Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/28/1998 Council PacketAGENDA 5:30 P.M., CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING 1. Consider Otter Lake Road Litigation CITY OF LINO LAKES Call to Order and Roll Call Monday September 28, 1998 6:30 P.M. Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? 1. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of Minutes: 1. September 14, 1998 B. Consideration of Expenditures: 1. September 28, 1998 2. September 4, 1998 (SAC) 3. September 18, 1998 (SAC) 4. Centennial Fire District, September 2, 1998 2. Open Mike 3. Police Department Report, David Pecchia A. Consideration of Conditional Job Offers for Police Officer and Community Service Officer (CSO) 4. Community Development Department A. Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - 144, Setting Public Hearing on the Establishment of a Redevelopment Project Plan, Brian Wessel PAGE 1 AGENDA B. FIRST.READII OrdinarictNo. 12 -- 98,-�Re ffe Clearwater Creek, 3rd Addition, Al Brixius C. Comprehensive Plan Update, Brian Wessel (Verbal) F. Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - Awarding Bids for the Lake Drive Trunk Utility Improvements, John Powell 5. Administration Department Report A. Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - 140 Setting the Public Hearing for Proposed Assessment, Delinquent Sewer and Water Utility Bills, Marilyn Anderson B. Consider Salary Adjustments, Phase II Restructuring, Dan Tesch 6. Old Business 7. New Business A. Consideration of Minutes, August 19, 1998 (Council Member Neal was absent.) 8. Community Calendar for September 29, 1998 through October 12, 1998 A. .S.epiember_3O 1998, Wednesday, 6:30 p.m:, Enviro rTental Budd— B. .. fl ursday, October 1, 1998, 7:00 a.m., EDAC C. October 1, 1998, Thursday,'p.m., Town Center Group D. October 3, 1998, Saturday, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Recycling Day E. October 5, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., Park Board F. October 5, 1998, Monday, 7:00 ayor's Round Table G. October 7, 1998, Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session H. October 8, 1998, Thursday, 7:00 p.m., Charter Commission I. October 10, 1998, Saturday, 9:00 a.m., Vision Bus Tour J. October 14, 1998, Wednesday, 6:30 p.m., The Planning and Zoning Board will conduct a public hearing on the Draft Comprehensive Plan PAGE 2 AGENDA K. October 26, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., the City Council will consider the Draft Comprehensive Plan 9. Adjourn September 21, 1998, 9:30 a.m. PAGE 3 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY SEPTEMBER 28, 1998 6:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration of Minutes of Thursday, August 27, 1998 3. Resolution No. 98 -04 Authorizing the Preparation of a Redevelopment Project Plan 4. Adjourn CITY OF LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES DATE: Thursday, August 27, 1998 MEMBERS PRESENT: K. Sullivan, J. Bergeson, C. Dahl MEMBERS ABSENT: C. Lyden, A. Neal OTHERS PRESENT: Brian Wessel, Mary Divine, Ron Batty, Mike Mulrooney CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES EDA President Sullivan moved to approve the minutes from the August 24, 1998 EDA meeting and noted this meeting was a continuation of the August 24 meeting. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, JADT DEVELOPMENT GROUP (SHOPPING CENTER) Mr. Wessel explained that Mr. Batty and Mr. Mulrooney had been working with staff on a development proposal for Tim Baylor of JADT Development Group. The intent was to responsibly respond to the developer's request. Mr. Wessel explained that this proposal was for the only shopping center within Lino Lakes, and that the City Council had approved a concept plan. The proposal for the EDA to consider involved a "non -TIF" pay -as- you -go assistance in the range of $696,000. This was based on the estimated net city tax generated from full development of Phase 1 of $69,600 per year. The developer would be assessed for city improvements to the property and the city could reimburse the net city portion of the taxes for 10 years or $696,000, whichever came first, to use as reimbursement of assessment costs. Mr. Wessel noted that while the city would not be generating city taxes for 10 years, there were advantages that should be weighed. Residents would have needed shopping center services sooner than later, the city would have more control over the type and quality of development, and the risk to the city was minimal because only the city taxes generated by the development would be reimbursed. The Forest Lake School District and the county receive their portions of tax base. The process involves authorizing preparation of a Redevelopment Project Plan, much like a TIF Plan. Mr. Wessel informed the Authority that McDonalds has submitted a site plan for a parcel on the site and wants to go to P &Z in September. Mr. Batty noted that TIF is not available for this project, and discussed the merits of this plan. In it, the EDA would enter into an agreement with the city, and is a better approach for this project than a tax abatement, another form of reimbursing city taxes. EDA President Sullivan asked what would happen if the developer defaulted. Mr. Batty said the pay -as- you -go assistance kept the city from risk, because it would be reimbursed only if the project were built. Under 429, if a property defaults, assessments and taxes are paid first. Under this plan the $69,600 is the increase in the amount of taxes this property now generates. Mr. Mulrooney addressed the issue of how soon a shopping center would develop without assistance. He said that underwriting the project reduced the hurdles to development and made it more feasible by allowing greater latitude on the part of the developer to reduce rents, etc. He suggested a shopping center was unlikely to develop at that site without assistance until the market (head count) was higher, probably in the range of five years. Mr. Wessel noted that assistance makes the project less dependent on the current population. Mr. Mulrooney added that because of fiscal disparities, approximately 40% of the gross taxes went into the metro pool and were returned to the city, which is a fiscal disparities winner. Mr. Batty added that the substance of the development agreement would spell out what the city received in exchange for assistance, and a threshold could be set so if the development did not draw major development, the deal would be off. The burden would be on the developer. EDA Member Bergeson noted that if development did not occur for five years if no assistance were provided, the city was really only losing five years worth of taxes, not 10. He added that his reason to support this project was not so much financial as to keep the momentum for development of the Town Center. Mr. Batty informed the Authority of the procedure, which would require everything to come back for approval, plus a public hearing. EDA President Sullivan said a decision should be made before the city proceeded with it, since it wouldn't help the city's credibility to pull out after leading the developer on. Mr. Wessel said members should not initiate the plan until they felt comfortable with it. Ms. Divine noted that an escrow would be required of the developer before formal action that required legal services was initiated. EDA President said the members needed time to think about it, and the absent members needed information. It was agreed it would go to the next Council work session and they intended to act on it at the next EDA. ADJOURNMENT EDA Member Bergeson moved to adjourn. EDA Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. With the establishment of the Redevelopment Project and adoption of a Redevelopment Plan, the EDA and JADT will negotiate a development agreement. Staff suggests that key terms of that agreement include the mechanism for reimbursing JADT the city portion of the taxes for up to $696,000 or 10 years, whichever comes first. This amounts to approximately 7 percent of the estimated market value of a fully developed Phase 1. Only net city taxes generated by development will be reimbursed. Development of the critical core of the shopping center - -the grocery/retail area - -will be required before any costs are reimbursed. This ensures that the EDA will be assisting the type of development it is seeking. The development agreement will also address Town Center architectural design guidelines. As is always the case, the EDA will have to review and approve the terms of the development agreement prior to its execution by the parties. OPTIONS: 1. Authorize the preparation of a Redevelopment Project Plan and direct staff to proceed with the negotiations for a development agreement with JADT. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: LINO LAKES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 98-04 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes (the "City ") established the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "Authority ") in 1990 and conferred upon it responsibility for economic development within Lino Lakes; and WHEREAS, the area of the city in the vicinity of I -35W and Highway 23 known as the Town Center has not developed solely through private efforts in a manner consistent with its prominence within the city and which justifies the public expenditures for infrastructure improvements which have been made; and WHEREAS, it appears that it will be necessary to provide public assistance to assist development in the area to achieve the city's goal for quality commercial development within the Town Center; and WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the area generally known as the Town Center be established as a Redevelopment Project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.001 through 469.047 (the "HRA Act ") in order to offer financial assistance to selected projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority as follows: 1. Staff and Kennedy & Graven, Chartered are hereby authorized and directed to prepare a Redevelopment Project Plan (the "Plan") concerning the Redevelopment Project. 2. The executive director of the Authority is authorized and directed to schedule a meeting on Monday, October 26, 1998 at 6:00 p.m. in the council chambers at city hall, at which time the Authority will consider adoption of the Plan and the establishment of a Redevelopment Project Area. 3. The staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to bring the Plan before the Authority at the October 26, 1998 meeting. 