Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/12/1999 Council PacketAGENDA AMENDED AGENDA 6:00 P.M. EDA MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday April 12, 1999 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda Consideration of Minutes i. March 17, 1999, Council Work Session March 22, 1999, Regular Council Meeting iii. March 22, 1999, Special Council Meeting iv. November 16, 1998, Special Council Meeting A) Consideration of Expenditures: i) April Manuals ($548.70) ii) April 12, 1999 ($284,839.08 Ck.# 55643 - 55772) iii) Centennial Fire District 2. Open Mike A. Mayor Sullivan's State of the City B. Tree City Award, Mayor Sullivan c Phi �^ /� %.��6 S �.vp,A �ncs 6 •t LOI+^v'^�✓[d - Cr i i'2 S�1►K 36 � . YA4c,4 Page 1 a, cp •..l° •Pia,. 3. Re c rt+ �4.+c n e 4.) bus, as RNoy tJ vo- (e. 5 8 36 e M V- 6)6 ,,te 7t-) c41-4.0e le642,c/c,- 6)-J a-/-rvc4) P, L/eAe AGENDA 3. Public Services Department Report, Rick DeGardner A. Consideration of Resolution No. 99 -15, Accepting Donation from Circle - Lex Lions for a Party Wagon. 4. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A) Accept Resignation of Financial Analyst B) Consideration of Application for Authorization to Conduct Excluded Bingo, Centennial Women of Today C) Consideration of Resolution No. 99 -22, Authorizing the Transfer of Monies from the General Fund to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund D) Authorize Staff to Begin Process to Recruit a Replacement for Retiring City ClerktLinda Waite Smith) 5. Public Safety Department Report, Dave Pecchia A. Consideration of 1998 Annual Police Department Report (Removed from the Agenda at the Work Session) fl B. Consideration of an Addition to the Lino Lakes Code by Adopting a y Tobacco Ordinance C. Authorize Staff to Negotiate an Agreement with City of Circle Pines to Provide Building Inspection Services, Linda Waite Smith (Removed from Agenda) 6. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel Consideration of Clearwater Creek Phase III, Rezone from Rural and Rural Executive to PDO /Single Family and Preservation Development Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Jeff Smyser (4/5 Vote Required) B. PUBLIC HEARING, First Reading continued from March 22, 1999, Ordinance 05 -99, Vacation of Roadway Easement, Clearwater Creek Phase III, Mary Kay Wyland (4/5 Vote Required) C. SECOND READING, Ordinance 04 -99, Exchange of Property with James and Tracy Douglas, John Powell Page 2 AGENDA D. SECOND READING, Ordinance 06 -99, Vacation of Easements in Old Arborlake Plat (Replatted Otter Bay), Mary Kay Wyland (4/5 Vote Required) E. Consideration of Fogerty Investment, 524 Apollo Drive, Rezone from GB, General Business, to PDO/Light Industrial, Jeff Smyser F. Consideration of Surfside Addition, Final Plat, Mary Kay Wyland G. 1. Resolution No. 99 -24, Proclaiming April 24, 1999, Earth Day, Marty Asleson 2. PROCLAMATION, Proclaiming May 21, 1999 as Lino Lakes Arbor Day H. Consideration of Approval of Anoka County Solid Waste Agreement, Marty Asleson I. Consideration of Resolution No. 99 -23, Award Bid for the Audio/Video Equipment at the Civic Complex, Mary Divine J. Consideration for Approval of a Commercial Appraisal for a Retail Site on Lake Drive, Brian Wessel 6'uwc.It li s G rc e.ti e,. ir Poi k Car ..)\ 5 ►kle-- 7. usiness A. Consideration of Settlemejt of Ed Vaughan Litigation, Bill Hawkins 41,&44), Cits 4 r /aU, ozry 8. New Business A. Consideration of Minutes, September 25, 1995, Regular Council Meeting (Mayor Sullivan, Council Member Lyden and Dahl were not Members of the Council) Consideration of Minutes, September 9, 1998, Work Session Minutes IP) (Council Member Neal Absent) \)) Consideration of Minutes, November 14, 1998, Special Council Meeting to Interview Candidates for City Administrator Position. Consideration of Minutes, March 2, 1999, Special Council Meeting r`' 9. Community Calendar, April 13, 1999 through April 26, 1999: A) April 14, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Planning & Zoning Board Meeting B) April 19, 1999, 5 :30 p.m., City Council Finance Work Session AGENDA C) April 19, 1999, 6:30 p.m., Monday, Annual Board Review D) April 21, 1999, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session E) April 23, 1999, 7:30 a.m., Coffee with the Mayor F) April 24, 1999, Earth Day - City Auction 10. Adjourn Apr. 9, 1999, 11:00 a.m. Page 4 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY APRIL 12, 1999 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of Minutes of Monday, March 22, 1998 3. Consideration of Contract for Private Development between Lino Lakes EDA and Lino Lakes Business Center Phases 5, 6, 7 & 8 4. Adjourn STAFF OR tl `Q Brian Wesel DATE: 4112/99 TO onsidera of tl a Cun t for Private velopmentitwreen no Lakes ESA ar Lakes usi Center Phases 5, 6, 7 & E This devel nt c ontr amines tha conditions for assistance to Lino Lakes Business Center {Bid } for #tte construction o r additional light industrial leasable buildings. Ttu site is six formerly corned by Ha wkins Ch e cal (see heed }. Th+e duper plan to build a total of 84,2ik� square fit by end of year. The total rninirnum market value { of the lete+d l will 3,329,7. The earlier: of the Limit Lakesiness Center have provided appro on tl base to t #y. Thy' h also at toted excel t core r s and good paying jobs to the busi park, as well as pro fa lilies for Ba sting businesses to grow and stay within In thls agree to provide maximurn gr unt € f tax ire financing t ►532 , which e r 16°x► of lire I Ill 1/, The removes the a n of i i upfront, and a rung T!W will provided d on a pay -as- you-go basis top fir the cost of la cl and sfe prep ` n argil lan irig The city r l bNe reimbursed first for the a tints and then de ck w l receive rental increment Estim pa is in 2007. The developer requit t to s a 0,t escrow wl is ti is refundable in increments as ,fie build are cons�c tech 1n the event all four buildings are not tl by der er i of 2000, the developer It s the a crow for un tact ngs and will nat be for any site preps tion costs. This pr act is in<< ter TIF Die ct.1 -9, whi r requires a 10% local 272) from the . This c rib��n will be avai ' gas the c y's local 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 2 //2 I - -SH€ V QD - - 10 2 z 14 13 12 11 10 A 6 4181 OUTLOT B PARK NORTH 12 - 477TH_ 4 %OO L s LILAC- - - STREET- APOLLO RUS/NESS PAR NO F' LINO LAKES OUTLOT R EHABILITATIO(ll CENTER STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY N0.49 74 TH - STREET - 14 MARSHAN MANUAL EXPENDITURES March -1999 WATER/SEWER POSTMASTER/UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE POSTMASTER/UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE TOTAL UTILITY Page 1 $ 229.97 $ 318.73 $ 548.70 EXPENDITURES APRIL 12, 1999 Date: 04/06/1999 Time 11:34:52 Operator: JAL Ranges: Options: Page: 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Fund: (A) Dept Id: (A) Program: (A) Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Schedule Journal #: (A) Bank #: (A) Cash #: (A) Payroll Check Dates: (A) Print: D Report Format: 1 # of copies: 1 Total By Account: Y Check # Vendor Alpha Name Sort: D Print Ranges /Options: Y Process Payroll: N Page on Sort: N Description Dept Amount O FIRESIDE CORNER O HEALTH PARTNERS O MEDICA 0 SOLBERG ELECTRIC REFUND PERMIT /2221 REILI * * * * * * ** HEALTH INSURANCE * * * * * * ** HEALTH INSURANCE * * * * * * ** REIMBURSE ELECTRICAL PER * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** O PLETSCHER'S GREENHOUSE DISH GARDEN /ARRANGEMENT MAYOR /CO O TEAMWORKS INTERNATIONA COUNCIL MEETING /COMP PLA MAYOR /CO O TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC MARCH 22 MAYOR /CO 0 WAITE SMITH, LINDA MEALS MAYOR /CO Total for Dept 401 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A T & T WIRELESS SERVI HEALTH PARTNERS HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, L HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER, IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LABOR RELATIONS, INC. MEDICA MONTHLY SERVICE HEALTH INSURANCE PERMITWORKS SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STAPLES SERVICES RENDERED HEALTH INSURANCE METROPOLITAN AREA MEMBERSHIP DUES /LINDA W PLETSCHER'S GREENHOUSE DISH GARDEN /ARRANGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA 1998 MINNESOTA STATUTES TESCH, DAN MILEAGE /MEETING WAITE SMITH, LINDA MEALS Total for Dept 402 O MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE Total for Dept 407 ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST ADMINIST FINANCE O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE ECONOMIC O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE ECONOMIC O PLETSCHER'S GREENHOUSE DISH GARDEN /ARRANGEMENT ECONOMIC Total for Dept 415 25.50 1,459.84 1,111.84 80.50 2,677.68* 18.74 625.00 374.25 10.49 1,028.48* 27.02 1,502.74 308.75 67.12 52.72 1,624.75 350.00 61.00 18.74 228.97 24.62 9.50 4,275.93* 289.61 289.61* 27.02 207.62 18.74 253.38* O MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE PLANNING 289.61 O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /VACATION OF PLANNING 48.13 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:34:52 Operator: JAL Check # Page: 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN 5 NAME PLATES 0 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SEC MARCH 10 Total for Dept 416 PLANNING PLANNING O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE ENGINEER O STATE OF MN, DEPT OF T STREET RELATED MANUALS -8 ENGINEER Total for Dept 417 O AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, REPLACE BATTERY CHARGER/ POLICE O ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF YEARLY DUES POLICE O BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE L TRAINING /TIM R POLICE O BIG BEAR CAR WASH, INC CAR WASH POLICE O CENTURY COLLEGE SIGN LANGUAGE /B YOUNG POLICE 0 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE CAR WASHES POLICE 0 CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE POLICE 0 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONA DRUG SCREEN POLICE O GALL'S INC. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE /M DEMA POLICE O GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN SPRING WATER & EQUIPMENT POLICE O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE POLICE O MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE POLICE O PETTY CASH MILEAGE /PARKING /MEALS POLICE O PLETSCHER'S GREENHOUSE DISH GARDEN /ARRANGEMENT POLICE O ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTION POLICE O THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH BATTERY,T /SIG,HOUSING,TE POLICE O TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC PENCILS /PIN /PLUSH LION POLICE O TUXALL UNIFORM COMPANY AUTO LOCK KIT POLICE Total for Dept 420 O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE Total for Dept 421 O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE O PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, PAGERS O STATE OF MINNESOTA /BUI SEMINAR /PETE K & TOM J O SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Total for Dept 422 O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI O CONNEXUS ENERGY O CORPORATE EXPRESS O D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPL O EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIAT 0 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC O HEALTH PARTNERS O JULEEN DESIGNS, INC. O MEDICA O NORTHERN STATES POWER, O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN O T.K.D.A. O TOM THUMB, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES WHITE MARKING PAINT BARRICADES ADVERTISING /SEASONAL HEALTH INSURANCE FABRICATE "BLOCK PARTY" HEALTH INSURANCE STREET LIGHTS /MARCH ADVERTISING /SEASONAL FLASHERS /LAKE & MAIN PATCHING MATERIAL FIRE BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS HEL STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS 36.21 250.50 624.45* 24.89 40.00 64.89* 45.94 20.00 200.00 7.99 92.00 80.94 10.65 104.00 731.84 41.57 2,522.86 2,518.05 285.87 18.74 99.99 62.30 220.79 85.16 7,148.69* 472.56 472.56* 350.00 20.77 60.00 636.66 1,067.43* 24.89 301.59 26.48 308.88 512.05 41.25 597.62 311.20 289.61 2,529.19 49.87 1,015.00 8.52 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:34:52 Operator: JAL Page: 3 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept O TOWER ASPHALT, INC. O WEATHER WATCH, INC. O WILKE, CHARLES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OPTIMIX STREETS WEATHER SERVICE /MARCH STREETS REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOW STREETS Total for Dept 430 AMERICAN FASTENERS OF NUT /CAP /RING /COTTER PIN/ FLEET BAUER BUILT, INC. BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. CAPITOL CITY WELDING, CHEMSEARCH CLEARWATER CREEK CONVE CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. DEHN OIL COMPANY ECM PUBLISHERS, INC FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. GILLUND ENTERPRISES, I GOA COMPANY, INC. KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. LEEF BROTHER, INC. MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFE BALANCE /LABOR PARTS /SUPPLIES COMPRESSED GAS COOL SHIELD /AEROSOL CAR WASH HYD PUMP KIT DIESEL FUEL ADVERTISING /SEASONAL HEL FUEL FILTER ASSEMBLY /SUB RUST PENETRANT /CLEANER /S OIL & GREASE SUPPLIES SHOP TOWELS REGISTRATION/ #339 FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET FLEET PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /SEASONAL FLEET SNAP -ON TOOL, INC. UPDATE FLEET STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO SPRING /CLIP /RIVET /SCREW/ FLEET THANE HAWKINS POLAR CH BATTERY,T /SIG,HOUSING,TE FLEET WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES FLEET Total for Dept 431 O ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. MONTHLY SERVICE /APRIL GOVERNME O CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME O DIAMOND CLEANING SERVI JANITORIAL SERVICE /MARCH GOVERNME O GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, IN SPRING WATER GOVERNME O IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, COPIER MAINTENANCE GOVERNME O NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE GOVERNME O PITNEY BOWES PROTECTION AGREEMENT /JAN GOVERNME O SCHUSTER, DALE BOILER MAINTENANCE GOVERNME O SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMP BUILDING LIGHT GOVERNME Total for Dept 432 O MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, REPAIR /STORM I /SUNRISE P STORM #1 Total for Dept 433 0 A T & T WIRELESS SERVI 0 ANOKA COUNTY G.Z.S. DI O CENTURY FENCE COMPANY, O CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF O CORPORATE EXPRESS O DEGARDNER, RICK O ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 0 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SE 0 HEALTH PARTNERS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS GEO INFO /RESHANAU LAKE PARKS BACKSTOP REPAIR PARKS MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS OFFICE SUPPLIES PARKS MILEAGE PARKS ADVERTISING /SEASONAL HEL PARKS WORKSHOP /STEVE G & MIKE PARKS HEALTH INSURANCE PARKS Amount 112.14 176.00 218.98 6,523.27* 27.56 336.63 719.34 82.10 278.38 4.26 313.95 3,918.55 41.25 126.83 65.69 776.15 87.56 5.99 23.50 49.87 107.57 1,663.47 306.01 34.67 8,969.33* 129.18 958.84 1,287.34 167.85 460.97 5.36 176.00 360.00 300.86 3,846.40* 3,581.36 3,581.36* 27.02 33.00 214.85 199.01 110.01 62.40 41.25 118.00 1,560.00 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:34:53 Operator: JAL Page: 4 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount O MEDICA HEALTH INSURANCE PARKS 289.61 O MENARDS, INC. CEDAR /SCREWDRIVER /STAPLE PARKS 55.81 O NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE PARKS 192.13 O PETTY CASH REIMBURSE PETTY CASH PARKS 26.83 O PLETSCHER'S GREENHOUSE DISH GARDEN /ARRANGEMENT PARKS 18.74 0 PLUNKETT'S, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE /MAT PARKS 28.22 O POPP TELCOM SYSTEMDIVI SERVICE PLAN PARKS 77.00 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /SEASONAL PAR PARKS 107.99 O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN 5 NAME PLATES PARKS 36.21 O US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /780 -1885 PARKS 235.99 O WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES PARKS 82.14 Total for Dept 450 3,516.21* O A T & T MONTHLY SERVICE /780 -1885 RECREATI 2.44 0 A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATI 24.89 O BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. ENGRAVED PHOTO PLAQUE RECREATI 37.28 0 BURSACK, ELIZABETH MILEAGE RECREATI 9.91 O CORPORATE EXPRESS BINDERS /PENS RECREATI 94.51 O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE RECREATI 597.62 0 SIERRA DIGITAL, INC. RECWARE SOFTWARE RECREATI 495.00 Total for Dept 451 1,261.65* O CORPORATE EXPRESS BINDERS /PENS PARK BOA 32.78 Total for Dept 452 32.78* O A T & T WIRELESS SERVI MONTHLY SERVICE ENVIRONM 24.89 O DAVIDSON, MAURINE 1ST QUARTER '99 STIPEND ENVIRONM 225.00 O DONLIN, AMY 1ST QUARTER '99 STIPEND ENVIRONM 150.00 0 FRISK - THOMPSON, LORI 1ST QUARTER '99 STIPEND ENVIRONM 100.00 O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE ENVIRONM 175.00 O HOUCHINS, J. P. 1ST QUARTER '99 STIPEND ENVIRONM 150.00 O KUKONEN, ROD 1ST QUARTER '99 STIPEND ENVIRONM 100.00 O LANE, EUGENE 1ST QUARTER '99 STIPEND ENVIRONM 100.00 O SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, IN 5 NAME PLATES ENVIRONM 18.11 O TREHUS, MIKE 1ST QUARTER '99 STIPEND ENVIRONM 50.00 0 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /785 -4018 ENVIRONM 75.21 Total for Dept 461 1,168.21* O SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATI RECYCLE USED OIL SOLID WA 447.00 Total for Dept 462 447.00* O HEALTH PARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE FORESTRY 175.00 Total for Dept 463 175.00* 0 ANDERSON, PATTI O HOPPE, BOB O LOURO, KAREN O MCLEAN, MICHELE O SARVELA, LAURA O THOLE, ELIZABETH REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC 62.00 13.00 21.00 18.00 29.00 7.00 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:34:53 Operator: JAL Page: 5 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount Total for Dept ** 150.00* O BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. BASKETBALL TROPHY ADULT SP 113.42 0 MRPA BASKETBALL STATE FEE ADULT SP 225.00 Total for Dept 202 338.42* O CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES SPECIAL 27.95 O S & S WORLDWIDE PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES SPECIAL 1,478.82 O TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN BALLOONS /ORIGAMI PAPER SPECIAL 542.27 Total for Dept 205 2,049.04* O BURGER, LUANN DANCE INSTRUCTION YOUTH IN 864.00 O CROWN TROPHY, INC. BASKETBALL MEDALS (100) YOUTH IN 105.43 O S & S WORLDWIDE PAPER RECYCLER YOUTH IN 301.35 O TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS IN BALLOONS /ORIGAMI PAPER YOUTH IN 343.37 Total for Dept 207 1,614.15* 0 CROWN TROPHY, INC. SOCCER TROPHIES YOUTH SP 841.35 Total for Dept 208 841.35* O FOREST LAKE AREA BILLING FOR 1998 -99 FUND OTHER 1,200.00 O SMITH, PEG MILEAGE /CLASS OTHER 92.28 Total for Dept 499 1,292.28* O COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SE RECEIPT PRINTER ADMINIST 679.04 Total for Dept 402 679.04* 0 ALBANY '99 FORD PICKUP POLICE 44,055.00 0 DESIGNWISE 8 CHAIRS POLICE 1,802.83 O MN DEPT PUBLIC SAFETY/ REGISTRATION FORD EXPLOR POLICE 1,488.57 O MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAF REGISTRATION /'99 PICKUP POLICE 11.00 Total for Dept 420 47,357.40* O CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRI QUARTERLY BUDGET FIRE 87,244.39 Total for Dept 421 87,244.39* O J- CRAFT, INC. DUMP TRUCK & EQUIPMENT STREETS 32,720.17 Total for Dept 430 32,720.17* O CENTER FOR CONFLICT MEDIATION OTHER 1,210.87 Total for Dept 499 1,210.87* O KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PROGRESS 1,455.38 Total for Dept 507 1,455.38* 0 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, RE: TAX INCREMENT OTHER 180.00 Total for Dept 499 180.00* O KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE GNW MECH 91.00 Total for Dept 511 91.00* Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:34:53 Operator: JAL Page: 6 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept 0 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE Total for Dept 499 O CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMP EXCAVATOR Total for Dept 499 OTHER OTHER O PATCHIN MESSNER APPRAI APPRAISAL /OUTLOT IN PHEA OTHER Total for Dept 499 O MITEL TELECOMMUNICATIO INSTALL SX -2000L O PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /ECON DEV Total for Dept 499 O OSM, INC. O STRUB, BEN & JODY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CENTENNIAL SCHOOL Total for Dept 499 OTHER OTHER OTHER REIMBURSE UTILITY OVERPA * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** A T & T WIRELESS SERVI AMERICAN FASTENERS OF AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS CONNEXUS ENERGY ECM PUBLISHERS, INC HAWKINS WATER TREATMEN HEALTH PARTNERS HILLESHEIM, TIM MN. DEPT OF HEALTH MONTHLY SERVICE SMALL TOOLS SHIPPING /UTILITY MAILERS MONTHLY SERVICE ADVERTISING /SEASONAL HEL CHLORINE HEALTH INSURANCE REIMBURSE PHONE BATTERIE REGISTRATION /JON R & TIM NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /SEASONAL SERCO LABORATORIES, IN BACTERIA TESTING Total for Dept 494 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER O SHOREVIEW, CITY OF QUARTERLY UTILITY BILLIN * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AMERICAN FASTENERS OF SMALL TOOLS SEWER AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS SHIPPING /UTILITY MAILERS SEWER CONNEXUS ENERGY MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT WEAR RING SEWER HILLESHEIM, TIM REIMBURSE PHONE BATTERIE SEWER MICKELSON, LESTER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE NEIL DORNBUSCH & ASSOC SUBMERSIBLE CHOPPER NORTHERN STATES POWER, MONTHLY SERVICE SEWER SEWER SEWER SY /COM, INC. LIFT STATION MONITORING SEWER US WEST COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICE /785 -9276 SEWER Total for Dept 495 0 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DI PARCEL SEARCH /SMA CONSTR * * * * * * ** 0 OSM, INC. CONSTRUCTION /MILLER'S SO * * * * * * ** Amount 290.15 290.15* 506.42 506.42* 6,050.30 6,050.30* 977.31 210.38 1,187.69* 3,676.54 3,676.54* 9.78 9.78* 48.89 5.98 20.13 347.25 41.25 1,329.48 207.62 29.28 170.00 450.52 49.88 150.00 2,850.28* 4,486.13 4,486.13* 5.98 20.12 384.41 223.14 29.28 80.96 11,653.86 194.92 28,185.00 37.07 40,814.74* 84.00 216.00 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:34:53 Operator: JAL Page: 7 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Approval of Bills Check # Vendor Alpha Name Description Dept Amount 0 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, IN ADVERTISING /VACATION OF * * * * * * ** Total for Dept ** 19.25 319.25* Grand Total 284,839.08* Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:27:19 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Ranges: Vendor #: (A) Invoice #: (A) Entry Journal #: (R) 164 - 173 Trans #: (A) Line #: (A) Due Date: (R) 04121999 - 04121999 Bank #: (A) Operator: JAL Page: 1 Options: Detail / Summary: S Invoice