Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/22/2006 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting February 22, 2006 6:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: AUGUST 5, 2005 AND APPROVAL OF AGENDA ND JANUARY 25, 2006 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Pheasant Stroll Estates /Rezone to R -3 and Preliminary Plat for 28 Lots. • 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Stoneybrook Representative/ Kim Brouillet B. Wildlife backyard Habitat C. Earth Day 7. ADJOURN ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair O'Dea called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES July 27, 2005 CITY OF LINO LAKES DRAFT MINUTES : August 31, 2005 . 6:31 P.M. . 8:31 P.M. : Barbara Bor, Constance Grundhofer, Rod Kukonen, and Mary Jo O'Dea : Barbara Bauman, Teresa O'Connell, and Dennis Smith : Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson Page 2, seventh paragraph: "Chair O'Dea stated the Board would like to see walkable and bikable trails connecting the parks and open spaces within the site, but also with City and County parks outside the site." Kukonen made a motion to approve the July 27, 2005 meeting minutes. Bor seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA • Discuss Distribution Alternatives visit under 6C. The Board approved the agenda as amended. 4. OPEN MIKE No citizen comments were made. 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Apollo Landing Landscaping Review/Hampton Inn /Site Entry Asleson reviewed the background and analysis. He introduced Craig Piet, a representative for the Hampton Inn. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 Mr. Piet indicated the lighting plan was the same, so he was looking for recommendations from the Board on the entry and landscaping. Grundhofer questioned staff if Black Hills Spruce was a good choice. Staff indicated they were a good choice because they were resistant to disease. Grundhofer inquired about plans for recycling. Mr. Piet responded the containers would be located inside the building on the map C -2. Grundhofer asked about the size and location of the doorway. Kukonen added the door needed to have a mechanism that was trouble free in the winter. Mr. Piet assured the Board there would be adequate accommodations for waste disposal and recycling. B. Village of Hardwood Creek/Comp Plan Amendment and PUD Consideration Asleson clarified the application was for the land use plan. He reviewed the background and analysis. Greg Hayes introduced himself and Kendra Lendrahl, stating they were from Hardwood Creek and Landform. Mr. Hayes began with an explanation of the land use plan proposal, and that they were looking for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The plan had 11200 -1250 housing units with 80 -95 acres of open space. The goal was to integrate and reshape the neighborhoods. He presented a map with adjacent property owners and the connections. They were concerned with the phasing, because with a development of this size, it would probably take more than five years. The utilities were coming from the South to the North. There were just under four miles of trails planned in the development, for over five miles of sidewalks and trails. Ms. Lendrahl added that the blue were heavily used trails, while magenta were trails along the roads were blacktop, and did not include the concrete sidewalks. She indicated they were trying to preserve the agricultural heritage, and were not wanting a hard, clean, urban look. Grundhofer inquired about plans for the native plantings and perennials. Mr. Hayes responded that the details would come later. Grundhofer questioned the representatives about the size of the largest open space. Ms. Lendrahl answered that it would be about 2.5 acres. Mr. Hayes stated they desired to provide what the community would want. He also briefly reviewed the presentation from the last meeting. 2 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 Asleson inquired if they were going to integrate the surface water train. He also asked if Rehbein was still working on the plan. Mr. Hayes responded that they were still working with Rehbein. Bor questioned if the conservation inventory indicated an area was a wetland. Mr. Hayes answered that the area was on a 100 -year flood plain, but there were about 14.7 acres of wetland on site. He referred to a map of the current wetlands on site. Asleson stated that before ditching, it was all wetland. O'Dea added that the Board attempts to preserve the natural environment, and make sure the wetlands were accounted for. Grundhofer mentioned the wetlands and open space attract wildlife. Ms. Lendrahl responded they have incorporated wildlife corridors within the plan, such as culverts under paths. Asleson stated rare plants have come up in sites where disturbance. He restated that the stormwater treatment was critical, and the buffer areas were important for songbirds and deer. Mr. Hayes mentioned his front yard was a natural prairie, so he was familiar with the benefits of native plantings. Kukonen stated in the Handbook, the City had expressed the value of continuous wildlife areas. Asleson mentioned that the size of the site was comparable to Clearwater Creek. Bor inquired about the acreage conceptually designated for open space. Mr. Hayes answered the open space would be 80 -95 acres, or about 26 %. Kukonen indicated a conservation development would have 50% open space. Bor stated that the residents were very invested in the community, and she encouraged them to work with everyone to make the development different than other cities. Mr. Hayes agreed, and indicated that he understood that they were a gateway, and wanted cohesiveness within the community. Asleson stated the open space was designed to meet the standards in the AUAR, and the details were not yet apparent. Mr. Hayes answered they were constrained by the process. Grundhofer inquired of the 26% designated for open space, how much would be open for wildlife. Mr. Hayes mentioned it could be designed into the project. 3 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 Bor questioned staff about the PUD. Asleson responded it would go from strictly industrial to mixed use. Bor inquired the units per acre, and how many of each was planned. Mr. Hayes defined the general values, and guidelines allowing for 1500 units. The mix was not yet decided. He was hopeful that some new and intriguing things could be done. Ms. Lendrahl stated she would address the planning and landscape portion. They had a range of units for the City. The first step was to go through the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, then the details would be worked out with Rehbein to reduce the runoff. Kukonen inquired if there were any existing homes in the Northwestern area of the property. Mr. Hayes indicated there were two existing homes, and they had been dialoguing with residents. One resident indicated she would like to live in one of the townhomes in the development. _ Kukonen questioned staff if the Board was to discuss buffering at a later date. Asleson answered that the AUAR would look at the connectedness. Mr. Hayes stated that he believed the AUAR process should be completed, and clarified that they were looking for a comment of support of the concept. The Board discussed plans for County Road 14. Grundhofer inquired if the plan had been discussed with Council. Mr. Hayes answered that they had been to all units of government, held neighborhood meetings, the City of Centerville and Open Houses. He believed that bringing the theme forward would assist in showing the details that were planned. After a brief discussion, the Board made a statement that it is supportive of the general environmental direction the plan is heading. C. Legacy at Woods Edge/Betty's Pies Asleson stated that the plan had already been through the EAW Review process, and addressed the surface water issues. The Board would now review the Landscape Plan and Lighting Plan. He reviewed the background and analysis. Kukonen inquired if it would be a retail establishment. Frank James with the Hartford Group answered it would be a restaurant and bakery. O'Dea expressed concern for the accessibility of the waste area. Mr. James responded the waste area would be in the Northwest corner, and that there was a 4 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 111 sidewalk in the back. He said all the commercial area would have a single provider with a covenant and a city bid process. • Bor clarified that the concern was for general functionality. O'Dea added that the size of the area needed to be large enough to handle expanding recycling. Mr. James stated that their engineers were working with City staff. He added there would be recycling in the residential apartments, and assured the Board he would explore the area. O'Dea expressed concern about the lighting in the parking lot, because it appeared that the C -41 did not meet City requirements. Asleson answered that it was a flush mounted light, and would be uniform throughout the project. He indicated that the Type B wall mount did not meet the City requirements. Mr. James assured the Board that they would -meet the City requirements for lighting. Kukonen asked Mr. James to address the parking details. Mr. James responded the hotel had its own parking, and met the requirements for the City. The other commercial sites would have shared parking. The apartments would have shared parking, while the assisted housing would have underground parking. Grundhofer inquired if there were plans for a gas station. Mr. James answered there were no plans for one at this point. Grundhofer questioned if Green Velvet Foxwood was a good choice. Asleson responded that it was not very hardy. Mr. James stated they would work with staff on the vegetation. Asleson added that there was a general plan submitted, but staff had not yet addressed it. It would be traffic calming and consistent throughout the village. Grundhofer inquired about the roof drainage. Asleson responded that there would be opportunities for innovative ideas in this area. It would go into the surface water train, and would be directed onto pervious areas. O'Dea expressed concern about the vent cleaning of the building. Asleson clarified that it should drain into the building. He questioned if there were plans for litter pick -up in the parking lot. Mr. James answered that the association would be responsible for upkeep in the common areas. Bor asked the developer to look at the HVAC systems to ensure that the food smells did not escape, and also the air intake in the buildings. DRAFT MINUTES • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 Grundhofer questioned if the building designs would support rooftop gardens. Kukonen made a motion to recommend approval with staff recommendations and the following Board recommendations: • Work with staff on the lighting. • Work with staff on venting the restaurant for odors per ordinance requirements. • Work with staff on landscaping. Grundhofer seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Legacy at Woods Edge/Lakewood Apartments Asleson stated the situation was similar to the previous site. They should work with staff on landscaping. The topsoil should be incorporated for water penetration, and thereby needing less chemicals. O'Dea indicated the same comments would apply for lighting and landscaping. Grundhofer made a motion to recommend approval with staff recommendations and recommendations from the Board • Work with staff on lighting. • Work with staff on landscaping. Bor seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. E. Legacy at Woods Edge/Woods Edge Hotel Asleson stated that the hotel would be Country Inn Suites. He indicated that they should work with staff on lighting and landscaping. Grundhofer made a motion to recommend approval with staff recommendations and the following recommendations from the Board: • Work with staff on lighting. • Work with staff on landscaping. • Establish a recycling plan. • Work with provider for functionality on trash facilities. Bor seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Blue Heron Days Discussion 6 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 • Asleson stated there were no people by the announcer. Most of the people were at the beginning of the parade route. • O'Dea inquired if there were any tables at the beginning. She asked if participating was out of the Board's focus. Bor questioned if signage would be better. O'Dea suggested handing out popcorn. Asleson mentioned the Board could make a float for the parade. Bor stated that she believed Earth Day might be a better forum for Board participation, because people would take more time to discuss things. Asleson noted the Historical Society had a nice table. Grundhofer inquired about the number of posters used. Asleson responded that the low number was because of their location. - Kukonen noted they were only there for three hours. Bor questioned staff if a thank -you note could be sent to Andy from the Board. Asleson mentioned his study took a turn from Industrial Studies to Environmental Management. B. 2005 Goals O'Dea addressed the environmental boards in other cities. There might be several other organizations working within the cities, and they could be added to the list. C. Distribution Alternatives Visit Bor stated that a report could be compiled of a self - evaluation of past sites. Asleson added that the lighting had been inaccurately implemented. The Pannetoni people were dedicated to native plantings. A responsible company was contracted for maintenance. He was also was encouraged by the use pervious parking. O'Dea indicated that it was helpful to see if the recommendations were implemented. Asleson noted the lighting at the Dairy Queen site was not in compliance with City requirements. O'Dea mentioned that a summary of whether recommendations had become reality might be helpful. DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 Grundhofer questioned if developers were required to comply with the ordinances, and was there any enforcement mechanisms to encourage compliance. Asleson responded he would look into the issue. O'Dea mentioned she would like to do a site visit of a residential development, for instance Stonybrook, that had no stones or brook on site. Asleson added that he had questions about the landscaping. Bor stated that if a report was compiled, the Planning and Zoning Board should receive a copy, because they had voting power. O'Dea wanted to know if Stonybrook was notifying homeowners of the surface water issues, mowing, preserving the wetlands, and if there were documents. She set a meeting time for the Stonybrook entrance at 5:45 p.m. on Wednesday, September 28, 2005. Kukonen reviewed the recommendations from -the Board for Stonybrook: • Tabulated impervious • Parking stalls to the minimum. • Submit Tree Preservation Plan. • Work with staff on landscape plan. • Comply with lighting ordinance. • Submit pH level models. • Increase number of trees and oaks in back. • Ensure adequate separation with groundwater. Kukonen inquired about the pond on the South side. Asleson answered the pond was a part of Schwan's and was going from formal to native plantings around the pond. He was encouraged because they did what they said they would do. They had a three -year contract with a reputable landscape company for maintenance. O'Dea noted that October 1, 2005 was the Fall Recycling Day and would be from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. She saw a nice article about it in the City Newsletter. Grundhofer commented on the Community Wildlife designation. She expressed her frustration on taking a course on -line. 8. ADJOURN It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on September 28, 2005. There being no further business, Kukonen moved to adjourn at 8:31 p.m. Grundhofer seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 8 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING AUGUST 31, 2005 Transcribed by: Brigette Blesi TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 9 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT 1. 3. CITY OF LINO LAKES DRAFT MINUTES JANUARY 25, 2006 : January 25, 2006 . : P.M. . : P.M. : Barbara Bor, Barbara Bauman, Constance Grundhofer, Teresa O'Connell, and Mary Jo O'Dea and Rod Kukonen : Dennis Smith : Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, CALL TO ORDER Chair Mary Jo O'Dea called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of minutes postponed to next meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The Board approved the agenda as amended. With amendment of no minutes or any additions to agenda. Update as to applicants: 4. OPEN MIKE No citizen comments were made. Closed 6:34 p.m. 5. ACTION ITEMS No Action Items on Agenda. Motion by Kukonen to amend seconded by O'Connell. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Woods Edge Landscape Update /Comments Marty commented that the city will be advertising for bids in February for the Woods Edge streetscaping and lighting improvements. Bob Moberg, SEH Inc., was in attendance to discuss landscape and lighting along with his representatives. Mr. Moberg, introduced Julie Goller who is a landscape architect and Ken Tallion who is a lighting design specialist involved with lighting plan. • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2006 Mr. Moberg explained that the Phase 1 contract was started last fall consisting of the street & utility work. We are now moving forward with Phase 2 and Phase 3 which consists of landscaping, streetscaping and street lighting. Mr. Moberg reviewed the general layout of the development and the areas identified for landscaping and streetscaping. He explained that the street and utility construction will continue in April and be nearing completion in May or June. Due to the urban setting with no building setbacks the streetscape improvements will extend from the curb to the building line. The sidewalk areas will include two solider courses of paver brick adjacent to curbs and poured concrete sidewalks from that point back to building. The sidewalk areas will include trees with tree grates place around them. The grates will be at surface or will have a barrier and cover grates. Mr. Asleson noted that Cornell University soil be used within the tree planting areas to improve the survivability of the trees. In the town home areas the streetscaping will revert to more of a typical residential suburban setting such as sidewalks with boulevards with tree plantings and so forth. The developer of the town homes is responsible for tree plantings on private property. In the round about area a number of evergreen plantings with up lighting will be planted to illuminate evergreens after dark. Mary Jo O'Dea asked if the red on maps represent pavement brick. Mr. Moberg responded that some of the lines represented scoring in the concrete. But the pavers were located behind curbs, at street corners and in the on- street parking bays. The parking bays were designed to capture runoff. Connie Grundhofer asked how wide the roundabout is. Mr. Moberg stated that typically the outside diameter is 120'. Colored concrete would be used adjacent to the curb to allow for wheel tracking of larger vehicles such as buses or semi trucks. Barbara Bor asked if the traffic is a one way system. Mr. Moberg stated that traffic around the community green would be one way to the east and one way to west. Mr. Moberg stated that the traffic study estimated traffic volumes along Town Center Parkway to reach approximately 15,000 trips per day. The roundabout was design to allow for these trips to move more efficiently and safely through the intersection. The roundabout area is going to have concrete planters adjacent to the curb line. This is intended to channel pedestrians to designated street crossings. Additionally, the landscaping within the roundabout is intended to focus vehicle attention on the roadway. Teresa O'Connell asked if there will be a sprinkler system in center. Mr. Moberg stated that they are planning to have irrigation throughout. For instance all street lights will be 2 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2006 • furnished with arms to support hanging baskets and flags. They will not have to be watered manually. There will be irrigation tubing to plants. Julie Goller provided an overview of the Community Green improvements. On the western end there will be red pines to provide an evergreen screen backdrop. A 10 foot wide walkway will extend around the perimeter of the green. . The east perimeter will have center perennial beds. The open areas would be sod and include wooden benches for seating areas. The darker red areas represent concrete. There are pathways across with added red pavers for accent. There will be trees and plantings on the outer edge of park. There will be texture and color all year round throughout. Continue to east there will be an interactive water feature with five spray jets and a depth of 6" at the center or deepest part of water pool. There will be picnic tables incorporated. Moving to the east further there will be areas for sitting with red maples and more. Pergola will be western red cedar and galvanized steel. Areas to the east open and a turf area is to be used as a gathering place or for large performances also able for smaller groups. Connie Grundhofer asked how large of a space this would be. Julie Goller answered 28' across and 40' to the south. Connie Grundhofer was wondering if they could incorporate more native plants in the park area. Julie stated that she does feel the selections are best for use in this particular situation. Items that are multi stemmed and dense hold up to maintenance. Specific plants are hardy to salt spray, liter, etc. Julie feels that combinations of plants are very important for year round color, texture and seasonal interest. Barbara Bor asked about the water system. She wanted to know if the water was recycled or how was water being served. For instance are dogs allowed in there? Mike Grochala said not necessarily. It is anticipated that the water could be duck and children magnate. It was asked how this will aerosolize out. Mr. Moberg explained that the water system was filtered and chlorinated. If kids, etc. run through it would be the same as say swimming pool water that needs to be cleaned out. Marty Asleson stated that it is a neat place to put a farmers market and could come in along northern entrance. It has potential for Christmas trees sales, pumpkins or whatever. Rod Kukonen asked if the Aspen's will hold up over time in that environment. Julie Goller stated that yes, it should be just fine. They are set back off the road. Mary Jo O'Dea asked about the roundabout: Julie Goller said it will feature white pines in center and outside will be red pine dwarf honeysuckle. Marty Asleson said none of the trees will be 100 year trees and 60 -70 -80 foot. Realistically if they survive 20 years they are doing well. 3 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2006 Mary Jo O'Dea asked if it was the City who does replacing. Marty Asleson answered yes. Julie Goller stated that the size going into the ground would be 21/2 caliber maybe 20 feet height. The initial construction/planting warranty will be 1 year. The City will have the long term city upkeep and maintenance stated Mike Grochala. Mr. Moberg stated that the reason why evergreens serve as traffic function as well. We want a visual barrier for people to slow down. They felt it more effective than a deciduous tree. Marty Asleson asked about snow removal and the concern about salt onto soil. Mike Grochala stated that ultimately most of the snow will be removed from site. The issue we have created as much on street parking as possible to reduce off street parking. We are working with Hartford as to responsibility of the city and merchants. There is a timing issue when snow can be cleared. There needs to be some sort of an agreement worked out that business will clean off sidewalks and city will maintain roads. Merchants will clear first and city plow snows back on after. Teresa O'Connell asked if daffodils in grass will be eaten and have to be tricked to have them stay. Julie Goller said by lying netting on top of bulbs and essentially wrapping them will help to prevent rodents and other animals access. Connie Grundhofer said there is a need to keep grass longer around daffodils so they survive. Julie Goller said that you might keep a little bit taller but not so as to be inappropriate. Connie Grundhofer asked about what will be surrounding the water feature. Julie Goller said pavement. Slope with colored concrete, panels, cobbles, and aggregate. Rod Kukonen asked what plantings will be to the north, south, and east of Roundabout. It was stated that there will be dwarf honeysuckle, three types of spiraea, etc. 2' area of space to add bushes, etc. Mary Jo O'Dea asked what the base lights around boulevard will be. Mr. Moberg stated low lights. Mike Grochala noted they tried to get low maintenance shrubs /trees /plants and still incorporate annual planting beds, and maybe we could get volunteers to maintain. Mary Jo O'Dea asked what type of trees were located west of the community green. Julie Goller said they are Redman Lindens. They use a greater street area and work well in urban settings. 4 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2006 Ken Tallion was onto lighting. We will incorporate light fixtures with similar poles as seen throughout the city. Similar to light outside of city hall without the glare. Ken Tallion discussed the irrigation tubing within the street lights. He stated that while we don't want the area to be lit up like a baseball field it is necessary to provide for a secure feeling in an urban environment. The lighting in the residential areas will be more spaced out as in typical residential subdivisions. Mr. Tallion also noted that the existing light fixtures at City Hall would be replaced with the new street lights. The receptacles will have a tree base to put in twinkle lights options with grates. Receptacles will be located near the opening in the grate with bricks on top. There will be one brick missing for the lights. Receptacles are short, about 1 foot high with lockable covers. Receptacles will come on at a certain time and go off at certain time. Whereas the pole lights are on all night. There will be tree up lights in a few areas by the entrance. This will minimize lighting by using wider distribution so the majority of light will be blocked. We want to provide a glow. Initially there will be a little more lighting, say 70 watt fixtures. We have thousands of options we can use for fixtures. Around the park area will be additional fixture receptacles for events. Machines will be able to be hooked up such as ice cream or pop corn machines from a 120 volt and up to 240 volt possibility. There will also be smaller receptacles for smaller events. Additionally there will be some not so attractive cabinets planted on the outside of the development for electrical. The will either be painted or left at their natural state. They will not rust. Mary Jo O'Dea asked if they will blend in to landscaping. Ken Tallion said that they could. There are ways of making the cabinets less inclusive. The large parking lot areas will not be lighted. The Developer is handling this. Mary Jo O'Dea asked if this was different than this lighting. Mike Grochala noted that they are basic shoe box, non - decorative cabinets. Ken Tallion noted that that we are getting more efficient fixtures than others available. Teresa O'Connell asked if the lights could have a green glow to them. Ken Tallion said no, the lights are more of a "flood light" fixture. Connie Grundhofer asked about the residential light poles being 200 feet tall and do they have a downward focus. Ken Tallion said yes they have a cut off style. Mike Grochala noted that the bulb sits in a saggy lens. He also noted that the tub is just above the outer edge. Ken Tallion said that it does not let light go out, it spreads it out along the ground. These are called cut off fixtures. If you compare cut off fixtures to non cut off fixtures, cut off fixtures are more efficient and give more reflected up light than generated from non cut off fixtures. Ken said that it looks nicer without the glare in your eyes. It enhances the entire experience not to be blinded. They are nice and comfortable. 5 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2006 Mike Grochala noted that Ken Tallion has been very helpful to the city with any complications we have had regarding electrical and lighting. We anticipate using Ken Tallion's expertise to address lighting city wide. It was asked how the signage was lit near city hall. It was noted that the signage currently operates from the lighting system. It was asked if it could tie into tree receptacle systems. Mike Grochala noted that ultimately there could be something on the Fairview lot across from off ramp and coming into Legacy at Woods Edge. We have not really addressed this yet. We are just looking at concepts. There will be some lighting of a sign. It doesn't need to be on all the time. Mr. Moberg said that the only destination on Town Center Parkway now has many facilities and there is a stronger need to have city hall distinguished around the clock. It was asked if the police station was manned all night. Someone said yes. Ken Tallion said that the medallions will be placed at every other fixture and in commercial areas. They will be right inside the area of lighting. Connie Grundhofer wanted to go back to the plantings and retaining walls. Connie asked if we knew what was planted. Marty Asleson planted native seed mix below. Julie Goller said that on the tier are black -eyed susan's and bush honeysuckle. Mike Grochala noted that the other pond area is part of the city hall construction. Seed has been thrown down to establish something as of now. We wanted to spruce up the city's existing seed mix and native seed mix. It should cycle throughout the year. Marty Asleson was able to transplant seed further back in the development. Most of the area was bulldozed. We were able to salvage most of the plants. Mary Jo O'Dea asked if there were any other questions. There were none. Mr. Moberg said that all light poles and fixtures come fabricated with the ability to put arms or flags on for baskets in the future. Connie Grundhofer asked Marty Asleson if he had any concerns he would like to shed light on. Marty Asleson said that he had one concern. He said that he had concerns of how to get the trees out if one dies in the soil because it's all rock. He said that when we come across the situation we will have to figure it out. Mike Grochala noted that will experience all kinds of new things. The key is to provide a pedestrian environment and soften the environment with materials that we can. Theresa O'Connell was concerned with the cobblestone because of seniors, etc. Mr. Moberg said that we need to keep in mind the paver brick is right behind the curb. It will not be attractive for pedestrian to be walking. There will be no mortar in- between bricks. 6 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2006 It was noted that there was a worry of the texture of bricks becoming slick in winter. Mr. Moberg said that a paver was chosen that will not have a slick surface. B. Other Discussion Items Mary Jo O'Dea said that she had emailed Gordon Heitke about a survey. Gordon Heitke's response was something based on a previous survey SEE GORDON'S EMAIL. It was said that there were Extension Service brochures handed out for availability for Environmental board. There was a discussion about the Blue Herons. Marty Asleson talked about Steve Kittelson. Marty said Steve was transferred to Mankato. Marty will see if he can meet with council members to update them. Council should be updated on what is going on with Herons. Steve Kittelson will be giving a talk on the Blue Heron's somewhere local, Connie Grundhofer said. It was asked if Steve was done with the project. Marty Asleson said that he was not sure. Steve Kittelson has done significant work and made many discoveries. Marty Asleson said that it was hoped that Steve can make it to a council meeting. Barbara Bor asked if we have ever asked the city to consider as a board to help with money for the project. Barbara Bor asked if there is something that raccoons are afraid of that we can use, such as sent or decoy. Marty Asleson said that it sounds like the coyotes are in a certain range and the raccoons stay away from them. The raccoons tend to stay in closer to where people are. Raccoons that Andy has been tracking are back and forth meandering around the shore all the way up to the freeway. It is no secret that they are harvesting some of the raccoons right now. Marty said there was a newspaper article about the 40 nests. Some are really falling apart. There are probably between 30 -40 nests left out there. Glen Fox and his people from the county, along with the city are putting additional flashing up to protect the Blue Herons. Marty said that the Raccoons are really smart when climbing trees. Barbara Bor wanted to understand about both funding and flashing and do we let nature take it's course or address the problem with decoys and flashing, understanding the cost and looking for contributions. Marty Asleson asked Jeff to bring along a copy of the grant on how it was funded. Barbara Bor said that when this is presented to council the information needs to be accurate. They need to understand the grant, when it ends and who will be running. Marty Asleson noted he thinks it is January 1. 7 DRAFT MINUTES • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 25, 2006 C. Board Applications Update: Marty Asleson talked to Dan Tesch and Dan said he had received some environmental board applications. Marty Asleson can think of other people that might apply that would be good as well. We will be loosing Barbara Bauman after the February meeting. Mary Jo O'Dea said that we love having you (Barbara Bauman) on the board and you've meant a great deal to the board. There is a work session meeting February 8th to present goals. We would like as many of us there as possible and will I present asked Mary Jo O'Dea? Marty Asleson said yes you will present. The goals will be presented to council on February 13 and Marty Asleson will do that then. Mary Jo O'Dea said it is up in the air about a Blue Heron update. 7. ADJOURN It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on February 22, 2006. There being no further business, Connie Grundhofer moved to adjourn at 8:04 p.m. Barbara Bor seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Lisa Hogstad Community Development Secretary 8 DRAFT MINUTES • • AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: February 22, 2006 TOPIC: Pheasant Stroll Estates /Rezone to R -3 and Preliminary Plat For 28 Lots BACKGROUND: Pheasant Stroll Estates is a 10 acre proposal located At County Road J and Ware Road (Attachment 1). The developer proposes to build 28 units at 2.8 units per acre on this 10 acre site. This site is guided for Medium Density Residential in a stage 1 growth area. Sewer and water is available to the site. Storm sewer is also available along Ware Road. The developer is proposing to re -zone the land from R, Rural to R -3, medium density residential district. Level One Habitat Level one habitat areas are those areas that were mapped from the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System of Lino Lakes showing resources of higher significance. The level one habitat areas are those areas that were pulled out of the MLCCS that had higher existing values. The level one habitat areas are the foundation for the location of our proposed greenways and Trail corridors. Please refer to the Preliminary Park, Greenway & Trail System Plan document. The map on the 1st page shows this area as a Natural resources Conservation area with trail corridor from the East to the West in the vicinity of this development. Also see Attachment 2. Attachment 2 shows the edge of this Level one habitat plunging in to the northern part of the property. This area is for the most part flood plain. Vegetative Cover The MLCCS is depicted on Attachment 3. The site has planted mixed conifers and deciduous to the SE, Short Grasses and Mixed Trees to the SW, Aspen Forest, Cattail Marsh and Boxelder to the North. Water Resources Surface water from this site flows to Baldwin Lake. The sub watershed is mostly flat with a very small slope going to the North. Attachment 4 shows the Sub Watershed Boundary National Wetlands Inventory, and Flood Plain. Not shown are the delineated wetlands on the site. Type 3 Wetlands were delineated in the NWI area and an area to the SE. Rice Creek Water Shed has received the wetland delineation but will not be able to verify wetland boundaries until spring. They have not looked at any of the proposed surface water management features at this time. Required Tree Preservation Plan and Resources Inventory The developer has submitted Tree Inventory and "Clear Zone" Map for trees and resources (Attachment 6). Trees in the save areas are depicted as separated • from construction activities by silt fence. The developer should understand that the City