1 -27.7 available for 2003 8.4 as of September 29, 2004 J a 1— 0 l- a) O O N co O O N E` O O N CC 0 0 N CA 0 0 N et 0 0 N M O O N z 0 H Q V 0 J J a a u) m 2 J Q H z W C Cl) W Lt 252.0) I- O O ti i-- co o c) r o N N to r N r LLB o CO N- 0 (O M O o remaining of annual 36 -7.0 -7.1 15.4 30.6 26.6 36.0 36.0 O co co O O O (O M co 0) O (0 co "t co .1t co O CO CO co CO r r O LC) F O co. O N O (O CO r r 0). N N CO (fl LL) r r CO r7' O CO M t— I's N C IC) r O ei .cp annual target Stoneybrook Century Farms North Ravens Hollow Justin's Preserve Junes Addition Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Speiser Addition Birch St.: 441, 461, 473, 495 a rn ) 0 0. 0 5- West Shadow Ponds 2nd total 'ct 0 0 N Cr; N N E a) n. a) U) w- O co a) N C. N C w a) O c 7 O v (Q a) T .Q N C (0 Q. 0) c .7) (0 L 0- O �.1 g N 0 0 N LOTS /UNITS 0) 0 O N CO 0 0 N CO 0 0 N L0 0 O N O O N M O 0 N N O 0 (p 0 N CD C >,m E (ra d 0 N O) N O N C's r To C C O 0) C .= .( E a) L 521 O NLO r r (p O r M N N r r r N O r N o0 r M N O r (O LC) 653) 0 0 Cl (My el NI- M LO NI- N r N LC) r LO O r N CO r M N CO r r r CO ti r CO r CO LC) r vt N CO r N LC) CO LC) r O r M N N N r r CO v. r L() r (p 103 249 r CO lC) O r M N O r r d' N O r N 00 r 00 r O Ln Stoneybrook 2nd Addn Century Farms North Keefe: prel plat, not final plat Morton (minor subdiv) 'Ravens Hollow Haley Manor (10 new lots) Crystal Cove Millers Crossroads Lakeview Estates (2 new) Snell (minor subdivision) Pheasant Hills Pres. 13th Justin's Preserve Marshan Estates Rice Creek Church duplex Rice Church: Oakwood View 1Junes Addn 'Highland Meadows East 2nd Marshan Townhomes 2nd Pheasant Hills 12th island proposed West Shadow Ponds 2nd Add Fox Den Acres (resubmittal) (total N O) N O N C's r To C C O 0) C .= .( E a) L 0 at P-4 cd a Q" C.) E 5 r- 0 M C7 bA E rn O N 0 0 ti O) lit • Agenda Item 5C • Environmental Board Meeting Date: October 27, 2004 Topic: Mike Vaughan Subdivision Background: Application was received to plat existing homestead site at 600 Birch St to single family, 5 Tots, at approximately 0.4 acres each. Location map is included as (Attachment 1). The Minnesota Land Cover Classification lists this area as 26% to 50% impervious cover with deciduous trees (Attachment 9). Tree save areas are depicted on Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Attachment 5). Rare vegetation indicators are absent from the site. Analysis: Site Vegetation The Minnesota Land Cover Classification (Attachment 9) shows this area as 26% to 50% impervious cover with deciduous trees. There are no rare species or rare plant location indicators on the site (Attachment 10). Although the smaller plans submitted do not include a tree preservation plan, the developer has submitted a larger plan titled Tree Preservation Plan. The Plan shows 1.5' of protection for each inch of tree diameter in the protection areas. The protection areas can be seen as that area that falls outside the silt fence area of the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan (Attachment 5), and trees within the proposed grade area. Although the Grade Plan shows three trees within the grade area as save trees, the Tree Preservation Plan shows 5 trees. Houses proposed for the site are walkouts. This should save as many trees as possible on the site. Additionally, the developer should be responsible for mitigating any oak wilt started on the site. Site Surface Water There are no flood plain areas on the site. There is flood plain on the publicly owned property immediately to the East. From the National Wetlands Inventory, there appears to be Type 7 wetlands on the eastern most boundaries. Type 7 wetlands are classified as wooded swamps with water within a few inches of the surface during the growing season. This area is shown on their Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan (Attachment 5). Surface Water is directed to rain gardens and ponds on the South and East side of the project. Rice Creek watershed District has not reviewed or responded to this proposal yet. The rain gardens, rain garden swales, and ponds should use the City Native seed mix, and the developer should hire a contractor experienced in native plant establishment to manage the establishment of this area for at least 3 years. • • Site Management Under the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan notes (Attachment 5), Item 2 indicates that 4 inches of top soil and sod or seed be placed on disturbed, unpaved areas. This should say that 4 inches of topsoil would be thoroughly worked (tilled) into the soil. Notes should also say that no soil shall be imported or exported from the site without City approval. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (Attachment 6) notes, item 9 states that sediment laden water must be discharged to a sediment basin whenever possible, if not possible it must be treated with appropriate BMP's. This should include a statement that the City will be notified when storm water must be treated with alternative BMP,s and agree to them. Item 11 in the notes states that external washing of construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of the site. This site should be identified on the plan, or at pre- construction time, and include the internal washing of cement carriers. Sequencing under the notes section (item 2) indicates the construction of a rock construction entrance. The plan should include additional stockpile of rock on site to top dress the entrance pad when the pad becomes filled up. In addition, in the notes concerning sequencing, the sediment ponds are constructed early. The ponds should be dug with minimum compaction equipment and fenced off to further traffic during construction. Item 15 under notes #2 should include a statement of restoring soil to pre- construction soil densities. Tilling, plowing, disking, etc can do this. Options: 1. Approve Mike Vaughan Subdivision 2. Other recommendation as per Environmental Board. Recommendation: Option 1. Option 1 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Boundary and Topographic Survey 3. Existing Conditions 4. Site Plan 5. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control • 6. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 7. Preliminary Plat • • 8. Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Details 9. MLCCS 10. Rare Vegetation Indicators /Sites • NAME VAUGHAN MICHAEL E SEH DataView ADDRESS 600 BIRCH ST r7A-c v e.A.9-- t. PIN 293122340002 ilk rat in to No 1 Mi ■■ 1 a wiltir -- 1111 Ai STILES?" 411 hew 111111111 wry orimr . min ik 'RV4111I .e.' nissiu a !sl' rfl■l tw 4I WIN OP, 111 NM On I I I NW PM nitinouuml ? it Tu. an MIT tri., 11111111 11111611111111 4""frisevif 111111111U1111 V MN- API .♦iI11u111ir= MEW gni 111 gr- im 416 011111.1= Nit rif lit mom= *II "00, ( 1 I rl W. LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 29 • S'L Y RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS SHOWN ON ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY RIGHT- OF-WAY PLAT N0. 11 -�` L_ MN IPW0 43/90 9.90. 90417 O wv. 87168 5 5 APPROXIMATE LOCAn0 j12" PVC SANITARY SEWER DER PLAN > 9. 5 ;';;...,;4 CO ..,. , , ,r,..,, ••,-r, P17,9.1 , -,,, -r,.M , Pi_ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 8' FORCEMAIN PER PLAN BIRCH STREET i APPROXIMATE L OCA79V OF 16" WATERMAIN PER PLAN I I / I l I 6 doe � 6 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION TELEPHONE LINE PER MAPPING --�L BITUMINOUS SERFAGE �M1A 0M1� 6,y1 PIf I f6 1Z• GAS dl' BITUMINOUS PATH (C.SAH. NO. 10 ) N89'S8'28 "W aT 377.07 (aYY.i+ ieI h1 P 0 7 �. 7 \---1:EcetvED OCT 0 7 2004 CITY Of E.4 ° LPLt4ES re I =1_1_213i, PLAN) 6M1 N. LINE OF THE •P' SE 1/4 OF THE SW I/4 OF `- SEC. 29, T. 31 N, R. 22 W APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GAS LINE PER CEN7ERPOINT ,. ENERGY MAPPNG (A4. 977 900*" it /4" CRP BITUMINOUS PATH LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of the North 345.8 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 29, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, lying East of the West 879.46 feet, except the East 60 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. GENERAL NOTES 1. The legal description shown hereon was obtained from Schedule A of the Title Commitment No. 233644 , provided by Land Title, Inc., issued on January 27, 2004. 2. We have shown buried structures and utilities on and/or serving the site to the best of our ability, subject to the following restrictions: a. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. b. Those utility operators that do respond often will not locate services from their main line to the customer's structure or facility - they consider those segments private installations that are outside their jurisdiction. If a private service to an adjoiner's site crosses this site or a service to this site crosses an adjoiner, it may not be located since most operators will not mark such private' services. c. Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of a buried structure or utility. 70 d. Maps provided by operators, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. e. The surface features end elevations shown on this drawing are located by Loucks Associates. f. All of the underground utility information and location shown on this plan were prepared from record drawings obtained from the client and information obtained from the city of Lino Lakes. g. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651/454 -0002. 895 S'\ ,96A FEE. 902.7 417 , 2 STORY BUILDING SPLIT ENTRY 1 ; 01 1 tt 0 GARAGE a1 •WOOD DECK to A% e 698 de, oP e 1°' EDGE OF WETLAND LOCATED ON 03/22/04 - BY. KJOLHAUG EWRONMENTAL 5£RWCE5 COMPANY o. 00 tr oAd 695 9 70 I 5. LINE OF THE N. 345.8 FEET I OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW l/4 OF SEC 29 m 389.58'28' 376.36 h. Per Gopher State One -Call Ticket No. 2147, the following utilities and municipalities were notified: XCEL ENERGY ...... ......... ....... .651 - 224 -0413 CITY OF LONO LAKES.. ....... ....651-982-2400 METRO WA ST COMMISION......651- 602 -4511 M /NNEGA S C O ......................... 651- 224 -0413 AT &T BROADBAND 651 - 224 -0413 ANOKA COUNTY 763- 862 -4234 QWEST 651- 773 -5680 SURVEY LEGEND — EXISTING CONDITIONS (i) 0 0 CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE WATER MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UGHT POLE POWER POLE GATE VALVE HYDRANT SIGN .972.5 SPOT ELEVATION TREE OA OAK TREE CO COTTON WOOD TREE —.—STORM SEWER - >—SANITARY SEWER — I —WATER MAIN — m.— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE - - SANITARY FORCE MAIN —GAS— UNDERGROUND GAS —c'— OVERHEAD UTILITIES --a--- -CHAIN LINK FENCE —0-- -o —WOOD FENCE CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE CONTOUR MA MAPLE TREE 7- GUYWIRE O DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED 'RLS 26724" • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE BIRCH STREET AT HOUSE NUMBER 600 ELEVATION 905.71 (PER ANOKA COUNTY SURVEYOR OFFICE) AREA: 130,269 SF OR 2.99 +/- AC NORTH 0 30 60 7.171.... SCALE IN FEET I Project Name: 600 BIRCH STREET Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1 Owner /Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota I Professional Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES Planning • Civil Engineering • Land Surveying Landscape Architecture • Environmental 02004 • 7200 Hemlock lane - Soho Minneapolis, Minnesota 53369 Telephwre: 1763/4244505 Fax (7631424 -5822 www.loucksmciagan.e0m 1 CADD Qualification: CAW 6. pnpaN N w 12,.,99 b ads pgea rr.eNNasmwiwap4a6d.wlm. r.m rrp.d. w pal.. Tease e.o.m. M ana6med4s ep.,doped., 6.wm.e e9 mica 6,1:4466646661.69,66.4 er 466.4411164 640n apa:9 14 no ea* vA cap ee66466.66461,.64 6'aw4s...dawpo.. a awrm.4 9.. CARD 6. mm 9 a.9 M6.16.04698aWe Mars, Adam. Wows w6dba y ar...laa... .., W 9lftle 504002•MASTER.DWG 1 Submittal: 03/1104 DRAWING ISSUED 0107P4 ADDED WETLANDS AND CULVERTS 1 Professional Signature: 1 honey codify a.INbpm, .p.n caXnaopal'. impaled by and or.rdee my area sup.Ma9r.b that 1 we mealy Licensed Land Bumpn,mdt.ASYvs Of the 61e9 el MNnuele. Charles E. E. Webb, 1r. - 41226 License Na Dale 1 Quality Control: pm)"nmd: CEW U4wn 9y. CEW RLS 1 Vlcmny: I Sheet Title: BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 1 Project No.: 04002 1 Sheet No.: Professional Services: 1 • SHEET INDEX CO-1 COVER SHEET C1 -1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C2 -1 SITE PLAN 0-1 GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL C3 -2 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C4-0 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C6.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT C8 -1 GRADING & EROSION DETAILS C9 -1 UTILITY DETAILS L1 -1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. These Construction Plans were prepared by a field survey prepared by Loucks Associates and record utility drawings from the City of Lino Lakes. 2. We have shown buried structures and utilities on and/or serving the site to the best of our ability, subject to the following restrictions: a. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. b. Those utility operators that do respond, often will not locate services from their main line to the customer's structure or facility - they consider those segments private installations that are outside their jurisdiction. If a private service to an adjoiner's site crosses this site or a service to this site crosses an adjoiner, it may not be located since most operators will not mark such "private" services. c. Snow and ice conditions during winter months may obscure otherwise visible evidence of a buried structure or utility. d. Maps provided by operators, either along with a field location or in lieu of such a location, are very often inaccurate or inconclusive. e. The surface features and elevations shown on this drawing were located by Loucks Associates. f. All of the underground utility information and location shown on this plan were prepared from record drawings obtained from the client and the City of Lino Lakes records. g. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT 651/454 -0002. VAUGHAN ADDITION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROPOSED SITE LOCATION PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, AND STREET VICINITY MAP WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651. 454 -0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA 651 -454 -0002 TOLL FREE: I- 800 -252 -1166 LEGEND E1STING CIVIL LEGEND SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASH CULVERT HYDRANT GATEVALVE 4472 POST INDICATOR VALVE LIGHT POLE POWER POLE SIGN BENCHMARK SOIL BORINGS WATER MANHOLE TELEPHONE MANHOLE UTILITY MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WATER SERVICE SANITARY SERWCE HANDICAP PARKING DIRECTION OF FLOW SPOT ELEVATION CONTOURS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEWAIN DRAINTILE SILT FENCE CURB & GUTTER -. = = = = RETAINING WALL TREELINE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE -- - --.— FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND TELE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC DEVELOPER PROPOSED • 0 • M ®7v • -o- fw1'vYYY"lv'� COMPANY NAME 600 BIRCH STREET LINO LAKES, MN 55038 APPROVED MIKE VAUGHN TEL: 651 -483 -8734 JIM STUDENSKI, P.E. LINO LAKES CITY ENGINEER DATE: OC ► 0 7 2004 CITY OF Lai° O LAKES S V /1UUflt1IN ADDITION Minnesota 1 Owner /Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota LOUCKS ASSOCIATES Planning. Civil Engineering• LanlSuieyil• La"Acapc Arc,ilcclum• Emkmmmal • 7200 Hemlock Lam -SwW300 Minn yaks. Min.. 55369 Tel Fax, 4717634 -5022 5 Fax. (763)4345822 www.laudasndapx.cun 411004 1 CADD Qualification: ewe �Pwdan,.0 �ur,nas i,d w.w,.m.q,wm a.yau,....CNNM mcm...a an"w.Fe W wr.ra.Y- �snRWw M w. C.w.W..w "w. taw. INI. a.... may lag goner. aria ww1.110 w .IMIC w aistiona LaYw. .5' daw"••e•mwnael.aao. 1 Submittal: 1407/IN IhliW' •'- yA�ry.inal 1 Professional Signature: 6wtl,dallyMIa Ma,xndobn • MPS m.40me•anew",*asup** axed NN Lt.* Pa1no•wlE.•••• rw.ir dRN Mar dMnwW. k •iirey A. 51•0).• PE 15624 LierlsL•Na. 1 Quality Control: 110 0 KVR ( Sheet Index: C41 COVER SHEET 1.I.1 MISTING CONDIRlR.SRAN G' -1 SW RAN 03.1 _GRADIN_CL ORNNAC(,& EROSION CONTROL ST(RIMWATIRPODUTION PRr.TNIKIN Raw C4.0 OVERALL O(E0Y HAN -- --. 06.1 PROLNRNARY RAT -- - - - - --- C41 GRADING & EROSION DETAILS- _.-- _.. - -. C9 -1 UTILITY MARS 11.1 TREEPRESERVATIONRAN 1 Sheet Title: COVER SHEET ( Project No.: 04002 1 Sheet No.: co -1 tE OF /ME 4 OF ME f/4 OF 4t: SE APPROPNRrE LOCAT'M»yi2' PAC 'AR' SEWER fig PLAN v t 1 w "e°>sQ3a .ones a -'1 APPAxsM443s La:Anas,rr�e^ PcaY<L.w, 1 _ _ , e r' • 4lRY n7n N AFPR( !E LYx !kt 4- (.NCENAAY Pf6 P; AN N89'S8'28"W ..7 c". / • 377.07 - 0 I rl tCLr. Or ME H' TF r/4 OF rte Sw 1/t r. 4614 R. 22 F' i APPINJAIK T.F LG::AT r 11;:'140)7 LING' 6(6 *144' : -- trr,A(A,D 46c ■' \ P d'- lD &isAkNC4F' PArir '4• f- nA F•AY LBE AS SHOWN 4..•,- eft _._..r_ -_—� 4 t -- = „ ' sac; COLN:• wKNwnY II'°. .._ ...: �C f , •u.,y..ti --nxs^°•�..e.. - } -w r T4.A! At If N../1 , ;' <;'— < 1!1 " W 67846 - -� S7� :N:O! ware -4rt s4 ''q.5 PAM t S to, Vm .. r .I p`b d 7' hi N i t %fir :/ tri • • h 0E • $'1D*716,. lnT .wax O nni SAVE TREES _r SEE SHEET LI- I, >�orr. SAVE TREE SEE SHEET LI -I VAT LALF CIF be K 3459 f.L. (4' 567 S- :/ 67 767 5. V4 24-7 ..r 11et. !u' *5(67wa, ▪ Lcs ArE(m C#i nJ /:2,, 7A ...