Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/25/1999 Council PacketAGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday January 25, 1999 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda 1. Consideration of Minutes: a) January 6, 1999 b) January 11, 1999 Consideration of Expenditures: 1. January 25, 1999 ($2,565,569.90 Ck. #55134 - 55225) 2. Centennial Fire District 2. Open Mike 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A. Consideration of Depository, Lakeland National Bank B. Consideration of Leave of Absence for General Maintenance Employee C. Consideration of Additional Annual Appointments D. Consideration of Telecommuting Contract, City Clerk- Treasurer E. Consideration of Renewal of Gambling License, Centennial Youth Hockey 4. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel Page 1 AGENDA A. West Shadow Ponds, R. Carlson, Rezone, Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Al Brixius B. Site Plan Review, Donald Cisewski, 60 Marvy Street, Mary Kay Wyland C. Site Plan Review, Anoka County Corrections, 4th Avenue and Lilac Street, Mary Kay Wyland D. Conditional Use Permit/Planned Development Overlay, Preliminary Plat, JADT/McDonalds, Lake Drive at Apollo Drive (Extended), Al Brixius E. Consideration of Joint Powers Agreement with the Wayzata School District for Trooper Chairs, Mary Alice Divine F. Consideration of Amendment to the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Contract, Mary Alice Divine 5. Public Safety Department Report, David Pecchia A. Consideration of Resignation of Police Officer 6. Old Business 7. New Business 8. Community Calendar, January 26, 1999 through February 8, 1999: A. January 27, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Wednesday, Environmental Board B. February 1, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday, Park Board C. February 1, 1999, 7:00 p.m., Monday, Mayor's Round Table D. February 2, 1999, 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, Town Center Committee Meeting E. February 3, 1999, 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, Interview Board Candidates for Boards and Groups F. February 3, 1999, 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, Council Work Session G. February 4, 1999, 7:00 a.m., Thursday, Economic Development Advisory Committee H. February 6, 1999, 9:00 a.m., Saturday, City Council Goal Setting , Wargo Nature Center. I. February 8, 1999, 5:30 p.m., Monday, Interview Candidates for Boards and Groups Page 2 AGENDA J. February 8, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday„ Regular Council Meeting K. April 19, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday, Annual Board of Review 9. Adjourn Jan. 19, 1999, 9:00 a.m. Page 3 AGENDA EXPANDED AGENDA CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday January 25, 1999 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call (Council Member Neal was absent.) Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? Mayor Sullivan removed agenda items No. 4A and 4D. 1. Consent Agenda (Approved) 1. Consideration of Minutes: a) January 6, 1999 b) January 11, 1999 B. Consideration of Expenditures: 1. January 25, 1999 2. Centennial Fire District 2. Open Mike (No one appeared under Open Mike.) Mayor Sullivan made the following comments: 1. City streets are plowed following every 2" snowfall making some large banks attractive to children who are making snow forts. Mayor Sullivan noted the danger associated with the snow forts and reminded motorist to be careful. 2. Noted a Town Center Committee meeting scheduled for February 2, 1999. There will be a presentation of the environmental overlay for the Town Center. 3. Senator Jane Krentz spoke with Mayor Sullivan on three issues: Page 1 AGENDA a. She asked staff to meet with her at the Capitol on TIF issues, specifically the TIF penalty problem. b. Equity base school funding, commercial tax base, what can she do to help situation? c. Senator Krentz attended the last Mayor's Coffee meeting. She plans to initiate legislation moving the authority for setting speed limits in school zones from the County to the cities. 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A. Consideration of Depository, Lakeland National Bank (Approved) B. Consideration of Leave of Absence for General Maintenance Employee (Approved) C. Consideration of Council Liaisons (Approved, adopted a motion to discontinue the Solid Waste Committee) D. Consideration of Telecommuniting Contract, City Clerk- Treasurer (Approved effective 3/1/99) 4. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A. Consideration of West Shadow Ponds, Al Brixius (Removed when agenda was set) B. Site Plan Review, Donald Cisewski, 60 Marvy Street, Mary Kay Wyland (Approved move -in garage) C. Site Plan Review, Anoka County Corrections, 4th Avenue and Lilac Street, Mary Kay Wyland (Approved addition to the adult detention center. Council Member Bergeson noted that this area in Anoka County needs a holding facility. Mr. Dan Ceynowa said that he was available for further discussion) D. Conditional Use Permit/Planned Development Overlay, Preliminary Plat, JADT/McDonalds, Lake Drive at Apollo Drive (Extended), Al Brixius (Removed when agenda was set) E. Consideration of Joint Powers Agreement with the Wayzata School District for Trooper Chairs, Mary Alice Divine (Approved) F. Consideration of Amendment to the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Contract, Mary Alice Divine (Tabled) Page 2 AGENDA 5. Public Safety Department Report, David Pecchia A. Consideration of Resignation of Police Officer (Approved with thanks and good wishes to the Officer) 6. Old Business (None) 7. New Business A. Rick DeGardner gave a brief outline of the Anoka County Parks meeting held on Wednesday, January 20th at Wargo Nature Center. County officials outlined plans for use of a 1.6 million dollar grant for the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park. A concept plan is being developed and will be ready for review in late March. Park improvements should be substantially completed by the fall of 2000. This is a passive park which means that only 20% of the park will be developed for recreational use. Rick also noted that the Public Services Department is preparing a grant application for trails. 8. Community Calendar, January 25, 1999 through February 8, 1999: A. January 27, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Wednesday, Environmental Board B. February 1, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday, Park Board C. February 2, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Tuesday, Mayor's Round Table D. February 2, 1999, 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, Town Center Committee Meeting E. February 3, 1999, 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, Interview Board Candidates for Boards and Groups F. February 3, 1999, 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, Council Work Session G. February 4, 1999, 7:00 a.m., Thursday, Economic Development Advisory Committee H. February 6, 1999, 9:00 a.m. to ?, Saturday, City Council Goal Setting, Wargo Nature Center I. February 8, 1999, 5:30 p.m., Monday, Interview Candidates for Boards and Groups J. February 8, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday, Regular Council Meeting K. April 19, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday, Annual Board of Review Page 3 9. Adjourn (7:14 p.m.) Jan. 14, 1999, 10:30 a.m. AGENDA Page 4 EXPENDITURES JANUARY 25, 1999 P bate: 01/20/1999 Time: 09:10:51 Operator: JAL Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 55130 55133 55135 55138 55140 55141 55147 55152 55154 55157 55158 55163 55165 55170 55171 55172 55176 55181 55184 55193 55195 55199 55201 55205 55208 55210 55212 55215 55217 55224 Description Dept Amount A T & T AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, ANOKA COUNTY BERNSTEIN, BARRY BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. CATCO PARTS, INC. D.C.A. INC. F. HANSON ASSOCIATES FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, L KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET LABOR RELATIONS, INC. LEEF BROTHER, INC. MATT PARROTT AND SONS METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT MINNESOTA STATE TREASU OLSON SEWER SERVICE, I PERSONNEL DECISIONS, I RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPAN SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI STATE OF MINNESOTA SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC TRUCK UTILITIES, INC. U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE TROUBLESHOOT /REPLACE MAI VIBRATORY PLOW MILEAGE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI * * * * * * ** RECYCLING BINS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE CONTAINER DEMURRAGE COMPUTER SUPPORT SUPPLIES CONSULTANT SHOP TOWELS PAYROLL /AP CHECKS DECEMBER SAC /JANUARY 4TH QUARTER SURCHARGE PUMPING SEPTIC TANKS ADMINISTRATOR RECRUITMEN * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** SEW * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** REPAIR STREET LIGHTS RECYCLE OIL FILTERS BLOCK OF TIME CONNECT /OPERATION CHARGE * * * * * * ** BOX LUNCHES TOOL /UNDERBODY BOX MULTI PORT EXPANDER REGISTRATION /T JACKSON SUPPLIES Total for Dept ** 55142 CENTERVILLE FLORAL SPRING ARRANGEMENT /LWS MAYOR /CO 55211 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC JANUARY 11 MAYOR /CO 55220 VIGER, JEAN REIMBURSE CAKE /CITY ADMI MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 215.44 936.20 1,064.00 91.65 377.85 195.21 210.60 4,466.29 303.01 98.79 116.44 30.00 212.50 36.45 3,516.25 13.28 620.86 16,830.00 4,207.59 290.00 3,500.00 1,360.45 677.00 3,299.50 390.00 97.01 147.82 1,186.72 310.00 1,005.33 45,806.24* 31.12 214.50 33.84 279.46* 55164 HEALTH SERVICES OF NOR RANDOM DRUG /ALCOHOL TEST ADMINIST 109.44 55178 MEDIATION SERVICES, IN 1999 MEDIATION SERVICES ADMINIST 1,169.26 55217 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT REGISTRATION /5 ADMINIST 40.00 Total for Dept 402 1,318.70* 55182 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 55217 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT REGISTRATION /5 Total for Dept 417 55137 55143 55148 55173 55183 ASSOCIATION OF TRAININ MEMBERSHIP /B HAMMES CENTURY COLLEGE DALE CARNEGIE LETTERMAN SPORTS MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS CLASS /B YOUNG CLASS /K STREGE PLAQUE PA MONTHLY SERVICE ENGINEER ENGINEER POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE 4.42 40.00 44.42* 50.00 92.00 795.00 160.50 100.47 Date: 01/20/1999 Time: 09:10:51 Operator: JAL Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 55197 55202 55204 55207 55217 55219 Description Dept Amount QUINLAN PUBLISHING GRO SAM'S CLUB, INC. SHRED -IT, INC. ST. PAUL POLICE TRAINI UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOT US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 55179 MENARDS, INC. 55182 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 55222 WEATHER WATCH, INC. 55223 WILKE, CHARLES 55139 55149 55179 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. DEHN OIL COMPANY MENARDS, INC. 12 ISSUES /BULLETIN SUPPLIES DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL INF REGISTRATION /R KAULFUSS REGISTRATION /5 MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 420 SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE Total for Dept 430 SOLENOID /GASKET FUEL SUPPLIES Total for Dept 431 55131 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE 55145 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. CHEMICALS 55150 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVI JANITORIAL SERVICE 55183 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE 55193 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, I PUMP LLPD SEPTIC 55209 SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMP LIGHT BULB /BALLASTS 55216 UNITED STATES POSTAL S POSTAGE ESCROW 55219 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE Total for Dept 432 55198 RECYCLING ASSN OF MINN MEMBERSHIP 55201 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL Total for Dept 442 55130 55134 55182 55213 55144 55166 55167 55182 55183 55187 55188 55189 55218 55219 55225 A T & T AMERICAN MINNCOMM MONTHLY SERVICE FORESTS, INC. MEMBERSHIP /M ASLESON PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, IN SUB - TENANT Total for Dept 444 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI STAMPS HOFFMAN, MICHAEL IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA NATURE CALLS, INC. NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY URICH, TRACEY US WEST COMMUNICATIONS WOOD, SANDIE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS FLEET FLEET FLEET GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** PARKS REIMBURSE TRAINING MANUA PARKS COPIER MAINTENANCE PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS RENTAL UNITS PARKS REPAIR COUNTRY LAKES WAR PARKS TURF MIXTURE PARKS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS MILEAGE /MEALS PARKS 72.97 280.78 54.95 590.00 120.00 431.22 2,747.89* 40.16 8.84 160.00 68.56 277.56* 86.11 1,892.65 56.39 2,035.15* 81.81 16.57 1,287.34 801.37 90.00 256.93 5,000.00 718.37 8,252.39* 110.00 397.00 507.00* 9.15 25.00 4.42 200.00 238.57* 99.00 40.00 39.02 8.84 100.79 305.77 117.75 1,668.37 67.98 392.35 31.40 • Date: 01/20/1999 Time: 09:10:52 Operator: JAL Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Total for Dept 450 Amount 2,871.27* 55144 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFI STAMPS RECREATI 99.00 55167 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, COPIER MAINTENANCE RECREATI 72.48 55182 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI 8.84 Total for Dept 451 180.32* 55211 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL SER PARK BOA 88.50 Total for Dept 452 88.50* 55146 COX, ANNA REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC * * * * * * ** 27.00 55153 FINLAYSON, RAY REIMBURSE PROGRAM RED * * * * * * ** 27.00 55162 HAUGEN, DAVE REIMBURSE PROGRAM RED * * * * * * ** 27.00 55186 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SUPPLIES * * * * * * ** 50.00 55192 OLDS, DIANE REIMBURSE PROGRAM RED * * * * * * ** 54.00 55200 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPOR DOUBLE AXEL TRAILER * * * * * * ** 235.00 55206 ST. HILARIE ALT, JEAN REIMBURSE PROGRAM RED * * * * * * ** 24.00 Total for Dept ** 444.00* 55214 U S BANK SA3330050 /OBLIGATION REV DEBT SER 84,943.75 Total for Dept 470 84,943.75* 55180 MET COUNCIL EVIRONMENT COMMUNITY LIVABLE GRANT * * * * * * ** 8,400.00 Total for Dept ** 8,400.00* 55155 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JU LAND PURCHASE * * * * * * ** 2,317.58 Total for Dept 400 2,317.58* 55129 A & P CONSTRUCTION, IN CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 31,350.00 55132 ADOLFSON & PETERSON, I CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 22,144.60 55136 ARCH SPEC CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 14,041.95 55156 GEPHART ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 103,265.00 55159 GRAZZINI BROTHERS CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 27,170.00 55160 HALDEMAN -HOMME CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 57,015.20 55168 JORGENSON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 392,055.50 55174 LISTUL INDUSTRIES, INC CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 16,076.85 55175 M. G. MCGRATH CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 23,827.90 55177 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL, IN CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 171,866.40 55194 OLYMPIC WALL SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 89,727.50 55221 WASCHE COMMERCIAL FINI CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX * * * * * * ** 14,365.19 Total for Dept ** 962,906.09* 55151 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICE CONSULTANT * * * * * * ** 1,110.24 55169 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN SERVICE RENDERED /ISSUANC * * * * * * ** 8,196.85 Total for Dept ** 9,307.09* 55185 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 4TH QUARTER STATE FEE 55191 NORWEST BANK DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT Total for Dept ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** 2,780.00 205,000.00 207,780.00* Date: 01/20/1999 Time: 09:10:52 Operator: JAL Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 55182 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 8.84 55183 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 323.93 55203 SERCO LABORATORIES, IN LABORATORY ANALYSIS FEE ENVIRONM 77.00 55219 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 61.50 Total for Dept 461 471.27* 55191 NORWEST BANK REGISTRAR FEES /WATER REV DEBT SER 1,193,068.75 Total for Dept 470 1,193,068.75* 55190 NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE * * * * * * ** 2,545.79 Total for Dept ** 2,545.79* 55181 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT DECEMBER SAC /JANUARY SEW SOLID WA 27,738.11 Total for Dept 462 27,738.11* 55161 HASSELMAN CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSE BUILDING ESCRO * * * * * * ** 55196 PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, I REIMBURSE BUILDING ESCRO * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** 500.00 500.00 1,000.00* Grand Total 2,565,569.90* P 'Date: 01/20/1999 Time: 07:08:16 Ranges: CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 1 FM' Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 39 - 50 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (R) 01251999 - 01251999 Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000022 A & P CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 31,350.00 31,350.00 .00 .00 000052 A T & T 3 224.59 224.59 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 81.81 81.81 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 2 936.20 936.20 .00 .00 000220 AMERICAN FORESTS, INC. 1 25.00 25.00 .00 .00 000410 ANOKA COUNTY 1 1,064.00 1,064.00 .00 .00 000477 ARCH SPEC 1 14,041.95 14,041.95 .00 .00 000500 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICERS MN 2 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 000670 BERNSTEIN, BARRY 1 91.65 91.65 .00 .00 000770 BOYER TRUCKS, INC. 1 86.11 86.11 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 377.85 377.85 .00 .00 000929 WILKE, CHARLES 1 68.56 68.56 .00 .00 001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 195.21 195.21 .00 .00 001054 CENTERVILLE FLORAL 1 31.12 31.12 .00 .00 001067 CENTURY COLLEGE 1 92.00 92.00 .00 .00 001100 CIRCLE PINES POST OFFICE 1 198.00 198.00 .00 .00 001208 COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 16.57 16.57 .00 .00 001214 COX, ANNA 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 210.60 210.60 .00 .00 001269 DALE CARNEGIE 1 795.00 795.00 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY 2 1,892.65 1,892.65 .00 .00 001309 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 1 1,287.34 1,287.34 .00 .00 • Date: 01/20/1999 Time: 07:08:17 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name # of items Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Net Gross Discount Lost 001435 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES, INC. 1 1,110.24 1,110.24 .00 .00 001459 F. HANSON ASSOCIATES 1 4,466.29 4,466.29 .00 .00 001477 HASSELMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 001479 HAUGEN, DAVE 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 30.00 30.00 .00 .00 001488 FINLAYSON, RAY 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 001504 U S BANK 1 84,943.75 84,943.75 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 303.01 303.01 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 98.79 98.79 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 116.44 116.44 .00 .00 001732 GRAZZINI BROTHERS 1 27,170.00 27,170.00 .00 .00 001772 HALDEMAN -HOMME 1 57,015.20 57,015.20 .00 .00 001850 HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 2 8,196.85 8,196.85 .00 .00 001980 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. 1 111.50 111.50 .00 .00 002106 JORGENSON CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1 392,055.50 392,055.50 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 36.45 36.45 .00 .00 002220 LABOR RELATIONS, INC. 1 3,516.25 3,516.25 .00 .00 002325 LETTERMAN SPORTS 2 160.50 160.50 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 13.28 13.28 .00 .00 002432 LISTUL INDUSTRIES, INC. 1 16,076.85 16,076.85 .00 .00 002486 MATT PARROTT AND SONS COMPANY 1 620.86 620.86 .00 .00 002516 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL, INC. 1 171,866.40 171,866.40 .00 .00 002530 MEDIATION SERVICES, INC. 1 1,169.26 1,169.26 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 2 96.55 96.55 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 44,568.11 44,568.11 .00 .00 • Date: 01/20/1999 Time: 07:08:18 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name # of items Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Net Gross Discount Lost 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 44.20 44.20 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 1,326.56 1,326.56 002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 2,780.00 2,780.00 002816 HEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH 1 109.44 109.44 002836 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 1 4,207.59 4,207.59 003047 M. G. MCGRATH 1 23,827.90 23,827.90 003123 NATURE CALLS, INC. 1 305.77 305.77 003193 NEWSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 117.75 117.75 003220 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY, INC. 2 1,668.37 1,668.37 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 2 2,545.79 2,545.79 003340 NORWEST BANK 8 1,398,068.75 1,398,068.75 003362 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL 1 50.00 50.00 003409 OLDS, DIANE 1 54.00 54.00 003427 OLYMPIC WALL SYSTEMS 1 89,727.50 89,727.50 003483 PERSONNEL DECISIONS, INC. 1 3,500.00 3,500.00 003509 PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 500.00 500.00 003710 RECYCLING ASSN OF MINNESOTA 1 110.00 110.00 003789 RIVARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 1 1,360.45 1,360.45 003866 RYDER STUDENT TRANSPORTATION 1 235.00 235.00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 5 1,074.00 1,074.00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 280.78 280.78 003977 SERCO LABORATORIES, INC. 1 77.00 77.00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2 3,299.50 3,299.50 004110 ST. HILARIE ALT, JEAN ANN 1 24.00 24.00 004127 ST. PAUL POLICE TRAINING 2 590.00 590.00 004172 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 390.00 390.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Date: 01/20/1999 Time: 07:08:19 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Vendor # Name # of items Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount Net Gross Discount Lost 004280 SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 1 256.93 256.93 .00 .00 004306 SUZANNE'S CUISINE, INC. 1 97.01 97.01 .00 .00 004370 HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD. 1 212.50 212.50 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 303.00 303.00 .00 .00 004510 TRUCK UTILITIES, INC. 1 147.82 147.82 .00 .00 004511 TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, INC. 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 004561 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 .00 004562 U.S. FILTER /WATERPRO, INC. 2 1,186.72 1,186.72 .00 .00 004612 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 3 510.00 510.00 .00 .00 004660 URICH, TRACEY 1 67.98 67.98 .00 .00 004670 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 1 1,603.44 1,603.44 .00 .00 004720 VIGER, JEAN 1 33.84 33.84 .00 .00 004778 WASCHE COMMERCIAL FINISHES 1 14,365.19 14,365.19 .00 .00 004791 WEATHER WATCH, INC. 1 160.00 160.00 .00 .00 004836 WOOD, SANDIE 1 31.40 31.40 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 1 1,005.33 1,005.33 .00 .00 900178 MET COUNCIL EVIRONMENTAL SERVICE 1 8,400.00 8,400.00 .00 .00 900284 ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC. 1 22,144.60 22,144.60 .00 .00 900448 GEPHART ELECTRIC 1 103,265.00 103,265.00 .00 .00 900523 OLSON SEWER SERVICE, INC. 2 380.00 380.00 .00 .00 900533 QUINLAN PUBLISHING GROUP 1 72.97 72.97 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 126 2,565,569.90 2,565,569.90 .00 .00* ECON DEVELOPMEN ADMINISTRATION MISC SAC September -1998 MANUAL DISBURSEMENT MN CHAPTER OF AMERICAN PLANNING $ 150.00 REGISTRATION M K WYLAND LEAGUE OF MN CITIES /REGISTRATION D TESCH $ 10.00 AMA/KEY /REGISTRATION D BUGGE $ 124.00 APPROVED ON 9 -28 -98 PAYABLES WYLAND, CATHY /NEWSLETTER ADMINISTRATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICE PUBLIC WORKS ARNOLD, ROBERT THOMPSON, JEAN APPROVED ON SAC PAYABLES $ 1,017.60 $ 407.00 $ 101.75 $ 101.75 LAKE TRUNK CHICAGO TITLE /ORMOND PROPERTY APPROVED ON 8 -24 -98 COUNCIL MEETING UTILITY CIRCLE PINES POSTMASTER /POSTAGE REVENUE BONDS U S BANK/ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TOTAL MANUALS PREAPPROVED MANUALS SEPTEMER MANUALS Page 1 $ 1,628.10 $ 559.27 $ 559.27 $ 202,149.10 $ 210.63 $ 5,237.25 $ 210,627.62 $ 202,832.37 $ 7,795.25 SAC EXPENDITURES SEPTEMBER 25, 1998 Page: 1 Date: 09/24/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Computer Check Register Current File, 09/25/98 to 09/25/98 All Accounts, Sessions 000000 to 004587 Check /Payment Check Dt. Vendor Information Amount Check Account: 1010 Check #: 52597 Check #: 52598 Check #: 52599 Check #: 52600 Check #: 52601 09/25/98 950392 - BERG, JAMES 09/25/98 950393 - JENNI, MICHAEL 09/25/98 950394 - MUNSON, DOUGLAS 09/25/98 950395 - WEED, THOMAS 09/25/98 950396 - WINIECKI, MARK Total For Check Account: 1010 Check Register Total : 559.27 559.27 526.37 526.37 460.58 2631.86 2631.86 AGENDA ITEM 3 A. STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration• DATE 19 January 1999 SUBJECT Legal Depository VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND - Lakeland National Bank is the latest addition to the city's list of financial institutions. As such, we would recommend they be added to our list of official depositories. The addition of Lakeland National to this list simply means that should the city decide to enter into financial transactions with this bank, we would be able to do so. A Request for Proposals for banking services will be prepared later this year. OPTIONS 1. Add Lakeland National Bank to the list of official depositories. 2. Do not add the bank to our list of official depositories. RECOMMENDATION 1. AGENDA ITEM 3 B STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 19 January 1999 SUBJECT Six Month Leave of Absence VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND A long-time employee of the City of Lino Lakes has requested a one year leave of absence. A request of this nature can only be approved by the council, based upon recommendations of the employee's department director and city administrator. Based on anticipated work load requirements, reason for the leave and staffing considerations, the city administrator and public services director are recommending a six month leave of absence for this employee. OPTIONS Approve the six month leave of absence. Deny the leave. RECOMMENDATION 1. 11 January 1998 Tom Decheine 8940 Pascal Avenue Circle Pines, MN 55014 Dear Tom: We have received your letter in which you have requested a One Year Leave of Absence. Your request has been evaluated based on a number of factors, including anticipated work load requirements, reasons for the requested leave, and staffing considerations during the proposed period of absence. Based upon those issues, Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director and Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator will making a recommendation to the city council that you be granted a six (6) month leave of absence. Your leave of absence will run from January 1999 to 1 July, 1999. In order to extend the leave of absence past 1 July, we will need a letter from your physician stating the exact date of your return to work. That date will have to be some time prior to 1 October, 1999. During your unpaid leave of absence, you will remain an employee of the City of Lino Lakes. You will not however, accrue seniority, sick or vacation time, or any related benefits. We hope that your recuperation is going well. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, or your employment status, please feel free to contact either myself or Rick DeGardner. Sincerely, Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration cc Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator Paula Schloer, Finance Rick DeGardner, Public Services Tom DeWolfe, Public Services j: \personnel\DECHEINE take place on OPTIONS MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR SULLIVAN AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: DANIEL TESCH, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION DATE: 19 JANUARY 1999 RE: 1999 LINO LAKES CITY COUNCIL ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS 1. CIRCLE PINES GAS COMMISSION (3 year term) 1999 - 1998 1999 - 2001 Vern Reinert 2. NORTH METRO TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1988 Chris Lyden Dan Tesch - Alternate 3. CENTENNIAL FIRE STEERING COMMITTEE 1998 John Bergeson Andy Neal 4. ASSESSOR 1999 1999 1998 1999 Anoka County 1999 Annual Appointments -2- 5. FISCAL AGENT 1998 1999 Springsted Inc. 6. VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1998 1999 Rocky Keehn 7. JOINT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY 1998 1999 Andy Neal 8. ANOKA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM LIAISON 1998 1999 Andy Neal 9. 800 MEGAHERTZ COMMITTEE 1998 Caroline Dahl - council Milo Bennett - staff 1999 1997 Annual Appointments Page -3- 10. CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS Departments Commissions Boards Committees Administration Public Services Public Safety Community Development Charter Commission Planning and Zoning Board Park and Recreation Board Environmental Board Economic Development Committee 1998 Kim Sullivan Kim /Chris Andy Neal Council 1999 Caroline Dahl Caroline Dahl Chris Lyden John Bergeson AGENDA ITEM 3 D STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 20 January 1999 SUBJECT Telecommuting Agreement w/ City Clerk VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND After meeting with the city clerk, Council Member Neil proposed staff look into the possibility of a telecommuting arraignment being drawn up for the clerk position. It was the consensus of the council that an arrangement of this nature be explored. Mr. Hawkins prepared an agreement that was reviewed, and revised by the city clerk and city administrator. The city clerk will remain a city employee with full salary and benefits. The primary focus of this arrangement will be the preparation of past meeting minutes. In addition there will be a recommendation on code codification, record transfer to the new city hall, preparation of a procedures manual and elections. OPTIONS 1. Approve the agreement for the city clerk to telecomrnute. Deny the agreement. RECOMMENDATION AGENDA ITEM NO. 3E STAFF ORIGINATOR Dan Tesch, Administration Director DATE January 20, 1999 TOPIC Consideration of Renewal of Gambling License, Centennial Youth Hockey BACKGROUND: The Centennial Youth Hockey Association has been conducting pull tab gambling at Shirley Kaye's since July, 1994. They are asking that their license be renewed as of April 1, 1999. Licenses are now issued fora two (2) year period. All reports and gambling taxes have been paid as required by the City Gambling Ordinance. All net proceeds from this gambling operation are used to support the Centennial Youth Hockey program. This organi?ation meets all requirements of the Gambling Ordinance and I recommended that the City Council approve the gambling license renewal application. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the application for renewal of the gambling license. 2. Return the matter to star for further information. 3. Do not approve the license. RECOMMENDATION Option No. 1 West LG214PPR PRINTED: STATE OF MINNESOTA GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR BOARD USE ONLY) IAMT PAID CHECK NO. IDATE LICENSE NUMBER: B- 03934 -003 EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/01/97 EXPIRATION DATE: 03/31/99 NAME OF ORGANIZATION: Hockey Circle Pines Centennial Youth Assoc GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT WHERE GAMBLING WILL BE CONDUCTED Shirley Keyes 6810 Lake Dr Lino Lakes 55014 COUNTY Anoka IS THE PREMISES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS ?: Y LESSOR INFORMATION DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION OWN THIS SITE ?: No IF NO, LIST THE LESSOR: Shirley Moore 6810 Lake Dr Lino Lakes MN 55014 NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (WHEN NOT LESSOR): SQUARE FEET PER MONTH: 30 AMOUNT PAID FOR RENT PER MONTH: 1000 SQUARE FEET PER OCCASION: 0 AMOUNT PAID PER OCCASION: 0 BINGO ACTIVITY BINGO IS CONDUCTED ON THIS PREMISES: No IF YES, REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUIRED ATTACHMENT STORAGE ADDRESS __. L q 4/.2 o Ncy/es STW eiseler-Pittel5-4B4-55"0"14-6441146- MN -37-5-4"/9 BANK INFORMATION - r -W���► (:47) Fede. ..,A 1os9 Meadow /a.vis 1 - - - - --- Wiis`f-e gear Lae ,44/t/ 6 -s /a7 GAMBLING BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER: 15966 ON THE LINES PROVIDED BELOW LIST THE NAME, ADDRESS AND TITLE OF AT LEAST TWO PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CHECKS AND MAKE DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS FOR THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT. THE ORGANIZATION'S TREASURER MAY NOT HANDLE GAMBLING FUNDS. Oa,r y / M � J/e- /� 9S� 13; rcJ1 St 4t./<'es C,.6O Skai^on k,'cul7 713. Lake l'ew 1), Lt►to Lakes /A'9 N' ss of y C apia A101ay (BE SURE TO COMPLETE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS APPLICATION) THIS FORM WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN ALTERNATIVE FORMAT (I.E. LARGE PRINT, BRAILLE) UPON REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGMENT GAMBLING PREMISES AUTHORIZATION I HBREBY GIVE CONSENT TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD, OR AGENTS OF THE BOARD, OR THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OR PUBLIC SAFETY, OR AGENTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS, TO ENTER THE PREMISES TO ENFORCE THE LAW. BANK RECORDS INFORMATION THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD IS AUTHORIZED TO INSPECT THE BANK RECORDS OF THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT WHENEVER NECESSARY TO FULFILL REQUIREMENTS OF CURRENT GAMBLING RULES AND STATUTES. I DECLARE THAT: • I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD; • ALL INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE;; • ALL OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FULLY DISCLOSED; • I AM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE ORGANIZATION; • I ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAIR AND LAWFUL OPERATION OF ALL GAMBLING ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED; • I WILL FAMILIARIZE MYSELF WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA GOVERNING LAWFUL GAMBLING AND RULES OF THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND AGREE, IF ISSUED A PREMISES PERMIT, TO ABIDE THOSE LAWS AND RULES, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THEM; • ANY CHANGES IN APPLICATION INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE CHANGE; • I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION OR PROVIDING FALSE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF THE PREMISES PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. THE CITY* MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN CITY LIMITS. 2. THE COUNTY ** AND TOWNSHIP ** MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN A TOWNSHIP. 3. FOR TOWNSHIPS THAT ARE UNORGANIZED OR UNINCORPORATED, THE COUNTY ** IS REQUIRED TO ATTACH A LETTER TO THIS APPLICATION INDICATING THE TOWNSHIPS STATUS. 4. THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (CITY OR COUNTY) MUST PASS A RESOLUTION SPECIFICALLY APPROVING OR DENYING THIS APPLICATION. 5. A COPY OF THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESOLUTION APPROVING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION. 6. IF THIS APPLICATION IS DENIED BY THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT, IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD. TOWNSHIP: BY SIGNATURE BELOW, THE TOWNSHIP ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE ORGANIZATION IS APPLYING FOR A PREMISES PERMIT WITHIN TOWNSHIP LIMITS. ft& DATE I zi0915)e CITY* OR COUNTY ** TOWNSHIP ** CITY OR COUNTY NAME SIGGNNAA�j TITLE PERSON RECEIVING APPLICATION DATE RECEIVED / -7 -9? TOWNSHIP NAME SIGNATURE OF PERSON RECEIVING APPLICATION TITLE DATE RECEIVED REFER TO THE CHECKLIST FOR REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS MAIL TO: GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD 1711 W COUNTY RD B - SUITE 300 S ROSEVILLE, MN 55113 Minnesota Lawful Gambling Lease for Pull -Tab, Paddlewheel, Tipboard, and/or Rattle Activity - LG221 Name of Legal Owner of Premises Street Address City Zip Daytime Phone 5hiriEq kaye Moore 6 W Laken LIh. e Lai'es /11/v' 5Z isi (GS'i ) 71a-We/ Name of Le or Street Address City Zip Daytime Phone (If same as legal owner, write in "SAME ") OLielet e. ( ) Name of Leased Premises Street Address City Zip Daytime Phone Sh,'4e ka cs 5 orfs gar (QS10 l-xieeLD,' Linoktees sso /Y((Ps/ )780 - 8/ Name of Lessee (namerof organization leasing the,mises) GCB license no. of organization Daytime Phone Centenlnt`at markt ttoc cey Assn. B- 03931- 003 (Gs/ )786-3„21q Rent Information • Total rent cannot exceed $1,000 per month for all non -bingo activity for this premises. • For bingo activity, use lease form LG222. • For pull -tab dispensing machines, use lease form LG223. • An organization may not pay rent to itself or to any of its affiliates for space used for the conduct of lawful gambling. Rent to be paid per month $ 700 O. 00 (If no rent is to be paid, indicate -0-) Sketch and Dimensions of Leased Area Sketch: For all areas being leased for the conduct of gambling and storage of gambling product at this premises, attach a sketch (drawing) showing: (1) the leased area(s), and (2) the dimensions. Dimensions The leased areas are: Storage Storage o feet by feet by feet by feet by feet by PRIS feet for a total of square feet. feet for a total of square feet. feet for a total of square feet. feet for a total of square feet. feet for a total of square feet. Combined total square feet. Lawful Gambling Activity Type of gambling activity that will be conducted at this gambling premises. Check all that apply. i( Paddlewheels �` Pull -Tabs K Raffles i(� Tipboards Term of Lease Amended Lease Only The term of this lease agreement will be concurrent with the premises permit issued by the Gambling Control Board, unless terminated sooner by mutual consent of the lessor and lessee. If this is an amended lease showing changes occurring dur- ing the term of the current premises permit, write in the date that the changes will be effective / / Both parties that signed the lease must initial and date all changes. Questions on this form should be directed to the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651- 639 -4000. This publication will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. Hearing impaired individuals using a TTY may call the Minnesota Relay Service at 1 -800- 627 -3529 and ask to place a call to 651- 639 -4000. The information requested on this form will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules goveming lawful gambling activities. All of the information that you supply on this form will become public information when received by the Board except, if required, your Social Security number, which remains private. Page 1 of 2 Rev. 7/98 Lease for Pull -Tab, Paddlewheel, Tipboard, and /or Raffle Activity - LG221 LESSOR PROHIBITIONS Management of Gambling Prohibited The owner of the premises or the lessor will not manage the conduct of gambling at the premises. Participation as Players Prohibited The lessor, the lessor's immediate family, and any agents or gambling employees of the lessor will not participate as players in the conduct of lawful gambling on the premises. Illegal Gambling 1. The lessor is aware of the prohibition against illegal gambling in Minnesota Statutes, section 609.75, and the penalties for illegal gambling violations in Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0050, subpart 3. 2. To the best of the lessor's knowledge, the lessor affirms that any and all games or devices located on the premises are not being used, and are not capable of being used, in a manner that violates the prohibitions against illegal gambling in Minnesota Statutes, section 609.75, and the penalties for illegal gambling violations in Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0050, subpart 3. 3. Notwithstanding Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0050, subp. 3, an organization must continue making rent payments, pursuant to the terms of the lease, if the organization or its agents are found to be solely responsible for any illegal gambling conducted at that site that is prohibited by Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0050, subpart 1, or Minnesota Statutes, section 609.75, unless the organization's agents responsible for the illegal gambling activity are also agents or employees of the lessor. 4• The lessor shall not modify or terminate the lease in whole or in part because the organization reported to a state or local law enforcement authority or the board the occurrence at the site of illegal gambling activity in which the organization did not participate. Other Prohibitions 1. The lessorwill not impose restrictions on the organization with respect to .providers (distributors) of gambling - related equipment and services or in the use of net profits for lawful purposes. 2. The lessor, the lessor's immediate family, and any agents or employees of the lessor will not require the organization to perform any action that would violate statute or rule. 3. If there is a dispute as to whether any of these lease provisions have been violated, the lease will remain in effect pending a final determination by the Compliance Review Group (CRG) of the Gambling Control Board. 4. The lessor shall not modify or terminate this lease in whole or in part due to the lessor's violation of the provisions listed on this lease. Arbitration Process The lessor agrees to arbitration when a violation of these lease provisions is alleged. The arbitrator shall be the CRG. ACCESS TO PERMITTED PREMISES State of Minnesota and Law Enforcement The board and its agents, the commissioners of revenue and public safety and their agents, and law enforcement personnel have access to the permitted premises at any reasonable time during the business hours of the lessor. Organization The organization has access to the permitted premises during any time reasonable and when necessary for the conduct of lawful gambling on the premises. I LESSOR RECORDS MAINTAINED I The lessor shall maintain a record of all money received from the organization, and make the record available to the board and its agents, the commissioners of revenue and public safety and their agents upon demand. The record shall be maintained for a period of 3-1/2 years. OTHER OBLIGATIONS AND AGREEMENTS - Attachment All obligations and agreements between the organization and the lessor are contained in or attached to this lease. (Attach additional sheets if necessary. Any attachments to this lease must be dated and signed by both the lessor and the lessee.) JJ ce.� aGhpd l Pfte. f^ This lease is the total and only agreement between the lessor and the organization conducting other than bingo and pull -tab dispensing devices. There is no other agreement and no other consideration the parties as to the lawful gambling and other matters related to this lease. Any changes in this the Ga . • *Control Bo .- en days prior to the effective date of the change. �y 1 / lawful gambling activities required between lease will be submitted to )229/f ate • ,f / "- ■ /� t� „► i')'l Signature of Less • r Date ture of 0 . • aniza .7 n Official (Lessee) Ski rli� k. `(dive ()woi er 1 ■ ■ f Print Name and Title of Lessor Print Name a d Title of Lessee age 2 _ A 2 Rev. 7/98 The following items agreed upon by Centennial Youth Hockey Association and Shirley Kaye's Sports Bar St Grill. Effective dates: April 1,1999 through March 31, 2001. 1 Rent of $1000.00 is due on the first of every month. 25% of garbage and janitorial fees vill be paid on receipt of bills each month. 2 Hours - to be open seven days a week except holidays. regular bb-usiness hours are to be maintained at all times. Any changes vill be conveyed to Shirley Kaye's management. Pull tab booth must be closed by 12:30 a.m. to ensure that everyone lea ves the bar by 1:00 a.m. 3 Dress - all employees of lawful gambling vill be appropriately dressed and vill year a name tag. 4 All raffles conducted on these premises must be run through the Centennial Youth Hockey Association. No illegal gambling vill be permitted on these premises. 5 Meetin, may be called by either the gambling rnaanag r or a representative of Shirley Kaye's. 6 Shirley Kaye's vill provide any non-alcoholic beverage free and food at half price. Absolutely no delivery of food vill be acceptable. A bag lunch can be brought in and the microwave is available. 1:/h thirley Moore - 0 4 ner Shirley Kaye's Date Daryl Miller/ CEO centennial Youth Hockey Association AMENDED - AGENDA ITEM 4 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: 1/22/99 TOPIC: West Shadow Ponds, R. Carlson, Rezone, Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment COUNCIL ACTION: Rezone - 415th Vote Required, Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 415th Vote, Preliminary Plat - simple majority BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on November 12th, 1998 and recommended the following: Approval of the Rezone on a 6- 1(Trehus) vote, Approval of the Comp Plan Amendment on a 6- 1(Trehus) vote, Approval of the Preliminary Plat on a 6 -0 -1 (Robinson) vote with the following conditions: 1. Preliminary utility plan subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 2. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street and wehther the funding and resources avalialbe is sufficient to support upgrade of 62nd Street. 3. The Grip Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The plan may be subject to modification to provide fore maximum number of trees to be preserved. 4. The applicant provide a Vegetation Plan and Landscape Plan illustrating the trees to be removed and the trees to be preserved. 5. The applicant provide dal vegetation along the trail right-of-way to buffer the recreational and residential uses. 6. The Planner & Zoning Board strongly recommends the upgrading or reconstruction of 62nd Street occur as soon as possible. Until reconstruction is completed, West Shadow Lake Road will be blocked at the north end of the development. 7. Spruce trees shall be placed in clusters along the trail segment and concrete driveways shall be required. 8. A 40' front setback shall be required along West Shadow Lake Drive. g. Neighborhood comments as presented at the public hearing. The City Council reviewed this item at their November 23rd meeting at which time the Applicant, Mr. Carlson, requested a delay to allow him time to meet with some of the adjoining property owners to address their concerns. Since that meeting staff has also received a transportation report from Mr. Carlson's Engineer, Ted Mattke which was submitted to Council in December. Mr. Carlson would now like the Council to reconsider his request and take action. The City Engineer and Transportation consultant will be available on Monday to address the traffic/transportation issue. See attached original staff report, minutes from the P & Z meeting and minutes from the November City Council meeting. OPTIONS; 1. Approve rezone 2. Approve Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3. Approve Preliminary Plat with conditions listed above by P & Z. 4. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John Powell, City Engineer DATE: January 21, 1999 RE: City Council Agenda Item 4. A. West Shadow Ponds Attached is the traffic study for the West Shadow Ponds subdivision which I mentioned at last evening's Work Session. You previously received a study prepared by the developer's engineer, Mattke Engineering; the enclosed study was prepared at the City's request by SEH. ff5EH January 20, 1999 Mr. John Powell, P.E. City Engineer City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear John: 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST PAUL, MN 55110 612 490 -2000 800 325 -2055 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota West Shadow Lake Drive Extension Traffic Study SEH No. A- L1NOL9713.00 We have reviewed the report titled "Traffic Study for West Shadow Lake Drive Extension" prepared by Mattke Engineering Incorporated. The report uses a somewhat unconventional method of traffic projections, and is a little difficult to follow, therefore, it took a little more time than anticipated to review. The report is based on 21/2 hour traffic counts made in the morning. Everything in the report was based on these counts. There are also quite a number of assumptions made on traffic distribution, type of traffic, potential changes due to road configurations, and the impact that construction vehicles have on current traffic volumes. We have previously studied some of the same area. A study was made of the Miller's South Glen development proposal and a letter report was prepared dated December 2, 1996. This report looked at both traffic generated by the Miller's South Glen proposal and by a combination of Miller's South Glen development plus potential future development along 62nd Street. It used these traffic generations on three different road systems including the existing road system, the existing system plus West Shadow Lake Drive extended from Birch Street to 62nd Street, and the existing system with West Shadow Lake Drive completed between Birch Street and County Road J. A copy of the report is attached. The most pertinent information in the report can probably be obtained by comparing Figure 6 and Figure 7 of the report. Figure 6 shows the additional peak hour traffic contributed by both Miller's South Glen and the potential area development on the existing road system, and Figure 7 has the same traffic volume on the road system with West Shadow Lake Drive extended to 62nd Street. The volume of traffic based on area development does not change significantly. A major adjustment is traffic which is generated in the development area having an opportunity to use West Shadow Lake Drive and Birch Street to the east. These drawings both show only the additional peak hour traffic and do not show changes in existing traffic. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LAKE COUNTY, IN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mr. John Powell, P.E. January 20, 1999 Page 2 We did a preliminary investigation as part of the report and indicated that traffic generated by the Reshanau Lake Estates, Shenandoah, Park Grove and Birchwood Acres Additions could modify their traffic pattern and utilize West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street. We estimated that there was potential to add an additional 50 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 70 trips during the p.m. peak hour to an extended West Shadow Lake Drive and consequently to 62nd Street. If West Shadow Lake Drive is extended further, from 62nd Street to County Road J, the traffic volumes on 62nd Street diminish considerably, as the West Shadow Lake Drive traffic and a considerable amount of generated traffic along 62nd Street would then use West Shadow Lake Drive to County Road J. It appears that part of the Mattke report refers to an additional 22 homes which would be fronting on West Shadow Lake Drive. The potential traffic from this type of development was included in our previous report, in terms of future general volumes. By fronting on West Shadow Lake Drive, the traffic would have the opportunity to travel in several directions. We estimate that approximately 30 percent of the traffic would travel to the northwest, 25 percent to the northeast and 45 percent to the southwest. With West Shadow Lake Drive extended south to County Road J, the volumes traveling to the northeast would be reduced and replaced by traffic traveling to the southeast on the new portion of West Shadow Lake Drive. This means that the 22 new homes would generate between 210 and 220 trips per day. There would be approximately 16 of these during the morning rush hour and 22 in the evening rush hour. These rush hour periods are one hour in length and should not be confused with the 21 hour rush period used by Mattke in his report. With the completion of West Shadow Lake Drive to 62nd Street, it is anticipated that some of the traffic generated by the Colonial Woods subdivision will be reoriented. The Mattke report indicates that traffic now traveling west to Ware Road and traveling back on County Road J to I -35E would instead choose to use West Shadow Lake Drive, Birch Street and Centerville Road. In analyzing traffic both coming from and going to Colonial Woods, we feel that some traffic may utilize that route to the north, but at best about half the traffic would do so. With approximately 28 dwelling units, the Colonial Woods development would generate about 270 vehicle trips per day. With approximately 30 to 35 percent traveling to the southeast (80 vehicles), this would be a net daily reduction of approximately 40 trips on 62nd Street if one -half were diverted to West Shadow Lake Road. Offsetting this would be the higher volume of traffic generated in the Birchwood Acres Additions and Reshanau Lake Estates Addition. Much of this traffic which now travels on Deerwood Lane or West Shadow Lake Drive to the north would instead be able to use West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street. We estimate that this would add approximately 500 vehicle trips per day to 62nd Street. This would remove some traffic from Hawthorne Road and reduce volumes on West Shadow Lake Drive and Deerwood Lane south of Birch Street. Thus, the extension of West Shadow Lake Drive could add 500 trips to 62nd Street but be offset by those 40 trips from Colonial Woods as well as redistribution of trips from Miller's South Glen and other development. We do not believe that traffic volumes will decrease on 62nd Street as a result of the extension of West Shadow Lake Drive. Mr. John Powell, P.E. January 20, 1999 Page 3 The only way that traffic volumes would decrease is if West Shadow Lake Drive were completed south to County Road J. We believe that this not only reviews the Mattke report but tries to address some of the traffic volume questions which may have prompted the report. If you have any questions regarding our calculations or comments, or need additional information or study, please feel free to call me at (651) 490 -2045. Sincerely, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Glen Van Wormer, P.E. Manager, Transportation Engineering Group sah Attachment c: Dave Hahn, SEH F:\ projects \kMinol\9713\c\powel.j 19.wpd December 2, 1996 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 612 490 -2000 8W 325-2055 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION Mr. David Ahrens, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear David: RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota Preliminary Plat Review Miller's South Glen q SEH No. A- LINOL974..00 Attached please find a preliminary plat review report which reviews the impact of the Miller's South Glen and potential area development on adjacent roadways. The report addresses the questions regarding the proposed development raised by the Board and the nearby residents at the September 11, 1996, Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting. If you have any questions regarding the study or the calculations that were made, please feel free to contact me at 490 -2045. We appreciate the opportunity to review this preliminary plat for the City. Sincerely, Glen Van Wormer, P.E. Manager, Transportation Department cbp Attachment c: John Hagen, SEH Dave Hahn, SEH SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN Si CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LAKE COUNTY, IN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW Background Miller's South Glen is a proposed 48 -lot subdivision located in the City of Lino Lakes. It is immediately north of 62nd Street, just east of Ware Road. Figure No. 1 shows the proposed subdivision. The subdivision proposal was submitted to the City and considered by the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board on September 11, 1996. During this meeting, questions were raised by the Board and residents that live in the area regarding the impacts of the proposal on the adjacent street system. As a result, the applicant withdrew the proposal pending the preparation of a report which will document potential impacts of this subdivision. This report summarizes our study and findings. Traffic Volumes Estimated total average daily traffic generated by the proposed 48 -lot subdivision is 480. The actual rates utilized for the trip generation were based on those in the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The maximum peak hour of traffic is anticipated to be from approximately 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. At that time, it is anticipated that there would be 48 trips generated by the site, with 31 inbound and 17 outbound trips. In the a.m. peak hour, anticipated to be between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., there are an estimated 36 trips generated by the development, with 9 inbound and 27 outbound trips. Existing Roadway System Given the existing roadway system, all traffic entering and exiting the proposed subdivision must use 62nd Street and Ware Road. It is anticipated that during the a.m. peak hour, 70 percent of the traffic will have an origin and destination south of 62nd Street and 30 percent to the north. The directional distribution during the p.m. peak hour will likely have a higher northern orientation along Ware Road as a result of increased traffic to and from the schools and commercial areas north of the proposed subdivision. As a result, 59 percent of the traffic generated by Miller's South Glen will have an origin or destination south of 62nd Street and 41 percent to the north. The additional peak hour traffic volumes on the existing roadway system contributed by Miller's South Glen are shown in Figure No. 2. West Shadow Lake Drive Extended to 62nd Street The directional distribution of the development - generated traffic will change slightly if West Shadow Lake Drive is extended from its current terminus to 62nd Street. While all of the traffic entering and Millers South Glen A- LINOL9709.00 Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 1 exiting the subdivision will have to use 62nd Street, not all traffic will need to use Ware Road. It is estimated that 6 percent of the a.m. peak hour traffic and 8 percent of the p.m. peak hour traffic generated by the proposed subdivision will use West Shadow Lake Drive. This reduces the site - generated traffic using Ware Road north of 62nd Street to 24 percent during the a.m. peak hour and 33 percent in the p.m. peak hour. Site - generated traffic south of 62nd Street or Ware Road is not likely to change with the extension of West Shadow Lake Drive to 62nd Street. The additional traffic contributed by Miller's South Glen on the adjacent roadway system and the West Shadow Lake Drive extension is shown in Figure No. 3. West Shadow Lake Drive Extended to County Road J The directional distribution of the development - generated traffic will further change if West Shadow Lake Drive is ultimately extended to County Road J. Under this scenario, site - generated traffic from the north and south would be able to use either Ware Road or West Shadow Lake Drive and then 62nd Street to gain access to the development. Of the 70 percent of the a.m. peak hour site - generated traffic with origins and destinations south of 62nd Street, 35 percent will utilize both Ware Road and West Shadow Lake Drive extended south of 62nd Street. During the p.m. peak hour, an estimated 30 percent of the site - generated traffic will use Ware Road south of 62nd Street, 29 percent will use West Shadow Lake Drive. Site - generated traffic north of 62nd Street is not likely to change from the previous scenario as a result of further extending West Shadow Lake Drive to County Road J. The additional traffic contributed by Miller's South Glen on the adjacent roadway system and the West Shadow Lake Drive extension is shown in Figure No. 4. Potential Area Development In addition to the proposed Miller's South Glen development, there currently exists developable land along 62nd Street that would utilize the adjacent roadway system. This potential area development includes the second addition of Miller's Glen as well as other developable land along 62nd Street. Plat maps and aerial photographs were used to identify the remaining buildable land in the vicinity of 62nd Street. Approximately 70 additional lots were assumed. Figure No. 5 shows the location of the potential area development along 62nd Street. The potential area development along 62nd Street would add an additional 700 trips on an average weekday, 62 trips during the a.m. peak hour, and 71 trips during the p.m. peak hour. The additional traffic generated by the potential area development was assigned to the adjacent roadway system using the same general directional distribution of the Miller's South Glen traffic. Figure Nos., 6, 7, and 8 illustrate the additional traffic contributed by Miller's South Glen and the potential area development on the adjacent roadway system for the existing roadway system, West Shadow Lake Drive extended to 62nd Street, and West Shadow Lake Drive extended to County Road J scenarios, respectively. Miller's South Glen A- LINOL9709.00 Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 2 Traffic Impacts Once the additional traffic generated by the proposed Miller's South Glen and the potential area development was distributed to the adjacent roadway system, an evaluation of the traffic impacts was completed. The following represents a summary of worst -case scenarios in terms of additional traffic on 62nd Street and Ware Road, first considering only Miller's South Glen, and then considering both Miller's South Glen and potential area development. Miller's South Glen The roadway scenario which would result in the greatest increase in traffic on 62nd Street and Ware Road as a result of the Miller's South Glen development is the existing roadway system. Either extension of West Shadow Lake Drive would decrease volumes on 62nd Street and Ware Road. 62nd Street at Ware Road 62nd Street is stop controlled at its intersection with Ware Road. This location is potentially the most affected location due to the additional southbound left turns approaching the site onto 62nd Street, as well as westbound left turns leaving the site onto Ware Road. In the a.m. peak period, these movements are estimated at 3 vehicles and 19 vehicles, respectively. In the p.m. peak period, which has the highest conflicting traffic volumes, these movements are estimated at 13 vehicles and 10 vehicles, respectively. This represents approximately one south -to- eastbound left turn per 4.5 minutes, and approximately one west -to- southbound left turn every 6 minutes. The remaining movements affected by the proposed project -- westbound and northbound right turns -- have low conflicting volumes and represent an additional volume of one vehicle every 8.5 minutes westbound and one vehicle every 3 minutes 20 seconds northbound during the p.m. peak hour. The existing intersection geometrics and traffic control can accommodate these added volumes. Ware Road at Birch Street Ware Road is stop controlled at its intersection with Birch Street. The proposed development will generate approximately 5 left turns onto Birch Street and 4 left turns onto Ware Road. This represents approximately one north -to- westbound left turn per 12 minutes and approximately one west - to-southbound left turn every 15 minutes. The remaining movements affected by the proposed project -- northbound and eastbound right turns -- have low conflicting volumes and represent an additional volume of approximately one vehicle every 20 minutes northbound and approximately one vehicle every 6.5 minutes in the eastbound direction. The existing intersection geometrics and traffic control can accommodate these added volumes. Ware Road at Ash Street (County Road J) Ware Road is stop controlled at its intersection with Ash Street. The proposed development will generate approximately 5 left turns onto Ash Street and 9 left turns onto Ware Road. These volumes represent a frequency of approximately one south -to- eastbound left turn per 12 minutes and approximately one east -to- northbound left turn every 6.5 minutes. The remaining movements affected by the proposed project -- southbound and westbound right turns -- have low conflicting volumes and represent an additional volume of approximately one vehicle per 12 minutes Miller's South Glen A- LINOL9709.00 Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 3 southbound and approximately one vehicle every 6.5 minutes in the westbound direction. The existing intersection geometrics and traffic control can accommodate these added volumes. Miller's South Glen and Potential Area Development The roadway scenario which would result in the greatest increase in traffic along 62nd Street and Ware Road as a result of both Miller's South Glen and the potential area development is the existing roadway system. 