may ask for a more substantial tree protection fence in areas where grading and construction approaches save areas. In addition to tree locations, the map shows soil types, delineated wetlands, and flood plain areas. I have supplemented this map with GIS Attachments 2, 3, 4, and 11. Trees for the most part are smaller diameter Boxelder, and Siberian Elm typical of a previously disturbed site. There are also select areas of Eastern red Cedar, Scotch Pine, and White /Blue Spruce. Significant Resources Considerations. There are no documented National Registry plants or animals on this site. Although not documented on the site, there are other areas of the City where we have found rare plant communities that have the same ecologic signature as an area on this site. See Attachment 11. Pinned areas on the map show areas on the edge or in the flood plain on Iw soils where one expect these plants to exist. This is one of the reasons the level one habitat /greenway area is shown dipping into this parcel. One other site observation is the City Blandings Turtle Model predicts Blandings Turtles breeding and activity areas to the North and East. This site is an excellent place to start obtaining connectivity through the level one habitat area to the designated Greenway area to the NE. A Conservation Easement or Fee Title to flood Plain Wetlands on the North Side of this property should be given. A rare plant survey should be required for this proposed development area to substantiate any existing plants. • It is unclear to me if the developer is showing the required 10 buffer around wetland areas to the North. A wider buffer is preferable. Type three wetlands proposed to be filled on the South side of the plan will have to be mitigated on a two for one basis somewhere in the sub - watershed. I have inquired with RCWD concerning their findings. All wetland mitigation area, pond areas, and disturbed buffer areas of remaining wetlands must be seeded with the City native seed mix. Signs along a requested Conservation Easement should be placed on the boundary every 100 to 150 feet. All pond and infiltration, and spillway areas must show a public access for maintenance needs. Forbays should be incorporated into pond and spillway areas in order to keep sediment out of existing wetland Native seed should be used at any spillway overflow areas. There is a concern for the spillway over flow. The spillway is questionably and empirically small and a good amount of surface water is flowing to it. One might expect sedimentation to occur periodically into the wetland area. We do not want this to occur. The Pond area on the North and East sides are constructed into the flood plain and possible rare plant feature area. The ponds /wetland replacement area should be pulled out of this flood plain area and left undisturbed. The rare plant communities commonly found in these areas are dependent on flood plain. It • • • should be noted that even though rare plants may not be found in a site survey, it does not mean that rare plant seed banks do not exist and a restoration project be successful in bringing these plants back. Other Surface Water Credit/BMP Considerations. Water from impervious surfaces should be directed to a grassy area first instead of down driveways into storm sewers. This should include provision that all roof drains must be directed to the grassy areas. There should be a requirement that alI'turf areas be loosed before sod is placed. All top soil should be completely tilled into the soil. No soils should be imported or exported with out City approval. Suggest a system of curb -cuts and rain - gardens along street scapes as a more integrated approach to Surface Water Treatment Train. Roof top, driveway and street runoff could be directed to these gardens and have a significant effect on stormwater volumes leaving the site. Since Private Drive West has only two storm water inlets on a very long stretch of road, the rain gardens would have ample opportunity to capture surface water runoff. Stormwater Pollution Prevention The Developer has submitted a storm water pollution prevention plan. The plan is included as Attachment 12. The plan has most of the issues covered. The "Inspection and Maintenance "notes section" should add that all inspection records and the SWPPP will be maintained on the site in a designated location and available to inspectors at all times. The developer must state where this location will be on the site. Most convenient is a mailbox. The rock entrance described in the SWPPP should be at least 50 feet long. The large scale map was unreadable. In addition, it is suggested that additional stockpile of 1.5 inch rock be maintained on the site to top dress the entrance when rock pore space is filled. The City would prefer the Infrasafe Debris Collection Device (or a suitable substitute) for storm sewer inlet protection. These must be used on all constructed and existing storm water inlets. If there are anticipated concerns with soil movement along Ware Road, these devices should be used there. A street sweeping schedule should be submitted that is acceptable to the City on all interior and exterior roads used for the project. Landscaping Escrow money should be allocated to provide 1 tree per street frontage on all new lots. A landscape plan should be submitted with a plan to screen all adjacent properties that are affected. Credit for existing and preserved trees that afford screening should be applied. The landscape plan should show all seeded areas and the native City seed mix shown on the plan specifications. A landscape contractor that is experienced with the installation of native seed should be approved by the City. City Goals and Policy I have included in this report a copy of the City Goals and Policies under the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan (Attachment 13). Please note specifically the language concerning special concern features, and the preservation of water systems including flood plain. OPTIONS: 1. Approve with recommended with comments and recommendations of this report and those of the Environmental Board. 2. Other recommendation as per the Environmental Board RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. Attachments: 1. Pheasant Stroll Estates Location Map 2. Pheasant Stroll Estates High Level Habitat Vicinity Map 3. Pheasant Stroll Estates MLCCS • 4. Pheasant Stroll Estates Water Resources Map 5. Pheasant Stroll Estates Boundary and Topographic Survey 6. Pheasant Stroll Preserve Resource Inventory Map, Tree Inventory, and Tree Removal Plan. 7. Pheasant Stroll Preserve Preliminary Plat 8. Preliminary Grading Plan 9. Preliminary Grading Plan 10. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 11. Special Resource Considerations. 12. Storm water pollution Prevention Plan 13. City of Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan, Natural Environment Section, Goals and Policies. • 1 0 V I- Tuawuaallb oa ;S ;ueseeqd dew uogeooi sa;e;s3 Pheasant Stroll Estates • High Level Habitat Vacinity Map 0.2 0.2 0.4 Miles 0 Pheasant Stroll Location Map Level 1 Habitat_PSE Vacinity Map Aspen (forest, woodland) with 11- 25% impervious cover =Aspen (forest, woodland) with 26 -50% impervious cover MI Aspen forest ME Aspen forest saturated Aspen -birch forest northern hardwoods subtype ;w Oak forest Oak forest dry subtype MI Willow swamp Level 1 Habitat_Floodplain_PSE 0 Parcels Attachment 2 • PSE MLCCS • • 0.08 0 0.08 0.16 0.24 Miles Attachment 3 Q Parcels Pheasant Stroll MLCCS Aspen forest Boxelder - green ash disturbed native forest Cattail marsh - seasonally flooded Planted mixed coniferous /deciduous trees with 11 -25% impervious cover 1, Short grasses and mixed trees with 26 -50% impervious cover 5 • • PSE Water Resources Attachment 4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles Pheasant Stroll Estates Water Resources 0 To Baldwin Lake 0 Pheasant Stroll Location Map Q Parcels MI Ponds National Wetland Inventory Type 1 Type 2 -] Type 3 Type 4 ill Type 5 Type 6 Type 7 1 Type 8 _] Industrial /Municipal Riverine Upland Floodplainshape. s 130UNDAi 1'r 4 TOPOGIRAP H IC SUIRVM1' P MA6ANT 611801.1. E6i'A "M FOR: ! UNN CUSTOM HOMES 2161108TH LANE N.E. ELAINE, MN 55442 TELE: (1e43) "ISO -0323 - -- �qn NW corner of 'Pt S.,GPr SI /2 of SEI /4 5506'16 Aa s e %�� -egca5 pg5960.52(meas.) - .069.769 deed g4Ioo 555010 60554 L __ No Seale VICINITY MAP Section 31. Twp. 31, Rge. 22 S88 °53'33 "E - 660.68 - 461.02(deed GRAPHIC SCALE 20 b M 5504 eT ( 774 FEET ) 1 Inch e< 40 ft. Alk wes117 559166 NORTH 5201.21 "•- -fence 1.9' east & (pope,' 4.5' of property Mo of thie:'poln1 ` -North line of the 5E1 /4 rl the 571/4 of e� the 5011./4 of Sec. 31, Tw . 31, Ong. 22. At, EX MN 092 5 0077..05 0 KN 007.00 .73 1c 0 A. -fit 0 to 42 g C1447.78 175 9. )I K 6p 1100. 7 PE 0 1� %004.65 --North line of the South 20 rods %5.3§7 -. of the 5E1 /4 of the 5E1 /4 505.50` t f0.5' s 74. shed 12.6' x 10.6'' 690.05 q0 a° %006.06 50p80 ens p6 e permanent sanitary oeweM591y__ _ 1211emenl per doe, no. 543 & referenced 5, do no. 1213145 ", c q pY� fi4rr,, 9a53xz"�44 r 'S, .1.27 9, i5e FM y' deck %556.00 - N fork 65 m dge f gravel ' T - . � 906 ...... ......... . r400 5au1,5e .00.2A1 550.0' 589.91 ,905." Erige of rock v 1 50 '.. i 99904 5004.59.........: e • ea 6 Si 5095.49 TIT 461 111 y .. I y,5o OR 550 568 °47'04'7 'y 9? ?;1t .. permanent serail pe X IO' HOPE .9 - 627.79 -.' - ' � "�" ..easem57t per-, 000'0 • - ^.�... ...•.........'...... doe J.. 1257269 EX 10 1 rF EX MH RE 099.50 E 009.95 05516 r >g5t.gT 50S{I'' qp0,' • -edge Y . n0 ' 7 1 $ � : d9 /.bilumM1raus 5n0e --ASH STREET. (C.SA.hI. `No. 32) 461:02 dead - SEX MN 1. 10 B97 a..9' :oUn oa 1y9�- pegdtor.ntllrmm �L ,1 'P. • '0 01 41 LEGEND L5) D4 1% DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT ' ^:. DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR -�-- DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE ->>---- DENOTES STORM SEWER -X- DENOTES EXISTING FENCE DENOTES CRAWL DENOTES CONCRETE DENOTES BITUMINOUS 01011.2 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION DENOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND, SEE NOTES DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES WELL DENOTES UTILITY P071 DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES UTILITY BOX DENOTES CABLE BOX DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES GATE VALVE Gel I- '00-55360- 1 15 502.50 r -r 7o enup__t__tke':hvdranl J I r �000�1 88_ I PROPER 7T DESCRIPTION The Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 31, Range 2Z, Anoka County, Minnesota. 'PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NOTES: 1- Property is also known as Lots 19, 20, and 21, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County, Minnesota. 2 -No description furnished for parcel known as Lot 20. Gaps or overlaps may exist between adjacent parcels. 3 -Title commitment number 245288 by Chicago Title Insurance Combany furnished for Lots 19 and 21. 4- Parcel No. 1 (Lot 19) as listed in title commitment uses rod measurements instead of Quarter Section subdivision units. Monumentation found in field supports that Quarter Section subdiVion units were used to monument property boundaries. Cops /overlaps may exist with adjoining property lines and with interior parcels. Adjacent property descriptions should be obtained. The boundaries shown on this survey reflect Quarter Section subdivion units. 5- Parcel No. 2 (Lot 21) as listed in title commitment does not close. It appears a call In description was forgotten. The description used for this parcel was the existing property description as shown in permanent sanitary sewer easement per doc, no. 1257269 (see survey). AREA - Total Property Area = 436.7331 sq.R. (10.031 . 4cres) - Less Right -of -Way = 394,1831 sq.ft. (9.051 Acres) 07447450 8Y' ERV CHECK 60 000 J05 NO: 0477300 1 04 7E: 12,03/04 DWG NO:04173pp.deg i SHEET: I of 1 7/30/06 REM5ED ELEV. DA)UM & UOL'S Oita 2 I I BENCNIMARKI � 30 Top Nut Hydrorit of the Southwest combr „l„ of Bucher and o Rd J. 1 al Elevation = 90.67 (NCVD 1929) 1 l NOTES: , 1 eeeia 1-- 30 .o at 7; +'r sf 559.1 >-0 I I 31, Ong. 22 - 2 foot Contour Interval - N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum - Topography Collected in Field by E.G. Rud 8 Sons on November, 2004. - Wetlands delineated by Earth Science Associates, Inc. in October, 2004.(tele: (651) 674 -6210) - Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. - See tree Inventory survey by E.G. Rud & Sons for tree inventory. - Observable eNdence of utilities have been located. No osbuilts obtained for this survey Cali Gopher State One Coll prior to any construction / digging. I hereby certify that this survey; plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the I +ws of the State of Minnesota. Daniel W. Ob hiller Date: / I.;OJCG' Rea. No. 25341 FEB 0 3 2001) CITY OF LINO LAKES ROME, 4 SONS INC. LAUD SURVEYORS 6100 LE744457ON A A.140 GW0GLE POJE6, In6MJE15'JTA E60I4 -702E to RESOURCE INVENTORY MAP, TREE INVENTORY and PHEASANT 6T O1-1_ E6TATES POR: BRUNN CUSTOM HOMES 2161 10PTI -k LANE N.E. SLAIINE, MN 55•4,5 TELE: (T 3) "180 -0323 NW comer of 51/2 of 5E1 /4 TREE REMOVAL. PLAN cif: GRAPHIC SCALE ZONE A ( 194 FEET ) 1 Inch = 40 IL. 4 NORTH EX 56* RE 607.25 ( )its 88704 TEN 607.09 S88 °53'33 "E — 660.68— — 660.52(meas.) — iGp — 859.789(deed L al 5 461 ()Mood - -North Ilne of the SE /4 of the 5E1/4 of Soo. 31. Two 'ya q4, y` 115 11 EX RE 7.70 1E5 9871 7EN 8057 y2° -61 4 40, 45 ▪ 45 00 5 Elh'clrio Aetna( & transformer Ina LT 5. permanent pei l per doe. sewer 1211543 & referenced In • dos. no. 1213145 4.r — FM ref M FM 1 ............... I ✓ t1' r,I rr} rtr T fq 1257249 Ex le APE w e6 ehw _......eriw.:..Cet. ti . _..,CN .......... .... rll wedge of Illundne. ' -ASH STREET (C..A.H. No. 32)- _ 461.02 deed) — existing bituminous - -- 53 ape IE 8051, 1 EY'dr ▪ I I id' EX 9. 15P 8 r LEGEND • DENOTES IR()N MONUMENT FOUND o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET • DENOTES WELL rT3, DENOTES UTILITY POLE 1 DENOTES GAS METER 69 DENOTES UT1LITY BOX 6l DENOTES CABLE BOX El DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX ® DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE 15 DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE cv �j DENOTES GATE VALVE • DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR e6....— DENOTES OVERHEAD 1419E DENOTES STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING FENCE DENOTES GRAVEL DENOTES CONCRETE DENOTES BITUMINOUS DENOTES EXISTING TREE, SEE TREE NOTES lee�i4 T,,..__. T F.... F'ihl,_ t fi DENOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND, SEE NOTES 4a-854E. DENOTES LANDMARK TREE DENOTES TREE REMOVAL LIMITS, LIMITS OF GRADING AND SILT FENCING 51' fit%e (952 - 9955254 DRILLED 011 BRAUN RTEC — 3- 05 EVALUATED WATER LEVELS IN 57-1 IS 892.2 & 893.2 111 ST2 -4 (SEE REPORT DATED 1- 17 -05. y '0a o edge bHaminave 660.74 Tap eat fire l I I E7j 6 "aIP ' Iev. -9u EX 61R E a .. �,.._._ r ..... ...,��.. _ .._ _. DENOTES EDGE OF (ZONE A) PER FEMA FLOOD INS. RATE MAP. NET 2 r -0E- 9aese- I IE 892.50 T TREE NOTES, See tree guide prepared by Kunde Company Inc. (tele: 651 -484 -0114) for individual tree types, sizes, and tree heights. Trees tagged on site in October, 2004 by Kum Company, Inc., and located in field by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. in field in November, 2004. DENOTES TREE REMOVAL LIMITS, LIMITS OF GRADING AND SILT FENCING DENOTES TREE REMOVAL AREA. ALL TREES SHOWN WITHIN 8115 AREA TO BE REMOVED, ALL TREES SHOWN OUTSIDE THIS AREA TO BE PRESERVED. 0911114 81 ONO CHECK 139: MVO JOB NO: 04173PP 1051E: 1/27/06 ONG NO:04173pp.dwg' SHEET ::1 of I BENCHMARK, Top Nut Hydrdnt at the S?uthwest cor�Ier T of- Bucher and.. Co Rd J. Elevation = 911.67 (NGVD 1929) 1 30v I 1 1 1 I I I NOTES, t+ -n R _ . I • I •y1- -E9C +I , a 1 > I EX WI RE 099 Jt, Rng. 22 .4 11 00330 F- 30 EX MN 06 89E50 E 869.95 — 2 foot Contour Interval — N.G.V.D. Vertical Datum — Topography Collected in Ffeld by E.G. Rod & Sons on November, 2004. — Wetlands delineated by Earth Science Associates. Inc. in October, 2004.(tele: (651) 674 -6210) — Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. SOIL TYPES , FROM ANOKA COUNTY SOILS INVENTORY, — SoA = Sederville tine sand _ Zm8 = Zimmerman fine sand _ Iw Loamy wet land DENOTES SOIL DELINEATION LINES FROM ANOKA COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAPS. I hereby certify that this survey; plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am o duly Registered Land Surveyor' under the ) o vas of the State of Minnesota. Daniel W. Obermiller n...... 1/5011/1/ G.n 61n 25,11 1 �::.rrsrmlras prp- FEB 0 e 2006 CITY OF UN° LAKE m a reu • eONS, INC. LAND SURVETORS 91802 L.VC114GTCS4 AYE. NO. CIRCLE PINE?, MIIPIE9OTA 65674 -1626 A PFZELIMIN4i °t' PLAT OP: PigniMASANT STRO7_!. ESTATES FOR: BRAN CUSTOM HOMES 2161 108TH LINE N.E. e1-41NE, MN ,4.41.eB TELE: (163) 180 -0323 GRAPHIC SCALE o tau NORTH (arh-c.rT 1 inch - 40 1L N 88 °53'33" 302.82 A'itticoittr TOWNHOME TYPICALS '5EIBACK& 3D' FRONT TO CURB LINE, 30' SIDE SIREET FROM CURD LINE, 30' REAR YARD, 20' BETWEEN UNITS. PATIOS TO BE W11HIN PROPOSED SETBACKS *UNITS FOUNDATION SIZES MAY VERY SLIGHTLY W1111 FINAL PLANS. .DRIVEWAYS TO BE 30' FROM GARAGE TO CURB MINIMUM. .ALL UNITS ARE SLAB ON GRADE w 2 7 01 f 66.00 C } 40 N O ° yra10 O ^� c' QQ`O rOQN a0 65.00 4 40, toff. F y. <(4 on 40 0 66.00 of r O . °Z 0 '440 E7 a , f 66.00 888 °53'33 "E - 660.68 - 0. PRIVATE DRIVES FRONT SETBACK 30' TO CURB LINT` off' r / ,- 45 t..nO° 24 V' 16 00 !9,45. o ' 0 5 88 °53 6 LOT 29 4 1N88 53'33 /250 -k- TEMP. SAC _3" LOT 29 0 ai 0 a 0 0 I; oa 6 0 0 30 89 8' iS" d I ssl7 _ I I� n 1 589 °28'06 "El °I 16 18 N a 89 °28'16" E 66.00 1 r 66.00 0 'O 5 89°28'16:1E1 o 0 115 ° 1° I 66.00 I at 5 89 °28'16" Er- 1 to 14 ° 66.00 S89;266'16" I 66 13 S89 °28'16 "E w r�I 66.00 h I' 112 66.00 5 89'28'16" E 0o e I O O I , O 0 61.00 k 89 °28'16" E 0 .r 1 10 IS 862016" E 30' SETBACK 01 0 O0 0 DRAIN GE & UTILITY EASEMENT OVERALL OF LOT 29 S 30' -44 0 0 to 8. 