- -' - - - ° -- -• er: *706 414*? F,r t.60»tsrTAL 5'61':65; .7emp R• .P, • st A ps S89 °5878'fai' 376.36 t- _ Lanus CIVIL LEGEND HAPvIte STOMA um.. CAECA RAW CULVERT D4 wmKVE Rn. POST 01OICATOR VALVE • Lkan POLE ■ L2J POWER POI( • sw SOIL OCRs= WATER YAM. © 15LEMIWE 0AM10LE R MITT MMMOLE Q: ELECTRIC WAROLE RATER awvaE SANTART SCARCE RMOKAP PARxma oeElnN a ROT Erot ELEVATOR CoNTORTS awTWY O MINT WEER RrmCn.s, EleNvoLE CAN R OEMER RETArW TALL ,Bala EMMERT log RETRACT Led FOCI la 150EROROU 0 TELE 00ERSRURD CAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC • 0 • • 14 cv NORTH ii- 0 30 60 7.77.2 SCALE IN FEET EXISTING CONDITIONS GENERAL NOTES 1. The Information shown on this Existing Conditions plan was prepared Lam o Boundary and Topographic Survey prepared by Loucks Associates /Loucks Mclagan and doled April I, 2004. Utility information shown on this pion, such as Sonitory Sewer. Wdtermoin, Sturm Sewer. Forcemain. Etc. was provided by the City of L410 Lakes Record Pions. Utility information shown on this pion, such as Natural Gas, (Metric Lines, Telephone Lines, Fiberoptic Lines, Coble Television Lines, Underground Pipelines, etc. was supplied or located by Gopher Stole One Can, Ticket Number 2147 and the following Wallies and Municipalities were notified: XCEL ENERGY CITY OF LINO LAKES METRO WASTE COMMISION MINNEGASCO AT &T BROADBAND ANOKA COUNTY OWEST 651 -224 -0413 651 -962 -2400 651- 602 -4511 651 -224 -0413 651- 224 -0413 763 -1362 -4234 651- 773 -5660 2. The wetlands information shown on this pion was provided and delineated by Kplhoug Environmentd Services Company, doled Mach 17, 2004. We hove shown buried structures and 010tks on and /or serving the site to the best of our °bitty, subject to the laming restrictions: a. Utility operators do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher Slot. One Call service for boundary and lowlion purposes such as this. b. Those utility operators !hot do respond. often will not locate services Gran the rnoin fine to the customer's structure or focally - they consider those segments private installations that ere outside of their isdiclion. If a primate service to on adjoner s site crosses this site or a service to this site crosses an adjener, it Coy not be located since most operators will not mark such "private" Services. c. Snow and Me conditions Miring winter months moy obscure otherwise visible e0dence of o buried structure or utility. d. Mops provided by ul0'oly operators, either Sang with 0 field locolion or in lieu of such a location, ore very often inaccurate or kmc000101100. Mops provided by utility operators ore very often at a very small scale. or no stole. e. Extreme caution must be exercised before on excavation lakes place on or neor the site. Before dgging. you ore required by low to notify GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 01 least 413 hours in advance of 651 -454 -0002. 3. OCT 0 7 2004 CITY OF LI %0 LAKES IID VAUGHAN ADDITION Minnesota 1 Owner /Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN • 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1 Professional Services LOUCKS ASSOCIATES PLRwing • Ovll Engineering • Lind Surveying la0Rrap.Mfiile6me • Envkma 0*A {:0m4 • 73105 Hemlock lone • SOO Minneapli0MW1esals 35300 040 6eme: 06314245505 . 1243143451122 wRw .laleksmclagn.mm 1 CADI) Qualification: Marns1W055Lw.w 055 b 06. cuiwrTAwpdams lor or solely wW.AFPAm wme p.s1 nms•CAm•w AwRae. ova MM pel*larie aebns pVVev wwpAnAhsr'�eA.•wa� • y bbl sa WO.CUSWWs M: +RRa .r. p• ems_ en gip. CAOa6rmm pwprAlmAV ATE p•TenlwuwwWeWew.. CI -Idwg 1 S11LCniit5* I Professional Signature: may mamas. Mon WNcesino wools. MPed blamer Tap min eta Maw. 00 a d eel 1 son duly ItainsireMolalsboal Smahrn:n ft Ma of Pa Male alrasMa 40110y6. Shrg.k -PE WrN Lkmie Na Mole 1 Quality Control: 56.04.4 KVR Uu K Sheet Index: OLI NAASSWET CI.1 L151SIIGC NUMOe6PL4N C2..1 N1E FlAN _Cal GRAONG. 000000LLA USSIONCON1a. C3.M STORMWAURNM.LWIOVPOMNSU NAN 746 OVLRNLURITYNAN Ctrl PRLIMINAR0MT BI ERARNGA61O36390ETNL5 LY.I UTAIIY RIMS 01.1 TREEPRE%006110NRAN 1 Sheet Title: EXISTING CONDITIONS Protect No.: 04002 1 Sheet No.: N89.58 28 "W 377.07 �/• BIRCH STREET IRIAN PATH RAMP a (pct. s REA °R EXISTING GWVEL DRIVr AND R.F'.a1IORrAER CITY STANDARDS }M5 30' is L axo c • 1886., 589'58781 376.36 OCT 0 7 2004 CITY OF L. M0 LA'K S SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES I SETBACKS Front building setback N Side building setback Rear building setback 2. 7ONINS, Existing zoning a 30' 10' 30' 9 -1 Proposed x0049 . R -1 4. ARFA /DFNRITY Total Plot Area a 2.99 Ac. a 1002 Total Wetland Area a 0.08 A. a 2.79 Total Net Plot Area a 2.91 Ac. a 97.39 Total Housing Units a 5 Gross Density a 1.67 Units /Acre Net Density a 1.72 Units /Acre Impervious Surface Area a .526 As N 17.69 Building Surface Area a .054 A0. a 1.62 Pervious Suffixes Area a 2.41 Ac. a 80.62 5. All paving, concrete curb. gutter and sidewalk shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the details Mom per sheet C9 -1 and the requirements of the City. See Landscape and Architectural Plans for any additional hordscope oppkcotions. 6. The City Department of Engineering and Building inspections Dept. and the instruction engineer shall be notified al least 48 hours prior to ony work within the street right of way (sidewalk. street or driveways) 7. Minnesota Stole statute requires notification per "Gopher Stole One Coll" prior to Canmenehg any grading, 000000tion or underground work. 8. See contract specifications for any removal details. 9. My sign or fixtures removed with In the right of way or as port of the site work 50011 be replaced by the conlr0000r in accordance with the City requirements. Thee tractor Moll preserve one moinldn y existing street lights and traffic signs per the requirements of the City. 10. Cleo and grub and remove NI trees, vegetation and site debris prior to grading. All removed material shall be hauled from the site day. All clearing d grubbing and removals shall be performed per the contract specifications. Erosion control measures shall be immediately established upon removal. (See Sheet C3-I) a u 11. The contractor shall be required to obtoin 011 permits horn the City os required for all work with the street and public right of way. 12. A significant portion of site improvements not shown on this sheet ore described ond provided in further delay on the Architectural and Landsoope Plans TNs includes landscaping. lighting and other failures. 13. Surmountable concrete curb and gutter shell be installed at the edge Of all Cornmm drives and parking lots. The curb shall be tapered and dropped to across individual driveway entrances. 14. Construction Notes: Oo Pedestrian romps shall be provided al the locations shown end as shown per the landscape site pions. OThe contractor Moll saw -WI bituminous and concrete pavements as required per the specifications. Remove existing curb end gutter and Petal 8618 concrete Curb and gutter. 15. See Sheets C3 -1 odd C4 -I for grading and utilities. 16. All concrete curb and gutter Surmountable. City's 55.560,6 Rotes. (See Detail Sheet). 17. The intent of the proposed construction is to preserve as much of the existing street pavement as possible. and to mill and oredoy. Removed pavement area and patching shall be installed per pavement section provided per Detail Sheets CALL BEFORE YOU DIG( Gopher State One CaII TWIN CITY AREA: 651 -454 -0002 TOLL FREE: -800- 252 -1166 lnasl050 CIVIL LEGEND KOPOSm 0 • • Mr • • 04- R�lt0 SANITARY YANK. STORY KAKAS COCA um Merit o 0505605 00 CATWALK Sax, Post 05900(017 met unit Past ;d down POLE • Sae ea a 6MOrrle SOL 59000 • WATER 0505009E Q: 10EPKNE MANIPLE • urana wwwLE 695050 L 000090 SArl.n SEeua HANDICAP PI114050 ONECnni Of ROW VW tames Cnia1ln wnMT SINK STOW SD. raaRNON SAT ring cure a dAnd St SAM., LK SM. LINE MOWS LK 15050090055 SELF ueoE.e.ano OAS 005.0500 rucTIK i" Y NORTH O 30 60 SCALE IN FEET I Pro4Le.l Nam: VAUGHAN ADDITION Minnesota ( Owner/Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN • 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota Pmf000ional Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES Waning • CLWIEnpkwerthg • 1a001eveyig Landscape Anemias • Emble 5...01 i 21101 • M1200 Fkminrk law • SW. 291 Lnnagxiis,Minee44 55169 Tel yhrne: 1763)424 -05115 Ead 176314244022 wwwSWeksarlapendom CARD Qualification: pada u0 00 000. 00. 00x1 we wail N ti wry n.. ewO nil aWx.m adWwa slam xsmesil.50x1*n40a Msarvierrra.5590 AY Me Comm* arww wCAW wwq WasWon.a wa.w swum.. mL 4 ur 'b 004 asn Na. ewiauaay at ft NI ww..snw Caawaem war auoaeroa deb, weds.. 62.1.006 1 Submittal: 'WPM Pn.1ataxyCity AR! - 1 Prof050ianal Signature: (INA W y may m MA 9n w0?ercn ar KOA KI WANK by we w blowmyawa doWniKnmwN 1 tan 5 Ne Lkwne dinamm enawa atlw ell M Ww Sae Nktrams Mkey A. SWIM. •PE 14:1.1 Urea. Nu. Noe 1 Quality Control: JID Nwnlry- KVR 1 Sheet Index: _ 6141 _ CO.100)015 Cl -1_ E195T1HGCOMIRMISRAN_ C2 -I -I 5111PIAN 0040069.DRAIIUQ,i1R0510NUh150L 0.2 STORMWATERP9LL11TI0N IRIVSIIIIORAN CM fri1RN1l0A11YPIM3 061__ PR01Ma1ARYPIAI 661 00550966 PRUSKW DETAILS Cal N6IOS 000AIL5 _ 11.1 TRR PRBERVATR0NPIAN 1 Sheet Title: SITE PLAN 1 Project No.: 04002 iSheet No.: STS' 1/4 Or SET: 28 57.Y MC-yr- -MA'r G&W 5e SWONA AAk0A Ciq.sr'r, pr.ra4wA r 2{..r - cc- *o * PLR NA �, Pr ,7rx Nthr: I I dl.w A'aM - A05,50775VC ££X.57107, t2' PVC SAN :7AkY SEW. PREP PI IN > . .�-.- > - --.- �- we Kf.J f•Y'�'tAM: 1 > T r - ----- --- -- -__-51_ _____ _. -- -- - - - - -�- -' -- -_ -. --- --I I A • e.A r tt ~A7 31 rEtrNW :uri BIRCH STFIEET k I c U 5151 401' /InPV?OFMpr?' tEKA.rIU?: J1' rE° eAT NN .YF F*j,AN 51 51 / .rWeraxaiate' 1..^M FAxr J% r fo..: U :' PEN PLO, ..., 5151.. , ": ',7'.':':=:';'...- , C. • / N89 38'28 "W I 377.07 r 5151 5151.. , ti`;' 51-51-$ - -M1 -- F 0.---5"1-, ?o`- 45•4'' BENCH MAW. 5151 i • It- WrOloki”...IT Pit Nit }�"- \ia. .'o'er ti t e" °1 ii °T .T 4,0' ' °" i N o" (T. (C.S., A.H. NO. 10) 4. i Ann- :ti619. 6<6 ENS r`c >' Ge'tirna;,w: £1ti£O, 4£an /fk N LP;E i!x' !NF Ss 7/0 EY. ill' Sic 1/4 !Y 2V. 24. f 3! N. R 22 R 507- -,, ,•-: ' yy SILT FFE�NCEE etta / LuP t -, 5,5000 CIVIL LEGEND .50,5000 500000m 00wNWE • @ C VOW 504006E 00001 5000 > 0550, D MEW • 305* 1.051 •100/201 00660 0..v • 13041 POLE 0 POS. POLE / - 0051 s • t• 30POTs* SOL BOW. 4h1- 8D TWO 0.015E .�, 0a0P105E 50001E (11 MUTT 5.0550 rD tams wiener HYMN. 0001046 0.0000 or now 4•411G■ YOr *E0*00 SO .4415+' Cana. tea✓ _._..... >, 50001440 30505 w•ww•=4. �». STOW SEWS - �� -� woe55m mamma so SSW COTS • OaTTOT TIRSOLea 3020.5 oS T. UK 1050501,0010 r4E M0510RpaU 6•5 OVERHEAD 0100050 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. The contractor shall refer to the orchitectura plans for exact locations and dimensions of bendings, vestibules. sloped paving, exit porches, romps. truck docks, entry locations and ocations of downspouts. C 2. All disturbed unpaved Weal ore to receive minimum 4 inches of lop son and sod or seed. These areas shall be watered by the contractor until the sod or seed is growing in a heolthy manner. 3. The contractor shall 501.5 •0li precouti0ns necessary to avoid property damage to adjacent properties during the construction phase of this project. The contractor will be held responsible for ony 400109 s to adjacent properties occurring during the construction phase of this project 4. The contractor will be responsible for providing ond mointoining troll contra devices such as barricades, warning signs, dieclionol signs, flagmen and lights to control the movement of Ironic where necessary. Plocemenl of these devices shall be approved by the engineer prior to placement. Traffic contra devices shall conform to the oppropriafe Minnesota deportment of Traneportolion standards. 5. In accordance with generally accepted construction practices. the contractor will be solely and completely responsible for conditions on the job site. including safety of all persons and properly during the performance of the work. This requirement the apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. 6. The duly of the engineer 00 the developer to conduct construction review of the contractors performance is not Intended to include review of the adequacy of the contractors solely measures in. or near the construction site 7. Before beginning construction the contractor shoe install o Temporary Rock Entrance pad 0t all points of vehicle Ball from the project site. Said Rock Entrance pad shall be moinloined by the contractor for the duration of the project. See deloils shown on Sheet C8 -1 of the project plans. 8. Erasion and Se0imentolion contra measures shell be established around the entire silo perimeter on6 in m pro mil with NPDES pmil r quirements. Best Manogement Practices. City requirements and the details shown on Sheet C8 -1 of the project plans. 9. All entrances and connections to city streets shag be performed per the requirements of the City. The contractor shell be responsible for 011 permits and notIficolions as required by the city. 10. See utility pion and storm sewer profiles for further detail regarding the storm sewer. ILT FENCE 58938284.; 376.36 S th r.Y• ire N. 3416 far c1 1^F 5£ :/4 G.' 744( _ s4 1/4 OF SE:. 2b' CALL BEFORE YOU 012! Gopher State One CaII TWIN CITY AREA; 651- 454 -0002 TOLL FREE: 1 -800- 252 -1166 NORTH 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET I Prole[I Name: VAUGHAN ADDITION Minnesota I Owlet/Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota I Professional Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES Naming • Ovil Engineering • lad Ss.o.ykls Landoo,le AoNhrlae • En6mrenmW 52000 • 7210 Eknixk tae - Suite 100 MMnypnle, 5001000 55169 Telephone: (7631424-5505 9041 1763)474.5072 w Jwneendegan.cml CADD Qualification: 0.00 Apw M0w0 0.deew s latum.dely Plw, (0000 OSw 00000en So b.c 51qua wermram a15.es wue.ese.r de w N bison+ 0 04.w..5ama.aw 5ewwwaweowwwr 51000.0 Pn �.00c� ww.ber rPro x,algwur5mar sal epmnm bwrwrwgr 0505.+~ w a w.PPwrr. 0515 we wr C1 -IUh,B I Submittal: 191174M plialC.:_wAiriwel Professional Signature: 1 holey may 0wwe W0.wecic 0065 wren. me 005050051 me or *rev foe sup** I wneggl.keweRwP4mM Engineer. .Won .1.0 MMbwPLL Mfbw A. Sko .k- PE 14624 lirens0 Nn. nee I Quality Control: Reid ion *5514..151, 00.40 KVR Sheet Index: Cel COVER Peri Ct.l ESSMINGCOMDffiC 6PLAN C2.1 511611M O.1 GRADING, DRAINAGE, 6 EROSg1 C00100IX C1-2 STORM WATER POLIAMON 99 HNS074 PUN C40 OVERALL UTILITY RAN Cb! PREUMNARY RAT C41 GRADING& EROSION DEMOS C9.1 UttO!100416S 01.1 TR0EPRE0RVAT14N RAN I Sheet Title: GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL Project No.: 04002 Sheet NO.: C3-1 GAUD Qualification: 1 ( N89'58781W I 377.07 BIRCH STREET (C.SAH. NO. 10 901 ROCK ENTRANCE PAD Ai - I 1 L,G_ -I P ^_ , 905.5D ' 905.50 to to L .• 01, 902 096 LT FENCE 6- £G• 589°5828"Ea.P' 376.36 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE NATURE OP THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING: FIVE SOME FAMILY LOTS WITH WATERMAN, STORM AND SANITARY 551YER CONNECTIONS. 2. THE INTENDED SEOUENCE OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS: L INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAD. 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE. 3. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR SEDIMENT BASIN. 4. CONSTRUCT SEDIMENTATION BASIN. 5. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE. 6. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL. 7. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE. B. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES WITHIN N DAYS OF LAST CONSTRUCTION N THAT AREA. 9. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAN, STORM SEWER. AND SERVICES ID. SUB -CUT STREETS, INSTALL STREET SECTION. II. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER. 12. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 13. 5INAL GRADE SITE INSTALL SEED AND MULCH. N. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN. 15. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. 3. SITE DATA: AREA 10 BE DISTURBED m 3.00 rm. PRIOR TO POST CONSTRUCTION YEMISTRICTION IdPERVKN? AREA 060 ae D 411 De COIL TYPFO A POST CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF COFFFRXFNT 04.50 4. TIE LOCATION OP AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, STAKES. SKNS. SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY - EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES TIME AN AREA CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN NOT TYPF OF SI OK PCIIVLY BEING WORKED STEEPER THAN 11 14 DAYS 10:1 70 3:1 FLATTER THAN 10.1 21 DAYS DENOTES SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 6. ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND /0R GULLIES. SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. 7. ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 8. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS CR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT O SILT. CLAY. OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEMPT (EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES. DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES. SAND STOCKPILES). 9. SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER P055RLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE_ IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BLIP'S. l\.Tm1�e 10. SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED Or PROPERLY AND KIST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REDUREMENTS. 011. (VNAL OF 7HE WASHINSITE. G OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AR ER 12. NO ENDINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE, 13. THE OWNER W40 SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION I5 A 9E9411 0E0 AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF 14E PERMIT. THE OPERATOR (CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGN5 THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION 15 A PERMITTEE FOR PARTS 118., PART N.C. AND PART IV. OF THE 490E5 PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT. M. 1.416455 (6 - RA . -UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING. UTILITIES. AND STREET CONSTRUCTION THE NEW OWNER (HOME BIALDE9) MUST SUBMIT A SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION WITHIN 7 DAYS O: ASSUMING OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE. COMMENDING WORK ON THEIR PORTION OF THE SITE. OR OF THE LEGAL TRANSFER. SALE OR CLOSING ON THE PROPERTY. NOTF- THE NEW OWNER CAN IMPLEMENT THE ORIGINAL SWPPP CREATED FOR THE PROJECT OR DEVELOP AND IMPLAMENT THEIR OWN SWPPP. 15. TERMINATION OF SOVFRA0E- PERMITTEE($) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE MPCA. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 3D DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: A. FINAL STABILIZATION. PER 149DES PERMIT PART IV.G. AND DEFINITION IN APPENDIX B HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE I5 RESPONSIBLE. FINALLY STABILIZED. PERIMETER CONTROL FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE RESIDENCE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO THE HOMEOWNER. ADDITIONALLY. THE PERMITTEE MUST DISTRIBUTE THE MPCA'S BENEFITS OF. FINAL STABILIZATION. R. INSPECTIONS A. INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE 15 REOURED. B. EXPOSED SOL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 0.5' OVER 24 HOURS RAN EVENT. C. STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS D. FROZEN GROUND: AS 500N AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. 17. OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REWIRED FOR THE PROJECT, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE. PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS. AND REOURED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS 18. SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN: A. THERE 15 A CHANGE IN DESIGN. OPERATION, MAINTENANCE. WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE B. INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP 15 NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE 15 EXCEEDING WATER OUALIT1 STANDARDS. C. THE BMF'S IN THE SWP99 ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS O THE PERMIT. SILT FENCE REOU)RED MAINTENANCE: I. WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE IT MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 2. REPAIR OR REPLACE DISFUNCTIONAL 5111 FENCE WITHIN 24 HOURS. IHSIRES �.i fed CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED PORN OPPOSE COMAS I,.oRAN, • P4 WI[¢ALVE PP. P051 MCAT* YN.RE ❑ WO POLE (5 POWER POLE • 9d <- 11- SOIL BORINGS • PATER APAHElE 5 7EEEPPOK OAm1at • Mr( M8MRE 52 MEMO 941101E WATER SERVICE WNW. SEANCE HANDICAP NAMING ONESnw M now SNP EELEVA,ON CONTOURS • 0 a M • •ry SH n Rs. op Re es NORTH 0 30 60 71.J7.-J SCALE IN FEET OCT 0 7 2004 SEE SHEET C8 -I FOR GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 1 11010CI Name: VAUGHAN ADDITION Minnesota I Owner /Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN • 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 1 Professional Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES Planning • Civil Engale 441 • Land Moseying landscape NChilenln •Envi9nno9A1 7200 114441 law -Sage NW MinnwPIil. 6{111.0x6* 55564 TI phonc17A0424.5505 Fm.- 1763424 -5522 xwwJOHkmm.,Rarum .5.2WP.1 LADD NPR Snasepnis of w rm c ooNN IN as Maly Nan wow o hNnp mi... N. mea•nPO.moaRN E .wnwsN'pa mrauor+r ofew Ps la* el us pg,INHowNANNERH @Rooms oo,aaMaM mmambwa mow mmmmm• Cl -tsix9 1 Submittal: Prokssiola1 Signature: Ih*tlyP 1.y RML.P...OPP 1*914,7.10 famed M 1.m n San my ARIA som•'m• 6I,E OM I Pm•d6y LwP6 RON WEno*,.M•r OP Ha P.O.* MMmARMP 1464y A. 9Niwl- I'L 141.24 Lkenm No. DAR I Quality COnN01: (ID 1 Sheet Index: 001 [OVERSHOT CI.1 IX9SIINGLT)NAINA514 A>; C2 -I LTE RAN 0.4 GRAIlKN40RMYAGF.AFWXI(A fl WlilX C12 STORM want HALUTIINPREISSIIINPLA\ 76-1 PIIILMNNARY 0.1 (62014406 0/641511455 C9.1 MORT DEMO 11 -1 TREEPOLS(RVATKNRAN I Sh6•L4 Title: ( STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 1 Project No.: 04002 Sheet No.: C3-2 • BIRCH 'STREET MER d?"11e1V J77.07 sit J71EJ9 SHEi'LAi s°a ✓e( +'Ass i 2N0 ADO! T1014 OMNI QV{. LE430 MOM wan mai sta mesa Wen e.O. • at= mown • amua N OW Mt 0C m Vat Orw • an y0 0 • M111 q[ • 110 r.w 00 Kea al. IMAMS f0@.IRw edeaA. nMN meat /utaa IWaas. ate MIME ■•■ MOM, - tones PARK LTv memo or maw eiillmo Ns' mar Osumi yp• morn �. Leman Neese mimmitelmmw -.- slow awe ammI 11 ewer.. waa.r Sal la Irsomisseamma 0ma00e11A ma Mr sum wr.aaw.M °Mort see Set aar a fa ua aWOwa6lo. DOCala .41 nag. 0.0000 UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1 M smiler)/ sew,. Mom sewer MO walermaa *Maim Nall be Iurnitl.e6 bbl intoned per the requirements of Ine epeeifcaiab. the Gly end the standard utilities specification of the Gly Engineers Association of a:rnesola (CEAM). 1999 edition. M HOPE connections to concrete manholes Mall be connected with en internal rubber gadget or by using ADS walerslop gasket. M sanitary sewer main line shod be 5DR 35. All oonilery sewer services shod be 5DR 25. 2. See 5Mee1 C9 -1 and the Conlrecl epeciliceli0ns for specific utility *aloes and Melly Melee delais 3. An utility pipe bedeitg eked be eampeeled 00r16 or fine groaner melerid per 1M rsquir.menle to Me Gly. M toenail. shed be perlarmed per 1110 requk0mente 01 the MAN Specification. 4. An connection. to ticketing Malkin shall be performed per the Iequuennmis of the City. The Gly Deportment of Engineering and evading Inapeetirn Department and Die construction engineer must be notified of least 40 hours prier to ony work within the puh00 right el soy. er were k000cl'ing public telethon 5. M sanitary sewer and water services Nod termnme of the prmerly lint unless otherwise noted. 6. The contract, Noll notify GOPHER STATE ONE CALL el 651 -454 -0002 at Neel e6 hours P0er to p,lormiq any eaeovotien or underground were. 7. The contractor Nall fond e1nl wale/ mein le amid contacts with sonilery sewer, APT sew,. and services as require. Insulation of miner and sonilery saw, Ina Nall be provided Mere 7.5 feel minimum depth can net be oltoined. 6. Al street repairs and Deleting shall be periaed per the requirements o1 the Gly. All traffic control Nil be prodded by the .amen., and Nall be sslmliMed per UN requirements of 1ne Nnnesoto Manuel of Uniform c Control Devices (MUTCO) and Me City. This shed inn4rde od signage. Momir-odtl. Rashers and Ro9gers as needed. M public streets shed be open l0 traffic o1 od tines NO rood dosing Ned be permitted without the expressed aaherily of of the City. 9. *0 new wolermon must hove a madmen of 7.5 feet of cover. 0. Adket all eaei1g structures. both public and privele la IM proposed roars where dalur0e end comply 06th aK requirements of the ulaily 000,1. Structures brag reset 10 paved ,nos reed meet Owners requirements let Valk loading. 11. Proposed Pipe Materiels: quote area DIP GOes 52 No Mss then 7.5' dap. deal, Service COPPER TYPE K.1 Service to properly tae. Smeary Saver PVC 5DR 35 No mare lam 20' tMap. Smeary Sewer PVC SDR26 20' - 25' deep. Smeary Sever PVC e Service to property One. Strum Sewer RCP CLASS 5 12' 4 18 diameter. 0rantas POLYETHYLENE Batt of curb. OCT 0 7 2004 CITY` OF LR.,X) LAKES CALL BEFORE YOU 0101 Gopher State One CaII YVN GTY AREA: 651 -454 -0002 TOLL FREE 1- 800 - 252 -1166 NORTH 0 30 80 711177■J SCALE IN FEET 1 Protect Name: VAUGHAN ADDITION Minnesota 1 Owner/Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN • 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota ' Professional. Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES ankle • Civil Enplane .Land Surveying Landscape Mo*000Ue • Emorranenlal • 7210 Hemlock Lane- Suite MM Min yoke. laneM. 55369 Ta4pas: l763N2e -*505 Fox ww sea M 0*0* 11CADD Qualification: wm.v°'0er0wwa e�rm0000 war.r..rrwr.wsa Ir.oaar r new ererm.ero..re. ▪ rrOw:..wwW°v.'r. nwl.uwwwswwrwrrw.. wr.c.wMr.vmww.ca . rnro....a.. r .wre.s r rr� va..r r awl d....0 a— .1▪ .m ./.wwa.mm.s. • ...Ws. .w rr.av -+� w.r.ww r Cealdwll 1 Submittal: 14, 00 Pld*kw* CMV Amend I Professional Signature: low 1abww. oa.. wwrowerw�wn.s soarsb oaw Slld ovawa 00d m�w I ad/ An..WWFgsr inn dear baleta re bay A. 51aaak • PE 1.24 liar. Nu 1 Quality Control: wuw )ID 11..3■w: EVE amat 1 Shed Index: OLI COVER PM CI -f I0i6TING CON0ITKR6 MAN C2 -1 SRI NAN C3.1 GRADING, DRAINM2.a WPM CUNIRUI 0..2 STORAIWATDIPOLLNgN PRnTlall *PUN C4-0 OVERALL URITIHAN C41 IYQIA/eMR3 PLAT (0.1 GRADING & EROSION IIETMS C9-1 UI011Y DETIlS 11•1 TREE PRLgRVAIION PLAN 1 Sheet Title: OVERALL UTILITY PLAN 1 Proiecl No.: 04002 1 Shen No.: C:4 -O PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: VAUGHAN ADDITION * IK LINE OF THE 'i SE 1/4 OF THE 1 I ` / . S17 1/4 OF SEC 29 F Ali (PM PIJN) OeN 87°0154, > > APPROXILT7E LOCATIONI 12" PVC SANITARY SEWER P>ER FLiN > ( e' ! 1 !M1 ••L•• APPROXIMATE LOCAT1CIN ,09,10 °' ?7i_1�Rx_'nl929PLA7r'`! ',— /'--- -1—/'� pM1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 8" FORCEMAIII PER PLAN I 9°`d N. LINE 09 THE +�. 1 ''=y E I/s of rHE I �i,•,..,, ::T,"� :: i_ �1 (;..,... ,., .. ...... ... `- 5E239, T, 31 11, R. 22 W W89 °5828 "W w 377.07 m i (i3 PON) •1 - I e h I -� ° Ie BITUMINOUS PATH {r SRO' a D( Sty RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE AS SHOIYN 11��•='r ON ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY v- .=-F� X11 RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT N0. /( -�\- �r�A ��. r '946 \°�'T "-+i 1i' ° yb atA,+�j -N • � BTUNA DS SURFf AM10E ?BIRCH STREET IT CCAPER PMAPPING - -. TEMLPPNOV✓E ATLE INLE 4' I rts n$�v La's y@� BENCH HARK 'ro I v s-- 579.46 '5 / ARM /M::24i5 2017ITMrr O° f E:3 LINE PE CEO IRRPOAVT (C.S.4•H. NO. 10) . EN6TC) IMMIX / ti^ 14" GNP es. ge Zi 1 ey° RITU :U NOUeiS P1n� _e___,41 ° e -- a 3 ,C,' t1�= --• f-hn - -cam b l—f mo _ `.. trl 1.; g.51 d e ,, 1 ° / i d N r . ''''744'-;7.;--- 4+ -1 / •°cow ittP e'• Dv {� ^'P / S. UNE OF THE N. 345.8 FEET j OF THE SE I/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 29 S89e58'28'SL' 376.36 O DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED "RLS 26724" • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: , �Ir5 6- L 10 I I ID 1.—_—L---_ BEING 5 FEET IN 460705TED A110 ADJOINING LOT S LINES SAND E B ONG 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE • • PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES SURVEYOR: Loucks Associates, Inc. 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55330 763 - 424 -5505 OWNERIDEVELOPER: Mike Vaughan 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55038 651 - 483 -8734 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the North 345.8 feet of the Southeast 114 of Southwest 114 of Section 29, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, lying East of the West 879.46 feet, except the East 60 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. DATE OF PREPARATION: 071021 2004 BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE BIRCH STREET AT HOUSE NUMBER 600 ELEVATION = 905.71 (PER ANOKA COUNTY SURVEYOR OFFICE) EXISTING ZONING: Zone (R -1) single family residential PROPOSED ZONING: Zone (R -1) single family residential TOTAL AREA: 130,269 sq.ft. 2.99 +1- acres LOT AREAS: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 UPLAND LOT AREAS: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 16,014. sq.ft. 22,834. sq.ft. 16,506. sq.ft. 20,719. sq.ft. 17,629. sq.ft. 14,010 sq.ft. 11,654 sq.ft. 12,894 sq.ft. 19,665 sq.ft. 17,629 sq.ft. ROW DEDICATION: Existing R -O -W 22,620. sq.ft. New R -0 -W 13.943. sq.ft. BUILDABLE AREA: 88,383 sq.ft. PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS: Front = 35 Feet Side (Corner) = 30 Feet Side (Interior) = 5 Feet Rear = 30 Feet Arterials and collectors = 40 Feet FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: This property is contained in Zone C (area of minimal flooding) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 270150010 B, effective date of May 17, 1982. SURVEY LEGEND (� CATCH BASIN ® STORM MANHOLE O SANITARY MANHOLE 85 WATER MANHOLE CO TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 0 UGHT POLE O POWER POLE Pl GATE VALVE Q HYDRANT SIGN .752.3 SPOT ELEVATION 0 TREE OA OAK TREE` CO COTTON WOOD TREE NORTH FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 SEC. 29 HAS 974 G5aa•.1 He' SOO•?s'48"E — EXISTING CONDITIONS —�'- -- -STORM SEWER ' —>— SANITARY SEWER — I —WATER MAIN —7o.— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE —m— SANITARY FORCE MAIN —ass— UNDERGROUND GAS —0.— OVERHEAD UTILINES —x-- -x —CHAIN UNK FENCE 0 o WOOD FENCE CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE CONTOUR MA MAPLE TREE 7-- GUY WIRE —950L— BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY LINE 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Project Name: VAUGHAN ADDITION Minnesota 1 Owner /Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN • 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota Professional Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES Panning • 564? Engineering • Land 5wveyin? Landscape Archllecwo • Environenul • 7200 Hemlock Lane - Sella 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369 Telephone: 7763)424-5505 7 N 6Aouc63624 -5n.mm Came I CADD Qualification: Ca0DIIrm*w1eca nocamaca1.nana.n • �� e�P8t,�MOO. mono .Im> beaten• n W.P3ec mama...mama papaw wean amenammeam by Pa an toga elms ota me»..Ie.uw.rw a.m. Mete% clokfteu Nose GM war mug um namma am.. ose= n..ma,,.ew eams▪ emnomm4n, amsatm.mamaroue 50400244A5TER.1 Submittal: 061040' Wee Creek WeeMN Pelne 91425' ,shed Reaeil8008(bl 'mad Professional SIRnalure: men* may IMO,* Nen..p.o!4aaa a anal P.0.0 .y a area supeMalon .m.miu aen seriem neecre lm VIM sated M)= aa. l.�v 545 E. W.7.17L -'1... Cholks E. Webb, U. .1.5 41226 13F 5/I Limo ND. I Quality Control: CEW CEW MOM a Sheet Index: Cal COVER SHEET CI.1 EXESh ?C COMMONS PLAN C24 SMEPIAN C3,1 GRACING, DRAINAGE. &FROMM CO C3• STORM WATER POLLUTIONPREVENTI( C40 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN Cal 171U14 MRY PLAT C61 GRADING 4 EROSION OETAR3 C9.1 MIRY OETARS 17.1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Sheet Title: PRELIMINARY PLAT I Proied No.: 04 Sheet No.: ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3/16/04 I STANDARD DRAWING N0. 605 5' METAL OR 2'e2'WOOD FENCE POST OEOTEIIILO WITN NET BACKING BACKFILL •N. GEOIEKTRE 10 OVERLAP THROUGH TRENCH. fi NOTE -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO MN007 3886. TYPE B. - FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. 3/16/00 • SILT FENCE (IN STANDARD DRAWING NO 601 MMMd LAIN aaM W NAM SMALL, - T. 00 0 0 0 4 015 lo 00 7M, 0a6Re 70 WORT 71060 Lreac�MNtew 50.0 710100 m 004 7001 0100 e -500 Conn. eMs PIT (W015Y100w IM K enema, P.M 70 saK«Wl 0; a e[OIl suer *CT rwa 1/4- al. ROCK] 0 NIP WE NMES 50e 70 W, PMTS as 70060 Mach .e Inch. O.. aK Inten..4 v60Aw. unni[Sm. Cr ITC .pelt SM. W TO m SINVC.E. WT MC( la W PLACED MOUND 000* ,WO OW[. MICE TO MAW tr CATCH BASIN SILT PROTECTION DETAIL RIPRAP a THICK 4' RIPRAP BEDDING - - - -- FILTER FABRIC SEC. B -B 2' DPAIA. PLAN p�` "Vv xlv -01 � � D _ r USE EQUIV. D FOR t PIPE ARCH c; SEC. A -A RIPRAP AT OUTLETS GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. Where soil corrections end /or tiling o •imin the street right - of -soy, me 0010701 material shall be compacted to 9510 of line standard moisture density relolionship of soils (astm d- 698 -70) except the lop three feet (3') of the back611 which shall be compacted to 1000 density. An independent testing firm shall lest the street section in fill areas and provide the results of these tests to the city, engineer and 7410 client. 2. he contrody shat install silt fence prior to commencing grading activities end shall maintain sold fence for the duration of construction activities. 3. The contractor shall limit his activities to the grading limits shown on the grading plan. All construction activities shell comply with the lecol ordmon0.. 4. The contractor shell install snow fence, as directed by the engineer, to protect tree roots. 5. The 00111001ar shall schedule his 09.007i0ns to minimize the disturbed area at any given tine. 6. All disturbed non - street areas shall be restored with a minimum of 4- top son and seed or sod as directed by the engineer. within 72 hours of completion of the grading activity in toot particular area. a. All seed, sod, mulch and fertiizer Mall conform with the following mn /d01 specifications, as modified below. - Item Specification Number Sod 3878 Seed 3876 Mulch (type 1,0isc anchored) 3882 Fe:leiter 3881 General placement 2575 b. Sod shall be placed behind curb immediately fallowing the backfaling under city street and utility project. c. The seed mixture shell consist of a NnDOT type 500 unless noted otherwise on the plan. 7. F0ROwing street construction, the developer shell Dean the streets on on en -gong basis os required by the city. 8. Unless otherwise noted, the 171(01ian ponds are temporary, and shot! be removed and restored to the original contour by the developer 404700ng the permanent establishment of turf on 750 of the dronoge area. The ponds and pond au0el5 shoe be constructed under the grading contract. 9. Rip -rep shell be placed 01 all storm sever outlets under the utility contract and shall conform with applicable oily end watershed district standards end ap0cifi0otions. 10. VertiCd grading Ida7once shall be within 0.2 feet of the oily approved grading pan. • LOCT072004 TV C'Cz LUZ Lf. @ALES I Yrole01 Name: VAUGHAN ADDITION Minnesota 1 Owner /Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN • 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota I Professional Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES Planing • Cm8fn8lnearin7 • Lad Surveying landscape Architect.. Environmental karma 7200 Hemlock Lase - S,Se Sal Mimmupllis, Minnesota 95369 Telephone: (763/424.5505 Fox: (763/4249822 wwwiodomclagms.cml 1 CADD Qualification: GOON= riwnwd,0 70500. Pan.. Is 004 *wale MpeP111./...1a ®0.041 .000. MPea. MOW Mb, al RY nand N alms •mnx.t.nsm w 0 gas. ..JIM With Ma CWYnrsm.011s11 I.wr.w d40:y.m esss.�www0 l er.1011.wt seas, w i .Ywryr C..Mmi Mr. i espnwde.0 O.Iws.s C &I Awe 1 Submittal: II707,05 PAlilrtyCil�7ppwd 1 Professional Signature: I silty tell et to p.5 e W Bw0be.l7M.s P.Mwe00 M Or Vanwyen04xpe.iene.daK 1071. eM tew.ee N4SO1M Eansr RYr M I.w t Ow e100a0twpi Miry 0.9.154.1.1E 1.624 lactose No. 1 Quality Control: HID er 1641.1.,: KVR 1 Sheet Index: 00-1 COVERM4FT C0.1 FX56TNGCONDRK86SPIAN C2.1 511EPUN Cpl CRAOIN4ORANAGE.L EROSION CONTROL O.2 STORMWATERPDMVDDNPRtVENTNN1RAN C40 OVERALL UTILITY PIAK 0,1 PRE VAINARY PUT C6 -I 001/1005 EROSION MTAR5 Cot UMW OtIAILS 1.1.1 TREE PRt9FRVA1004P0 N 1 Sheet Title: GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION DETAILS 1 Project No.: 04002 1 Sheet No.: 03 -1 COMPACTED GRANULAR 11A0631. GRANULAR MATERIAL ENCASEMENT 4- GONER CONCRETE CRADLE PIPE BEDDING DETAILS STANDARD 00AMNG N0. )02 CURB 0001EXTEE FABRIC 041 3733 3 CONCRETE BLOCK REACTION BACNN[G GALVAM2E0 S,EEY�Lg140 *005 eWETM+Ea G1 iDS t�5 EORRAU*T) AT JOINTS BLOC* SEE STD. 000. 