The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/23/1998 Council PacketAGENDA AMENDED AGENDA 5:00 p.m. Special Council Meeting with Harry Bruhl of P.D.I. CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday November 23, 1998 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call (All members present) Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? (Item 3A was removed from the agenda and Council Member Lyden added 5H. Planning Item) 1. Consent Agenda (Item A.1 was removed for consideration on December 14th. Consent agenda was approved as amended) A. Consideration of Minutes: 1. October 26, 1998 (Removed) 2. November 4, 1998 B. Consideration of Expenditures: 1. November 23, 1998 ($2,096,174.36 - Check Nos. 53114 - 53242) 2. Centennial Fire District A. November 5, 1998 B. November 17, 1998 2. Open Mike (No one) 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch A. Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - 167 (Removed) PAGE 1 AGENDA B. Consideration of Letter of Support for Gene Peterson, Rice Creek Watershed Board (Approved with copy of approval to be sent to County Commissioner Langfeld) 4. Public Services Report, Rick DeGardner A. Consideration of Public Trail Easement, Wenzel Farms (Approved) 5. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel A. Site Plan Review/Move in House, Dennis & Martha Houle, Mary Kay Wyland (Approved) B. Site Plan Review, Chomonix Golf Course, Anoka County Park Reserve, Mary Kay Wyland (Approved) C. Ordinance No. 14 - 98, Rezone West Shadow Ponds and Preliminary Plat, Richard Carlson, Al Brixius (4 /5ths Vote) (Tabled and will be placed on the 12/14/98 agenda) D. Zoning Text Amendment Pertaining to Non - Conforming Structures, Mary Kay Wyland (4 /5th Vote) (Approved, will have SECOND READING of Ordinance 12/14/98) E. Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Brian Wessel (Long discussion, audience comments, motion to forward Plan to Met Council no earlier than 12/22/98 and no later than 12/31/98. Motion approved with Lyden & Dahl voting no.) F. Livable Communities Demonstration Account Contracts, Brian Wessel (Discussion regarding if the contracts are approved, what obligation would the City have to Metro Council. Contracts approved with Dahl/Lyden voting no.) G. Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - 166, Payment of Easements for the Lake Drive Trunk Utilities Project, John Powell (Approved) H. Planning Item (Lyden asked that the Lyden/Dahl Comp Plan be submitted to Met Council along with the Comprehensive Plan Committee document. The Council voted on a three (3) to two (2) vote not to do this.) 6. Attorney's Report, Bill Hawkins PAGE 2 AGENDA A. Consideration of a Quit Claim Deed, the Village (This involves deeding certain property along Lake Drive in the southeast quadrant of I -35W and Lake Drive to Anoka County to be used for additional right -of- way for Lake Drive (County Road #23. The Deed was approved.) 7. Old Business (None) 8. New Business A. Consideration of Minutes, November 9, 1998 (Council Member Lyden was absent.) (Approved) 9. Community Calendar November 24, 1998, through December 14, 1998 A. November 26th and 27th, 1998, Thursday and Friday, City Hall will be closed for the Thanksgiving Holiday B. November 30, 1998, Monday, 5:00 p.m., Special Council Meeting with Harry Bruhl, P.D.I. (This meeting will continue after the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing) C. November 30, 1998, Monday, 6:00 p.m., Truth in Taxation Public Hearing D. December 1, 1998, Tuesday, 6:00 p.m., Town Center Committee Meeting (Rescheduled for 1/12/99) E. December 2, 1998, Wednesday, 3:00 p.m., Council Tour of Civic Complex (Rescheduled for 12/8/98, 2:00 p.m.) F. December 3, 1998, Thursday, 7:00 a.m., EDAC G. December 7, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., Park Board H. December 7, 1998, Monday, 7:00 p.m., Mayor's Round Table (Centennial Fire Station No. 2) I. December 7, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., Truth in Taxation Continued Public Hearing (If needed) J. December 9, 1998, Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session K. December 9, 1998, Wednesday, 6:30 p.m., Planning and Zoning Board L. December 14, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., Council Meeting PAGE 3 AGENDA M. December 16, 1998, Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., DATE CHANGE for Last Work Session N. December 21, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., DATE CHANGE for Last Council Meeting of the Year 10. Adjourn (10:55 p.m.) November 18, 1998, 2:30 p.m. PAGE 4 AGENDA AMENDED AGENDA 5:00 p.m. Special Council Meeting with Harry Bruhl of P.D.I. CITY OF LINO LAKES Monday November 23, 1998 6:30 P.M. Call to Order and Roll Call Setting the Agenda: Are there any items to be added or deleted from the Agenda? Consent Agenda Consideration of Minutes: -'1' October 26, 1998 -- November 4, 1998 Consideration of Expenditures: November 23, 1998 ($2,096,174.36 - Check Nos. 53114 - 53242) Centennial Fire District _ November 5, 1998 ,B November 17, 1998 Open Mike 3. Administration Department Report, Dan Tesch Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - 167 (THIS ITEM WILL BE TABLED) PAGE 1 AGENDA Consideration of Letter of Support for Gene Peterson, Rice Creek Watershed Board Public Services Report, Rick DeGardner Consideration of Public Trail Easement, Wenzel Farms 5. Community Development Department Report, Brian Wessel Site Plan Review/Move in House, Dennis & Martha Houle, Mary Kay Wyland IT 6. �Attgn j 's Report, Bill Hawkins Site Plan Review, Chomonix Golf Course, Anoka County Park Reserve, Mary Kay Wyland Ordinance No. 14 98, Rezone West Shadow Ponds and Preliminary Plat, Richard Carlson, Al Brixius (4 /5ths Vote) ! 1)- lq f2t /� Zoning Text Amendment Pertaining to Non - Conforming Structures, Mary Kay Wyland (4 /5th Vote) Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Brian Wessel ivable Communities Demonstration Account Contracts, Brian Wessel 1 , Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - 166, Payment of Easements for the Lake Drive Trunk Utilities Project, John Powell Consideration of a Quit Claim Deed, the Village Bus'nes w Business Consideration of Minutes, November 9, 1998 (Council Member Lyden Was .absent.) unity Calendar November 24, 1998, through December 14, 1998 November 26th and 27th, 1998, Thursday and Friday, City Hall will be closed for the Thanksgiving Holiday PAGE 2 AGENDA B. November 30, 1998, Monday0 p.m., Special Council Meeting with Harry Bruhl, P.D.I. C. D. E. November 30, 1998, Monday, 6:00 p.m., Truth in Taxation Public Hearing .?4 . • iti•e•.,= ,Cosapleer ) ---�6)5g F. December 3, 1998, Thursday, 7:00 a.m., EDAC G. December 7, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., Park Board H. December 7, 1998, Monday, 7:00 p.m., Mayor's Round Table (Centeuia1 -'- Fire Station No. 2) I. December 7, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., Truth in Taxation Continued Public Hearing (If needed) J. December 9, 1998, Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session K. December 9, 1998, Wednesday, 6:30 p.m., Planning and Zoning Board L. December 14, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., Council Meeting M. December 16, 1998, Wednesday, 5:30 p.m., DATE CHANGE for Last Work Session N. December 21, 1998, Monday, 6:30 p.m., DATE CHANGE for Last Council Meeting of the Year 10. Adjourn November 18, 1998, 2:30 p.m. PAGE 3 EXPENDITURES NOVEMBER 23, 1998 Page: 1 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND 1994 CONSTRUCTION FUND * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY /HWY 49 & LAKE) Total for Department 1997 CONSTRUCTION 1997 CONSTRUCTION 451.20 451.20 Total for Fund 451.20 ARNT CONSTRUCTION(CONTRACTOR /OTTER LAKE ROAD R) RICHARD MARTINEK, CHERYL MARTI(EMINENT DOMAIN) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY /OTTER LK SERV) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY /OTTER LK RD REA) 1998 CONSTRUCTION FUND 371,400.81 120,000.00 727.00 316.80 Total for Department 492,444.61 Total for Fund 492,444.61 DRESEL CONTRACTING(CONTRACTOR -LAKES ADDITION) EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES, INC.(CONSULTANT) HARRIS, DAVID, INC.(EMINENT DOMAIN) IMAGING SPECIALTIES, INC.(RELOCATION BENEFITS) LEO B. BRUDER, GENEVIEVE A. BR(EMINENT DOMAIN) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(APOLLO DRIVE) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(LAKES ADDITION ROAD RECONSTR) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(LAKES ADDITION ROAD RECONSTR) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY /LAKE DRIVE) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY /LAKE DRIVE) AREA AND UNIT CHARGE Total for Department 376,583.66 1,499.40 317.98 19,000.00 8,000.00 1,526.57 20,096.89 4,834.59 1,104.00 96.00 433,059.09 Total for Fund 433,059.09 RAY L. JORDAN AND SONS(REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER) -15.00 Total for Department -15.00 Page. 2 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY /4TH AVE TRUNK) Total for Department CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX 96.00 96.00 Total for Fund 81.00 ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC. CM(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC.(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) GEPHART ELECTRIC(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) JORGENSON CONSTRUCTION, INC.(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) LEONARD PARKER ASSOCIATES(ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES) LISTUL INDUSTRIES(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) MCGUIRE MECHANICAL, INC.(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) JOLYMPIC WALL SYSTEMS(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) PREMIER CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) VEIT & COMPANY, INC.(CONTRACTOR /CIVIC COMPLEX) CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS 22,852.88 242,725.00 44,935.00 194,085.00 9,802.89 26,362.50 115,514.30 34,810.00 89,936.50 ✓131,777.35►/ 2,850.00 Total for Department 915,651.42 Total for Fund 915,651.42 CHICILO HOMES(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6279 HOLLO) DELMAR HOMES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2231 CLEAR) GORHAM BUILDERS, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6686 LACAS) HANSON BUILDERS(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6626 LACAS) HANSON BUILDERS(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6614 LACAS) HOMES BY J. BROWN, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6719 CLEAR) IVY RIDGE HOME BUILDERS(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /610 AQUA) IVY RIDGE HOME BUILDERS(REIMBURSE HYDRANT METERS /2) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(JADT) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(MCDONALDS) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(R CARLSON /WEST SHADOW) POTHEN, HARVEY(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6424 N TRA) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING /RICK CARLSON) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING /MCDONALDS) PROCRAFT HOMES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6601 TELE) PROCRAFT HOMES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6646 CLEAR) RAY L. JORDAN AND SONS(REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(PHEASANT HILLS 9TH) SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(PHEASANT HILLS 7TH) STERLING HOMES, INC.(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /2338 CLEAR) W. STEWART HOMES(REIMB BLDG ESCROW /6608 TELE) 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 731.35 552.61 237.75 500.00 18.55 26.50 500.00 500.00 250.00 1,384.97 27.21 500.00 500.00 • age: 3 ate: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUN ATTORNEY /PHEASANT HILLS) 624.00 Total for Department 10,352.94 Total for Fund 10,352.94 DEDICATED PARKS BARTON SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY,(MED BUCKSHOT) JANSICK, INC.(DECK STEPS /RAIL /SEATS /ETC.) LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL(PLAY SYSTEM /RICE LAKE ESTATE) LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL(PLAY SYSTEM /RICE LAKE ESTATE) GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 3,111.28 4,217.10 24,896.00 2,963.90 Total for Department 35,188.28 Total for Fund 35,188.28 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 6.14 ANOKA COUNTY(REGISTER DEED) 22.85 * C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 346.09 D.C.A. INC.(FLEXIBLE SPENDING) 206.70 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 1,625.30 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 36.43 PERSONNEL DECISIONS, INC.(CITY ADMINISTRATOR SEARCH) 23,196.98 * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 37.36 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) 14.38 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC.(SUBSCRIPTION) 22.10 * WYLAND, CATHY(WINTER NEWSLETTER) 543.10 Total for Department 26,057.43 BUILDING INSPECTIONS * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 8.63 * C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 12.48 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 472.56 * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 11.70 * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 9.00 SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC.(ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS) 1,171.60 Total for Department 1,685.97 CHARTER COMMISSION * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) 11.93 Total for Department 11.93 age: 4 ate: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION(MEMBERSHIP /M K WYLAND) * C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(PLANNING) * NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC(COMP PLAN) * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) WESSEL, BRIAN(MEALS /DUES & TUITION /LODGING) WESSEL, BRIAN(MEALS) * WYLAND, CATHY(WINTER NEWSLETTER) Total for Department * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(OCTOBER SAC) * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(OCTOBER SAC) OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAM /L TA(REFUND COPS FAST GRANT) 40.23 147.00 14.49 207.62 629.26 1,195.23 46.86 4.00 1,640.74 144.00 217.22 4,286.65 19,000.00 - 190.00 44,941.15 Total for Department 63,751.15 ELECTIONS AND VOTER REGISTRATION * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 47.48 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) 33.13 Total for Department 80.61 ENGINEERING * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 4.42 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC(CITY ENGINEERING SERVICE) 16.44 Total for Department 20.86 ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC.(SUPPLIES) MILLERS ON THE MAIN(ENVIRONMENTAL LUNCH) * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) Total for Department FINANCE 23.27 67.36 13.55 104.18 * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 4.38 * C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 69.73 Page: 5 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.(BLOCK OF TIME) FIRE DEPARTMENT 8.92 21.95 850.00 Total for Department 954.98 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 472.56 Total for Department 472.56 FLEET MANAGEMENT A & C SMALL ENGINE(PARTS) BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC.(PARTS /SUPPLIES) CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC(CHAIN /KUPLER) CRYSTEEL DIST., INC.(HYD FLUID /PIN /COTTER PIN /SWI) CRYSTEEL DIST., INC.(HYD FLUID /SPRING /CABLE) CRYSTEEL DIST., INC.(HYD PUMP KIT) DEHN OIL COMPANY(FUEL) DEHN OIL COMPANY(FUEL) FOREST LAKE FORD, INC.(SUPPLIES /PARTS) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC.(SUPPLIES) KATH AUTO PARTS, INC.(BATTERY & CORE) LEEF BROTHER, INC.(SHOP TOWELS) LINO AUTO MACHINING(DRUMS TURNED) RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.(SEAT /SCREW /WASHER) SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(CRUSHED OIL FILTERS) TOP TRAILERS, INC.(LIGHT /LENS) TRUCK UTILITIES, INC.(IMPACT VIBRATOR /COUPLER) WINNICK SUPPLY, INC.(SNOW PLOW REPAIR) Total for Department FORESTRY DEPARTMENT A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) * C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, INC.(OFFICE RENTAL) Total for Department GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) ACE SOLID WASTE, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC.(JANITORIAL SERVICE) 23.92 648.18 54.11 164.85 148.63 170.13 1,409.74 1,442.06 397.44 5.71 2.65 19.96 84.56 10.85 35.00 1,053.52 297.00 8.52 199.31 8.52 6,184.66 12.60 6.72 7.29 472.56 4.42 200.00 703.59 85.48 47.37 1,087.61 Page: 6 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount ECM PUBLISHERS, INC(ADVERTISING) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(COPIER MAINTENANCE) METRO COMMERCIAL FOOD EQUIPMEN(CONDENSOR /RAETONE COOLER) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC(SUPPLIES) UPPER MIDWEST SALES COMPANY, I(BUILDING BATHROOM PRODUCTS) * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) LEGAL CONSULTANTS 20.57 4.20 89.88 386.57 170.50 164.46 4.98 2.52 26.50 162.31 255.68 733.28 Total for Department 3,241.91 * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY) * WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATE(CRIMIINAL ATTORNEY) MAYOR AND COUNCIL 1,345.00 10,014.10 Total for Department 11,359.10 REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC.(VISION BUS TOUR) TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL(OCTOBER 26) TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL(NOVEMBER 4) TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL(NOVEMBER 9) 100.00 354.75 99.00 121.50 Total for Department 675.25 PARK BOARD TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL(NOVEMBER 2) Total for Department PARKS DEPARTMENT * CORPORATE EXPRESS(SUPPLIES) FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC(GOPHER GETTER PROBE) * INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC.(SUPPLIES) JOHNSON READY -MIX, INC.(CONCRETE /SUPPLIES) * MENARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) * MENARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC.(PUMPS /PITCHING RUBBERS) * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 76.50 76.50 -5.84 57.44 9.21 35.11 1,890.24 95.80 48.34 1,898.07 12.52 84.03 237.34 8.84 33.90 184.67 • Page: 7 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC.(SKID STEER) 532.50 * TODORA, GAIL(PREPARE ACTIVITIES GUIDE) 442.50 URICH, TRACEY(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) 37.49 * US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 416.56 Total for Department 6,018.72 POLICE DEPARTMENT A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 30.80 A.E.L.E. WORKSHOPS(REGISTRATION /K STREGE) 597.00 AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(REPAIR SIREN /HOLLY DRIVE) 198.45 ANOKA COUNTY(QUARTERLY MDT SERVICE) 900.00 ANOKA COUNTY(WARRANTY /MDT) 54.70 ANOKA COUNTY(WARRANTY /LAPTOPS) 254.16 C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 35.57 CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE C(CAR WASHES) 23.39 CY'S UNIFORMS, INC.(UNIFORM ALLOWANCE) 301.12 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 15.95 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 30.75 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 3,119.66 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.(KIT) 253.36 KATH AUTO PARTS, INC.(FLOOR MATS) 124.94 * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) 15.09 NORTH STAR AMOCO, INC.(CAR WASHES) 55.38 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 245.65 PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 70.47 PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF(IACP CONFERENCE) 286.22 PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF(CRIME PREVENTION /FILM) 12.96 SAM'S CLUB, INC.(SUPPLIES) 96.08 SHRED -IT, INC.(DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIA) 54.95 ST. PAUL CITY OF(RADIO SERVICE /MAINTENANCE) 180.18 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS(MONTHLY SERVICE) 451.10 * WYLAND, CATHY(WINTER NEWSLETTER) 54.31 Total for Department 7,462.24 RECREATION DEPARTMENT ALL STAR SPORTS, INC.(SUPPLIES) 75.00 * CORPORATE EXPRESS(SUPPLIES) 28.97 * FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) 7.54 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 680.18 * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 8.84 PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING /SEASONAL WORKERS) 67.01 * TODORA, GAIL(PREPARE ACTIVITIES GUIDE) 442.50 Total for Department 1,310.04 SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 13.27 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(RECYCLE USED OIL) 50.00 age:' 8 ate: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(RECYCLE USED SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC.(RECYCLE USED Total STREETS OIL) OIL) for Department ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC.(1998 SEALCOAT) ANOKA COUNTY(SIGNAL MAINTENANCE) k C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) k FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) k HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) J & C TRUCKING, INC.(WASHED SAND /HAULING) k MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) k NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC.(FINE ASPHALT) WEATHER WATCH, INC.(WEATHER SERVICE) k WYLAND, CATHY(WINTER NEWSLETTER) ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC.(MAIN BRUSH BROOM /VANGUARD) MINNESOTA STATE AID BRAUN INTERTEC, INC.(WARE ROAD) PROGRAM RECREATION NELSON, PAUL(REIMBURSE PROGRAM REC) RECREATION DEPARTMENT • CORPORATE EXPRESS(SUPPLIES) ✓ CORPORATE EXPRESS(SUPPLIES) • FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC.(SUPPLIES) JEM, INC. DBA(CAMERA ACCESSORIES) k MENARDS, INC.