39 e O o MO to 0 66.00 -0 -V -y V 1 \ 'd m 5'-a- 00 toyGAR t 24 GAR. 40 40 0 LAB GLA 0 12 t t r;-/,'./4_/;.; ;az4as Alk DRAINAGE & U5LITr k93t;A /4/7/ 4�/ i > � � / • // �a °, 3 // //,,,9,;(;: '/ / /:; / � r 3 _i. NOj /J�I:J / :///://///r/":1C1//:/'144114133 i /��//:'�1�0 '' /AND iao(/, ,g di ( /c1 / ; I:L /r /r /fl/ .c'1LCL1 Ais .d(4_ f 116.16 ; - 3 1 S88 °53'33 "E (1 Ley, /,,11 F I 1 Ste; f 1 ALL r, r,AL , 11 -"i f 1 ` 1 I I 1 1 / AL / r ", 4`�1, \CYP60 1" ., :r "1/ I -db° yI LOCK 1 1J LOT 1 m L No Scale CO. RD. J VICINITY MAP Section 31, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 r_ I 5 8978'16" E • 22 66.00 ' S 8928'16" E 23 S89 "28'16 "E 66.00 2#6. IS 89 °28'16" E 125 S 69°28'16" E I 66.00 0 d O 0 a° 5I89G68016" E 26 66.00 00 a 15 89°28'16" E 0 27 66.00 IS 89°28'16" E 1 28 0 ori 130' S66 0G- - s sg gab ".E 3 1 r.. 7 JA \� Pl ° �aPr;F, o�F' d1 / / 2.74 acres ir/ 119,175 sq. ft. ,// k cv / 5 81590" E 159.54 �4 FI�VATE m ee,5\6,,, � :. m CHINE " - 235.18 S 88 °4704" E °n 50 dTl. z z e) S 88 °47'04" E 5 88 °47'04" Eno 45.00 45.00 45.00 30 45.00 0 CD L 45.00 s w is a0T[] N0 a- roS 0 0 aT 10.0 _ 45.00 5 88 °47'04 "I E 558.94' SETBACK 3 0 tV 00 / 7 4- 0 OS m 6 w o» 0 Q LOT 29 30 BU(LDING SETBACK LINE 3.87 acres 45.00 45.00 168,640 sq. ft. DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT OVER ALL OF LOT 29 86.50 5 88'47'04" E 588 °47'04 "E 68.80 9- =ASH STREET`(C.SA.H. No. 32)-.; a. CounTy7.116a%' ) • LEGEND • 0 m N T DENOTES IR170 MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES WELL DENOTES UTILITY POLE DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES UBLITY BOX DENOTES CABLE BOX DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT ▪ DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE >1 - DENOTES STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING FENCE DENOTES GRAVEL DENOTES CONCRETE DENOTES BITUMINOUS DENOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND. SEE NOTES DENOTES DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE �._:.. , ,HE (`(0. iv ." r N88 °47'04 "W r ASH .:TOE E, ..0 (•(... -r -5 PROPER TI' DESCRIPTION The Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. .PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NOTES: 1- Property Is Olso known as Lots 19, 20, and 21, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County; Minnesota. 2 -No description furnished for parcel known as Lot 20. Caps or overlaps may exist between adjacent parcels. 3 -Title commitment number 245288 by Chicago Title Insurance Company furnished for Lots 19 and 21. 4- Parcel No. 1 (Lot 19) as listed in title commitment uses rod measurements instead of Quarter Section subdivision units. Monumentatlon found in field supports that Quarter Section subdivion units were used to monument property boundaries. Gops / overlaps may exist with adjoining property lines and with interior parcels. Adjacent property descriptions should be obtained. The boundaries shown on this survey reflect Quarter Section subdhi0n units. 5- Parcel No. 2 (Lot 21) as listed in title commitment does not c ose. It appears a call in description was forgotten. The description used for this parcel was the existing property description as shown in permanent sanitary sewer easement per doc. no. 1257269 (see survey). NOTES' - Wetlands delineated by Earth Science Associates, Inc. in October, 2004.(101e: (651) 674 -6210) - Bearings shown are on assumed datum. - Drainage and utility to be dedicated over all of Lot 29, the common assoc. element. DRAWN B1:• ERV CHECK B0 DINO JOB N0: 0417.3PP 'DAM 12/03/04 DWG 140 :04173pp.dwg 1 SNEED/ of 1 AREA - Total Property Areo = 436,7331 sq.R. (10.034 Acres) - Less Right-of -Nay = 394,183± sq.ft. (9.05± Acres) 28 TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS 1 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY NOME 27 PROPOSED TOWNHOMES DENSITY Tolol properly area = 10.03 acres induding existing right of ways 28 Proposed Units Density = 2.8 units /acre I hereby certify that this survey: elan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the Stale of Minnesota. j)j /J r Doniei 1N. Obermiller Date:. //16'LG6 Reg. No. 25341 ( �I 'I/ A• ( NO LAKES l '1 11 1'!"aT.f LID 4 BONe, INc. LAND SURVEYORS Sleet L@XI1.L,TON AVE. NO. CIRCLE_ PINES, MII.34500TA ESOI4 -3b ^.S 40.00 40.00 45.00 w- 45.00-- to - - -- uT ^ ^ 30' SETBACK I� 8 19 20 toi o 12I 45.00 4090, z 40.00 45.00 5 88 °53 6 LOT 29 4 1N88 53'33 /250 -k- TEMP. SAC _3" LOT 29 0 ai 0 a 0 0 I; oa 6 0 0 30 89 8' iS" d I ssl7 _ I I� n 1 589 °28'06 "El °I 16 18 N a 89 °28'16" E 66.00 1 r 66.00 0 'O 5 89°28'16:1E1 o 0 115 ° 1° I 66.00 I at 5 89 °28'16" Er- 1 to 14 ° 66.00 S89;266'16" I 66 13 S89 °28'16 "E w r�I 66.00 h I' 112 66.00 5 89'28'16" E 0o e I O O I , O 0 61.00 k 89 °28'16" E 0 .r 1 10 IS 862016" E 30' SETBACK 01 0 O0 0 DRAIN GE & UTILITY EASEMENT OVERALL OF LOT 29 S 30' -44 0 0 to 8. 39 e O o MO to 0 66.00 -0 -V -y V 1 \ 'd m 5'-a- 00 toyGAR t 24 GAR. 40 40 0 LAB GLA 0 12 t t r;-/,'./4_/;.; ;az4as Alk DRAINAGE & U5LITr k93t;A /4/7/ 4�/ i > � � / • // �a °, 3 // //,,,9,;(;: '/ / /:; / � r 3 _i. NOj /J�I:J / :///://///r/":1C1//:/'144114133 i /��//:'�1�0 '' /AND iao(/, ,g di ( /c1 / ; I:L /r /r /fl/ .c'1LCL1 Ais .d(4_ f 116.16 ; - 3 1 S88 °53'33 "E (1 Ley, /,,11 F I 1 Ste; f 1 ALL r, r,AL , 11 -"i f 1 ` 1 I I 1 1 / AL / r ", 4`�1, \CYP60 1" ., :r "1/ I -db° yI LOCK 1 1J LOT 1 m L No Scale CO. RD. J VICINITY MAP Section 31, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 r_ I 5 8978'16" E • 22 66.00 ' S 8928'16" E 23 S89 "28'16 "E 66.00 2#6. IS 89 °28'16" E 125 S 69°28'16" E I 66.00 0 d O 0 a° 5I89G68016" E 26 66.00 00 a 15 89°28'16" E 0 27 66.00 IS 89°28'16" E 1 28 0 ori 130' S66 0G- - s sg gab ".E 3 1 r.. 7 JA \� Pl ° �aPr;F, o�F' d1 / / 2.74 acres ir/ 119,175 sq. ft. ,// k cv / 5 81590" E 159.54 �4 FI�VATE m ee,5\6,,, � :. m CHINE " - 235.18 S 88 °4704" E °n 50 dTl. z z e) S 88 °47'04" E 5 88 °47'04" Eno 45.00 45.00 45.00 30 45.00 0 CD L 45.00 s w is a0T[] N0 a- roS 0 0 aT 10.0 _ 45.00 5 88 °47'04 "I E 558.94' SETBACK 3 0 tV 00 / 7 4- 0 OS m 6 w o» 0 Q LOT 29 30 BU(LDING SETBACK LINE 3.87 acres 45.00 45.00 168,640 sq. ft. DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT OVER ALL OF LOT 29 86.50 5 88'47'04" E 588 °47'04 "E 68.80 9- =ASH STREET`(C.SA.H. No. 32)-.; a. CounTy7.116a%' ) • LEGEND • 0 m N T DENOTES IR170 MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET DENOTES WELL DENOTES UTILITY POLE DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES UBLITY BOX DENOTES CABLE BOX DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT ▪ DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE >1 - DENOTES STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING FENCE DENOTES GRAVEL DENOTES CONCRETE DENOTES BITUMINOUS DENOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND. SEE NOTES DENOTES DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE �._:.. , ,HE (`(0. iv ." r N88 °47'04 "W r ASH .:TOE E, ..0 (•(... -r -5 PROPER TI' DESCRIPTION The Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. .PROPERTY DESCRIPTION NOTES: 1- Property Is Olso known as Lots 19, 20, and 21, Auditor's Subdivision No. 107, Anoka County; Minnesota. 2 -No description furnished for parcel known as Lot 20. Caps or overlaps may exist between adjacent parcels. 3 -Title commitment number 245288 by Chicago Title Insurance Company furnished for Lots 19 and 21. 4- Parcel No. 1 (Lot 19) as listed in title commitment uses rod measurements instead of Quarter Section subdivision units. Monumentatlon found in field supports that Quarter Section subdivion units were used to monument property boundaries. Gops / overlaps may exist with adjoining property lines and with interior parcels. Adjacent property descriptions should be obtained. The boundaries shown on this survey reflect Quarter Section subdhi0n units. 5- Parcel No. 2 (Lot 21) as listed in title commitment does not c ose. It appears a call in description was forgotten. The description used for this parcel was the existing property description as shown in permanent sanitary sewer easement per doc. no. 1257269 (see survey). NOTES' - Wetlands delineated by Earth Science Associates, Inc. in October, 2004.(101e: (651) 674 -6210) - Bearings shown are on assumed datum. - Drainage and utility to be dedicated over all of Lot 29, the common assoc. element. DRAWN B1:• ERV CHECK B0 DINO JOB N0: 0417.3PP 'DAM 12/03/04 DWG 140 :04173pp.dwg 1 SNEED/ of 1 AREA - Total Property Areo = 436,7331 sq.R. (10.034 Acres) - Less Right-of -Nay = 394,183± sq.ft. (9.05± Acres) 28 TOTAL PROPOSED UNITS 1 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY NOME 27 PROPOSED TOWNHOMES DENSITY Tolol properly area = 10.03 acres induding existing right of ways 28 Proposed Units Density = 2.8 units /acre I hereby certify that this survey: elan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the Stale of Minnesota. j)j /J r Doniei 1N. Obermiller Date:. //16'LG6 Reg. No. 25341 ( �I 'I/ A• ( NO LAKES l '1 11 1'!"aT.f LID 4 BONe, INc. LAND SURVEYORS Sleet L@XI1.L,TON AVE. NO. CIRCLE_ PINES, MII.34500TA ESOI4 -3b ^.S PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN ©F: P12-1EASANIT S''RO11,- MST TE FOR: 5RUNN CUSTOM HOMES 21601 105TH DINE N.E. E31..AIINE/ MN 55.449 TELE: (i6o3) 150 -0323 treOSI W CCWTIT c'L NOT33 fl) PRIOR to 500011 ORAN54 INS)NL Er silo if.NCES N Lecn111A15 11110. A1anaML sal s1OP MUSD RILL E KO RAD w1aE LOCAL m.DITRws MOORE ) excnRA5 rams (1 01 ROUGH 0 SHALL R 0070. ON NI AREA R. AREA DADS 10 MOM 71) OIAAoio Mn A DIMWIT '0041 DAME 100 STEER, 00 0011040 SET DIDD (5)an'1A1n1 IO 00liox 1.7 STOP (ERG, ( 112 0040470 1Y ACONNIAMD IS (6) "MME n0O1N11U1W =MUM MOM Pam 41(5 DE 511E DIM ERN RIARIIRID. (7) FOR 5(00040 RE0J5(110115 or IMOIMIUAL AREAS. EE SIAPP L kI VII 7ae+°.�:+'°1r ROCK CONSTRUCTER! ENTRANCE 1.4114 4411 16T I!NCM xe9AB7 / 611 No Scale VICINITY MAP Section 31, Twp. 31, Rge. 22 POND D ,AI 1 CATCH BASIN INLET CONTROL OPTIONS (OR AMP. 22/100 1, 09 S88 °53'33 "E - 660.68 - cp ALL 400 �s7 F 89505 x0§1 \i 'Er SB %p3t05 &5 and .003' 99511 611.5 011 g3A gFE G P51Y S g NORTH 0. -, .05 1 6 +29.71 • 17 117 ` lge riosj 14�lt daROPOS: 1. "TOWNHOOME let gO0'i x115 .. S.O.G 9e T.0 . =90 2 of At 9.41 I- /"9i -6l N2= 89.46. GV _ +1 TRPrnTl / TR %905.47 5▪ 99 _ 90• 0.11 905.32 ;;4.151 x9s,31 ,02.5 ,030 90 �1E11Ly] 900... Aar, . B, aBra 995.10 ASH STREET•(C.S.AH No 32)-; L_- - - - -t i' - GRAPHIC TSCx1, -E i52511RIMMIVIr"IIIM ', ® 9M010.07 N88 °47'04 W r I 77-7-1 I t 1 4 I ( IN i T) I NOTES, I I 1 loch = 40 IL LEGEND - 2 foot Contour Interval • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND - N.G. V.D. Vertical Datum - Topography Collected in Wield by E.G. Rud & Sons on November, 2004. o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET - Wetlands delineated by Earth Science Associates, Inc. in October, 2004.(lele: i DENOTES WELL - Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. al, DENOTES UTILITY POLE - See tree Inventory survey by E.G. Rud & Sons for tree inventory. O DENOTES GAS METER - Observable evidence of utilities have been located. No osbuills obtained for t Ell DENOTES UTILITY BOX Call Gopher Slate One Call prior to any construction / digging. - Minimum Lowest Floor to be 2' feel above HWL or 4' feet above ® DENOTES CABLE BOX NWL of adjacent ponds, and 1' foot above o controlling EDF. M DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX - All house pads on filled areas shall be designed by a registered IR DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE Professional Engineer and approved by the City of Lino Lakes. - Drainage and Utility easements to be dedicated over, (9) DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EOF's, wetlands and ponding areas, and 10 feet on either DA DENOTES GATE VALVE side of all storm, sanitary, or watermoin not within public D4 DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT R /W's. To be determined upon final site design. • . ,. DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR - All proposed units are propsed to be slab on grade. I -RA.- DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE TREE NOTES »---- DENOTES STORM SEWER x DENOTES EXISTING FENCE See tree guide prepared by Kunde Company Inc. (tele: 651 - 484 -0114) for Individual tree types, sizes, and tree DENOTES GRAVEL heights. Trees tagged on site in October, 2004 by Kunde DENOTES CONCRETE Company, Inc., and located in field by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. In field In November, 2004. DENOTES BITUMINOUS Ice -" DENOTES EXISTING TREE, SEE TREE NOTES we DENOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND, SEE NOTES ao'BOl(E. • DENOTES LANDMARK TREE rs BENC Top Nut Hydran of Bucher and Elevation = 901 (651) 674 -6210) his survey. ----�� DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE DENOTES TREE REMOVAL LIMITS, LIMITS OF r� GRADING AND SILT FENCING 57A° �.A6 (52 995 -2254) DRILLED ONBRAUN -3-05. ' EVALUATED WATER LEVELS IN ST -1 1S 892.2 & 893.2 IN ST2 -4 (SEE REPORT DATED 1- 17 -05. <BER Denotes Emergency Overflow (EDF) A300le19LJIR)E5 FUR INF0.IAATION BA.Br IL n ens01 la RE410111 MOOED 040 PRAM or SA.07 etas ALLO0507 2) C01I11nc1BR SHALL EXERCISE CARE 101A00MZE COMPAC11011 E SOILS 3) FRIAL 0501E MX UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS 4) Ar707 05100 0RwM4 0005 FLUa1 TO 9C TRIED TO EPTI Ore NMIES. 5) USE 11312SOIL/5NI0 MIA FOR DRESSING M LIEU OF TOPSOIL ONL7. 0) 050 SEED Mix 01 FOR AIfRTRAIIO. 0EVEETA101. AFTER 01mmm 0R00e15 AND 5050 WO 010ROUN0 9ASM5 I 51LT FEN, 0001 STREAM AREAS ARE SUMMED. DRAWN BY 080 CHECK BY: OWO JOB NO: 041'1301'1041E. 1/30/06 VIVO N0: 04173pp.dwg I SHEET: 1 of 1 2 ll Ll �... zl 1•,.1 TB 0 3 2006 OF MO LAN ARK, at the Southwest cornlr 67R(IJGVD 1329) I1 0996�%AR£ %1nF' PROPOSED WETLAi' EILL0 - 3,954 01 of wetland fill WETLAND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS` - 2:1 replacement required (7,908 sf) Minn. rule 8420.0546 `PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION, - 2:) replacement required (7,908 sf) - New Wetland Credit proposed (WC) = 3,954 ±s1 Minn. rule 8420.0541, Subp. it - Public Vol* e Credit proposed (PVC) = 3,790±0.(. Minn. rule 8420.0541. Subp. 6 -Buffer easement = 12,797 sL Upland within easement = 3,790 sf. - total replaeement proposed 7.744±04 mllrgalion - DENOTES WETLAND FILL AREAS - DENOTES WEILAND MITIGATION (NWC) - DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER EASEMENT - SEE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN BY EARTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED. Tel: 651- 674 -6210. 517E PLANNING ENGINEERING, I PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 9780 LEXINGTON AFE NE CIRCLE PINES MN 55014-3625 FAX: (763) 786 -6007 (763,1 785 -7043 (STORM 5£IIER &_POND DESIGN) l hereby certify that this pion nos prepared by me or under my direct superOsion and (/10) I am o du /y Licensed Pro- fessional Engine Drtder Ih the SY*(e al Minnesota. RAC G 5CHLFCHi/ G 21r 1/30/06 L/C. NO. 41295 1 hereby certify that this survey; pion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Registered Land Surveyor under th I,ws of th Efate of Minnesota. r-ted• Llj I / /-4•f Daniel W: Obermiller Date: //.36100 Reg. No. 25341 E.<.3.IRUI9 4 eONS, INC. LAND SI.IRVEYORb 9180 1 5*051070N Avg. 1100. CIRCLE PINES, HMNE50Ta 55014 -3650 TEL. (163) 108 -5E65 4,111 (163' 106 -6001 gginWgrallilliiii 117 ` lge riosj 14�lt daROPOS: 1. "TOWNHOOME let gO0'i x115 .. S.O.G 9e T.0 . =90 2 of At 9.41 I- /"9i -6l N2= 89.46. GV _ +1 TRPrnTl / TR %905.47 5▪ 99 _ 90• 0.11 905.32 ;;4.151 x9s,31 ,02.5 ,030 90 �1E11Ly] 900... Aar, . B, aBra 995.10 ASH STREET•(C.S.AH No 32)-; L_- - - - -t i' - GRAPHIC TSCx1, -E i52511RIMMIVIr"IIIM ', ® 9M010.07 N88 °47'04 W r I 77-7-1 I t 1 4 I ( IN i T) I NOTES, I I 1 loch = 40 IL LEGEND - 2 foot Contour Interval • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND - N.G. V.D. Vertical Datum - Topography Collected in Wield by E.G. Rud & Sons on November, 2004. o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET - Wetlands delineated by Earth Science Associates, Inc. in October, 2004.(lele: i DENOTES WELL - Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. al, DENOTES UTILITY POLE - See tree Inventory survey by E.G. Rud & Sons for tree inventory. O DENOTES GAS METER - Observable evidence of utilities have been located. No osbuills obtained for t Ell DENOTES UTILITY BOX Call Gopher Slate One Call prior to any construction / digging. - Minimum Lowest Floor to be 2' feel above HWL or 4' feet above ® DENOTES CABLE BOX NWL of adjacent ponds, and 1' foot above o controlling EDF. M DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX - All house pads on filled areas shall be designed by a registered IR DENOTES MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE Professional Engineer and approved by the City of Lino Lakes. - Drainage and Utility easements to be dedicated over, (9) DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EOF's, wetlands and ponding areas, and 10 feet on either DA DENOTES GATE VALVE side of all storm, sanitary, or watermoin not within public D4 DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT R /W's. To be determined upon final site design. • . ,. DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR - All proposed units are propsed to be slab on grade. I -RA.- DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE TREE NOTES »---- DENOTES STORM SEWER x DENOTES EXISTING FENCE See tree guide prepared by Kunde Company Inc. (tele: 651 - 484 -0114) for Individual tree types, sizes, and tree DENOTES GRAVEL heights. Trees tagged on site in October, 2004 by Kunde DENOTES CONCRETE Company, Inc., and located in field by E.G. Rud & Sons Inc. In field In November, 2004. DENOTES BITUMINOUS Ice -" DENOTES EXISTING TREE, SEE TREE NOTES we DENOTES EDGE OF DELINEATED WETLAND, SEE NOTES ao'BOl(E. • DENOTES LANDMARK TREE rs BENC Top Nut Hydran of Bucher and Elevation = 901 (651) 674 -6210) his survey. ----�� DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE DENOTES TREE REMOVAL LIMITS, LIMITS OF r� GRADING AND SILT FENCING 57A° �.A6 (52 995 -2254) DRILLED ONBRAUN -3-05. ' EVALUATED WATER LEVELS IN ST -1 1S 892.2 & 893.2 IN ST2 -4 (SEE REPORT DATED 1- 17 -05. <BER Denotes Emergency Overflow (EDF) A300le19LJIR)E5 FUR INF0.IAATION BA.Br IL n ens01 la RE410111 MOOED 040 PRAM or SA.07 etas ALLO0507 2) C01I11nc1BR SHALL EXERCISE CARE 101A00MZE COMPAC11011 E SOILS 3) FRIAL 0501E MX UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS 4) Ar707 05100 0RwM4 0005 FLUa1 TO 9C TRIED TO EPTI Ore NMIES. 5) USE 11312SOIL/5NI0 MIA FOR DRESSING M LIEU OF TOPSOIL ONL7. 0) 050 SEED Mix 01 FOR AIfRTRAIIO. 0EVEETA101. AFTER 01mmm 0R00e15 AND 5050 WO 010ROUN0 9ASM5 I 51LT FEN, 0001 STREAM AREAS ARE SUMMED. DRAWN BY 080 CHECK BY: OWO JOB NO: 041'1301'1041E. 1/30/06 VIVO N0: 04173pp.dwg I SHEET: 1 of 1 2 ll Ll �... zl 1•,.1 TB 0 3 2006 OF MO LAN ARK, at the Southwest cornlr 67R(IJGVD 1329) I1 0996�%AR£ %1nF' PROPOSED WETLAi' EILL0 - 3,954 01 of wetland fill WETLAND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS` - 2:1 replacement required (7,908 sf) Minn. rule 8420.0546 `PROPOSED WETLAND MITIGATION, - 2:) replacement required (7,908 sf) - New Wetland Credit proposed (WC) = 3,954 ±s1 Minn. rule 8420.0541, Subp. it - Public Vol* e Credit proposed (PVC) = 3,790±0.