Status: A # of copies: 1 Sort: N Check Over Expend: N Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 000052 A T & T 1 2.44 2.44 .00 .00 000093 ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 1 129.18 129.18 .00 .00 000100 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 1 45.94 45.94 .00 .00 000110 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE 1 229.51 229.51 .00 .00 000167 ALBANY 2 44,055.00 44,055.00 .00 .00 000207 AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS 1 40.25 40.25 .00 .00 000210 AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOTA, IN 2 39.52 39.52 .00 .00 000424 ANOKA COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC 1 20.00 20.00 .00 .00 000430 ANOKA COUNTY G.I.S. DIVISION 4 117.00 117.00 .00 .00 000610 BAUER BUILT, INC. 3 336.63 336.63 .00 .00 000703 BIG BEAR CAR WASH, INC. 1 7.99 7.99 .00 .00 000860 BROADWAY AWARDS, INC. 2 150.70 150.70 .00 .00 000900 BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 1 719.34 719.34 .00 .00 000922 BURSACK, ELIZABETH 1 9.91 9.91 .00 .00 000929 WILKE, CHARLES 1 218.98 218.98 .00 .00 000960 CAPITOL CITY WELDING, INC. 1 82.10 82.10 .00 .00 000980 CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 2 506.42 506.42 .00 .00 001040 CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT 1 87,244.39 87,244.39 .00 .00 001051 CENTER FOR CONFLICT 1 1,210.87 1,210.87 .00 .00 001067 CENTURY COLLEGE 1 92.00 92.00 .00 .00 001070 CENTURY FENCE COMPANY, INC. 2 214.85 214.85 .00 .00 001109 CHEMSEARCH 1 278.38 278.38 .00 .00 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:27:20 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 2 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001110 CIRCLE PINES, CITY OF 1 199.01 199.01 .00 .00 001148 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER 2 85.20 85.20 .00 .00 001187 CONNEXUS ENERGY 1 2,002.74 2,002.74 .00 .00 001193 COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 1 679.04 679.04 .00 .00 001230 CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 2 313.95 313.95 .00 .00 001247 CROWN TROPHY, INC. 2 946.78 946.78 .00 .00 001262 D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY, INC. 1 308.88 308.88 .00 .00 001280 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 1 223.14 223.14 .00 .00 001281 DAVIDSON, MAURINE 1 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 001288 DESIGNWISE 1 1,802.83 1,802.83 .00 .00 001292 DEHN OIL COMPANY 4 3,918.55 3,918.55 .00 .00 001298 DEGARDNER, RICK 1 62.40 62.40 .00 .00 001309 DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 1 1,287.34 1,287.34 .00 .00 001329 DONLIN, AMY 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001380 EARL ANDERSON ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 512.05 512.05 .00 .00 001390 ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 3 165.00 165.00 .00 .00 001473 FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL HEALTH CARE 1 104.00 104.00 .00 .00 001480 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 1 1,329.48 1,329.48 .00 .00 001487 FIRESIDE CORNER 1 25.50 25.50 .00 .00 001527 FOREST LAKE AREA 1 1,200.00 1,200.00 .00 .00 001530 FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 1 126.83 126.83 .00 .00 001590 FRISK - THOMPSON, LORI 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 001600 GALL'S INC. 3 731.84 731.84 .00 .00 001610 GILLUND ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 65.69 65.69 .00 .00 001620 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 2 209.42 209.42 .00 .00 001630 GOA COMPANY, INC. 1 776.15 776.15 .00 .00 001825 HEALTH PARTNERS 1 9,828.48 9,828.48 .00 .00 Date: 04/06/1999 Time 11:27:22 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 3 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 001840 HILLESHEIM, TIM 1 58.56 58.56 .00 .00 001848 HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER, P.A. 1 67.12 67.12 .00 .00 001854 HOUCHINS, J. P. 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 001855 HOPPE, BOB 1 13.00 13.00 .00 .00 001860 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 1 1,836.53 1,836.53 .00 .00 001980 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. 2 513.69 513.69 .00 .00 002030 J- CRAFT, INC. 1 32,720.17 32,720.17 .00 .00 002100 JULEEN DESIGNS, INC. 1 311.20 311.20 .00 .00 002110 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 1 87.56 87.56 .00 .00 002220 LABOR RELATIONS, INC. 1 1,624.75 1,624.75 .00 .00 002328 LEEF BROTHER, INC. 1 5.99 5.99 .00 .00 002376 LOURO, KAREN 1 21.00 21.00 .00 .00 002422 LANE, EUGENE 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 002520 MCLEAN, MICHELE 1 18.00 18.00 .00 .00 002540 MEDICA 1 5,138.33 5,138.33 .00 .00 002550 MENARDS, INC. 1 55.81 55.81 .00 .00 002580 METROPOLITAN AREA 2 61.00 61.00 .00 .00 002590 MICKELSON, LESTER 1 80.96 80.96 .00 .00 002743 BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY 1 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 002760 MN. DEPT OF HEALTH 1 170.00 170.00 .00 .00 002780 MN. DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 11.00 11.00 .00 .00 002852 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INC. 1 3,581.36 3,581.36 .00 .00 002900 MN. DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY 1 23.50 23.50 .00 .00 002995 MITEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. 1 977.31 977.31 .00 .00 003050 MRPA 2 225.00 225.00 .00 .00 003159 NEIL DORNBUSCH & ASSOCIATES 1 11,653.86 11,653.86 .00 .00 003242 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1 118.00 118.00 .00 .00 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:27:23 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 4 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 003250 NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 2 3,372.12 3,372.12 .00 .00 003285 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 180.00 180.00 .00 .00 003430 OSM, INC. 4 3,892.54 3,892.54 .00 .00 003441 ANDERSON, PATTI 1 62.00 62.00 .00 .00 003457 PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, INC. 1 20.77 20.77 .00 .00 003491 PETTY CASH 1 26.83 26.83 .00 .00 003492 PETTY CASH 1 285.87 285.87 .00 .00 003524 PITNEY BOWES 1 176.00 176.00 .00 .00 003530 PLETSCHER'S GREENHOUSES INC. 1 93.70 93.70 .00 .00 003540 PLUNKETT'S, INC. 1 28.22 28.22 .00 .00 003551 POPP TELCOM SYSTEMDIVISION 2 77.00 77.00 .00 .00 003600 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 10 535.37 535.37 .00 .00 003868 S & S WORLDWIDE 2 1,780.17 1,780.17 .00 .00 003900 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 4 447.00 447.00 .00 .00 003912 SARVELA, LAURA 1 29.00 29.00 .00 .00 003977 SERCO LABORATORIES, INC. 1 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 003990 SHOREVIEW, CITY OF 1 4,486.13 4,486.13 .00 .00 004007 SIERRA DIGITAL, INC. 1 495.00 495.00 .00 .00 004010 SIGNS BY NORTHLAND, INC. 1 90.53 90.53 .00 .00 004040 SMITH, PEG 1 92.28 92.28 .00 .00 004060 SNAP -ON TOOL,INC. 1 107.57 107.57 .00 .00 004130 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC. 1 99.99 99.99 .00 .00 004142 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO 2 1,663.47 1,663.47 .00 .00 004173 STATE OF MINNESOTA /BUILDING CODES & STAN 1 60.00 60.00 .00 .00 004191 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 228.97 228.97 .00 .00 004210 STATE OF MN, DEPT OF TRANS 1 40.00 40.00 .00 .00 004241 STRUB, BEN & JODY 1 9.78 9.78 .00 .00 Date: 04/06/1999 Time: 11:27:24 CITY OF LINO LAKES FM Entry - Invoice Journal Operator: JAL Page: 5 Discount Vendor # Name # of items Net Gross Discount Lost 004251 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 1 636.66 636.66 .00 .00 004280 SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 2 300.86 300.86 .00 .00 004320 SY /COM, INC. 1 28,185.00 28,185.00 .00 .00 004350 T.K.D.A. 1 1,015.00 1,015.00 .00 .00 004370 HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD. 1 308.75 308.75 .00 .00 004400 TESCH, DAN 1 24.62 24.62 .00 .00 004410 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET, INC. 1 368.31 368.31 .00 .00 004427 TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 3 624.75 624.75 .00 .00 004450 TOM THUMB, INC. 1 8.52 8.52 .00 .00 004467 TOWER ASPHALT, INC. 1 112.14 112.14 .00 .00 004479 TREADWAY GRAPHICS, INC. 1 220.79 220.79 .00 .00 004481 TREHUS, MIKE 1 50.00 50.00 .00 .00 004485 TRIARCO ARTS /CRAFTS INC. 2 885.64 885.64 .00 .00 004538 TUXALL UNIFORM COMPANY 1 85.16 85.16 .00 .00 004670 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 3 348.27 348.27 .00 .00 004759 WAITE SMITH, LINDA 1 19.99 19.99 .00 .00 004789 PATCHIN MESSNER APPRAISALS, INC. 1 6,050.30 6,050.30 .00 .00 004791 WEATHER WATCH, INC. 1 176.00 176.00 .00 .00 004840 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 2 116.81 116.81 .00 .00 007109 SCHUSTER, DALE 1 360.00 360.00 .00 .00 900158 SOLBERG ELECTRIC 1 80.50 80.50 .00 .00 900198 THOLE, ELIZABETH 1 7.00 7.00 .00 .00 900524 BURGER, LUANN 2 864.00 864.00 .00 .00 900528 MN DEPT PUBLIC SAFETY /EMERGENCY MGT 1 1,488.57 1,488.57 .00 .00 900561 TEAMWORKS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1 625.00 625.00 .00 .00 900591 CORPORATE EXPRESS 4 291.73 291.73 .00 .00 950061 KUKONEN, ROD 1 100.00 100.00 .00 .00 Grand Totals: 184 284,839.08 284,839.08 .00 .00* STAFF t3R. G1NATOR: ` Rick De ner, Public Services Director DATE: April 6,1999 TOPIC: 1% olution 99 -15 Vote Required: Majority Vote BACKGROI„1 D; The Circle -Lex Lions Club a ►ro the Parks' and Recreation D rent to rove possibility of providing a community party n to area residents. Circle -Lex Lions Club purchase a community FY:wagon and n amounts to X10,945: coati+ n will be a ble be iFn ng March 29 at the Parks and Recreation Bu lic ens received by S ll'be proceed in random orb on April 9. Block Party l cations will rec+sive priority n i lividual appli cations. ` Also, there will be no fee to rve the parry fo a ood block party. A n ' feee will be required for an a uatio pr ty;or %roily r, nion.' wagon will be anrailab Jude 1 Scp Wither 15. The QPTIONS:; 1. Accept the $ 10,945 Circle -Lex Lion Club. 2. Return donation from. C• ut o-Lex Lions Club Q DATION: tion 1. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 -15 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE CIRCLE -LEX LIONS CLUB, FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PARTY WAGON. WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department was sought out by the Circle - Lex Lions Club to investigate the possibility of purchasing and operating a community party wagon; and WHEREAS, The community party wagon will be available for persons to reserve; and have it delivered for block parties; and WHEREAS, The Circle -Lex Lions Club donated $10,945.00 to purchase the community party wagon and all its contents. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby accepts the donation of $10,945.00 to purchase the community party wagon for block parties and wishes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Circle -Lex Lions Club for its support and donation for this program. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: sw /sandie/resolution 99 -15 Party Wagon.doc AGENDA ITEM 4A STAFF MEMBE Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 7 April 1999 SUBJECT Resi nat on of Financial Analyst VOTE RE+IUTRED Simple Majority BACKGROUND Daryl Sulander, Financial Analyst with the city has informed us that he is rasing financial position with an out-state community. Daryl's last day will be 16 April 1999. We' Daryl all the best with his career. We would like to discuss the replacement of is position at the council's next work on. OPTIONS pt the resignation. RECOMMENDATIO0 a AGEN STAFF OR 'FOR: Dan TE DATE: 9' TOPIC: Applicg C€ ndu BACKGROUND- Non- profit organttions for an exemption ;from a gay gambling ions per year. Jay Cee Women, are requ fi resident who has caner. Thi, School on April 30, 1999. $dal OPTtONS: 1. Adopt a license. Do not ITEM tion for Centennial Women of Today to F_xcluded' Bingo lowed under the State Gambling Statutes to appl ling license if they conduct fewer than five (5) The Centennial Women of Today, previously the to hold a Bingo fund - raiser for a Lino Lakes event will be held at the Rice Lake Elementary an approving the Option No. 1 t for an exemption from a gambti Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo - LG240B If your organization has been licensed or exempted in the current calendar year, you are not eligible to apply for excluded bingo. Organization Information Organization Name (� P. esN-� -e 'r\c� ( 0' L_L o re_(-, c)-- -To CL ai Street PO .Rey. s4c, City State/Zip ( r c i S L P i r S M (4 SS o 1 1 ) Type of nonprofit organization (check one): ❑ Fratemal p Veteran ❑ Religious 0 Other nonprofit organization Type of proof of nonprofit - attach a copy (see instructions): XCertificate of Good Standing - Minnesota Secretary of State's Office ❑ Internal Revenue Service ❑ Affiliate of Parent nonprofit organization (charter) Excluded Bingo Activity Information Has your organization held a bingo event in the current year? If yes, list the dates that bingo was conducted Check one: 12/The bingo event will be one of four or fewer bingo events your organization will hold this year. Date(s) of bingo event A pr-; k 30 Acton No V Yes -OR- ❑ The bingo event will be conducted (up to 12 consecutive days) in connection with a: County Fair - Date(s) of bingo event State Fair - Date(s) of bingo event Civic Celebration - Date(s) of bingo event Name of the person in charge of the bingo event Premises Where Excluded Bingo Will Be Conducted Daytime Phone (ei)..)- 14 -gcn7 Name of Premises c — L9 E try. e r*o c Street Address City County Township Be sure to complete page 2 Page 1 of 2 10/98 4A,6- aLorklA Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo - LG240B Page 2 of 2 10/98 Organization Name Chief Executive Officer's Signature The information provided in this application is complete and ac cu -te to the best of my knowledge. Chief Executive Officer's signature Name (please print) M cxrq ∎ CTO A o 14 Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment and Approval Date/ aS /ctc '/ w' On behalf of the city, I hereby approve this application for excluded bingo activity at the premises located within the city's jurisdiction. For the township: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for excluded bingo activity within the township limits. A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2). rint na Sig Title re of city personnel receivin plication Date /ac Print name of township Signature of township official acknowledging application Title Date / / For the county: On behalf of the county, I hereby approve this application for excluded bingo activity at the premises located within the county's jurisdiction. Print name of county (Signature of county personnel receiving application) Tolle Date / • / Mail Application and Attachment(s) Send the completed application and a copy of your proof of nonprofit status at least 30 days prior to the activity date to: Gambling Control Board 1711 W. County Rd. B, Suite 300 South Roseville, MN 55113 If your application is denied by the local unit of government, do not send the application to the Gambling Control Board. This form will be made available in aftemative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. You have the right to refuse to supply the intonation requested; however, if you refuse to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue you an authorization. If you supply the information requested, the Board will be able to process your application. Your name and your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All the other information that you provide will be private data about you until the Board issues your authorization. Acknowledgmentof Gambling Control Board Your request to conduct excluded bingo has been received and is acknowledged by the Gambling Control Board. Acknowledged by: Date / Licensing Specialist When the Board issues your authorization, all of the information that you have provided to the Board in the process of applying for your authorization will become public. If the Board does not issue you an authorization, all the information you have provided in the process of applying for an authorization remains private, with the exception of your name and your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about you are available only to the following: Board members, staff of the Board whose work assignment requires that they have access to the information; the Minnesota Department of Public Safety; the Minnesota Attomey General; the Minnesota Commissioners of Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national and intemational gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies that are specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this Notice was given; and anyone with your consent. Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo - LG240B, Instructions 10/98 Completion of Application Complete the application, and attach proof of your the IRS or the Minnesota Secretary of State. Minnesota Secretary of State Certificate of Good Standing - Nonprofit Articles of Incorporation Attach a copy of your organization's Certificate of Good Standing (317A) showing incorporation as a nonprofit organization. This certificate can be obtained from the Minnesota Secretary of State: Minnesota Secretary of State Business Services Division 180 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: 651 -296 -2803 OR .dar year car conducted • 'filkiettill . organization's nonprofit status from either IRS Income Tax Exemption Under a national organization If your organization falls under a national organization, attach both of the following: 1. a copy of the IRS letter showing that your national organization has been a registered nonprofit 501(c) organiza- tion and carries a group ruling, and 2. a copy of the charter, or letter from your national organization, recognizing your organization as a subordinate. Not under a national organization If your organization does not fall under a national organization, attach a copy of the IRS income tax exemption [501(c)] letter in the name of your organization, showing income tax exempt status. To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, send your federal ID number and the date your organization initially applied for tax exempt status to: IRS P.O. Box 2508 Room 4010 Cincinnati, OH 45201 Phone: (513) 684 -3957 Recordkeeping Your organization must keep your bingo records for 3 -1/2 years. Y. to onneso state Mi to SECRETARY OF STATE Certificate of Good Standing I, Mary Kiffineyer, Secretary of State of Minnesota, do certify that: The corporation listed below is a corporation formed under the laws of Minnesota; that the corporation was formed by the filing of Articles of Incorporation with the Office of the Secretary of State on the date listed below; that the corporation is governed by the chapter of Minnesota Statutes listed below; and that this corporation is authorized to do business as a corporation at the time this certificate is issued. Name: Centennial Women of Today Date Formed: 05/29/1979 Chapter Governed By: 317A This certificate has been issued on 03/22/99. 4a (/ ThofState. tf tem 4C STAFF ORIGINATOR: " Dan Tesch DATE: 4/1/99 TOPIC: nsiderration of Resolution 99 -22:authorizing the transfer of monies from the General Fund to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund Vote Ne BACKGRO)NI? Dollars were budgeted in the 1998 General Fund budget for a Natural Resource Inventory Study. A portion of the study ($8,216.00) was financed with CDBG dollars and the costs were paid out of the CDBG Fund. In:addit on, there was an additional $1,211.50 in personnel costs that need to be funded thro ugh a transfer from General Fund. OPTIONS 1 Approve transfer from the General Fund to CDBG Fund in the amount of $9,427.50 Option 1 Council member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: City Of Lino Lakes Resolution 99 -22 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF MONIES FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND WHEREAS, dollars were budgeted for a Natural Resource Inventory Study in 1998, and WHEREAS, a portion of the study was financed with Community Development Block Grant dollars ($8,216.00), and WHEREAS, these costs were paid from the C.D.B.G. Fund, and WHEREAS, other unfunded costs total $1,211.50. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following transfer be authorized effective December 31, 1998: Increase Decrease C.D.B.G Fund (402) $9,427.50 General Fund (101) $9,427.50 Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes this 12th day of April, 1999. Kimberly Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by And upon vote taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: STAFF TOR: Linda Waite Smith DATE: 4/7/99 TOPIC: Authorize stiff to begin process to rec it a ilac a nt r rehiring The cur t city c i sch led to r ire =the earl of 1999. I sug the I to the City mow, with the intent of h�8 so hi d by Iuly 1, I F the sal ary we Id come from tl i to a Hut ty Clerk to mete is tit she has No It would avoid stnber doing "da►uble duty" by assuming the day -lay city clerk duties tl revert tli city clerk from completing the duties only she can complete It would also alfi€ w a tra tion period for retiring City Clerk to provide advi d inftion to the new City Cie. It would t ' sc one : on staff to implement and QTI 1. Authorize staiobegin t process to recruit a city clerk, 2. Deny staffs riequest to begin the process to replace the retiring city clerk. Option #1 OF 1990 oRT I will be presenting an overview of the 1998 Annual Police Report, at the Council worksesion of April 7. I would like to present this report to the City Council and community = at the City Council meeting on April 12, 1999. 