4. The city council of Lino Lakes (the "City ") is urged to schedule a public hearing on the proposed Plan to be held as soon after consideration of these matters by the Authority as reasonably possible. Dated: September 28, 1998 Kimberly A. Sullivan, President ATTEST: Executive Director The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. V • .. • 11 4 out AL APOLLO BUS /NESS PAR NO 2 // Ou/ /ot B OUTLOT AUQ: SUB. TRACT 182 /MARSHAN LAKE CINNAMON TEAL I COURT 2 I MEMORANDUM TO: Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority FROM: Ron Batty, EDA Attorney DATE: September 18, 1998 RE: JADT Shopping Center Development At several recent meetings the EDA has discussed a proposed shopping center development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of I -35W and Highway 49. The developer's request for financial assistance from the EDA presents issues that are novel and somewhat complex. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize these matters for the benefit of all members. The proposal is to create a redevelopment project area centered on the intersection of I- 35W and Highway 49. The project area would include land in addition to the parcel under consideration for the shopping center. Establishing a redevelopment project area is essentially a planning decision. The project should include areas of the city viewed as needing additional development attention but it does not necessarily involve any fiscal or financial implications. There is no commitment to assist a project merely because of its location within a redevelopment project area. Within a redevelopment project, however, the EDA may choose to assist selected developments. In the past, the EDA's most frequently used tool for assistance has been tax increment financing. TIF is not available in this instance because it would be necessary to establish an economic development TIF district and such districts cannot be used to assist retail projects. The suggestion in this instance is to use a different method to assist the developer. The alternate has some characteristics of tax increment, although it is significantly less powerful because it involves only the city's portion of taxes generated by the new development. This method of financing, sometimes called "phantom" tax increment, involves the EDA entering into a contract with a developer. The developer would agree to construct specified improvements and the EDA would agree to provide a level of financial assistance. Rather than utilizing tax increment generated by the project to meet its obligations, the EDA would look to the city. State law allows the city to assist the EDA in promoting specific development goals. The city may use any funds available to it for this purpose. The city would limit its commitment to the EDA to the amount of new taxes generated by development on the subject property. Rather than controlling the entire stream of new taxes, however, the city would be limited to its minority percentage of the taxes generated by the project. Upon receipt of these taxes, the city would pay the EDA, which in turn would reimburse the developer for specified expenses. RHB- 150056 LN140 -64 1 A second option is for the city to grant a tax abatement to the project equal to its portion of real estate taxes. This would generate the same number of dollars as the phantom tax increment approach, but there are drawbacks. Tax abatement is a less flexible tool and the city would have a more difficult time exercising the control over the project which it desires. If this option is pursued it is strictly a city - developer arrangement and does not involve the EDA. The key consideration whenever public assistance is offered is whether the public benefit outweighs the cost. There are at least three benefits to be gained by EDA assistance to the shopping center project. The first involves timing of the development. No one knows for certain when, or even if, a particular development will occur. However, the consensus seems to be that some retail development will occur on the subject property within five to ten years. A benefit of assistance would be to advance the initiation of the project. The goal would be to have a retail development under construction soon and substantially in place within 18 months to 2 years. This would mean services available to members of the community earlier than might otherwise be anticipated and would set the tone for development within the redevelopment project area. A second benefit would be to have greater discretion over the land uses which are included within the development. Typical zoning controls are not designed to allow fine distinctions among uses. For example, in a commercial district it would be expected that retail uses would be allowed, perhaps to the exclusion of all others. This would exclude residential or industrial uses but not make a distinction among the wide variety of potential retail uses. If the city is interested in including or excluding particular retail uses, zoning is simply not an adequate tool. Offering assistance to a developer would give the EDA the ability to prohibit or require the inclusion of specific uses. For example, if construction of a YMCA in The Village is deemed critical, it would be possible to exclude a competing facility from locating in the shopping center (at least for the length of the development agreement). A third justification might be the enhanced architectural and design control which would be possible under a development agreement. Building codes, zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations do not allow the attention to detail which might be desired by a city seeking to promote a "quality" development. By offering financial assistance, a city earns its place at the table with regard to these matters. Skillful use of this leverage would allow the city to achieve enhanced site plan and design quality over that which could be extracted through typical land use regulations. There is, of course, a cost to all of this. The proposal (subject to further discussion) is for the EDA to offer assistance in the amount of approximately $69,000 per year over ten years. The true cost of such an assistance package is somewhat less than the face amount of $690,000. Although it is beyond the scope of this memo to quantify that cost, the assistance outlined above represents a stream of payments. The present value of those payments is less than $690,000. In addition, if it is true that development of the property has been advanced by a number of years, taxes generated in those years are dollars which would otherwise not have been paid. Nevertheless, there is a true cost to the city for RHB- 150056 LN 140 -64 2 offering assistance. It is up to the EDA to evaluate whether that cost is worth the additional benefits which have been outlined above. If the EDA decides to pursue this option, there are two agreements which will be necessary. One will be between the city and the EDA and will outline the terms and conditions of the city's assistance to the EDA. Generally, this will be a commitment by the city to pay a specified portion of the taxes it receives from the development to the EDA for its use within the redevelopment project area. The more critical document will be the agreement between the EDA and the developer. The EDA's commitment to the developer absolutely should be on a pay as you go basis whereby its obligation would be limited to the taxes actually paid to the city from the project. If statutory tax rates go down, as they did in 1998 and will again in 1999, or if there are tax delays or delinquencies, there will be less or no money available to assist the developer. This significantly reduces the risk to the city and EDA. Staff recommends that any EDA/developer contract contain several key provisions. The first would be a requirement that no assistance be paid until a predetermined threshold of development is achieved within a specified period of time. This might take the form of requiring that a certain number of square feet of space or building dollar value be constructed within a specified period of time or no assistance would be offered. This would be designed to assure an early and substantial investment in the project. Similarly, it would be possible to exclude the taxes paid by an undesirable use or to negate the EDA's obligations entirely if such a use were included. For example, if the EDA did not want to see a specified use, taxes generated by that project could be excluded in calculating the amount of available assistance or that could even represent a "poison pill" which would cancel the agreement. The EDA could also specify architectural and design controls. This type of control is more or less permanent because once the buildings are constructed, they are likely to remain largely unchanged for a considerable period of time. Good design can be a lasting characteristic of such projects. The converse can also be true. These are only a few suggestions as to the type of conditions the staff envisions in the development agreement. Such provisions would, of course, have to be approved by both the EDA and the developer. I will attend the city council work session on September 23, 1998, and will be prepared to answer any questions you may have with regard to the project. If there is anything you would like to discuss prior to the meeting, please feel free to give me a call at my office at 337 -9262. RHB- 150056 LN140 -64 3 EXPENDITURES SEPTEMBER 28, 1998 age: 1 ate: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(PROPERTY CONDEMNATION APPEAL) k WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(HWY 49 /LAKE DRIVE) 1997 CONSTRUCTION Amount 504.42 202.00 Total for Department 706.42 Total for Fund 706.42 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE(ADVERTISING OTTER LAKE ROAD) f PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) T.K.D.A.(OTTER LAKE ROAD REALIGN) T.K.D.A.(OTTER LAKE ROAD REALIGN) k WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(OTTER LAKE SERVICE ROAD) r WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(OTTER LAKE ROAD REALIGN) 1998 CONSTRUCTION FUND 124.70 42.40 83.22 27,119.81 57.60 393.60 Total for Department 27,821.33 Total for Fund 27,821.33 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,(TESTS) CONWORTH, INC.(APOLLO PROJECT) EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES, INC.(CONSULTANT) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(APOLLO DRIVE) SHORT- ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(ENGINEERING SERVICES) T.K.D.A.(21ST STREET) T.K.D.A.(21ST STREET) WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(LAKE DRIVE CONSTRUCTION) APOLLO BUSINESS PARK FUND APOLLO BUSINESS T.K.D.A.(COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Department Total for Fund 644.20 300.00 1,448.12 7,485.87 60.06 1,594.03 8,259.46 3,398.06 23,189.80 23,189.80 62.42 62.42 62.42 age: 2 ate: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount AREA AND UNIT CHARGE CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE(ADVERTISING) 234.90 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE(ADVERTISING) 220.40 T.K.D.A.(4TH AVENUE TRUNK) 166.44 T.K.D.A.(LILAC STREET UTILITY EXTENSI) 855.18 T.K.D.A.(LILAC STREET TRUNK) 2,250.18 T.K.D.A.