(. Minn. rule 8420.0541. Subp. 6 -Buffer easement = 12,797 sL Upland within easement = 3,790 sf. - total replaeement proposed 7.744±04 mllrgalion - DENOTES WETLAND FILL AREAS - DENOTES WEILAND MITIGATION (NWC) - DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER EASEMENT - SEE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN BY EARTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED. Tel: 651- 674 -6210. 517E PLANNING ENGINEERING, I PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 9780 LEXINGTON AFE NE CIRCLE PINES MN 55014-3625 FAX: (763) 786 -6007 (763,1 785 -7043 (STORM 5£IIER &_POND DESIGN) l hereby certify that this pion nos prepared by me or under my direct superOsion and (/10) I am o du /y Licensed Pro- fessional Engine Drtder Ih the SY*(e al Minnesota. RAC G 5CHLFCHi/ G 21r 1/30/06 L/C. NO. 41295 1 hereby certify that this survey; pion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Registered Land Surveyor under th I,ws of th Efate of Minnesota. r-ted• Llj I / /-4•f Daniel W: Obermiller Date: //.36100 Reg. No. 25341 E.<.3.IRUI9 4 eONS, INC. LAND SI.IRVEYORb 9180 1 5*051070N Avg. 1100. CIRCLE PINES, HMNE50Ta 55014 -3650 TEL. (163) 108 -5E65 4,111 (163' 106 -6001 v PHEASANT STROLL ESTATES PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota •T5- H - --PH -- -FN. ICI E> Iv'" PM 794.70 1110RA047 AND VALVE 5429.71 16 -0. PVC 0 6401 1.5- 594.09 M/ 0" CAP n n n n -- PROPOSED TOVA'H� E �1._�Z_I Z__ _L r 1 . 09633 015.0 RIPRV 0/ 113695E FABRIC 'FLOW 80/911, ZONE2A OUTLET COHR5L SRIUCOURE (SEE DETAIL POND AREA 5) PONDING 5 NWL =897.0 9500(=098.82 EOF =899.00 TOP 899.5 >;lk 01/111_=696.14 LOT 29 C6 2 RE 900.50 LE 907.70 \»'*"2iI4. W ET_ 1� } 6MUC11M� ,' dM'99aD ' 1 - 09511_1 1 I‘\ 1 1 111 ii 1 \� II 1 1 1 11 III III I ,. 11 I 1 t. )snr-Re '40 155 I I i \ LE. 0895,0 `¢00(0 t 0r17241nnfr L}+irlr 9 C?�Y.plr N P.EOOXTIE FA9RIC lI 1 7J t 1� II / NIURAM AND VALVE 1 1 NH AL F NL = 891.46, e RC9 12' RC APRON LE. 091.50 6 CY. 816806 M/ (LOIEYNE r48002 Ex 13' RCP EX MR RE 097.70 IFS 98&71 TN 08857 6002E2 VNDING 2 NW1 =896.0 NIYL =B_ 0 7.87 EIOF- -4398. 0 106=898.5 NH. 3 (DROP) 6.5- 904.30 ELLS. 09204 SLE 005.04 ELE 091.94 CULVER, OLEO INIg LLSTINO B' ANr) C44NNE95 NH tttA''' T ADf {5-5 SHORN MR. 1 R.E. 90160 LE M eae.60 LE Wi 089.50 R.E 9 1.20 LE N 091.10 LE OLLT 091.00 ONWNE AND VAL1£ 1 8' t Om MERMAN CCAMEC9 1D I 6. OF RATER M' TAPPING • AND STEM. 9 PROPOSED TOWNHOME WNHOME H194ANT AND VAL LOT 29 O.E. 416.30 1.1 89547 15' Ne APRON LE 00190 40 -5 • RC( 0.320 EX AN 99.50 RP 009.95 15" RC APRON LE. 90178 EA d0CEAIAIIN rH r1 STTMEEf. (C SA.H. No. 32) EX FE'96VO I- - R 89S11 I EX 9' v5� A 1 10(19 4(1(55 0E90655 oats AR. A* • SNGLE 19505_ T NN -lr p. ?-mmIxi CASERLNT 0T NOUS n5- S >- S!1- s_i=-- S- I�d•l�t� EXI> 6 1. 1 _ `� ->- ��I-� EX 50 W I A' 09260 1 1 1 CANNA a tr t9614iL. WI R FT PAP GUfrAL.l. er4 ,L IZATICN 9097 TO 1.6.LE, CONCRETE SPILLWAY DO A DWI it C InaswtOml LOHLRE5E PIPE T1E5 Alt 31456 LEGEND: 0 Existing Wotermoin Existing Sanitary Sewer Existing Storm Sewer Proposed .Walermoin Proposed ' Sanitary Sewer Proposed Storm Sewer EXIsting Hydrant Proposed Hydrant Existing Sanitary Manhole Proposed Sanitary Manhole Proposed Catch Basln /Manhole Existing Gas Line Existing Overhead Wires D -412 CURB & GUTTER (TYPICAL) 3A1R wing 1/r RAD. -r- r GRAPHIC SCALE r RE, 995.99 'eee.3O r - OUTImET CIONTROL - STRUCTURE (NOT TO 904115) 7•40 AREA 15' -12" RCP 0 10.09 12' -15" RCP • 950% 0%.0 897.0 e" R i1 0710) 24' -I5- Rr9 0 500 904.0) 7.1 -12' RIP 0 0.0% n MS^ 000.75 STRUCTURE SCHEDULE N0. DESCRIPTION CASTING OUTLET POND AREA 5 48" DIA. METAL GRATE OUTLET POND AREA 2 48" DIA. METAL GRATE C63 48 DIA. METAL GRATE C52 2'03' RECT. NEENAH R -3067 NEENAH 12-3067 CB1 48" DIA. W/ SLAB TOP ( BI FEET) 1 Inch = 40 It. GENERAL NOTES: 1 I) THE NFORUA1ON SNOW EN AIFSt ORAINIMS CONCERNING not NA LOCA9O4 Or EXIS11NG UO:I1IE515 H01 OAA9AN1® le RE ACCURATE 07 ALL 015IN"IVE THE 00111RACRW IS 9E4`0151IE FOR NA81NG HIS OWN OEIDIUMAIO4 AS 10 714E THE AN0 LOCATION OF UNITIZES AS MAY 0E MCESSMi TO AWIO IMAM 10 111Eis 91113525. 2) CONTACT 60695(11 5501E ONE -CALL AT 051- 454 -0002 FOR COSMIC tiny 1019510545. 3) 712 CONTRACTOR STALL FISLU VERIr5 FEE, L0CA15011, AND NEI/AII94 Or FASTING SANITARY SEWER RATER MAR, AND STOW SERER AND NOTIFY 05*150 ER OF ANY 0C{REPATOIES PRIOR 10 115E START Or NSTAU.\0tJ5S. 4) NSFAUA0N45 551711 COMM! TO 711E CRY ENCINRP.S ASSOCIATION IF T9595(5910 50(AN) STANDARD UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS (1909 EDITION) A10 HE on Or RAMSEy 510150000 5P9ancnnas. 5) COl1RAC9OP SHALL 94DT0Y On or 1050 LANES 9500150 WORKS 090150 041 AT (95i) 002 -0400 A WNW 0= 24 HOURS 99509 T9 ANY N1ERRUFROH OF SANITARY 5E91S On WATTS 097590 TO (A5TRID outs OR MUSINESSIS. STORM SEIER NOTES: 1) 550'1 5(1104 551015' 85- RCP (cuss 10 WN0RN1 OR TRIPE UNLESS 0111(510009 00500 d1 710515. 2) STORM SEWER LENGTHS PEWEE RE LAYN . LENGTH Or THE APRON. 3) F FTELD SMRG 695895 ,AOot 52 NANO WERTT0090469955 955Y50 osti4ErANCICS POOL 10 195E 59001 W OWSMRC55r/t 4) LAIL11 000551 PO (000 OD IRE CR MALL 56 0 Am SCf,DI 117 =RI DETAAN NOTE: CONTRACTOR 5H :011 5-010 YEP.Ir, LOCATION AIM ELEVA094 Or 5-001010 501115097 SEWER AND RAIE0MAN ALA' HORFY (NOI4EER Or ANY DISCREPANCIES moon 1 57017 OF *151AL5TIOn. ! FEB 0 3 2006 MTV OF LINO LAKES WAIE1) MAIN 901E 1) 00955010 404040w M 7.5 FEET Or 00551 OVER 00100 SEANCE 2) WATER MINIM TO BIIAD0105 FULL BE 1' CO UNLESS 07116105E 001(0. 3) WQIMUS Or ANT DISCA5A0CIE5 PRI0n 50 TLE �I OF NOTIFY 750040)0000051' SANITARY SEWED MOTFS 8 EA5e1415 SANITARY SEWER LOCATIONS STALL 0E MOM N 1170 PRIM. 10 0005510001951. 2) SANITARY SERER( 59501' TO 00100055 MA1 PE 4' Pee 5^JIEIARE 40 NLE55 011.0__ 50010. 3) 21E0 05055 LO'APOI, SI& AIM WEPT ELEVATION DT EXISTING SANITARY 00960 AND 5150 00 (IGNITER or ANY 01SCRERAICFS PRINT 00 4t START M 1955505050051 s T AN2.B178MINOUs 801ES' 7) SAN-CUT EXISTING BM51BNDU5 AN0 CONCRETE CURB m MONDE Bun - 49151. 2) REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF EA55NC STREET IIA5E1IA15 AS RE0JId5 FOR C91S5NUCn9N I5 R4o0ENTA. 3) RESTORE N BED SR EEl TO EY15TIN0 OR BEM SECTION PS 4) CONTRACTOR SNAIL 105E TRAme CONTROL MEASURES (N ACCORDANCE WiIH ITT '6119173010 MOWN_ Or IIMr0261 UOTTIC MORGL OEN2(5 ") 65 NELE55ARY *7*015VEH COMM, MINTY. OR PAYING OPERATORS ENCROACH ONTO ADJACENT STREETS. CURB NOTFSi, 1) BAC0 -0059 OF OMOS WITH 04 -5119 MAIFRI055 15 NOOENTAL TO CURB CONSIRUC0ON. 2) CURB 040 SUTTER SHOWN MALL Et 0412 IINIE55 901ERMS5 Ht/TED 951 PLANS. DEMMME15 Tin Ga' DRAWS BM CA4L CNECIED 900 CTS. 000,£(0 NO 04009 1 hereby certify thot this 195050 90I erepored kV ne 0^ under ny erect Huper,'lslon nod /het 1 a duly L5Censed Pruressl9,0I Engineer yer the, 5009109 00e 5tote 09 50Innes0i0. 2Rr17�r� �_ mt'g, 1/30/05 105.9515E 0 41095 _a SITE FLAMMNS PLOWE ENGINEEF11NG, INC. 9100 1E00151101 AVENUE NE. CIRCLE FINES RN 55014-36E5 9 07635 1700607 9P9FARER BRUPPI CUSTOM HOMES 01E1 100th Lone NE 850151E, NN 55449 Phone (763) 700 -0323 0915-' 1/30.116 MCI c1 • • Pheasant Stroll Preserve Special Resource Concerns Attachment 11 0.3 0 0.3 0.6 Miles 0 Pheasant Stroll Location Map Q Parcels Blandings_Activitypatches. Blandings_Breedingpatches Q Flood Plain . Pheasant stroll soils.shp Iw SoA ZmB PHEASANT STROLL ESTATES STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) and EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Lino Lakes, Minnesota GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE 1. The Pemdllee(s) (either the owner or operator) must roulinoy imp.cl the construction elle once every seven (7) days during active construction, and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. 2. All inspections and mointenonce conducted during conetrucUon moat be recorded In fling and these records must be retained with he SWPPP n oceodande wan RECORD DETENTION R.caras of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: snail inane: o. Dote end lime inspections: b. Nome of person(s) conducting inn:salio00; c. Findings of Inspections. including recommendations for corrective 006(000; d Corrective action taken (including dotes, Ines. and party completing mon/enonce 0.6108ea): e. Dote end amount of minfet events greater than 1/2 Inch (0.5 inches) in 24 hops; and L Documentation of changes made to the SWPPP. 3. Where parts of the eansroclion the hove undergone final stabilization, but work remain. an ether pans of the site. inspections of the mobilized areas may be reduced to on. per month. Where work has been suspended the to frozen ground condition., the required inspection. and m086000nn must lake Mae en soon Gs runoff occurs et the site or prior to resuming construction. whichever comes find 4. All erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs must be 8.0.06ed to ensure Integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctional BMP. must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented with functional BLIP.. The Pennilee(s) must investigate and comply with the following neee.. and maintenance requMment.. a All sit fences must be repaired, replaced or supplemented when they became nonfunctional (destine teas, detach berm pas. post became dlslddged tram r.p08s must be madesediment within 2reaches ope lof discovery, height r as Boon 69900. e the ft0d These conditions d0• accesses o b. Temporary and permanent sedimentation pan. must be drained and the dimenl .moved then the depth of the sediment clotted in the basin readies 1/2 the storage Tokens Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery or as sop as field conditions Wow ocean. AMENDMENTS TO SWPPP The Pennine.(.) must amend the SWPPP as necessary to holude additional requirernthts, such as addltionol or Identified or a dress situations whenever: lied BMPc, designed to correct problems 1. There le 0 change in design. construction, operates, maintenance. nether or nom conditions that has o significant elect on the discharge of poeulants to surface waters or underground enders, 2. Inspection. or investigations by M. operators. local, slate or federal of Wale indicate the SWPPP is not effective in Mnentng or signifie0n11y minimizing he discharge of pollutants to wrbee rater. or underground waters or hat he d8enarges are causing water quality standard e0ceedancen. or 3. The SWPPP l nal achieving the general objectives of controlling pollutants in storm water discharges 0.eaclobd with construction actMty, or the SWPPP Is not consistent with the terms and conditions of his perm6L 4. Al any time after permit coverage b .90.6(ve, the YWCA may determine that the propel'" storm water dbchages may cause. have reosonoNe potential to come, or contribute to non - attainment of any applicable water quolhy standard. If 149CA makes an a determination, the MPCA ell notify the Pemittes(s) In writing. In response, the Permillea(e) 1110111 4evelap 0 supplemental BMP actin plan or appropriate SWPPP amendments describing SWPPP modl.alians to address the identified concerns and submit information requested by the MPCA. which may Maxie an individual permit application. 11 MPCA'et written notification requires o response, failure to respond within he specified lnehome constitutes a permit violation. FINAL STABILIZATION The Permltee(s) must ensure find alab9ealion of the site. The Pennitee(s) must submit a Notice of Termination within 30 dogs after 0nol slob9izo(on is complete, or another owner /operator (Permlttee) has assumed control over dl areas of the site that hove not undergone Mal etabiizatian. Final etabilitotion con be achieved in one of the following ways. c Surface waters. including drainage ditches and conveyance systemm., must be inspected for evidence of mine. bang deposited by erosion. The Permitee(e) must remove all deltas and .edenent deposited in writhe waters, Including ' drainage ways. Balch basins. and other drainage systems, and rentable. the areas where sediment remover result. In ennead wt. The removal and stabilization must take peace within seven (7) dap of d8rnvery teens precluded by legal. regulatory, or physical onus constraints The Permltee Mall use el reasonable efforts to obtain access. 11 precluded, removal and stab9holnn must take place within sewn (7) colander dor of obtaining anew. The Permitee Is reponeibIo for contacting all local, regional state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work. d. Conet,o06. e6e vehicle exit locations must be inspected for evidence oft -site ...Anent tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed horn W off-site paved surface., within 24 hours of discovery, or N applicable, within a shorter time e. The P.rmittes() are reaoonabls for the operation and maintenance of temporary end permanent voter quality management BMP.. 0e well as all eroela0 prevention and sediment control BMPS, for the auratbn of the construction work at the sits The PermBl..(a) are ruponelble tenth another Pennine has assumed control ow areas Of the Ste hot have not been finny stabilized or the Me has undergone Meal stabilization. and a Notice of Termination hos been submitted to the MPCA (sea TERMINATION OF COVERAGE). L If nannenl escapes the contraction Me, of -site ocumeo0one must be mono.. in o manner and of a frequency sufficient to minimize off -site Woo.. (e.g., xptHe sediment h street" could be washed into etarm sewers by the need rah and/or pane a safety hazard to users of public .true). 5. M in998.0.. areas must be nspected to ensure that no uakmnt from ongoing construction activities . reaching the infiltration woo and these areas ore protected Irons eam900(10n duo to construction equipment driving across the h6lrallon area. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Pamitee(s) ehdl Implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site: 1. Slid Bostic Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings. floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must corrupt with MPCA disposal requirements. 2 Hazardous Materials. OIL gaeolne. paint and any hazardous ...tones. mot be properly stored. Including seeondory containment to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted oases to Morage areas mini be provided to prevsnl vandalism. Stereo. and dipopl of hazardous waste mot be M compliance nth MPCA regulations. .3 External wohing of trucks and other contraction within must be limited to a defined area of the sits. Runoff mu01 be contained and wane properly deposed al. No engine dsgrea0,9 is thawed on Me. DEWATERINC AND BASIN DRAINING 1. D.o01 Nog or [mein draining (e.9.. pumped discharges. trench /ditch auto for drainage) related to the conetmctin activity that may hove turbid or sediment laden dlemarge water must be discharged to a temporary or permanent sedemnlalbn bone an the project site whenever possible. II the voter dermal be discharged to o sedimentation bee prior to entering the surface water, it must treated wih the appropriate NAP, such that the dischage does not adversary affect the receiving water or downstream tondownas The Permillee(s) must ensure that discharge point. are adequa105 protected from erosion and scour. The discharge oust be dispersed over natural reek 069,09, nand bags. plastic Meeting or other accepted energy d.ipollan measure.. Adequate esdimentalion control manures are required for discharge water that contains emended solids. 2 Al water Nom dewatering or base draining activities mot be discharged in n manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion In receiving channels or on downslope properties, or inundation in wetlands causing signtli0nt adverse impact to the wetland. • • SiTE SPECIFIC EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 81fE BFOfMAATNN This project w11 consist of the canetnec n of 1 slope family tot, and 27 lownhomes. Two etarrnivater ponds and one Infiltration besin ore proposed for this site, which rO collect the majority of hard surface run -ali (minus soma roof drainage). The proposed prows aria bash w1l proWde rote cont. and sedimentation end outiel to he coining wetlands on and ddjocenl to he site. 5o0 disturbing cavil.; wN nclude. 6sldaten of a rode construction entrance; n0(090(nn of sift fence when surface run -oli loons .11e; site grading (t include the impart of material): storm sewer; install wotemon and sonitery sewer, building construction including (.0060lion excavation. drivswoy construction; and preparation for lure restoration. TRANSFER ROW TO COUNTY 300 IMPERVIOUS ElEOU@10E OF BITE MADNO AND MAJOR AC NITES 1. Prior to any grading operations, the contractor ehd hatch a rook construction entrance and perimeter sit fence as Mown on plan. (Contact CRy to inspect erosion control measure. U neces.ay) Aoiltlenal sit knee 0007 be nsceuary If local conditions require. 2. Excavate pending area and install slit stop fence around pond at proposed NS&L elevation. 3. Perform remainder of she grodng on on ado- by-area bolds to minimize uncompleted moos As each area Is completed. all exposed sons must hove temporary erosion control protection or permanent cover according to the following time table: 1. All soil disturbing at the site have been completed and all roils must be stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover Nth o density of 70 percent over the Mire previous surface area, or ether equ8SMt means necessary to prevent sal failure under ernes conditions and; s All drainage ditches, constructed to drain water from he site after construction k complete, meet be stabilized to preclude erosion; b. M temporary amble.., and structural ero9on prevention end sediment control Beet Management Plane (wen os Wt fence) must be removed as pat of he sits final stabilization; and e. The Permilee(s) must Neon out ail sediment from conveyances and from temporary sedimentation basins that ore to be used as permanent rater quality management basins. Sediment noel be stabilized to prevent R from being washed back into the bosh. conveyance and drainage wop Wachorgng off -stn or to saf0ee woes. The clean out of permanent basins mum be sufficient to return the basin to anIgn capacity. 2 For r ielen nl construction only, final stablealbn hos been ochiewd when temporary erosion protection ore down gradient perimeter control for individual lob hos 6000 completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally, he Pennies must d11nbute the MPCA 'homeowner fool Meet" to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need far, and benefits of, find alabt.aUon. RECORD DETENTION The 50,999. all change" to R. end Inspections and maintenance records mot be kept at the site dung construction by the Permit. who has operational control of that potion of the site. The SWPPP con be net in either the ffe10 office of in on on-site vehicle. NI owner(s) most keep the SWPPP. along with the IWowng additional records. an Be for three (3) years after submitted of the NOT as .Utned In TERMINATION OF COVERAGE The OMs not Include any records after submittd of the NOT. 1. My other permll0 required for the project; 2. Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted curing construction 3. M permanent opero(bn and mantenenee agreements that rove been implemented, including all right of way. contract. covenants, and other b00(09 rsqukomenb regarding perpetual maintenance; and 4. All required calculation for deele l of the temporary and permanent slam water management syetems. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE Permlltee(s) wishing to terminate coverage under hie permit must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) to the MPCA Competence Mlh the permit is rupee. ante a NOT is submitted. The Perm9tes(s) wlhorkotn to dichane odor this permit terminates at midnight 61 the day the NOT is signed. 2. All Pamllleo(s) must submit a NOT within thirty (30) clap after one or mare of the following conditions hove been met 0. Feral Stabilization has been °thieved on all portions of the she for which the P.rmltee le responsible (9dudny the removal of all temporary erosion control measures such as 101 len.. and If applicable, returning agricultural land to Its pa construction agriculture' use); b. Mother owner /operator (Permit.) hos assumed control according to Part 8.8.5 of MPCA Permit No. MN 9100001 ow 011 areas of the the that hove not been Melly stabilized; or 0. For residential denetrunian only, temporary erosion protection and don prescient perimeter control for individual lots has ben completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally. the Pemnilee mot dietrfbute the MPCA's "homeowner .ct9set' to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, Mal stabilization. TYPE OF SLOPE TIME. Steeper than 3:1 10:1 to 3:1 Not Allowed 14 dojo Flotler thon 10:1 21 days • MOeiwm time on Sea n remain wen wnen lee one le t 00.1hely bang wake0.) A0 sod. seed, mulch and /.enal condom following MODOT specification" as modified EROSION CONTROL LEABUFEB BITil1CC7URAl. PRAClICE8 1. Slit Fence - will be in.lthed error to any grading activities along the perimeter of those portions of the she which are downstream of storm, water run -off. 2. Storm water Management - Storm wafer . to be enamel/ and routed to 0 9(0Fmw0le, pond and Infiltration basins that ant to be constructed for this site. The p0069 /basins .11 provide rote control before exiling into the existing wetland. 5. be Storm an nMed rot the storm wear outlet into Me pond 00 9 91Permonent melon il control measure 11EM BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION TOTAL SITE AREA 10 ACRES 9 ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPERVIOUS 0.90 ACRES 2.70 ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED PERVIOUS 9.10 ACRES 6.30 ACRES 300 IMPERVIOUS ElEOU@10E OF BITE MADNO AND MAJOR AC NITES 1. Prior to any grading operations, the contractor ehd hatch a rook construction entrance and perimeter sit fence as Mown on plan. (Contact CRy to inspect erosion control measure. U neces.ay) Aoiltlenal sit knee 0007 be nsceuary If local conditions require. 2. Excavate pending area and install slit stop fence around pond at proposed NS&L elevation. 3. Perform remainder of she grodng on on ado- by-area bolds to minimize uncompleted moos As each area Is completed. all exposed sons must hove temporary erosion control protection or permanent cover according to the following time table: 1. All soil disturbing at the site have been completed and all roils must be stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover Nth o density of 70 percent over the Mire previous surface area, or ether equ8SMt means necessary to prevent sal failure under ernes conditions and; s All drainage ditches, constructed to drain water from he site after construction k complete, meet be stabilized to preclude erosion; b. M temporary amble.., and structural ero9on prevention end sediment control Beet Management Plane (wen os Wt fence) must be removed as pat of he sits final stabilization; and e. The Permilee(s) must Neon out ail sediment from conveyances and from temporary sedimentation basins that ore to be used as permanent rater quality management basins. Sediment noel be stabilized to prevent R from being washed back into the bosh. conveyance and drainage wop Wachorgng off -stn or to saf0ee woes. The clean out of permanent basins mum be sufficient to return the basin to anIgn capacity. 2 For r ielen nl construction only, final stablealbn hos been ochiewd when temporary erosion protection ore down gradient perimeter control for individual lob hos 6000 completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally, he Pennies must d11nbute the MPCA 'homeowner fool Meet" to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need far, and benefits of, find alabt.aUon. RECORD DETENTION The 50,999. all change" to R. end Inspections and maintenance records mot be kept at the site dung construction by the Permit. who has operational control of that potion of the site. The SWPPP con be net in either the ffe10 office of in on on-site vehicle. NI owner(s) most keep the SWPPP. along with the IWowng additional records. an Be for three (3) years after submitted of the NOT as .Utned In TERMINATION OF COVERAGE The OMs not Include any records after submittd of the NOT. 1. My other permll0 required for the project; 2. Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted curing construction 3. M permanent opero(bn and mantenenee agreements that rove been implemented, including all right of way. contract. covenants, and other b00(09 rsqukomenb regarding perpetual maintenance; and 4. All required calculation for deele l of the temporary and permanent slam water management syetems. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE Permlltee(s) wishing to terminate coverage under hie permit must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) to the MPCA Competence Mlh the permit is rupee. ante a NOT is submitted. The Perm9tes(s) wlhorkotn to dichane odor this permit terminates at midnight 61 the day the NOT is signed. 2. All Pamllleo(s) must submit a NOT within thirty (30) clap after one or mare of the following conditions hove been met 0. Feral Stabilization has been °thieved on all portions of the she for which the P.rmltee le responsible (9dudny the removal of all temporary erosion control measures such as 101 len.. and If applicable, returning agricultural land to Its pa construction agriculture' use); b. Mother owner /operator (Permit.) hos assumed control according to Part 8.8.5 of MPCA Permit No. MN 9100001 ow 011 areas of the the that hove not been Melly stabilized; or 0. For residential denetrunian only, temporary erosion protection and don prescient perimeter control for individual lots has ben completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally. the Pemnilee mot dietrfbute the MPCA's "homeowner .ct9set' to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, Mal stabilization. TYPE OF SLOPE TIME. Steeper than 3:1 10:1 to 3:1 Not Allowed 14 dojo Flotler thon 10:1 21 days • MOeiwm time on Sea n remain wen wnen lee one le t 00.1hely bang wake0.) A0 sod. seed, mulch and /.enal condom following MODOT specification" as modified EROSION CONTROL LEABUFEB BITil1CC7URAl. PRAClICE8 1. Slit Fence - will be in.lthed error to any grading activities along the perimeter of those portions of the she which are downstream of storm, water run -off. 2. Storm water Management - Storm wafer . to be enamel/ and routed to 0 9(0Fmw0le, pond and Infiltration basins that ant to be constructed for this site. The p0069 /basins .11 provide rote control before exiling into the existing wetland. 5. be Storm an nMed rot the storm wear outlet into Me pond 00 9 91Permonent melon il control measure 11EM 1 Ecw1cATION AND NOTES Sod 3879 Seed 3876 For Pending Arson (NW. -HWL) Mixture VA (at 5 los /acre) Mixture WI (at 6 los /asre) For Pending Areas (HIM..-top of slope) For General Areas Mixture Old 500 (50 Ibs /Sae) For Infiltration and Mitigation Areas Mixture WI (5 Ibs /acre) Mulch 3582 (Type 1 - Dec Anchored 2 tons /acre) •Fertilizer 3881 Fertilizer is not 'nommended for na1Ne see areas ht Induce weeds The contractor Mob pay special attention to W adjacent properly lines and the slam ewer from the proposed pond to the re6end.. The contractor mot make sae he erosion contra practice. Mince in those areas pr..nb migration of esdnent onto edp0ant properties and wetlands. If any copes appear to be falling, oddIlia to NH fence, ea9ment logs and erasion control blanket MW be added as needed The contractor shoe maintain and rpoir all alt fence (including the removal of emenulaled adamant) until vegetation is established and the site Is •lablized. (see ales INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE). 4, Remove accumulated sediment from pending area upon stabilization of upstream areas. 5, Upon grading completion the contractor shun provide native tope. seed, and mulch anchored with a straight eat disc within 48 hours of final grading. 6. Excess sal sheen be treated Ilse other exposed sal and stabilized within 72 hum. ADDITIONAL N0T15 FOR INFILTRATION BASIN: 1) BASIN TO RETAIN UNLINED (NO MINING OF 5A1401 SOILS ALLOWED). 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE TO MINIMIZE COMPACTION OF SOILS. 3) FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABIU2Ai1OF1 OF UPSTREAM AREAS. 4) AFTER FINAL GRADING. BASIN FLOOR TO DE TILLED TO DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 5) USE TOPSOIL/SAND MIX FOR MESSING IN LIEU OF TOPSOIL ONLY. 6) USE SEED MIX WI FOR INFILTRATION REVECETA1ION. 7) AFTER FINAL ARE GRADING AB1) SEEDING SURROUND BASINS WITH SILT FENCE UNTIL 7 OTHER CONTROLS 1. Conslruelion Waste Materials - All waste materials generated as a result of the construction shall be collected and removed according to all local and /or state waste management regulalfdms by o licensed solid waste management company. The contractor Mil ensure that MI elle personnel ore instructed in thew procUcee. 2. Hazardous WoObs - All hazardous wale materials Mall be stored properly to prevent spin and va do1.m. Shen n t.sary. hazardous wastes will be disposed of in the manner specified by local end /or crate reg./tattoo or by the manulocturer. 3. Suntory Waste - NI sanitary waste w81 be enacted Tram the portable uMe by a local, licensed water management company, as required by local regulation. 4. OHsits Vehicle Tracing - A rock conelructnn entrance has bee, provided to help reduce vehicle tracking of "edema . The paved street adjacent to he en entrance moll be swept on an ae- nestled boss, or oe determined by the City. Dump frocks hauling loose materials (sand. topsoil, etc.) l0 and /or hen the site Mall be cowed with o tarpaulin. 5. Vehicle Cleaning - No engine degreasing is allowed on -sle. Extem6 washing of vehicles to be confined to a defined area ('bane yard') on -she. INSPECTIONS MO IMINIBUNCE PROCEDLMES (A.0 sw'kwPeobr1 end 14ieenmae' under 'AL BROOM AIM 8E wear CONTROL) The 1d1own9 ore the Inspection and enohlenance practices that w91 be used l0 melanin erasion and sediment contras • MI control measures -00I b0 nspertad- a(-ieast once-each -week Ond1WOwn9 any storm even of 0.5 inches or greater. • All measure 01111 be molntotned in good working amen if a repair is necessary, it will be n1Uate* within 24 huure or report • Built up sediment Mel be remand from silt fence when it has reached one-third (1/3) the height of the fence or on-third depth of fabric in catch basin. • 591 fence eel be hp.0led for depth of sediment. teas. to sea 8 the fabric is 'carroty attached to he fence posts, and to see that the fence pone are firmly in the ground. • Temporary seeding and planing eel be npected for bore pots, washouts. and healthy 9rewlh. • A maintenance report will be made after each Mpeefwn. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION I) Allowed. waking hours shoal be In confamonce to the City of Lino Lakes requirements. 2) All siopee an-sle Mall be 3:1 maximum. TflittivveT p EROSION CONTROL NOTES FRO9O41 C0N1RIS N0107 h IMP 4MrtITA11Wi msan (1) MCP 70 Roust OIADN. INSTALL 50.1 STOP FENCES N LOCATIONS SHOWN ADDITIONAL SILT 510P FENCES 1M11 9E REWIRED WOE LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE (2) EXCAVATE PONDS. (3) ROUGH GRADING SHALL PROCEED ON Ali AREA BY AREA BASIS TO MNa0ZE UNCOMPLETED AREAS. (4) AS ANCHORED WITH A GRADED. SETT DI5CN VS1164 114 DAYS 01 FI AND MULCH NAL CRADN6. (5)1MAINT R D REPAIR STOP O1FENCES INCLUDE TIE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED (6) REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM POND AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. (7) FOR MECUM REOUNEMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL AREAS, SEE SWPPP rerelw r.n . r M 1 Ye 2' mu or NO Iww. M0. 4' men. epode, Wee nook Neereeneol. • me NM. le f} phi. N. Is 90el nurs eve e. eel Neves 00 M Mrs. /NW INN - uwme wear sy'MwrIoolen et a' Nome IN NM M tar Mph ONara Wet i °sea et DUN No Me INN w nos W wAwe9. ICU ON cm le M 0910.0 SILT _FENCE T1k ne IMO On IT 1 Mm In .0 111.7 PROlydnal. IwTM 110ee101. Y1.F altar ewmletwNN f011Nee.T 9070* gem r.0,m .T"" .., IIIRCLARLIINA11.0112G.JMELSZsomoun CATCH BASIN INLET CONTROL OPTIONS (UR APPROVED 60VAL) DESIGNED 811 CC.2. M NW D1: CAU. ammo 811 00.2. PRLLECT N0: 04559 04TE REy4S/0V hereby certify that this pion nos prepared by me or under direct supervision end that I Om a duly Licensed Professional Engineer ur}psr the lows of the Slate of Minnesota. • DATE. / ff+rmlr' e CRAIG G. 1/30/05 CHL /CHTINC L /CENSE 1 41295 SITE PUNNING ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 5.180 LEXINGTON AVENUE N.E. CIRCLE PINES MN 55014 -3625 PHONE: (763) 786-0073 PREPARED FOR: BRUNN CUSTOM HOMES 2161 108th Lane NE Blaine, MN 55449 Phoned (763) 780 -0353 DATE: 1/30/06 SHEET C2 POLICY PLAN NATURAL ENVIRONMENT The natural environment resources are of major importance within Lino Lakes. Their proper preservation and utilization as valuable community amenities, or conversely, as areas in which natural barriers present development constraints, become the focus for which guidance by the following goals and policies are determined. These goal and policy statements are supplemented by the Brauer and Associates Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. Goals 1. Protect the environmental quality of Lino Lakes while accommodating moderate growth. 2. Preserve the open character of Lino Lakes through the preservation of natural open space and the establishment of greenway corridors. 3. Promote biodiversity through the use of native plant materials and other materials where appropriate. 4. Utilize the Chain of Lakes Regional Park as an aesthetic and recreational community amenity while preserving the park's biosystems. 5. Integrate new development with the City's natural environment in a compatible manner. 6. Maintain and when feasible, improve the City's water resources. 7. Protect and maintain natural wetlands, ponding areas and drainageways in an effort to establish a community -wide storm drainage system. In planning development consider possible effects on the natural plant and animal populations, particularly species of special concern. Policies General 1. Conduct an environmental inventory and prepare an ecological restoration and management plan of the City. Quantify and rank the environmental resources of Lino Lakes. These documents will be adopted as addendum to the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE LINO LAKES 22 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 1 POLICY PLAN 2. City regulations on density, lot size, open space preservation, and development design shall be used to protect natural features important to the community and vital to desirable development. 3. Integrate new development to the natural characteristics of the land to enhance the development through the preservation of attractive natural amenities (i.e., wetlands, waterways, wooded areas, slopes, etc.). Consider new development regulations that serve to preserve unique natural areas. 4. Promote low impact lighting with new development. Light should be reflected downward to prevent glare or light spillage on adjoining properties, rights -of -way, or skyward. 5. Promote greenway planning to protect environmentally sensitive areas of the City, to preserve natural area and open space, and to define neighborhoods: a. Generally define greenways in the Comprehensive Plan. More detailed definition of greenway boundaries will occur through the City's Environmental Survey /Management Plan and the development process. b. Greenways should be of a size and configuration to protect the natural amenities within the greenway, provide wildlife corridors and provide linkages to the Chain of Lakes Regional Park, other designated greenways, natural areas, and other cities. c. Greenways will be protected through the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Local Water Management Plan, conservation easements and development regulations including zoning, subdivision, shoreland, floodplain, and wetland preservation. d. Uplands within greenways may be preserved through voluntary donation, conservation easements, park land dedication or the transfer of development rights to the areas of the City more suitable for development. e. The City needs to develop a policy on design, ownership, maintenance and funding of greenways. Some greenways might not have trails. f. Pursue available grant programs designed to assist the City's acquisition and development of local greenways. g. Restore greenways where necessary to improve their ecological health. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE LINO LAKES 23 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK POLICY PLAN h. Ensure that greenways serve all community residents through the protection of view sheds and the provision of pedestrian trails within the greenway corridor. Pedestrian trails will be located and designed within the greenways in a manner that will not degrade the natural features of the greenway. Create an awareness of the value and importance of greenways through community education, volunteerism in greenway maintenance, and citizen stewardship activities. Vegetation 1. Encourage the preservation of natural vegetation including plants of Oak Savannas, prairies, woodlands, wetlands and aquatic vegetation to be a design consideration for new subdivisions. 2. Examine the Lino Lakes landscaping and tree preservation ordinances to determine the need for additional requirements. 3. Implement programs designed to protect trees through disease control and re- forestation. 4. Require proper soil preparation for new development to insure deep rooting of new landscaping and minimal irrigation. 