HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-023 Council Resolutiona
•
Council Member introduced the folio
CITY OF LINO L
RESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION OF PRELLMJNARY APPROVAL
FOR SUBMITTAL TO METROP
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 473.864 requires that c
Metropolitan Area must review and, if necessary, updat
and submit it to the Metropolitan Council for review; az
WHEREAS, the City conducted an extensive planning
survey in 2005; and
Cop
WHEREAS, the quality of life survey was followed by the creation of a citizen committee that
prepared the 2030 Vision Plan, which was completed in 2007; and
WHEREAS, the City Council established the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel, a citizen
group that worked with city staff and the City Council through 2007, 2008, and into 2009 to
prepare the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the goals and policies in the 2030 Vision Plan formed the foundation of the 2030
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board conducted two public hearings on the 2030
Comprehensive Plan, on September 9, 2008 and April 8, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the
2030 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval includes the revisions to the draft plan
included in the June 8, 2009 report and attachments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that following review by the Metropolitan Council, the City
Council will consider final approval of the Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this g4.1 day of
J. Berge s 'yor
ATTEST:
e Bartell, City
1lerairk�"
Resolution No. 09 -23
page 2
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
a. t ((.4ip and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
c- tvft).,C tills', 0`1)1,114e -0,
The following voted against same:
9e5O"
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
•
•
•
•
•
AGENDA ITEM 6 A
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser
C. C. MEETING DATE: June 8, 2009
TOPIC: Resolution No. 09 -23: Preliminary Approval of 2030
Comprehensive Plan for Submittal to Metropolitan Council
BACKGROUND
The draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan was presented to the City Council for preliminary approval
on April 27. Following the staff presentation, public comment, and council discussion, action on
the item was tabled until the May 11 regular council meeting.
On June 3, the council met for a special work session to discuss the plan. The council gave
direction on several issues and directed the staff to bring the plan to the June 8 regular city
council meeting for a vote. The specific direction given by the council are described below in a
section of this report.
Under state law, every city within the Seven County Metropolitan Area must update its
comprehensive plan every ten years and submit it to the Metropolitan Council. This ensures that
city plans do not conflict with metropolitan system plans.
The process began in Lino Lakes with the Quality of Life survey of residents in 2005. The
results of the survey guided the Citizen Visioning Committee in preparing the 2030 Vision Plan,
completed in 2007. Staff and our consultants then worked with a citizen group called the
Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel. Using the Vision Plan as the foundation for the work, the
Panel met monthly or more through 2007 and early 2008 to prepare the draft Comprehensive
Plan. We have held three open houses, inviting the general public to ask questions and learn
about the plan process. We learned much from the citizens at these events, as well.
The Planning & Zoning Board held the first public hearing on September 9, 2008 to consider the
draft Comprehensive Plan. The Board recommended approval with some minor revisions. On
November 10, the City Council approved Resolution 08 -131, approving the distribution of the
draft plan to adjacent jurisdictions for review and comment. Since then, the City Council met
with the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel in January and has been discussing the plan. The
City Council decided that the P & Z Board should hold a second public hearing to provide for
public discussion of comments received and revisions made since September.
The P & Z again recommended approval. The next step will be preliminary approval by the City
Council to submit the plan for Metropolitan Council review. The deadline was December 31,
but Lino Lakes received an extension. We must submit it to the Metropolitan Council by May
2030 Comprehensive Plan
City Council June 8, 2009
page 2
29. City staff will work with Met Council staff on any issues that arise during the review.
Ultimately, the plan will be approved by the Met Council and the City Council will adopt it.
City Council Direction at June 3, 2009 Work Session
The council gave staff the following directions at the June 3 work session:
1. Change the growth forecast for households and population to match the Metropolitan
Council's forecast. This lowers the forecast in the November draft to the following:
year
2000
2010
2020
2030
households
4,857
7,500
9,100
10,600
population
16,791
22,500
26,300
30,700
Employment forecasts will include City's forecast because the Met Council forecast has
already been exceeded and thus is obsolete.
year
2000
2010
2020
2030
employment
2,444
4,500
7,118
8,000
A list of revisions that will result from this change to the forecast is included with this report
as Attachment F.
2. The land use and staging maps will not change from what is in the draft plan now.
3. In order to learn more about how housing affordability is addressed elsewhere, the city will
pursue additional information from other communities and from organizations to become
more educated about the topic.
4. The land use maps will not be changed in response to two specific requests from the property
owners. These were received after the Planning & Zoning Board's public hearing and
recommendations. One site is in the area of Lake Drive/Main Street and the other one is
north of that intersection. The council supported the recommendations of staff on these
requests. Specific information one these requests is attached to this report.
Comments From Adjacent Jurisdictions
As required by law, we sent out the draft plan to adjacent jurisdictions in November. We have
received comments from most of those jurisdictions and staff has recommendations on how to
address them. The majority of the comments require simple clarifications. Some, however, led
to additional review and some changes to figures or text. Attachment A lists the comments and
the recommended actions.
•
•
•
2030 Comprehensive Plan
City Council June 8, 2009
page 3
Staff Review, Recommended Revisions
Staff has found a number of needed clarifications or corrections to the text of the November draft
document, based on other revisions and discussions that have occurred. The attached memo of
March 23, 2009 from Michael Crrochala to Bonestroo lists these (Attachment B). Staff is
recommending these changes be approved also. Most are minor. However, the statement about
flexibility on the actual boundaries of the land use categories is important (# 8 on the memo).
At the September public hearing, the Rice Creek Snowmobile Trail Association asked for
recognition of the trails they manage. A statement will be added to the parks and trails plan in
chapter two and the transportation plan in chapter six.
City Council Revisions to Goals, Policies, Land Use Categories, and Staging
Discussions by the City Council, including the January meeting with the Advisory Panel,
resulted in several important revisions since the November draft document.
1. The Growth Management Policy was revised as follows:
• Provide for an intensive Comp Plan review every five years in addition to the biannual
review already in the draft policy. This will mean a review in the third year, an intense
review in year five, then less intense reviews in years seven and nine, followed by the
next ten -year major update.
• To more closely monitor and manage growth, the 10 -year staging areas were further
divided into 5 -year phases.
Stage 1 (2008 -2020) is divided into 1A 2008 -2015
and 1B 2015 -2020
Stage 2 (2020 -2030 is divided into 2A 2020 -2025
and 2B 2025 -2030
These are shown on the revised Utility Staging Map (Attachment C).
2. Several existing, unsewered neighborhoods were removed from the staging areas. That is,
the City will not plan on providing utility service to those neighborhoods until after year
2030. They have been designated Stage 3, Post -2030, on the Utility Staging Map.
This also removes them from the Low Density Residential category and into the Urban
Reserve category on the 2030 Future Land Use Map (Attachment D).
2030 Comprehensive Plan
City Council June 8, 2009
page 4
3. The densities in the residential land use categories were modified to the following:
• Low Density Residential 1.5 — 3.5 units per acre (no change)
• Medium Density Residential 3.6 — 6.9 units per acre (instead of 3.6 — 7.9)
• High Density Residential 7.0 — 12.0 units per acre (instead of 8.0 or greater)
• Increase the percentage of residential development of the following Mixed Use areas:
Lake Dr./ Main St., and Centerville Rd..CR J.
Changes 2 and 3 above result in an overall net density of 3.04 units /acre, which is consistent with
Metropolitan Council Policy.
4. In the Housing chapter, Goal 5 is "Improve availability of affordable and life -cycle housing."
A new policy was added: "Strive to integrate affordable housing in all residential land use
districts."
Landowner Requests to Revise Future Land Use Map and Utility Staging Map
The discussion in September included some requested changes to the land use designations and
the staging map. Since then, we received four additional requests to change the land use map
and/or the staging map. They include:
1. Weinkauf property, 797 Main Street: request to guide the site Mixed Use to allow for
home business computer service and sales. This request was later revised to guiding the
site and several nearby lots to Commercial. Letters from three landowners were submitted.
This second request was discussed by the City Council on June 3.
2. Nogai property, 1370 Birch Street: request to bring the site into pre -2030 staging area.
3. Joyer property, Main Street east of Elbe Street: request to bring the site into Stage 1 (2009-
2020).