(LILAC STREET TRUNK) 6,025.63 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(4TH AVENUE TRUNK) 48.00 Total for Department 9,800.73 Total for Fund 9,800.73 CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) 948.71 Total for Department 948.71 ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC.(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 81,201.25 ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC. CM(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 21,958.50 CROSSTOWN MASONRY, INC.(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 64,969.55 GEPHART ELECTRIC(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 9,025.00 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) 474.29 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) 235.00 LISTUL INDUSTRIES(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 950.00 MCGUIRE MECHANICAL, INC.(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 55,932.20 * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(CIVIC CENTER SAC CHARGES) 20,000.00 TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 1,045.00 VEIT & COMPANY, INC.(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 10,450.00 W. L. HALL COMPANY(CONTRACTOR CIVIC COMPLEX) 2,113.75 Total for Department 268,354.54 Total for Fund 269,303.25 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FOREST LAKE AREA(JULY &AUGUST SERVICE) Total for Department Total for Fund 1,484.00 1,484.00 1,484.00 age: 3 ate: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS CHICILO HOMES(REIM BLDG ESCROW /6260 COYOTE) NEW VISION HOMES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6606 SHERM) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING /CLEARWATER CREEK) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING /MCDONALDS) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING /RICK CARLSON) * PETTY CASH(PICNIC SUPPLIES) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING /MCDONALDS) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING /MILLERS SOUTH G) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING /PHEASANT HILLS 8) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING /BEHM'S 4TH) * SAM'S CLUB, INC.(PICNIC SUPPLIES) * SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(ENGINEERING SERVICES) * SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC(ENGINEERING SERVICES) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(PHEASANT HILLS 7TH) STERLING HOMES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2246 TELE) T.K.D.A.(BEHM'S CENTURY FARM 3RD) T.K.D.A.(CLEARWATER CREEK 2ND) T.K.D.A.(CLEARWATER CREEK 1ST & 2ND) T.K.D.A.(BEHM'S CENTURY FARMS) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(HILL ESCROW) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(21ST STREET) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE) Total for Department Total for Fund GENERAL ADMINISTRATION * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) AMA /KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER(REGISTRATION /D BUGGE) D.C.A. INC.(FLEXIBLE SPENDING) k HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD.(PHONE CONFERENCE /LETTER) HOFF, BARRY & KRUDERER, P.A.(SERVICES RENDERED) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, IN(FALL NEWSLETTER) * PETTY CASH(TRAVEL) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) Total for Department Amount 500.00 500.00 834.43 247.50 41.25 1.98 14.58 378.95 140.45 278.25 115.51 328.73 197.23 64.64 500.00 1,566.12 127.60 41.61 7,502.24 528.00 96.00 144.00 14,149.07 14,149.07 11.05 139.00 206.70 2,552.74 126.00 23,233.20 102.33 439.67 1,413.80 82.00 74.20 28,380.69 lge : 4 tte: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount BUILDING INSPECTIONS • A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) • HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) • PETTY CASH(FILM DEVELOPING) SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC.(ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS) Total for Department COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) DEAN GALLERY, INC.(PLASTICPAC FRAMING) DIVINE, MARY(2ND QUARTER BALLOON CONTRACT) HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) • NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING) • NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, IN(FALL NEWSLETTER) PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) PETTY CASH(POSTAGE) STAR TRIBUNE, INC.(ADVERTISING /CITY PLANNER) Total for Department HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(CIVIC CENTER SAC CHARGES) METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(AUGUST SAC' CHARGES) METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(AUGUST SAC CHARGES) Total for Department ELECTIONS AND VOTER REGISTRATION PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) Total for Department ENGINEERING A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.(BLUELINE SUPPLIES) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(GIS PROJECT) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(TRAFFIC STUDY) 1.21 390.00 197.00 220.00 35.50 1,343.20 2,186.91 18.08 175.85 300.00 207.62 264.00 102.33 513.02 1,368.95 1,547.55 10.46 6.89 4.00 514.50 5,033.25 134.00 1,283.28 402.10 74,206.00 - 200.00 10,000.00 - 100.00 85,725.38 11.93 11.93 0.15 66.19 109.00 44.00 99.00 8,985.35 Page: 5 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * T.K.D.A.(CONSULTING ENGINEER) T.K.D.A.(COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) T.K.D.A.(COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) T.K.D.A.(COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) FINANCE 1,539.09 485.88 169.64 20.81 Total for Department 11,519.11 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) FIRE DEPARTMENT 7.50 264.00 Total for Department 271.50 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 472.56 Total for Department 472.56 FLEET MANAGEMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOT(PARTS) * BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS /SUPPLIES) GOA COMPANY, INC.(OIL) GOA COMPANY, INC.(OIL) * INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC.(TRUCK BOARDS) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY, INC.(SWITCH FOR HUSTLER MOWER) STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING C(SHOP SUPPLIES) Total for Department FORESTRY DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, INC.(SEPTEMBER OFFICE RENTAL) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) Total for Department GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, INC.(PAPER) C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(OFFICE SUPPLIES) DAVE'S FLOOR SANDING & INST.,(SENIOR CENTER FLOOR) DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC.(SEPTEMBER) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS /SUPPLIES) 1.01 27.99 393.39 3.17 41.64 199.24 15.95 88.00 14.53 157.78 942.70 6.30 472.56 88.00 200.00 77.42 844.28 67.45 874.67 206.02 150.00 1,087.61 8.50 aRe: 6 ate: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) STAN'S DOOR SERVICE, LLC(REPAIR /MAINTENANCE ADA DOOR) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) LEGAL CONSULTANTS 390.95 4,451.33 13,563.67 513.00 77.11 122.43 717.86 Total for Department 22,230.60 k KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORI) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(CRIMINAL ATTORNEY) MAYOR AND COUNCIL 273.00 2,460.60 6,388.30 Total for Department 9,121.90 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) MILLERS ON THE MAIN(MEALS /8- 26 -98) * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL(SEPTEMBER 14) Total for Department PARKS DEPARTMENT BARTON SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY,(MEDIUM BUCKSHOT) BIFF'S, INC.(RENTAL UNITS) * CORPORATE EXPRESS(SUPPLIES) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS /SUPPLIES) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS /SUPPLIES) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) HOFFMAN, MICHAEL(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) * IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) * IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) * INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC.(PLYWOOD FOR PLAYGROUNDS) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) k LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INC.(BIRCH PARK BID) MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INC.(LINO PARK BID) MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INC.(ZIPPER CLIMBER) * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, IN(FALL NEWSLETTER) SHORT- ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(PARK /REC MAP UPDATE) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) Total for Department 3,875.00 30.62 21.89 144.75 4,072.26 2,216.32 385.14 57.15 12.72 16.89 1,480.00 53.39 92.31 53.79 321.17 770.33 615.67 25.32 30,000.00 30,000.00 60.00 1,152.04 66.00 273.95 67,652.19 'age: 7 )ate: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Amount TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL(SEPTEMBER 9) 208.50 Total for Department 208.50 POLICE DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC.(APPLICATION /REMOVAL - GRAPHI) AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(REPAIR CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN) BIG BEAR CAR WASH, INC.(CAR WASHES) * BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(SUPPLIES) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC.(UNIFORM SUPPLIES) JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES, I(REGISTRATION /K RAUSH & M VAN) LABORATORY FOR SCIENTIFIC(TRAINING /D ZERWAS) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC.(PRINTING SERVICE) MIDWEST RADAR & EQUIPMENT, INC(RECERT RADAR) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS(FORMS) NORTH STAR AMOCO, INC.(CAR WASHES) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, IN(FALL NEWSLETTER) PERFORMANCE DRIVING, INC.(DRIVERS TRAINING) * SAM'S CLUB, INC.(CAMERAS) SHRED -IT, INC.(DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIA) STREICHER'S, INC.(TESTING KIT) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) Total for Department RECREATION DEPARTMENT * ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, INC.(PAPER) * CORPORATE EXPRESS(SUPPLIES) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) * IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) * IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, IN(FALL NEWSLETTER) Total for Department SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT 44.25 354.63 311.85 7.99 2.24 2,522.86 509.75 750.00 600.00 7,007.67 2,555.33 422.00 58.90 405.00 12.60 13.40 51.12 3.14 141.38 220.00 63.86 54.95 126.83 399.49 16,639.24 105.64 6.05 535.34 171.44 99.90 132.00 1,152.04 2,202.41 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(RECYCLE OIL) 50.00 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(RECYCLE OIL) 50.00 Total for Department 100.00 Page: 8 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount STREETS * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS /SUPPLIES) 21.27 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(PARTS /SUPPLIES) 34.02 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 907.62 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) 439.67 * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) 1,774.00 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 22.58 * NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, IN(FALL NEWSLETTER) 141.38 WEATHER WATCH, INC.