The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/27/2005 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting July 27, 2005 6:30 p.m. (This meeting not televised) AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 25, 2005 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Pine Glen /Preliminary Plat Consideration 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS IDA. Hardwood Creek Development Site Update B. Blue Heron Days 7. ADJOURN • • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 25, 2005 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT 1. CALL TO ORDER CITY OF LINO LAKES DRAFT MINUTES : May 25, 2005 . 6:35 P.M. . 8:11 P.M. : Barbara Bor (arrived at 6:43 p.m.), Barbara Bauman, Constance Grundhofer, Rod Kukonen, and Teresa O'Connell : Mary Jo O'Dea and Dennis Smith : Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson Chair O'Dea was not present, nor was Vice Chair Dennis Smith so the most senior member of the Board, Kukonen called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 27, 2005 Page 4, seventh paragraph: "Follow staff recommendations." Page 5, second paragraph: "Kukonen stated it appeared the parking requirements had been exceeded with 72 spaces." Page 5, twelfth paragraph: "Line the streets with trees as previously proposed, and ensure there would be adequate supporting soil." Page 5, twelfth paragraph: "The trash and recycling enclosure must be accessible by truck at any time, have a 10 -foot door opening and be an adequate size allowing for expansion." Page 6, first paragraph: "Follow staff recommendations." Page 6, sixth paragraph: "Grundhofer expressed concern about the 2 -4 lights on the patio of the Dairy Queen Grill and Chill." Page 6, eighth paragraph: "Chair O'Dea stated that the Board should review the lighting ordinance. Grundhofer inquired if a business did not follow the ordinance, could it still be changed." Grundhofer made a motion to approve the April 27, 2005 meeting minutes. Bauman seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA • Table the Project Review under Discussion Items. The Board approved the agenda as amended. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 25, 2005 4. OPEN MIKE No citizen comments were made. 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Integra Homes/Proposed Conservation Development Site/Discussion of Resources Asleson reviewed the background and analysis. He introduced Jason Husveth, who mentioned that 35 acres of the site was Type 3 Wetland. Asleson indicated that restoration for rare plants would be possible where the flood plains interacted with the Isanti soils. There were no rare plant or animal species found directly on the site. There were pedestrian and road connections planned on site through the development between Fox Borough and the Saddle Club. Bor noted that the Saddle Club had been denied, and inquired if an EAW had been requested. Asleson responded that one person had been concerned, because of a road issue. Kukonen added there was concern about sewer issues as well. Mr. Husveth stated they were attempting to put ecological principles into the site. He would like to keep the ecological integrity of the site. In a 53 -acre site, 35 acres were historically fairly wet. He named several rare plant habitats on the site, among them Clinton's Ball Rush, Lancet Violet, the Crossleaf Milkwort. He discussed with the developer the possibility of doing a survey. Sandhill Cranes and other species were present. Mr. Husveth contacted Rice Creek Watershed District and the Department of Natural Resources to create a mitigation bank. He wanted to restore the hydrology, vegetation and banking those areas. He noted that Steve Hobbes expressed interest in the plan. There would then be no development in those areas. It was in the initial stages, but he was helping them design a truly ecological development. It could include curbless streets. Asleson noted people complain about the swales, so the City comes in and uses the ECS system of drain tiles that includes a couple of feet of sand, so they can grow plants without sogginess. Grundhofer stated that residents should know what they were buying. Asleson answered that there were notifications to the buyer that the developer requires them to sign. He noted that it could be used in surface water easements between houses as well. 2 DRAFT MINUTES • • • 4 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 25, 2005 • Grundhofer indicated that the upland area appeared to be quite small according to the maps. Asleson clarified the buildable upland was small. • • Bauman had calculated the upland to be 18 acres. Grundhofer responded that they would have to bring in a lot of fill. Mr. Husveth mentioned that there were certain rights for a landowner to develop. He noted that if the wetland was put into an easement, it would not enhance the wetland, By aggressively managing the area, up to 20 species could be present in the seed bank. He believed it was a win -win situation. Asleson added that there could be a minimum lot size and reduced width of streets. Grundhofer inquired the amount the developer could fill. Mr. Husveth responded that under these circumstances, he would never fill the entire wetland. It was not economically feasible. Bauman questioned if it would be economically feasible through mitigation and banking to restore the wetland. Asleson noted there was an inventory, and there were 40 lots left for the City to develop this year. Bor asked staff to explain the P.U.D. or planned unit development. Asleson answered that there was less road to plow, and was probably and advantage for the City. The developer could often obtain higher price for the lots, and the area would have managed open space. Mr. Husveth indicated he asked Rice Creek Watershed District for wetland credit on the site. He tried to get a bigger picture, out to regional. He would like to address degraded wetlands. He walked the site, but it was early in the season. Asleson stated he needed a strong public value statement from the Board. O'Connell expressed concern over the developer's other sites Asleson answered that they had a good engineer working with them, who lived in Lino Lakes. Kukonen suggested that the Board began with staff's bullet points. Grundhofer inquired about the amount of land the plants needed. Mr. Husveth responded