203 TYP.k'.'AL HYDFoorr LAY.Oir; (VALVE IN BOULEVARD) 3/45/04 STANDARD DRAWING 201 I /2- MORTAR ON OUTSIDE. BETWEEN RIGS. 651010 tr RE•1000 CURB CATCH B�LN KN *00 9000s s000,H ON 00'0. NO MOOAR ON IyoE (10' Am OF RIGS M MORTAR). -INrE1- SNELO- SEAL OR KMI 0 0N BO1Tg AL l JRNT PRECAST CORER Si. 11yPE 3) 00 51 10111504.5,1E JCEMENT 00R1M 3/15/04 14 MIN.) vARUBLE iiilii331111ffiffl ILT•dGP1M911A■ 111111einIMM34111111 -13- �0D2•�l• tab MOO SY1.1. MO ANNAKK MINK PPM KKK Pm CASs API man • mot PSDNES PP SINCSPIONS OS P.SLITI.X.Ar4A471 TANKED KAPP KR 01 r'woUK UR1Nie.NR1RIEEDC KOORP'°0* E /0 0077A4Nm (0T'RFWNAet U7•. mem net =KKK K E"PO K.m°1s ND.O -ADG PPM • LIAMAPIN PPP, AS IP DM. Annum vet me sum.. SNP INN CORK NOMA. • WAWA NA<PM RmCAN 14" Taw .G ,;' PP«COAND •61441001 SAW KIK CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE, TYPE 405 Lh [ STANDARD DRAWING 4176 MID WK INPE 9157ALMTION I ACCORDANCE WON 0513 0 2321. TABU: 2. • EMBEDMENT MATERIAL 510al 005r000 TO A510 02321. TABLE 1. GRANULAR MATERIAL 8000)NG MET)'0D (FOR PVC PIPE) 12/19/07 STANWA0 0751144 103 I WATER SERvICE DETAIL 17/2/97 L i STANDARD DRAW70 xD. 207 CUT OP RaP1 SRN Rut[ a CORK 451Pq MR manumits PA CRAM KKK. Nm[ PRI K K S KA SNOOm1°°` A ASWU1w 1.11 a PAID wee PK OWN Fu'R VAMPSS SODA PO CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 3/16/04 S0AMN0D IUW010 i 402 tee mos COMPACTED 3/15/0 GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING EARTH FOUNDATION PIPE FOUNDATION 007 /1*LS [ 3/16/• SANfTARY SEWER SERI )C£ STANDARD ORAwwG W. , 313 I SaLURSED ELEVATION 4E RON BLOWS* DISTURBED SO4 3/15/0 IRON BLOCKING DUCTILE IRON PIPE REACTION DAM NG (FOR BENDS) TSTANDARD ORAINNG 200 SPECIAL FOUNDATION FOR STABILIZING 017 DEWATER)NG or TRENCH T- t0N0R00 00*0* 0 105 ( '1401- SLD- 1111 SEAL OR EOWL. INE I/O. MORTAR ON OUTSME. 1 BETnEE0w tr A� I 2AS10LE. FK150 SMOO,N ON NNE INSIDE. O MORTAR ON MAN0KE 55E0EE 0ETNL 3/16/0 51014105 STEEL STRAP FLEXIBLE 40• SLEEVE SECT*N A -A MANHOLE SLEEVE K NN1E SUPS [NMI K GM1 RNA ,[MN A0 RDSR AWOKEN •1ASK KA ASP PK fee MI f•NA K AS NOTED IN M SRGKA1IPS. MUM A[.eRK0 MOOD MANE KCMG PP ASP CND. fKAKRm PARIS NO AMMRO MIK AS OPPOSE PDT.. • ON 111 *.An KO NA RKL K WAND Moe DN (Na POPP IN PST DAL. Kenai PIK KI KA PORT NCI M N KKK NYSE WA M.�u'e PRP. SKOP .SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 301 (PIPES 27" OR LESS) STANDARD SNARING Np. 301 3/10/00 r � ,a6 1 STANDARD DRATA G W. 70 3 URBAN STREET UTIL 1TY L.000T) ^-.•t•! 3/16/0 5TAMARO 000 N0. 702 WRAPPING Of 0)0517 SOWER JOINTS, 3/40/0 -T 51A*WRe o*%0*10 h xo L 41y MAIN DRIVES B TRUCK AREAS AUTOMOBILE AREAS BITUMINOUS PATHWAYS OBITUMINOUS PAVING SECTION B612 B618 IT RAD BITUMINOUS SURFACE SURMOUNTABLE 1 5' 3 ORES. jjjjjI ' CORN I VARIABLE EXPANSION JOINT (BOTH SIDES) DRIVEWAY CURB CUT BITUMINOUS BERM 3' RES. S' C@05 8618 N0TE5 1. AT ALL TRENCHES 2- 94 REINFORCING RODS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE LOWER PORTION OF THE CURB 20 FEET IN LENGTH. 2. 2 -04 REINFORCING RODS AT CATCH BASINS NO LESS THAN 10 FEET IN LENGTH 3. 8618 CURB TO BE USED AT RADIUS. STANDARD CURB DETAILS- niNtlIANIS OCT 0 7 2004 et @ Y otM u ;43 LAKES LID vAuvnrvv ADDITION Owner /Developer Name: MIKE VAUGHAN • 600 Birch Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota Professional Services: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES PL 1415 • OKI0086eerkg• LandSIRV[yA lanclicape Arc4itenue• Drvnnmbl 1242004 • 7204 0*044004 Lane -Some 304 MinmMp0BR, Minnesota 55369 Tekyhwr.17631424 -3505 FRG 176314245822 RR Jucksmelag n 1 CADD Qualification: .NAwm1M�~ONNRWPNNAAVN s Impose* NANaNKb*NPW.A lb.•CADOM amy..AIe.H•nMr•.avw PASK. R NR•Geraw WKwcbslwissoor r WIWI MI.., uPb rM cw..ANmwsts Ne AN AN. C*A.Plaa. .eenb.w urw • rMS1b.. C9.1.1M5 1 Submittal: 1407114 Minion! COy Alp0E2 1 Professional Signature 1AwtlrRMyInal. My d ORPH•rd0*0 PPM* M/ •11 R RroN D)' MAK ARP ADNen *R *r 1 nine SRN Lome* 000444m1 Enon WGeeM r et Inn Wince n Shapek• PE 15624 LACONIC NA Date 1 Quality Control: PENN.. Ar KVR 1 Sheet Index: CO-1 COVER SHEET Cad COSTING CONDRIONS PLAN 0-1 SITE PLED 63.1 CARDING, DRA*RA4, a EROSION CONTROL 0-2 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C40 050003 UTILITY PLAN C111 PROIMINANYFIAT 69.1 CRAOOx 6 EROSION DETAILS C9-1 UTRITYOUAR5 LI -1 100EPRES0004101NPEAK 1 Sheet Title: UTILITY DETAILS Project No.: 04002 1 Street No.: M.Vaughan Subdivision MLCCS Buildings and pavement with 91-100% impervious cove 26% Short grasses with 11-25% impervious co Pave t with 91-100% impervious cover to 50% impervious cover with deciduous trees Sort grasses and mixed trees with 51-75% impervious cover Floating algae Cattail marsh z 0.08 0 """•■•••_ Attachment 9 Parcels Mvaughn MLCCS • 26% to 50% impervious cover with deciduous trees • Buildings and pavement with 91-100% impervious cover Cattail marsh Floating algae Long grasses and mixed trees with 4-10% impervious cover Oak forest 11E Pavement with 91-100% impervious cover Short grasses and mixed trees with 11-25% impervious cover Short grasses and mixed trees with 51-75% impervious cover Short grasses with 11-25% impervious cover Short grasses with sparse tree cover on upland soils • O . .0) acb • a) U) D) i O (i co ILL O O TO° ._.I,.r73 mE c .>7 O 0 • Attachment • 0 O 0 • Agenda Item 5D Environmental Board Meeting Date: October 27, 2004 Topic: Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses Background: Application to build a Church on the shores of Rice Lake was received on October 11th. Rice Lake is classified as a Natural Environmental Lake. The application proposal includes plans for a structure of 5,032 square feet. Their proposed building will be 4200 square feet. The proposed auditorium of 224 seating capacity on the plan will be reduced to 170 for the proposed structure. General Location Map is included as Attachment 1. The property is located just south of the Seaplane Base. The Church is proposing a designed wastewater treatment system. The property is located in a shoreland management overlay district. The property is zoned R1. The property would require a Conditional Use Permit. The property is unsewered. An on site system is proposed. Analysis: Shoreland Overlay Management District. The Planning and Zoning Board will be reviewing the plan for conformance to the Shoreland Management Overlay District standards. Regardless of the district standards, it is recommended from an environmental viewpoint to move the proposed septic system as far away from the lake area as possible, and surface water treatment areas away from the Septic System. Adequate lake -view screening should be presented in the plan. Screening should be reviewed by the city to be of adequate size spacing and species selection to provide for this screening. Site Vegetation The MLCCS for Kingdom Hall is shown on Attachment 2. From Rice Lake, there is a band of Seasonally Flooded Non - Native Dominated Emergent Vegetation, with a small area of Palustrine Open Water within this band. To the west is another band of 11% to 25% Impervious Cover with Perennial Grasses and Sparse Trees. There are no known unique vegetation or wildlife indicators in our GIS for this area. Trees on the site are labeled but we do not have the inventory or preservation plan. For the most part there are Siberian Elm, Red Pine and 2 White Spruce on the road right -of -way. There are 4 Red Oaks in good condition in the center of the property. There are Siberian Elm and Cottonwood on the Lakeside of the project. • Site Management • A generalized sequence schedule was submitted with the drawings. There was not a tree inventory and preservation plan submitted at the time of this writing. A detailed plan for erosion control should be submitted. This plan should include a plan to fix or install silt fence when fence becomes one -third full, and extra stockpile of rock on site to top dress rock entrances when entrance rock becomes soil filled. The plan should include a plan to avoid soil compaction in all non- disturbed areas, and in created surface water treatment, infiltration areas. If soils become compacted in areas that do not need compaction, than the soil should be loosed before landscaping. The plan should state that no soil would be hauled on to the site or off the site without City approval. Native plant restoration seed should be planted at the time of quick growing soil stabilization seed is applied. Surface water Plan Onsite and NURP are proposed to be installed on the 896 to 900 survey elevations. The Anoka County Soil Survey indicates that the Zimmerman C Fine Sands have a depth of > 6 ft to the seasonally high water table (Attachment 3). Looks like infiltration will work here. Suggest that the developer reduce the NURP, maybe shallow it out (so that it can be called and managed as a rain garden) and combine it with some additional surface water features, that would be acceptable to RCWD, such as rain gardens off of the parking areas, swales to a designed rain garden where the present NURP is, and pervious parking. Again, suggest moving the on -site treatment system to a higher elevation on the Lake Drive end. All Surface water treatment areas should be planted with the City Native Seed Specifications, and planted and maintained by a nursery that specializes in Native seed management for a minimum of 3 years. Lighting Plan A lighting plan is submitted as Attachment 4. The zoning standard is the light shall not exceed 0.4 -ft candles at residential property lines, and 1 -ft candle at mid street lines. The lighting plan demonstrates that these criteria are met. The developer's application information submittal does not include pictures or specifications for the types of lighting to be used. As per previous Environmental Board recommendations the developer should use low profile, downward focused, recessed light boxes that are low impact to sight glare issues. The Environmental Board may wish to recommend the establishment of a "lights off' after service clause to the approvals. • Landscaping A smaller version of the landscape design was not submitted at this time. The plan shows no existing trees in the landscape. It is suggested that some of the Red Pine and the two White Spruce be saved on the Lake Drive Side of the site, and any of the Red Oaks if possible. The plan should retain as many trees as possible (except Siberian Elm) on the Lakeside of the project. Additional materials that are suited to transitional soils should be planted in order to meet Zone screening needs. Aspen, Birch, Ash, Swamp White Oak, Red Osier Dogwood, and tall native grasses and flowers would be desired in this area. A number of White Spruce /Scotch Pine are proposed for the North and South property lines. The Church is also proposing a 4 ft wooden fence along the property lines. In order to meet screening needs of the city requirements, a 6 ft fence would work better. If a 4 foot fence is the final product, than more trees in the sight -lines of adjacent properties should be planted to achieve adequate screening. Suggest changing Scotch Pine to Red Pine. Parking lot islands have flowering crab proposed for the islands, and around the SE and SW sides of the building. Additional Autumn Blaze Maples are shown on the front side. There is no reference ground story cover on the plan. Again, Native grass and flowers should be designed around surface -water management areas and sod areas defined with irrigation. The plan should add materials for some foundation plantings. Flower gardens would be desirable. Parking Parking should be reduced to the minimum needed for this type of facility. Pervious parking should be incorporated into the design for at least overflow areas. Options: 1. Approve with staff and Environmental Board recommendations 2. Refer back for further review Recommendation: Option 1 Attachments: 1. General Location Map. 2. MLCCS • 3. Soils 4. Lighting Plan • 5. Grading Plan 6. Site Plan 7. Erosion Control Plan 8. Building Design W • N w i O i 1 . King Hall MLCCS • Attachment 2 ) F 11% to 25% impervious cover with perennial grasses and sparse trees Seasonally flooded non- native dominated emergent vegetation 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 Miles Parcels Kingdom Hall MLCCS j 11% to 25% impervious cover with perennial grasses and sparse trees Aspen forest saturated Boxelder - green ash disturbed native forest Buildings and pavement with 76 -90% impervious cover Cattail marsh Limnetic open water 1 Long grasses and mixed trees with 4 -10% impervious cover • _ Palustrine open water Pavement with 91 -100% impervious cover Seasonally flooded non - native dominated emergent vegetation - Short grasses on hydric soils ] Short grasses with 11 -25% impervious cover N C1) •O N co • 1 E 0 ED cn c Y • Attachment 3 N L m 0 C C. o s 0 N vi c 'o c CO E0co c Doc =,vs- cn tti CL 0 0- < ,g a3 i� Y 111 Fine Sand C 1 0.18 Miles O CO 0 • • EXIST. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY 150 O 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 ❑ a 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 0 0 a 0 -- -- "0 "0 "0 ^^ ^^ 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (,F S51 °33'43 "E 460.00 150 ° ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0▪ .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 I oA 0.0 0▪ .0 0.0 0A 0.0 O ❑ a 0.0 0.0 0.1 a a 0 O < 0 O 0.0 0A �2.... j 'F'A' N O I_ 0 ¢ Q❑ 0.6• 2 0.1 0. LLJ a 0 W 0.1 O 0.0 0.0 09 0.▪ 0 0.0 -0:2-N, 0.1 O a 0.7 1.0 09 ❑ 2.4 +42 25 3.0 3.9 2.6 OA 0.0 ❑ ❑ 0.1 0.1 0.1 120 ❑ ❑ 42 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 ❑ 0.0 0.0 ❑ ❑ 0.0 7.7 6.3 t�t�1 0 a3.13 09 0.7 13`•22 .� 2.7 0.9 0.9 0.6 '.6 0 0.0 0A 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.0 OE 0.0 0▪ .0 0.0 0.0 ® vv 0.0 0.0 0▪ .0 0▪ .0 0.0 EXIST. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY cgi l7 2.0 1t6 '�.. 3.1 5.6 49 0.0 0.01 X0.0 0▪ .0 0.0 0.0 0.13 I 0.2 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 .7 12 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 ❑ ❑ 0 4.1 1S 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 OA 0.0 0 O 03 0_. 0 .9 /1.4 1.2 0▪ .6 z r 0.0 0.0 0. a 0 a a ❑ O ❑ ❑ a a a 0 a a 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 °'482.66 551°33'43"E 0.0 0.0 OA 0 a a 0 ❑ Lao ❑ 0 _• - OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 �S✓ OA SETT OD 0.0 OD OA OD M set 5.0 ❑ 0.0 04) \00D 0 0.0 0 0 a ❑ ° ° ° 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 OA 0▪ .0 0.0 0.0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ a ° 0 0 a ❑ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT (2) PS4S22C2BZ 22 x 4 x.1:5 SQUARE STEEL POLE (1) PS4S22C1BZ 22x4x.1 ;5 SQUARE STEEL POLE POLE AND FIXTURE MEETS 130 MPH SUSTAINED WINDS PAVED AREA ONLY Illuminance Values(Fc) Average X210 Maximum Al Minimum Avg/Min Ratio =7A0 Max/Min Ratio =22.00 lamhweSCbae❑ Project AI Projects Symbol Q ty Label 5 PR 2 a'2 a.0 ab ('1! •,a 7 a t�t�1 0 a3.13 09 0.7 13`•22 .� 2.7 0.9 0.9 0.6 '.6 0 0.0 0A 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.0 OE 0.0 0▪ .0 0.0 0.0 ® vv 0.0 0.0 0▪ .0 0▪ .0 0.0 EXIST. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY cgi l7 2.0 1t6 '�.. 3.1 5.6 49 0.0 0.01 X0.0 0▪ .0 0.0 0.0 0.13 I 0.2 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 .7 12 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 ❑ ❑ 0 4.1 1S 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 OA 0.0 0 O 03 0_. 0 .9 /1.4 1.2 0▪ .6 z r 0.0 0.0 0. a 0 a a ❑ O ❑ ❑ a a a 0 a a 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 °'482.66 551°33'43"E 0.0 0.0 OA 0 a a 0 ❑ Lao ❑ 0 _• - OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 �S✓ OA SETT OD 0.0 OD OA OD M set 5.0 ❑ 0.0 04) \00D 0 0.0 0 0 a ❑ ° ° ° 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 OA 0▪ .0 0.0 0.0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ a ° 0 0 a ❑ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT (2) PS4S22C2BZ 22 x 4 x.1:5 SQUARE STEEL POLE (1) PS4S22C1BZ 22x4x.1 ;5 SQUARE STEEL POLE POLE AND FIXTURE MEETS 130 MPH SUSTAINED WINDS PAVED AREA ONLY Illuminance Values(Fc) Average X210 Maximum Al Minimum Avg/Min Ratio =7A0 Max/Min Ratio =22.00 lamhweSCbae❑ Project AI Projects Symbol Q ty Label 5 PR z 0 O co m a 0 p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 UT IP 0 0D 0.0 0.0 0.0 O0I ` "0.0I OD it a 0 0 0 Ocr o 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0D \\1 a a p a 01 0.0 0.0 0.0 o0.0 I OA I03 0.1 a 10.4 0.1 .4 0.1 p 0 p a p 0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0 1 0D 0.0 a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a 0.0 O O O 0▪ .0 irs 5D Lel 0.0 J W Y O p 7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.g 0.0 o o o o a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SET le a a a a a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 p p p a 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SQUARE STEEL POLE SQUARE STEEL POLE 1 MPH SUSTAINED WINDS PAVED AREA ONLY Illuminance Values(Fc) Average =210 Maximum 411 Minimum Avg/Min Ratio =7.00 Max/Min Rat10 =2100 ?I") rj Iio_e q L( PR2640 -M / /kb 7 AT4 2 1 0.. wmnaieSchedule Project AR Projects Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Descrlpoon PR SINGLE 40000 0100 PR2640 M 400W PSMH RUUD LIGHTING 800236.7000 USA <www.ruudRghtigrom> 905.671.1991 CAN Date:10/11/2004 j Stalc1..30' I Layout by. FRANK ATEMPESTA Project Name 64120 LOT 6 AUDOORS SW/OIYISO2N Filename:. MCommonlAppEn9 W UM1011 DKIFATA32 leminellon resobshownondmIgl eegde<yRirebsrdmpmjeape+mmies Provided to kind U9teeg uxd in conjunction who Ww.dmtea pmodwn conducted uneer hbonmry mnrebrn Amin Pmjeo mna0u. 61bYg 6m. duce deign pommel.. may affea 6e10 651r16.11emmmv Is repornt&e for verifying compliance who any appeoble aaadoL a9uina aava9P rode. FOOTCANDI FS CALCULATED AT GRADE USING MEAN LUMENS Nome&Summary Neject0Y Pmjs]s Label Avg Max Min AvoAAin GPAOE 0.69 U 0D 0ID 060 • /47714c4ttlle,44- go-". L ÷ / 4p { Jer � L 0 T 1'1AU11ON 001 " s CORM 01010 44. 