Joyer property, 8174 Lake Drive: request to guide 600' x 600' area Commercial. This
second request was discussed by the City Council on June 3.
4. Leroux property, 2104 64th Street: request to bring the site into pre -2030 staging area.
5. O'Connell property, 1000 Main Street: a) request to include property in Stage 1 (2008-
2020), and b) opposes changing abutting property on west from Low Density to Medium
Density. (These revisions were submitted at the public hearing April 8th.)
The attached information indicates the locations of these properties and includes information
analyzing the requests as well as staff recommendations (Attachments E and G).
•
•
2030 Comprehensive Plan
City Council June 8, 2009
page 5
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMENDATION
At the second public hearing on April 8, 2009, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended that
the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan, with the revisions recommended in the
report.
OPTIONS
1. Approve Resolution No. 09 -23, Preliminary Approval of 2030 Comprehensive Plan for
submittal to Metropolitan Council. This approval includes the revisions recommended in this
report and attachments.
2. Return to staff with direction.
RECOMMENDATION
Options 1
Attachment A: Comments from adjacent jurisdictions and recommended revisions to draft plan
Attachment B: Memo of March 23, 2009 from Mike Grochala listing revisions to draft plan
Attachment C: Utility Staging Map dated February 27, 2009
Attachment D: 2030 Future Land Use Map dated February 27, 2009
Attachment E: Map change requests from landowners, analyses and recommendations
Attachment F: Memo of June 5, 2009 listing revisions resulting from forecast revision
Attachment G: June 3, 2009 work session handout for two land use change requests
2030 Comprehensive Plan
City Council June 8, 2009
page 6
Page left blank intentionally
•
•
•
DRAFT 2030 COMP PLAN
COMMENTS FROM ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS
•
•
ATTACHMENT A page 1
City Council 6/8/09
4
Resource
Mgmt
6
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Water Supply
pg. 2 -3
pg. 6 -3
PAGE 4
pg. 6 -5
PAGE 9&
PG. 16 FIG
6 -6
& text PAGE
17
Fig. 6 -3
FIG 6 -6 PG.
16
pg. 6 -10
P 15
VARIOUS
Goal 3, Policy 1 - supports the
coordination of trail & sidewalk
connections with ad'acent communities.
Goal 7, Policy 3 - Insert, where
appropriate, support for County plan to
realign CSAH 12 in Blaine to match with
Apollo Dr at CR53 (Sunset Ave)
Jurisdictional Classification - confirm
extension of CR53 (Sunset) to northern
border is in Anoka County plan
Confirm classification of CR 53, CSAH
12 & CSAH 23 with Anoka County plan
Confirm classification of CR 53
No action necessary
The City supports this realignment, and
SRF will add text to reflect that support.
SUGGEST TEXT BE ADDED EITHER
ON PAGE 17 AS A NEW BULLET
POINT IN THE LIST OF ROADWAY
CONNECTIONS OR ON PAGE 19 IN
THE "COORDINATION WITH OTHER
JURISDICTIONS" PARAGRAPH
Correct water tower labels on all water
system maps (both towers shown as
#1
SRF will confirm this with Anoka County
No action necessary
SRF will confirm this with Anoka County
TKDA will correct the maps and figures.
SRF Will add text on page 17under the
list of planned roadway connections to
read, "In addition, the City of Lino Lakes
is supportive of Anoka County's plan to
realign CSAH 12 in Blaine to match
CSAH 12 (Apollo Drive) at CR 53
(Sunset Avenue) in Lino Lakes.
Confirmed. CR 53 extension will be a
county road and is shown in County's
draft 2030 plan.
Anoka County will verify the future
functional classification of CR 53.
Functional classification of CSAH 12 is
consistent with county plan. SRF will
modify classification of CSAH 23 from A
Minor Expander to A Minor Reliever for
consistency with the County's future
functional classification •Ian.
See above response.
TKDA will correct.
2
3
Land Use
Transportation
Transportation
Future Land
Use Map
Fig 6-4
Fig 6-4
FIG 6 -10 PG.
27
Consider moving high density zone
north of Centerville boundary & west of
20th Ave.
Concerned about future street
connecting to Old Mill Road in regards
to previous comment.
Verify extent of trips (7,000 AADT) &
impact on Peltier Rd. and City of
Centerville
The high density will be separated from
Centerville by a greenway corridor.
Staff does not support changing this
designation.
The high density area will have direct,
controlled access to 20th Avenue.
SRF will confirm the number of trips
4
Sanitary
Sewer
Fig. 7 -3 & 7-4
Insert notation regarding sanitary sewer
interconnect with Centerville on LaMotte
Drive & the end of Mound Trail
TKDA revise these figures to depict
these two areas in a sewer district.
No action necessary
No action necessary
The 7,000 AADT forecast is the result of
the planned high density residential
zone in Lino Lakes, north of Centerville;
however, this traffic is local (within Lino
Lakes) and unlikely to "cut- through"
Centerville.
TKDA revise these figures.
5
Sanitary
Sewer
pg. 7 -20
Amend text per above comment
TKDA will insert text regarding the
sewer connections that exist for these
two areas.
TKDA will insert text.
6
Sanitary
Sewer
Fig. 7 -3
Differentiate colors of Med. Density
Residential & Manufactured Home Park
TKDA will use an updated full build map
that does not include a separate
manufactured housing land use
designation.
TKDA revise figure.
7
Water Supply
VARIOUS
Same comment as City of Blaine -
correct water tower labels on all water
system maps (both towers shown as
#1)
TKDA will correct the maps and figures.
TKDA will correct the maps and figures.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Most land along Columbus guided for
utilities after 2030 or permanent rural.
Full build show develo•ment •ost 2030.
Household, population projections
hi • her than Met Council forecasts.
Notes planned trails and functional
classifications of count roads.
Plan includes sewer and water
summaries but not detailed reports.
Observations of the Lino plan, no action
necessary.
Plan includes increase over previous
forecasts.
Full utility plans will replace summaries
as Chapters 5 and 6.
Plan included no discussion for
potential utility service to Lake Drive
area in Columbus. Columbus would
like Lino Lakes to acknowledge that
Columbus has requested ultimate public
utilities service for Lake Drive from Lino
Lakes, that the two cities' staffs have
met on the issue a few times, and the
two cities will continue to work toward
that goal.
The Metropolitan Council's 2030
Framework includes this area of
Columbus in the "Diversified Rural"
geographic planning area. Unless the
Metropolitan Council policy toward
Columbus changes, sanitary sewer
service cannot be extended to
Columbus. If that change does occur,
wastewater flow capacity for Columbus
will need to be determined. If service is
to run through the Lino Lakes system,
the capacity allocated to Lino Lakes by
the Metropolitan Council would need to
be re- examined. The Lino Lakes
sanitary sewer system plan would need
to be re- examined as well, including the
need and cost for oversizing of trunk
lines. Lino Lakes has received no
information regarding regional policy or
flow needs for Columbus. Therefore,
Lino Lakes is not including service
outside its borders in the planning of its
municipal utilities systems.
In 8/15/08 review letter of Columbus'
draft comprehensive plan, Lino Lakes
staff notified Columbus that we are not
•tannin• to •rovide utilities service.
Text to be added describing the issue
and the need for Met Council change of
policy and capacity planning before Lino
Lakes will change sewer planning.
PAGE/
FIOURB
1
•
1
Consistent with Ramsey County goals
and Comp. Plan
No action necessary
OIVINKNO.ED
No action necessary
•
•
Supports Mixed Use for 49/J area, but
concerned about the impact future
development will have on the
transportation network.
Verify that City forecasts (market
based) were used for transportation
modeling.
Staff is also concerned about the impact
future development will have on the
transportation network. The master
plan adopted for the area addresses
some of these concerns, and any
development that occurs in the area will
re• uire anal sis of the im •acts.
The modeling was based on the market
based forecast, so no action is
necessary (App. B Full Transp. Plan)
•
Commends city for recognizing the
limitations the City Charter has & how it
becomes difficult, if not impossible, to
have viable Ion • ran • e infrastruct. • Ian.
Supports a coordinated effort on
providing trail segments to serve the
needs of the communities.
Clarify the roadway count of 60,000
projected is for I -35E instead of 20th
Ave. CSAH 54
SRF will confirm this and revise the
figure accordingly.