(SUPPLIES) Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Department Total for Department Total for Fund Amount 50.00 50.00 163.27 2,570.85 258.71 23.44 42.59 1,152.74 2,406.99 8.84 2,479.05 102.61 160.00 54.31 345.06 9,605.19 144,226.79 583.25 583.25 583.25 12.00 12.00 12.99 4.48 29.79 117.04 149.29 313.59 325.59 Sage': 9 )ate: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) SAC REVOLVING FUND BUCHOLZ, JO ANNE(REIMB SAC /8215 WOOD DUCK TR) DICK, TERRANCE(REIMB SAC /6241 RED MAPLE LAN) RUSCHKE, PALMER(REIMB SAC /289 ROHAVIC LANE) Total for Department Total for Fund SEWER OPERATING SEWER DEPARTMENT AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(REPAIR BLACK DUCK LIFT STATI) AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC.(INSTALL COMPRESSOR /BLACK DUC) * COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES,(RECONFIGURED NETWORK & PROG) * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVI(DECEMBER SEWER CHARGES) * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) Total for Department Total for Fund SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ARNT CONSTRUCTION(CONTRACTOR /APOLLO BUSINESS P) Total for Department Total for Fund TOWN CENTER PROJECT FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH(LAND PURCHASE) GREBNER ASSOCIATES(URBAN DESIGN SERVICE) HERB BALDWIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITE (LANDSCAPE SERVICE) Total for Department Total for Fund Amount 559.27 559.27 559.27 1,677.81 1,677.81 368.55 220.94 194.12 150.50 30,587.50 4.42 499.25 11.92 32,037.20 32,037.20 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 2,317.58 4,534.86 469.50 7,321.94 7,321.94 'age: )ate: 10 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Claims Roster sorted by Department, Grouped by Invoice Vendor Company (Entry Description) Amount WATER OPERATING RAY L. JORDAN AND SONS(REIMBURSE HYDRANT METER) -11.41 Total for Department -11.41 WATER DEPARTMENT * A T & T(MONTHLY SERVICE) 6.93 * C. P. OFFICE, PRODUCTS(SUPPLIES) 18.98 * COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES,(RECONFIGURED NETWORK & PROG) 194.12 * GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 150.50 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP,(CONTAINER) 10.00 * HEALTH PARTNERS(HEALTH INSURANCE) 207.62 * MINNCOMM PAGING, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 4.42 * MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, I(MONTHLY SERVICE) 108.98 * NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC.(MONTHLY SERVICE) 1,294.15 * PETTY CASH(SUPPLIES) 1.70 * PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC.(ADVERTISING) 11.93 Total for Department 2,009.33 Total for Fund 1,997.92 CONTRACTORS DEPOSITS INTOXIMETERS, INC.(LIGHT DISPLAY A/S & MANUAL) Total for Department Total for Fund Total for Checking Account 2022 ** Total ** * - Invoice split to different Departments 775.32 775.32 775.32 775.32 $2,096,174.36 Page: 1 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount Checking Account 1010 000017 - A & C SMALL ENGINE 23.92 000050 - A T & T 201.91 000093 - ACE SOLID WASTE, INC. 47.37 000094 - A.E.L.E. WORKSHOPS 597.00 000100 - AID ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. 787.94 000158 - ALL STAR SPORTS, INC. 75.00 000160 - ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC. 2,570.85 000250 - AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 147.00 000370 - ANOKA COUNTY 1,208.86 000390 - ANOKA COUNTY 258.71 000420 - ANOKA COUNTY 22.85 000583 - BARTON SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, INC. 3,111.28 000820 - BRAUN INTERTEC, INC. 583.25 000900 - BUMPER TO BUMPER, INC. 648.18 000930 - WILLIAM G. HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES 14,774.10 000946 - C. P. OFFICE PRODUCTS 528.07 000980 - CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 54.11 001115 - CHICILO HOMES 500.00 001147 - CLEARWATER CREEK CONVENIENCE CENTER 23.39 001193 - COMPUTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 388.24 001230 - CRYSTEEL DIST., INC. 483.61 001255 - CY'S UNIFORMS, INC. 301.12 001260 - D.C.A. INC. 206.70 001289 - DELMAR HOMES, INC. 500.00 Page: 2 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 001292 - DEHN OIL COMPANY 001309 - DIAMOND CLEANING SERVICE, INC. 001390 - ECM PUBLISHERS, INC 001435 - EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES, INC. 001480 - HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP, INC. 001530 — FOREST LAKE FORD, INC. 001560 - FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE, INC. 001584 - FUNKHOUSER, JAMES & JUDITH 001603 - GORHAM BUILDERS, INC. 001620 - GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD, INC. 001680 - GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC. 001741 - GREBNER ASSOCIATES 001825 - HEALTH PARTNERS 001830 - HERB BALDWIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 001862 - HOMES BY J. BROWN, INC. 001880 - HUGO FEED MILL & ELEVATOR, INC. 001952 - IVY RIDGE HOME BUILDERS 001965 - LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL 001970 - INTERSTATE LUMBER, INC. 001972 - IMAGING SPECIALTIES, INC. 001980 - IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. 002020 - J & C TRUCKING, INC. 002054 - JANSICK, INC. 002094 - JOHNSON READY -MIX, INC. 002110 - KATH AUTO PARTS, INC. 002153 - KNOWLAN'S SUPER MARKETS, INC. 2,851.80 1,087.61 20.57 1,499.40 10.00 397.44 210.19 2,317.58 500.00 120.63 301.00 4,534.86 10,301.04 469.50 500.00 95.80 1,000.00 27,859.90 68.30 19,000.00 676.36 2,406.99 4,217.10 1,898.07 209.50 23.27 Page: 3 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 002328 - LEEF BROTHER, INC. 002360 - LINO AUTO MACHINING 002550 - MENARDS, INC. 002564 - METRO COMMERCIAL FOOD EQUIPMENT,INC 002565 - METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, INC. 002570 - METRO COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 002640 - RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. 002689 - MILLERS ON THE MAIN 002694 - MINNCOMM PAGING, INC. 002700 - MINNEGASCO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, INC. 003167 - NELSON, PAUL 003219 - NORTH STAR AMOCO, INC. 003250 - NORTHERN STATES POWER, INC. 003320 - NORTHWEST ASST CONSULTANT, INC. 003457 - PAGENET OF MINNESOTA, INC. 003478 - PECCHIA, DAVID CHIEF 003483 - PERSONNEL DECISIONS, INC. 003490 - PETTY CASH 003566 - POTHEN, HARVEY 003600 - PRESS PUBLICATIONS, INC. 003880 - SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 003882 - SHRED -IT, INC. 003900 - SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, INC. 003910 - SAM'S CLUB, INC. 004030 - SMITH MICRO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 004120 - ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC. 10.85 35.00 245.84 170.50 237.34 49,397.50 1,053.52 67.36 44.20 322.43 12.00 55.38 4,707.75 3,346.20 70.47 299.18 23,196.98 218.31 500.00 221.85 27,886.67 54.95 447.00 96.08 850.00 532.50 Page: 4 Date: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 004125 - ST. PAUL CITY OF 004130 - ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS, INC. 004251 - SUBURBAN INSPECTIONS, INC. 004280 - SUNSHINE LIGHTING COMPANY, INC. 004340 - T.A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS, INC. 004427 - TIMESAVER OFF -SITE SECRETARIAL, INC 004456 - TODORA, GAIL 004466 - TOP TRAILERS, INC. 004510 - TRUCK UTILITIES, INC. 004511 - TSCHIDA EXCAVATING, INC. 004654 - UPPER MIDWEST SALES COMPANY, INC. 004660 - URICH, TRACEY 004670 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 004715 - VEIT & COMPANY, INC. 004791 - WEATHER WATCH, INC. 004800 - WESSEL, BRIAN 004840 - WINNICK SUPPLY, INC. 004850 - WYLAND, CATHY 004890 - ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC. 900058 - HANSON BUILDERS 900076 - PROCRAFT HOMES, INC. 900121 - RICHARD MARTINEK, CHERYL MARTINEK 900160 - W. STEWART HOMES 900217 - ARNT CONSTRUCTION 900223 - REHBEIN TRANSIT, INC. 900284 - ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC. 180.18 22.10 1,171.60 162.31 102.61 651.75 885.00 8.52 199.31 200.00 255.68 37.49 1,600.94 2,850.00 160.00 1,784.74 8.52 868.94 345.06 1,000.00 1,000.00 120,000.00 500.00 391,400.81 100.00 242,725.00 ,age': 5 )ate: 11/17/98 City of Lino Lakes Summary Claims Roster Vendor - Company Name Amount 900318 - RAY L. JORDAN AND SONS 900354 - LEONARD PARKER ASSOCIATES 900431 - HARRIS, DAVID, INC. 900440 - STERLING HOMES, INC. 900448 - GEPHART ELECTRIC 900484 - JEM, INC. DBA 900591 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 900632 - DRESEL CONTRACTING 900684 - LEO B. BRUDER, GENEVIEVE A. BRUDER 900707 - MCGUIRE MECHANICAL, INC. 900708 - LISTUL INDUSTRIES 900797 - ADOLFSON & PETERSON, INC. CM 900816 - PREMIER CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS 900820 - MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION 900821 - JORGENSON CONSTRUCTION, INC. 900822 - OLYMPIC WALL SYSTEMS 900823 - OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAM /L TAYLER 950405 - BUCHOLZ, JO ANNE 950406 - DICK, TERRANCE 950407 - RUSCHKE, PALMER 001967 - INTOXIMETERS, INC. ** Total ** 223.59 9,802.89 317.98 500.00 44,935.00 117.04 40.60 376,583.66 8,000.00 115,514.30 26,362.50 22,852.88 131,777.35 34,810.00 194,085.00 89,936.50 44,941.15 559.27 559.27 559.27 775.32 $2,096,174.36 AGENDA ITEM 3 B STAFF MEMBER Daniel Tesch, Director of Administration DATE 18 November 1998 SUBJECT Letter of Support for Gene Peterson Rice Creek Watershed District Representative BACKGROUND Mr. Gene Peterson has requested the city council support his re- appointment as a Rice Creek Watershed District Manager. Anoka County is currently represented by Mr. Peterson, a Circle Pines resident, and Mr. Andy Cardinal of Lino Lakes. Mr. Cardinal has also contacted the city and requested our support in Mr. Peterson's re- appointment. OPTIONS 1. Forward the attached letter of support for Mr. Gene Peterson to the Rice Creek Watershed District. 2. Do not forward the letter of suppo RECOMMENDATION 18 November 1998 Commissioner Dan Erhart Chairman, Anoka County Board of Commissioners Anoka County Administrative Offices 2100 3rd Ave. Anoka, MN 55303 Re: Reappointment of Mr. Gene Peterson to the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers Dear Commissioner Erhart : We are in receipt of County Administrator Jay McLinden's letter dated 25 September 1998, which notified us of the upcoming term expiration of Mr. Eugene Peterson. On behalf of the City of Lino Lakes, I would like to urge the re- appointment of Mr. Eugene Peterson as one of Anoka County's representatives on the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. Mr. Peterson has served the community and district admirably for six years. Mr. Peterson resides in the Middle Rice Creek sub - Watershed portion of the District. His residency therefore, satisfies Minn. Stat. 103D.311 which calls for equitable representation of hydrological areas within the District. I, along with the members of the city council appreciate your consideration of this request. Respectfully, Mayor Kim Sullivan City of Lino Lakes DT AGENDA ITEM NO. m STAFF ORIGINATOR: Rick DeGardner, Public Services Director DATE: November 17, 1998 TOPIC: Consideration of Wenzel Farms Trail Easement DACKGROUND On November 13, 1998 the Wenzel Farms Townhome Association Board approved the trail easement along the western boundary of the development to provide a trail connection from Snow Owl Lane to Ivy Ridge Lane. The Board also signed the additional 8' easement along the southern property line that was approved at the November 26, 1996 Council Meeting. In exchange for this easement the City has agreed to provide the following 1. Street sweeping of Ivy Ridge Court and Ivy Ridge Lane, where trail easements exist, two (2) times per year with additional sweeping at the discretion of the Public Services Director. 2. Trail signage.indicating "No Motorized Vehicles Allowed" at both trail entrances. 3. A split rail fence along the southern property line of Lot 31. 4. Construct the bridge. 5. Pave remaining trail segments. I anticipate design of the bridge to occur this winter with construction to begin in the spring of 1999. The trail will be addressed and prioritized with the annual trail paving projects. At the November 2, 1998 Park Board Meeting the motion to approve this agreement was approved unanimously. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the agreement 2. Do not approve the agreement RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. SW /Rick /Consideration of Wenzel Farms Trail Easement Green Sheet.doc _ AGENDA ITEM 3A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: 11/18/98 TOPIC: Dennis & Martha Houle, 16xx Birch Street, Site Plan Review BACKGROUND; Dennis and Martha Houle would like to move a single family residence onto their property at the southwest comer of Birch Street and Centerville Road. The structure is to be located on the north/west comer of the 40 acre parcel of property which is currently Zoned Rural The existing land use plan indicates the site as rural while the draft comprehensive plan indicates the site as low /medium density residential with commercial along Centerville Road. The City's Zoning Ordinance requires any structure to be moved into the City to go through a site plan review. The Building Inspector_ has inspected this dwelling which is currently located at 1966 North Chatsworth in Roseville. The structure was built in 1926 and appears to be structurally sound. The inspector would suggest the following improvements prior to occupancy: 1. reroof 2. reconstruct stairway to basement 3. replace existing windows 4.- additional insulation 5. redash existing stucco The applicant has asked for permission to construct a pole bam/garage/shop area on the site. The proposed structure will be approximately 54 x 30 for 1,620 square feet in area This size building is permitted on a 40 acre parcel, however, construction is not allowed until such time as the principle structure is built. Should the P & Z consider allowing construction of the accessory building prior to the principle building a Variance would need to be processed. Staff would suggest that construction of the two building be simultaneous thereby eliminating the need for a variance which can not be justified as no hardship to the land exists. The P & Z concurred that construction should be simultaneous (house and garage /pole building) thereby requiring no variance. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this site plan review to allow the relocation of a single family home onto the property at the south /west corner of Birch Street and Centerville Road on a 7 -0 vote with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits are obtained for all construction and the home is located to as to conform to all City rules and regulations and the Uniform Building Code. 2. The applicant connect to City Water, if practical. (A water line exists along Birch Street). 3. Prior to occupancy, the following improvements shall be made: a. reroof b. re- insulate c. re- stucco d. replace windows e. replace stairway to basement 4. An access permit is obtained from Anoka County. Mr. and Mrs. Houle were present and concurred with the above recommendations. OPTIONS: 1. Approve site plan review with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 CFAITFF TY OF LINO 15d� miter h itd,i • . hC, • CT1ICTE OF SUIRVE`r 10 For - Martha Houle 707 Harriet Avenue Shoreview, MN 55126 Tel: 482 -8973 GRAPHIC SCALE Of The NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 Sec. 26, 7' 31, R 22 Anoka County, MN 400 24.7 (01 PEE'r) I Inch - 100 8. HOUSE DETAIL :.CALE 1:50 1 T i 906.35 I1 906.82 II o 40 0 24 - I\ oo' \ o.x \ \ w O 906.37 4-I 1 -04- 906.40 1 I ^I \ 4.751 ' 4'905.75 \ 1 eo \\ / 4904.68 / 05117 By 9p4.813 * I / I 64 0 Y U 1/1 30 i EXIS11NG HOUSE TO BE MOVED 84 HOUSE OIAG: 48.0 x 46.0 = 66.48 BARN OIAG: 54.0 X 52.0 - 74.97 • E. G. RUC 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors 9150 LEXINGTON 1AvENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, MN. 55014 -3625 Tel. 186 -5556 Fax 186 -6m 1 NORTH eo West 1/4 Cansr See. 26, 131, R22 SY Moles County. C.LM. \I Bev. Mon.- 909.72 u Kit LEGEND Q DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY R/W MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET cm DENOTES W300 HUB AT 11 F001 OFFSET. f02D DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION. x 1 011 .2 DENOTES EXIS11NG ELEVATION. DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE. f a DENOTES LOYA..AND (NO WETLAND DELINEATION COMPLETED OR APPROVED BY ANY GOVT AGENCIES) BENCHMARK SoutheoS4 corner of bottom step of 2nd House 239.5 fe.t West of West 1/4 Comer Sec. 26. T 31. R 22. (Per Anoka County Highway Department) Elev. - 911.58 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: License No. i \_ North Line of the NW1 /4 of SW1 /4 of Sec.26 i 492.14 988'42'35 "W ( BIRCH STREET I T ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY;RIGHT -OF -WAY PLAT NO 11 907.20 1 905.53 A • 02'35'50" R = 11399.16 l - 516.72 - 1314.83- N88'52'50"W C.S.AJ -I. 10 QQ 489.22 l', - - -r • N88.42'35'W ro . 1 / 1906.35 906.82 �n j 4• Q • e4 9037 . *906.40 .4 i ;40� 9:5.75 10547. cn 0 z u ♦904.68/ 899.07 901.42 901.64 901.52 899.76 301.68 ,- 302.72 - 906.12 �_' R = 11519.16 904.27 = 522.16 301.30 N88•41'35'6 303.57 meas. 301.30 plot N88'41'35'E 2''0.56 1 1314.83 S88•52'50 "8 1 - -� + 918.39 '0 N ° O O C W S ° C z U .c 0 c J 40 0 W l• l I 11 �W IM 0 N °Ofp p 10) C.SA.H. HIGHWAY NO. 21 92_./O g>: Z�r•a'x 9i.:. N'-:4 901.95 South Line of the NW1 /4 of SW1 /4 of Sec.26---- ec.26 - - - 1317.77 N88'50'O2" lr Center of See. 26,. T 31. R 22 5 AGENDA ITEN1413 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Mary Kay Wyland DATE: 11/18/98 TOPIC: Site Plan Review, Chomonix Golf Course, Anoka County Park Reserve BACKGROUND: Chomonix Golf Course is requesting a site plan review to allow the construction of a 20 x 24 addition to the maintenance building that will include office sPace, a lunchroom and restrooms. Additionally, they would like to construction two rain shelters (approximately 10 x 16) on the course that could shield 20 to 30 patrons from inclement weather. The property in question is Zoned PSP, Public Semi- Public and a site plan review is required for any construction on the site. The Planning & Zoning Board reviewed this item and recommended approval on a 7 -0 vote with the conditions outlined below. The exterior is intended to blend with the existing club house and actually enhance the appearance of the existing maintenance building. The rain shelters will also blend with the existing architectural design of the club house and maintenance building addition. The requirements of Section 2, Subd. 5. Site & Building Plan Review, D. Design Standards appear to be met with this proposed construction. Conditions of approval include the following: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to construction. 2. A landscaping plan is provided subject to the review and approval of the City Forester. 3. Exterior treatment of the proposed addition and rain shelters shall match the existing club house building. OPTIONS: 1. Approve site plan with conditions outlined above. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMM NDATION: Option 1 • Q ASPHALT SHINGLES GAF WEATHER W000 TO MATCH CLUBHOUSE VINYL LATTICE, WHITE COLOR TYPICAL WHERE SHOWN 2" X 4" ROUGH SAWN CEDAR CIRCLE TRIM, CUT ARCS FROM 2 X 12 MINIMUM BOARDS AND JOIN ARCS TO MAKE CIRCLE, ROUT TO RECEIVE LATTICE. PLYWOOD BEYOND WHITE ALUMINUM FLASHING ROOF EDGE 2" X 6" ROUGH SAWN CEDAR TRIM, ROUT TO RECEIVE LATTICE. SHELTER FRONT ELEVATION (REAR SIMILAR, REAR FIN WALLS NOT SHOWN) SCALE = 1 /2" =1' -0" ALL WOOD STAINED BY OWNER 2" X 4" ROUGH SAWN CEDAR TRIM, ROUT TO RECEIVE LAI TICL. 2" X 8" ROUGH SAWN CEDAR TRIM, ROUT TO RECEIVE LATTICE. ROUGH SAWN CEDAR POST it SHELTER SIDE ELEVATI SCALE - 1/2" =1 ' -0" C,uts•i-fpm EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING EXISTING PAVING NEW CONC. PATIO (ALTERNATE) 6413Kni SITE RAN 5o NEW ADDITION EXISTING FENCE /WALL f SHELTER '7\ Lamm Wetland '• Ex. Range 1., ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE PLAN i64.? • NORTH SHELTER 1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ANOKA COUNTY AND SUPPLEMENTED BY ANOKA COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE 4/19/95. Benchmark: RAILROAD SPIKE IN POWER POLE ON FAIRWAY EAST OF CLUBHOUSE. ELEVATION = 888.52 (SEA LEVEL DATUM) * NEW RAIN SHELTER LOCATIONS LOCATION MAP 1 AGENDA ITEM 5 C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Alan Brfxius DATE: 11/18/98 TOPIC: R. Carlson, West Shadow Ponds, Rezone, Preliminary Plat, Comprehensive Plan Amendment BACKGROUND: Please see attached NAC Planning Report including correspondence from the Developer, Mr. Rick Carlson and his Engineer, Ted Mattke, Two adjoining property owners, and from the Environmental Board, Are Chief, CPTED Officer, and City Engineer. Also enclosed for consider review are the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Board which include citizen comments from the public hearing . The Planning and Zoning Board recommended the following: - Rezone - approval on a 6-1 vote with M. Trehus voting nay • Comp Plan Amendment - approval on a 6-1 vote with M. Trehus voting nay - Preliminary Plat - approval on a 6-0-1 vote with A. Robinson abstaining OPTIONS: 1. Approve rezone 2. Approve comprehensive plan amendment 3. Approve preliminary plat 4. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1, 2, and 3 NOU -18 -1998 15:32 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02/06 NXC PLANNING REPORT NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH TO: Brian Wessel / Mary Kay Wyland FROM: Troy D. Hagen / Alan Brixius DATE: 5 November 1998 RE: Lino Lakes - West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat FILE NO.: 194.01 - 98.15 BACKGROUND Richard Carlson had previously submitted a Concept Plan of West. Shadow Pond and is requesting approval of a preliminary plat entitled West Shadow Pond, which would require approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to introduce MUSA to the site and Rezoning from R: Rural District to R -1X: Single Family Executive Residential District. The site is located south of Birchwood Acres, which is south of County Road 10, west of the Colonial Woods Subdivision and east of Ware Road. The preliminary plat illustrates that West Shadow Lake Road will be extended from the Birchvwod Acres Subdivision through to 62nd Street. The applicant intends to develop 22 single family lots on 18.88 acres. Attached for reference: Exhibit A Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Site Location Preliminary Plat with Utility Plan Grading Plan Environmental Committee Comments Mattke Engineering Comments (Project Engineer) 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5541 6 PHONE 612.595 -9636 FAX 61 2 -595 -9837 E -MAIL NAC @WINTERNET.COM NOU -18 -1998 15:33 ANALYSIS NAC 612 595 9837 P.03/86 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning. The 1990 Lino Lakes Land Use Map identifies the subject site as a rural land use area. However, the area has been looked at as a location for future urban expansion in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. Therefore, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended to introduce low density residential to this area. Further, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended to include the subject site as part of MUSA. Currently, the land is in the R: Rural District. The applicant is proposing the location be changed to R -1X: Single Family Executive Residential district. Before a zoning change can be granted, the Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment based on the following criteria: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official Comprehensive Plan. Based on the proposed development abutting existing MUSA to the north, the requested zoning, similar approval of the Miller South Glen Subdivision, and the needed extension of West Shadow Lake Drive, it would be logical that the MUSA Amendment be granted. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed preliminary plat calls for low density urban residential development. The lots would be larger than required under the R -1X District and are designed to be compatible with Colonial Woods development, which is to the east. The plat offers deep lot separation with ponding to add distance and buffering between developments. This would be of great compatibility with the adjacent land uses. 3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. The preliminary plat will review compliance with the R -1X District standards. 4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. There is no anticipation of an overburdening of existing public services. 5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. a. It is consistent with the 1998 Transportation Plan for street capabilities. 2 NOV-18-1998 15:33 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04/06 b. It would provide an altemative route that would reduce current traffic levels on Birch Street. c. West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street have been designated as Minnesota State Aid (MSA) streets and would be eligible for upgrade financing through the state. d. As stated in the letter dated October 21, 1998, the developer will contribute S44,000 towards the dedicated street reconstruction fund for the upgrade of 62nd Street. As stated previously, this will help alleviate the traffic burden on Birch Drive. Preliminary Plat. Lot Size. Under R -1X District establishments, minimum lot size shall be no less than 12,825 square feet of buildable land. Buildable land is defined as, land area occurring within the property lines of parcel or lot excluding drainage ways, wetlands, water bodies, parklands, easements, road rights -of -way, and slopes in excess of 18 percent. The applicant has proposed lots no less than 14,718 square feet, therefore, the minimum lot size is satisfied. Lot Width. The West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat indicates that the minimum lot width of 90 feet will be satisfied. Lot Depth. The R -1X District requires a minimum lot depth of 135 feet. The subject development is allowing lot depths of at least 150 feet, thus satisfying the zoning requirements. Setbacks. The required setbacks established in the R -1 X District are 40 feet (front yard), 30 feet (rear yard), and 10 feet (side yard). The lots have adequate dimensions to meet required setbacks. Pond and Wetland areas will mandate a significant setback between the proposed building sites and adjoining homes in Colonial Woods. Lot & Block. The applicant has submitted plans to be considered for land subdivision. The Lino Lakes Subdivision Ordinance states that block length shall be no more than 1,500 feet and no Tess than 400 feet. The proposed length of Block 1 is 1,362.28 feet, according to the sum of the lot frontages at the street line. With the inclusion of Lot 1, Block 5 the total length may exceed the 1,500 foot limit. However, the wetlands to the east and west mandate the proposed block configuration. Street Design. When the Concept Plan was submitted the proposed extension of West Shadow Lake Road was to end in a cul-de -sac at the south end near 62nd Street. The applicant has since modified the plans to extend the street through to 62nd Street. Sixty- 3 NOV -18 -1998 15:33 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05/86 Second Street is designated as a minor collector and it is indicated in the City of Lino Lakes Transportation Plan that West Shadow Lake Road will be a minor collector. The plans indicates that the width of the right -of -way will meet the minimum width of 80 feet. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street with regards to traffic safety and its necessity for the future. Grading. A Grading Plan has been submitted and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Utilities. The applicant has submitted a Preliminary Utility Plan indicating the placement of easements. This shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Park Land Dedication. When Millers South Glen Addition was approved, land west of the proposed West Shadow Pond was bought to fulfill park land dedication requirements for both Millers South Glen Addition and West Shadow Pond. Wetlands. The preliminary plat indicates that some wetland areas will be filled and some ponding areas will be created to mitigate for this filling. According to the plans, 2.17 acres of wetland are proposed to be filled, and 4.87 acres of wetland are proposed to be created for mitigation. Wooded Areas. The applicant has indicated that a wooded area exists along the eastern edge of the site, bordering the Colonial Woods Subdivision. According to the Grading Plan, the applicant has proposed significant grading, in this area, to establish a ponding area. The applicant has indicated in a letter dated October 19, 1998, that the oaks are located along the west side of the Colonial Woods Subdivision, and that the preliminary grading plan had been designed to protect them. It also states that a tree preservation plan will be submitted with the Final Grading Plan, protecting the trees. Trail. There is a trail right -of -way between Lot 1, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 5 of Birchwood Acres - Third Addition. The applicant shall provide additional vegetation as a buffer along both property lines. RECOMMENDATION The rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment is a policy decision for the Planning Commission to determine. Based on the Planning Commission's approval of the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, our office recommends the approval of the West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat based on the following conditions: 4 NOV -18 -1998 15:34 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06/06 1. The Preliminary Utility Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street and whether the funding and resources available is sufficient to support upgrade of the 62nd Street. 3. The Grading Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The plan may be subject to modification to provide for the maximum number of trees to be preserved. 4. The applicant provide a Vegetation Plan and Landscape Plan illustrating the trees to be removed and the trees to be preserved. 5. The applicant provide additional vegetation along the trail right -of -way to buffer the recreational and residential uses. 6. The Planning Commission shall review and evaluate the comments of the Environmental Committee (Exhibit D) dated September 24, 1998. cc: Richard Carlson 5 TOTAL P.06 RICHARD S. CARLSON & ASSOCIATES 7671 Central Avenue * Fridley, MN 55432 * (612) 786 -1218 Fax (612) 786 -1219 November 18, 1998 To: Mary Kay Wyland, City Planner City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55104 Re: Planning and zoning - West Shadow Ponds Item That the developer would consider deed restrictions in his lot sales for wetland buffer -areas subject to Rice Creek Watershed approval. That the developer give consideration to imposing deed restrictions in 10 foot buffer areas around all wetlands. That developer give consideration to sharing these deed restrictions with the city. Response: The developer will change the following language and incorporate into the covenants: Article II - Easements 2.4 Drainage Easements around ponds and wetlands. Purchaser acknowledges that no dredged or fill material may be placed into waters, wetlands or drainage easements and no cutting, removing or burning of vegetation will be allowed within drainage easements around ponds and wetlands without the written approval from the City authority and from the the Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Watershed District, where applicable. The developer will include the additional 10 ft. buffer area into the easement. The developer would ask the City of Lino Lakes to incorporate covenants into the zoning approval and would be named as the successor to the developer in the recorded document. This should satisfy the sharing of deed restrictions and Commissioner Johnson concern as to how these covenants can be enforced after the developers homes are complete. Regarding the Planning Commission's suggestion that these ponds and wetlands be open for use by all residents of Lino Lakes, I am opposed for the following reasons: 1. The Rice Creek Watershed requires me to sign a personal guarantee to maintain the integrity of the vegetated buffered areas. This agreement is perpetual and would become impossible for me to enforce if these areas become recreational and open to the public. 2. I have designed these upgraded wetlands for aesthetic reasons and to create large buffers between developments. Opening these areas up for public use would destroy the buffered areas and the privacy of the new home owners. I have platted through these areas so individual home owners are responsible for the liability insurance. This would have to change if open to public use, as individual owners can not be expected to be liable for what would be public land or park. I have dedicated approximately twelve acres of upland and wetland to the city for park dedication adjacent to West Shadow Ponds. If the city council agrees, I am recommending that the ponding for public use take place on the park land. The second alternative is to build skating rinks on the upland under park supervision. Prior to the council meeting, as per the City Planning and Zoning Commission, I would ask that the Ci Attorney review my suggestion for sharing the deed restrictions through enforcement of covenants .1 his opinion on the use of wetlands and ponds on private property. Thank you, Ri."411 Car on RSC:lh Page 2 1 rn T EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C OCT-28-1998 11 :27 • CITY OF LINO LAKES 612 464 4568 P.01/05 Memorandum To Brian Wessel CC: Mary Kay Wyland Ted Mattkee From: Marty Asleson Date: 09/24/98 Re: West Shadowlake Drive Extension/Rick Carlson Proposal The West Shadowlake Drive extension proposal by Rick Carlson was presented to the gorpem^nral Board on Wednesday the 23 of September. The Environmental Board made the following recommendations concerning this proposed development: 1. That water infiltration consideration be given to site planning. Consideration be given to reduced or no slope in the boulevard areas of the street sections. Consideration be given to implementation soil mixing in landscape practices and ti.at specific guidelines be given to the developer on the nature of this mixing. ,..,commendation was made to use native plants approved by the city in re- establishment of wetland and buffer areas. 2. That the developer would consider deed restrictions in his lot sales for wetland buffer -areas subject to Rice Creek Watershed approval. That the developer give consideration to imposing deed restrictions in 10 foot buffer areas around all wetlands. That developer give consideration to sharing these deed restrictions with the city. 3. That the developer give consideration to requiring individual tut builders to follow soil mixing practices in landscape of yards. 4. The city consider passing an ordinance requiring new standards for soil preparation in development projects 5. That the developer prepare a tree preservation plan at the time the grade plan is submitted, to protect the oaks woodlands on the west side of the development. EXHIBIT D Post -It` Fax Note — 1 Oj ,),1 (,.o► 5 Fro1n M 1 Td 4t ` {). apt ^ ck hick CoJDoOG �A� Co. Phone M Phone M Fax 0 Fee M OCT -28 -1998 11:27 CITY OF LINO LAKES ......,...� -• 46 .••6, ...v- 612 464 4565 P.02/05 r- • Mattke Engineering, Inc. Q 7671 Central Ave. N.E. • Fridley, MN 55432 • (612) 783 -0300 October 19, 1998 City of Lino Lakes C/O Ms. Wyland 1 189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 re: WEST SHADOW PONDS -- Environmental Board comments Dean- Ms. Wyland: Regarding the Memorandum of 9/24/98 by Marty Asieson, I have the following comments: 1. As discussed in the Environmental Board meeting, we have been using native plants in revegetating wetland and buffer areas in our past projects, and plan to do so here also. We are looking forward to receiving specific recommendations on soil mixing. 2. We have used deed restrictions with regard to the wetlands and buffers on previous projects, and will do so on this project also. We will be looking for your recommendations as to how to share these restrictions with the City. 3. We do not believe it is practical to require individual lot builders or owners to follow soil mixing practices unless it is incorporated in ordinance. When we receive the specific recommendations, we will happily provide them to lot buyers. 4, We agree that the City should consider a soil preparation ordinance. 5. The oaks are located on the west side of the Colonial Woods subdivision, and the preliminary grading plan has been designed to protect them. A tree preservation plan will be submitted with the Final Grading Plan, protecting the trees. Sincerely Tedd W. Mattke, P.E. • Residential & Commercial Deuelopment EXHIBIT E OCT -28 -1996 1127 CITY OF LINO LAKES 612 464 4568 P.03/05 Mattke Engineering, Inc. Q 7671 Central Ave. N.E. • Fridley. MN 55432 • (612) 783 -0300 October 21, 1998 City of Lino Lakes CIO Mary Kay Wyland & Planning Commission 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 re: WEST SHADOW PONDS -- Neighborhood Meeting Results Dear Ms. Wyland and Planning Commission Members: Last evening, Mr. Richard Carlson (RC) and I met with neighbors to the proposed West Shadow Ponds subdivision, and we would like to share the input received in that meeting. 23 names were listed on the sign-in sheet including 7 from Colonial Woods subdivision, 14 from Birchwood Acres, and 2 (Arnold Rehbein and Wayne Junes) from 62nd Street. There was general support for the project, including the quality of the development, environmental concerns, park and trail interests, and traffic circulation planning, however a single issue -- safety on 62nd and on West Shadow Lake Drive (WSLD) -- was the dominant topic. Michael Guthmueller, 642 Fox Road, asked about covenants and if he could see a copy, and RC made a copy for him of Millers South Glen covenants (which should be similar.) Thomas Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, was concerned about drainage at the intersection of the proposed WSLD extension and 62nd Street, as it is presently a Low point of 62nd. I explained that drainage from the north side of the intersection would be conveyed to the ponds and wetlands north of the intersection, and 62nd would not be impacted. Norma Mayhew, 678 Fox Road, and Amy Ziolkowski, 686 Fox Road, asked if they could purchase some of Lot 1, Block 2 so they had pond access, and RC indicated that this was not possible. Then they asked if they could plant trees along the edge of Lot 1, Block 2 for screening, and RC said they could. Stan Zarambo, 6250 Red Maple Lane asked if street lights were required on corner lots. We did not know the answer, but indicated that we would check into it and let him know. In addition to these questions, there was general discussion on the following topics: 1. Could the street lights in the project match the lights in Birchwood Acres, could concrete driveways be required as they are along WSLD in Birchwood Acres, and will the covenants be recorded and enforceable, and RC indicated that, with City approval, all of these could, and would be done. • Residential & Commercial Development EXHIBIT E -1 Hydrology • Water Resources • Municipal OCT -28 -1998 11 :2? CITY OF LINO LAKES 612 464 4568 P.04/05 2. Blending the existing rear yards in Birchwood Acres into the grading of the new project, drainage along the trail into the park, and who would pay for it. 1 indicated that a culvert would be required to convey water from the north side of the trail to the wetland pond on the west side of WSLD, and that we could also grade the rear of those yards in Birchwood Acres to improve drainage if the City approved. RC indicated that he would pay for such grading, sod replacement, and sprinkler system replacement if approved by the City. 3. Pond design, depth, safety issues, and covenants to prevent filling of the ponds. I indicated that the ponds and wetlands will likely be about 4 feet deep with gradual sloping sides, and wetland vegetation surrounding them. The covenants and stipulations in the easement around the ponds will not allow cutting vegetation, or filling the ponds. These would be enforceable by Rice Creek Watershed District, and also by the City if it is named on the easement that surrounds the ponds. 4. Who is responsible for enforcing the covenants. RC indicated that he is responsible until 100% of the development is sold, then a committee can be formed by the property owners in the development to enforce the covenants. 5. Would the barbed wire fence be removed, and could a more appropriate fence be installed around or along side of the ponds, or to separate the park from the Birchwood Acres development. RC indicated that he would remove the barbed wire fence, but he would not install any fences, and that individual property owners could construct their own fences if they so chose. RC also agreed to plant groupings of pines strategically located along the trail west of WSLD (with park Board permission) to help isolate the trail. RC also indicated that he would plant some trees for screening along the Rawleigh property east of WSLD. Safety Issues on West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd Street -- the Dominant Issue 6. Safety issues on West Shadow Lake Drive related to connecting WSLD with 62nd Street. These concerns stem from the idea that, with the connection, traffic from Birch Street may cut through WSLD to 62nd Street to Ware Road to Ash Street to Highway 49 in order to avoid the intersection at Birch Street and Highway 49. Fears that WSLD would be a 50 mph speedway were expressed, and a general consensus was reached that stop signs may be warranted along WSLD if the connection is made. (A better choice for drivers wanting to cut through to Ash Street would be to take Ware Road -- a straight shot.) 7. Safety issues related to the width of 62nd Street, and the increased traffic on 62nd Street with the connection to WSLD, and general speeding in that area. Residents indicated that the narrow street width, combined with excessive speed, make 62nd Street dangerous even now. Increased traffic would increase the danger. Joe Barthel, 6272 Red Maple Lane, indicated that school buses race around Red Maple Lane, getting up to 50 mph between stops. Others indicated that higher speeds are regularly observed on 62nd Street, making it especially dangerous for pedestrians. One person remarked that, You don't want to be walking along 62nd when two vehicles are t' V' d �dlpl meeting — there is no place to go to get out of the way!" Thomas Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, noted that the Street Condition and Traffic Study prepared for the Millers South Glen project (2 years ago) projected an increase of 50 -70 trips per day on 62nd Street from existing homes in Birchwood Acres if WSLD were extended to 62nd Street. Add 3 trips per day from the homes in the new project, and the total increase in traffic on 62nd Street would be about 130 trips per day. A solution that we proposed is that the City use part of the S44,000 that RC would contribute to the street reconstruction fund to widen the north side of 62nd street with a trail from Colonial Woods subdivision to Millers South Glen (where it continues to Ware Road) This would provide pedestrian safety along 62nd Street, and also a certain amount of additional safety to vehicles. Other alternatives include temporary cul-de -sacs, either at the south end of WSLD, or at the north end of the new section of WSLD. A cul-de-sac at the north end would limit the increase in traffic on 62nd to about 70 additional trips per day, while a cul- de-sac on the south end would prevent any increase at all.. In summary, the major concern raised with regard to the WEST SHADOW PONDS project was a safety issue regarding street safety. Part of the concern involves speeding, and part involves the narrow width of 62nd Street. Even without this project, safety concerns exist regarding 62nd Street. With the project, however, the City will have $44,000 of dedicated street reconstruction funds that it could use to improve safety on 62nd Street. If the City approves this project, the major decisions will involve safety issues: (1) whether to install stop signs on WSLD, (2) whether to use part of the dedicated street reconstruction funds to widen 62nd Street with a trail, and (3) whether to allow the connection of WSLD with 62nd Street, or to construct a temporary cul- de-sac at one end of the new section of WSLD to reduce traffic on 62nd Street. We believe that the advantages of connecting West Shadow Lake Road and 62nd Street outweigh the disadvantages. The advantages include reducing the present 3/4 mile Red Maple Lane cul- de-sac to about 500 feet, allowing a more direct route from Birchwood Acres to Ware Road, allowing a more direct route from Red Maple Lane to Birch Street, and reducing the school bus and garbage truck traffic on 62nd Street by allowing one -way driving loops via WSLD. Sincerely Tedd W. Mattice, P.E. Memorandum DATE: November 6, 1998 TO: Mary Kay Wyland n FROM: John Powell, City Engineer `� RE: West Shadow Ponds, Prelimin Plat Review The following review is based on the Preliminary Plat and Grading Plan for the referenced project, dated October 6, 1998, which have been prepared by Mattke Engineering, Inc. Comments regarding these documents are as follows: 1. The proposed segment of West Shadow Lake Drive (WSLD) will be a Municipal State Aid Street. The width of the new roadway will be consistent with the northerly portion of WSLD, 45 feet (back of curb to back of curb). The 80 foot wide right -of -way shown along WSLD is adequate for this roadway section. The City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan indicates WSLD is a Minor Collector and the extension of this roadway to 62 °d Street is consistent with the Recommended Improvements contained in the City's plan. 2. 