1. Accept the Polio presented. Return to staff for further Department 1998 Annual report nformation Option No. STAFF ORIGiTOR David J Peccha, Chill DATE APRIL I1, 1999 TOPIC AR' ADDXTlt TO L 71DOPTING A TOBACCO O The Liao juvesle viola tic bees sbc probl.ma sale, PC protect. the ills Council coaaac+c© vs,etatZOUe. a o tat e► and Federal to be the cause' c>F e which place a fiaa ncia 1t 7 tbiat ordinance a3 eesai n, and oats of t tnor apaaat the aer r►1 oi. tobacco. I �athor,ae a drat reads: :bees viola rss and ab.c teal serious r rden o a �e iatande�d` co, tobacco p'tatc effectal saaociate oamend ; that the C o this ordinance. City of Lino Lakes Tobacco Ordinance Section I. Purpose: Because the city of Lino Lakes recognizes that many people under the age of 18 purchase or otherwise obtain, possess and use tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices, and such sales, possession, and use are violations of State and Federal laws; and because smoking has been shown to be the cause of several serious health problems which place a financial burden on all levels of government; this ordinance shall be intended to regulate the sale, possession, and use of tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices for the purpose of enforcing and furthering existing laws, to protect minors against the serious effects associated with the illegal use of tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices, and to further the official public policy of the State of Minnesota in regard to preventing young people from starting to smoke as stated in Minn. Statute 144.391. Section II. Definitions and Interpretations: Except as may otherwise be provided or clearly implied by context, all terms shall be given their commonly accepted definitions. The singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular. The masculine shall include the feminine and neuter, and vice - versa. The term "shall" means mandatory and the term "may" means permissive. The following terms shall have the definitions given to them: Subd. 1 Tobacco or Tobacco Products: Any substance or item containing tobacco leaf, including but not limited to, cigarettes; cigars; pipe tobacco; snuff; fine cut or other chewing tobacco; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready - rubbed, and other smoking tobacco; snuff flowers; cavendish; shorts; plug and twist tobaccos; dipping tobaccos; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings, and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco leaf prepared in such manner as to be suitable for chewing, sniffing, or smoking. Subd. 2 Tobacco Related Devices: Any tobacco product as well as a pipe, rolling papers, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing, or smoking of tobacco or tobacco products. Subd. 3 Self Service Merchandising: Open displays of tobacco, tobacco products or tobacco related devices in any manner where any person shall have access to those items without the assistance or intervention of the licensee or the licensee's employees. The assistance or intervention shall entail the actual physical exchange of the item(s) between the customer or the licensee or employee. Subd. 4 Vending Machine: Any device which dispenses tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices upon insertion of money, tokens, or other form of payment directly into the device by the person seeking to purchase the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related devices. Subd. 5 Individually Packaged: The practice of selling any tobacco or tobacco product wrapped individually for sale. Subd. 6 Loosies: The common term used to refer to a single individually packaged cigarette. Subd. 7 Minor: Any natural person who has not yet reached the age of eighteen (18) years of age. Subd. 8 Retail Establishment: Any place of business where tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices are available for sale to the general public. Subd. 9 Moveable Place of Business: Any form of business operated out of a truck, van, automobile or other type of vehicle or transportable shelter and not a fixed address store front or other permanent type of structure authorized for sales transactions. Subd. 10 Sale: Any transfer of goods for money, trade, barter, or other consideration. Subd. 11 Compliance Checks: The system the City of Lino Lakes uses to investigate and ensure that those authorized to sell tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices are following and complying with the requirements of this ordinance. Compliance checks shall involve the use of minors as authorized by this ordinance. Compliance checks shall also mean the use of minors who attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices for educational, research and training purposes as authorized by State and Federal laws. Compliance checks may also be conducted by other units of government for the purpose of enforcing appropriate Federal, State or local laws and regulations relating to tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices. Section III. License: Subd. 1 Application: An application for a license to sell tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices shall be made on a form provided by the city of Lino Lakes. The completed application is to be returned to the city of Lino Lakes at which time the application will be forwarded to the Police Department for background checks. If the application is deemed incomplete it shall be returned to the applicant with a notice of the missing data. No incomplete applications will be reviewed. The completed application will be forwarded to the city council for review and action. If the city council denies the application a notice of the denial shall be given to the applicant as well as a notice of the applicants right to appeal the decision. Subd. 2 Term: All licenses approved under this ordinance are valid until midnight December 31St of each year. Subd. 3 Revocation or Suspension: Any license issued under this ordinance may be revoked or suspended as provided in the Violations and Penalties section of this ordinance. Subd. 4 Transfers: All licenses issued under this ordinance shall be valid only on the premises for which the license was issued and only for the person to whom the license was issued. Subd. 5 Moveable Place of Business: No license shall be issued to a moveable place of business. Only fixed location businesses shall be eligible to be licensed under this ordinance. Subd. 6 Display: All licenses shall be posted and displayed in plain view of the general public on the licensed premises. Subd. 7 Renewals: Renewals of a license issued under this section shall be handled in the same manner as the original application. The request for a renewal shall be made at least thirty (30) days, but no more than sixty (60) days before the expiration of the current license. Section IV. Fees: No license shall be issued under this ordinance until the appropriate license fee shall be paid in full. Section V. Basis for Denial of License: The following shall be grounds for denying the issuance or renewal of a license under this ordinance; however, except as may otherwise be provided by law, the existence of any particular ground for denial does not mean that the city must deny the license. If a license is mistakenly issued or renewed to a person, it shall be revoked upon the discovery that the person was ineligible for the license under this section: (Note: The following is not an exclusive nor an exhaustive list.) A. The applicant is under the age of 18 years. B. The applicant has been convicted within the past five (5) years of any violation of a Federal, State, or local law, ordinance provision, or other regulation relating to tobacco or tobacco products, or product related devices. C. The applicant has had a license to sell tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices revoked within the preceding twelve (12) months of the date of application. D. The applicant fails to provide any information required on the application, or provides false or misleading information. E. The applicant is prohibited by Federal, State, or other local law, ordinance, or other regulation, from holding such a license. Section VI. Prohibited Sales: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device: A. To any person under the age of eighteen (18) years. B. By means of any type of vending machine, except as may otherwise be provided in this ordinance (see "Vending Machines ") C. By means of self - service methods whereby the customer does not need to make a verbal or written request to an employee of the licensed premise in order to receive the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device and whereby there is not a physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device between the licensee or the licensee's employee, and the customer. D. By means of loosies as defined in this ordinance. E. By any other means, to any other person, in any manner or form prohibited by Federal, State, or other local law, ordinance provision or other regulation. Section VII. Vending Machines: It shall be unlawful for any person licensed under this ordinance to allow the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices by means of a vending machine unless minors are at all times prohibited from entering the licensed establishment. Section VIII. Self - Service Sales: It shall be unlawful for a licensee under this ordinance to allow the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices by any means whereby the customer may have access to such items without having to request the item from the licensee or the licensee's employee and whereby there is not a physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco products, or the tobacco related device between the licensee or his or her clerk and the customer. All tobacco, tobacco products and tobacco related devices shall either be stored behind a counter or other area not freely accessible to the general public. Section IX. Responsibility: All licensees under this ordinance shall be responsible for the actions of their employees in regard to the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices on the licensed premises, and the sale of such item by an employee shall be considered a sale by the license holder. Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the city of Lino Lakes from also subjecting the clerk to whatever penalties are appropriate under this ordinance, State or Federal Law, or other applicable law or regulation. Section X. Compliance Checks and Inspections: All licensed premises shall be open to inspection by the Lino Lakes Police Department or other authorized city official during regular business hours. From time to time, but at least once per year the city shall conduct compliance checks by engaging, with written consent of their parents or guardians, minors over the age of fifteen (15) years but less than eighteen (18) years, to enter the licensed premise to attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices. Minors used for the compliance checks shall not be guilty of the unlawful purchase or attempted purchase, nor the unlawful possession of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices when such items are obtained or attempted to be obtained as a part of the compliance check. No minors used in compliance checks shall attempt to use false identification misrepresenting the minor's age, and all minors lawfully engaged in a compliance check shall answer all questions about the minor's age asked by the licensee or his or her employee and shall produce any identification, if any exists, for which he or she is asked. Nothing in his section shall prohibit compliance checks authorized by State or Federal Laws for educational, research or training purposes, or required for the enforcement of a particular State or Federal law. Section XI. Other Illegal Acts: Illegal Sales: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to sell or otherwise provide any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device to any minor. Illegal Possession: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any minor to have in his or her possession any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device. This subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in a compliance check. Illegal Use: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any minor to smoke, chew, sniff, or otherwise use any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device. Illegal Procurement: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any minor to purchase or attempt to purchase or otherwise obtain any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device, and it shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to purchase or otherwise obtain such items on behalf of a minor. It shall further be a violation for any person to coerce or attempt to coerce a minor to illegally purchase or otherwise obtain or use any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco related device. This subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in a compliance check. Use of False Identification: It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any minor to attempt to disguise his or her true age by use of a false form of identification, whether the identification is that of another person or one on which the age of the person has been modified or tampered with to represent an age older than the actual age of the person. Section XII. Violations: Notice: Upon discovery of a suspected violation, the alleged violator shall be issued, either personally or by mail, a citation that sets forth the alleged violation and which shall inform the violator of his or her rights to be heard on the accusation. Hearings: If a person accused of violating this ordinance so requests, a hearing shall be scheduled, the time and place of which shall be published and provided to the accused violator. Hearing Officer: The city council shall serve as the hearing officer. (The city council may appoint an independent hearing officer). Decision: If the hearing officer determines that a violation of this ordinance did occur, that decision, along with the hearing officer's reasons for finding a violation and the penalty to be imposed, shall be recorded in writing, a copy of which shall be provided to the accused violator. Likewise, if the hearing officer finds that no violation occurred or finds grounds for not imposing any penalty, such findings shall be recorded and a copy provided to the acquitted accused violator. Appeals: Appeals of any decision made by the hearing officer shall be filed in the district court for the jurisdiction of the City of Lino Lakes. Misdemeanor Prosecution: Nothing in this section shall prohibit the city from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any alleged violation of this ordinance. Continued Violation: Each violation, and every day in which a violation occurs or continues, shall constitute a separate offense. Section XIII. Penalties: Minors: Any person under the age of 18 who attempts to purchase tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices may incur administrative penalties as follows: A. First Violation: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $50 And/or require the person to attend tobacco related education classes, and/or participate in a diversion program and/or complete community service. B. Second Violation Within 24 Months: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $75 And/or require the person to attend tobacco related education classes, and/or participate in a diversion program and/or complete community service. C. Third Violation Within 24 Months: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $100 And/or require the person to attend tobacco related education classes, and/or participate in a diversion program and/or complete community service. Individuals: Any person who purchases or provides tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices for a person under the age of 18 may incur administrative penalties as follows: D. First Violation: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $50 And/or require the person to attend tobacco related education classes, and/or participate in a diversion program and/or complete community service. E. Second Violation Within 24 Months: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $75 And/or require the person to attend tobacco related education classes, and/or participate in a diversion program and/or complete community service. F. Third Violation Within 24 Months: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $100 And/or require the person to attend tobacco related education classes, and/or participate in a diversion program and/or complete community service. Licensees: Any licensee found to have violated this ordinance, or whose employee shall have violated this ordinance, shall be subject to the following administrative penalties: A. First Violation: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $500 and/or a suspension of the license for a period of ten (10) days. B. Second Violation Within 24 Months: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $750 and/or s suspension of the license for a period of thirty (30) days. C. Third Violation Within 24 Months: The city council may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 and/or suspension of the license for a period of one (1) year. Section XIV. Exceptions and Defenses: Nothing in this ordinance shall prevent the providing of tobacco, tobacco products, or tobacco related devices to a minor as part of a lawfully recognized religious, spiritual, or cultural ceremony. It shall be an affirmative defense to the violation of this ordinance for a person to have reasonably relied on proof of age as described by State law. Section XV. Severability and Savings Clause: If any section of this ordinance shall be found unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, that fording shall not serve as an invalidation or effect the validity and enforceability of any other section or provision of this ordinance. Section XVI. Summary: It is the intent of this ordinance to regulate the sale, possession, and use of tobacco, tobacco products, and tobacco related devices in the city of Lino Lakes and to reduce the illegal sale , possession, and use of such items to and by minors. The City of Cher, Pirn provide bulidin ink 1999. Circle Pines Circle Pines employees would continue to process permits and ar r zonir questions and their cum ntracor wadi continue to perform a rival inscions d cion would scheduled by Lino Lades staff in order to word name work weer the two Mies. TF additional it pecl ns wool# be ne dy to ti tt rary e s in the lino Lakes Inspections' gttent durir the <spring and surnrner. After consu an hourly rate I services has been calculated on the spry, Ins tnd we rker's c npe+nsati+o i:prem for the Lino Lakes budll ng ial an homey charge for vehicle u has been added. The r+aa ch would be $33.32 per hour. If the city council autt staff to .p with discuss ns with Circle Pines,, any tentative arrnent that is reached would be forwarcd to td attorney for rev v and then to pity council for final action. . Authorize the a drr iratoer and tic safety disc r to negc bate with t city ardmin r for of the City cif Circle Pines, an agreement to provide b it ns nrioes on a contract bass. . [3o not author ze r s e#e a building in STAFF ORIGINATO: C.C. MEETING DAT< TOPIC: Tell Si CITY COUNC ACTION: 4/5 vote - Comprehensive Plan Amendment 'n'°"-'1' 4/5 vote - Rezone from R and R-X to PDO r'rd,��.s� 3/2 vote - PDO Preliminary Development Plan ro ye.4 BACKGROUND 2 City Council jmeet ng. The staff report from' 1 had several quests about the open space. There are 1. Homeow restrictions tc is part of the PHomeo rs ianon wi holds an ea over the c gives enforcement au+tho ity;t responsibility o the C y. A homeowners a ciatio • open excs pt #lie trail corridor. a that restricts activity in the open City is rnsble for gc nent of open space. anent with Mr. Quigley, he states he wants to urge enough to include the park and much of the 1d the portion, about 135 lots. The ation.` The last p would be the southeast Phasing could Mild be part of Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition April 12, 1999 page 2 Staff is recommending one additional condition of approval: 14. Building setbacks shall be those of the R1 -X zoning district. The item must be acted on tonight unless the applicant agrees to an extension. OPTIONS 1. Approval of the land use and MUSA amendment of the existing Comprehensive Plan for the southeast 40 acres of the site. The MUSA allocation would become effective only at the time of final plat approval. If the new Comprehensive Plan is adopted, this amendment will be rendered unnecessary. 2. Approval of the rezoning to Planned Development Overlay for single family residential use based on the findings in this report. 3. Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for the PDO with the conditions listed. 4. Denial of land use and MUSA amendments to the existing Comprehensive Plan. Findings must be made. 5. Denial of rezoning to PDO. Without the rezoning, the development plan cannot be approved. Findings must be made. 6. Denial of PDO development plan. Findings must be made. RECOMMENDATION Options 1, 2, 3, STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser MEETING DATE: Marc 22, 1999 TOPIC: Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Rezone from Rural and Rural Executive to PDO - PDO Preliminary Development Plan/Preliminary Plat CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 4/5 vote - Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4/5 vote - Rezone from R and R -X to PDO 3/2 vote - PDO Preliminary Development Plan BACKGROUND This project has been discussed extensively by various citizen boards and staff. The original application for rezoning and preliminary plat was in July 1998. The applicant agreed to re- evaluate the site design in light of preservation development principles being presented as part of the City's environmental inventory. The applicant participated in a redesign meeting and came back with a new design. This was then discussed by staff, consultants, and at numerous City boards. The current application represents the product of those discussions. The application is for a Comprehensive Plan amendment including MUSA amendment, rezoning from Rural and Rural-X to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) for single family residential use, and approval of the preliminary development plan for the PDO. The site includes 162.7 acres. The existing Comprehensive Plan guides most of the site for single family residential. However, the southeast 40 acres is guided Rural and is not in the current MUSA. The Plan amendment application is to change this 40 acres to residential and expand the MUSA to cover the 40 acres. The draft 1998 Plan guides this entire site for low density, sewered single family residential. The site currently is zoned R Rural except for the southeast 40 acres, which is zoned R -X Rural Executive. The rezoning application is to rezone the entire 162.7 acres to PDO Planned Development Overlay for single family residential. The rezoning is necessary before the property can be platted for more than ten acre lots. Thus, the rezoning is necessary before the preliminary development plan can be approved. Comprehensive Plan (existing) Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 2 Comprehensive Plan (draft) Zoning site north east west south SF Resid. and Rural SF Resid. City of Hugo Rural Rural Low Density Sewered Resid. Low Density Sewered Resid. City of Hugo Low Density Sewered Resid. Low Density Unsewered Resid. This report is based on the following submittals: Preliminary Plat Preliminary Utility Plan 2/22/99 Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan 2/22/99 revised 2/22/99, original 12/21/98 R and R -X R -1 and R City of Hugo R R A PDO requires a preliminary development plan and a final development plan. The preliminary plat is included as part of the PDO preliminary development plan. The plan proposes 243 single family lots. Project data is listed below: total area 162.7 acres 100% greenways uplands wetlands 26.5 acres 34.1 acres 60.6 acres 37 % park dedication open parkland trail corridor 5.5 acres 2.9 acres 8.4 acres 5% total open space 69.0 acres 42% lots and roads 93.7 acres 58% total lots 243 gross density 1.49 lots /acre net density 2.59 lots/acre (area in lots and roads only) Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 3 ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan Amendment The existing Comprehensive Plan, last amended in 1990, guides most of the site for single family residential, but the southeast 40 acres is guided rural. If this 40 acres is to be included in this development, the Plan needs to be amended. The proposal is consistent with the existing Plan on the other 120+ acres of the site. The 120+ acres are in the existing MUSA. The southeast 40 acres are not. New MUSA allocation would be approximately 25 acres: only the area to be developed with residential lots and roads. The exact amount will be determined at the time of final platting for this area. The draft 1998 Plan guides the entire site for low density, sewered residential. The proposal is consistent with this land use. If the draft 1998 Plan is approved by the Metropolitan Council and adopted by the City, there will be no need for this amendment. Much research and public participation went into the preparation of the land use policies and recommendations in the draft 1998 Plan. The result was a recommendation to guide this site and land around it for low density residential. It is a logical extension of existing utilities, it stages growth out to the next contiguous area, and the road access is adequate to serve the area. If the project is staged so that development on the southeast 40 acres does not occur until last, the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would become moot if the 1998 draft is adopted. Staff recommends approval of the land use and MUSA amendment of the existing Plan to reflect the intention of the draft 1998 Plan for this area. If the draft Plan is not adopted, this would mean that the 1990 Plan is amended to guide the entire site for single family residential and include the site in the MUSA. The MUSA allocation would become effective at the time of final plat approval (final development plan for the PDO). Staff is recommending approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment including the MUSA amendment. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 4 Rezoning to Planned Development Overlay The standards in a Planned Development Overlay zone are to a great degree created by the development plan. In this development, lot sizes are reduced from R -1 minimums to provide for more open space preservation. As stated in the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed zoning amendment and its recommendations shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the draft 1998 Comprehensive Plan. Only the southeast 40 acres is not consistent with the existing 1990 Plan. If the Plan is amended as recommended above, this inconsistency is eliminated. It is a logical extension of existing utilities, it stages growth out to the next contiguous area, and the road access is adequate to serve the area. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Because of the large amounts of open space to be preserved in this development, it will be compatible with many different potential land uses in the area. This includes the existing residential development to the north, potential residential development of different densities, and large lot rural use. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The preliminary development plan is reviewed below. The development plan will establish many of the standards for the development. Other standards will be addressed. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 5 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Capacity exists to serve the site with sewer and water. Public facility planning included projected needs of development in this area. The majority of the site is within the MUSA. A MUSA amendment will be necessary for the southeast 40 acres. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The roads in the area can handle the traffic generated by the proposed development. Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning to PDO based on the above findings. Preliminary Development Plan The application includes the preliminary development plan. A final development plan will be submitted in the future and will be reviewed by the P & Z Board and the City Council. Density: The total site is 162.7 acres with 34.6 acres of wetland, which leaves 128 acres of upland. Average density in the City has been two lots per acre. This would yield 256 lots. The proposal includes 243 single family lots. Gross density is 1.49 lots/acre. Net density, counting only the developed uplands, is 2.59 lots per acre. Lots and Blocks: The development takes advantage of the flexibility provided by a planned development. The typical lot and block sizes are altered to allow for the open space preservation. The typical standard limits block length to 1500 feet, and the City may require a pedestrian way through a block over 900 feet. There is one long unbroken length (Block 14) that reaches approximately 1600 feet without a. However, the topography and the wetland behind the lots makes it more advantageous to route the trail to the east of the wetland. Suggestions from the Environmental Board and Park Board include realigning short segments of trail. This would put the trail between Lots 2 & 3 Block 1 and between Lots 2 & 3 Block 5. This would allow a better connection with other trail segments. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 6 Open Space, Greenways, Parks and Trails The plan includes approximately 70 acres of open space, which is about 42% of the gross acreage. The open space includes 61.7 acres in greenways as well as 8.4 acres of parkland. The 8.4 acres of parkland consist of a 5.5 -acre central park area and 2.9 acres of trails. This is about 1.6 miles of trails. The trails allow the public access to the large open space areas and contribute greatly to promoting the greenway corridor concept. The 5.5 -acre park and all the trail corridors (15 feet wide) will be dedicated to the City as parkland. The majority of the open space lands should be owned by a homeowners' association A tree plan for the streets will be required. There are some forested areas on the site, though most of the site is not wooded. The optimal situation may be to avoid disturbing the trees. However, that would leave severely restrict development because a significant proportion is in wetlands (21% of the site). A tree plan will be required which will be worked out between the developer and City staff. City staff also will discuss with the developer ways to restore previously impacted wetlands and means to encourage better soil and seeding methods. The area notated "greenway K" was created after discussion with staff on open space. The resulting buffer around the wetland isn't large enough to provide an enforceable buffer. Staff appreciates the developer's cooperation. However, we recommend eliminating this as open space and simply using a typical drainage easement over the wetland. The wetland will then be within platted lots with an easement over it. A buffer detail for the strip of land between Otter Lake Rd. and Lot 4 Block 12 should be provided. Open Space Protection: We are applying aspects of the City's Preservation Development program to this project. However, the Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. project was well underway before we had established the Preservation Development program. The goal for the Preservation Development program is to have a permanent conservation easements over the open space held by a third party. The Minnesota Land Trust is an entity created specifically to hold conservation easements and we are working with them to design the program. We have heard from the Land Trust about this project. The open spaces as designed do not meet their criteria for permanent easements. The primary issue is that there is little if Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 7 any land that could be developed without the easements and so there is nothing for a conservation easement to conserve. In addition, the open spaces, while significant, are not connected enough. Also, enforcement would be almost impossible with the extensive number of lots bordering the open spaces with no clear demarcation of the boundaries. These are some of the main points we will have to keep in mind on future projects. We expect to have more information for the meeting to help with this discussion. This does not mean the development is a less desirable place to live or that it will be unsuccessful in preserving open space. On the contrary, the access to the open spaces and trail system make it a very desirable location. The open space to be preserved is an important amenity and goes a long way toward meeting the open space conservation goals. A homeowners' association is still the best option to own the open space areas. The City will own the trail corridors and the central park. We should require deed restrictions to prevent dumping, cutting and mowing, and other disturbances in the open spaces. The residents themselves will be responsible for protecting their common open space. A management plan also needs to be prepared to address diseased trees and other issues. Park Dedication: The 8.4 acres will be dedicated as parkland. The Park Board voted to recommend accepting this. The Park Board added concern for how the trails will be paved. The 8.4 acres comprises about 7% of the upland areas (128 acres). The typical park dedication requirement is 10 %, which would be 12.8 acres. However, the large areas of open space should be taken into consideration: not as park dedication, but as the provision of open space. Staff recommends that the developer could pave the trails. Along with the 8.4 acres of dedicated land, this woul fulfill the park dedication requirement. The developer has agreed to this arrangement. The 5.5 -acre park in the center of the site will need to be planned by the Park Board and parks staff to determine the best uses for it. It could serve as an active, programmed park. It also could serve as a "village green," which would be an open, grassy area available for picnics, informal sports activities, and other non - programmed use. Stormwater Management Staff will be working with the developer on implementing preservation development principles regarding strormwater management. This would include infiltration and otherwise keeping runoff on the site as much as possible. The intent is to utilize natural Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 8 drainage methods rather than concrete and pipe. This reduces impervious surface and saves money. The City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District will work with the developer to achieve this where possible. Roads and Traffic The plan provides numerous connections with other properties. Extensions of Clearwater Creek Drive and LaCasse Court connect to the established residential area to the north. An east/west road provides a connection between Otter Lake Rd (Co. Rd. 84) and 24th Ave. (Elmcrest Ave.). A loop road provides the main circulation route within the development. The extended Clearwater Creek Drive provides additional internal circulation. The preservation development discussions have included reducing road widths. Less pavement would further reduce impervious surface and save money. However, methods of maintaining roadways must be included in design standards. City staff will investigate maintenance options for different road designs. At this time, it may not be wise to vary from the established road design, with 60 -foot rights of way. The developer will need approvals from Anoka County for the new road access to Otter Lake Drive. The developer also will need to ascertain if the County is planning on additional ROW on Otter Lake Rd (CR 81). In addition, there is an existing road easement that will need to be vacated. Conditions of Approval: PDO Preliminary Development Plan With the following conditions, staff is recommending approval of the preliminary development plan, as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Board. 1. Eliminate Greenway K as open space and use a typical drainage easement over the wetland. The wetland will then be within platted lots with an easement over it. 2. A buffer detail for the strip of land between Otter Lake Rd. and Lot 4 Block 12 should be provided. 3. The developer will pave the trails and with the 8.4 acres, the park dedication requirement would be fulfilled. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 9 4. Developer will move trail alignments near Lots 1 & 2 Block 1 and Lots 1 & 2 Block 5 if possible to allow a better connection with other trail segments. Exact trail alignments throughout the development will be established with Parks staff. 5. The developer will need approvals from Anoka County for the new road access to Otter Lake Drive. The developer also will need to meet any County requirement for additional ROW on Otter Lake Rd (CR 81). 6. A tree preservation plan and street tree landscaping plan must be submitted for review by the City Environmental Specialist. Noise abatement to address freeway noise should be considered in this plan. 7. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 8. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 9. The City Engineer's comments in his memo of March 4, 1999 must be addressed to his satisfaction. 10. Drainage and utility easements to be held by the City shall cover all wetlands and drainage ways subject to approval of the City Engineer. This includes lot line easements as required by the City Subdivision Regulations. P , a 06'1 cam"' ;11 be rar( 11. A development agreement will be requiredc:." d r Lu ` l� `l'tiP Go 12. In addition to normal City requirements, the development agreement will require that a homeowners' association be created. Association by -laws shall be subject to review by the City. The homeowners' association will own the open space areas. Deed restrictions must be included to address protection of the common open space areas. A management plan for the open space must also be prepared. T ubsirc o4- 13. The minimum house sizes in the R -1 zone shall apply in this PDO.��15 sc 0 u S15 ? `eha 5 to` C,a.4 c s) ode a LLr , 5 6'4 put SA QUO cam v n PLANNING & ZONING BOARD ACTION 01‘e- (e c) « " a,U °U r,.� d 145 At its March 10 meeting, the P & Z Board considered the applications and held a public r' hearing on the Plan amendment and rezoning. The P & Z voted to recommend approval. ��• �ol�6w�"� CQoC• r U 6) 6)\ AAA) b) c01, se,- u !kA-, 6 r erin Clearwater Creek 3rd Addn. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezone to PDO PDO Development Plan March 22, 1999 page 10 Vice -chair Johnson voted against approval because he believes this development should include a variety of housing to help meet the life -cycle housing needs of the community. Mr. Trehus opposed the Plan amendment because of the need for MUSA, and opposed the development plan because he wants more open space and tree preservation. The vote was as follows: Comprehensive Plan amendment including MUSA 3 - 2 approve Rezone to PDO from R and R -X 4 - 1 approve PDO development plan, with conditions 3 - 2 approve OPTIONS 1. Approval of the land use and MUSA amendment of the existing Comprehensive Plan for the southeast 40 acres of the site. The MUSA allocation would become effective only at the time of final plat approval. If the new Comprehensive Plan is adopted, this amendment will be rendered unnecessary. 2. Approval of the rezoning to Planned Development Overlay for single family residential use based on the findings in this report. 3. Approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for the PDO with the conditions listed in this report. 4. Denial of land use and MUSA amendments to the existing Comprehensive Plan. 5. Denial of rezoning to PDO. Without the rezoning, the development plan cannot be approved. 6. Return to staff for further review. RECOMMENDATION Options 1, 2, 3, 1 P�e/tr 4 • 3 '1 0 O R 35: 5 0 2 Miles ustrial 1 Growth Area 1998 -2010 iIi•MAmi Pi thlir .-eA-m oni r,t Lino Lakes Public Services Department 7204 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 780 -1885 Fax (651) 784 -7227 March 8, 1999 TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Rick DeGardner, wPublic Services Director SUBJECT: Clearwater Creek 3— Addition Preliminary Plat At the March 1, 1999 Park Board meeting, the Park Board approved the preliminary plat for the Clearwater Creek ri Addition. The primary concern was regarding the development costs for the proposed 1.6 miles in trails as well as the maintenance of the open space and greenway corridors. This needs to be kept in mind when negotiating with the developer. Another concern was the time line for the park area to be available for development: Mr. Larry Olson indicated that the proposed 5.5 acre park will probably be done in the first phase. Pat Huelman stated the trail on the western edge to the existing trail jogs across the street. He would prefer the trail be lined up for safety reasons. I will forward you the Park Board minute with more detailed information in a few weeks. RD:sw sw/rick/Clearwater Creek 31d Addition Preliminary Plat — Wyland Memo Memorandum DATE: March 4, 1999 TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Clearwater Creek 3"d Addition I have reviewed the Preliminary Grading and Preliminary Utility Plans dated February 22, 1999 which have been prepared for the proposed subdivision by Midwest Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers, Inc. My preliminary comments are as follows: 1. A permit must be obtained from Anoka County for the connection to Otter Lake Road (County Road No. 84). 2. The standard street section shows LaCasse Drive, Clearwater Creek Drive, and Street B as being 32 feet wide from gutter to gutter. This should be revised to show them as being 32 feet wide from back to back of curb. It also appears the developer is requesting flexibility, for the width of the roadway on the remaining streets. The developer has not provided a reason for this change and it is not apparent from the plan whether this is to reduce drainage or to minimize the grading impact on adjacent lands. 3. All cul-de -sacs must be constructed according to City standard. 4. Hydraulic and hydrologic computations must be submitted for review. 5. Rice Creek Watershed District permits must be obtained prior to grading. 6. If the project is to be implemented in phases, this should be shown. I will provide additional comments as more details become available. If you have any questions, please let me know. 1189 Main Street • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 ti/10/99 14:56 FAX 651 236 3074 HB FULLER 1 1002 TO: City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board CC: City of Lino Lakes City Council FR: Jacqueline and Joe Jarosz 5299 Grand Avenue White Bear Township, MN 55110 RE: Rezoning of Clearwater Creek Phase III Date: March 10, 1999 This memo is in response to the proposed rezoning of phase III of the Clearwater Creek Development. As near - future residents of this development, we have perused the tentative plans and are greatly concerned on many fronts. When considering build sites for a new home (most frequently the largest investment a family makes) many aspects are considered. Lir our particular case, a major factor in the decision making process was the future return on investment the development offers. It is not uncommon for the first few, homeowners of any new development to assume a somewhat higher amount of risk due mostly to the uncertainty of future homes built in the area. However, upon researching many developments it has been our experience that as a development grows and as each new phase is added, the lot prices and minimum builds of future homes are held to higher standards. Current homeowners can feel relatively secure that their investment will continue to appreciate and future home sites will be comparable in size and market value. Your proposed plans indicate that the opposite may be true for Clearwater Creek. Our concerns are as follows: • The number of proposed home sites is very large. Currently, there are safety concerns with both over pass bridges located at Co. Rd. J and at County 14. An additional 220+ homes multiplied by an average of 2 cars per home will undoubtedly create heightened logistic and safety issues. • The proposed lot sizes and minimum builds will not be raised to higher standards, in contrast, these levels may decrease. What message does this convey to existing and potential homeowners in the Lino Lakes area? I would like to have the confidence that the City of Lino Lakes will uphold their obligation to current residents and the future of the Clearwater Creek development. A devaluation of the next phase from rural executive may not only 03/10/99 14:57 FAX 651 236 3074 HB FULLER weaken the investment potential of existing home owners but may also adversely effect the existing culture that so many neighbors have diligently worked at achieving. • Aside from the proposed park area there appears to be no attempt, from an environmental perspective, to maintain and accent the landscape of the existing land. In contrast, the proposed lay out appears to completely destroy the existing prairie characteristics. As a rural executive build site, this area could be designed such that any future development will not only enhance the current landscape but also strengthen the entire development. We speak on behalf of NUMEROUS residents of the Clearwater Creek Development when we say that we are feverishly against the rezoning of Phase III of Clearwater Creek. A vote to keep this land zoned as rural executive will be a "win win' situation for all parties including current residents, future residents and the City of Lino Lakes. Thank you for your time and interest. Respectfully submitted, al 003 Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 2 IV. OPEN MIKE Acting Chair Johnson declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:36 p.m. No one appeared for open mike. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:37 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 5 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, Clearwater Creek Phase III, Rezone from Rural and Rural Executive to PDO /Single Family and Preservation Development Preliminary Plat and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Mr. Smyser stated the current application represents the product of discussions with staff, consultants, and numerous City boards. The applica ' - is for a Comprehensive Plan amendment including MUSA amendment, rezonin Rural and Rural -X to Planned Development Overly (PDO) for single family rend .; , and approval of the preliminary development plan for the PDO. Mr. Smyser reviewed the analysis report using a PDO noting that it includes e also explained the new format ction. Mr. Mike Quigly, Developer f ������ a Creek, stated the houses will be priced in a range of $175,000 - $400, _ he will take care of the trail paving within the development. Acting Chair Johnson declared s e public hearing open at 7:43 p.m. Mr. Smyser distributed a letter from Jacqueline and Joe Jarosz, 5299 Grand Avenue future homeowner in the first or second phase, which expressed concerns regarding the rezoning of Clearwater Creek Phase III and request that it remain rural. He asked that the letter be entered into the public record. Mr. Curt Deppard, 6614 LaCasse Drive, came forward and asked for clarification on several issues. He asked if the PDO is the first try and if the street widths will be smaller. He asked how many homes will be priced above $250,000 and how many builders will be allowed in the development. Mr. Smyser indicated the PDO is the first step in approval for a development and the street width will be smaller to accommodate for more open space. Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 3 Mr. Quigly stated that the majority of homes built in the development will be priced above $250,000. The number of builders allowed in the development has not yet been set. He stated most builders will purchase a block of lots. At this time he anticipates approximately six builders within the development. He added he does have control over the architectural design. Mr. Deppard stated residents in the 1st and 2nd phase are concerned about low priced homes within the development. He asked about money being set aside for parks when a development goes in. He expressed concern regarding a park being developed for the first two phases. He asked if the 1st and 2nd phase homeowners will be part of the homeowners association and have to pay dues. Mr. Smyser stated the homeowners association will address ownership and stewardship of the open space. The park and trails will be owned by the City. Park equipment that is put in will be determined by the Park Board and input from the neighborhood when the neighborhood is built up. He added that park funding does come from land dedication or cash dedication from residential and industrial development. Ms. Wyland noted that if a cash dedication is mad not set aside for a particular park. When devel Park Board will hold neighborhood meetings The 8 acre park in phase III will be for thehol not be responsible for the park land. laced in the General Fund and stantially completed, the e . ow the park is developed. a. The homeowners association will Mr. Deppard asked if funds fro that if property taxes are goin indicated she was unsure s go to the parks. The neighborhood feels . ey should have a park. Ms. Wyland s go to fund parks. Mr. Deppard stated he is con + about too many builders leading to a large mix of style. He asked the developer keep the number of builders to a limit. He stated there is a lot of freeway noise in the area and asked if the City or developer can do something about it. Mr. Smyser addressed some concerns of the residents. He stated the number of homes planned in this development is fewer than was originally planned. He stated that other conservation subdivisions around the country have shown the lots selling at equal or higher than standard subdivision price because of the open space. He stated this project was put together with the City's environmental consultants and they feel the plan protects a larger part of the environment. He stated he will discuss a buffer for noise with the developer in the next stage. Ms. Tracy Kuny, 6706 Clearwater Drive, stated she was one of the first buyers in phase I. She stated the billboard on Otter Lake Drive advertised executive homesites. She stated she was shocked when phase II was developed. She indicated residents are concerned about the changes that occur midway through development. She asked if there is a way to Platining & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 4 set the standard and then enforce it. She stated there is a difference in the covenants between the phases and a lot of confusion. She asked that the confusion be eliminated. She also asked about the discussions that were held with residents. Acting Chair Johnson advised that "executive" is a marketing term that anyone can advertise. Covenants are attached to the lots. Covenants are not enforced by the City. The developer provides a list of lots sizes but there is no guarantee regarding the prices. Mr. Quigly noted that nothing has changed between phases. Pricing has always been consistent. The covenants were the same between phases. There is confusion regarding a basketball hoop. A resident put one in. The only way to enforce the convenants is to go through the court system. He noted they discourage fencing but cannot prohibit it. He stated the standards are published and distributed in the packets. All builders receive the packets. Mr. Deppard asked when the plan becomes cast in stone. Acting Chair Johnson advised that if the plan is appro City Council on March 22, 1999. Mr. Smyser add the Planning and Zoning Board again. There m this project. Mr. Smyser stated that a public notice g project. An earlier public hearing o was very little public response. developer set up neighborh project was not held. Ms. project originally came fo tonight, it will go before the the fmal plan will come before other public hearing regarding residents within 600 feet of a as held in September, 1998. There of public interest staff will suggest the special neighborhood meeting relating to this there was a lot of public interest when the Ms. Kuny stated that the standard of notifying residents within 600 feet is only 20 homes in their case. The bulk of the homes are further than 600 feet. She stated the lack of interest from residents was because of the lack of notice. Mr. Smyser stated great efforts are made to notify the public. Typically, the City Council will not hold another public hearing. However, the Council is willing to listen to residents. He stated the notification process is a difficult process. Ms. Dory Martinez, 2316 LaCasse Court, asked if the park will be connected to the 3rd phase. Ms. Wyland stated there is too much wetland to connect the property so no trailway was planned. Ms. Martinez asked how many park lands were dedicated for phase I and phase II. Ms. Wyland stated two areas were dedicated for park land. The land will not necessarily be developed for play area. They may remain open area. When the development is more complete there will be a neighborhood meeting. Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 5 Ms. Martinez stated that it is not out of line to expect that 151 homes in the area be notified of the project. A mailing of the whole area could have been done. Mr. Dunn suggested staff develop guidelines for R -1 and R -1 X within a PDO. That will determine the size of the houses and garage. It will also set the price of the homes. A policy should be set for future projects. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:37 p.m., and was supported Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 5 -0. Mr. Corson indicated a condition regarding R -1 minimum house size be added as a condition of approval. Mr. Schilling stated when the plan first came forward he was sensitive to residents concerns. He stated those concerns have been cleared up tonight. Mr. Quigly has done a good job and the project should move forward. Mr. Dunn stated he feels good about the new pr have been shown. The plan meets the City's ob. and this project will add to that. at improvements in the plan earwater Creek is a fine area Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve existing Comprehensive Plan for th - 4? , th would become effective only at supported by Mr. Dunn. and MUSA amendment of the acres of the site. The MUSA allocation plat approval. The MOTION was Acting Chair Johnson stat ', 4 d vote no to the project. He is very happy with the preservation plan. However, • ,,a a very large development for homes over $250,000. The City needs a variety of housmg. The enjoyment of this project should not be limited to a specific price range. Townhomes and club homes in the price range of $125,000 would be desirable. The City has young families, single people, and older residents who cannot afford homes in that price range. Mr. Dunn agreed that the City needs a variety of housing. Planning for a mix needs to come at the beginning of a project, not mid stream. He suggested a note to staff be made regarding more affordable housing. Mr. Corson stated he agrees the City needs variety. This plan is too far down the trail to change it now. Mr. Trehus stated this area is not suitable to the type of housing Acting Chair Johnson is referring to. Lino Lakes is not keeping up with the average price for new homes. He stated he will vote no to the plan because he is against the expansion of MUSA. He • Planning & Zoning Board March 10, 1999 Page 6 added the City should receive more of a trade off for the PDO. The City needs more open space. MOTION carried 3 -2 with Acting Chair Johnson and Mr. Trehus voting no. Mr. Corson made a MOTION for approval of the rezoning to Planned Development Overlay for single family residential use based on the findings in the report, and was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 4 -1 with Acting Chair Johnson voting no. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the preliminary development plan based on the following conditions: 1. Eliminate Greenway E as open space and use a typical drainage easement over the wetland. The wetland will then be within platted lots with an easement over it. 2. A buffer detail for the strip of land between Otter Lake Road and Lot 4 Block 12 should be provided 3. Staff recommends that the developer pave the Awith the 8.4 acres, the park dedication requirement would be fulfilled. 4. Developer will move trail alignments . and 2 Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2 Block 5 if possible to allow a better corn other trail segments. Exact trail E� alignments throughout the develop i, w i e tablished with Parks staff. 5. The developer will need a Otter Lake Drive. The dev additional ROW on Otter ro Anoka County for the new road access to '11 need to meet any County requirement for (CR 81). submitted for review by the City Environmental 6. A tree preservation plan must be Specialist. 7. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 8. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District. 9. The City Engineer's comments in his memo of March 4, 1999, must be addressed to his satisfaction. 10. Drainage and utility easements to be held by the City shall cover all wetlands and drainage ways subject to approval of the City Engineer. This includes lot line easements as required by the City Subdivision Regulations. • Planning & Zoning Board ylarch 10, 1999 Page 7 11. A development agreement will be required. 12. In addition to normal City requirements, the development agreement will require that a homeowners' association be created. Association by -laws shall be subject to review by the City. The homeowners' association will own the open space areas. Deed restrictions must be included to address protection of the common open areas. A management plan for the homeowners' association will be required. 13. R -1 minimum house size will be part of the development project. The MOTION was supported by Mr. Schilling. Motion carried 3 -2 with Acting Chair Johnson and Mr. Trehus voting no. The Planning and Zoning Board directed staff to work with the developer to address the noise abatement. This item will go before the City Council Monday, March 22, 1999, 6:30 p.m. Acting Chair Johnson recessed the meeting at 8:40 or a short break. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 p.m. B. PUBLIC HEARING, Behm's ��k ms 5th Addition, Revised Preliminary Plat Ms. Wyland stated Mr. Gary �_ " " ted review of a revised preliminary plat for the Behm's Century Farm Acting Chair Johnson declar- ;_' public hearing open at 9:04 p.m. Mr. Trehus asked if the additional MUSA was approved by the Metropolitan Council. Ms. Wyland stated special approval was obtained from the Metropolitan Council to use the MUSA reserve on this project. The exact amount needed will be determined with the final plat. Mr. Corson asked about the safety issues regarding the Williams Pipeline. Mr. Powell stated Williams Pipeline has reviewed the plan. The plan does meet all their requirements. Mr. John Johnson, Civil Engineer for Mr. Uhde, came forward and reviewed the area of the pipeline noting the high points, low points, and drainage patterns. He stated the changes in the plan is a result from discussion with the Corp. of Engineers, Rice Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County Soil, and City staff. •21111M11.01.1114 NM, WO Ma ILI ANN lam IN Le MIL LT. Or POW ass • KM SR aunt ff affaILD saasmilt I01.0•19 •••WIR • A MO a LW IP On • gaff SR NOM MORO Ana .Ita Me MIS ••■ AMINO OAR Iv L Waft =ay.. Ar...11:13 SAIV.V" LaI01 Sat RAMS Alia anal a 11410 /Ma Marla Or OMR, I. win.. Oaliall LOR•01. Iff PINS. ORM% 01411••••• RR me aanOKR•• • Iffahafft ORO 111a0 • VOW Pla Ss. It ROM awassal Mae so. OR MITI Off NRIL LIR ay, • ALL•014* CLEARWATER CREEK 3RD ADDITION PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN for Gor—em, LLC. i • I I I ,, r7 .k I.,. LTJ 1,. '4.111 - 1 ,.;.. r ` ,.---1--,: .r.;_„;_.- _.,I, 4,,...1 1'' , F- "[ - 1 :, ' 2,,\.F-i \;I r ,■z-,,,... . -1.'...-: /, 7 \ ss-./ > .i. Y ... . ' , I s L7. n., .;,,, ,t-T: ,- ,- .,,, • -,A,y , ..A -/ ^.7 -' , r-• .,,,, ,>... 4,,,k,,i.,71, ' rs ?, 7 ..r. „." ',A., (' ), .,1";‘, i ALS! , ,i --1,5%.,.<,..1v., / r,-^,%:./.-• ;4 ' '■- ..-. -, ..--to .. / i.._ j '; .11 ',■ • 1 1 i - ; ...,1;..-.„,,i..]:.7..'..if,,.. / \,..,54 is GRAPHIC SCALE (01(0?) I Lab • la (0.05•0 is ) (0.1 .0 Mtt373 0.3•91.0 -10II20/S. =31 rD01" IWO. IMMO - 11.0 3011,33 *•7011.4101 le • OW CL w0702004 - I. COMA 370101 30011 -- RCP 1112.1.01.. .14'" Of 011 L•in 270000001. L 7.3. 100m0 MLR 011 InT001.412 3. 10 2010•0070. 9/00.41100 007010* 1•1073211301111 •070112121. 3. 007 71000 01430 00 M00110 AMMO 370•11 inn 3703001.2132 101M0 ON 124 4.4/1 UK. L 1.1. 001112.0 %or eilvAn011 0010 UMW .0. 0420701 41131100 102.107 IOU 0000111 42.100 304111610•1 -0-- SIMMS nr37023 3.011103T anon 042010 41371110 nut 0(00771 IMMO 11190 DOOM 01271. 10 1001 031000 0111100.1. DOOMS 42011103 2 IOW C007001 110000A0 DOOM 003100 1130“ Minn MI 01 1•37U2100 0312100110 11 wt.. n000.007 OM 10/27/10 • 4.10.000 42011000017(0 (3111013 0/94 morn 300. noon DOOMS PROPOSIS WA T(111.01 0420141 100.01110 1.0010.117 30012 ANC 2•22014 140010 22014030 010121 Mtn LIO 001101 03110101 0011110 1110011100 001070 3701010 1001017 1110211 Down OMNI 170•11 MLR STANDARD STREET SECTION 201 70 3C. h•Ida eaellly Mat MN pa, •• m•••I as ROL* by Fa a ads my amst afar.. and that I OM • Ray toff twat Maw*. [Lai.. unOw M• las el Ow Stat. 01 annsaa Oslo 1:11:b...•01* ■■• MIDWEST Lend Surveyors Le Civil Engineers, Inc •■=-"" 7‘.? 0. 0 00-•••••• • 0.• ••••••••• ■••• • ■• STAFF ORIGINATOR: DATE: TOPIC: COUNCIL ACTION: AGE NO. 6 B Mary Iay Wyland April 12,1999 CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC RE. Ordinance No. 05-99 Vacating Public ter Creek 3rd Addition 4/5 Vote e rtti G, BACKGROUND Several years ago the property owner recorded a roadway ease s to provide access to several parcels of property betty een Otter Lake R and Elracrest Avenue. Since that time this property leas been sold to make why for the development of Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition. In o1 tea plat the Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition; the existing roadway dents rou tiesrea of the development must be vacated. Staff would recommald v described in Ordinance No. 05 -99 y sr on t OPTIONS:, 1. Approve Piirst 'ng ctf Ordinance No. 05- Vacating Road Right of Way recorded on Document No. 7175 2. Return to staff for fer iration Option 1 Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 05-99 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A ROADWAY EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 717509 AND RECORDED WITH ANOKA COUNTY(plat drawing attached) The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I That it is in the best interest of the City and the property owner to vacate the previously recorded roadway easement to make way for the platting of Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition. II That the legal description of said roadway easement is described as follows: (insert) III That the City held a Public Hearing before the City Council on March 22, 1999 after due published and posted notice had been given on March 2nd, 1999 and March 9th, 1999 and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard. IV This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 22nd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer jO we FTS ,. 6:0 aoo 0o f„� pci.L. to .,0 p7ili , ;F- ►bnmm9000C00 �r, do9u'i74 .* -7.7, ii®iI 11113It W Fait.,' ijuF Q :1454 f4Pi'o �a cc,0 2. GTY Of l �II MINEMICIDIATIZZ pnvoormari � • . n iocoocv 17 loo ©Qy� �' rrtw �■ — -•4 *rya E10.01fl0 -au n- I AiP�sOdG■ • IMIE I . I M 1 g@ ©fie,. G iig4j off 'iv �A e�Q( ) 4 livm ftwal 1 AY ___.. ;Agri.. • OTTER LAKE w J STAFF ORIGINATOR: Job Pow+ MEETING DATE: April 12, ACTION ITEM:'' SECOND READ Ii G, Ordinance No. 44-99, Exc with J acid Tracy Douglas wing at the h 22, 1999 Council . s an i Tracy D ougias pert of the' Lake Drive . A copy of the ardi cc is aged along with Na 04-99 2. Return to s Council Member introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA Ordinance No. Ob(iCkCt AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF LAND BY THE CITY OF LINO LAKES WITH JAMES J. AND TRACEY M. DOUGLAS The City Council of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordains: I . The real property described in Exhibit A hereto is presently owned by the City of Lino Lakes. The City Council of the City has determined that the property is no longer needed by the City for any public purpose. II. The real property described in Exhibit B herein is owned by James J. Douglas and Tracey M. Douglas. Such property is needed for public drainage purposes by the City of Lino Lakes. That James J. Douglas and Tracey M. Douglas have agreed to exchange the property described on Exhibit B for the property owned by the City described on Exhibit A. The Mayor and the City Clerk- Treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to execute such deeds and other documents as may be necessary in order to exchange the properties described herein. IV. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days following its passage and publication, in accordance with section 3.09 of the City Charter. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by council member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. First Reading Approved on , 1999 Second Reading Approved on , 1999 Published in the official newspaper on , 1999 EXHIBIT A A permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes, over, under and across the following described parcel: That part of the west 660.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, lying south of the north 500 feet, and north of the south 500 feet thereof; and that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter Tying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, except road, subject to easement of record. Said permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes being that part of the above described parcel lying south of a line being 300.00 feet northerly of as measured at right angles to and parallel with the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Except that part which lies within a 100 foot wide strip of land being 50 feet wide on each side of the following described center line: Commencing at the South Quarter corner of said Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 836.79 feet to the point of beginning of the center line to be described; thence northeasterly 1124.51 feet along the arc of a non tangential curve concave to the southeast having a central angle of 78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds and a radius of 818.51 feet, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds East, 1038.14 feet; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 221.72 feet more or less, to the center line of Lake Drive and said center line there terminating. Said permanent easement contains 45,510 square feet, more or less. EXHIBIT B The south 300 feet of that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as part of Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota. PROPERTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this — day of , 1999, by and between the City of Lino Lakes, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota ( "City ") and James J. Douglas and Tracey M. Douglas, husband and wife ( "Douglas "). 1. Consideration. In consideration of the covenants herein contained and One Dollar ($1.00) to each party paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City agrees to convey or cause to be conveyed to Douglas the following legally described property: See attached Exhibit A and Douglas agrees to convey or cause to be conveyed to the City all of the following described property: See attached Exhibit B. 2. Warranty Deeds. The parties hereby agree to execute and deliver a Warranty Deed conveying marketable title to said premises subject only to the following exceptions: a. Building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations. b. Restrictions relating to the use or improvement of the premises without effective forfeiture provisions. c. Reservations of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. d. Utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements. 3. Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. Real estate taxes due and payable in and for the year of closing shall be prorated between the parties on a calendar year basis to the actual date of closing. Each party shall pay all special assessments levied against the property they shall be conveying to the other on the date of this agreement. Each party shall pay the real estate taxes due and payable on the parcels received by them in the year following the closing and thereafter. 4. Title. The parties mutually agree that within a reasonable time after approval of this agreement, they will furnish a Commitment for Title Insurance, Abstract of Title or Registered Property Abstract, certified to date to include proper searches, etc. The other party shall be allowed ten (10) days after receipt thereof for examination of said title and the making of any objections thereto, said objections to be made in writing or deemed to be waived. If any objections are so made, the non - objecting party shall be allowed 120 days to make such title marketable. If said title is not marketable and is not made so within 120 days from the date of written objections thereto as above provided, this agreement shall be null and void, at the option of the objecting party. If the title to said property be found marketable or be so made within said time, and the objecting party shall default in any of the agreements and continue to default for a period of ten (10) days, then, and in that case, the non - objecting party may terminate this contract. This provision shall not deprive either party of the right of enforcing the specific performance of this contract provided such contract shall not .be terminated as aforesaid, and provided action to enforce such specific performance shall be commenced within six months after such right of action shall arise. 