the land should be thought of as a large wetland complex in order to keep the plants intact. It needed to remain intact, and could be restored and managed as a continuous corridor. Grundhofer questioned if there was enough greenway space for animals and plants. Mr. Husveth stated it was not just a matter of quantity, but also quality. Money would be needed to restore and manage the area through an endowment or dues. 3 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 25, 2005 Bor asked if Rice Lake Watershed District might be willing to consult. Asleson responded that from a wetland perspective it would take expertise. Mr. Husveth added that the key would be for them to receive more credit than the land would cost. Asleson noted that Rice Creek Watershed District would be eager to work on the project. Mr. Husveth inquired who was the eligiblee. Asleson answered that the eligiblee Rice Creek Watershed District. Mr. Husveth indicated that the typical goal was no net loss of wetland. Some LGU's might argue no new wetlands. He stated it was an exceptional area. Bauman noted that when development continues, it would set up a precedent for upstream users, to not degrade the restored area. Mr. Husveth agreed, and added that merely placing a conservation easement on the area would not accomplish that goal. Kukonen inquired if there were other bullet points to add to those staff put forth. The Board's recommendations were as follows. • Manage wetlands as a contiguous corridor. • Work with Reshanau Lake Association. • Work with Rice Creek Watershed District to restore the hydrologic condition of the ditch. • Look at adjacent uses and trail systems supporting P.U.D. Developments. • Without a conservation P.U.D. process and working with Rice Creek Watershed District, it would be difficult to realize these resource management goals. O'Connell made a motion to pass on staffs recommendations and the above stated Board recommendations as a public value statement to be passed on through the process. Bauman seconded the motion. O'Connell inquired about how the homeowners would be notified of the wetland. Asleson responded they could be told through signage, flyers and informing the public. Bauman cautioned that she did not want the general public to know the specifics, because it would endanger the rare plants. She knew there would probably be some press on the issue though. Motion carried unanimously. 4 DRAFT MINUTES • • 1 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 25, 2005 • 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Goals/Project Review/ Community Wildlife Habitat This item was tabled to the June 28, 2005 Environmental Board Meeting. B. Additional Discussion Items Bor inquired of the Board if it was desirable to respond to the AUAR document. She wanted to know if the Board members would like to meet with the Environmental Quality Board to learn how to respond effectively. They were available to meet on Tuesday, May 31, 2004 at 9:00 a.m., but he was open on the time of the meeting. She invited staff to also attend. After a brief discussion, it was decided that they would try to have the meeting Wednesday, June 1, 2005 sometime in the afternoon. Asleson noted that the goals had been met for Recycling Day. Kukonen added he heard compliments on O'Connell and Grundhofer's work on the event. Grundhofer stated she did not believe the numbers of people attending were as high as in the past. 40 7. ADJOURN It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on June 28, 2005. There being no further business, Bor moved to adjourn at 8:11 p.m. Grundhofer seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Brigette Blesi TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • 5 DRAFT MINUTES • • • AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: July 27, 2005 TOPIC: Pine Glen /Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND: Pine Glen is a 68.46 acre parcel. This parcel of land is located south of James Street to the North, and North of Lois Lane to the South the total upland area is 44.78 acres. The total wetland area is 23.68 acres. The outlot areas in Pine Glen total 25.83 acres. Writing on plat indicates that outlots will be maintained by a neighborhood association and be covered by a drainage and utility easement. Proposed zoning is R -1 and Commercial. Existing zoning guides this property for General Business, R -X, and Rural to the west. There are two lots proposed for Commercial use on the West. The commercial area totals 2.08 acres. From the proposed commercial areas to the wetlands to the East there are 78 single family Tots proposed. The single family Tots have an average lot area of 16, 458 square feet with a density of 0.88 lots per acre. Submitted with the preliminary plat are a Preliminary Utility Plan, Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, Storm Sewer Drainage Area Plan, Drainage Area Map, and a Wetland Fill and Tree Preservation Plan. Analysis: Soils of Pine Glen Attachment 7 depicts the soils of Pine Glen. Soils consist of upland sand soils on West side of the parcel, with bands of wet sand bordering muck and upland sands to the East. Banded soils are important ecological features in the Anoka County Sand Plain. Existing Wetlands and Surface Water of Pine Glen Attachment 9 shows the wetland complex, flood plain and perennial stream that are features on the East side of the property. The flood plain overlaps the banded soils in two spots that might support rare features. See two red dots on Attachment 11. The perennial stream conveys surface water from the North and East to George Watch Lake. • • • Habitat Attachment 10 shows the Level 1 Habitat from the Open Space, Parks, Trails and Greenways Plan. Level 1 habitat is areas that include protected and unique features. The level 1 habitat areas form the basis for Lino Lakes greenways. Attachment 12 shows the greenway link through this area. Pine Glen MLCCS Attachment 8 depicts the Minnesota Land Cover Classification for Pine Glen and some bordering areas. A good portion of the trees on the West side are pines, many of them Scotch Pines. This pine area has some openings with non - native grasses. Smaller areas on the West side include "other deciduous trees ", "short grasses with mixed trees" and "long grasses on upland soils ". East of the Pine area of Pine Glen and in