62nd Street in this area is also a Municipal State Aid Route and is indicated as a Minor Collector in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The existing roadway condition is generally acceptable but the City will implement safety improvements, or may reconstruct the roadway, from Ware Road to Red Maple Lane in order to accommodate the additional traffic resulting from the extension of WSLD to 62nd Street. 3. No wetland permit information has been included in the submittal documents. Any plat approval will be contingent upon receiving approvals per the State's Wetland Conservation Act. 4. Sanitary sewer and watermain sizes are not shown. The 12 -inch diameter trunk watermain on existing WSLD will be extended through the proposed subdivision. 5. Approval is subject to a detailed review of the storm sewer and pond design. The design of the existing storm sewer at Fox Road/WSLD must be reviewed to verify it has the capacity for the runoff from the north end of the proposed roadway. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding these comments. 1189 Main Street • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 Phone/TDD: 651-464-5562 • Fax: 651 - 464 -4568 Centennial Fire District 7741 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 784 -7472 October 28, 1998 Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Mary Kay, You have asked me to comment on the extension of West Shadow Lake Drive to 62nd Street. I have reviewed the notes and maps. I have the following comments: - Red Maple Lane area has been an area that is difficult to access with our fire trucks. The tanker trucks that come from the east must go to Ware Road and then backtrack on 62nd to get to this area. The extension of West Shadow Lake Drive would improve this situation. - The Red Maple Lane area does not have city water or hydrants. A fire hydrant on West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd would reduce our distance that we must travel to get water for the tankers. - The existing homes within 1,000 feet of the hydrant on West Shadow Lake Drive and 62nd should get an improved insurance rating for fire insurance. I have not addressed any of the other issues, such as traffic and runoff, because these are issues outside our area of expertise. Sincerely, Milo Bennett Fire Chief POLICE DEPARTMENT David 1. Pecchia, Chief of Police October 29, 1998 Mary Kay Wyland City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Mary Kay, I have reviewed the notes and Maps for the West Shadow Lake Road extension. From a CPTED stand point, I do not see any problems with the development. The only question that I would have, is what the traffic impact would be to the citizens that live on West Shadow Lake Rd, North of Fox Road. D PP; cam. 7731 Lake Drive • Lino Lakes, Minnesota • 55014 -1109 Public Administration /Records: 651- 780 -0605 • Fax: 651- 780 -0901 LANT MATERIAL BUFFER Approx. 80' from foul lino to prop.rty lino. TOTAL DEDICATED PARK AREA AREA OF WETLAND RAIL ACCESS Lynn & George Fernstrom 6340 Red Maple Lane Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 483 -6198 November 10, 1998 Dear Planning and Zoning Board Members: This letter is our request to you to re -think the future movement on the preliminary plot for the project before you this evening: WEST SHADOW PONDS, Property Identification No. 32- 31 -22 -13 -0001 & 0010 & 0011. As we are unable to attend the meeting this evening, this would be our proverbial "$ .02 worth ". We have had the pleasure of living in Lino Lakes for the past 15 years and fully recognize that growth is part of the changing landscape for this community. We would also like to recognize and commend Mr. Carlson on the larger lot sizes for this development, something that we believe could be a complement to the city. What we take issue with is the connection of West Shadow Lake road to 62 "d street. Our understanding is that West Shadow Lake road would be what is referred to as a "feeder" road and would be about 80 ft. wide. Our concern is it's connection to a very narrow, feeble road such as 62nd. Sixty second (62'') has, and is already taking a beating from the South Miller Glen development. It isn't, nor was it, ever designed to handle increased traffic, which will undoubtedly increase from the Pine Ridge and South Reshanau developments. We are all acutely aware of the issues that arose from Ware road. If West Shadow Lake does go through, this action, in essence, purposely creates a road hazard similar to that, which occurred on Ware over time. We are asking that this be given more time and thought by the board. Our request would be the following: #1. That this development be put on hold until the time where 62nd road is developed to accommodate increased traffic. #2. Choice would be that if the development must go through, that West Shadow Lake extension end in a cul -de -sac with the potential to be connected to 62nd in the future. (This allows 62nd some time to heal/develop as need be). I would encourage the board to do a "drive -by sighting" if you will; of 62nd going the posted 45 -mph both during the day and in the evening to truly get a "feel" of the condition of the road. Then pause and imagine the increased traffic flow, which would ensue if West Shadow does connect to 62nd. We thank -you for your time and consideration in this matter. Respectfully submitted, NOV 12 '98 08 :59AM CRETIN P.2 November 1 1,1998 To The Members of the Planning and Zoning Committee, My name is Paul Nyberg and I reside at 6307 Red Maple Lane, Lino Lakes. 1 am writing this letter to you as I am unable to attend tonight's meeting to express my concerns and thoughts regarding the rezoning for the West Shadow Ponds development. I am not opposed to the idea of the West Shadow Ponds development. I attended the meeting Mr. Carlson held on October 20th and was pleased by his openness and candor in discussion of the development. What my issue was then and continues to be today is the connection of West Shadow Lake Drive to 62nd street. I fear this connection not because of the traffic increase 22 lots will bring, but rather because of the large scale traffic flow that will empty out of the developments north of West Shadow Ponds onto 62nd street. If 62nd street were to be rebuilt to handle the traffic I would not be opposed to this connection. 1 think you would agree, however, that emptying a 60 ft. wide collector street onto a road that is only 20 ft. wide in spots, with no shoulders is unwise, unsafe, and unthinkable. I spoke with John Powell, the city engineer, this past Monday and he spoke of the fact that 62nd would need to be upgraded and/or rebuilt in response to this development. Mr. Powell stated that a feasibility study would need to be done to see what work can and should be done on 62nd street. En light of this study, I would ask the Planning and Zoining Committee to not rezone this land until the city has had a chance to complete a study on 62nd. There are two reasons for. this: • If the study should shows 62nd can be upgraded, I think that we as citizens should know exactly what is meant by "upgrading ". We need this spelled out so we can the have input on a clearly defined objective. • If for some reason 62nd cannot be upgraded but instead must be rebuilt, does the city have the money to do this? If not, how long would we then be forced to drive on this unsafe stretch of road before funding can be found? These questions need to be addressed and answered before Mr. Carlson starts on this new development. The safety of our families, friends and neighbors depends on this. We as taxpayers deserve nothing less. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter please contact me at 484 -0250. Sincerely Paul W. N 6307 Red Maple Lane Lino Lakes cc: Lino Lakes City Council Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 2 IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Schaps declared the Open Mike portion of the meeting open at 6:33 p.m. No one appeared for open mike. Mr. Schilling made a MOTION to close the Open Mike portion of the meeting at 6:34 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Corson. Motion carried 7 -0. V. ACTION ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARING, West Shadow Ponds, R. Carlson, Rezone from Rural to R -1X and Preliminary Plat, 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive Extended Chair Schaps declared the public hearing open at 6:55 p.m.. Mr. Hagen, Planning Consultant, stated Mr. Richard Carlson had previously submitted a Concept Plan of West Shadow Pond and is requesting approval of a preliminary plat entitled West Shadow Pond, which would require approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to introduce MUSA to the site and Rezoning from R: Rural District to R -1X: Single Family Executive Residential District. The site is located south of Birchwood Acres, which is south of County Road 10, west of the Colonial Woods Subdivision and east of Ware Road. The preliminary plat illustrates that West Shadow Lake road will be extended from the Birchwood Acres Subdivision through to 62nd Street. The applicant intends to develop 22 single family lots on 18.88 acres. Mr. Hagen reviewed the site location, preliminary plat with utility plan, grading plan, Environmental Committee comments, and Mattke Engineering comments. He noted the correction in the setbacks from 30' to 40'. He also corrected the trail right -of -way location which is located north of Lot 1, Block 1. Mr. Powell stated 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake are State Aid roadways. State funding will be available next year to begin the upgrade of 62nd Street. The remainder of the funds for project completion will be available in 2000. It was anticipated that West Shadow Lake Drive would eventually connect to 62nd Street. He stated the City has received letters from residents in Colonial Woods expressing concern about the width of 62nd Street. If 62nd Street is reconstructed the road would be widened and a trail would be added. The widening of the street will be based on a Feasibility Report. The costs could be born fully by the State Aid funds. With the Ware Road reconstruction project, lots were proposed to be assessed $2,000. The developer has indicated he will help with the cost of reconstruction for 62nd Street in the amount of $2,000 per lot. It would be Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 3 beneficial to time the reconstruction of 62nd Street after the subdivision is constructed to help eliminate construction traffic on a new roadway. If the project is approved, the 62nd Street reconstruction project would be initiated immediately. The City Council does, however, make all final decisions regarding reconstruction projects. Mr. Corson expressed concern regarding citizen assessment for the reconstruction project. Mr. Powell indicated that residents on Ware Road were proposed to be assessed $2,000 per lot. Mr. Corson asked if 62nd Street would become an 80 foot r row to include a trail. Mr. Powell said we could consider an 80' row, both urban and rural sections. We would not absolutely have curb and gutter. RCWD has adopted rules on infiltration that would support rural sections. We defmitely need an upgrade and widening with a trail section. Mr. Corson stated that the plat appears to be 60' east of this development. Would we need additional row. Mr. Powell indicated that a portion of the row is not technically in the plat, we could work within the existing row. Mr. Corson suggested that we may want to get the additional row dedication at this time. Mr. Corson questioned the use of infiltration on this plat. Mr. Powell felt that a combination of infiltration and standard storm sewer would work. Ware Road incorporated similar features. Mr. Trehus asked if the Ware Road project included sewer and water at $2000 per lot or was that assessment just for the roadway. Mr. Powell indicated that the $2000 was just for the roadway. If property owners are interested in connection to sewer and water there would be an additional assessment. Regarding 62nd Street, Mr. Powell indicated that the city would evaluate the need for sewer and water and most likely install them along with any reconstruction work. Mr. Trehus asked about using the allocation of State Aid funds and if the City has enough to cover these costs. Mr. Powell stated the City does have a balance of State Aid funds now. The City receives an annual allotment. In 1999, $350,000 will be received. By 2000, $700,000 will be available. Generally, road improvement costs can be estimated at one million dollars per mile. The Feasibility Report will give a detailed analysis of the costs. Mr. Trehus asked how much is currently in the City's State Aid fund. Mr. Powell stated the City may possibly dip to a negative balance after the fmal payment is made for Ware Road. Mr. Trehus asked how much will be in the fund after the fmal payment of Ware Road and when the 1999 allotment is received. Mr. Powell indicated approximately $300,000 will be in the State Aid fund. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 4 Mr. Richard Carlson, Developer of West Shadow Pond, came forward and thanked staff for the analysis and the report. He stated he was in agreement with the conditions of staff, the Environmental Board, and Park Board. He stated a neighborhood meeting was held with 23 neighbors. Two hundred invitations were sent out. He stated the majority of the neighbors were concerned with 62nd Street. He reviewed the following concerns raised at the meeting: 1. Street light on 62nd Street and West Shadow Lake Drive - Mr. Carlson stated he assumed a street light would be placed at that intersection. 2. Concrete Driveways - There are concrete driveways north on West Shadow Lake Road and residents would prefer the new homes have a concrete driveway also. 3. Setback - The setback will be 40'. 4. Screening along the trail - Mr. Carlson stated he will plant a row of Pines along the first two properties for screening. The rest of the property is park land which requires park approval for screening. Screening with trees 40' from the roadway will also be placed adjacent to the Rawleigh property - Lot 5, Birchwood Acres. The lots are 3/4 of an acre. 5. Drainage - Mr. Carlson stated water will drain away from 62nd Street. Mr. Carlson stated the neighborhood meeting went well. He indicated he agrees with the concerns raised about 62nd Street and will donate to those improvements. He stated another option is to develop a cul -de -sac on the end of the development to deter traffic. He stated a Master Plan of the park was distributed at the meeting. Mr. Dunn asked if Mr. Carlson would consider talking to the City Forester about planting Spruce trees instead of Pines. He stated he believes Spruce trees offer more screening and live longer. Mr. Carlson stated he has met with the City Forester. He has concerns regarding the park trail being screened completely. The City Forester would like to see a grouping of trees. Mr. Carlson indicated he is willing to screen with Pine or Spruce trees. Mr. Ted Mattke, Mattke Engineering, came forward and distributed pictures to the Board of 62nd Street. He suggested that if the plat is approved the developer could install a trail in the interim to at least get the pedestrians off the roadway. Mr. Tom Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, expressed concern regarding 62nd Street. He reviewed a traffic study that was conducted in December, 1996. If the development occurs there is the potential for 1,300 trips per day accessing 62nd Street. He stated he is in favor of the development with the exception of West Shadow Lake Road not going through to 62nd Street until reconstruction of 62nd Street occurs. He suggested a barricade be left on the north side of West Shadow Lake Road while the development is Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 5 being done. The road can be opened after 62nd Street is done. Traffic control should be considered on West Shadow Lake Road because there are no stops all the way to Birch Street. He requested the lighting be minimized because the neighborhood prefers it dark. He suggested using directional lighting. He raised the issue of the low spot on 62nd Street. He stated that if 62nd Street is improved and elevated there should be no problem. The lowest spot on the road is the entrance and there are already water and ice problems in that area. Chair Schaps entered into the record letters received from Mr. Paul Nyberg, 6307 Red Maple Lane, and Lynn and George Fernstrom, 6340 Red Maple Lane. Both letters expressed concern with the condition of 62nd Street. Ms. Susie Guthmueller, 642 Fox Road, came forward and stated that if the trail would go through the lots instead of behind her house she would be very happy. She stated she has an open lot behind her home which is why she moved there. She expressed concern regarding stop signs. She stated cars currently go too fast down West Shadow Lake Drive and the road completion would allow cars to go faster. She stated the development looks good although she is concerned about the increase of people in the area. She stated that lighting is needed for the path for security purposes. She asked if the ponds being developed will be available for use by the whole community. Mr. Carlson stated that because of the way the development is platted the ponds would be privately owned. The ponds are located on individual lots. He stated he is open to however the City would like him to develop the ponds. Ms. Guthmueller stated the ponds are on the lots but also connected to the park. She stated that change is hard. She indicated she has lived there for three years. Twenty -two homes are going to be developed behind her house. She stated she hopes this adds to the value of her home. She asked that the path be moved and indicated she is happy with the trees. Ms. Dawn Kenny, 6299 Red Maple Lane, asked when the construction of 62nd Street will occur. Mr. Powell indicated reconstruction of 62nd Street would occur within a year. The project would begin next year and be completed in 2000. He noted the City Council makes the final decisions regarding road reconstruction. Ms. Kenny asked what will happen if the Feasibility Study shows the project will cost too much. Mr. Powell indicated the City can consider borrowing ahead from the State Aid fund. Ms. Kenny asked for clarification regarding Chapter 429 and The Charter. Mr. Powell stated that State Statute Chapter 429 governs road improvements. It provides protection for property owners and requires a public hearing for road improvements. Per the City Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 6 Charter, road reconstruction can go to a citizen vote if general funds are used for the project. Ms. Georgette Korkowski, of Red Maple Lane, stated her lot abuts the new area. She expressed concern regarding drainage. The lot next to her was wet often this year because of all the rain. The water floods into her lot. She stated the drainage is terrible and does not want any more water. Mr. Mattke stated the area is in a wetland area. The development will not be raising the water table. New ponds will provide drainage for a better outlet. The water will eventually drain into Reshanau Lake. The development will not cause the current water problem to get any worse. Mr. Johnson asked if the outlet from the pond in the north/east corner will allow for adequate drainage underneath to the west side. Mr. Mattke indicated it will allow for adequate drainage. There is a gentle slope from the north/east to the south/west which is the way the drainage will flow. An equalizer pipe will be put in to level the elevation. There will be three ponds added that may lead to some drainage improvement in the area. Mr. Dunn asked if the system is similar to the one done in Centerville. Mr. Mattke indicated it is a similar system. The ponds will have an easement also. Restrictions regarding cutting the grass will be enforced. The City will have access to the ponds. Mr. Barry Rice, 6622 Fox Road, stated he was happy with the proposed development. He indicated he would like for the City to own the ponds. He asked that the lighting be similar to Birchwood Acres. He stated there is a definite need for a four way stop at West Shadow and Fox Road. He would like for the construction of the pond to stay clear of the Oak trees that are currently there. He stated he has been assured by the developer that the ponds can handle a good size rain storm. Mr. Mattke indicated the grading of the pond will not contour close to the Oak trees. Mr. Steve Andre, 495 Ash, expressed concern regarding the section of road between Ware Road and his property. He stated the current speed limit there is 35 mph. It is not uncommon to see people driving 70 mph down the street. He indicated he does not want more traffic on his street. Public safety regarding this issue is a concern. He stated he moved to this area because it was safe. He stated it has not been safe for the last four years. It is not uncommon for people to try to pass a vehicle on the left when you are trying to turn left into your driveway. Cars and trucks have gone across yards, smashed into parked cars, and hit mailboxes. Some houses in the area have been sold three times over in the last five years. Adding more traffic to an already deadly situation is irresponsible. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 7 Ms. Kenny stated the current traffic on 62nd Street is bad. A school bus went off the road before Millers South Glen went in. Adding more traffic to the area is a bad idea. She asked the difference between reconstruction and an upgrade of the road. Mr. Powell stated an upgrade would involve widening the road and developing a trail. Reconstruction would develop a completely new road and trail. He stated that more than likely reconstruction of the road would occur. He indicated it is a good idea to put the trail in now. Ms. Ann Carlson, 630 Fox Road, stated the West Shadow extension will be used as a cut through. The elevation will be only three feet higher than Birchwood Acres. She expressed concern regarding the number of trees that have to be cut down for the pond development. Ms. Linda O'Connor, 6291 Red Maple Lane, stated the path in front of Millers South Glen is growing grass. She asked if the path will be gravel or tar. Mr. Powell stated the path will be an 8' wide bituminous trail. Generally, the developer installs a gravel trail with the development. The City then paves the trail when the City's trail pavement project occurs. The City is looking at how to do the trails differently so grass does not grow on them. He noted the path in front of Millers South Glen will be paved. Mr. Holm, 634 Fox Road, requested that West Shadow Lake Road does not go through until 62nd Street is done. He requested screening between his house and the pond. He stated he has a nice nature area now and would prefer Spruce trees for screening. He suggested the City develop a pond maintenance plan to keep the ponds looking nice. If a pond has no water movement they do not stay nice for very long. Mr. Mike Pojar, 6255 Red Maple Lane, expressed concern regarding the ponds in the development and there is great dissertation regarding the pond boundaries, depth, and slope. He stated he disputes the way the developer stated the water will flow. He stated the State of Minnesota has maps regarding water flow direction and would like the maps to be studied. Mr. Mattke stated he is experience in hydrology. In his opinion, the water will flow under 62nd Street to an existing ditch that eventually goes into Reshanau Lake. He stated the water from the north/east corner of the development will flow north. Mr. Pojar referred to a map of the development. He stated that part of the pond on property #7 flows north, therefore, other water will flow in that direction also. He stated he wants to know precisely where the water will go because of the close proximity to his property. Mr. Powell suggested Mr. Mattke meet with Mr. Pojar and provide his map source. He stated that he trusts the judgment and analysis done regarding the water flow direction. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 8 He suggested more information be obtained from the State and provided to Mr. Pojar. Mr. Mattke indicated he will meet with Mr. Pojar. Mr. Dunn suggested the possibility of a gating process regarding water flow. Mr. Mattke stated a gating process will be used. A culvert will control the flow on the east side. The pond is 4 -5 feet lower than the existing ground. He offered to go over the grading plan and elevations with the Board and property owners. Ms. Kenny asked what a Feasibility Report is. Mr. Powell stated the City Council orders a Feasibility Report. The report looks at the cost, proposed improvements, assessments, design, alignment of streets, elevation, and storm sewers. It is a preliminary design for the project. Mr. Pojar asked who holds the developer accountable if the drainage does cause a problem. Chair Schaps stated the City Council will hold the developer accountable. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to close the public hearing at 8:02 p.m., and was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 7 -0. Mr. Corson asked if there is currently a City policy regarding ponds and liability and if skating is allowed on the ponds. Mr. Powell stated the ponds will have drainage easements. Typically, the City's ponds are not fenced to allow the City access. Liability regarding skaters is a legal question. The City would have an easement which is standard. Mr. Schilling stated the improvements to 62nd Street are a big concern. He asked if the cul -de -sac option would allow the improvements to be completed more quickly. Mr. Powell recommended not developing a permanent cul -de -sac. He stated a temporary cul- de -sac is an option. He suggested the recommendation of 62nd Street being upgraded be added to the motion. Mr. Trehus asked about grading. Mr. Mattke stated that the ponds will be excavated to obtain materials to build up the road and lots. Because the wetlands are degraded the value is reduced. He indicated he expects agreement from the Rice Creek Watershed District regarding the wetlands. Most of the drainage produced will run off the back. Drainage in the front will be drawn to the center of the project, with the exception of both ends of the project. The City Engineering Department will determine if the grades will be elevated at the low spot. Mr. Trehus asked if there is a storm sewer on the north end of the project. Mr. Mattke indicated there is a storm sewer on the north end. A storm sewer will be constructed on the south end of West Shadow. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 9 Mr. Trehus stated there will be a lot of water running in front of the homes on 62nd Street. Mr. Mattke showed a map indicating the high point of the street. Everything west of the first lot will go to a storm sewer retention pond. Mr. Pojar asked about the water in regard to the first three lots near the Rawleigh property (Lot 5, Birchwood Acres). Mr. Mattke stated the water in that area will run into the pond. The elevation is 892'. Mr. Pojar stated water collected in the middle of the road this summer. Mr. Mattke stated they have taken care of that water problem. The water was not draining properly and it has been corrected. Mr. Pojar noted the water may not drain properly with this project either. Mr. Trehus asked about the increase in elevation of the street. Mr. Mattke stated the elevation of the street will be approximately 3 1/2 feet higher than the highest point of the street. Mr. Trehus asked if the catch basins will be at street level. Mr. Mattke indicated the catch basins will be built up at the center of the project at an elevation of 902'. Mr. Mattke referred to a Preliminary Vertical Profile that shows the elevations. Mr. Powell noted the elevations may change slightly. Mr. Corson asked if there is a problem with completing the reconstruction of 62nd Street before West Shadow is continued through. Mr. Powell stated that stipulation can be included as a condition of approval. The processing of 62nd Street improvements will be handled by the City Council. Mr. Corson asked about a temporary cul -de -sac. Mr. Powell stated a simple barrier could be used. Something is needed to keep the traffic down. He stated the trail should be developed in the interim. Mr. Johnson noted the comments from the Environmental Board. He indicated there is not a problem with the Environmental Board's comments, therefore, condition #6 regarding preliminary plat approval should be deleted. He suggested adding the condition of making a strong recommendation to upgrade 62nd Street. Mr. Trehus asked why the City requires street lighting in new developments, noting that older developments do not have street lights. Mr. Powell stated the cost of street lights is born by the developer. Street lights are mainly a pedestrian safety issue. The City does respond to residents requests for street lights. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 10 Mr. Trehus suggested the policy regarding street lights be reviewed. He asked if the new street lights will match what is currently in the area. Mr. Powell stated the new street lights will be consistent unless NSP has changed their design. Mr. Dunn stated the proposed Comprehensive Plan does direct the City to study and develop a lighting plan. It is possible that Ordinances may be developed regarding street lighting. He stated that he believes the applicant has met all the requirements for approval. This is a good development for the City. The development will be a forcing issue to correct 62nd Street, which is another step in meeting the goals of improving the City's infrastructure. He stated he would not like to see a cul -de -sac, but would like to see good progress on 62nd Street. The issues from residents should be incorporated into the action that the City takes. He indicated he would like to move forward on this project. He is in favor of the project. He stated the traffic is unfortunate, but does not believe this project will add to that problem. Mr. Trehus read page 26 from the proposed Comprehensive Plan regarding premature expansion to a rural area. He stated this needs to be considered. He also read page 79, which referred to rural land uses and preserving open space. He read the staff recommendation from two months ago regarding the extension of 62nd Street. He noted the disadvantages of reconstructing 62nd Street now as opposed to later. This project will add more traffic to a rural area. According to the proposed Comprehensive Plan this development is premature. He noted there are only 58 acres left in the City's MUSA bank. This project will take 19 acres of the MUSA bank which will leave the City limited regarding business development until more MUSA is obtained. He stated the MUSA issue is a reason to deny approval of the project. Mr. Wessel stated no additional MUSA is needed for business development in the City. MUSA is not an issue. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION, and was supported by Mr. Corson, to approve the rezone of West Shadow Pond. Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Trehus voting no. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION, and was supported by Mr. Dunn, to approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to introduce MUSA to the West Shadow Pond site. Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Trehus voting no. Mr. Johnson made a MOTION to approve the West Shadow Pond Preliminary Plat, based on the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Utility Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the capabilities of 62nd Street and whether the funding and resources available is sufficient to support upgrade of the 62nd Street. Planning & Zoning Board November 12, 1998 Page 11 3. The Grading Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The plan may be subject to modification to provide for the maximum number of trees to be preserved. 4. The applicant provide a Vegetation Plan and Landscape Plan illustrating the trees to be removed and the trees to be preserved. 5. The applicant provide additional vegetation along the trail right -of -way to buffer the recreational and residential uses. 6. The Planning & Zoning Board strongly recommends the upgrading or reconstruction of 62nd Street occurs as soon as possible. Until reconstruction is completed, West Shadow Lake Road will be blocked at the north end of the development. Chair Schaps made a friendly amendment to incorporate all comments from citizens into the motion. Stop signs are needed in the area and neighborhood use of ponds should be clarified. The friendly amendment was accepted. Mr. Powell noted the need for stop signs in that area will be evaluated. Mr. Corson made a friendly amendment to clarify trails as far as specifying Spruce trees being placed in clusters. He also asked that concrete driveways be used on West Shadow Lake Road and there be a 40' setback incorporated into the motion. The friendly amendment was accepted. Mr. Johnson noted that covenants can only be enforced if there is a committee to enforce them. The MOTION, to approve the preliminary plat including stated conditions, neighborhood comments, and the friendly amendments, was supported by Mr. Dunn. Motion carried 6- 0 with Mr. Robinson abstaining. Mr. Carlson asked for direction from the Board regarding the ponds. Chair Schaps directed Mr. Carlson to work with staff Mr. Carlson stated that ponds have been made as outlots before which can create a legal problem. He suggested the City Attorney be asked for a recommendation. Chair Schaps directed staff to review the pond issue with the City Attorney. Chair Schaps recessed the meeting for five minutes. • 5 4 PO \1 a II \ \ 1 10 r --�- ►AIMt - "1 ▪ l� r - - --, - r - - --■ \ 1 \ Fox Rood • 1 I 1 / I I / f 1 4 ; 3 J4 8LOCK4 5 1 11 I 1 0 1 3. O\7 1 1 V 6 . lot", BLOCIj 3 i( \\ \/ J t 4 1 1 3 1 0 v 0 -c tn _ 2 1 N 0 .4 1 • Mat 57* 3 1 1 3 1 \ 6�\.\ ; ; \' • I -' ▪ 1 \ y-\ v� (/ \ / L . c- 1 c6 \5.- - - ---1 —J - -r--- r-- -1 - --r-" 1 3 c' , Fox Rood t 1 1 ... � et ti • r---- r- -- -T -� 1 t 1 l—''� \ \\ I 1 7 • s I 1 1 I 2 1 1 ; ',EILLOCK 4 i 6 •f e r3 se I R -1X Housing 22 Lots Total Average Lot Size = 31.989 SF = 0.73 Acres Min. lot Width = 90 Feet Min. Lot Depth = 150 Feet (Useable) T Tctol Plat Area 18.83 Acres Soto) High C4wgd - 449.370 SF 10.32 ACM Tend Wetland t panting - 8.51 Ayes 94.322 SF Wetlold all Total (2.17 Ayes). 212.012 sr Wetland Mitigation & Pending (4.57 Asses) r a 1 t. / • • .L ci .3 .i \ \ • • 3.- - -J I I I 107,205 % I •eer4 101111t1-m • f°"e`g 1 1 1 4 1 , $ \ \ • • • 2 / `\`\ lam/ 1 1 • • 1 4 •`.4. �1 n r 14 4 J .1 4. Red Maple Lone s 1 • / \ \ / ', � ,(\ 0\ -C)G. ; 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 Q, / 3 /t r' 1 v / 27.444 V svelviii, 0 / j4/ b / 2 /q0, 1 1 1 3. / 4 . l Street J 4 401•21' • -132144' I wog artier 1741 •4. •1w. r•.xr1 -.. 9.•• w Wm .I N ..• - ..4r .1y Nw4 -ee_.- w •..i 1 — • Sir '.rn -•4 e.I.�we c••^•- emir U. 14.4. a W -4s44. 14.b•.4 1..•In.. 324.•2 M 314.4 4001141443 / IItM1.Oe1 4q. 0.11 M•n/214Cp r.1 0:3043x, 1... • 04444 Pi 15. I ~ -..- .. mx•6. At MATTKE ENGINEERING. INC. 7671 Centro,. Avenue NE Fridley, 6171 55432 (512) 733— 0300 Richard S. Carlson & Associotes, Inc. pwravir, 71T G.Yd 4wr 411 ••■••. ••• 110672 (412) 70,-174 u•c7,lu West Shadow Lake Extension •..•rc 1nz Sketch Plon bt..n GJJ 4q-am40 1411 y14.1•:G T y C74tic. 0•n • i,a •9. •CAA. 1 "..:0[' 11 AGENDA iTEMMt D STAFF ORIGINATOR: Alan Brixius/Mary Kay Wyland DATE: 11/18/98 TOPIC: PUBLIC HEARING, Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment, Non- conforming Structures (4/5th Vote) BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Board suggested the following Text Amendment as a result of the recent Variance request from a property owner on Bald Eagle Blvd. This amendment would allow additions to non- conforming structures provided there is no increase in the number of units or an expansion in the degree of non- conformity. The Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 2 B.9 currently reads as follows: Alterations may be made to a structure containing non - conforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or expand size of existing building or structure. The proposed language is as follows: Alterations may be made to a structure containing non - conforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of units or expand the size or degree of non - conformity. Staff would recommend approval of the First Reading of the attached Ordinance Amendment. OPTIONS: 1. Approve Ordinance Amendment. 2. Retum to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 Xi+ 4411NPVVT1POMIIIINhl- dCd' Igtf ithczatil OF LINO LI ACH AD CERTIFICATE OF UkVEY 1N - For - Martha Houle 707 Harriet Avenue Shoreview, MN 55126 Tel: 4 82- 8973 GRAPHIC SCALE fro 200 ,., Of « The NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 Sec. 26, T 31, R 22 Anoka County, MN 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 100 ft HOUSE DETAIL CALE 1:50 908.21 L _- 24.7 9 N Q. 906.35 906.82 /� 40 0 24 ky ` \ a:<,1.... (O 90b.37- 1 4 906.40 1 05.7 *905.75 / =yoa \ / (n \ / 4.88 * 3D - *904.68 / EXISTING HOUSE TO BE MOVED IN HOUSE DIAG: 48.0 x 46.0 = 66.48 BARN DIAG: 54.0 X 52.0 = 74.97 i • E. G. R•D 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors SISO LEXINGTON AvENUE N. CIRCLE PINES, MN. 55014 -3625 Tel. 186 -5556 Fax 186 -6001 NORTH 5 West 1/4 Corner - Sec. 26. T31, R22 =T Anoka County, C.I.M. \I Elev. Mon. =909.72 e s j��\ Ilit LEGEND Q DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY R/W MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES ANOKA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET CO23� X1011.2 DENOTES W000 HUB AT 11 F001 OFFSET. DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION. DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE. A. DENOTES LOWLAND (NO WETLAND DELINEATION COMPLETED OR APPROVED BY ANY GOVT AGENCIES) BENCHMARK Southeast comer of bottom step of 2nd House 239.5 feet West of West 1/4 Comer Sec. 26, T 31, R 22. (Per Anoka County Highwoy Department) Elegy. = 911.58 1 hereby certify thot this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: License No. North Line of the NW1 /4 of SW1 /4 of Sec.26 492.14 - 7 9 j '__ I 1 906.35 906.82 3710 * 906.40 1 11 II' 9:5.75 1 ili / \ 4. 1 " *9CN.68 ` 3 N89'42'35'W BIRCH STREET = 02'35'50" R = 11399.16 L = 516.72 - 1314.83- C.SAH 10 N88•52' 50"w 301.30 N88'41'35'E ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY !RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO 11 48922 907.20 1 905.53 ' 888'42'35'W3- R = 11519.16 L = 522.16 904.27 904.13 905.57 04.48 899�.07.� "`jet 899.60 899.20 ". *.'+�'�rr� '-7 900.10 898.94 901.42 904.79 905.24 303.57 meas. -� 301.30 alot 912.6`_ N86•41'35'6 2'0.56 \ 1 (_. - .. + 918.39 f L 904.44 33 904.23 904.24 899.48 899.78 1.1 \� I 908.52 899.76 902.39 902.19 \ x 301.69 901.86 • 302.72 906.12 • 9:1140 .'"' _ - ."vs-- 901.95 r/ -- South line of the NW1 /4 of SW1 /4 of Sec.26 ' - 1317.77 N88.50'02" W 33 33 905.79_' 1; 33 0 cc J U 33 1314.83 588'52'50 "E Line of the NW1 /4 of SW1 /4 of Sec.26 C.SA.H. HIGHWAY NO. 21 33 Center of Sea 26, i T 31, R 22 AGENDA ITEM 5 E STAFF ORIGINATOR: Brian Wessel DATE: 11/18/98 TOPIC: Comprehensive Plan Submittal to Metropolitan Council BACKGROUND: Communities within the Seven County Metro Area have been mandated, by State Legislation, to submit their updated comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council by year end. The Comprehensive Plan Task Force approved the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan on a 12 -0 vote, the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board approved the plan on a 6 -1 vote. Staff would recommend submittal to the Metropolitan Council of the Draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of Lino Lakes. This plan will then be reviewed by Met Council staff. That staff review may include recommendation for approval or suggested changes /revisions to the plan. Upon completion of the Met Counicl review, the City Council will be asked to adopt a final draft of the Plan. This will most likely occur in the first quarter of 1998. OPTIONS: 1. Motion to submit the Draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review and approval. mpp sew>c tti%- (c,, , 2. Return to staff for further consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 TO: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS: THE MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS ON 62ND STREET HAVE SIGNED A PETITION REQUESTING THAT WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE WOULD NOT BE EXTENDED TO 62ND STREET (I HAVE 10 SIGNATURES OUT OF 14, AND I HAVE ONE MORE RESIDENT TO CONTACT). I AM STARTING A PETITION FOR RESIDENTS ON RED MAPLE LANE, WARE ROAD AND LINDA AVENUE. THOSE SIGNING THE PETITION WOULD REQUEST()THAT WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE WOULD NOT BE EXTENDED TO 62ND STREET. (WOULD THOSE RESIDENTS WHO WOULD SIGN THIS PETITION PLEASE RAISE THEIR HANDS). 1) WHEN WAS THE LAST FEASIBILITY STUDY DONE REGARDING BUILDING HOMES IN LINO LAKES AND IS THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL ABIDING BY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS. I FEEL THE GROWTH RATE IN LINO LAKES IS T00 HIGH. 2) IF WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE IS EXTENDED TO 62ND STREET: A) I BELIEVE WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE RESIDENTS WOULD ENCOUNTER TRAFFIC PROBLEMS IF THEY TRY TO ENTER 62ND STREET. B) I BELIEVE RED MAPLE LANE RESIDENTS WILL ENCOUNTER TRAFFIC PROBLEMS AS WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE RESIDENTS ENTER 62ND STREET. C) I FEEL THERE WILL BE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS AT 62ND STREET AND WARE ROAD SINCE 62ND STREET DEADENDS AT WARE ROAD. D) I FEEL WHEN RESIDENTS TRAVEL NORTH TO BIRICH STREET OR SOUTH TO COUNTY ROAD J, THEY WILL ENCOUNTER ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC PROBLEMS. E) IF TRAFFIC IS EXCESSIVE ON WARE ROAD, I FEEL SOME RESIDENTS WILL EXIT THRU LINDA AVENUE. 