Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-049 Council ResolutionCouncil Member Boeser adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -49 RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF REVISED 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR SUBMITTAL TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 473.864 requires that every city within the Seven County Metropolitan Area must review and, if necessary, update its comprehensive plan every ten years and submit it to the Metropolitan Council for review; and WHEREAS, the City conducted an extensive planning process that included a quality of life survey in 2005; and WHEREAS, the quality of life survey was followed by the creation of a citizen committee that prepared the 2030 Vision Plan, which was completed in 2007; and WHEREAS, the City Council established the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel, a • citizen group that worked with city staff and the City Council through 2007, 2008, and into 2009 to prepare the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the goals and policies in the 2030 Vision Plan form the foundation of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and • WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board conducted two public hearings on the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan, on September 9, 2008 and April 8, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan was submitted to the Metropolitan Council and was approved by the Metropolitan Council on December 9, 2009; and WHEREAS, the City Council made subsequent revisions to the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan through years 2010 and 2011; and WHEREAS, the revisions were distributed to adjacent jurisdictions for review in accordance with MN Statute 473.859 and all the jurisdictions have responded. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves the revised draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council. • • • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval includes the revisions to the draft plan included in Attachment A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that following review by the Metropolitan Council, the City Council will consider final approval of the Comprehensive Plan. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rdday of May , 2011. ATTEST: e Bartell, C. Cler Jeff Reine a or The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Gallup and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Roeser, Gallup, Rafferty, O'Donnell, Reinert The following voted against same: none Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • STAFF ORIGINATOR: C. C. MEETING DATE: TOPIC: ACTION REQUIRED: BACKGROUND AGENDA ITEM 6 A Jeff Smyser May 23, 2011 Resolution No. 11 -49: Preliminary Approval of Revised 2030 Comprehensive Plan for Submittal to Metropolitan Council 3/5 The City Council approved Resolution No. 09 -23 in June of 2009, granting preliminary approval of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to the Metropolitan Council. The plan was submitted to the Metropolitan Council in August of 2009. At the request of the Metropolitan Council, supplemental materials were submitted in October 2009 and the plan submittal was determined to be complete. The plan was reviewed by the Metropolitan Council's Environmental Committee and Community Development Committee in November 2009. On December 9, 2009 the Metropolitan Council authorized the City to put its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update into effect. The City Council has continued to discuss modification of the plan regarding growth management and housing. At the January 4, 2011 work session the City Council completed its review and directed staff to make the following modifications and distribute the plan to adjacent jurisdictions for review. • Chapter 3, Land Use Plan (pages 26 -27). The statement within the Growth Management Policy establishing an annual average of 230 new residential dwelling units per year was modified. The City Council reduced the maximum number of residential units allowed in any one year The proposed language now reads: "The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5 year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. At the end of the 5 year phasing period unallocated units will be averaged out over the next five year phase." • Chapter 4, Housing Plan (pages 10 -11). The City Council added a statement that in acknowledging Metropolitan Council's affordability goals the City is not committing to provide funding for housing. Also included are limited text revisions within the affordable housing section. 2030 Comprehensive Plan City Council May 23, 2011 page 2 • The City Council modified the Residential Land Use density ranges as follows: Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential 1.6 to 3.9 units per acre (instead of 1.5 to 3.5) 4.0 to 5.9 units per acre (instead of 3.6 to 6.9) 6.0 to 10.0 units per acre (instead of 7.0 to 12.0) The proposed Land Use Plan revisions are intended to address council concerns regarding establishment of a hard growth cap, providing development flexibility, managing pace of growth, and maintaining even growth from year to year while still accommodating the growth forecasts. Upon final approval of the Comprehensive Plan the city's existing Growth Management ordinance would be amended to incorporate these revisions. Staff submitted the proposed revisions to adjacent jurisdictions for review in February 2011. The information sent to the adjacent jurisdictions included supplemental material submitted to the Met Council in October 2009 as part of the original review because the other jurisdictions had not seen that material. The last response was received on May 11, 2011. The only change resulting from comments from the other jurisdictions are minor corrections in the transit section regarding express bus route 275. These corrections are included in Attachment A along with other transit corrections resulting from the 2009 Met Council approval. We also sent the proposed revisions to the Met Council for a preliminary look in order to expedite the formal review. Met Council wanted the estimated breakdown of sewered and unsewered households added to the growth forecast table on page 1 -6. This just inserts data that was part of the original review but not in the document. It does not change the forecasts. The next step is to submit the revisions for formal review by the Metropolitan Council. After Met Council's approval, the City Council will need to act to grant final approval. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution No. 11 -49, Preliminary Approval of revised 2030 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to Metropolitan Council. This approval includes the revisions in Attachment A, described in this report. 2. Return to staff with direction. RECOMMENDATION Option 1 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A, Revisions to the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan Attachment A Revisions to the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan May 23, 2011 • • • • higher than the Met Council's 2030 employment forecasts for the city. According to the most recent Met Council employment estimates, the City contained 3,750 jobs in 2005 and 3,920 jobs in 2006. In other words, the City has already exceeded the Met Council's original 2030 employment forecast of 3,550 total jobs. As demonstrated above in Table 1 -1, the Met Council forecasts do not account for the number of existing jobs within the city. As the city grows, additional opportunities for commercial and industrial employment will be created. A revised employment forecast was discussed with Met Council staff during the preparation of this Comprehensive Plan update and Met Council staff indicated that the revised employment forecast presented in Table 1 -2 was reasonable. Therefore this Comprehensive Plan Update is based on accommodating the employment growth forecast presented in Table 1 -2 rather than the original System Statement forecast presented in Table 1 -1. Table 1 -2. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Growth Forecasts The City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan will focus on conformance with metropolitan plans and consistency with regional policies for transportation, water resources, wastewater services, housing, land use, regional parks and open space. The city's plan was reviewed for compatibility with adjacent and affected government units such as Anoka, Washington, and Ramsey counties, cities of Centerville, Columbus, Forest Lake, Hugo, North Oaks, Shoreview, Circle Pines, Blaine and Ham Lake, White Bear Township, Rice Creek Watershed District, Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization, Centennial Independent School District No. 12, Forest Lake Independent School District No. 831, and White Bear Lake Independent School District No. 624. The city received comments from several adjacent and affected governmental units and the plan was revised to address many of the comments. The city will also need to coordinate planning efforts with government agencies such as the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MnDOT and the Pollution Control Agency. Additionally, to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with natural resource protection and mitigation measures, the Comprehensive Plan was prepared in concert with the Rice Creek Watershed District's Resource Management Plan, an unprecedented cooperative planning effort between a municipality and a watershed district. The City of Lino Lakes is classified by the Metropolitan Council as a "Developing" community (Figure 1 -4). Developing communities are cities where the most substantial amount of new growth will occur through the year 2030— about 60 percent of new households and 40 percent of new jobs. Developments should be 3 — 5+ units per acre, with higher densities near transportation corridors. Lino Lakes needs to plan for 20 years of growth and identify post -2030 growth areas. The City of Lino Lakes has prepared a plan that responds to these Metropolitan Council guidelines for developing communities. The City has prepared a Land Use Plan that is consistent with the net density requirements. Higher density residential housing and mixed use nodes that will incorporate high density housing are planned along the City's major transportation corridors. The City has also developed a staging plan that identifies the anticipated timing for growth through 2030 and an Urban Reserve area to accommodate post 2030 growth. 2000 Estimate 2010 2020 2030 Population 16,791 22,500 26,300 30,700 Households 4,857 7,500 9,100 10,600 sewered 2,857 5,300 7 800 9,975 unsewered 2,000 2,200 1300 625 Employment 2,444 4,100 6,200 8,000 The City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan will focus on conformance with metropolitan plans and consistency with regional policies for transportation, water resources, wastewater services, housing, land use, regional parks and open space. The city's plan was reviewed for compatibility with adjacent and affected government units such as Anoka, Washington, and Ramsey counties, cities of Centerville, Columbus, Forest Lake, Hugo, North Oaks, Shoreview, Circle Pines, Blaine and Ham Lake, White Bear Township, Rice Creek Watershed District, Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management Organization, Centennial Independent School District No. 12, Forest Lake Independent School District No. 831, and White Bear Lake Independent School District No. 624. The city received comments from several adjacent and affected governmental units and the plan was revised to address many of the comments. The city will also need to coordinate planning efforts with government agencies such as the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MnDOT and the Pollution Control Agency. Additionally, to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with natural resource protection and mitigation measures, the Comprehensive Plan was prepared in concert with the Rice Creek Watershed District's Resource Management Plan, an unprecedented cooperative planning