5. Additional Terms. The following additional terms and conditions shall apply to this transaction. a. The City agrees that it will construct a driveway from the newly constructed Apollo Boulevard to serve the residence of Douglas. Such driveway shall be in substantially the same form as that driveway which is currently being used by Douglas. Such driveway shall be installed at the City's expense. During the construction of Apollo Boulevard, the City will provide daily ingress and egress to the house owned by Douglas. b. The City agrees to install a sewer and water stub large enough to serve the entire portion of the property that would be owned by Douglas after the conveyance of the property to them by the City. Such stub shall be sized to serve the maximum allowable densities currently in existence under the City zoning ordinance. c. The City, at its expense, shall have both properties described in Exhibit A and 6 surveyed for the purpose of creating legal descriptions. d. The City agrees to pay for all expenses for this transaction including title insurance commitment fees, state deed tax, recording fees, and any other miscellaneous fees or expenses that would be incurred in completing the terms and conditions of this agreement. 6. Notices. All notices required herein shall be in writing and delivered personally or mailed to the address as shown in this paragraph, and, if mailed, are effective as of the date of mailing. Addresses for the parties are: To City: To Douglas: Lino Lakes City Hall 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 James J. Douglas Tracey M. Douglas 540 Lilac Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 7. Minnesota Law. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. Well Disclosure. Both parties certify that they do not know of any wells on the property that they are conveying to the other party. Both parties agree that there are no individual sewage treatment systems on or serving the property that they are conveying. 9. Closing. The closing on the transfers of the real estate shall take place on or before March 1, 1999. 10. This agreement shall apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties. 11. Additional Compensation. That the City hereby agrees to pay such out - of- pocket costs that Douglas may incur as a result of this property exchange for such items as change of addresses, etc. in an amount not to exceed $1,000. Douglas shall provide documentation supporting any requests for such reimbursements. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their respective hands as of the effective date first written above. DOUGLAS: STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) James J. Douglas Tracey A. Douglas On this day of , 1999, before me, a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared James J. Douglas and Tracey A. Douglas, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public CITY: CITY OF LINO LAKES Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, City Clerk EXHIBIT A A permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes, over, under and across the following described parcel: That part of the west 660.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Tying south of the north 500 feet, and north of the south 500 feet thereof; and that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter Tying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, except road, subject to easement of record. Said permanent easement for drainage, utility and ponding purposes being that part of the above described parcel lying south of a line being 300.00 feet northerly of as measured at right angles to and parallel with the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Except that part which lies within a 100 foot wide strip of land being 50 feet wide on each side of the following described center line: Commencing at the South Quarter corner of said Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 836.79 feet to the point of beginning of the center line to be described; thence northeasterly 1124.51 feet along the arc of a non tangential curve concave to the southeast having a central angle of 78 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds and a radius of 818.51 feet, the long chord of which bears North 67 degrees 05 minutes 31 seconds East, 1038.14 feet; thence South 73 degrees 33 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 221.72 feet more or Tess, to the center line of Lake Drive and said center line there terminating. Said permanent easement contains 45,510 square feet, more or less. EXHIBIT B The south 300 feet of that part of the west 500 feet of the south 500 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line; Commencing at the southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence easterly along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 320 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly at a right angle 500 feet and there terminating, now known as part of Lot 16, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota. iwbcst 1111-44•1 STAFF ORIGINATOR DATE: TOPIC: COUNCIL ACTON: GRQ request to vacate the r+s a� Arborlake Plat. For Council Bay in 1987 but the original. AGENDA I TI NO. '6 D Mary Kay Wyland Second Reading, Ordinance No. O6 -95 Vacating Easements in Arborlake Flat (Otter Bay) 4!5 Vote .GI5 . rbook at the Mme' 22, 1999 Council Mew a xs a ea rnents originally platted in 1980 as a part of the bn ion, that plat was abandoned and replatted as Otter always egad; easements of Arborlake were never vacaated. A resident in Otte. Bay brought this tc� easements,were fled in and easements have not be providing clear titles to #lie vacation of the roads and e Bay plat will remain as pie Staff would rand approval of the easements and roadways originally our attention because the original road and �. For unknown reasons, t underlying rows obstacle to other property transfers In the interest of teen properties in Otter Bay, staff would recommend the ants i Arborlake. The roads and easements in the Otter OPTIONS: 1. Approve Second Reading of Clr+dsnc Right-of-Way 2. Return to stag' for further co asideratio on 1 ng of OrdinanceNo. 06"99 vacating or Lake. o. 06-99 Vacating Basements and Public Council Member adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA ORDINANCE NO. 06-99 AN ORDINANCE VACATING ROADWAY, UTILITY AND OTHER EASEMENTS ORIGINALLY PLATTED AS A PART OF THE ARBORLAKE PLAT The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota does ordain: I That it is in the best interest of the City and the Residents of the Otter Bay plat to vacation all roadway, utility, and other easements platted with the old Arborlake Plat II That the City held a Public Hearing before the City Council on March 22, 1999 after due published and posted notice had been given on March 2nd, 1999 and March 9th, 1999 and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard. III This ordinance shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the Lino Lakes City Charter. Passed by the City Counicl of the City of Lino Lakes this 22nd day of March, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: The following voted against same: .pig ogoo_A_©m©o©mm�©eos'grr�i►�� S �llo :oP Qo ©eQe�P s0�d� mia 1 -( leek ETetat �oaa��oodi .ES. PINES (odd even 0 HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM STAFF OR INATOR: Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: Aril 12, 19 t B, A Fogarty Inv+ ay for rezanmg to PIS?, and the Ply? in Lino . Lakes a PIX) typically i usn a PIS is is that t Land to the east north is guided ri the Ccrrnprelu sive Plan for general business%► ia1 a amt Wined GB. the west is guided light ind zoned GI, 1 he I -35W right of way faritns the Bourn boundary raf the site, Site Plan sheet 1 of 3, dated 1/18199, revised 2/11/99, rec'd by City 2/12/99 title d Pte► sluff 2 of 3, slated 1/18/99, rec'd by City 1/19/99 Landsc pe Plan sheet 3 of 3, dat cl 1/1'! ►9, r 'd by City 1/19/99 Y Pre l ni ar' prat, Apotlo► Business Park No. 2, dated 6/24/96, rec'd by City 2/16/99 b uilding el .vatic Lino Business Ce r 2, date: 3 /24/97, reed by City 2/16/99 enema film Wild a E. Fa ty, d Feb , 1999 r+ec'd 2/17/99 1 Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 2 REZONING TO PDO The overall plan for this site is to construct four light industrial buildings. The site is a single lot now. The future plan is to subdivide into three lots. The current Zoning Ordinance, which was adopted in 1997, states that "more than one principal structure per lot may be allowed in planned developments" (Sec 3.C.3). This applicant has put more than one building on a lot before, but that was before the current Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1997. The intention to have more than one building on a single lot is the reason that the PDO zoning is needed. Since the site is one lot now, the PDO is necessary to build more than one building. Rezoning Criteria A zoning amendment decision must be based on findings that consider the following factors as stated in the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The site is included in the interchange study area of the current Comprehensive Plan. The interchange study recommends general business uses for the site. The site also is included in the Planning District 1 study, which was adopted in 1997 by the City Council with the intention of incorporating the study into a revised comprehensive plan. The District 1 study recommends light industrial uses for the site, as does the new draft Comprehensive Plan. The actual line forming the boundary between industrial and business use areas differs from one plan document to another, but the nature of a planning document is not always conducive to precise boundaries. General business uses benefit from direct access for retail customers, or the general public at any rate, while (light) industrial uses do not need the same access for customers. Most potential retail/general public customers are likely to be on Lake Drive, though Apollo provides access to additional General Business sites as well. The subject site will be approximately 1500 feet from the intersection of Apollo and Lake Drives. This site could be considered appropriate for either business or industrial uses. Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 3 The property immediately to the west is zoned General Industrial. However, the uses on Outlot B anticipated by the rezoning applicant are office /warehouse with some light manufacturing. These would better fit in the Light Industrial rather than the General Industrial category. At six acres, the site is large enough to rezone on its own, and it fits in well between the General Business zone and the General Industrial zone. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Existing uses in the area include Apollo Drive and the medical clinic on the north, Apollo Business Park to the west, the freeway on the south and east. Across Apollo Drive to the north is an asphalting business and the owner's residence. Any future redevelopment on the asphalt business site probably will be either general business or light industrial uses. The asphalt business itself is probably best categorized as a light industrial use. The uses in the GI zone to the west (Apollo Business Park) could fit in the light industrial category. The site is on the edge where general business uses meet industrial uses. As long as the transition can be designed properly, uses allowed in the PDO district will be compatible with the existing and future uses of the area. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. A planned development allows for flexibility from typical zoning standards. An approved PDO plan establishes some specific standards that may differ from the Zoning Ordinance. The site plan is a major element of the development plan. All development must conform to the approved PDO plan. Elements not specifically addressed in the development plan are covered by the Zoning Ordinance. A review of the development plan appears below. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Sewer and water are available to the site. Ample capacity exists. Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 4 S. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Apollo Drive (CSAH 12) is an A minor arterial and is designed to accommodate industrial traffic in the area. The road and the intersection at Lake Drive are designed to handle the traffic from several industrial/business parks. The change in zoning for this site will not significantly alter the traffic generation of the area. By agreement with Anoka County, the number of accesses to Apollo Drive is limited. The agreement allows four road accesses and driveways no closer than 600 feet from each other on each side of the road. The site shares a driveway access with the clinic. The City Engineer is pursuing an additional driveway for this site, and the Anoka County Highway Dept. has indicated willingness to trade a road access for a driveway access. Staff believes that the fourth road access is not needed. PDO DEVELOPMENT PLAN: COMBINED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAN This PDO differs from others in that in Lino Lakes a PDO typically is used for residential development and parallels the platting process. A preliminary and final development plan normally are required. Because the only reason a PDO is needed on this proposal is that there will be more than one building on a lot, we are combining the preliminary and final PDO development plans into one. Future subdivision of the site will need to undergo a separate subdivision review process. The project has been undergoing change since its beginning. The current proposal is to construct buildings A and B immediately but build only the foundations for buildings C and D. The applicant states that water, sewer, and storm sewer pipes and other utilities must be installed for the entire site all at once. In addition, he states the parking lots for the entire site must be constructed. Because of this, the foundations for all buildings must be constructed now. This poses the possibility of naked foundations for an unknown period of time. This causes a concern because of the visual impact, especially at a location right on the freeway and at the major gateway to the community. There also is the concern of how the foundations alone will fare over a winter. The Planning & Zoning Board was comfortable with this proposal as long as the City has adequate financial guarantees to cover the cost of removing the bare foundations if they are not built in a timely manner. The City can fashion guarantees to ensure the buildings are completed by a specified date. Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 5 Future Subdivision: Mr. Fogarty's plan is to subdivide the parcel in the future into three lots. Buildings A and C each would be on a separate lot, and buildings B and D would be on the same lot. Though the current application does not include subdivision, a review of the future lots is in order as part of the PDO to ensure the development plan is workable. Though a planned development offers flexibility, the LI Light Industrial zoning district provides guidance. All lots meet the minimum LI lot size of one acre and all LI building setbacks from lot lines and other buildings are met. Easements typically are required along property lines when a subdivision occurs and the structures located as shown would not interfere with these easements. Green Space and Building Coverage: The Light Industrial zone requires at least 10% landscaped area. The entire project area has 20 % green area (51,231 sf). The General Business district requires 25% green area. Because this is essentially an industrial use, the LI standard is more appropriate. However, because of the location next to a GB zone, staff recommends that the 20% is a good compromise. Landscaping Plan: The LI district requires a 40' landscaped buffer where a lot line coincides with an adjacent commercial district. Landscaping, planting, berming, or other effective screening is required. Though a PDO is not necessarily bound by this, substantive screening would be appropriate given the rezoning to allow industrial uses next to the clinic. A landscaping plan has been submitted, but it was unacceptable. A second landscaping plan was submitted showing a new access and some additional screening. The City Environmental Specialist has prepared recommendations and a new landscaping plan must be submitted. The recommendations are included as conditions of approval in addition to those approved by P & Z. Parking: Parking requirements are as follows: office areas, three stalls plus one stall per 200 sf; warehousing, one stall per 2,000 sf. The individual unit areas within each building will have different amounts of office space depending on the tenant needs. If we assume that 5% of the floor area will be used for office, the following calculations apply. The plan provides ample parking. Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 6 required required required shown total sf office sf warhs sf office pkg warhs pkg total pkg total pkg bldg A 20,000 1,000 19,000 8 10 18 38 bldg B 22,000 1,100 20,900 9 10 19 22 bldg C 32,200 1,610 30,590 11 15 26 54 bldg D 9,500 475 9,025 5 5 10 19 TOTAL 83,700 4,185 79,515 33 40 73 133 Traffic, Circulation: The site currently shares a driveway access to Apollo Drive with the clinic. However, the applicant has requested that the City pursue an additional access for this site. The City Engineer is pursuing this and the County is willing. In fact, the P & Z recommends that the existing shared access be closed to this site and a new one created as a condition of approval. This will eliminate any concerns over truck traffic conflicting with clinic traffic. Structures: Building elevations were submitted from a previous project by Mr. Fogarty. The new buildings will be the same: rock -faced concrete block with aluminum frame windows. No screening of trash areas is shown, but this will be required. Lighting: No lighting plans were submitted. The City's CEPTED officer wants to see lighting plans. Other staff needs to ensure that lighting will not be excessive or cause glare on roadways. In addition, we are going to begin working to ensure that lighting does not shine up into the night sky. This is a recommendation from the Environmental Board and staff agrees it is a good idea. Comments From Neighboring Properties We have had extensive discussions with staff of the clinic on the north (North Suburban Family Physicians, P.A.) and a representative of Health Partners. They have expressed concern about an industrial use next door and sharing the driveway with industrial traffic. Their primary concern is being on the edge of a commercial district instead of being surrounded by commercial uses. They believe their business will suffer because of less commercial traffic going by and because the image of their location will be less desirable for patients. They also are concerned that heavy screening between their site and the project site will reduce the visibility of their business from the freeway. The clinic representatives also have voiced worries over health issues that might arise due to the proximity to a site with the potential for manufacturing uses. Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 7 One of the P & Z's conditions of approval was that staff meet with representatives of the applicant and the clinic to resolve the concerns. Staff has had numerous conversations with the applicant. Staff met with representatives of the clinic on March 25. The clinic representatives remain opposed to the rezoning. Planning & Zoning Board Action The P & Z approved the project at its March 10 meeting with a list of conditions. The P & Z supported the project while acknowledging that the clinic should not have to share the driveway access. The Board also wanted significant screening between the properties. Staff did not put the project on the next City Council meeting to allow time to discuss the issues and design ways to fulfill some of the conditions. Conditions of Approval The following conditions of approval were approved by P & Z for the PDO development plan: 1. Only uses that are permitted uses in an LI zoning district will be part of this PDO. 2. A new landscaping plan, which includes significant screening along the clinic property boundary, must be submitted and obtain approval from City staff. 3. A lighting plan must be submitted and obtain approval from City staff 4. Trash areas must be screened. Plans for the fencing or walls must be submitted and approved by City planning and building staff before building permits are issued. 5. A minimum of 20% of the site shall be green space. 6. Prior to issuance of building permits, building and lighting plans must be reviewed by the City CSO for CEPTED review. 7. Any signage shall conform to the sign ordinance and proper permits obtained. 8. Proper building permits must be obtained prior to any construction and 1% of the construction costs must be put in escrow to insure completion of all site improvements. Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 8 9. All permits required by the Rice Creek Watershed District shall be obtained prior to any site grading. 10. Utility, grading, and drainage plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 11. The parking area shall be paved with curb and gutter and construction plans must obtain approval from the City Engineer. 12. Park dedication fee shall be required as described by City regulations. 13. All comments from the City Engineer in memo dated March 4, 1999 must be addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 14. Roof mechanical equipment must be screened visually and for noise. 15. A new access to Apollo Drive must be obtained on the south side of the property and the existing driveway access to the PDO site must be closed off so that there is no longer a shared access with the clinic property to the north. 16. Staff meet with representatives of Fogarty and the clinic to resolve concerns. 17. A time limit and financial guarantee must apply to the construction of any building foundation if the building will not be constructed immediately. The following recommendations, prepared in response to amended landscaping plan received March 24, should be added as conditions of approval: 18. Existing driveway access to site reconstructed to eliminate shared access. Costs shall be borne by the PDO rezoning applicant. 19. Green space between buildings B and C to be opened up to provide for vehicle circulation. 