Confirm with Anoka County the
projected four -lane divided highways
SRF will confirm this and revise the
figure accordingly.
Confirmed. The 60,000 AADT is for 1-
35E not CSAH 54 (20th Avenue). Figure
6 -10 will be revised to avoid confusion.
Anoka County confirmed they are
comfortable with the recommendations
made in the plan regarding future lane
needs since this is a planning -level
analysis; however, SRF will add text to
the Year 2030 System Needs (pg. 29)
section to note the final design of the
proposed roadway improvements will be
determined throu•h additional stud .
Consider adding text regarding possible
sewer services to parcels on County Rd
J near the Poplar Lake Open Space
Supports the coordinated planning of
trails between the communities.
TKDA will review capacity of pipes in
area & determine if possible. If so, staff
supports amending plan to provide for
the o•tion in future.
Planning Dist 1: Recommendation
regarding access management on CR
J- add to text "Cit of Shoreview"
Bonestroo will add this text to the
document.
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Fig. 6 -3
FIG 6 -6 PG.
16
Fig. 6 -4
FIG 6 -10 PG.
27
Pg. 6 -11
PAGE 15
Review classification of future CR 140
(80th St)
Projected volume for CR 140 seems
more in line with a Minor Arterial rather
than a Principal Arterial. (as noted in
• revious comment.
Add text to support extension of CR 84
from city limits to junction with TH 97 as
a joint Anoka - Washington County
roadway
SRF will confirm the projected traffic
volumes on this right of way, and if
necessary amend the figure.
SRF will confirm the projected traffic
volumes on this right of way, and if
necessary amend the figure.
Figures within the plan already show a
future roadway in this area, but SRF will
also add text to reflect the county's
support.
SUGGEST TEXT BE ADDED EITHER
ON
• PAGE 15 WHERE CR 84 IS
DISCUSSED, or
• PAGE 17 AS A NEW BULLET
POINT IN THE LIST OF
ROADWAY CONNECTIONS, or
• PAGE 19 IN THE
"COORDINATION WITH OTHER
JURISDICTIONS" PARAGRAPH
• or maybe several of these
• laces...?
Text on pg.13 notes CR 140 (CSAH 54
to I -35E) is recommended to be
upgraded to future principal arterial
when northern bypass is constructed.
CR 140 east of I -35E will remain an A
Minor Expander which is consistent with
Washington County. The call -out box on
Figure 6-6 regarding this future
functional classification change will be
modified to more clearly identify the
termini (CSAH 54 to I -35E) of the
•ro•osed change.
see above response.
SRF will add text on page 15 and page
17 to acknowledge Washington
County's support of the future CR 84
extension from Main Street to the
northern city limits.
•
No Comments
No action necessary
No action necessary
Concur with #1 Goal: Maintain the first -
class education that the children of Lino
Lakes are receiving, while also
providing opportunities for additional
education for adults.
Would be happy to discuss any
additional educational programs that we
feel would be of interest to the
community.
No action necessary
No action necessary
No action necessary
No action necessary
4
Resource
Mgmt
Resource
Mgmt
Resource
Mgmt
Entire
Document
Appendix A
pg. 2 -21
pg. 2 -31
pg. 2-43
Various
insert approval date of RMP, and
adoption & effective date of RCWD's
Rule RMP -3
revise text at end of 4th paragraph to
reference Figure 2 -8 not 2 -7
insert approval /adoption /effective dates
- delete "It is noted that the RMP rule is
likel to be ado•ted..."
insert approval dates as previously
indicated
remove "Draft" from Lino Lakes RMP
As the RCWD
Bonestroo will
•ro•osed.
has approved the RMP,
make the changes
As the RCWD
Bonestroo will
• ro •osed.
has approved the RMP,
make the changes
As the RCWD
Bonestroo will
• ro •osed.
has approved the RMP,
make the changes
As the RCWD
Bonestroo will
• ro • osed.
has approved the RMP,
make the changes
As the RCWD
Bonestroo will
• ro •osed.
has approved the RMP,
make the changes
Bonestroo will make the changes
proposed.
Bonestroo will make the changes
proposed.
Bonestroo will make the changes
proposed.
Bonestroo will make the changes
proposed.
Bonestroo will make the changes
proposed.
•
•
•
•
Parks and
Trails
Plan was well- written and addressed all
areas of concern to the county
No action necessary
No action necessary
Water Supply
Suggested changes to the plan in
regards to water supply adequacy for
future development levels.
TKDA will review the report mentioned
to determine if any change is necessary
TKDA has reviewed, no changes
needed.
Water Supply
Replace all references to "Groundwater
Protection Plan" to read "Wellhead
Protection Plan"
TKDA will make this change in the
Water Supply chapter.
TKDA will make this change.
Water Supply
Disagree with city's contention that the
northern section of the city doesn't
have a suitable aquifer.
TKDA will change the text to state that
there are no 'compatible' aquifers
instead of 'suitable aquifers.
TKDA will change the text.
Comm.
Facilities
Add text to summarize programs &
facilities available to residents to
manage waste
Bonestroo will work with the
Environmental Services Coordinator to
add text.
Text has been prepared.
Comm.
Facilities
Fig. 9 -1
revise map to include location of Rice
Creek Chain of Lakes Compost Site
Bonestroo will work with the
Environmental Services Coordinator to
add the Compost Site to this figure.
Bonestroo will revise figure.
Transportation
pg. 6 -1
PAGE 2
Goal 2: Rationale - consider using the
term "crash" instead of "accidents"
This goal was written as part of the
citizen participation process, is not
inaccurate, and should not be changed.
No action necessary
Transportation
pg. 6 -2
PAGE 3
Goal 6: consider removing "and rail"
since rail is a form of transit.
This goal was written as part of the
citizen participation process, is not
inaccurate, and should not be changed.
No action necessary
Transportation
Fig. 6 -2
FIG 6 -3 PAGE
8
Issues Map - Consider enlarging figure
to make easier to read.
Staff feels that this figure serves the
purpose it is intended for, to show the
location of transportation system issues.
No action necessary
10
Transportation
pg. 6 -7
FIG 6 -5 PAGE
14
insert the Existing Functional
Classification System Map into short
plan
clarity. It is in the full plan as Fig 6 -5
on page 14
No action necessary
11
Transportation
pg. 6 -9
PAGE 12
fix typo by removing redundant text
(CSAH 32 is listed twice)
SRF will remove the redundant text as
commented.
SRF will remove the redundant text as
commented.
12
STAFF
COMMENT
PAGE 12
make correction: 62"a Street. not
62"d Avenue
SRF will revise the text as commented.
13
14
15
16
17
18
Transportation
Transportation
STAFF
COMMENT
STAFF
COMMENT
STAFF
COMMENT
STAFF
COMMENT
pg. 6 -10
FIG 6 -6 PAGE
16
pg. 6 -11
PAGE 15
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 26
PAGE 29
"A" Minor Arterials: confirm with County
the future designation of CR 53 (Sunset
Ave) - adjust accordingly
"B" Minor Arterials: revise text to refer
to the future classification of CSAH 34
to be a result of the Corridor Study
BULLET PARAGRAPH UNDER
"Anoka County" DESCRIBES CSAH
14 PROJECT: MAYBE UPDATE
REFERENCE TO COMPLETION
DATE
IN "COORDINATION" PARAGRAPH,
AFTER 'ANOKA COUNTY' ADD
RAMSEY COUNTY & WASHINGTON
COUNTY: WE SHARE
BORDERS /ROADS
• 3ro BULLET IN LIST AT BOTTOM
OF PAGE, ROADS TO EXCEED
CAPACITY IN 2030:
CSAH 32 — from the west city
limits to future extension of
Shadow Lake Drive West
• 8`h BULLET: CR 53, not CSAH 53
• 18f BULLET IN LIST OF ROADS
'APPROACHING CAPACITY BY
2030':
CSAH 32 — from future extension
of Shadow Lake Drive West to a
new....
SRF will confirm the future designation
with the County and amend accordingly.
SRF will revise the text to reflect the
CSAH 34 study that has already begun.
(note model language on page 31)
Anoka County confirmed the extension
of CR 53 (Sunset Avenue) will be a
future county road. Anoka County will
confirm future functional classification
consistency with their 2030 draft Future
Functional Classification plan.