62nd Street at Ware Road As mentioned previously, 62nd Street is stop controlled at its intersection with Ware Road. This location is potentially the most affected location due to the additional southbound left turns approaching the site onto 62nd Street, as well as westbound left turns leaving the site onto Ware Road. In the a.m. peak period, these movements are estimated at 7 vehicles and 45 vehicles, respectively. In the p.m. peak period, which has the highest conflicting traffic volumes, these movements are estimated at 31 vehicles and 25 vehicles, respectively. This represents approximately one south -to- eastbound left turn per 2 minutes, and approximately one west -to- southbound left turn every 2.5 minutes. The remaining movements affected by the proposed project -- westbound and northbound right turns -- have low conflicting volumes and represent an additional volume of one vehicle every 3 minutes 20 seconds westbound and one vehicle every 1 minute 20 seconds northbound during the p.m. peak hour. The existing intersection geometrics and traffic control can accommodate these added volumes. Ware Road at Birch Street Ware Road is stop controlled at its intersection with Birch Street. The proposed development will generate approximately 12 left turns onto Birch Street and 11 left turns onto Ware Road. This represents approximately one north -to- westbound left turn per 5 minutes and approximately one west -to- southbound left turn every 5.5 minutes. The remaining movements affected by the proposed project -- northbound and eastbound right turns -- have low conflicting volumes and represent an additional volume of approximately one vehicle every 10 minutes northbound and approximately one vehicle every 3 minutes in the eastbound direction. The existing intersection geometrics and traffic control can accommodate these added volumes. Ware Road at Ash Street (County Road J) Ware Road is stop controlled at its intersection with Ash Street. The proposed development will generate approximately 12 left turns onto Ash Street and 23 left turns onto Ware Road. These volumes represent a frequency of approximately one south -to- eastbound left turn per 5 minutes and approximately one east -to- northbound left turn every 2.5 minutes. The remaining movements affected by the proposed project -- southbound and westbound right turns -- have low conflicting volumes and represent an additional volume of approximately one vehicle per 4.5 minutes southbound and approximately one vehicle every 2.5 minutes in the westbound direction. The existing intersection geometrics and traffic control can accommodate these added volumes. Miller's South Glen A- LINOL9709.00 Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 4 Cut - Through Traffic Given the existing roadway system, site - related traffic could cut - through the existing neighborhood to the west of the proposed development by traveling west on 62nd Street, north on Ware Road, and then west on Linda Avenue to gain access to Hodgson Road. However, due to the nature of the roadway alignment -- reverse turns -- there does not appear to be a time - saving benefit to use Linda Avenue. Therefore, since there does not appear to be a significant time - saving benefit for traffic to use Linda Avenue, there should be few (if any) vehicles cutting through on Linda Avenue. If West Shadow Lake Drive is extended, either to 62nd Street or to County Road J, site - generated traffic may use this facility to travel to and from Birch Street. As previously mentioned, 6 percent of the a.m. peak hour traffic and 8 percent of the p.m. peak hour traffic generated by the site may be expected to use the extended West Shadow Lake Drive. During the a.m. peak hour, this would correspond to an estimated 3 vehicles (1 southbound, 2 northbound), or equal to approximately 1 vehicle every 20 minutes. An estimated 4 vehicles (3 southbound, 1 northbound), or roughly one vehicle every 15 minutes, would use an extended West Shadow Lake Drive north of 62nd Street. While not specifically included in the scope of this study, a preliminary investigation was conducted of the traffic generated by the Shenandoah, Park Grove, and Birch Wood Acres Additions, which may utilize an extended West Shadow Lake Drive to 62nd Street and/or Ash Street. It is estimated that the existing Shenandoah, Park Grove, and Birch Wood Acres Additions have the potential to add an additional 50 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 70 trips during the p.m. peak hour to an extended West Shadow Lake Drive. Given this preliminary estimate, it is anticipated that the increase in traffic along an extended West Shadow Lake Drive due to existing development would be greater than the traffic due to the proposed development along 62nd Street. Roadway Construction With regard to the impact of the proposed Miller's South Glen with or without the influence of potential area development, the traffic generated by the development(s) will not change the pavement design of the roadway. The need to upgrade the existing roadway pavement design would therefore be a product of age, deterioration, and/or the desired type of vehicles using the roadways and not one of increased traffic due to the proposed development. Summary Based on the anticipated traffic volumes, the existing roadway system, and the existing roadway geometrics, the proposed Miller's South Glen -- without or with the potential area development -- will not require any additions or changes to the public roadway system. Miller's South Glen A- LINOL9709.00 Lino Lakes, Minnesota Page 5 FIGURES OWN STREET 22 23' 24ts ti =7 tt ,... . 11111.31 1132 /t 3 E`Rlb V 0M©G�Pp �� a© >� ROK ��9'6� v iiiii 092 -4/i7 13 li .G ir4 A �s � :4411 Iz N a © ©� p 1i a . ����� -• ��' >< 14 1; 211 1761., P , ,s,, MI', „ \ \∎;∎ \�.g∎∎0 ►\\\��� `iMO ANON\\ 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 ANOKA COUNTY HOMY RNGNT -OJ-IM $.A* 47.2 I V411111 P ? 10 © 8Vo, 'v 4 -74e0 • 4 a s d • � �Er cot ay • E • c • • . u • � �¢ • - • � a s M?nryry L ;11% 0 9 A • - r— J \TRANS \LINOL ASH ST. - 1 � I CORPORATE LIMI #S OF CITY OF LINO IL COUNTY —STATE — A1O-1NAHWAY —NO.32 — PROPOSED SUBDIVISION Ad..rAllirASFEH PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALINOL9709.0C FIGURE 1 S: \TRANS \LINOL \LA02 7 14 Birch Street 0 0 a) 0 11 20 4 6 MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN 62nd Street 0 -a1 a 36 48 25 28 13 14 Ash Street County Road J 12 14 X X Legend Am PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Pm PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTED BY MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN: EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM. SEEN PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALINOL9709.00 FIGURE 2 S: \TRANS \LINOL \LA03 7 14 Birch Street -o 0 0 cc a) 0 8 16 1 2 MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN 62nd Street 0 -01 s 3 4 33 44 25 28 Ash Street 12 14 3 4 County Road J 13 14 X X Legend Am PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Pm PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTED BY MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN: W. SHADOW LAKE DR. EXTENDED TO 62nd STREET. =SEH PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALINOL9709.00 FIGURE 3 S: \TRANS \LINOL \LA04 14 Birch Street -v 0 0 a) L v 8 16 1 2 MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN 62nd Street 21 30 13 14 13 14 Ash Street County Road J 4 5 i 15 18 12 14 X X Legend Am PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Pm PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTED BY MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN: W. SHADOW LAKE DR. EXTENDED TO CO.RD. J. PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALINOL9709.00 FIGURE 4 AI k& COUNTY WORMY RIONT -OF•MA PLAT 111 Irenri lin - 1i .,tl XII i u ,Q .�- 10 © IT�6V, '0 !1 • S ..q � •t O.T. A•� 171'1 S,iS..:,..�. d' 0 0 '000 !gr� ■ MILLER'S SOUTH �� GLEN (48 LOTS) .... ►► 1 23 LOTS 18 LOTS S: \TRANS \LINOL \LAOS 3 ASH CORPpRATE LIMliS OF ' ITY OF LINO L COUNTY —STATE —MO —NOWAY —NO. 32 POTENTIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT ALONG 62nd STREET PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALINOL9709.00 FIGURE 5 E 0 0 S: \TRANS \LINOL \LA06 18 32 Birch Street 0 0 Q) 0 27 49 9 17 MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN 62nd Street 0 -a .01\ 88 119 61 70 31 36 Ash Street County Road J 30 34 X X Legend Am PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Pm PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTED BY MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN AND POTENTIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT: EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM. =SEH PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALINOL9709.00 FIGURE 6 S: \TRANS \LINOL \LA07 18 32 Birch Street 0 0 e' a) L. 0 22 39 4 7 MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN 62nd Street 0 -0 a 5 10 83 109 61 70 31 36 Ash Street County Road J 5 10 30 34 X X Legend Am PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Pm PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTED BY MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN AND POTENTIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT: W SHADOW LAKE DR. EXTENDED TO 62nd STREET. =SEMI PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALINOL9709.00 FIGURE 7 0 S: \TRANS \LINOL \LA08 18 32 Birch Street v 0 0 22 39 4 7 MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN 62nd Street 0 -o 0 5 10 53 75 31 36 31 36 Ash Street County Road J 35 44 7 8 30 34 30 34 X Legend Am PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Pm PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTED BY MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN AND POTENTIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT: W SHADOW LAKE DR. EXTENDED TO CO.RD.J. =SEH PERLIMINARY PLAT REVIEW MILLER'S SOUTH GLEN LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA FILE NO. ALI NOL9709.00 FIGURE 8 AGENDA ITEM 4 A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland. DATE: 1/20/99 TOPIC: West Shadow Ponds, R. Carlson, Rezone, Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment COUNCIL ACTION: Rezone - 415th Vote Required, Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 415th Vote, Preliminary Plat - simple majority BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing on November 12th, 1998 and recommended the following Approval of the Rezone on a 6 -0 (Trehus) vote, Approval of the Comp Plan Amendment on a 6 - 0 (Trehus) vote, Approval of the Preliminary Plat on a 6 0 -1 (Robinson) vote. The City Council reviewed this item at their November 23rd meeting at which time the Applicant, Mr. Carlson, requested a delay to allow him time to meet with some of the adjoining property owners to address their concerns. Since that meeting staff has also received a transportation report from Mr. Carlson's Engineer, Ted Mattke which was submitted to Council in December. Mr. Carlson would now like the Council to reconsider his request and take action. The City Engineer and Transportation consultant will be available on Monday to address the traffic/transportation issue. See attached original staff report, minutes from the P & Z meeting and minutes from the November City Council meeting. NXC PLANNING REPORT NORTH -WEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH TO: Brian Wessel / Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Troy D. Hagen / Alan Brixius DATE: 5 November 1998 RE: Lino Lakes - West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat FILE NO.: 194.01 - 98.15 BACKGROUND Richard Carlson had previously submitted a Concept Plan of West Shadow Pond and is requesting approval of a preliminary plat entitled West Shadow Pond, which would require approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to introduce MUSA to the site and Rezoning from R: Rural District to R -1X: Single Family Executive Residential District. The site is located south of Birchwood Acres, which is south of County Road 10, west of the Colonial Woods Subdivision and east of Ware Road. The preliminary plat illustrates that West Shadow Lake Road will be extended from the Birchwood Acres Subdivision through to 62nd Street. The applicant intends to develop 22 single family tots on 18.88 acres. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Site Location Preliminary Plat with Utility Plan Grading Plan Environmental Committee Comments Mattke Engineering Comments (Project Engineer) 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554. 1 6 PHONE 612 - 595 -9636 FAX 612 -59S -91337 E -MAIL NAC @WINTERNET.COM Tr.. 1 T OGG T- l"r1_I11"IV�I ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Zoning. The 1990 Lino Lakes Land Use Map identifies the subject site as a rural land use area. However, the area has been looked at as a location for future urban expansion in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. Therefore, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended to introduce low density residential to this area. Further, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended to include the subject site as part of MUSA. Currently, the land is in the R: Rural District. The applicant is proposing the location be changed to R -1X: Single Family Executive Residential district. Before a zoning change can be granted, the Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment based on the following criteria: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official Comprehensive Plan. Based on the proposed development abutting existing MUSA to the north, the requested zoning, similar approval of the Miller South Glen Subdivision, and the needed extension of West Shadow Lake Drive, it would be logical that the MUSA Amendment be granted. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed preliminary plat calls for low density urban residential development. The lots would be larger than required under the R -1 X District and are designed to be compatible with Colonial Woods development, which is to the east. The plat offers deep lot separation with ponding to add distance and buffering between developments. This would be of great compatibility with the adjacent land uses. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The preliminary plat will review compliance with the R -1X District standards. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. There is no anticipation of an overburdening of existing public services. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. a. It is consistent with the 1998 Transportation Plan for street capabilities. 2 b. It would provide an altemative route that would reduce current traffic levels on Birch Street. c. West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street have been designated as Minnesota State Aid (MSA) streets and would be eligible for upgrade financing through the state. d. As stated in the letter dated October 21, 1998, the developer will contribute $44,000 towards the dedicated street reconstruction fund for the upgrade of 62nd Street. As stated previously, this will help alleviate the traffic burden on Birch Drive. Preliminary Plat. Lot Size. Under R -1X District establishments, minimum lot size shall be no Tess than 12,825 square feet of buildable land. Buildable land is defined as, land area occurring within the property lines of parcel or lot excluding drainage ways, wetlands, water bodies, parklands, easements, road rights -of -way, and slopes in excess of 18 percent. The applicant has proposed lots no less than 14,718 square feet, therefore, the minimum lot size is satisfied. Lot Width. The West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat indicates that the minimum lot width of 90 feet will be satisfied. Lot Depth. The R-1X District requires a minimum lot depth of 135 feet. The subject development is allowing lot depths of at least 150 feet, thus satisfying the zoning requirements. Setbacks. The required setbacks established in the R -1X District are 30 feet (front yard), 30 feet (rear yard), and 10 feet (side yard). The lots have adequate dimensions to meet required setbacks. Pond and Wetland areas will mandate a significant setback between the proposed building sites and adjoining homes in Colonial Woods. Lot & Block. The applicant has submitted plans to be considered for land subdivision. The Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance states that block length shall be no more than 1,500 feet and no Tess than 400 feet. The proposed length of Block 1 is 1,362.28 feet, according to the sum of the lot frontages at the street line. With the inclusion of Lot 1, Block 5 the total length may exceed the 1,500 foot limit. However, the wetlands to the east and west mandate the proposed block configuration. Street Design. When the Concept Plan was submitted the proposed extension of West Shadow Lake Road was to end in a cul-de -sac at the south end near 62nd Street. The applicant has since modified the plans to extend the street through to 62nd Street. Sixty- 3 T/']. 1 T mrC T_e _e∎nm Second Street is designated as a minor collector and it is indicated in the City of Lino Lakes Transportation Plan that West Shadow Lake Road will be a minor collector. The plans indicates that the width of the right -of -way will meet the minimum width of 80 feet. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street with regards to traffic safety and its necessity for the future. Grading. A Grading Plan has been submitted and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Utilities. The applicant has submitted a Preliminary Utility Plan indicating the placement of easements. This shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Park Land Dedication. When Millers South Glen Addition was approved, land west of the proposed West Shadow Pond was bought to fulfill park land dedication requirements for both Millers South Glen Addition and West Shadow Pond. Wetlands. The preliminary plat indicates that some wetland areas will be filled and some ponding areas will be created to mitigate for this filling. According to the plans, 2.17 acres of wetland are proposed to be filled, and 4.87 acres of wetland are proposed to be created for mitigation. Wooded Areas. The applicant has indicated that a wooded area exists along the eastern edge of the site, bordering the Colonial Woods Subdivision. According to the Grading Plan, the applicant has proposed significant grading, in this area, to establish a ponding area. The applicant has indicated in a letter dated October 19, 1998, that the oaks are located along the west side of the Colonial Woods Subdivision, and that the preliminary grading plan had been designed to protect them. It also states that a tree preservation plan will be submitted with the Final Grading Plan, protecting the trees. S. (3;aes Trail. There is a trail right -of -way between Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot ,.. Block W. The applicant shall provide additional vegetation as a buffer along both property lines. RECOMMENDATION The rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment is a policy decision for the Planning Commission to determine. Based on the Planning Commission's approval of the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, our office recommends the approval of the West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat based on the following conditions: 4 • , T OGGT_cP_nnw '1. The Preliminary Utility Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street and whether the funding and resources available is sufficient to support upgrade of the 62nd Street. 3. The Grading Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The plan may be subject to modification to provide for the maximum number of trees to be preserved. 4. The applicant provide a Vegetation Plan and Landscape Plan illustrating the trees to be removed and the trees to be preserved. 5. The applicant provide additional vegetation along the trail right -of -way to buffer the recreational and residential uses. 6. The Planning Commission shall review and evaluate the comments of the Environmental Committee (Exhibit D) dated September 24, 1996. cc: Richard Carlson 5 ten. i r OCCT_Cfl- I11lhl Memorandum To: Brian Wessel CC: Mary Kay Wyland Ted Mattkee From: Marty Asleson Date: 09/24/98 Re: West Shadowlake Drive Extension/Rick Carlson Proposal The West Shadowlake Drive extension proposal by Rick Carlson was presented to the Environmental Board on Wednesday the 23 of September. The Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning this proposed development: That water - infiltration consideration be given to site planning. Consideration be given to reduced or no slope in the boulevard areas of the street sections. Consideration be given to implementation soil mixing in landscape practices and that specific guidelines be given to the developer on the nature of this mixing. Recommendation was made to use native plants approved by the city in re- establishment of wetland and buffer areas. 2. That the developer would consider deed restrictions in his lot sales for wetland buffer -areas subject to Rice Creek Watershed approval. That the developer give consideration to imposing deed restrictions in 10 foot buffer areas around all wetlands. That developer give consideration to sharing these deed restrictions with the city. 3. That the developer give consideration to requiring individual lot builders to follow soil mixing practices in landscape of yards. 4. The city consider passing an ordinance requiring new standards for soil preparation in development projects. 5. That the developer prepare a tree preservation plan at the time the grade plan is submitted, to protect the oaks woodlands on the west side of the development. 1 Oct 19 98 02:54p Mattke Engineering, Inc. Q October 19, 1998 City of Lino Lakes CIO Ms. Wyland 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 6127830300 p.1 Mattke Engineering, Inc. 7671 Central Ave. N.E. • Fridley, MN 55432 • (612) 783 -0300 re: WEST SHADOW PONDS -- Environmental Board comments Dear Ms. Wyland: Regarding the Memorandum of 9/24/98 by Marty Asleson, I have the following comments: 1. As discussed in the Environmental Board meeting, we have been using native plants in revegetating wetland and buffer areas in our past projects, and plan to do so here also. We are looking forward to receiving specific recommendations on soil mixing. 2. We have used deed restrictions with regard to the wetlands and buffers on previous projects, and will do so on this project also. We will be looking for your recommendations as to how to share these restrictions with the City. 3. We do not believe it is practical to require individual lot builders or owners to follow soil mixing practices unless it is incorporated in ordinance. When we receive the specific recommendations, we will happily provide them to lot buyers. 4. We agree that the City should consider a soil preparation ordinance. 5. The oaks are located on the west side of the Colonial Woods subdivision, and the preliminary grading plan has been designed to protect them. A tree preservation plan will be submitted with the Final Grading Plan, protecting the trees. Sincerely Tedd W. Mattke, P.E. • Residential 81. Commercial Development Hrhrfrnlnrni • Writer Resources • Municipal Mattke Engineering, Inc. Q 7671 Central Ave. N.E. • Fridley, MN 55432 • (612) 783 -0300 October 21, 1998 City of Lino Lakes C/O Mary Kay Wyland & Planning Commission 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 re: WEST SHADOW PONDS -- Neighborhood Meeting Results Dear Ms. Wyland and Planning Commission Members: Last evening, Mr. Richard Carlson (RC) and I met with neighbors to the proposed West Shadow Ponds subdivision, and we would like to share the input received in that meeting. 23 names were listed on the sign -in sheet including 7 from Colonial Woods subdivision, 14 from Birchwood Acres, and 2 (Arnold Rehbein and Wayne Junes) from 62nd Street. There was general support for the project, including the quality of the development, environmental concerns, park and trail interests, and traffic circulation planning, however a single issue -- safety on 62nd and on West Shadow Lake Drive (WSLD) -- was the dominant topic. Michael Guthmueller, 642 Fox Road, asked about covenants and if he could see a copy, and RC made a copy for him of Millers South Glen covenants (which should be similar.) Thomas Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, was concerned about drainage at the intersection of the proposed WSLD extension and 62nd Street, as it is presently a low point of 62nd. I explained that drainage from the north side of the intersection would be conveyed to the ponds and wetlands north of the intersection, and 62nd would not be impacted. Norma Mayhew, 678 Fox Road, and Amy Ziolkowski, 686 Fox Road, asked if they could purchase some of Lot 1, Block 2 so they had pond access, and RC indicated that this was not possible. Then they asked if they could plant trees along the edge of Lot 1, Block 2 for screening, and RC said they could. Stan Zarambo, 6250 Red Maple Lane asked if street lights were required on corner lots. We did not know the answer, but indicated that we would check into it and let him know. In addition to these questions, there was general discussion on the following topics: 1. Could the street lights in the project match the lights in Birchwood Acres, could concrete driveways be required as they are along WSLD in Birchwood Acres, and will the covenants be recorded and enforceable, and RC indicated that, with City approval, all of these could, and would be done. • Residential & Commercial Development Hydrology • Water Resources • Municipal 2. Blending the existing rear yards in Birchwood Acres into the grading of the new project, drainage along the trail into the park, and who would pay for it. I indicated that a culvert would be required to convey water from the north side of the trail to the wetland pond on the west side of WSLD, and that we could also grade the rear of those yards in Birchwood Acres to improve drainage if the City approved. RC indicated that he would pay for such grading, sod replacement, and sprinkler system replacement if approved by the City. 3. Pond design, depth, safety issues, and covenants to prevent filling of the ponds. I indicated that the ponds and wetlands will likely be about 4 feet deep with gradual sloping sides, and wetland vegetation surrounding them. The covenants and stipulations in the easement around the ponds will not allow 'cutting vegetation, or filling the ponds. These would be enforceable by Rice Creek Watershed District, and also by the City if it is named on the easement that surrounds the ponds. 4. Who is responsible for enforcing the covenants. RC indicated that he is responsible until 100% of the development is sold, then a committee can be formed by the property owners in the development to enforce the covenants. 