7 7 41 741 7 0*M"e552.144 071(?Y oration 1111 07 (0 1? °caw"w4441o°R- (411115at 0100s'%�TI. i Ca110 54 08810`.881 08811010[0 .it 11( 40001.110140 000.415 111.1 M 111&05 210 Om 7$1.00 10 KOM1 001 IRO moan O 014411 1100 K 7t K 107077M1 O M 000100110 4104101 ALL 44 011 C 7NMEl .•01 2111 088 01 1.171 010001010000 0 COLL *I 1001 4. hI70.844. ail -il. a� s 101. 010101110 IC ArNO M at 0 0104110 010 001071100 %NERM /01(x; • 003011010 01L 110 A 88 0100 4.14. 1111 M /..R 0[1110 .70 0100 811 118811. 770/0110.77 1.1 8000 01001 00088 08805077 1801! 000110 400 03000 000000. 80 C00100104 O 0001000 1 M 0011011 210110 5011 rot ML 881088000 8(411.007 A 100 4000 00441 A M5.001 710.0111 0111111 0*410M101 wsf 41 11170011. K 001010 0L R 00 0000 1000111•41 101 *7 0004110(00080 A 4* 8800488 010.1070 0100 010 00010000010 8100 Or 111 Mo(04. - 1 SN111NOM 00011110010 0 100000141 008 000880 0•10 00.100(01 0.07048. M 001110 110 R 1047 880 211400 11080.001 881 21105 10 M 770 MR. 401050 1011? O 0 101105 410 10000 00010 0010410 41 141 000 1011100010110 AMY 010.90 7 41 W�0000O 50110001040110 .K 011101 TM 00(0 00 1000 10 COYt1 Cp1MICp1 01880• 41 00 00 0 00 01 fR 060[ SOME. Or MC 8800.0 Or 1M 0014701/ S0 11100101 R 0 0 MM 0-8 • 0110010 10. CORM 010 0L 8800001 001000 1110 0 R [00100[10 70 140 • 0*01 0040 2111. 01 0101000 10 088140 4001 2110110 0 0*8841 088 80111• 000010 0*. 9140440 NOTE& I. MC 10100 70•00.1% 0101? le 1011 8811000 00100 50? ? CO M In Or 100 i K 0001.*0 140 01101 0* 010110 •188 000040110 01100 A MM 000010 0 At 814.4 .*20201000 00010 O 1t [01100880 80808815 8800 010100 N1001 R 010 IQ 10 00 000 0.11104. 11000100. 10001 01 8.e.00 1Mtl81. 01110 O 881 1000 .1400* 0 0.1.00( O 0?' *101i 10 000 7011 01010 mu 1 1 t 401tl101.1Cre *8044 0900 01 Am ORA NIL 000. 01,-0 0 * 4.0 0 00000000 m 4* Mme 1.10 Tat 010 *?00 *�O*105 000. • K 01100 s•4 ME 4450*1 r0 00000 0 01080080 30Nrt lama 4101 501 4 10000011 •0801 5081 01S00080 2077 004.0 MM 0015 A 211110 M 010101 C 30011 10* Kamm 110,04 1 2100 051111 000 0001114110 000•0109 1000511 OP01I7110 O 11000•20 5100800. • 8800000070&05 MI ?0 7 0[0 N1L0 0001. (0111 0711008010 088100 AN 510 10 1 MAO 00000 an 10340 010 ru 10070 58■5 R 11 0 0411 0100 088010 1016 • 7101 611100 511 000 10 7010011 010800 1071 50106 170005 500 a 000 0m 410101 410 *11010005 05170 010081 0010. 1 A( 00/00100 1418 1168 8021 10.1170/ •■• 0011•0041 .70 841 21100 800 0010 MI.77 • M/ 011110 0808 4000 10/0 00 000 811000 A 104170047 1 1405 • 190*? 141 000m21�00100g001 18810. Cg101[000 001 1 nova 01110401101 18010 IMCO 0[01051= 00 0 1 O.? 07 201171. 4 70 11 4 1 11101{04* 5577000 R AT 1115000ICA1 010( 004E[11 01880{ 01'/5 0110101. 40 08•8 R 2778110 N 1104 4 009 87 7( 111110 NO 00 4175 057[0. 741 880101 •0 M 0771 007070. .1. f11LL 0(100( 0101 11000 O M Salt 0 801110 10 MC 00001 001000 01 11 510141 505 0•1) IC 1000 0000 110011011 Or MM.% W? R 10416 01401 50116 108 R 10010 0 14010 0 0/41 880 00 000KRY MO M 080202 •. 2040 *8•040 WM LSO A MOH *00.82 P 0 701104 !0 150 0 50 00 1 01010 1040( 01K11MOM Or 0•01 1 00010 02ff 0010 9041011. EIMMElin L 0 T P 11 COMPETE Of 11/001 -4155 r *C0ECA1( .ASE 88071004.00 SUMAC( • 401ER TO 881/001 SPECKICAI1005 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1. 881 22000077 R 40040 AK TO 011:011900120 01141 WINS /1110 0*40.01. 2. MO 114105 OR 1E01E0 01010 11/001 0190/11077 1 DC MILANO WENT COMEX 880114101 4017041 116 SE N 10710512. 01 /41.011104410 001200 FON 775041747 410OON 54.1 OF .E 175050 5 0041 *1011 F0 1*1( 0040 110 01000E 011080110. 141 111115E 10L 0E 1E90108 10 1E0E0112 A 111NI181 01 * 5170088 O 51a0140 11720 MS MN A 4 8801 SWW 50 4 10 75 0111/1/0 MR 6 100000 010E 151 01010 00 14000 IRCIFIICCIMS1Md0rn1 (0410 SI 6 NSOT q�x10 1611001. 0/3 WORE; OAK (10 a 97 0 .10/115. 1 SAKI/ 0. 0161/180101 ANIS MIT 11K .401.001 040 1110 100 01 081E 776E101. 1141 0101010 570. 9J0411 91011 0504062 51102880 494030 ANT 1.440.11. PAVEMENT SECTIONS NO SCALE cP �4, co\ O• iN icr 5 0' se 44, .4*. W • het/ P GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 20 40 .o ( IR Imre ) 1 5110 +• 40 It I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECI- FICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND A DULY LICENCED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. W 10 0 10/10/2004 PROJECT NAME: NEW BRIGHTON KINGDOM HALL PLAN SHEET: GRADING PLAN 0 z BUILDING REGIONAL MINNESOTA i'1`$ubrT 0 5 L 0 P KINGDOM NALL DEVELOPMENT NOTES: Nom TON 914 Arm Total WWI Elea Ana My MAIM' 0 7Uia1 My PerA.p R... - tp 5«1. a Aualalum Pomp Freda* G) (1C/50 Mime) (I$ N.0 NNW (16' V4. accessible N.C. Moll) TOTAL 171.110 54 7l (AP4r.eMaay 4.07 AC) 4,200 54 71 4a:1 OW41.4) 720 5o 44 Ca Pao) 170 Seal. in Main Auditorium 57 Spaces 54 wnw.. I 4.1.70.. 1 4.1.1d.a 50 4.40e • KM TO 41.1007 5PEC4ICATIONS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1. NA 11400675115. AS 9CON0. ARC 10 M COMOORD 100414 5411E Nra COPACINN. 7. ALL DOOMS A10 900100 VOW 11.00t 00500101. 1 DE PQ10AM CUMIN COOKK PAE4N1 41ME 91140 0[ 11 COMMIT ON 416E01RAM0 011(100 T01 6*701121 YC1N1 7A O ME MOM SPECITCADONS AO 5101 ROAD NO MOO CMORCIO* ME 101118 SNAU IC (00000 10 OCOL04 • MOM C0410591t 11ENOMN a 3100 P9 A000 DMZ NN A 4 e101 MTV NO • 10 15 021041100 A1. 4. MCFCA1 044 SMALL CONON TO 0e/001 990ACAp1 720 (0455 5) 1 Q01Q011 POE F010A100. 00101 0O01 0101011 MIMI 0000 O Alin COMMA AMAO MOD A MIEO 010171 TO 10 NET 1 OP14 0 0140 00 0011040101 91ALL ALSO NET AIL C0KMK1N1 ANS NO lE 00 UST ANT DE E0O CC DE 444(0020. M C0110ACT01 9141. MOAT 0104 511101010 9100110 40010= All 1.01041. PAVEMENT SECTIONS NO SCALE GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 TO 40 40 (IN Parr) 1 446 - 40 M1 U a 11. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, W< T Z 0 < U1 O CC a O. VI 0 z V Y Q 6 m FICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED OR UNDER IAY DIRECT I- < UNDER THE LAWS OF THE K W z E) z W Q O z z TO TO • ml Notes: DRAWN 10/10/2004 PROJECT NAME: NEW BRIGHTON KINGDOM HALL z J a_ PLAN SHEET: SITE d z BUILDING REGIONAL MINNESOTA 1 f 4/ NI 411111111111111111111111114 :1 �U111pSO141O1111110�0♦ A ii i✓ 1/ ///I; Y���■ � /1% 140`I iUal4lirni .0 tom. tett MIq.0$ *nolo1 SAM mmo SOS Mu-p MOMS moo R R.M/R Mtn 40TH WAN 51Aw1MI1 041•:-x. 051 ow t so on at rot r owns Mal loa tH10. r Ma AIM.tMM ROA MHO 114 OM i151M. Tw 1. A Ts wools MR 111111kiGUR jpilENTATKI IJ T mace NTH ,RAE SUPPORT oo9T/ 1 D. q, r -r *LAM ((5.4 KOR*KL 101011A04 CONSTRUCTION EXIT 10[1 SOIL EROSION SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE ETT5rCIPIRllIT4Fi]57411T11,:44 r• ^r'll,ya..a a•�ts• rElrii7Crar.- 4:'.'7!IL4 ice sil.:i"1.tc :Taf V, Wit izcawii fits III {...'ii..1411.. D726 1I ZIL1L.7I t ,•1501 4144154.... miwiNNIEN 104 En _ glegeLARzaulatral 1. 02,41 4101111 MW WIM• .M at 0µ04[ W Wwi tom[[ M R tA.fARRO W OVA[ L OMMW v umnv `M s a0. ORR ROSSIRS MANOR 1 Mn [Y=a LNMil(arOa FOR UROSIS nOM•MI ATM K IRI tat *14"[04 Lfte'P Gi �..Gf OI°1 COaxIt. M [10140[1* WMT W.TAM ML M AII.a11R ODOR CDFYtf Al ACAS, * [MIS OM ACT [KAMIM TO ROAST COACT 140 oT AnOI a u. n*t MAIL R Mt .tn nRM • 110 OMIMCTOI 10 *LKAR R 1.t 1OMO uRIRS MOO. OM1C1 .M 0t 1IIaat faM1001 11nµ OM R SASS YY ICCAUn a MALL WOKS HALL • a1140 n R IMMMO n CRAM ..4f101A MMt* SCAR DIL ORA AT fSS -[[FOR w CM -CM-wR 1 Mt =KW C0011•10011 MML 1.t R ROCK OOIl IRKRMY TO ARO /•nf1 OMAR R MAM0011101011141 00.0 1 C041020101 _Ala or M Min. Mt W1RCC101 .0 R MOO SORT IRIOrYC MI NW OMAm Ma•• 10 M NACOS 1••0141 same 114 WIT.I.CIM MMS R M 001tt 4 lot 11C•YW0 4.711.1 .Mta SAM Moo.) 1 CO•SO to* mom 4OOSST • 041151141 W.1* RM - t5. wan tt MAMMAS KTML MK SAM ••7012 AllA00011 MOUO Si SO SRAM [ROnSASOR =MN 0010 MOM. NO n MOM M 1L 0011005.0 t•MO1 r1.0.1100 Mmwca.f • M W.MKM !MU R KO04is A C0•1I06 • II•TS4 110 A141.40004 KO M tAttA ODOM.t 1t•.M0 ROW ROT Cwf1NCM. SLUR. COIOKyOR M IANCONSACTOn MR .M SUM MRII RUSKS IKIM1A Lunt µIM • COM a ITS SOS AIM 11[ STAR O l.M[SnA MAIM* ROAUIM 0.10.11101 LA..AIM Mf0 COOP* MOM (MKS 1410 01) M KWIC RMAM s5. Oa. CwOTL Mt HMV M *41. OMER MLA IO 000701* 1J11 R nfol AT Mt I5. ROM[ C0IIII00M01. • OLMACIO Ss. W IX.CRf RM .MA010T 1ACMS 51517) AS ARSONS n MR OA • nwsIt M 0111.0.1 a.LL =ME M *VIM.. • IutrOti M O TM 1101 M [q5. I '5161 nos w•F.MM O C•RAUCMa ma 011 (•1111■CTIa 1 0110[,01 • •140O M R MTMM4i 101141* MS 1111 K 0•1.0010 AS 0M140 • 10•115 I111M2400 at /OHM O C0411tooIM. T. MR'1 MO [SASH sna cow. 10 RRRA.. MAT. w LOVA MO•RMn w .Huas O MGM. AS Mnc,51. C5R•CM Own 011.11111 401S.* C0404t M moan n 11•f14 =NO K OMER L L ownlaClar MR sum. i Mp5RKARS(AASA IMCYLO MOM. 111 As RAt MASH. [RI a 110 55 *iOK11 LR WOK OW KKO 4* Mal L 101.* OM0AC11 MALL wMOlE M Mt SAM THE ROOMY AOAM M 110101 MA 5404 WALL 5! K *co Al Mt KA•RM? WM1wMC[ AY M QM** AWL OM= •0 ARIA MO 4 1145 LKAM (MOMS 5AOAR5 mMa IOWA MM MAI MYHIRS R au fYL. *HMI (CO.OR5 55555 KIM04. O[Y.R C55.7I =wool [TG) tom K MHO 1 A ELMO M1 a 15 15 MO Sufi R OMAN. IMO 151004.• SK i w 051041 NO [MACK KaG•11 *4040 44. 1a1000 a 00 MAU YwM 1 •H1r1 M /MAIM NOW ..ALL R 0WMMO M LR w Mil AY*MT 1 W11M M 04!45.55 NEL 0411KAL Wt. MD RIMS It ACAS w 14 Olt 1•401.111 C l*511t M u5. O.1µ 101 MM OAST 11005. 5..O CO TWO AWN MI Oat *50411• 000401 O MO*.RO IL SAO MIL• OOncIID 10.Ot. A14154 • OA10R1( w0fna 1111111.10 WOW *MA *1145. IMOL =ammo • 5.0511 511.1 • LMR. *111114 K 0900 O ~PLY • WR CODLY OM W1 01•1. 140.14100M11. IA 1147•01701 WHY% a. (41O41. NM1 • Mt MAI11007111M0011 MIT R HOMO, 51005. Koolo4 Meow. CO.TMMMIT. 11RIMt 041 L1n w 0111 =OHM; 1011110 AC015 1 MOOR MAS WM K MOH. 01 M*011 7441AL411. SOH= • O•011* O 11*M001 salt most R 1104115. •M .On YOMAMOI I0. IRMO ot1* 071•IGO 1051/ al[(O WASHES 110 ACOAL) 1 MD * MOW 151110 rf4if0 0700000 7 1540 MOM sMt K w AKOIOAMS M• 15.10 515 a1 ) Own Mkt 0451 14 04* /•ITCR MM 101 SI 0411 111 ow w MA OM MOM OtM OR% OR MA 4 MM 414141 W K 0110510 MOM a MI Mrt WOOL •I1..•C.O1 KOOM1 HAS 4M1501ILt 11I1020 1111 K 1[MM((R4 IMO. MS ARAN MALL 5. 0[51 O ACWOMR 051 Mt M IM[ 5.104010 AYR OMR M M 01010 w IYOKAI ALAN 151 411116I5 0741 Ht. COMMAC11f w 11 00510* 11. K 4•0411 104 MYnwO =WMI Ills O 4571*0f • Mtn R•00041 f1O0Y1MM 5ALM 1Ht M t0 w 150 AS 14.15111711 •1. AOIY 001515.111 was 0000N 001 K SMAKM[0 R M1w11I HMI RIM .AMO OCAS MO MO wsa M *TM0[S M MMM01Mn 5.WMWO 01 -110 a M 111IM OHM/ OR 1[MWT Of 14•110101 WW1 MIT K 1•0((1 10 MINIM M SARI 5. OSA CMA0n. R 04-15 • 00-12 s5. 110010{1 .0 011. MAS MALL R 01•5104 Mat I.o1O. 00 0.0TAIM n•MD. 040001IM R 001 SWAM 110 *•0 MA LO1IMS soli R MVO a rot MR 151 M 1011111110 M AC5.YM0 .1.M TIMUM ROW MA•MI.TL IL 113/1•MI SR 1101•1121 MI .OK 1St MICE M OM R M11C00 110011111 SWIMS • CM0101 K µA0 0 SWIM MM11. 0101014M 20001M0 0•I411401 M01 4 OM • 0110 MOM O Kiln • •1055 R 40101 S.W K 151 M A 150000 W0IM O.M• M MOM MAK 1 REDO AIMS R01Rt 51.0 t.M5 R. Out 1 OAK 5510 OM114 140.01100 w MK MOW. 0* COMM Soy • Rs•0.1M[ IOM /WRING M NOM COMO WASHES MT 4.15 MAW SALSL 011*) n MOT DOOM 71 0511 i l 15.1 t MRM MIOMCO.SO5 5114 O MR M HOLM MOw*51 O 104001 1O MOM RM1RIM .O *510105. MOMEKYICE• H t�oi ALL, ALL MAIMS 0104.01* 030111011 111 OM INS 01011014 44 %WM MI OW. O ICI, I AIMWOIRO M Mt011t a iwa s M04> ML1 01100A0 frtOOFoo■ W.1n MHO. MONO to On /M M1l fWMO, *11CI M La4101I101 a Mt OW [WT M0 Mn RPM AcIt W11uC1a YO .MY N Mows Y[5. A MY!*L [MAST 010101 1151 0.1 MOH1. 34 140411 ALL CROON APO OMMMIM COMM WHIMS MS MALL R 0.1.0I1 M NOHOW M ACCw*M5. 1* 11010■10 L *L SOT ORM MALTS OM °ROARS 01•0 W11I1OIM WM R MRCO n 405•4 0517 SIR Y SW= 051 •00[* I04 OnuMM R SAC 0[TWt TRW 155400 M. ML 100 MM *Ml R 0*110 54111, 1 SR CRT • Mw MM R S41IM0. MN 5440 R I51II10L 04M* M KNOWN AS 14004 a RT 1111 MILL K K orot% 5?t0 w luiRpoiroto R 511 MOM COO1las • MOM. 10•14. MW R *.IRO VOW 1 Rf MOM NM o 0(0{1 Ot-MY 151 .MOO O 11 OLT /15.. MQR ROHM WV • w M. 34 MM*1 O 11451,. w AS 1Mµ M TOO W01M.e *LM AWSI. A 1•+03 ROOM O UMW TKO tt [511151 MR 404 R I MO n 0517 SAT. Al MR MAO. OOMrt w SIM MM 0A0I. w 1WY10011 M1RML s1IQt f.mr1 MIT R .M • 100 047 M TOT MO11 M •110001 ROOfMT ma woo 15100 a M Ot swat. RIOIM Motor ant R moan 1100 Au 111-515 MAIO sawn MHO * MO01 O MWt*t M 4021. a 11* ROOM MMMM DO MANE MA MOLL 111141.1 N Ow LOOM (M11O1 004 now MO MOW/. WM W, MONK R HOC 510 ORISON • M 550101 •AMD0 AS WOW* ODOM. L 011111 sOLICI.II.1S M Mt M151MM M 0010141011101111010.1111 MW 55* K owns. M 0041104* 600I115. AS *L 1145 =NM !HALL R ROMS MA SOY[l 1 maw M Mon NON 114 tam CM•On MM[f 05-M411 14 1101M R.WK. aM.M • MNMY 1111 K CO RAO •1104 0 .IM011 O DIMON M AS 101 M MO 0001101 YAM K011L SEOUENCE Or CONSTRUCTION erin ). 1. MALL MYUf1 Ori10•IM Wow= L ((IOM 500004 MMOR M MIRAGE ML a CORM= OR SO MRCS Co A[ 110 • CO0IUC1 THE MO.w1•IM M SNOW 151 04045 5 MAW M OM 514 Mt. L MOT CsIRK1a O Mt MM0 MAO Are 11114110011. 5 NM 00451K DR. 1. IO.OY*• M I MMO MM L 4IMLL ulM• 10010100..4 STOW KOHL OM 151 0.1RYt a ((MALL M-I100 0000 0414., soactML • M. Mn 14011f(lla MOM ALL MOW sµ1 sIOKItIKL L MOM s5 RN 1•000. L Mot SR. T. gam. *001 M0• Oat= CO1LR $C•4 M OOML 4050. KRM1 10 MO µ5M atom( Mt ��f • (OILY • SR RIO ■•••∎ ttYL0. M =AVM CMMO KM51 GRAPHIC SCALE OCYELOPER/OK(ER M 100.10. CaOK01IM a 450057 DMSM1 AeOKfL M OVUM /0001 Ca*ACMIR 5•00.5O1M5 •CRE*OE 9.110/ANY IN ACM MMM.1f MA OM a! .510.0 MA M15.30 KKK MA Lilt M TO* OSIORR0 MA AY AC. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECI- FICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME 4- z a OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION A DULY LICENCED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE OF MINNESOTA. CCP �Z Z Ce Notes: DRAWN 10/10/2004 PROJECT NAME: NEW BRIGHTON KINGDOM HALL SHEET: EROSION CONTROL PLAN Z J d 6 z BUILDING REGIONAL MINNESOTA fD ?v CD D to O u) CD 1, .. - 133D,* 3� OmmC'< 0�1 r- r, rt d c (n rt tA up C W 73 0 00 iv AA O 0 rr n 33 c p CCD 7 N to v) N n) -1 • V NP N L rt N -4. 0 • -o dosa • N N 0 01 WW N N N x o 00 GIS 00 ZZ 00 000gz1 z1rnIrn W W,Oi1,Oi1:t 0101 p4 L>1 L,1 19 P P 41N� [WN��(„1N �N LIW IJ N N N fl IJ 1�1 IJ 888888888888888888,888 U N O U (p71 N U 871 (011 (pA O U N 888 I I I I I I I I I II I II I Iy � I I I >I 1 Iy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (I? 11 ]1� 1 (Iy 11 ???1,1,1111,1111111 � vVOlW616�iii Niliil�il in+t t 1 9 t.1 1i P.1 1i 19 t �a I.1 i.1 �� + 111 N N N.N N N N N 11 2 492,'Pt'4 W0 x x x .1 O G) O 9- x x x O a N 9.00 WN�_rW N��WN�.N�WN -max O= � T. 1T, � W N � W N � 0 00 0 D o c c v v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00000000 0000 00 0000 0000000.000 Z Z-z _ mm 66 ATI zD i 0 qmq 22!; %m mmmmza l'OO- 0 ar zgBo � � f+i � mo $�8 000 rn > I mom $$flfl O n x X88° z tx Fo $ a =two v v o o oo M 0 0 c c+�IC i 9�o 8 8 8 ,...=,,,gga � la8agalm , 2, �c �c zyo0 o°m o o o o o o "zz -90°m PR m m m n (m o y m A m mym mmm mymmm x m m O m 8 *0�O Z OZO O 1 O<* >O> > > 1 )1> �d { Z //y ! y y l Zy � y O I O 0 ZO 2 O O mO -i z m Ov x a o o 0 A Li p g o o g aam3.N 6m g�Z 0 S C $ 2 A :. s o ` 5 v s 0 o A y O 0 _ 6 o Z z O lEg*L-gE4- 0 v oAV oaomv Z gm Co m0 my m O 00 os RN 6 0,9,2 52- y PO Z C0z RR m no� A z 08 M8 0r 6-, N m m 0 0 m 0 PC) P1 5 m 0 pWNRO6miNN ONI814f11d — S3I • =0.1919 CC SHEET No. A0.1 O 1 > CD o -' 1 Z o P1 IOWN BY CKD NY: I Tini COMPLETE DRAWING LISTING NO °" TE REVISION sr PR JECi 11ILE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA O O O _ W 1.T + • - p L. L. W N o O O O O O O pp O yy > yO Oy O> yO 0 0 S. > > O > S. D (T # W W id N D 0 0 0 1 I 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w rla ° N° °w !oT 0 • I l 1 o 0 0 A _v O _)pP ^* W O Z0 c 2g 2G q N r �� ON OZ O� Oj� Oy o '�] �v = mg m0 mZ my mZ 8 I ii v a �� g= 81 �p g $� z 0 ai 0"5 m mm mZ min m4 �' v=i 05 0 9 9u) 9� 9m 9N La czi x x x i> i'1' Aci S k z w o E Z p" GA GA v v A 0 z S11YJ3O NI) Sl1Y130 13NI8YO 0 8 z S1ivi30 NI) Slrvi30 13N18Y0 0 0 m P I P1 SA ▪ N TH Of Of Of 9 p w 1 o• w w w w s 1 M a W 1 �1 1O 1 1 1 1 O o 9 0 z 0 a O A v ONI8WWTld — S31iL3WOSl ONY (AZI0133810 SIIY130 NI) Sllg30 Om op 6-g oo 8A o mw mm mi o1 8 oo• z m; Zp mo mm PS z 4 _ =- 1 = Mm STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 In D � Z • O a 0 0 m SHEET TrRE DRAWING INDEX PROJECT TITLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION BY 636•e' -,ov 2'-0 I! 3' -0• 4) f • 1'-8• 5'-0 g g A8 A me z z z P Z o8 L0 mZ z =r m D9 NO 1 Lo —Zr -5o ., 0.1 g " �. I- o g n - TIME SHEET FLOOR PLAN NO DATE REVISION BY PROJECT TITLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA __& CO v Z g SHEET No. A3.1 I W I. g 03 o OWN BY CKO BY ITLE am ' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NO DATE REVISION BY PROJECT TRLE STANDARDDEKINGDOM HALL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA W t■ CO x 0 SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT TRLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION BY IV 1o. -1. TOP OF PLATE TOP OF PATE MECH CHASE 6'-0' 9. -6' 0 D —� z • O co SHEET TITLE BUILDING SECTIONS HIPPED ROOF PROJECT TRLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION E1Y ® 0 0 0 DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET TITLE DOOR SCHEDULE PAINT OR STAIN FINISH; 1 -3/4" THICKNESS HARDWARE: (3) 4-1/2" X 4-1/2* BALI. BEARING FULL DATE REVISION BY PAINT OR STAIN FINISH; 1 -3/4" THICKNESS HARDWARE; (3) 4 -1/2" X 4-1/2- BALL BEARING FULL PROJECT "ME STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PAINT OR STAIN FINISH' 1 -3/4" THICKNESS: 1 UNDERCUT HARDWARE: (3), 4-1/2" X 4-1/2" BALL BEARING FULL MORTISE HINGES; PUSH PLATE/ PULL PLATE; SURFACE MOUNTED CLOSURE; KICK PLATE; WALL- MOUNTED DOORSTOP WITH HOLDER WOOD: EXTERIOR PAINT OR STAIN FINISH; 1 -3/4" THICKNESS EARfiWARF: (B) 4-1/2" X 4-1 /2 BALL BEARING FULL 0 0 0 PAINT OR STAIN FINISH; 1 -3/4" THICKNESS HARIIWARF• (3) 4 -1/2" X 4-1/2" BALL BEARING FULL PAINT OR STAIN FINISH; i 1 -3/4" THICKNESS; 1" UNDERCUT BAR2WARF• (3) 4 -112" X 4-1/2- BALL BEARING PAINT OR STAIN FINISH; 1 -)3/4` THICKNESS / iiA@f1WABF: (6) 4-1/r PUSH PLATE/ PULL FULL PLATE; SURFACE MOUNTED CLOSURES OPIION: USE FULL OR HALF GLASS DOORS 0 0 0 HOLLOW METAL; EXTERIOR PAINT OR STAIN FINISH; 1 -3/4" THICKNESS HARDWARE: (3) 4-1/2" X 4 -1/2" BALL BEARING FULL PAINT OR STAIN FINISH' 1 -3/4" THICKNESS; 1 UNDERCUT HARDWARE: (3) 4 -1 /2" X 4-1/2" BALL BEARING FULL PAINT OR STAIN FINISH,' 1 -3/4" THICKNESS; 1" UNDERCUT HARDWARE: (3) 4-1/2" X 4 -1/2" BALL BEARING FULL (1) m� Cr) z O • g T - ,, m IOWN BY: CKD BY: SHEET TITLE DOOR SCHEDULE NO DATE REVISION BY PROJECT "ME STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In m II PLATFORM c E II MECH CHASE z m MEETING ROOMS 11 & 12 °C INEN'S ROOM WOMEN'S ROOM m T^ c m 3 ROOM OR SPACE I FINISH SCHEDUI � T,j JS -+ co = N m J • FEET 'A P k pr 3 ? SURFACE FMpSH F N E- N 1 1 rrn gn m f*T m m 1 m 1-+I SURFACE FINISH P Q LL !mil 8° ° ° �o M 1 1 ° ° m2 m m ° rr�. o A $ %,:, m o i o F pr SURFACE FDISF w "M� N D z • J' O SHEET TITLE ROOM FINISHES PROJECT MIX STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION BY Ftm SHEET No. AT v I e Pi i m ,- o g SHEET TIRE ENLARGED ROOMN NO DATE REVISION BY x ° PROJECT TILE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Z �O rE e W LL i��suu4nON 3 -1 2' WOOD STUDS O 16" O.C. 3-10 BATT IN W/ ONE / LAYER 5/8S GYP BD EA v �Zo c��c N ZO g v v • oz n °z 0 m m- c 0 m m m v • o 8 > g = „ o o SHEET 7fIlE ALTERNATE ENLARGED PLAN TOILET ROOM NO DATE REVISION 9Y PROJECT TITLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _' D i 3'-4' T1LE HGT r- o A L 'KI c3 5 g o� 2' -0* 4' -0' TILE HGT BEHIND URINALS (MENS ROOM ONLY) i8 SHEET No. A7.2 gil o D 0 N 1 sail: 1 /2 " =1' -0" ° -- ° T, SHEET TITLE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS NO DATE REVISION BY PRa�T TAE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 11■■/IAM ...