The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/30/2007 Env Bd Packet• • City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting May 30, 2007 6:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. Meet at City Hall for site visit of Legacy of Woods Edge. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes April 25, 2007 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Open Mike 5. Action Items A. Grandview Preliminary Plat and Variance 6. Discussion Items A. Water Emergency and Conservation Management — Verne Jacobsen B. Recycling Day C. Updates 7. Adjourn • • • Memorandum To: Environmental Board Members From: Marty Asleson Date: 5/30/07 Re: Pre Meeting Site Visit It has been a tradition of the Environmental Board during the spring/summer months to visit some of the past reviewed project sites. For those that can, we will meet at city hall at 5:30 p.m. to walk through the Legacy of Wood Edge development. • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 25, 2007 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES : April 25, 2007 . 6:33 P.M. . 7:30 P.M. : Mary Jo O'Dea, Martha DeHaven, Barbara Bor, Kimberly Brouillet, Peter Brown and Paula Andrzejewski : Alan Traylor : Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, 1. CALL TO ORDER Ms. O'Dea called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ms. O'Dea had a change to the March 28, 2007 minutes on page 3, should read: Motion carried 6 -0, not 7 -0. Page 4, second paragraph, should read: include a bum, not berm at the end of this year. Ms. Brouillet made a motion to approve the March 28, 2007 minutes with changes. Ms. Andrzejewski seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ms. Brouillet made a motion to approve the agenda as is. Ms. Brouillet seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. OPEN MIKE Opened and closed at 6:35 p.m. 5. ACTION ITEMS A. LaMotte Soil Excavation Mr. Asleson presented his staff report to board members. He noted that at this time, Rice Creek Watershed District has determined this application to be incomplete. Mr. Asleson stated that a tree preservation plan is not necessary. 1 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 25, 2007 Mr. Brian Baroussa from MFRA Engineering was present to answer questions. Ms. O'Dea questioned if this was a stock pile. Mr. Bourassa stated this project is not an ongoing pit application. The purpose of this project is to excavate good material from this site and bring it to a project around the corner. Mr. Baroussa stated this is a temporary project that will be rimmed with silt fence. Ms. O'Dea asked what we are creating. Mr. Bourassa stated basically a hole in the ground. Mr. Bourassa stated that organic material will be placed at the side slopes and seeded. Mr. Brown asked Mr. Asleson if this is a good or bad way of doing this. Mr. Asleson stated this is an economical way. Ms. Bor questioned the safety of children. It was stated the side slopes are 4 to 1. Ms. O'Dea asked if there will be three holes that will be dug. Mr. Bourassa said at this time it is only a proposal. All three holes might not be dug. Ms. Brouillet questioned at what point if the hole(s) become a pond can Rice Creek Watershed District come in and say they are going to delineate? Mr. Asleson stated after 25 years. Mr. Asleson stated this isn't the first time this type of project has been done in the city. Mr. Bourassa stated Rice Creek Watershed District has asked for additional information on this project. MFRA has submitted the information to Rice Creek Watershed District twice. They are reviewing MFRA's material at this time. The material that will be going to be put back in the MFRA analysis shows they will not draw down on the wet land area. Ms. O'Dea asked if the wet land started to dry up is there a way to deal with that? Mr. Bourassa has requested a dewatering permit from the city engineer. Mr. Brown asked how many gallons of water will be retained in the holes. Mr. Bourassa stated he did not know at this time. He stated he believes the pond will be 1/2 the elevation of the existing ground water. Ms. Brouillet questioned if there will be a buffer between the existing lots in Trappers Crossing and this project. Mr. Bourassa stated that they will not be taking any trees. He stated the project will take place approximately 30' from their property lines. Ms. O'Dea asked for motion to approve or deny this project and for staff recommendations. Ms. Bor made a motion to forward with the following staff recommendations: 1. Add Rice Creek Watershed District approval. 2. Add fencing or other barrier around the property for safety purposes. Ms. Andrzejewski seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 2 DRAFT MINUTES • • • • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 25, 2007 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Comprehensive Plan Draft Goals and Strategies Mr. Grochala was present to update the board on the first phase of the Comprehensive Plan process. The advisory panel has been meeting over the past two months. Ms. O'Dea noted on page 11 of the Draft Goals and Strategies, under Strategies, the SHEP program information should be included. Board members discussed the wording to be used. It was decided that the following language would be added to the Draft Goals & Strategies document on page 11 under Strategies: 4. Continue to support programs that measure environmental best practices. Ms. O'Dea noted on page 4 of the Draft Goals and Strategies, under Goal 3, add #8. Encourage the use of green building techniques. Mr. Grochala stated the word "new" will be added under sewered section. Under the current zoning ordinance, we will not rezone any property or industrial district unless public sewer and water are available. Another change will be that commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or any type of building of that magnitude will also be covered by this. Ms. O'Dea asked the board members if there were any other questions. There were none. Ms. O'Dea stated the document is very well put together document. Mr. Grochala stated that the format will continue to be changed and updated with new information. B. Arbor Day, Recycle Day and Earth Day Arbor Day - Arbor will take place April 27, 2007 at Lino Lakes Elementary School at 2:00 p.m. Mayor Bergeson will present the Tree City Award and give the proclamation. There will be a tree plated and dedicate to the teacher from Blue Heron Elementary who passed away in an automobile accident this year. Mr. Asleson stated that if other schools want to participate in Arbor Day, he is open to doing this. Recycle Day — Lino Lakes Recycle Day is scheduled to take place from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Saturday, May 5. This will be the only recycle day of the year for the city. Mr. Asleson stated that if there are board members who would like to volunteer to help they could come at anytime during scheduled hours. 