Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/22/1999 Council PacketAGENDA 5:00 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING NOTE TIME CHANGE A. ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS 6:00 P.M. EDA MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday March 22, 1999 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda Consideration of Minutes i. March 3, 1999, Council Work Session ii. March 8, 1999, Regular Council Meeting A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) March 22, 1999 - $436,073.15 (Check # 55532 - 55642) ii) March 22, 1999 - Centennial Fire District - $20,320.58 (Check #11962 - 12010 payroll) - $7,003.93 (Check #10001 - 10030 expenses) 2. Open Mike A. Mayor Sullivan's State of the City 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Consideration of Annual Board Appointments B) SECOND READING, Ordinance 03 -99 , Amending Cable Franchise to Extend Existing Franchise. C) Authorization for Attorney, George Hoff, to do additional work. D) Adopt Resolution No. 99 -16, Appointing Sgt. Kent Strege the City's Y2K Coordinator Page 1 AGENDA 4. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A. Consideration of Contract Hardware, 374 Apollo Drive, Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision B. Consideration of Clearwater Creek Phase III, Rezone from Rural and Rural Executive to PDO /Single Family and Preservation Development Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment (4/5 Vote Required) C. PUBLIC HEARING, First Reading, Ordinance 05 -99, Vacation of Roadway Easement, Clearwater Creek Phase III (4/5 Vote Required) D. Consideration of Behm's Century Farms 5th Addition, Revised Preliminary Plat E. PUBLIC HEARING, First Reading, Ordinance 06 -99, Vacation of Easements in Old Arborlake Plat (Replatted Otter Bay) (4/5 Vote Required) F. Consideration of Trapper's Crossing 2nd Addition, Final Plat G. Consideration of Resolution No. 99 -18, Accept Bids and Award Construction Contract, Apollo Drive Phase 3, John Powell H. Resolution No. 99 -19, Consideration of Joint Powers Agreement for Water Service with the City of Centerville, John Powell I. Resolution No. 99 -20, Consideration of Agreement with Williams Pipe Line Company for Behm's Century Farm 5th Addition, John Powell J. FIRST READING, Ordinance 04 -99, Exchange of Property with James and Tracy Douglas, John Powell K. Consideration of Resolution No. 99 -17, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contracts for Landscaping the Civic Complex, Mary Alice Divine L. Resolution No. 99 -21, In Support of Minnesota DNR Conservation Planning Grant, Marty Asleson M. JADT Amoco/McDonalds, Lake Drive at Apollo, Planned Development Overlay, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, Jeff Smyser. Added 19 March 1999 5. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner Page 2 AGENDA A. Consideration of Resolution No. 99 -15, Accepting Donation from Circle - Lex Lions for a Party Wagon. 6. Old Business 7. New Business A. Consideration of Minutes, February 17, 1999, Special Council Meeting (Bergeson and Neal were Absent) B. Consideration of Minutes, February 17, 1999, Council Work Session (Bergeson and Neal were Absent) C. Consideration of Minutes, June 24, 1996 (Sullivan and Dahl were not Members of the Council) 8. Community Calendar, March 23, 1999 through April 12, 1999: A) March 23, 1999, 6:00 p.m., Town Center Group Meeting B) March 31, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Focus Group Meeting C) April 1, 1999, 7:00 a.m., EDAC D) April 1, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting E) April 5, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Park Board Meeting F) April 5, 1999, 7:00 p.m., Mayor's Round Table G) April 8, 1999, 7:00 p.m., Joint City Council and Charter Commission Mtg. H) April 12, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Regular Council Meeting I) April 19, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday, Annual Board Review J) April 24, 1999, Earth Day - City Auction 9. Adjourn Mar. 15, 1999, 1:00 p.m. Page 3 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY MARCH 22, 1999 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of Minutes of Monday, December 21, 1998 3. Consideration of Annual Appointments A. EDA officers: President, Vice - President, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer, Executive Director and Secretary B. Official Newspaper C. Official Depositories 4. Consideration of Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Contract Hardware (McLad, LLP) in the Apollo Business Center 5. Adjourn l rPce� EXPENDITURES MARCH 22, 1999 • Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:59:56 Operator: JAL Ranges: Options: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor 8: (A) Invoice 8: (A) Schedule Journal #: (A) Bank 8: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dept Amount HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE * * * * * * ** KIEGER ENTERPRISES, IN GRAPPLE /FRONT -END LOADER * * * * * * ** LAND TITLE ASSESSMENT OVERPAYMENT * * * * * * ** METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT FEB SAC /MARCH SEWER MN. TEAMSTERS PAYROLL WITHHOLDING PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE Total for Dept ** * * * * * * ** * * * ** * ** * * * * * * ** O NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING MAYOR /CO 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC MARCH 8 MAYOR /CO O TOM THUMB, INC. POP /JUICE COUNCIL GOAL S MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 O A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE 02 -25 -99 ADMINIST O BARD AND BARD, LTD. HEARING /TEAMSTERS ADMINIST O C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS LABELS ADMINIST O D.C.A. INC. FLEXIBLE SPENDING ADMINI ADMINIST O EXPRESS MESSENGER, INC DELIVERY SERVICE ADMINIST O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINIST O NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING ADMINIST O OFFICEMAX, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINIST O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE ADMINIST O SAM'S CLUB, INC. SUPPLIES ADMINIST O SPRINGSTED, INC. ADVISORY SERVICES /SEPT T ADMINIST 0 ST. PAUL STAMP WORKS, SPLIT RINGS ADMINIST O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS ADMINIST Total for Dept 402 0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI REVIEW CHARTER ARTICLE 8 CHARTER Total for Dept 405 O A T & T O LADEN'S BUSINESS MARHI O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE O SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR MONTHLY SERVICE 02 -25 -99 REMOUNT SIGNATURE PLATE LIFE INSURANCE 2 COMPAQ /CARRY CASE /2 HP LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE 1,522.12 208,924.05 25.36 31,185.00 549.20 201.75 242,407.48* 347.66 200.25 9.53 557.44* 4.53 300.00 20.24 210.60 67.54 1,502.74 1,738.36 112.11 20.25 98.15 870.40 38.17 100.08 5,083.17* 300.00 300.00* 63.94 35.00 7.00 1,971.42 28.09 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:59:57 Operator: JAL Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept 407 O WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A LEGAL SERVICE Total for Dept 414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A T & T BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, L DIVINE, MARY HEALTH PARTNERS NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE MONTHLY SERVICE 02 -25 -99 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES GRAN BALLOON CONTRACT SEPT -MA HEALTH INSURANCE CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING LIFE INSURANCE UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 415 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI SELECTED AREA -OTTER BAY CORSON, KIRK DUNN, DONALD JOHNSON, WILLIAM C. NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE ROBINSON, AL SCHAPS, JAMES SCHILLING, TODD TREHUS, MIKE UNITED WISCONSIN QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND PLANNING SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY QUARTERLY QUARTERLY INSUR LONG TERM STIPEND STIPEND STIPEND DISABILITY Total for Dept 416 2,105.45* LEGAL CO 9,307.80 9,307.80* ECONOMIC 30.45 ECONOMIC 3,160.50 ECONOMIC 420.00 ECONOMIC 207.62 ECONOMIC 347.66 ECONOMIC 7.00 ECONOMIC 27.44 4,200.67* PLANNING 28.00 PLANNING 50.00 PLANNING 150.00 PLANNING 150.00 PLANNING 417.25 PLANNING 7.00 PLANNING 50.00 PLANNING 75.00 PLANNING 100.00 PLANNING 150.00 INS PLANNING 22.39 1,199.64* O A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE 02 -25 -99 O NORTHWEST ASST CONSULT PLANNING SERVICE O NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE O T.K.D.A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 417 O A T & T O AIR TOUCH CELLULAR O CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE O CONNEXUS ENERGY O CORPORATE EXPRESS O CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. O DARE AMERICA MERCHANDI O GALL'S INC. O HEALTH PARTNERS 0 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, 0 JOHNSON, KEVIN 0 LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN O METROPOLITAN 911 BOARD O MIDWEST RADAR & EQUIPM O MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MONTHLY SERVICE /780 -0605 MONTHLY SERVICE /02 -20 -99 37 CAR WASHES MONTHLY SERVICE /JAN 21 - STATEMENT /OFFICE SUPPLIE POLICE UNIFORMS SUPPLIES /STEVE POLICE CHART CASES DUTYBELT HEALTH INSURANCE POLICE COPIER MAINTENANCE /24000 POLICE REIMBURSE MICROCASSETTE/ POLICE 1000 20# WHITE FOLDED REGISTRATION /S MORTENSON RECERT RADAR MONTHLY SERVICE /MARCH ENGINEER 2.31 ENGINEER 348.80 ENGINEER 347.66 ENGINEER 1.75 ENGINEER 6,528.70 ENGINEER 3.74 7,232.96* POLICE 58.64 POLICE 429.00 POLICE 157.62 POLICE 10.65 215.32 467.84 POLICE 26.06 POLICE 436.90 2,522.86 160.88 58.55 POLICE 126.26 POLICE 378.00 POLICE 315.00 POLICE 142.57 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:59:57 Operator: JAL Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Description Dept Amount MN. TEAMSTERS NORTHERN STATES POWER, NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE SAM'S CLUB, INC. PAYROLL WITHHOLDING MONTHLY SERVICE CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING MONTHLY SERVICE MARCH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE LIFE INSURANCE SUPPLIES POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE SHRED -IT, INC. DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MAT POLICE THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, IN BOOTS /BINOCULAR /KNIFE -D POLICE UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS POLICE US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 780 -0605 POLICE WAGNER, STEVE REIMBURSE POLICE Total for Dept 420 O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE FIRE O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE FIRE O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FIRE Total for Dept 421 O A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE 02 -25 -99 O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE O LIGHTNING PRINTING, IN CORRECTION NOTICES O MEDICINE CHEST PHARMAC LIGHT METER O NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE O SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS /1 O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 422 O A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE 02 -25 -99 O AMERICAN FASTENERS OF WASHERS /NUTS /CAPS /DRILL O ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPA CALCIUM CHLORIDE PELLETS O CATCO PARTS, INC. FITTING, HOSE O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE /JAN 21 - O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE O MENARDS, INC. REPLACEMENT BLADE #9 O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY O NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE 0 SERCO LABORATORIES, IN RIGHT -TO -KNOW TRAINING O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS O VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS BATTERIES /EAR PLUGS /ASPI Total for Dept 430 BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS O AMERICAN FASTENERS OF PLUGS /NUTS /CAPS FLEET O BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. SHOP SUPPLIES /SMALL TOOL FLEET O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE SUPPLIES FLEET O H & L MESABI, INC. PARTS FOR SKID -STEER SNO FLEET 78.00 203.84 347.66 70.70 525.00 70.00 116.37 54.95 350.00 518.06 230.19 469.36 506.58 9,046.86* 472.56 3.50 13.74 489.80* 2.28 350.00 60.33 212.95 347.66 8.75 804.33 27.63 1,813.93* 4.37 63.11 551.67 154.96 301.59 49.51 597.62 7.28 7.78 2,739.66 14.00 300.00 50.21 130.14 4,971.90* .56 1,211.30 35.77 124.95 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:59:57 Operator: JAL Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description O KING EQUIPMENT, INC. REPAIR SNOW PLOW O LEEF BROTHER, INC. ORANGE SHOP TOWELS O MENARDS, INC. GALV NIPP /ELBO /PVC PIP O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE 0 RUFFRIDGE - JOHNSON, INC FILTER O SERCO LABORATORIES, IN RIGHT -TO -KNOW TRAINING O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS 0 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA KNIFE -CUTT /KNIFE Total for Dept 431 O A T & T O ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE O GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN O IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, 0 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA O SCHUSTER, DALE O US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MONTHLY SERVICE 02 -25 -99 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT /C MONTHLY SERVICE /JAN 21 SUPPLIES SPRING WATER COPIER MAINTENANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /MARCH BOILER MAINTENANCE MARCH Total for Dept 432 AMERICAN FASTENERS OF AUTO- MEDICS, INC. DEGARDNER, RICK FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE HEALTH PARTNERS MENARDS, INC. MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA MRPA NORTHERN STATES POWER, PLUNKETT'S, INC. PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE SAM'S CLUB, INC. PLUGS /NUTS /CAPS TOW /PARK VEHICLE FROM DI MILEAGE SUPPLIES HEALTH INSURANCE SCREWS /PAINT MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY MONTHLY SERVICE /MARCH NATURAL RESOURCES WORKSH MONTHLY SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE /MAT LIFE INSURANCE SUPPLIES SERCO LABORATORIES, IN RIGHT -TO -KNOW TRAINING UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MARCH /653 -0966 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS BATTERIES /EAR PLUGS /ASPI Total for Dept 450 O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY O NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSO RENEWAL /B BERNSTEIN 0 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 451 O HUELMAN, PAT O LANE, SHARON 0 LINDY, GEORGE QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND Dept FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET Amount GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME GOVERNME PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI RECREATI PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA 533.80 7.58 10.03 3.50 120.79 60.00 9.59 331.84 2,449.71* -52.90 129.18 1,217.65 44.88 112.79 390.10 760.12 240.00 690.11 3,531.93* 1.84 53.25 76.38 .73 1,560.00 145.89 7.78 127.17 45.00 150.81 28.22 24.50 11.84 240.00 64.86 167.19 130.13 2,835.59* 535.34 7.78 20.00 3.50 15.57 582.19* 150.00 150.00 225.00 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:59:58 Operator: JAL Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O MONTAIN, PAUL O REINERT, JEFF O SCHMIDT, JOE O TASCHUK, PAM O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND QUARTERLY STIPEND SEC MARCH1 Total for Dept 452 FEDEX HEALTH PARTNERS MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, IN DELIVERY TO ROBOTICS HEALTH INSURANCE MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING LIFE INSURANCE OFFICE SPACE RENTAL /MARC UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 461 PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA PARK BOA ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM ENVIRONM HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE FORESTRY PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE LIFE INSURANCE FORESTRY UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS FORESTRY Total for Dept 463 FRAHM, SUSAN REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC Total for Dept ** KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKET CAKE /BALLOONS /CIDAR Total for Dept 207 * * * * * * ** YOUTH IN UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR LONG TERM DISABILITY INS OTHER Total for Dept 499 SPRINGSTED, INC. DISCLOSURE REPORTING OTHER Total for Dept 499 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGI 2 COMPAQ /CARRY CASE /2 HP ADMINIST Total for Dept 402 METRO SALES INCORPORAT RICOH COPIER Total for Dept 420 T.K.D.A. LILAC STREET Total for Dept 499 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN SERVICES RENDERED Total for Dept 505 POLICE OTHER FOGARTY EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, ASSEMBLE /DRAFT /REVIEW /MA OTHER Total for Dept 499 VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Total for Dept 499 OTHER 150.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 126.00 1,101.00* 10.45 175.00 3.89 347.66 1.75 200.00 7.19 745.94* 175.00 1.75 7.19 183.94* 27.00 27.00* 74.33 74.33* 4.49 4.49* 400.00 400.00* 4,570.88 4,570.88* 14,936.94 14,936.94* 12,630.45 12,630.45* 197.35 197.35* 810.00 810.00* 1,195.60 1,195.60* Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:59:58 Operator: JAL Check # Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JU LAND PURCHASE Total for Dept 499 OTHER 0 CABLEOPTICS, INC. INSTALLATION /VOICE,DATA, OTHER O SOUND SYSTEMS, INC. INSTALLATION /CAMERA /MULT OTHER Total for Dept 499 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A LEGAL SERVICE OTHER Total for Dept 499 0 AMUNDSON, HENRY D AND PERPETUAL EASEMENT OTHER O EVERGREEN LAND SERVICE LAND ACQUISITION /LAKE DR OTHER O KRYSINSKI, THERESA AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OTHER O SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK APOLLO DRIVE OTHER Total for Dept 499 O CITYWIDE GLASS O CONNEXUS ENERGY O FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE O GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, 0 HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN O HEALTH PARTNERS O INFRATECH, INC. O MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PA O NORTHERN STATES POWER, 0 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE O SERCO LABORATORIES, IN 0 SY /COM, INC. 0 T.K.D.A. O UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR O US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TEMPERED GLASS /WELL HOUS WATER MONTHLY SERVICE /JAN 21 - WATER SUPPLIES WATER 139 CALLS WATER CONTAINER DEMURRAGE WATER HEALTH INSURANCE WATER BLUE /GREEN MARKING PAINT WATER MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY WATER MONTHLY SERVICE /MARCH WATER MONTHLY SERVICE WATER CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING WATER LIFE INSURANCE WATER BACTERIA TESTING /2 -10 -99 WATER PRINTER FOR MASTER SCADA WATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE WATER LONG TERM DISABILITY INS WATER MARCH /426 -1902 WATER Total O CONNEXUS ENERGY O GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, O METRO COUNCIL WASTEWAT 0 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. O NORTHERN STATES POWER, O NYSTROM PUBLISHING COM O PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE 0 UNITED WISCONSIN INSUR for Dept 494 MONTHLY SERVICE /JAN 21 139 CALLS FEB SAC /MARCH SEWER MONTHLY SERVICE /FEBRUARY MONTHLY SERVICE CITY NEWSLETTER /SPRING LIFE INSURANCE LONG TERM DISABILITY INS Total for Dept 495 - SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER SEWER O ANOKA COUNTY O ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI 0 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICK 0 STRUB, BEN & JODY O T.K.D.A. FILING FEE PARCEL SEARCH ENGINEERING SERVICES REIMBURSE BUILDING ESCRO BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 4TH 2,317.58 2,317.58* 22,896.01 9,066.65 31,962.66* 4,567.00 4,567.00* 4,768.00 363.53 2,000.00 5,701.90 12,833.43* 110.41 627.01 50.07 52.50 20.00 207.62 193.11 3.89 150.85 527.22 173.83 5.25 183.00 3,054.98 900.79 15.95 58.79 6,335.27* 114.98 52.50 31,023.42 45.94 446.65 173.83 5.25 15.31 31,877.88* 88.50 53.00 804.76 500.00 1,984.47 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:59:58 Operator: JAL Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept 0 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & A LEGAL SERVICE Total for Dept ** 0 LANG BUILDERS, INC. ASSESSMENTS Total for Dept ** Grand Total * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** Amount 384.00 3,814.73* 7,370.16 7,370.16* 436,073.15* Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:57:57 CITY OF LINO LAKES Operator: JAL Page: 1 FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (A) Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (R) 03221999 - 03221999 Bank #: (A) Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000042 AMUNDSON, HENRY D AND PATRICIA D. 1 4,768.00 4,768.00 .00 .00 000052 A T & T 2 113.62 113.62 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 129.18 129.18 .00 .00 0001859 CITYWIDE GLASS 1 110.41 110.41 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOTA, IN 2 65.51 65.51 .00 .00 0003250 JOHNSON, KEVIN 1 58.55 58.55 .00 .00 000420 ANOKA COUNTY 1 88.50 88.50 .00 .00 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 2 81.00 81.00 .00 .00 000487 ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. 1 551.67 551.67 .00 .00 000521 CABLEOPTICS, INC. 1 22,896.01 22,896.01 .00 .00 000540 AUTO - MEDICS, INC. 1 53.25 53.25 .00 .00 000570 BARD AND BARD, LTD. 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 000810 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 1 3,160.50 3,160.50 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 1,211.30 1,211.30 .00 .00 000930 WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 1 14,258.80 14,258.80 .00 .00 000946 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 1 20.24 20.24 .00 .00 001000 CATCO PARTS, INC. 1 154.96 154.96 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER 1 157.62 157.62 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,271.88 2,271.88 .00 .00 001209 CORSON, KIRK 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 001255 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 1 467.84 467.84 .00 .00 001260 D.C.A. INC. 1 210.60 210.60 .00 .00 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:57:58 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001293 DARE AMERICA MERCHANDISE, INC. 1 26.06 26.06 .00 .00 001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 76.38 76.38 .00 .00 001338 DUNN, DONALD 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001432 ST. PAUL STAMP WORKS, INC. 1 38.17 38.17 .00 .00 001435 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES, INC. 2 363.53 363.53 .00 .00 001450 EXPRESS MESSENGER, INC. 1 67.54 67.54 .00 .00 001456 FEDEX 1 10.45 10.45 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 001557 FRAHM, SUSAN 1 27.00 27.00 .00 .00 001560 FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 1 180.96 180.96 .00 .00 001584 FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 1 2,317.58 2,317.58 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 2 436.90 436.90 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 1 112.79 112.79 .00 .00 001680 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 1 105.00 105.00 .00 .00 001768 H & L MESABI, INC. 1 124.95 124.95 .00 .00 001825 HEALTH PARTNERS 1 9,828.48 9,828.48 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 197.35 197.35 .00 .00 001875 HUELMAN, PAT 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001971 INFRATECH, INC. SUITE 100 1 193.11 193.11 .00 .00 001980 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. 2 550.98 550.98 .00 .00 002102 JOHNSON, WILLIAM C. 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 002142 KIEGER ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 208,924.05 208,924.05 .00 .00 002145 KING EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 533.80 533.80 .00 .00 002153 KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 1 74.33 74.33 .00 .00 002175 KRYSINSKI, THERESA AND WILLIAM 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 .00 .00 002226 LADEN'S BUSINESS MACHINES, INC. 1 35.00 35.00 .00 .00 002230 DIVINE, MARY 1 420.00 420.00 .00 .00 Date: 03/17/1999 Time 07:57:59 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 002243 LANE, SHARON 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 002245 LANG BUILDERS, INC. 1 7,370.16 7,370.16 .00 .00 002280 LAND TITLE 1 25.36 25.36 .00 .00 002310 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 300.00 300.00 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 7.58 7.58 .00 .00 002340 LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 2 186.59 186.59 .00 .00 002355 LINDY, GEORGE 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 002541 MEDICINE CHEST PHARMACY & CAMERA 1 212.95 212.95 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 4 163.20 163.20 .00 .00 002570 METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1 62,208.42 62,208.42 .00 .00 002584 METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1 14,936.94 14,936.94 .00 .00 002650 MIDWEST RADAR & EQUIPMENT, INC. 1 315.00 315.00 .00 .00 002694 MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 1 77.06 77.06 .00 .00 002700 MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 1 1,180.71 1,180.71 .00 .00 002980 MN. TEAMSTERS 1 627.20 627.20 .00 .00 003011 MONTAIN, PAUL 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 1 45.00 45.00 .00 .00 003120 NATIONAL REC /PARK ASSOCIATION 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 2 4,068.18 4,068.18 .00 .00 003285 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 810.00 810.00 .00 .00 003320 NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 1 766.05 766.05 .00 .00 003370 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 1 4,171.98 4,171.98 .00 .00 003390 OFFICEMAX, INC. 1 112.11 112.11 .00 .00 003457 PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, INC. 1 70.70 70.70 .00 .00 003478 PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF 1 525.00 525.00 .00 .00 003540 PLUNKETT'S, INC. 1 28.22 28.22 .00 .00 003625 PRUDENTIAL HEALTHCARE GROUP 1 386.50 386.50 .00 .00 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:58:02 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003753 REINERT, JEFF 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 003805 ROBINSON, AL 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 003860 RUFFRIDGE - JOHNSON, INC. 1 120.79 120.79 .00 .00 003880 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 5 6,506.66 6,506.66 .00 .00 003882 SHRED -IT, INC. 1 54.95 54.95 .00 .00 003910 SAM'S CLUB, INC. 1 226.36 226.36 .00 .00 003915 SCHAPS, JAMES 1 75.00 75.00 .00 .00 003929 SCHILLING, TODD 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 003935 SCHMIDT, JOE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 003977 SERCO LABORATORIES, INC. 2 783.00 783.00 .00 .00 004030 SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1 6,542.30 6,542.30 .00 .00 004065 SOUND SYSTEMS, INC. 1 9,066.65 9,066.65 .00 .00 004100 SPRINGSTED, INC. 2 1,270.40 1,270.40 .00 .00 004241 STRUB, BEN & JODY 1 500.00 500.00 .00 .00 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 804.33 804.33 .00 .00 004320 SY /COM, INC. 2 3,054.98 3,054.98 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 9 22,044.41 22,044.41 .00 .00 004367 TASCHUK, PAM 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 004416 THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES 1 350.00 350.00 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 326.25 326.25 .00 .00 004450 TOM THUMB, INC. 1 9.53 9.53 .00 .00 004481 TREHUS, MIKE 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 004511 TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, INC. 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 004590 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED, INC. 1 518.06 518.06 .00 .00 004603 UNITED WISCONSIN INSURANCE COMPANY 1 643.66 643.66 .00 .00 004667 VERMEER OF MINNESOTA 1 331.84 331.84 .00 .00 004670 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 6 1,385.45 1,385.45 .00 .00 Date: 03/17/1999 Time: 07:58:04 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 5 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004671 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR 1 429.00 429.00 .00 .00 004687 VADNAIS LAKE AREA WATER 1 1,195.60 1,195.60 .00 .00 004730 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 1 260.27 260.27 .00 .00 004749 WAGNER, STEVE 1 506.58 506.58 .00 .00 004972 METROPOLITAN 911 BOARD 1 378.00 378.00 .00 .00 007109 SCHUSTER, DALE 1 240.00 240.