the wetland complex area are "seasonally flooded non - native dominated vegetation" i.e. Reed canary grass, "Alder swamp ", "saturated non - native graminoid vegetation ", Boxelder, Green Ash on disturbed soils ", "Maple- Basswood forest ", "long grasses on upland soils ", and Aspen forest saturated ". The Alder swamp is very degraded with reed canary grass as the dominant vegetation. There are however small pockets of sedge meadow remnants that have a limited invasion of Reed canary grass. Opportunity exists to restore the alder/ sedge meadow areas of this wetland complex with hydrologic restoration (a long term thing). Given the banded soils, flood plain overlap on the banded soils, there are two possible places on the parcel where rare plants most likely existed at one time. These areas are depicted on Attachment 11. It appears that one of the spots is proposed for wetland mitigation where the proposed road comes through (see Attachment 1 and 11). Jason Husveth did a survey for rare plants on the site. No rare plants were found. Attachment 13 is Jason's Report. Other Unique Considerations Attachment 11 shows surrounding special concerns with rare plants and animals. The Blanding's turtle modal shows Blanding's Turtle considerations to the South of Lake Drive. Other than the two plant concern sites mentioned, there are no other known special concerns with plants and animals. A wetland delineation is shown on Attachment 3. Forest concerns The developer has submitted a tree preservation plan as Attachment 6. Basically most of all of the pine trees will be removed. Existing trees in the proposed commercial area are not identified. There is no key for the trees identified on the northern side. There are no trees identified in any of the other designated tree preservation area. Significant trees within 50 feet of soil disturbance sites must be identified. There are no indicated measures to preserve remaining trees. • • • Landscaping There is no indication of what types of seed will be used on infiltration, swale and pond areas. Attachment 3 does indicate seeding timing to meet NPDES requirements. However, all seeded areas within pond, wetland, swale, and infiltration pond sites should use the City Native Seed Specification. Additional screening with the use of shrubs and hardwood trees should be used on the top of the NURP adjacent to the houses to the North. Surface Water Design Infiltration must be designed to at least meet a one -half inch rain fall event. An infiltration pond is indicated on the NW side of the western most proposed cul -de -sac. There is also an infiltration area indicated in Outlot B (Dupont Avenue) I would think there would be more opportunity to increase the infiltration capacity of the project by further utilizing Dupont Avenue with a series of infiltration areas. This might help to retain some of the water volumes lost to NURP. Storm water piping from the NURP on the North side might go into a series of infiltration ponds along Dupont before it gets to the natural swale on the East side. There is no correspondence that we have received at this time on RCWD comments for the proposed plan. The same could be done with the water leaving the NURP's in the Commercial area. This type of "Treatment Train" would do more to conserve the water resource and filter the end product leaving the site. Access to all surface water treatment areas should be shown. There is a "water Garden shown on the plan on the East sides of lots 1, 2 and 3 Block 4. I would suggest the use of ECS in this area to mitigate the "wet and mushy" concerns of post project property owners. A design should be submitted for this water garden. A management plan should be written to address the maintenance and preservation of all surface water features, and planted areas. A contractor /ecologist specializing in the establishment and maintenance of native plants should be retained by a homeowners association and budgeted dollars put aside for future maintenance. Yearly maintenance plans should be submitted to the City for approval. A Conservation Easement /should be set up over all wetlands, buffer areas, infiltration and swale areas. Conservation Easement should cover 20 feet from the backs of the houses in Blk 5 that are adjacent to the wetland. Signs should be placed at all conservation easement areas denoting Easement presence, no mow, no fill, no alteration. A Natural Resource Brochure should be written and handed out to all new home owners describing the Conservation easements. NPDES A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) should be submitted indicating detailed conformance to NPDES. This plan must be submitted to and approved by the City of Lino Lakes. This plan must show silt fence locations, 50 foot rock entrances, trash and cement truck clean areas. The SWPPP should reiterate the seed areas, type of seed and timing issues. A designated place on the site must be indicated on the plan where the SWPPP and inspection sheets will be maintained. Storm sewer inlets should have debris /sediment collection devices installed such as InfraSafe • Other issues • • No soils should be imported to the site without City approval. Soils approved should be of similar structure to the indigenous soils on the site. OPTIONS: 1. Recommend to approve with recommended staff and Environmental Board changes. 2. Do not recommend approval. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. Attachments: 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Preliminary Utility Plan 3. Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan 4. Storm Sewer Drainage Area Plan 5. Drainage Area Map 6. Wetland Fill and Tree Preservation Plan 7. Pine Glen Soils 8. Pine Glen MLCCS 9. Pine Glen Wetlands and Surface Water 10. Pine Glen Level 1 Habitat 11. Pine Glen Rare and Unique 12. Open Space Plan for Pine Glen Area 13. Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc., Report -Pine Glen T.- // 1 // SeaR721NR22N .. GRAPHIC SCALE 11N 008'2) 1 In777 . 100 ft. 1 James f 14•)'4 ?41. 44,44 PINE GLEN PRELIMINARY PLAT for 23, LLC. OWNER AND SUSINWOrR ENGINEER SURVEYOR: 23. TLC 1873 STATION PARRIYAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (763) 735 -8554 L5.1 ENGINfi'RINO, INC. 7875 STATION PARKWAY NW, ANDOVER, NW. 55304 (705) 162 -5281 Maws: Land Surveyors k k CND Engineers Inc. 710 EGO River Reed Anoka, An. 55303 (763) 712 -00077 T aI WN IT 0A C 0.