effort between a municipality and a watershed district. The City of Lino Lakes is classified by the Metropolitan Council as a "Developing" community (Figure 1 -4). Developing communities are cities where the most substantial amount of new growth will occur through the year 2030— about 60 percent of new households and 40 percent of new jobs. Developments should be 3 — 5+ units per acre, with higher densities near transportation corridors. Lino Lakes needs to plan for 20 years of growth and identify post -2030 growth areas. The City of Lino Lakes has prepared a plan that responds to these Metropolitan Council guidelines for developing communities. The City has prepared a Land Use Plan that is consistent with the net density requirements. Higher density residential housing and mixed use nodes that will incorporate high density housing are planned along the City's major transportation corridors. The City has also developed a staging plan that identifies the anticipated timing for growth through 2030 and an Urban Reserve area to accommodate post 2030 growth. • • 1 Table 3 -2: Future Land Use Categories Land Use Category Description Commercial The purpose of this category is to accommodate retail, office and service uses. Industrial yA Mixed Use The purpose of this category is to accommodate manufacturing, processing, warehousing, and research and development uses. The purpose of this category is to accommodate a mix of residential, retail, and office uses either within one building, structure or development. Residential development may include higher density housing options. Permanent Rural The purpose of this category is to designate those areas that are not intended to receive sewer service due to topography and soil issues. Development in rural areas shall be limited to residential single family at low densities or agriculture related uses. Low Density Residential The purpose of this category is to accommodate residential development at 1.5 to-3:5 1.6 to 3.9 dwelling units per acre. Medium Density Residential The purpose of this category is to accommodate residential development at 3.6 to 6.9 4.0 to 5_9 dwelling units per acre. High Density Residential Urban Reserve The purpose of this category is to accommodate residential development 7.0 to 6.0 10.0 at -1-279 to units per acre. The purpose of the Urban Reserve area is to preserve land for post - 2030 urban development. To promote an efficient future development pattern in this area, land use prior to year 2030 in the Urban Reserve area shall be limited to agriculture related uses and single family residential limited to one unit per 10 acres. The purpose of the Civic / Institutional area is to accommodate public Civic / Institutional buildings or facilities, private or public utilities and infrastructure, public and private schools, and cemeteries. The purpose of the Parks / Open Space area is to accommodate passive or active recreational areas and facilities as well as lands under public control that are designated as permanently undeveloped for the purpose of resource management or protection. Private Airfield The purpose of the Private Airfield area is to accommodate aviation related uses. 4110 Discussion of Future Land Use Categories • • In 2030, Lino Lakes will include a variety of land use and development types. A summary of planned land use acreages is presented in Table 3 -3. Table 3 -3: 2030 Future Land Use Acreages Land Use Desi Designation 9 Gross Acres % Gross Acres Net Acres (Without Wetlands) Total Acres (Without Wetlands) Net Acres (Without Wetlands and Open Water) % Total Acres (Without Wetlands and Water) Wetland N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Open Water 3273 15.4% 3273 20.8% N/A N/A Park & Open Space 3453 16.2% 1105 7.0% 1,105 8.9% Permanent Rural 682 3.2% 191 1.2% 191 1.5% Low Density Residential 4240 19.9% 3388 21.5% 3,388 27.1% Medium Density Residential 689 3.2% 581 3.7% 581 4.7% High Density Residential 189 0.9% 162 1.0% 162 1.3% Commercial 453 2.1% 396 2.5% 396 3.2% Industrial 637 3.0% 546 3.5% 546 4.4% Mixed Use 564 2.7% 536 3.4% 536 4.3% Civic/Institutional 468 2.2% 313 2.0% 313 2.5% Private Airfield 66 0.3% 42 0.3% 42 0.3% Right -of -Way 1636 7.7% 1488 9.4% 1,488 11.9% Urban Reserve 4917 23.1% 3730 23.7% 3,730 29.9% Total City 21267 100.0% 15753* 100.0% 12480 ** 100.0% otal does not include 5,522 wetland acres, which is 25% of gross acres **Total does not include 5,522 wetland acres or 3,273 open water acres. As demonstrated by Table 3 -3, approximately half of the city's total acreage consists of wetlands, water, or parks and open space, which will remain undeveloped. Approximately 34 percent of the City's total 2030 planned land area (net of wetlands and open water) will be dedicated to residential uses, which will accommodate a variety of housing types and sizes. Lino Lakes will also include additional commercial and industrial lands to provide jobs for its residents. Additional mixed use areas will provide housing and shopping opportunities and convenience for residents. Each land use category is discussed in greater detail below. Additional discussion is provided for the future land use categories that will accommodate new development. This detailed discussion will also address how the Land Use Plan will achieve the community's goals and policies. While establishing the importance of the 2030 Future Land Use Map, it is important to acknowledge the realities of land development. Future development may involve assembling several land parcels. Site layouts may need some flexibility to ensure efficient design and safety, especially internal circulation. In addition, natural features do not follow linear property boundaries. Because of these and other factors, the actual boundaries on the Proposed Land Use Map should be considered somewhat flexible in order to accommodate development or redevelopment proposals. For example, the City may consider averaging out different land use densities across the project site for a project that includes areas mapped for several residential land uses. Residential Land Uses Residential uses will account for