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS 1 215.32 215.32 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 144 436,073.15 436,073.15 .00 .00* AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ME MBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 3 March 1999 SUBJECT Annual Board Appointments VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND The city council relies on the advise and recommendations of advisory boards and committees to make informed decision that affect our community. The council has three advisory boards and one committee. The Planning and Zoning Board is the city's planning agency, and review all land use matters. Recommendations as to compliance with zoning ordinances, the comprehensive plan and related regulations are forwarded to the city council for fmal consideration. The Park and Recreation Board makes recommendations regarding long term park, trail and recreational activities and facilities. The recently created Environmental Board recommends ways to preserve and protect the communities' sensitive environment. The Economic Development Committee advises the council on matters of a commercial and industrial nature. OPTIONS Applicants for positions on the boards and committee are as follows: (incumbents are designated with i) Planning and Zoning Board (2) three-year terms and (1) one-year term Al Robinson (i) Don Dunn (i)- -- / y e,f Rob Rafferty Pat Rickaby William Kusterman 1. (Three -Year Term) 2. (Three -Year Term) 3. (One -Year Term) Page -2- Green Sheet Park and Recreation Board - (3) three-year terms are required George Lindy (i) Paul Montain (i) Joe Boyle Chris Wesland Jeremy Wesland 1. 2. 3. Environmental Board - (2) three year -terms are required J. P. Houchins (i) Eugene Lane (i) Qaisar Abbas Scott Lanyon 1. 2. Economic Development Committee - (3) three-year terms are required Fred Chase (i) Don Gorowsky (i) Brian Wessel (i) Howard Juni 1. 2. 3. RECOMMENDATION Council Prerogative AGENDA ITEM 3B STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 2 March 1999 SUBJECT Extension of Existing Cable Franchise VOTE REQUIRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND A reduction in staff at the North Metro Telecommunications Commission has slowed down the cable franchise renewal process. The North Metro Telecommunication Commission has requested member cities extend the existing franchise agreement with Media One to 1 October 1999. This will give staff the time needed to evaluate the cable company's proposal for renewal. OPTIONS 1. Extend the life of the cable franchise agreement six months, to 1 October 1999. 2. Deny the extension RECOMMENDATION Council Member its adoption: introduced the following Ordinance and moved CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 03-99 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CABLE FRANCHISE ORDINANCE NO. 83- 08, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 4, FRANCHISE TERM The City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 83 -08, Article 2, Section 4, Franchise Term, is hereby amended to read: Section 4.04 Franchise Term This Franchise shall commence upon the effective date of the regular certificate of confirmation issued by Board and shall expire on October 1, 1999 unless terminated sooner as hereinafter provided. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be effective upon passage and official publication. PASSED by the City Council this 3rd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM 3C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Linda Waite Smith DATE: 3/15/99 for. 3/22/99 TOPIC: Consider Authorizing Additional Attorney Costs for Insurance Claim VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: In January 1999, the City Council authorized Attorney George Hoff to represent the City in negotiations with Great American Insurance Company. The negotiations are not completed but the attorney fees have reached the previously authorized amount of $1,000. Mr. Hoff estimates that the next phase of activity will cost a minimum of $750 and may reach a maximum of $4,000, depending on the amount and type of work involved. OPTIONS: 1. Authorize Attorney George Hoff to continue negotiations with Great American Insurance Company on behalf of the City for a fee not to exceed $4,000. 2. Authorize Attorney George Hoff to continue negotiations with Great American Insurance Company on behalf of the City for a fee less than $4,000. 3. Decline to authorize Attorney George Hoff to continue negotiations with Great American Insurance Company on behalf of the City. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1: Authorize Attorney George Hoff to continue negotiations with Great American Insurance Company on behalf of the City for a fee not to exceed $4,000. AGENDA ITEM 3D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Linda Waite Smith DATE: March 15, 1999 for March 22, 1999 TOPIC: Consider Adoption of Resolution No 99 -16 Appointing Y2K Coordinator for City of Lino Lakes VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 BACKGROUND: The City's umbrella insurance coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities does not include coverage for problems resulting from the so- called Y2K bug in computer systems. Limited coverage is available and expanded coverage may later be available if the City engages in a comprehensive, documented planning effort to identify possible problems, make corrections where possible and develop contingency plans to deal with unforeseen problems. City staff has been working for several months on just such a comprehensive plan, including documentation of efforts. To qualify for additional insurance coverage through LMCIT, the City needs to formally appoint a Y2K Coordinator and forward a copy of the resolution to LMCIT. The attached resolution names Police Sergeant Kent Stregge the Y2K Coordinator for the City. Sgt. Stregge has attended training on Y2K planning and has been the lead staff person in charge of the Police Department's Y2K activities. As Y2K Coordinator for the City, he will coordinate the ongoing efforts of all City departments and ensure that documentation meets LMCIT requirements. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution 99 -16 appointing Police Sergeant Kent Stregge the Y2K Coordinator for the City of Lino Lakes and direct staff to forward a copy of the resolution to LMCIT. 2. Modify Resolution 99-16 to appoint another City employee as the City's Y2K coordinator and direct staff to forward a copy of the resolution to LMCIT. 3. Do not adopt a resolution appointing a Y2K Coordinator for the City. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Resolution 99 -16 appointing Police Sergeant Kent Stregge the Y2K Coordinator for the City of Lino Lakes and direct staff to forward a copy of the resolution to LMCIT. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 -16 RESOLUTION APPOINTING Y2K COORDINATOR WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes recognizes that the Year 2000 problem involves more than just a computer issue; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that all of its departments and services may be impacted by the Year 2000 problem; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a policy establishing the Year 2000 problem as a top priority for all city operations; and WHEREAS, the City in this policy sets forth its commitment to identify, address and resolve potential problems created by Year 2000 issues and to make its best effort to ensure continuity of essential city services; and WHEREAS, the City's efforts to minimize the potential impact for the Year 2000 problem will likely involve multiple city operations and outside organizations; and WHEREAS, the City believes that coordination of all persons working on the Year 2000 problem on behalf of the City is essential to the efficiency and effectiveness of the City's overall Year 2000 effort; and WHEREAS, the City pledges to create contingency and community preparedness plans to reduce the possible effects of computer and operational system failures throughout the community; and WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Cities has requested that cities designate a contact person to receive information on the Year 2000 problem; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes hereby appoints Sgt. Kent Strege to serve as the City's Year 2000 Project Coordinator. Adopted by the City of Lino Lakes City Council this 27th day of November, 1995. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed. AGENDA ITEM NO "y Kay Wyland eh 22, 1999 COUNCIL AC BACICGRO 1 Contract Ham is r construction of an `18,01 Apollo Business Center. "The p? commercial on the City's Land U seven years and currently has a n t warehousing in White B+ Town; location will bri`8r ` fcil 14 and anticipate a in MINOR SUBDIVISION: feet of frontage slang Apol of 100' with a lot ooi the site. and minor subdivision to allow the use/manufacturing facility in the Light Industrial, and indicated as s been in operation for Minnetonka, Park. This proposed �e an employee base of lot is approximately 2 acres in size with 239 requires a minimum frontage will be a shed driveway on the west side of 1. Utility and drainage 30' drainage and utility additional utili ty rnent a utility. 2. The applicant shall sign a development agreement. SITE PLAN RE IEW: the City Engineer including a ropertyline and an ty line as necessary for the trunk gay agreement as a part of the seam foot building including 4,120 sq. ft. of x,680 sq. ft. of warehousing space. There are rdinanc;e provides that following: Office - 3 spaces plus 1/200 sq. ft. = 23 spaces Warehousing - 1/2,000 sq. ft. = 5 spaces Manufacturing - 1/2,000 sq. ft. = 2 spaces TOTAL = 30 spaces required Staff would suggest the applicant add one parking space to meet the requirements of the ordinance. Handicapped parking shall also be provided according to ADA requirements. The exterior of the building is planned as precast concrete panels - random rib with a colored sheet metal fascia and efis finish at the entrance. A landscaping plan has been submitted and will be subject to the review and approval of the City Forester. Native plantings have been suggested by the Environmental Board for a portion of the site near the ponding area. The CPTED Officer has reviewed the plans and has suggested that the applicant may want to install lighting on the freeway side of the building to allow squads to view that area in passing. He also reviewed the landscaping plans and requested that plantings not inhibit surveillance of the service and garage door area on the north side of the building. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and provided comment on the attached memo. Utilities are available to serve the site and a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District is pending. Final plans will be subject to the review and approval of the Engineer. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the Minor Subdivision and Site Plan Review with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. 2. A development agreement shall be signed which includes a shared driveway agreement. 3. Park Dedication shall be collected based on the size of the proposed structure and in accord with the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. One additional parking space shall be provided to meet parking requirements. Handicapped parking shall be in accord with the ADA Rules and Regulations. 5. Drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer with proper easements shown on the site survey document. 6. Trash handling shall be indicated on the plans and properly screened from adjoining properties and public roadways. 7. The parking area shall be paved with a bituminous material and concrete curb and gutter provided around its perimeter and the access drive. 8. Roof top heating and ventilating units shall blend with the exterior of the building. 9. Final building, lighting and landscaping plans shall be subject to the reviewed and approval of City Staff including the building inspector, CPTED Officer and City Forester. 10. A signage plan shall be submitted to City Staff for their review and approval prior to issuance of any sign permits. 11. Permits shall be obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to any site work. OPTIONS: 1. Approve site plan review and minor subdivision with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 ..1 It • Pa., , sn^ raaa e iriPiM, aort a 11 . :, _„ - -- _ arm InniellW I iiiiimumo 111 IND 111011111111111111 111 ° mimagimmitl fir* °gyp oo � ` .g �� PARK RpR7M III milFAAKIIIMIMI 0 117111110 WIN ou „;-zwinnesit 1.21 —..... ;. �v ukm.t.ta. I��lgyC�© � aOVg=No'o II 1.11,0. BEIM n ,coal mo n - - -- -- ME 111 MEN 101 %IP MI MEM II S 0000 0 ail Will/ /I gm gm VIM Iii, s a s= e A]UIiiiiii M GEORGE A r • E. e.o ue opvdt ,vy DDwriE.•'14 i�4 o ©' ryEn to r Jro [nur+,• ° v. iuu GirC VD wilco © Tall0Gi1rC9 KIM .i]rioyy 611.7:t• a© ;�ai0000:ro:c orlon 0pl"' OEM MaiFoonorigLam ©� ir.� yrrrrr�rr(,m WO!'.J�4�C•r•GCr'r.. Ng IlloMmetIPZ, •lCE LAKE 4,41 Ova RESHANAU LAKE w• % • \ \ • \ • • • • / • ! • • r • ` ^ ~ \\ \\ lea `� • '- \1 • • \ \ \ • „ • • • • • • • • ` ' • • • ;‘ • • \ .\ • -a`\ • • • • • • • • • • \\ • • V� \\ • \\ \ • • !!.. N \ \V • • • • P • • • • • - •- • / /////1988-\ 1 . • / , \ // /ire — \ \ \ \\ \g, \ 1\ • y / / /// / \ \ \ \; ////,rte /� -� —� \ \ \` \\^ • • /r / /air/ is 1 \ +� \\ y \ • /V/ /8/88888/ ; 1 `@2 • \yq,• \•• • ir • • \ \�s` \ \\ \ • • ! /�iiii� /// �ox— 4 t J` \\\:\\\;\•‘,11 \ // A O ' bD d As � e � = A 74%, \_ _ \i 77SQ� =3t • •• \ \ 411 a 4; 44 J :f.' .......................11:2==...., "."-. N I t ......„ ! —r— 1 i : • • . . :. i --r- :.! . ...is. .... . . . . . : i . ',.0 i I . • 1 , 1 ,P. AP -,,,■,,-r,ri....,n t i rt,;srs,c":0,:.•'.7,- i r mgr., tsti, P.A.X.-N16 f"-J, fv.,r,cf.., "7' Vit.:, ,rt••••' -r- t Tv_ I! t..e,i4,74' r:12,1a-Jetieele.10 -v fe,fe: 7 I"' 35,er . • P.Ffwg-qt4e8 v. lerthay. rpeSe',. 01 • l'—ii-i/Japro;-- .10454 A.) 0/0042PC 400, f44, t4V`.• pitaseut. af.e7.4 2 r.-;‘.0-.44,1 o* (7.• 1.1.61,Vit - VE."4 {Ft r-4.1-tw; r1LaP1,4/4 41,-7 et,C. ,41; 0 Cowen.one.,:15 3 ',Ito., 7 I; ( ).6WT i.a..avo,rtoN v le. r-c_. -4,"• . • tACairlep . -(A-...eeinsirmegm -Cioaf.i, 0 1:*01-'4%,T / 4 AVSST E K.! :1Mti .4•4110: 4 boit.li.:94"0.,r.- ree-V•,,A51,60 5,1T.wel.4.• ... ''-i 1'04 '4",vv Fa:1,3 .' 1- --1- ,— -.- 0 41i I - .6 .-- - - • -• - - - - • -- -1 . „ ,I ' 1 . • — .s`.sc.le7„n ° e-,Z._e. 1r:i 1-.. we„_..w-a6- s6•-e --s4e ‘- s 4 7• - r <. 0.s5 .-. ./ 4 .4X4 , -41 2, i '1 ---i.. -- J 1 ...g ' . : I .• .... \ . 4,04 1 ,..„6..4:i 1 f ':t o 4T %- " I i r i • • 1; t 4 11 i__ , ,.. . . 1 ! I 1 I I ! . T Wee. Oct Wert,0),. Int% or,4441104,16. uefgArr ; 4: !' -r- erozie,rs. 4)*Ote,01 K,V4 cwt. P•leeliv -Mgr ejetritt.4- oct.:4 ,0164-0s. at342.- staX1001 :OP; 101 tit . 4.‘s” tAPK- rlograke, wo. 4 - ,.••••!FAI IAA n60 (7E: $ )• •-• rekb4...418 LTA. oro. L,ta Aco) • o." ..m.ruo+,44, Cad 74 ter, ofte 1. AND.`,EAP: PLANTWC _SC:KU...1LP.: .Clw ceAtiOnt CrrimoN Mc site ii.,,,,T -We VitliaPr D r 3 DOV4LA.5 FIA- _ 12,425asAjltaz ell4r 'NIS soavcE • ftaii 4tAkktortoliW- BC f.c, GiossY niacit aviteberty .• 18 coo' i,oeQr 5R 1p tiardy ..silt,13 koar ., 18 comr IXL LANDSCAPE P LA ItIraJG NOTE SI <loos co .se cookthi. shot zo 44 i..4. saw 4..L co at. 4S4-0002. wow 49 inus Or %ill Iscadforl 2, qcilf 44.1 sot titAil sein korm-44 oc au'.( Ow... e le. a ktUACS- VOW 46),,,O. 3. hot 1. 01 ItAvkik.t ii•ea AM 130:eR4 NHL. ODNiNS ONDS INN, hattwei shilkoa 0,,,e-.4 g sevW 4*- k i. This ifiiiiAt Ott b449.4o be i• G ciiv‘..ce ot +e surratob..tie* intioiew.‘ b&L.S. 4. aff°341414. eletUNI d(ONOND DA 4fillt f*DaDtk tiNti.. aart Pr.,;(;4. 4a,ss Amer). acce4:1 to ertts.A Sr . 30 0 30 60 SCALE FEET RECEIVED FEB 1 2 1999 CITY OF LINO LAKES ol • KALWAY CONSTRUCTION LINO LAKES, MN CITY SUBMITTAL (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) • 1 RERUN Ontroy ma.nes- rim snarranott OR AVOW I/14 . PREMIER Sy ' ME OR IOW VC Do= gro.....VOR AND 1101 .1 AM A OW IRVISIERED PROFERICOOL OOHED' MOM RIC IARS O RIC • DAWN 1M oqe th/7 ' . • . op.r...mor tto, . LAN Or '14 a'. affit.a. • ITCL ... ,, - - - ',ill; :•., : ,;F. r,' - :, ,. ..r e H., ..,,“,, ::::,p '+- I. s tiA1,,.-.) .1 re, . A41.; . e fri - --7'111'41"7'11,---11— -7 - r747. -,--tX•- :-.1.-........1,. —44=7 — :=4:-.)::: .1-1777- i . • - - •.tal,./.-1.11- Kr,,,••• c4-,••:. I jr„ OP■..* .0., r•cr..4- . i P ; .ic: -rior• Jvikl:P.D . -.3-1"".4. ; ';-.'• il .ilsSi 6 F'Fil■7:" i •.:"...i..!./. I. i • 7:PPP, 0 .1-SisArt4c#1:, g.°-4-,T.A.IF ILE'W-4•114i6j'L 4 eriettig i •4'.• Ofef-1 i Ch 4'. a" I 11 4io ...•fr f "swot. ALL Dow- ,ex 0.9 t-tam«, son. OF FALL f445., Tt V Sat41.4qC • 41 T.141.f.44, -PV-V-TS. • CIALA0-1;.‘ tl- Ardita-1: 47,0,04.ett4 crr AG," - ?%04.1"102 i'VVV:44.; A neve 0:400... AV /5444A,5 14.4.A.Ogrr .m4 u,,,Ate. 49 pr. •••1•1440.0,,. mouttIVIGI UV IttIPPK$ wow. 320 4150i0 p•ICAL! HOLM '41-4ID II' Vs' ofsmoS 0400r-s 4,004 -r ;% 1004 r it0 %IOW 0140. Own. At 4,0E . W s 4s.os,:r OIF 061.0* S' JAM& atom 4611* t■ft,kX Al 0t-tow,,b4c, .0ari maw% le sox .4%1%4 . . rtitt, 4104- •e 4-•1401,..4* 4 p s r n Atte Ivx&-ii • 1110.41- • 0•10006 RAMO w4.•,4 • TV F-1400. OF- t•••00F• • 1 1•1‘.(K # 11•1-Pti 5., REY. L. ___F_.—..----- (--- i • • - - Nirt i I m01,1 t ..•,c/S: '' ., . t# 1 $) 1 • 1 1 I . :166.1' : - Di t I P.040:7 MCit. *ramie- V12- !•'.'" 14" '.A4VG4.••• A.9_674 - • - 10.4 's-al'- 4 ran 0 0 I ! P1411 4 - ., '0 ; ' 1 • 1 r.got. bdr.iotwv ! 0 1 '0 I a ! / I 1,{4.7P, 44v.1-0 t.1> '44.h/'I • 1 . 1 i 4 --- --e-- - • +6 ' - AGENDA ITEM 4 B STAFF ORIGINATO MEETING DATE: TOPIC: Jeff Smyser arch 22, 1999 Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Rezone from Rural and Rural Executive to PDO PDO Preliminary Development Plan/Preliminary Plat CITY COUNC BACKGROUND. This project has been discussed extensively by various citizen boards and staff. The original application for =wing and preliminary plat was in July 1998. The applicant agreed to re- evaluate the site design in light of preservation development principles being presented as part of the City's environmental inventory. The applicant participated in a redesign meeting and came back with a new design. This was then discussed by staff, consultants, and at numerous City boards. The current application represents the product of those discussions. 4/5 vote - Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4/5 vote - Rezone from R and R X to PDO 3l2 vote - PDO Preliminary Development Plan The application is for a Comprehensive Plan amendment including MUSA amendment, rezoning from Rural and Rural -X to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) for single family residential use, and approval of the preliminary development plan for the PDO. The site includes 162.7 acres. The existing Comprehensive Plan guides most of the site for single family residential. However, the southeast 40 acres is guided Rural and is not in the current MUSA. The Plan amendment application is to change this 40 acres to residential and expand the MUSA to cover the 40 acres. The draft 1998 Plan guides this entire site for low density, sewered single family residential. The site currently is zoned R Rural except for the southeast 40 acres, which is zoned R -X Rural Executive. The rezoning application is to rezone the entire 162.7 acres to PDO Planned Development Overlay for single family residential. The rezoning is necessary before the property can be platted for more than ten acre lots. Thus, the rezoning is necessary before the preliminary development plan can be approved. Comprehensive Plan (existing) AMENDED PAGE 2 Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 Comprehensive Plan (draft) site north east west south SF Resid. and Rural SF Resid. City of Hugo Rural Rural Low Density Sewered Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. City of Hugo Low Density Sewered Resid. Low Density Unsewered Resid. This report is based on the following submittals: Preliminary Plat Preliminary Utility Plan 2/22/99 Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan 2/22/99 revised 2/22/99, original 12/21/98 Zoning R and R -X R -1 andR City of Hugo R R A PDO requires a preliminary development plan and a final development plan. The preliminary plat is included as part of the PDO preliminary development plan. The plan proposes 243 single family lots. Project data is listed below: total area 162.7 acres 100% greenways uplands wetlands 26.5 acres 34.1 acres 60.6 acres 37 % park dedication open parkland trail corridor 5.5 acres 2.9 acres 8.4 acres 5% total open space 69.0 acres 42% lots and roads 93.7 acres 58% total lots 243 gross density 1.49 lots /acre net density 2.59 lots /acre (area in lots and roads only) Comprehensive Plan (existing) Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 2 Comprehensive Plan (draft) Zoning site north east west south SF Resid. and Rural SF Resid. City of Hugo Rural Rural Low Density Sewered Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. City of Hugo Low Density Sewered Resid. Low Density Unsewered Resid. This report is based on the following submittals: Preliminary Plat Preliminary Utility Plan 2/22/99 Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan 2/22/99 revised 2/22/99, original 12/21/98 R and R-X R -1 and R City of Hugo R R A PDO requires a preliminary development plan and a final development plan. The preliminary plat is included as part of the PDO preliminary development plan. The plan proposes 243 single family lots. Project data is listed below: total area 162.7 acres 100% greenways uplands wetlands 27.1 acres 34.6 acres 61.7 acres 38 % park dedication open parkland trail corridor 5.5 acres 2.9 acres 8.4 acres 5% total open space 70.1 acres 43% lots and roads 92.6 acres 57% total lots 243 gross density 1.49 lots /acre net density 2.62 lots /acre (uplands only) Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 3 ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Amendment The existing Comprehensive Plan, last amended in 1990, guides most of the site for single family residential, but the southeast 40 acres is guided rural. If this 40 acres is to be included in this development, the Plan needs to be amended. The proposal is consistent with the existing Plan on the other 120+ acres of the site. The 120+ acres are in the existing MUSA. The southeast 40 acres are not. New MUSA allocation would be approximately 25 acres: only the area to be developed with residential lots and roads. The exact amount will be determined at the time of final platting for this area. The draft 1998 Plan guides the entire site for low density, sewered residential. The proposal is consistent with this land use. If the draft 1998 Plan is approved by the Metropolitan Council and adopted by the City, there will be no need for this amendment. Much research and public participation went into the preparation of the land use policies and recommendations in the draft 1998 Plan. The result was a recommendation to guide this site and land around it for low density residential. It is a logical extension of existing utilities, it stages growth out to the next contiguous area, and the road access is adequate to serve the area. If the project is staged so that development on the southeast 40 acres does not occur until last, the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would become moot if the 1998 draft is adopted. Staff recommends approval of the land use and MUSA amendment of the existing Plan to reflect the intention of the draft 1998 Plan for this area. If the draft Plan is not adopted, this would mean that the 1990 Plan is amended to guide the entire site for single family residential and include the site in the MUSA. The MUSA allocation would become effective at the time of final plat approval (final development plan for the PDO). Staff is recommending approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment including the MUSA amendment. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 4 Rezoning to Planned Development Overlay The standards in a Planned Development Overlay zone are to a great degree created by the development plan. In this development, lot sizes are reduced from R -1 minimums to provide for more open space preservation. As stated in the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment and its recommendations shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the draft 1998 Comprehensive Plan. Only the southeast 40 acres is not consistent with the existing 1990 Plan. If the Plan is amended as recommended above, this inconsistency is eliminated. It is a logical extension of existing utilities, it stages growth out to the next contiguous area, and the road access is adequate to serve the area. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Because of the large amounts of open space to be preserved in this development, it will be compatible with many different potential land uses in the area. This includes the existing residential development to the north, potential residential development of different densities, and large lot rural use. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The preliminary development plan is reviewed below. The development plan will establish many of the standards for the development. Other standards will be addressed. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 5 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Capacity exists to serve the site with sewer and water. Public facility planning included projected needs of development in this area. The majority of the site is within the MUSA. A MUSA amendment will be necessary for the southeast 40 acres. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The roads in the area can handle the traffic generated by the proposed development. Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning to PDO based on the above findings. Preliminary Development Plan The application includes the preliminary development plan. A final development plan will be submitted in the future and will be reviewed by the P & Z Board and the City Council. Density: The total site is 162.7 acres with 34.6 acres of wetland, which leaves 128 acres of upland. Average density in the City has been two lots per acre. This would yield 256 lots. The proposal includes 243 single family lots. Gross density is 1.49 lots/acre. Net density, counting only the uplands, is 2.62 lots per acre. Lots and Blocks: The development takes advantage of the flexibility provided by a planned development. The typical lot and block sizes are altered to allow for the open space preservation. The typical standard limits block length to 1500 feet, and the City may require a pedestrian way through a block over 900 feet. There is one long unbroken length (Block 14) that reaches approximately 1600 feet without a. However, the topography and the wetland behind the lots makes it more advantageous to route the trail to the east of the wetland. Suggestions from the Environmental Board and Park Board include realigning short segments of trail. This would put the trail between Lots 2 & 3 Block 1 and between Lots 2 & 3 Block 5. This would allow a better connection with other trail segments. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 6 Open Space, Greenways, Parks and Trails The plan includes approximately 70 acres of open space, which is about 43% of the gross acreage. The open space includes 61.7 acres in greenways as well as 8.4 acres of parkland. The 8.4 acres of parkland consist of a 5.5 -acre central park area and 2.9 acres of trails. This is about 1.6 miles of trails. The trails allow the public access to the large open space areas and contribute greatly to promoting the greenway corridor concept. The 5.5 -acre park and all the trail corridors (15 feet wide) will be dedicated to the City as parkland. The majority of the open space lands should be owned by a homeowners' association A tree plan for the streets will be required. There are some forested areas on the site, though most of the site is not wooded. The optimal situation may be to avoid disturbing the trees. However, that would leave severely restrict development because a significant proportion is in wetlands (21 % of the site). A tree plan will be required which will be worked out between the developer and City staff City staff also will discuss with the developer ways to restore previously impacted wetlands and means to encourage better soil and seeding methods. The area notated "greenway E" was created after discussion with staff on open space. The resulting buffer around the wetland isn't large enough to provide an enforceable buffer. Staff appreciates the developer's cooperation. However, we recommend eliminating this as open space and simply using a typical drainage easement over the wetland. The wetland will then be within platted lots with an easement over it. A buffer detail for the strip of land between Otter Lake Rd. and Lot 4 Block 12 should be provided. Open Space Protection: We are applying aspects of the City's Preservation Development program to this project. However, the Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. project was well underway before we had established the Preservation Development program. The goal for the Preservation Development program is to have a permanent conservation easements over the open space held by a third party. The Minnesota Land Trust is an entity created specifically to hold conservation easements and we are working with them to design the program. We have heard from the Land Trust about this project. The open spaces as designed do not meet their criteria for permanent easements. The primary issue is that there is little if Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 7 any land that could be developed without the easements and so there is nothing for a conservation easement to conserve. In addition, the open spaces, while significant, are not connected enough. Also, enforcement would be almost impossible with the extensive number of lots bordering the open spaces with no clear demarcation of the boundaries. These are some of the main points we will have to keep in mind on future projects. We expect to have more information for the meeting to help with this discussion. This does not mean the development is a less desirable place to live or that it will be unsuccessful in preserving open space. On the contrary, the access to the open spaces and trail system make it a very desirable location. The open space to be preserved is an important amenity and goes a long way toward meeting the open space conservation goals. A homeowners' association is still the best option to own the open space areas. The City will own the trail corridors and the central park. We should require deed restrictions to prevent dumping, cutting and mowing, and other disturbances in the open spaces. The residents themselves will be responsible for protecting their common open space. A management plan also needs to be prepared to address diseased trees and other issues. Park Dedication: The 8.4 acres will be dedicated as parkland. The Park Board voted to recommend accepting this. The Park Board added concern for how the trails will be paved. The 8.4 acres comprises about 7% of the upland areas (128 acres). The typical park dedication requirement is 10 %, which would be 12.8 acres. However, the large areas of open space should be taken into consideration: not as park dedication, but as the provision of open space. Staff recommends that the developer could pave the trails. Along with the 8.4 acres of dedicated land, this woul fulfill the park dedication requirement. The developer has agreed to this arrangement. The 5.5 -acre park in the center of the site will need to be planned by the Park Board and parks staff to determine the best uses for it. It could serve as an active, programmed park. It also could serve as a "village green," which would be an open, grassy area available for picnics, informal sports activities, and other non - programmed use. Stormwater Management Staff will be working with the developer on implementing preservation development principles regarding strormwater management. This would include infiltration and otherwise keeping runoff on the site as much as possible. The intent is to utilize natural Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 8 drainage methods rather than concrete and pipe. This reduces impervious surface and saves money. The City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District will work with the developer to achieve this where possible. Roads and Traffic The plan provides numerous connections with other properties. Extensions of Clearwater Creek Drive and LaCasse Court connect to the established residential area to the north. An east/west road provides a connection between Otter Lake Rd (Co. Rd. 84) and 24th Ave. (Elmcrest Ave.). A loop road provides the main circulation route within the development. The extended Clearwater Creek Drive provides additional internal circulation. The preservation development discussions have included reducing road widths. Less pavement would further reduce impervious surface and save money. However, methods of maintaining roadways must be included in design standards. City staff will investigate maintenance options for different road designs. At this time, it may not be wise to vary from the established road design, with 60 -foot rights of way. The developer will need approvals from Anoka County for the new road access to Otter Lake Drive. The developer also will need to ascertain if the County is planning on additional ROW on Otter Lake Rd (CR 81). In addition, there is an existing road easement that will need to be vacated. Conditions of Approval: PDO Preliminary Development Plan With the following conditions, staff is recommending approval of the preliminary development plan. 1. Eliminate Greenway E as open space and use a typical drainage easement over the wetland. The wetland will then be within platted lots with an easement over it. 2. A buffer detail for the strip of land between Otter Lake Rd. and Lot 4 Block 12 should be provided. 3. The developer will pave the trails and with the 8.4 acres, the park dedication requirement would be fulfilled. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 9 4. Developer will move trail alignments near Lots 1 & 2 Block 1 and Lots 1 & 2 Block 5 if possible to allow a better connection with other trail segments. Exact trail alignments throughout the development will be established with Parks staff. 5. The developer will need approvals from Anoka County for the new road access to Otter Lake Drive. The developer also will need to meet any County requirement for additional ROW on Otter Lake Rd (CR 81). 6. A tree preservation plan and street tree landscaping plan must be submitted for review by the City Environmental Specialist. Noise abatement to address freeway noise should be considered in this plan. 7. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 8. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 9. The City Engineer's comments in his memo of March 4, 1999 must be addressed to his satisfaction. 10. Drainage and utility easements to be held by the City shall cover all wetlands and drainage ways subject to approval of the City Engineer. This includes lot line easements as required by the City Subdivision Regulations. 11. A development agreement will be required. 12. In addition to normal City requirements, the development agreement will require that a homeowners' association be created. Association by -laws shall be subject to review by the City. The homeowners' association will own the open space areas. Deed restrictions must be included to address protection of the common open space areas. A management plan for the open space must also be prepared. 13. The minimum house sizes in the R -1 zone shall apply in this PDO. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ACTION At its March 10 meeting, the P & Z Board considered the applications and held a public hearing on the Plan amendment and rezoning. The P & Z voted to recommend approval. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 10 Vice -chair Johnson voted against approval because he believes this development should include a variety of housing to help meet the life -cycle housing needs of the community. Mr. Trehus opposed the Plan amendment because of the need for MUSA, and opposed the development plan because he wants more open space and tree preservation. The vote was as follows: Comprehensive Plan amendment including MUSA 3 - 2 approve Rezone to PDO from R and R -X 4 - 1 approve PDO development plan, with conditions 3 - 2 approve OPTIONS 1. Approval of the land use and MUSA amendment of the existing Comprehensive Plan for the southeast 40 acres of the site. The MUSA allocation would become effective only at the time of final plat approval. If the new Comprehensive Plan is adopted, this amendment will be rendered unnecessary. 2. Approval of the rezoning to Planned Development Overlay for single family residential use based on the findings in this report. 3. Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for the PDO with the conditions listed in this report. 4. Denial of land use and MUSA amendments to the existing Comprehensive Plan. 5. Denial of rezoning to PDO. Without the rezoning, the development plan cannot be approved. 6. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION Options 1, 2, 3, minescs 011111141 mon intiO 7 tra- Mir A' TA 0.1 wittsukw VP._/,.sotr jx. 0 2 Miles dustrial ablic /Semi Public 1 Growth Area 1998 -2010 2 Growth Area 2010 -2020 � ,,, 5 =� : � q: '>,..,,: <.. k,:..,. fix: ��:�fi f.� . , . �. Lino Lakes Public Services Department 7204 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 780 -1885 Fax (651) 784 -7227 March 8, 1999 TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Rick DeGardner, ,Public Services Director SUBJECT: Clearwater Creek 3`d Addition Preliminary Plat At the March 1, 1999 Park Board meeting, the Park Board approved the preliminary plat for the Clearwater Creek 3`d Addition. The primary concern was regarding the development costs for the proposed 1.6 miles in trails as well as the maintenance of the open space and greenway corridors. This needs to be kept in mind when negotiating with the developer. Another concem was the time line for the park area to be available for development. Mr. Larry Olson indicated that the proposed 5.5 acre park will probably be done in the first phase. Pat Huelman stated the trail on the western edge to the existing trail jogs across the street. He would prefer the trail be lined up for safety reasons. I will forward you the Park Board minute with more detailed information in a few weeks. RD:sw sw /rick/Clearwater Creek 3n° Addition Preliminary Plat — Wyland Memo Memorandum DATE: March 4, 1999 TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition I have reviewed the Preliminary Grading and Preliminary Utility Plans dated February 22, 1999 which have been prepared for the proposed subdivision by Midwest Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers, Inc. My preliminary comments are as follows: 1. A permit must be obtained from Anoka County for the connection to Otter Lake Road (County Road No. 84). 2. The standard street section shows LaCasse Drive, Clearwater Creek Drive, and Street B as being 32 feet wide from gutter to gutter. This should be revised to show them as being 32 feet wide from back to back of curb. It also appears the developer is requesting flexibility, for the width of the roadway on the remaining streets. The developer has not provided a reason for this change and it is not apparent from the plan whether this is to reduce drainage or to minimize the grading impact on adjacent lands. 3. All cul-de -sacs must be constructed according to City standard. 4. Hydraulic and hydrologic computations must be submitted for review. 5. Rice Creek Watershed District permits must be obtained prior to grading. 6. If the project is to be implemented in phases, this should be shown. I will provide additional comments as more details become available. If you have any questions, please let me know. 1189 Main Street • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 Phone/1-00. 651 -464 -5562 • Fax: 651 - 464 -4568 03'/10/99 14:56 FAX 651 236 3074 HB FULLER Lj002 TO: City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board CC: City of Lino Lakes City Council FR: Jacqueline and Joe Jarosz 5299 Grand Avenue White Bear Township, MN 55110 RE: Rezoning of Clearwater Creek Phase III Date: March 10, 1999 This memo is in response to the proposed rezoning of phase III of the Clearwater Creek Development. As near - future residents of this development, we have perused the tentative plans and are greatly concerned on many fronts. When considering build sites for a new home (most frequently the largest investment a family makes) many aspects are considered. In our particular case, a major factor in the decision making process was the future return on investment the development offers. It is not uncommon for the first few homeowners of any new development to assume a. somewhat higher amount of risk due mostly to the uncertainty of future homes built in the area. However, upon researching many developments it has been our experience that as a development grows and as each new phase is added, the lot prices and minimum builds of future homes are held to higher standards. Current homeowners can feel relatively secure that their investment will continue to appreciate and future home sites will be comparable in size and market value. Your proposed plans indicate that the opposite may be true for Clearwater Creek. Our concerns are as follows: • The number of proposed home sites is very large. Currently, there are safety concerns with both over pass bridges located at Co. Rd. J and at County 14. An additional 220+ homes multiplied by an average of 2 cars per home will undoubtedly create heightened logistic and safety issues. • The proposed lot sizes and minimum builds will not be raised to higher standards, in contrast, these levels may decrease. What message does this convey to existing and potential homeowners in the Lino Lakes area? I would like to have the confidence that the City of Lino Lakes will uphold their obligation to current residents and the future of the Clearwater Creek development. A devaluation of the next phase from rural executive may not only 03/10/99 14:57 FAX 651 236 3074 HB FULLER weaken the investment potential of existing home owners but may also adversely effect the existing culture that so many neighbors have diligently worked at achieving. • Aside from the proposed park area there appears to be no attempt, from an environmental perspective, to maintain and accent the landscape of the existing land. In contrast, the proposed lay out appears to completely destroy the existing prairie characteristics. As a rural executive build site, this area could be designed such that any future development will not only enhance the current landscape but also strengthen the entire development. We speak on behalf of NUMEROUS residents of the Clearwater Creek Development when we say that we are feverishly against the rezoning of Phase III of Clearwater Creek. A vote to keep this land zoned as rural executive will be a "win win' situation for all parties including current residents, future residents and the City of Lino Lakes. Thank you for your time and interest. Respectfully submitted, Ij 003 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CLEARWATER CREEK 3RD ADDITION VA; Owl Sol ./ YE 14 .I VOA .r tiIM Mal 1/4 So. ta. rat. 1 ]t. AO.Y Conk /C.w..M. ION Name. M. E1Y MCI IIL 55.5: (SII) 225- MOM' Sand Snow. & C G1 CMY•• tic 6w Soldk Oft S3433 (Slt) AM -.111 155.75 A.w. SOUL 1-1 t "MU Av...4 IY a.■ ewe., Ia -21-11 /gra 0.11.1•.• /01/01M 02/{(7X0 /06 Al =Mr Mg OW mar • ROM AIR SI t IMP= VATITITASTE.1:21""""" PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOM 0.11001,110“ WANKS sm. it mon m mat MEDD DOOM 000101 MILT KU MOTO COMO WOW. -0--- Warn MIMI* WM. SAO 0010103 0001001 MORS 20•0011 RAN 17.1,111. MOM MAP .0007 MANION IP! MI 001010 NO MA NB OF 04:000. NOM MO WI OW sTrain7e.7.: own mow. eumat 171 Se NM. NOM NY WORM f OVUM M1001 70 0■10:1•017 TYPICAL LOT DETAIL MORS 009001 MINN 131.0011 • WON •••• • 4.111....1•11MINO r•illallinaUS • • 11•11.111 • : marsr•-• 1 nor., yerlity VW 00001.01. •01.•0 by me by my Onsi 00.0.10. anyi UM I VA • Aft my.. 'raked DO.. ton. 00 Web 10. el MM... MIDWEST - «MK! DIMS NWT 1011 KNOW! 1Me11M WONSAN _0 KNOWS (1STM0 LMMAT 10211 WOWS 01111M TKt SCUM MUM 1 IOOT OKTO40 1MIlS1 Au NUMB M1.SA K TO MMT 01 11M1 IN¢1 1IAMOL01. 1.1' W W. COY! OM WIN. 10. HORIZONS• SERSRATISH SEMEN LAMM 1C'KM A11M MAMA MMYK AT MN SM. K M0TA41! AMMO All. VON 1110* 1WMKM111 40LTCC M MESS TAMO WM. A[ UNTW Mgr O LL [YATION MA WV Om Nem Laod Surveyors & Clv11 • AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 C STAB ORIG ' Its Mary Kay Wyland DATE: l+vlarch ;22,1999 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Ordinance No. 05 -99 V att r g Public Right -o - ay, Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition COUNCIL ACTI QN: 4/5 Vote Several years ago p y owns rented a roadway ea several parcels of property between Otte r Lie Rawl and Elz time this property has b+ sold to mace way for the d lol 3rd Addition. In order to p rd Add exy sh€�vn on t QPIIONS: 1. Approve Fi 'fig ,of finance No. '05-99 V g R aad Right of Way recorded on 3vcument Nu. 717509 2. Return to sta or further c idera *on ;1 Vi L.. via Con O© 5.,,,, B7C I ZEN ::: aQ1ryvar c�,� OOH tA© ,, © a eat G :0960 Eifik i© EM NV Rat R'►O .AII■I,1 ° °Aaiun C� �rEi� maxi sommilmariggcomiclimartrrwmm WitaFiTAIMkraireirfirrviisquom eammigtearriffiEzelleestaw F3:fLete& LAKE 1'11 Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 05-99 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A ROADWAY EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 717509 AND RECORDED WITH ANOKA COUNTY(plat drawing attached) The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I That it is in the best interest of the City and the property owner to vacate the previously recorded roadway easement to make way for the platting of Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition. II That the legal description of said roadway easement is described as follows: (insert) III That the City held a Public Hearing before the City Council on March 22, 1999 after due published and posted notice had been given on March 2nd, 1999 and March 9th, 1999 and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard. IV This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 22nd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: The following voted against same: STAFF GA DATE: TOPIC: AGENDA ITEM NO. I- A D: I ay Wyl March 22, 1999 13ehm's t:ry Revised Pr COUNCIL ACTION: Simple Ma. BACKGROUND. ►d Fauns 5tbr Addition, urinary Plat and Variance(s) Mr. Gary Uhde has requested of at revised preli Farm 5th Addition. He has been w with both th and the US Corps of Engineers to revise the original w of the development. The revised prelim a the realignment of the cul-de-sac to the north and the a provided for the modification of the trail and open space plan through this area to preserve more of the ecological re urces wirthin the project and provide a better connection to future development to the north, for the Behm's Century k Watershed District eation on this portion work and has allowed lots. It has also The Council granted approval to the original preliminary plat for phases 4, 5, & 6 on July 28, 1997. The Final Plat for Phase 4 was approved by the Council on June 8,1998. One lot remains unsold in the 4th Addition. The project to extend trunk utilities to serve the 5th addition has been ordered and utility installation should begin by April 1. The project site is Zoned R-1 and indicated as single family on the existing and proposed land use maps. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved by the City and the Metropolitan Council in 1997 that allowed the City to use Interim. Reserve on the Behm's Century Farm Development it was outside tl a MUSA area. The Interim of development at the time of final plat approval as is the Hasa wins other subdivisions requiring MUSA from the Reserve Bank. MUSA Reserve has The subject si7 the minimum 20,725 sq. ft. ldition meet or exceed e average lot area being The original revised plan called for three variances. After discussion at the P & Z meeting, the City Engineer suggested that the trail shown behind lots 1 and 2 be located on a required drainage easement which is actually a pipe to carry drainage under the roadway. This allows the lots to meet the minimum depth requirement since the easement is within the lot lines and eliminates would eliminate the need for the variances while still allowing the trail link connection. The applicant agreed to the change as did the P & Z members. The remaining variances to be considered are: - A variance for lot width at the building setback line for Lot 7, Block 4. This lot is deficient in width at the 30' building setback line. However, a structure can not be built at the setback line due to an existing pipeline easement, it must be setback 100 -120' at which point the lot exceeds the 80' width requirement. The purpose of the lot width requirement is to insure that a structure can be built and still meet the setback requirement. - A variance for cul -de -sac length granted with the original preliminary plat approval. The subdivision ordinance requires a maximum cul -de -sac length of 500', the proposed roadway is approximately 780'. Findings of Fact. In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the City shall make a fmding of fact: 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 5. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Board agreed with staff that all five criteria can be met in relation to the variance requests for Lot 7, Block 4 and the cul -de -sac length and recommended approval. The Environmental Board and the Park Board have both reviewed this revised plat and are supportive of the proposed revisions. The ponding area and adjacent outlot are proposed to be dedicated to the City for open space and the trail will connect from the 2nd addition through the 5th to the park area and also northerly to the 6th addition and future Molitor expansion area. Overall a total of 10.178 gross acres will be available for park/open space /greenway. It is the applicants intention to dedicate this land to the City. On Tuesday, March 2nd, Mr. Uhde held a neighborhood meeting. At that meeting, several issues were raise that included the planting of boulevard trees, completion of the pond area, final grading, removal of existing dirt and brush piles and other related concerns. A letter from the residents and a response from Mr. Uhde with a timetable as to his estimated completion dates for removal of the dirt and brush piles and the boulevard tree plantings are attached for information purposes. Staff, at the direction of the P & Z, met with Mr. Uhde and his engineer to discuss completion of the grading and pond work. There will be a letter sent to residents surrounding the pond detailing what can and cannot be done on the edge of the wetland in regard to plantings and earth work. This letter will be prepared in conjunction with staff and the Rice Creek Watershed District. In addition, the Developer will meet with the residents in mid April to make certain all concerns have been addressed. Dirt piles and debris will be removed by mid June and a construction access on the north side of the pond will be discontinued and regraded. Staff will visit the site in June to insure completion of these items. Staff recommended approval of the revised preliminary plat and the P & Z concurred on a 5 -0 vote with the conditions outlined below. Included in the approval is the variance for Lot 7, Block 4 and the cul -de -sac length. 1. Permits are obtained from the Rice Creek Watershed District , the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Anoka County for access to Sunset Road. 2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are approved by the City Engineer. 3. Drainage and utility easements are provided along all lot lines and placed over designated wetland & drainage areas subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. The plat is redrawn to eliminate the need for the lot depth variance on Lots land 2 and an easement for trail purposes is provided over the drainage and utility easements on these lots that connect to the trail segment provided on the plat. 5. A variance is granted for lot width on Lot 7, Block 4 and the cul -de -sac length for Palomino Lane 6. A detailed landscape plan and tree preservation plan is submitted which addresses screening at the periphery of the plat and reduces the visual impact of the subdivision from adjacent properties outside the plat. 7. The developer shall provide a disclosure statement for all properties abutting trails. 8. The developer shall remove all brush and dirt piles surrounding the pond as detailed in his letter to residents of Behm's 2nd Addition dated 3/4/99. An additional neighborhood meeting will be held in late April to insure resolution of neighborhood concerns. OPTIONS: 1. Approve revised preliminary plat with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. 3. Deny amended preliminary plat request. RECOMMENDATION: Options 1, 2, and 3 Memorandum DATE: March 4, 1999 TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Behm's Century Farm 5th Addi I have reviewed the Preliminary Grading Plan dated February 17, 1999; and the Preliminary Utility Plan dated February 15, 1999; which have been prepared for the proposed subdivision. These documents were prepared by J C Johnson Consultants, Inc. and address changes in the wetland delineation on this site. My comments are as follows: 1. The site grading on earlier additions of this project has not yet been completed. As a condition of approval, the developer should submit a specific schedule for the completion of the remainder of the site grading. 2. Williams Pipeline has a pipeline and easement running through this site. Documentation must be submitted indicating Williams approval of the proposed improvements. Maintenance and accessibility of their pipeline is included in the agreement documents currently under review by the City. 3. The watemiain loop to be constructed between the two Palomino Lane cul- de -sacs must be shown. 4. Any preliminary drainage calculations related to alterations in the plan must be submitted for review. 5. If it has not already been addressed, trail location disclosure requirements should be considered for those properties abutting trails. Every effort should be made to complete the trail grading and gravel placement prior to selling any additional lots in the 5th Addition. 6. Permits for both grading and wetland impacts must be received from the Rice Creek Watershed District and the US Army Corps of Engineers. 7. A permit must be obtained from Anoka County for the connection to Sunset Road. If you have any questions, please let me know. 1189 Main Street • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 Phone%TDD: 651 -464 -5562 • Fax: 651 - 464 -4568 �- -' - MEI Ep. Au 4 � 0000.Lira= inzu 11111116 _ � 110 ©m �a0000� 1 IIp I gig I in. - - - - - 11111111111 1111 MARSHAN LAKE en•E Ei is NrF MAR= 4 -99 FRI 4:29 PM G. M. DEVELOPMENT 3/4/99 Steve Rymer 7625 Appalossa Lane Lino Lakes, MN 55414 FAX NO. 6124249542 P. 2 Re; Bchm's Century Farm 5th Addition Neighborhood Meeting. Dear Mr. Rymer, I received your letter dated March 3, 1999 regarding the neighbors concerns for the clean -up and completion of certain items relating to 2nd, 3rd and 4th additions. On March 4th Mr. Richard Ganunon, project coordinator, and myself visited Behm's Century Farm to acquaint ourselves with the issues and questions you and your neighbors raised. I will try to address them all in this letter but some will have to be discussed individually on a lot by lot basis. 1.) Boulevard Trees will be installed in April or May of 1999 by the developers landscape contractor. The species and location of the tree is detemilned by the City of Lino Lakes forester, Mr. Marty Asleson. My landscape contractor and a representative of Lino Lakes will meet at the site after all underground utilities have been located and narked. A stake will be placed where the tree is to be planted. A copy of the approved landscape plan is in the Association Booklet you should have received from your agent or builder. I have enclosed an additional copy for your convenience. I will notice the affected neighbors previous to the planting. 2.) Stockpiles of sand and topsoil on the westerly bank will be removed or leveled this spring or no later than June 15th. The pile of brush and trees also on the westerly bank of the pond will be removed by Apri TI5th. 3.) The re- grading of the pond bank and erosion concerns will require that we meet at the site on a case by case basis. Since most of the area of concern is in the wetland and under jurisdiction of the Rice Creek Watershed I will suggest that we invite their representative, Mr. Tony Brough. I would expect that we could meet sometime in April or May in the evening. I will notice you of the meeting time, date and address. 