=9.7305022. PROPOSED LOTS! Proposed Zeroing a RI Singe Fondly Lela a 78 Awes. Lel Are a 76,468 51, DenWy: Leh Per Aare a 0.88 eatnnsr 707 Lai 2 Total Aran s 3.08 Acres 17119 Area ee 68.48 Acres Upland Area 44.76 Acre. Welkin* Area = 23.88 Aerea 0017090 25.83 Acres S£OM740 AREA) = 28.13 Aare Street Il it A Ir' 1 r.et� -7-72.27/2 m N. 1!5417. PROPOSED 1 COMMERCIAL AREA ' I *MO now lf4121.505.5.F. trt 5.. A 2 `b, ramp 4.01 o..1s Mein �1 15173 If, -- i/sYMMb .__N89 °31'30 'W LJ rwv: Nr es 2mTO l 1 r� DESCRIPTION I 7 1 I 1 -. Cevpi)et . rr AIa _�- IM Rial I Aoshmo we' \;I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1_ J »c . - 1` 1 1 I 1, �____ }. I t' I� I Lane As acntaim fA No Ta7770631Md Tilt YaaMw Ca 70e Peel A yam 4+AYSoonno1� f t fWa. i.. 7,77.:: • 04 10900419 07 NMnry Malt of see Lot S UMW SWIM" a Ow Eat lino of ono tot S 47672 fief. N tin pint of broinnina f0anre NaNry. el Mem mom 40.21 7001. TOT or my to UM Norttoroaterty lloo of eat! lot 5 0.24 5.00oolarly 92211 of May By of 011Mey R) ail Woo *.*0705 eve 400 1y09 Natntrlr of a Om atom Pain *M S001Mm1 M Lr 4 et m angle of 0n 40Vone. 70 m1r4.. 30 NCO.. mown! Gam North 15 Mot 70 IM .Maly Ma of soil Lot 4 017 drove te.rb.7*.. 0 000tin9 M.ron 's ono a7 above. m pall lima .Nina 2Af7 E of Mono Cpnty 7004..oy 011917 of Noy Pw No. 77. Aiwa ENa40 ro P.M0 p Tax pro of VI! 500111 N4! et too Na7Nve1 Cuomo of ee AMIn.OI 11 pwta of Solon R Teamp 31. Ram 22 NNA0 CN0NR Mia0ote yeq 001971 one So0r0 ^y of Ina Neon 137 Mt of 7N WOW 32650 lee nee EonmNy of the Ea7ay live 07 Am.e Calty MANGO, Rlmr-0F 0*? 0 Np not *700 7. maw.ih9 fa the MR 0eaanm! 5017077 .x00 Wmty, It The FaM Nor Of Ins Non.aol DuaNr of Me NOM.. 0uafa 01 Lib, 9. Tor.* 34 Roam 27 Mo. Comm, 7010e101a L one 50X! MO of tor hWM.el7 Oartr of Ik MtrlIMS1 D0w1a of Swam 9, 7oawp 21, Rego 22, Mob Ca217, *470.010 YYeellen R Toon* 31, A' om. 2,A EINI la 00eOptltn Em1ely 73(100 NH Owe.: MAW 5r MINIMUM LOT REOUIREMENTS MINIMUM AREA! 10.800 Sq.fl. MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 80 Feel O trent building setback 11na 770 Feel. Corner 7.0) MINIMUM DEPTX 135 Fed BUILDING 001810X5: 30 Feel Front 35 Ford Neer 10 Fed Side Street 10 Foot house Side - 6 Foot Alla.Md Garage I I LEGEND DENOTES E00E OF NELANO •-•+ AS DELINEATED 81 7,04040 ENVROeRN'K Fanny 7.0 7000 0Ne79e Bat or Meta -. -,- foot. -- 70e2"- 2 Foot (07(001 Moro. 10 for Cohw01 Mfrw' -C- 070MOae Baaan*m Line -ao- OWNM10 21.157 108 Tae Spot EN,w17 400 1.7740400 Bag SITE 71191 51. 041917 7701 Wog -{y- Lois 30' PROM SETBACK LINE 11 24911 12. _.� 08430 SF.) 11 0ENO7E5 N80 AT FRONT SETBAO% DENOTES 0101 NUMBER 0[x0105 0101 AREA DENOTES 7.01 AREA 04790E 19006*159074 7074■741 0E90705 PAD AKA 5e X 50' 1091D433 NOUSE SIZES MAT VIM DENOTES TYPICAL DRAIN= AI0 U7MIT1 EASEMENTS MESS 0INEMMSE 419NN ON THE PLAN. TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE \OUTiptp,'', Dnpunt - - -A e�2ntr .0bPened 1I 1 1 1 / ------ { - I I 1 ,� -, : 11 1 L I% t 7 `_ 1001.33 17 NOTE: 1.) ALL EXISTING ON SITE BUILDINGS SHALL BE REMOVED PER CRY REQUIREMENTS. 2.) OUTLOTS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY NEIWIBORN000 ASSOC. AND BE COVERED BE DRAINAGE Pr UTILITY EASEMENT. lam OUTLOT C I .9.1. certify tool under 947 dir plan m .apart d prepare by ere m nd S ee three[ ephe laws ofd that tern - 0 d4y registered Land 337.07107 under 70e !Ore of the 070)e woo of Minnesota. 948 s�A 24 Svp7497 SERER 00120011 570227 5MR h® DENOTES 501L BORING BY STS CONSULTANTS. INC. Bata L RAW Reg Na 077.94 Date DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING DENOTES DE7E17S0N POND 1Lsad f �l.Surveyors & Civil Engineers, Inc. R fa-1;i 7.- as me t O. 087x* IM eo,aan a area B7a..a. 01. - An**. e.e.7 MIDWEST VICINITY YAP Not 10 SCALE DENOTES 8' WOOD CHIP TRAIL 11900'64 RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES • 41 • / // / /) / he /7 ■4' OWNER AND SUODNID3I?: • 4 T — .4 // ■. 1/ / cl/ iL ENGINEER, A31 COMPANIES, 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55.304 (753) 755-655A 55.1 ENOINEEINNO, 7875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDO(ER, MN. 55304 (763) 562-3281 PINE GLEN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN for 23, LLC. I . James k. ., 1 '‘. i 1 1 „ \ (1 „ \I 1 ) \ / fir INFILTRATION AREA #4 1 V DRY POND A1111.597.5 .15014.597.7 iaar.=a Street 7r / P ......... 4PINNLV:04.5 1YR=504.7 10Y12.905.2 bi,Amme......1001'R=1.052 --114-3:71-7;4= .1 1 NWL=89;7\ (T.? PONDS,- / 7), • ------ .0 ---- r / so. .000.00 OUTIO ' ..... ven /777,81 peeti) -7y on OUTLOT ............... .. ',...--. . Dunnii7 - -Avenue— i (t)ninened,V. ‘-',■ C,C.Wolwts.'-'''''''''hr?'''' i '',2'.'-'+'-'''''.7-*-"IViiii031.6triZOTG-vt''''''''''25:'---'''' 17-7,77:71`7"---"^1:^77'-'firi— - - :•7771- ' '''-"Nnt- allormt^1,0:?C'-`,..".`''''''AA.71742A7*.i.iiiti..fr: --'''';'''''"'"'" . , E 1E' I I nJgeoTE) I ‘- - - I \ /I ' ' ' ' - iii9,74 • - 1=14 ,o- fl l /12"-' 0 –I----„ --'-:\ ', ' "s\ 1;211t --- ?1, I 1 ----FE::-P::::'--..)%, ,...' I ,-- ------- 1------4--„„Tot3tis.s I 1 A ,: .... ----- .• , / -' iirai;sa..../ -/LL I ,.. • -.... ; ., I 1 yograraa7.0 ---1 -1------lill_., , • .,.1\,, (< I < I 1 71-- I, - ------- -'4---- ' , , 1,--- -, i - • r ... ::.-.41-=E:1'.:1*-:tz-_-_:::::::.11 \ II 1 r-1.-- i 1 ,/ , ..., , ) ', '1 ' ' i __.., ......, i .H.„ \ 1 1%. 1-----_, 1 / ,,,-- i .---.-1----..._, \ 1 1 ( 1 /---1--------f:---„\T,;--„N„\ 1 1 , —L. P '' ..:L . _J-- Lois i Lane 111 1 ! 1 1 1 , , 0220twermA7117/ .017.72.110- /1---"- li / ,,,/ f ',, ii-•.-:::,,, ', \ i \ 1 --L.- tarrvvr....t. STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE 00' RA, 140007 (2345 wLAPINS enueSr 44e001 (2557 21110.410005 1051 COM 7 00B007 57331 Be= Men 545/001 Cs. 0.01 SLIM GionmAN (02011100401 5)5I574 00.5)7030M oft ncao cctiontorm 0,12 112.11111) 0450 W 0111115 i4040 St 7514 St VICINITY NAP 7401 10 01201.5 LEGEND AS OrlINEATED 5.10111U0 tfenRONVIRIAL re,,•,,Lmsom nee 001, Eetniee tr. ore0 5)115017055 5101010, - eons 2 fort (elan --HMO-- 70 7001 5001001 Intend —05-04,1555 Vanuatu. 541 •■■ 01 awlsrad UMW live 500 Com., 1,00.02000 Box Pow 0 we, —e— IX UMW, 111054 101 WAISVAIAN, SIM 511000 grarist.T.Url.„5,c13. 7.2 DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING Qv* DENOTES WATER GARDEN DENOTES Er WOOD CHIP TRAIL DENOTES EASEMENT MAT(RIALS. SANITARY SEWER - 8" PVC (511035). 