(WEATHER SERVICE) 95.00 WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(POST DRIVER) 14.70 Total for Department 3,450.24 PROGRAM RECREATION ABFALTER, KURT(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ALT, DAVE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ANDERSON, ERIC(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ANDERSON, GARY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ANDERSON, SCOTT(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ARNETT, JOHN(REIMBURSE PROOGRAM REC) BENESCH, BARB(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) BENNETT, PATTI(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) BERGERSON, LOIS(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) BLOOM, GARY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) BRINTZ, BILL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) BROLIN, STEVE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) BRUNER, TINA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) CARDINAL, PAULA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) CHRISTENSEN, DAVE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) CHRISTENSEN, TAMMY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) CRAIG, BRUCE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) DAVIES, GLENN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) DEZELAR, WENDY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) DUOOS, HOLLY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ECKER, MIKE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ENGEL, MARY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ENGELMEIER, KEN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) FARRINGTON, JEFF(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) FELLOWS, JAN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) FERGUSON, DELENE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) FERRENCE, LAURIE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) FIX, CAROL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) GANYO, JAYNE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) GOBRAN, TRACEY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) GRANGER, PATRICIA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) GREGORY, FORREST(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) GRIMM, BILL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) Total for Fund 261,065.65 5.00 5.00 5.00 8.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00 13.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 43.00 5.00 46.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 Page: 9 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount GUINN, LINDA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) GUTHMELLER, MIKE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) HATCHER, CAROL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) HENNES, JOYCE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) HOYEZ, SHERI(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) HUSU, COREY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) JACOBSON, DENISE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) JANZEN, PETE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) KAMPA, GLEN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) KINGDON, STEVE(REIMBURSE PARK & REC) KOCH, MARY KAY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) KORSMOE, TINA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) KROUGH, NANCY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) KRYSINSKI, JOE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) KUHNLY, KEITH(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) LABER, DENISE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) LARSON, MIKE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) LAVALLE, ROBERT(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) LENZ, BILL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) LIND, CATHY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) LOUSTAD, ANITA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) LUND, STACIE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) MALINOWSKI, MOLLY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) MATHERN, DEANN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) MATTSON, RENEE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) MCGOUGH, MIKE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) MERCER, BILL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) MOCKENHAUPT, CINDY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) MYSLICKI, CARMEN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) NASE, SHERRI(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) NELSON, SALLY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) OAWSTER, STAN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) OLSON, TERRY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) OREN, LAURA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) PETERSON, SARAH(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) PHILIPPI, MARLON(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) PIERSON, KASEY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) PROUTY, SUE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) RAMSAY, JERRY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) RAUCHBAUER, DEEDEE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) REMILLARD, DEBORAH(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ROBICHAUD, SARA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ROSENBURG, MIKE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) ROSVOLD, RICK(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) RYAN, SUE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) SANDBERG, BRIAN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) SCHLENDER, TOM(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) SEVERSON, KAREN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) STEELE, BILL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) STERN, JAMES(REIMBURSE'PROGRAM REC) STREHLO, DIANE(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) SWANT, VIVIAN(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) THOMPSON, JANET(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 28.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 9.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 'age : 10 )ate: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) TOSNEY, JIM(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) WALKER, MARY(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) WHITE, BRENDA(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) RECREATION DEPARTMENT ALL STAR ALL STAR ALL STAR HOMETOWN Total for Department SPORTS, INC.(T- SHIRTS /SOCKS /T'S) SPORTS, INC.(T- SHIRTS /SOCKS /T'S) SPORTS, INC.(SOCCER SHINS) PIZZA(14 14" LARGE PIZZAS) SEALCOATING T.K.D.A.(WEAR COURSE /TRAIL PAVING) SEWER OPERATING Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Department Total for Fund * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) Total for Department SEWER DEPARTMENT AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(INSTALL CONVERTER /LIFT ST #4) AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(INSTALL TWO FANS) BRW, INC.(INFLOW /INFILTRATION STUDY) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(OCTOBER SAC CHARGES) T.K.D.A.(COMP SEWER /WATER PLAN) Total for Department Amount 5.00 5.00 5.00 622.00 1,234.60 863.64 1,435.16 70.00 3,603.40 4,225.40 62.42 62.42 62.42 745.66 745.66 2,312.00 403.17 9,453.62 175.67 197.17 63.50 30,587.50 2,531.38 45,724.01 Total for Fund 46,469.67 Page: Date: 11 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT C. W. HOULE, INC.(STORM SEWER REPAIR) * T.K.D.A.(APOLLO BUSINESS PARK) Total for Department Total for Fund TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT 1 -4 * KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC.(EMTECH) Total for Department Total for Fund TOWN CENTER PROJECT FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH(LAND PURCHASE) HERB BALDWIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITE (ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE) Total for Department Total for Fund WATER OPERATING * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE ALLOCATION 98/99) T.K.D.A.(WATER TOWER #2) Total for Department WATER DEPARTMENT * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE * LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST(INSURANCE * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY * PETTY CASH(POSTAGE) T.K.D.A.(COMP SEWER /WATER PLAN) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) ALLOCATION 98/99) ALLOCATION 98/99) ALLOCATION 98/99) SERVICE) Total for Department Amount 1,850.00 1,583.73 3,433.73 3,433.73 130.00 130.00 130.00 2,317.58 2,314.68 4,632.26 4,632.26 746.33 20.81 767.14 207.62 176.00 197.17 64.50 42.17 17.15 83.22 37.00 824.83 Page: Date: 12 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount Total for Fund Total for Checking Account 1010 ** Total ** * - Invoice split to different Departments 1,591.97 668,128.12 $668,128.12 Page: 1 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount Checking Account 1010 000050 000095 000100 000158 000201 000210 000320 000583 000700 000703 000705 000900 000930 000946 000950 001115 001204 001208 001224 001260 001277 001291 001309 001435 - A T & T - ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INC. - AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. - ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. - AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - AMERICAN FASTENERS OF MINNESOTA, IN - ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY, INC. - BARTON SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, INC. - BIFF'S, INC. - BIG BEAR CAR WASH, INC. - BRW, INC. - BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES - C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS - C. W. HOULE, INC. - CHICILO HOMES - CONWORTH, INC. - COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. - CROSSTOWN MASONRY, INC. - D.C.A. INC. - DAVE'S FLOOR SANDING & INST., INC. - DEAN GALLERY, INC. - DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. - EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES, INC. 157.00 354.63 3,027.02 3,533.40 644.20 27.99 980.31 2,216.32 385.14 7.99 9,453.62 395.63 13,716.16 206.02 1,850.00 500.00 300.00 66.19 64,969.55 206.70 150.00 175.85 1,087.61 1,448.12 Page: 2 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001527 - FOREST LAKE AREA 001560 - FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 001584 - FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 001630 - GOA COMPANY, INC. 001825 - HEALTH PARTNERS 001830 - HERB BALDWIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 001850 - HOFFMAN, MICHAEL 001860 - KENNEDY AND GRAVEN, INC. 001970 - INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC. 001977 - I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC. 001980 - IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. 