3) THE MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS ON 62ND STREET HAVE SIGNED A PETITION THEY WOULD NOT PAY FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ON 62ND STREET. A) HOW MUCH DO STATE AID FUNDS PAY FOR STATE AID ROADS? B) WHO WOULD PAY FOR THE REMAINING COST OF IMPROVING 62ND STREET? I APPRECIATE YOUR HELP ON THIS MATTER. SINCERELY, ROSEMARY WILLIAMS 498 62ND STREET 484 -4676 P.S. A QUAD COMMUNITY REPORTER INFORMED ME HE WOULD BE AT THIS MEETING. ALSO MY HUSBAND AND I FEEL THAT IF WEST SHADOW POND WAS APPROVED, TRAFFIC SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ENTER 62ND STREET AND WOULD HAVE TO EXIT W. SHADOW LAKE DRIVE. PETITION TO: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS THE UNDERSIGNED WILL N 0 T P A Y FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ON 62ND STREET. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, AS PROPERTY OWNERS ON 62ND STREET ARE PETITIONING THE FOLLOWING; 1) THAT TRAFFIC WOULD NOT BE ROUTED ONTO 62ND STREET FROM W. SHADOW LK:DR. ** 2) THAT SEWER AND WATER WOULD NOT BE INSTALLED ON 62ND STREET. 3) THAT RESIDENTS BE ALLOWED TO REPAIR OR REPLACE THEIR SEPTIC AND WELL SYSTEMS AT ANY TIME THEY CHOOSE €VEN IF SEWER AND WATER ARE IN THE STREET NAME Zotzt UJti� 17-?(7/2/1-z-1:1 "A ' Lam.. * *THAT WEST SHADOW LAKE ADDRESS DATE ca, a s2 it- t g'-- I T 11- / r Th LSyo- c z',`- ' 51 11- / DRIVE IS NOT EXTENDED TO 62ND STREET. PETITION TO: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: THE RESIDENTS ON 62ND STREET PAGE 2 THE UNDERSIGNED ARE PETQ�IQQTIONING NAME FOR THE ITEMS ON ,PAGE 1: ADDRESS-6-06- DDRESS - �U 6 (7Z'vs t 47 ?6 �. 760 Lynn & George Fernstrom 6340 Red Maple Lane Lino Lakes, MN 55014 (651) 483 -6198 November 23, 1998 Dear Council Members: This letter is our request to you to re -think the development of the project: WEST SHADOW PONDS. As we are unable to attend the meeting this evening, this would be our proverbial "$ .02 worth ". We have had the pleasure of living in Lino Lakes for the past 15 years and fully recognize that growth is part of the changing landscape for this community. We would also like to recognize and commend Mr. Carlson on the larger lot sizes for this development, something that we believe could be a complement to the city. What we take issue with is the addition of 22 more homes feeding into a roadway system that is already faulty. The street known as 62nd street is a road, which barely accommodates the limited traffic it already takes on a daily basis. To rebuild this road to satisfy us and the addition of 22 homes will cost the city a good sum of change. At a time when there is already rampant development and surely roads which are in need of repair, perhaps, the city should take this opportunity to vote "no" to this new development, and upgrade the roads first before extra loads are placed on them. As representatives of the people, please take the time to hear those of us who are already living in Lino Lakes, and not necessarily those who may live here, nor the needs of one developer. Drive down 62nd and actually feel and see what that road is and what it may become. South Miller Glen is not done developing yet, do not add to the misery, which is 62nd street. It isn't, nor was it, ever designed to handle increased traffic. We are all acutely aware of the issues that arose from Ware road. We are asking that this be given more time and thought by the council. Our request would be the following: #1. Vote no on this new development. #2. Choice would be that if the development must go through, that West Shadow Lake extension end in a cul -de -sac with the potential to be connected to 62nd in the future. (This allows 62nd some time to heal /develop as need be). We understand that Lino Lakes is a community caught in the pains of developing. As such, please take the time to ensure that it develops into something to be proud of, not simply to develop "just because ". We thank -you for your time and consideration in this matter. Respectfully submitted, AGENDA ITEM* D STAFF ORIGINATOR: A y Wyland DATE: 11/18/98 TOPIC: PUB H RI , Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment No coal rmin ; S Lures (415t#� Vow The Planning 'and Zoning Board suggested the foilowin Text Amendrt nt as a result of the ant Vari request from a pn rty owner on Said Eagie`Blvd.' This amendment would allow add Iona to non-conforming structures provided there is no increase in the number of units or an expansion in the degree of non - c onfornnity. The Zoning Ordinance, Section 3, Subd. 2 B.9 currently reads as follows; Akera#ions maybe made a s tructure contain non - nformin r res at units when aey ility thereof, provided they Mil' not increase the number of dr ug units or expand size of existing binding or structure, The proposed la. r gufage Alterations may be mac t to a structure contain i non nfc�r rrrig residential units when they rill improve the livabl ty thereof, pm they will not increase the number of units or expand the size gr ciggEge af, foray. Id recommend approval of the First Reading of the attached Ordinance OPTIONS: 1. Approve Ordinance Amendment. 2. Return to staff for further torisidera on. Option 1 OCT-06"--1996 16:07 NAC plc 70.., I V V ORDINANCE NO. 98- CITY OF LINO LAKES ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF ALTERATIONS TO STRUCTURES CONTAINING NON - CONFORMING RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Section 3, Subd. 2.B.9 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance (Non - Conforming Uses and Structures, Provisions) is hereby amended to read as follows: 9. Alterations may be made to a structure containing non - conforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of duelling units or expand the size or degree of the non - conformity. existing-Valet-tire. Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED by the Lino Lakes City Council the day of 1998. CITY OF LINO LAKES By: Kimberly Sullivan, Mayor ATTEST: By: Marilyn Anderson, Clerk/Treasurer TOTAL P.03 AGENDA ITEM 5 E STAFF ORIGINATOR Brian Wessel DATE: 11/20198 TOPIC: Comprehensive Plan Submittal to Metropolitan Council BACKGROUND: Communities within the Seven County Metro Area have been mandat 1, by State Legislation, to submit an updated comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council by year end. The Comprehensive Plan Task Force approved the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan on a 12-0 vote, the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board approved the plan on a 6-1 vote. Staff would recommend submittal to the Metropolitan Council of the Draft Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of Lino Lakes. This plan will then be reviewed by Met Council staff, the review may include recommendation for approval or suggested changes/revisions to the plan. Upon completion of the Met Council review, the City Council will be asked to adopt a final Plan. This will most likely occur in the first quarter of 1998. For Council information, the City's submittal to the Met Council must include a land use plan, transportation plan, and sewer and water utility plans. The transportation plan is complete and will be forwarded to the Met Council as a part of the Comprehensive Plan submittal. The sewer and water utility plans are being drafted based on the land use information provided in the draft land use plan and will be submitted to Met Council upon their completion. OPTIONS. 1. Motion to submit the Draft Comprehensive Land Use Flair to the Metropolitan Council for their review and approval. 2. Return to staff for further consideration. NOU -20 98 15:06 FROM: ItMetropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future TO:612 464 4568 PAGE:02 /03 November 19, 1998 Brian Wessel Community Development Director City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes MN 55014 -2123 RE: Request for Clarification of Council Procedures for Review of Comprehensive Plans Dear Mr. Wessel: In general, there are two ways the Metropolitan Council receives and reviews comprehensive plans, plan updates and plan amendments submitted from local units of government. In both cases, the city council must take affirmative action to send the plan to the Council for review. These options arc outlined in the Council's Local Planning Handbook, May 1997 edition, pagc7.3. The first option is for the city council to "take action to submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review and continent but without taking formal action to approve the plan." In this case, the city council ask for the Council to complete its review and determine whether any plan modification will be required before the plan is officially adopted. The upside of this action is that it may eliminate the need for multiple hearings if a plan modification is required, and allows the city council to consider the Council comments in depth before adopting the plan. The downside to some city councils is that adoption of the plan is postponed until the Council's review is completed, which may take up to sixty days following the Council's determination that the plan is complete for review. Because this option does not require formal approval of the comprehensive plan, a two- thirds majority approval by the city council may not be required simply for submission of the plan to the Council unless required by city charter. Minn. Stat. § 462.355, Subd. 3 says in part... ...Unless otherwise provided by charter, the goveming body may by resolution by a two - thirds vote of all of its members adopt and amend the comprehensive plan or portion thereof as the official municipal plan upon such notice and hearing as may be prescribed by ordinance. This permits a second option for a city council to "adopt the plan contingent on Metropolitan Council review and comment." in effect, under this option, the city council takes official action to adopt the plan but agrees not to take any action to implement the new plan (such as making zoning changes) until after the Metropolitan Council has completed its review. The upside of this option is that the city council does not need to take further action on the plan or hold further hearings so long as the Council's review does not result in a plan modification. The downside is that if the Council requires a plan modification, the city may need to have another public hearing and the city council will need to take additional action to modify and resubmit the plan to the Council. AREA CODE CHANGES TO 651 IN JULY. 1998 230 Cu;i Ptiih' crer,I SI. 1 ;`:nit, MIr" ebniv. 55101.1626 16121 602 -1000 Fax 602 -1550 TDD /ITY291.0904 Metro Info Lint 602 1868 NOO -20 98 15:06 FROM: Brian Wessel November 19, 1998 Page 2 TO:612 464 4568 PAGE:03 /03 In Lino Lakes' situation, unless otherwise provided by charter, it would appear that 2/3' of the city council would need to vote affirmatively to adopt the plan and send it on to the Council under this option. The Council has reviewed plans submitted by local governing bodies under both of the options discussed above. Regardless of the option chosen, Metropolitan Council review and comment on the local comprehensive plan, plan update or plan amendment is necessary before the city can implement its plan. This letter is intended to suggest possible options for the city in for submitting its comprehensive plan to the Council for review. It is not intended to convey a legal opinion -on the matter. You should consult with your city attorney with respect to the city's charter requirements and the applicability of the options to Lino Lakes, or ask for an opinion on the matter from the Attorney General. If you have any further questions, please contact Guy Peterson, your sector representative in the Office of Local Assistance at 651 - 602 -1418. Sincere Thomas C. c vecn Director of Housing and Local Assistance c: James Wychor, Metropolitan Council District 9 Jeanne Matross, Associate General Counsel Richard E. Thompson, Supervisory, Comprehensive Planning Guy Peterson, Sector Representative, Office of Local Assistance V :/l ibruy/ commundv /referral/letters/LLvote.doC NOU -20 -1998 11:53 NMC NAC 612 595 9837 P.01/08 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM - VIA FAX TRANSMISSION TO: Brian Wessel FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: 20 November 1998 RE: Lino Lakes - Comprehensive Plan Review Comments FILE NO: 194.02 - 98.10 Attached please find my evaluation of the points of compromise for the Comprehensive Plan. Due to a meeting conflict, I am unable to attend Monday night's Council workshop. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 5541 6 PHONE 612- 595 -9636 FAX 612 -595 -9337 E -MAIL NAC @WINTERNET.COM NOU -20 -1998 11:53 NAC I. ISSUE - Neighborhood Businesses Along Birch Street 1. Destroy the character of the street. Response: 612 595 9837 P.02/08 1 a. The Comprehensive Plan outlines strategies for blending the commercial development with the surrounding residential through performance standards and proper site planning. 1 b. The concept of neighborhood commercial is to offer commercial services that will address the needs of adjoining residential neighborhoods. This intended to contribute to the character of neighborhoods by providing compatible services, providing locations where neighbors may meet, and to reduce the need for longer trips by addressing day-to-day consumer needs. lc. The proposed neighborhood commercial locations are located at the intersections of the City's major thoroughfares. Neighborhood commercial land use would benefit from the proximity to these transportation routes. Alternative residential land uses may view this physical location as a compatibility issue. 2. Is the Centerville Road/Birch Street location an optimal location for ''the athletic complex"? Response: 2a. This site could be considered for an athletic complex. The site has excellent access to two major streets for large events and the land area is available. 2b. This area of the City is not proposed to receive utility availability until after 2010. In this respect, the City would not be sacrificing any of its commercial area earmarked for immediate development. 2c. The athletic complex would likely be developed prior to 2010. The athletic complex would also be a community -wide facility. In this respect, the facility would represent a fairly intense land use being introduced into an area that is currently rural residential in character. The City should consider both the traffic and site amenities associated with an athletic complex (i.e., lighting, seating, concession stands) when evaluating this location for the athletic facility. This land use may be as intense as the neighborhood commercial. 1 NOU -20 -1998 11:53 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03/08 3. What is the tax impact of taking this off the tax rolls entirely, and how does it impact the overall commercial availability to reach our tax goals? Response: 3a. As a public park facility, the site would be tax exempt and the various taxing jurisdictions would not receive any tax revenues from the site. 3b. The loss of this commercial site would not make or break the City efforts to achieve the City's tax goals. This site lies outside the 2010 growth area. As such, it would not have development potential until after 2010. Additionally, the land use designation and zoning would not guarantee a timely development even after MUSA became available. 3c. The table below illustrates the property tax capacity ratio for 1999, illustrating the different tax capacities for various land use types. PROPERTY CLASS RATES 1999 Percent Homesteads < $72,000* 1.00 Homesteads $72,000 to $75,000 1.00 Homesteads > $75,000 1.70 Rental Homes < $75,000 1.25 Rental Homes >$75,000 1.70 Duplexes/Triplexes 1.70 Apartments 2.50 C/I and Utility < $100,000 ** 2.45 C/I and Utility $100,000 to $150,000 2.45 C/I and Utility > $150,000 3.50 Low income Rental 1.00 Cabins < $75,000* 1.25 Cabins $72,000 to $75,000 1.25 Cabins > $75,000 2.20 Farm land and buildings Homestead < 320 acres < $115,000 0.35 2 NOU -20 -1998 11:53 NRC 612 595 9837 P.04/08 PROPERTY CLASS RATES 1999 Farm land and buildings Homestead < 320 acres > $115,000 0.80 Homestead > 320 acres < $115,000 0.35 Homestead > 320 acres > $115,000 1.25 Non - Homesteads 1.25 * Homestead and cabin tier threshold increased from $72,000 to $75,000 for 1998 ** C/I tier threshold increased from $100,000 to $150,000 and the limit of one preferred C/I property per County per owner is eliminated for 1998 IL REGULATORY MECHANISM 1. EHI -Tax Base vs. C/I 2. Existing Comprehensive Plan Measures The Comprehensive Plan outlines goals for percentage of tax base comprised by commercial and industrial land uses and reductions in the local City tax rates. The goals that were established were deemed achievable by the Community Development Department and the Comprehensive Plan Task Force. The ultimate goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to inspire a development philosophy that results in a reduction in City's local tax rate. The reduction in the local tax rate directly benefits the local property owners. The increase in C/I is an important element to achieving this goal, however, it is not the only means of accomplishing this objective. The City should use the local tax rate as the primary measure of fiscal success. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes a inter - dependence between residential growth and economic development. The establishment of a moratorium will serve to slow-down the City success in expanding the C/I growth. The City has designated sufficient land area to accommodate projected commercial and industrial growth. 3 NOU -20 -1998 11 :54 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06/88 2. Alternative - Limit 2010 expansion to 200 acres, post 2010 to 500 acres. All MUSA could be requested at the time the Comprehensive Plan is filed. Establish written limitations on MUSA availability. Response: 2a. The City could consider the reduction of the MUSA request to reduce or eliminate the amount of MUSA overage. 2b. Based on Anoka County assessment policies, the geographic application of MUSA would restrict the City's flexibility in future use of the MUSA. If the City does not wish to retain this flexibility, the direct geographic application is possible. 2c. The past geographic application of MUSA resulted in areas of the City with MUSA not having practical access to sanitary sewer. -As a result, this land has not developed. To bring utilities to these isolated MUSA areas require projects of sufficient size to finance the needed utility improvements. This may work contrary to the City's objective of a steady rate of growth. 3. Use alternative measures that relate to a "footprint size of 7,575 households." 3a. The alternatives for controlling growth generally stem from the availability of MUSA. The following alternatives can be considered: (1) Adjustments to the amount of MUSA requested. (2) The direct geographic application of MUSA versus the use of growth areas and a MUSA reserve. The Comprehensive Plan outlined its MUSA forecasts and application philosophy as a means for controlling growth while retaining some flexibility in addressing future growth interests. As a compromise, we would suggest a reduction in the MUSA acres request while retaining the proposed Phase I- growth area. This would serve to limit the amount of MUSA expansion but allow the City flexibility in the geographic application of MUSA. This option would provide the City with the ability to maintain a constant rate of growth rather than the peaks and valleys of past years. 5 NOV -20 -1998 11:54 V. PAGE 72 NAC 612 595 9837 P.0 ?/08 1. Remove last sentence in Item 1 and remove Item 3. This recommendation references the following staged growth area rules: "1. Urban development through 2010 shall be confined to 2010 staged growth areas. The City will annually evaluate community growth prior to expanding into the 2020 staged growth area. 2. The City maintains the opportunity to trade staged growth areas through a Comprehensive Plan amendment process to respond to changing community development needs." Response: la. The removal of these rules can be done. It should be noted, however, that this modification would not prohibit future City Councils from considering Comprehensive Plan amendments that may result in a growth area land trade or an adjustment in the staged growth area boundaries. VI. HOUSING 1. No percentage increase in medium and high density housing except for seniors. Response: 1 a. The Comprehensive Plan promotes a diversity of life cycle housing opportunities. The limit of medium and high density housing reduces these housing types as life cycle housing options. 1 b. City staff is in the process of examining the LCA benchmarks with the _ Metropolitan Council and making necessary adjustments reflective of community interests. 1 c. The Comprehensive Plan recommendation for medium and high density residential does not mandate that these are to lower value homes. The plan does make specific recommendations for strengthening performance standards to require amenities and quality construction to insure high quality construction. (Lino Lakes townhome development has ranged in value from $100,000 to $250,000.) 6 NOV-20-1998 11:54 NAC VII. FRITZ JOHNSON LETTER 10/20/98 612 595 9837 P.08/08 1. Staff would favor the elimination of any numerical growth reference. However, we feel that it is necessary to outline the City's managed growth objectives of a constant rate of growth rather than peaks and valleys. 