■� II■■r■ ■!'■PI 241110 ■fiii == =7i\\ ■�'I www ■1111[9■ ■11r. ■Gg l a41lii■7■ ;EN N1141 11111111r ■11:. l!I■ ■►ID mu. ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ LAMM mom tams ■ I.I imr■ •II 11LJ ►=I i►?rl ■ [kiln -. . w lain 702 MIy � ■mac li 0 E 6 m ■■■■■■i I Ium.0 ■ ! d.IIi 11II ■■124■I ■■■ii ■ ■t :°■ •11111 ■ ■■ ■■ iis■■ ■I - 111■ ■!!sr ■■ • ■\Et■\\ _ wn•ar == I\\■■�■\■ ■►L1■■ ■►, ___ i\\i■►■ �� ■■ lisp 111 ■ /■� ►I ■IIEmmI ■ /I■ 11111°11 vir iliiii imi il kL�% viil ■ ■ ■■■■ ■■ ■■■� ■ ■ ■ ■■ • •/211•111■%A■IIIIIIIIEI■/■■ IIIIIIIIIII Mali 111111111.111 Mil liFil MIN • ■.■II11.I -I ■■ %■ ■■■ •■ ■ ■■ � ■■ ■ 3...v. iI!II __ iI!Ii ___ iI!1i1 ■■N�L■ ...%■ ■■■!IN111■■•■■•■V■=I�2■r m, i���■•■ �■■■ /Imm=�►�.►� 1ltli �■ ■lii1�►� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■►�■ / NM k►rI�_li■% .■■■ ■■ uri I�%zi Li ■I ■�! !1 1111111111111 MI IV I■=1 54E7 EEO EL33 �DN 11 v z -c z • L Z z v k , S w 2 Z e. El el k • BPAZI2 SHEET TITLE PROJECT TITLE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESDESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION BY 8 Z 4 co 8 ME H 2MG 32 E rn N a -o m REM fa. 43 ).• 0% \. ® e sN b ® ®6 6 • �rn m § sCs a)° 5 HOME RUN TO PANEL WITH CIRCUIT NUMBER (3M3) 2131003 2131VM ORED313 c 01 p m Or mS 8m a Fl, 53 8 % • O m ... 0E. 4 > o° E m 0 x m - co 8 0, 21313H df10H 11VA FLOOR DUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET 1311no 313V1d33321 X31dfk1OYf1D 131110 313Y1d33321 X31010 2 O g 0 1 N o -' g a ' ,- O 3 n 5 ' SHEET IRE FLOOR PLAN — POWER NO DATE REVISION er T No. E2.1 PROJECT TRLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA • ...8t. I N N ; jia o OWN PM CND BY SHEET FLOOR PLAN - SECURITY, TELE, AND AUDIO NO DATE REVISION BY ET No. E2.2 PROJECT TREE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA • A , •, ■ •.►11 MECH CHASE " ■ ■ ■,., _ ■ ■■r - 7- - � ii ■■ ■ \11 rinlmm ulisuum �. mil,1. ila u \ ■ ug■ �/■i II■ , !I ■r■ .union Gr■sp 6■■■■ I ■ ` / /JA ■ ■±i© ■■ mina ■e% /a ■ :awe iii •7l/���ra■■ /i■■�n�■■�ma�mrw■■■ .■rte ■ ____ �■a■■■ rac v-- m■N■■■■e■■■� ■■■e t�� ■■■■ ■m�1\■��■■ ■ ■ ■ ■m■m■ ■■■� •,`�� �� D�7�J■■© �i2C��Iav '��ii■■�ii■�ii�i3■■��0�1� /I %•.■■..■1' 6-- ■■■■■■■■�■■■ ■■ ii ■... ■,a■a■■■a■s lailinailli [al■■ -11) 1 ►,i,n ��� -, !u1L1■ ice`: II11MB■■/� ■M' � � ' MIS mum mpg �111g8■■ B ■Ram ®■ ■M■■ MK) l tA01 EN Q-■ I11I■■■•■ ■0 ■� ■ ■U ■■ ■ Iliir'Ti�m :,,:i.-4114 r ��' 11111N■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 11:4 ■■E4 -r a BMW �1111�■■ ■■� ■■ ■ ■SIN ■_ 111 •i mom I!/� MIME. u■ ■■ ■ N 1I EI :�r;s ■IAA IIILMI• /il■1•' /r �.1, ■1 " iiu■••••r!E•■ • ■L1 ■ ■■■ ■6I ■ ■■■ ■1 I 111 0 ■ ■ ■■F ■�■ E ■■■ Iili1■ ■■ ■►al'ilm■ g 1D '1JhIIJhUJlIJhki . REE:m.e---a-=:..F.--.-01.-mr IMF Z N■ j o \1Z�r■�a gall //i 7 H. 'gave I ■■ ■ ■= ■�i : LI i Ili E .may 00 z C a °z cs N N 532 2 12 2 I 0 � a cEA NY 5 E m crro esuoi•I *13t•m elloiri=e .. 6 CO SHEET TITLE LIGHTING PLAN PROJECT TITLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Z 0 NO N 647E REVISION SY m�^ • h Not ■I WPC L� mml 7 IV MUM ESPIN _ -1 C 311 0 0 N cg = a z = ■ II 0 I ,■■■■■E MC MIE ,- - ■ ■ munimui EINCIal ■ ■r ■II. Crain ll. M 15. ■ ■■ •■■`vJ■1 7r■� iA11111111111111111 • ■■a�i rri. ■ ■ i ■ u lin 1111111111111311111111111 ui IIIdIHHIII$IHIIH ■■ 15 ■■ ■■.111115 ■1111 ■■■= w � ■1115■15■■■15 ■:: rimil 1 I wily 1 1__iiiiiiiiiiii1iuiii 111111■11151Milri11M■15M11■ 15I i n ■ ■■■■ ` ie ■ ■1515■ RI n15•• 15151511■■ 151115 ro .�11■N ■= ■■1511■■ 1111 ■ ■1515■ ■1515151515■ s. a .m1515 ■■ ■■15151511 ■�11 1515■! .m■15 ■ ■1515 1515■■ ■ =mum ■1515 15151111. R : m .� 15 u■a ■ 15. .■■i11■iii■■ ia■ ■■i15 ■ ■■ . A 11U11i ■v ■ ■_�1! ■1111 I MOI 1515 1511■ 11 i In2 i Inue• 15■ EAI©■' / 1 `: •i■15l15■11 Li�U 11 1151 11 ■1515 ■ ■ ■■ ■� L 01 1 ■IC.16 ■........�..�I:■ NMI N lam gN O3 0 8iNRORR X N 1 0 • • • • gr•1RIAT.!WFA m N z 0 SHEET TREE FLOOR PLAN AND RISER DIAGRAM FIRE ALARM SYSTEM N 0 < o PROJECTILE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION BY N 0 1 71 o? U co aOZ O O m I 1' m • o. lii z /1 ■l ter: =I_ 111410111:1'41 aim a .. a -0.frommEttarrnEeli- Fillummoup,Rpo r,. �e11 - 11 ■I rl�. /\�7�1g1�1i■ ■1!/iI���2_iI1I. D!�F�!' 11L■ tv:iunjl�� ■I*! ■ ■�� !1■I111� ■� W i-. -7 r -!_. 1 ItALC MI /II-- !!■■■■ IIB ■■ -111111 i ii�: amme,��'!� -5■�I `l � ll; !,,4' l �;__,.y -- - --..- g a.� ►1111■■■ li7i�d_ :r.�: _ 0,94,01 .1.1 of.niurr ll_- :.��_r27 :4 11� ■1111■ ELM i :r 1I ■1n 1■� �1 ■I�io►%011M 111L�� 1a , ■ ■�, I� , on 1PKAIIIIIi'iPJiVl►i ■ ■IMIIII PU ■11111 11� ■ta�r...�. ill 1 ■1�!.u��ni1.�.rn :u ■4�7 ■ ■ ■nj,;,�..:�_ r F. , t;. •ate mime j ■■11111 I�r • n , ��a�■I11 � ME11.I� ■1 :.1—:" SEIILBB. :� till [Zi/A uii•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu Elm ‘Iirtrirlillitiaglza Alga I "IIrIl 111IIL: rim ■ ■ ■ ■i1111■U■IR,11 Ui o alell om MEra∎•..iIMIEiiii ∎IFREES= DILMetlillniadiMilig maw ■■ 111 >■ 3ii 7 v ■ •Ii1_1irdi/1 ] l ■1111 111111,111111111111111111111111111111111 _r411—���: ig■ 1111■ ■iUm1=■ 1r■ ■■ .4,,,, t-; 0 1111111■■ ■■0111,1 ■■11 MIR= _ IRPIIUJ&HHHIU• U ■ - IIIIII »RI 411211 ■ ■ ■ ■■ IGINE ■ ■■�1RI\'>►'1E■ ■■■■■N ■■ __ is iii -`a o 11 = =mu �� -7 invimlf47407011111EWER1111111111M1 MIA :43E. %:=1.`17D' ■■ . 1 ■ l imaxeao - air %■ ■I 1 ■1 MA MI Ell m aNO m v - O 0 - O N O P N rn o• 0 5 SHEET TRLE PROJECT TIRE FLOOR PLAN AND NOTES - MECHANICAL /2 UNITS STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION BY ggy Z CD01 o • an'I 8 a m a Z 001 O O Ot; 1 N 1 /1 1 °N ▪ !1 .11. mai 1 A *1 KM t V1 NM&NLT VP V I1111111Effa• ®'0 8 I ,�Q�liall1IS 12Eft E aFa�al nul■ • E2 Ewa a'ZIM11air� wal i ,shim m - _=, 21 � Ali ii .,, Ilaaaal- imm1lliaaalgaa r,1 �jimikait% n ■s�-�rl� i 1=441' > it MENG. aniiiiV21-7.7--7.17-7-hoi. !LIM iViliiIiifirejarVil III 111.11151111111 iNdIMB MIN III IMO MEE ii����lN��alllsiil Eat _�la�,.i jjl ,Gx,4 \���[�� ►1�]I�I�i�mn� �'3 it t:pi'_.!'era111 ikei IIII !7� r IIi►� /IIMMII1Ir�1111l�" R i 1 - �11■oili 1gi�c: ■ai lraa�ill11PUUa•R� �.1 !'�1' i J —r !r•11■■��ifir�"` iIrrrlrrrlp1110'.- I ar /�!� ■u i ur__'ii 4 7ag111aiY �, ��1n1� j kill warm ! 111 .rM_ IU�:.� %FI II IMM 'riR` 0 _.1111 ,='i HIHiIHhiIIJIIII a i 1 1M111. .s laaaaa� Irrlaaaal ��1�'1ii illkiliii11111IIIIi li aaaaalaa■a■ar l,aaaal ■aaa•�I■aa■u111 ■.11 tlal.-Z.Iro ;ma WI riiiiM ' � c, � I'h -a ,��II�IaI ■''�n� �E o% • 2rl•a�t `.,_._: 1; i •V4 �1d11 \101111 Y" al • ,v► , -- ,II "11.11 aara l rimainulioungricam Iin o lowiil a aala ea il. aa � 1_ �.:I:.ollmonWiU■ aaaaa 1119al ai,Iliaaa QD co ••••I___ �J44ai 11 MI ■aa� URUI►i�1 {M�>aai ! IUMIU 1111,70111111/IiIIIM1111111111M11111 ■MOMMIIIIIIINa MIIIIM U`rL%I 1.\►III -� ..._.- . ■�...� ► - ir_'1 ►' x.001 =11:7 IIMINI aaf /11111la .r- INICAMMEMILIIIMINNIIIIIIIi111 CD(T � n 0 Z :It71t�1:1 E-�t= X111_ {! [8:1I.1:riif co b m m V. cr 0 0 - O CO 0 Iv 0o N , ✓ P §0 P1 sY P. tx FR. LS �c s°c c0 0 2A 2 m g °Z9 09 G0-.1 R? 9 Fmg' p : yy m � z z. ° Z a x; O Z m= oaaa���tn c vc z3 m= mm crz `gri 0 v� 0 z m ° O 3 SHEET TITLE PROJECT TITLE FLOOR PLAN AND NOTES - MECHANICAL /3 UNITS STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO DATE REVISION BY • C) w =i JCD j: 05 -M4 -12 1 "' t. S SHEEf nu SECTIONS - MECHANICAL /2 UNITS NO DATE REVISION BY A • P •° CKD BY: PRA STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I CEO ►: 05 -M4 -13 R = X .. C CO iia t. o !OWN BY: CND BY I SHEET TREE SECTIONS - MECHANICAL /3 UNITS NO DATE REVISION BY 14 PROJECT TITLE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA h 0 ONI8Y1lld Ndld -•gr i fp '''.'40 8Roo A33 Os= C N _ O O N n Pg1�10 mg z° °z zo g.. G75 -iAz c) it m I 7<iq Q PA M6 - mo •0p IA �z c 1Z m ° N C g. 220 riTz—E 5.' Pt . Ppi V 0 > = M m0 O mDR . m Z O m• ° - o °C ZZ° Ca'O yyN 0 8gEE paA mIn 0 s% o� 2z `a,- z etn pmO E I-m �1 o0zR or^ z z° In RD s� m -P m �m s 0 E s FLOOR PLAN AND ISOMETRICS — PLUMBING NO m REVISION BY co I IV N • 1 1 N W M i i i i 1 1 Zm i 1 i i ": i 1 1 : I 1 -•gr i fp '''.'40 8Roo A33 Os= C N _ O O N n Pg1�10 mg z° °z zo g.. G75 -iAz c) it m I 7<iq Q PA M6 - mo •0p IA �z c 1Z m ° N C g. 220 riTz—E 5.' Pt . Ppi V 0 > = M m0 O mDR . m Z O m• ° - o °C ZZ° Ca'O yyN 0 8gEE paA mIn 0 s% o� 2z `a,- z etn pmO E I-m �1 o0zR or^ z z° In RD s� m -P m �m N o -' = Z x ° FLOOR PLAN AND ISOMETRICS — PLUMBING NO DATE REVISION BY PROJECT MALE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2'— 29' -0- 50' -0' 2' -O I� N 0 w r�* m O n v w 0 11 � ►? 4 1 10 0 a c I v x —co (du) '3.0 ,..frz 0 m0 Z C) c 2 XI 0 C m W N � y N SHEET No. S2.1 g 1 N = ? 13 co 11' o I c swEf nu ROOF FRAMING PLAN HIPPED ROOF NO DATE REVISION EIY PROJECT TIRE STANDARD KINGDOM HALL DESIGN 05 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Agenda Item 5E Environmental Board Meeting Date: October 27, 2004 Topic: Friends of the Mississippi River Storm Water Management Ordinance Review Background: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director received an inquiry from the Friends of the Mississippi River about our interest in pursuing an ordinance review of our storm water ordinances. The purpose of this review is to enable language in our ordinances that would be compatible with the Rice Creek Watershed District's Comprehensive Wetland Management Planning (CWMP) in the City of Lino Lakes. Dollars would be made available through the Rice Creek Watershed's; application to the PCA. Friends of the Mississippi River would facilitate the research of our ordinances with their research consultant, Shabana Hameed, formally of Bonestroo and Associates. Analysis: Michael will be present at the meeting to discuss this issue. We would like a recommendation from the Environmental Board to proceed. Options: 1. Recommend moving forward with Ordinance Review 2. Other recommendations of the Environmental Board. Recommendation: Option 1 Agenda Item 5F Environmental Board Meeting Date: October 27, 2004 Topic: Friends of the Mississippi Water Quality Workshop Background: The Friends of the Mississippi River (FMR) is a charitable 501( c )3 Organization by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and is incorporated and registered as a charity in the State of Minnesota. FMR seeks to restore the Mississippi River's fish and wildlife, it's vital floodplains and bluffs, it's natural and cultural treasures, it's beauty and romance. Attachment 1 is from the FMR web page. The Friends of the Mississippi River reach out to upstream stakeholders in an effort to take restoration to the source waters. Through public education efforts the FMR hope to raise awareness of the Mississippi River watershed efforts that can help achieve Mississippi River improvements. The FRM has approached the City of Lino Lakes to express their desire to initiate and offer a public education for watershed stakeholders in the Lino Lakes area. Please see Attachment 2 for their submitted information. Analysis: This would be a good and timely public education session. Options: 1. Recommend moving forward with FMR 2. Other recommendation of the EB Recommendation: Option 1. Attachments `l. FMR web page 2. Friends of the Mississippi River packet • • • • FMR - About Us Prato: dogs artrj Riverfront About Us Page 1 of 2 4 Q71 (44-rneAJ 2 Search FMR! FMR Home > About Us Our Mission Friends of the Mississippi River (FMR) advocates a new vision for the Mississippi, especially the river and its watershed in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Through active leadership and education, FMR seeks to preserve and restore the river's fish and wildlife, its vital floodplains and scenic bluffs, its natural and cultural treasures, its beauty and its romance. Our Vision We envision a river on which small boats are safe and welcome, to which we have clear and easy access and in which we can safely swim and fish. We envision a river that is cleaner, healthier, more alive and more inviting, a river no one can ignore or take for granted. Our Organization With over 1,000 members, 15 active board members, and 8 full -time and two part-time staff, Friends of the Mississippi River is a leading citizen organization working to protect and enhance FMR staff— Early 2003. the Mississippi River in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Our three -fold approach to our mission embraces the goals of improving water quality, protecting riverfront land, and cultivating a "Sense of Place" by introducing people to the river through a variety of educational, recreational, and volunteer events. In 2001, our river stewardship programs engaged over 3,000 volunteers in hands -on activities that improve the health of the Mississippi River. Addtional details about our program work are available thoughout this site, and FMR - About Us Page 2 of 2 funder and financial information can be found in our 2003 Annual Report (pdf format - 1.1 Megabytes). Friends of the Mississippi River is recognized as a charitable 501(c)3 organization by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and is incorporated and registered as a charity in the State of Minnesota. FMR has been reviewed by the Charities Review Council of Minnesota, and their review is available for public viewing at their web site. Friends of the Mississippi River 46 E 4th St, Ste 606 Saint Paul MN 55101 651/222-2193 fax: 651/222 -6005 info @fmr.org • FMR Home Original Content © 2001 -2003 Friends of the Mississippi River Page last updated 17 September 2004 • Friends of the Mississippi River 46 East Fourth Street, Suite 606 • Saint Paul, MN 55101 -1121 •651/222 -2193 • Fax: 651/222 -6005 • www.fmr.org Working to protect the Mississippi River and its watershed in the Twin Cities area. • October 11, 2004 Michael Grochala Community Development Director 600 Town Center. Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 Mr. Grochala, I am excited by the possibility of working with the City of Lino Lakes on a public meeting /workshop discussing the current and future quality of the Rice Creek Chain.of Lakes. I believe this could be a greatway.to focus broader attention on the Chain of Lakes and the need for effective and proactive planning and management in order to protect and improve their quality. I have attached some notes of what a meeting might look like, apostcard for a similar meeting we co- sponsored. with Apple Valley and local news articles on the Apple Valley meeting and a similar one in Farmington. Our goal for both of these meetings was to engage the public in discussing some of.the issues impacting water quality and to provide •a forum for feedback to public officials. Both meetings were well received by residents, city staff and elected leaders. Good press coverage helped to broaden the scope of the meetings. to include the entire community. Let's talk further about how a similar meeting /workshop could.be beneficial for the City and its efforts to protect water quality in the Chain of Lakes. enclosures. Printed with soy -based ink on 100% post-consumer recycled paper Public Workshop to discuss the Chain of Lakes, their health and their future. Sponsored by: City of Lino Lakes, Friends of the Mississippi River, others? - Anoka County Parks, Anoka Conservation District. Early December Agenda: Welcome — Mayor of Lino Lakes Presentation — Water Quality in Chain of Lakes. This presentation would include watershed 101 describing how land use impacts water quality — Daniel Huff Presentation — AUAR for Lino Lakes or other items for public input — Lino Staff Break out Sessions — facilitated sessions enlisting public feedback on issues discussed. Wrap -up Roles: FMR 1. Develop presentation in corporation with Lino Lakes staff and other partners. 2. Collate mailing lists. 3. Design, print and mail postcard announcements. 4. Call people on lists, invite to meeting. 5. Press releases and press contacts City of Lino Lakes 1. Assist with presentation. 2. Preview and approve presentation, post card, press release 3. Provide mailing lists of potentially interested residents and contacts to others 4. Host meeting, provide space, refreshments, supplies for break out sessions, etc.. 5. Invite City Council, Planning Commission, Parks Commission members, County Commissioner, RCWD Board members, etc. Goals: 1. Engage public in planning around Chain of Lakes 2. Educate and promote water quality issues among public 3. Achieve press coverage 4. Focus attention on water quality issues surrounding lakes 5. Allow for public feedback to public officials • •. • a� • Gk. • w c 3 0 • • • NI `" Q y U " a • S a. • > o „0 • r • w o y • • • �;� 4. 