The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/25/2007 Env Bd PacketCity of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting April 25, 2007 6:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes March 28, 2007 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Open Mike 5. Action Items A. LaMotte Soil Excavation 6. Discussion Items A. Comprehensive Plan Draft Goals and Strategies B. Arbor Day, Recycling Day and Earth Day C. Project Updates 7. Adjourn • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT 1. CALL TO ORDER CITY OF LINO LAKES DRAFT MINUTES MARCH 28, 2007 : March 28, 2007 . 6:32 P.M. . 8:10 P.M. : Barbara Bor, Alan Traylor, Martha DeHaven, Kim Brouillet, Peter Brown, Mary Jo O'Dea, Paula Andrzejewski : None : Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson Chair O'Dea called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. Ms. O'Dea removed items 2 and 3 from the agenda, as they occurred at the last meeting. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 31, 2007 Ms. Brouillet made the following changes: Page 2, last paragraph, delete the following sentence: The site meets RCWD's standard of water. Page 3, first paragraph, change to read: rain gardens instead of rain garden. Page 3, second paragraph change to read: Ms. O'Dea instead of Mr. O'Dea. Page 3, ninth paragraph change the word sight to site. Page 4, 4th paragraph, delete: the word by. Page 4, last paragraph, change to read: 100 year flood plain instead of flood plane. Page 8, Recycling Day, change to read: Arbor Day is April 27 instead of Recycling day. February 28, 2007 Mr. Brown made a motion to approve the February 28, 2007 meeting minutes. Ms. Andrzejewski seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ms. Brouillet requested to add a discussion item regarding Stoneybrook development. Ms. Andrzejewski requested to add a discussion item regarding Target landscaping. Ms. Bor requested to add a discussion item for Comprehensive Plan updates. 1 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 28, 2007 Ms. DeHaven made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Mr. Traylor seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Brown excused himself from the meeting at 6:38 p.m. 4. OPEN MIKE Open Mike was opened and closed at 6:38 p.m. No citizen comments were made. 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Conditional Use Permit for earth material storage at 6644 20th Avenue, Royal Oaks Realty Mr. Asleson reviewed the background and analysis. He noted that he was informed that additional storage material was proposed to be stored since he wrote the staff report. He was informed that this project requires approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. He noted that the wetland on the property was delineated but not marked and there is a silt fence in place. Mr. Asleson stated that a tree preservation plan is necessary. Ms. O'Dea asked if access to the site should be addressed. Mr. Asleson replied that access would be addressed as part of the SWPP Plan. Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, Applicant, stated that the Conditional Use Permit will be used until the property gets developed. He anticipated a use for two to three years. They will stockpile black dirt on site to be used as needed. He noted it is not intended for a large use and there will be no sale of material. Mr. Black stated that they plan to store approximately 15,000 cubic yards, however they would accept a condition of approval limiting the amount of storage material. He noted that the amount of dirt will fluctuate as it is used. He stated the storage area will only be visible from 35E. He expects trucks to access the site about once a week. Mr. Asleson stated that inactive areas need to be covered per the SWPPP, which is required for more than one acre. Mr. Black stated that the usable area of the site will be less than one acre, but will follow the city and RCWD's recommendations. Mr. Black noted that they do not intend to remove any trees. Mr. Asleson stated that the property will be considered a construction site, which requires a tree preservation plan if there is a soil disturbance within 50 feet of any trees. 2 DRAFT MINUTES • t • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 28, 2007 Ms. Brouillet asked where the soil is coming from that will be stockpiled. Mr. Black responded that the dirt will come from both Lino Lakes and Centerville. Ms. Bor asked staff if the ordinance requires that the applicant would need to come back to the city for any alterations of the use, and if the city can visit the site for compliance. Mr. Asleson replied yes to both questions. Mr. Black stated that he understands that the CUP can be revoked if conditions are not met. Board members recommended that the wetland delineation area be remarked. Mr. Asleson said that he is meeting on Friday morning to discuss the wetland delineation area. Mr. Asleson explained that the RCWD is the city's LGU, and that the city has responsibility for management and integrity of our construction sites. He stated that the city has an inspector on staff, Tim Payne, who will be invited to the meeting on Friday morning. Mr. Black stated that they will do a SWPP Plan and they will follow Best Management Practices. Mr. Black stated that they measured the pile of dirt from its deepest and widest measurements at just under an acre. He noted that the dirt pile is not as wide as the silt fence area. • Ms. Bor made a motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following recommendations: 1) Clarify the wetland delineation area. 2) Submit a tree preservation plan or move the dirt pile away from tree root areas. Ms. Brouillet seconded the motion. Motion carried 7 -0. 