3 DRAFT MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING APRIL 25, 2007 Ms. Brouillet mentioned that Walter's Recycling has donated a dumpster for recycling day. Earth Day — Mr. Asleson stated that about 735 people attended the Earth Day celebration at Wargo Nature Center. He stated that this event was a success. Ms. Andrzejewski had a booth at Wargo Nature Center for the event. She brought information resources and activities for the kids. C. Project Updates: Blue Heron Days, Spring Restoration Burns and Heron Colony Update Blue Heron Days - Walter's will donate trash bins with wheels for Blue Heron Days stated Ms. Brouillet. Spring Restoration Burns. Mr. Asleson reviewed with the board where burns have taken place in the past week. He stated that a Blanding's turtle was found on the Fox Borough site. Mr. Husveth from Critical Connections will document the finding. Pictures were taken and the turtle was then released. Heron Colony Update: Mr. Asleson is looking into an inventory flyover of Peltier Island to record the number of Blue Heron nests present at this time. 7. ADJOURN It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on May 30, 2007. There being no further business, Ms. Bor moved to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. and Ms. Brouillet seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Lisa Hogstad Community Development Secretary 4 DRAFT MINUTES • • • Agenda Item 5A • Environmental Board Meeting Date: May 30, 2007 Topic: Grandview /Preliminary Plat and variance for minimum lot depth and minimum lot area within the shoreland area. Background: Request Royal Oaks Realty has submitted an application for Preliminary Plat of Eight (includes parsonage house) single family lots known as "Grandview ". Site Location The Grandview Development proposal is located east of Lake Drive, and North of Gethsemane United Methodist Church, and adjacent to Marshan Lake. Site Data Gross Area: 3.32 acres Upland Area: 3.24 acres Wetland: 0.08 Acres Total Lots 8 Existing Zoning is R -1. Proposed Zoning is R -1. The proposed development is in a Shoreland Overlay District. Shoreland means land located within 1000 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHW) of the lakes and land located within 300 feet from the streams classified in section 1102.05 of the code, or the landward extent of a flood plain designated by ordinance on a river or stream , whichever is greatest. The area would be serviced with city sewer and water and is located in the MUSA boundary area. Analysis: Shoreland Area The development proposal is in a shoreland overlay area, and NPDES area of "Within 200 feet of Lake." The Shore Impact Zone within a Shoreland Area is defined as land located between the ordinary high water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 % of the structure setback. This is the closest distance that a structure may be built in a shoreland district. The Grandview proposal meets • • • these requirements. The removal of vegetation is also prohibited in a shore Impact Zone. Surface Water Management Preliminary Grading Plan (Attachment 4) shows a National Urban Runoff Pond (NURP) and an infiltration pond on the SW side of the project. Sizing must be verified for volume storage, runoff rate and infiltration requirements on proposed infiltration and storage ponds. All infiltration areas must be protected from construction as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. All infiltration, pond, and disturbed wetland areas must be planted with the City native seed mix and managed by a company listed with the Minnesota DNR as recommended for such work for a period of at least 3 years. Plan should show access for pond and infiltration area maintenance. Suggest that all houses direct runoff from impervious to pervious grass areas through the use of downspouts. A temporary sediment pond should be installed somewhere on the site that will accept construction water from storm events. There should be an agreement that all builders agree to landscape contractor requirements for tilling top soil into the subsoil before sodding occurs. Suggest that the developer prepare a brochure for new home owners. The brochure should discuss the importance of water treatment and that some areas may be a bit wet after a storm. Other information should include Shoreland Overlay district restrictions on vegetation removal. Conservation Easement Recommended In an effort to address MNDNR concerns for rare species, a conservation easement should be required to include the shoreland Impact Zone to Marshan Lake. Signage should be placed at the boundaries where the easement areas are described. The Conservation Easement should be similar in nature to the easement granted in the Marshan Meadows Development. City control over all surface water treatment features should be maintained. Surface water management areas are covered by drainage and utility easements. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan • The developer has submitted a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP must be approved and implemented prior to the commencement of a grading permit. A number of modifications to the SWPPP have been identified and will need to be incorporated into the final plan as identified in the attached SWPPP memo. Site Vegetation Almost the entire site is classified as medium tall grass non - native dominated grassland. The Eastern -most edge falls into a Native dominated temporarily flooded shrubland. Trees: There are no trees within the proposed construction area.. Rare and Unique Feature Search Developer should check with the Minnesota DNR on how to develop with National Heritage concerns in the area. There is an indication from the Lino Lakes Blandings Turtle Model that we have activity and breeding on this site. Given that there is a potential for breeding and activity on this site, the site should be designed to enable Blanding's Turtle • activity. Low - profile, surmountable curbing to allow turtles to cross roads should be used. Signs similar to the signs placed in Marshan Meadows indicating a potential nesting area should be placed on along the same contour as Marshan meadows. A wetland delineation report submitted is shown on Attachment 6. Wetlands are confined to the eastern edge of the site. The wetland area is a shrub swamp type of wetland. Rice Creek Watershed District has declared the delineation as incomplete due to seasonal constraints related to vegetation and frozen soils. The report is considered incomplete until the vegetation is analyzed. Because of the rare features concerns and the shoreland overlay district, a conservation easement should be drafted that is contiguous with that of Marshan Meadows. Literature should be given to new residents notifying them of the easement and the reasons for it. Conservation easement signs should be placed along the easement line with at least one sign per frontage of easement. The sign should state that "no cutting, planting, filling or excavating should occur within the easement." Soils Soils on the proposed development site are for the most part fine sand, and Lake Beach along the lake shore. No soils should be imported or exported with out City approval. Soils must be protected from compaction and restored if • • • development process changes the pre - development soil density. Suggest fencing around the new surface water treatment areas before and after construction. No soils should be imported or exported without city approval. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the following staff and Environmental Board recommendations be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board for consideration: 1. Sizing must be verified for volume storage, runoff rate and infiltration requirements on proposed infiltration and storage ponds. 2. All infiltration areas must be protected from construction as part of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 3. All infiltration, pond, and disturbed wetland areas must be planted with the City native seed mix and managed by a company listed with the Minnesota DNR as recommended for such work for a period of at least 3 years. 4. Plan should show access for pond and infiltration area maintenance. 5. Suggest that all houses direct runoff from impervious to pervious grass areas through the use of downspouts. 6. A temporary sediment pond should be installed somewhere on the site that will accept construction water from storm events. 7. Suggest that the developer prepare a brochure for new home owners. The brochure should discuss the importance of water treatment and that some areas may be a bit wet after a storm. Other information should include Shoreland Overlay district restrictions on vegetation removal. 8. A number of modifications to the SWPPP have been identified and will need to be incorporated into the final plan as identified in the attached SWPPP memo. 9. Developer should check with the Minnesota DNR on how to develop with National Heritage concerns in the area. 10. Because of the rare features concerns and the shoreland overlay district, a conservation easement should be drafted that is contiguous with that of Marshan Meadows. Literature should be given to new residents notifying them of the easement and the reasons for it. Conservation easement signs should be placed along the easement line with at least one sign per frontage of easement. The sign should state that "no cutting, planting, filling or excavating should occur within the easement." 