20. Eliminate the 16 parking stalls on the north end of the site to make more space available for screening as described below. 21. New landscaping plan to include: a. Screening on north property edge which includes a cedar fence setback from the property line and along the entire 400± feet . Vines planted to grow on north side of fence: woodbine or trumpet creeper. Rezoning, PDO Development Plan Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 April 12, 1999 page 9 b. Four bur oaks, four red oaks, and three red maples to replace spruce and techny arborvitae shown on plan. Oaks and maples staggered, planted on north side of fence (between fence and property line: trees on clinic side of fence but still on site). c. Replace spruce on western corner along Apollo Drive with bur oaks. d. Red pines planted along freeway boundary. Minimum twenty red pines. 22. New plan drawing to include data of square footage total of green space and showing green space shaded. A minimum of 20% of the site must be green space. 23. Plan for screening of roof mechanicals: visual and sound. 24. A preliminary and final shall be submitted for review through the normal subdivision process when applicant wants to subdivide the' property. OPTIONS 1. Approve the rezoning from General Business to Planned Development Overlay based on the findings listed in this report. 2. Approve the combined preliminary and final development plan with the conditions of approval listed in the report. 3. Deny the application. RECOMMENDATION Options 1 and 2 Memorandum DATE: March 4, 1999 TO: Mary Kay Wyland FROM: John Powell, City Engineer RE: Lino Lakes Business Center , VI, VII I have reviewed the plan for the referenced project which was prepared by Development Engineering, P.A.; dated January 18, 1999; which was revised on February 11, 1999. My comments are as follows: 1. This review was prepared with the understanding that units A and B will be constructed in 1999, and units C and D will be completed by the end of 2000. Any alteration of this schedule will require an additional review. 2. The reference to a "core cut" into the existing sanitary sewer manhole is to be deleted. Service to the site will be provided exclusively by existing service stubs which have been extended to the property line. No disturbance of the existing roadway will be allowed. 3. Proposed MH 1 is to be located outside of the Apollo Drive right -of -way. 4. Apollo Drive is an Anoka County roadway, any work within the right -of -way will require a permit from the County. 5. The manhole over the existing 21" RCP should be shown as a proposed manhole. 6. The existing 21" RCP storm sewer stub has a designed capacity of 10 cfs. In addition to the flow from the Clinic site, the proposed site plan showsl9 cfs being discharged into this stub. The City will require that a flow restriction be placed in proposed CB 1 which limits the discharge from this site to the available capacity in the 21" storm sewer stub. 7. If not already in place, gate valves must be installed at each connection to the City water services. 8. The proposed Site Plan must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 1189 Main Street • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 9. Access to Apollo Drive is limited by a Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and Anoka County. Access to the site will be limited to a joint driveway with the Clinic unless the City can secure an additional access at the south end of the site. The applicant has requested that City Staff pursue this additional access with Anoka County and we are proceeding with same. 10. HDPE pipe will not be allowed in the County right -of -way. 11. In several areas, the proposed storm sewer system has less than three feet of cover which may cause it to be susceptible to movement during freeze /thaw cycles and may lead to deformation under traffic loading. Although these will not be City improvements, we would recommend installation of a drain tile parallel to the storm sewer and verification of the structural stability of the storm sewer. 12. Locations of the silt fence and rock construction entrance are not shown. During construction, Apollo Drive must be kept free of material tracked off the site. 13. The curbing at the north end of the site must be moved away from Apollo Drive such that the traffic exiting the site is channelized prior to approaching the roadway. The curb orientation as proposed will create congestion at the driveway. 14.The utility easements shown on the site are not required as the utilities on site are private. 15.The location of proposed concrete curb and gutter must be shown more clearly. The proposed pavement section is not shown. If you have any questions, please let me know. 2 Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 March 4, 1999 Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Lino Lakes Business Center V, VI, & VIII Dear Mary Kay, We have looked at the site plan for these buildings and have the following comments: • This site plan shows four buildings sharing the same driveway and this driveway is also shared with another building. Access to the buildings, when cars are parked, could be a concern. • There will probably be a need for an additional hydrant or hydrants. • It would be of great help to us if we could get a map of the area. We could then see where this plat fits into the existing roads and buildings. Sincerely, Milo Bennett Fire Chief Lino Lakes Police Department 02 -24 -99 CPTED Review for the Lino Lakes Business Center, Behm farms edition, Shirley Kaye's, and the Kalway construction building. I have reviewed the site plans for the above mentioned projects. I realize that these are not the finished plans, and that additions may be added at a later date. Lino Lakes Business Center: In block 1 lot #2 Building D. I am concerned about the parking lot. By placing the parking lot between the two buildings, the natural surveillance will be eliminated. If criminal activity occurs in the parking lot, it may go unseen from Apollo. With the proper lighting installed, criminal activity may be deterred. What types of enclosures are going to be used for the trash dumpsters ?. Are they going to be fully enclosed, or just partially. enclosed. I would recommend a fully enclosed dumpster, with locking doors. By using this type of inclosure, un- authorized persons will be kept out of that area. When the time comes, I would like to view the lighting plans, and hardware plans. IE. Door and lock hardware. Will the building be alarmed. Behm Century Farm Development: The only question or concern that I would have, is that of the trail system. Will the trail system be wide enough, to allow a squad car or fire truck to drive on it. Shirley Kaves addition: I would like to view the lighting and landscaping plans in the future. Kalway Construction building: The green area presents some questions, for instance, will the plantings grow to a height that would interfere with the natural surveillance for the service and garage doors (North Side of the building). Will the plantings furnish a place to hide for burglars. On the East Side of the building, it appears that 4 foot windows will be installed. From the plans, I could not determine if any lights were going to be placed on that outside wall. I would recommend some type of lighting on that wall. With lighting installed, Squads and passing motorists on 35w would be able to view the rear of the building. : Minnesota Department of Transportation GF• Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 March 29, 1999 Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Mary Kay Wyland: SUBJECT: Apollo Business Park No. 2 Preliminary Plat Review P99 -019 Northwest Quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) 35W and Lake Drive Lino Lakes, Anoka County C.S. 0280 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Apollo Business Park No. 2 preliminary plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subd. 2, Plats. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments. • The final plat must identify the edge of Mn/DOT right of way. We will allow no work on Mn/DOT right of way. This includes disruption to right of way fences. • We are concerned that this development in combination with other development in the immediate area will greatly affect the TH 35W/Lake Drive interchange. Under the draft guidance of Anoka County's T1-1242/CSAH 14 Access Management Study, the City is currently considering a potential CSAH 14 connection with a new or revised TH 35W interchange in this area. We request the opportunity to review any traffic analysis developed as part of this consideration. Please contact me at 651 - 582 -1654 with any questions. Sincerely, Scott Peters Senior Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison c: Larry Hoium, Anoka County Surveyor An equal opportunity employer en Real Estate, Inc. February, 1999 To: City of Lino Lakes Brokerage and Leasing 474 Apollo Drive, Suite 10 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Ph: (612) 783 -9786 Fax: (612) 783 -8970 From: William E. Fogerty Re: Rezoning of Outlot B Apollo Business Park No. 2 The request to rezone this parcel is because the initial design and construction of the water, sewer and storm drainage on this parcel need to be completed at one time. This means the parking lots, asphalt, water lines, sewer lines and storm sewer need to be completed at the initial development of this property. Since that needs to be completed at the front end of the project, it also means that the footings of each building will be initiated at the same time. Therefore, to accomplish this all at one time it is available by applying for the Planned Development Overlay. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. RECEIVED FEB 1 7 1999 CITY OF LINO LAKES RECEIVE, FEB - 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES NORTH SUBURBAN FAMILY PHYSICIANS, P.A. Christian P. Anderson, M.D. PatrickT. Coumeya, M.D. Subbayamma Atluru, M.D. Elizabeth A. Detlie, M.D. Jeanette I. Keifert, M.D. Karen L. Mackenzie, M.D. Steven H. Slatten, M.D. Robert R. Weber, M.D. Julie Q. Zimmerman, M.D. North Suburban Family Physicians, P.A. 404 West Highway 96 2831 Snelling Avenue Shoreview, MN 55126 Roseville, MN 55113 482 - 8080 636 -4525 FAX: 482 -8274 FAX: 636 -7427 March 4, 1999 Mr. Jeff Smyser City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Mr. Smyser, 7761 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 784-1611 FAX: 7846093 MAR 1 01999 CITY OF LINO LAKES' North Suburban Family Physicians is tenant in a clinic built specifically for our needs on Apollo Drive in Lino Lakes. We made the move to this new facility just a year and a half ago from our old home on Lake Drive. We have been providing medical care in the community of Lino Lakes for the last 12 years and feel a part of this dynamic and growing community. I have learned a proposal has been made to re -zone this property from general business to planned development overlay /light industrial. That type of use is clearly incompatible with our business as a medical facility. The location choice for us included a clear understanding that that property would remain a general business use area and that the adjoining parcel of land would not be allowed to develop an incompatible use. Indeed, we agreed to a joint driveway arrangement for our clinic with the adjacent property after being assured that incompatible uses would not be allowed. To be the only general business in a light industrial area would put us at a serious disadvantage. To consider sharing a driveway and development area with light industry and its associated fumes, traffic, and noise would drive patients away from a business that has been providing an important service in the Lino Lakes community for more than a decade. Indeed, for most of that time we were the only source of primary care in that area. Mr. Jeff Smyser March 4, 1999 Page 2 On behalf of our clinic and our physicians who are members of the community they work in, I strongly request that the City deny re- zoning. A general business use precedence has been established based on assurances that we have from the City and the close proximity to the freeway exit argue strongly for the maintenance of general business we use. Please contact me at (651) 636 -7490 for questions. Sincere ya, M. D. Pre ident North Suburban Family Physicians Patr k C o me PC /kah i tu: HealthPartners ® 8100 34th Avenue South P.O. Box 1309 Minneapolis, MN 55440 March 4, 1999 Mr. Jeff Smyser City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Mr. Smyser: /Lz3.97,7 666! 8 0 614 r HealthPartners Services, Inc. is the owner of property located on Apollo Drive in Lino Lakes on which the North Suburban Family Physicians Clinic is built. HealthPartners purchased this property in October of 1996. The site was selected after careful consideration of many other sites, and was chosen because of good highway visibility and position within the City. HealthPartners had concerns about potential future uses of the adjacent property because the adjacent property was not developed. We were assured by the City that no industrial uses would be allowed because the property was zoned General Business. It has now been proposed that the Property be rezoned from general business to Planned Development Overlay/Light Industrial. We do not believe that this is a compatible use with a medical facility, and strongly object to the rezoning. We are very concerned about truck traffic, exhaust, and manufacturing odor and noise. In addition, at the time of our purchase, the City required a joint driveway with the property adjacent to our property, which is now proposed to be rezoned. The City did not want additional curb cuts on Apollo Drive. We were assured by the City that uses incompatible with our medical clinic use would not be allowed on the adjoining parcel and therefore we agreed to the joint driveway arrangement. If a light industrial use is now allowed, our patients will have to share driveway use with industrial traffic. This is a very disadvantageous situation for us. We strongly request that the City deny the rezoning. The freeway visibility seems much more compatible with general business use, which would benefit from that visibility. Please contact me at 612- 883 -5311 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HEALTHPARTNERS SERVICES, INC. Deb bie,Lawrence Senior Real Estate Analyst I21 North Suburban Family Physicians 576 Apollo Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 March 8, 1999 Mary Kay Wyland Planning and Zoning Board City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Planning and Zoning Board: We are the physicians who practice at the North Suburban Family Physicians Office at 576 Apollo Drive in Lino Lakes. We are writing because we are concerned with the proposed rezoning of the adjacent parcel of land from General Business to Planned Development Overlay /Light Industrial. Our concern is that the property then may be used in a manner not compatible with a medical facility. At stake would be the health and well being of our patients as well as the long term viability of our business. When we signed the lease for this facility, we were told that no industrial use of the adjacent property would be allowed. The owner had been assured of that fact by the City of Lino Lakes. We ask that the Planning and Zoning Board deny the rezoning. The site seems more appropriate for general business use. Sincerely Steven H. Slatten, M.D. 4or Douglas M. Berg, M. Julie G. Zimmerman, M.D. • C _>nc Auaal Land Use Plan AC ))10-rAter SYVby- /997 FAM /L'f 4RL\ 2 . . j..4 r �11ii. ✓b^/ I • SUp. r\_.;! — T'- I ;�.�. Residential 5/4/4 t IFRS "�•' -- ': MARSH/AN (E_. • LAKE .1i. ••;,!i riI Ib..:.i I_::•:: •u( 1■,.1 1a1 it::., I Industrial it r; I if: rl i'uhiiC!Sea:i i uulr: 11 .;I') I' < (T_.,.i t _ •F,) N\ \‘, CFA 11.1 N 41r • 4 17 UNO MS CEN • i Highland • - 1 Meadows 1 Park I I I II 15 1 15 13 AUD SUB R.-1 1:AHI!'kt " 111 LI NO _• 014' 4AMILIF <fi A.44.1111 111 i I 1 t 1D 4 i j 3----_Y H. T4 , Faillif—o ■•• 5 , t' r 1Z.1 \ / ••• 4\ .-J 1 / R-2 \ R-3 -- 7 MARSHAN LAI • g-460,41//ti 3 c) - J L3.) 1-- <.4 -4 (4 1-. C3 - J Z3 S -4 1-1J LILAC STREET L 5 3 3 ,r 0 BE DED I CA TED AS LLAC STREET 1 N .89 • I 4 0 t.alliA OUTLOT 13400 gQ. FT. 245. 94— • T /1. NO. 49 NO 'VC!. UDED IN PLAT / N 89'14 00-11 357. 20 ) LOT 1/ / BLOCK 2,4' f5.960 SQ . . 0.83005A5C PINES 12-14 +606.7 LOT 1 BLOCK 1 120.400 SQ. ET. Z . 77 AC. / 123 906 ------ 7 +MB —912— - - — OUTLOT BIL 260,900 SQ. FT., 5.99 AC. / C< 21E I- (-5 LJj 0); C .4 CL - 43.). 1- - C -J 1 +011.5 9/0 5 (1 \ 0( -- 0 4,0 t% ■.% 4,6v, ot, \ -- .....- MEDCEN 24 36 / LINO LAKES BUSINESS CENTER V, VI AND VII z LOT 3 TOTAL AREA: 280,920.38 SQ. F7'. 5.989 ACRES AREA 95.03E05 SQ. IT 2.162 ACM SCALE I INCH = 40 ?Ltd' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OUTLOT B, APOLLO BUSINESS PARK NO. 2. Med FOTIM IIMMOPS AS AP= tat sum A UM UM WI 5512I 712-1120 0.4P bi trklail AAA Dm. by 6 OMMLOPMENT MICDAZUMIC. P4 Sone/ KO al■ "MBILO 111.110. WINO). MPS NMI 11016 IT PM Mt int trot Aniusa amp. - 1011 3 Anita, ..1-6-11 ars*. IMM Sket wortyr 2 el EX CB INV 900.05 24 IN9 900.29 21' rats vmr. N511110 SI' PCP INV 900.2 LINO LAKES BUSINESS CENTER V, VI AND Vil EXISTING 21• RCP O 0.505 W�t6 NI TYPIC1l) -12 CONC C ! C - - ( k bubo 4 fr`. *� 3 ItB NV soas7 .« scam v sb" SCALE 1 NCH - 40 FEET LEGEND X 910.00 RECEIVED FEB 1 2 1999 CITY OF LINO LAKES EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE SILT FENCE DRAINAGE ARROWS PROPOSED ELEVATION NOTES: ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED. MULCHED AND FERTILIZED NITHIN 10 DAYS OF FINISHED GRADING ALL TOPSOIL TO BE SALVAGED AND RESPREAD ON THE FINISHED GRADED LOTS AND BOULEVARDS ALL SITE GRADING SHALL FOLLOW THE OTY CF 1140 LAKES AND THE RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. STATE LAW REOUIRES THAT BEFORE YOU DIG CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002 FOGERTY 1IES71cxrs 474 APOLLO ME. 9317 A LINO LAIES. M1 5121 7d1 -9370 DEV67.OP6®F9 ENGD ZERDIG. P.A. memo+ Era MIIIINC 1161•119109 =NMI RN @1189311 9360. 99 MUL 11L /SW 01121 719 -9111 55606 Des* W 9 troy by b SIMI roe4 II SAPnMa 932213 01911A4 dole 1 -16.99 9Nllao 7 -11-99 r„9y041119 r.w9.11.•1r ..., -• ;,i=ce of r2 -11-99 w1,. 16464 Pop Mk 9A RA I 99991 Antra 1 el 3 LINO LAKES BUSINESS CENTER V, VI AND Vil SCALE 1 INCH = 40 FEET OB&8 TREE PLANTING N3 TALE %CIE 1111MOES 11Y F 1/! 16 1/3 �� 3EUNIG IMENM f 61p6H 3/4- VIP 100( 11111E1 FIBRE 6A0I11 W61 RARING 901. 1111£1 YEW R/d1C COCO( Fw1 ROAS(M Q mPACI D OR Uoa1I4133 Sa CONTAINER GROWN AND B&B SHRUB PLANTING No sou PLANT LIST ARKS 12 f1SEN ASH SEECCESS 1 1/2'- 2 63 CA MATCH 36 011M0 BURMNG BUSH 16. 1101 BB 36" OC S DWARF ►ACID PINE 1S 11671 1P 60- OC 10 NORWAY SPRUCE 6• BB NS NOTES: ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE TRUE TO NAME AND SIZE ACCORDING TO AMERICAN NURSERYMAN'S STANDARDS ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARE?4758D FOR ONE YEAR FROM DAY OF ACCEPTANCE DEAD AND UNHEALTHY PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATLNG AND PROTECTING ALL U lLfl7FS WITHIN THE FIELD PRIOR TO AND DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLANTS CAN BE RELOCATED TO AVOID U77IJTTPS SUBJECT TO OWNERS APPROVAL ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SLR. MULCHED AND FERTHJZED gTHIN 10 DAYS OF FINISHED GRADING. ALL TOPSOIL TO BE SALVAGED AND RESPREAD ON THE FINISHED GRADED LOTS AND BOULEVARDS. ALL SITE GRADING SHALL FOLLOW THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND THE RICE CREEIC WATERSHED DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT BEFORE YOU DIG CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 -0002 arm Q4 N OPEI71ORS 1116 1)173. 63 65121 1174610 OHM Oy f OWN dolt 1 -36-19 Drew fry 011IIaPAMN2 ..—.--"* PA rrrw Sam MtNo. R tos !!1 p!63 KIR t19ER 16t 1 �w M303[ 111C176Htl1 163 1 , f6121S R 41on 1_36-16 760 Po, Mk UN09QPC 9.6 wafter 3 of 3 ' +A L LA C STREET '4..e.olr„„/ : :: 33' r0 BE DEDICATED, -' I AS 1 ;LAC STREET I I OUTLIO T A 13400 IQ . FT . rn _co -o cl. -J Nc C3 1-- C3 -J lQ L3 .H. NO. 49 NOT NCLUDED IN - / /7/ PLAT N 89.14'00 -W 357.20 \ PIES 12 -14 L.74/ /9 �e • - 50 +506.7 1 N 89'14'064/ 245.9( ) LOT 1 / �/ /BLOCK 2. 5.960 SQ. FT. 10. 8310AC' a \ /gr .) LOT 1 BLOCK 1 120.400 SQ. FT. 2.77 AC. Fios.1 999- 6- 7 r OUTLOT B L +117.1 260,900 SQ. FT.\ -, 5.99 AC. \ -912-- -- -- - -1 +511.5 00'02'36 "E ° // 1114 4 942 // / 1. ..,<....- 1, 1 q5� jr� L��-, / / / w f - 9 / \G f %5,0Raj i /OR /NE�j `` ‘€°' I \AO SCALE 0 60 IN 120 PRELIMINARY PLAT APOLLO BUSINESS PARK NO. 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES FEET 240 SCALE t INCH • 60 FEET BEARINGS ON ASSUMED DATUM PHYSICAL FEATURES ARE LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY BENCHMARK USED: TNH - W. SIDE APOLLO DRIVE OPPOSITE SWLY COR. OF PROP. LOT I. BLOCK 1 ELEV. • 000.12 DATE: JUNE 24.1996 ANOKA CO., MN. CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC C C 2 C3 C 4 C 5 LINE L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 L 5 L 6 L 7 02'44'05 " 899.00 42.91 25'26 "07" 799.00 354.70 37'28'41` 899.00 588.05 23'51'36 " 866.95 361.03 20'51'04" 660.95 240.53 BEARING DISTANCE N 20'33 27-E N 00'46'00 "E N 89 "14'00 "W S 20'32'58 -W S 58'02"08 -W N 24 "44'55 "E N 16'51'06-W +106.1 a • DENOTES D CONTOURS DENOTES SETBACK LIES Mows r CONTOURS DENOTES R9HT-OF -VAY LIE O '0TES SECTION Lt'E D ENOTES SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES WATER DEC1ES STORM SEVER DENOTES SANTMY SEVER DENOTES CATCH BART DENOTES CONC. CLR6 AND GUTTER DENOTES GATE VALVE 78.66 57.93 42.12 21.25 48.28 30.11 7.15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Shot part of the Northeast aborter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17. Township 31 North. Range 22 Vest. Anoka County. MI to described as follows: Quarter u i of Sections 17.hTownshipn71.oRanyge 22:1 •hence (Warier of degree 00 Northwest nl.utes. ossuned bearing. deong the north line of the Northeast Quarter of the Sout• hw001 avrts,. a 00 ndlnutescsa dlstonce of feet 425 feet: thence Vest 00 thence nlnutes. a distance of 352.0• feet to the west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17: thence South 00 degrees 46 Motile' 15 seconds East. along the west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Ouorter. o dlstonce or 155 feet. nore or less. to the northwesterly rtyht- of-way line of Intaterstate Hbgh.oy NN yo. 35V: tMOce northeasterly. ta sold northwesterly e intersection) with the) souther dlys lssotoff the2Edoe8ranshaud tracts asodescrpibedt of Varronty Deed recorded in Book 796 of Deeds. Poge 71. on file In the office of the Register of Deeds. Anoka County. Minnesota: thence westerly. along sold southerly line. a distance of 112 feet. nor• or less. to the southwest corner of said Edo Branshaull tract: thence north ly. Oionq the westerly tine of said Iracl. 0 distance of 16 feet. nor• or less. to the southeast corner of the Richard Peters tract. es described on Warranty Oeed recorded In Book 592 0f Deeds. page 413. on file In II.e office of the Register of Deeds. Anoka Courtly. Minnesota: thence Vest 00 degrees 00 nlnutes. along the south line of sold Richard Peters tract. 