4.) Future pond expansion and excavation is scheduled for completion with the development of 6th addition. The 6th addition completion is scheduled for years 2000/2001. A copy of the Behm's Century Fami Phasing Plan is in your Association Booklet. Mr. Gammon has agreed to scale off the plan the approximate boundary of the future pond expansion and mark it so any of you who would like to view it may. This will happen no later than April 15th. aa9c - RSth Avantia North • Brooklyn Park. Minnesota 55443 • 612 -424 -8559 MAR- 4 -99 FRI 4:30 PM G.M. DEVELOPMENT FAX NO, 6124249542 P 3 As suggested, some of you may want to remove and transplant some of the trees in the future pond area. No trees will be removed by myself or any of our subcontractors unless it is absolutely necessary to complete our work. It is our intention to save any and all trees that we can. 5.) Lot 27 - We will need to meet vith you to see exactly what you need and how best remove the existing haul road. 6.) Lot 13 - Replacement of trees lost because of grading would be cost prohibitive. The sale price of a lot could double or more. 7.) Lot 9 - We will need to meet with you on the grading of the southwest comer of your lot. With the 5th addition, stone pipe will be extended north and some of that drainage swale will be filled. At that time the stockpiles of topsoil will be used to cover existing road and fill over the extended storm pipe. Any left over will be spread out or removed. 8.) Lot 24 - I will be meeting with the owner before the pond excavation starts. 9.) Lot 20 - I was not sure what the problem is other than seeing some erosion and hay bales that need to be removed. 1 suggest we talk more when we meet on the pond bank/erosion issues with the other neighbors. 10.) Lot 25 - Future pond excavation and any other construction should not be using Palomino or Appalossa other than that necessary to construct the rentaining homes. 11.) Lot 11 - Property stakes are placed by the developer eller the grading is complete and previous to selling the lot to the builder. Many tunes property stakes are lost as the home is being constructed and must be replaced. The builder would be responsible to replace any lost property stakes. 12.) Lot 15 - Fallen trees are the responsibility of the property owner. The construction debris is the responsibility of the builder or subcontractor. Since it is hard to monitor and enforce, the developer does a clean -up once in the spring and once in the fall. The spring clean -up will take place by May 15th. Sodding of rear yards is the responsibility of the builder or the homeowner, depending how the sales contract reads. Behm's Century Farm covenants are consistent with City of Lino Lakes ordinance. Contact city hall on your concerns for outside storage. They would be the enforcement agency. I hope this helps to answer some questions and start the process to resolution. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Gary Uhde co: John Johnson Mary Kay Wytand Richard Ganunon March 3, 1999 Ms. Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Ms. Wyland, I am writing this letter on behalf of the property owners in Behm's Century Farm that were in attendance at the Tuesday, March 2, 1999, meeting with Mr. Gary Uhde. Per our discussions with Mr. Uhde, we would like to have the following concerns addressed at the March 10, 1999, Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting. A group of residents will be attending the meeting to discuss our concerns with the Board and City staff. At that time, we would like decisions made about the course of action required of Mr. Uhde as he completes the second, third and fourth additions of Behm's Century Farm and as he begins the fifth addition. Resident Concerns Lot 10 2nd Add. Lot 27 2nd Add. Lot 17 2nd Add. Lot 13 2nd Ad. Lot 9 2nd Add. Lot 24 4th Add. Dirt piles removed, improve grading around the pond, save as many trees as possible when the pond is expanded. Dirt road is low, additional fill is needed next to garage. Backyard eroding into pond (steep bank), clean up brush, remove dirt piles, save as many trees as possible when the pond is expanded. Remove dirt piles, plant boulevard trees, regrade pond to a gradual slope, replacement of trees lost in grading, save as many trees as possible when expanding pond. The drainage ditch behind house is slowly eroding the usable land for gardening and general use. Fill in and remove dirt piles. Also concerned about the amount of truck traffic. There is continuous noise and dust. The grade in the southwest corner of the lot is terrible and when it rains the water ponds. Grade better so that it is more level and ponding does not occur. I would like to sit down with Gary and discuss the pond situation. Lot 20 2nd. Add. Lot 25 2nd add. Lot 11 2nd Add. Lot 15 4th Add. Lot 12 2nd Add. Our lot contains the culvert and our yard has constantly eroded into the pond. In addition, the slope into the pond is steep, not gradual. The land on the north side of our property, above the culvert between the two ponds, has settled and water ponds in it constantly. It does not drain properly. No heavy truck traffic on lots north of Palomino. Pond regraded to a gradual slope and dirt piles removed. Would like to meet to see where the pond will be expanded and what trees will be removed. Identify where boulevard tree will be planted, when it will be planted and what type will be planted. Identify property survey stakes. In the "wetland" area behind Mustang Court (off of the NE corner of lot 15), there are fallen trees from last year's storms and construction debris. When will that be cleared? By whom? One of the trees borders our property and was sodded around. Why wasn't sod extended to the tree line (between lots 15 and 21)? Will it be sodded? Who enforces covenants, specifically the storage of personal items on property? Would like to meet to see where the pond will be expanded and what trees will be removed. Identify where boulevard trees will be planted, when they will be planted and what type(s) will be planted. Thank you for your immediate attention to these concerns. We look forward to discussing them with you and the Board. Sincerely, Steve Rymer 7625 Appaloosa Lane Lot 12 H:\PERSONAL \WYLAND. WPD **** ... .. . • . . . ..... .. ....... • . .. . • /'.' .. - "-7-::::,...• .... ::•-•,•:-. .. . iE. :::: . . .: . ''' - :•-....."'.'•:,-.. •,, , . .., ::: - : • .: 1 ::::-..... :.::.:. /.7...:;:::, Nit..... ..._ , 14•116 111111•11.40 1 : ... .: e1.•••• ir.o‘if E . 9 i I : 1 f I 1 13 • . . . . . .. • ........... • 12 . • • ........ - - - - . Aigarran. . .. . • .... . : .. !C• 7 3 4 • .. 5 7 2 a .,••••••• • PASING PLAN FOR HOME SALES `PRASE 2 2A 4 5 6 (40 . OF 55 42 7 30 24 19 OTS /-1 TOTAL I8$ 4 SALES YEA)2 1996-11997 1997- P.998 1997-11998 1998- 0,999 1999-2:000 2000-2001 a CONSTRUCT I Oh YEAR 1996 1997 1997 ??? 1997-19i 1998.-19! 1909-20( ........... ..... ........ giveisr;41-1;4444# s -r J C JOIIGON CONSULTANT'S. PC NrE &NW NO cc Onrollie Pak IIII 164$1 /Iwo IRO MON FAM ass 111111-41174 •••■■=1. WETLAND AREAS 1111 NEW POND AREAS OW • a • • Zir 15 14 13 12 . . . , .. . ..... .. 4 ...................................... . • . • or,fter E1.1.4,1e' 4:1,41V401.1, " 14,A # • 444e' ................................ PigN51-1VTIP;igi. • 0 0 LZZ SHEET Act, 2/24/641 2110.11C1 •21206 401/0.41 LILAC COW . .................... W.1011 5 PRELIM GRADING PLAN - 5th ADDITION BEHM'S CENTURY FARM CENTURY FARM DEVELOPMENT. Inc. Liao Laos. Ma 11546 J C JOHNSON CONSULTANTS. NC. SITE PLANN•G AND DESIGN 6601 - 75* A.4. k k.1,. Pork 111 55426 Phew MI 566-666 FAX (Se) 566-4374 '44 • ft MO SO lat! 601• 641.14 11s t...1 • • vs340 ‘4,04 * Vol/wit* 40 AGE ITE NO. 4 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mariay Wyland DATE: Mar 22, 1999 TOPIC: First R eadi ng, O rdinance Na. 06-99 Vacating F�asentents in Arbor Lake Plat (new Otter Bay) COUNCII. ACflON: 4/5 Vote' ion of L :[es development was t latt d is 1987 as Otter Bay; original plat were not do no n ►tch platted as Arltc►rlake in 1980. The xowever, the raids and ents of and eannt in the new ple1 A resident in Otter Bay altered staff to were ed in a title search. For uuk easements have not an le to of providing clear eitle to theurtee the vacation of the easements Otter Bay plat will remain as pla#i. Staff would recantmend appea l afthe first re din ofOrdinenr a No. 06-99 v . 8 the easements and roadways originally platted in Arb+ slake, OPTIONS: 1. Approve Ordinance No. 06-99 Vaca 2. Return to staff for further esit Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 06-99 AN ORDINANCE VACATING ROADWAY, UTILITY AND OTHER EASEMENTS ORIGINALLY PLATTED AS A PART OF THE ARBORLAKE PLAT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I That it is in the best interest of the City and the Residents of the Otter Bay plat to vacation all roadway, utility, and other easements platted with the old Arborlake Plat II That the City held a Public Hearing before the City Council on March 22, 1999 after due published and posted notice had been given on March 2nd, 1999 and March 9th, 1999 and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard. III This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the City Counicl of the City of Lino Lakes this 22nd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: The following voted against same: rfisimmiltiallsmizemzelieloatAm \1 mime ice emeneG._ LAKE :iMiii ;ES, PINES a l lodd even 0 HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM ' ' ' by t e City Counc on A The on Jude 24,1996, and only six (6) oftho TRAPPERS CROSSI \G 2 \D ADDITIO\ CITY OF LINO LAKES Hokanson Development Inc. 9174 Isanti Street NE. Blaine Minnesota 55449 Phone 1 (612) 784 -4792 / .••■•••'- 2 1cn cal \ \�G �I ,-i , 7 HOLLY 4/70 WIG COUNTY OF ANOKA I% (8� C \\ N. Wa of tM t41/2 of the NE1 /4 of Soc. 33. T. 31. R. 22 I wce 4and '' '' Anoka County Monument at I~ V� NE. Cor. of thy NE1 /4 of Srrc. 33. T. 31. R. 22 CV ; S11941'20'11��' Cdr : p 10 • U T� S 89.33'07 -E - 262.8 127.00 s nKryre 117.00 _"trainees DR VE 119.00 -4Atinnd 3 4 LOW NO /1 7, 8 t 9.32 <1. LOW 97.49 150.42 4 1- AGENDA ITEM 4G STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer DATE: March 17, 1999 TOPIC: Resolution No. 99 -18, Accept Bids and Award Construction Contract, Apollo Drive, Phase 3 BACKGROUND: The bids for this project were opened on March 9, 1999. There were nine bids submitted for this project and the apparent low bid is below the engineer's estimate. The bids have been tabulated and the capability of the low bidder to successfully complete this project is being evaluated. This process should be completed such that a recommendation regarding award of this contract can be submitted at the City Council meeting Monday evening. STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell, City Engineer DATE: March 17, 1999 TOPIC: Resol ion No. 88 -18, A Bids and Award Construction Contract, Ato Give, asre 3 Tle City Cow moved then plans and spficatlans far this project on August 10, 1998 with the understanding the praject would not be bid until earty in 1999. Sealed opened an Tuesday, March 9, for the Apollo ;drive Phase 3 . City C c. anon is required to award a construction contract to the lowest Corm any Central Landscaping, Inc. OptiCon, Inc. W. B. Miller, Inc. Ryan Contractg, Inc. Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. Northwest alt, Inc. S R.Weiderro, Inc. Richard Knutson, Inc. Hardrtves, Inc. id Amount 373,094.41 $ 379,98%3.49 386,209.12 $ 387,629.08 394,804.87 395,477.04 $ 398,047.06 $ 425,376.08 $ 428,132.37 Engine's Estate $ 411,180.50 imp 8 below the Engineer's Es #Irr ate for this project. A copy bulation and the recommendation for award of the contract is twill be financ l throw h s a menu to benefiting % our s (through the J rtnt P Agr nt), and the City of Lino Lakes. The proposed edule for tt proms is as follows. Cot rtcil Awards Bid March 22, 1999 Construction I�rta April 5, 1999 Constructic t h B t noes at t,ita /Apollo June 15, 1999 Constr u on C rrrptete August 15, 1999 Return to staff for further review, 2. Adopt Resolution Number 99-18, acme pct to Genital Landsc ping, Inc. fc Staff moo that Resolution Number 99-18 be adopted. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 -18 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — APOLLO DRIVE PHASE 3 IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the Apollo Drive Phase 3 Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Company Central Landscaping, Inc. 13655 Lake Drive Forest Lake, MN 55025 Bid Amount $ 373,094.41 OptiCon, Inc. $ 379,986.49 10300 Portland Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 W. B. Miller, Inc. $ 386,209.12 6701 Norris Lake Road NW Elk River, MN 55330 Ryan Contracting, Inc. $ 387,629.08 8700 13th Avenue East Shakopee, MN 55379 Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. $ 394,804.87 14777 Lake Drive Forest Lake, MN 55025 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $ 395,477.04 1451 Stagecoach Road Shakopee, MN 55379 S. R.Weidema, Inc. $ 398,047.06 17600 113th Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 Richard Knutson, Inc. $ 425,376.08 12585 Rhode Island Avenue South Savage, MN 55378 Hardrives, Inc. $ 428,132.37 14475 Quiram Drive Rogers, MN 55374 Engineer's Estimate $ 411,180.50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Central Landscaping, Inc., is the lowest responsible bidder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Central Landscaping, Inc., 13655 Lake Drive, Forest Lake, Minnesota 55025 in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construction of the Apollo Drive Phase 3 Improvements according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 22, 1999. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer VADNAIS cENrER DRIVE, 200 SSEN (ENTER, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 651490 -2000 8A? 325 -2065 HTECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION h 16, 1999 RE: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesot Apollo Drive Phase 3 Client Project No. SEH No. A- LIN0L9808.01 City of City of Lino La] 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 On March 9, 1999, at 10:00 a.rn. nine (9) bids were received for the a ve- ref ject. The bids ranged from a high of $428,132.37 to a low of $373,094.41. The low bid was submitted by Central Landscaping, Inc. We have investigated the qualifications of Central Landscaping, Inc. and find that they (1) have a sufficient understanding of the project and equipment to perform the construction for which it bid; and (2) according to their bonding agent they presently have the financial ability to complete the project bid. SEH makes no representation or warranty as to the actual financial viability of the contractor or its ability to complete its work. Accordingly we recommend the l City of Lino Lakes receipt of all a Sin Dav d' . Hahn, P.E. Project Manager c: Wayne Becker, SEH Frank Bodine, SEH FrAprojestAknino119806101Vealward. SHORT ELLIOTT t4ENDRICKSON INC. MI nde ST. CLOUD, ABM CFIt':Fi EQUAL OPPORTUNITY Ei41t'1 OYER Inc, contingent to the ount of $373,094,41. MADISON. 6w LAKE COUNTY, IN City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Apollo Drive - Phase 3 SEH No. A- LINOL9808.01 Bid Tabulation Engineer's Estimate Central Landscaping Inc. OptiCon, Inc. W.B. Miller, Inc. Ryan Contracting Co. Forest Lake Contracting Inc. Item Item Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unk Total Unit Total No. No. Description Unit Qty. Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost 1 2021.501 Mobiization L.S. 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $17.000.00 $17,000.00 $21,920.00 $21,920.00 $4, 000.00 $4,000.00 $3,679.00 $3,679.00 $8,600.00 $8,600.00 2 2101.502 Clearing Tree 18 $100.00 $1,800.00 $50.00 $900.00 $60.00 $1,080.00 $31.00 $558.00 150.00 2,700.00 75.00 1,350.00 3 2101.507 Grubbing Tree 18 100.00 1,800.00 50.00 900.00 40.00 720.00 61.80 1,112.40 100.00 1,800.00 35.00 630.00 4 2104.501 Remove Culverts LF. 185 5.00 925.00 9.00 1,665.00 6.00 1.110.00 3.10 573.50 6.00 1,110.00 6.00 1,110.00 5 2104.501 Remove Curb and Gutter LF. 250 4.00 1,000.00 5.00 1,250.00 3.00 750.00 5.15 1,287.50 2.00 500.00 1.10 275.00 6 2104.505 Remove Bituminous Pavement S.Y. 3,390 2.00 6,780.00 1.25 4,237.50 2.50 8,475.00 1.70 5,763.00 1.00 3,390.00 1.00 3,390.00 7 2104.513 Saw Cut Bituminous Pavement LF. 1,050 2.00 2,100.00 3.40 3,570.00 1.00 1,050.00 1.80 1,890.00 1.75 1,837.50 1.75 1,837.50 8 2104.523 Salvage Type C Signs Each 34 27.00 918.00 10.00 340.00 10.00 340.00 35.00 1,190.00 20.00 680.00 10.00 340.00 9 2104.523 Salvage Hazard Marker X4-2 Each 2 25.00 50.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 20.00 25.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 10.00 20.00 10 2104.528 Salvage Type D Signs 1 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 150.00 150.00 50.00 50.00 30.00 30.00 11 2105.501 Common Excavation (P) C.Y. 5,500 3.00 16,500.00 2.70 14,850.00 5.50 30,250.00 3.50 19,250.00 3.00 16,500.00 325 17,875.00 12 2105.511 Common Charnel Excavation (P) C.Y. 5,500 5.00 27,500.00 3.00 16,500.00 1.60 8,800.00 2.50 13,750.00 4.75 26,125.00 3.75 20,625.00 13 2105.525 Topsoil Borrow (LV) C.Y. 1,754 7.00 12,278.00 5.80 10,17320 6.00 10,524.00 8.25 14,470.50 6.00 10,524.00 7.00 12,278.00 14 2111.501 Test Rolling R.S. 15 20.00 300.00 50.00 750.00 50.00 750.00 10.30 154.50 10.00 150.00 55.00 825.00 15 2112.501 Subgrade Preparation R.S. 15 100.00 1,500.00 100.00 1,500.00 260.00 3,900.00 128.75 1,93125 125.00 1,875.00 175.00 2,625.00 16 2130.501 Water for Dust Control M (Gal) 15 20.00 300.00 30.00 450.00 35.00 525.00 5.15 77.25 10.00 150.00 20.00 300.00 17 2211.501 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crushed Limestone) Ton 3,400 8.00 27,200.00 9.65 32,810.00 7.46 25,364.00 1026 34,884.00 10.50 35,700.00 10.50 35,700.00 18 2331.51 Type 31 Bl ominous Binder Ton 865 26.00 22,490.00 21.85 18,90025 19.60 16,954.00 24.50 21,192.50 22.64 19,583.60 22.50 19,462.50 19 2331.514 Type 31 Numinous Base Ton 3,215 25.00 80,375.00 21.85 70,247.75 18.75 60,28125 23.90 76,838.50 23.07 74,170.05 22.50 72.337.50 20 2341.508 Type 41 Bituminous Wear Ton 1,025 27.00 27,675.00 23.85 24, 44625 22.80 23, 370.00 26.40 27,060.00 25.36 25,994.00 24.50 25.112.50 21 2357.502 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal. 1,000 1.50 1,500.00 1.25 1250.00 1.00 1,000.00 1.05 1,050.00 1.00 1,000.00 1.30 1,300.00 22 2501.511 12' RCP Class V LF. 400 21.00 8,400.00 18.00 7200.00 19.00 7,600.00 15.70 6,280.00 20.00 8,000.00 20.00 8,000.00 23 2501.511 15 RCP Class V L.F. 147 22.00 3,234.00 20.00 2,940.00 36.00 5,292.00 17.00 2,499.00 21.00 3,087.00 25.00 3,675.00 24 2501.511 18' RCP Class V LF. 144 24.00 3,456.00 22.00 3,168.00 31.00 4,464.00 18.90 2,721.60 22.00 3,168.00 27.00 3,888.00 25 2501.511 21' RCP Class V LF. 75 30.00 2,250.00 26.00 1,950.00 36.00 2,700.00 22.65 1,698.75 26.00 1,950.00 31.00 2,325.00 26 2501.511 24' RCP Class V LF. 243 35.00 8,505.00 33.00 8,019.00 35.00 8,505.00 29.75 7,229.25 34.00 8,262.00 33.00 8,019.00 27 2501.511 36' RCP Class V L.F. 800 50.00 40,000.00 70.50 56.400.00 74.00 59, 200.00 68.00 54, 400.00 73.20 58,560.00 80.00 64,000.00 28 2501.515 12' RCP Apron with Trash Guard Each 1 500.00 500.00 560.00 560.00 900.00 900.00 760.00 760.00 650.00 650.00 575.00 575.00 29 2501.515 15' RCP Apron wI h Trash Guard Each 1 625.00 625.00 620.00 620.00 950.00 950.00 814.00 814.00 750.00 750.00 650.00 850.00 30 2501.515 36' RCP Apron with Trash Guard Each 1 1,400.00 1,400.00 1,350.00 1,350.00 1,700.00 1,700.00 1,637.00 1,637.00 1,450.00 1,450.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 31 2506.501 Construct Drainage Structure, Design LL406 -48 LF. 26 250.00 6,500.00 130.00 3,380.00 214.00 5,564.00 192.00 4,992.00 156.00 4,056.00 175.00 4,550.00 32 2506.501 Construct Drainage Structure, Design LL406 -60 LF. 21 360.00 7,560.00 217.00 4,557.00 270.00 5,670.00 267.00 5,607.00 229.00 4,809.00 260.00 5,460.00 33 2506.501 Construct Drainage Stnaxure, Design LL406 -72 LF. 22 500.00 11,000.00 295.00 6,490.00 360.00 7,920.00 330.00 7,260.00 273.00 6,006.00 325.00 7,150.00 34 2506.501 Construct Drainage Structure, Design LL406 -84 LF. 6 650.00 3,900.00 490.00 2,940.00 350.00 2,100.00 496.00 2,976.00 805.00 4,830.00 500.00 3,000.00 35 2506.516 Casting Assembly R1642 -13 Each 2 400.00 800.00 440.00 880.00 275.00 550.00 300.00 600.00 380.00 760.00 350.00 700.00 36 2506.516 Casting Assembly R3250•A Each 9 450.00 4,050.00 475.00 4,275.00 330.00 2,970.00 400.00 3,600.00 500.00 4,500.00 450.00 4,050.00 37 2506.532 Adjust Existing Manhole Casting Each 5 300.00 1,500.00 160.00 800.00 160.00 800.00 360.00 1,800.00 200.00 1,000.00 350.00 1,750.00 03/12/9910:29 AM Short Eftott Hendrickson Inc. Page 1 of 5 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Apollo Drive - Phase 3 SEH No. A- UNOL9808.01 Bid Tabulation Item No. No. 38 2511.501 39 2511.515 40 501.602 41 506.602 42 2521.501 43 2521.501 44 2531.501 45 2531.501 46 563.601 47 2564.502 48 2564.531 49 2564.531 50 564.602 51 564.602 52 564.602 53 564.603 54 564.603 55 564.603 56 564.603 57 564.603 58 565.603 59 2573.503 60 2575.501 61 2575.502 62 2575.505 63 2575.511 64 2575.519 65 2575.532 66 504.602 03/12/9910229 AM Item Description Engineer's Estimate Unit Total Unit Qty. Price Cost Central Landscaping Inc. Unit Total Price Cost OptiCon, Inc. Unit Total Price Cost W.B. Miller, Inc. Ryan Contracting Co. Forest Lake Contracting Inc. Unit Total Unit Total Unft Total Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Random Riprap, Class III Geotextile Fabric, Type IV Pond Outlet Structure Connect to Existing Structure 6' Concrete Wak 3' Concrete Wak 8618 Concrete Curb and Gutter 8418 Concrete Curb and Gutter Traffic Control Instal Salvaged X4-2 Furnish and Instal Type '0' Sign Furnish and Instal Object Marker X4-11 Pavement Message (Right Arrow) Epoxy Instal Salvaged Type 'V Sign Instal Salvaged Type 'D' Sign 4' Slid Double Yellow - Epoxy 4' Broken White - Epoxy 24' Sold White - Epoxy 4' Solid Yelow - Epoxy 4' Solid Yellow - Epoxy 4' PVC Conduit, SDR 40 Silt Fence HD Preassembied Seeding Seed Mixture, Type 50A Sodding Lawn Type Mulch Type I Disc Anchor Commerclal Fertilizer, Analysis 10 -10-10 Adjust valve Box TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST C.Y. S.Y. Each Each S.F. S.F. LF. LF. LS. Each S.F. Each Each Each Each LF. LF. LF. LF. LF. LF. LF. Acre Lb. S.Y. Ton Acre Lb. Each 20 65.00 1,300.00 48.00 47 3.00 141.00 3.00 1 1,500.00 1,500.00 2,100.00 2 300.00 600.00 450.00 83 3.00 249.00 3.00 560 2.25 1,260.00 2.50 280 6.00 1,680.00 8.25 2,581 6.00 15,486.00 6.32 1 10,000.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 1 60.00 60.00 20.50 176.69 25.00 4,41725 22.95 4 85 340.00 32.50 2 90 180.00 125.00 24 60 1,440.00 32.00 1 130 130.00 95.00 740 1.00 740.00 2.60 510 0.50 255.00 1.26 60 3.50 210.00 6.50 1,000 0.50 500.00 1.30 780 0.50 390.00 1.26 500 6.10 3,050.00 4.00 200 2.00 400.00 3.00 2.5 300.00 750.00 100.00 125 3.75 468.75 5.00 2,218 2.50 5,545.00 1.70 5 170.00 850.00 110.00 2.5 75.00 187.50 60.00 1,000 1.75 1,750.00 0.15 6 100.00 600.00 125.00 *411,180.50 960.00 141.00 2,100.00 900.00 249.00 1,400.00 2,310.00 16,311.92 2,000.00 20.50 4,055.04 130.00 250.00 768.00 95.00 1,924.00 642.60 390.00 1,300.00 982.80 2,000.00 600.00 250.00 625.00 3,770.60 550.00 150.00 150.00 750.00 MEM / 373.094.40 $0.01 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 80.00 1,600.00 65.00 1,300.00 40.00 800.00 70.00 1,400.00 2.00 94.00 3.00 141.00 2.00 94.00 2.00 94.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 200.00 400.00 350.00 700.00 700.00 1,400.00 175.00 350.00 2.35 195.05 3.00 249.00 6.50 539.50 3.00 249.00 1.80 1,008.00 2.60 1,456.00 3.00 1,680.00 2.50 1,400.00 7.50 2,100.00 8.30 2,324.00 7.00 1,960.00 6.75 1,890.00 6.30 16,260.30 6.35 16,389.35 6.00 15,486.00 6.50 16,776.50 2,350.00 2,350.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 1,300.00 1,300.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 20.50 20.50 25.00 25.00 20.00 20.00 21.00 21.00 22.95 4,055.04 23.00 4,063.87 22.50 3,975.53 23.00 4,063.87 32.50 130.00 45.00 180.00 45.00 180.00 33.00 132.00 148.00 296.00 155.00 310.00 125.00 250.00 148.00 296.00 32.00 768.00 80.00 1,920.00 80.00 1,920.00 32.00 768.00 95.00 95.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 95.00 95.00 2.20 1,628.00 2.35 1,739.00 2.60 1,924.00 2.20 1,628.00 1.05 535.50 1.10 561.00 1.26 642.60 1.05 535.50 8.20 492.00 8.40 504.00 6.50 390.00 8.20 492.00 1.11 1,110.00 125 1,250.00 1.30 1,300.00 1.11 1,110.00 1.05 819.00 1.10 858.00 1.26 982.80 1.05 819.00 2.50 1,250.00 6.20 3,100.00 3.75 1,875.00 3.75 1,875.00 4.00 800.00 4.15 830.00 2.50 500.00 2.50 500.00 225.00 562.50 618.00 1,545.00 250.00 625.00 1,500.00 3,750.00 3.75 468.75 3.10 387.50 3.60 450.00 4.00 500.00 1.70 3,770.60 2.30 5,101.40 2.00 4,436.00 2.50 5,545.00 150.00 760.00 390.00 1,950.00 125.00 625.00 150.00 750.00 40.00 100.00 103.00 257.50 35.00 87.50 40.00 100.00 025 250.00 0.35 350.00 0.25 250.00 025 250.00 130.00 780.00 155.00 930.00 150.00 900.00 150.00 900.00 $379,986.49 < ✓ $387,629.08 $394,804.87 385,20925 $999.87 Page 2 of 5 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Apollo Drive - Phase 3 SEH No. A- L1NOL9808.01 Bid Tabulation Item Item No. No. Description Northwest Asphalt Inc. Unit Total Unit Qty. Price Cost S.R. Weidema, Inc. Richard Knutson,lnc. Hardrives Inc. Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost 1 2021.501 Mobilization 2 2101.502 Clearing 3 2101.507 Grubbing 4 2104.501 Remove Culverts 5 2104.501 Remove Curb and Gutter 6 2104.505 Remove Bituminous Pavement 7 2104.513 Saw Cut Bituminous Pavement 8 2104.523 Salvage Type C Signs 9 2104.523 Salvage Hazard Marker X4 -2 10 2104.528 Salvage Type D Signs 11 2105.501 Common Excavation (P) 12 2105.511 Common Channel Excavation (P) 13 2105.525 Topsoil Borrow (LV) 14 2111.501 Test Rolling _ 15 2112.501 Subgrade Preparation 16 2130.501 Water for Dust Control 17 2211.501 Aggregate Base pass 5 (100% Crushed Umestone) 18 2331.51 Type 31 Bituminous Binder 19 2331.514 Type 31 Bituminous Base 20 2341.508 Type 41 Bituminous Wear 21 2357.502 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat 22 2501.511 121 RCP Class V 23 2501.511 151 RCP Class V 24 2501.511 18' RCP Class V 03/12/991026 AM L.S. Tree Tree L.F. L.F. S.Y. L.F. Each Each C.Y. C.Y. C.Y. R.S. R.S. M (Gal.) Ton Ton Ton Ton Gal. L.F. L.F. L.F. 1 $8,500.00 18 100.00 18 25.00 185 6.30 250 4.00 3,390 124 1,050 1.31 34 35.00 2 35.00 1 35.00 5,500 3.25 5,500 2.30 1,754 6.45 15 35.00 15 120.00 15 25.00 3,400 10.87 865 22.64 3,215 23.07 1,025 25.36 1,000 1.00 400 21.53 147 24.36 144 27.46 $8,500.00 1,800.00 450.00 1,165.50 1,000.00 4,203.60 1,375.50 1,190.00 70.00 35.00 17,875.00 12,650.00 11,313.30 525.00 1,800.00 375.00 36,958.00 19,583.60 74,170.05 25,994.00 1,000.00 8,612.00 3,580.92. 3,95424 $19,885.00 $19,885.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 103.00 1,854.00 178.50 3,213.00 75.00 1,350.00 51.50 927.00 102.00 1,836.00 25.00 450.00 8.35 1,544.75 8.00 1,480.00 6.60 1,221.00 3.10 775.00 5.00 1,250.00 3.30 825.00 1.03 3,491.70 1.00 3,390.00 2.30 7,797.00 1.55 1,627.50 3.06 3,213.00 2.50 2,625.00 10.30 350.20 20.40 693.60 11.00 374.00 51.50 103.00 20.40 40.80 11.00 22.00 51.50 51.50 20.40 20.40 33.00 33.00 2.68 14,740.00 5.00 27,500.00 4.95 27,225.00 2.68 14,740.00 4.50 24,750.00 4.85 26,675.00 2.57 4,507.78 8.50 14,909.00 7.40 12,979.60 10.30 154.50 150.00 2,250.00 15.00 225.00 283.00 4,245.00 250.00 3,750.00 115.00 1,725.00 10.30 154.50 25.00 375.00 15.00 225.00 10.60 36,040.00 10.08 34,272.00 10.75 36,550.00 22.50 19,462.50 25.10 21,711.50 24.60 21,279.00 22.50 72,337.50 2423 77,899.45 23.75 76,35¢25 24.57 25,18425 26.32 26,978.00 25.80 26,445.00 1.30 1,300.00 1.02 1,020.00 1.00 1,000.00 31.75 12,700.00 20.93 8,372.00 22.55 9,020.00 33.40 4,909.80 23.26 3,419.22 25.50 3,748.50 31.85 4,586.40 25.16 3,623.04 28.75 4,140.00 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Page 3 of 5 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Apollo Drive - Phase 3 SEH No. A- LINOL9808.01 Bid Tabulation Item Item No. No. Description Unit Oty. Northwest Asphalt Inc. Unit Total Price Cost S.R. Weidema, Inc. Unit Total Price Cost Richard Knutson,Inc. Hardrives Inc. Unit Total Unit Total Price Cost Price Cost 25 2501.511 21' RCP Class V 26 2501.511 24" RCP Class V 27 2501.511 36' RCP Class V 28 2501.515 12' RCP Apron with Trash Guard 29 2501.515 15' RCP Apron with Trash Guard 30 2501.515 36' RCP Apron with Trash Guard 31 2506.501 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 11406 -48 32 2506.501 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 11406 -60 33 2506.501 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 11406 -72 34 2506.501 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 11406 -84 35 2506.516 Casting Assembly R1642 -B 36 2506.516 Casting Assembly R3250 -A 37 2506.532 Adjust Existing Manhole Casting 38 2511.501 Random Riprap, Class 111 39 2511.515 Geotextile Fabric, Type IV 40 501.602 Pond Outlet Structure 41 506.602 Connect to Existing Structure 42 2521.501 6' Concrete Walk 43 2521.501 3' Concrete Walk 44 2531.501 B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter 45 2531.501 B418 Concrete Curb and Gutter 46 563.601 Traffic Control 47 2564.502 Install Salvaged X4 -2 48 2564.531 Fumish and Install Type "C' Sign 03/12/99 10:26 AM L.F. L.F. L.F. Each Each Each LF. LF. LF. L.F. Each Each Each C.Y. S.Y. Each Each S.F. S.F. L.F. L.F. L.S. Each S.F. 75 33.23 243 34.60 800 69.10 1 582.75 1 668.85 1 1,795.50 26 286.65 21 383.25 22 525.00 6 850.50 2 406.00 9 462.50 5 175.00 20 52.50 47 420 1 1,260.00 2 262.50 83 420 560 3.78 280 10.50 2,581 7.00 1 1,575.00 1 21.00 176.69 23.63 2,492.25 8,407.80 55,280.00 582.75 668.85 1,795.50 7,452.90 8,04825 11 ,550.00 5,103.00 812.00 4,162.50 875.00 1,050.00 197.40 1,260.00 525.00 348.60 2,116.80 2,940.00 18,067.00 1,575.00 21.00. 