11. No soils should be imported or exported without city approval 12. The developer has submitted a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP must be approved and implemented prior to the commencement of a grading permit. A number of modifications to the SWPPP have been identified and will need to be incorporated into the final plan as identified in the attached SWPPP memo. Attachments: • • 1. Grandview Location Map 2. Certificate of Survey 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Preliminary Grading 5. Preliminary Utility 6. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 7. SWPPP Memo AERIAL LAYOUT s RANDVIEW ATTACHMENT 1 •)R: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER) OWNER: GETHSEMANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST, SUITE 150 .7330 LAKE DRIVE -" SHOREVIEW MN 55126 LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE (651) -483 -5518 PROPERTY DESORPTION Tracts B and C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 182, Anoka County, Minnesota. • ICKE. G. RUD a SONS, INC. Est /BM Professional Land Surveyors , ,1, om 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 NOTES survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc include the location of the OHM_ Wetland located by E0. Rud & Sons on 2 -05 -07 on 02 -05-07 to Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc (651)- 674 -6210 Jan 07. Feld verified and approved by Watershed on 1 May 07. - Bearings shown are on Anoko County datum. - Curb shots are token at the top and bock of curb. - This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE b 0 b 69 M6 (It1 FEET ) 1 Inch = 80 f7. BENCHMARK At gage site, a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden romp for dock. Devotion = 886.37 (N.G. V.D. 1929) DEVELOPMENT DATA - Total Piet area = 3.76 Acres - Upland within plat = 3.67 Acres (98X) LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 • DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T,T DENOTES HYDRANT La DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES 12' CMP e DENOTES WELL m DENOTES SANITARY STUB • DENOTES WATER STUB m DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX 31,. DENOTES WETLAND AREA r "`"c•a:= DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS X 952.]6 DRAMS BY: "NAA JOB NB 06543PP I DATE: O5 -14-07 CHECK Br. OVA BAG NO PRE - PUT -3) SCANNED ❑ 2 NO. DAZE DESCRWnON BY DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES FLOOD ZONE UNE DENOTES SOIL UNE DENOTES WETLAND UNE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE VICINITY MAP SEC. 17. TWP. 3I. RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOT TO SCALD GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE R I MINIMUM BU LDNG SETBACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE R I MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 10,800 sq. ft. = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shoreland lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 700.00 feet (comer) CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RECEIVED MAY 1 4 2007 CITY OF LINO LAKES Le3 DANIEL W. OBERMILLER Date: ,.3 /1 LL /o 7 License No. 25341 PP nr.54APP\PRF=PI_AT -adwo 5/14/2007 12.14■37 PM CDT RESOURCE INVENTORY /CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY GRANDVIEW 110R: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER) 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST, SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 PHONE: (651) -483 -5518 OWNER:'GETHSEMANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 7330 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES MN 55014 NORTH U11E OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4. SOUTH UNE OF DO NMENT LOT 3, & SOUTH UNE,- OF THE OF MARSHAN MEADOMS .• '`/ satyr 1 ., r r.40‘56 '9°4'. I >... R,1 p�plLY ~ / 4. ......` TON: -O , F . ,JA0, 5tN 0. t 1 A r ■ r l , - . i r eEN51'i�' • ate _- . -....- - / „,‘„,,,o,,. \/I // , , � f -1...9,-': \xl 044 T. 1 ,i-7, if i t, xy�PwN1 . xFp 1 / , .. ( ,/ �,�01 .. 0 / 1-' / EXISTIN CHURCH BUILDIN 4:10 IN 1 __tat/ -. ...0 -6.& „c/so 137.7 3 � TONS R_ b�J m. elg 1:/ r:6. T/ 10 #; 1 1 JI 1 / 11. o ( 1' _ \¢ , 7 . 4f7.474 - s A \ \. ATTACHMENT 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Trocts 8 and C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 182, Anoka County, Minnesota 0�W c1. 3 \ � b`� - \ 1i da?a°T s 11 c6ee° J e LOCATION OF WETLAND DELINEATION ."xiL•.... \ . • . -BY EARTH SCIENCE JAN. 2007. .A? •` ' LOCATION OF B83-3 OHW UNE l I \ I \ I I 1 1 b04.5 >_ . L / e.Ln / I TpN� R_1. xeeT ae -401W" _ De.° 8'64'E6"B )ft.ao E. G. ROD a SONS, INC. MA" Professional Land Surveyors wwW7.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 TeL (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 361 -8701 y1I 11 hir- • r I` 1 . 1 5l�� `0W °E149 I woo NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc on 02 -05 -07 to include the location of the OHWL Wetland located by-E.G. Rud & Sons on 2 -05 -07 Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science inc. (651) -674 -6210 Jon 07. Field verified and approved by Watershed on 1 May 07. Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. Curb shots are token at the, top and back of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work Additional easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of o current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. A %.111 /1 -h r h ti F 1 I% v 1 1 1T 1 f LO DRAWN BY: NAA JOB Na 06543PP'DATE 05 -14-07 HEC ( or DWD DWG Na. PRE - PLAT -3I SCANNED ❑ 2 3 Na DATE DESCRIPTION BY NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE o 10 40 !. ( FEU ) 1 inch = 40 FL BENCHMARK At gage site, o 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden romp for dock. Elevation = 886.37 (N.G.V.D. 1929) DEVELOPMENT DATA - Total Plot area = 3.76 Acres Upland within plot = 3.67 Acres (98Z) LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS{ 25341 el DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T( DENOTES HYDRANT p Q DENOTES GATE VALVE • DENOTES 12- CMP O DENOTES WELL • DENOTES SANITARY STUB ® DENOTES WATER STUB m DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX il. DENOTES WETLAND AREA DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ■ DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH LINE DENOTES FLOOD ZONE UNE DENOTES SOIL LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW LINE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE VICINITY MAP SEC. I7, TWP. 31. RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOT TO SCALD GUIDING - Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA - Property falls within the MUSA - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE R1 MINIMUM BUILDING SCI HACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 70.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE RI MINMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 10,800 sq. ft = 20,000 sq. ft. (upland) shorelond lot Lot Depth = 735.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (comer) CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or unde my direct supervision and that I am o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lairs of the State of Minnesota. DANIEL W. OBERMILLER Date: c5 /p,i /D7 License No. 25341 RECEIVED MAY 1 4 200? CITY OF LINO LAKES PP-� PRELIMINARY. PLAT OF GRANDVIEW: •R: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER) 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST, SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 PHONE (651) -483 -5518 I r ATTACHMENT 3 PROPERTY 'DESC2PTION- Trocts 8 pond C, REGISTERED. LAND SURVEY NO. 182, Anoka County, Minnesota. OWNER GETHSEMANE UNITED. METHODIST CHURCH 7330 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES MN 55014 NORTH UGI aF Gow GENT LOT 4. SOUTH ,•;:.-'• .......-LINE of LOT 3 & SOUTH. LNE.+- i OF THE P LAj Or MARSH_ A N MEADOW .! .•y , r am `1 14 A r♦ /- I I Ar I I t- i \•..41 �,ti' 1 I Y • LOCATION OF N OLMD DELINEATION • �••`?C % .