0a IMO • O CCS V] tIO .4 ee... hi �y1 • D w d .a o 3 • C 7 .4 .S 4� ► N • b 1: 0 p C U o S • G t— I '> • •b c ) 68 e t • • • .D ti d o a • d Z °' o - .8 • • 2 VI • V C obi - > •z . • ,o• aD > ~• ao O • • • p C p. C7 • *1:i am 1 �, b-0 • • r/ ) S.' cd C U • I /MT 1 '� ^d > • Leo z., o •Es 3w w 4) y t7 v.a A” .a. o • O '44 li 'may CU 0 • y • y 3 m • y • > •C .= O o O h O co • • Friends of the Join us on July 19th for a public workshop: and its Watershed" Sinci25m _Posted on Wed, Jul. 21, 2004 River's health is a concern Runoff an issue as population booms BY LAURA YUEN Pioneer Press Apple Valley sits at the tip of just one crooked tributary that feeds into the Vermillion River. But despite that long- distance relationship, residents of the city do care about the health of the waterway — from trout that swim there to polluted runoff that suburbanites help create. Concern over the Vermillion evidently has spread beyond the people who fish or kayak on the trout stream or who live near it, said Kevin Bigalke, a member of the Vermillion Watershed Planning Commission. He organized a workshop Monday night that drew more than 70 Apple Valley and Rosemount residents alarmed by the threats of bacterial contamination downstream, habitat loss and flooding as the area becomes more populated. "Now, people who have never seen the Vermillion are beginning to say, 'I know it's a resource, and I know I'm contributing to it, for good or bad,' " said Bigalke, who hosted the event along with the Twin - Cities -based Friends of the Mississippi River and the city of Apple Valley. • • The watershed, or the land that drains into the Vermillion, comprises 335 square miles occupied by 150,000 residents. The population is expected to double by 2030. ne potential threat centers on rainwater. Typically,.it is filtered and absorbed by the ground but becomes a problem if it ifs off too many rooftops and too much asphalt and concrete before draining into the river. Not only do those surfaces at up the runoff — making it unsafe for trout — but they increase the pesticides, fertilizer and other pollutants in the water. The interactive workshop was the first to gather feedback before a joint - powers board that oversees the watershed leases a strategic plan in September. The plan will outline methods and rules intended to prevent further damage to the river. To pay for the measures, the plan also could call for.tax increases, which Dakota and Scott counties could levy on households in the watershed. Some Apple Valley residents wanted better education and cleanup of the stagnant Long and Farquar lakes — and were willing to pay for the cleanups through higher taxes, as long as they knew how the money would be spent. And some were seeing the bigger picture of the water system for the first time Monday. • Sue Cadwell came to address the buildup of algae in Long Lake, where she lives. But she didn't realize the seriousness of the problems facing the entire watershed. "Educating the public will be a big challenge," she said. "We need good information, so that everyday households (can learn), 'What can we do as individuals to improve that water system ?' " But City Administrator Tom Lawell noted that aerial photographs of the lakes have showed that cyclical "greening" comes and goes. Mayor Mary Hamann - Roland cheered an idea to create a pilot program to treat the lake, and.by doing so, make the Vermillion healthier. If all went well, the experiment could be replicated in other lakes and streams, she said. The river, which anglers have prized for its trophy trout, begins in New Market Township and flows northeast through Dakota County before dropping over a waterfall in Hastings. The river then joins the Mississippi near Red .Wing. A joint - powers board-of three county commissioners governs the watershed: Joe Harris and Paul Krause from Dakota and Bob Vogel from Scott. Although the board. gives the ultimate nod to watershed decisions, a planning commission made- of nine citizens from across the area proposes ideas and counsels the panel. ("me of the preliminary proposals include: • Retrofitting holding ponds so they infiltrate storm water. Gravel could be used to replace the clay bottoms of older, shallow ponds that are warmed by the sun and feed the river with water too hot for trout to survive. Providing incentives for new developments. A shopping -area developer could keep a portion of his parking lot grassy, where cars still could park in the busy season; a homeowner could be encouraged to build "rain gardens" — attractive gardens shaped to absorb the rain. • Upgrading faulty septic tanks, the biggest source of fecal contamination downstream. In the entire watershed, 2,800 of the'2,600 septic tanks are believed to run afoul of regulations. y residents said they'd be willing to bear a portion of the costs with developers. Bigaike, however, said he thought it tkely that the watershed organization would force developers to pay to retrofit existing storm water systems that meet current guidelines. Remi Stone, public policy director for the Builders Association of the Twin Cities, said in an interview that many develop— already are trying to implement alternative storm water systems such as swales or rain gardens. But Stone said some uneducated residents "will say, 'My yard is wet there, I don't like it,' and they mow it,' " Stone said. She also noted that any cost incurred by the developer is passed onto the homeowner. Laura Yuen covers Apple Valley and Eagan. She can be reached at lyuen @pioneerpress.com or 651- 228 -5498. 0 2004 S[. Paul Pioneer Press and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved. http:iiwww. twincides. corn • • Protecting the watershed discussed Posted: 7/23/04 by Brett Andersen Thisweek Newspapers Kevin Bigalke, Apple Valley representative on the Vermillion River Watershed Planning Commission, held a public forum July 19 for citizens to offer ideas and input about the future of the river. The commission has spent nearly 18 months developing a plan and identifying issues and goals for the watershed. They are nearing completion of the plan and will be sending it out for public review soon, according to Bigalke. He said he thought this was a good time to poll the public for ideas. During the meeting, forum attendees, many of whom lived on lakes in the watershed, divided into smaller groups to •scuss potential solutions and attitudes toward expenses improving water quality in the Vermillion River. One attendee referred to a potential drinking water shortage as, "the real hammer down the road" and money spent today to stave off a crisis "might sound like a good deal." Another participant said residents "can't make this a high enough priority" and felt strongly that any solution needed mandatory compliance. • Laws exist to protect the watershed, said one participant, but they need to be aggressively enforced. The Vermillion Watershed District is a taxing authority, and currently taxes $4 per year on a $200,000 property. That tax pays for a $344,000 budget, broken into $74,000 in monitoring, $3o,000 in education and $190,000 in administration and planning. Participants were given sample budgets if taxes were $8, $25 or $5o per year. At $50, the total budget would be $3.7 million and would pay for such things as 166 acres of buffer protection, 540 septic upgrades at $10,000 per upgrade, 40 acres of wetland restoration and 300 acres of agricultural incentives. Most participants seemed supportive of raising the tax, but several said they prefer to see a plan before committing to a dollar amount. A Farquar Lake resident referred to the $8 plan as "an insult," considering the amount of money which has been used in creating the problem. A.suggestion for helping people who had failing septic systems on their property but could not afford the $10,000 upgrade was establishing a fund to buy the upgrade, but then put a lien on the property so at sale the watershed tract could recoup the expense. ig issue Friends of the Mississippi River Watershed Programs Director Daniel Huff said the Vermillion watershed is the .argest in the metro area at about 335 square miles. A watershed is an area that drains to a single point. The Vermillion River is a groundwater -fed river. According to Huff, the cold clear water made it a brook trout stream. Water in the area filters through rock and sediment to a "deep aquifer," which provides water for area cities including Apple Valley, Rosemount, Lakeville and Farmington. •bviously this watershed has changed over the last couple of hundred years," Huff said. _ He showed a photo of Highway 5o between Lakeville and Farmington in 192o — a one lane dirt road. He noted there Alas no erosion control on the banks of the river, field runoff went right into the river, the outhouse flowed straight to the river, and cities had a water "treatment plant that really didn't treat." "As a result of these practices, pretty much because we didn't know any better," he said, "the watershed became degraded and the brook trout died out." Huff referred to trout as an "indicator species." "Our trout are canaries in the coal mine," he said. He said until 1959, there was no trout left in the river. However, humans learned a lot about environmental stewardship and today the stream is known as a trophy trout stream. However, there are signs that the trout are in jeopardy. "Once again this resource is at a crossroads," he said. One issue, according to Huff, is that rapid growth in the area has changed the dynamics of the system causing water flowing into the river to be warmer, contain more contaminants, and more impervious surfaces is forcing higher volumes of runoff water. Runoff of fertilizers and pesticides from agricultural uses is another factor as is about 2,800 septic systems in the watershed suspected of being below standards. Apple Valley has about 3o septic systems. One of the most serious questions for the area is if enough water is soaking into the ground and "recharging" the •eP aquifer and clean drinking water. Huff estimated it would cost about $300,000 to convert a storm -water holding pond into an "infiltration pond." "he Environmental Management Department of Dakota County studied the issue of nitrates in the system and discovered that 26 percent of private wells had above the drinking water standard for nitrates. Nitrates are toxic to .infants younger than about 6 months, according to Huff. Nitrates can cause death, "blue baby syndrome" and is connected to developmental problems, he said. In a study of pesticide residue and caffeine in the wells (caffeine can only come from human waste) the study found a least one of the agents in all wells. "That's a real concern and has raised some red flags," he said. "That means that it is a combination of septic systems and wastewater treatment plants and agriculture." He said the primary culprit was agricultural runoff. • The Environmental Protection Agency has listed the river as "impaired," due to high levels of fecal coliform bacteria —.a category of bacteria present in the feces of warm - blooded animals and indicative of potentially harmful contamination. The Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Board consists of Dakota County Commissioners Joe Harris and Paul Krause and Scott County Commissioner Bob Vogel. Commissioners Willis Branning (Dakota. County) and Barb Marchall (Scott County) are the alternates. Brett Andersen is at ay.thisweek @ecm- inc.com. •op of Page Check out this week's newspaper for more about your community. f'hisweek Newspapers 12190 County Road ii, Burnsville, MN 55337 Telephone: 952-894 -1111 Fax: 952-846 -2010 Cji USE IndeDndent Your on motion ion to Fa ° ingtok Mince into Meeting next week will focus on Vermillion River's future Thursday, August 26, 2004 By Nathan Hansen, editor The Vermillion River has a long history, but now the people who are in charge of caring for the river want to talk about its future. On Aug. 30 groups including the city of Farmington, Empire Township and the Vermillion River Watershed Planning Commission will host a meeting to talk to Farmington area residents about the river and the issues that could affect its health in the years;to come. According to Daniel Huff, watershed program director for Friends of the Mississippi River, another of' the meeting's hosts, those issues include water quality, flooding and protection of natural habitat. Monday's meeting will also give residents a chance to identify their own issues, and to talk about how willing they are to do something about problems that have been identified over the past two years as the watershed planning commission developed a plan for the river's future over the next decade. "They want to make sure everybody's informed on their intentions," said Farmington mayor Jerry Ristow, a member of • watershed planning commission. "That's what this meeting is for." ues :^ ^cording to Huff there are some serious issues to discuss. Studies in recent years have shown high levels of fecal ;form bacteria in the Vermillion. Though the bacteria itself is not dangerous, it is easy to detect and is typically a sign of bigger problems. The Environmental Protection Agency has listed the Vermillion as impaired because of fecal coliform levels, and Huff said there have been reports of kayakers in the Hastings area getting sick after spending time in the river. The cause of the pollution is not entirely clear. Much of it probably comes from fame runoff; but failing septic systems also could be a cause. There are other water quality issues. There is increased sediment in the river, due in part to the runoff created when farm fields are paved for roads or filled with homes, and there are signs of nutrient pollution. According to Huff, rapid development in Farmington and other parts of Dakota County can be blamed for some of the problems, but it is also part of the reason some of the problems are finally being noticed. "The more people you get to the area, the more likely you are to have people in contact with the water, and they're more likely to get sick," Huff said. Runoff increases created by new developments are a problem for other reasons, Huff said. Runoff water from streets tends to be warmer than water that has come through fields or seeped through the ground. That damages the habitat for trout, which need cool, clear water. The Vermillion is the only trophy trout stream in the metro area. Water quality . issues are not limited to the river itself, though. Recent studies have found evidence of contamination in drinking water east of Highway 52. Though the river itself is not used for drinking. water, water from the Vermillion can seep into groundwater aquifers. According to Huff, 26 percent of private wells in the eastern part of the watershed have nitrate levels higher than state standards, and the city of Hastings has had trouble managing nitrates. Rapid development in the upstream areas of the watershed and the loss of natural buffer areas have led to flooding problems downstream, ail there are concerns about the loss of natural environment. The Vermillion watershed is home to two threatened Ipbcies, the loggerhead shrike and the Blanding's turtle. And while the watershed planning commission will not target its efforts specifically to tecting those species, efforts to protect the river should also help protect their natural habitat Solutions Part of Monday's meeting will focus on resident's opinions of the issues that exist in the Vermillion watershed, and on what residents are willing to do to address them. Currently, the owner of a $200,000 home in the watershed pays $4 in taxes to the watershed planning commission. said the meeting will focus on what can be done with tax increases of various levels. Possibilities, he said, include gram to inspect and require upgrades for failing septic systems, and an option to work in cooperation with Dakota unty's Farmland and Natural Areas Preservation plan. 