0.40 MIN. SLOPE &ARRANT SERVICE - A" PVC (00535) WATERMAIN a DIP (CL. 52) WATERMAIN SERVICE - 1" COPPER STORM SEWER -- RCP NEOLEST.. 1. AU. UTILITIES SHALL RE TO CITY OF UNO LAKES STANDARDS. 2. 7.5' MINIMUM COVER 001 WATERMMN 3. 10' HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN. A. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL 7113510 SEWER STRUCTURES LOCATED IN THE REAR YARD AREAS. 5. ALL EXISTING UTILITY ELEVATKIN SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED. ••■••■••••••■•■■■ ■■•-•.4••••114.01. DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND CATCH BASIN DENOTES PROPOSED FORCELIAIN GRAPHIC SCALE 07, ( Di PUT ) bpsn . 100 Li J EINGED1311=22242 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (753) 562-5251 hereto certify 7901 15)0 Mon, specilicalhar, rtpOrt was prepared by Ire 01 under rny direct superUsion and 1501 1 cm a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lows of the 0101e of Minnesota. Pint Norm,. Lawrence 1 Olson Sienaturet Date Registration no. _ma_ 553010! 6/9/05 RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES T OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: 04.3E COMPANIES, INC. 7875 S7AT10N PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. NN. 55304 (763) 755 -6554 ENGINEER LSI ENGINEERING, INC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55.304 (763) 862 -3287 PINE GLEN PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN for 23, LLC. James Street J.-9A -- ), 1 fl- INFILTRATION AREA #4 DRY POND 'N 1YRW897.5 .101R =897,7 PONDf3 NWL6B98.5 1766,860.6 7007 =QBryS / POND'S __.-NWL =9(145 1 Tp e1104.7 107,.905.2 1001Rw90 4; PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AREA 1 taxes. --!— 1w- owm.7- PErpan{ en 44vei ue 1- =t - -- NWL=904.0 04.0I 1TR=9 10YR.904 .11 (Unopened) / • dP l ,I� �,. -t'• ',„1;21,-4:-.1.14 -_, - -- r sw___ -_- _ j - I`. I ( ' _• --�` ' I'i r I . J.) L-- - - - - -- ---------1-1 1 , I I I I y.1 ---------- 1_ . 1 1—I 1 -I 1„1.----1-...1 I. I I I' ___I - 1 I '1__: 1 �'4•.I 1 I I �.' ( I _1_ I J- ' _J__. I I , aJ%)` 9 8 1,/ritood - .,- r,- v }- ; >;•.n�- v+�4a; ,.....- Y,-,' r+, yi- r{r•r,..,m- �r— .v^.v.v.Y, -.�,. INFlITpAt10F.AREA yF7 k`+ ROCK ENTRANCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE t =— Dup INFTC}RA ITON7'mfEE (DIRT) PON5 D) I 1TR 908. ant----- AveauS" / (Unbpened)' l �YRA`6kfi% 1 '1 ' 1010 tl96 L: 000009¢867.0 • 7.11tleeto /Ma WI .7 MK ILL 1.17,11 IMO le 1110. Al WAS= WIm 10117 e. 1M UM. SIX MOW VIM TYPICAL SILT PENCE INSTALLATION NOT TO SCALE I I I I Lois I I I i l l i l l STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE Lane I I I LEGENCI DENOTES EDGE G WELAND AS DEL0KATm BY 6.101040 ENMROWENTK ' `'r-v um, Inc LF1. E.N Ag Mee LOOM!. or NN.. fence -- Non 790* CMM. Memel -.9010 10 feel Cont. Mei. —a Om°.E Tranrmasen 7Me Awn. VIBTy tine Iwe Spot [Mahan O 1elewww 6o. W0)7 Pao e Mnl E% EANOBy d1¢R EA. NATENNAW 5) Ex STORM SERER DENOTES SOIL 606760 61 STS CONSULTANTS, INC. DENOTES 6.0721100 BUILDING -- • - -wew PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS ") DENOTES WATER GARDEN •--"- PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR - --T.. PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR w PROPOSED SILT FENCE — PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW CGL DENOTES CUSTOM GRADED LOT (ROOM DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES 6' WOOD CHIP TRNL DENOTES EASEMENT 30. FRON1 SETBACK 91).6 ru0 06904.6 904.6 15 i 35' REAR 4I9ACK LIM Y 0AN2F17000 (70460401 FR -__FULL BASEMENT FBS00- -1645 BASFJIEM SPLIT WALKOUT rim - -FILL BASEMENT wALK001 WEB --- MODEE0 FULL BASEMENT MFBSWO- MODe60 FULL BASEMENT SPLIT WALKOUT 1)977110 - 100665 NAL BASEMENT w(LKduT SE -- -SPLIT ENTRY SWO - -5PLn EMIR? YNLKOI0 D ENOTES MINOAN FLOOR ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSER • 80U7 t*E0A5ON D ENOTES PAD AREA 50 A 05' WOMDUAL NOOK SEES MAY *081 DENOTES 17PK41. DRAINAGE AND MUTT EASEMENTS LESS ONARWSE 9NOWN ON191PLAY. NOTE: FULL BASEMENT 1' FROM GARAGE FLOOR TO 9ASE.4.1 FLOOR TYPO. TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOT 10 SCALE RFATINAe Frn ?F 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE 2. BERN SITE GRADING s. STRIP 10P SOl G. GRADE STE TOPSOIL DISTURBED AREAS 2. SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS (MBeN 14 DAYS FROA COMPLETION OF GRADING) UTILITY CONSTRUCTION STREET CONSTRUCTION SUED AND MULCH NEWLY DISTURBED AREAS (WTHIN 14 DAYS FROM COMPLETION OF GRADING) 7. INDIVIDUAL BUILDERS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL AND RESTORATION FOR HOME CONSTRUCTION. 6 NOTE: t. DRAINAGE k UTILITY EASEMENT 0VER ALL OF 061107 A, 778 C STORM SEWER SILTATION CONTROL NOT 10 SCALE e D GRAPHIC SCALE Ito 0 IC a ■■ RN -- - Mel 1■NO ( 777 6067 ) i 1nel - 100 ft. =1 J 1075 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (763) 862 -3281 I hereby eertlly that this plan, specification or report was preparers 09 me or under my direst supervision end that I en, o duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the lows at the State 01 Minnesota. Print Nome: Lawrence J. Orson Signature: • 9 /95/04 ' Dote 9eoiet?ation No _AM_ REMSED: 6/9/05 RECE JUL 0 7 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKE i OWNER AND SUBDIVIDER: AJE COMPANIES INC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (783) 755 -8554 ENGINEER: LSJ ENGINEERING, INC. 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. NN. 55304 (783) 882 -3281 PINE GLEN STORM SEWER DRAINAGE AREA PLAN for 23, LLC. James I I 111 /_ I n I 1 I 1L-- I 0. I, ( INFILTRATION AREA #4 i..1. 1 DRY POND `ll1YR =897.5 I 10YR=897.7 Street sty 6f+ iff POND85 ___.____ -tiWL =804.5 YR =904.7 1 OTR =9053 1001R =905.8 1 MIME Vire VilinftwA �= in-V4)11111, 11 0.11011% q \40 1 �, 25 Fr- --PONE/#3 NWL =896.5 ITRa896.6 100/Re. �umTayla �a � �7�1! I ? 71-7)))7 1; ; rr / 1 .'P � P f i40 B a�Alb4 �t 114firalayar eitnal.... IN -. l %ie��ni� • -, ' ' T r:1411M151 Ile M. IIIII nig, _, - .,.ter. _...._.-. , .� r . ..�.. ., ` IlTS,ont'le"z)1VQtSJi e taA ryCND; 4YR 904.0 10YR =904.1 10OTR =904.5 OUTLOT B1 1 ------ --- _ (Unopened)H . _ —r—-) x:.e / i .M--- F---- RRgO)) , I . 1 - - f li ^ -. \400.9014 I I •` - yp--e- Y "- — .� -1------- "------- - -1I i --- � ; I -I I I , -I - - - - -- _J_ - I 1 — 1 lI), I Lois 1 1 1 STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE ,-1/8 04001 70341 WARM 055.700 WW1 42151 141800045 1A0K CORI 0 WW1 45311 WPM 0550s P lei/D01 C.. 5 54' WWI SCUM VNNNLA0 RAs women. 