0 distance of 175 feel to the southwest corner thereof: thence North 00 degrees 00 n lnutes. airnig the west line of sold Richard Peters lrocl, o distance of 200 feet to the north Ilse of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 17. thence Vest 00 degrees 00 ntautes. along sold north line. 0 01stance of 50 feet to the paint of beglentop. cnialel.q 11.4 acres. more or less. and subject to Lilac Street clonq the 15051 .ortherIy line thereof. Except shot port plotted as Clty of Lino Lakes Right -of -Way Plat No. 2. Also except the following described trocl: Thal port or the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter described os follows: Begt.nlnq 01 the .ortheast career of said Northeast Ouorter of the Northwest Quarter Ihe1.ce s0uth along the ease line for 30 rods or 405 feel: thence north 70 degrees 22 n.notes West for 40 feel nare Or less to the centerline of irenk Highway No. a os now established and traveled t0 the point of beglnn 'no: thence continue 01 forth 70 degrees 22 nlnutes Vest. following o..old property line which is nerved by on old fence Iles for 363 feet: the.ce South 24 degrees 36 moulds Vest for 161.25 feet: thence South e7 depress 52 nlnutes East for 363 feel to oforwsold c.eterllee of Trunk Highway No. 8: thence North 24 degrees 56 Moines East along said centerline for 160 feet to the pout of beginning. KURTH SURVEYING. INC. 4002 JEFFERSON ST. N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS. MN 66421 -4THONE: 788 -9789 FAX: 766 -7602 • I G. bxe, scoPEP ryt.pc.K. cl...45,* IIJ At-IM• 6g-/NieS V'VnI GRIM, L. 134E74- •_r P "ca "2-C Oxii 4ear2E1, 447 ts.C... 1 1- P-OCk_FACC GONG- PRErik.,151ipo 5,1A Lo. ■3 - (-/ .•.•a N.101z,TH E*T_ • : ! • 71_17- __• 404G- 71 74• • • • '-:- • i2-1•.- • • •-•-• • 4- • o 1 6 E. pc 15 5oaRED O4.6 4▪ - CC*JC F51.0C-14- f> 4cop.ED coo WC moeW. TIFertgrStiVo uni EAs-r 0 OM. • WWII.. MINN :e.o• _ —9 • Of 1.41 .0 10-11f .1? 11. • ) r I MMMMM 711111■WILIrill • • / ROCI‘PA ca. c-014e- BL•0 C4f- •i:• •• • , 4 11=1011 — Ift'i ' — • cyros.cFpopif 3ort•-q.SA54-At.to9 pow- *JO .Fir-e. Writ %Pau eP-Exle- I 4 fi‘Xer 5•44:420:1 \6,4 ISLOGIC. 2 IIJGVI. INTL -1 • , — - -1 — —4 ■-•• ' 12.‘t4 UAW. !tn. i'x?' swot. 104. poor_ 4 r-.P.4446. G mus ra- -e potral.n94 S.N. r.cuRnitt. *PowrisPour ta■al -!4 ibyt, 1c.ort-r3 1 Mr■IINVIN1 1:11=1181.• :11111111M=11.7.21:0 1= \ ,-1— .L. r r 1,1 9, Py.,412, ELT 104.•0". 1,10KNE-i4,45T LEvT 1 ON • -••••• •••-- •— — 1— '41 ( e-gr- ;4 _L• •c, •T▪ ir/Frz• TOPA-1.4sfEl 49 I( PL.1012- aL,4tae-oq sTop/FTis . El.•=ft %CET AG A I STAFF ORIGINATOR: It ary l ay W la l MEETING DATE: Apri l 12, 1 . TOPIC: Final Plan - Surfside Addition VOTE REQU S' hriajor A Prelimity Dane was appr fur the Addition in August of e plat creat€d five (5) R-1X l€ is with a PDO that alto ed a 50' wide joint the ability fur each lot to construct a 2400 square foot sea plat ado cuts which property. ir. R Anson has campy his Lion of Covenants, Conditions and Rests ction s end they have been reviewed, with a title commitment, by the City Attorney and fauaid to bye te. A Deveoprnent Agreement has been signed and steel for the utility 'on. Grading will be com feted on a per lot basis as described in the devel Staff would retommend approval oftl condition that ()utlots A and B are cos. that they remain one parcel. far the Surfside Addition with the Parcel No. 20- 31 -22 -23 -0010 to insure OPTIONS: rNS: 1. Approve Final Plat withitiun that Q ors A and B are combined with parcel 20-31-22-23-0010. 2. Return to staff for furs ter 'duration. h• �'1 ►en �� 0 ®111' oo ©i■ o lir oao I ©© v PQby`• ,A o� •� LINO LAKES s�7'�g` I :fir MAN ®S dla° REHABILITATIO rcurco� Qt e 5 z I ;8 11111E 111 MUWiI o Om we oovc0'v a © !1m WIC/ sal °iu© qqn0 ICI ICI M© —. Eva a yi KM MallEM OM �0 6' o°cpo ii* !! oo Ca=ri3; o awl oiaoo o zoc¢ rra y�� min o c ci r! fu ©o rum,„Q[ Ir op © IC 'um EjCi MI MIMI EN Val6M17.2 ,, •s Enos toi uadiatu.z X11© f iCCGIGiG © Om a t cell mo©£ r "ace MI ICI= ©a© MI Min MA EINI M. e © MEM MI MEM :Br NM WI IOWA ;® •Esi MINI KEW pWI NM UM VIA GEORGE MEM RESHANAU LAKE NORTH LD t:OIL 1r 20M" g 1 a 0.[t 20 0 .• Dr . .L_ :...:.: �• / . -150.00 - r - 125.00 --I a /-`' I `s _ a II fzS g g En o 1 is y Y S /F 6 /• _.., / 14.00 • (c1o" il°1°i"1) I1>E -$ • x raj 125.00 `i . 1 C �g ! 589h0'25'E (N04ST3T'r pqp U •� 1 o A0E /SDpye 8 y- a (EAST sr-E' -- 1305.34-- N. UNE OF GOVT LOT 3. SEC. 20. T. 31, R. 22. A-60 FEET ROAD EASEMENT 841.34 .._ SURFSIDE ADDITION CITY OF LINO IAKES, ANOKA COUNTY r - 125.00 1 1 1 epli 2 p .41 I 11 11 II 125.00 I �r- 11 11 1 occEp280i g" :/ i /17 g',10 �• -, 279.91 / f•-• 238.68 �s w.- • 1' 0 .AV 4445. 137.85 S89•46'02'W 210.00 '101 1 4q. 1' 04 ' ` U,'O" sec" 11" Lr' i` 4- �d. 4 / ' SOUTH LINE OF NORTH i SECTION 20, 7.31. R.22 / ALSO NORTH UNE OF WUTH 1/2, SECTION 20. 1 -- NORTH UNE OF GOVT LOT 1. SECIKIN 19. T.31. R.22 ALSO SOUTH LINE OF NORTH 1/2. SECTION 19. 125.00- r- 125.00 -1 r- 12500-1 II II WI 11 I di �n ° I r1 ° ! Ifi 3 4 4 • fiwg1 1 C 11 / 1 Is ' CASEMENT 125.00 u 125.00(914-7 1•66.05 COGr or 566 05 . scf r216.34 755.,2 If 'r 1. X91 MET LAND 124.11 VICINITY MAP GRAPHIC SCALE r w 1+ we (wPT) I ,ems 100 R NE Cor. of Gov't Lot 3, Soc. 20 EASEMENTS ARE SHOW THUD 5.00- 10.00- I 1 J 1--5.00 1 10.00 1 1 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT UNES AND BEING 10 FEET IN (MOTH AND ADJOINING STREET AND REAR LOT UNES UNLESS OTHERIMSE SHORN ON THIS PLAT. ° DENOTES 1/2- MOIMMIENT FOUND MESS 07NERMISE INDICATED. AU. MONUMENTS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE. AND NOT SHORN ON THIS PLAT. MILL BE SET 1111HN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF DRS PLAT AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IR0N PIPE MARKED BY RLS 17765. . FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT INC NORTH UNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 19. TI1P. 31. MG. 22 15 ASSUMED TO BEAR N119'46'02'E. DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY MONUMENT AN • r •.1«,trrrtcattr'i [AND SURVEYING Earth Day Resolution City of Lino Lakes 1999 We, the residents of Lino Lakes, do hereby support and celebrate Earth Day 1999 in the Quad Cities, Whereas, the protection and preservation of the environment benefits all people, Whereas, the preservation of natural resources ensures the health and happiness of generations to come, Whereas, living a sustainable lifestyle helps maintain species diversity in all kingdoms of life, Whereas clean air, pure water, and rich topsoil are necessary for continuing life systems, Whereas, celebrating community promotes a safe, productive and vibrant place to live, Whereas, Earth Day is celebrated nationally on April 22rd, Let it therefore be resolved that Saturday, April 24th 1998 be designated Quad Cities Earth Day 1999 for the Cities of Lino Lakes, Centerville, Circle Pines, and Lexington. Mayor Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member wa l r Day P aclamation fr r 1 9. Day is F Lin+ Lakes Ei is this year o Nay 21,1999. Lino Lakes Flame C ` Tree Tt 'Green Teams environmental i off pf d desist pi i , of # nat ish 21st May Line Lakes A+rt r Day by the attached City of Lino Lakes Arbor Day Proclamation 1999 Whereas, In 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and Whereas, this holiday, called Arbor Day was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and Whereas, trees reduce the erosion of our precious top soil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen and provide habitat for wildlife, and Whereas, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products, and Whereas, trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community, and Whereas, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal, and Whereas, the City of Lino Lakes has been recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue its tree - planting practices Whereas, each year Lino Lakes Elementary of the Forest Lake School District has fostered an understanding of the benefits of trees with its students, and hosted the City of Lino Lakes Arbor Day Ceremony inviting all residents to attend, NOW THERFORE, I, Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor of the City of Lino Lakes, do hereby proclaim Friday, May 21st as ARBOR DAY, in the City of Lino Lakes, and urge all citizens to celebrate Arbor Day and to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands, and Further, I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the heart and promote the well being of this and future generations. Dated, this 12th day of April, 1999 Mayor Anoka County Contract #900260 -9 AGREEMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on the 12th day of January, 1999, notwithstanding the date of the signatures of the parties, between the COUNTY OF ANOKA, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY ", and the CITY OF LINO LAKES, hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Anoka County has received $786,018 in funding from the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board and the State of Minnesota pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 115A.557 (hereinafter "SCORE funds "); and WHEREAS, the County wishes to assist the Municipality in meeting recycling goals established by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners by providing said SCORE funds to cities and townships in the County for solid waste recycling programs. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions: 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between the County and the Municipality to implement solid waste recycling programs in the Municipality. 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement is from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. 3. DEFINITIONS. a. "Problem material" shall have the meaning set forth in Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subdivision 24a. b. "Multi -unit households" means households within apartment complexes, condominiums, townhomes, mobile homes and senior housing complexes. c. "Opportunity to recycle" means providing recycling and curbside pickup or collection centers for recyclable materials as required by Minn. Stat. § 115A.552. d. "Recycling" means the process of collecting and preparing recyclable materials and reusing the materials in their original form or using them in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of recyclable materials in a manner that precludes further use. e. "Recyclable materials" means materials that are separated from mixed municipal solid waste for the purpose of recycling, including paper, glass, plastics, metals, fluorescent lamps, major appliances and vehicle batteries. f. Refuse derived fuel or other material that is destroyed by incineration is not a recyclable material. 1 disposition of all recyclable materials collected pursuant to this agreement. The Municipality shall also report the number of cubic yards or tons of yard waste collected for composting or landspreading, together with a description of the methodology used for calculations. Any other material removed from the waste stream by the Municipality, i.e. tires and used oil, shall also be reported separately. b. Information regarding any revenue received from sources other than the County for the Municipality's recycling programs. c. Copies of all promotional materials that have been prepared by the Municipality during the term of this Agreement to promote its recycling programs. The Municipality agrees to furnish the County with additional reports in form and at frequencies requested by the County for financial evaluation, program management purposes, and reporting to the State of Minnesota. 6. BILLING AND PAYMENT PROCEDURE. The Municipality shall submit itemized invoices semiannually to the County for abatement activities no later than July 20, 1999 and January 20, 2000. Costs not billed by January 20, 2000 will not be eligible for funding. The invoices shall be paid in accordance with standard County procedures, subject to the approval of the Anoka County Board of Commissioners. 7. ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDS. The Municipality is entitled to receive reimbursement for eligible expenses, less revenues or other reimbursement received, for eligible activities up to the project maximum as computed below, which shall not exceed $35,038.00. The project maximum for eligible expenses shall be computed as follows: a. A base amount of $10,000.00 for recycling activities only; and b. $5.85 per household for recycling activities only. 8. RECORDS. The Municipality shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the County and the State of Minnesota. The Municipality shall maintain strict accountability of all funds and maintain records of all receipts and disbursements. Such records and accounts shall be maintained in a form which will permit the tracing of funds and program income to final expenditure. The Municipality shall maintain records sufficient to reflect that all funds received under this Agreement were expended in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 115A.557, subd. 2, for residential solid waste recycling purposes. The Municipality shall also maintain records of the quantities of materials recycled. All records and accounts shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than three years from the last receipt of payment from the County pursuant to this Agreement. 9. AUDIT. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.06, Subd. 4, the Municipality shall allow the County or other persons or agencies authorized by the County, and the State of Minnesota, including the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, access to the records of 3 h. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portion of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating the relationship of co- partners, joint venturers, or an association between the County and Municipality, nor shall the Municipality, its employees, agents or representatives be considered employees, agents, or representatives of the County for any purpose. 11. PUBLICATION. The Municipality shall acknowledge the financial assistance of the County on all promotional materials, reports and publications relating to the activities funded under this Agreement, by including the following acknowledgement: "Funded by the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and State SCORE funds (Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment). 12. INDEMNIFICATION. The County agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the Municipality harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the County under this Agreement. The Municipality agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from all claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of its public officials, officers, agents, employees, and contractors relating to activities performed by the Municipality under this Agreement. The provisions of this subdivision shall survive the termination or expiration of the term of this Agreement. 13. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written agreement of the parties or by either party, with or without cause, by giving not less than seven (7) days written notice, delivered by mail or in person to the other party, specifying the date of termination. If this Agreement is terminated, assets acquired in whole or in part with funds provided under this Agreement shall be the property of the Municipality so long as said assets are used by the Municipality for the purpose of a landfill abatement program approved by the County. 5 AGENDA ITEM 61 �ideratinn of Resolution NO. 99-23 accepting and awarding Contracts for Council Chamber 1�iaual Equipment t ,,4# tt vu re t l forr audio visu equipment for the new city hall tut Friday, April 2. The € ty's audio visual consultant Bugg litre item the equip seie one bis er %installation of the ui nt. Three idler Ip a Vim ar i Audio, a +r and EPA (see attached) will be providing equip t, ark ' V s low bidder for installation. The cost for the equipment tine! ink is ,+ +.70. The project budget was $28,000. 1. Approve Rest an No. 9.23 awarding c tracts far the city hall udio visual equipment aid direr a to execute tie eery documents. 2. Return to Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 99 -23 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBER AUDIO VISUAL EQUIPMENT, CIVIC COMPLEX WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for audio visual equipment for the Civic Complex; bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement; Name: Total Bid Tierney Brothers $38,193.35 Alpha Video and Audio $24,438.28 Graybow Communications Group $26,912.15 EPA $26,719.00 AND WHEREAS, the city requested line item bids to provide for the selection of equipment on a line item basis; the following lowest responsible bidders were selected: Name: Amount of Low Bid Alpha Video and Audio 7 1 Computer Ave. MN 55435 Graybow Communications Group 5340 Cedar Lake Road St. Louis Park, MN 55416 EPA P.O. Box 40 Rockford, MN 55373 $11,116.91 $11,351.79 $3,567.00 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the contracts in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the Civic Complex, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file at Lino Lakes City Hall. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of April, 1999. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on April 12, 1999. Jean M. Viger, Deputy Clerk 04/06/1999 19:24 612 - 781 -1456 AVTS Lino Lakes Council Chamber AN Equipment Order Jeff Volk Alpha Video and Audio 7711 Computer Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55435 Please order the following list of equipment. Equipment/Description PELCO LENS CONTROLLER KNOX 8 X 8 VIDEO ROUTER PANASONIC B &W 3X5 MONITOR KRAMER RACK MOUNTS WINSTEAD 70" VERTICAL RACKS WINSTEAD FLAT SHELVES WINSTEAD POWER STRIPS WINSTEAD SCREWS WINSTEAD RACK CASTERS TOA 8" CEILING SPEAKERS Misc. Cables, Connectors, Etc. FREIGHT SALES TAX EQUIPMENT TOTALS INSTALLATION LABOR PROJECT TOTAL Deliver to: City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Attn: Dan Tesch Model MLZ6DT KNOX 8X8 WVBM 503 MS -50R 90020 86088 98700 G8103 88240 PC -671 R Qty 1 1 1 1 2 10 2 1 2 20 1 Price ea $200.00 $1,250.00 $1,050.00 $66.00 $559.00 $31.00 $55.00 $50.00 $87.00 $26.00 $565.00 PAGE 02 Ext Price $200.00 $1,250.00 $1,050.00 $66.00 $1,118.00 $310.00 $110.00 $50.00 $174.00 $520.00 $565.00 $0.00 $378.91 $5,791.91 $5,325.00. $11,116.91 04/06/1999 19:24 612 - 781 -1456 AVTS Lino Lakes Council Chamber AN Equipment Order Wendy Weiss Ackerman Graybow Communications Group 5340 Cedar Lake Road St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 Please order the following list of equipment. Equipment/Description JVC COLOR CAMERA BITRONICS 24 VAC TRANSFORMER MACKIE AUDIO MIXER CROWN AUDIO AMPLIFIER KRAMER VIDEO DA KRAMER AUDIO DA AUDIO TECHNICA MICROPHONES SONY 9" MONITORS JVC 36" MONITORS PEERLESS JUMBO MOUNTS TANNOY SPEAKERS DELTASCAN VGA INTERFACE FREIGHT SALES TAX EQUIPMENT TOTALS Deliver to: City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Attn: Dan Tesch Model TKC -1380U BIT PW 2440 1402 VLZ D75 MS -50VN MS -50A Qty 1 1 1 1 1 1 1AT915QMRx/C ; 10 KV -9PT50 AV36 0020 JMC 660 -ST CPA 5 DS -200 10 2 2 6 1 Price ea $675.00 $9.25 $447.50 $459.90 $350.00 $350.00 $192.50 $269.00 $921.75 $103.00 $214.00 $369.00 PAGE 03 Ext Price $675.00 $9.25 $447.50 $459.90 $350.00 $350.00 $1,925.00 $2,690.00 $1,843.50 $206.00 $1,284.00 $369.00 $0.00 _$742.64 ($11,351.79; [Change in Model iChange in Quantity I 04/06/1999 19:24 612 - 781 -1456 AVTS PAGE 04 Lino Lakes Council Chamber AN Equipment Order Bob Witschen EPA P.O. Box 40 Rockford, Minnesota 55373 Please order the following list of equipment. Equipment/Description RAINBOW LENS RANE AUDIO EQUALIZER QUAM SPEAKER ENCLOSURES EQ SECURITY COVER FREIGHT SALES TAX EQUIPMENT TOTALS Deliver to: City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Attn: Dan Tesch Model Qty H 16 X 6.5 M 1 ME30B ERD8 20 SC -1 -7 2 2 Price ea $2,496.00 $344.00 $5.00 $25.00 liChange in Quantit ! Ext Price $2,496.00 $688.00 $100.00 $50.00 $0.00 $233.00 $3,567.00 AGENDA ITEM 6J STAFF ORIGINATOR: Brian Wessel HATE: 4/12199 TOPIC: Consideration of a Contract with Patchin Messner Appraisals, Inc BACKGROUND: This contract is for professional services to provide an appraisal of the 4-acre city owned site on Lake Drive. One acre of the parcel currently houses the po station, which wilt be vacated shortly. The entire parcel is zoned for neighborhood commercial usre. The sale of this property places it back on the tax roles and has been considered a critical element in the overall Town Center financial planning. The cost of the appraisal is $1, =ROM : PATCHIN MESSNER APPRAISALS FAX NO. : 6128951521 1 atchin Messner Appraisals Inc. Valuation Consultants Apr. 06 1999 12:23PM P2 (612) 895-1205. 101 West Burnsville Parkway, Suite 200, Burnsville, Minnesota 55.337.. FAX (612):895-1521 April 6, 1999 City of Lino: Lakes- 1189 Main Street Lina ".Lakes, MN 55014 ATTN: Mr. Brian Wessel Chairman, . Economic Development RE: Valuation Consulting•and • Appraisal Services Patchin Messner Appraisals, Inc. • 101 W. Burnsville Parkway, Ste. 200 Burnsville, Minnesota- •55337 To whomit.may.Concern:•• ". . This..letter is "intended to be a. memorandum of understanding conceming•the•errgagement of Patchin Messner":Appra'rsals, :Inc. for purpose of rendering valuation consultation • and/or • appraisal reports. • • It- is understood by both parties that the nature. of :.the assignment- is as • follows: • .... • ,:-TYpe-of Property/ . • ••Location:" . Furiction.of Appraisal/ • Consultation: Data.Needed to-'erform. • Value Analysis: :. -Type of Services..to be 4± Acres of Commercia•-Zoned• Land 7701 - 7731 Lake Drive .. Lino Lakes, Minnesota Estimate the current fee . simple market value.. for possible sale/disposition. • Legal description, tax statement and survey. Prepare a limited appraisal_inTa summary:.: report in compliance with the. Uniform- Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ... FROM : PATCHIN MESSNER APPRAISALS Estimated Cost of Services Rendered: Delivery Date: Terms: FAX NO. : 6128951521 Apr. 06 1999 12:23PM P3 $1,500.00; plus professional fees of $125.00 per hour for time after delivery of appraisal report, if necessary. We will furnish three copies of the appraisal within 5 to 6 weeks following return of authorization to proceed, and requested data. We can only complete the appraisal by this date if we receive the requested data in a timely manner. Total amount due within 30 days following date of invoice, 1 -1/2% per month interest charges will be added to accounts not paid by that time. Retainer Fee - to be paid in advance: None Date of Proposal: JLM :prj Authorization To Proceed Client Name: Individual Responsible: Signature: Date Accepted: April 6, 1999 Respectfully submitted, PATCHIN MESSNER APPRAISALS, INC. Jason L. Messner, MAI " ' 'Patchin Messner-Appraisals, Inc.