SRF will revise the text to note the
CSAH 34 (Birch Street) study currently
underway and that the future functional
classification and future lanes needs
for CSAH 34 will be developed as a part
of that study.
SRF will revise the text as commented.
SRF will revise the text as commented.
SRF will revise the text as commented.
SRF will revise the text as commented.
•
•
•
•
•
19
20
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
pg. 6 -13
PAGE 29
AND FIG 6 -12
P.32
pg. 6 -16 &
Fig. 6 -5
PAGE 33
AND FIG 6 -14
P. 34
Fig. 6 -4
Fig. 6 -4
Fig. 6 -4
FIG 6 -10 P.27
8•
FIG 6 -13 P.32
Fig. 6-4
Fig 6 -10 page
27
Anoka County would like to discuss
with the city the 2030 system needs
listed in the plan, specifically the
current projections for number of lanes.
(they suggest "four lanes will be
considered...")
Anoka County would like to discuss
with the city the 2030 system needs
listed in the plan, specifically the
current projections for number of lanes.
(they suggest "four lanes will be
considered...")
Remove symbol for "future full access
interchange" as no new ones are
shown on ma •
Consider showing traffic volumes in the
Cit of Centerville.
Adjust placement of 60,000 vehicles to
clarify for I -35E and not 20th Ave. S.
AND CR 84
adjust placement of traffic volumes on
CSAH 14 through the park as
described in comment letter
SRF will discuss the system
improvements section with Anoka
County, and will revise the text to reflect
the 'potential' need for four lane streets.
The final design of all of these roadways
will require further study.
(note: will these remain rural
sections so the thresholds differ from
urban • er Table 6 -2 • a • e 21
SRF will discuss the system
improvements section with Anoka
County, and will revise the text to reflect
the 'potential' need for four lane streets.
The final design of all of these roadways
will require further study.
(note: will these remain rural
sections so the thresholds differ from
urban • er Table 6 -2 'a! e 21
This legend is repeated on all maps and
doesn't warrant a revision on only those
where the s mbol is unused.
Staff feels the current information is
sufficient and to • ical.
SRF will revise the figure to clarify the
volumes for the interstate and 20th
Avenue South. AND CR 84
• AND FIX THE OVERLAY OF
LINES FOR 35E AND CR 84 IN
THIS SAME AREA UP TO CSAH
14 ON BOTH FIGS. 6 -10 AND 6 -13
SRF will review the traffic forecast for
Main Street and fix accordingly
Anoka County confirmed they are
comfortable with the recommendations
made in the plan regarding future lane
needs since this is a planning -level
analysis; however, SRF will add text to
the Year 2030 System Needs (pg. 29)
section to note the final design of the
proposed roadway improvements will
be determined throu • h additional stud .
Anoka County confirmed they are
comfortable with the recommendations
made in the plan regarding future lane
needs since this is a planning -level
analysis; however, SRF will add text to
the Year 2030 System Needs (pg. 29)
section to note the final design of the
proposed roadway improvements will
be determined through additional stud .
No action necessary
No action necessary
SRF will revise the figures as
commented
SRF reviewed the traffic forecasts on
CSAH 14 through the park and found
the appropriate volume should be
15,600 (Figure 6 -10) and 10,400
(Figure 6 -13). This was reviewed with
Anoka Count and the concurred.
25 STAFF
COMMENT
FIG 6 -12
PAGE 30
MAP IN PLAN CHAPTER (FIG 6.5,
pg. 6 -15) ADDED A GRAPHIC NOTE
REGARDING CSAH 34 — DO WE
WANT THIS NOTE ADDED TO
CORRESPONDING MAPS IN FULL
PLAN (REPLACES CHAPTER)?
WOULD BE FIGS. 6 -12 AND 6 -14 IN
FULL PLAN (PAGES 30 & 34)
Note regarding CSAH 34 Study in
progress will be added to Figures 6 -12
and 6 -14. This was discussed with
Anoka County and they concurred.
Transportation
Fig. 6 -5
PAGE 33
Anoka County would like to discuss
with the city the 2030 system needs
listed in the plan, specifically the
current projections for number of lanes.
(they suggest "four lanes will be
considered... ")
SRF will discuss the system
improvements section with Anoka
County, and will revise the text to reflect
the 'potential' need for four lane streets.
The final design of all of these roadways
will require further study.
Transportation
pg. 6 -16
PAGE 31
revise text in first full paragraph
regarding conditions on CSAH 14 as
described in comment letter
SRF will revise the text to reflect a more
accurate portrayal of the conditions of
Main Street.
Transportation
Fig. 6 -6
FIG 6 -13 P.
32
review forecasted trips on CSAH 34
between CSAH 21 & CSAH 54 as
described in comment letter
SRF will review the traffic forecast for
Main Street, and Birch Street and fix
accordingly.
Transportation
FIG 6 -13 P.
32
adjust CSAH 14 alignment & traffic
volumes as described in comment
letter
SRF will review the traffic forecast for
Main Street, and Birch Street and fix
accordingly.
Transportation
pg. 6 -19
PAGE 37
Access Management - first
paragraph /last sentence: change text
from "accident" to "crash"
SRF will change the text to reflect the
suggested terminology
Anoka County confirmed they are
comfortable with the recommendations
made in the plan regarding future lane
needs since this is a planning -level
analysis; however, SRF will add text to
the Year 2030 System Needs (pg. 29)
section to note the final design of the
proposed roadway improvements will
be determined through additional study.
SRF will revise the text to reflect the
more detailed traffic operations study
that is in progress with the CSAH 14/1 -
35E interchange project which supports
the future lane recommendations of this
plan in this area.
SRF will review the traffic forecast for
Main Street, and Birch Street and post
additional volumes in this area to more
clearly articulate traffic patterns in this
area.
SRF will revise Figure 6 -13 layering of
CSAH 14 versus Rondeau Lake
roadways to clearly articulate future
volumes in this area.
SRF will change the text to reflect the
suggested terminology
Transportation
pg. 6 -19
P. 37
Recommend endorsing /adopting
Mn /DOT and Anoka County access
management guidelines.
SRF will revise the text to add a
statement requiring the official controls
be amended to include access
management guidelines in the
Implementation section.
SRF will revise the text to add a
statement requiring the official controls
be amended to include access
management guidelines in the
Implementation section.
•
•
•
32 Transportation pg. 6-19
PAGE 39
The acquisition of right of way shouldn't
be limited to just local roads.
SRF will revise this text to clearly
indicate that the potential acquisition of
right of way is not limited to local roads.
LAST SENTENCE: "For ROW
acquisition, the city may use a variety
of tools, including but not limited to:"
Also, add bullets to first three tools,
as with others on page 40
SRF will revise as commented
33
Transportation
pg 6 -19
PAGE 39
include reference to RALF as a right of
way acquisition option
SRF will revise the text to include the
Met Council's Right -of -way Acquisition
Loan Fund as a potential source for right
of way acquisition. (under "Direct
Purchase " ?)
SRF will revise the text to include the
Met Council's Right -of -way Acquisition
Loan Fund as a potential source for
right of way acquisition.
34
Transportation
pg. 6 -21
c.f. PAGE 41
Transit Market Area: The plan should
note the existing and future market
areas for the city.
SRF included this information in the full
Transportation Plan, and staff feels it is
not necessary in the abbreviated version
in the Comprehensive Plan(ALREADY
IN FULL PLAN BEGINNING PAGE 41:
BUT DOES THIS ADDRESS "FUTURE
MARKET AREAS " ?)
SRF will note the future market areas
for the City as defined by the
Metropolitan Council.
35
Transportation
pg. 6 -21
pp. 42-43
Existing Transit Service - fix typo by
deleting redundant sentence "Metro
Transit and First Student..."
SRF will revise the text to eliminate the
repetition(ERROR DOESN'T EXIST IN
FULL PLAN)
No action necessary
36
Transportation
Fig. 6 -8
FIG 6 -16 P.
47
Transit Service and Facilities: discuss
with Metro Transit any potential future
bus service lines - revise accordingly
SRF will revise the figure to reflect the
future routes that Metro Transit and the
city anticipate.(are there any ?)
37
Transportation
FIG 6 -16 P.