--BY EARTH SPENCE JAIL 2007. ,■-- LOCATION Cr 8833 0Hw LINE • I-- 137.7 ® i EXISTIN CHURCH BUILDIN 75.0' rr r Veal / / / ' E. O. 111111 & SONS, INC. Professional Land Surveyors TNW1B.•giud.com 6776 - Lake - Drive NE, Suite 1.10 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361 -8200 Fax (651) 3614701 64186E . '_r , / .A i-- J1 n I i L_ ./ NOTES' Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud .and Sons, Inc. on 02 -05-07 to indude the location of the OHWL - Wetland located by EG Rud & Sons on 2-05-07 -Wetland :delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. '(651) -674 -6210 Jan held verified and approved by Watershed On 1 May 07. Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum.' Curb shots are token at the top and back of curb. - This _survey. was prepared without the benefit of .titie work. Additional' easements, restrictions and /or encumbrances may exist' other than those shown hereon: Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or on attome /s title opinion. 07. SE t .4 4 r \. /:- I I A • r )rI r rr -: ri ?1 i'.i' DRAM BY:- NAA J013 N� 06543PP I DAIS: 055 -14-07 CHECK eW. JAW elm ma PRE- PLAT -31 SCALPED ❑ 3 ND. DATE DESCRIPTION BY NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE M 0 - - - wC (m ) 1 Each - 40 n TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTILITY EASEMENTS it I 4. I J L Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining side lot lines, and rear lot lines and 10 feet in width and adjoining street fines, DEVELOPMENT DATA - Total Plot ores = 3.76 Acres - Upland within plat = 3.67 Acres (98X) - 8 Proposed Single Family Lots - Single Forney Lots = 3.26 Acres - Streets = 0.49 Acres - Average Lot Size = 17,78Bi sf - Density - - 212 Lots / Acre • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND :AS LABELED • .DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 m DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE XL DENOTES HYDRANT pQ DENOTES CATE VALVE DENOTES 12' CHP e DENOTES WELL 0 0 DENOTES SANITARY STUB DENOTES WATER STUB ID DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX I DENOTES WETLAND AREA DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS o rem DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH UNE DENOTES SETBACK UNE DENOTES WETLAND LINE DENOTES OHW UNE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE 1 YICINIr`t' MAP SEC. 17, TWP. 31, RNG. 22 ANOKA COUNTY, MNN ESOTA NOT TO SCALE) GLADING — Property guiding Low Density Single Family. MUSA - Property fails within the MUSA. - No MUSA amendment proposed ZONING - Property is Zoned R -1 ZONE RI MWIMUnA BIADWG SETBACKS Front = 30.00 feet Rear = 30.00 feet Side = 10.00 feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (OHW) = 150.00 feet ZONE R I MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot Area = 10,800 sq. ft. = 20.000 sq. ft (upland) shorelond lot Lot Depth = 135.00 feet Lot Width - 80.00 feet Lot Width = 100.00 feet (corner) .13ENC —MARK At gage site. a 60d spike, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the in - - -- ., of wooden romp far dock. Elevation CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or unde my direct supervision and that 1 om a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the I of the State of Minnesota. DAFIIEL W. OBERMILLER `�� Date: SIP / o* License No. 25341 PP -3 S/ rud\CAD\06proJ\06543PP\PRE= PLAT -3.dwg 5/14/2007. 12112 51 P14 CDT PRELIMINARY GRADING CIUNDVIEW ATTACHMENT 4 .R: ROYAL OAKS REALTY (DEVELOPER) : OWNER GETHSEMANE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 1000 COUNTY ROAD E. WEST, SUITE 150 7330 LAKE. DRIVE SHOREVIEW MN 55126 LINO LAKES MN 55014 PHONE: (651) -483 -5518 I 41 x0A" xeo' ' : ; a, r. I V I Lt Fe 1-41 fr I'. �7 mo, x50• ost 010 ..; NORTH LeffI�0F OO'I S1 NTLOT 4. SOUTH _,.••''' Leff OF CO4ER1t1ENTxLOT s.:& SOUTH UIE/ . *. OF 7FE KLAi tOF YARSIlAN YEAOOwS ,. -" . I %` -i: t - - -x %weX' EXISTIN SHELTER/ 00 - PR PERTY DESCRIPTION Tracts C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY. NO. 782, Anoka County, Minnesota BENCHMARK At gage site, a 60d sp &e, 1.0 feet above ground, on Northwest .side of 0.5 foot ash tree at the intersection of wooden romp for dock. Devotion _- 886.37 (N.G.V.D. 1929) 905 • . yt 05S d P°6*t '.•- ., --/`: 41k. - ' LOCATION OF WETLAND DEL8IEATION ,/ �� --SY EARTH SCIENCE JAN. 2007. 5AT'�. �.se .— LOCATON aF :883.3 O4W UNE F � i' A0 In In ImG �e 7Dro ° w Z f' vm-ns' 4.0 0 c rea000.saz.rp gZls.v� 4'pZ.s4 N N 1 20 : , °w „W4ll1 vA1 EXISTIN CHURCH BUILDIN • %ai u y-� vwvw.egrud.coon -a I I e, 1- -I; IF( 1-- J I I •• I I L- SE ., x i. i •1 I A e r //1 r1 he to Lt rl1 1 I r t I I r -I I x 10 NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 02 -05-07 to include the location of the ONIM.. — Wetland located by EG.'Rud & Sons on 2 -05-07 E. G. RUD 8t SONS, - INC. - Professional Land_ Surveyor - 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 TN. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 3618701 Wetland delineation completed by Earth Science Inc. .(651)- 674 -6210 Jan 07. Field verified and approved by Watershed on -1 May 07. Bearings shown are on Anoka County datum. Curb shots are token at the top and bock of curb. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work ' Additional easements. restrictions and /or. encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. .Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or on attorney's title opinion. SI\r•ud\ CAD \06proJ \06543PP\PRE4PLAT -3.dwp 5/14/2007 12124,21 PM CDT ZONE R MINMUM BULDNG SETBACKS Front = -- 30.00. feet Rem = 30.00 feet Side = 1CLOO feet (house) Side = 5.00 feet (garage) Lake (0111V) = 150.00. feet - ZONE 'R MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS Lot -Areo = 10.800 sq. ft. = 20;000 sq. ft. (upland) shoreland lot Lot Depth - 135.00 feet Lot Width = 80.00 feet Lot Width - 100.00 feet (comer) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 140 ( DI FEET ) 1 inch - 40 R PROPOSED HOUSE PAD INFORMATION '— ' \�Darotas proposed mid, Garage floor is 0.3' oboe the elm front M ��` N.—Denotes house stile. (w0- sdiuwtxFLATX (- iooIout). (Assumed 12 as bent depth proposed) ',Denotes suggested amount to drop prose Denotes finishpInds 0 rear of hams Finished Boor is --" "_ and 2.5 below this elevation on lookout tots homes above this elev. co lookout s NOTE Minimum- Lowest floor to be 2' feet above H. or 4' feel above NUM. of odioeent sonde, and lowest opening to be 1' foot above a controlling EOF. TYPICAL DRAINAGE E UTIUTY EASEMENTS I. II sal 1I J L' Being 5 feet in width,: unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining side lot lines, and rear lot lines and 10 feet In width and - adjoining street lines, DRANK BY. NM JOB NM 05543PP 1 DATE 5 -14-07 CHECK 8Y.• DHO DSO NQ PRE- PLAT -3f SCANNED ❑ 2 3 NO. DATE DESORPTION 87 'I hereby o. Uly that this pbn was pepret by me as widr my direct ahpeMdon and•that 1 am o.ddy, Licensed Professional Engineer r the ides te of Minnesota. 08102 AD8nt• 610115E . 5/14/07 ucENSE i -43983 Mt ten UMW SUM lb 130 LAM MI nor Mai VICINITY MAP SEC, 17, TWP. 3L RNG, 22 ANOKA COUNTY. MINNESOTA (NOT TO SCALE) • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341 CD DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T,T DENOTES HYDRANT M DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES 7r PAP O DENOTES SANITARY STUB 1 DENOTES WATER STUB ID DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX 1E DENOTES WETLAND AREA DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS x nss.x DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES FENCE DENOTES BRUSH UNE DENOTES WELL (W1 D DENOTES SILT FENCE laigN DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (EOF) --+0— DENOTES PROPOSED STORM LINE DENOTES WETLAND LINE • =_.