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Stoneybrook Ms. Brouillet stated concerns about the Stoneybrook development. She said there is a dispute over who is responsible for maintenance of the monument signs and the wetlands in Stoneybrook. She asked Mr. Asleson if he could look into the issue to see if there is escrow money from the developer at the city for this purpose. Ms. Brouillet wants developers to be responsible for maintenance of these areas and does not want to see problems with future developments. Mr. Asleson agreed to look into who is responsible for these items. Ms. O'Dea stated that the board should be able to review conservation easements as they are proposed prior to council approval. Ms. O'Dea asked if they could add 3 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 28, 2007 this discussion to next month's meeting agenda. She asked if Mr. Grochala could attend to speak on the issue. Mr. Asleson agreed to speak with Mr. Grochala about this issue. B. Target Landscaping Mr. Asleson explained that ponding and wetland mitigation was necessary for the Target site as the city looked for every opportunity to maintain water by maximizing a small site. He explained that the small native islands were for storing rainwater. He noted the design was to take water overflow to the north side of the building. He stated that ultimately the design failed and Target recognized they did not get what they paid for. He stated that about three years ago they redesigned the site, which will include a berm at the end of this year. He said they will perform a burn at the end of one more year, then they will see how it looks after the three -year cycle. He stated that the site should look better next spring or changes will need to be made. He explained that lots of new structural BMPs are being designed. Mr. Asleson explained that a presence of native plants greater than 50% would be a success. Mr. Asleson stated that Target has worked well with the city. C. Comprehensive Plan Update Mr. Asleson said that the first Comprehensive Advisory Panel meeting took place. Ms. Bor gave a summary of the meeting, stating that there seems to be a lot of pressure that the city is divided in two by its East and West sides. She stated that the city acknowledges and supports resident input. She noted that over 60% of the subjects addressed environmental issues. The next Advisory Panel meeting is scheduled for April 4. Updates /Other Items Mr. Asleson stated that the city is in the top three running for environmental initiative. SHEP Mr. Asleson noted that SHEP will be going to the Monday Council Work Session. He will find out what is necessary for the presentation. He stated that the city is considered an in -kind partner and the data presented will be useful for the future. Peltier Island Mr. Asleson stated that as of Monday, three birds were seen on their nests. He stated that Glen Fox saw a dozen and will continue to observe. Mr. Asleson informed the board that four raccoons and 14 opossums were trapped. He noted that there are no cameras set up for monitoring this year. Mr. Asleson said they will provide additional sticks and twigs to improve the habitat. 4 DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 28, 2007 Arbor Day Mr. Asleson reminded the board that Arbor Day is on April 27t • A presentation will be held again at Lino Lakes Elementary. Mr. Asleson noted that a memorial tree will be planted in honor of a teacher who passed away. There will also be an educational session on pruning trees. Earth Day Mr. Asleson noted that Earth Day is on April 21. He stated that the city met the requirements for Tree City USA for the 18th year. He stated that Wargo Nature Center is working on vendors and displays for this year's Earth Day celebration. He noted that they are short on money this year as the Friends of the Park was dissolved, and they were the funding tool for this event. He noted that Lisa Hogstad is scheduling clean up groups at the city, and that 15 groups have already signed up. Mr. Asleson said that sometimes garbage haulers will assist with bag pickup, otherwise he will coordinate pickup through city staff. He asked board members about the interest in starting a garden club. Ms. DeHaven volunteered to take over this initiative and encourage community gardens. Ms. Bor noted that she did not see hooks for hanging flower pots on the light posts in the Legacy development. Ms. Andrzejewski noted that she has participants interested in display booths for Earth Day. Mr. Asleson asked her to contact Wargo directly. Mr. Asleson noted that Connie Grundhofer had stamps for kids, and that Environmental Board members can talk to kids about environmental issues while at Wargo. Mr. Asleson said that the city will provide popcorn. He stated that the next Earth Day meeting is at Wargo on April 5 at 6:00 p.m. Ms. Bor agreed to contact Connie Grundhofer about the stamps. Ms. Brouillet asked if a garbage hauler such as Walters is willing to donate a bin for recycle day, could the Environmental Board then use their bins to throw trash in for the Blue Heron Days Parade? Mr. Asleson replied that whichever hauler was willing to offer bins could be used. Mr. Asleson informed the board that he submitted burn permits to the DNR for Stoneybrook, Otter Lake Road, Clearwater Creek 3rd addition, Clearwater Creek wetland area, south Reshanau Lake Estates, Elm Street mitigation pond, Shenandoah Park entrance area, Highland Meadows and Century Farms. He stated that all bums will depend on weather and if the DNR issues the permits. Mr. Asleson stated that the fire department is informed of burns but that no permits are required. He informed board members that the fire department should be contacted for private burns. 5 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 28, 2007 Mr. Asleson spoke of possible future burns at Rice Lake Elementary, Centennial Middle School, Behm's Pond area and a small burn on Elm Street. The Board discussed possible signage for restoration areas. Mr. Asleson stated that the DNR offers free "Don't Mow" signs and that the city could budget for a dozen or so permanent signs. 