002093 - JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 002141 - AMA /KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER 002230 - DIVINE, MARY 002320 - LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRST 002340 - LIGHTNING PRINTING, INC. 002570 - METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 002650 - MIDWEST RADAR & EQUIPMENT, INC. 002689 - MILLERS ON THE MAIN 002700 - MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 002822 - MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOC 003219 - NORTH STAR AMOCO, INC. 003220 - NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY, INC. 003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 003370 - NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. 1,484.00 96.57 2,317.58 240.88 11,568.30 2,314.68 53.39 403.00 337.12 509.75 808.39 750.00 139.00 300.00 116,268.00 58.90 60,287.50 405.00 30.62 157.20 13.40 51.12 14.53 25.72 3,005.15 5,548.19 Page: 3 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 003481 - PERFORMANCE DRIVING, INC. 003490 - PETTY CASH 003600 - PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 003880 - SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 003882 - SHRED -IT, INC. 003900 - SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 003910 - SAM'S CLUB, INC. 004070 - CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MAGAZINE 004143 - STAN'S DOOR SERVICE, LLC 004150 - STAR TRIBUNE, INC. 004178 - STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING CO. 004240 - STREICHER'S, INC. 004251 - SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 004350 - T.K.D.A. 004370 - HLB TAUTGES REDPATH, LTD. 004427 - TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 004511 - TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, INC. 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 004715 - VEIT & COMPANY, INC. 004791 - WEATHER WATCH, INC. 004840 - WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 900284 - ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC. 900305 - HOMETOWN PIZZA 900381 - MCGOUGH, MIKE 900440 - STERLING HOMES, INC. 900448 - GEPHART ELECTRIC 220.00 179.87 940.76 17,791.30 54.95 100.00 179.37 580.00 122.43 514.50 157.78 126.83 1,343.20 62,150.92 126.00 353.25 200.00 1,505.72 10,450.00 95.00 14.70 81,201.25 70.00 5.00 500.00 9,025.00 Page: 4 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 900591 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 900703 - W. L. HALL COMPANY 900704 - TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS 900705 - NEW VISION HOMES, INC. 900706 - MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INC. 900707 - MCGUIRE MECHANICAL, INC. 900708 - LISTUL INDUSTRIES 900709 - LABORATORY FOR SCIENTIFIC 900710 - KINGDON, STEVE 900711 - HOFF, BARRY & KRUDERER, P.A. 900712 - DEZELAR, WENDY 900713 - ANDERSON, GARY 900714 - BENNETT, PATTI 900715 - BRINTZ, BILL 900716 - KROUGH, NANCY 900717 - MOCKENHAUPT, CINDY 900718 - MERCER, BILL 900719 - RAUCHBAUER, DEEDEE 900720 - BLOOM, GARY 900721 - KRYSINSKI, JOE 900722 - LENZ, BILL 900723 - MATHERN, DEANN 900724 - OLSON, TERRY 900725 - GREGORY, FORREST 900726 - ARNETT, JOHN 900727 - STREHLO, DIANE 63.20 2,113.75 1,045.00 500.00 60,060.00 55,932.20 950.00 600.00 28.00 23,233.20 3.00 8.00 10.00 13.00 10.00 10.00 9.00 2.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 Page: 5 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 900728 - LOUSTAD, ANITA 900729 - SWANT, VIVIAN 900730 - STERN, JAMES 900731 - THOMPSON, JANET 900732 - CRAIG, BRUCE 900733 - FERGUSON, DELENE 900734 - WHITE, BRENDA 900735 - BERGERSON, LOIS 900736 - DUOOS, HOLLY 900737 - NASE, SHERRI 900738 - OREN, LAURA 900739 - PROUTY, SUE 900740 - PETERSON, SARAH 900741 - REMILLARD, DEBORAH 900742 - SCHLENDER, TOM 900743 - STEELE, BILL 900744 - TOSNEY, JIM 900745 - RAMSAY, JERRY 900746 - PIERSON, KASEY 900747 - BROLIN, STEVE 900748 - BRUNER, TINA 900749 - CHRISTENSEN, DAVE 900750 - ENGEL, MARY 900751 - LARSON, MIKE 900752 - FARRINGTON, JEFF 900753 - OAWSTER, STAN 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Page: 6 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 900754 - HENNES, JOYCE 5.00 900755 - GRIMM, BILL 5.00 900756 - GUTHMELLER, MIKE 5.00 900757 - RYAN, SUE 5.00 900758 - PHILIPPI, MARLON 5.00 900759 - GOBRAN, TRACEY 5.00 900760 - GRANGER, PATRICIA 5.00 900761 - GUINN, LINDA 5.00 900762 - JACOBSON, DENISE 5.00 900763 - KOCH, MARY KAY 5.00 900764 - LIND, CATHY 5.00 900765 - LUND, STACIE 5.00 900766 - MALINOWSKI, MOLLY 5.00 900767 - MATTSON, RENEE 5.00 900768 - MYSLICKI, CARMEN 5.00 900769 - ROBICHAUD, SARA 5.00 900770 - ROSVOLD, RICK 5.00 900771 - SEVERSON, KAREN 5.00 900772 - WALKER, MARY 5.00 900773 - ANDERSON, ERIC 5.00 900774 - JANZEN, PETE 5.00 900775 - DAVIES, GLENN 5.00 900776 - ROSENBURG, MIKE 5.00 900777 - ABFALTER, KURT 5.00 900778 - ALT, DAVE 5.00 900780 - HOYEZ, SHERI 5.00 Pq,ge: 7 Date: 09/22/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 900781 - HUSU, COREY 900782 - HATCHER, CAROL 900783 - KAMPA, GLEN 900784 - KUHNLY, KEITH 900785 - LABER, DENISE 900786 - LAVALLE, ROBERT 900787 - FELLOWS, JAN 900788 - ANDERSON, SCOTT 900789 - BENESCH, BARB 900790 - CARDINAL, PAULA 900791 - CHRISTENSEN, TAMMY 900792 - ECKER, MIKE 900793 - ENGELMEIER, KEN 900794 - FIX, CAROL 900795 - GANYO, JAYNE 900796 - FERRENCE, LAURIE 900797 - ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC. CM 900798 - NELSON, SALLY 900799 - SANDBERG, BRIAN 900800 - KORSMOE, TINA 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 46.00 43.00 21,958.50 10.00 5.00 10.00 Total for Checking Account: 1010 668,128.12 ** Total ** $668,128.12 SAC EXPENDITURES SEPTEMBER 11, 1998 Page: 1 Date: 09/10/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Computer Check Register Current File, 09/11/98 to 09/11/98 All Accounts, Sessions 000000 to 004540 Check /Payment Check Dt. Vendor Information Amount Check Account: 1010 Check #: 52386 Check #: 52387 Check #: 52388 Check #: 52389 Check #: 52390 Check #: 52391 Check #: 52392 Check #: 52393 Check #: 52394 Check #: 52395 09/11/98 950382 - BILDER, THOMAS 09/11/98 950383 - CONDE, DAVID 09/11/98 950384 - ELLIOTT, JOHN 09/11/98 950385 - HOGAN, PATRICK 09/11/98 950386 - KLOSNER, DAVID 09/11/98 950387 - MATHIOWETZ, KEVIN 09/11/98 950388 - MIERS, HENRY 09/11/98 950389 - SALAI, DANIEL 09/11/98 950390 - WRIGHT, GERALD 09/11/98 950391 - ZAUDTKE, ROYCE Total For Check Account: 1010 Check Register Total : 493.47 427.68 559.27 559.27 493.47 559.27 427.68 625.07 559.27 625.07 5329.52 5329.52 :d Pol c. 0 1998 City C sil etit i s Arnold the part -fie. ., poe tic . D t a date c r th+e full -time police officer ila►re ext ve bcrctind ihve+igaeti is co offic it had not bean d be or the police officer: Since the at 24: 1998. Cocil mrteing,' tea }gave b on the police officer and D is the ap lic hqt we are reaara► endfog f r t police off cerr eition. Daaron recently grade Ili oli ity College ri.th A.. 8. D nforc► t. ' Des hat served as a R srva 0f. Li ►n Laken is :fie Department ' since 1995. Da i . He sus* • backgr d psychological evalu It is to hire Dearon n a eaatiaf etory medical evaluation. . Approve recce endation. . Return- to ataaff' for . further revie .; a�.ec a to 1998 City Council sae tix g, Daa roar Arnold 0 gosh .on.. Deem r s to far : full -ti a pol cse officer e extenarive backgra d' i is e afifcer c dic a►tiaa, it ha<d. `not `beam ld he a teh for the lice o iiaar eit Lx t tip ,: i ua t 4, 1 9# C+a ncil t g, the a .i t. t we ' fierci a ng >ror rtx��- ice c is siti on. ire is va ca ncy si is a a ° on tha . eligik ility list, 9t+srere Bi a ruse a c ►tai far +. eideratiaa. to i s a Cae t xia1 Ss 3 ate a recently gr tad frrras rti e sg ' C unity College with au AS D grse, is Lam .fo:res. t. He s b ,v loye# with :Re Hoopital ire . Pain. ►r rids ` : aecur i!ty. for h e ital .vititore, etaf aua►d. tiaata eve haa� ter d ae a, Reser to 0ffice�r the role P ' .iee Depa t, and ee ed as a t of Heir ore ►i "t far 1/2 years. Steve poea emae the .aiiioati for theritca. fe or gi .bui t etr c n tin E is roz 4.4' from, 0' froot the porgy cif Rt1g fiv. 1 ©rdinance re r ck of 30' frcorn both roadways. Rolling Hills Drive appears to be C ain d on an old r rtway and is not a typical 60' wide stye right of way. a vanan+ae o allow an e r of the dwell ze aver though ey` a re: b The pro a n av l not on value of this ddition, for bul permit would c the following in view of the Nana fanl" e: B. That the plight of the landowners is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the land owner. The situation in this case is unique and was created many years ago, most likely prior to established zoning regulations. C. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and a reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Economics are not an issue in this case.. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Staff would consider a similar request given a similar situation. E. That the proposed actions will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. Property values should be enhanced with this proposed construction. F. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed variances are in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this matter at their September meeting and recommended approval of the Variance as submitted. OPTIONS: 1. Approve variance to Section 3, Subdivision 2, B.9 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 ES C) CD odd even r 0 HOUSE NUMBERING SYSTEM 09/02/98 WED 14:47 FAX 6515823396 GRAPHIC SCALE GUIDANT CPI C�j 011 e) ' j .l I J_w I ,, -4 ----' IQ I .1 ;) I Iw I /1 iN I /1 1 I /1 ( IN FEET) 4 I 1 inch = 40 ft. I 33 I / Point of beginning 33 ,c/ , • I \ ,�Cii' 6 63.00 �, �� • / 2 I 1 /1 0 — / 1 Q° I / / ' '!\N / i 1 ...1 _ �� 1 r c' <c. c 3 1Q 1 $ uJ Im N o1 1 Z •_ 03 • O� 1 • C, /' 1 1 n �1 ;�G = 71 / J 1 33 \ �►, N 89'08'00" E 224.88 33 CARLEY - TORGERSEN, INC. LAND SURVEYORS (612) 484 -3301 SUITE 703 70 WEST COUNTY ROAD "C" SEN LITTLE CANADA, MN. 55117 I hereby certify thot this survey, pion or report wo prepared by me or under my direct supervision on that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under of ths7 State of Min esota. the I Dbvid E Torgersen, P.L.S. M in : °g. No. 17551 Dote J. --/J `" 27 Planning & Zoning Board September 9, 1998 Page 2 Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:41 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 7 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. David & Lynn Mason, 6225 West Bald Eagle Blvd., Variance Ms. Wyland stated Mr. and Mrs. Mason have purchased the property at 6225 West Bald Eagle Blvd. and plan some extensive remodeling of the property. The matter is being presented to the Planning & Zoning Board because of Section 3, Subdivision 2, Non - Conforming Uses and Structures, Section B. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. The non - conformity exists in the fact that the dwelling is too close to both Rolling Hills Drive and West Bald Eagle Blvd. The setback is approximately 14' from West Bald Eagle Blvd. and 10' from the paved portion of Rolling Hills Drive. The Mason's are requesting a variance to allow an expansion of the dwelling size even though they will not be increasing the setback non - conformity since they are building up, not out. The proposed expansion involves not only interior remodeling but a 1,118 square foot second story consisting of three bedrooms and two baths. Ms. Wyland indicated staff recommended approval of a variance to Section 3, Subdivision 2, B.9 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Trehus asked if it is appropriate to make a recommendation to modify the language of the Zoning Ordinance as it may be too restrictive. Chair Schaps stated that could be discussed at a different time. He asked how long the road has been there. Mr. Mason indicated he did not know if the road or the house was there first. Mr. Robinson stated he believes the house was there before the road. Mr. Robinson made a MOTION to approve variance to Section 3, Subdivision 2, B.9 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, and was supported by Mr. Trehus. Motion carried 7 -0. Mr. Brixius stated that the wording of the Zoning Ordinance should be looked at. The City does not want to discourage residents from investing in their own property. Chair Schaps directed staff to submit a text amendment at the October, 1998, meeting. A public hearing will then be held in November, 1998. STAFF C RIGINATl DATE: 9/22/98 TOPIC. iv AGENDA ITEM 4 B Sunset Road). fay lure into The parrcel would c onsist of 1.41 aid Mr. Uhde is currently with sevc ral their inclusion in his redevelopment of property owners along Lilac. In January of subdivision and rezone f ar five is slob Zoned Rural and a rezo is not scheduled a considered at the October meeting of the P appropriate to review the considered at the time a of Behm's Century Farms is cunnsi �d t, 7744 Sunset Awn x'375' of Lot 5, Bak 1, Suet O ms's Ceny Farms 5th or 6th live .69 acres with the existing hotn arty o along Suit re Behm's Century Farms as he did wit 1997 the City approved a similar min Lilac Street. The property is currently this time, however, rezoning could be Z if the Board determines it would be more asly. In the alternative, a rezone could be would incorporate this site in future phases • As with the request reviewed in early 1 from the January 3,1997 NAC repo 44 �7, several isst Fa Approval: sa Non - conforming Lr is The existing lot is non - conforming with re art to lot for un sewvered lots. Further reduction in lot size raises concern for potential on site system failure prior to extens on of utilities. MUSA - The subject property is not within the MUSA nor is it within an area that we can draw from our MUSA Bank. The City's draft Comprehensive Flan does show this area in the first phase of development between 1998 and 2010 with the possibility of additional MUSA allocation upon adoption and approval of the Plan by the City Council and Metropolitan Council. However, the fact that the plan has not yet been approved may deem this proposal premature. Future development .. Without similar ll purchase with adjoining property owners it may be difficult to incorporate this parcel into future development of Be's Century Farms. Factors Supporting Approval: Comprehensive Plan - The City's 1990 Land Use Map indicated this area of the City as low density residential use as does the draft Comp Plan. The proposed subdivision would be consistent with these plans and suggested future plans for the area. Adjacent Uses - The property is adjacent to the original Phase 6 of the Behm's Century Farms Development which is currently Zoned R -1. This subdivision would provide additional land for future expansion of this development and therefore be consistent and compatible with the planned development of the area. Lot Design - Upon rezone to R -1 the lots would meet the requirements of that Zoning District and future phases of Behm's Century Farms. Should the P & Z and Council determined that this request fits the long term development goals of this area we would suggest the following conditions: 1. A rezone from Rural to R -1 be approved prior to development of the remnant parcel. 2. No building permits be issued prior to rezone and redevelopment of the remnant parcel. 3. The westerly parcel, containing the homestead, be required to connect to municipal sewer service at such time as service lines are extended to serve the area. The Council may also choose to deny the request on the basis that it is premature as the subject parcel is not currently within the MUSA nor Zoned for R -1 development. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this matter at their September 9th meeting and after much discussion recommended approval with the conditions outlined above and the following additional condition: 4. Staff ensures the agreement provide a provision for the septic system upgrade prior to City sewer availability if necessary and the property owner be advised that connection to City sewer, if available, will be required upon septic system failure. OPTIONS: 1. Approve minor subdivision with conditions outlined above. 2. Deny minor subdivision. 3. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Planning & Zoning Board September 9, 1998 Page 3 B. Century Farm Development, 7744 Sunset Ave., Minor Subdivision Ms. Wyland stated that Mr. Gary Uhde would like to purchase the rear 375' of Lot 5, Block 1, Sunset Oaks (7744 Sunset Road) for future inclusion into the Behm's Century Farms 5th or 6th Addition. The parcel would consist of 1.41 acres and leave .69 acres with the existing homestead. In January of 1997 the City approved a similar minor subdivision and rezone for five parcels along Lilac Street. The property is currently Zoned Rural and a rezone is not scheduled at this time, however, rezoning could be considered at the October meeting of the P & Z if the Board determines it would be more appropriate to review these items simultaneously. In the alternative, a rezone could be considered at the time a preliminary plat that would incorporate this site in future phases of Behm's Century Farms is considered. Ms. Wyland summarized that factors that discourage approval and supported approval. She stated it is a Planning and Zoning Board determination to approve or deny the request for minor subdivision. Mr. Corson asked about the State Code regarding one acre lots and the septic system. Ms. Wyland stated the City Ordinance refers to existing homesteads. Mr. Corson asked if the .69 acres would be required to have City sewer. Ms. Wyland stated staff is suggesting the .69 acres have City sewer when it becomes available Mr. Dunn asked how the septic requirement will be mandated. Ms. Wyland explained that in other situations the City required the property owners to waive their Charter rights. The residents on Rice Lake Lane signed a petition waiving their rights because they were reducing their lot size. There is a precedent that has been set regarding this issue. The sewer will then be installed with the 5th or 6th Addition. Mr. Dunn asked if a legal document will be on file regarding this issue. Ms. Wyland indicated there could be provisions in the development agreement. Mr. Dunn stated he is concerned that if there is not a legal document it will not be done. Mr. Trehus asked how the parcel can be subdivided if it is not in the MUSA. Ms. Wyland stated that when the Comprehensive Plan is approved this area will be in a growth area. It is possible the area will be added to the MUSA. Because the land is not being developed now, it does not need to be in the MUSA right now. The request is unique to this area. Mr. Gary Uhde, a representative from Century Farm Development, came forward and gave a history of the process of Behm's Century Farms which began in 1992. The City Council has requested they continue to incorporate the neighbors in the development process. That was demonstrated on Lilac Street. They are currently going through the same process. An answer is needed in a timely manner for the property owners. Planning & Zoning Board September 9, 1998 Page 4 Mr. Uhde explained that a document is required at closing that states the landowner must hook up to City sewer and water when it is available if their septic system fails. This document could be filed with the County also. He stated that it is possible the area will never be added to the MUSA. It is a big risk. The worst case scenario would involve going before the Metropolitan Council and requesting that parcel be added to the MUSA. Mr. Uhde commented on the discouraging factors regarding approval. He stated that the MUSA issue is a risk for the developer. Regarding the nonconforming lot he believes there is additional room on the site for an alternative septic system. Regarding future development, if there is no more property acquired in the area they will be able to develop at least two large lots. Chair Schaps asked about access to the lots. Mr. Uhde referred to the map and indicated there is access to the lots from the east. Chair Schaps asked if he has spoken with all property owners in the area. Mr. Uhde explained he is working will the property owners. One home would have to be moved. Another property owner would have to be bought out completely. He has met with the property owners twice and they are in the process of making a decision. Mr. Johnson stated that if all property is acquired there will be a short street into the property. Mr. Uhde stated it would be a loop street. Mr. Dunn expressed concern regarding incorporating new residences around existing property. The existing property does not seem to integrate with the neighborhood. He asked if there are better ways to integrate more effectively. Mr. Uhde stated it is always the goal of the developer to blend well. Individual land owners have individual rights. The developer makes an offer and works with the existing property owners as best they can. Mr. Dunn asked if there is anything in the City Ordinances that refer to a marriage of old and new. Ms. Wyland indicated she is not aware of any such ordinances. Mr. Dunn stated that issue should be discussed. He stated he is in support of a land bank. Mr. Uhde is taking all the risk. Chair Schaps asked what stage of the phasing they are currently in. Mr. Uhde stated they are into the 3rd and 4th Phase. There are 36 lots and half of them are currently sold. Their projection was 25 lots per year. They are currently at 30 units per year. Phase 5 will start in late fall. There will be 26 lots in Phase 5. The 6th Addition will begin in the year 2000. Planning & Zoning Board September 9, 1998 Page 5 Mr. Corson asked if there is a State Code which prohibits the creation of a lot less than one acre if a septic system is on that lot. Mr. Jackson stated that newly created sites must have a location for a back up system on them. Mr. Corson expressed concern regarding the extension of service to the north. He indicated the subdivision may be slightly premature. He suggested reviewing a ghost plat. Chair Schaps noted there is not much down side for the City if the subdivision is approved. Mr. Trehus stated there is the risk of the Comprehensive Plan in choosing not to approve the subdivision of this area. He asked about the possibility of Mr. Uhde saying that the City is liable for his expenses. Mr. Uhde stated he already has preliminary plat approval. All additional plats will need approval. The City is not liable if the subdivision does not go through. Mr. Robinson stated Mr. Uhde will be buying the property from Ms. Trask if the subdivision is approved with conditions. Mr. Dunn suggested a fourth condition be added that staff ensures the agreement provide a provision for the septic system upgrade prior to City sewer availability and the developer agreement provide language with the homeowner that sewer hook up will occur with the City if a failure occurs. He added he would feel better about approval with this condition. Mr. Trehus stated he is not comfortable with approval of such a small subdivision without taking into consideration the larger picture. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the minor subdivision with the following conditions: 1. A rezone from Rural to R -1 be approved prior to development of the remnant parcel. 2. No building permits be issued prior to rezone and redevelopment of the remnant parcel. 3. The westerly parcel, containing the homestead, be required to connect to municipal sewer service at such time as service lines are extended to serve the area. Planning & Zoning Board September 9, 1998 Page 6 4. Staff ensures the development agreement provide a provision for the septic system upgrade prior to City sewer availability and the homeowner agree to hook up if septic failure occurs. The motion was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Trehus voting no. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS B. Environmental Inventory/Plan - Discussion with Mr. Jeff Schoenbauer Mr. Jeff Schoenbauer gave a presentation to the Planning & Zoning Board and Park Board regarding the Environmental Inventory/Plan being conducted within the City of Lino Lakes. Several Park Board members were present, including Paul Montain, George Lindy and Pam Taschuk. He stated the goal is to determine ways development can occur while maintaining the natural integrity of the environment. Mr. Schoenbauer went over maps which identified ecological systems. He stated he will be making recommendations to preserve the natural aspect of the community. One of the goals is to preserve the natural gradient going beyond wetlands. Mr. Schoenbauer stated a key objective is to obtain a solid ecological basis for development and to preserve the communities natural resources. There are many possibilities that exist and flexibility is needed as to how the City will work with developers. He stated the next step is to meet with the Environmental Board to review the reports of their findings. Several different teams will be involved to apply the findings directly to the City of Lino Lakes. Mr. Corson asked if density transfers will be used as one of the tools to protect sensitive areas within the City. Mr. Schoenbauer stated they are considering using density transfers. Another tool used may be wetland banking. They want to make sure the recommendations made are ecologically positive. Mr. Corson stated the DNR has conducted a biological diversity study in this area. Mr. Schoenbauer stated that some information provided from that study will be integrated into this study. Mr. Dunn stated this is an excellent tool for the Planning & Zoning Board to have available to them for decision making regarding development. He asked if this study will look at the Watershed District and what it would do to the lakes. Mr. Schoenbauer indicated the study will look into the Watershed District. He stated conservation includes looking at ways to integrate development and preserve the natural environment. He stated this study will look into a much broader scope. Mr. Dunn asked what the current basis for status is. He asked how to determine when enough is enough. Mr. Schoenbauer stated his associate can better answer that question. • AIIIIIIIIIIFS glissm4itarad "-D-7P•SlEast- Jill Man1 L rountrr Hwr RIGNr■OF WAY PLAT O MAIN STREET - - -6-0011 Y Pm Mai PLAF NUMBER es I F.-17/6N-F-1 0F WM' L W I OUTLOT 111111111 OUTLOT 8 NORTH .7.6msolm0211. S U 13' 110 153-- 2 38 InrToH LINO LAKES REHABILITATION CENTER 0,r I SEP- 3 -98 FRI 6:16 PM G. M, DEVELOPMENT a 5 •uuiy/ 'puoyt1.1 z 0 N O N S>W0 13SNf1S 1 >NOO1B 'S l01 0i 0 FAX NO. 6124249542 SUNSET ROAD CO. RD. NO.53 •164.09•-• P. 3 i 'r 0 0 0' 0' — 163.68 -4 v a b 0 v 0. C C a p a 21 O O O 0 t7 � o co 0 aIt311.111-ta a5ou!■J4 0001JfS 6210u30 a5oio0 pasodoid 544SS olosauum •XJOd u4PI00J3 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 no CO 0 0 0 0 CO 15 Y• w v x 0 a, to 0' m m a a2. o a• a 'PM8 vAIKo°JB S48L Roots Jo dol pasodo-id SHOAHAlifig =uaurtuoy{ uoJi sa}ovap 0 V z 0 '0 v • r 1 yo i R PARK,- NORT • 6 6 LILAC .I..L. PHASING PLAN FOR HOME SALES PHASE 2 2A 3 4 5 6 N0. OF LOTS 55 42 7 8 28 24 19 TOTAL 183 O SO 100 30. 300 ... u /V 0..01. 3.010 /1. r —.1 vm w SHEET d><, 11/3.,» CONCEPT SKETCH B E H M ' S CENTURY FARM CENTURY FARM DEVELOPMENT - I. <. Li.o Loh.., M. =" t-:.�,, - ..:.7-z e`' a `•"'"" r J C JOI -SON CONSULTANTS. NC. SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN 6601 - 7511 A... N. Brediy. Park M4 55426 Phew: 16121566-6156 FAX 16121 566 -4374 r.r 11i.. .— p1i06 *Ham mwmu YEAR 1996 -1997 1997 -1998 1997 -1998 ? ?? 1998-1999 1999 -2000 2000 -2001 AGENDA ITEM 4D STAFF ORIGINATOR Brian Wessel DATE: 9/28/98 TOPIC: Resolution No 98 -144 calling for a public hearing on th Establishment of a Redevelopment Project BACKGRRJN Earlier this evening the Economic Development Authority (EDA) authorized e preparation of a Redevelopment Project Plan to provide financial assistan to selected projects in the Town Center. The impetus for the plan was a reque t for financial assistance from JADT Development Group to provide public assis n in the form of tax reimbursement for the Shopping Center development. 11 • er the HRA Act, the Plan requires a public hearing after adoption by the EDA. OPTIONS: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 98 -144 calgng fora public hearing on October 26, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and m CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 98 -144 11 ved its RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMEN OF A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA ") intends to create a Redevelopment Project (the "Project ") and adopt a Redeye! opment Project Plan (the "Plan ") related thereto pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, . ections 469.001 through 469.047 (the "HRA Act "); and WHEREAS, the HRA Act requires that the city council of the city of Li o Lakes (the "City ") hold a public hearing on the establishment of the Project following approval thereof by the EDA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lin • Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The city clerk- treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice f. r publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the ity council to consider this matter on Monday, October 26, 1998 at 6:30 •.m. in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior to the public he ring. 2. The city staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any . nd all other actions necessary to bring this matter before the city council at t e time of the public hearing. Dated: September 28, 1998 Kimberly A Sullivan Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. and upon vote being taken thereon, the f Ilowing plans and sped io s for this f e on June 22, 1998. F, n nt S. . eider ► inc. $ 1,186.80 3arbaressa 789,8'12.00 N rt d Constru n Co. $ 85 },947/�.45 Richard tson, c. 7y 1 04.44 The ic�w bid Engineer's Estimate for this copy + tfi e c pi to b ' for award contract is attacd. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The proposed schedule for the project is as follows: Council Awards Bid Construction Begins Completion Date —west of Lake Drive /Apollo Drive Completion Date -north of Lake Drive /Apollo Drive September 28, 1998 October 12, 1998 December 1, 1998 July 1, 1999 OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Adopt Resolution Number 98 -153, accepting bids and awarding a construction contract to S.R. Weidema, Inc. for the Lake Drive Trunk Uti Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution Number 98 -153 be adopted. ity Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 98-153 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT — LAKE DRIVE TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of th Lake Drive Trunk Utility Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name Bid Amount S.R.Weidema Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. Northdale Construction Co., Inc. Richard Knutson, Inc. $ 694,186.80 $ 799,812.00 $ 850,947.45 $ 867,104.44 AND WHEREAS, it appears that S.R.Weidema, Inc., is the lowest responsi bidder; le NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with S.R. Weidema, Inc.,17600 113th Avenue North, Maple Gro e , Minnesota 55369, in the name of the City of Lino Lakes for the construc ion of the Lake Drive Trunk Utility Improvements according to the plans and specifications approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of th successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a co tract has been signed. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 28th day of September, 1998. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on September 28, 1998. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk - Treasu er 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 612 490 - ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • "Standard Letter Recommendation for Award" September 8, 1998 City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Attn: John Powell, P.E. City Engineer 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota, Minnesota Client Project No. SEH No. A- LINOL9807.01 T 800 325 -2055 NSPORTATION On September 1, 1998, at 10:30 a.m., four bids were received for the above referenced proj ct. The bids ranged from a high of $867,104.44 to a low of $694,186.80. The low bid was sub itted by S. R. Weidema, Inc. We have investigated the qualifications of and find that they (1) have a sufficient understa ding of the project and equipment to perform the construction for which it bid; and (2) accordin 14 to their bonding agent they presently have the financial ability to complete the project bid. SEH akes no representation or warranty as to the actual financial viability of the contractor or its a s ility to complete its work. Accordingly we recommend the project be awarded to S. R. Weidema, Inc. in the . ount of $694,186.80 contingent upon the City's receipt of all permits and easements. David C. Hahn, P.E. Project Manager sah Attachment F: \projects\kNino1\9807 \01 \s\stanawrd.908.wpd SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LA E COUNTY, IN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER $ $$$$$$$$$$Up$1152W$R,$$BSii$$g RR, !gym §oR ^c.1 l !,e it% sx N N a"-- ED N ^ OD N N Yf N R $$$$$$21848 $5 88$$aq$$mequa4ry.7 :=$$$R $ $$$ s !$$88$$$$$$$$$$$$$$_$S$4,5'RAS$ N N N N p r h R h m b W h Yf Of N m N l7 $$$$ sip $$8$$$$$$$$$ *�$4t$$a4�v�$.c I$$ !' ' mm ^$iiig°°n$RglIggivF)aRgE88Ng8 tit' N 8838388888888888888888888888888828 l9 Y W 10 N m N R m N m —.2 a g R n N N $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ po p pp $ 8 p pp p po p p tp �p o p O Q 8 Q g N N If) N O O N R V b tI 1n m N 8 W g 8$ R N S S R t9 O d M ``��h ��DD ''`Y`YCC tO f7 (O $ $$ i 51$ $ P X N Z N 2 3 N p$ $ X A $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $$ $$ R $ R / $ E R O m N N P) W O N O W N t Y g 0 R S y $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 4 $ $ p$ $p $$ 9 $ $ $ R p$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ m$ m8 �$p �$ $ p$ $ il za Q a— N aD § cif N l� h y^ N,§ R R N- N y h p O p O cy R H 8$$$$ $ $$$$$$ $ $ 888888888$$$$$$$$$$$ $ N "5 4 N R N R N C Val 8$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$p$$p$$$$$$$p$�8p$$$ O O 8 O 8 h N OD $ Q 9 2 2 O R �' N m §$ R 8 v R R 9O a s g /D 8§ d x O) l) w wwwuJw 2 Z 2U -1., 00000 �' ~ y R 0) W H H in SH d O n W Q 9 9 9 x > N N d }514 «� (7$�Y+� qFw W {yW� 1C8 W - il Q ¢t R 2 R G ZZ p �L W to M i w¢ 1- �~A 0 p a �yQ`1 0 0 0 0 p m< 2 f: W W W w w W w- QS G7 'J� V Y• O V C U) CI) (A f/) C<� 2 — m m w C- ((�� ((�� ((�� u1 ¢ 2 W c71 N N ED . C>i V> !>>i V> o> i_ 2 d g ? 3; j; j J yW C7 w W W Y Y Y Y Y VX 2 V V 0 o R U) U) <n o w to y y V F V 3< fL m '> >-,-, N N N .. W N N N N N !!! N N N N O O O O 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 BID TABULATION $$$$g 81iP38$$8 °'$$$$$$$N$$$$ARi$ aJ ad N "1 N I. m m N m — m N f O $4g44t4t88518888Cg�8y�8N$Q8$ BQ 83g8 5i ^ O n N a8 § .a- 4 V "� V g m O h§ 8$§ a3 O N Y N $ R y 8 Q sQ !! 8N 51 s8s 5gZ. g$ g$ 8 $ 8$ g N R$ $ gm 5 3 8 8$ 8$ $ p$ $ $ 8 $ ° 8 8 4 Y k P m E 3{ V Rf O �? �f 1� 6 R m n O. O o2 N Y O I R N ♦ O a ' i N N - F - � � ♦ l7 —— ad f cmy m$$$$ 8 a $ 3 a �y 8 8 $$ Q$ p$ $$ 0 8 8 8$ N R§ 44"'ROR to 88888ao mN$ZYN 111777��� c�S $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8 8 $ $ $ $ $ 8 8 8 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5 P m m M N N m P h N O N m a9 ♦ a7 Singg PARR N N N R A4c cf N N m PRR .tm $ Nm8 $ $ $ Y o ♦ m m $$8888$$$8$$$ARRA$$$$$88888 8 88- $N$$$�$p g§§ S N N N §§ 88—:28:2`°:28§8%§" O N V N n Cl R N N N 8. 08 8 8 8 5 3 8 8 S8 p$ 8 88 88 8 p (8 88 8 p8 8 8 88 �8 j 8 88 8 8 g8 g 8 8 O I N F§ A k§ o W V Y< R O < N N u5 N V (7 l`( O§ g. ad. N • aG d d-- N N Y ••• $ $Q 8$ $ A ^ `'! A $ $ O $ $ R A $ A A N A $ $ $ $ O i2f le. g ° '$�mv,a$ai§8§c 9 Lei O $ N 4 'm N N N 8 8 O W N $4$$$ r N W m $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 88 8 $ 8 $ 8 q §. §. M kk §. §.Fa §.8 § g gn N N N aO N N- m m m N N m 0.0eg $$$$$$$$$$$$$8$$$$88$8$$8§$88 8 8 8 ^ $$$$$ 1§^ •N- ' .S^§ 0 8 N^ 8 O t R m �7f k N R R N ' g N— .. 448.°22 1� QCs � U m• J J • J IL J LLJ J N J J tu° Z S2 271 .t Q8 a yg, .0 W � W 2 m 44 aM < 2W 2 0.222 • 0) z s µ1 Y W Z J Iss m °g U W . w 2 WQ i s U � o N 'v .'a F -a { U x W °°° g com3ct g Uw -!!KEY. MEU U W i m U � a � � 4 P= W C O to7r to §7 4zN y y N zt yW U(7 MMM §M§FE D §g W§ § §1§! O O O V g O O O O N N N N N O O O O O N N N N N N J J J J U U hh 82555 g a a D bEov FAM gOill 2 a =o6 Z 14 g 6 s dgV Gs =4 z St8$8$88zi8 RSg a4Rlg4liggi 3 m Y N 03 OA 80874 8.°2.Fs8 8888888888 8 N a N m' m 88g$$35�$8.$8.8 2888888888 R X glgWVSF 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 M $$888$8888 10100.1.0§030.- 8 8 STAFF ORIGINATOR dick D i DATE Sept r 17, 998 TOPIC Re tion No. 98 -154 i g tom. Circles -Lex Po t. 83P ' for ti the Lino Lakes Pam and �reattion Fiat Annual Family Turkey Shoot Ev BAC.GR rtment sit pro sp ors fc 1 on November 14,1 8. The event is a ke • s that consi is of low key; ccetr ti + The Circle -Lei defer the case OPTIONS: Adopt Resolution No. 98 - 154. F� ATION Council option No 1, Council Member adoption. introduced the following resolution and move CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE CIRCLE -LEX VFW POS #6583 FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT'S FIRST ANNUAL FAMILY TURKEY SHOOT EVENT its WHEREAS, The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department is holding this ann al holiday event for the first time on November 14, 1998; and WHEREAS, The event is a free holiday event for the families of Lino Lakes; and WHEREAS, Participant teams, consisting of one child (ages 4 -14) and one adult, 11 compete in a variety of low -key athletic events for prizes; and WHEREAS, The Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 was made aware of the desire of th; Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department to conduct the Family Turkey Shoot with the support of a program sponsor and has donated $250.00 to the City to defer the costs of this event. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereb accepts the donation of $250.00 to help fund the Family Turkey Shoot event and wi hes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Circle -Lex VFW Post #6583 or its donation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 19 8. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Coun it Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted i favor thereof. The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4,1998. The Lisa otma teas donated 2so.00 to P d the yourriaon. ion No. 9&-155 Council Member adoption. introduced the following resolution and move CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 98-155 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE CIRCLE- LEXLIONS CL THE SUPPORT OF THE LINO LAKES PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTME FIRST ANNUAL FAMILY TURKEY SHOOT EVENT WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, its B FOR 'S The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department is holding this ann al holiday event for the first time on November 14, 1998; and The event is a free holiday event for the families of Lino Lakes; and Participant teams, consisting of one child (ages 4 -14) and one adult, '11 compete in a variety of low -key athletic events for prizes; and The Circle -Lex Lions Club was made aware of the desire of the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department to conduct the Family Turke Shoot with the support of a program sponsor and has donated $250.0 the City to defer the costs of this event. 0 to NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereb accepts the donation of $250.00 to help fund the Family Turkey Shoot event and wi•hes to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Circle -Lex Lions Club for its donation. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 19`8. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Cou it Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted i favor thereof. The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM ' '! y i'CT. Anderson, Clark -Tr September 22, 1998 Resolution No. 98 14 sZnentj Water Utility Bills BACKGROUND: year to Utiii Bid Clerk praxes a list of proms owners who have d sewer and water ut lity bi11s that ale c linquent two (2) or more months. Utters a s ant to # prop rty.ow s die tl and tint o€ blic hearing. The also e p the nq rit ) wi11 be certi with a $31i. A Auditor for collection with their next years proper taxes. A11' quarterly utility bilk nct.pad within 34 days ofthe billing date are penalized 10% as ruic by the City Cede. 'i he quarterly billing, tlae penalty and the adinition charge are all assessed to the prrty if a delinquent balance `is still owing. Eech 3ar the list of year, the Utili the nay or gncauon. . I am recommending that Council adopt Resolution No. 98 - 140, calling for a public hearing on the proposed assessment of delinquent sewer and water utility billings. Council option No. 1. Council Member adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 98 -140 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT OF DELINQUENT SEWER AND WATER UTILITY BILLS WHEREAS, City Staff has prepared a proposed assessment of the delinquent sewer and water utility bills as required in Chapter 400 of the City Code, and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the City Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on Monday, October 26, 1998, in the city hall, 1189 Main Street, Lino Lakes, Minnesota, at 6:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owners of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two (2) weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the City Clerk. The property owner may also pay a portion of the assessment thereby reducing the amount of the assessment to be certified to the County Auditor. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 28th day of September, 1998. RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 140 Page -2- Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA ITEM III STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 9 September 1998 SUBJECT Restructuring\Phase II1Salary Negotiations BACKGROUND One aspect of Phase II of the city's recent restructuring was the of salaries with certain affected LLMA and non -union employees. An agreement has been reached, and will need to be approved by the city council. Attached are the new salary ranges for affected employees and a recommendation for salary placement effective 10 August 1998 (the Building Official effective date would be 17 August due to his being out of town). Recommendations have been highlighted with a box. The LLMA contract is due to be re- negotiated at the end of the year. OPTIONS 1. Approve the salary recommendations 2. Return to staff for additional negotiations. RECOMMENDATION rnyd ■1 b0 C�C7 'b C7 J, a, O cf Ftt oo00 a ..... w cr •-. 0 2. 'g 2 a c,•2, o o o c c CI 0• ' 0 CD --. N W VI CT CD O O 0 W 00 W A CA --.1 O IA 00 .-..1 IA N N 0•■ OT O Cn ON C/1 00 O\ 0\ 69 N 00 cn OT EH 0\ 0 O 0A 01 N O W C/l a w cn 00 o O o O ON 0\ Cn 0\ 00 0 W W ■•0 00 N N O o\ A i ON ON J N ---1 O .D N 00 N 00 00 00 O 0\ J 0\ 00 LA O CN Cr, 4. - 69 00 0 0 00 0 O O sa.l(ES/PE11uoo 69 69 w I.-. 00 v 69 69 w w IC •--- O lci o, 69 69 —. o o, N Q\ 69 W IT O 69 J O N LA 69 00 ■O 00 CCI