■ DENOTES O1IW LINE 44 DENOTES STORM STRUCTURE/RIPRAP O DENOTES PROPOSED CATCH BASIN DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES GRAVEL SURFACE _ DENOTES POND LINER UP 7D 890 CONTOUR CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this surve or report was prepared by me my direct supervision and that a duly Registered Land Surveyor the /9ws of the S ote of Minnesota. RECEIVED MAY 1 4 2007 Plan r OF LINO LAKF_,S under DANIEL W- OBERMILLER Date: s//•f I License Na 25341 C GRANDVIEW "'PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN Ci ly of Lino Lakes, Minnesota OENERAL NOTES • The iafortn.Uoo dam an them dnwi,ge concerning type and location of existing utilities is not guaranteed to 4. accurate r atl YMu.Ha The contractor le responsible far making his own determination as to tsp. and location of Meths as necessary to ovoid damage to thew utilities. • Cant Gopher State On.-Ca at (651) 454 -0002 far existing utility locations. • The contractor shag tied verify .ise, dewti.n, and location of sedating sanitary seer, storm tower. and aot•Imaln and notify &lob r of any discrepancies prior to the start of installations. • iat0atia s she conform 1. Use City Engineer's Association at Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Utility Bpedlkotloro (1999 Edition) and the Oils Standard Sp•d6w0one. • Contractor show notify City of Lino Lakes Engineering Dena-Mont at (651) 982 -2400 a minimum of 24 hors prior to the intoraption of any seer or water services to existing hams or businesses. WA'EERMAW NOTES • Maintain a minimum of 7.5 fest over awe wotermoin pips • Watomain shun be 5• DP pass 52 (minimum). • Combined seater imam to church lot shall be 6' DP ass 52 (minimum). • Hydrant Mods shave be 6' DP pose 52 (minimum). • Donhestlo Srvke Lips shun b. roomer • Field verify size and location of exletleg watrmdn aid notify engineer at my derepohd.e prior to any imtalblbm. • Provide preformed insulation, PPG Foamglo.., or approved equal where emery mover or storm weer mosses within 16' of watornah • Ytotetmain bends, tees, fittixgt, and hydrant leads shall be threat restrained with •Mago -Lugs' or droved equal SAWTAI YSEWER NOTES • Sanitary sewer pipe shun be PVC SDR 35, unless oth.ruim noted Field verify dm, • d engineer of any discrepancies prior to y sewer and notify • Ssrr Swam to Church lot to be 6' PVC Schedule 40, and on other smeary sewer services dub be 4' PVC Sehed de 40 (to be stationed from the downstream MH). • serer shun be RCP (dose • minimum) or HOPE as seem STOWS SEWER NOTES • Field verity size, elevation, and Meatier: of existing atom ewer and notify engineer of my discrepancies prior to any Installations. • Stan sew lengths include the laying length of the apron • Um Band /granule material for McMinn and compaction of HOPE pipe in accordance Nth th. requirements at ASV 2321. ROBB IMES • Back-filling of curbs with on-eR• materials is Inddmtd to the orb construction. • C.tb and gutty Moen Mail be D412 mime otherwise noted on plans. STREET AND BITIIMI00BS NOTES • Saw -cut existing bituminous and concrete curb to provide butt -joint • Removal and disposal of Meting street materials as required for caabuMan purpose in Incidental. • Restore dlelurbed street to existing or better section as approved by engineer. • Contractor shun 6m tra0lc control measures (h accordance with the 'Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devies7 as necessary whenever grading, ut9Ry or paving operations encroach ante ad)xent streets • 0 0 i$ —p6F- Existing 7Astennain Proposed Watermain Exthfing Sanitary Sewer Proposed Smeary Sewer Existing Sturm Seer Proposed Storm Sewer EdsUng Sanitary Manhole Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole. Existing Hyde* Proposed Hydrant Esbting storm Sewer Manhole /Apr, Proposed Catch Basln/Stonn Sewer Manhole Fxiatlp Fiend -End Section Propo.ed Flare -End Seethes Existing Cate Valve Prpasd cote Valve Existing Overhead Wit Existing Telephone Line Existing Ut9Hy Pole % A e / A A // • r / t .' I 1 \ L /\, T— NORTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SOUTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, & SOUTH UNE OF THE PLAT OF MARSHAN MEADOWS CLEAN -OUT fee 899.50 NV 081.01 wine p 6' 01 PLUG r A 1 /r ATTACHMENT 5 EXISTING HYDRANT AND VALVE PROP SAN Mil 2 NV emus \ A 4 r- A r\ P\ ,4/1 F-- /_I 1 1 1 1 1 l L- ,/ CO*ECT 10 D051BD. r 0r t•ATERMAN 11/. 130,1E VALVE 1 A / 1/I/ V V .i X8' of 0ao' os CX 06 / P 6 ,.-- -LOCATION OF 883.3 OHW UNE ivek • LOCATION OF WETLAND DELINEATION —BY EARTH SCIENCE JAN. 2007. RAUL tli0CD BY: C.C.S. DESIGN BY: C.C.S. PROJ.NO. 07 -1131 ORIGINAL DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 2007 ROM OAKS WRALTT 1000 COUNTY RD 0,580 SHOREVIEW 1N 55128 PRONE (651) 489 -5516 1 I., /:\ 1 1 1 IY� r , • SITE PLANNING & ENGROURING PLOWS EIGHBEIMM 1111 T 1 E T��HYDRANT AND 6778 L02! DTD92 BOle6 110 LINO LASS. MN 55014 PHDNE (651) 881 -821 FAN (651) 881 -670 NORTH EXIST. HSE A 4 A \/1 / 1 1 1 / 1 es '. o� 15 30 1 NCH s 30 FEET 02 GRANDVIEW $TORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN [SWPPP) City M Lino lades, Minnesota MOO INLET PBOiECuON NOT 10 SCALE 5. GRANULAR FLIER BLMOET (SEE NOTE) NOTE IRE CONTRACTOR. AT HIS OPTION, MAY SUBSTITUTE A GEO1EXIV.E FABRIC, SPEC. 3501 FOR WE GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE SPEOF ®N THE PLANS. FABRIC SMXBD COVER THE AREA OF DIE RIP -RAP OVERFLOW NOT TD SCALE ROC[ CONSiIORTION EBiMANCE NOT TO SCALE 11- PAT Sff >S A-A NOR WE OOORAODL AT NS OP71E0. NAY 0606165 A WARE[NL PILING. W16. 3001 F1R111E MIRROR RUM RiANR= OMER 01BIE SPEOFID M 1E RAM. 11E PANR 0 01RD GORR M AREA OF 1E WRAP AN DI10D NCO lE NLVRT APR11I S FRT. WP -BAP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE ATTACHMENT 6 NOTE0 - ALL MINTS SHALL E SOLVENT WELD 0RCEPT AS NOTED. — ALL PFE 70 E SCHEDULE 40 SERVICE CLEAN OUT Y X.r wow "OR STEEL POST •-r 0.C. WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT, STD. FEND FENCE. NN. 30 HIGH, MAX. MESH SPAC140 OF 6' AND MN. • 14 -1/r 0AURE W8E IB OPTIONAL 8EOIEXILE FLIER FABRIC = OVERLAP 6' AND FASTEN AT 2' NIERVALS. LAY FABRIC N TRENCH. FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. BACKED. TRENCH NATURAL SOIL 1611i ili TAMPED EXTEND WME MESH INTO 1RENCH ANCHORAGE R4-STU SOIL.- = 1) MOUE RESIT IS NOT REQUIRED. 2) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE fOR REMOVAL OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS FOLLORNG TUFF ESTABU996NT. EROSION CONTROL FENCE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE INCED GRA 1 5/6' 0 WELL- TREADED PLANING MEDIUM (SEE NOTE /1) AGGREGRIE (SEE NOTE {2) NON -WOVEN GEOTEXT115 (WIDOT TYPE 1) OVER AGGREGATE C PERFORATED DRAIN 2/ SOCK 886.25 (EXTEND TO MANHOLE) 1/4' STEEL BAND WELD 6e �4D6' ; _ EIFV=990.60 1/4' STEEL PIATE ELEV- 890.10 TOP WALL=889.75 10' DIAL ORIFICE INY 888.75 WEN WALL /2' RNAMMER. ANCHCW 60.T. INOWM 4' EASE IDIT ELEV =88625 6' DRAINIILE NY 886.25 (ENTERS THIS SIDE OF 1EIR WALL) 110.6000150 1. WELL-GRADED PLANTING NEDRA/ TOE COMPRISED OF (BY VOWMEK 40.5 SEMI -COURSE WASHED OR NATIVE SAND 302 M11DOT GRADE 2 COMPOST 302 NATIVE TOPSOIL 2. AGGREGATE SHALL E THE FOLLOWING 1' -1S DOUBLE WASHED SIDE 1/$ -1/2' WASHED RHEA RUN PEA GRAVEL 3. STABILIZATION BLANKET TO E DATABLE FOR SEEDING (E.6. STRAW -COCONUT D ANKET). 4. NO 10240 OF SANDY SOBS ALLOWED N BASIN. 5. FINAL GRADE ONLY UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. 6. 810- FLTRMION BASIN TO REMAIN UNLINED. 7. PROTECT BASIN FROM RUN -OFF DURING LOT 004SIROLTION *011811155. AREAS. BASIN ONLY UPON STABIUZAlION OF B. USE NCH-PERFORATED ORAW1LLE OUTSIDE OF BASIL BI0- FNiIAfON BASIN NOT TO SCALE 1/2' TTP. GRATE GALVANIZED Rr tam moo MNWN 1/2' 5 1/4' 55 � 11516 5150. PLA1E 1/2' OAMETR. 6' LONG TREADED ANCHOR BOLTS 1110 1 1/4' FLAT WASHER AND NUT N 4 LOCATIONS 51011. BAND 1/4' 1100 BY 1 1/2' AWE BY 7'-B 5/B' I2:045 WRAPPED AROUND AND MELDED 1O STEM ROBS CONCREiE OUTLET STROCiVRE NO SCALE TOP VIEW 16' STEEL RODS 4 QC, EACH WAY NE1D AT EACH NTERSECIIOI STEEL PIAIE 1 4' ROCK MELDED 1D SM. RODS 1151501. 4 MATION1 DRAWN TRY: DESIGN BY: 84.8. C.C.S. 0400) BY: PRO& NO. C.C.S. 07 -1131 ORIGINAL DATE . MAY 14. 2007 z S3 ROYAL OAKS REAM 1000 COUNTY RD $1641 QHOREIIEL 1111 55128 PHONE (651) 483 -5518 srrA lewl6c k ZNOINITERING PLOWE BIGINEBUNI BTm TAKE lova mt sorra 110 TAD 11108, MN 55014 PEONS (651) 301 -8215 HA& (651) 981 -8701 C4 • ATTACHMENT 7 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 30, 2007 TO: Jim Studenski FROM: Marty Asleson RE: Grandview SWPPP The following comments should be addressed: 1. Must provide maps with : • Existing and final grades • Locations and types of Erosion and sediment control practices • Stormwater flow directions • Soil types, undisturbed areas, wetlands, and receiving waters • Show design and location of Pretreatment and biofiltration basins. 