7. ADJOURN There being no further business, Ms. Brouillet moved to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. Ms. DeHaven seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Lisa Hogstad Community Development Secretary 6 DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • Agenda Item 5A Staff Originator: Marty Asleson Environmental Board Meeting Date: April 25th 2007 Topic: Lamotte Property Grading CUP Applicant: AIT/ Del Zentgraf BACKGROUND: Request: To remove 90,000 cubic yards of material from the site, the majority of which will be deposited in The Preserve development (Integra Homes Attachment 1 & 3). Future plans include single family houses in the upland areas to the east. The request proposes to mine the soils and create two rather deep ponds on the site (Attachment 3). Site Location: 12th Avenue and Birch Street ANALYSIS: Land Cover: The site consists of short grasses. The land on the east side of the property is mostly upland, slopping down rather quickly to the west. This area below the slope is extensive type 2 wetland and flood plain. CD 25 bisects the floodplain area from south to north. Rare and Unique Resources The possibility exists for rare plant communities on a part of the site that does not appear top be in the proposed excavation areas. Parks, Natural Open Space/ Greenways and Trail System Plan: The Parks Open space Greenways and Trails Plan shows this as an important link and flood plain area. (Attachment 7) Wetlands: There is an approved Wetland Delineation for the property (Attachment 2). Soils According to the Ground water model, the soils in this area are classified as moderately susceptible to ground water pollution. Although the proposed constructed ponds will not be accepting stormwater from impervious areas at this time, future platting may direct water to these ponds. When that happens, additional water treatment bmp's must be implemented to filter water to these ponds. Surface Water Surface water from this site goes into CD25, approximately 7000 -foot tributary to Wards Lake. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan A comprehensive Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan has been submitted for this project (Attachments 4, 5, 6). Additional information must be submitted concerning the name and phone number of the SWPPP site manager, and where the SWPPP and inspection forms will be located on site. A mailbox is preferred. Although the proposed ponds that will be created appear to be in ordinary high groundwater, there is no proposed impervious runoff from the site at this time. However, when platting is done on the site where surface water from impervious areas can run into the pond, than additional pond/filtration structures will be needed, or the ponds that are dug modified to accept storm water runoff from the impervious areas. Item 16, under the General Erosion Control Notes of the Erosion and Sediment Control Notes and Details sheet of the plan submittal (Attachment 3), # 16 should read Disturbed portions of the site where construction activity has stopped shall be temporarily covered and seeded. Under the same #, "Flatter than 10:1" should say 14 days per RCWD requirements. Ponds should be final grade stabilized with the City native seed mix Tree Preservation There are no tree preservation plans needed at this time. Landscape Plan All final grades should be seeded with the City native Seed mix. • • • • • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the following modifications be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board for consideration: 1. When platting is done on the site where surface water from impervious areas can run into the pond, than additional pond /filtration structures will be needed, or the ponds that are dug modified to accept storm water runoff from the impervious areas. 2. Recommended changes to the SWPPP are submitted to the City Engineer to make changes to the documents submitted. Changes should include City native seed mix in all final grade stabilization, and installed by a DNR listed contractor. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Lamotte Soil Movement 2. Wetland Delineation 3. Lamotte Property Grading Plan 4. Lamotte/ Phase 1 Erosion and Sediment Control 5. Lamotte /Phase 2 Erosion and Sediment control 6. Lamotte Erosion and Sediment Control Notes 7. Greenway Plan 8. SWPPP Letter /Seed Specs tr„ Lamotte Soil Movement • • 0.9 0 0.9 Parcels Ponds 1.8 Miles • • • Notice of Decision Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Mailing Date: 12/12/06 LGU: Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 611 Blaine, MN 55449 Project Name: LaMotte Property RCWD Ref. #: 06 -132R Location: Lino Lakes, Anoka County Name of Applicant: AIT c/o MFRA, Inc. Wetland Decision Type: Wetland Boundary Determination Date of Decision: 12/12/06 Description of Decision: A wetland delineation report was received on 11/02/06. The delineation was reviewed by RCWD staff on 11/16/06. The RCWD approves the delineated wetland boundaries as depicted in the attached figures for use in implementing the Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland delineation approvals are generally valid for a period of 3 years. You are hereby notified that the above - referenced decision was made by the Local Government Unit on the date stated above. The decision becomes final if not appealed to the Board of Water & Soil Resources within 30 days of the mailing date. / Ken Powell, Permit Coord. Date C: MN Board of Water and Soil Resources, ATTN: Lynda Peterson U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Tim Fell Anoka Conservation District ATTN: Dennis Rodacker MN DNR Ecological Services, ATTN: Wayne Barstad City of Lino Lakes Consultant, MFRA, Inc. ATTN: Todd Ullom • Mp►PctVEs-r Beaver or 2006 MapQuest, lnr, Rice Creek - Chain County Regional Pk Q jA ttr—we P/ 6 0 co c as 441 2 g pc- 0 Tamarack Ln 8ircu Park Aspen Ln Wards Lake Gr0UsP fi a okecherry Rd. B ckthorn Ln 4te Oak Rd ItapcOsCt ••••'• a .�C Holly Ct E Centerwifle 01 ,300t ' 00ft Lake Park Access Road E Sherman Lake Cer Hunters, ro er Vc\- Birch St r N Karth Rd 3 4 Holly Dr E rr� 02006 N)UTE SCALE = NONE MFRA# 16172 Client AIT Ogilvie, MN Project LAMOTT PROPERTY Lino Lakes, MN LOCATION MAP Wetland boundary Survey c I ingineerhly • Plannkg • u/Irving IVFRA'-417..zzrz Oen. 70/476,-6070 lillarbs hat Rea 90 75J/I79e130 Associoss, Yu • A19pBJ J J / - r 9pp �BqB/ i 12TH AVENUE e26/ — ��1 /�� •- � / rg94 R 890 e\ � 4s,0 / 4 (es +.,, --88,__ B84_ _ _ _ 1 92 \B �9B\ �\ \ T \\DON\ \\ < III I °I 1 I .o I 1 1 1 / / / // / lJi / / / �,p ,F' 18gB '�J:11' ▪ �B 9, // / / / . / _ _B92� J� l � / 1 (/ / :mo / J1 '/ (v' / , / m / C (/ r ( \\ A / . 