2. By establishing the City's growth management objectives in the Comprehensive Plan property owners, prospective developers, and businesses have an understanding of the City's growth goals. Biannual goals setting for the number of building permits creates a moving target for the various parties that may have a development interest in Lino Lakes. 3. Holding two- thirds of the requested MUSA in reserve until after 2005. This does not assure that the existing MUSA will be built out by 2005. Through the growth management recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, the City can control both the rate and location of the development through the use of the MUSA reserve. This process was seen as a means of addressing both the growth management concerns and providing opporutnities for local property owners to pursue development. VIII. DEFINITION 1. Growth Area: The geographic area within the City where MUSA may be applied. 2. Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA): The MUSA defines the areas within the City where public sewer may be made available. 3. MUSA Reserve or Bank: MUSA that is not already geographically defined within the City of Lino Lakes. The MUSA reserve shall be MUSA acres held in reserve and geographically applied within a growth area as development is approved. 7 TfTAL P.08 MEMORANDUM date: November 20, 1998 to: Brian Wessel from: Jeff Smyser subject: Growth and MUSA Projections I have looked at the data relevant to growth in Lino Lakes including the numbers provided in the draft Comprehensive Plan. Attached is an analysis of past growth based on census data and future projections based on the data in the Plan. The historical data in the Plan is from the U.S. census and building permit records. The projections (forecasts) for number of households and population are included here for easy reference. I've added a table that shows the projected ten -year increases in households, population, and employment. It also shows the five -year increase from 1995 to (projected) 2000. I've also attached a few graphs that illustrate past growth trends and the reduction in growth envisioned by the plan. These graphs show the ten -year and annual increase in number of households based on the Plan. They show how growth will be slowed significantly. I've also added a graph showing how household size has been decreasing over time. This has been true regionally and nationally, so the Lino Lakes data is consistent with national trends. Please note that the numbers are rounded off for simplicity. The analysis also includes MUSA acreage. The analysis addresses both the MUSA reserve (often referred to as the "bank ") and the existing MUSA acreage that has already been mapped. This data has been updated since the draft Plan was printed, so the MUSA reserve is slightly smaller than what is shown in the Plan (54 acres vs. 96). I've used the most current data available to our staff. Staff discussed the probable demand for additional MUSA. There will be the need for approximately 240 acres of new MUSA to accommodate residential growth in the near future. This figure is based on knowledge of development projects anticipated in the Phase 1 areas. This is a "net" acreage total, in that it does not include wetlands known or suspected in the expected development areas. In addition, staff anticipates a need for approximately 180 additional MUSA acres for Phase 1 commercial /industrial development. DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS from page 63 LINO LAKES RESIDENTIAL PERMITS 1990 Number of Resid. Average Annual Year Housing Units Number of Units 1970 -1979 645 64.5 1980 -1989 1222 122.2 1990 -1997 1928 241.0 from page 64 LINO LAKES DEMOGRAPHIC FORECASTS 1990 1990 1995 est 2000 2010 2020 Households 2603 3899 4600 6000 7575 Population 8807 13097 14540 17820 20500 Employment 1229 1405 1750 2570 3130 Using the same numbers, a look at the change over time, in hard numbers and percentages. 1990 1995 est 2000 2010 2020 Households 2603 3899 4600 6000 7575 5 -yr. increase 1296 701 % 50% 18% 10 -yr increase 1997 1400 1575 % 77% 30% 26% Population 8807 13097 14540 17820 20500 10 -yr increase 5733 3280 2680 % 65% 23% 15% Employment 1229 1405 1750 2570 3130 10 -yr increase 521 820 560 % 42% 47% 22% Ten -year households data only 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Households 812 1388 2603 4600 6000 7575 10 -yr increase 576 1215 1997 1400 1575 annual increase 58 122 200 140 158 Ten -year population data only 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Population 3692 4966 8807 14540 17820 20500 10 -yr increase 1274 3841 5733 3280 2680 annual increase 127 384 573 328 268 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Population 3692 4966 8807 14540 17820 20500 Households 812 1388 2603 4600 6000 7575 person /hshld 4.5 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.7 MUSA ANALYSIS units /acre per historic development 2 acres remaining in MUSA reserve 54 undeveloped acres in existing MUSA 868 Commercial /Industrial Acres in Existing MUSA 183 Residential Acres in Existing MUSA 685 total Residential MUSA acres (existing and reserve) 739 These 739 acres provide, at two units per acre, for the following: units per year 100 147 150 175 200 225 250 no. of years 14.8 10.1 9.9 8.4 7.4 6.6 5.9 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 - 600 400 200 - 0 1970 10 -Year Increases in Number of Households 1997 1575 1215 576 1400 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 200 180 - 160 - 140 - 120 - 100 - 80 60 - 40 - 20 - Annual Increases in Number of Households 158 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Past and Projected Persons Per Household 1970 -2020 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 - 3.5 - 3.0 -- 2.5 - 2.0 - 1.5 1.0 - 0.5 - 0.0 1970 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.7 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 .; AGENDA ITEMF STAFF ORIGINATOR: Brian Wessel DATE: 11/23/98 TOPIC: Consideration of Livable Communities Demonstration Account Contracts BACKGROUND: The City of Lino Lakes received a $220,000 grant from the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account. The purpose of the grant is to hire nationally recognized experts to accomplish three things: 1) refine the master plan for The Village as a demonstration of a pedestrian oriented, mixed use development; 2) design a development framework that provides mechanisms to ensure implementation of the master plan; and 3) study the feasibility of combining commercial storefront space and living space in the same structures to provide a iiive/work environment. Community Development staff and the Town Center Group have begun the process and intend to accomplish the objectives of the grant within the entire Town Center. The end result will be a plan for compatible, diverse uses on all four quadrants on the I -3W interchange. Early discussions and plans are beginning to address the integration of transportation, housing, commercial, civic and recreational uses, plus connections within the Town Center to make a safe, walkable environment. Calthorpe Associates, a nationally known urban planning and design firm that specializes in Traditional Neighborhood Development, has visited the site and produced preliminary plans for The Village within the context of the entire interchange area Peter Calthorpe and Matt Taecker, principals of the firm, are involved in many projects around the country that have become reality. They are interested in the unique opportunities within the Town Center. As a part of their contract with the city, they will be including the expertise of the Design Center for American Urban Landscape at the University of Minnesota School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture. They will also subcontract with Maxfield Research, a local marketing research group, for local supply -side data Zimmerman/Volk Associates is a market research group that is also well known for its cutting edge work in housing analysis. They go beyond traditional market research and study the residential mix that best matches the lifestyle and economic characteristics of households with the highest potential to move into this type of mixed use development. The intent of this group of experts, working with staff, the Town Center Group, and consultant Dennis Grebner, is to complete the redesign of the Village, the transportation and land use study of the Town Center, and the development framework by mid -1999. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the contracts with Calthorpe Associates, Maxfield Research Group and ZimmermanNolk Associates for the completion of the objectives of the Livable Communities grant funding. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 althorpe sociates Urban Planners • Architects Mayor Kimberly A. Sullivan City of Lino Lakes, 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 Dear Mayor Sullivan, October 1, 1998 We are excited by the prospect of helping your community create a vibrant town center. We feel that a true town center draws community members for various reasons, with a range of civic, commercial, residential and open space uses. Calthorpe Associates is nationally recognized for its ability to integrate these pieces within a pedestrian supportive fabric, while being responsive to market realities. In this proposal, we described a scope of work and work products that we consider to be essential to a successful project. We have broken the scope into phases, and submit Phase 1 to you for authorization at this time. If the City decides to commit to the direction described by Phase 1, we will resubmit the Phase 2 & Phase 3 scopes for authorization. (We have included Phase 2 & 3 scopes to give you a more complete understanding of remaining tasks.) If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me or Matt Taecker, my Associate in charge of this important project. PHASE 1: PRELIMINARY MASTER PLANNING $35,000 1] Opportunities and Constraints Analysis & Review of Relevant Documents $5,000 This task will draw out key issues and questions. Using information made available to us, we will review existing aerials, site plans, utility maps, topographic maps, wetland surveys, local development regulations, comprehensive plans, and other documents relating to the site. Using available materials, we will summarize critical features within an Opportunities & Constraints Map. Features that are likely to be important include: site access, wetlands, drainage, mature woodlands, steep slopes, noise, and use restrictions. We will also prepare a context map that shows the site's relationship with surrounding land uses, natural features, and transportation. Products: Opportunity & Constraints Map Context Map September 23 Meeting to Review Initial Analysis 2] Preliminary Master Plan $20,000 We will develop a Preliminary Master Plan (at 1" =100') that describes land uses /intensities, building /open space configurations, and circulation patterns. A statistical summary will accompany the Master Plan and describe floor area, unit counts, and parking for the various commercial, residential and civic elements. A shared parking analysis will also be performed. 739 Allston Way Berkeley, CA 94710 510 - 548 -6800 Fax 510- 548 -6848 I't•tt r (aithurtx • mitt ide( ker • k ,i•tih F:. Si a iig,i Prior to finalizing the Preliminary Master Plan, an interim sketch of the Master Plan will be provided for review and comment by City staff and the team's market economist. Products: Interim Sketch -- Preliminary Master Plan Statistical Summary Shared Parking Analysis Presentation Plan -- Preliminary Master Plan Statistical Summary Shared Parking Analysis 3] Preliminary Studies for Streets and Open Space $5,000 Many of the unique village qualities desired for this site will be captured in the scale and character of streets and open spaces. We will develop: a set of critical street sections, an open space framework diagram (showing trails and drainage patterns), and a sketch concept for a "village green." Special attention will be given to maintaining mature woodlands, encouraging naturalized solutions to drainage, and taking advantage of scenic views. Products: Street Sections Open Space Framework Diagram Village Green Sketch Plan 4] Public Presentation and Site Visit $5,000 An Associate will travel to Lino Lakes to present Phase 1 materials to the community. A slide show will be developed to describe the proposed plans and illustrate them using relevant precedents. We will also assist City staff in soliciting feedback by developing a questionnaire or by recording comments before the assembly. We will also visit the site to field verify conditions critical to the Master Plan. Finally, we can meet with City staff to discuss Phase 2 and possible revisions to the Master Plan. Products: One -Day Visit & Public Presentation TERMS We bill on a fixed fee basis, to be billed monthly on a percentage of task completed, and on a time and materials basis for additional services when requested. (See enclosed billing policy statement.) Expenses are included within the budgeted amounts. We will require a $10,000 deposit to begin work which will be credited to the final invoice for services on this project. Enclosed as part of this agreement is our Billing Policy (exhibit A) and General Conditions of Agreement (Exhibit B) from the AIA standard contract document B151. If you wish us to proceed with Phase 1 and you agree to the terms herein, please sign below and return a copy as a letter of agreement. i7 Peter Calthorpe Calthorpe Associates, Date /v 9 ' Kimberly A. Sullivan City of Lino Lakes Date PHASE 2: DETAILED MASTER PLANNING $40,000 (non including Task 9) 5] Refined Master Plan $15,000 We will develop a Refined Master Plan (at 1" =100') that describes land uses /intensities, building /open space configurations, and circulation patterns. The Refined Master Plan will be based on City preferences, the market economics analysis, and technical feasibility's (grading and drainage assessments by a civil engineer are advised). A statistical summary will accompany the Master Plan and describe floor area, unit counts, and parking for commercial, residential and civic elements. A shared parking analysis will be performed. An interim sketch of the Master Plan will be provided for review by City staff and the team's market economist. We will also coordinate with the project's civil engineer (to be retained by the City) as they prepare a Tentative Map. 6] Street Sections and Parking $4,000 Critical street sections developed in Phase 1 will be revised and expanded to include all streets in the area. In addition, critical intersections and critical parking configurations will also be analyzed and illustrated. We will coordinate closely with the City's public works and fire departments to ensure acceptance of these materials. Products: Revised and Expanded Street Sections Intersection Plans Parking Analysis 7] Parks and Open Space Schematic Design $6,000 We will refine the open space framework diagram developed in Phase 1 and finalize a schematic plan for the "village green." We will also develop two additional schematic plans for other active open spaces, such as linear parks, pocket parks, tot -lots or amphitheater areas. Techniques for maintaining mature woodlands, encouraging naturalized solutions to drainage, and taking advantage of scenic views will be diagrammed. Products: Revised Open Space Framework Diagram Village Green Schematic Plan Two Additional Schematic Plans 8] Typical Lot Plans and Building Types Studies $10,000 To help finalize the Master Plan and communicate its built character, we will diagram schematic lot plans for various residential, commercial and mixed uses. These studies will show the product type for a given lot size along with its typical massing, entry pattern, sectional relationships and parking configuration. Products: Building Type Diagrams for Prevailing Llses Site Plan Diagrams for Prevailing Uses 9] Optional Renderings Bird's- eye - $4,000; Street level - $2,500 Perspective renderings are valuable public presentation marketing resources. Bird's -eye and street - level perspective renderings will be prepared which illustrate key views of and within the project. 10] Public Presentation and Working Session $5,000 An Associate will travel to Lino Lakes to present Phase 2 materials to the community, and discuss needed refinements with City staff so that materials can be finalized. Products: One -Day Visit, Public Presentation & Working Session with staff. PHASE 3: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS $50,000 11] General Zoning Overlay Standards $15,000 A set of reusable 'Block Standards' will be developed which will allow the City to regulate key aspects of future development. These measurable standards can be applied through simple administrative review of projects, while offering developers flexibility. They will be crafted to result in a high - quality mixed -use pedestrian- oriented town center. A description of techniques for modifications and variances will be included. Products: Block Standards for Town Center 12] Design Guidelines $30,000 Guidelines for the land use components will be developed to control the ultimate builders. Individual packages of urban and architectural controls will be developed for the various residential, commercial and mixed use types contained within the town center. Landscape, signage and lighting controls are not included. Products: Design Guidelines for Town Center 13] Public Presentation and Working Session $5,000 An Associate will travel to Lino Lakes to present Phase 2 materials to the community, and discuss needed refinements with City staff so that materials can be finalized. Products: One -Day Visit, Public Presentation & Working Session with staff. BILLING POLICY Fees for Services The hourly billing rates for employees of Calthorpe Associates are as follows: Principal $200.00 Associate $125.00 Project Manager $100.00 Designer $80.00 Draftsman $60.00 Clerical $40.00 Expenses Services billed at cost: Long distance telephone Messenger services Postage Photocopies Auto Mileage @ $.35 Travel Expenses Contract Blue Printing Special Materials and Supplies Special CAD Services Billing Invoices will be issued monthly for services and expenses of that month. Payment is due 30 days from the date of invoice. Late payment will accrue interest at the rate of 1.5% per month. $151 Policy Attachment Article 5 Ownership and Use of Documents 5.1 Drawings and Specifications as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. The Owner shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifications for information and reference in connection with the Owner's use and occupancy of the Project. The Drawings and Specifications shall not be used by the Owner on other projects, for additions to this Project, or for completion of this Project by others provided the Architect is not in default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the Architect. 5.2 Submission or distribution to meet official regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not td be construed as publication in derogation of the Architect's rights. Article 6 Arbitration 6.1 All claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties to this Agreement, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. No arbitration, arising out of or relating to this Agreement, shall include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional person not a party to this Agreement except by written consent containing a specific reference to this Agreement and signed by the Architect, the Owner, and any other person sought to be joined. Any consent to arbitration involving an additional person or persons shall not constitute consent to arbitration of any dispute not described therein. This Agreement to arbitrate and any agreement to arbitrate with an additional person or persons duly consented to by the parties to this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. 6.2 In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 6.3 The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Termination of Agreement 7.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the party initiating the termination. 7.2 This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner upon at least seven days' written notice to the Architect in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. 7.3 In the event of termination not the fault of the Architect, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed to termination date, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Termination Expenses as defined in Paragraph 7.4. 7.4 Termination Expenses include expenses directly attributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensated, plus an amount computed as a percentage of the total compensation earned to the time of termination, as follows: .1 20 percent if termination occurs during the Design Phase, or .2 10 percent if termination occurs during the Construction Documents phase, or .3 5 percent if termination occurs during any subsequent phase. Article 8 Miscellaneous Provisions 8.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. 8.2 As between the parties to this Agreement: as to all acts or failures by either party to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than the relevant Date of Substantial Completion of the Work, and as to any acts or failures to act occurring after the relevant Date of Substantial Completion, not later than the date of issuance of the final Certificate of Payment. 8.3 The Owner and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 8.4 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the Owner and Architect. AIA Document B151 • Abbreviated Owner- Architect Agreement • June 1978 Edition NOV -03 -98 05:33 PM ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 P.02 ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. 