5. Would the barbed wire fence be removed, and could a more appropriate fence be installed around or along side of the ponds, or to separate the park from the Birchwood Acres development. RC indicated that he would remove the barbed wire fence, but he would not install any fences, and that individual property owners could construct their own fences if they so chose. RC also agreed to plant groupings of pines strategically located along the trail west of WSLD (with Park Board permission) to help isolate the trail. RC also indicated that he would plant some trees for screening along the Rawleigh property east of WSLD. Safety Issues on West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street -- the Dominant Issue 6. Safety issues on West Shadow Lake Drive related to connecting WSLD with 62nd Street. These concerns stem from the idea that, with the connection, traffic from Birch Street may cut through WSLD to 62nd Street to Ware Road to Ash Street to Highway 49 in order to avoid the intersection at Birch Street and Highway 49. Fears that WSLD would be a 50 mph speedway were expressed, and a general consensus was reached that stop signs may be warranted along WSLD if the connection is made. (A better choice for drivers wanting to cut through to Ash Street would be to take Ware Road -- a straight shot.) 7. Safety issues related to the width of 62nd Street, and the increased traffic on 62nd Street with the connection to WSLD, and general speeding in that area. Residents indicated that the narrow street width, combined with excessive speed, make 62nd Street dangerous even now. Increased traffic would increase the danger. Joe Barthel, 6272 Red Maple Lane, indicated that school buses race around Red Maple Lane, getting up to 50 mph between stops. Others indicated that higher speeds are regularly observed on 62nd Street, making it especially dangerous for pedestrians. One person remarked that, "You don't want to be walking along 62nd when two vehicles are meeting -- there is no place to go to get out of the way!" Thomas Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, noted that the Street Condition and Traffic Study prepared for the Millers South Glen project (2 years ago) projected an increase of 50 -70 trips per day on 62nd Street from existing homes in Birchwood Acres if WSLD were extended to 62nd Street. Add 3 trips per day from the homes in the new project, and the total increase in traffic on 62nd Street would be about 130 trips per day. A solution that we proposed is that the City use part of the $44,000 that RC would contribute to the street reconstruction fund to widen the north side of 62nd street with a trail from Colonial Woods subdivision to Millers South Glen (where it continues to Ware Road.) This would provide pedestrian safety along 62nd Street, and also a certain amount of additional safety to vehicles. Other alternatives include temporary cul -de -sacs, either at the south end of WSLD, or at the north end of the new section of WSLD. A cul -de -sac at the north end would limit the increase in traffic on 62nd to about 70 additional trips per day, while a cul -de -sac on the south end would prevent any increase at all.. In summary, the major concern raised with regard to the WEST SHADOW PONDS project was a safety issue regarding street safety. Part of the concern involves speeding, and part involves the narrow width of 62nd Street. Even without this project, safety concerns exist regarding 62nd Street. With the project, however, the City will have $44,000 of dedicated street reconstruction funds that it could use to improve safety on 62nd Street. If the City approves this project, the major decisions will involve safety issues: (1) whether to install stop signs on WSLD, (2) whether to use part of the dedicated street reconstruction funds to widen 62nd Street with a trail, and (3) whether to allow the connection of WSLD with 62nd Street, or to construct a temporary cul -de -sac at one end of the new section of WSLD to reduce traffic on 62nd Street. We believe that the advantages of connecting West Shadow Lake Road and 62nd Street outweigh the disadvantages. The advantages include reducing the present 3/4 mile Red Maple Lane cul -de -sac to about 500 feet, allowing a more direct route from Birchwood Acres to Ware Road, allowing a more direct route from Red Maple Lane to Birch Street, and reducing the school bus and garbage truck traffic on 62nd Street by allowing one -way driving loops via WSLD. Sincerely Tedd W. Mattke, P.E. RICHARD S. CARLSON & ASSOCIATES 7671 Central Avenue * Fridley, MN 55432 * (612) 786 -1218 Fax (612) 786 -1219 November 18, 1998 To: Mary Kay Wyland, City Planner City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55104 Re: Planning and zoning - West Shadow Ponds Item That the developer would consider deed restrictions in his lot sales for wetland buffer -areas subject to Rice Creek Watershed approval. That the developer give consideration to imposing deed restrictions in 10 foot buffer areas around all wetlands. That developer give consideration to sharing these deed restrictions with the city. Response: The developer will change the following language and incorporate into the covenants: Article II - Easements 2.4 Drainage Easements around ponds and wetlands. Purchaser acknowledges that no dredged or fill material may placed into waters, wetlands or drainage easements and no cutting, removing or burning of vegetation will be allowed within drainage easements around ponds and wetlands without the written approval from the City authority and from the the Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Watershed District, where applicable. The developer will include the additional 10 ft. buffer area into the easement. The developer would ask the City of Lino Lakes to incorporate covenants into the zoning approval and would be named as the successor to the developer in the recorded document. This should satisfy the sharing of deed restrictions and Commissioner Johnsons concern as to how these covenants can be enforced after the developers homes are complete. • Regarding the Planning Commission's suggestion that these ponds and wetlands be open for use by all residents of Lino Lakes, I am opposed for the following reasons: 1. The Rice Creek Watershed requires me to sign a personal guarantee to maintain the integrity of the vegetated buffered areas. This agreement is perpetual and would become impossible for me to enforce if these areas become recreational and open to the public. 2. I have designed these upgraded wetlands for aesthetic reasons and to create large buffers between developments. Opening these areas up for public use would destroy the buffered areas and the privacy of the new home owners. 3. I have platted through these areas so individual home owners are responsible for the liability insurance. This would have to change if open to public use, as individual owners can not be expected to be liable for what would be public land or park. I have dedicated approximately twelve acres of upland and wetland to the city for park dedication adjacent to West Shadow Ponds. If the city council agrees, I am recommending that the ponding for public use take place on the park land. The second alternative is to build skating rinks on the upland under park supervision. Prior to the council meeting, as per the City Planning and Zoning Commission, I would ask that the Ci Attorney review my suggestion for sharing the deed restrictions through enforcement of e covenants his opinion on the use of wetlands and ponds on private property. Thank you, RSC:lh Car on Phi ;,. Vwin 00 [�� "° 144:10e. �,, eedo o�ee�►�d o tr �� o qa /4 01111 % N IMO 001r vOr� k4t.4, "uF AO p ® t�l % //, Al ri■ Ringing LANT MATERIAL BUFFER Approx. 80' from foul lino to prop.rfy lino. TOTAL DEDICATED PARK AREA AREA OF WETLAND Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 2 IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:33 p.m. No one appeared for open mike. Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:34 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 7 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, West Shadow Ponds, R. Carlson, Rezone from Rural to R -1X and Preliminary Plat, 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive Extended Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 6:55 p.m.. Mr. Hagen, Planning Consultant, stated Mr. Richard Carlson had previously submitted a Concept Plan of West Shadow Pond and is requesting approval of a preliminary plat entitled West Shadow Pond, which would require approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to introduce MUSA to the site and Rezoning from R: Rural District to R -1X: Single Family Executive Residential District. The site is located south of Birchwood Acres, which is south of County Road 10, west of the Colonial Woods Subdivision and east of Ware Road. The preliminary plat illustrates that West Shadow Lake road will be extended from the Birchwood Acres Subdivision through to 62nd Street. The applicant intends to develop 22 single family lots on 18.88 acres. Mr. Hagen reviewed the site location, preliminary plat with utility plan, grading plan, Environmental Committee comments, and Mattke Engineering comments. He noted the correction in the setbacks from 30' to 40'. He also corrected the trail right -of -way location which is located north of Lot 1, Block 1. Mr. Powell stated 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake are State Aid roadways. State funding will be available next year to begin the upgrade of 62nd Street. The remainder of the funds for project completion will be available in 2000. It was anticipated that West Shadow Lake Drive would eventually connect to 62nd Street. He stated the City has received letters from residents in Colonial Woods expressing concern about the width of 62nd Street. If 62nd Street is reconstructed the road would be widened and a trail would be added. The widening of the street will be based on a Feasibility Report. The costs could be born fully by the State Aid funds. With the Ware Road reconstruction project, lots were proposed to be assessed $2,000. The developer has indicated he will help with the cost of reconstruction for 62nd Street in the amount of $2,000 per lot. It would be Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 3 beneficial to time the reconstruction of 62nd Street after the subdivision is constructed to help eliminate construction traffic on a new roadway. If the project is approved, the 62nd Street reconstruction project would be initiated immediately. The City Council does, however, make all final decisions regarding reconstruction projects. Mr. Corson expressed concern regarding citizen assessment for the reconstruction project. Mr. Powell indicated that residents on Ware Road were proposed to be assessed $2,000 per lot. Mr. Corson asked if 62nd Street would become an 80 foot r row to include a trail. Mr. Powell said we could consider an 80' row, both urban and rural sections. We would not absolutely have curb and gutter. RCWD has adopted rules on infiltration that would support rural sections. We definitely need an upgrade and widening with a trail section. Mr. Corson stated that the plat appears to be 60' east of this development. Would we need additional row. Mr. Powell indicated that a portion of the row is not technically in the plat, we could work within the existing row. Mr. Corson suggested that we may want to get the additional row dedication at this time. Mr. Corson questioned the use of infiltration on this plat. Mr. Powell felt that a combination of infiltration and standard storm sewer would work. Ware Road incorporated similar features. Mr. Trehus asked if the Ware Road project included sewer and water at $2000 per lot or was that assessment just for the roadway. Mr. Powell indicated that the $2000 was just for the roadway. If property owners are interested in connection to sewer and water there would be an additional assessment. Regarding 62nd Street, Mr. Powell indicated that the city would evaluate the need for sewer and water and most likely install them along with any reconstruction work. Mr. Trehus asked about using the allocation of State Aid funds and if the City has enough to cover these costs. Mr. Powell stated the City does have a balance of State Aid funds now. The City receives an annual allotment. In 1999, $350,000 will be received. By 2000, $700,000 will be available. Generally, road improvement costs can be estimated at one million dollars per mile. The Feasibility Report will give a detailed analysis of the costs. Mr. Trehus asked how much is currently in the City's State Aid fund. Mr. Powell stated the City may possibly dip to a negative balance after the final payment is made for Ware Road. Mr. Trehus asked how much will be in the fund after the final payment of Ware Road and when the 1999 allotment is received. Mr. Powell indicated approximately $300,000 will be in the State Aid fund. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 4 Mr. Richard Carlson, Developer of West Shadow Pond, came forward and thanked staff for the analysis and the report. He stated he was in agreement with the conditions of staff, the Environmental Board, and Park Board. He stated a neighborhood meeting was held with 23 neighbors. Two hundred invitations were sent out. He stated the majority of the neighbors were concerned with 62nd Street. He reviewed the following concerns raised at the meeting: 1. Street light on 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive - Mr. Carlson stated he assumed a street light would be placed at that intersection. 2. Concrete Driveways - There are concrete driveways north on West Shadow Lake Road and residents would prefer the new homes have a concrete driveway also. 3. Setback - The setback will be 40'. 4. Screening along the trail - Mr. Carlson stated he will plant a row of Pines along the first two properties for screening. The rest of the property is park land which requires park approval for screening. Screening with trees 40' from the roadway will also be placed adjacent to the Rawleigh property - Lot 5, Birchwood Acres. The lots are 3/4 of an acre. 5. Drainage - Mr. Carlson stated water will drain away from 62nd Street. Mr. Carlson stated the neighborhood meeting went well. He indicated he agrees with the concerns raised about 62nd Street and will donate to those improvements. He stated another option is to develop a cul-de -sac on the end of the development to deter traffic. He stated a Master Plan of the park was distributed at the meeting. Mr. Dunn asked if Mr. Carlson would consider tallcing to the City Forester about planting Spruce trees instead of Pines. He stated he believes Spruce trees offer more screening and live longer. Mr. Carlson stated he has met with the City Forester. He has concerns regarding the park trail being screened completely. The City Forester would like to see a grouping of trees. Mr. Carlson indicated he is willing to screen with Pine or Spruce trees. Mr. Ted Mattke, Mattke Engineering, came forward and distributed pictures to the Board of 62nd Street. He suggested that if the plat is approved the developer could install a trail in the interim to at least get the pedestrians off the roadway. Mr. Tom Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, expressed concern regarding 62nd Street. He reviewed a traffic study that was conducted in December, 1996. If the development occurs there is the potential for 1,300 trips per day accessing 62nd Street. He stated he is in favor of the development with the exception of West Shadow Lake Road not going through to 62nd Street until reconstruction of 62nd Street occurs. He suggested a barricade be left on the north side of West Shadow Lake Road while the development is Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 5 being done. The road can be opened after 62nd Street is done. Traffic control should be considered on West Shadow Lake Road because there are no stops all the way to Birch Street. He requested the lighting be minimized because the neighborhood prefers it dark. He suggested using directional lighting. He raised the issue of the low spot on 62nd Street. He stated that if 62nd Street is improved and elevated there should be no problem. The lowest spot on the road is the entrance and there are already water and ice problems in that area. Chair Schaps entered into the record letters received from Mr. Paul Nyberg, 6307 Red Maple Lane, and Lynn and George Fernstrom, 6340 Red Maple Lane. Both letters expressed concern with the condition of 62nd Street. Ms. Susie Guthmueller, 642 Fox Road, came forward and stated that if the trail would go through the lots instead of behind her house she would be very happy. She stated she has an open lot behind her home which is why she moved there. She expressed concern regarding stop signs. She stated cars currently go too fast down West Shadow Lake Drive and the road completion would allow cars to go faster. She stated the development looks good although she is concerned about the increase of people in the area. She stated that lighting is needed for the path for security purposes. She asked if the ponds being developed will be available for use by the whole community. Mr. Carlson stated that because of the way the development is platted the ponds would be privately owned. The ponds are located on individual lots. He stated he is open to however the City would like him to develop the ponds. Ms. Guthmueller stated the ponds are on the lots but also connected to the park. She stated that change is hard. She indicated she has lived there for three years. Twenty -two homes are going to be developed behind her house. She stated she hopes this adds to the value of her home. She asked that the path be moved and indicated she is happy with the trees. Ms. Dawn Kenny, 6299 Red Maple Lane, asked when the construction of 62nd Street will occur. Mr. Powell indicated reconstruction of 62nd Street would occur within a year. The project would begin next year and be completed in 2000. He noted the City Council makes the final decisions regarding road reconstruction. Ms. Kenny asked what will happen if the Feasibility Study shows the project will cost too much. Mr. Powell indicated the City can consider borrowing ahead from the State Aid fund. Ms. Kenny asked for clarification regarding Chapter 429 and The Charter. Mr. Powell stated that State Statute Chapter 429 governs road improvements. It provides protection for property owners and requires a public hearing for road improvements. Per the City Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 6 Charter, road reconstruction can go to a citizen vote if general funds are used for the project. Ms. Georgette Korkowski, of Red Maple Lane, stated her lot abuts the new area. She expressed concern regarding drainage. The lot next to her was wet often this year because of all the rain. The water floods into her lot. She stated the drainage is terrible and does not want any more water. Mr. Mattke stated the area is in a wetland area. The development will not be raising the water table. New ponds will provide drainage for a better outlet. The water will eventually drain into Reshanau Lake. The development will not cause the current water problem to get any worse. Mr. Johnson asked if the outlet from the pond in the north/east corner will allow for adequate drainage underneath to the west side. Mr. Mattke indicated it will allow for adequate drainage. There is a gentle slope from the north/east to the south/west which is the way the drainage will flow. An equalizer pipe will be put in to level the elevation. There will be three ponds added that may lead to some drainage improvement in the area. Mr. Dunn asked if the system is similar to the one done in Centerville. Mr. Mattke indicated it is a similar system. The ponds will have an easement also. Restrictions regarding cutting the grass will be enforced. The City will have access to the ponds. Mr. Barry Rice, 6622 Fox Road, stated he was happy with the proposed development. He indicated he would like for the City to own the ponds. He asked that the lighting be similar to Birchwood Acres. He stated there is a definite need for a four way stop at West Shadow and Fox Road. He would like for the construction of the pond to stay clear of the Oak trees that are currently there. He stated he has been assured by the developer that the ponds can handle a good size rain storm. Mr. Mattke indicated the grading of the pond will not contour close to the Oak trees. Mr. Steve Andre, 495 Ash, expressed concern regarding the section of road between Ware Road and his property. He stated the current speed limit there is 35 mph. It is not uncommon to see people driving 70 mph down the street. He indicated he does not want more traffic on his street. Public safety regarding this issue is a concern. He stated he moved to this area because it was safe. He stated it has not been safe for the last four years. It is not uncommon for people to try to pass a vehicle on the left when you are trying to turn left into your driveway. Cars and trucks have gone across yards, smashed into parked cars, and hit mailboxes. Some houses in the area have been sold three times over in the last five years. Adding more traffic to an already deadly situation is irresponsible. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 7 Ms. Kenny stated the current traffic on 62nd Street is bad. A school bus went off the road before Millers South Glen went in. Adding more traffic to the area is a bad idea. She asked the difference between reconstruction and an upgrade of the road. Mr. Powell stated an upgrade would involve widening the road and developing a trail. Reconstruction would develop a completely new road and trail. He stated that more than likely reconstruction of the road would occur. He indicated it is a good idea to put the trail in now. Ms. Ann Carlson, 630 Fox Road, stated the West Shadow extension will be used as a cut through. The elevation will be only three feet higher than Birchwood Acres. She expressed concern regarding the number of trees that have to be cut down for the pond development. Ms. Linda O'Connor, 6291 Red Maple Lane, stated the path in front of Millers South Glen is growing grass. She asked if the path will be gravel or tar. Mr. Powell stated the path will be an 8' wide bituminous trail. Generally, the developer installs a gravel trail with the development. The City then paves the trail when the City's trail pavement project occurs. The City is looking at how to do the trails differently so grass does not grow on them. He noted the path in front of Millers South Glen will be paved. Mr. Holm, 634 Fox Road, requested that West Shadow Lake Road does not go through until 62nd Street is done. He requested screening between his house and the pond. He stated he has a nice nature area now and would prefer Spruce trees for screening. He suggested the City develop a pond maintenance plan to keep the ponds looking nice. If a pond has no water movement they do not stay nice for very long. Mr. Mike Pojar, 6255 Red Maple Lane, expressed concern regarding the ponds in the development and there is great dissertation regarding the pond boundaries, depth, and slope. He stated he disputes the way the developer stated the water will flow. He stated the State of Minnesota has maps regarding water flow direction and would like the maps to be studied. Mr. Mattke stated he is experience in hydrology. In his opinion, the water will flow under 62nd Street to an existing ditch that eventually goes into Reshanau Lake. He stated the water from the north/east corner of the development will flow north. Mr. Pojar referred to a map of the development. He stated that part of the pond on property #7 flows north, therefore, other water will flow in that direction also. He stated he wants to know precisely where the water will go because of the close proximity to his property. Mr. Powell suggested Mr. Mattke meet with Mr. Pojar and provide his map source. He stated that he trusts the judgment and analysis done regarding the water flow direction. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 8 He suggested more information be obtained from the State and provided to Mr. Pojar. Mr. Mattke indicated he will meet with Mr. Pojar. Mr. Dunn suggested the possibility of a gating process regarding water flow. Mr. Mattke stated a gating process will be used. A culvert will control the flow on the east side. The pond is 4 -5 feet lower than the existing ground. He offered to go over the grading plan and elevations with the Board and property owners. Ms. Kenny asked what a Feasibility Report is. Mr. Powell stated the City Council orders a Feasibility Report. The report looks at the cost, proposed improvements, assessments, design, alignment of streets, elevation, and storm sewers. It is• a preliminary design for the project. Mr. Pojar asked who holds the developer accountable if the drainage does cause a problem. Chair Schaps stated the City Council will hold the developer accountable. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:02 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 7 -0. Mr. Corson asked if there is currently a City policy regarding ponds and liability and if skating is allowed on the ponds. Mr. Powell stated the ponds will have drainage easements. Typically, the City's ponds are not fenced to allow the City access. Liability regarding skaters is a legal question. The City would have an easement which is standard. Mr. Schilling stated the improvements to 62nd Street are a big concern. He asked if the cul-de -sac option would allow the improvements to be completed more quickly. Mr. Powell recommended not developing a permanent cul-de -sac. He stated a temporary cul- de -sac is an option. He suggested the recommendation of 62nd Street being upgraded be added to the motion. Mr. Trehus asked about grading. Mr. Mattke stated that the ponds will be excavated to obtain materials to build up the road and lots. Because the wetlands are degraded the value is reduced. He indicated he expects agreement from the Rice Creek Watershed District regarding the wetlands. Most of the drainage produced will run off the back. Drainage in the front will be drawn to the center of the project, with the exception of both ends of the project. The City Engineering Department will determine if the grades will be elevated at the low spot. Mr. Trehus asked if there is a storm sewer on the north end of the project. Mr. Mattke indicated there is a storm sewer on the north end. A storm sewer will be constructed on the south end of West Shadow. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 9 Mr. Trehus stated there will be a lot of water running in front of the homes on 62nd Street. Mr. Mattke showed a map indicating the high point of the street. Everything west of the first lot will go to a storm sewer retention pond. Mr. Pojar asked about the water in regard to the first three lots near the Rawleigh property (Lot 5, Birchwood Acres). Mr. Mattke stated the water in that area will run into the pond. The elevation is 892'. Mr. Pojar stated water collected in the middle of the road this summer. Mr. Mattke stated they have taken care of that water problem. The water was not draining properly and it has been corrected. Mr. Pojar noted the water may not drain properly with this project either. Mr. Trehus asked about the increase in elevation of the street. Mr. Mattke stated the elevation of the street will be approximately 3 1/2 feet higher than the highest point of the street. Mr. Trehus asked if the catch basins will be at street level. Mr. Mattke indicated the catch basins will be built up at the center of the project at an elevation of 902'. Mr. Mattke referred to a Preliminary Vertical Profile that shows the elevations. Mr. Powell noted the elevations may change slightly. Mr. Corson asked if there is a problem with completing the reconstruction of 62nd Street before West Shadow is continued through. Mr. Powell stated that stipulation can be included as a condition of approval. The processing of 62nd Street improvements will be handled by the City Council. Mr. Corson asked about a temporary cul-de -sac. Mr. Powell stated a simple barrier could be used. Something is needed to keep the traffic down. He stated the trail should be developed in the interim. Mr. Johnson noted the comments from the Environmental Board. He indicated there is not a problem with the Environmental Board's comments, therefore, condition #6 regarding preliminary plat approval should be deleted. He suggested adding the condition of making a strong recommendation to upgrade 62nd Street. Mr. Trehus asked why the City requires street lighting in new developments, noting that older developments do not have street lights. Mr. Powell stated the cost of street lights is born by the developer. Street lights are mainly a pedestrian safety issue. The City does respond to residents requests for street lights. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 10 Mr. Trehus suggested the policy regarding street lights be reviewed. He asked if the new street lights will match what is currently in the area. Mr. Powell stated the new street lights will be consistent unless NSP has changed their design. Mr. Dunn stated the proposed Comprehensive Plan does direct the City to study and develop a lighting plan. It is possible that Ordinances may be developed regarding street lighting. He stated that he believes the applicant has met all the requirements for approval. This is a good development for the City. The development will be a forcing issue to correct 62nd Street, which is another step in meeting the goals of improving the City's infrastructure. He stated he would not like to see a cul-de -sac, but would like to see good progress on 62nd Street. The issues from residents should be incorporated into the action that the City takes. He indicated he would like to move forward on this project. He is in favor of the project. He stated the traffic is unfortunate, but does not believe this project will add to that problem. Mr. Trehus read page 26 from the proposed Comprehensive Plan regarding premature expansion to a rural area. He stated this needs to be considered. He also read page 79, which referred to rural land uses and preserving open space. He read the staff recommendation from two months ago regarding the extension of 62nd Street. He noted the disadvantages of reconstructing 62nd Street now as opposed to later. This project will add more traffic to a rural area. According to the proposed Comprehensive Plan this development is premature. He noted there are only 58 acres left in the City's MUSA bank. This project will take 19 acres of the MUSA bank which will leave the City limited regarding business development until more MUSA is obtained. He stated the MUSA issue is a reason to deny approval of the project. Mr. Wessel stated no additional MUSA is needed for business development in the City. MUSA is not an issue. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION, and was supported by Mr. Corson, to approve the rezone of West Shadow Pond. Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Trehus voting no. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION, and was supported by Mr. Dunn, to approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to introduce MUSA to the West Shadow Pond site. Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Trehus voting no. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat, based on the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Utility Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street and whether the funding and resources available is sufficient to support upgrade of the 62nd Street. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 11 3. The Grading Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The plan may be subject to modification to provide for the maximum number of trees to be preserved. 4. The applicant provide a Vegetation Plan and Landscape Plan illustrating the trees to be removed and the trees to be preserved. 5. The applicant provide additional vegetation along the trail right -of -way to buffer the recreational and residential uses. 6. The Planning & Zoning Board strongly recommends the upgrading or reconstruction of 62nd Street occurs as soon as possible. Until reconstruction is completed, West Shadow Lake Road will be blocked at the north end of the development. Chair Schaps made a friendly amendment to incorporate all comments from citizens into the motion. Stop signs are needed in the area and neighborhood use of ponds should be clarified. The friendly amendment was accepted. Mr. Powell noted the need for stop signs in that area will be evaluated. Mr. Corson made a friendly amendment to clarify trails as far as specifying Spruce trees being placed in clusters. He also asked that concrete driveways be used on West Shadow Lake Road and there be a 40' setback incorporated into the motion. The friendly amendment was accepted. Mr. Johnson noted that covenants can only be enforced if there is a committee to enforce them. The MOTION, to approve the preliminary plat including stated conditions, neighborhood comments, and the friendly amendments, was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6- 0 with Mr. Robinson abstaining. Mr. Carlson asked for direction from the Board regarding the ponds. Chair Schaps directed Mr. Carlson to work with star Mr. Carlson stated that ponds have been made as outlots before which can create a legal problem. He suggested the City Attorney be asked for a recommendation. Chair Schaps directed staff to review the pond issue with the City Attorney. Chair Schaps recessed the meeting for five minutes. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 12 B. Dennis & Martha Houle, 16XX Birch Street, Site Plan Review to Move House into City Ms. Wyland explained that Dennis and Martha Houle would like to move a single family residence onto their property at the south/west comer of Birch Street and Centerville Road. The structure is to be located on the north/west comer of the 40 acre parcel of property which is currently Zoned Rural. The existing land use plan indicates the site as rural while the draft Comprehensive Plan indicates the site as low /medium density residential with commercial along Centerville Road. The City's Zoning Ordinance requires any structure to be moved into the City to go through a site plan review. The Building Inspector has inspected the dwelling which is currently located at 1966 North Chatsworth in Roseville. The site is being cleared to make way for a new city park. The structure was built in 1926 and appears to be structurally sound. The Inspector would suggest the following improvements prior to occupancy: 1. Reroof 2. Reconstruction of the stairway to the basement. 3. Replacement of existing windows. 5. Additional insulation 6. Redash existing stucco The applicant has asked for permission to construct a pole barn/garage/shop area on the site. The proposed structure will be approximately 54 x 30 for 1,620 square feet in area. This size building is permitted on a 40 acre parcel, however, construction is not allowed until such time as the principle structure is built. Should the Planning & Zoning Board consider allowing construction of the accessory building prior to the principle building a Variance would need to be processed. Staff would suggest that construction of the two buildings be simultaneous thereby eliminating the need for a variance which can not be justified as no hardship to the land exists. Chair Schaps asked if staff is not recommending approval of the pole barn at this time. Ms. Wyland stated the principle structure needs to be in place first. Chair Schaps asked if the applicants are in agreement regarding the recommended conditions. Ms. Wyland indicated the applicants have agreed to the conditions. Mr. Robinson asked if the wiring is up to code. Ms. Wyland stated the home has recently been rewired and is up to code. Mr. Corson asked about the right of access from the County and the location of the drive way. Ms. Wyland stated the applicants will need to obtain a permit from the County. The driveway will go out to Birch Street on the east side of the building site. • 4 4 4 1 1 ("y 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1") t \`\ 46 \ t% / r - -- -clam.... 1 1 O I Ct� 2 1 L • 11 3 \.� I ro- -r- -- --j* i ec 11.,A(,\ 1 1 i u e, . \ 7 \P i / • r - - --\\ t pg 6'111 i �A^' 1 i ° i 10�� i t ,�� Y' • ( ` • i (\� ,„‘„4,1 _ r �V ° .\C�J 1 BLOCl� 3 i ,.1---___J- --' �' + \� \1 1 1 I ' J L 1.......----•\ Fox Rood o Fox Rood �� ��`\ �' ~\ • 1 ( __ -_' - --' 1 i ' • 11 \\ • 1 1 1 1 1 5 I. rr 2 (LOCK 5' = 1 3 1 w•„vnorre 1 t j i() ti 1 ` \`\ 1 i ss°d I sQCK 4 t 04 w / \�\ 1 1 4 J J rr^ 1 cJ J 1. . L r R-1X Mousing 22 Lots Total Average Lot Size • . 31.989 SF 0.73 Acres Min. Lot Width - 90 Feet Min. Lot Depth' - 150 Feet (Useable) T Tctal Plot Area 18.83 Acres Total High Ground 449.375 SF 10.32 Acres Total wetland & tPcrtdons - 8.31 Acres 94..322 Sr Wetlo,d re Total (2.17 Aws) 212.012 SF Wetland mitigation & Pawling (4.07 Acres) 2 r 0 1 ...ej ..,10r1, w.t •.. ohm r.•r/.....,,, "'°r'W YM.t •on • 1. I ...I e,,�„��e11iH1,,e,,,r"" SS.Wpi•^-�--- yt•+^- --.-w Se 3 .r w»...•• "twist.. s..«.• >,z•.ox .. als.t• �oaml1$ / IK\esoa I NATTKE ENGINEERING, INC. 4t Richard S. Carlson & Associates, Inc. ,4""0","""c•-•.••••,•••.a. F.4.. W OO.Y 0'2; '",r° M0. pnl[ iMMlynC tR1® MOW" .nacasu West Shadow Lake Extension N. 7671 Centre Avenue NE i Fridev. MN 55432 (512) 753 -0300 • o+.».c.nc Sketch Pion 01.0. C42) •••••0.• n.. 00..04. o o.c. a.w • i+a.•9!11C.a 1' -:OG. •.1.. U.w. rt N. . 6N- N- 1:: 1N.; 4 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Council Member Lyden expressed concern regarding any impact of noise for the neighborhood. Ms. Wyland stated the structures will be 500 feet from any residence. The structures are also not visible from anyone's property. Mayor Sullivan stated that additional down lighting needs to be utilized. Council Member Bergeson moved to approved the site plan with the conditions outlined. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 14 - 98, Rezone West Shadow Ponds and Preliminary Plat, Richard Carlson, Mary Kay Wyland (4 /5th Vote) - Ms. Wyland reviewed the NAC Planning Report which included correspondence from the developer, Mr. Rick Carlson and his Engineer, Mr. Ted Mattke, two (2) adjoining property owners, and from the Environmental Board, Fire Chief, CPTED Officer, and City Engineer. Ms. Wyland noted the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Board which includes citizen comments from the public hearing have been distributed. Ms. Wyland stated the Planning and Zoning Board recommended the following: 1. Rezone - approval on a 6 -1 vote with Mr. Trehus voting nay. 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - approval on a 6 -1 vote with Mr. Trehus voting nay. 3. Preliminary Plat - approval on a 6 -0 vote with Mr. Robinson abstaining. Staff recommended approval of the rezone request, Comprehensive Plan amendment, and preliminary plat for West Shadow Ponds. Mayor Sullivan asked for a show of hands from those present in the audience who would like to speak regarding this issue. She stated this is not a public hearing. The public hearing was held at the Planning and Zoning meeting. She suggested that those present decide who would be best to represent their views. Four (4) people may speak for five (5) minutes. Ms. Wyland briefly went over public comments that were made at the public hearing. Mayor Sullivan asked if legalities were a concern regarding shared ponding. Mr. Hawkins stated that from a legal stand point shared ponding would not work. Mayor Sullivan asked if Mr. Carlson has a perpetual agreement regarding ponding. Mr. Carlson stated the Rice Creek Watershed District has asked him to sign a personal guarantee that the integrity, buffering, and wetlands be kept. He stated he is willing to include additional ponding for the neighborhood to use on the park land at his expense. Mayor Sullivan stated Mr. DeGardner would have to make a recommendation regarding a public pond on park land. 6 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Ms. Wyland noted three (3) separate motions are required; 1) the rezone; 2) the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and 3) preliminary plat approval. Mayor Sullivan asked why the Planning and Zoning Board approved the preliminary plat with an unanimous vote and did not approve unanimously the rezone and Comprehensive Plan amendment. Ms. Wyland indicated that Mr. Trehus had voted nay on the Comprehensive Plan and rezone request but aye on the preliminary plat. Mr. Carlson thanked Ms. Wyland for the accurate background report. He stated that Mr. Dunn had mentioned that he preferred an upgrade of the trees. It is important to note there is a 30' easement behind the properties. Trees have to be planted in the easement which requires Park Board approval. The situation is the same near the Raleigh property. Mayor Sullivan stated this is the first project sent through the full approval process which includes the Environmental Board, Planning and Zoning Board, and the Park Board before coming to the Council. The City can not legally require a developer to go through that process. She stated that the City appreciates that fact that Mr. Carlson did go through the entire process. She stated the public hearing will not be reopened but additional comments will be considered. The petition and the additional written information will also be considered. She stated the comments the Council is looking for are different views that have not already been heard. Mr. Ted Mattke, Mattke Engineering, stated that safety on 62nd Street is a major concern. Several people at the public hearing indicated that when there are two (2) cars on the road there is no room for pedestrians. Mr. Mattke passed out photos of 62nd Street as it currently stands, and pictures of Millers South Glen which is a much safer area. He stated a trail should be extended along 62nd Street in conjunction with the improvements. Mayor Sullivan noted that most residents are concerned about 62nd Street. She asked the City Engineer to comment on plans for 62nd Street. Mr. Powell stated 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive are State Aid collector streets. If the development is approved, a feasibility study will be initiated for the improvement of 62nd Street and presented at the next Council meeting. Assessments for sewer and water will be determined by the feasibility study. The State Aid account from the balance of 1998 and for 1999 and 2000, will give the City enough funding to reconstruct 62nd Street from Ware Road to Red Maple Lane. The balance in the State Aid Fund will be $392,000 after Ware Road is completed. He indicated he agrees that additional traffic should be routed to 62nd Street. However, traffic from north of the new subdivision should not be routed to 62nd Street until 62nd Street is reconstructed The traffic to the north is the major concern. Mayor Sullivan noted that 62nd Street improvements do fall under the Charter. She asked if Mr. Carlson will help fund the improvements of 62nd Street. Mr. Powell stated Mr. Carlson has agreed to pay $2,000 per lot for improvements which is similar to the Ware Road improvements. 7 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Council Member Lyden noted a feasibility study should not guarantee a road. The State Aid fund is a finite amount of money. There are many State Aid roads that need improvements, such as Elm Street. Mr. Powell stated Elm Street would be the next street scheduled for reconstruction if 62nd Street is not done. Council Member Dahl expressed concern regarding spending two (2) years of State Aid funding for one road. Mr. Powell stated the City will not have to borrow future years funding from MSA. The allotment for the year 2000 should cover the costs. He noted the City does have the option to borrow ahead if necessary. Council Member Dahl asked for the estimated cost of the reconstruction. Mr. Powell indicated the costs will be approximately $800,000. Council Member Dahl stated the improvements will have to wait until January, 1999, for the allotment. Mr. Powell verified that two (2) years of State Aid funding will be needed. Council Member Dahl asked about the 25% allowed to maintain roads. Mr. Powell stated the 25% for maintenance is over and above that amount. The City is allowed 25% for maintenance without any required paper work. Council Member Bergeson asked for verification that the reconstruction would be from Ware Road to Red Maple Lane. Mr. Powell indicated that is correct. Mayor Sullivan noted that current plans for the extension of West Shadow Lake Drive includes a cul -de -sac that would keep traffic from Birch Street from coming south to 62 Street. This cul -de- sac will be a temporary situation. The City always has the option to leave the cul-de -sac. Mr. Powell stated currently there are approximately 380 trips on 62nd Street per day. The new subdivision would create another 220 trips per day. He suggested the City at least develop a trail parallel to the roadway to get pedestrian traffic of the road. Council Member Neal asked what the cost will be to residents. Mr. Powell stated the Council determines what the assessments will be. The Ware Road assessments were paid by State Aid funds. Council Member Neal asked if there was a cost (assessment) to the residents for Ware Road. Mr. Powell stated there were no costs to the residents for the Ware Road improvements, however, a $2,000.00 road assessment was considered but not levied by the Council. Mayor Sullivan verified that the cul -de -sac will not be opened until 62nd Street is reconstructed. Mr. Powell indicated that is correct. Council Member Lyden asked the amount charged to Ware Road residents for improvements. Mr. Powell stated the amount was $2,000 per lot. However, the Council has not agreed to levy those assessments. 8 • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Mr. Carlson stated that through discussions with residents, the most important issue is children on 62nd Street. He stated he would like to make sure his financial contribution goes to developing a trail along side of 62nd Street. Ms. Rosemary Williams, 498 62nd Street, stated she has lived on her property for 20 years. She expressed concern regarding safety and the speed limit. She stated speeding is already a problem on 62nd Street. Residents have signed a petition against extending West Shadow Lake Drive to 62nd Street. She stated she obtained 10 out of 14 signatures. She indicated she will be starting another petition for residents on Ware Road, Linda Avenue, and Red Maple Lane. She asked who will pick up the monetary difference if there is not enough money (MSA funds) to cover the reconstruction costs. Money has also been spent for a growth study. She asked when the last feasibility study was done. She expressed concern regarding a road coming right between two (2) of her neighbors homes. Traffic is already extreme on 62nd Street. She stated she has had two (2) accidents on that road before Ware Road was improved. Traffic is excessive on Ware Road and if it exists on Linda Avenue it will cause a problem for those residents. The petition indicates residents will not pay for assessments. Taxes in Lino Lakes are up already. She stated she is not against the development but the traffic problem has to be addressed. The current speeding on 62nd Street is a problem and it doesn't seem there are many Police Officers on the roadway. She stated she would like the City to take care of Elm Street first. She indicated she will get the majority of residents to sign the three (3) other petitions. Mayor Sullivan noted the petition is to be entered into the record. She noted a feasibility study would be complete on this road in particular. Mr. Powell stated a feasibility study is not a traffic study. It is a formal step required by State Statute Chapter 429 and the Charter. The study looks at design, cost, assessments, funding, and a time table to complete the project. The feasibility study will be presented to the Council for their review and acceptance. Ms. Williams stated the growth rate study suggests that 40 -70 new residences be built per year and the proposed Comprehensive Plan asks for 140. Why spend money on a study if traffic is already a problem? She stated Mr. Carlson agreed to build 12 new houses per year for four (4) years. This did not happen. There was no restrictions after the first year. A gradual process would be better. Council Member Lyden noted this is a symptom of a larger problem. Mr. Don Dunn, 6885 Black Duck Drive, stated he is not present as a member of the Planning and Zoning Board and not as a representative of Mr. Carlson. He stated he is concerned about the traffic on Birch Street. The area being discussed is an extension of an existing plan. West Shadow Lake Drive was always intended to be extended to 62nd Street. He stated 62nd Street is a terrible and unsafe road and needs to be fixed. It is part of the State Aid Plan and as such improvements do not require a referendum. The road can be reconstructed in the same manner as Ware Road. Discussions have been held regarding moving the traffic on Birch Street. Why should residents living south of Birch Street go north to get to the south. Residents should be permitted access to 62nd Street. When discussing the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan Task Force attempted to direct traffic to County Road J. County Road J can take traffic to 9 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 I -35E or I -35W. This is merely an extension of an obligation that was made many years ago. The residents living north of 62nd Street should have as much direct access to the direction they want to go which is south. To suggest that a road that is public become somewhat private is mind - boggling. Access cannot be limited. He indicated he hopes the City looks at extending West Shadow Lake Drive, leave the road barrier there as Mr. Powell has discussed and when 62nd Street is improved, open West Shadow Lake Drive so that the residents of that area have access to 62nd Street. Birch Street is a dead end road at Hodgson Road. A traffic light at this intersection is planned and will help that situation. Traffic is heavier off of Birch Street. There are very fine quality homes and open space in that area. He stated he is in support of the development and approval should be given. Safety is an issue that should be addressed. The Police Department should be taking care of the speeders. Ms. Gail Munson, 707 62nd Street, expressed concern regarding the corner of where the road will come out of the development. She stated she is opposed to the road being placed between two (2) neighbors. She stated her home was built 18 years ago and there were no proposed new roads at that time. She stated she wants her privacy maintained. The area will be ruined with more lights and traffic. Her property will be devalued and it will change their lives. She asked that the long time residents not be ignored regarding this issue. She stated she feels like the long time residents have no rights. Mr. Tom Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, expressed concern regarding the potential traffic impact and increase in number of trips per day. Millers South Glen added 480 trips in the area. If the development is approved, 700 trips will be added. The West Shadow Lake extension will add 120 trips per day. This does not account for the traffic from the east/west/north from Birch Street. He stated this is too many trips on one road. He expressed concern regarding road width, surface, and unsafe leverage related to fixing the road. He asked that West Shadow remain closed. He stated that Mr. Carlson is a fine developer. He indicated the south end of Birchwood Acres is the biggest problem regarding the extension. The extension of West Shadow Lake Drive would benefit to the residents in Colonial Woods because emergency vehicles would have another route to that area. He noted the brief discussion from the Planning and Zoning meeting regarding Mr. Trehus reading from page 10 of the proposed Comprehensive Plan. He indicated he hopes the City will be consistent with the Planning and Zoning recommendation of keeping the road closed until 62nd Street is upgraded. Mayor Sullivan stated items from the proposed Comprehensive Plan have been reviewed. She noted the danger of people taking things of out context. The Comprehensive Plan needs to be read as a plan. This development is an infill, not an expansion and it is not premature. The Council needs to remember the new Comprehensive Plan will not go into effect until next year. Council has to work under the old plan. Mr. Powell stated the Charter prohibits the use tax dollars for road improvements unless a referendum is held. Also State Aid funding is actually tax dollars. There is an emergency access in Fox Circle. A trail from Reshanau Lakes Estates South acts as an emergency access. A detailed study was reviewed regarding this issue. 10 1 JP COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Council Member Lyden asked Mr. Dunn if he was taking issue with the right of citizens under the Charter to petition. Mr. Dunn indicated he was. Council Member Lyden stated this is not a difficult issue. He indicated the constituents that he represents live in Lino Lakes now, not the next masses who will live in the City in the future. The quality of life is paramount. In regard to petitions, people who sign them do not trust their elected officials. The Comprehensive Plan that the City must work under right now is the old plan. There are five (5) items in the old plan that determine this development is premature. Mayor Sullivan stated she does not believe this development is premature. Council Member Lyden stated the area is Zoned Rural. Mayor Sullivan stated that a Comprehensive Plan amendment is required for the development of West Shadow Ponds. There are 150 acres of MUSA reserve to allow the placement of well thought out and well planned developments. Council Member Neal stated that unless 51% of the residents signed the petition it cannot go through. Mr. Hawkins indicated that is incorrect. The majority relates only to road improvements in the Charter. The petition just entered into the record is only advisory. Council Member Bergeson noted the first issue involved is the additional housing and traffic the development would bring. The second issue is the opportunity to upgrade 62nd Street. Improvements are needed on 62nd Street. Because of the Charter, the opportunity to upgrade a street without assessments to residents does not happen very often. There is an opportunity now to do that with State Aid funding and a contribution from the developer. If those funds are not used now it may be a very long time before 62nd Street is upgraded and it may then require an assessment. He also noted that it is possible people do not want 62nd Street upgraded. Council Member Bergeson stated the item before Council includes a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Board. The last recommendation is that until reconstruction of 62nd Street is completed, West Shadow Lake Road will be blocked at the north end. Mayor Sullivan verified the traffic will go to 62nd Street to Ware Road. She asked if the suggestion from the developer regarding the trail can be accomplished. Mr. Powell indicated the trail can be developed on the north side from the developer's contribution. Mayor Sullivan asked about the rate of development in comparison to the road reconstruction. Mr. Powell stated 22 homes will be built before the 62nd Street is completed in 2000. Some homes will be in by next year. Blocking the road at the north end would force construction traffic to use 62nd Street. Council Member Bergeson asked about the possibility of a cul -de -sac at the south end. Mr. Powell stated a temporary cul -de -sac would not be a problem on the south end. The proposed right -of -way is 80' which is standard. 11 4 • COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Mayor Sullivan asked if the road right -of -way existed when the property was purchased. Mr. Powell said no, however, the new plat indicates that the right -of -way abuts the property. There is a 30 foot to 40 foot space between the right -of -way and the property. An 80 foot easement is needed for the road of which 45 feet would be blacktopped. Mayor Sullivan asked if the developer has purchased the road right -of -way. Mr. Powell stated the developer purchased the property on which the right -of -way will be located and dedicated to the City. Council Member Lyden stated the safety issue relating to 62nd Street should be pursued. He indicated he does not believe that 51% is a determinant for approval of the development. Council Member Dahl stated she is not comfortable going by the old Comprehensive Plan relating to rezoning and MUSA allocation. All stages of homes already approved have not yet been completed. She stated the City is too far ahead and it is making a short cut to take pressure off of Birch Street because of the Birchwood Acres development. A short cut through this area encourages more development on the south side. If the proposed Comprehensive Plan had received a 4/5 vote, the north side of 62nd Street would not be scheduled for development until 2010. She stated 62nd Street is an issue. The road will accommodate current traffic usage only. With a new street, it will not be able to accommodate traffic. Reconstructing 62nd Street as a State Aid road is questionable. What if another street has more priority and the City has no money until 2001? Council Member Dahl said that she was sure that there was a priority list through the Charter but was unable to remember what roads were on the list. What happens when a road is designated as a priority by staff and then the bond referendum fails? She stated class sizes at the Centennial Middle School are already at a high level. Rice Lake Elementary is also quite full. The project is not only on one drawing board. Citizens may have to pay for another school. She stated she believes the City should wait until the new Comprehensive Plan is adopted. Council Member Bergeson asked if the extension of the trail along 62nd Street fits into the overall trail plan. Mr. DeGardner indicated that area has not been discussed. The trail proposal can be looked at with the annual trail review. Council Member Neal asked if the park has been planned. Mr. DeGardner stated the park has been master planned and consists of approximately 16 acres. Mr. Mike Pojar, 6255 Red Maple Lane, asked the Council not to spend $44,000 and not take care of the road or trail properly. He stated there are several residents in the neighborhood that would like to get together with the contractor for concerns not relating to 62nd Street. He stated there was a problem regarding drainage and the pond in 1989 and he does not want it to happen again. He expressed concern regarding the northwest corner of the development. He stated he would like to make sure that what the developer does has no negative impact. He asked the Council to hold off on the vote until discussions can be held with the developer. 4 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Mayor Sullivan stated Mr. Carlson will continue to have discussions with the residents regarding this project and area. Mr. Pojar stated that if the project is approved now the developer does not have to do anything else. He stated the map worries him. Council Member Bergeson asked if delayed action on this request to allow the residents to speak with the developer will affect the developer. Mr. Carlson indicated he is not opposed to a couple of weeks delay. He stated he would prefer to do it that way and is willing to meet with anyone to discuss their issues. Council Member Neal asked if Mr. Pojar attended the public hearing. Mr. Pojar indicated he did attend the public meeting and voiced his concerns at that time. Mayor Sullivan noted that public input has been reviewed and considered. Council Member Bergeson moved to table the West Shadow Ponds rezone, preliminary plat, and Comprehensive Plan amendment until the December 14, 1998, Council meeting. He added the two (2) Council meetings in December are December 14, 1998, and December 21, 1998, if for some reason the issue is table again at the December 14, 1998, Council meeting. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Council Member Dahl asked if Mr. Pojar had met with Mr. Mattke yet regarding his issue. Mr. Pojar stated he has not yet met with Mr. Mattke. Finding a convenient time for everyone has been a problem. He guaranteed he will meet with Mr. Mattke prior to December 14, 1998, if the issue is tabled this evening. Council Member Bergeson asked if a delay until December 14, 1998, is acceptable to Mr. Carlson. Mr. Carlson indicated December 14, 1998, is fine. Council Member Neal asked if the meeting will be posted. Ms. Wyland stated the issue will be a regular agenda item. Additional publication is not required. Council Member Neal stated he wants to be sure that people know the project will be voted on December 14, 1998. Mayor Sullivan directed staff to put notification in as a community brief. The public hearing is closed. She asked for anyone that has additional comments to put them down in writing. The comments and information will be considered. She indicated she wants Council to be prepared to vote on this project December 14, 1998. She encouraged residents to work with Mr. Powell regarding 62nd Street and their concerns. Motion carried with Council Member Dahl and Council Member Lyden voting no. Mr. Pojar suggested Mr. Carlson hold another neighborhood meeting at the City Hall facilities. 13 COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Mayor Sullivan recessed the meeting for five (5) minutes at 8:17 p.m. Mayor Sullivan reconvened the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Zoning Text Amendment Pertaining to Non - Conforming Structures, Mary Kay Wyland (415th Vote) - Ms. Wyland stated the Planning and Zoning Board suggested the following text amendment as a result of the recent variance request from a property owner on Bald Eagle Boulevard. This amendment would allow additions to non - conforming structures provided there is no increase in the number of units or an expansion in the degree of non - conformity. The Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 2 B.9 currently reads as follows: Alterations may be made to a structure containing non - conforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or expand size of existing building or structure. The proposed language is as follows: Alterations may be made to a structure containing non - conforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of units or expand the size or degree of non - conformity. Council Member Neal asked if this was the farm next to Andy Cardinal. Ms. Wyland stated the property that precipitated the change is on Bald Eagle Boulevard. Council Member Bergeson stated the Council in the past has done with a variance what this amendment suggests. The justification for prior variances is it did not increase the size of the non - conformity. This change puts it into the code. Council Member Neal asked how the Planning and Zoning Board voted. Ms. Wyland stated the Planning and Zoning Board vote was 7 -0 in favor of the amendment. Council Member Lyden moved to approve the First Reading of the Ordinance Amendment, as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Brian Wessel - Mr. Wessel stated that communities within the seven (7) county metro area have been mandated, by State Legislation, to submit their updated comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council by year end. The Comprehensive Plan Task Force approved the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan on a 12 -0 vote, the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board approved the plan on a 6 -1 vote. Staff would recommend submittal to the Metropolitan Council of the Draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of Lino Lakes. This plan will then be reviewed by Met Council staff. That staff review may include recommendation for approval or suggest changes or revisions to the plan. Upon completion of the Met Council review, the City Council will be asked to adopt a final draft of the Plan. This will most likely occur in the first quarter of 1999. 14 AGENDA ITEM 4 B STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: 1/20/99 TOPIC: Don Cisewski, 60 Marvy Street, Site Plan Review COUNCIL ACTION: Simple Majority Vote BACKGROUND: Mr. Cisewski is requesting a site plan review to allow a 28 x 40 (1,120 sq. ft.) garage to be moved onto his property at 60 Marvy Street. The building to be moved is currently located at the corner of Lilac Street and Lake Drive. The removal is necessary to make way for a new motor fuel station /convenience store. The property in question is Zoned Rural and R -1 (see attached section of Zoning Map) and has frontage on both Marvy Street and Apollo Drive. The home is located on the Marvy Street side of the property. The parcel contains 2.45 acres and is allowed up to 2,020 sq. ft. of accessory building for either zoning district. Mr. Cisewski currently has a 484 sq. ft attached garage. The addition of this 1,120 sq.ft building is within the requirements of the ordinance as there will be a total of 1,604 sq. ft of accessory building with the proposed addition. The two temporary buildings located on the property will be removed with the placement of this relocated structure. The building inspectors have both inspected the structure to be moved. Some improvements will be necessary to bring the building up to current UBC Standards. Mr. Cisewski has beenfadvised of these improvements and is in agreement. Staff would, therefore, recommend approval of this site plan review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained prior to relocation and concrete slab details are provided. 