47
Transit Service and Facilities: revise
map to fix gap in bus route on CSAH
21 at county border
SRF will revise the figure to close the
gap
SRF will research any potential future
routes that the City and Metro Transit
anticipate and revise the figure if
necessary.
SRF will revise the figure to close the
gap.
38
Transportation
pg. 6- 30PAGE
58
Aviation Plan: increase title size to
match formatting
SRF will revise the text to increase the
font
39
Transportation
pg. 6 -31
PAGE 60
The County would like the City to
endorse /adopt the Mn /DOT and Anoka
County guidelines for access
management.
SRF will revise the text to add a
statement requiring the official controls
be amended to include access
management guidelines
SRF will revise the text to increase the
font
SRF will revise the text to add a
statement requiring the official controls
be amended to include access
manaaement uid I_�ines
Consider identifying safety problem
areas.
Insert text where appropriate that the
county has identified CR 153 as a
turnback route to the city.
•
THERE IS A REFERENCE TO
"FIGURE 39 ON THE NEXT
PAGE ". PLEASE CLARIFY
STAFF WILL WRITE
STATEMENT RECOGNIZING
SNOWMOBILE TRAILS.
SRF included this information in the full
Transportation Plan, and staff feels it is
not necessary in the abbreviated version
in the Comprehensive Plan
STARTS ON PAGE 33 IN FULL PLAN
SRF will include text that clearly
identifies CR 153 as a turnback route.
IT'S ALREADY IN CHAPTER, PAGE 6-
5, AND IN FULL PLAN ON PAGE 9
SRF will revise text on page 57 —
reference should be to Figure 6 -17 (not
Figure 39). SRF will add text, to be
provided by City staff regarding
snowmobile trails.
•
•
•
ATTACHMENT B
City Council 6/8/09
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 23, 2009
TO: Ciara Schlichting, Bonestroo
FROM: Michael Grochala, Community Development Director
RE: 2030 Comp Plan Revisions
Staff has reviewed the draft 2030 plan and have the following changes /revisions:
411 1. Pg. 2 -31; 4th paragraph, last sentence. We believe figure reference should be Figure 2 -8.
•
2. Pg. 2 -33; Clarify what text is amending Park Plan (May want to format differently). Please
reference section/page of Park Plan amended.
3. Parks section should include statement regarding snowmobile trails in the trail system plan.
4. Parks section should include implantation items listed in Chapter 11.
5. Pg. 3 -11; Change densities in table 3 -2
6. 3 -15 Change densities in Medium Density and High Density paragraphs.
7. Pg. 3 -13 & 3 -24: Revise maps 3 -3 (Land Use Plan) and 3 -4 (Staging Plan) to reflect
phasing and land use changers per City Council and CPAP joint meeting.
8. Pg. 3 -14; Insert land use district flexibility language (Sent by Jeff on 2/11/09)
"While establishing the importance of the 2030 Future Land Use Map, it's
important to acknowledge the realities of land development. Future development may
involve assembling several land parcels. Site layouts may need some flexibility to ensure
efficient design and safety, especially internal circulation. In addition, natural features
don't follow linear property boundaries. Because of these and other factors, the actual
boundaries on the Proposed Land Use Map should be considered somewhat flexible in
order to accommodate development or redevelopment proposals. For example, the City
may consider averaging out different land use densities across the project site for a project
that includes areas mapped for several residential land uses."
9. Pg. 3 -17; Change mixed use table (Table 3 -4) to reflect CC /CPAP changes
10. Pg. 3 -23; Revise Table 3 -5 to reflect changes in land use categories and density
methodology (RR low density <10 acres).
11. Pg. 3 -25; Growth Management Policy. Insert revisions regarding 5 year intensive review
and phasing.
12. Pg. 3 -27, 5th bullet change Net Density 3.04 unit/acre. Rewrite to reflect change in density
calculation methodology.
13. Pg. 4 -2; Insert new goal 5 "Strive to integrate..." from CC /CPAP mtg.
14. Pg. 4 -14; table 4 -6 — Same revisions as table 3 -5
15. Pg. 4 -17; 1St paragraph, last sentence - change density 8 units /ac reference.
16. Pg. 10-5;
3rd bullet add City of Shoreview.
•
•
•
•
,V -5 -,519 -i q - coo , &
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) se.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )
1186647
AFFIDAVIT OF
KENNETH W. TSCHIDA
Kenneth W. Tachida, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes
and says as follows:
1. That he is the President of Land and Oaks Inc., a
corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
2. On September 1, 1977 Land and Oaks Inc. entered into a
Purchase Agreement naming Land and Oaks Inc. as buyer and Cyril H.
LaCasse and Catherine M. LaCasee as sellers for the purchase and
sale of certain property si.t:vated in the County of. Annke, State of
M.i.nneeota lega.l].y deoarihed ad Colloweu
The West One -half of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter, Section 24, Township 31, Range 22 and
that portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, Section 24, Township 31, Range 22 lying north
of Clear Water Creek except the part belonging to
Northern States Power Company containing 35 acres more
or less.
3. A copy of the Earnest Money Contract is attached hereto.
4. By mutual agreement the closing of the purchase was
indefinitely delayed.
5. Land and Oaks Inc. has paid to the sellers at least
$15,000.00 toward the purchase price of the property.
6. Ay mutual rnnnnnt, the AAllers have continued to farm
the property end received thn cropn rained thereon.
7. Land and Oaks Inc. now wishes to complete the purchase
of the property by paying the balance of the purchase price owing
and receiving a warranty deed for the property.
Affiant is making this Affidavit for the purpose of placing
on record the interest which Land and Oaks Inc. clajms in the
subject property.
Subscribed and sworn to before
me this /d' — day of October,
1905.
eGGV &g'^-"'''.
Public
~ MOT A
If/ IN. ION
Kenneth W.Tschida
e,„,.„4pidiAr4A-ift
ti CI N
& &' e T 1 i'' 45s- o7�c-
ps,. I I IIAby-IAmatiid Ca sr. rate, wNN.
71115 CONTACT APPROVED BY ST. PAUL BOARD OF REALTORS, IND. AMP BY THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF TIIE RAMSET COIINIY BAR ASSOCIATION IN 1965
MEMO /21h
titethl,t�Ae, a= .POWs
a.en11
y • � jll_- /�211111r'MM-� _. ..� _. wwlaend In pert permit to the pl.twn a 'Witt
•. 9;7" er Nato— WhI -" '
EARNEST MONEY CONTRACT
d
lla/bd In Os Cud* e1 slats d MIM,t.4, sod legally d..eribad as Ma*, le ldh
w !y_ C46: /9 AVF /y s, 7 1I/ >- 3j fz d� z�: >✓ x�� N� 1 s e gi
s �4, ur sn/, Rz2_ ?Z.lJ�� c��c,d �iidE x� Ce,“,,e -tL Z -razz" -A-
'Zb' ]tsct�u..a. GOTa�dg �t4.� 35 nt..P�.
laded* * faun was. pleats, Mulls ad 17171, all storm 11d, Pan doom, b1sa0N11 whoa), I1'..., slemnp, wledew nodes. 01101ds Onemung rmsUsn 1ddt, dr8.In fob.
Inward rod, *doe reds, 011151 1dersa, p8.Ml.g Ihdord, bat odd tend sod Mall* peal *Rd as Mown, 11Ns, slabs and doer Ndpp el tea Wed s8.w. M,
*in sallow aid Odle pa boa sod centrals 111 the oddity d odor), allrlar Television Means, lndaratw, Aahwa.ha 1d gshap deposal,
sa eleste 1 Map ant, podding, II* m111111, and did WNW d111I pdpw.M Nd sad Waled N add mottoes went
ell d di arced* 1u onbnlpN, as 14114 r IM aRw, has tee via ad 8. as Gayer ear IM awe eL& i .c4. 1 — '
- /1 n .