3CIN5 (0000(51 d (040 0W0Rrtn) 5-4I( *0)8015 0150 0 CUTUP WO ST. TIM ST. VICINITY MAP NOT TO 3001.5 LFGFNQ i ■ • rtiW thiPM "' � 111 013110T.0 spohl---- -- Asrem7F' . .p ybened) NOR '�� I 1 IDTRrJ P0ND y I ICYR� 906.9 _ __ - -- 'I I ' _,,1 —j' I I I � Lan e As 000NEAIED T KAOWDD ENNRONY[NTAL � �Ldaia T lb* Wc� MrMe 8a* or Maw --NOT— 7 Tom Caw. arwo. - -bra --10 Toot Callow 5407004 — 007.aaw 0Memnam Lbr — 04.0.e7 Way Li■ 5574 rM+win. 1040 75eN047 007 40. WAINP0a Reg IX AMOR( MICR — iX RATERMMN ) � N. SOW 0600 ee DENOTES 00L BORING 81 515 CONSULTANTS. INC. DENOTES 05(51510 BOLDING DENOTES WATER GARDEN POND ;L NgI4 .094.5,/ rSrmago..8` OTRS488 ;. ` 4","7997.° (� I iI DENOTES PROPOSED WATERMAIN DENOTES PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED 010RM SEWER AND CATCH BASIN DENOTES PROPOSED FORCEMAIN DENOTES 8' ROOD 0.P TRAIL DENOTES EASEMENT 1 GRAPHIC SCALE ta ( IN FLIT) Nab ..SW n. L J 1573 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (783) 882 -3281 I hereby certify that this plan. SpecObatlon or report was prepared 07 mo or anger my threat parslsion and that 1 ten a duly Lioanee74 Pratvaiorbl Engineer under the love of the Stole of 640054nla Print Nome: Lawrence J. Noon Signotarr ,9 Dote Reglatrelim No 15753 REM8D4 (/5 /O5 JUL RECEIVED 0 7 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES // "\ A // / /o' -' I // •;=',/ - -, /� / ,!J / // ..s. , / L \/ / / // ` , / k 1 -- teille - ' \s, / irf -- • PDNDR5 .' -HWI 904.5 F 1 YRe9O47 10711=905.2 (P - 10001,9052 PINE GLEN AJE COMPANIES, INC. 7875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (783) 755_6554 DRAINAGE AREA MAP for 23, LLC. ENCINEER: LSJ ENGINEERING, INC. 1675 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (763) 562 -3257 Street -T i1 (r DRY POND AREA 04 1., R 4101E-896.5 3 /l iI i �.dD % -' - ♦ I, ,� 10 R =897.7 I "� i >'_--- jurfte96.$ \•'� _ _ �"" Sly ( I -� . NitVW% 11 II a Itik !kVA iL *VW ll."- PON.g• 0YR 4904.1 L ODYR=904.9 4P' f3 `�- r� 4t Bde r (7Jnopeae ~�f \ INFILTRATIO .AREA 17 i ti }}.� Y I T; i ,1�1'R --BO�r I.M-«�MwMw11.T� f _____T____,_ r- 4 i \ ,.r, 1 1084=9 M IV, a. \, 41,.4'' -F. ,....-1111 `, -1 1 I 1 I II ` II '; 11- 1 I'', it - -, I I/1 11% B 6 - 1 1 (00717 *4) I - -- I Lois I 1 STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE RAY J- I Lan e 141/24 40001 22341 .44140 10740E *0001 42357 8445112075 1MA 0021 2' 12001 57331 M IER WAVE r MA101a.5 N 4.001221221 04117140 BAS 12004804141 227156 9E/240EM m 1610 04357010) D-412 .01047E CURB k OUTER LEGEND ODIOUS El= Of MAID AS 122.e6A170 BY 1451010 ENNROWIUGAL EN1ny 3wN O.Ap EAro4n E. a 84121 Ewe - -1RM -- 2 Feel 00,4.0 news. - 1010 - -10 foal 021(ea 5,411.44 -M. Over0n0 7rmenswn Lim -w_ D.anpd urmy low 500 Eewri4n 7e5ranoee Boo TN44y 111. IWe w0 0 1 --e- EX SMeWAIM SEVER EX 047(58201 42 ' EX 500&0 MCP °0 DENOTES SOIL BORING BY 515 CONSULTANTS, INC. DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING DENOTES WATER GARDEN PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR II , Iii I j 1 '• r I ;ti +-'' -'•�� `. I 1 1 _ I.5._.: '� :IAA 7 1 3 6 5 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS E1 23.5 ACRES iF 12.1 ACRES (OFF 01770) O 21.9 ACRES S 39 ACRES (OFF SITE) 61.3 ACRES PROPOSED OFMINADE AREAS 0 10.7 ACRES 8.6 ACRES (OFF SITE) 1.6 ACRES 28 ACRES (OFF SITE) 11.2 ACRES 3.4 ACRES 0.7 ACRES (OFF SITE) 25 ACRES 0.9 ACRES (OFF SITE) 10.7 ACRES (OFT 51TE) 0.6 ACRES (OFF SITE) 2.6 ACRES (OFF SITE) 1.6 ACRES (OFF SITE) ACRES (OFF 51TE) ACRES (OFF SITE) 2.5 0.7 61.3 ACRES DENOTES 6' MOOD CHIP TRAIL DENOTES EASEMENT GRAPHIC SCALE (DI PERT) T 100 - 200 fl E2 44 SR MIMI DENOTES PROPOSED °RAMAGE AREA DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY DENOTES EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA DENOTES EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY L 17 1675 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER. MN. 55304 (793) 862 -3281 I hereby certify that thIs pion, specification or report rl0s prepored by me or under my abed supervision and that 1 am o duly licensed Profesiono1 Engineer under the lows of the State et Mumesol0 Print Nome: LOwrm00 .4 01so Dote 5/26/04 Reglstrollm No 16753 42N10. 4/9/00 GRAPHIC SCALE ( rx 1,904) two - 100 N. PINE GLEN OWNER AND 23, LU - - - SUROMDERr 1875 STATION PARKWAY NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 WETLAND FILL AND TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (785) 755 -5554 for 02)002114(8, 11..8 ENCINEERRIO, INC. LLC. (� 1875 57A/108 PARKWAY NW. t� �.d 3 , LL V . ANDOVER. 7 ) 802-3281 James Street I -( A, INFILTRATION N IO N AREA 14 41, 41,1 $D0RT11 R_0a9 0D T0=597.5 7. 4 I n J POND /3 9215886.5 1YR=896.3 - I---- 1440 =695,5 100 ma '7 PDNDIT5 ------- -.NV/L=904.5 1713=904.7 107R =905.2 100Y125905.0 WETLAND FILL 4,873 S.F. Unopened) NWL= 04.0 II'' 110 =904.0 10YR4:904.1 10018= 9044 +,xr,sru strabitirirrrrsr.. INFILIRATIO ,AREA g7 4R'I _POND'1 1PR =807.0 10D1Rw907J9 1 1 I 1 - ----- J.. I I _ I I I =Iy,l 1 1 i7Rpi�9065) ' 1 - - --- ._-- 1'--- dOD1Ra 065 4 ---- -. - - -- _.1..._ - _ ,, - -L. ,4•l - -`; ! _ ,__-- -1 _� I , 1 Dupont ----- ------- p'ened): Lois Lane �TTi —TT-TT I T 1 i i T 1 i I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 � 1 I I I STANDARD STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE 1-1/' wool ob. ,64.2)0 CM= UMOt 12551 eIIUINOU51M1 001.1 2. WW1 OM EN= COO= 14 200001 Cl. 8 74' MN01 SMELT RIMULNI NAM ■ADOMONAL 91111 v 61005851 Ca NUN CONNINWS) 1.1-412 NIICIx10 CIMM N 801411 VICINITY YAP NOT 70 SCALE LEGEND 030(9735 W03 or WAND AS DEINEARO N7 N4045U5 50WR011N3915. r' Y1Llr1llq tree 45. L., MM Ncp t edict Mr of Matz - rope -- 7 Feet colt... MOM* - -row -_ 10 Tom Conaw intense - 8— Orpmpd ireusabien 2Ae - o a0wd U481y live Spot Elevation 1690 7wpeane 11a. M.. MOP. ® Nee 54M1ARY SEINN —� Lx 1rm7LRNAN *4 LX 5101241 M R '0 DENOTES SOIL BORNS 81 STS CONSULTANTS, INC. DENOTES 30071140 BWLDNO DENOTES DETEN550N POND L 17 1875 5147108 PARKWAI' NW. ANDOVER, MN. 55304 (783) 882 -3281 I hereby certify that the pion, specification Or report was prepared by me or order my direct supervision and that I ern a duly Licensed Prafe0NOrdl Engineer under the laws of the Stole of Mlnno,ota. Print NaM. - - 1p ssNpd.,1_ONop SIgneturc _ q . &,/ - DENOTES TREES TO RE SAVED