2. The structure is brought into compliance with the State UBC including the following improvements: a. the structure is located on a concrete slab b. all wiring is removed or brought up to State Code c. center beam is upgraded or support posts added d. a treated bottom plate is installed e. rotted studs are replaced f. attic access is enlarged to meet code g. other items as determined by the building inspector 3. The building is located within the setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (proposed located is 20' from side property line, a minimum of 5' is required) 4. The exterior of the building is painted or dashed to match the existing dwelling. 5. The above improvements are to be completed by July 15, 1999. 6. The temporary buildings are removed as soon as practical or no later than July 15, 1999. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval on a 5/0 Vote (two members were absent) with the conditions listed above. OPTIONS: 1. Approve site plan review with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 I:37n 2j MT= 640 VIAPtrtgVi" -.,,420.1‘.4-letkt:01113 mot= riff2 MIEN ozwi sum -n" MeV IPALM-131:51n1 PI. Oa Rpm EOM" HE tiiiirt gem. ittigaTirt-7.9 4 CtRTIP'ICATg OF SURVEY Kum+ SURVEYING, INC. 4e1Yz xr19I•OM K. COt.ueow b4tON11 MI31 1 i Sn 1 r1YWY TII*T 'new 79a -97p /LAN. M OSPOAT WAS p*OAwsw w re ow uNocw uT awscT SJP WISION AIA THAT s AY A -- _ ISTSwa w ow YNOSS row LAWS OI TNS STAYS OI 141Nwt11OTA MINNESOTA REGIS TION NO. 1`113 Ab\R.: ST, Cb *) t (3.1450)1/4°) l 80,'1 S 5 SS°O(ctavw DATE /0 1 SCALE I'= ICC o = IRON MONUMENT Lcyr 5 Ilb Og► ve AGENDA ITEM 4 C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: 1/20/99 TOPIC: Anoka County Corrections, 7555 4th Avenue, Site Plan Review COUNCIL ACTION: Simple Majority BACKGROUND: The Anoka County Corrections Department has asked City Staff to review this item tonight in order to maintain their review, bidding, and construction schedule. Initially there was some confusion as to whether or not this item required additional city review as the proposed expansion had been indicated on the original site plan approved by the City in September of 1994. Staff determined, however, that the review was necessary and agreed to expedite the process we therefore ask the Planning and Zoning Board for their consideration this evening. The request is to allow the construction of an addition to the existing 60 bed adult detention facility at 7555 4th Avenue. The new additional will add 17,000 square feet to the existing 23,000 square foot facility. The proposed construction will include the addition of 60 beds, space for a serving kitchen, day rooms, segregation cells, an indoor and secured outdoor recreational space, a classroom, remodeled booking area and office space. The existing staff level will increase to nineteen. This proposed construction is a mirror of the existing facility. As with the original construction, parking will be jointly shared with the State Correctional Facility along with the addition of approximately 11 parking spaces on the north side of the addition. The exterior of the building is intended to match the existing structure. The walls will be solid reinforced concrete masonry in earth tone colors. The outdoor recreation area will be tight - meshed chain link. The property in question is Zoned Public, Semi Public. Public buildings for county and state government are listed as permitted uses, however, site plan review is required. The site currently contains several County buildings including: 1) Juvenile Center - a 24 bed shelter care facility this is a residential facility for juvenile males and females) which include a gymnasium, classrooms and offices 2) A 50 bed maximum security facility for juveniles located in two buildings (Sanford and Walker) 3) East Central Regional Juvenile Center - a 36 bed maximum security facility - this building is attached via a secured walkway to the Juvenile Center for shared use of the gymnasium 4) Adult Correctional Center - medium security facility, 60 beds existing - 60 proposed (most offenders in residence have been sentenced for less than one year in this facility). The Police Chief is familiar with this proposed project and has indicated no objections to the construction. The proposed construction meets with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, staff would, therefore, recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained prior to construction. 2. Grading and drainage plans are approved by the City Engineer. 3. Building exterior blends with the existing structure. 4. Parking facilities are shared with the correctional facility to the south as indicated by the applicant. 5. The expanded parking area is provided with bituminous surfacing and concrete curb and gutter as approved by the City Engineer. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval on a 5/0 vote (two members were absent) with the conditions listed above. OPTIONS: 1. Approve site plan review with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 norm °° opvdr.-:a 0= o`v�uw�0�p4pAO ii ! t+ iuu_CtIGLi� EMI 0vo �.vfuc c „trail, MEI ©eaoo FERP¢ !lid SSo Aucoproawow ( rte, MARSHAN LAKE ov.e i G o Ic ; I NEI i :" Q= �::: m a °gym ° o o a MICE o �ni,pp71 ,. MOM MEE , ' INZIEI JuGrlIC:tay:wa RICE LAKE RES BUETOW & ASSOCIATES A R C H I T EC TS Dayroom Exterior View ANOKA COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONAL CENTER Anoka, Minnesota This new 27,000 square foot two -story adult correctional facility is planned to begin operation in the spring of 1996 and is designed to separately house 60 male pris- oners. It is to be located adjacent to an existing Anoka County Juvenile Detention Facility. Its two separate housing areas are designed as two -level dormitories each surrounding a common Dayroom. The staffs direct supervision of prisoners is efficiently and effectively achieved by the placement of each prisoner activity area in close proxim- ity to its respective housing unit. Staff requirements and related operational costs are thus, minimized. This building is designed for expansion and for the possibility of future functional mod- ifications. Thus, it's dormitories can be converted into individual cells so as to double prisoner capacity. Control Room 2345 RICE STREET SUITE 210 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA 55113 TELEPHONE (651) 483-6701 i at wrest itegronoN cr ETV SA DAM eaaracnal was 100.0. Mil Aria k 1►` R j ill Yt51 f f%Mwlks BBUUIL DING 1 Locum gam ®� sc'u- r- 4'-o- NORT 12H9i .ice. A EXISTING JUVENILE CENTER ROADS MUST ACCESSIBLE TIMES FOR 3 TO COUNTY IES EXISTING PARKING CONTRACTOR STAGING AREA TO BE ON BALL FIELD. EXACT LIMIT TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. SOD AS REQUIRED NEW PARKING 1 EXISTING PARKING EA 108' -0" T SEE SU1 OE NEW . PAVING: SOD - -� SOD EXISTING WALKER BUILDING EXISTING ROAD PAVING STRIPING TYPICAL SOD NEW ADULT CORRECTIONAL ADDITION'/ as EXISTING ADULT CORRECTIONAL FACILITY BITUMINUS AVING WITH IN FENCE SOD STEAM:: ._ :LINE VERIFY:: LOCATION CONTRACTOR ACCESS ONLY CONSTRUCTION LIMIT •I� _ 1\-- SOD - -1 it 1 1--CTV, TELEPHONE, WATER AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES - VERIFY LOCATION GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO DEMOLISH EXISTING ROADWAY AND LIGHTS AND ALL ITEMS NOT NOTED TO BE SAVED: NEW CURBS - SEE C1 r-, EXISTING PARKING v COUNTY WILL PROVIDE PERMITS FOR CONTRACTOR PARKING AMENDED - AGENDA ITEM 4 D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Alan Brixius, NAC DATE: 1/22/99 TOPIC: JADTtMcDonalds, Lake Drive at Apollo Extended, PDO for Shopping Center, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for McDonaldslAmocco COUNCIL ACTION: PDO - 415th Vote Required, CUP - simple majority Preliminary Plat - simple majority BACKGROUND The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing at their October 1998 meeting. The item(s) was then continued to the January meeting at which time the Board recommended denial of the PDO, CUP and Preliminary Plat based on the findings outlined in the January 1999 NAC Planning Report. The Vote was 5/0 with two members absent. Please see attached staff report. OPTIONS: 1. Deny PDO for reasons outlined in Staff Report 2. Deny Preliminary Plat 3. Deny Conditional Use Permit 4. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 AGENDA ITEM 4 D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Alan Brixius, NAC DATE: 1/20/99 TOPIC: JADTIMcDonalds, Lake Drive at Apollo Extended, PDO for Shopping Center, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for McDonaldstAmocco COUNCIL ACTION: PDO 415th Vote Required, CUP - simple majority Preliminary Plat simple majority BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing at their October 1998 meeting. The item(s) was then continued to the January meeting at which time the Board recommended denial of the PDO, CUP and Preliminary Plat based on the findings outlined in the January 1999 NAC Planning Report. The Vote was 5/0 with two members absent. Please see attached staff report. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING PLANNING REPORT DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH TO: Brian Wessel FROM: Alan Brixius / Cynthia Putz -Yang DATE: 8 January 1999 RE: Lino Lakes - JADT PDO and Amoco /McDonald's CUP FILE NO: 194.01 - 98.07 BACKGROUND The Lino Lakes Planning Commission reviewed the JADT PDO and Amoco /McDonald's CUP at its October meeting and found the information incomplete. The applicant has submitted additional information addressing issues discussed in the October meeting. This report addresses the JADT PDO application. In June 1998, the Lino Lakes Planning Commission and City Council reviewed and approved a concept plan illustrating the general layout of a shopping center and surrounding sites on the northeast quadrant of the I -35W /Lake Drive interchange. This concept plan envisioned an attractive and integrated shopping environment anchored by a community- oriented shopping center. In this concept plan, the applicant was requesting various design flexibilities that go beyond the SC, Shopping Center District and other development regulations: 1. Variable lot sizes smaller than district standards. 2. Setback flexibility for both building and parking. 3. Private streets. 4. Lot frontage. In consideration of the concept plan, the City emphasized the following design elements in its approval. 1. Environmental sensitive design related to green space, landscaping, tree preservation, storm water infiltration, integration of site design with natural amenities. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 61 2- 595 -9636 FAX 612- 595 -9837 E -MAIL NAC @WINTERNET.COM 2. Attractive site and building design related to clustering of buildings, shared parking, landscaping, green space, pedestrian access and circulation and architectural standards. 3. Traffic systems - convenient and safe traffic systems include automobile, truck, pedestrian and bicycle. The City wants the shopping center area to be pedestrian friendly. The applicant wishes to proceed with the first phase of the development and has submitted applications for the following: 1. PDO, Planned Development Overlay Zoning District 2. Preliminary Plat 3. McDonald's, conditional use permits have been requested for: a. Gas sales b. Drive - through lane Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Exhibit F: Exhibit G: Exhibit H: Exhibit 1: Exhibit J: Exhibit K: Exhibit L:. Site Location Natural Features/Tree Inventory Concept Development Plan Southwest Area Preliminary Drainage Preliminary Plat McDonald's Site Plan McDonald's Grading Plan McDonald's Utility Plan McDonald's Landscape Plan McDonald's Details McDonald's Elevations Design Framework Narrative The PDO and CUPs are integrally tied together in establishing the theme and identity of the entire shopping center. In this respect, the various planning applications have been reviewed in conjunction with one another within this report. Since the original concept plan, a number of issues and changes have presented themselves: 1. The first development site was originally identified as a fast food restaurant site. The current proposal includes a combination fast food, convenience store, gas sales and car wash. 2 This change from the initial land use has raised concerns in the following areas: a. Over - utilization of the site with the combination of land uses. b. Clear cutting the site to accommodate the combination of uses. c. Duplication of similar land uses within the Town Center Planning District that may establish an image contrary to the planning objectives for the Town Center area. d. Establishing a design and land use theme for the shopping center area of the Town Center that is inconsistent to the image portrayed in the original concept plan. 2. The applicant is requesting a staged development of the PDO and flexibility in site use and design to retain the greatest flexibility in the marketing of the sites to perspective businesses. While recognizing the need for site marketing, the requested PDO is intended to establish firm rules and design guidelines for the entire site development that insures the high quality development originally envisioned in the concept plan. The applicant and his design team have attempted to respond to City design issues, however, there is a reluctance to establish firm design elements for the overall PDO that may encumber or discourage a potential development interest. Without establishing some specific PDO design perimeters, staff believes that the City would not maintain the necessary controls to insure that land use and site design elements emphasized in the City's review of the original concept plan and the City objectives for the entire Town Center commercial area. 3. Since the initiation of the JADT development applications, the City had contracted with Calthorpe Associates and Zimmerman Volk Associates to revise the Town Center Master Plan and establish land use and design site guidelines for the entire Town Center area. The new Town Center Master Plan will emphasize the principles of traditional neighborhood development (TND). Within all four quadrants of the 1 -35 /CSAH 23 interchange, specific recommendations pertaining to traffic circulation, streetscape, site access, environmental preservation, land use, and site design will be offered to ensure a mixture of land uses that will complement each other and create the kind of quality commercial development desired by the City. The formulation of these specific Town Center land use and design criteria is consistent with the recommendations outlined in Planning District 1 of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. The lack of these specific Town Center land use and design guidelines have complicated the PDO /CUP review in that the City's expectations are not clearly defined. This has resulted in numerous negotiations over the PDO standards, many of which are still undecided. 3 ANALYSIS Planning Development Overlay Rezoning. In Lino Lakes, the PDO District is a zoning overlay district application that is processed as a zoning amendment. In consideration of any change in zoning, the Planning Commission must make findings based on the following factors: The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. In 1997, Lino Lakes adopted a Comprehensive Plan amendment for Planning Districts 1 and 2. Planning District 1 outlines the land use and planning recommendations for the Town Center area, which includes this PDO site. The General Land Use Plan proposed commercial development on the proposed site. The Town Center Planning District Plan for this area of Lino Lakes includes the following commercial recommendations: "The City will identify the type and character of the commercial land use it wishes to attract. Currently, the Town Center design team is outlining design criteria that may be extended to all commercial areas of Planning District 1. This criteria will include guidelines for site and building design." The development of the Town Center guidelines has been an ongoing process anticipated for completion this Summer. As a result, City staff and the applicant have been attempting to define the criteria through the processing of the PDO, CUP, and subdivision applications. Through the process, much progress has been made on various design issues, however, a number of land use and design issues remain unresolved. The City is currently in the process of developing Town Center guidelines with the assistance of Calthorpe Associates and Zimmerman Volk Associates. With these guidelines still pending, it is premature to determine if the JADT PDO and Amoco /McDonald's are consistent with the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed land uses are allowed within the Shopping Center Zoning District. The change of land use from a fast food restaurant in the original concept to a combination fast food /convenience store /gas sale /car wash raises compatibility concerns with regard to the following areas: 4 a. The site land use duplicates land uses at the CSAH 23 /Apollo Avenue intersection. This duplication raises concerns over the image and identity being created in the Town Center area. b. The proposed development results in clear cutting of the Amoco /McDonald's site to accommodate the proposed use. The site plan only proposes to retain three existing trees or 3 percent of the existing significant trees on this site. This is not consistent with the City's stated objectives outlined in the concept approval. The applicant has offered a tree replacement plan, however, to date, specific tree preservation areas or replacement sites have not been geographically defined. c. The Amoco /McDonald's development represents a very intense development in the first development of the site. This initial development will establish the theme for the balance of the PDO. This development intensity presents concern with its compatibility with original concept plan and the City's stated objectives in approval of the concept plan. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The PDO is intended to permit greater flexibility and consequently, more creative and imaginative design for development. With the consideration of the original concept plan, the PDO District was identified as the appropriate zoning mechanism to implement the proposed development. The applicant is seeking the PDO to allow for flexibility from the shopping center performance standards in the following areas: a. Smaller lot sizes. b. Lot frontage. c. Private streets. These flexibilities are intended to promote an efficient land use pattern, higher level of amenities, and the preservation of natural areas and open space. While this area of Lino Lakes will likely be developed under a PDO in the future, the current application presents concerns with regard to land use, over - utilization of the site, and internal traffic circulation. Additionally, the reluctance of the applicant to provide firm PDO design criteria for the overall PDO does not assure the City that subsequent projects will not result in similar design concerns. 5 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. The proposed development will not overburden existing public utilities or services. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The proposed site will be accessed via the Apollo Drive /CSAH 23 intersection. The Town Center Master Plan will involve working with both Anoka County and MnDOT with regard to the redesign and improvements to both the I -35 /CSAH 23 interchange, bridge and CSAH roadways. These improvements will impact the proposed PDO development with regard to site design, streetscape treatment, and traffic circulation. In respect to these roadway improvements, the PDO development and preliminary plat are premature. PRELIMINARY PLAT / CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS The preliminary plat involves only a portion of the overall PDO site and includes a partial dedication of Apollo Drive, an outlot for the private street, and a single commercial lot. Review of the preliminary plat presents the following comments: Lots. The SC Zoning District requires a minimum lot size of three acres. The conceptual development plan and the preliminary plat illustrate lot sizes in the southwest corner of the PDO site less than three acres. Through the PDO process, flexibility may be approved without variance. Utilities. The general development notes have been revised t� state that drainage and utility easements will be provided in accordance with the following schedule: Pipelines Ponds Perimeter Lot Lines Wetlands 20 feet (centered on utility) 1 foot above HWL 5 feet on all lot lines 5 feet beyond wetland boundary Private Street. The proposed private street is proposed to be platted as Outlot A. In response to staff comments, the applicant has revised the concept plan to illustrate the private road ending in a temporary 40 foot radius turnaround until the restaurant site is developed. This change, however, was not also made to the site plan. Without the addition of this turnaround, vehicles must rely on private parking areas for vehicle turnaround. 6 The private street will be required to meet City Street construction standards for commercial streets. As a private street, deed restrictions will be placed on outlots that prevent future turnover of this street to the City. Public Streets. The applicant is requesting flexibility from the 80 foot ROW standard for commercial streets. The concept plan shows Apollo Drive with a 100 foot ROW between CSAH 23 and the first intersection within the PDO and a 60 foot ROW for the remainder of the street. The City Engineer has indicated that a 60 foot ROW would be acceptable if the sidewalk/trail is located outside the ROW in a sidewalk easement. This will require a revision of the concept plan and site plan. The infiltration basin located near Apollo Drive on the McDonald's site will need to be altered to allow for the sidewalk. Based on staff comment, the applicant has revised the preliminary plat to include right -of- way dedication along CSAH 23, along Parcel 4. Anoka County must formally approve the Apollo Drive access point. The concept plan has been revised to illustrate Apollo Drive ending in a temporary 40 foot radius turnaround until Apollo Drive is extended. However, this turnaround has not been added to the site plan. Streetscape. The applicant has provided a narrative describing the proposed streetscape treatment within the PDO. While the streetscape narrative is appealing, the following issues should be addressed: 1. The PDO is intended to be bicycle and pedestrian friendly, however the PDO will have sidewalks on only one side of the public and private streets, except on Apollo Drive between CSAH 23 and the first intersection. The following items should be given attention: a. The applicant has revised the concept plan and site plan to include sidewalks on both sides of Apollo Drive between CSAH 23 and the first intersection within the PDO. A sidewalk/trail should be considered on both sides of the rest of Apollo Drive because of the traffic and aesthetic emphasis of this street. b. The applicant has revised the concept plan and site plan to show marked pedestrian crossing within the PDO. c. Sidewalks on one side of the private streets raise similar issues to Apollo Drive. 7 2. The PDO narrative describes the streetscape landscaping. In review of this information, the following issues have been raised: a. The PDO narrative has been revised to indicate that tree spacing for public and private roads will generally be three trees per 100 feet of curb length. Parking lot islands will have at least one tree with a minimum three inch caliper. No graphic plan has been provided that shows the quantities, locations or spacing of streetscape trees. b. No plant schedule is offered for the PDO, however, some plant sizes are described in the PDO narrative. The PDO narrative states that, "Replacement trees will include overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or deciduous trees having a minimum height of eight feet." This statement should be revised to the following: "Replacement trees will consist of overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or evergreen trees having a minimum height of eight feet." c. The PDO narrative has been revised to indicate that native grasses and wildflowers will be emphasized in the eastern portion of the site (near Wetlands 2 and 3), along the 1 -35 corridor, and along infiltration areas. These are appropriate locations for native grasses and wildflowers. d. The site plan for Phase 1 has been revised to not include amur maple trees, however the PDO narrative states that small groves of multi -stem amur maples will be planted along Apollo Drive and private roads. The use of amur maples as a boulevard tree raises issue with regard to traffic sight lines. Also, amur maples are native to Asia and can become invasive in natural areas in the Midwest. A native species, such as cockspur hawthorn, would be more desirable if a small tree is needed. 3. Streetscape Along CSAH 23. The Town Center Planning District recommends the establishment of a streetscape treatment along CSAH 23 that will provide design connection between each quadrant of the Town Center interchange. The design parameters for this public improvement has not yet been established to allow for a continuous streetscape design between CSAH 23 and Apollo Drive. These streetscape elements are currently under study. The streetscape elements between Apollo Drive and CSAH 23 should be integrated with one another. Tree Preservation. The PDO narrative states that tree preservation is recognized as a major concem of the City. The narrative also states that sight lines are essential for retail development and some tree removal is unavoidable. The applicant has proposed that for each of the 275 identified trees (not including Elm or Boxelder) that is removed as part of the PDO development, a 1 -for -1 tree replacement plan be provided. Replacement trees 8 will consist of overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or evergreen trees having a minimum height of eight feet. No standards for the number or percent of trees to be preserved has been proposed by the applicant. Of the 98 trees existing in the Phase 1 area, 95 are proposed to be removed. The tree replacement proposal offered by the applicant offers the following advantages and disadvantages: Advantages: • Each significant tree that is removed will be replaced. • Three -inch caliper deciduous trees and eight -foot evergreen trees are trees of a significant size and exceed Zoning Ordinance standards for size. • Replacement of existing trees allow for the establishment of proper sight lines, necessary for the economic survival of retail developments. Disadvantages: • The replacement trees will not match the existing trees in size when planted. • This proposal does not prohibit clear cutting the site. • The proposed plan does not illustrate the replacement of the lost trees in Phase I. In consideration of the tree replacement proposal, the following conditions should be considered: Street Lighting. The PDO narrative outlines lighting standards for parking lots. The narrative has addressed the following lighting issues that were raised in the previous report: 1. The narrative states that street lighting for both Apollo Drive and private streets shall be consistent with the City's selection for the Town Center areas, which is the Lumec VR -300 lighting standard with a globe shaped light bulb container that protrudes below the fixture opening. 2. The narrative states that in order to control site illumination and to limit glare, site lighting intensity will be limited to 1.0 foot candles at the site's perimeter. Drainage. The drainage from the McDonald's site is reliant on off -site facilities. The grading plan has been revised to address issues raised in the previous report. 1. The drainage plan has been revised to integrate the recommendations of the Environmental Review Board. The storm pipe from the bituminous area on the west side of the McDonald's building has been eliminated as recommended. The infiltration basin next to the woodland east of Outlot A has been narrowed and reduced in size to preserve more of the trees in this area. To compensate for the 9 reduced size of this basin, two additional infiltration basins have been located at the southern end of the site. 2. The general development notes have been revised to list appropriate drainage easements. 3. The grading plan will be subject to review by the City Engineer. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The original concept plan for the shopping center was very appealing in design and vision. Through the processing of the PDO application, the applicant and staff worked hard in an effort to respond to site issues and define the design parameters for a PDO. However, changes in land use from the original concept plan, and the applicant's reluctance to establish PDO design guidelines complicated the development application review. In this respect, we recommend that the City deny the development application of both JADT and McDonald's with the following findings: PDO is denied finding: 1. The proposed PDO rezoning is inconsistent with the approved Comprehensive Plan Town Center Planning District 1 recommendation. 2. The proposed PDO rezoning and development applicant are contrary with the defined design objectives cited by the City in the concept plan approval. 3. The proposed Phase I land use raises land use compatibility issues related to: a. Duplication of similar land uses at each quadrant of the CSAH 23 /Apollo Drive interchange. b. Removal of 97 percent of significant trees to accommodate the Amoco /McDonald's development. 4. The PDO rezoning and site development are premature in light of anticipated improvements to both CSAH 23 and the I -35 /CSAH 23 interchange which will impact the site design and traffic circulation of the proposed PDO. 10 5. The PDO is intended to offer design flexibility in return for improved site design, and land use relationship. The PDO material has not established specific plans and design commitments to ensure that the quality development initially offered in the concept plan will be achieved in exchange for the requested ordinance flexibilities. Preliminary plat is denied finding: 1. Without the flexibility of an approved PDO Zoning District, the preliminary plat is non - conforming to City subdivision standards related to lot size and private streets. Conditional use permits for gas sales and drive - through lane is denied finding: 1. Without the flexibility of an approved PDO Zoning District, the proposed lot is substandard with regard to lot size. pc: Bill Hawkins Mary Devine Jeff Smyser Mary Kay Wyland 11 • 'a r " ['CITIES OMAF OF F LINO LAKES, u L CENTERVILLE, a PART OF CIRCLE PINES EXHIBIT A 1 ir MIN J REVISIONS RDAS 0•101!SOTA gb.l.rtasurver =UM-LAM •••••■ •••••• • .11 •••• ...UP • -e2,21t NOLOVA. MEWL IM WOO 01111411313 1441WEINE: CAN OM mocarnes Om. IN• • Blumentals/ AreMtoetin be EXHIBIT K • L 11 if 1i!. i 11;1 1 s 11 i it : i; • • No DATE REVISIONS RE►6 m r � • Mares .z&. m r ur —Z .0 R T C ,71 J:2y2 WPM r NOIMAY 17. • >pq .I 711,• —rwrr ,.m w.rc...