4,175.18 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 35.60 2,670.00 28.60 2,145.00 34.80 2,610.00 37.40 9,088.20 31.84 7,737.12 36.25 8,808.75 77.50 62,000.00 69.59 55,672.00 72.50 58,000.00 517.00 517.00 505.17 505.17 610.00 610.00 571.00 571.00 565.62 565.62 700.00 700.00 705.00 705.00 1,652.10 1,652.10 1,880.00 1,880.00 220.70 5,73820 174.89 4,547.14 300.00 7,800.00 276.60 5,808.60 254.04 5,334.84 400.00 8,400.00 433.35 9,533.70 327.80 7,211.60 550.00 12,100.00 722.90 4,337.40 539.90 3,239.40 890.00 5,340.00 16125 322.50 382.62 76524 340.00 680.00 253.40 2,280.60 469.95 4,229.55 275.00 2,475.00 206.00 1,030.00 225.00 1,125.00 150.00 750.00 79.00 1,580.00 60.50 1,210.00 55.00 1,100.00 2.40 112.80 2.50 117.50 4.40 206.80 1,065.00 1,065.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,320.00 1,320.00 515.00 1,030.00 969.50 1,939.00 275.00 550.00 3.71 307.93 428 355.24 3.85 319.55 1.85 1,036.00 3.46 1,937.60 2.00 1,129.00 7.00 1,960.00 8.41 2,354.80 7.40 2,072.00 6.80 17,550.80 6.37 16,440.97 7.20 18,58320 1,545.00 1,545.00 1,530.00 1,530.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 20.60 20.60 20.40 20.40 25.00 25.00 23.18 4,095.67 22.95 4,055.04 25.25 4,461.42 Page 4 of 5 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Apollo Drive - Phase 3 SEH No. A- L1NOL9808.01 Bid Tabulation Northwest Asphalt Inc. S.R. Weidema, Inc. Richard Knutson,Inc. Hardrives Inc. Item Item Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. No. Description Unit Qty. Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost Price Cost 49 2564.531 Fumish and Install Object Marker X4 -11 50 564.602 Pavement Message (Right Arrow) Epoxy 51 564.602 Install Salvaged Type 'C' Sign 52 564.602 Install Salvaged Type 'D' Sign 53 564.603 4' Solid Double Yellow - Epoxy 54 564.603 4' Broken White - Epoxy 55 564.603 24' Solid White - Epoxy 56 564.603 4' Solid Yellow - Epoxy 57 564.603 4' Solid Yellow - Epoxy 58 565.603 4' PVC Conduit, SDR 40 59 2573.503 Silt Fence HD Preassembled 60 2575.501 Seeding 61 2575.502 Seed Mixture, Type 50A 62 2575.505 Sodding Lawn Type 63 2575.511 Mulch Type 1 64 2575.519 Disc Anchor 65 2575.532 Commercial Fertilizer, Analysis 10 -10-10 66 504.602 Adjust Valve Box TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 03/12/99 10:26 AM Each 4 47.25 189.00 46.35 185.40 45.90 183.60 35.75 143.00 Each 2 155.40 310.80 152.45 304.90 150.96 301.92 165.00 330.00 Each 24 84.00 2,016.00 82.40 1,977.60 81.60 1,958.40 35.00 840.00 Each 1 84.00 84.00 82.40 82.40 81.60 81.60 105.00 105.00 L.F. 740 2.31 1,709.40 2.27 1,679.80 225 1,665.00 2.40 1,776.00 L.F. 510 1.10 561.00 1.08 550.80 1.08 550.80 1.15 586.50 L.F. 60 8.61 516.60 8.45 507.00 8.37 50220 9.00 540.00 L.F. 1,000 1.16 1,160.00 1.14 1,140.00 1.14 1,140.00 1.22 1,220.00 L.F. 780 1.10 858.00 1.08 842.40 " 1.08 842.40 1.15 897.00 L.F. 500 3.00 1,500.00 5.15 2,575.00 6.66 3,330.00 5.00 2,500.00 L.F. 200 420 840.00 3.09 618.00 3.06 612.00 4.40 880.00 Acre 2.5 210.00 525.00 231.75 579.38 229.50 573.75 220.00 550.00 Lb. 125 420 525.00 3.86 482.50 3.83 478.75 4.40 550.00 S.Y. 2,218 2.00 4,436.00 1.75 3,881.50 1.74 3,859.32 2.10 4,657.80 Ton 5 262.50 1,312.50 154.50 772.50 153.00 765.00 275.00 1,375.00 Acre 2.5 94.50 236.25 4120 103.00 40.80 102.00 100.00 250.00 Lb. 1,000 026 260.00 026 260.00 026 260.00 0.28 280.00 Each 6 125.00 750.00 154.50 927.00 135.50 813.00 125.00 750.00 395,128.44 $348.60 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. $398,047.06 $425,376.08 $428,132.37 Page 5 of 5 AGENDA ITEM 4H STAFF ©t# TOR: John Pot ll, C DATE: March 19,1 TO C: Rest t No, ;99 -19, CGonsidk the of vein end metes I ink n. A Ott Pc City in drat# frrt, nt r -iii NfMi111I'i. )iYt1..11IY }RM1IIi.NiY ►��IIR'.�IrtNVis..ii- IA1i "�sw ii r�Yrwsvw.. The City of Ce tervil a to #complete the construction n of a water s to voir with °t a of the date of ag nt execution. The city with g atest nit to the other Wi#i full ether City for the cess fle +v at c ry City's rates wilt be in a Memos nd m of tJ ; , =r ;¢ lch o tea modifed to reflect hart w out 'r the essot ated wi th the c onstruc t of tie mt pay only for cats associated with teleme 3. Adopt Reattution Number 99 -19 wMt evisions sugge ted Council. adopt Resolution Number 99 -19. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 -19 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE FOR WATER SERVICE AND TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes and the City of Centerville agree that a controlled connection of their two water systems is in the best interest of both communities, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, authorizes political subdivisions to enter into Joint Powers Agreements: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Hereby approve the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Centerville for Water Service and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Agreement. Adopted by the City Council this 22 "d day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 22, 1999. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer INTERCONNECT AGREEMENT CONTRACT FOR JOINT USAGE OF WATER FACILITIES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1999, by and between the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation, situated in Anoka County, Minnesota, hereinafter called "Lino Lakes ", and the City of Centerville, a municipal corporation, situated in Anoka County, Minnesota, hereinafter called "Centerville ". Both Lino Lakes and Centerville have the authority to enter into this agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.59. WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has constructed a water system capable of providing emergency and peak demand water supply service to Centerville, and Centerville is considering water system improvements including the construction of an elevated water storage tank and trunk watermains. WHEREAS, until this water system in Centerville is fully developed with source, distribution, and storage capacity, this area can be more effectively served by interconnection with Lino Lakes water system. WHEREAS, after the completion of the Centerville water system a more reliable water supply in both Lino Lakes and Centerville would result from the interconnection between the two communities water systems. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. In consideration of the covenants and agreements herein set forth, Centerville shall construct a water system connection to the public water system of Lino Lakes subject to all terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement as hereinafter expressed. 2. Water flow recording meters shall be installed at the interconnection line for the purpose of measuring the flow from the Lino Lakes water system into the Centerville water system and the flow from the Centerville water system into the Lino Lakes water system. 3. Lino Lakes shall have ownership and be responsible for operation and maintenance of the water line located within the corporate boundaries of Lino Lakes. Centerville shall have ownership and be responsible for operation and maintenance of the interconnection line, metering manhole, and appurtenances of the water lines located within the corporate boundaries of Centerville. 4. Centerville shall commence with the design of the metering manhole within 60 days of the date of this agreement. Centerville shall, within nine (9) months from the date of this agreement, construct and have operational the metering manhole. 5. The meter shall operate automatically according to an agreed upon telemetry system to provide each City with water during an emergency condition. 6. The City of Centerville shall complete the construction of a water storage reservoir within a minimum of eight (8) years from the date of execution of this Agreement. The City of Lino Lakes may extend the time period for the City of Centerville to construct the water storage reservoir based on recommendations from the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Water Plan. 7. The City of Centerville shall adopt an "odd/even" lawn watering policy. The City of Centerville shall comply with and enforce total lawn watering bans that may be implemented by the City of Lino Lakes on Lino Lakes water customers. SECTION 2. CHARGES Each of the meters installed pursuant to this Agreement shall be read at the end of each calendar quarter. The city with the greatest net flow will bill the other city, by the 10th of the month following the end of the calendar quarter, for the amount due based upon such excess flow. Payments for water usage shall be at the current respective City residential water rate at the time of billing. Payments shall be made on or before the 20th day of the month following the end of the quarter, and shall be administered by current city ordinance. Centerville shall pay for project costs, including construction costs, pre - engineering, and construction engineering, for the Centerville meter vault systems. Lino Lakes shall pay for the cost of the Lino Lakes control systems. 2 SECTION 3. WATER STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION 1. Lino Lakes and Centerville agree that they shall exercise reasonable care to prevent toxic or harmful substances from contaminating the water supply of either party. Each city's water supply shall provide clean, safe, potable water. On a yearly basis, each city shall supply the other city with Copies of yearly analytical test data from the Minnesota Department of Health, Division of Environmental health. In addition, on a yearly basis, each city shall supply test results from a recognized testing lab, whose analyses were performed by EPA or other recognized standard procedures. There shall be results provided for hardness, manganese, iron, and volatile organics. If either city allows volatile organics to be discharged into the water system, such items shall be eliminated by the responsible city. Failure to comply with this section shall be grounds for immediate termination of the water exchange system. 2. The location of connection of the water system of Centerville with the water system of Lino Lakes is designated as the intersection of 20th Avenue and Cedar Street. In the event either party feels the expansion of the water system within the city's boundaries will adversely impact its ability to supply water to its residents, it may elect to terminate this Agreement upon three (3) years written notice. Lino Lakes shall waive any permit application or fee for work in existing utility easements or on the proposed connection. 3. All watermain construction within Centerville or Lino Lakes shall meet the most recent City Engineers Association of Minnesota "Standard Utilities Specifications for Watermain and Service Line Installation and Sanitary Sewer and Storm Installation." Neither party shall substantially change the specifications for any parts of the water system which would be interconnected between the cities without the notification of the other. SECTION 4. INDEMNIFICATION Each party agrees to indemnify the other and save the other harmless from any and all claims or demands for damages arising out of or which may result from the water supply pursuant to this Agreement, and from the use, installation, maintenance, and repair of its facilities as set forth in this Agreement. SECTION 5. TERMINATION In addition to the termination provisions in Section 3, either city shall have the right to cancel this Agreement on account of any violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by the other city by first giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other party of such violation and a failure to correct the violation within said thirty (30) day period of time. Either city shall have the right to cancel and annul this Agreement, 3 without cause, by first giving three (3) years written notice to the other party of such intent to cancel this Agreement, no further payments shall be due hereunder, except obligations arising prior to the effective date of termination. Upon such effective date of termination, the connection between the water system of Lino Lakes and the water system of Centerville shall immediately be disconnected. SECTION 6. INSPECTION 1. The City Engineer of Lino Lakes or any employee authorized by the City Council of Lino Lakes shall be permitted, at the expense of Lino Lakes, to inspect the construction, as well as the operation, of the water system in Centerville at any reasonable time to see that same is being constructed and operated according to the plans and specifications and operated in compliance with acceptable municipal practice and that the Agreement herein contained is being complied with insofar as reasonably necessary to protect the City of Lino Lakes. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AGREEMENT This Agreement shall take effect and be in force after the date of execution of the same by the proper officers of Centerville and Lino Lakes, pursuant to a resolution of the governing bodies of the municipalities, accepting and agreeing to abide and be bound by the terms, provisions, and conditions hereof and authorizing such execution. CITY OF CENTERVILLE CITY OF LINO LAKES By: By: Mayor Mayor By: By: City Clerk City Clerk 4 AGENDA ITEM 4# STAFF INATt1R: John Powell, y weer DATE: TOPIC: Resolution No. 99 — 20, Consideration of Agreeinent with V llia Pipe t.i Company for Behm's Century Farm 5"' Addition. In 1957 and ' r [e tt w granted to Great Lakes Pipe Line Company predet ar of Line Cc pa y) over an area in Section 7 beat e+ Sunset Avenue and north of Lilac S .The property dais easement platted into Oaks a bdh . As part of Behm's Century Farm late s covered by the any has asked that the Clty aht.has been reviewed by. . ase no that his and sik, located on pages 1. ft to further rev . 2. " Adopt Resolution Nt tber 99 -20 epp av tt Encroac m tjt Ag nt with VViiarns Pipe Lute npatr with # changes recmend+acf by the City Attorney. 3. Adapt Resolution Nt € tber 99 - 20 with revisions as suggested by Council. I to adopt Resolution Number 99 - 20. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 - 20 RESOLUTION approving the ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAMS PIPE LINE COMPANY. WHEREAS, Williams Pipe Line Company has an existing easement over a portion of Section 7 to be re- platted as Behm's Century Farm 5th Addition, and WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes proposes to construct public improvements within the easement, and WHEREAS, Williams Pipe Line Company requires an encroachment agreement for such construction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Hereby approve the Encroachment Agreement with Williams Pipe Line Company. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 22, 1999. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer This instrument was drafted by Williams Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation, P.O. Box 3448, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, 918/588 -3295 ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT This Encroachment Agreement ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into by and among WILLIAMS PIPE LINE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, whose address is P.O. Box 3448, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101 (hereinafter "Williams ") and The City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, a Municipal corporation, established under the laws of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter "City ") whose mailing address for the purposes of this agreement is c/o Loucks and Associates, Inc., 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300, Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 -5592. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Williams is the owner of a pipeline known as the Minneapolis- Superior Junction 2- 8" (hereinafter called "Pipeline ") and all or part of the pipeline easements and rights of way (hereinafter called "Easements ") on, over and through portions of the South Half (S /2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW /4) and the Northeast Quarter (NE /4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW /4) of Section 7, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, pursuant to certain instruments recorded in the Register of Deeds Office of said County and described as follows: 1. Right of Way Agreement dated 12/6/57 from Lakeville, Incorporated to Great Lakes Pipe Line Company (Williams' predecessor in interest), its successors and assigns, filed for record on 12/23/57 and recorded in page 550 of book 402 as Document No. 186206. 2. Right of Way Agreement dated 7/15/57 from Harrison J. Maker and Florence House Maker, husband and wife, to Great Lakes Pipe Line Company (Williams' predecessor in interest), its successors and assigns, filed for record on 9/9/57 and recorded in page397 of Book 395 as Document No. 183306. And: C: \data\ 13 - 696EN2. DOC Page 1 of 6 Tracts 8599 & 8600 WHEREAS, City desires to construct utilities within a subdivision known as Behm's Century Farms, (hereinafter referred to as the "Encroachments ") as set forth on that set of plan drawings designated as the Behm's Century Farms Grading Plan 4th, 5th & 6th Additions to the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, a copy of which Williams and City have in their possession; and WHEREAS Williams and City agree that the construction and existence of the Encroachments in the manner indicated on the Plan Drawings: (a) conflicts with the terms and conditions recited in the Easements and (b) interferes with and obstructs Williams' rights, obligations and abilities as set forth in the Easements; and WHEREAS, City desires to obtain Williams' consent to the construction and existence of the Encroachments across and in close proximity to the Pipeline as indicated on the Grading Plan Drawings under the terms and conditions hereinafter stated. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants herein contained, Williams hereby consents to the construction of the Encroachments upon Williams' easement under the following described terms and conditions: 1. The Encroachments shall be limited to utility lines over, under and within the lands affected by the Easement at the locations specifically described on the Plan Drawings. 2. City agrees to abide by all construction restrictions, conditions and specifications listed below: (a) Within Behm's Century Farms subdivision and various road rights - of -way and following construction of the Encroachments, City shall maintain over the Pipelines, as a minimum, the ground elevations as indicated on the Grading Plan Drawings. City shall be responsible to bear all costs for erosion control to maintain the above - described minimum ground elevations. (b) Exclusive of Saturday, Sunday and legal holidays, City shall notify Williams a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any construction activities related to the Encroachments so that Williams may arrange to have its Line Supervisor present during construction. Williams' Line Supervisor or representative shall be on site during all construction activities related to the Encroachments over or within ten feet (10') of the Pipeline to confirm that no damage occurs to the Pipeline, cathodic protection or pipe coating. Written notification to Williams shall be provided at: Williams Pipe Line Company, Attn: Line Supervisor, 2451 West County Road C, St. Paul, MN 55113; Phone (612)633 -9339, Fax: (612)633 -8217, Mobile (612)750 -0507 or such other representative of Williams which Williams may from time to time designate. City shall require the following language to be conspicuously displayed on all pages of any construction prints that include Williams facilities: C: \data \13- 696EN2.DOC Page 2 of 6 Tracts 8599 84 8600 WARNING! PETROLEUM PRODUCTS PIPELINE! Excavation and /or Construction Requires a Minimum of Two (2) Business Days Advance Notice Prior to Construction Contact Phil Hermann at Williams Pipe Line Company 2451 West County Road C St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 (612) 633-9339 City shall also call the Gopher One Call System at (800) 252 -1166 prior to the start of any work related to the Encroachments. (c) During City's construction, City shall provide protection to Williams' Pipeline and related facilities and no heavy equipment shall be allowed to operate over Williams' pipeline except as herein provided.. 3. City shall use its best efforts to protect Williams' pipeline shall indemnify, save, hold harmless, and at Williams' option, defend Williams its affiliated companies and their respective directors, officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, demands, costs, (including without limitation, reasonable attorney's and expert witness' fees and court costs), expenses, losses, causes of action (whether at law on in equity), fines, judgments, civil penalties and administrative proceedings for injury or death to persons or damage or loss to property, environmental damages or other business losses, including those made or incurred by Williams or its affiliated companies and their directors, officers, employees, agents, or third parties or governmental agencies in any way arising from or connected with the construction, existence, operation, maintenance or removal of the Encroachments. The presence of Williams' representative or any instructions given by such representative shall not relieve City of any liability under this agreement. Prior to any construction activities in the vicinity of Williams' pipeline, City shall remit a check in the amount of $3,500.00, payable to Williams Pipe Line Company, which shall be for the purpose of defraying the costs of Williams' on -site representative during construction activities. After completion of the above - described Encroachments, Williams shall submit an invoice to City delineating all relevant costs. Should the costs to Williams be less than $3,500.00, the remainder shall be returned to the City. Should costs exceed the $3,500.00 submitted, City agrees to reimburse Williams for all reasonable costs in excess of this amount within 60 days from receipt of Williams' invoice. 4. In the event that the construction, existence, operation, maintenance, erosion, to incur any cost for installation, operation, maintenance, protection, repair or inspection of Williams' facilities, or the clean up or handling of any spills of commodities being transported by Williams, City, its successors or assigns, agrees to reimburse Williams for any and all such costs that would not have occurred but for the existence of the Encroachments. It is strictly understood and agreed that City shall hold Williams harmless from and against any and all claims for damages arising from Williams C:\data\ t 3- 696EN2. DOC Page 3 of 6 Tracts 8599 & 8600 removal, destruction, occupation and use of the portion of Encroachments which will exist within Williams' Easement in the performance of Williams' installation, maintenance, operation, repair, removal, replacement or inspection of Williams' facilities. 5. Williams and City agree that the existence of the Encroachments does not constitute a waiver of Williams' express rights under the Easement or any other rights, which may be implied at law or equity. Williams hereby reserves and City hereby grants and confirms all of Williams' rights, title and estate as set forth in the Easements including, but not limited to, the rights to access, lay, maintain, operate, repair, replace, change the size of, protect and remove existing and future pipelines, communications lines and other facilities within, under and across all of the Behm's Century Farms development which are subject to Williams' Easement. 6. Except for the Encroachments as set forth on the Plan Drawings, City will not at any time erect, construct, or create any additional buildings, improvements, structures, pavement, ditches, utility or sewer lines, trees or obstructions of any kind either above, on or below the surface of the ground within twenty -five feet (25') of the then - current location of any of Williams' existing or future facilities, or change the grade thereof, or cause or permit these things to be done by others, without the express prior written permission of Williams. City specifically agrees not to allow, permit or grant rights for other utility lines, pipelines (other than Williams'), utility poles, or paved access roads within the specified road rights -of -way and within ten feet (10') laterally of the Pipeline or Williams' future facilities as they then exist by virtue of the Easement or this Agreement. 7. In the event that City breaches any of the terms, covenants or provisions of this Agreement, and Williams commences litigation to enforce any provisions of this Agreement, the cost of attorney's fees and the attendant expenses will be payable to Williams by City, its successors or assigns, upon demand, for all claims upon which Williams prevails. 8. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants running with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. Williams executes this Agreement and provides the consents set forth in this Agreement solely on its own behalf. Williams does not represent, through this Agreement or otherwise, any other entity other than Williams' future successors and assigns. 9. The Easements, insofar as they may cover and relate to land other than the land within the boundaries of the Behm's Century Farms development as described in the Grading Plan Drawings, shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with all of their terms, conditions and provisions. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as releasing or impairing any rights or privileges under the Easement insofar as the Easement covers the Behm's Century Farms development as described in the Grading C: \data \I3- 696EN2.DOC Page 4 of 6 Tracts 8599 & 8600 Plan Drawings; but the Easement, insofar as it relates to the said Behm's Century Farms development, and insofar as it may be inconsistent or in conflict herewith, is hereby amended to the extent that the rights, privileges and obligations of Williams and City, their respective successors and assigns, shall be determined under the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals on the day and year below. WILLIAMS PIPE LINE COMPANY By: Bryan E. Young, Manager Real Estate Services Attorney in Fact Date: (SEAL) CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA ATTEST: By: City Secretary STATE OF OKLAHOMA) COUNTY OF TULSA ) ss By: Title: Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the county and state aforesaid, on this day of , personally appeared Bryan E. Young, Manager of Real Estate Services and Attorney -in -Fact for Williams Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation, by virtue of an April 1, 1998, Power of Attorney filed for record July 27, 1998, in the County of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma, in Book 6083 at page 2256, as Document 98081311, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation, and said Bryan E. Young acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed by official seal at my office in said county and state the day and year last above written. My Commission Expires: C: \data\ 13- 696EN2. DOC Notary Public Page 5 of 6 Tracts 8599 8G 8600 STATE OF COUNTY OF ) SS BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this _ day of , 1998, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, appeared , to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn did say that he is the of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota., a Minnesota municipal corporation, duly organized, incorporated and existing under and by virtue of the laws of Minnesota, who is personally known to me to be the person who executed, as an officer, the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation, and such person duly acknowledged the execution of the same to be the act and deed of said municipal corporation. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal at my office in said City and State the day and year last above written. Notary Public My Commission Expires: C: \data \13- 696EN2.DOC Page 6 of 6 Tracts 8599:& 8600 LAW OFFICES OF William G. Hawkins and Associates Legal Assistant WILLIAM G. HAWKINS TAMMI J. UVEGES BARRY A. SULLIVAN March 15, 1999 Mr. John M. Powell City Engineer Lino Lakes City Hall 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Re: Williams Pipe Line Encroachment Agreement Dear John: 2140 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 PHONE (612) 427 -8877 FAX (612) 421 -4213 have reviewed your letter of March 8, 1999 and the proposed Williams encroachment agreement. Normally, when another public utility is located within city street right -of -way, this type of agreement would not be appropriate. However, in this situation, part of the area that the City intends to construct sewer pipes lies outside of dedicated right-of- way and furthermore the pipe line easement was granted before the dedication of the streets in the plat so Williams has the right to demand such agreement. Your questions are as follows: 1. Is Williams within their rights to require the City to execute such a document? Yes, based upon the discussion above. 2. Should the developer, Mr. Uhde, be executing a similar document? If Mr. Uhde is going to be performing work as a part of his subdivision such as grading and anything that may cause interference with the pipe line, he should be executing such a document. That would be something that Williams Pipe Line, however, would have to negotiate with Mr. Uhde. 3. If this agreement is justified, does the City need to address pipe lines contained in areas platted as City right -of -way? This depends on whether or not the pipe line easement was granted prior to the right -of -way being dedicated in the plat. 4. I have reviewed the attached agreement and would make two comments. Paragraph 4 seems to have something left out in the first several lines and I believe it should be revised by the pipe line company. Paragraph 6 should be Mr. John Powell March 15, 1999 Page Two changed so that there are no restrictions on the City of this type if they are placed outside the easement. There may be improvements the City is going to undertake within 25 feet of the pipe line that lie outside the pipe line's easement over which they would have no legal right to restrict our activities. The remainder of the agreement is acceptable. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sin ely, illiam G. Hawkins WGH /tju Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA Ordinance No. Qkqg AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF LAND BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES WITH JAMES J. AND TRACEY M. DOUGLAS The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordains: The real property described in Exhibit A hereto is presently owned by the City of Lino Lakes. The City Council of the City has determined that the property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose. II. The real property described in Exhibit B herein is owned by James J. Douglas and Tracey M. Douglas. Such property is needed for public drainage purposes by the City of Lino Lakes. That James J. Douglas and Tracey M. Douglas have agreed to exchange the property described on Exhibit B for the property owned by the City described on Exhibit A. The Mayor and the City Clerk- Treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to execute such deeds and other documents as may be necessary in order to exchange the properties described herein. IV. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the City Charter. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by council member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. First Reading Approved on Second Reading Approved on Published in the official newspaper on , 1999 , 1999 , 1999 EXHIBIT A A permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes, over, under and across the following described parcel: That part of the west 660.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, lying south of the north 500 feet, and north of the south 500 feet thereof; and that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, except road, subject to easement of record. Said permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes being that part of the above described parcel lying south of a line being 300.00 feet northerly of as measured at right angles to and parallel with the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Except that part which lies within a 100 foot wide strip of land being 50 feet wide on each side of the following described center line: Commencing at the South Quarter corner of said Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 836.79 feet to the point of beginning of the center line to be described; thence northeasterly 1124.51 feet along the arc of a non tangential curve concave to the southeast having a central angle of 78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds and a radius of 818.51 feet, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds East, 1038.14 feet; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 221.72 feet more or Tess, to the center line of Lake Drive and said center line there terminating. Said permanent easement contains 45,510 square feet, more or less. EXHIBIT B The south 300 feet of that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, Tying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as part of Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota. PROPERTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this — day of , 1999, by and between the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota ( "City ") and James J. Douglas and Tracey M. Douglas, husband and wife ( "Douglas "). 1. Consideration. In consideration of the covenants herein contained and One Dollar ($1.00) to each party paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City agrees to convey or cause to be conveyed to Douglas the following legally described property: See attached Exhibit A and Douglas agrees to convey or cause to be conveyed to the City all of the following described property: See attached Exhibit B. 2. Warranty Deeds. The parties hereby agree to execute and deliver a Warranty Deed conveying marketable title to said premises subject only to the following exceptions: a. Building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations. b. Restrictions relating to the use or improvement of the premises without effective forfeiture provisions. c. Reservations of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. d. Utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements. 3. Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. Real estate taxes due and payable in and for the year of closing shall be prorated between the parties on a calendar year basis to the actual date of closing. Each party shall pay all special assessments levied against the property they shall be conveying to the other on the date of this agreement. Each party shall pay the real estate taxes due and payable on the parcels received by them in the year following the closing and thereafter. 4. Title. The parties mutually agree that within a reasonable time after approval of this agreement, they will furnish a Commitment for Title Insurance, Abstract of Title or Registered Property Abstract, certified to date to include proper searches, etc. The other party shall be allowed ten (10) days after receipt thereof for examination of said title and the making of any objections thereto, said objections to be made in writing or deemed to be waived. If any objections are so made, the non - objecting party shall be allowed 120 days to make such title marketable. If said title is not marketable and is not made so within 120 days from the date of written objections thereto as above provided, this agreement shall be null and void, at the option of the objecting party. If the title to said property be found marketable or be so made within said time, and the objecting party shall default in any of the agreements and continue to default for a period of ten (10) days, then, and in that case, the non - objecting party may terminate this contract. This provision shall not deprive either party of the right of enforcing the specific performance of this contract provided such contract shall not be terminated as aforesaid, and provided action to enforce such specific performance shall be commenced within six months after such right of action shall arise. 5. Additional Terms. The following additional terms and conditions shall apply to this transaction. a. The City agrees that it will construct a driveway from the newly constructed Apollo Boulevard to serve the residence of Douglas. Such driveway shall be in substantially the same form as that driveway which is currently being used by Douglas. Such driveway shall be installed at the City's expense. During the construction of Apollo Boulevard, the City will provide daily ingress and egress to the house owned by Douglas. b. The City agrees to install a sewer and water stub large enough to serve the entire portion of the property that would be owned by Douglas after the conveyance of the property to them by the City. Such stub shall be sized to serve the maximum allowable densities currently in existence under the City zoning ordinance. c. The City, at its expense, shall have both properties described in Exhibit A and B surveyed for the purpose of creating legal descriptions. d. The City agrees to pay for all expenses for this transaction including title insurance commitment fees, state deed tax, recording fees, and any other miscellaneous fees or expenses that would be incurred in completing the terms and conditions of this agreement. 6. Notices. All notices required herein shall be in writing and delivered personally or mailed to the address as shown in this paragraph, and, if mailed, are effective as of the date of mailing. Addresses for the parties are: To City: To Douglas: Lino Lakes City Hall 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 James J. Douglas Tracey M. Douglas 540 Lilac Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 7. Minnesota Law. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. Well Disclosure. Both parties certify that they do not know of any wells on the property that they are conveying to the other party. Both parties agree that there are no individual sewage treatment systems on or serving the property that they are conveying. 9. Closing. The closing on the transfers of the real estate shall take place on or before March 1, 1999. 10. This agreement shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties. 11. Additional Compensation. That the City hereby agrees to pay such out - of- pocket costs that Douglas may incur as a result of this property exchange for such items as change of addresses, etc. in an amount not to exceed $ 1,000. Douglas shall provide documentation supporting any requests for such reimbursements. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their respective hands as of the effective date first written above. DOUGLAS: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) James J. Douglas Tracey A. Douglas On this day of , 1999, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared James J. Douglas and Tracey A. Douglas, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public CITY: CITY OF LINO LAKES Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, City Clerk EXHIBIT A A permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes, over, under and across the following described parcel: That part of the west 660.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Tying south of the north 500 feet, and north of the south 500 feet thereof; and that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, except road, subject to easement of record. Said permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes being that part of the above described parcel lying south of a line being 300.00 feet northerly of as measured at right angles to and parallel with the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Except that part which lies within a 100 foot wide strip of land being 50 feet wide on each side of the following described center line: Commencing at the South Quarter corner of said Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 836.79 feet to the point of beginning of the center line to be described; thence northeasterly 1124.51 feet along the arc of a non tangential curve concave to the southeast having a central angle of 78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds and a radius of 818.51 feet, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds East, 1038.14 feet; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 221.72 feet more or less, to the center line of Lake Drive and said center line there terminating. Said permanent easement contains 45,510 square feet, more or less. EXHIBIT B The south 300 feet of that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, Tying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as part of Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota. SMOCID Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99-17 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR LANDSCAPING FOR THE CIVIC COMPLEX WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for landscaping for the Civic Complex; bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name: Amount of Bid Prescription Landscape, Inc. 1311 Sylvan St. St. Paul, MN 55117 $34,690.00 ND WHEREAS, it appears that Prescription Landscape, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder for landscaping; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the contract with Prescription Landscape, Inc. in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the Civic Complex, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file at Lino Lakes City Hall. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 22nd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on March 22, 1999. Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk 41 ° 03/16/99 TUE 13:49 FAX Adolfson & Peterson Construction ADOLFSON & PETERSON [6 001 6701 West 23rd Street • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 • (612) 544-1561 • FAX (612) 525 -2333 March 16, 1999 Re: Lino Lakes Civic Complex — Sid Package #3 (Landscape). CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS Dear Mary Divine, Adbli'son & Peterson, Inc have reviewed the bidfor fandscaping, fbr bid package #3 of the Lino Lakes Civio Complex. Therefore, I am pleased to recommend to the City of Lino Lakes to accept the Base Hid and Alternate No.5 from Prescription Landscape, Inc. in the amount of 534,690.00. Scott E. Johnson Const. Manager Member of Construction Mansoement Association of America s . I V i h P1 Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 -11 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO GREENWAYS PLANNING GRANT SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes has a vast and extensive natural resource heritage, AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes natural resource heritage is a critical component in maintaining the area's high quality of life, its economic and environmental vitality, AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes has provided funding over the last two years for the extensive study of the natural resource base and the development of a Management Plan for these resources, AND WHERAES, the preservation development process developed in our management plan includes the need to refine site boundaries and update restoration efforts into our inventory, AND WHEREAS, Anoka County Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Park includes 2600 acres of dedicated resource with several large recreational lakes, AND WHEREAS, Anoka County Parks has developed a similar resource inventory and management plan simultaneously with the City of Lino Lakes, AND WHEREAS, the City will be collaborating in resource management efforts with Anoka County, and the Rice Creek Watershed District, and there is a need for support tools by both Anoka County and The City of Lino Lakes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: Supports the grant proposal to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for a planning grant for the purchase of needed equipment under the Conservation Partners Program. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this xocth day of x000000c, 1998. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on date. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer )T any ray, :cDQnald' DO - 4/5 vote an ► Plat - rnple majart; rite lined r8 held a Public He to u ry 13 meetu , for the January 25 City Council meeting. The ns be rescheduled three times: to the February 22, March Qeet ngs. 'Tire City Council must take action tonight or the lly apprrc v 1. The deadline lava is not clear on this point. ate to deny the applications. A written request from the The PDO requires a 4/5'trot the PDO fails to be ved. i the P CUP do not endg oa the fis in t OPTIONS NXC NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Brian Wessel FROM: Alan Brixius / Cynthia Putz -Yang DATE: 8 January 1999 RE: Lino Lakes JADT PDO and Amoco /McDonald's CUP FILE NO: 194.01 - 98.07 BACKGROUND The Lino Lakes Planning Commission reviewed the JADT PDO and Amoco /McDonald's CUP at its October meeting and found the information incomplete. The applicant has submitted additional information addressing issues discussed in the October meeting. This report addresses the JADT PDO application. In June 1998, the Lino Lakes Planning Commission and City Council reviewed and approved a concept plan illustrating the general layout of a shopping center and surrounding sites on the northeast quadrant of the I-35W /Lake Drive interchange. This concept plan envisioned an attractive and integrated shopping environment anchored by a community- oriented shopping center. In this concept plan, the applicant was requesting various design flexibilities that go beyond the SC, Shopping Center District and other development regulations: 1. Variable lot sizes smaller than district standards. 2. Setback flexibility for both building and parking. 3. Private streets. 4. Lot frontage. In consideration of the concept plan, the City emphasized the following design elements in its approval. 1. Environmental sensitive design related to green space, landscaping, tree preservation, storm water infiltration, integration of site design with natural amenities. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 61 2- 595 -9636 FAX 61 2- 595 -9837 E -MAIL NAC @WINTERNET.COM 2. Attractive site and building design related to clustering of buildings, shared parking, landscaping, green space, pedestrian access and circulation and architectural standards. 3. Traffic systems - convenient and safe traffic systems include automobile, truck, pedestrian and bicycle. The City wants the shopping center area to be pedestrian friendly. The applicant wishes to proceed with the first phase of the development and has submitted applications for the following: 1. PDO, Planned Development Overlay Zoning District 2. Preliminary Plat 3. McDonald's, conditional use permits have been requested for: a. Gas sales b. Drive - through lane Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Exhibit F: Exhibit G: Exhibit H: Exhibit I: Exhibit J: Exhibit K Exhibit L: Site Location Natural Features/Tree Inventory Concept Development Plan Southwest Area Preliminary Drainage Preliminary Plat McDonald's Site Plan McDonald's Grading Plan McDonald's Utility Plan McDonald's Landscape Plan McDonald's Details McDonald's Elevations Design Framework Narrative The PDO and CUPs are integrally tied together in establishing the theme and identity of the entire shopping center. In this respect, the various planning applications have been reviewed in conjunction with one another within this report. Since the original concept plan, a number of issues and changes have presented themselves: 1. The first development site was originally identified as a fast food restaurant site. The current proposal includes a combination fast food, convenience store, gas sales and car wash. This change from the initial land use has raised concerns in the following areas: a. Over - utilization of the site with the combination of land uses. b. Clear cutting the site to accommodate the combination of uses. c. Duplication of similar land uses within the Town Center Planning District that may establish an image contrary to the planning objectives for the Town Center area. d. Establishing a design and land use theme for the shopping center area of the Town Center that is inconsistent to the image portrayed in the original concept plan. 2. The applicant is requesting a staged development of the PDO and flexibility in site use and design to retain the greatest flexibility in the marketing of the sites to perspective businesses. While recognizing the need for site marketing, the requested PDO is intended to establish firm rules and design guidelines for the entire site development that insures the high quality development originally envisioned in the concept plan. The applicant and his design team have attempted to respond to City design issues, however, there is a reluctance to establish firm design elements for the overall PDO that may encumber or discourage a potential development interest. Without establishing some specific PDO design perimeters, staff believes that the City would not maintain the necessary controls to insure that land use and site design elements emphasized in the City's review of the original concept plan and the City objectives for the entire Town Center commercial area. 3. Since the initiation of the JADT development applications, the City had contracted with Calthorpe Associates and Zimmerman Volk Associates to revise the Town Center Master Plan and establish land use and design site guidelines for the entire Town Center area. The new Town Center Master Plan will emphasize the principles of traditional neighborhood development (TND). Within all four quadrants of the I-35 /CSAH 23 interchange, specific recommendations pertaining to traffic circulation, streetscape, site access, environmental preservation, land use, and site design will be offered to ensure a mixture of land uses that will complement - each other and create the kind of quality commercial development desired by the City. The formulation of these specific Town Center land use and design criteria is consistent with the recommendations outlined in Planning District 1 of the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. The lack of these specific Town Center land use and design guidelines have complicated the PDO /CUP review in that the City's expectations are not clearly defined. This has resulted in numerous negotiations over the PDO standards, many of which are still undecided. ANALYSIS Planning Development Overlay Rezoning. In Lino Lakes, the PDO District is a zoning overlay district application that is processed as a zoning amendment. In consideration of any change in zoning, the Planning Commission must make findings based on the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. In 1997, Lino Lakes adopted a Comprehensive Plan amendment for Planning Districts 1 and 2. Planning District 1 outlines the land use and planning recommendations for the Town Center area, which includes this PDO site. The General Land Use Plan proposed commercial development on the proposed site. The Town Center Planning District Plan for this area of Lino Lakes includes the following commercial recommendations: "The City will identify the . type and character of the commercial land use it wishes to attract. Currently, the Town Center design team is outlining design criteria that may be extended to all commercial areas of Planning District 1. This criteria will include guidelines for site and building design." The development of the Town Center guidelines has been an ongoing process anticipated for completion this Summer. As a result, City staff and the applicant have been attempting to define the criteria through the processing of the PDO, CUP, and subdivision applications. Through the process, much progress has been made on various design issues, however, a number of land use and design issues remain unresolved. The City is currently in the process of developing Town Center guidelines with the assistance of Calthorpe Associates and Zimmerman Volk Associates. With these guidelines still pending, it is premature to determine if the JADT PDO and Amoco /McDonald's are consistent with the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed land uses are allowed within the Shopping Center Zoning District. The change of land use from a fast food restaurant in the original concept to a combination fast food /convenience store /gas sale /car wash raises compatibility concerns with regard to the following areas: 4 a. The site land use duplicates land uses at the CSAH 23 /Apollo Avenue intersection. This duplication raises concerns over the image and identity being created in the Town Center area. b. The proposed development results in clear cutting of the Amoco /McDonald's site to accommodate the proposed use. The site plan only proposes to retain three existing trees or 3 percent of the existing significant trees on this site. This is not consistent with the City's stated objectives outlined in the concept approval. The applicant has offered a tree replacement plan, however, to date, specific tree preservation areas or replacement sites have not been geographically defined. c. The Amoco/McDonald's development represents a very intense development in the first development of the site. This initial development will establish the theme for the balance of the PDO. This development intensity presents concern with its compatibility with original concept plan and the City's stated objectives in approval of the concept plan. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The PDO is intended to permit greater flexibility and consequently, more creative and imaginative design for development. With the consideration of the original concept plan, the PDO District was identified as the appropriate zoning mechanism to implement the proposed development. The applicant is seeking the PDO to allow for flexibility from the shopping center performance standards in the following areas: a. Smaller lot sizes. b. Lot frontage. c. Private streets. These fiexibilities are intended to promote an efficient land use pattern, higher level of amenities, and the preservation of natural areas and open space. While this area of Lino Lakes will likely be developed under a PDO in the future, the current application presents concerns with regard to land use, over - utilization of the site, and internal traffic circulation. Additionally, the reluctance of the applicant to provide firm PDO design criteria for the overall PDO does not assure the City that subsequent projects will not result in similar design concerns. 5 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. The proposed development will not overburden existing public utilities or services. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The proposed site will be accessed via the Apollo Drive/CSAH 23 intersection. The Town Center Master Plan will involve working with both Anoka County and MnDOT with regard to the redesign and improvements to both the I -35 /CSAH 23 interchange, bridge and CSAH roadways. These improvements will impact the proposed PDO development with regard to site design, streetscape treatment, and traffic circulation. In respect to these roadway improvements, the PDO development and preliminary plat are premature. PRELIMINARY PLAT / CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS The preliminary plat involves only a portion of the overall PDO site and includes a partial dedication of Apollo Drive, an outlot for the private street, and a single commercial lot. Review of the preliminary plat presents the following comments: Lots. The SC Zoning District requires a minimum lot size of three acres. The conceptual development plan and the preliminary plat illustrate lot sizes in the southwest comer of the PDO site less than three acres. Through the PDO process, flexibility may be approved without variance. Utilities. The general development notes have been revised t� state that drainage and utility easements will be provided in accordance with the following schedule: Pipelines Ponds Perimeter Lot Lines Wetlands 20 feet (centered on utility) 1 foot above HWL 5 feet on all lot lines 5 feet beyond wetland boundary Private Street. The proposed private street is proposed to be platted as Outlot A. In response to staff comments, the applicant has revised the concept plan to illustrate the private road ending in a temporary 40 foot radius turnaround until the restaurant site is developed. This change, however, was not also made to the site plan. Without the addition of this turnaround, vehicles must rely on private parking areas for vehicle turnaround. 