17 East Main Street Clinton, New Jersey 08809 908 735 -6336 908 735 -4751 fax Research & Strategic Analysis AGREEMENT For A Market Position Analysis Of a Town Center Development On an Approximately 60 -Acre Tract In the City of Lino Lakes Anoka County, Minnesota Submitted to The City of Lino Lakes November 3, 1998 NOV -03 -98 05:33 PM ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 • P.03 City of Lino Lakes Page 2 November 3, 1998 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY OBJECTIVES This agreement describes a research and analysis program, to be undertaken on behalf of the City of Lino Lakes (hereinafter referred to as the client), designed to establish the optimum market position for residential uses within a town center development. The developn:.ent is proposed for the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Interstal,e 35W and Lake Drive (Highway 23/49) in the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota. The optimum market position will be established based on Z1MMI:RMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES' proprietary target market methodology, as well as the firm's nationwide expertise in the feasibility, market analysis and market positioning of developments designed using the principles of the New Urbanism. The Market Position Analysis will provide the following: • Delineation of' the draw area(s) for residential development within the town center; • Evaluation of relevant currently- active residential properties; • Analysis of the housing propensities of households within the draw area(s); • Optimum residential mix for the site, including tenure, density and building configuration; • Optimum unit sizes and market -entry base prices and rents; • Absorption forecasts; • Retail implications; • Phasing strategies; and • Profiles of target market buyers and renters. METHODOLOGY_ To achieve the study objectives and establish the framework for analysis, ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES will employ its target market methodology. This proprietary methodology, developed and employed exclusively by ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, is an analytical technique, using the PRIZM geo- demographic system, that establishes the optimum market position for residential development of any property —from a specific site to ZIMAWRN i.NIV ni.V. Ass iCIn Ii: . U.c.. NOV -03 -98 05:33 PM ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 P -04 City of Lino Lakes Page 3 November 3, 1998 an entire political jurisdiction— through cluster analysis of households living within designated draw areas. In contrast to classical supply /demand analysis —which is based on supply -side dynamics and baseline demographic projections — target market analysis establishes the optimum market position derived from the housing and lifestyle preferences of households in the draw area and within the framework of the local housing market context, even in locations where no close comparables exist. In geo- demographic segmentation, clusters of households (usually between 10 and 15) are grouped according to a variety of significant factors, ranging from basic demographic characteristics, such as income qualification and age, to less - frequently considered attributes such as mobility rates, lifestyle patterns and compatibility issues. ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES has refined the analysis of these household clusters through the correlation of more than 500 data points related to housing preferences and consumer and lifestyle characteristics. As a result of this process, ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES has identified 41 target market groups with median incomes that enable most of the households within each group to qualify for market -rate housing, and an additional eight groups with median incomes in which a more limited number of households is able to qualify for market -rate housing. The most affluent of the 49 groups can afford the most expensive new ownership units; the least prosperous are candidates for the least expensive existing rental apartments, The MARKET POSITION ANALYSIS will include: I, Draw Area Delineation The appropriate draw area(s) for housing within the proposed town center will be identified, based on historic settlement patterns, migration trends, and market dynamics. II. Market Overview The study will include a brief evaluation of: • The site's characteristics, visibility and location in relation to its position within the market area; and • The housing market context —based on ZIMMERMAN /VOI.I: ASSOCIATES' field investigation and data to be supplied by the client —in relation to potential residential development on the property. %IM\ {P.RM /N /V (ILK AS )CIA'Ii INt. NOV -03 -98 05:34 PM ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 P.05 City of Lino Lakes November 3, 1998 III. Target Market Analysis For the defined draw area(s), target market groups with the potential to buy or rent new housing within the proposed town center will be quantified as follows: • Current household classification by market group within the draw area(s); • Qualification and filtering of the draw area households by relevant criteria including, among others, mobility and migration factors, and the propensity to purchase or lease new housing units; and • Determination of those target market households within the draw area(s) with a propensity to move to the site. IV. Conclusions and Recommendations Market data and evaluations, target market data and analysis, as well as site location, existing conditions, constraints and opportunities, and the objectives of the client will be correlated to determine the optimum market position. Recommendations for each housing type will include: • Optimum density and/or lot size; • Optimum building configuration; • Unit size ranges; • Market -entry base prices; • Market -entry base rents; and • Absorption forecasts. Absorption forecasts will be based on an assessment of the optimum market position of each housing type within the context of the sales or leasing performance of relevant properties in the market area and ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES' understanding of the market dynamics of the New Urbanism. In addition to the optimum residential mix, the conclusions will also provide: • Profiles of target buyers and renters; • Retail implications; and • Phasing strategies. Page 4 LIMMP.RMI.N /VOt K Assu<;I, i KS, lNc NOV -03 -98 05:34 PM ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 P.06 City of Lino Lakes November 3, 1998 SCHEDULING AND REPORTS Based on verbal authorization during an October 27 telephone conference with client representatives Brian Wessel and Mary Divine, field evaluation has been confirmed for November 12 through 15. The conclusions and recommendations of the study will be provided no later than January 15, 1999, and possibly as soon as late December, 1998. The Market Position Analysis will be presented in memorandum form, including tabular supporting data. If required, the study will be compiled into a printed report—within a period up to 60 days from the presentation of the memorandum —for an additional fee of $2,500. Three copies of the study are included in the additional fee. MEI'ETINGS AND ADDITIONAL COSTS No formal meetings are included within this scope of work. A Zimmerman/Volk Associates principal will participate in an informal meeting with the client and its design consultants on November 13. Charrette or meeting participation is $1,500 per diem per principal plus travel expenses. CLIENT OBLIGATIONS The City of Lino Lakes will provide an outline of any development constraints, physical, regulatory, and practical, as well as any other existing data to which it has access that might be relevant to this assignment. The City of Lino Lakes, through a contract with Maxfield Research, will provide current supply -side data and background material for relevant housing in the market area. Information and materials to be provided: • Information on for -sale residential development, by community. — Month and year opened. — Total units planned. — Units sold to date. — Average monthly sales pace. — Lot size by housing type. — Unit sizes by housing type. — Sales prices by housing type. — General buyer profile. — Sales collateral material. — Location or street address. Page 5 ZlMMIlRMP.N /Vltt.I: ASSOCIATIIS, INC. NOV -03 -98 05:34 PM ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 P.07 City of Lino Lakes November 3, 1998 • Information on market -rate rental communities. — Year opened. — Total units. — Average monthly lease -up pace (for new properties). — Occupancy rate. — Turnover rate. — Unit sizes by bedroom count. — Rents by bedroom count. — General renter profile. — Leasing collateral material. — Location or street address. • Sales information on existing dwellings (Multiple Listing Service summaries). — Sales by price band and housing type. — Days on market by price band and housing type. Acceptance of this contract by the client will guarantee payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses, as outlined below, in a timely fashion. COSTS The total cost for this program is $16,400, broken down as follows: Professional Fee: $14,000 Travel and Data Costs: $2,400 Total Cost: $16,400 Expenses are based on one, two - person research visit. Travel expenses associated with additional required trips — including meeting or charrette participation —have not been included in the calculation and will be billed as an extra if authorized by the client. BILLING, PAYMENT AND TERMINATION The professional fee and costs are due as follows: $8,000 upon acceptance of this agreement as an initial retainer $8,400 upon receipt of the memorandum containing conclusions and recommendations. All payments are due as of the billing date. Payments received after 90 days may be assessed a one - and -a -half percent (1.6 %) per month late payment charge at the discretion of ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES. Page 6 ZINIM1UtA AWVOIX Ass) I, IH ?.1hC. NOV -03 -98 05:35 PM ZIMMERMAN'VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 P.08 City of Lino Lakes Page 7 November 3, 1998 If payments are more than 120 days past due, the client acknowledges that ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES may cease all work concerning this assignment without penalty and may declare the entire unpaid balance of payments covered under this agreement immediately due and payable. Moreover, the client acknowledges that if ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES must resort to legal action to obtain payment, then the costs of such action will be borne by the client and not by ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES should ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES prevail in such action. This contract can be terminated by either party with written notice. In the event the contract is terminated by the client, ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES will cease all work upon receipt of written notice. The amount due ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES shall be calculated according to the actual work completed as a percentage of the total project. ZIMMY.KMt.N /VUL►: A% oc.:IA.1'Fj. INC. NOV -03 -98 05:35 PM ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOC INC 908 735 4751 City of Lino Lakes November 3, 1998 ACCEPTANCE This agreement will become should be returned the ZIMMERMAN /VOLK signatures below. One signed copy payment of $8,000. ASSOCIATES, INC., togel,her with the initial paym Upon acceptance with authorized signatures below, this document constitutes the entire contract between the City of Lino Lakes and ZIMMI!RMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. regarding this site. Any modification to this agreement must be made in writing, signed by both parties, and attached to this document. The authorized signatures below show acceptance of the terms and obligations of this agreement by ZIMMERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. and the City of Lino Lakes. odd 1 • erman For ..t ERMAN /VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. November 3, 1998 P.09 Page 8 The methodology, schedule, client obligations, fees, and payment method outlined above, as well as any signed attachments, are accepted for the client with the signature of this responsible and authorized individual: For the client: Name Title Data ZIMMI:RA ANN 01,K ASSOClAT1i5. 1Nr. MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. October 6, 1998 Mr. Brian Wessel Chairman Economic Development Advisory Board City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Dear Mr. Wessel: This letter will serve as our agreement for Maxfield Research Inc. to provide "supply- side" data on new owned single - family and multifamily homes in the Lino Lakes area. This data will be supplied to Zimmerman/Volk Associates, Inc. (ZVA) to assist them in their housing analysis for traditional neighborhood development. In addition, Maxfield Research will provide data on the average value of home resales. For each subdivision/development, information will be provided on location number of lots /units month/year marketing began home styles /number of bedrooms square footage unique features and amenities buyer profiles /origin/employment base pricing price per square foot lot sizes number of lots /units sold, absorption rate number of builders in subdivision names of builders /developers A minimum of 25 projects will be surveyed, including townhomes and single- family develop- ments. Brochures /marketing materials on each project will be provided to ZVA, Inc. to assist them with their work. Information collected will be presented in a tabular format for ZVA, Inc. and copies of the information will be provided to the City. In addition, Maxfield Research Inc. will provide a narrative text on overall trends in the Twin Cities for -sale housing market and in particular, distinctive characteristics on the Lino Lakes housing market. The above collection of supply -side data and narrative text will be completed for $5,600, plus out - -of- pocket expenses for long- distance telephone, photocopying, mileage, photo processing, etc., estimated at $300.00. 510 Marquette Avenue • Suite #206 • Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 - 338 -0012 • Fax: 612 - 338 -0659 Mr. Brian Wessel City of Lino Lakes MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. If this agreement meets with your approval, please sign and return one copy to our office and we are prepared to begin work immediately. The information requested will be completed within 30 days of authorization to proceed, unless delayed by unexpected emergencies, forces beyond the control of one or both parties or by written agreement of the parties. Any meeting time requested will be billed in addition to the above work at our standard hourly rates for staff time which range between $50 and $150 per hour. Payntent All invoices are payable to Maxfield Research Inc. within fifteen (15) days of receipt of an invoice showing the work completed and the direct costs for expenses. A finance charge of one and one -half percent (1.5 %) per month will be added to the unpaid balance of each invoice not paid within thirty (30) days. Disclaimer The objective of this research assignment is to gather and analyze as many market components as is reasonable within the time limits and projected staff hours set forth in this agreement. We assume no responsibility for matters legal in character. The property /land is assumed to be free and clear of any indebtedness, liens or encumbrances; and good and marketable title and competent management are assumed, unless otherwise stated. If building plans or site plans included in the report, they are to be considered only approximate and are submitted to assist the reader in visualizing the property. We assume no responsibility for the accuracy of any building or site plans. Certain information and statistics contained in the report, which are the basis for conclusions continued in the report, will be furnished by other independent sources. While we believe this information is reliable, it has not been independently verified by us and we assume no responsibility for its accuracy. The conclusions in the report are based on our best judgments as market research consultants. Maxfield Research Inc. disclaims any express or implied warranty of assurance of representation that the projections or conclusions will be realized as stated. The result of the proposed project may be achieved, but also may vary due to changing market conditions characteristic of the real estate industry, changes in facts that were the basis of conclusions in this report, or other unforeseen circumstances. Page 2 n I MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. Mr. Brian Wessel City of Lino Lakes In the event payment is not received on a timely basis, Maxfield Research Inc. shall be entitled to a lien against the subject property. This agreement will be construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. Termination This agreement may be terminated upon written notification of either party to the other. In the event of termination, the Client will pay Maxfield Research Inc. for staff hours performed at the firm's normal hourly rates, plus all expenses incurred through the date of termination. We are delighted to be able to assist you with this project. Sincerely, MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. CITY OF LINO LAKES Mary C. jold / By: Vice President Title: Page 3 AGENDA ITEM 5H'4, STAFF ORIGINATOR: John Powell," City Engineer DATE: November 18, 1998 TOPIC: Resolution No. 98 -166, Accept Utility Easements and Authorize Payment, Lake Drive Trunk Utility Improvements BACKGROUND: Easements are required for the installation of sanitary sewer and watermain as part of the Lake Drive Trunk Utility project. Easement negotiations are underway with property owners throughout the length of the project which begins at Apollo Drive/Lilac Street and extends to Lino Lakes Elementary School on Main Street, west of Lake Drive. To date, the property owners listed on the attached exhibit have signed Easement Grants for the project. This listing shows the property owner, easement areas, and amounts to be paid for the easements. OPTIONS: 1. Return to staff for further review. 2. Not approve Resolution No 98 -166. 3 Approve Resolution No 98 -166, accepting the Easement Grants and Approving Payment for the Lake Drive Trunk Utility Improvements, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Resolution No. 98 -166 be adopted. c O E 0000000 0000000 O 0000000 0000000 0 0001'X000 ui tntl)NNN T 0 0 0 N CO N O 0 0) O d' T N Cr) CO �to1)17NI-0 CO CO 0)LOTCO O 0d d' cfi TTNTNM O) 0 T 074 340 40 tT ff3 03 EF3 Ef3 EA3 E03 07 cts a) //LLB� //LLB�. CO LLL LL �rL/L^ LL/L/�� U- /L/L� LL/. LL CO //LLL� LL'JL^ /L/LB� V) U) CO V/ U) U) U) VJ Cn Cn, Cn CI) U) Cn Q.� C10 I's NCOIAMO lnOOt171100 Q N CVU)ODC7TTCD N170NN101) E O ODNNTC01.1) C)NNTTNI7 H W N M T d N In CO CD d CO 1n N C a) E A N d C a) (.0 cn ci) cf) co rn c E C) i CN) 0 Na M T a W 0) N T N CC T o 0 E m d ci o c _ U) C o L — �� ° z co 'c 'c v) CO CO c > E-E-o w4 = N = in E o -J .1... 0 ) C CM ° N 0 O6Zaa N C> L.-1WLL: ,a ° "'`/'o2x xoc � ° " o E mc°'crt Q' ° aa Y °�-� v J C m �UVJJ O O 0mc3cncn -0 'v a om - �� i C3 O N t C C 5 5 « ctl = 't3 m as CO CL coo tocc))cc)oE o�'o 2 m O > U=cncnoCQ » §c it i2 c _z .> N Z of E a) Y O 0 JJW 0- 0) L0f-CQ)0)) - 1-1-NNNNN Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 98 -166 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UTILITY EASEMENTS AND APPROVING PAYMENTS FOR THE LAKE DRIVE TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council passed by the council on October 27, 1997, the Lake Drive Trunk Utility Project was ordered; and, WHEREAS, utility easements are needed to construct the improvements; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council passed by the council on November 10, 1997, the acquisition of the necessary easements was authorized; and, WHEREAS, property owners along said improvement have agreed to execute Permanent and Temporary Easements that will accommodate the improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. To approve the easement grants and payment amounts for those parcels listed on the attached exhibit. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23th day of November, 1998. Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on November 23, 1998. Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer AGENDA ITEM 6A STAFF ORIGINATOR: Bill Hawkins DATE: 11/23/98 TOPIC: Consideration of Quit Claim Deed, The Village BACKGROUND: Anoka County has agreed to convey a parcel of land on the corner of 49/23, in the vicinity of the Reiling property, to the city. In exchange for this property the city is conveying the two outlots in Village No 1 to the county for right of way. (See attached maps). A Quit Claim Deed will be needed to convey the property. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the conveyance of the two outlots in The Village No.1 to Anoka County. 2. Return to staff for further consideration RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 1 40 40 1 3— M co 14 II M 15 1 -0 Itoco I .odki I G • • • S. o' \‘Oe c 4o • 4 `X44. ' i Q o� 1 F + o • 6\454 6 68 X03� 60 8 S84 •38'53"E 275.00 0 L 150.00 N84•8'53'W N 40 )• c TOWN CENTER PARKWAY 485.00 243.87 "'24•Q or 61.0Q E —0J 4.31.49 0 0r00 3 874.09 N85•57. 53"W 1 I r fl .„Thwir.,Es___ 0 Q 0 0 0 a rn IP y ty f9 n, • rT nC 'OT ,TT S64•38'53'E 240.00 1 80 : 1 < 1 I I - r - - r, 4 N - J. - • • --r • • L 1- (_ 240.00 0 m 564'38'53 "E 240.00 S64'38'53'E 275.00 ni, 3 0 0 0 i 0 60 8 60 0 L 0 CJ An 0 Z %qc, lcr 150.00 N64•38'53'W P rg g TOWN CENTER PARKWAY S64•38'53'E 485.00 207.59 T 674.09 I 4. 674.09 N65•57 53" A' s��• I I I I I I I I 243.87 TN24b2or 61.00 F -OJ 431.49 � I I I I I I I