5. Promote the use of native grasses, forbes, shrubs and trees in development site restoration. Discourage the use of herbicides, pesticides, and phosphorous fertilizers on lawns to prevent runoff to wetland areas. 7. Implement strategies for the control of invasive /exotic plant species in greenways, natural areas, and open spaces. Soils 1. In areas of soils (hydric soils) that have limitations for development, soil testing will be required to identify the soil correction measures necessary to insure safe and quality construction. 2. Drain tile around building foundations and streets will be required in soil areas characterized by moisture retention, high water tables, or perched water tables. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE LINO LAKES 24 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK POLICY PLAN 3. Require erosion and compaction control plans for all site grading to prevent erosion, dust, and soil sedimentation. 4. Establish a pollution control program which monitors the potential contaminants within the City, in order to protect soil and ground water resources. Storm Water/Wetlands /Drainage 1. Implement the goals and policies of the Lino Lakes Local Water Management Plan, 1994, as may be amended. 2. Restrict or prohibit development on wetlands, floodplains and other natural features that perform important environmental functions in their natural state. Where desirable and practical, maintain such - natural features in a condition for appropriate storm water system or recreational uses. 3. Prohibit development on or alteration of natural drainage system components where storm water can be adequately managed without construction of storm sewer. 4. Require subdivisions to plat lots with minimum lot area above the designated wetland boundaries to insure adequate buildable area and usable yards. Enforce floodplain regulations to regulate floodplain development in a manner consistent with State requirements to protect property and public safety from damage due to flooding. 6. Promote higher quality surface water treatment facilities through the use of infiltration and bioretention where appropriate. 7. Utilizing the Shoreland Ordinance, establish natural vegetative buffer areas along all lakes, wetlands, creeks, and drainage ways in new developments. 8. Work closely with the two Watershed Districts and Anoka County to develop future storm water management plans for Lino Lakes. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE LINP 25 DEVELOPMENT FP Memo 6-Pr Environmental To: Lino Lakes Environmental Board From: Marty Asleson Date: February 22, 2006 Re: Stoneybrook Revisit Last year the Environmental Board selected Stoneybrook Development as a revisit/review project. The Board wished to invite a representative, or representatives from the neighborhood to come to a meeting. I have talked with Kim Brouillet from Stoneybrook and invited her to the February meeting. I have included background information in the packet. Marty • Page 1 Memo Environmental To: Michael Grochala From: Marty Asleson CC: Jeff Smyser Date: April 3, 2002 Re: Environmental Board Review /Recommendations /Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat The Environmental Board made the following recommendations of the Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat, at the March 27, 2002 Environmental Board Meeting: • O'Connell made a motion, seconded by Halen to deny the Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat proposal. • The developer needs to contact and send plans to the St. Paul Regional Water Utility and Vadnais Lakes Watershed District. If the development should go on for approval, than the Environmental Board made the following recommendations: • To pass on all staff recommendations highlighting the use of water quality design 1. Water basins and surface water management areas should be protected from compaction and planted with a buffer of native plants. 2. Basin filtration capacities should be enhanced with organic bed establishment in flow areas. 3. A sequencing and management plan should be submitted for all resource protection issues during construction and post development. Sequencing should include protective fence installation for trees and soil/wetland areas. Sequencing should include specific times the fencing will be removed. • Page 1 Sequencing should establish soil budgets and soil protection areas where possible, and the manner and location in which soils will be disturbed for general grading and utility installation. Sequencing should establish a place for concrete truck cleaning, and establish a time the cleaning area will be cleaned up post construction. Sequencing should include all issues that may result in disturbance or changes to an established tree or soil, wetland or surface water areas be addressed with City Staff before changes occur. Sequencing should establish equipment and materials staging. Sequencing should establish a method to restore soils to pre development densities where compaction is not necessary for civil engineering purposes. Management should include a plan to enforce buffers and include signage along property lines that inform no- mow /no- disturbance. The City should approve signs. Seed for buffers should be in accordance with City seed lists. A City approved contractor experienced in native plant establishment should plant buffer area. A three to five year contract should be established, and approved by the City, with a company experienced in native plant management. Covenants should be established with the HomeOwners Association prohibiting encroachment into buffer areas. An information sheet should be distributed to homebuyers at the pre - purchase time informing them of the buffers. This information sheet should be acceptable to the City of Lino Lakes, and proof given of pre- homeowner acknowledgment of receipt of the information sheet. Management should establish, and show that no changes to the surface or ground water will occur in the areas off the site to the West of the Preliminary Plat No soils should be removed or imported to this site with out City approval. • Buffering should be provided for the pipeline easement in the NE comer lots. • Street lighting should be downward focused, and "no- spill." • A substitute should be used for the proposed Colorado blue spruce in the buffer along Birch Street. If evergreens are desirable, than white spruce would be better. Environmental Board Comment: As long as the Developer is asking for a rezoning, would he consider asking for a PDO to preserve open space, following the principles of development from the Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development? • Escrow Dollars should be received for: 1. One boulevard tree per frontage. • Page 2 • • • 2. Silt fence and soil protection fence installation, enforcement, and removal. 3. Tree protection 4. Native seed areas and management 5. Buffer signs. 6. Soil restoration • Page 3 Agenda Item 5A Environmental Board Meeting Date: June 26, 2002 Topic: Stoneybrook Development/Preliminary Plat Background: The following minutes are from the March 27th Environmental Board Meeting. At that time the Stony Brook Preliminary Plat was discussed and passed on to the Planning and Zoning Board. ACTION ITEMS A. Stoneybrook, Preliminary Plat, Rezone, MUSAIComp Plan Amendment Asleson indicated that there were three development areas. He reviewed the background material. The property was guided forlow- density sewered residential development in the Comprehensive Plan. The developer was requesting MUSA allocation, and rezoning from R -Rural to R -1X -Low Density Residential, and approval for a 111 -lot subdivision. There were 19.2 acres of wetland, with 2.06 requiring mitigation, which would be accomplished on site, and 58.87 acres of upland. The site was very wet, and infiltration techniques were limited, so water quality design was important. The water basin areas should be protected from compaction and planted with a buffer of native plants. Basin filtration capacities should be enhanced with organic bed establishment in flow areas, such as an organic pond area. Schneider inquired if the recommendations were binding. Asleson responded that they were only recommendations. Grundhofer pointed out that there was a development on Ward's Lake adjacent to this development, and asked if they were both aware of each other's impact and the combined impact. Asleson indicated they were being dealt with individually. Asleson continued reviewing the background material. The soil was very insensitive to ground water pollution, except for a small area in the South East corner that is in the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed District. Additional water volume discharges should be minimized. A sequencing plan and a management plan including a 3 -year contract with a landscaping company should be submitted. He urged that no soils should be hauled off the site or brought on the site without permission from the City. The sequencing plan should indicate responsibility for cleanup after the last house was completed including the fencing. The landscape- screening plan was submitted for Birch Street, but staff had concems about Colorado Spruce and the maple was not hardy for the soil. Grundhofer questioned if there were any acceptable conifers. Asleson stated that the only native conifers were white pines located in northern Anoka County, but were not native or adapted to this area. He conceded that a white spruce might grow if they wanted a spruce. O'Connell inquired about whether willows were native. Asleson indicated the water willow was possible. Asleson stated water filtration was important. In addition, he recommended the developer should escrow money. Chair Kukonen reviewed the Site Plan Review process. First there was a staff review, then the developers would present, followed by a dialogue with the Board. Concerns he had were buffering in the North East corner near Lots 4 and 5 in C, and the greenway should not be encroached upon. Asleson said the areas of buffering should have signage and be covered in the covenants. He noted that they needed to be careful of the water table. Chair Kukonen identified an inconsistency in the wetland inventory possibly due to the draining and ditching. He attempted to walk the site, but it had no trespassing signs and barbed wire fences. Halen asked for a brief description of buffering. Chair Kukonen responded that it could be several things such as a berm for noise pollution as in the intersection of Highway 96 and Lexington, but it could also be a wetland for water absorption. Asleson noted that the number of houses was reduced to about 102. Grundhofer inquired about the effort to have houses located in the Stoneybrook Flood Plain. Halen questioned if the houses located in the flood plain needed to be approved. Asleson responded the approval would be based on the soil and the housepads. Chair Kukonen explained the Army Corps of Engineers would be looking at the flood plain in relation to the elevation and the 4 -foot leeway. Asleson advised the Board to allow the Army Corps of Engineers to deal with the issue. He added that no one raised the issue of importing soils. Chair Kukonen asked if there was no requirement for park designation due to the outlots. Asleson responded he did not believe so, if not land possibly money. Schneider inquired about the direction that the watershed flowed. Asleson answered that they all went into ditches. Grundhofer expressed concern over the preservation of the oak savanna area. Asleson explained that it was actually off site and should not be impacted by the changes on the property. Chair Kukonen submitted that they should ask for an overlay or a PDO, and ask for more open space. He was concerned about the streetlights, but the City cannot ask for a light site plan for residential. Grundhofer stated that because of the presence of wetlands, the City should ask for low impact shoebox lighting. Chair Kukonen read comments submitted by Donlin who could not attend. She pointed out that the site plan appeared to fit into the premature subdivision designation. She also expressed concern over the number of houses, in light of the 147 goal for the year. Donlin also submitted that it could cause traffic concerns on Centerville Road. She mentioned the Saint Paul Pipeline area should not be developed. Finally, she stated the site was one of the remaining agricultural lands, and inquired about other options. Schneider inquired about it being a reasonable option. Chair Kukonen answered that legally the time clock begins when a developer begins the process, if the City does not respond within the 60 or 120 -day period, it would pass. The Board could ask for it, but the City could not require it. Schneider asked for confirmation that it would be better to make recommendations on the plat than to deny it. Chair Kukonen indicated that most often it was. • Chair Kukonen stated that a road was proposed over the culvert owned by the St. Paul Water Utility. He thought the plan should be denied with recommendations. He added that things had been approved in the past. Asleson indicated that the City decides after it goes to the Planning and Zoning for reviewal. Schneider questioned if the culvert with the proposed street over it was referring to Street B. Chair Kukonen responded that the culvert was from Vadnais. Asleson clarified that the Pipeline easement was not a greenway, but a trail connection. Chair Kukonen called for a motion. He reviewed the Board recommendations to be added to the staff recommendations: 1) Deny and contact the St. Paul Regional Water Utility and the Vadnais Lake Watershed District. 2) Provide Buffering for pipeline easement in the northeast corner lots. 3) Street lighting should be downward focused, no spill. O'Dea suggested more open area, where 50% or more should be preserved as open space not including wetland mitigation. She proposed an additional 17 acres should remain undeveloped, and encouraged clustering. - - Asleson submitted signage on the buffer areas and language in the association's covenants. O'Dea addressed the screening on Birch Street, and inquired about the possibility of promoting non - linear plantings. She also asked if the ditch was going to remain or if it would be altered. Chair Kukonen inquired if would he consider asking for a PDO to preserve a 17 -acre additional open space, as long as the developers were requesting a re- zoning, and follow the principles of development from the Handbook for Environmental Planning and Conservation Development. Asleson noted that signage should be placed on the buffer boundaries to indicate that buffers did exist, and covenants should be established with the homeowners' association prohibiting encroachment. Schneider asked about the site's chance for approval. Chair Kukonen responded the site plan would go the Planning and Zoning Board, and then to Council. He added that the Environmental Board was reviewing the plan because it was submitted prior to the moratorium taking effect. Asleson pointed out the Rice Creek Watershed District usually met the same night as the Environmental Board, so he had tried to meet with them earlier. Schneider asked for more information about the role of the Army Corps of Engineers. Asleson answered they would be involved if there was a headwater located on site. Schneider asked for a definition of MUSA allocation. Chair Kukonen responded that it was City water and sewage, and was dictated by the Metropolitan Council. Asleson added that it affected the capacity to deal with sewage. Grundhofer inquired about when it was going to be approved. Chair Kukonen stated that the Surface Water Management had already been approved. Asleson added the Rice Creek Watershed District had yet to be approved. O'Connell posed the question about the possibility of asking the developer to communicate with Ed Vaughn. Asleson spoke concerning the combined impact of the two developments. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency controlled the discharge rates. The developer was going to try to keep the water on site, or to use filtration. O'Connell made a motion to pass on the denial and the staff and Board recommendations: • Contact the St. Paul Regional Water Utility and Vadnais Lake Watershed District. • Buffering for Pipeline easement in the northeast corner lots. • Street lighting should be downward focused, no spillage. • As long as the developer was requesting a re- zoning would he consider a PDO to preserve an additional 17 acre additional open space. • Signage should be placed on buffer boundaries to indicate buffers exist, and covenants should be established with the homeowners' association prohibiting encroachment. Halen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Planning and Zoning Board tabled the Preliminary Plat Hearing because of platting issues. The Preliminary Plat is before you again. Not too much has changed. The Rice Creek Watershed however has made a recommendation (not a requirement) that the street width be reduced to 29 feet instead of 32 feet. Please find the most recent Plat Proposal (Attachment 1). Analysis: Reducing the street width from 32 feet to 29 feet would reduce the amount of impervious area in the development by about 23,000 square feet. I agree with the recommendation. However, there is no adopted standards under the subdivision code providing for this, and there was concern from public services regarding street plowing and fire and pedestrian safety. Chief Bennet indicates the Fire Department needs 20 feet for access. A 20 -foot road would restrict parking to one side of the road in order to achieve this 20 -foot fire access. Please refer to attached street design section from the Center for Watershed Protection for more information on road design case studies (Attachment 2). I stated at the previous Environmental Board review of Stony Brook Preliminary Plat that Stoneybrook is a very wet site. There is little room for infiltration, but plenty of room for improved design in filtration. Residents living in this development are going to experience "soft- and - mushy" situations. I think the developer should go beyond standard disclosures and inform residents before they sign purchase agreements on this situation. An informational brochure describing the buffering, and soft and conditions that may be experienced should be given to them. Options: The March Environmental Board recommended that the Plat be denied. Please see issues listed above. The Environmental Board issues were forwarded on • • and many of them addressed. (Attachment 3). I would recommend adding the two above issues in "Analysis" as additional considerations. Recommendation: Environmental Board Comments: Attachments: 1. 2. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND EASEMENTS FOR STONEYBROOK THIS DECLARATION is made this day of , 2003, by Tollefson Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Declarant "). WHEREAS, Declarant is the Owner of certain real property located in the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of one hundred three (103) detached single - family lots ( "Lots ") which have been platted and developed for the construction and occupation of single family residences; and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to establish certain protective covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements on the Property to foster consistent quality in architectural design, preservation of values on the Lots and on the Property, continuing maintenance of certain subdivision monumentation, and wetland buffer signage. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant declares that the Property shall be subject to this Declaration, the terms and conditions of which hall constitute covenants to run with the Property, and that the Property and all. Lots shall hereafter be owned, used, occupied and conveyed subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, and charges set forth herein, all of which shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of all parties having or hereafter acquiring a right, title or interest in the Property, any Lot, or any part thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns ARTICLE I ARCHITECTURAL AND EXTERIOR CONTROLS Section 1. Administration; Architectural Control Committee. (A) There shall be an architectural control committee ( "ACC ") composed of three (3) members, each of whom shall be an Owner of a Lot, but the initial committee ( "Initial ACC ") shall be composed only of the Declarant or Declarant's designees. The ACC (and/or the Initial ACC) shall have the authority and • responsibilities as set forth in this Article and in Article 1V, Sections 1(D) and 2 and Article V. (B) At such time as each and every Lot comprising the Property has been improved with a single family residence, but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120) days after the date upon which Declarant no longer owns any Lots, the Initial ACC shall convene a meeting of those who own fee title to the Lots Page 1 of 11 (B) Purpose. The purpose of the Monumentation Easement granted herein, and the easement granted over the Outlot Easement Area, is for the initial construction by Declarant of entrance monuments to the Property for the benefit of all current and future Owners of Lots and for the continuing maintenance thereof after construction, and for no other purpose. (C) Nonexclusive. The Monumentation Easement granted is nonexclusive, and the Owners of the Easement Areas, shall have the right to use the Easement Areas to the extent such use is not inconsistent with the rights declared in this Section. (D) Maintenance. Continuing maintenance of the entrance monuments contained within the Easement Areas and the Outlot Easement Area shall be the obligation and responsibility of the ACC. The anticipated costs of such maintenance shall be included in the ACC budget prepared pursuant to Article I, Section 1(E), above. (E) Duration. The Monumentation Easement shall be effective upon the recording of this Declaration, and shall terminate ten (10) years from the date of such recordation. (F) Binding Effect. Lot 1, Block 5 and Lot 1, Block 6, above - referenced, shall specifically be transferred, held, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to and together with the Monumentation Easement granted herein. The Monumentation Easement, prior to its termination as referenced above, shall be binding upon all parties having any right, title, or interest in the said Lots, and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each Owner of Lots elsewhere within the Property, and shall run with the land. (G) No Alteration. During the term of this Declaration, no alteration of the entrance monuments shall be effective, save and except for such maintenance as is required hereunder. (H) Enforcement. Any controversy or dispute involving this Monumentation Easement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the provisions set forth in Article V, below. Section 2. Conservation Easement. Portions of the Property have been made the subject of a conservation easement ( "Conservation Easement ") which has been, or will be, recorded by Declarant in favor of the City of Lino Lakes. As set forth in the instrument creating the Conservation Easement, the purpose thereof is to assure that those portions of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement remain in their current undisturbed condition, constitute scenic surroundings, and constitute a suitable habitat for wetland vegetation and/or wildlife In order to ensure that the boundaries of the Conservation Easement located on any Lot are, and shall remain, identified, Declarant initially shall place sign posts or other markings as required and approved by the City of Lino Lakes along the Conservation Easement boundary at locations selected and/or aproved by the said City, which said sign posts or other markings shall remain undisturbed, and may not be removed for any reason. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any future maintenance, repair or replacement of such sign posts or other markings shall be the responsibility of the ACC. Anticipated costs of any such maintenance shall be included in the ACC budget prepared pursuant to Article I, Section 1(E), above. Each Lot which is subject to the Conservation Easement shall be subject to an exclusive appurtenant easement over the Lot, exercisable by the ACC and its designees, for the purposes of such maintenance, repair, and replacement of sign posts and other markings referenced herein. Section 3. Easement for Inspection. The Property shall be subject to an exclusive appurtenant II easement on and over the Lots, exercisable by or on behalf of the ACC, for purposes of inspection of improvements, the construction of which has been approved by the ACC and for such other purposes reasonably necessary for the ACC to fulfill or perform any responsibility or obligation otherwise contained in this Declaration Page 7 of 11 CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT ( "Easement ") is made of this day of 2003 by Tollefson Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("Grantor"). RECITALS A. Grantor is the owner of that certain real property lying and being within the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota legally described on attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); and B. The City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota ( "Grantee ") is a Minnesota municipal corporation. C. Grantor desires and intends to grant and convey to Grantee, a conservation easement for the purposes set forth in this instrument, all as more fully set forth herein. • WITNESSETH NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants to Grantee a non- exclusive conservation easement over, under and across that portion of Grantor's Property legally described on attached Exhibit B (the "Easement ") on the terms and conditions set forth herein. The Easement area is depicted by a sketch attached hereto as Exhibit C. Exhibit C is for illustrative purposes only, and the legal description of the Easement contained in Exhibit B shall control. Section 1. Conservation Easement. 1.1 Grant. Grantor herewith grants to Grantee a conservation easement for the purposes, and subject to the terms herein specified, over and upon the Easement area legally described in Exhibit B. 1.2 Purpose. The purpose of the Easement is to assure that the Easement area shall, at all times hereafter, remain in its current undisturbed condition, constitute scenic surroundings, and constitute a suitable habitat for wetland vegetation and/or wildlife. This conservation easement shall in no way be construed so as to grant to the public any rights to use or improve the Easement area for any other public or private purpose. J 1.3 Building Restrictions. No buildings or other structures of any kind, and no fences, roads, signs, poles, no wires, or other material of any kind shall be erected, installed, constructed, placed, or allowed to be erected, installed, constructed or placed on or within all or any portion of the Easement area. Page 1 of 6 • , 1.4 Restriction on Removal of Vegetation. No trees, shrubs, or other vegetation shall be removed from the Easement area except for noxious weeds or for purposes of tree disease control by, or as directed by governmental agency. 1.5 Storage Restrictions. No storage of any manmade objects, and no soil, trash, waste, or other • materials or substances of any kind shall be dumped or placed, or allowed to be dumped or placed, as fill or for any other purpose, upon any portion of the Easement area. 1.6 Excavation Restriction. No soil or other material or substance shall be excavated, dredged, or removed from any part of the Easement area. 1.7 General/Environmental Restrictions. No activities detrimental to the drainage, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation or wildlife and vegetative habit preservation of the Easement area, and no other activities detrimental to the preservation of the said area, shall be conducted or permitted on all or any part of the Easement area. No fertilizers, whether natural or chemical, no pesticides, herbicides, or insecticide may be sprayed or applied to the Easement area except by, or as directed by, a governmental agency. No surface use shall be made of all or any part of the Easement area which is detrimental to the preservation of its scenic beauty or its habitat for wetland vegetation and/or wildlife. 2. Maintenance. Grantor herewith grants to Grantee, its agents and employees the right, but not the obligation, to preserve, improve and enhance the slope, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat within the Easement area by altering, clearing, and removing trees or other vegetation, by changing the contour of the land, and by planting trees or other vegetation and to enter upon the Easement area at anytime to enforce compliance with the terms of this instrument. 3. Enforcement. 3.1 By Public Authorities. This Conservation Easement may be enforced, at law or in equity, by Grantee. 3.2 By Private Parties. This Conservation Easement may be enforced, and any controversy or dispute involving the meaning of the language, or any term or condition, of this instrument, may be settled, in arbitration in accordance with the arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association by a sole arbitrator. In addition to owners of any portion of the Property, Grantee shall have standing to initiate such arbitration proceedings. All owners of any portion of the Property, and Grantee, shall have the right to receive notice of the pendency of any such arbitration proceedings, and the right to participate therein. The arbitration proceedings shall be held in the Association's offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota, or at such other place as is agreed to by the parties. The arbitrator shall have the right, to be exercised in the discretion of the arbitrator, to award attorneys fees and costs to the opposing parties if the arbitrator determines that any party to any dispute or disagreement in connection with this instrument has acted in bad faith with respect to the Easement, the dispute, or the arbitration. Judgment upon any award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in Anoka County District Court. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any person owning any portion of the Property, or possessing any rights hereunder, shall have the right to seek from Anoka County District Court equitable or provisional remedies (such as temporary restraining orders, temporary injunctions, and the like) before or after any arbitration. 4. Miscellaneous. • 4.1 Severability. If any term, covenant or provision of this instrument, or any exhibit attached hereto, is held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason whatsoever, such determination shall not be Page 2of6 deemed to alter, affect, or impair in any manner whatsoever any other portion of this instrument or any exhibit attached hereto. 4.2 Binding Effect. The Property shall be transferred, held, sold, conveyed, and occupied subject to and together with the Conservation Easement granted herein. The Conservation Easement shall be binding upon all parties having any right, title or interest in the Property, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each such parties and shall run with the land. 4.3 Duration. The duration of this Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. 4.4 Nonexclusive. The owners of any portion of the Property shall have the right to use the Easement area to the extent that such use is not inconsistent with the rights granted to Grantee by this instrument. 4.5 Title. Grantor represents and warrants that no other person has an interest in the Easement area other than Grantor, and that Grantor has good right, title and interest in the Property which is the subject to the Easement granted herein. IN WITNESS 'WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this instrument as of the day and year first above - written. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) _ foregoing the corporation. TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Minnesota corporation instrument was acknowledged before me this 4-11 ay of 2003, by •d � L..., Graf' (. , of Tollefson Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on. behalf of This instrument Drafted by: S. Todd Rapp, P.A. 15025 Glazier Avenue, Suite 401 Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 (952)432 -3240 birryv4 Notary Public EXFIIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lot 1 through 9, inclusive, Block 1; Lots 1 through 3, inclusive, Block 2; Lots 1 through 25, inclusive, Block 3; Lots 1 through 4, inclusive, Block 4; Lots 1 through 3, inclusive, Block 5; Lots 1 through 7, inclusive, Block 6; Lots 1 and 2, Block 7; Lots 1 through 5, inclusive, Block.8; Lots 1 through 22, inclusive, Block 9 and Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 10, all in Stoneybrook, Anoka County, Minnesota. • EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA • EXHIBIT C EASEMENT AREA SKETCH • H �N 4444.. I I• r— — r`�� --'898r `v �.` �` . - -. 4444. � _� r �.._..- �.�.��_�., `• —• -- —_rte. � _._-�^- ���.� 911.3 BIRCH STREET CSAH 10 _ -9ao- H L — _ —1 xiivis 1 I— _ +I 6i< I I s / BIRCH —STIR z F 1 X910- -4444_._ r 1 1 36 ea um GRAPHIC SC= IN FEET jt **�c� 47 PIONEER we ow.. arr. Afton. twig: "'". 1.1••94 011111.145 PLANT SCHEDULE KEY COMMONA3OTANICAL NAMES OYERSTONY TREES rA SIZE/ROOT QTY. SWAMP WW1E OAK BICOLOR PAPATMCRE ASH S PENMYAMCA Ppg RE . p ss BS BLACKS�AgJ1t1CA DENSATA i.a 0.9 812 24 1 I.1MY ••11M Met tle• par• .e• Mound by 44•. to moo am Mod wprM•bn and tnel 4 on • duly R.yl•I.4 Landman. Msheml mat 494 Na of te• 414.1• el 94.1111. N.re. Asp No T D.1. 2/ ,CN / •' WETLAND NO. 2 SHEET 111LE PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES •• bwr°•ii•� �w: Mn pe w•M �. WARM •. •4 nwy. •.d de►• " a4 b .4 p.Irr. d byy wb..• pan Uw 114 Mel MP 011ry 94 444 fl...*4. rN •• pima entail MM ..4M 494 .Ir.dw4• Mod N Mt.44v pr N a fbdr Nr•••I•• weeme4•.d •• 114. N W (4) 11:0111 N W 44.9 1:r �D.pL • .IM of 0•t of 60 r�ar'yw. i•..N p WPM •lb tsN••r• ]r shed pr9Nr nw plwt of Maw • ie . •1 wt 4.9. 11 mow. a U•.• .N aw• 4 • r ew.%r. 494 .w.41 .4 m the redjmt Hot. • 1.�yO +U.49e r�rdwlyMy rO . al br.w.4 ai MMd polyM Y Mei.d M ~ McYM •r d 44.44 rwdr 84.44 b F.w.d a*. Y1 a... p4.Net ..•401 N Mont bd. M wd1ew. Wk4 .11. 1949• 4... 4414 ado r bomb* 44s me. atom* WIM tom 4.949..! bon MI Wend la I.41 Mr. tl.• Moe MM. •U.�UN e=1CrineSZTIZ W. 444•'•°i nbl POW OWNER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT. INC. 17271 KENYON AVENUE. SUITE 103 LAXE1U.E. MINNESOTA 55044 PROJECT STONEYBROOK a SHEET L1 Of 1 SHEETS PRELIMINARY PLAT 1/1 l 27 E' ST0NYBROOK tam Iva es ovi SE e 5.c. taxmcf4v ------------ r :47:3:7/49 10 7,7 9 04•1318 03.111193.307 zt./ zw, sr • r 19 11.511 SHERMAN LAKE ROAD 4. 5 2 ls ---1PHEASANT HILLS DRIVE 22 ;1 130 1,4 2642.61 N0CI•40'50W 6.- wen ens M we Cost INN of am 50 LOCATION MAP DENOTES PROPOSED WETLAND AREA DENOTES PROPOSED PCMOING AREA , DENOTES PROPOSED BUFFER EASEMENT GRAPHIC SCALE too 0 50 100 200 100 1111 1111111■11 ( 111 ITET ) I bob TOO 15 LOT DATA (NOT TO SCALE) I0Nest.111 LOT DEPTH 135 FT. MINIMUM 1,07 910111 Al SETBACK UNE 90 VT. AT CORNER 115 ft AT RAY UNE 11/0 fT 131ARTEmat'fARO 30 FT. IMAM LOT AREA CORNER N/A 50. TT. INTERIOR 12.1125 SO TT. ILDAELE AREA (12.525 SO. Ft) DOE YARD SETEIA01 NOUSE 10 FT. GARAGE 5 TT. PIER 30 FT. 1 wavy c.1211y 1011 Pee Oe we pewee be .01 1101 el ded eeleeelev end te 1 en e duly Neensetl Land Sweep/ melte the Wet of the Stow Kvomoto STREET FRONT YARD SETTIA01. 30 FT. DRAINAGE AND 1.111LITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 5*1 9 1--_1 I-s S feet in width. and adj.:Orno lot onim ond 10 feet in width and adjoining street linos and rear lot lines unless otherwise indicated an the plat. LECALIEMEIP110. SITE DATA, TOTAL AREA OUTLOT AREA TOTAL LOT AREA UPLAND LOT AREA R.O.W. AREA UPLAND AREA NUMBER OF LOTS LARGEST LOT SMALLEST LOT AVERAGE LOT EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING UTIUTIES This East Half (1/2) of the Southeast Quarter (1/4). SeetIon 37, Township 31. Range 22. ascent the East 1 1/2 reds thereof. =Cording to the United States Covernmont Survey thereof and situate in Anoka Gaunly. Minnesota. 2. R.... shoos 3-7 (p.. 011ee014) Pee. MEET C 3 Rev. w.f. (pet Gtr e.041144.14) 5 MP". LOl .0 ...Wt. 44 A1111 Owen 1f 09/04/02 I Layout 03/06/02 5 01/01/03 7. 01/22/02 4.1/II 1 144 No 20595 Oa • 3. 05/19/09 SHEET D ILE 4,4444evot PRELIMINARY PLAT 78.07 AC. 21.44 AC. 43.71 AC. 36.08 AC. 12.92 AC. 54.60 AC. 103 46,380 S.F. 12.826 S.F. 14,042 S.F. AGRICULTURE R-1X AVAILABLE SHEET INDEX 1. PREUMINARY PLAT 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PREUMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 4. PREUMINARY GRADING a EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6. PREUMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7. PREUMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 8. GRADING DETAILS oviER TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT. INC. 17271 KENYON AVENUE, SU11E 103 TAKEN/Ka MINNESOTA 55044 PROJECT STON EYBR 00K SHEET 1 or 8 SHEETS 201132PRP DWG