<• . MIMI& si Blumnnttln• k. CMS o�atlaaw �i SIN OW 111 M w 1i - a��r awl Mg f0 Iron Mb -arM. ggel 1aa1 aw-YD REVISIONS NI *DONALD' 0 I I IIIIROIIATION ra-zr.:1.J1 rreENECtIN-ii 49 MOOS OIL GfWC MYTTO elgi A "Me r*- 27:42.7 2S.■ r1:P. 42 :OEN LC:20..1222.2.2=2r=r2==.1, ••■•• .1•• foam* •••••• •••• ••.• ••••••••••• •••• •••• • 4. • •••• •■•••• •••••■••• ••■• ••• ••• ••••••••• •1•1•1‘20,• owil 2 u•c2.2. 2 042122 We* 2100. 2C - W & 1110MAY U 21222--LACES. 122MEICT2 1111111111111111 [IL TOM. KUMAR. 102. - =WIN PEICI.M. MENEM mkt-SSE': "Ellii.vu Wag" 4•110 1.111•■•••• •••■■ WO i•mor a. los 1AL mOMI.I 0.11 A. MN BIUMORtaki Arehltiebre CMS Fab Iran Ildwe Sato UO 111.148 Cwir lifonmis Sue feli Nn-1J JIIIIIIIIUHIIUIIAIU NM I 11 111111 RFVISIONS 10/13714 Design Framework Lino Lakes Commercial Development JADT Development Group September, 1998 EXHIBIT L THE VISION • When developed, the project should make the City proud, and provide a lasting legacy for the land owners. • The project should be a significant landmark, and a gateway to the community. • The project should be pedestrian- friendly, while providing a convenient and safe transportation system. • The project should emphasize green space with an overall landscaping theme. • Stormwater management should emphasize the preservation of existing on -site wetlands and the creation of stormwater infiltration opportunities. • Building design and siting should emphasize quality, aesthetics, clustering and shared parking. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The streetscape is shaped primarily by the placement of buildings and parking lots within the project's setting. This section establishes design guidelines for site planning, building massing, and landscaping to control the development patterns within the Lino Lakes Commercial Development. I. STREETSCAPE HIERARCHY The streets within the project play a vital role in shaping the project's identity. The streets serve as entries and gateways to the individual users, provide linkages between the various buildings and establish the development pattern. What are Streetscapes? The term "streetscape" refers to the physical setting shaped by the relationships and design of buildings, parking lots and structures, streets, sidewalks, landscaping and other elements. In addition to buildings, streets and parking lots, other streetscape elements include trees and lighting. The relationship between all of these elements and the quality of their design are what will shape the image and scale of Lino Lakes Commercial Development. A hierarchy of streetscape treatments has been established to emphasize traffic functions within the project. The hierarchy of street is defined as follows: • Primary Streets: • Access Drives: • Pedestrian Linkage: A. Primary Streets - Apollo Drive Apollo Drive, proposed to be a public street, is the entrance and the main distributor of traffic within the project, connecting Lake Drive (CSAH 23) with 77th Street. At its intersection with Lake Drive, Apollo Drive will be a divided roadway to facilitate a sense of arrival and traffic control. After approximately 300 feet, Apollo Drive will be a 30 -foot wide street section located within a 60 feet right -of -way. A 5 -foot wide sidewalk is proposed on both sides of Apollo Drive from CSAH 23 to the first interior intersection, and then along the south and east side of Apollo Drive to facilitate pedestrian movement. This trailway links a future County trail along the east side of Lake Drive to trail routes to individual sites within the development. B. Access Drives - Private Outlots Privately owned outlots are to be controlled be Common Maintenance Area Agreements, will serve as spokes from Apollo Drive. Typically, these outlots will provide transportation linkage between Apollo Drive and several individual parking lots/building sites. These streets will be treated with a moderate use of streetscape elements. Their main design objectives are: • Create comfortable pedestrian scaled linkages between Apollo Drive and the individual uses, and parking area. • Provide continuity between Apollo Drive and the rest of the project through common streetscape elements and architecture. • Incorporate street trees. The design of the access drives will generally include a 50 -foot wide outlot containing a 30- foot wide private driveway, and a parallel sidewalk/trail. The outlots will be encumbered by deed restrictions that prevent their future turnover to the City for public streets. C. Pedestrian Link Bicycle, walking and jogging sidewalks are incorporated into the public street Corridor (Apollo Drive), the private driveways and also into specific building sites. These trails and related open spaces link and integrate all areas of the development and provide connections • with the City's park and trail systems, including the future trail along the east side of Lake Drive. Tree lined boulevards serve as gateways and links to the development. They reinforce the positive image and serve to create distinctive corridors for buildings to front and people to walk along. Great care will be taken in the design to create and sustain a strong, pedestrian oriented environment. This is accomplished through the creative use of such streetscape elements as landscaping, walkways and lighting. Parking is ample and convenient, but, it is designed to serve multiple tenants by centering between buildings, allowing sharing. II. LANDSCAPING The Anoka County/Lino Lakes area is dominated by sandy soils and an existing tree cover of oaks in upland areas. For these reasons the landscapes plan will be dominated by oaks and other trees suitable for rapidly draining soils. All lawn and planted areas will be irrigated with the exception of areas planted in native grasses and wildflowers. The use of native grasses will be emphasized in the eastern portion of the site (near Wetlands 2 and 3), and along the I -35 corridor, and along infiltration areas. A tree survey of the site was performed that identified 308 larger diameter trees, of which 33 were Elms and Boxelders. The remaining 275 trees included, for the most part, Oaks with some Cedar, and a smaller number of other tree types. Tree preservation is recognized as a major concern of the City, yet it is also recognized that site lines are essential for retail development with some tree removal to facilitate an economical development being unavoidable and necessary. In view of the fact that replanting trees can mitigate tree removal, it is proposed that for each of the 275 identified trees (not including Elm or Boxelder) that is removed as part of the development, a 1 -for -1 tree replacement plan be provided. Replacement trees will include overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or deciduous trees having a minimum height of eight feet. A. Perimeter Landscaping Anoka County CSAH 23 & I -35W Treatment of the perimeter areas adjacent to the Interstate will consist of clusters of oaks with view corridors open to retail buildings and signage. The overstory canopy of oaks will be augmented with an understory of ornamental trees clustered in small groves. Clearly defined areas of native grasses and wildflowers will be used along the I -35 corridor and the eastern portion of the site. B. Service Areas Service areas will be screened with evergreen. C. Apollo Drive Apollo Drive will be generally lined with clusters of Red Oaks and small groves of Multi- stem Amur Maple set in native grass planting areas. Groves of Quaking Aspen, tolerant of wet conditions, will be used in infiltration pond areas. The entry median will be planted with flowering ornaments, flowering ground covers (such as day lilies) and low shrub masses. Tree spacing will generally be three trees per 100 feet of curb length. D. Private Roads Private Roads will be lined with groupings of Hackberry, Ash, Red Maple and Honeylocust. Groves of Quaking Aspen, tolerant of wet conditions, will be used in infiltration pond areas. Small areas of Amur, Maple and flowering ornaments used on Apollo Drive will be repeated along with evergreens as needed for screening and accent. Tree spacing will generally be three trees per 100 feet of curb length. E. Foundation Planting Retail pedestrian areas shall incorporate foundation planting with colorful accents. These may include pots with seasonal color and entries and seating areas for pedestrian interest and ambiance. F. Common Open Space Area Common Open Space areas will be defined by plantings, berms and buildings to become outdoor rooms. Usable spaces shall be sod or a hardsurfaced paving material. Open spaced to be predominantly for viewing shall be nature grasses and wildflowers. G. Parking Lot Interiors Landscaping the interior of parking lots improves the appearance of large commercial parking lots and breaks up large expanses of asphalt. Parking lot islands must be large enough to support the trees planted and trees and other plant materials should be selected that thrive under harsh conditions. Parking lot interiors should have 150 square feet of landscape islands per 25 parking spaces. The islands shall include at a minimum one overstory tree with a minimum of 3 caliper at time of planting. III. LIGHTING Lighting should provide continuity and consistency throughout the area. All parking lot lights shall be uniform in style, color and height. Exterior wall lighting shall be encouraged to enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting styles and building fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. To reduce the number of lights in larger parking fields, high performance light standards shall be encouraged. Parking areas will be lit with a downcast box -type fixture mounted on a 22 foot aluminum pole. The light source will be a metal -halid lamp which will cast white light over the parking lot. The light cast by these fixtures will be restricted to .5 lumens at the property line and shall be adjustable and directional. Parking areas will be lit after dark and during hours of operation only. Wall mounted security lighting located at all building entrances will also be downcast to reduce visibility from off site. Street lighting (Apollo Drive and private streets) shall be consistent with the City's selection for the Town Center areas, which is the Lumec VR -300 lighting standard with a globe shaped light bulb container that protrudes below the fixture opening. In order to control site illumination and to limit glare, site lighting intensity will be limited to 1.0 foot candles at the site's perimeter. IV. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Design Character and Details: The architectural character established throughout Lino Lakes Commercial Development is intended to reflect a long lasting, durable, and high quality image. Special attention to massing, proportions and details are encouraged. B. Building Placement and Relationship to Parking The intent of the master planning is to orient buildings as appropriate or allowing for functional needs of shared parking, visibility from roadways and pedestrian accessibility. Where feasible, buildings shall be built to minimal 30 feet setbacks from Apollo Drive as to encourage an urban sense of scale. Buildings shall be grouped and oriented so as to promote shared parking. Parking shall be convenient and accessible from the front entrances of buildings. • All developments should encourage a strong connection between the building and parking areas through unified construction of elements, pedestrian path and entries. • Pedestrian passageways through the parking areas are encouraged. ■ Up to 20% of the parking spaces in a parking lot may be permanently marked for compact cars • When determined appropriate, commercial buildings are to accommodate bicycle /motorcycle parking areas and bike rack design. • Shared parking areas with varying peak demands shall be utilized when possible. Shared parking encourages users to move between destination points without getting into cars. Shared parking will allow for greater intensity of development, will relieve the problem of poorly utilized parking areas and with less paving, will result in less runoff e:\rnainAmiscAdesgnfrmwrk9-28 09/28/98 11:27 '$612 885 4769 MCDONALD'S CORP- w: e. • 09/28/98 11:31 $612 885 4769 Fixture Specifications Dimensions: 400 1000 A C D E 17" 17" 9,h" 9" 6" 22" 22" 101/2" 11" 6" MCDONALD ' S CORP. Fixture Ordering Information: Cat # ASB C - A 175 MH • DB - Dark Bronze cut -off 250 MH AD - Almond FT - Fixed arm 400 MH W -White (forward 1000 MH BK - Black throw) 250 HPS PLT - Platinum 400 HPS '' Consult factory for other finishes 1000 HPS MT - Multi-Tap ballast (120. 208, 240, 277Y) 480V Pole Specifications Tenon Top Pole 10" Bolt Circle .12S wall thickness Handhole with Cover 12" 24" Painted .pored stcd base for concrete pour (optional) Features: I. Mill finished, aluminum housing. 2. Access to lamp and ballast compartments through hinged door assembly. 3. One -piece tempered glass lens. 4. Optical system fabricated of polished alzak aluminum. Provides for optimum efficiency for long and wide light distribution. 5. Includes adjustable tenon adaptor. 6. Includes integral /adjustable light cut-off shield. 7. Available with photoelectric control. 8. Available with polycarbonate she 9. Suitable for wall mounting - consult factory. Features: 1. Square steel poles finished w weatherproof rust preventative paint (Wrapped for protection). 2. 4 galvanized anchor bolts.3A" x 36" plus 3" hook,with galvanized nuts and washers provded. (1-jam nut 2 h nut 2 -flat washers per bolt.) 3. Furnished with metal template. 4. Handhole provided. 5. Optional decorative anchor bolt cover. 6. Optional painted.tapered steel pole base for concrete pout (pictured at left). 7. 4" square pole up to 20 feet; 5" square pole from 20 -28 fee Pole and Mounting Bracket Ordering Informat Pole Cat # SSP - Specify pole Specify fi "�Sh height (see above) ICC Tr -1 A TT-2A TT-3A TT-4A Specify mounting bracket type (see below) Performance Designed Lighting Products 3477 WestTouhy Avenue. Lincolnwood, Illinois 60645 Toll Free:1- 800 - 544-4848 In Illinois: 847- 674 -7100 Fax 847 - 6747105 TT4AX (90` •' 1131 .... _��� NM RPM ] I I • • I' ' 1 1 11NM17pFMa{ ` Nb d 7.ro Ow07L CO t NOTES 1. ALL UNIMPROVED PORTIONS OF LOT SWILL BE SODDED EXCEPT WHEN NOTED AS SEED. 2. AU. .000170 AREAS TO BE PoBGATED. 3. P.U. SHRUB BEDS TO HAVE FABRIC. EDGER. AND MULCH. • �� ��'HyR LEGEND Nf142ATION- BASIN NATIVE GRASS k FORGE MIX NFILTRATIGN BASIN PLANTS FLOWERS ANGELJGA RED INUCNEED NEW ENGLAND ASTER PALE INDIAN PLANTAIN WA SENNA CANADA TICK TREFOIL OX EYE SUNFLOWER FRAME BLAZINGSTAR DENSE BLAZNGSTAR GREAT BLUE LOBEUA BERGAMOT • YELLOW CONEFLOWER BLACK EYE SUSAN SHEET BLACK EYED SUSAN PLANTING NOTES 6 w keel*. wow M M • lto•• 4.. ..041•• •• •7.-•7 - w w *Ow *•• eel oral. M M •* Pada IMO bo•••• e eA•A •.47 r 47110. 1 boor • •117 - Me.7hllwb►*rw•4O� by •}•.III/WMo* a•I 44.. •W•""'•""" «•M -r7. M /141.10 r ••• S 188 O4r* 4y l•gPOY* MOprl M• �Otw/a wMNldw 881 • 7..•5•1I44141 �or••••••M 4 • WOO INI► 4q'i�wNb"Or MINI �w N•AI. S 14 ••••■ 1141 Wan 1•/8818. 8Y. IMNOWN %ifMdM r WM i w.rrlww N�'Mriww 443•�y""" l ; 88•••• • ••• Mom* 4•I= ti 644▪ 10 •••• wool ••• w r. M 44 bike 4 r•N•• Y p•1.4% mono 7. 4• too W Ploso•eo ••• 0 MI •wdkw 7 54448 - 000.4441 61.444• 4 - •48 1 bibs 4i M 481• Y 7..Y 4. ~II* 0 6418• • M .444 e. 10 M eq 4••• •110.8888.188 10104 • NW r• o- •.. •••• O. * •••••• a MI •••r 4 y- Wool • r•.7. as I.r•w• Ywra 4 -M0- Y4 * • e•ee w N 1.` 11.81 ••17•1 ∎•∎ 4 71 MM 4r for w wok% 884 /1Y 8_ Ww 881 •rLL�i• Y •I •I `*.Aliww` wiYMI. •7~It"141Y` 010 M 0.88148 :Iy 888„11. N 11 11 Nol.1 4 •rjwe 0;11110111 IWO 1.1 1 1l i771F•. Yo~wlwa r•. 4 •• 1•• A•e rue •llo4 Medea I* 4 4 44 w ho ••■• •w >.• bw. Ml limo 4 *I 73 0 NONFM balm • r o* M 3 mob 118 881• • ONO. 1•881•eP•88 NY I•••110.8.41••O.•M r• III% Nr we 101 Frew/ 1a P4O. •• * Peoee 1••/8888 owe Me ran. • �NraMrl: :1W r olio 11 ••80888 4.88 • •17.1. Webb Obi 88 �7.7.488y• �r110- 46.-I.`mow•:, M•*e 881.1.10 M• R•7. ••IM•• 44 nM 08.7. 7. • Mood/oft/ •N. *e• •Ir *88.107. ••••••• 7 •••• 111 Ow or-00m 4•401•• w•1 M-A w • Mow sow • •••••4InOwabw ew• 000. N•eyw 00G Vr•• r W M 18 •8b /WIN ••• on* Ph1 M. n. •M••i 8710 a 1OI•N4iwi 1. I7.. ••• 4040 00 4.10, 740 ere 44.4• Y •eew Y�wY e7. e•w M•" Ib1• Aw0 l Ye•, 1'* MArLL 884 7'rr wwYO• - •* vim 8888,• Nt >. 1ww••• war •••• •• AP• r ant 10 Per ••••••• 41ea ~Yob} w w• •er..P4ie•Nr�Mw'••M•. ••• r�8 Moe•• •4 014.0. Pllw M MM•ItM m* 4 warm ' 8.11/40 * III be% M ••• •PO 1••••••1 6. *Maly id r ea* • 11. 8848088 FLOIIERS BRANCHED CONEFLONER CUPPLANT OHO GOLDENROD STIFF GOLDENROD BLUE VERVAIN GOLDEN ALEXANDER GRASSES, BULRUSHES & SEEDGRASSES FRINGED BRp$ BIG BLUESTERN CANADA VALD RYE DARK GREEN BULRUSH FOXTAL SEDGE 0' 30' SCALE IN FEET 60' 90' NORTH aLow. NOTES 1. /*4011ND1 080 104• MO •88E NE 07 R0 1141 C00MC1011. wow 00 SWING MME M M Cowl COe01CTOM. 2. MOT. 8841101 OOL1T. COIOIM. AM •1070 7pl M< 0111•1 11010 ME M M C[e1ML 000111C104 3. LOT MR MCI. CON4R AND AMC M10101D M 00081. OORMIKTOIL P1711 MO MOM TI111MIES 0.010100 M e•0001Cr. IMaLLED M 71E 40DM1 CONNOC1M. 4. RTES /OR R•0Pe0 NE N WE COM. 008811•001. 40408 IC US ME M I0 TIMMS P.17I 0. MIOPOIID MA ES NE 078•4 s /008810 0141: 13007 ECCA1OI5 atoll ST 0[107./00 10 NSW TON M 11051 MOM/ INSTAl1A11011, R 111E C00e:10R TI5L COOMON11E ON NL UIWY COIRWET 10 041080 EXACT P00 07 SUM 0001001011 •7 E4857. %MUM 4171701 10 THE 040000 0J2011RA MO MANIOC 00OM10 708 040117 1874 ICE wawa .00111088. 000. 40 MAIM 7. ML arenas 00•11 ME 0 N000= 70 M /0441/444 AID 4447 117 VIEWED M 1117 404E04 C01001L70M AT CIIOINCOi/R a 014.0 WU NO WAS OSHAIOIM AMA O 0' ANCP4 7Ng4 1000:16. 0. ALL INI010PE MTAS 0e1 OE 1101141 MOD 10 r OEJDw NIA OF ML MMOIS MO ONSS. 7001 0010114 MO 04046174 48 M 117 011101/0n0001. 10. L07 004517. COMM* 70171410 10 =MK 1710 M SOIL1 IMPORT 113C0e013081010 X XI 110 110111M3R•41 SR[. kilt igi < O SI MANG SPECIFIC/21M 011•.417 3' TOM. C0uMC170 /0048811 00001ESS) 0.107.107 NNW 0001E •748511 1.17 18W7. 17 R 4001704E 6.17 5188881. PON ML Page 401100.78 10 17007. 1114700 3138. OIOS 0. 1000 401.100 0188017 48. 3 ' 088880100 NSL CaM IC 001/01000 141 787.01. 174510N 1311. 1101011CVS Vat 0317 CONFORMS 01�M 4130111.T. 011.40101.0 S7A corms 0 6000L.SECION 274/. OOE 1000 PANT IQUM WO07. 1 OK* 7410 OM170 0=11.88/1 I7. -MOO. MN .` UMW i 70 O 88.16 e40AO WM1�0 A� .17 OSMO MO MO 4880880 VIII 71011 MAR MA 441011 OOM01O0141 101 O 0400 • 40100101 1111•1111/014 RO8 4••1 • 111111 Nat CON= q •• •10.3,111 ION 47. a MM 4481717 844814. 40017.1. 1G 04 a 81046 NCI ring LOT LJONOIG REOOMMIDO boN 10 imam 170108E us 4017 AqE GLIB 5401 1000 ea writ Klux 1/7.!8 NO sr PO= 040 0x0110•. 8 00MC01110 01100 117 0000 MS eMO 7.8888341. PNI•33 O 31 MOS VI4811708. • MOM OM 0108 10 1111101010. PAWNS INFNIN ATTON 63 36 was f X Es • 90 3 48CS 14 X Is • 417. w .•41E f X IS 7.p • WW1 X • LLTLL/IY 8070555TION 0.117488 SEMI M1ER STORM SEM 460000 v i SURMEr immisa710N 84118840 10 .00401 Must 11008 41048140, N0. 15000 23fxMOM Mem P01EUM, 117. 00427 Mos-OM NM/ 12100 SATE: SRC AREA 1.86 00 LUDO S S S $ C C 0 0 SW LOT MR 0=0 tP 30 811103 ara 11078 (70.5) - 4880641 OIVATON r-1 _R- STORM SETXX fT- _ TIME_� RAN 00415 IM - 30' STREET MOMS X)OOOOoO(X XX)00OOOOCX 000000 x CRY LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA 1 11 1 1 1 D0L81Tr ANOKA LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEPT GSM 85480« AS -P.LT SEOIONN. ova 880 'comma DWO. NO. MIN -14 -98 022 -0342 C 8 s1/s4CNO Noes / / ~m0°iIOEO NS MOrO� G DENOTE SITTER OWE. h. smogs Alp Gaol CONNISu / se Ooteacto1/STwL mesa own= 4404 J lee =mum ><TAT1241 AND ER1saN a TIE � 4r�L woo Ue R NL Ecu JC WRY 10 CC_d 1 CROS011 AAs1pp 11111241 NaNN0. out N0T W1ED ST MAIN d1Ef, BOOR 4SN111�f MOOS >LT JX�DI 11�bL�f Mal aR11sIe we OONIIRC awolr t AOCpT 0r INC Ms sal INC OMER _ DK TAi1pN As • N01IOE>< AtiL 0121101 ate 10 NEVIS 010•/1 NOT 1112. Or s1T. .TILE pp//qq VAT Ai 1t{�� SPOON. 01001 aC _ 11:/IR1T _ 1KaIDDS At� &W et 124 MOIECT PIN - - ANY Ise a' 2411SNMDVSNEN / LT10111N ooNl•QL Atp oustaaN maw wefts ALL �SNAAIIL STC N SOOd OR WASS WU. MIMEO. 'PIER EACH 1111 Alp NUS IMMO 10 INC SA ACTON OF THE O1NER. ALL AT waviest or TEE awNAe+a t AIO POI11C3 T SD,OR1NTA1ON LULL SE MIN IN sow WOK DE MIST s: w ESE P'NSI24 3 IRIS'/ 10 CNPLE1GN Or / c 1.12 coNwuc1s 24u t L�/IL = ?c- it 'r�1 ms c m iNL / .ACC ANCE *14 112 lEa/LODP: G &1i 01IETrs ''CIS :i EER1/ o. ojanortreatzmcouu. sof tens, N0 O10fl4 1RM:1C w�sl n E. Tawas= / supomamv 124 2. OK NEVA FOOT / 11 � 01R PROM*NO At Ij�1�l1p AAIIbr:saf 10�p &&PIP i I�ESDTA OEPMRIDITICF 1 / II / II DE )INIIEO SWAM ELEVATION /NUL NOT a TOOT M042. OR 0.30 mat 0NL M A1101'/AT ANY PONT MERE NEAP IS PALS AKA 24151111E moo wI ALL VARY h 110RE 1111 005 root at ato T MES111(0 ELEVA14ON Or ART PONY AK 1011201.1E 10PS0L 241NL NE 01:101201I10 WI NN OR 241044 THE AMMO ELEVATION, 1441214 ST RC DANCER. $4141 1( 000E0 TO PWS OR 1MIS I/s 111 OF "A" ow OWING 1S o011RET1D, i (HISS (0 SNORT OF SN. 017 111 11 CONTRACTOR ARE 24111 1(0 117ORT R. A 011 111E 241E TO AN AREA BE L Nu or THE OONIRACTOR, T IJTAsLE 517121211 TO At ME. 112 ` v Ak TES>r10 1. E CONKERS in' PIE 044111 SXS - RE cO N4CTNE 241 OF •M ?:iaPt rat moss oa6 / ALL MES .c. SON TESTS 444 YESFE r7 _ 1 '17. ZC X X. 11 :• A OEOoEOINCW sly: M. '1E. M • :;/;., ' a� -.:� :. •- 1 1 t r A''RR 24511 .M� t do 0 1 24•.• aTr/a +L,4 TIC 241E 001/10 OON5aUCa011 11 00111 111, 1112 A•051R4CT01 24111 EEO NO N1LCN 150.E AREAS AS NIE01(D wT tRit "Mk 1412 MEMO SPA:. C1s1LV TEAM lI4100? /PECIrIO•110N Na I 91 `O 11.E toms. 01 10444/1. tr.1, F.. PO. 504 AND APPIXD AT A RATE P -NR .. 1 O 241116 SE 444L0402. 1MJ: ' k1 - Cl /:Y 1CT` ✓/ ?• iz ��:4y1T10N � T1fPE I. RRJ • T i E1''►'C TOO.151'1 7/1 a ii` f U3".4 watt SE APPLIED AT TIC NATE N ! Ten PER Ar0E Wit IAt,EG1 SHALL NE 11111120 ISM A ,�. WOOD ADM OLs4ET Su41 SE MRNORCO AND PLACID N AREAS so;;;;.: .9 AW01 �rl/A^T CISC, CLOORIMER OR 0110 APPR3 0 E0 ANCT4T. s c R E THE S L O P E S C U D S 0I, APOLLO Ir WETLAND \. • • 1. NORTH rosz 1-- 30' 1 60' 90. SCALE IN FET.� 1 CEtERN. NOTES 1. IMO014011 777,0 • M MO ME MIC M TIC ION CONRICIOA COMM 4401111.0 MEN TIE COCOA C00111CIOIL 2. YANA MCI MOOR 30.11. coos. AI• NANO 1011 ML PICT 1010 441E A 1111 OOONL C111NC1a & LOT UO T M1EL CO MO 11.10 POOYOEO N 001121IL CONNIC70IE 1011! MO 011111110 MOWS 7U11IW 0100410'1, sass M M KNOW 01MMCIOI. 4. WOO CON 71A0101.13 ME w n1E WOW OON1NCroN. 44104011 10.11 MIE N M 740101E SIPNIOL S. MOUND MMIIS MC •001 N MIMIC MIC OILY. MC LOCATIONS OWL K OETOMO • ALLOW CONTIC 110.1 ECOIONCAL OISI/11A110R w 1111 01111144001 MOLL COONIN IE 1214 /44. sun 001544121 1000701440 EXACT 1017 or 101211E 0011401101 a D0150 MM. WEN 10 111E •11010 QSORCAL 440 NIA010 MANN= CON MEAL' NONCE 011NM10E 4000IO6. 12121, NO 7. 17. ODATO4 MOON ME N ICI OR 10 7712 KKINNN MO NMI K M00E0 b 1112 COOK COIINCNN Y CRO NOEwvc • 05111 WX 440 CUM 0Ew11o6 MALL K r AMC NISI PAVEMENT. A ML 744010144E Mil• ONLL K ROOM WEED 10 r UNION TOP N ML 10MMS MO CMS. 1144 04010. AND t0OSCME ME N M owNEVONNNNL 10. 40T U0111/10 CONCRETE 1012•011 1 COMM NMI TE SOLS WONT 10o*000CM RR 110 4NICIAM f0[. O i 6 E i a 1 NE O a O 011•AN r TOTAL CONNCTED ASINIALT TRONEMO .14,1 1 MOOR TEE • AL K r 000•11E 1114 1M1O0R 722 ILL PATIO 066010N0 10 NON, 1ECRON 3131 CLASS A 1008 CROWD 0144147 ROCK. r NRR440N WE CONS[ COWMAN/ 10 IOCCN. 8'1101 211. MINNOW TICK 040 MALAY. r ILMFACE 04240 COWMAN N 10 16001SECRON 1341. NNE 1114110 WANT 111110 NON. NOON AN. 001111,20 NW= MOM MOOR IP MOM M OS 1@44 M0 PAL • 4(0M 0r AM W O1O140 ,PI 0111111.011 944 4 SW. >r P ! .44041 IRMA 6016444 511 OA OA 6(4401 NO M 2440 MI BOOR OAR 016 Y111 a WNW RICO 140 IOW 10 CORM • 04144 1Nr •I/R A 104011E NWI M4 COMM 44401 Npp014. 116 OIL N 441441 ORK N 14400444417. 0•0411 K NL 11 OMI0. 11 wit ti E LOT 11444110 12001 1111111011 TO =DAMMY mum us We Aaa1124RS 4NM 1000 von HELL 11101E urns so SY P1ES. same s-oouset. 1106 RIR11001M 01411110TH 0 MLR IN Lena 44 440101 100{111a 1140 • A MOM WM MCIO MO1t • IOOOT SOIL Mal 'OK /BORN. PAWNS 1•101WAT011 sTas ®3 SO SPIES S 3 ES • $0 • SPICES 3 • • YISAY /4/011/1101 SIZE TYPE LOCATION 344170' ws4 WATER SR01Y SEWER ELECTRIC Wi SURIEY Ii0NNT10N 1REPMEO 011 scams /RAMC Roos ATSCOu1EL Ne 10070 7314 AWNS 10011 mucus. 1/I. 00477 (Sl 071 -1010 NNW 77106 SITE AREA 1.86 oc LEGEND SANONTY mss" STORM -3T -3711 4-N- --4 aEL' - - - -E 401 LINT C=0 144.30 DOSING ELEVATION MOOED ELEOLTION (70A)- no PUN SCALE: t• . !0• STREET 100RESS C11Y LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA 1 i1 STATUS I I 1 1 011E or cowry ANOKA CONCEPT GRADING PLAN GSM AS -SALT meow DSa 110 CORPORATE ONO. N0. MIN -14 -98 022 -0342 C - 6 • .. - 111117071 TLAND3 7,004 0.11. 0.16 clues • 1 / • "a.m. • •■■■• • Clam • Engineering • Nanning • SurtypIng 11FRA -McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. MO aol Mataa 111!..""•14 Ntriefeelt• SOO 412.4m- • Ix 611/471-8511 &oat apananfraeau JADT Development Group 1302 Douala Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 ■ 010 • VIM. •-.,_ 1• ...:....44 ,..-,A-g:-1--,;•-:-..f.,. „ ... • ..----4-74'.iltit.:4,4!;.;,- , . . •., , - ..e '- - :?-a;:;k1;;-..T...-1.-.:;•,...,,,----.4.6-:• .,,.,,,at. 34, • ... , . "ik •-■•• ,'''.• ... - - • -.."4-:.-, ' - -, -43 .. .... ' • la. !"101r."!,:, „.,..„ 104 ' - 1').14C-• 0412,irt.ArPLLO ..N1.0 1:121rt • ..:* ■r P. 4C.:.. ... . ..; . we !Ai!" .1141..47-4,4' , ,.4::, --'0...,•• • .„-%.....--1..1*,.... .... 111E.,...,..f.......:. i 1111-.,...74::'..r4'.. . •!., -"•••• k • 1.• ••••• ,C. MI.. % .,:: ,,,,,,a, N.,.-.;,,, -••:',... .. .1 I • -,.-- we. *, . ••••,..,: ... AN ■,. 1.4.0 ; 7 C.r z?.41.4 ri" = 17- / al" , •111.41, s..."It...............tiL. „. ....,,..:: • , x 0107'1: ' :,.,......:. ..,:\e.,:;......,z,k.."--ii.........., ..1.,,,.., • - ,....,:-..it.: ....7:.."'`.7i:Ts %.,,,.,... - 7 • - ....„.,.--..... ..,:,.T.:t4;1;x--44:::,....'''.-',...' -- ......,,,...„-_,...... . . , s •*.-d- A „....., • ,.-.. ■-s.- - -.....:.;.:',.. ■ 4 ._ .41 ;,_,:"*.•.---.7S1.,- ■ • .\ .-- .. ..,' - • =,.. ' ''--...17 .', '-u. .■ ' • set 04114.10 040•0, NORTH ••• WETLAND 1 15.107 00.0. 0.35 acres MMILIIMMELEIROWM Wm NNW or was reseaess E lure 1101110 10111100 11101 INDEX OF DRAWINGS 1 Natural Features/ Tree Inventory Plan Vicinity Map 2 Concept Development. Plan 3 Northwest Area Preliminary Drainage 4 Preliminary Plat C-5 Site Plan C-8 Grading Plan C-7 Utility -Plan C-8 Landscape Plan C-9 Details C-10 Details Tin WC. FT/ D& MO MAP 000021103117 00011N 17 n 1 4s• i 005400 a 27" V Mn 00 014 01111 NO 01.011 11111 01911 M▪ O 07 0171 001 1/027 NO VW 1000 104 0117 N 411101 NS M KW ‚50(70 OM ‚5 0111 00 1130 100 0011 117011100 0110 041 = 000 1144 00 1"4 M• D MO NM 110 00 001 Nu1014 010 140 DM 0470 OM 10 N 4CC/W:0OO":V 0MMI" 1 O P 01 0 0 E: M ." Ws• e = l ue F 0 0070 Mai en MX 13 101 MP 174 1"0"a" 100 10 101 OM 1018 NM le .4681.1 ems O 011 oss mie 103 10116:6 1111 WM 100 Me 01111 1100 110 MP 00-Same OP 0 MB 00001 101 10 ass 1101C16"1" 107 ewe 101110 11101 rip 11111 0100- 170 005 1301 130 1101 1301 110 0111 130 ON 1311 120 110 1221 1727 030 WI 072 031 OM 00 00 00 00 1101001501 0411 057 10711 0134 0174 0▪ 111 00.71 O ▪ 00 10127 use* 010 10141 10• 0 006 003 0173 01130 074 smae Mess mese 07.0 Nen mese 01131 000 0.110 O 111 007 070 11010 100 11010 MS 1101.0 ItSI ORM IT/ UV 1211-11 01 1030 310003301 00 0241 0010 1153 01111 000 1114 0273 040-041 010 030 000 PIM 0131 000 OR 020 03 0011 PUS POI 010 OW 1110141-0 00 0113 0103 ON 001.711 004 1103 MN 004 014 1071 M0 081 P/ Mt 030 0 11101-0-11 1101 MO =t 701* az t 1272 0014 07 VOA =4" 074 0107 MX 000 000-0 OM 1020 PM 00 11310 01101 070 100 1270 007 =4441 00 001.71 0040 00 00111 000 01111 NM WM tli. 003 00 0007 11011 4003 NM ON NW 0101-ss-te 1110 07.11 WO 00 KIM 004 011 WI 0041 OP 00113 00 004 110.311 PM 00 MP 000 ass 'WM OM 00 0011.01 PIO 010 Me 000 0115 000 UPI PM =114145 11114 NM /1402 *2 4014 0000 UN Wit P00.0 OM Wm PAWN 110 101111 r=41-0 1111 1010 41520114 110141.11 110 MO 1101-01 101 MN TES Mt emus em• &was ••• pem-0-111 0000-0 00101-11 004 01011-15.04 0010-1047-0 010144.1001 0000 001117 000 010 OWN 0004740 010 0000 000-11/ 001141 00114-100 000 001/44 0•04■111:■111 00Wflt rattr4•1Ir-: 001742 ormorre-le arms 01034■411 0101 00111 000 11401143411 001 0401341 0000 004i 41001 1104 00004 000-01411 1141044411-10 Mame Owe teem w IND MI 1111110 0103 001 000374 g14$ • 001114140 110.33 000 111141 00342 100.0 MO 0000 MAD 100.10 1107.0 00 :r01 C00100 0101 000004 00▪ .111 Pie N IP 110101-111 000.» 11014-110-0 110.111 004 WM 007 044 007414040 001-13-111 011110-11 r177/: =6.47 004 (0411111 110.10 00 ▪ mica. coseta-Ni-Ni 1001 *015*412 Ma MO MOM 000 01111 0000 MN MP, 01403 Mew MSS 40/0111 ▪ 101040 MOS 1100011 PIM MAO 040 001110 111131 Mama 0(01001* 000 0001 0377 MOIR/ M00 ma =.... MN =1" KW KW MAW 000 011P1 111110 0100111 iiiiiii+ iiiiii iiill iiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiii;iMa a. VICINITY NAP 11000403 ISIT TRU MSC. 1114.0 1100 11110 IRK= 0 MO MOW 111011 ORO 1010 000 1101 000 *3.00 *4 030001 WM 0000 PIM 0000 0 • 0103-0-0-11 100 0000-040 04.111 100 0001 01004144 1001 1031 EV 1070 ▪ • 001 101117 000 0(14010-00 1111)0 0011440 11= 01111147 11410 00041 gt. 003 mu 00341 1071 0001 10147 0404 IOW WM 30117011-00 0331 011154■* 1103.77 00247 000 Pa0 000 004 PM M$11 007 1.521 11011-21 11101-01 0701 000 0 -11 0 ri IT] 1 Med Lino Lakes Commercial Development lino Lakes, MI Sheet Title Natural Features/Tree Inventory Plan Vicinity Map I hereby ax111y that Ii Om 0111 prepared by me or odor my *set supertision and that 1 ern a duly Registered Professional Engineer mkt the We of Vie State of Minnesota. Nome Ode Registrant timber Waned MIN Clocked Omen MB Aeoreved 000. 11/19/98 Revisions No. Ode By Remotes A 10/2/98 IAN REV PER an COMMENTS 8 ii/m/913 Rue REV PER OTT COMMENTS Sheet Revision B MFRA FILE NO.: 120011 t1Y l Y I" WETLAND 3 7.0134 sq.f . 0.16 acres FUTURE XElEza°MEArr J SIDEWAUc kcip ■ • -1114".10 utt. ILLULWLWIIUI1L1I1111 c 1I'i. I \ "1.11111111F" NOV 1 6 1998 CITY OF LINO LAKES FUTURE TRIIL , TREE PRESERVAInON PORARY 40' RAD. TURN - AROUND UNTIL RESTAURANT SITE IS DEVELOPED. SEE SITE PLAN FOR 5I1E 55 K/ LOCATION ON McOO DE. TREE PRESERVATION NOTE: 6• CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT DRIVEWAYS WETLAND 1 15,107 sq.f1 0.35 acres 4 dl 25' FOR OUTLOT A r 3' (PLUS) CUSHION' UNDER CURB (TYP.) 271 25' FCR OUTLOT A 15' MINIMUM SECTION DETAIL A TYPICAL N.T.S. OU 1.5' at ARING MN/ DOT SPEC C i3N � 2357 TAO( COAT 1.5' TTU � COURSE SPEC r AGO SASE LAS 5 (SEE SCION N.4.A) APPROVED SIBORADE (SEE SECTION 14.4.5, 8 AND 4) DETAIL A • FULL R -0-W Fat APOLLO DRIVE FROM CSAH 23 TO FIRST INTERSECTION IS 100 FT, THEN R -0 -W TRANSITIONS TO 60 FT NN 1NDIH. 1d STREET SECTION FOR APOLLO DRIVE AND PRIVATE STREETS NORTH 1 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT NOTES: 1. THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL BEYOND 144E PROPOSED McDONALD'S SITE. LOT CONFIGURATIONS TIU. BE REFINED 111 FUTURE PHASES. 2. APOLLO DRIVE SHALL BE DEDICATED AS A PUBUC STREET. WESTERLY 300 FEET (APPRO5UA1EL1) all. BE DEDICATED WITH FINAL PLATING OF FIRST PHASE, AND FUTURE DEDICATIONS TILL BE MADE AT TIME OF FUTURE PHASES 3. OUTLOT A AND TEMPORARY TURN - AROUND TO BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MANTAINED BY COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. FUTURE SHARED DRIVEWAYS ALSO TO BE PLATTED AS SUCH. DEED RESTRICTIONS SHALL BE PLACED OVER P16vATE OUTLOTS THAT PREVENT FUTURE TURNOVER OF PRIVATE STREETS TO CITY. 4. uTIUTY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED ON A PHASE BY PHASE BASIS AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE DESIGN AND DEDICATED TO 114E CITY AS PART OF THE FINAL PLAT DOCUMENT. DRAINAGE ANO UTIUTY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED N N ACCORDANCE 11144 THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: PIPELINES- 20 FEET (CENTERED ON UTILITY) PONDS- 1 FEET ABOVE NW. PERIMETER LOT UNES- 5 FEET ON AU. 5.07 UNE5 WETLANDS- 5 FEET BEYOND WETLAND BOUNDARY 5. DEDICATION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR CSAH23 ANO ACCESS FOR APOLLO 081118 ARE SUBJECT TO COUNTY RENEW. 