6 The private street will be required to meet City Street construction standards for commercial streets. As a private street, deed restrictions will be placed on outlots that prevent future turnover of this street to the City. Public Streets. The applicant is requesting flexibility from the 80 foot ROW standard for commercial streets. The concept plan shows Apollo Drive with a 100 foot ROW between CSAH 23 and the first intersection within the PDO and a 60 foot ROW for the remainder of the street. The City Engineer has indicated that a 60 foot ROW would be acceptable if the sidewalk/trail is located outside the ROW in a sidewalk easement. This will require a revision of the concept plan and site plan. The infiltration basin located near Apollo Drive on the McDonald's site will need to be altered to allow for the sidewalk. Based on staff comment, the applicant has revised the preliminary plat to include right -of- way dedication along CSAH 23, along Parcel 4. Anoka County must formally approve the Apollo Drive access point. The concept plan has been revised to illustrate Apollo Drive ending in a temporary 40 foot radius turnaround until Apollo Drive is extended. However, this turnaround has not been added to the site plan. Streetscape. The applicant has provided a narrative describing the proposed streetscape treatment within the PDO. While the streetscape narrative is appealing, the following issues should be addressed: 1. The PDO is intended to be bicycle and pedestrian friendly, however the PDO will have sidewalks on only one side of the public and private streets, except on Apollo Drive between CSAH 23 and the first intersection. The following items should be given attention: a. The applicant has revised the concept plan and site plan to include sidewalks on both sides of Apollo Drive between CSAH 23 and the first intersection within the PDO. A sidewalk/trail should be considered on both sides of the rest of Apollo Drive because of the traffic and aesthetic emphasis of this street. b. The applicant has revised the concept plan and site plan to show marked pedestrian crossing within the PDO. c. Sidewalks on one side of the private streets raise similar issues to Apollo Drive. 7 1 2. The PDO narrative describes the streetscape landscaping. In review of this information, the. following issues have been raised: a. The PDO narrative has been revised to indicate that tree spacing for public and private roads will generally be three trees per 100 feet of curb length. Parking lot islands will have at least one tree with a minimum three inch caliper. No graphic plan has been provided that shows the quantities, locations or spacing of streetscape trees. b. No plant schedule is offered for the PDO, however, some plant sizes are described in the PDO narrative. The PDO narrative states that, "Replacement trees will include overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or deciduous trees having a minimum height of eight feet." This statement should be revised to the following: "Replacement trees will consist of overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or evergreen trees having a minimum height of eight feet." c. The PDO narrative has been revised to indicate that native grasses and wildflowers will be emphasized in the eastern portion of the site (near Wetlands 2 and 3), along the 1 -35 corridor, and along infiltration areas. These are appropriate locations for native grasses and wildflowers. d. The site plan for Phase 1 has been revised to not include amur maple trees, however the PDO narrative states that small groves of multi -stem amur maples will be planted along Apollo Drive and private roads. The use of amur maples as a boulevard tree raises issue with regard to traffic sight lines. Also, amur maples are native to Asia and can become invasive in natural areas in the Midwest. A native species, such as cockspur hawthorn, would be more desirable if a small tree is needed. 3. Streetscape Along CSAH 23. The Town Center Planning District recommends the establishment of a streetscape treatment along CSAH 23 that will provide design connection between each quadrant of the Town Center interchange. The design parameters for this public improvement has not yet been established to allow for a continuous streetscape design between CSAH 23 and Apollo Drive. These streetscape elements are currently under study. The streetscape elements between Apollo Drive and CSAH 23 should be integrated with one another. Tree Preservation. The PDO narrative states that tree preservation is recognized as a major concern of the City. The narrative also states that sight lines are essential for retail development and some tree removal is unavoidable. The applicant has proposed that for each of the 275 identified trees (not including Elm or Boxelder) that is removed as part of the PDO development, a 1-for-1 tree replacement plan be provided. Replacement trees 8 1 will consist of overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or evergreen trees having a minimum height of eight feet. No standards for the number or percent of trees to be preserved has been proposed by the applicant. Of the 98 trees existing in the Phase 1 area, 95 are proposed to be removed. The tree replacement proposal offered by the applicant offers the following advantages and disadvantages: Advantages: • Each significant tree that is removed will be replaced. • Three -inch caliper deciduous trees and eight foot evergreen trees are trees of a significant size and exceed Zoning Ordinance standards for size. • Replacement of existing trees allow for the establishment of proper sight lines, necessary for the economic survival of retail developments. Disadvantages: • The replacement trees will not match the existing trees in size when planted. • This proposal does not prohibit clear cutting the site. • The proposed plan does not illustrate the replacement of the lost trees in Phase I. In consideration of the tree replacement proposal, the following conditions should be considered: Street Lighting. The PDO narrative outlines lighting standards for parking Tots. The narrative has addressed the following lighting issues that were raised in the previous report: 1. The narrative states that street lighting for both Apollo Drive and private streets shall be consistent with the City's selection for the Town Center areas, which is the Lumec VR-300 lighting standard with a globe shaped light bulb container that protrudes below the fixture opening. 2. The narrative states that in order to control site illumination and to limit glare, site lighting intensity will be limited to 1.0 foot candles at the site's perimeter. Drainage. The drainage from the McDonald's site is reliant on off -site facilities. The grading plan has been revised to address issues raised in the previous report. 1. The drainage plan has been revised to integrate the recommendations of the Environmental Review Board. The storm pipe from the bituminous area on the west side of the McDonald's building has been eliminated as recommended. The infiltration basin next to the woodland east of Outlot A has been narrowed and reduced in size to preserve more of the trees in this area. To compensate for the reduced size of this basin, two additional infiltration basins have been located at the southern end of the site. 2. The general development notes have been revised to list appropriate drainage easements. 3. The grading plan will be subject to review by the City Engineer. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The original concept plan for the shopping center was very appealing in design and vision. Through the processing of the PDO application, the applicant and staff worked hard in an effort to respond to site issues and define the design parameters for a PDO. However, changes in land use from the original concept plan, and the •applicant's reluctance to establish PDO design guidelines complicated the development application review. In this respect, we recommend that the City deny the development application of both JADT and McDonald's with the following findings: PDO is denied finding: 1. The proposed PDO rezoning is inconsistent with the approved Comprehensive Plan Town Center Planning District 1 recommendation. The proposed PDO rezoning and development applicant are contrary with the defined design objectives cited by the City in the concept plan approval. 3. The proposed Phase 1 land use raises land use compatibility issues related to: a. Duplication of similar land uses at each quadrant of the CSAH 23 /Apollo Drive interchange. b. Removal of 97. percent of significant trees to accommodate the Amoco /McDonald's development. 4. The PDO rezoning and site development are premature in Tight of anticipated improvements to both CSAH 23 and the l -35 /CSAH 23 interchange which will impact the site design and traffic circulation of the proposed PDO. 10 5. The PDO is intended to offer design flexibility in return for improved site design, and land use relationship. The PDO material has not established specific plans and design commitments to ensure that the quality development initially offered in the concept plan will be achieved in exchange for the requested ordinance flexibilities. Preliminary plat is denied finding: 1. Without the flexibility of an approved PDO Zoning District, the preliminary plat is non - conforming to City subdivision standards related to lot size and private streets. Conditional use permits for gas sales and drive - through lane is denied finding: 1. Without the flexibility of an approved PDO Zoning District, the proposed lot is substandard with regard to lot size. pc: Bill Hawkins Mary Devine Jeff Smyser Mary Kay Wyland 11 r 0-==•• MAP OF CITIES OF LINO LAKES, L_ ••••In• CENTERVILLE , & PART OF CIRCLE PINES EXHIBIT A and Q i'0 JRFVISIONS IreiS I i lnllUUlmmmuml 11 1-_c- •ur : Ij Ii11,1� Ilh IMP 1 1111 1 ;::141,Hi+ ufi I, saw nail ■ *INUIT �� Iona • D a -- nil(. �. _ no miumgjou_ mscr snot M+ �. jam: OM Or� Seam w.yrwOi 11+.'b awn MOM Me IMN WNW z REVISIONS I e.... nm•a IMAM err 4) MOSS . .s.ywr _ e Ow Me ftwoora some INS Arditiebn OS Ode ems MA Sift IN SUB pus � N 11111111111111111 l l 11 REVISIONS 4o Wit nib 1Y . ;, Awl. a =L 1. �em.nsx s INMAN MIRK 11111•••11 OM Nil NEM,* An: be metre as. tt. � •• r.y.1"A Design Framework Lino Lakes Commercial Development JADT Development Group September, 1998 EXHIBIT L THE VISION • When developed, the project should make the City proud, and provide a lasting legacy for the land owners. • The project should be a significant landmark, and a gateway to the community. • The project should be pedestrian- friendly, while providing a convenient and safe transportation system. • The project should emphasize green space with an overall landscaping theme. • Stormwater management should emphasize the preservation of existing on -site wetlands and the creation of stormwater infiltration opportunities. • Building design and siting should emphasize quality, aesthetics, clustering and shared parking. SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The streetscape is shaped primarily by the placement of buildings and parking lots within the project's setting. This section establishes design guidelines for site planning, building massing, and landscaping to control the development patterns within the Lino Lakes Commercial Development. I. STREETSCAPE HIERARCHY The streets within the project play a vital role in shaping the project's identity. The streets serve as entries and gateways to the individual users, provide linkages between the various buildings and establish the development pattern. What are Streetscapes? The term " streetscape" refers to the physical setting shaped by the relationships and design of buildings, parking lots and structures, streets, sidewalks, landscaping and other elements. In addition to buildings, streets and parking lots, other streetscape elements include trees and lighting. The relationship between all of these elements and the quality of their design are what will shape the image and scale of Lino Lakes Commercial Development. A hierarchy of streetscape treatments has been established to emphasize traffic functions within the project. The hierarchy of street is defined as follows: • Primary Streets: • Access Drives: • Pedestrian Linkage: A. Primary Streets - Apollo Drive Apollo Drive, proposed to be a public street, is the entrance and the main distributor of traffic within the project, connecting Lake Drive (CSAH 23) with 77th Street. At its intersection with Lake Drive, Apollo Drive will be a divided roadway to facilitate a sense of arrival and traffic control. After approximately 300 feet, Apollo Drive will be a 30 -foot wide street section located within a 60 feet right -of -way. A 5 -foot wide sidewalk is proposed on both sides of Apollo Drive from CSAH 23 to the first interior intersection, and then along the south and east side of Apollo Drive to facilitate pedestrian movement. This trailway links a future County trail along the east side of Lake Drive to trail routes to individual sites within the development. B. Access Drives - Private Outlots Privately owned outlots are to be controlled be Common Maintenance Area Agreements, will serve as spokes from Apollo Drive. Typically, these outlots will provide transportation linkage between Apollo Drive and several individual parking lots/building sites. These streets will be treated with a moderate use of streetscape elements. Their main design objectives are: • Create comfortable pedestrian scaled linkages between Apollo Drive and the individual uses, and parking area. • Provide continuity between Apollo Drive and the rest of the project through common streetscape elements and architecture. • Incorporate street trees. The design of the access drives will generally include a 50 -foot wide outlot containing a 30- foot wide private driveway, and a parallel sidewalk/trail. The outlots will be encumbered by deed restrictions that prevent their future turnover to the City for public streets. C. Pedestrian Link Bicycle, walking and jogging sidewalks are incorporated into the public street Corridor (Apollo Drive), the private driveways and also into specific building sites. These trails and related open spaces link and integrate all areas of the development and provide connections with the City's park and trail systems, including the future trail along the east side of Lake Drive. Tree lined boulevards serve as gateways and links to the development. They reinforce the positive image and serve to create distinctive corridors for buildings to front and people to walk along. Great care will be taken in the design to create and sustain a strong, pedestrian oriented environment. This is accomplished through the creative use of such streetscape elements as landscaping, walkways and lighting. Parking is ample and convenient, but, it is designed to serve multiple tenants by centering between buildings, allowing sharing. II. LANDSCAPING The Anoka County/Lino Lakes area is dominated by sandy soils and an existing tree cover of oaks in upland areas. For these reasons the landscapes plan will be dominated by oaks and other trees suitable for rapidly draining soils. All lawn and planted areas will be irrigated with the exception of areas.planted in native grasses and wildflowers. The use of native grasses will be emphasized in the eastern portion of the site (near Wetlands 2 and 3), and along the I -35 corridor, and along infiltration areas. A tree survey of the site was performed that identified 308 larger diameter trees, of which 33 were Elms and Boxelders. The remaining 275 trees included, for the most part, Oaks with some Cedar, and a smaller number of other tree types. Tree preservation is recognized as a major concern of the City, yet it is also recognized that site lines are essential for retail development with some tree removal to facilitate an economical development being unavoidable and necessary. In view of the fact that replanting trees can mitigate tree removal, it is proposed that for each of the 275 identified trees (not including Elm or Boxelder) that is removed as part of the development, a 1 -for -1 tree replacement plan be provided. Replacement trees will include overstory trees with a minimum three -inch caliper, or deciduous trees having a minimum height of eight feet. A. Perimeter Landscaping Anoka County CSAH 23 & I -35W Treatment of the perimeter areas adjacent to the Interstate will consist of clusters of oaks with view corridors open to retail buildings and signage. The overstory canopy of oaks will be augmented with an understory of ornamental trees clustered in small groves. Clearly defined areas of native grasses and wildflowers will be used along the I -35 corridor and the eastern portion of the site. B. Service Areas Service areas will be screened with evergreen. \ C. Apollo Drive / ` Apollo Drive will be generally lined with clusters of Red Oaks and small groves of Multi - stem Amur Maple set in native grass planting areas. Groves of Quaking Aspen, tolerant of wet conditions, will be used in infiltration pond areas. The entry median will be planted with flowering ornaments, flowering ground covers (such as day lilies) and low shrub masses. Tree spacing will generally be three trees per 100 feet of curb length. D. Private Roads Private Roads will be lined with groupings of Hackberry, Ash, Red Maple and Honeylocust. Groves of Quaking Aspen, tolerant of wet conditions, will be used in infiltration pond areas. Small areas of Amur, Maple and flowering ornaments used on Apollo Drive will be repeated along with evergreens as needed for screening and accent. Tree spacing will generally be three trees per 100 feet of curb length. E. Foundation Planting Retail pedestrian areas shall incorporate foundation planting with colorful accents. These may include pots with seasonal color and entries and seating areas for pedestrian interest and ambiance. F. Common Open Space Area Common Open Space areas will be defined by plantings, berms and buildings to become outdoor rooms. Usable spaces shall be sod or a hardsurfaced paving material. Open spaced to be predominantly for viewing shall be nature grasses and wildflowers. G. Parking Lot Interiors Landscaping the interior of parking lots improves the appearance of large commercial parking lots and breaks up large expanses of asphalt. Parking lot islands must be large enough to support the trees planted and trees and other plant materials should be selected that thrive under harsh conditions. Parking lot interiors should have 150 square feet of landscape islands per 25 parking spaces. The islands shall include at a minimum one overstory tree with a minimum of 3 caliper at time of planting. III. LIGHTING Lighting should provide continuity and consistency throughout the area. All parking lot lights shall be uniform in style, color and height. Exterior wall lighting shall be encouraged to enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting styles and building fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. To reduce the number of lights in larger parking fields, high performance light standards shall be encouraged. Parking areas will be lit with a downcast box -type fixture mounted on a 22 foot aluminum pole. The light source will be a metal -halid lamp which will cast white light over the parking lot. The light cast by these fixtures will be restricted to .5 lumens at the property line and shall be adjustable and directional. Parking areas will be lit after dark and during hours of operation only. Wall mounted security lighting located at all building entrances will also be downcast to reduce visibility from off site. Street lighting (Apollo Drive and private streets) shall be consistent with the City's selection for the Town Center areas, which is the Lumec VR -300 lighting standard with a globe shaped light bulb container that protrudes below the fixture opening. In order to control site illumination and to limit glare, site lighting intensity will be limited to 1.0 foot candles at the site's perimeter. IV. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Design Character and Details: The architectural character established throughout Lino Lakes Commercial Development is intended to reflect a long lasting, durable, and high quality image. Special attention to massing, proportions and details are encouraged. B. Building Placement and Relationship to Parking The intent of the master planning is to orient buildings as appropriate or allowing for functional needs of shared parking, visibility from roadways and pedestrian accessibility. Where feasible, buildings shall be built to minimal 30 feet setbacks from Apollo Drive as to encourage an urban sense of scale. Buildings shall be grouped and oriented so as to promote shared parking. Parking shall be convenient and accessible from the front entrances of buildings. • All developments should encourage a strong connection between the building and parking areas through unified construction of elements, pedestrian path and entries. • Pedestrian passageways through the parking areas are encouraged. • Up to 20% of the parking spaces in a parking lot may be permanently marked for compact cars • When determined appropriate, commercial buildings are to accommodate bicycle /motorcycle parking areas and bike rack design. • Shared parking areas with varying peak demands shall be utilized when possible. Shared parking encourages users to move between destination points without getting into cars. Shared parking will allow for greater intensity of development, will relieve the problem of poorly utilized parking areas and with less paving, will result in less runoff e:\main: misc:\desgnfrmwrk9 -28 09/28/98 11:27 $612 885 4769 L C iilx1relit :- :1.1 II111N■N0■l11_' /0 —rn I • at • 09/28/98 11:31 $612 885 4769 Fixture Specifications Dimensions: 400 1000 A B c E 17" 17" 91/2" 9" 6" 22" 22" 1 1" 6" Fixture Ordering Information: Cat #ASB - cut-off FT - Fixed arm (forward throw) 175 MH 250 MH 400 MH 1000 MH 250 HPS 400 HPS 1000 HPS Pole Specifications Tenon Top Pole MCDONALD'S CORP. feed an II (Forward The.-4 013- Dark Bronze MT - Multi-Tap Z 8.240.277Y) AD -Almond 480V( W -White BK - Black PLT - Platinum *Consult factory for other finishes .125 wall thickness Handhole with Cover v Y Ir 18" Painted s .pered stct.1 base for concrete pour (optional) 24" L Features: I. Mill finished, aluminum housing. 2. Access to lamp and ballast compartments through hinged door assembly. 3. One -piece tempered glass lens. 4. Optical system fabricated of polished alzak aluminum. Provides for optimum efficiency for long and wide light distribution. 5. Includes adjustable tenon adaptor. 6. Includes integral /adjustable light cut -off shield. 7. Available with photoelectric control. 8. Available with polycarbonate shier 9. Suitable for wall mounting - consult factory. Features: 1. Square steel poles finished with weatherproof rust - preventative paint (Wrapped for protection). 2. 4 galvanized anchor aerlu` on galvanized wsh provided. (jamuut,2 h nut 2 -fiat washers per bolt) 3. Furnished with metal template. 4. Handhole provided. 5. Optional decorative anchor bolt cover. 6. Optional painted.tapered steel pole base for concrete pout (pictured at left). 7. 4" square pole up to 20 feet; 5" square pole from 20-28 feE Pole and Mounting Bracket Ordering Informat Pole Cat # SSP - —� finish Specify pole Specify f onisnes height 11J TT-1A i.l TT-4A TT-2A Performance Designed Lighting Products 3477 West Touhy Avenue. Lincolnwood, Illinois. 60645 Specify mounting bracket type (see below) TT-3A F-v R47- 6747105 • • CT7! ;- 1163,79 2191 7 4.1111111 IIPIME tii _'1011,01'Y• 4 -7"7' _'1E'T7T1rAMI MIME L11/[?.�i.�fl' LIE ~ya yYS, • NOTES: I. ALL IIFMl1101IED POId10NS CF LOT SNAIL !E S000ED EXCEPT MIEN NOTED AS SEED. 2. ALL. 9000E0 AREAS 10 E IOOGATED. 3. NL 901/11 SE06 10 ME FMOC EDGER NA MULCH. PUNTING NOT•CS L • goal* •b• 0 w w boom 1• Y W AN OW Omni 1.Or• •••• Yr or o•1Y00rk •••• •• Wow 000 olho • w1OO boo R lia Craw 1710„......0•11W -• bN 1w* t •• 1[ •111..w•• r M room all • r MM IwiU•b1 ••• Yo41Yw OoO- ow. im7br�"w+r w.. r'iiw 12 /• �li•�'0 1n•▪ • zy 1.1.0 M OrY O• •~ y b mwn•mb M•0O• 00 0•~ ww: IIWWI OMI �▪ pwn•M1•••1•••••I O�o•• •I•N• =oil*•gym MI�0�0+• Mw.•r ▪ =tilt =Ma N M•▪ ••yO•�" se//O� •r ti•M la Ambit 10.0.510 } Imo 01o. • banonl 110 el glob a, ▪ =.1 z; =Mg �. »•."1�awl •~p • Y15mi•• mull wry 00 / �► 1 ira�YO•1•L O/i MM •M ebb OMm•i•y/� / 1•b b•M. Mk_ s1. 4O•N 1n1•o M Ob1•�is O•• Y•Imi • Or 1510 17 WO0 mt 1>�mL Y /N M IiO1i•n bb•. r OP WWI w �•�•O11WOwn Abbe aI� •••••i11 ir4i/•1 7,414 rIlagard nay 0•N• 11n•11•M• I▪ re▪ rww. AS Memo • *Mk •••.•m.. 044 goo" 111.1 ~rw Mir •�r•r1••1 I V•b•m/l•I.1•••.••b 411.5 w ••• M w •••1 w4�F UMW IN WWI WWI M EM. MKS LEGEND ram rIFtTRAZON- BASIN NA1TC BRASS ! FORBE •rx l ILTRA1Id1' BASSI FLANTS CLOSERS N16'EUCA REO MUCKED NEW ENGLAND ASTER PALE INDIAN PLANTAIN OLD SOMA CANADA IIOC TREFOIL (X EIE SUNFLOWER NSE SLAt TAR DE OREAT SLUE LOBELIA BERGAMOT COMMONER BLACK EYE SUSAN SOEET BLACK (TED SUSAN \•k ROVERS BRANCHED CONEFLOOER CIMPLANT OOLDENRCO STIFF GOLDENROD SLUE Witwuri GOMA ALEXANDER ASS S9IE9 FdINm'k'0 BROOK CANADA MD RYE OANL GREEN BULRUSH FOXTAL SEDGE NORTH o' 30' SCALE IN FEET 6o' 110' ,. IY00008 0001 100 000000 w I C 100 CO111MCIOR 00018 NO MOC ARC N NE COMM CONMIC1011 2. 00 001011 10.11. 001011 S 10108 00101 VMS MR N 00 0DIE ML COINMCOL I. 1* 1101 100, =Off 00 WM0 00180 w OOHC CONMLL7OA P0111 01. 10000 AMMO UNTO= w 010010001. 1001* N 116 AMOK 0010110100. 4. 100 1011 11/010111 AM w 1K ISO ML 00101•L700. NOM SODA wt N K RAMC KIPPUR S. 10070110 NUMB 0t DOM • 00{0016 OM 1104 100•00 OWL M INERNIAMS 10 MAW 1011 M NOV 000N0U00 1 S41.V 1 R Mt OM07.00 MAL COMM URI 0L 110011 001/0/17 0 WOWS 011101 POUF OF MIX 00•03001 • 2111013 VIM 108 11 RC DAM •FCRIC LL M MAIM MM•ROS FOR 10041FMXL 011M7 100004.0005 NO MEMO 7. 01 0NMO014 Sem OF M 008041 A we 000100 00 01011[,0110 N We OHM COMMO I 0 p01/0MtML a r1WN MOt NO 0110 116/1■14 11104 M r 016 1871 S 0L 10500004 OWL 9010101MOW 0 r MIN 100.0L IW000 UMW MN 008 NO %NORM AM N I10 OM01/008FR. K 101 OMNI COMIC 10010 0 COMM MM NE 1087 LOOM I00010000M0 100 DO MUM* 1 1 a s a • 1 01 PIANO SPECITICAIK41 •••1* r Tom 0001070 001101 800000 maws 146 ova M r M1M00t sot 011••0 PR as 1110 001//000 0 MOO[, 000700 31*. MASS 1. MCI 001010 SAWN ROOD SMINAOSI 13' 1Mai17w0 /11000 1011111 want 16CWoN nN w1. O 000 NAM. r WINNOW *sea own cower* Is IROMACCINN 710. ONE MVO NW MEMO! MOO. 1•701 AM =1"11 allism A' ow wwwwin0OM W11 f O>r • ••••• wawa swam0M vs M WINO we WS WORD WO IMO NIA 11 w a eum M6 .0 •WWAR NM •••••0. IOU lb M N N1 SI IM•N•11a 0001, KWILMW0100L 101 10060 RYVi.M.M. N 11001011Y 11161010E N01F MOWN •111 1000116E OM 011[ IMPS NO Sr FOBS. 1141110 11- 00uNES. 1011 1101K vs. 811000001 MN WI 4*00 as 00 •1• AL IOO.O • if NM MOS 1.00000008 • 0001E 00 WOW* M MOM moo MOIMw710N Mks 63 1 >s was • F is .60 • 3 00 w = w •b• 2a own 9 F NI • as • • VMS • K • • . • UMW 11901916014 0ZE 110E LOCA110N WOW 01308 • VIM WIO01 INN IMMO I O :I © I 21JIb1E.1f 6.068.1018 PREPARED Sr. 1000110 561111 00 - 0104 -(f. "0. 11 (1�1102210N1011R MVO" IN OW 1 110IeN 2! 0713.0090 IO W 1010, 211E MU 1.86oc 156020 1 7 01411 -uE 1QU-w- 0 0 5 0 0 IN USW CCI we 0011301 ON (1.11 - 110P01• aria= PLAN SOAIL• 1• • so' MET A009169 CRY LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA 1 N VAX 6 0415 1 1 V 1 1 BY mUNW ANOKA LANDSCAPE PLAN CONCEIT A2 -BOLT • 6Eao1w. coo. No oo1rmIYBt o11D. N0. MIN-14-98 022 -0342 8 ,p� / ammo mammas. am SDIOX CUM 002C h. fLTAt01I AIO S �oU / / we canvas/am maw wax RE1S� rat CaN10uJI RT11s0 [ea moor Or 11t MI & ALL COMPLY �plIAIL ear wrovaatan MACIICIS WPM. Li IMMO MAO IECITS ART SI S111YI1 WEL HOOK / �/� SILT lull smac COVENS[ rtl OIOKI� OOKIKrt � �� �YIOL. OF S1 CC L 1K 1NC cannochroncovu. ions swam s� oalfot m'aa ro ��gl!X�1� ` 1 4w" Ira= 41 TiARIOITIOP / I I R RILE p ALL /EtIOI�NO INC 10 MOW WISOWI NO 011t 1Eif1 A O WPM wt. .�,•,• •„ i.. -� aI WO MOOD. NOM EJ•011 SWIM MOW OM WU, OWL ENfSMfARN � 10tiAL SA AWN OF 1¢ 0111011. a mo . 121 WW1' '11C Elm MIY FONT •CIC �K► OR FANtNO NT 1 SUSCIWOC WAN 0�AS root ( at OM R YE l � EIZIMT101 a' ANY POINT Mi ' ` ro:ViS1D1oW. LcO401"NL+na • WN5 NO •l ISIDIT1CS A 1E wE�IMLLIKIST O / oat mom. sa N1IYSSART so 0011011m Oi / M MACS C INC OONRUCae fMt�a w�as : mom actors' gar ,/ F, NABJ .. /1O:MA 10E MM `3 V Tit Man :SIN? t11�11f'1,/ OIMI 12{142 MIL SE COMM WPC INNERS SOILS . ,J 101 101800•NaCf0! /Ml 01 s�7•WOWS r �/ Ali SOIL NM 00K1 wer0rsl..... - "1'At.R9lL.YA i7 �' 4 _. -/ �-•� 1`t a`aFN Al1Ce lfiit .. ORS' p; tie ems .074F." _-, / WL1roE301COA000 TO 01000 OR IOOIS I/O NM 1K - pa t€ CCON1RAC SNAIL � T A t OFT 1E ITC TO 101 N)EA SOiCEO ST SE C0N11ACT0R. l ITAKS wawa 70 Nt ono. / 0 � I C CC ORAONO COR$1R1C110K O OOl1ETI . SE • w' al1SAOTOR WU. SEEO NO NUM 1110E WA$ AS OKiCEO ST rot 01001. s he s If.'L'NE •01 OA MO AT A1�IRAT1 L.Q ^t.1- ••:F �•- i!1'-ffii.1A' . sA 2RN& SC WILCO& so N/ttlr.al/« 0g1 W %*1 . •rv) ! t4.1l011t 11 3OSZ THE 1. wN1 . . hw_1 $..S�r.* :011- 1O.N*0000000c011111 7 vorsao11[1110. 241.72+ ._ il''s . 101. rN IMNL SE MNEO AT 141 RAE 01 2 MS r171 �J TIE NOM 2840. SE MOSCOW 1111 A 1100. 0.COSOSTOI 0S 01108 APPRXE0 CONWIEN1: 11i1NElioiTm oor cZrToto silo l s N i1R a APOLLO W - - - -•••••• r A / A. 