'ff said response to the plan was good at a similar meeting held in Apple Valley. "There's sort of an understanding that these issues need to be addressed and they're only going to get more expensive," Huff said. The meeting is scheduled from 7 to 9 p.m. at the Dakota County Extension and Conservation Center. Content © 2004 The Farmington Independent Software © 1998 -2004 lupi Software, All Rights Reserved • • • ANT MEE indrvoNd Vermillion River is unique Thursday, August 26, 2004 Vermillion is a resource worth preserving e tut of iiii ielil tee Fermi iil aut, Minnesota The Vermillion River doesn't look like much. At its widest it's not much more than an Olympic long jump across, and it never gets especially deep. It does not have the majesty of the Mississippi, to which it ultimately empties. To dismiss the Vermillion as 'just another stream, though, would be to sell it short, because the narrow river that twists and turns through farm fields from Farmington to Hastings and beyond is one of the most valuable natural resources in the area. And it is in danger. The Vermillion River is unique in the Twin Cities metropolitan area because the cool, clear, water it offers along much of its length are ideal habitat for trout. The Vermillion is one of the few trout streams in the metro area, and the only one where fishermen can find trophy - worthy trout. Much of the river has been designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as an official trout stream, granting it certain protections as the area around it develops: ee protections become more necessary every day, because the runoff generated by newly paved roads and freshly installed rooftops, if not managed well, can threaten that habitat. Without precautions, water that would once have "-en cooled in grassy fields might runs straight into the Vermillion, warming the river and carrying sediment that :ddies the water. Threats from other areas are accentuated by rapid population growth. Runoff from pastures and farm fields that once went unnoticed creates problems now that more people are using the river for recreation. The situation is certainly not hopeless. As we said, much of the river has been designated a trout stream, and as one river watcher has said, trout are like canaries in a coal mine - if they are there, the water must be at least reasonably healthy. If they start to suffer, it is a sign something is going wrong. But we cannot wait until something goes seriously wrong to take action. It is far easier to prevent a problem than to fix one. That is one of the messages of a meeting scheduled from 7 to 9 p.m. Monday, Aug. 30 at the Dakota County Extension Center, and it is one we enthusiastically support. The Vermillion River, small and unassuming as it might seem, is too important to do otherwise. Content © 2004 The Farmington Independent Software © 1998 -2004 1 upl Software, All Rights Reserved • • AGENDA ITEM 5G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DATE: October 27, 2004 TOPIC: Appointments to I -35E Advisory Panel BACKGROUND The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the I -35E corridor area for a variety of land uses including low, medium and high density residential, commercial, industrial and rural land uses. Recently approved, as well as proposed, development projects along this corridor have initiated discussions regarding transportation, stormwater management, land use compatibility and other development related impacts. It is anticipated that development interests along the corridor will continue to increase as transportation infrastructure is improved and surrounding communities continue to grow at their current pace. The proposed Hardwood Creek development, located northwest of the Main Street/I- 35E interchange is one example. While this proposed 360 acre development provides an opportunity to master plan a large area, the site is relatively small when compared to the long term development potential of the I -35E corridor. While the proposal will likely require some level of environmental review, it is staffs opinion that the City would benefit from a more comprehensive examination of the surrounding area. The City Council goals, adopted in June of 2004, included the direction to begin Master Planning of the I -35E corridor. These goals are also supported by the Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) Action Plan identifying the need to master plan the corridor. In conjunction with these, staff has viewed the Hardwood Creek development as an opportunity to leverage public and private dollars to complete a more comprehensive study of the corridor area. City staff has received a proposal from Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban, Inc. (DSU), a leading planning and landscape architecture firm in the state, to complete an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the proposed area along the eastern side of the city encompassing approximately 4,000 acres. The geographic area was based on identified growth areas, rural land uses, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park, and the I -35E, I -35W and County Road 14 transportation corridors. The AUAR process gives the City the opportunity to assess the impact of potential development on the area's natural resources prior to receiving and considering development proposals for approval. A single AUAR process can address both public infrastructure construction scheduled for the near future as well as the ensuing residential, commercial and light industrial development slated for later years. By • Environmental Board I -35E Corridor AUAR Study October 27, 2004 examining multiple development scenarios throughout the AUAR process, the City is able to evaluate how much development can be accommodated in an area without significant environmental impacts. The DSU proposal includes the assistance of subconsultants for specific areas of expertise including the following: 1. Applied Ecological Services, Inc. (AES). AES was the co- author with Brauer and Associates of the City's Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. They will be responsible for the natural resources, ecological and stormwater management review. 2. URS Corp. URS is currently developing the Anoka County transportation model. URS will be handling the traffic modeling for the review. 3. TKDA. TKDA is the city's engineering consultant and will be handling sanitary sewer and water components of the study. 4. 106 Group. The 106 Group will be performing the Cultural Resources component. The AUAR process is proposed to be completed within nine months of the authorization to proceed. A key element of the process is the establishment of an Advisory Panel consisting of representatives from the Planning & Zoning Board, Environmental Board, • EDAC, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, property owners, surrounding communities, and representatives from other identified key groups and agencies. The process is designed to empower and support the City Council in making informed decisions at every key stage of the project. • The City Council authorized the study at its October 12, 2004 City Council meeting. Staff is requesting 3 to 4 members of the Environmental Board to serve on the Advisory Panel. The Advisory Panel will meet approximately 7 times over the next 4 months. The meetings will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday nights. A meeting schedule is attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION Select members to serve on Advisory Panel ATTACHMENTS 1. Advisory Panel Meeting Schedule 2. Project Area Map 3. Work Program 2 Environmental Board I -35E Corridor AUAR Study October 27, 2004 I -35E Advisory Panel Meeting Schedule Meeting Date/Time Group Topic(s) Firm(s) to Attend November 8, 6:30 p.m. City Council Confirm Advisory Panel Participants DSU November 18, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Project Initiation/Community Planning Workshop DSU December 2, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Municipal Services DSU, TKDA December 16, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Natural & Cultural Resources Workshop DSU, AES, 106 Group January 6, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Transportation Workshop DSU, URS January 19, 5:30 p.m. City Council Work Session Research Summary DSU January 20, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Demographics/Market Analysis Workshop DSU February 3, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Development Scenario Alternatives Workshop I DSU February 17, 6:00 p.m. February 17, 7:00 p.m. General Public Advisory Panel Open House — Research & Development Scenarios Development Scenario Workshop II All Firms DSU February 23, 5:30 p.m. City Council Work Session Review Development Scenario Alternatives Agency, Advisory Panel and Open House Comments DSU February 28, 6:30 p.m. City Council Order AUAR — Define geographic boundary and development scenarios DSU 3 4:P :511'el'uti7MIN ran a � c cmim-�. :ate • • • Project Initiation, Geographic Scope, Research, Inventory, Analysis, Mapping Communications Project Initiation Meetings -AUAR Team &City Staff -AUAR Team: & Advisory Panel Determine GeographicScope (AUAR BoOndary) Research: L Nahxat Resource Systems 2. Uansportalion.Sysfem 3. Municipal Services 4. Cuthud Resources 5. fond Use &Zoning 6. Demographics/Market Aricillsis WORK PROGRAM AND SCHEDULE City of Lino Lakes Northeast AUAR Scope of Services Adviser" Panel Workshops 1. Commurdiy.Planning 2. Natural Resource systems 3. Transportation 4 Municipal Services S. DernagrOptrics/Masket Analysis Prepare Devetuipment Scenario.Aftemalves: Advisor] f Panel Workshop - Present Development Scenario Akemaitves - :Select !Wetted Aiterrapve Clytouttcl Meeting - Select Development Scenario's) - Order the Preparation of the AUAR • E.,* Prepare Draft AUAR & Draft Mitigation Pian Advisory Panel Meeting = Review Draft AUAll & Draft MItigationitin City Council Meeting - ,AuthorzeDelribuffon cite D raft Doccumenf to Commenting Agencies DI$lr)Aute Draft AUAR & Draft MillitatiOn Moir to Conlmenilnp Agencies 304:lay Draft AUAR Comment Period Respond* Substantive eornments on the Draft AUAR As rimer:sem ReviseAMR & Prepare final Mitigation Pion Advisory Panel Meeting - Review Finial Mflfgafon Pion & Any Changes to the.AUAR Document City Council Meeting - Review Rnal Mitigation Plan &Any Changes tote AUAR Document - AulimMe Dlatbultor. of Final Document toCorrxnentors Two Week FInOI AUAR &MligUNortPlah Review Period City Council Meeting . - Adopt Fhb' AUAR &irNiigdiloii Mart • SEPTEMBER 2004 Staff/ 441p Advisory Cit Comment MY MAR Team Panel y council Period DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, & UBAN, INC. APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC, URS, CORP. T,i THE 106 GROUOUP,L • • AGENDA ITEM 5G STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DATE: October 27, 2004 TOPIC: Appointments to I -35E Advisory Panel BACKGROUND The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the I -35E corridor area for a variety of land uses including low, medium and high density residential, commercial, industrial and rural land uses. Recently approved, as well as proposed, development projects along this corridor have initiated discussions regarding transportation, stormwater management, land use compatibility and other development related impacts. It is anticipated that development interests along the corridor will continue to increase as transportation infrastructure is improved and surrounding communities continue to grow at their current pace. The proposed Hardwood Creek development, located northwest of the Main Street/I- 35E interchange is one example. While this proposed 360 acre development provides an opportunity to master plan a large area, the site is relatively small when compared to the long term development potential of the I -35E corridor. While the proposal will likely require some level of environmental review, it is staff's opinion that the City would benefit from a more comprehensive examination of the surrounding area. The City Council goals, adopted in June of 2004, included the direction to begin Master Planning of the I -35E corridor. These goals are also supported by the Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) Action Plan identifying the need to master plan the corridor. In conjunction with these, staff has viewed the Hardwood Creek development as an opportunity to leverage public and private dollars to complete a more comprehensive study of the corridor area. City staff has received a proposal from Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban, Inc. (DSU), a leading planning and landscape architecture firm in the state, to complete an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the proposed area along the eastern side of the city encompassing approximately 4,000 acres. The geographic area was based on identified growth areas, rural land uses, Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park, and the I -35E, I -35W and County Road 14 transportation corridors. The AUAR process gives the City the opportunity to assess the impact of potential development on the area's natural resources prior to receiving and considering development proposals for approval. A single AUAR process can address both public infrastructure construction scheduled for the near future as well as the ensuing residential, commercial and Tight industrial development slated for later years. By • • Environmental Board I -35E Corridor AUAR Study October 27, 2004 examining multiple development scenarios throughout the AUAR process, the City is able to evaluate how much development can be accommodated in an area without significant environmental impacts. The DSU proposal includes the assistance of subconsultants for specific areas of expertise including the following: 1. Applied Ecological Services, Inc. (AES). AES was the co- author with Brauer and Associates of the City's Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. They will be responsible for the natural resources, ecological and stormwater management review. 2. URS Corp. URS is currently developing the Anoka County transportation model. URS will be handling the traffic modeling for the review. 3. TKDA. TKDA is the city's engineering consultant and will be handling sanitary sewer and water components of the study. 4. 106 Group. The 106 Group will be performing the Cultural Resources component. The AUAR process is proposed to be completed within nine months of the authorization to proceed. A key element of the process is the establishment of an Advisory Panel consisting of representatives from the Planning & Zoning Board, Environmental Board, EDAC, Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County, property owners, surrounding communities, and representatives from other identified key groups and agencies. The process is designed to empower and support the City Council in making informed decisions at every key stage of the project. The City Council authorized the study at its October 12, 2004 City Council meeting. Staff is requesting 3 to 4 members of the Environmental Board to serve on the Advisory Panel. The Advisory Panel will meet approximately 7 times over the next 4 months. The meetings will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday nights. A meeting schedule is attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION Select members to serve on Advisory Panel ATTACHMENTS 1. Advisory Panel Meeting Schedule 2. Project Area Map 3. Work Program 2 • Environmental Board I -35E Corridor AUAR Study October 27, 2004 I -35E Advisory Panel Meeting Schedule Meeting Date/Time Group Topic(s) Firm(s) to Attend November 8, 6:30 p.m. City Council Confirm Advisory Panel Participants DSU November 18, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Project Initiation/Community Planning Workshop DSU December 2, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Municipal Services DSU, TKDA December 16, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Natural & Cultural Resources Workshop DSU, AES, 106 Group January 6, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Transportation Workshop DSU, URS January 19, 5:30 p.m. City Council Work Session Research Summary DSU January 20, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Demographics/Market Analysis Workshop DSU February 3, 6:30 p.m. Advisory Panel Development Scenario Alternatives Workshop I DSU February 17, 6:00 p.m. February 17, 7:00 p.m. General Public Advisory Panel Open House — Research & Development Scenarios Development Scenario Workshop II All Firms DSU February 23, 5:30 p.m. City Council Work Session Review Development Scenario Alternatives Agency, Advisory Panel and Open House Comments DSU February 28, 6:30 p.m. City Council Order AUAR — Define geographic boundary and development scenarios DSU 3 • :BG LAND •VEY NL} 2 I ;ut � � atr o � �� �� _ J4,a D c 2 v �' :1 ,n _.:: %' mu Em N e s� " VA * " /ME M I 0 ii N L1 ,el: ' • . Centerville Lake I i..oist W9 Ijj • Project Initiation, Geographic Scope, Research, Inventory, Analysis, Mapping Define Development Scenarios Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Communications ProjectCoordlnalion Project initiation Meetings -AUAR Tear & City Staff -AUAR Team f* Ad 1soryPanel Determine Geographic-Scope (AUAR. ikttindaiy) . Research:. T. Natural Resource Systems 2. TraisportaHOriSystern 3. Municipal. Services 4. Cunard Resources 5. Land Use &Zoning 6. Demographlcs/NkuketAnaysis Advisor( Poirpi;W4rkshops 1 . CornmicillyRoming 2. t4iaturdt ResourceSysterns 3.Traispartafon 4. Municipal SeMces 5. DetnagraphicslMarket Analysis Piepare Detrolopment Scena rio.Aitemaiiver .Adet3ory PnnetWorlishop - ,Preseri`fDaveiopment Scenodo Aiterri vei - .Select Preferred Alternative CiyCorii it Meeting - Select Development Scenodo(s) - Order the Preparation of the AUAR Prepare: Draft AUAR &'Draft Mmgation °Plan Advbary Panel Meeting • Review Draft AJAR & Draft Mltigatlon.Pian City Council Meeting - AuihodzeD1thIution of the Draft Document to Commenting Agenc(ee Dfshibute Draft AUAI; ><t Draft-Mitigation Plan io Cornmeniing Agencies 34day Draft AUAR Comment Period: Respond to Substantive Comments on the Draft AUAR As necessary, Revise MAR & .Prepare Final MtlfgatIon Plan Advisory Panel Meeting - Review Final Mitigation Plan & Any Changes to the. AUAR Document City Colima Meeting - Redlew Final Mlilfpction Plan &Any Changes tote AUAR Document - Authorize Distribution of Final Document to Comment= TWoar►eelrMinatAUAR >l MtItgdNoitPtan Review Pedod CRY Council Meeting , • ArfoptFi at AUAR & Mitigation Plan WORK PROGRAM AND SCHEDULE EL. • SEPTEMBER 2004 City of Lino Lakes Northeast AUAR Scope of Services Aik Staff/ 4i& Advisory • AL Comment AUAR Team Panel City Council NV Period DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, & UBAN, INC. APPUED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES. INC, URS. CORP. TKDA. INC. THE 106 GROUP,L• The Riverview Wine Bar and Cafe http://www.citypages.com/dish/detail.asp?CID=19063 Emma's Restaurant and Lounge, this place used to be something else and the back bar that they're talking about was really small and one of my favorite no body knows about this place spots. I'm curious what the new people are doing with it. http: / /www.citypages.com /dish /detail.asp ?CID =19778 El Meson - couldn't find a review because its not new, just a place I've always wanted to go and for some reason just haven't gotten too. I think it's right near where you said your new place is. http: / /citypages .com /restaurantads /display. asp ?w = 1546&x= 29658 &y= 601&z= 1736086 and one of my favorite spots in uptown Cafe Barbette htto://www.citypages.com/databank/22/1067/article9553.az