0 / ` q \ D \ \` 1\ DOB ` 9 C� \�D \ \\ \ mD \ \ \ c \ s\ k �'..:�•r4: /a 99 4 6 11 ` ` --890- B92. \ --r5 -�_��• L -\ 1- -8ee- 4 ,'„. ��` -fib 884 -� \L�` - \ j/ oa q0 91B Er9 r-r \ 1F/ 1e ,-9 ass a 4 ~ - -884- - - 884- - •F ON I-0110 J.1N00� 4 I I X11 t, LJ . 4 4 121H AVENUE HO mop V321Y 03000M 533Y939ligCS- `9 CHEW DM- (Tl�. 533211 3-rNdS \` 4 B PROPOSED SILT FENCE - ' 4 • ` SZ`J1 0 ll n \ • 4 B'6 4 r r s eb, o \ ' \ ✓ '' 0 L —O.' -\ 4 11 4 "iks \ //. Bee \fib 4 —� \ .j /�4e - 4 4 r[)1 / \lt ^/lt I L_1 \I v! \ kJI V THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS 5 A 015111 WAUTY LEVEL D. THIS OUAl11Y LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CHASM 36-02, 1T11ED'STANDARD GUIDELRUES FOR TIE COLEECIION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA' THE CON1RACIOR AND/CR SUBCONTRACTORS SHAD- DETER TIE EXACT LOCARON OF ALL DOMING MIRES BEFORE COMMENCING WORM, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (COPIER STATE 011E FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONIRACTOR AND /OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY NS OR HER FAl6E 10 EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILM S (UNDERGROUND AND OYT76CAD). 0Aln �1 VLJ 4 `1 \ 1 44 Y 4 m ''4" '1 7 � 4 4, l \4 43/' A 1,nITf(Th 1 r\LJLJI I I /I 986-' 4 4 m916- L / / / 1 / / / / I , - , - 7 1 - - . . . . „ 1 / _ 1`J \ IL 1 r \fir \\\ , - 4 -_. 4LC — /\ 1 .4 1 I-1 \4 I I ` I 11 ■ r - ) \ I - ,J�'�, '/ /� /' _+o-. -7--=-, _ - -- c� --/,/ 4cj / 9NISS0210 S213ddV81 H180N 1 r 1 r I I 1 I 1 / I °o.- - - - - -; GRADING NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO SEED TO THE OBSERVED WATER LEVEL WITH SEED MIXTURE 310 AF)tt CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. ( \• = Xr,/ 1 `` \ \ \ ` 4 I� \\ �\\_1 - ter/ \ \�''\ \ I . / .ti SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER • — »- --. SANITARY SEWER FORCEMALN (SAN.) WATERMAN EASEMENT SOL BORING LOCATION EXISTING WETLANDS -- LEGEND PROPOSED X 11625 902 EXISTING x9625 HOZ ;J s 0 tt- SB -1 $ APR 0 2007 Ca., Y (_:r Lit. t.D 0 100 SCALE IN FLEI 200 FINAL GRADING PLAN m N cc m m 0 z CO W J 0 0 0 mc° S 0i SLEET NLU1®Qt RE C -4.01 9FRA FILE } 16172 • • ROSIOR CWIR0.dfl to- 12TH AVENUE IIi / / r II,A.y� / /�Qb= ." qA �0 z_ _ -189 98\ \ q0B�gD // ' _�. / /L 9U2 /�0a2/ mm- ° 1 1 P1 i q ,... L,,,,, ,( _,„ .,_____ , ms' s / 4 , s \ � 0 /' 4 � q I I I 1' / Q ° J 7,.___________„,_,/, / ( f E` 1 ° 4 c , ,/ / 1 1 / 3 L ., , I / of \ / / _ O,'" q°° / m / I I 922-/ r I _ MII q a „,.../// IJ 11 / -_ 892 .... o 0' / �� mqm,/ q/ (\ • g q1a �J `– _�9� \ <.1> , ,�;;� , q/ ,/ r \ \ `bo o � 11 �' / 1 1 ( < l t 2 `, 1, CSI g \ l I BBB - - -`j C.n — 886.`] 978 k<41,4„ 4 e44\ �� \ \ `914_ \ \ -9° \\ \ 898\ s \ \ \ 92 \ 1 j s 1ST 12TH AVENUE 7' V36V 03000N, \1 - X916--- - - -�J� m i -_ \ \ 96\ • - -_ -� _s- -BBB- '� ' -'-B84 _ l - -884- \ \ 8 61,r \ pC B • e9479,\ \ — ------9°6 � \ L O4� 4 4 SIB— • — B8� 88 --••••• \ I 034- 9- • 99� \892- 89 4 ` ` ��` \ \1890._ \ \886 \� H9, \\ 4 sZ�10 . \ l m / 886\ • `1N 0 ` • \ / J r -886 "Q ep , I 4 4 4 / 4 4 d _\g s (I - 1 �� II u1 s B4' — 8b4_-_, 4 l4 111ZZZddd�11- - --- r 86 4 \ r / 1 \ ; 5,� m - - - -_ - I' ____ 5 \ f �- i 1 1 ,t it I % 02 4 1 • q _> i /c7 m I I 4 m 0�4 °\'� L -ea6� �/ S4 1\ 4 I • 1 ///� 4 ' "XSQ 4 / / \ a\ .>/ asB_ VI 4 4 '1 ill 4 - BBB--- e90.- �- -B9O� --BBB- - \III - - V. L)1 /•1� ^/'lA I LI\I..r \..i1_/IV 7AIr1 �1VL./ A f'• /1 I T T /•l A I /–TVVI 1 IIJI V 'S '8\ —1 r\'v� wv, r'v v-vwv- > oyv� , -v-.�v P 'fir TDiPORARY D1R , \\ \ A 1 FOR c ONSTRUCT 81 3,3 ladS 1 \ \ \\ 1-9 T�. SILT FENCE(TYP.)` N \ —918- -916- CHECK DAY (DTP,) ( SILT FENS -) 9NISSObC SN3dc vaL HU ON I / / T%v I I / / I I 1 1 \ ■ I `TI r / ''-•....i."- --- �L I'�_ a t / I • _ 1-' I ”) \- I I \\ r-- .1 \I :) // / — ._ —_ - -- • J "� ---/v r1/ \ ACREAGE SUMMARY in ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 0.00 AC BUILDING AREA 0.25 AC SEEDED AREA 6.75 AC TOTAL DISTURBED 7.0 AC DEVELOPER /OWNER: ALLAN LAMOTTE 6497 12TH AVE 5 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 SITE OPERATOR /CONTRACTOR /GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUPERINTENDENT: SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION PHASE J: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES 2. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 1 CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCES DN THE SITE 4. CONSTRUCT 114E SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENT TRAP 8451115. 5. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION OF BMPS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING KITH CONSTRUCTION. 6. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. 7. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE PHASE It: 1. TEMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS. 2. INSTALL UTILITIES. UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS. CURBS AND GUTTERS 3. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING . t. REMOVE AU. TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE 15 STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT O- rc fir/ SOIL EROSION /SEDIMENTA11ON CONTROL OPERATION 11ME SCHEDULE NOTE CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC .IAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRP & STOCKPLE TOPSOIL ROUGH GRADE / SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING /SEED/FINAL STABLRATION STORM FACILITES • REI-tX TO SHEET C.5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER O - -i 0 SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) WATERMAIN EASEMENT OVERFLOW ELEV. RETAINING WALL PROPOSED X 962.5 LXIS 1146 962.5 SILT FENCE SOL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN EOF TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA 0 'ST-9 i PA -10 2007 0 100 SCALE IN FEE 200 0 cc LU 0 0 0 W 1- 1-- 0 J 0 O 4- z O U O F- I- o - w W < (/] J O Z 0 O tz w w w 0 a 00 a 6 8 m U m CC SHEET NUMBER C -5.01 REV. "ERA FILE 1 16172 • 12TH AVENUE 12TH AVENUE \ V323V 03000M b - LiJ W 892_ \ ff \\ o�N \ o \ ,c \ / 1. „Kik 04,(4r SILT FENCE(TYP.) 1 _806.4 \v I eD� SB31iI--39A'dds- 4 4 Y.. 1ST j B 1 4 4 _ -- 884 .. -- -- 884_ -� 4 4 "884-`_ 4 -..70e4 - \ -L2 � _ X884 _ .GZ 'ON HOL10 /,LNE10� �� . 