'y -t .y= -' •'_i • Z NORTH • MCC 30• I 60' SCALE IN FErx -J COCINL NOTES �. sh0010405 MOO 1011 100 Mt on R M 1011 08111[108 01018 MO NAM MC OF M 0001 OOM ICFOL 2. Iltla MOM 40.1. MOM M0 010 14 101 ML OM01 1010 NS 1/f PC ODOM. 0001101001 i 10111010 0MR OMNI M0 IMO NOM 0► 40100. OOMNO71( 10110 NO 001000 10101001 1110•0 N .00100011. NM= M PC OOOM( 00811101& 4. 0.10 1111 /1/00110 As r4.M IOQ11& 00100017011 00104 0070 00 01 010 41/1110 SWUM O POOIOtNa MICE NC SIM 01 ICIO0 0 OW. OCT (100010001(10401000100110 •• It 100 M MO MONN A MIN0.00 0. IC NNINCIO 1 000L 001011 MN ML IAMA► 40040 10 OC11A1MC OM 100 1' MCC 0000•011111 1141110 OW. OMR 10 PC 01010041 112[1101( NO N1 MO 11411411 1011 11011/ 10110E 01411101 100008 UM MO 0101110. 7. 41 00104110 /141011 MI 10000 A 710 400•00 1010 00 M 01000 M M C0 ON& 00!0101404 • 0710110110. • 0111 11111 010 CUM 411•0010 0041 t r MOW /NN 1. 01 WPM Milo 111ML 11 MOWN ARCO A r 4000 7• 10 AL 10115 M0000( ANON 0010. NO 4100001 010 IN M 00011M0010111. K 1001110141 CCIOMOC 100110 11 001•00111011 M 1013 WON 10011.110111141 101 118 10101412.1• INC i 1 t g t e PAM SPECMTION. 0010140 r Nem. 220111110 411117 n00110) 4141w1t A10M1 = MOOR OM emu fE r 441411070141 wow RN M& ewe 0100000 O 1•004 0000 MA 1118 I. KM 0100 OAMO 00 r 040.10 0t Wan OMM/MM010 •4 W�O,4Kp MMOOR 001. 2360 as-1. 0111.1•10111 UM mum maewu. r 1 'p mom tome oNniami41 10 MOO( &ION 1744. 1400 10.0 Mir NUM MOM IMO& MN. MOSS COM X1110 0 OMR 1. 10� 11 WOi011001/0 -4N O OM M ONO COMO OMIO 1110 WOMB 010: 0701 010010101 MOM M00 IC MN 10 eM EM• 0M0M0M 110 0800 ACNE NOM 1 01000 MOM 001 0101 ~WM 14101 MIL It OF IC 0041 M 10101001 0001[0 0G MI t 10101 WIT //4111110 112021.042 SEN M 1100 011•0 for 11010 roroIM1MS rat 1000wr401101 wax uses NO2r0041. MOU0•0 0- 0011SZ0. 1001 1111101011100/110 00 M 10110 4 MOO MOM Ili 00 • N< 0010000 0100000001[1' • MINS &000 1001010 /01•1 PIMIMS WCOMIION >< I r m a • = N 000 • 83 --� NON _ r • • • UMW INFORM= SNOW NOM &NW WOW 0(01171 OD *IMF ■01111w1Cs 4000 10 01000101 ma 8000 .010000L tC 11011271000110 COO 1.1101111• 0LL 01017 r4/11'I•-1p10 WO/ 12101 >� MEA 1.86 oc LECE70 • wave( " • 0.1 0 0 12. IoM IA10 000 412.1004111 repo t= 0104104 774 PRAM SCAM 1• - 70" STREET ICORESS OTT LINO LAKES =IN MINNESOTA mum ANOKA GRADING PLAN it 11 11 SIAM CONCEPT FISLINIWit ONE 1 ti 11 eV 00141. 001 N 4 O CaNP000 00. 03 Na MIN -1-98 022 -42 C • 6 13 • •, 1. • E .3 El, 7 A. T .57 Enghwring • Planning • Stormiv MIA• Of haw r,' WETLAND 3 7.0.4 ea& • • •) ale (was / .• FRA McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. _.wo Maw StlAN-NV • Om WAT10-032 OSSA sphes&soss Mot JADT Development Group 1302 Dooglas Anne Nionespds, MN 55103 • 244. • , • • fiv 7t. r, 0- R "*Is ,s'') 7' .? x■-• 1 Y • ' • • "44. • *".. IND - .d . •aN..- , . ,...... 't...ilia --- - .:-..".;t::: ; -.. • - , -.... Ylk nnalIMILEMMIL Ion ono o sus srosso 112,1 001. IOW W 00101am ISOM* NORTH 114 i WETLAND 1 15;107 slit 0.35 ems . INDEX OF DRAWINGS 1 Natural Features/ Tree Inventory Plan Vicinity Map 33 2 Concept Development Plan it: 3 Northwest Area Preliminary Drainage 4 Preliminary Plat C-5 Site Plan C-6 Grading Plan C-7 Utility flan C-6 Landscape Plan C-9 Details C-10 Details 3 log ILIff TM MC. PIN Rif MP inc. is ts 810.11 - P ND ong., m us on la m so 0. 4.7 so E: =: ..... . = 6 • MI a a 06.a IneS VW a V 14 1 Mi 04064040 008 MI IMO :In 0011•66-11 EVS 1606 MI Oa E I 104 C 1114 1116 O M VI 1 Es ri,... 1211 011 006 1117 IPI We 1 ESVI Pr, Mi. SE " e 4 P 1 Uri MS ON 110 MI 1Nos = 1 O N : ift = FII4IMM411 104 10 Stel ON MO MS ELI us es us 1743 • ▪ Mg .. sis En' a INS 1164 44174 ass 406 = ON UM E a= t136 INS ONO OM 1: Es WI WM 1 i Bs .... OW i 3 E . ... 111P 110 Semi 93)iYl Uno Lakes Commercial Development um Labs, MN Skeet1Ne Natural Features/Tree Inventory Plan Vicinity Map Mosby artiy set Ok 144 .7 morel by •s sr usdrastiag g=siond 1 41111 fastior - IsSor Otte Os Stets lOsesoft IOW Osto Assbirstios Number 1±Wam1M■1/1■ Dsdsd pg. cAsice lierideas as 0* By RemsAS A IONS Sel emu cm, COMM I10/s0 44 REV PER CM MAWS Sheet NeWsloa L 1/101B NMI FILE NO.: 12151 • C 7Y,th 11 rleEr 1 STATES 4. 1 CROCERY J4000 r - RETAR I RCM i 14000 14000 t'iT fr • ..1„. • 1 RECEIVED NOV 1 6 1998 CITY OF LINO LAKES /- - FUTURE TIMIL TREE PRESERMRION IM0. TURN-AROUND IJIIL FESTAUNINT SEE IS MEWED. SEE ME PIANI2towMIXMAIL LOCATOR ON mix PRESOw*DON 123i. 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT DRIVEWAYS WETLAND 1 15.107 eq.ft. 0.35 ecru it • g 37. 2S FOR &LOT A r_I5' 28 30' 25 FOR °MOT A ginuedmeuvay.) 1.41203U13 SECTION SETAE A LB' Mt TEARING COURSE asybow p 234o LW TAOL ODAT Le ~Mug Ina COURSE MAW MC 2331 MIMED RAM& pa scow MA.A. 2 Ate 4) TYPICAL STREET SECI1ON FOR APOLLO DRIVE AND PRIVATE STREETS N.T.S. TN. A • Nu *-O-W rat APOLLO OPHE FROM CSAH 23 10 FIRST INTERSECTION IS 100 Ft RCN R-0-14 MA44011016 TO 60 FT 24 &Mt NORTH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT NOTES: 1. THIS OLNCLOPRDIT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL BEYOND ITE PROPOSED 11e0ONAUTI 91E. LOT CONFIGURATIONS TEL BE REFINED IN FUTURE PHASES. 2. APOLLO DRIVE SHALL 00 DEDICATED AS A DUBUC STREET. &MENU 300 FEET AFruPiTRE07311ATELt TILL BE DEDICATED %RH FINAL PLATING OF FIRST PHASE. AND OEDICA1I0/6 MIL BE RADE AT INK OF FUME PHASES. 3. 01111.01 A AND TEMPORARY TURN-AROUND TO OE PRIVATELY OWED N40 MANTA/CO IN C0411/014 AREA IMANTENANCE AGREDENT. FUTURE SHARED °AMNON ALSO 10 BE PLATTED AS SUCH. MO RESTRICTIONS SHALL OE PLACED OWN P24VA1E OUILOTS THAT PREWIIT FUTURE TURNOVER CIF PRIVATE STREETS TO CITY. 4. U1IUTY APO ORAINAGE mesons SHALL BE DETERMINED ON A PRASE BY PHASE BASIS AT RE MAE OF REAL 91E 019014 MIO DEDICATED TO 1141 OTY AS PART Or INC FINAL PLAT DOCUMENT. ORAINAGE AND VW EASEMENTS UM 31 10011010 24 ACCORDANCE NTH THE romantic SCHEDULE: PIPEUNES- 20 FEET (CENTERED ON MUM PONDS- 1 FEET ABOVE NIL PERIMETER LOT LINES- 5 FEET ON AL LOT IRKS &RANDS- 5 FEET BEYOND YETLAND BOUNDARY 5. DEDICATION Cr RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CSM123 AND ACCESS FOR APOLLO ORME ARE SUBJECT TO COUNTY REVIEW. 6. 91E DEIELOPMENT STANDARDS 1N41141.1M LOT 93E- 1.0 ACRES BUILDING SETBACKS- -FROM CSA423 50 FEET -fROM APOLLO ORM 30 FEET -FROM PRIVATE COMMON DRIVE 15 FM PARKING SETBACKS- -FROM CSAH23 152117 ••FROM APOLLO ERRE 15 FEET ••FROM PRIVATE COMMON ORM 5 FEET LOT CCRERME- 351330004 SPACE *FEN MINI DEVELOPMENT 7. WU TO OMR FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT. Engineenivg • Pionoing • Survviv F A McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. we Ay kw* **efts,'" thealf•• SSW —. fleAM-M • Ivo itit/IX-853: [-IA* “IIIhsisaws Client JADT Development Group 1302 Omen Avenue Minneapolt, MN 55403 Lino Lakes Commercial Development Use Lakes, MN Wet Tile Concept Development Plan 1 hereby art* Met ON Ow yes meowed by me er etkler sty *eel eupeniim end Not I em **Register& Premeimoltoteet 'gm& the kme el the 12•16 mi. Name Debt Reoldrefts Number Resident Na BeTe ay Reseda A 10/2/111 RN REV 2(0 017 CO RIENTS 11/10/16 111113 REV PER WY COMMENTS Skeet Revision 2/0 B MFRA FRE NO 120110 ileak - 44157 /.; /1: \/) • 4114IPP io&b- l(RE77.41L1 15,00011-- - • I - I 4 , 1 e4 - ,...1— . 1 ( =I RETAIL; i 6 000 1 ' 1 CD CD CD CD dD 1 lillilltaI1.111111110 f ,-' 4 t) C2' DRIVE -„,_ iinurn-ri-ci,_ _ _ ( , . RETAIL 12,000 ' 1 - ' ' n 1111111[111n , 1 u u11,111-1111110 A 1-J-7-'/I-..-! / _ _I -I _ 1 1, - A.LI1J1.11_11.11.11.1 i i , .•• WETLAND 1 15,107 Sq. ft. 0:S5 acres LEGEND 0 25 50 100 DOSING =TOURS• EMMA MAWS PROPOSED SPOT ELLIMAN PROPOSED CONTOUR ORMUZ BOUNDARIES NOTES NORTH 200 X 909.5 900 I) SEE SUB/NT/ED ORANACE CALCULATIONS FOR INFILTRATION BASIN SIZES AND CAPACITIES. FOR RENEW PURPOSES. WC OESIGNADEN OF MANAGE AREAS A010 0111.1RA1I0N PONDS AS REFERENCED ON MS PLAN MA ALSO VANN THE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ARE THE SAME. THEY ARE GENERALLY CODEO AS FOLLOWS: 0 SUOCATCHIENT AREA OESANADON POND OESANADON NOM NAT IN DRAINAGE CALCULATANS. POND 10 AND POND ARE INFILTRA100O INTO GROUND. Engimaring • Planning • Surming A McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. LION EN Awn. IONS • ftenerak ilionogs• 50(47 "PM 012/476-1010 • int 812/476-11112 EA** eselallMfrsoons JADT Development Group 1302 Douglas Acme Mieseepols, MN 55483 Lino Lakes Commercial Development uso Lakes. MI Sheet Title Southwest Area Preliminary Drainage I Panty ear* that Ibis pion las pc.j.d by nmer:Adsraistred prefesupernioadreoz odor VW a Name Ode 11/11/98 Negberelion Numbir Wed 144 Chocked 9.11 &ow 0000 #09toved id. il/l*fls Redden No. OM* Sy Moab Sheet Revision 3/0 1 MFRA FILE NO.: 12093 77tit STA7.,117` • ij 1 / 4 . • ...err. 7 . ....... . .... •,. F..1,......, . . ,-.,..,.. ,.........i C Rs .• WW1 UNE OF OE 20/4 OF 111E 111/4 SEC. 11-Nr S4-774 00* 0,c- 7. !•••••• 711127 PARCEL 1 sL,.. Yr/ S4-C 8 A ty - r 1.•• t s PARCEL 2 13 PARCEL 3 101.1114 IJC CC THE 10/4 or sews uo. we or ox ICl/4 air sec m/4 17.7.3'. y .7; •1 WETLAND 3 0.16 acres • TAM Wt. / .0= • IIMIM • • • ■•••■• • .1E0 • N.. • ,A0 •110‘.'i **It. so", 00 so sais • • war. • 5.5 .01 1 SE1/4 OF 17.1771Er= Pan THE S PARCEL 4 ado • dot Mat 1047327 moats, *drains' 04` SEcTioN 8 WETLAND 1 10.107 sqfL 0.35 saM 2 'EASEMENT SCHEE4Ait SEE NOTE 4 1 GENERAL OLNELOPMENT NOTES EP 04 SHEET SITE SUMMARY TOTAL AREA LOT 1 ILK 1 APOLLO 11-0-12 CSA14 23 R-0-4,1 OUTLOT A CUlLOT • 50.61 Wad 1.56 ogres 0.75 mom 0.15 mom 0.56 woo 47.29 mess PROPERTY DESCRIPTION POMO- 1: lad d4ed-p 0a- 5 a44, de Sara MI 4 w ila dd e 544041 4 Toed 40 31 MIK d o l s , 2 2 sad. aday 1041415.444044 a fmme Omomee a he worsom_eo elms ▪ olh gm of 24•20 2. Tm3 dad. 040522 s1 moo 1••A Lor.t..•• Dewy d-40-exr sssood dray o. 6 Oda Nortasataly aisEda Ow .1 41P Iledt a 5 N 444.0 ad So do odof i d 1addy Wd Fd d 144 4 eat * at Sado fr 41 Nowa fautdoadd awl pad/ dla Eastaly 401-44-say 544 of Iflamoola 141dars lla 5 fa 20500 Is* Mow Esat owl porde dth sod Sawa fadlos MAO 1•14. 441 05 led. to • lotsmodas Os Startlisostaly 4it54l5y au of lawdado listast•ta dfass Na 23•4 your Nadesslay damp ad Warawastaly delit-of- 44 lawdosto addled Illolaos 115 MN alstsostlos wla Ws Cad Ilse 11 sd0 6.ctIs. 91 dews lard slang sold East ad of Sada to Ms Mellow* caw al Sada Palf of Sallasest Otartor 41 sod Sodas 91 lassca and SOVIININ, asakrdert .1 14111 14514 .4 Sioads Ousda of foetd • 15 ts a da do iatrot-dord 514 of sld aessa Wray No. Mend Allef 01 Eay ad al ilkassoto Kiddy Ns. 0 to 05 palst of todnaly 04,0115, llandars the Idowly 3 pada =mom ND. l UM pat 44 015 Sodand Ossda d lisdadot Gadd of fogad 6. Tidal* 31 Ns" Renee 22 Met. awW ot o to 13 o Mmo 64•441e4 M 134. Mh Mo 154e1515. m t* lemme 114* 4.44.5,44049*01144144040401s044 Odder 441.41155 rammse"."14 dory Ns lb. las 41 04 Sada NW 4(05 Soulasest Odds, 1 Aiwa Of 402.00 bit la do pied of *5�50I dew asotosoko Not. day Nerd Ils• d do Sala NW 4401. lasalltoost llooter. i • *sew o f 24 2 lt dads Ws% 4d asay lo d •1 90 S' •4545555 al oso •••• tot. *maw 010444004105515. • •••• • 4 fd lassos *war dassei 15 Ow loft 113 Odds. • Odra, of 233.00 fod Os WO Odd of bop/ft t PE CORNED 1E1/4 OF 114E 2E1/4 SEC I. T.31. 6.22 0 NORTH 1 • I014 110. 2 1644 port 44 as 144 .4441 of do Stalboost Odra. of fads. Or Toddy X. amp 22. Ante Cad* Wbasseta dosabal 50 4044 s(M149491 .1,44 Odes .179* 01 *4ll45,4.I0444U115050104 Ni 4444 East as NW Nod v. •• sh. MOO of lesOnfibis . ammo oei 3 Ike pert of Fe MOM NW of Ns Saddost Coorlor of Sago 6. Toed* Now 21. Amos Coots illmasta Moolbat Woos Onfoomem 1 0 sd e N ohws m m o o sme Mel o 'maa Mm W , W Naod O 1 41 waes 23 ad* Waa Wane/ asay). Naa dt of d t.� W I of Swmi Oroo. • Oedo d 0P20 •t. Is m d 44 a Id * d 114144 Od 4 • 44 41 • ow N* w 1••• ow. so oole 37 mew* mot. zoom hot Ilona ot • deht op. 0411 40 4.05555 41 aisles 23 541:401414 Wad 50557 4444. aide fa Ida to So entail Is • of Amiss County Mai Plot 114 T6 Own 4445111amitay elm sal Pastati so • sur•• duds n:r111;2411.811 fast. • saard aye .4 00 41s05555 21 Morass 52 moan* • 40s4.nc• of 33.60 sok mane, IN% 45 05 aterseatlat s011t Ow foolli. ad of do Ike% MOO kid 41 WO 0oth Me of raudasit Guidon Odd Saud IN Mired maids• 23 seiradi fast. Wad oda Nora las of aid Sada MO of Sardosst Wald t• • pad of atorsdeat. pat alaspals• doted* 1557.46 fad Wad of Os faolltiod amnia of add Saud 1401 of fauthsal 415ar4ar. awl 204.00 last flooday 44 • 44111 Adds as sod Nada ad NM* N4111 00 *gross 11 addles 37 swan* East, es sold did .51. 04. 204.00 feet to the 1Me of mei South lad el Sda* faertaa lhonse faith 1111 adds 41 dadas 23 wands Eost. 206.711 fat to Sas 44154 p450 .1 bylagy. PARC& Tad psd of lho Soutbrost Odder .4 01. lisulasod Odder (115 1/4 .4 16 1/0 of Saabs 0414 01). 11414111111115-410 (31). Rasp 1.1517-015 (22). Mot le meolbof os felkom Cornroonobo 51 loo Intawatka •pr sm• 01s of sod Sedan 1:104 md Ms UM Me et 134441 laganyfla • es the odd is dm NW ad and add* %end frallasIng 11. divetla along ao East las of dal Illgassy Na 0. • 40stanie of two lwadal Vats e 05 Wd pad o WOO* 015105 4445155111 7,r doon day Eat ad of sof 14054, N. 0 • • *51.105.4 9* o 11:11d Wind daasy fastry sal pada 4.9.5 1.501 14 of sod *Ku. 601 oo. • ag•••• 1. worm motors (413) 01.0 thew wards. In • foutawadoly Oniclan owl panda 15 Ihs Ord acne • edam of too Sandal oda ( t h•••• cay Watady and fordo to de woad sans • Mow of far = Nada (413) OW d 11. dad pad of bytalsg. MO& & Al 444t 118 SW& 441(44 Soothe 5. Tama* 31 Wad. Row 2 Wd anl Cw 1 aboodo . Ow ataealas d hscdo •owe. 1••d• 3 Wod. Rys 2 Wd 1.15 /*ft anasita od Ws Easley siht •e 51 T. lawlassta 111oldeo 14.91 add Nartasaday sley Esstaly did 40 Ilso of dasossai =l No. 6 lr 23 446 add Gt e plid Ida dd 1451 as el Sala Ha r ad msr• a law to Idarsoctlan asdnaday .451444 awl of amote leteststo dalass N5 364 Wand Soufassarly flay fldatirly dolt el Ins 44 Ilkassola Islorelsal Na3SW kr 404 lost. adro or less to Its Intassdloe Ida dal 44,4 114041m 115 91 Odd Wad day sal Sada d Sodas far ND fast add er loss 1.915 odd •11401ralso. P AMOL M pel 440411441141510414404151014145411141S' 17. TsmsW4 31 Naga Paris 22 West. Odne lisrladdely Ild 4041 d 1157 44 14114dods tadrstla• Wises Ns 3411.1.4 foolltmotair tadeeds dyads No. 6 Enginirering • Planning • Surryyhg McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. neee 3051 raw owe •ftesem toomate filAN-WM • IN fat/ONSJit &Molt woolkoseon Mont JADT Development Group 1802 Dupla Avenue Minneapogs, MN 55103 Lino Lakes Commercial Development Lkio Ulm MN Sheet TM, Preliminary Plat 1 booby lbot 941 Om woo oropond by or gofer dral Komobion orol Not 1 am • Mity mem the Mos of the SW? Mionototser Novo 001. Malstratho laded ifig121LJI:L.r Eteso MB /wood fmt. IMAM No. Ode Sy RoswIto A IONN MU WI PER CITT omens WON MO IIEY PER art conions Sheet Revidol 4/10 B MFRS FILE NO.: 12105 4 • �i -F.. fir / <• +����Y.�.. • it 0 ICTM3 - ITT kin MBA roR Tie moos was - • 17' PAM !ACE MAC •It 0.C- f=[lW* K avow PNO.00 ova 101• EOM (T J - Sa NET • 001 ACME" ONOCM moo ova NO loll - SE )W $ 3 110110 ROM IMO !E f4ET o 3 NOS ISM OM NW WIER - SEE STET 4 MONO PANS - ICE SMET S 0SCETt PASO - WE MET 03 ON OTIS S10PlM 1 - SE SW • SO MP 1 O was 0 Tocas woo a Mon SUMS SCUMS NNW" SUMS 2 SCAM 4 0101 OMB TM SAM 01!04. 052 A AL 01101016 SOS ATE 10 OW PAX o► OJM UMW MOM 0* . ALL MOM MMPOOO To PEM= TOM 160T t OMMACT01 /ALL SEFER 10 M011E0IWL 11100 MOs (ACT MCCAWW AS MOOOSK ET PA112 MAO PAMOC. PAK WIG ono= moon AI. CMCT o111M16 0>iNY 0' 30 SCALE M( FEET trick 90' NORTH A10 v 6 19s8 1 eery Op C CRAL NOTES 1. 100510D2 100 !O1 NO PP at Pia OM COOIMCIOR moor NO OA16 Nt If M Waal 00N101a0 . 2. Mtf. mOOR I0 1. 0O1O0 . NO MO10 100 XL MP LOO LOOM 0► WC COaWL C01041 1. i 1.01 110110 Gam COOP NO IMO !1101001 M Para COMK1C101. POLES Na UMW MOO 11111.00 07 N0550'4. 1600110 N 1E 011001 COM10000. 4. MKS 100 1400100 N6 d 116 WOVE OOMOMCIOR 2101010 SOUS Alt Sr VC PIA10000 10$00 A ~OW MAO Mt SNNM N sodas ORT. MP 1.015550041.010(10105510100110105502111 =Oak 161111110tM. A 116 0010141100 0111 OONOPOT EMI al. IMSR7 Wawa 10 SEININIE OMR POOR 0/ 11111100 C129E010 0 000111 MAX ROM A 11[ PAM 01400011. MO PW110O 01111E 100 MAY 11116 0111110E 10001011. 1[0. NO COMM 7. OIL 0001.0[16DOOM Mt M 1055(010 tC 100110111 NO 1111001 •00100 114 COCK 001112155N OMOIMOIK/K A 1101155 NO cum a0M1016 era r NIO61111 PLUM A *1. SN0NOPE Ma O11L K KOP1 OWED 10 4 101 10P OF AL 1016 MO NMI MIX 60004 NO LNm1MO NO K INC 0111OVOPONOOR 10. LOT 11011 0045KK MOODS 10 COMM NOM M 104.1 W OO 1100OA011O6 OR 10 PNECOM /fR a 1 6 • PANTO SPECITICATON (16010 r Tow ~tom A NIA .T 111550) OP61ila so1rAlDit A/1R► moon MK sou. Kr MOOOK 0101 seam Ali AL pave 0000555105501. Pala 7101. O OS 4. OM allaNIX WNW ROCK r 8000e11 012 COOK 0OMOONO A 10011. pN00�0M,11211. a ir�i1L COO . r P110410 warm umbrala 1M•10as00M 13.0. Ott WPM Poor MERNS WOOL MON NOA 0m:..rOf1"M"NKoft 4 EYRN w': i 1. 11 wawa sissKua n0ost 0111E1M•M11• aim as MNO 1014. NA 110 mown NNE swont • am O YNOq OSO La K N K 551 1010104. Pawl. te11K_ ICU V.50.---tiga0 TOT L OK40S NECONI[IO0*0N 00 maw MOO 00T11016MOMS wits NCO WI 1tuL 11016E mom No 2r routs. qpWax A101MCt1 A OOIM e1 1/w6 i Mel moo as 100. WS NM Mai O.1ML • 00000555 MO NO Plow PAWS IMOINS110N 63 1 st • 55 0 0 10 •f0 • s 55 14 1 a •oo - N PPM 0 1 M • is • ▪ OMCCS S • • SPAY -1055555 INTONATION SIZE TYPE LOCATION R KA1a1 ROM SEMI COXING 1* 10556 ocooTo IION MMVNIPD DR Oq0 100001•* Moat MOOS moco0TS.11IO. 1/000/120 Ni004. 0*118 1Ot 270 -0000 0050/ 55 • ME AMG 1.86 oc MVP 1 110 f0 1 IBM - u -a- PUPA SCALE: I• - 30' 0 006 10 101 LNIR C=CI woo Dom adman ( MM 70Sr- OPaa) ar I r MEET AoONESS COY UNO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA 1 1; SAX 011E ti 1 r COUNTY ANOKA CONCEPT MIEMENAITY SITE PLAN MED ME6ONN. oft. 110 0OMP01d3E owe. NO. MIN -14 -98 022 -0342 C, - - • 4 • ► • • = r;F11jpJ3 :yr> of GATE OML* Illet CV= Or U fly o0NS14C1N NOTES R. se wore e N8N010E111 MIR SS MORR !LL IS COSIWCIED N 4031 1044 N11 1118 $fN0A10 WIPES 1MECNcA1cusr (AS pusulte• ST Se CST SOINEERS 414410N Cif reelOTA 1118E AS MOP= ROOM ONNICIOR Wu. WAN A COPT Or 1.181 owes ova E wow= N ACCORD/NIX 1O O1Y WOUIRDIENTS 2.44 11001 SOU. KS 111011,_1114 OFF. NTEY11OE MIL OR MACK ANT PIPE R INE 11 00 TO MITIINAN 10.ONal0 TO 1118 OIY VMS 1N*r 1101001314 TO 00 SO SY 118 GTR ANT MRROIE CORSEOWNCES E ANT Emu= a (*60041.10 0eeme 10115 E soma TO 101 MOO NE 1118 UIIO=11Y E 118 conneeme S.A► swam 118RlCA SENSATION EIS 1010 4 MOUSES AT AL C~RiEllu 0. NO SURER NON (04311. 814011 AIO SANRMIY) a AXIM 1 MAL E MO TO M TOD N Ms e1ECRICA11001 ERC AS 11 E►T 1./IL SNWSIAI•S 01111E Cpl[, 0114 THE 0E0110004ITi E 1E GIY. ZAl MUM 11810 10 E P■C SOR-20. MEW •01180 08184801. S.ALL ISSERNAN 10 E SUM NN - CLASS U. 4.141 11Dw1 1fler FIR 10 E RE - PASS S. SAP RAP WU. E Ile/DOT BASS 1 C Ce11RACTOR !LL IIS01 10 MEOINIECIURA SINS VCR Ea10T 18101148 *41051010010810 1810018 PIT PORCHES. 0A08.1 101 DOOM PRECISE MIND 11101144 NO tro MN 1CT IM MO Warn ENTRANCE 0. TIE OON1RA0100 11 mamma CAU10110 THAT 1418 1001104 100/1711 01101011 Ci ENSTR 0 V111ES AS SOW ON 1011 MANS 15 MSIA ON RECON 3 Or le PAWNS •T183! MOMS 140. 0106 MOM, 1KASAINDS1 Taos N K AEIO. K Ri4A*10N 11 NOT TO EE Kum ON AS EMC MOT OR CENPLE1L 1[ CNSEAOTON 01ST CAL se mix CAVA F1L0 ASIO E1T EXACT 110A E LOCAIN or /11111188 N emu. BE 118 10 2O1100111y Or K 001114C101E TO 114.0011E Ni. 0108104 le SAe. 1118 LOCUMS OF 0141 001 0OTme 101E commerce. ty 010140 010(0 STARE 0118 CNL 00i AT L SAFETY NO110E 10 ON11AC1ORS N AOOOOONIOE N14 4ECRALr ACEEINEO CNS1JCIN 118 CNTRACTOR NU OE SOLELY AND 000131.3 OESY01110 E roe w INS N 7118 doe 1111. 40140010 WE1Y EAU. PERSONS NO MO0ERIY 018.10 PEFOAIANCE E 118 TASK. 14 EOUEYEIT INL POPLY O01140O1ALr NO NOT SE 181180 TO NORMAL mum 110U10. 118 OUT E 118E MINCER OR 101E 0E011E00 10 0068103 00483801014 11811811E 101E CONINCTOrS PERFORMANCE 1S NOT 1100180 TO NOME 11181101 E 118 AEOUANr E 1e CNTRA01Ni SAFL1y 1EASIlRES N, ON OR NEAR 118 CN=1MlC1N $TE r. THE ONTRACT011 WU. E IESPONSa13 FOR MO110R10 110 NNIMNNC TRAFFIC COMM 49413 SUCH AS 11/14CAOES. 18010410 104 0*6110NN. CONS. FLA0IEN NO TORTS 10 CONTROL 1118 WOOS MAL 0010171E APP00*NA0 [0100• TA Warne 1011�E WOES. 1NAN10ORTA104 STNOMOS. 0. AL 8018 1E8140 04181E COME= IT AN NEPEDENT 10111 MOM ISCINATIE14 WC PURPOSE Or REN0143 uNITNAE OR IMIMTANI 101.S SILL E 00101110 PS MUM Sy 1e 8011 184011801 118E UNJTY 0104111* 00431.11010X MU C10.Y 011 4 ONIVACTOR Se REOUIRDIENTS 1 0 0 119 /11 FORE000R0NA1NO�MEOUEED SOILS IESIS AND SOL ROPECINS N1N 1e SOU E10NEER. A 001EGMCA 0IO1E0e10 MPCRT NA1 EE1 0010,11110 OTt 00101811 IV PLUG 0A1E01 101E CCNIRA1C8011 fNAL OST T,QF 1•8 SOLI WORT. 054. 118E I • roe REO on DRIVE ` NORTH %•■ N. • •` 0180181111 NOTES 010018107800 NN MO sex AE A 1880 0401/0101 elan NO 400 ANN 11C maw 808801. ANA A1088 NM COMA M 1818 I- AL 0080 1014 AN N 1K CONK 03161101111. IN ONO Olaf. mous NO NM PAWN ANNA* 004111010. PAN AA ION! MAO AMMO N 11.0014018. NETNII8 K M ANNA 81.1111100. ONS 140 RUa01N At M 18 MOW 008400/01 NONOR MOTS NE K M WNW N/NNA MANN MMES ON NOM N 1010480180 OM tamps NIL N 0110400 10 AL08 FOR 101 NON LCONNACAL •11110101 18 11- 11101111 NIL 001080 111- AL UMW 0010800 10 11010111111 OM 80.8 • 1INWN 8-080- AI O01•Y 00111 0511 10 101 IOMNO 80401. NO 40111.0 001001 FOR NM NCR! 080100 (801 Y. 0111. 00 04044811 ALL MAIM NON NC 111 8IOONC 011011010104 NO NAA E 00.0 N 101 COOK 84048000 Af 10AONNNI ANN 001- NO CNN 18080A NILE r -INS FAA MAIM Aa 1110001!1 ACM N11 E RUIN 4110E0 10 0' 1000 MP N NJ. INA S NO CIAL LORI AVM NO wawa an wee amot 80/NA 10. six 00110010140181.1114 COMM 801 INC 80.1 01840 0810000/ IOR /M NNOOM NIL i 1 1 e min SPECIFONON N A NA r roue OOYMCI1 /MALT 1041480) 140400E NN•ST 408140 maim ME 801- r mom= ow 4111111 roe se. 1010 01.484. M AMA. ACM- MA MN 0. MI MACS WNW MLA r Ub0Na SA0C CART NWO Mll• M ACC10p0. -ECM =111. 0114111010 111X ArIIC 0 NR 41.01 LE 001 1440 olio NIOOgECMI N11. aNC RIM' 408/8740 ANA ICON AA. jorria11 ~« 111111/41111.1102011111110.11 MIMI MIS AM • II INA At MI Mt A 100•14x• •• MAD 111011 •N1 OM *MOAN AMA MAO 1188•14111011 AMAIN 0060810 ass- NA•as•• -.Ira 1N..*•LOlaOMR • LOT U041110 HECCISENDIMON M UMW MOM 1011414 MR71IIueS NTN 1000 NOT 11801*1110EUOgMOSYP0113. Rcuouir 11-0044. 804 006 0410101 001111110418111 /0 MIa SIM NLM N• If Ad MOB ISM 11111111111L •ROM SUN 000 OE NAM ROMIG •E101REAT0N 11 06 • 1 N •10 • 63 1. IPACS NACU 14 = 1e+0., • X Si • 80 • 181040 X . • . • SNORT INN IAN SAM 186 SIC= 411110061010 S ZE b?E LOCATION NOM Of011•004 MOWED EA! 444001 FMIE 8000 18000118E 010. 0010170 NONE -OEM A 4f 4018412108 STE *6A. 1.86 oc MEND 0/4100 110101 1 1 a•FN 0 0813 • IN LOA C3=0 1h10 0141100 011811 MAI- AMMO SixeMil 78948080 NAM 101114 1• - 30' m SHEET 1/10RESS CRY LINO LAKES STATE MINNESOTA ig CC II fni ain SOURS E 1 1 ONE COIN! ANOKA PRO AUNT UTIUTY PLAN 01.1104 AS -IIUET 1001001* ONO. NO lemma( ON). N0. MIN -14 -98 022 -0342 C, - 7 March 19, 1999 Tim Baylor JADT 1302 Douglas Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55403 FAX TRANSMITTAL fax: (612)377 -1894 hard copy to follow in mail subject: JADT Planned Development Overlay Application and AMOCO/McDonald's Conditional Use Applications Dear Mr. Baylor: In January 1999 the Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board recommended the JADT Planned Development Overlay (PDO) and AMOCO/McDonald's plat and conditional use applications be denied. At your request, the City Council has not taken action on your applications. You have recently submitted a concept plan for a McDonald's restaurant for the first phase of the PDO development. While the change of use is seen as desirable, this amended information must again be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board prior to City Council action. To be placed on the April Planning & Zoning Board agenda, a complete application submission must be received no later than Monday, March 22, 1999 to allow public hearing publication to be sent out on March 24. Any delay in the application submission would move Planning & Zoning Board review and public hearing to May 12. The information received to date on the revised concept plan is incomplete for the development application review. The revised application information should include: 1. Revised application form and fees 2. Revised preliminary plat 3. Revised grading and drainage plan 4. Revised utility plan 5. Building elevations (McDonald's restaurant) 6. Landscape plan 7. PDO information, including: -PDO site concept plan -Tree preservation information - Landscape plan (showing plant location, sizes and species) - Grading and drainage plan 1189 Main Street • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 Pt ,.,�irnn Ac14F4_SSh7 • Fax- A51- 0,4 -4ShR Tim Baylor March 19, 1999 page 2 Some of this information may not have changed from the previous application but should be included with this new application. Any new information should attempt to respond to any outstanding issues identified with the previous application review. The architectural design for the revised project must be reviewed by the Town Center Committee. Significant progress was made in defining the architectural elements on the AMOCO/McDonald's project. This should be transferred - directly to the stand -alone McDonald's. As stated above, the previous application has not been acted on by City Council per your requests. Due to state law, the City Council must act on that application on March 22. The staff recommendation will be to deny the application as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Board. There are four options available to you: 1. Withdraw the application and submit the new application. 2. Request in writing another postponement to allow full review of revisions by the Planning & Zoning Board. The postponement must not limit the time to less than what is needed for full review. 3. Allow the City Council to act based on a recommendation for denial and request that the City waive the requirement to wait 12 months before resubmittal after a denial. 4. Allow the City Council to act based on a recommendation for denial and wait 12 months before resubmittal. We suggest that option one is the cleanest. Option two carries baggage that will complicate the review. It would seem that options three and four are particularly undesirable from your perspective. As we have informed you in several conversations, a significant revision to the plan constitutes a new plan and must be reviewed as such. In addition, the staff report highlighted several issues that will need to be addressed in your new plan. Upon receipt of a complete application we will schedule you for the Planning & Zoning Board and begin staff review of your new application. Sincerely, eff Smyser City Planner cc: Linda Waite Smith, City Administrator AGENDA ITEM NO. 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director DATE: March 16, 1999 TOPIC: Resolution 99 -15 - Donation from Circle -Lex Lions Club Vote Required: Majority Vote BACKGROUND: The Circle -Lex Lions Club approached the Parks and Recreation Department to investigate the possibility of providing a community party wagon to area residents. The Circle -Lex Lions Club has agreed to purchase a community party wagon and furnish a variety of equipment. This contribution amounts to $10,945. The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department is currently preparing a procedures and policy manual for the party wagon. These procedures will be strictly adhered to Applications will be available beginning March 29 at the Parks and Recreation Building. Applications received by April 8 will be processed in random order on April 9. Block Party applications will receive priority over individual applications. Also, there will be no fee to reserve the party wagon for a neighborhood block party. A nominal fee will be required for an individual event such as a graduation party or family reunion. The party wagon will be available for use from June 1 - September 15. The Parks and Recreation Department will coordinate the scheduling and delivery of this exciting new amend OPTIONS: 1. Accept the $10,945 donation from the Circle -Lex Lion Club. 2. Return donation from Circle -Lex Lions Club RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. swirick/Greensheet Party Wagon Donation.doc Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 -15 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE CIRCLE -LEX LIONS CLUB, FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PARTY WAGON. WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department was sought out by the Circle - Lex Lions Club to investigate the possibility of purchasing and operating a community party wagon; and WHEREAS, The community party wagon will be available for persons to reserve; and have it delivered for block parties; and WHEREAS, The Circle -Lex Lions Club donated $10,945.00 to purchase the community party wagon and all its contents. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the donation of $10,945.00 to purchase the community party wagon for block parties and wishes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Circle -Lex Lions Club for its support and donation for this program. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: sw /sandie /resolution 99 -15 Party Wagon.doc