1 19 m mr 11011 . Odd tee Wad IS ON In Um WNW wleeyp _
Ernest map sera pall O' 2 Pat � ad E "'�— /- gook, IX mi . /b.i*. / �r ay���
# / �� earpc. g-w'� 4.. d... 114,... ari - -t./ �/J5• ! 3/, /17.1". J� j
. 3/, / 8.3 .4.-4..„ .4'..4., dux " r'.."./
-e.4.4.4... ��I�I 7 31' de.A- . • e ..i.t a - _ lSocs, .c1w. g r6on,76
672.4.96-,,. °'SAree...4.a,, ,..el-. • �(.e�«... .T eorC'v ,*� Z g=e
1Y 8 t�nnonce by 111 buyer 11115111' agrees a mewl sag deliver 1` OOL�i 0e- —4 -E Werrdq Odd po M 9144 a
y .pinto, II ay) domino aurataba 1111 to uN prdmI.0 lwpet only le the felled* aeapllonsi
te) laen11eu of its illIne1111 al mined 111681 la Os Ste11 Of MIIMed1.
Id 1114 d Wand as areld hs ad late,
9 Its.
seder can1614161 Nlwlgl.. any, ap r ' Wild WNW ,Ion *undo Ian of Is. pr
T .yshM M tee ynr
917• a�arnune a llddap rz:la ua la, II wyr'� wag cbnplsad on pia prior a dote M aid std dbdl bon did by the saga.
11U17 speald aa1ldemeale, II.17,1111111 pall •7 up bsyer.
solar dated Out o ha d I...,I /ge of Way planned snprmdente whlcl, way muff 8. weds; eenumenb mob
Tl1 solid lordly draft b deliver WWI km es et be
.ddRias of Ids .anon have ben 7.51711.4 d11This saki dull Id closed on a Be
The buyer and tell u malady agree 111 pro-rtt dJwlwals d Inbred and 61W Old lad, M Om an Of Mena pbNry, current 1HU190 171wa dal MIN sal tea
winded se d 4 �� .� v:
1.1e. cwt this p day le ustlgd u asspd b W a see .Uwr tau hdera Ilia docks data, the asna.w.1 shall bacons wall and void, d a1 parity *Ilan, and 111
mantes paid handed shall a dal ad Is 511)4 71'11 111.
TM .11M 1,11 *M. - days at*S appnal of 91. dreaded, Mild a .141rst1 .7 GIN sullied M dale a seeded pgarty b WWI
Order 11atM1 &Iodine Isa11 old ending aaelnIPIl, a.MWICtII, And SMII 111 / *4etsl IdgmeOM ad 111u, The boyar shad be dbawd 10 dad and 8.1117* *0aeof er OanIPIUes
el uN 8111. Wad the deigs d any oblu11.. aerelee, said .09.88.., el M wade is willing a deemed 8. be valved. II 157 Medians are u mode IM seller 50.11 M Awed 120 dad to
mat. such 1111. amendable. Pods) coddlleqe. of 1111e the owned. 4anmar required shall be p.ap.dd, b.l upoa correction d dd. sod *Rhin TO days 1111 Iwllkin molds taw
Myer II Lid !odds 411$ i this untel Edle .4 8. alt cinch* land. 1M 120 days item *01 mate el swipes eblielle s1 third° a Add paded, 1141 pewdM 9141p11PaayM, Old 7 pda1d odd
and on ugh Iq 'w II71l W 11M Milled, mode upon
11 NMaaetad shall bpi 11/111 d 17 aid 11 la 1 t and WO spot. a tints !doodah IdRS eroot �I0HW pfd Menages, MM 06iMn1
of Ih. tuna Mreh MI Ihla pt.MW shad ad 0 111 /Mar parr oI de add d enforcing Oa swift eH.rm.M of s cosine err el dos. m1Ude1 add ad be lens utd b
da.111* and prodded solid b alas doh s7.Nlm palwm.na R M eum.dwd MUM Oa wane Mar mud right of soli* u 1 a e.
whelThis n Ae 148 ceasing Idd node dnamed Mlwman the parties, W aUMr Palle Mt f11114 add der n1 :M1 rprasnlltidI, weals, Or u1b718.dlnp set 114 11M bared
R h understood dal mead *al IW1 aka Is dada ,ublod 8. IM imprint, M the teller d and Pedal., b *rD111 which approval qdt -has dens 8.
118.1., ad Oat Ile ndnelprd swat 1. In ,a nada 11114, re 1117d/s1 am aroma d 111s utodad. 11711 a r.lwl a .soadi 1. Iho weal w*q Pao dad the 00114a.L
posI141 dial all th1
Th. delivery of ad ppd. sod dal. .1.11 1. mods d IM Wks el
1, U1 enbrsl wed, Belle, of 151 Nun Tad, de herby approve
the bens atri ,had Ins_. a b.
// gg y ,I1r
sailor
51 p
Wan smell woo to imam IM aid property la LW du ad moo tee Mow
•t" •� mi �<• / 1
Buy
T118S IS INTTHnrn TO BE A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, FOR IECAI. ADVICE IN CONNECTION WITN TUTS TRANSACTION, CONSULT YOUR IATIYFR.
•
IHmnr.,.iRaRS /atq 1_ic.nKx.ICgq
t - O *q Max U fl II al I.I
• ..r f0�/p%_ /���.�f.Y.. i ►�pf,'G Oat. TM Pak
•FTm uInt El
O `' W' R
. SR
OuweDa O GAO
DOCUMENrno. 1186647.0 ABSTRACT
ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA
1 HERESY CERTFYTHATTHE WITHIN INSIHUUBIT WAS RLEOIN HMS OFFICE
FOSRECORORN OCT 12 95
AT 11:30 AM AND WAS DULYREODPOEO.
$19.50 mO,
FEES ANO TAXES IN TIE AMOUNT OF
mama 95048028
EDWARD M. TRESKA
ANOKA COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ADANM IWITON.ECORDENNE01STTNROF7nLE3
SIC
SY
DEPUTY PROPERTY IAKAONINISTNATOWRECOROEWREDISTIUN OF FIRES
"ui■ I& NJULla ■••r•akaltM1■111r■ ■••■■••• .a -• ■■• ■••••1ALJI•■••■• ai•. Y11 ■AAILLIiiii�i�iii�iii• ...
L
r •
•
AJLIAMASAAAAAAJLA maim
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ATTACHMENT C
•
1 +■
.• ■•
•
•
•
•
•
140
■
•
f•
i
r.
■•••
■
•
•
11 SAL M
:r
•
•
1011111111••
■
• Uri
•
Peltier w 11111
Lake
George
Watch
Lake
a
•
_
rshan
Lake
•
•
•
.:
esprve
Centerville
Lake
a
Rice
Lake
Reshanau
Lake
•
•
••■■•
■ ■.• f.l■la.
• ■
■
•
- a•_1.1-
•
•
•
•
} ■. ■ ■ ■4• ■ ■.•
•
.11_11•rd•.••ur•r,•1 1 ••
•
•
•
•
■
•
•
■
•
■
4611'v
s1
a
• •
/••w4 •
o ■ • • ■
• ; :• ..•f•.. ": ,
■
•
1 •
▪ •
Imo 1 ' r
4. ■■ ■L■
■ r•
•
1
11■
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
Is I
•
•
•
•
•••■
•
..••j••••r
■
•
■
• •
4
•
•
•
•
• • ■■
1116 •• •■L •■• •vir.rArva • - -■1
Otter
Lake .
Utility Staging Map
City of Lino Lakes 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
4.000
0
4,000
Feet
• L.:Stage 1A Planned Service Area (2008-2015)
. 1 1Stage 1B Planned Service Area i2015 -20201
■ ■ ■.Sta a 2A Planned Service Area (2020 -2025)
• • ■.•� Stage 2B Planned Service Area (2025 -2030)
■•▪ IStage 3 Planned Service Area (Post 2030)
C.; No Service Area
i•
Municipal Boundary
MCES interceptors
an Regional Park Reserve
Wetlands
Open Water
Right -of -Way
CT F
IIN 11KES
February 27. 2009
}eca"ed by bOfle6TCS!
Kf ctIve'1arkr, Eberver,DX5/36-0507 ?.- HrOt3ke6axrpt3r.U:3g1ng.Mica
•
ATTACHMENT D
1441 awl m I r
1111tt #1 1111
.vtttttt e) "1 "1
-- i .1117 kr;�ra
l 4 �1i1ne 111t1�.. _
1111111111111111111111? -"441
111111III IIIIIII' .