6. 511E DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MINIMUM LOT SITE- 1.0 ACRES BUILDING SETBACKS- -FROM CSAH23 50 FEET -FROM APOLLO DRIVE 30 FEET -FROM PRIVATE COMMON DRIVE 15 FEET PARKING SETBACKS - -FROM CSA123 15 FEET - FROM APOLLO DRIVE 15 FEET - FROM PRIVATE COMMON ORVE 5 FEET LOT COVERAGE- 35% GREEN SPACE AFTER OVERALL DEVELOPMENT 7. REFER TO DESIGN FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT. Engineering • Planning • Suner,ft McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. IJWO £W Awe nre•Rj.wlk 1W1wU•SSN7 IOW e144711- E01O • /nr 8IJ/i36- JZ burst eeleardween Client JADT Development Group 1302 Douglas Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 Project Lino Lakes Commercial Development Lino Lakes, MN Sheet Tine Concept Development Plan I hereby noddy that (his pion as prgerKI by me a duly Registered Professional Engines weber Dm noes of the Slots of Minnesota Nona Dote Registration Number Designed Drown Date Checked Approved Revisions Na Dote By Remake A 10/2/913 MRJ REV PER CITY COMMENTS B 44/10/98 RNe REV PER CITY COMMENTS Sheet 20 Revision B MFRA FILE NO.: 1209E • /1 / 141-1*--t"1111111tIOAP040 c ( \I 1 RETAILI 15,0001 _LI 4 RETAILli 1b,UU(J1 1 CD CD CD CD dD 11111lli LI 11 L1111111111E P ..•••• .••••• ..••••• DRIVE r"""- "-• RETAIL 12000 I n .1_.0 1 BaAoNaKII 1 I I 01" Ul • k,LI 1J 1.1 LI ll WETLAND 1 15,107 sq.ft. 035 acres LEGEND 0 25 50 100 EXISMNG CONTOURS EXISTNG WETLANDS PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONTOUR DRAINAGE BOUNDARIES NOTES X 909.5 900 NORTH 1) SEE SUBMITTED DRAINAGE CALCULABONS FOR INF1L1RATION BASIN SIZES AND CAPACIllES FOR REVIEW PURPOSES. 1HE DESIGNATION OF DRAINAGE AREAS AND INFILTRATON PONDS AS REFERENCED ON THIS PLAN AND ALSO WHIN THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ARE THE SAME. THEY ARE GENERAU.Y COOED AS FOLLOWS: 0 SUEICATCHMENT AREA DESIGNATION APOND DESIGNABON NOTE THAT 94 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS POND 10 AND POND 11 ARE INFILTRATION INTO GROUND. Engineering • Planning • Surveying McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 2. Ammo ;Who Mow^ 101mogo. 5540 phone 012/476--6OI0 • Fax 612/476-8532 E—Afee eockientracen JADT Development Group 1902 Douglas Avenue IMeneapelis, MN 55403 Lino Lakes Commercial Development Use Lakes, MN Sheet TMe Southwest Area Preliminary Drainage 1 hereby certify thot this pan WOS roweled by me or under my *set supervision GM toot 1 am o 6:1 Registered Professional Engineer under the Iuius of ttj.5tote p1 beinesota. Name Dote 11/11/98 Registration Number 21836 Designed 0J4 Chodcal Draw Rile Aeoreved Ode 11/11/98 Revisions No. Date By Remarks Sheet 3/10 Revision MFRA FILE NO.: 12098 1.5 • •"-P,. An, t }� rainrart NORTH UNE OF 148E Si1/4 OF THE SE1/4 SECS 7.027 t.- .. a< i� ry zi -. .. sees 07704 PARCEL 2 -s PARCEL 1 F F1j4 SFcTiON WETLAND 3 7.084 sg.ft. 0.16 acres b NE COWER SE1/4 OF IBC 5E1/4 SEC. 6. 1.31. R.22 NORTH PARCEL 3 SOUTH UNE OF 11E SE1 /4 OF 1Hf1/4 SE0.*kik NORTH UPE OF RC NE /4 Cr THE NEI /4 - V. 17, T.31, SE1 /4 I' OF THE S PARCEL 4 O' ad awe we f WeQ L.173.27 n.4IH.9a en201ehP 4 SECTION 8 WETLAND 1 15.107 sc.tt 0.35 acres (EASEMENT SCHEDULE; SEE NOTE 4 OF I GENERAL DEVELOPMENT NOTES ON SHEET 2 SITE SUMMARY TOTAL AREA 50.61. acres LOT 1 BLN 1 1.86 odes APOLLO R -0-W 0.75 acres CSAH 23 R -0 -w 0.15 acres OUTLOT A 0.56 acres OUTLOT 8 47.29 acres PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: 1h0l port W the South Half of the Southeast Warta of Section 6. Township 31 North, Range 22 West. Anoka County. Mane at0, dewed as 'dram Commencing at trot intersration of the South Rae of Section 8. Tranship 31 Nerds, Range 22 Wset, Anoka County. Minerals. end the Easterly right-of-way ms of Minnesota Highway No. 8: therm Nartheestay along sold Easterly �tle�hmgs East our Bold SSooua feet of Section point lforr 413.00 1 «L of this Seetheast9Iy rd parole .Ith sold Easterly right -o( -ray line W Mineola Midway Na 8 for 209.00 Nob thence Cost o d parallel with sold South the al Section 1112.00 fee4 rare r less. to its intersection with the Northwesterly Aght -d -ay W4* of MIna0t0 interstate Highway Pie. 3504; therms Northeasterly drag sold NOrlhw•d*Xy right -of -w7 it e of MMw*sete Intestate Hl9hwoy Nee 35W to its intersection with the East One of sold Satan It therm North along sold East less of sold Section 6 to the Northast ewer of South Hall of Southeast Quarter of sold Section 6; therme Wed elrg the Nerds the a 0044 South Half of Southeast Quartos of Satan 8 to Its Inersectio0 with the Eat.Ay right- of -.ay line of sold Minnesota Highay No. 6; thence Southwesterly Meg sold Easterly right -of -way the of Minnesota Highway No. 6 to the point of beginning. Excepting (Mehra, the following 3 prods: EICEP1I0N N0. 1 Toot part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast quarter of Soctkn 6. Toonedp 31 North, Range 22 West, ..d that port of Lot 15 of Auditors Subd !dare No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota awwd es foram Commencing d g the Nee Northeast bee r the Swlh lbtf Half 1 49, Southeast a� t0 detrain of k thence Wed 117200 feet t0 th• point of Noonan thence continuing West. along the North hem Of the South Half of the Southeast Quertr, o Aston, of 206.7 fat; thews South. de8.ct 09 to the IA 90 degrees, o distance of 233.00 feet; theme East. deflecting to the left 90 degrees, . distance of 2015 Meet North. deflecting to the left 90 d•9red• s detoam of 23300 feet to 0. point of beginning. EXCEPTION N0. 2 Thot part of the South Hdf of Om Seethed! Questa. of Section 8. Tranship 31. Range 22. Anoka County. Mkm.sst0. deerbsd es Idiom of }eeryfPMnttt�� North of sold South Half et Southeast Quarter, distant 1 7.H 0 .. It. Ftrdotla. din ids on W South Nal�«*4111 therm Mtl „stymy*: .old Noah M t0 9h. point of begin i*. EXCEPTION N0. 3 Toot port of the South !loaf el the Southeast Quarter of S.tbn 8. Township 31, Range 22. Anoka County. Mae4Ote. dasar*d at facto.. CanwnencMg et the Northeast comer of sold South Half of Southeast Quarter: thence North e9 depress 41 minutes 23 ascends West (assumed tearing), afarg the North 927e of odd South Hoff W soath.ast O rtr. a dhlanee of 1380.70 fast, t0 the *dual point of begM.ning el treat to be darb.ek Mum* at 0 right Orals to the North Om South 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds West, 23300 Net them et a right raps, North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds Wed, 500.57 fat, more r Nee, to the Easterly Sat of Anoka County Highway Right -o1 -Way Plat No 17: Mum. North ate ly, d .old Easterly 1m on a come dame radius N 9641.95 fat • grated Dogs M 00 duress 21 minutes 52 second*, a distance W 36.08 fast, more or less, to its interaction with the South . Me of..th. North 201.00 fat el said South Had of Southeast Quarto': Mum. South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 undid* East pared oath NOM Rn* of sold sloth MO of Southeast Hurter, to • point M intersection, .old point of intersection Olsten* 1587.48 foot Owl of the Northeast comer M said South Half of Southeast Quarter, and 201.00 test Southerly eta right arearat to sold North Wee Mums North 00 degrees 18 mewta 37 seconds Eat, on sold South SS* �.n 4i0mkeuest 23 the North seconds Hit. 206.778 (0 (8.. actual point b.Ok.dng. PARCEL 2: That port of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of SE 1/4) W Section Eight (8), Townddp Thirty-.n• (31), Rang. Twenty -two (22). that le described as Neon Commencing et the btreeetkn Of the South ICI. of .old Section Eight (8). std the East Ice of Stele Hlghwoy Nee 8 os the urn. N row told out rd troweedd therm 00M(*kg h Normoeet*X direction dorg N. East era of sold highway Na 0. • distract of tt hundred thirty-1M (236) feel to the rabid peal Of beginning; M.am continuing be D Nartheately direction dung the East line of sold Highway Na 8 , • distance of two harem nee. (209) led: thew continues Eeel.Ay and prase to the South Ina of .old Section Eight (6), • astrce of four hundred ihH*• (413) hot thong continuing a o Southw.st.Ay Mallon era prole to Ora hat aura a distance of two hundred nee* (209) fat: thence continuing Westerly and parallel to scorn second oree r distance of s four hare thirteen (413) feet to the actual point of PARCEL 3: AI That Pint of the South Half of Sultan 8. Township 31 Meth. Rag* 22 W**t Anoka County, Minnesota . beginning at th• interaction of the South line of radical 0. Tranship 31 North. Range 22 Watt, Ands County. Mhn.sota MA the Easterly right of .ey of Minnesota Highwoy Nee 6; thence Northeasterly dug sold Easterly right of woy line of Minnesota 225 Highway 235 Ns* feet; OtraetNn with tin Nrthaest* right of way lea of Minnesota Mandate Highway Na 35; therm* Southwsol*y along sold Northwesterly right of .ay lire* of Minnesota interact* 90.35W far 494 feel, norm r lose to Rs hter1ol1as with said South One of Section Nee 6; Mato West dug sold South la. W Section 6 for 680 fat: mare or lea to the prat 01 Spinning. PARCEL 4: M Mot part of the North Half of the Northeast Worts" of Section 17, Taaew4 31 North, Reg. 22 Met, Iola Northwesterly of t right of way of Mkn**ela interstate Ingham No. 35W end Southeasterly *1 4anesot0 Highway No. 8 Engineering • Planning • Surveykg McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. dplo214 loam Norlb• ;batiste We /Bane 111 /47 • M•• 07/I76 -8511 [ -Mob 40( Brecon client JADT Development Group 1302 Douglas Avenel Minneapolis, MN 55403 Project Lino Lakes Commercial Development Lino Lakes, MN Sheet moo Preliminary Plat I hereby certify that this pion Was prwored by me Or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly Regktered Professional Engineer undo' the bus of to State of Minnesota Nome Dote Registration Nunba oeWnH let •iN90d Drawn AM8 Aaaoved Date 8/18/48 Revtsioas No. Dab By A 8 10/7/98 MRJ 11/10/98 RMB Remake REV PER CITY CO1AENTS REV PER 0TY COMMENTS Sheet 4�0 Revision B MFRA FILE NO.: 12105 SITE NOTES. OETM3 - ME OEM WETS 111111E roam toms - M !0' PROMS FAQ MOM AT Ld QC. - SEE WEFT N 50' PAM PACE MINIM At OTT O.0 - SEE 9EET 1C MOW PANS FAQ Al0 901 (TIN -SEE MET O •1MN ACCEMO t IWO(AP Pt*3* FAQ NO Ma - SEE MET S 2 1RARIC PLUS ,NOR SEE WET 9 3 MOOT 102 01006 No sum - SEE STET $ • Uinta ►A1R16 - SEE MEET 9 S CONC 111 PANS - SEE FCC 9 • 00 NOT 011ER 901 - SEE MET 9 7 S10P901 S EEECIOIAL 001 9 PEI RAID O NOTES t 0016119 11180!111 OF PAN016 was rams IWOOp STALLS 2 SOEINU1 3 WPM MOM M01 an so maws CETERA. NOTES A XL 05100901= NOM ME 10 0€ PACE Q 0111 MOM nom XL mow 80PE0 10 NEAREST 10.80 P00T R. COIPACTOt OWL REFER W MENTECCOIW PUTO 801 EXACT 100,106 NO 0111619= OF PATIO WED 89016 MANG MOOG AIO EXACT 01119800 UIUET 0' 30' SCALE IN FEET 60' 90' NORTH GETER% NOTES 1. Ye00NMD7 R040 MN NO ME ARE N NE OGI COIIRACTOR MIME NO MMr10 000 N 01 OEIEIML COOIIICTOR 2. SLMES. MOOR DOL111, COIDIAI. NO 08810 POP ALL MER S0M NIE N 111E MERE. CONTRACTOR 0 LOT 11040 MMES. CO M40 AND 80110 MIMED N 00113/0. CC111WIC OR. POLES ATO LI011M0 maim R18494ED N Mo001WD% MSTNLED N 111E COOK CONIROT01L 4. BLARES FOR 11,08,100E ARE N 111E 000101 L CORTIV TCR ANCHOR 80.73 AE N 0)E FLAGPOLE SUPPLIER a PRd10000 MUMS ARE OEM M $01000= ONLY. MET LOCATIONS OWL E 0(10800(0 TO 001011 PM 0E MOST 1000001000. NOTNU0011. a D1 COMIRCTOR OYU. COOROM 0 111TH ALL UT8VY aIrMES 10 DETERMINE EMU POW OF !EXAM COIEC10N A7 005180 UNITY. REFER 10 011 51,0800 0101004. AND PLUTON° DRAM= TOR our 10NICE 0110110E LOWEST . MM. MO DPCIRMID. 7. ALL [LOOM1S 000E ARE M SEMEN= TO 711E SEIONA 81 APO MIST E MEMO N THE GE EIN2 CONVECTOR AT OKAPICEMENL a mei WAX MO CURB OEMAf0441 OWL E 5. NOW AMP PAW 5. ALL 10009180E AREAS OWL E ROOPI ENDED 10 8. 5FLOR TOP OF AIL 104210 AI• CURBS MAW GRIMM AND IM051401 PPE N 11E INAIG/OPOMIOR TO. LOT UONMO CONCRETE 00018109 10 COWAN ION 711 SOILS REPORT RODOU10G00MS FOR 0O PARRCUAA OIE. 1 Kg S. 4 PANNE SPOCWIGQ10N (001.1100 r TOTAL COMPACTED AMMO' 11800105) WIMP AST SOWWER MISTESIALIESMILIN PAWNER ME MALL E r MAI ENO[ s00 WOK 0011 NL PANG 000(000(00 TO 00•00, =nom 31* 0005 S. 1005 ORUOND WART ROCK r 81011000 MIE COURSE 000088143 10 00001. 51011101 7331. SIIWMOUS TAOS COAT 00T(OOR10 TO HOOT 1357, SS-1, 0AAM1m AMU. Y r1U.104 01KACE �COWOR 800 10 N00T.SfC108 2341. WOE MATE NWT 181010 (ROOT. SECTION 3Ea 44.110 17 COMM 1.1188 AaatSO•sw maw 011Mr1pf 1 1 O Nov a3 i KID WNW 1.020 Rm°a4111 101 01111 OARS 01100 No NO 01201//11 MMOD NOM q4 I NINN II NM= MOM M 108 TO NORO , 801.47011 ROT 00.10 A OM 0,425E O 1011 NNW COROO. NM NI04 /67MM/K TOR NIL It M SC OMOR P WMw"7. 1100.111. K MIL 00010010. LOT L1OHTIIO NECOINEEOANON 10 scam, .010516 1100 MINT SAMEMO TES 7•10 1000 PAVE IETAI wet Lows 90 22' P01 50020816 5- 0001119. ROES 030110,. CCAMIT1 R 10 MOAT 181 LIMO 00 NOVA MOIL ALL OMNI • A 011110 MO POND P10INF. • 10000 MK OOD TOE 8000. PARKING RFORMATIC1 TOTAL SPACES 63 35 SPACES $ E 10 • 50 • 3 swam 14 R 10 • 50 • 24 SPACES 9 x 15 • 50 • SPACES - R - • - • UTUTY WORKTM0N SIZE TYPE LOCATION SANITARY SER I CATER STORY SERER 0101010 OAS SURVEY IN ORSMTON PREPARED N: DATE: I NA0NOS PIMIK MOOS A150001EL 51C. 15050 234 1011801E /10000 PLY1101R14 IRA 55427 181 ,70_0010 W0011/ 12105 WE AREA 1.86 oc 1.00016 SAMARA EATER 04 5 -•- 08 310180 SERER ELECTRIC -0-0-- OAS D-12 401 LAMA' C=0 L•:3o 1105780 =w001 (78.5) -- PROPOSED E1EFL•104 PLAN SC/EE: I' A. 30' STREET MOMS EUY LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA 1 a 1 n 1 v 1 1 6 1 r i STATUS Ir cowry ANOKA o0NEEPT PRELJIMNRT SITE PLAN ISSUED AS -DULT REGIONAL OT10. 000 CORPORATE 014, NO. MIN -14 -98 022 -0342 C, - 5 N01s . 10' GALE V*l.W O� QIS1S10 MAINOE COOK DROP UJTY CONSIRICIKS NOTES A. 111E U1UTY IMPRONDIENTS FOR INNS PROJECT SMALL BE CON6TRJG1ED 11 ACOOMANCE RIM 111E *STANDARD UIUMES SPECFICATICTS' AS POILISICO er THE ON PIONEERS A Uu�Tr1 E AS NOOF30 HEREIN NL (Fi Ca 1NESE SPECFICAT10IS, TALL UIUTES Rua. BE ONSTNF5150 N ACCaIOANCE 10 On REOUNDENT1. 2.C21IRACTOR &TALL 10T OPEN, TURN OT, M1ERFERE M11I, OR ATTA01 ANY PPE OR NOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAN 515110/10 TO THE 0n UNLESS DULY AV11101SZE0 TO 00 SO BY ME On. ANY ADVERSE CceseauENCES OF ANT %M U= OR escatow3) C011iR 1104 OF SEWAGE TO TIE PUBLIC ARE TIE UMUn OF TIE 3A MOM TERMMI MO SEWER INN 1(&RDN6. SSTO MIMEO i 10 SSANTART)T) 010690•04 B• AS 1100f0) HERE(. M C AS SPEWED N CEAM SPE0F1QA110NS EXCEPT TALL 1ATENAL5 RIME COMPLY *111 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ME 01Y. 2.NL SAMTARY SERER TO TIE PVC SOIL -26. MESS NOTED 01131113. &ALL WATERMAN TO 111E DUCTILE EON - CLASS 52. 4.ALL 5101x1 1E1tR PPE TO s1. rP - CLASS 4 3.1P RAP SMALL SEMR/DOTUASSa C. CONTRACTOR T LLL REFER 10 AROITECTURM. PLANS FOR EXACT EOCATIONS MO ONENRONS CF 133115150, 1.&1 PCROES, RAIPS,N110L PRE 011101301110131015 AO EXACT UMW UTUTV LOCATIONS. ENTRAKE MAT THE LOCATION O A10/O0 ERLEVAATION 11511(5 ASAS SNOT 011 MOE PLANS IS emu) 011 RECORDS OF 113 VNTOUS UT1oIY commas AND. MERE POSSRE, 13ASMEMENTSS TAKEN IN 111E FELT. T15 NFOIUA1I01 0 NOT TO FE MO ON A3 woo EXACT OR SWUM 13 C041RACTOR MUST CULL 113 APP1OPMA1 UTUn 0011IANY AT LEAST 4e 110145 WORE ANY MANNIKIN TO 1OIR:ST EXACT FELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE TIE RE0P0NSl4TY OF THE C5I1RACTOT TO RELOCATE ALL 01515IO UNITES 33601 COMUCT MM IX moan RFROLEIE1TS SN0M4 01 MME PLANS, 113 LOCAT101S OF SMALL UTILITIES SNAIL SE OBTAINED BY 113 CONIRACTON, sr CALLING OWNER STARE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002. E. WITTY NOTICE 10 CONTRACTOR! N ACCORDANCE OM OE ER*LY ACCEP1E0 COISTRUCIION PRACTICES, T13 CONTRACTOR MI BE SOLELY MO COMPLEXLY REl1511BR1E FOR 00am0NS ON ME .NOS &1E. NCUIONC WITTY OF ALL PERSONS NO M10PER1Y OUEK' PERFOIWANCE OF TIE ALOE. 1115 ICOu RELENT MLL APPLY CON1N0005.Y MO NOT BE LMRO TO NORMAL 11044446 MOIRE. ME DUTY OF 111E WNW OR ME OEVEI.OPEN 10 CONDUCT COISM uCoCe REVEe OF LIE CONTRACTORS PEPFOh1AN5 0 ROT MERCER TO NOAAE KYEN OF 113 50001501 or 113 COI41RACTOCS wire semen IL al OR N EAR 113 5CNSTRU011011 91E. F. RE 00111RACT0R situ B[ RESPONSIBLE FOR MIO13N0 ARO TANTANNO TRAFFIC 000RCL OEVICE5 SUCH AS RARRIC 7ES. WARNING ROME, ONECIIONAL ROTS. F1.AGLEN AND 11015 TO 00•111101 111E I1OVEM04T or 1X4110 MERE NECESSARY, TRAFFIC 5 111RO. OEML3S &4ALL 001faRM TO APP5OPISAIE 11.01015 OEPMRTIENT OF TRANSPORTATION summon. 0. ALL D)E.5 1531110 DULL 5 COMPLETED BY AN ICEPETDENT IOU 01010045 ERCAYAIKIN FOR 111E PURPOSE Cr 1010110 WIDENS OR UNSUITABLE 10LS SHALL SE COPLEIED AS REWIRED BY MME MILS WORM 111E wen BALWi1 50NS1541011O1 STAY. COOLY 4111 MME 5EOUNe3E1115 OF ME 30LS ENGINEER 113 CONTGCTOR Rua EIE NESPONS4LE FOR COORONA110 ALL RETUNED SCRS TESTS 510 SCR NEPEC110115 M1 ME SOILS ENOIEE . A 501ECHNCAL ON01EE1r46 REPORT HAS BEEN COIPLE150 Bri MORRES& le PG 0* D 111 T11E OONTRACTO R !MALL OBTtrE YAQF TINS SCRS REPORT. ViStas 1 1 1 T 1 /III s i l l , l 1 1 / // 1 / 1 1 / 1 1 1 / I / 1 � 1 V.4 l 5 MH 4 111 --WS C.6' REDUCER NY - 517./ 0' 30' 60' SCALE IN FEET 90' DRIVE ••••.11••� N. N. ` \ 1 NORTH •� •■ GENERAL NOTES 1. 5.5011101 NOM SG* 110 I1E ME SY 111[ 1IAf OONINA0701. COME 110 1110110 AE BY TIE MEVL COMA1C100. 2. RMMEL, MCM*L 1101.1E. COWL. 00 MME FOIL ALL OWER *MS ME BY 111E NEVI COMWCI R 3. LOT ISM MIES. COMM 10 MOO PROMO 01 BY C0E01. OOMMICIC L POLES A10 L011140 1LOLPES 411VIS1EO ry M.O0100'5 MULLED N M MERE 004•01*1 • WES FOR IFIMPC101 ME h THE MEOW CONIMC OR 11004 BOLTS ME BY 111E WOOLS SUPPLIER 1 N1 05001 4*UR1 ME 01001 N SWIM= ONLY. CPR =Alms SHIRR SE 009110EO TO ALTOS TOR 11E MIT ICOM011011. NSOLIATON. S. 11E C0NMCNR !MIL 0001CSVOT *111 ALL WRY COMAVES 10 0011011E COLT PORE Of MAX C*B[0110N AT 1303110 MM. REFER TO AE MONO 0LEC111CI1. 11 MAIM Names FOR WSAY 105110E 0041100 LOOI11011, 101.7. MO CAMARA 1. ALL 0145.101* SWAN MEN 1F10EpE TO 111E 1009114,X 5110 MUST SEEMED N 11E 00041. CONIINC10N At GIOLSNMKAR. IL 1NSn MIA 10 cum 0EM11*6 1114. E r AIM ANSA 1„W. /. 11 I•01300E 1FAS •111 E NONA GIRDED TO r E30M TOP Cr ALL I NWS Af0 00•. APRON ORONO. 510 (4(003111451511450451,10405(704. 10. LOT UNTIED C0INCETE P001401 TO =WOW MN M 101.1 MOAT IEC01Mp514* 0 F*t 111s 1RI11CUAR STE 1 0 3 k2 PAV46 IPECIeCA710N (MX•11M r Tom mum= ASPIMLT moans) �01 a moon sac 115(1. E r 401041E ME f010ML 411 11 PAMO CONFORM TO YOM. =BON 311 CLASS S. IOW CN1145 OWN" NOCK r MRRINOIN 114 COME O01•01•0 TO MEOO11, EL71*1 1111. IMILINKAIS MOM AY ILT 2 O�R NMALFA1AN O*MENaMO'M A* i0 *4043EC10N 2341. ONE TI MM 1141 MEMO MOT. SECTION 3311. IMMO 0 RIME ammo OAY:N. MITI e 4 . 11 at N:N�11.• WOK B f1 °CI A •5M1�M1� OURS OMA1EI 10 Al MMRO MN 110E0 MOM. 04 .M/M•r *0 IMMNO RR AM. 1 •.IO • NIIVCMI faf .010, A MPS X•.11. • mars sem coma. 111 /104 551*5 , IOU NM. It 1K 11.a11 11.,11114, IVIMR 4.0•1. It 0OM& LOT 110040 1001*4 IOAMON TO 10044111411 E LOT WO ASETARKS 114 1000 MOT KIN RNUOE IA1P5 AO 22' Pa1E3. meow 6-00310S. MIL •LL7NCN 0/010001110 CMS I* UMW AS NOM MM. 11. 1I1110a • SP .fOA 1•13 117101 0111MIL • MCOO OWE WELD W E MAMA PARKING (FORM ATOM 63 36 SPACES I X le • 90 3 SPACES 44 X N • 90 • 24 SPIC[S I X IS • b • FACER X - • - • Ury111' VICE TATMON SIZE TYPE LOCATION SAMIMY MAUI MATER 170X1 EVER ELECTRIC •1s 1 SURVEY I10MMIpN PREPARED BR 0400 11000111E FRMK RODS Al000E4 NC. 11000 234 AENGE Kern M1110" NT. 55427 1eT 471 -.010 W54/ 12106 RTE AREA 1.86 ac LE0EN0 SERUM SEWER S---S- WATER ST SUM/ 1- --- E�EIECIUC -`- OAS --D LOT LXNT C^0 Lh30 COSTING ELEVATION (7E5- PROPOED 014511011 1 � PLAN SCALE: 1' ■ 30' STREET ACTRESS x)000000 XXXXXXXXXX)oo(x 000( CAT LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA 1 1 is STATUS 1 1 2 1 8 1 01.1E BT 00u1n ANOKA CONCEPT UTIUTY PLAN ISSUED AS -EMLT RE010NAL 010 ICE CORPORATE 010. 110, MIN -14 -98 I 022 -0342 7 RIMS AGENDA ITEM 4E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 1/25/99 TOPIC: Consideration of Joint Powers Agreement with Wayzata School District for Trooper Chairs (3/5 vote) BACKGROUND: As part of the city's procurement of office furniture for the Civic Complex, city employees tried a variety of oft chairs and selected a particular brand called an AI!steel Trooper. This office chair is available to the city through a contract that has already gone out to bid and was entered into with the manufacturer by the Wayzata School. District, The school district, as the initiating party in this contract, can allow other public entities to participate in the quote in exchange for a deeper discount. This joint powers agreement allows us to access their contract so that the city can purchase the chair at a very good price. It does not obligate the city to purchase the chairs, but it does guarantee that the city can purchase the chairs at the guaranteed discount for the life of the contract. OPTION 1. Approve the joint powers agreement with the Wayzata School District 2. Return to staff for further consideration =Mgt" Option 1 Wayzata School District#284 Joint Powers Agreement #05979901 ?urchasinelS' Serrices Dania Adatin Vices 210 North (c'untv Rd 101 PO Box 660 i4ir}_ata. j1h' 55391 -0660 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT This agreement is entered into as of this day of , 199 , between Independent School District #284 ( "Wayzata School District "), an independent school district under the laws of the State of Minnesota and (herein referred to as APPLICANT), (The name of applying entity) a under the laws of the State of Minnesota. (Specif); Type o(ntity: 1g: Courtly, School City. etc;) RECITALS The Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Minnesota Statutes 471.59, provides that two or more governmental units, by agreement entered into through action of their governing bodies, may jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties. Wayzata School District and each has the power to procure furniture, equipment, supplies and commodities, and the obligation in many is stances, to procure such items through competitive bid; and In order to achieve cost savings through volume purchases, Wayzata School District has agreed to make available its procurement process and contract for furniture, equipment, supplies and commodities for use by the above named Applicant pursuant to the procedures and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein; and The governing bodies of Wayzata School District and Applicant have each approved the terms and conditions of this agreement NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, Wayzata School District and Applicant agree as. follows: 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this agreement is to create cost saving in the purchase, installation or servicing of furniture, eauiprnent, supplies or commodities through volume purchases by using the Wayzata School District procurement process and contracts to purchase such items for all parties to this Agreement. The agreement shall not be used for any other purpose. 2. COMPETITIVE: BIDDING. Wayzata School District shall periodically issue or publish requests for proposals through a competitive bid process which complies with Minnesota Statutes 471.345. Wayzata School District shall make available to Applicant(s) information concerning the successfiu bids and Applicant(s) shall be entitled to issue purchase orders using Wayzata School District's procurement contracts. Simultaneously with issuing a purchase order through a Wayzata School District procurement contract, Applicant(s) shall deliver to Wayzata School District a copy of such purchase order if requested. 3. I )ABU TTY. Each party shall issue its own purchase orders in its own name to Corporate Express. Each party agrees to pay for its own purchase orders in a timely manner. Neither party shall be deemed an agent, partner, or joint venture' of the other party. Neither party shall have liability for the purchase order of the other party or any other party utilizing Wayzata School District procurement contracts. Each party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the other party harmless from claims for payment of the imdemmf ing part' purchase orders, including without limitation, any interest, penalties, late charges or attorneys fees accraing with respect to such purchase orders. 4. OUALITY OF PRODUCTS. When any party purchases furniture, equipment, supplies, commodities or ancillary services through a Wayzata purcha.se contract, such party shall exercise its own due diligence with respect to the rnanufart;uer, the vendor, the quality of the products, the quality of the installation and all other aspects of any purchase. Wayzata School District shall have no obligation to perkcnnt such due diligence on behalf of any other party nor shall Wayzata School District have any liability with respect to any aspect of a purchase by named Applicant, including without limitation, any liability for defective or negligently manutacttem ed ntcrhandise, defective or negligent installation, failure to deliver merchandise, or late delivery of merchandise. 5. REPORTS. On or before January 30th of each calendar year, Applicant shall verify with Wayzata School District the total dollar volume of merchandise ordered through Wayzata procurement contracts and provide Wayzata such information about such purchases as Wayzata should reasonably require. 6. ADMMI ISTRATION FF•E. Wayzata School District reserves the right to charge a vendor an administrative fee to compensate for the services rendered in administering the procurement contract. All such fees, if anti, 1hs+11 belong to Wayzata School District. 7. TERM. Either party may terminate this Joint Powers Agreement without cause of action ails governing body and written notice of such action to the other party. 8. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. This Agreetent shall not act to create a separate entity nor shall it create any agency, partnership or joint venture between the parties. Neither parry shall have the anthnrity to bind the other party in any contract except that a purchase order made by an Applicant pursuant to a Wayzata procurement contract shall bind Applicant pursuant to the teams of such contract. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE. This agreement shall take effect upon approval by the governing bodies of both parties. 10. AMENDiNTS. This agreement may only be amended by written agreement executed by both parties to this Agreement. WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT #284 District Administrative Offices 210 North County Road 101 Wayzata, MN 55391 -0660 BY: (Its School Board Chairperson) ("Joint PowersApplicroit .Nom :e) 13Y: (Address) (Its Superintendent) (City. State. Zip) BY: luthorrzed Signature. Title) AGENDA ITEM 4F STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Alice Divine DATE: 1/25/99 TOPIC: Consideration of Amendment to the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Contract (3/5 vote) BACKGRQUND: The city has entered into a grant agreement for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding for refinement of the master plan for the Town Center. The standard grant contract does not allow funding to be used for travel expenses. The Metropolitan Council has agreed to amend the Lino Lakes contract to allow travel expenses since the purpose of the funding is to use a California based Traditional Neighborhood Development planner, Calthorpe Associates, to complete the design of the Town Center. 1. Approve the amendment to the Livable Communities Demonstration Account contract 2. Return to staff for fur RECOMM NDATION: Option 1 consideration Grant No. SG-98-39 AMENDMENT TO METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by the Metropolitan Council ( "Council ") and the City of Lino Lakes ( "Grantee "). WHEREAS, in June 1998 the Council and the Grantee entered into a grant agreement identified as Council Grant No. SG -98 -39 under which the Council provided Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds to the Grantee to help fund a demonstration project within the City of Lino Lakes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 4.03 of Grant No. SG- 98 -39, the Council and the Grantee mutually agree to amend Grant No. SG -98 -39 to clarify that travel expenses directly and necessarily related to the performance of project activities identified in the Grantee's application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds are eligible uses of the grant funds. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants contained in this agreement, the Council and the Grantee agree to amend Grant No. SG -98 -39 as follows: Article II, GRANT FUNDS, Paragraph 2.02, Authorized Use of Grant Funds, is amended to read as follows: 2.02 Authorized Use of Grant Funds. The total grant amount made available to the Grantee under this agreement shall be used only for the purposes and activities described in the Grantee's application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds, as revised to reflect the grant award made by the Council. A copy of the Grantee's application which identifies eligible uses of the grant funds is attached to and incorporated into ,1_:_ ,., „.__-,— ^fry. -1. ,..r , A IT ft.n,- ,...:c;„, nf'fh�.�.n,- fnr. °�n..l:r. of this agreement shall take 'precedence over the provisions of the application. Grant funds must be used to fund. the initiatives specified in Minnesota Statutes section 473.25, paragraph (b), in a Participating Municipality. Grant funds must be used for costs directly associated with the specific proposed activities and are intended to be used for "hard costs" rather than "soft costs." • Tneli Bible uses include: administrative overhead; activities prior to the date of . • uir .guilt award; travel expenses not directly or. necessarily related to . the �)� . :t: (c:;s, permits. licenses or authorization lees; costs a���ciawu �tiitn preparing . other grunt proposals; operating expenses; comprehensive planning costs; and prorated lease and salary costs.. the .Council shall bear no responsibility for cost overruns which may be Page 1 of 2 Pages incurred by the Grantee or others in the implementation or performance of the project activities described in Attachment A. The Grantee agrees to remit to the Council in a prompt manner: any unspent grant funds; any grant funds which are not used for the authorized purposes specified in this paragraph; and any interest earnings described in paragraph 2.05 which are not used for the purposes of implementing the project activities described in Attachment A. The Grantee must complete all major components of the grant project as proposed and for which the Council made its grant award, or the Grantee must return to the Council the entire grant amount specified in paragraph 2.01 of this agreement. Except for this amendment, the provisions of Grant No. SG -98 -39 shall remain in force and effect without change. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantee and the Council have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. This agreement is effective on the date of final execution by the Council. Approved as to form: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By Associate General Counsel Craig R. Rapp, Director Community Development SG9839A.DOG Date CITY OF LINO LAKES By Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Date Brian Wessel Community Development Director Date Page 2 of 2 Pages Chief` of Po ce, David Pee �a ua 20, 199 AC GRO ©fficer Willi+ Koch has su fitted a letter the Lino Lakes Police Depa a ci ng his pursuit cif a the eanp3.oylatim t l re sting tb.e City C unc .i aaccept E fig er loch's reeignati and fish him well. in hie future encdeavare. We anticipac roeeae a+ eoo n ans pasaib to replace the r cr arst ► this resi �etion, . Accept resignation • Return to staff for further review. • Accept resig ttio