Date 1 /01/10 Registration No. 18753 POMP 0/4/15 DENOTES 8' (4000 CHIP TRAL MOM DENOTES WEILAND FILL AREA r- RECEI JUL 0 7 2005 T! OF LINO LAKES Pine Glen Soils Attachment 7 • 7/7 wri Nom _v • 11 mom • 0 Pine Glen Location Parcels_Anok83 Pine Glen Soils Iw -Wet Rf -Muck Se -Muck SoA- Upland ZmA- Upland ZmB- Upland ZmC- Upland Pin len MLCCS Pine Glen Location Parcels_Anok83 Pine Glen MLCCS 4% to 10% impervious cover with deciduous trees Alder swamp Aspen forest saturated ® Boxelder - green ash disturbed native forest 1 Buildings and pavement with 76 -90% impervious cover 1 Cattail marsh Cattail marsh - seasonally flooded Coniferous trees on upland soils _ Long grasses on upland soils MI Long grasses with sparse tree cover on upland soils ▪ Maple- basswood forest MI Oak (forest or woodland) with 11- 25% impervious cover ▪ Oak forest dry subtype ME Other deciduous trees with 11- 25% impervious cover Palustrine open water MI Pavement with 91 -100% impervious cover ▪ Poor fen sedge subtype Rich fen floating -mat subtype L Saturated non - native dominated graminoid vegetation ▪ Seasonally flooded non - native dominated emergent vegetation lirShort grasses and mixed trees with 11 -25% impervious cover Short grasses and mixed trees with 4 -10% impervious cover Short grasses on upland soils mig Short grasses with 11 -25% impervious cover I. Tamarack swamp Upland soils with planted, maintained or cultivated coniferous shrubs Wet meadow 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Attachment 8 S Nhe Glen Wetlands dlhd Surface Water • 0 m w m c 45' c c L. C o d— C o L N `o o 0 E c E c o) m c hfrEl c c o o a. C C0,1 > > d Y j> d t t t t t ` V E C E c p �' C 00 a p a) Zr) 'C J '� 'C 'r. '� V ° C) ° t,� a R t: 'C C1 a• 0 C VC ) p Y C J -00 0 0CI 'C'd'ov'C > 0* 04-' d C 3'° C R V c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 w w a) °�,' —' C a C O. 7° cc ns a '°I a p '— ca ca a a u ca 0)C) 07 C3 CA CD CD ° y r N M er in tD A ao C 12 C N �mmmmmmm 'cc co co cccoh e.,1- U�EEEEE c 0 .;; c c c c c c c c_ c C C c_ c a -0 -0 )v co np 0 co 0 m a) m m a) d a) a) -. d 0 a) 0 ° C U) Q d 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca ca ca ca ca co ;; �; 0 0 Q) 41 d d d C >. >.>, T a > 0' �- o2 E'a Ea aUUUUUUUUCOOOCOCCcewmvomcncn 01-1-1 -1-1-1-1- -� »a o ZZZZZ Z . hhhhhh11 . ,$ Attachment 9 `► \ 4N,... la \\ lo _Aiwa, grA \\71111D/S121,_1____ ?r--x--,, A; o L. p WI'. „me perier 1 ...■ 111: iii"ilir iiiiwiiery_LA 1,... rt, MINI Ilk 11 IIIIP or j air% 44'11t- kiA --7L, IT AIP.Ir.‘ ibI �: ammo It. 1 MIME i ; Im rii ik r& IPA Zi 1 12 ■Nedb, Nr. dricE 11*IN Imi "iv •%, ,r ....... .. N • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pine Glen Level 1 Habitat • Attachment 10 C'd 4,1I1i1\■4 1 • %EMI INN • 1 Ar 1 ;wit; ,I� ■■1, • I. _ — i! r..../ -n i frrwr rI allimorire VW/ `n i MOI 1111 .4111111 mriv a II;I�r�r ��i Ira �v.� ....11. e _ - =111 umn .1. mm mop= it MIUMEOw :/111111111191r 1' Mom 1111111 diall1111111111W lows r, A' am 1 e[ t 111111h= w ce ir IIII `-` . _ , °-.w .l .. iAro' -0-,..°1 1 i& 110 mask 1; 11pr -,-41/ II11..I...11111. "11.1111WVIS iiii"*. iii- , - 1 11Th V.' 4 Asa UPI :I IL= �r�111111111111 Ir N.... a L". Al 0.7 1 ■ 0.7 Pi ne Glen Location Parcels Level 1 Habitat Z I • 1.4 Miles s Rare and Unique • Attachment 11 • • • Inveuvw to Vi= i _ ►I 11 Vin■ zt tt n.: i .1:::: III X1111 it SE ESQ ;!� mi _ .♦ 1111111 ■ _ /x .. nn . •-•111140 1 / 4 . Ammon, .flhuuIuuII.1i • •• • • • • I I IIIII II I .• IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11a 11:11IIIIIIIII 0.5 0 0.5 1 Miles 0 Pine Glen Location Parcels 41, Blandings_breedingpatches Blandings_activitypatches • Rare -Eco- Points S Natural Resource Consulting Landscape Ecology Botanical inventories 3 Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. 14758 Osttund Trail North, Marine on St. Croix, Minnesota 55047 Threatened & Endangered Species Surveys Greenway & Open Space Planning September 10, 2004 Mr. Mike Deruyter Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company 26105 Wild Rose Lane Shorewood, Minnesota 55331 Re: Report for Threatened and Endangered Plant Surveys Lois Lane Proposed Development Site, Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dear Mr. Deruyter: The following letter is a summary report of the results of the July 8 and 9, 2004 survey of the Lois Lane proposed development site. Background: Natural Community The Lois Lane proposed development site is a 70 -acre parcel located within T31N •Restoration R22W N1 /2 Section 9 in Lino Lakes, Minnesota (Figure 1). As per the request of Wetland the Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage and Non -Game Wildlife Research Program, Delineation & Mr. Jason Husveth of Critical Connections Ecological Services, Inc. (CCES) was Permitting retained by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company (KESC) to survey the site for the presence /absence of several state Endangered and Threatened vascular plant Wetland species and /or appropriate habitat for these species. Banking & M onitori ng Methods: Minnesota Land Cover Classification Geographic Information Systems Global Positioning Systems Database Management & Development is Environment Education Prior to visiting the site, CCES ecologists reviewed pertinent soils and vegetation data for the site and surrounding landscape, as well as recent color and black and white aerial photographs. CCES ecologists also reviewed records of state - listed plant species documented within recent years (1999 -2004) within ten miles of the site, as well as historic plant records. These data and analyses were used to identify potential habitats for state- listed plant species on the subject property, and to guide focused plant surveys in the field. The site was visited on July 8 and 9, 2004 by Jason Husveth, ecologist/botanist with CCES. The 70 -acre subject property was first assessed for suitable habitat for several rare species of the Anoka Sand Plain Ecoregion. Upon locating potential habitats that may support rare plant species, meander surveys were conducted to determine the presence /absence of Minnesota Endangered and Threatened vascular plant species. While performing the site survey, Mr. Husveth also searched for any high quality habitats and otherwise unusual or rare (i.e. special concern, DNR tracked, or Anoka County record) plant species. Phone: 651.433.4410 