= "'
Rce Creep,
Chain of Laa es
Rer_1iona^ Park. Reserve
Centerville
_aItie
.IIk1041 �
2030 Future Land Use Map
City of Lino Lakes 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update
4,000
0
�� j Municipal Boundary
Permanent Rural
Urban Reserve
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
4,000 UM High Density Residential
Feet Commercial
INN
Mixed Use
Industrial
Civic /Institutional
Park/Open Space
Private Airfield
Right -of -Way
Open Water
February 27. 2009
rcracVveK�(k, sservert1o0 - €OJi -c Ii I by Bonestroo
1. Weinkauf, Moore, and Green properties, 797 and 787 Main St., and un- addressed vacant lot
ATTACHMENT E page 1
0030 draft comp plan
request
2002 (existing) comp plan
existing zoning and use
analysis and recommendation
• Site is on edge of neighborhood, separated from the larger Mixed Use area by a driveway
Low Density Residential
Guide the site Commercial.
Low Density Sewered
Residential
General Business
for several lots. The 1200 ft. driveway comprises several parcels and easements under
different ownerships. This driveway serves as a good dividing line between the
Stage 1 A (2009 -2015)
This request followed
request for 797 Main St. to
be guided as Mixed Use to
allow for home business
computer service and sales.
Stage 1 (1998 -2010)
single family home on site
residential neighborhood and future commercial /mixed uses.
• Existing GB zoning conflicts with existing comp plan and makes houses nonconforming.
• Recommend: Guide as Low Density Residential as proposed
• Recommend: Rezone site to R -1 Residential like the rest of the neighborhood.
• Recommend: Revise home occupation requirements in zoning ordinance. This would
occur with amendments of ordinances to implement new comp plan. Example: home
offices & small service activities allowed in residential zones with restrictions that will
consider such things as maximum square footage for such activities.
AERIAL PHOTO
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE MAP
2. Nogai property, 1370 Birch St.
ATTACHMENT E page 2
2030 draft comp plan
re I uest
2002 (existing) comp plan
existing zoning and use
analysis and recommendation
• Utilities must be brought from White Oak Road and Birch by development of small
Urban Reserve through
Bring the site into pre -2030
Low Density Unsewered
Rural
properties to west. Also would require running utilities down Joyer Lane to lot
Stages 1 & 2 (2009 -2030)
Low Density Residential
staging area.
Residential
single family home on site
boundary. The site would accommodate three lots, or maybe four with a small interior
cul de sac and removal of existing house. The financial viability of all this is
questionable without a larger utilities project serving the neighborhood.
Stage 3 (after 2030)
• Recommend: This would be appropriate for a future comp plan amendment for a larger
utilities and road reconstruction project initiated by property owners in the neighborhood.
• Recommend: Guide as proposed, Urban Reserve to 2030, then Low Density Residential.
AERIAL PHOTO
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE MAP
•
•
3. Joyer property, Main St. east of Elbe St.
ATTACHMENT E page 3
draft comp plan
request
2002 (existing) comp plan
existing zoning and use
analysis and recommendation
0030
• Development of this site would require utilities, increasing possibility to serve
Urban Reserve through
Bring the site into
Medium Density
Rural
neighborhoods along Main St., which are in same sewer subdistrict.
Stages 1 & 2 (2009 -2030)
Stage 1 (2009- 2020).
Residential
• Removal from utilities service plan of existing older neighborhood in same sewer
Stage 2 (2010 -2020)
vacant
subdistrict freed enough capacity to comfortably serve this site.
Medium Density
Residential
• Access to Main St. and stubbed 81st St. (though a new Main St. access would be a right
in/out street per the access management plan.)
Stage 3 (after 2030)
• Recommend: Include this parcel in Stage 1A, 2009 -2020.
• Recommend: Also include adjacent small lot with existing house (dashed outline).
AERIAL PHOTO
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE MAP
4. Leroux property, 2104 64th St.
ATTACHMENT E page 4
2030 draft comp plan
request
2002 (existing) comp plan
existing zoning and use
analysis and recommendation
• Utilities are stubbed in Clearwater Creek, but it is unknown if all of this area can be
Urban Reserve through
Bring the site into pre -2030
Low Density Sewered
Rural
served by this sanitary sewer pipe because of depth and land elevation. Two properties
Stages 1 & 2 (2009 -2030)
staging area.
Residential
to the north must develop first to bring utilities to the site.
Low Density Residential
Stage 2 (2010 -2020)
single family home on site
• Development of area would require construction of 64th St. to provide adequate access,
and connection to Flora Court in Clearwater Creek neighborhood.
Stage 3 (after 2030)
• If this area of 70+ acres with potential for 100+ lots is moved into earlier stage, should
consider removing land from that stage or adding units to city forecast.
• Recommend: This would be appropriate for a future comp plan amendment for a larger
utilities and road reconstruction project initiated by property owners in the area.
• Recommend: Add text in Planning District 3 section of comp plan discussing this area
and potential for amendment if multi - property development plan is created.
• Recommend: guide as proposed, Urban Reserve to 2030, then Low Density Residential.
AERIAL PHOTO
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE MAP
•
•
5. O'Connell property, 1000 Main Street
ATTACHMENT E page 5
P030 draft comp plan
request
2002 (existing) comp plan
existing zoning and use
analysis and recommendation
Urban Reserve through
Stages 1 & 2 (2009 -2030)
Medium Density
Residential
Stage 3 (after 2030)
1) Include property in
Stage 1 (2008- 2020).
Low Density Sewered
Residential
Stage 2 (2010 -2020)
Rural
single family home on site
• The sewer pipe from the south will not serve this property because of the pipe's depth and
capacity. The pipe can serve the east part of James St. and the lot abutting James St.
• The O'Connell property requires new sewer trunk in Main St. from Lake Drive.
• Some land on. Main St. just east of Lake Drive likely can be served by trunk gravity sewer.
The precise eastern extent before the forcemain is needed is unknown.
• Extensive development will be necessary to finance the new forcemain and lift station for
sewer district 2C. This is unlikely to happen in the near future. Extending the staging area
creates the expectation that utilities will be available.
2) Opposes changing
abutting property on
west from Low Density
to Medium Density.
• This property and most surrounding land is guided Medium Density post -2030.
• Resource management planning shows wetland preservation corridors over much of the area.
• Allowing higher density in these areas allows setting aside environmental resource areas
while still allowing for financially feasible development.
• Recommend: guide as proposed, Urban Reserve to 2030, then Medium Density Residential
AERIAL PHOTO
•
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED LAND USE MAP
FULL BUILD OUT FUTURE LAND USE MAP (post -2030)
WITH FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
5. O'Connell property, 1000 Main Street (continued) ATTACHMENT E page 6
FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WITH SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
raii..Tf inlirr■••■■Pirif rir all
1 �. _
.jam.
wir
7:1,9
olp.„ 117
int
IL'AV !*A (j
as AIM 1u1 11l11l - INN
ARV a111111%11� 7/ s
EIPAINI AVAk
FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WITH STAGING PLAN
•
• MA I�
•
Stage 1
(2008 — 2020
-..-'---r--1..-1----1--k-1----1-1
Stage 3
(post -2030)
L , #11
•
•
■ . ■
• • • • •
.•.' • •
Wetlands
Wetland Preservation Corridor
•
ATTACHMENT F
• City Council 6/8/09
MEMORANDUM
June 5, 2009
To: City Council
From: Jeff Smyser
Subject: Revisions to Comprehensive Plan Resulting from Forecast Change
At its work session on June 3, the City Council directed staff to revise the growth forecast
in the comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council's forecast. The City Council also
requested a list of things in the draft plan that will need to be revised as a result of the
forecast change. The following items will be revised. The pages refer to the draft
comprehensive plan distributed in November 2008 (though the cover date is July 2008).
page 1 -5
Paragraph 4: Revise to remove discussion of higher, market based
forecast.
page 1 -6
Table 1 -1: Revise to show lower household and population forecasts
of Met Council. Employment forecasts will include City's forecast
because Met Council forecast has already been exceeded and thus is
obsolete.
page 1 -8
Paragraph 2: Delete sentences three and four, referring to higher
forecast data.
page 3 -10
Paragraph 1: Delete third sentence, referring to market analysis and
higher demand.
page 3 -23
Table 3 -5: Delete this table and replace with table of land use
acreages in five -year increments.
page 3 -27
First bullet point, last sentence: revise number of medium and high
density housing units to reflect lower forecast.
pages 4 -7 to
4 -14
Page 4 -7, paragraph 2: Rewrite to reflect lower household forecast.