4 4 --4- -6.96- . -1 r- - ___-_ 1 • - I 88 .] 4 L ✓ I .B • € O �89p8Re (� ` `SZ ON HOB l` 4 �- )`'Jf I I 4 4 4 ”. _ i° �� e 8P / 4 4 4 /' -886 090 r _ r - 1 �� I LI �` — 53'B84�- 9— • 4 1 -186= - ( _ - - - -- r �'�6� 4 ,�i / I i I 4 \0 4 4 1 • N. 4 �> I I T \ 1 I 10 L _Be6� \ 4 I /// ▪ 4 kS 4 �p8 V� /4 4 4, b 890- �� - -- - - --B9 baL ACREAGE SUMMARY in ACRES ;I I PAVEMENT AREA I 0.00 AC 41.1::J.n: ` APIA (? SE005 AREA TOTAL DISTURBED 7.0 AC 0 25 AC 6.75 AC DEVELOPER /OWNER: ALVIN LAM0TIE 6497 12TH AVE S LINO LAKES. MINNESOTA 55014 SHE OPERATOR /CONTRACTOR /GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUPERINTENDENT: SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION PHASE I: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 2. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 3. CONSTRUCT 1HE SILT FENCES ON 1HE SITE 4. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMENTA110N AND SEDIMENT TRAP BASINS. 5. HALT ALL ACTIVITIES AND CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT TO PERFORM INSPECTION CIF BAP. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT STORM WATER PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING NTH ENGINEER AND ALL GROUND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS BEFORE PROCEEDING NTH CONSTRUCTION. 6 CLEAR AND GRUB 114E 517E 7. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE PHASE II: 1. 1EMPORARILY SEED DENUDED AREAS 2. INSTALL UTILITIES. UNDERDRAINS. STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GU11000. 3. COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT 000008G AND PLANING. 4 REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED). IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT LEGEND SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP F:AP CURB & GUTTER _ STORM SLIER •- = SANITARY SEWER O FORC94AIN (SAN.) J WATERMAIN EAMON( OVERFLOW ELEV. RETAINING WALL PROPOSED x 962.5 E7(ISTING A9625 SILT FENCE SOIL BORINGS DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREA SOIL EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE NOTE CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSCIL ROUGH GRAD / SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / BUILDNG CONSTRUCTION SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING/SEED/FINAL STABILIZATION STORM FACLUTES REFER TO SHEET C.5.03 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS ST-9 i4A PA -10 AFAR 0 9 2007 yq. 0 100 SCALE IN FLLI 200 IX W 0 NON LL W 0 J 1 Designed DJD /JMD 0 2 O 0 m U •L SHEET NU183ER C-5.02 REV. 18RA FILE 1 16172 • E -06 05/06 NO SCALE SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 7 ACRPS CR I FSS OF DRAINAGE AREA. (DONNSIREAY VFW) 2 -1O ACRFS OF DRANAGE AREA ROCK CHECK DAM M FRA USGS MAP NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCT r HIGH BERM NTH MAX AM 510E SLOPE CF 4:1 x103 GRAVEL E -07 05/06 NO SCALE NOTE DIE R0O( ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR 7D THE START (IF ANY 511E NORF( THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL IF INSPECTED FELDIING EACH RAINFALL MAINTENANCE OF THE RO ( ENTRANCES SHALL INCWOE A TOP DRESSING OF NEW GRAVEL OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEENT OF TIE GRAVEL AS NEEDED, TO KEEP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECTED MUD. ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE 2'=2 rom POSTS 4.13. 0.G VFRA Yfami GWllMs A� ;AG E -1D 05/06 NO SCALE DIRECTION Cr DRAINAGE MORE STRINGENT SPECIFICATION SHALL APPLY. 2 114E CWTRACTOR 15 SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATIONS AND /OR ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTIUTY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE. MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTIUTY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDWNES OF Cl/ASCE 38-02. ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTIUTY DATA.' THE INFORMATION I5 NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTLrt1ES. IT SHALL BE 114E RESPONSBWTY OF 114E CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CAWNG MINNESOTA GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800- 252 -1166 OR 651- 454 -0002 3 'NE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF 114(5 PRO.ECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OCCURRING TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF 1X15 PROJECT. THE STORMWATER POLL611ON PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IS COMPRISED OF THIS DRAWING (EROSION 8 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN -ESC PLAN), THE STANDARD DETAILS. THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE 91EWORK SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 02370 (SWPPP). PINS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 5 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING k SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE MPCA GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMTUAR WI1H THEIR CONTENTS 'RE SIM AID ALL DINER RELATED DOCUIO71S MUST BE KIST AT 11E ST1E WRNS CONS1RUC110/ 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AS REQUIRED BY 111E SWPPP & PERMITS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERSEE THE INSPECTION @ MAINTENANCE OF THE BLIP'S AND EROSION PREVENTION FROM BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. IS APPROVED BY ALL AUTHORITIES. THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (10T) HAS BEEN FILED 'MTH THE MPCA BY EITHER THE OWNER OR OPERATOR AS APPROVED ON PERMIT ADDITIONAL NAPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION 7. BMP'S AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS LR MANUAL OF PRACTICE. AS APPLICABLE CONTRACTION SMALL MPLEUENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 8. ESC PLAN MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON Sill AT ALL TWES. 