2. Change the Type of Slope/Time chart to 14 days vs. 21 days in the "Flatter than 10:1 slope category. 3. Change the total site area chart to 4.35 acres vs. 3.29 acres. 4. Any vegetation shall be the City Native Seed mix and planted and managed by a DNR listed contractor that is suitable for Native plant installation and maintenance.. This maintenance should include one bum at the end of 3 years. 5. Since this is in a shoreland area, a temporary storm pond should be constructed on site to capture construction surface water runoff. 6. A concrete washout area should be shown on the map. • Agenda Item 6A • • Environmental Board Meeting Date: May 30, 2007 Topic: Water Emergency and Conservation Plan Background: Public water suppliers that service more than 1,000 people are required to have a Water Emergency and Conservation Plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources (Minnesota Statutes 103G.291). These plans were first required in 1996 and must be updated every ten years. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has prepared a schedule for each public water supplier, with a due date for the City of Lino Lakes of October 15, 2007. The plan must address supply and demand reduction measures and allocation priorities and must identify alternative sources of water for use in an emergency. The current Water Emergency and Conservation Plan was created by TKDA in 1997 and revised in 2004 to meet the requirements of a federal mandate of the USEPA, under the Homeland Security Act. That federal mandate required the City of Lino Lakes to prepare a Water System Vulnerability Assessment and amend and update the Water Emergency and Conservation Plan with the purpose of evaluating the existing security of the water system. Analysis: The Water Emergency and Conservation Plan Benchmarks and Conservation Measures are below. The City must address these items through their report to the DNR. Benchmarks and Conservation Measures. Permit approvals will be based on meeting specified benchmarks listed below. If water demands exceed Benchmarks for unaccounted water, residential per capita, and peak demands then permit approval will be contingent on implementation of one or all the listed Conservation Measures or Programs until the benchmark is achieved. Benchmarks Conservation Measures or Programs Unaccounted Water If over 10 %, a plan is required that (water withdrawals minus sales) addresses reduction of unaccounted water Less than 10% through universal metering and accounting of water use, routine meter testing and repair, and distribution system leak detection and repair. ➢ Metering of source water and customers. ➢ Accounting for public uses. • • D Water audits to determine unaccounted water. D A leak detection survey that also includes an inspection of hydrants once each year. D Operational procedures that include an established schedule for repairing leaks within 30 days. D Operational procedures that include an established schedule for meter testing, maintenance and repair. Residential Gallons Per Capita If over 75 GPCD, a plan is required that Less than 75 GPCD evaluates and implements measures targeted at reducing residential per capita. D Analyze residential customer use to determine reasons for high per capita use. D Customer education a minimum of four times per year that targets reduction of indoor and outdoor uses. D Contact customers with high volumes and large volume increases and offer home audits and conservation tips. D Incentive programs to reduce per capita use, such as distributing showerheads, aerators, leak detection kits, or soil moisture meters, rebates for washing machines or ULF toilets rebate programs, or other types of incentives. Peak Demands If over a ratio of 2.6, a plan is required to Maximum Day to Average Day reduce peak demands. Ratio Less than 2.6 D Ordinances for lawn watering including time of day, scheduling (along with information on how often to water) and water wasting (runoff) with adequate enforcement and penalties for noncompliance. D Development approvals with criteria that minimize large open turf areas, require organic soil augmentation for new turf areas on sandy soils, and require one or more trees for new construction. D Customer education /conservation tips during summer peak demands • Currently, the City is below the maximum threshold of 10% unaccounted water so our established practices are working appropriately. • For benchmark item Residential Gallons Per Capita, the DNR is following the AWWA Research Foundation study that found the average indoor water use in a conserving home is 45.2 GPCD (gallons per capita day). The study also found that the average indoor water use for a non - conserving home is 63.9 GPCD. The DNR requires Cities to be at 75 GPCD. Lino Lakes is currently at 90 GPCD. Our task is to reduce consumption from our current 90 GCPD to 75 GCPD (20 %). The current peak demand ratio for the City is 3.3. A reduction of over 25% in the peak water demand will be required. Recommendation: This is an informal meeting that requires no action at this time. We are requesting input from the environmental board on how to obtain the DNR benchmarks. • a minimum of four times between May and September of each year. D Conservation Water Rate Structure: Increasing block or summer surcharge with 25 -cent minimum increments between blocks or normal rates. Rate Structures - A conservation or conservation neutral rate structure is required that does not include any volume of water in the service or base charge (lifeline exceptions allowed). Monitoring Plan — A monitoring plan approved by DNR that includes monthly water level readings in production wells and /or observation that may be required. Monitoring data must be submitted to DNR once each year or upon request. Sustainability — All impacts and limits on natural resources and other water users must be satisfied. Currently, the City is below the maximum threshold of 10% unaccounted water so our established practices are working appropriately. • For benchmark item Residential Gallons Per Capita, the DNR is following the AWWA Research Foundation study that found the average indoor water use in a conserving home is 45.2 GPCD (gallons per capita day). The study also found that the average indoor water use for a non - conserving home is 63.9 GPCD. The DNR requires Cities to be at 75 GPCD. Lino Lakes is currently at 90 GPCD. Our task is to reduce consumption from our current 90 GCPD to 75 GCPD (20 %). The current peak demand ratio for the City is 3.3. A reduction of over 25% in the peak water demand will be required. Recommendation: This is an informal meeting that requires no action at this time. We are requesting input from the environmental board on how to obtain the DNR benchmarks. • The Anoka County Board of Commissioners commends the resource conservation efforts of The City of Lino Lakes its curbside recycling service providers Ace Solid Waste, Inc., Allied Waste Services, Walter's Recycling &Refuse, Inc.,. and Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. and its recycling center, recycling day, and reuse providers American Iron, Anoka County Community Action Program (ACCAP), Asset Recovery Corporation, Courage Center, Disabled American Veterans (DA 0, Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota, First State Tire Recycling, Inc., Green Lights Recycling, Inc., J..R.'S Advanced Recyclers, Knights of Columbus - Cedar Council 9585, Lupus Foundation, Safety. Kleen Corp., U'SAgain, and. Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) The City has consistently met its goals from 1988 -2006. During 2006, the City of Lino Lakes recycled 1,760.67 tons of materials, composted 1.5 tons of yard waste, and collected 63.92 tons of problem materials . for proper management. . • Dennis D. Berg District #1 Y " _ Dick Lang Di : 'ct #2' P w Kordiak Distrii #4 Sco DH 5. i o . yn ; est - Rhonda Sivarajaf District #3 District #6 • Dan Erhart District #7 . • 1001 ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVE AWARDS MI NNESOTA>EN VI RONMENTAL<I NITIATIVE • NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION Minnehaha Creek Land Conservation Program Nominated by Michael Pressman, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's Minnehaha Creek Land Conservation Program is among the most pro- active efforts in Minnesota to address the link between land use and Minnesota's growing list of impaired waters. Through technical assistance programs and acquisition of conservation easements, the Minnehaha Creek Land Conservation Program works collaboratively to help promote growth and development that conserves and restores natural resources and enhances the value of previously developed areas. Project partners include: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Carver County Planning Department, Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District, Hennepin Conservation District, Hennepin County, Minnesota Land Trust, Public and Private Landowners, State of Minnesota, and Three Rivers Park District. Minnesota Forest Legacy Partnership Nominated by Bernadine Joselyn, Blandin Foundation Itasca County has the largest concentration of privately held landscape -scale industrial forestland in the State of Minnesota. Despite this fact, since 1999 over 400,000 of Minnesota's few remaining large tracts of working forestlands have been parcelized or sold, leading to forest fragmentation and loss of wildlife habitat. In 2005, the Blandin Foundation created the Minnesota Forest Legacy Partnership for the Itasca County Area to help ensure that these lands remain working forest landscapes open to a variety of public uses. By April of 2007, this partnership -based effort will have protected 52,000 acres of biologically diverse ecosystems and important, commercially productive timberland in Itasca and southern Koochiching counties. Project partners include: Blandin Foundation, The Conservation Fund, Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce, Kresge Foundation, Minnesota Deer Hunters Association, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Forest Industries, Inc., Minnesota Forest Resources Council, The Nature Conservancy, Surdna Foundation, and The Trust for Public Land. Pine Bend Bluffs Natural Area Nominated by Tom Lewanski 6- Karen Schik, Friends of the Mississippi River Over the past eight years, a unique collection of collaborators, from industry to government to nonprofits, have worked together to protect and restore one of the highest - quality remaining natural areas in the Twin Cities on the bluffs of the Mississippi River. The 1,800 acre Pine Bend Bluffs Natural Area has been designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as an area of outstanding biological diversity. To date this project has resulted in the permanent protection of 256 acres of land as well as the development of ecological management plans for 800 acres with extensive ecological restoration work having been completed on more than 160 acres. Project partners include: Big Rivers Partnership, Friends of the Mississippi River, City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County, Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, Flint Hills Resources, Great River Greening, Legislative Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources, Macalester College, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Mississippi River Fund, National Park Service - Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, and The Trust for Public Land. • • • GREEN BUSINESS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Andersen's Bayport Steam Generating Facility Nominated by Charles Lederer, TKDA In February 2005, Andersen Corporation, Minnesota's largest window manufacturer, was notified that the steam energy provided from a nearby power plant would no longer be available for use, requiring Andersen to find a steam source within two years. Adhering to their environmental performance guidelines for both manufacturing products and process, Andersen selected a steam sourcing solution that provided the ability to use virtually all renewable energy, including wood waste and sawdust by- product from Andersen's manufacturing operations. The new steam source produces 100% of Andersen's steam demand and eliminated Andersen's reliance on coal -based steam. Project partners include: TKDA, Andersen CAC, Anderson Corporation, City of Bayport, Hunt Electric, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Pioneer Power, Siegfried Construction, and Xcel Energy — Alan S. King Facility. Medtronic Packaging and Literature Waste Reduction Program Nominated by Douglas Fullen, Medtronic The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that landfills contain 30 -40% of packaging waste. As part of its commitment to reducing the amount and toxicity of packaging waste, Medtronic developed and adopted a voluntary packaging and literature reduction strategy to reduce landfill waste. Through this effort, Medtronic has developed new packaging designs, and is moving from paper to electronic literature. These new designs have reduced Medtronic's packaging waste and paper literature by over 500,000 pounds, and saved $2 million. Project partners include: Medtronic, eManual Consultants, TUV, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Sparc's Lead Window Replacement Program Nominated by Seth Benziger, Sparc Sparc is a community development corporation working in St. Paul's North End, South Como and Hamline Midway neighborhoods. In conjunction with the St. Paul — Ramsey County Department of Public Health, Sparc developed a program to help homeowners replace windows in their homes that contain lead paint. The primary goal of this program is to reduce children's exposure to lead, with a secondary benefit being an increase in the energy efficiency of the house. Sparc has overseen 33 projects over a two - year period and two other community development corporations in St. Paul have replicated the programs. Project partners include: Sparc, St. Paul - Ramsey County Department of Public Health, and City of St. Paul -STAR program. GREEN BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT Hawk Ridge Estates Nominated by David Peterson, Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth The Hawk Ridge Estates development is a major land redevelopment in the city of Duluth that was within a mile of a national birding area known as Hawk Ridge. In order to minimize the impact to the birding area, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth, in consultation with the Hawk Ridge Nature Preserve, had its engineers conduct a study of migratory raptors. Storm water issues were also a concern, as the site is just upstream from a tributary to Lake Superior. The site was able to be reassembled and redesigned in such a way as to maximize the utilization on small building sites while leaving as much as 38% of the total land undisturbed or allowed to return to its natural vegetation. Project partners include: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth, Billman Homes and Construction, City of Duluth, David Carmin -Hawk Ridge Observation Association, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Hawk Ridge Nature Reserve, Lakeside Lester Park Planning District, Laura Erickson - Birding Expert, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency- Community Revitalization Program, Northern Community Land Trust, Saint Louis County, and Women in Construction Company. Lino Lakes 1 -35 Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Nominated by Ciara Schlichting, Bonestroo The I -35 Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review was a proactive, citizen - driven environmental review process that comprehensively assessed the environmental impacts of development in a 4600 -acre growth area in the city of Lino Lakes. The AUAR assessed the impact of development on sensitive natural resource areas and provided a mitigation plan for protecting these areas as well as documenting and planning for infrastructure needs and improvements. Project partners