Also, delete all text from that point through the first half of page 4 -14.
(Discusses market study resulting in higher household forecast.)
•
•
•
•
page 4 -17
Paragraph 1: Revise to remove discussion of higher, market based
forecast and
Paragraphs 1, 3, 5: revise number of affordable units to reflect lower
forecast.
Chapter 6
Transportation
Plan
The lower forecast will be run through the traffic model. Some results
will change slightly. For example, Fig. 6.4 will show lower traffic
forecasts. Fig. 6.5 likely will show a few less roads that cross the
threshold for increasing to 4 -lanes. Post -2030 data will not change
because they are based on full build out of city.
Chapters 7 & 8,
Sanitary Sewer
and Water Plans
These utility plans are based on the full build out of the city, which is
not changed by the lower 2020 and 2030 forecasts. Five -year staging
was not completed yet to allow decision on which forecast. This now
can be prepared.
page 9 -5
Table 9 -1: Revise to reflect lower forecasts.
•
ATTACHMENT G
June 3, 2009 work session handout
Minnesota Statutes
473.858 COMPREHENSIVE PLANS; LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS.
Subdivision 1. No conflicting zoning, fiscal device, official control.
Within nine months following the receipt of a metropolitan system
statement for an amendment to a metropolitan system plan and within
three years following the receipt of a metropolitan system statement
issued in conjunction with the decennial review required under section
473.864, subdivision 2, every local governmental unit shall have
reviewed and, if necessary, amended its comprehensive plan ...
Subdivision 1. No conflicting zoning, fiscal device, official control.
(continued)
.... If the comprehensive municipal plan is in conflict with the
zoning ordinance, the zoning ordinance shall be brought into
conformance with the plan by local government units in
con junction with the review and, if necessary, amendment of its
comprehensive plan required under section 473.864, subdivision 2.
After August 1, 1995, a Local government unit shall not adopt any
fiscal device or official control which is in conflict with its
comprehensive plan, including any amendments to the plan, or
which permits activity in conflict with metropolitan system plans, as
defined by section 473.852, subdivision 8. The comprehensive plan
shall provide guidelines for the timing and sequence of the adoption of
official controls to ensure planned, orderly, and staged development
and redevelopment consistent with the comprehensive plan....
•
• 1 •
473.865 ADOPTION; CONFLICTS, AMENDMENT OF CONTROLS, DEVICES.
Subdivision 1. Control copies to council. Each local
governmental unit shall adopt official controls as described in its adopted
comprehensive plan and shall submit copies of the official controls to the
council within 30 days following adoption thereof, for information purposes
only.
Subd. 2. No conflict with plans. A local governmental unit
shall not adopt any official control or fiscal device which is in
conflict with its comprehensive plan or which permits activity in
conflict with metropolitan system plans.
Subd. 3. Amendments. If an official control conflicts with a
comprehensive plan as the result of an amendment to the plan,
the official control shall be amended by the unit within nine
months following the amendment to the plan so as to not conflict
with the amended comprehensive plan.
Existing Hierarchy of Land Use Categories and Zoning Districts in Lino Lakes
LAND USE
CATEGORY
ZONING
DISTRICTS R R -X zoning R -1 R -1X R -EC R -2 R -3 R -4 R -6 GB LB NB GI LI
not
coordinated
Low Density
Unsewered
Rural Residential
Low Density
Sewered
Residential
Medium
Density High Density
Residential Residential Commercial Industrial
A 1 /1\4 n n n
Mixed Use
can include
variety of
zones, uses
Draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories
Low Density Residential:
Commercial:
Mixed Use:
The purpose of this category is to accommodate
residential development at 1.5 to 3.5 dwelling units per
acre.
The purpose of this category is to accommodate retail,
office and service uses.
The purpose of this category is to accommodate a mix
of residential, retail, and office uses either within one
building, structure or development. Residential
development may include higher density housing
options. 4
• to
Existing 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
•
A
Draft 2030 Future Land Use Map
Joyer request:
guide an area of
600 ` x 600'
Commercial
IIIIIIII t1 /I
Weinkauf request:
guide Mixed Use or
Commercial
14
•
•
Draft Full Build Out Future Land Use Map (post 2030)
•
Weinkauf request, 797 Main Street, and others
2002 (existing)
comprehensive
plan
draft 2030
comprehensive
plan
existing zoning
and actual use
request
Low Density
Sewered
Residential
Stage 1 (1998-
2010)
Low Density
Residential
Stage 1 A (2009-
2015)
NO CHANGE
FROM 2002 PLAN
General Business
single family
homes, driveway,
one vacant lot
Guide the site
Mixed Use or
Commercial to
allow for home
business
computer service
and sales, and
other commercial
uses.
•
•
•
•
Existing 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
if
Weinkauf request:
guide Mixed Use or
Commercial
T
Existing Zoning
II
• • •
ANALYSIS: Weinkauf request
• Site is in existing residential neighborhood.
• Existing zoning of several Tots conflicts with the land use category
in existing comprehensive plan. This must be resolved. Either the
land use category in the comprehensive plan or the zoning must
change.
• The current GB General Business zoning means the existing
homes are nonconforming uses. This creates limits and potential
problems for owners.
• Existing homes are separated from the proposed Mixed Use
(current Commercial) area by a driveway that provides access for
several lots.
• The driveway is 1200 feet long. It is made up of easements and
separate parcels under different ownerships.
11
ANALYSIS: Weinkauf request (continued)
• This driveway serves as a dividing line, a buffer between the
residential neighborhood and future commercial /mixed uses.
• Draft 2030 plan guides these properties Low Density Residential,
consistent with existing comp plan and the existing uses:
residences. P & Z supported this.
• P & Z also supported the recommendation to rezone Tots to R -1
Residential, like the rest of the neighborhood.
• P & Z also supported the recommendation to revise home
occupation requirements in zoning ordinance.
Example: allow home offices & small service businesses in
residential zones with restrictions to ensure compatibility with
the residential neighborhood.
This revision would occur with amendments of ordinances to
implement new comp plan.
12
• • •
0
No residential /commercial buffer space available between homes
•
0
•
Joyer property, 8174 Lake Drive
•
2002 (existing)
comprehensive
plan
draft 2030
comprehensive
plan
existing zoning
and actual use
request
Medium
Density
Residential
Stage 2 (2010-
2020)
Urban Reserve
until 2030
Mixed Use
post -2030
Rural, and
General
Business
residence,
garden center,
and agriculture
Guide a piece
of the site
Commercial:
600' x 600'
Existing 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map
Joyer request:
guide an area of
600 x 600'
Commercial
• • •
Existing Zoning
7
Draft 2030 Future Land Use Map
•
•
•
Draft Full Build Out Future Land Use Map (post 2030)
•
ANALYSIS: Jover request
• Existing GB zoning of part of this property conflicts with the land
use category in existing comprehensive plan. This must be
resolved. Either the land use category in the comprehensive plan
or the zoning must change.
• Guiding it for Stage 1 or 2 commercial development now is
premature because infrastructure is not available to serve 8+ acres
of commercial development.
a) Water and sanitary sewer are 1000 feet from property, and
b) There is not enough sanitary sewer capacity, and
c) The roadway /traffic infrastructure improvements
signalization of Lake /Main and widening of Lake Drive is
not expected in the foreseeable future.
• • •
• •
ANALYSIS: Joyer request (continued)
• An area of 600' x 600' could develop with approx. 90,000 sf of floor
area for retail, service, or office, or more with multi -story buildings.
Significant infrastructure needed for this and the rest of the lot.
• Draft 2030 plan guides as Urban Reserve until 2030.
• Post -2030, site is guided Mixed Use, which is the category
requested by the landowner in Sept. 2008. Mixed Use category
can accommodate commercial uses.
• P & Z Board supported the plan.
• P & Z also supported the recommendation to revise the zoning
ordinance regarding a commercial greenhouse /nursery in a Rural
zoning district and allowable activities at such a business. This
revision would occur with amendments of ordinances to
implement the new comp plan.
Utility Staging Map: to 2030
•
•