Fax: 651.433.4528 Email: info @ccesinc.com Web: www.ccesinc.com Threatened and Endangered Plant Survey Lois Lane Proposed Development Site Lino Lakes, Minnesota September 10, 2004 Survey Results: Page 2 of 3 Most of the 70 -acre subject property is moderately to highly disturbed from past and present land uses. The wetlands within the eastern one -third of the property are partially to effectively drained wetlands with dry to saturated organic peat soils. The vegetation of these wetlands is dominated by Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and offers little or no habitat for sensitive plant species. The western extent of the property is currently fallow old -field vegetation on dry sandy soils. This area was dominated by European forage grasses (such as Smooth Brome, Timothy, Kentucky Bluegrass) and Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea maculata). Although the degraded old -field was searched for Endangered and Threatened species of Dry Prairie habitats, it offered little or no habitat for sensitive plant species. A managed power line right -of -way transects the southern edge of the subject property. The vegetation of this right -of -way was similar to the old -field vegetation previously described, and no Endangered or Threatened plant species were detected within the managed right -of -way. The northern portion of the site is currently managed as a Red Pine (Pinus resinosa) and Scotch Pine (Pinus sylvestris) plantation. Within this dense pine plantation, three plant species that are tracked by the Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage Program were documented in several locations. These species include two species of grapefern: Botrychium dissectum (var. obliquum and var. dissectum), and Botrychium matricariifolium, and one orchid species, Liparis liliifolia. According to the University of Minnesota Herbarium Database, these are all the first documentation of these three species in Anoka County. Furthermore, the presence of Botrychium dissectum and Botrychium matricariifolium within the pine stands warranted a focused search for Botrychium rugulosum, a Minnesota Threatened species know to associate with other Botrychium species. After a thorough search of the pine stands and field checking several hundred Botrychium plants, no Botrychium rugulosum was documented on the site. Conclusions: No Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern vascular plant species were documented within the subject property during the July 8 and 9, 2004 surveys. Three species tracked by the Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage Program were documented on the site ( Botrychium dissectum, Botrychium matricariifolium, and Liparis liliifolia). However, these plants species have no protected status and are therefore not protected under Minnesota Statutes 84.0895. Due to the disturbed nature of the subject property, there was little or no potential for most plant species listed as Endangered and Threatened in Minnesota to occur. • • • • • • Threatened and Endangered Plant Survey Lois Lane Proposed Development Site Lino Lakes, Minnesota September 10, 2004 Page 3 of 3 If you have any additional questions regarding the results of the July 2004 survey of the Lois Lane proposed development site and the information contained within this report, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for calling on Critical Connections Ecological Services to assist you with this project. Respectfully submitted, J: son Husveth andscape Ecologist /Botanist Enclosures REFERENCES Aaseng, N.E., 1993. Minnesota's Native Vegetation. A Key to the Natural Communities, Version 3 1 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Biological Report Number 20. Saint Paul, Minnesota Bell Museum of Natural History, 1993. Minnesota Vascular Plant Database. www.wildflowers.umn.edu. University of Minnesota. Saint Paul, Minnesota. Coffin, B., and L. Pfanmuller, Eds. 1988. Minnesota's Endangered Flora and Fauna. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist, 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of the Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2nd Edition. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. Holmgren, Noel H., 1998. The Illustrated Companion to Gleason and Cronquist 's Manual. Illustrations of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, New York. Husveth, J.J. 2003. Ecological surveys of rare plants and plant communities in Eastern Anoka County, Minnesota. Final report submitted to the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources. Saint Paul, Minnesota. 12 pp. Marschner, F.J., 1974. The Original Vegetation of Minnesota. Map compiled from U.S. General Land Office survey notes. U.S.F.S., North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul. Minnesota County Biological Survey, 1995. Minnesota 's St. Croix River Valley and Anoka Sandplain: Maps of Native Habitats. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Saint Paul. Minnesota County Biological Survey, 1993. Minnesota's Native Vegetation: A Key to the Native Communities, version 1.5. Biological Report 20, Minnesota DNR, St. Paul. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1996. Minnesota's List of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species. Minnesota Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. Saint Paul, Minnesota Ownbey, G. B., and T. Morely, 1991. Vascular Plants of Minnesota: A Checklist and Atlas. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Soil Conservation Service, 1977. Soil Survey of Anoka County, Minnesota. United States Department of Agriculture, Univ. of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, St. Paul. Wovcha, D., B. Delaney, and G. Nordquist, 1995. Minnesota's St. Croix River Valley and Anoka Sandplain. A Guide to Native Habitats. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis, Minnesota. • • • ev vl c is � � O *+-' U N R3 c E> E a. 0 5 A m C 9- > CU C ,0 L U "CS L Q1 o D C4 O 2 z< mom' m J = J (S -p Z O O = M .c J W H J • AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Dawn Bugge ENV. BD. MEETING DATE: July 27, 2005 TOPIC: Hardwood Creek DISCUSSION: A representative of Hardwood Creek LLC will be presenting to the board the status of the Hardwood Creek project, located adjacent to Interstate 35E north of Main Street. •