include: American Institute of Certified Planners /Bonestroo, Anoka Conservation District, Anoka County, City of Hugo, City of Lino Lakes, Lino Lakes AUAR Advisory Panel, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Rice Creek Watershed District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, University of Minnesota - Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, and Washington County. Viking Terrace Apartments Rick Goodemann, Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership The Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership (SWMHP) is a non - profit agency committed to developing and preserving affordable housing. In 2006, SWMHP acquired the Viking Terrace Apartments with the goal of preserving affordable housing for the community while also undertaking extensive green redevelopment of the property. The project included the substantial rehabilitation of the interior and exterior of the building with multiple green technologies, including the installation of a geothermal heating and cooling system. Project partners include: Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Foundation, City of Worthington, Enterprise Social Investment Corporation, Enterprise Foundation, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Minnesota Green Communities, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, National Center for Healthy Housing, NeighborWorks America, Southwest Mental Health Center, University of Minnesota, and Worthington Regional Economic Development Corporation. • ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION Big River Journey Nominated by Lyndon Torstenson, United States National Park Service Big River Journey is a collaborative environmental education program among twelve organizations that connects school children with the Mississippi River's science and heritage, and fosters river and watershed stewardship. The partnership engages students in river - related curriculum over several months, including hands -on exploration, restoration, and community service projects that provide students with the chance to learn and practice citizenship in the form of river stewardship. Project partners include: National Park Service, Center for Global Environmental Education, Fort Snelling State Park, Friends of the Mississippi River, Historic Fort Snelling- Minnesota Historical Society, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge -U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mississippi National River Recreation Area, Mississippi River Fund, Padelford Packet Boat Company, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Science Museum of Minnesota, and Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community. LakeSuperiorStreams.Org and the Regional Stormwater Protection Team Nominated by Mindy Granley, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The goal of LakeSuperiorStreams.org and the Regional Stormwater Protection Team is to protect and enhance the Minnesota North Shore region's shared water resources through stormwater pollution prevention. The LakeSuperiorStreams project uses a partnership of regional scientists, managers and educators to enhance public understanding of streams and their connections to watershed land use by using real -time data and interpretive materials to illustrate the nature and consequences of degraded stormwater and its real cost to society. Project partners include: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, City of Duluth, Minnesota's Lake Superior Coastal Program, Sea Grant Minnesota, University of Minnesota - Duluth Natural Resources Research Institute, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Western Lake Superior Regional Stormwater Protection Team. The Eco Experience at the Minnesota State Fair Nominated by Jeff Ledermann, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency The Eco Experience is a partnership between the Minnesota State Fair and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, as well as dozens of additional public and private partners, to create a first -of -its -kind "eco experience" at the Minnesota State Fair. This partnership was the first in the nation to undertake such a large scale effort to demonstrate how environmentally friendly practices and choices can keep our water and air clean and preserve natural resources, as well as support economic development. Project partners include: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota State Fair, American Lung Association of Minnesota, Birch Clothing, Congregations Caring for Creation, ECONAR Energy Systems, Electric Auto Association - Minnesota Chapter, Emmons and Olivier Resources (EOR), ePower Synergies, e-Ride Industries, Extreme Panel Technologies, Inc., Fresh Energy, Hamline University's Center for Global Environmental Education, Kestrel Design Group, Minnesota Department of Commerce, Minnesota Renewable Energy Society, Natural Built Home, Neighborhood Energy Connection, Northwoods Custom Homes, Panelworks Plus, Inc., University of Minnesota College of Design, Renewing the Countryside, Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board, Sun Energy, University of Minnesota - Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment (IREE), University of Minnesota - Solar Vehicle Project, University of St. Thomas Psychology Department, Upper Midwest Hydrogen Initiative, Great Plains Institute, Windustry, and Winkelman's Environmentally Responsible Construction (WERC). AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE PROTECTION Elk River Landfill Gas to Energy Project Nominated by Julie Ketchum, Waste Management The Elk River Landfill Gas to Energy Project collects landfill gas that is generated by the natural decomposition of municipal solid waste and uses that gas to generate electricity. Burning the methane gas for fuel produces electricity, which supplants the need for fossil fuel. The gas to energy facility currently generates approximately 27 million kilowatt - hours per year, displacing the need for 14,000 tons of coal annually. This project represents an opportunity to reduce our dependence on fossil fuel and reduce the production of greenhouse gases. Project partners include: Waste Management, Elk River Municipal Utility (ERMU), Great River Energy, and Sherburne County. Laurentian Energy Authority — Biomass Energy Project Nominated by Michael R. Kunz, Sebesta Blomberg The Laurentian Energy Authority (LEA) is a joint powers public authority formed between the municipal utilities of Virginia and Hibbing to develop and operate combined heat and power renewable energy biomass plants in Northeastern Minnesota. The LEA Biomass Energy Project preserves public utilities, creates new jobs, reduces reliance on fossil fuels, improves environmental impacts, and provides a framework for biomass research opportunities in northern Minnesota. Project partners include: Sebesta Blomberg, Barr Engineering, Biomass, Forest Management Systems, Forest Resource Council, Harris Group Inc., Innovative Ventures, Institute of Agriculture and Trade Policy, Iron Range Resources, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, RBC Dain Rauscher, Springsted Incorporated, State of Minnesota, University of Minnesota Extension Service University of Minnesota - Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI), and USDA Forest Service. Waldsee BioHaus Nominated by Warren Shulze, Concordia Language Village Waldsee BioHaus serves as a unique Environmental Living Center for the Concordia Language Villages in Bemidji, Minnesota. The BioHaus features cutting -edge approaches to energy conservation and innovations in sustainable building design. These approaches resulted in a dramatic reduction in energy consumption, as well as the showcasing of a green roof system and low- emission building products such as paints, flooring materials, and cabinetry. Project partners include: Concordia Language Village, Albert W. Cherne Foundation Amvic, Ecolab, Deutshe Bundesstiftung Umwelt, Intep, Integrated Planning, LLC, Kresge Foundation, Muller Fensterbau, REHAU North America, Sto Corporation, System One Controls, and Zetah Construction. • • •