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACTURES. OFFICE TRAILERS. AND TOILET FACILITIES 10. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE AND SHALL BE CONTAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. ND ENGINE DEGREASING I5 ALLOWED ON SITE. 11. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOWS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READL1 AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN -UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS 12. DUST ON THE SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED. THE USE O MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TDXLC U0JID5 FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS 15 PROHIBITED. 13. SOLO NAVE COLLECTED SEDIMENT. ASPHALT A CONCRETE MILLINGS. FLOATING DEBRIS. PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC. CONSTRUCTION k DEMOLITION DEBRIS 3 OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY k MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REOJRNEMENTS. 14. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL GASOLINE. PAINT k ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS. LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDAUSA. STORAGE & DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE 1N COMPLIANCE NM MPCA REGULATIONS 15. ALL 5TORHA WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN, AND IN THE SWPPP, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AND PRIOR TO ANY 0IEWORK. 15 DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS STOPPED SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED. SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN/DOT SPEC. 2575 0 10DL85 /ACNE (0R APPROVED EQUAL) AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 711E FOLLOWING GUIDWNES: 0411E OF 5L0PE MME STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS 10:1 TO 3:1 14 DAYS (MAX RUE AN AREA CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN THE AREA IS NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED) FLATTER THAN 10:1 21 DAYS 17. DISTURBED PORTIONS DF THE 910 WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY SEEDED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE 1M114 THE TIME TABLE DESCRIBED ABOVE REFER TO THE GRADING PUN AND /0R LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR VEGETATIVE COVER. TEL CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT FROA CONVEYANCES k FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER OUA1ITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. SEDIMENT FAUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT IT FROM BENG WASHED BACK INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES. OR DRAINAGEWAYS DISCHARGING OFF -91E OR TO SURFACE WATERS. THE CLEANOUT OF PERMANENT BASINS FAUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASH TO DESIGN CAPACITY. I9. ON -9TE W OFT-SITE SOIL STOCKPLE AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF BMP'S. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS_ 20. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS & CANNOT BE PLACED N SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB & GUTTER SYSTEMS OR CONDUITS & DITCHES. 21. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT N A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. 22. DUE 1D THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (5LT FENCES, CHECK DAMS, MILD- PROTECTION DEVICES ETC.) TD PREVENT EROSION. 23. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY, 111I5 INCLUDES BACKFIWNG OF TRENCHES FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL OR BITUMINOUS PAVING FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE: ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED N FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR 0NAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE THE DESIGNATED CONTACT PERSON NOTED ON THIS PLAN MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS WRING ACTIVE CONTRUCTION AND WHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES N 24 HOURS. Al EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: I. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MADE OPERABLE DURING CWSTRUCTION MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMP'S UNTIL ALL 501JRCE5 NTH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABIUZED. 2 ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A COCO STAND 145 MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED, AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. 3. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED. REPLACED CR SUPPLEMENTED TO THEN ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE -THIRD THE HEIGHT OF 711E SILT FENCE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 4. VEHICLE TRACKING LF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE MINIMIZED BY BMP'5 SUCH AS STONE PADS, CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS, OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED 1F SUCH BMP'5 ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEGMENT FROM BEING TRACKED 0NTD THE STREET. TRACKED 5FOMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL OFF -SITE PAVED SURFACES WHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OR SOONER. 5. THE 7EMP0RARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIWIG TOP DRESSING O THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 6. OUTLET STRUCTURES IN IRE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIMES. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS WHEN THE DESIGN CAPACITY REACHES ONE -HALF THE STORAGE VOLUME. DRAINAGE & REMOVAL FAUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OR AS SOW AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. FLIER FABRIC (111RAFI- ENVRNO FENCE ON APPROVED EQUAL) 104. 30. - MAIL 36' ABOVE GRADE TRENCH 6- = 6' FRA Yfmbfarlrl JAHmlA`c SILT FENCE DETAIL L „N rY C Pty f'' L� 0 O a 00 51 O CD CO 1 5 CO m i 0 a SHEET NUMBER C -5.03 REV. MFRA FILE j 16172 • • • ntr La es Pa • • • ATTACHMENT 8 MEMORANDUM DATE: April 25, 2007 TO: Jim Studenski FROM: Marty Asleson RE: LaMotte Soil Excavation The following comments should be addressed: 1. This SWPPP must have the responsible manager listed and a 24 hour phone number that this person can be reached. 2. The SWPPP must contain the name and telephone number of the person responsible for the SWPPP. 3. The SWPPP must state specifically that inspections will occur on a weekly and post 1/2 inch storm event 4. The SWPPP must be located on the site (preferably in a mailbox), and the site location indicated in the SWPPP. 5. All references to Mindot seed mix for final grade should be changed to the City Native seed mix. Native seed application should be applied at the time of initial stabilization if soil stabilization plants would pose a problem for establishing the permanent City native seed mix. • • • icy, e VI. DETENTION BASIN FORBS Description % by wt. Alisma subcordatum 11.4 Mud Plantain Iris versicolor 5.7 Northern Blue Flag Sagittaria latifolia 2.85 Common Arrowhead Totals for FORBS: 19.94 GRASSES, SEDGES & RUSHES Description % by wt. Calamagrostis canadensis 1.14 Blue Joint Grass PLS Carex scoparia 2.85 Lance - fruited Oval Sedge Carex stipata 2.85 Common Fox Sedge Eleocharis acicularis 1.42 Spike Rush Elymus canadensis 56.98 Canada Wild Rye PLS Gylceria grandis 5.7 Reed Manna Grass Scirpus atrovirens 0.57 Dark -green Bulrush Scirpus validus 2.85 Great Bulrush Spartina pectinata 5.7 Cord Grass PLS Totals for GRASSES, SEDGES & RUSHES: 80.06 Totals for this mix: 100 • • • IV. WET PRAIRIE FORBS Description % by wt. Agalinis tenuifolia Slender Gerardia 0.34 Agastache foeniculum Anise Hyssop 0.69 Aster umbellatus Flat - Topped Aster 0.69 Eupatorium maculatum Joe Pye Weed 0.69 Eupatorium perfoliatum Boneset 0.69 Iris versicolor Northern Blue Flag 5.5 Liatris pycnostachya Prairie Blazing Star 5.5 Mimulus ringens Monkey Flower 0.34 Pycnanthemum virginianum Mountain Mint 0.69 Rudbeckia hirta Black -eyed Susan 2.75 Sisyrinchium campestre Prairie Blue -eyed Grass 0.69 Solidago graminifolia Grass - leaved Goldenrod 0.34 Solidago uliginosa Bog Goldenrod 0.69 Zizia aurea Golden Alexanders 0.69 Totals for FORBS: 20.27 GRASSES, SEDGES & RUSHES Description % by wt. Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem PLS 5.5 Calamagrostis Canadensis Blue Joint Grass PLS 1.37 Carex atherodes Hairy- leaved Lake Sedge 1.37 Elymus canadensis 54.98 Canada Wild Rye PLS Sorghastrum nutans 11 Indian Grass PLS Spartina pectinata 5.5 Cord Grass PLS Totals for GRASSES, SEDGES & RUSHES: 79.73 Totals for this mix: 100 • • • • V. DRY PRAIRIE FORBS Description % by wt. Agastache foeniculum Anise Hyssop 0.61 Asclepias hirtella Tall Green Mildweed 0.61 Asclepias tuberose Butterfly Weed 0.61 Aster oblongifolius Aromatic Aster 0.08 Aster sericeus Silky Aster 0.08 Liatris aspera Button Blazing Star 1.22 Monarda fistulosa Wild Bergamot 0.61 Penstemon grandiflorus Large- flowered Beardtongue 0.61 Petalostemum candidum White Prairie Clover 0.61 Petalostemum purpureum Purple Prairie Clover 0.61 Potentilla arguta Prairie Cinquefoil 0.31 Rudbeckia hirta Black -eyed Susan 2.44 Sisyrinchium campestre Prairie Blue -eyed Grass 0.31 Solidago rigida Stiff Goldenrod 0.31 Solidago speciosa Showy Goldenrod 0.31 Tradescantia occidentalis Western Spiderwort 0.61 Verbena stricta Hoary Vervain 0.31 Viola pedatifida Prairie Violet 0.31 Totals for FORBS: 10.53 • • TREES, SHRUBS & VINES Description % by wt. Amorpha canescens 0.61 Lead Plant Ceanothus americanus 0.31 New Jersey Tea Totals for TREES, SHRUBS & VINES: 0.92 GRASSES, SEDGES & RUSHES Description % by wt. Andropogon gerardil 4.89 Big Bluestem PLS Andropogon scoparius 9.77 Little Bluestem PLS Bouteloua curtipendula 9.77 Side -Oats Grama PLS Bouteloua hirsute 0.31 Hairy Grama Bromus kalmii 0.61 Prairie Brome PLS Calamovllfa longifolia 0.31 Sand Reed Grass Carex muhlenbergii 0.61 Sand Bracted Sedge Elymus canadensis 48.85 Canada Wild Rye PLS Koeleria cristata 1.22 June Grass PLS Sorghastrum nutans 7.33 Indian Grass PLS Stipa spartea 4.89 Porcupine Grass - Untrimmed Totals for GRASSES, SEDGES & RUSHES: 88.55 Totals for this mix: 100 • • • MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 2007 TO: Environmental Board ` FROM: Michael Grochal Community Development Director RE: Agenda Item 6.A. Comprehensive Plan Draft Goals and Strategies The Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel is nearing completion of the first phase of the Comp Plan update process. Over the past two months the panel has been working on establishing goals and strategies. A draft of the goals and strategies is being prepared for review by the City Advisory boards. Comments received from the boards will be brought back and discussed with the advisory panel at their May 16 meeting. Discussion of the goals and strategies is included on the Environmental Boards agenda. However, we were unable to get the revised draft, based on the panel's April 21 meeting, completed for distribution. We hope to have these delivered by Monday evening. I have enclosed copies of the first two comp plan newsletters which provide an overview of the first two panel meetings. See you on Wednesday. J: \Forms \Memo Template.dot o,. Spotlight on March 27, 2007 Issue 1 Advisory Panel lists issues during SWOT exercise Below are the top responses identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in Lino Lakes. The number of votes received is shown next to each response. Strengths • Natural amenities (parks, open space, lakes) - 18 • Location (close to economic engines Mpls /St. Paul) - 14 • Access to I -35E and I -35W - 13 • Conservation development - 6 • Sense of unique, small town community - 4 Weaknesses • Commercial and industrial development (lack of tax base, small businesses, bed room community) - 26 • Lack of community identity (no social, economic center, lack of community gateways) - 12 • Deteriorating road system - 6 • Lack of diversified housing - 5 • City Charter - 4 Opportunities • Conservation development - 13 • To have a novel plan - 9 • Location - 9 • AUAR process for comprehensive planning - 7 • Amend City Charter - roads - 6 • Mass transit - 6 Threats • Business climate - 16 • Water quality, pollution - 13 • Transportation issues - 9 • Private property rights - 5 • Failure to consistently implement plans - 5 Advisory Panel discuss issues facing Lino Lakes Input to be used to create city's goals any policies for the 2030 Comprehensive Plan In an effort to make the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan citizen - driven, an Issues Forum was conducted on March 21 at Lino Lakes City Hall. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel spent the evening discussing and wrestling with the biggest issues facing the city currently. To begin the meeting Ciara Schlichting, of the planning consulting firm Bonestroo, gave an introductory presentation, Ciara Schlichting described what a comprehensive plan is, and why it is important to plan for the future. Also included in the presentation was information about the Advisory Panel and how it was selected. For the full presentation go to the city's website at www.ci,lino- lakes,mn,us, At that point the Advisory Panel formed smaller groups to discuss their A member of the Advisory Panel votes on his top issues in Lino Lakes. thoughts about the top issues facing Lino Lakes. A SWOT exercise was then conducted. SWOT stands for Strengths - Weaknesses - Opportunities - Threats. Citizens were directed to think about Lino Lake's strengths and weaknesses, then to think about what opportunities and threats the city faces in the future. Getting thoughts out into the open helps citizens see what kind of city they have today and where they would like it to go over the next 20 years. The groups spent about 40 minutes discussing all of these issues with each other. After the discussion period, Ciara Schlichting moderated a group discussion where each group took turns sharing their thoughts from the SWOT exercise. Every group contribution to the SWOT exercise was written down and hung up on the wall. The participants were invited to vote on their top three issues in each category. The sidebar to the left shows the issues that received the most votes from the people at the forum. These issues will be utilized to shape the city's goals and polices, which is the next step of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. City of Lino Lakes Michael Grochala, Community Development Director 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 michael .grochala @ci.lino - lakes.mn.us Next step: The Advisory Panel will meet on April 4 to discuss draft goals and policies. If you have questions or comments, please contact: compplan2030 @ci. lino - lakes. mn. us • Spotlight on 2030 April 13, 2007 Issue 2 Advisory Panel utilizes meeting to explore and confer over important issues Panel spent almost two hours sharing, listening and discussing issues that they feel are important to the City of Lino Lakes' future The 2030 Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel spent the evening of April 4th at City Hall discussing and wrestling with some of the biggest topics and issues facing Lino Lakes. To begin the meeting Ciara Schlichting, of the planning consulting firm Bonestroo, reported back the results of the SWOT exercise that was conducted on March 21st. This exercise let advisory panel members state what they thought the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats were in Lino Lakes. After the results had been reported back a discussion was held that lasted almost two hours where a wide range of topics were discussed. The Advisory Panel discussed how future opportunities connect and /or conflict with one another job creation and housing, transportation and economic development, transportation and housing, and conservation development and housing. Some of the topics included: housing conditions, the Metropolitan Council's definition of affordable housing, redevelopment opportunities, conservation development, job growth, and business retention and expansion. This discussion afforded the Advisory Panel a chance to express their opinions and to hear different view points on the various topics that are important to the City's future. Also the Advisory Panel was able to hear what city staff is currently doing to address many of these issues already, while also learning what limitations the City faces when trying to solve some of the more complex subjects. This discussion is feeding the creation of goals and strategies for the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Advisory Panel will be continuing its work on the goals and strategies for Lino Lakes at its April 18th meeting. For more information of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan please visit www.ci.lino- lakes.mn.us. Below is a list of topics that were discussed during the Advisory Panel meeting. The topics are organized by the categories from the City's 2030 Vision Plan with Community Facilities added. The Panel ran out of time to discuss Community Assets and Natural Resources. Community, Residential and Neighborhood Development - Redevelopment /Infill - Rehab and maintenance of housing - Tying together transportation and residential uses - Conservation development and affordable housing; How will it work together? - Accommodating affordable housing - Metropolitan Council mandates Economic and Commercial Development - Proactive economic development - Business retention and expansion - Housing -jobs balance - Capturing local dollars "On Our Way Home" - Marketing all assets; income, businesses - How does industrial, commercial, and residential development all work together? Roads and Transportation - Light rail transit - Multiple modes of transportation - Walkable communities - Planned roads - Coordination with County Community Facilities - Continuing education - Post secondary education (i.e, Minnesota School of Business) - Niche facility? Band shelter, theater, fountain - Need for community center? - Community facilities as economic generator - Athletics - Partner with large corporations City of Lino Lakes R✓lichael Grochala, Community Development Director 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 michael .grochala @ci.lino- lakes.mn.us If you have questions or comments, please contact: compplan2030 @ci.lino- lakes. mn. us