approximately 34 percent of the total 2030 developed land area (net of wetlands and water) in Lino Lakes. Detailed descriptions of each residential land use category are included below, along with the rationale for locating these uses. 3 -14 Low Density Residential The City's predominant future residential land use is low density sewered residential. The Land Use Plan identifies 3,388 net acres of low density residential, or 27.1 percent of the total land area (net of wetlands and water bodies). This land use category provides for housing at densities of 1: te-3T5 1.5 to 3.9 units per net acre that is served by municipal sewer and water service. Efforts were made to locate these areas to avoid conflict with more intense land uses, including commercial and industrial areas, high density housing, and high traffic volume roadways. Low impact development will be required in accordance with the Resource Management Plan in environmentally sensitive areas within the Low Density Residential designation. This land use category also includes existing unsewered low density residential areas that will eventually be connected to City sewer and water systems. The City will work with landowners to provide utilities. • Medium Density Residential The city's Land Use Plan identifies 546 net acres for medium density residential development, or 4.3 percent of the city's total land area (net of wetlands and water bodies). This land use category will accommodate medium density residential development at densities of 36 te-6r.9 440 to 5.9 units per net acre served by municipal sewer and water. These areas can serve as a transition between lower and higher intensity uses. Development in these areas should consider neighboring uses, and efforts should be made to provide for smooth transitions between medium and low density areas. Several medium density residential areas were also located on sites with environmentally sensitive areas. This provides for increased flexibility for development in these areas. Allowing for higher density on suitable areas of a site will increase the financial feasibility of preserving sensitive areas, and allow for more creative site plans that incorporate natural areas into the site planning process. Standards for development in environmentally sensitive areas will require additional environmental protection measures to reduce stormwater runoff and other environmental impacts of more intense development, as defined in the Resource Management System Plan. • High Density Residential The future land use plan identifies 165 net acres of high density residential uses, or 1.3 percent of the city's total land area (net of wetlands and water bodies). The purpose of this land use category is to accommodate residential development at a density of 770 to 1-270 6.0 to 10.0 units per acre served by municipal sewer and water. These areas can also serve as a transition between lower and higher intensity uses, such as commercial areas or higher volume roadways. As with medium density residential areas, several high density areas were identified to provide for development flexibility in environmentally sensitive areas. Again, additional environmental protection measures will be in place to reduce the environmental impacts of more intense development in these areas, as defined in the Resource Management System Plan. The Land Use Plan achieves many of the community's residential goals for the future. The plan provides opportunities for affordable and life -cycle housing options in the community by accommodating development at a variety of types and styles. Opportunities for a variety of housing types address the community's goal and related strategies to improve the availability of affordable and life -cycle housing. Development of affordable housing is made more feasible by increasing the allowable density on a site, as land and construction costs per unit are reduced. • • • Ordinances: The City will review and update its ordinances to be consistent with the revised Comprehensive Plan. Through ordinance standards and the development review and permitting process, the City is able to implement many of the goals and policies included in the Plan, including the dedication of new parks, open space and trails and protection of natural features, such as wetlands, woodlands, and wildlife and plant habitats. In addition to ordinances protecting natural features, environmental protection within the city may also be supported through the incorporation of green building techniques to reduce the impacts of development and redevelopment. To promote attractive, quality development that enhances the character of Lino Lakes, landscape and design standards will also be reviewed and updated. • Rice Creek Watershed District Lino Lakes Resource Management Plan: As part of the integrated comprehensive planning process, the Rice Creek Watershed District prepared a Resource Management Plan to provide a watershed -based approach to wetland management. This process included an analysis of the city's future land use plan to determine the impacts of future growth on the area's aquatic resources. A key component of the plan is to establish a Wetland Preservation Corridor. This corridor may include high priority wetlands, natural open space (uplands), greenway connections, and marginally suitable development areas. The plan identifies several strategies to mitigate development impacts, particularly within the Wetland Preservation Corridor, as more fully described in Chapter 2: Resource Management System Plan. Infrastructure Capacity In addition to the protection of natural resources, many participants of the Visioning and Comprehensive Plan processes expressed concern about the capacity of the city's infrastructure to accommodate new growth in the community. The availability of infrastructure will also be used to determine the timing and feasibility of new growth. As part of the comprehensive plan, the transportation, water, and sanitary sewer systems were analyzed to determine their capacity to accommodate the 2030 and full build -out growth forecasts. These systems are discussed more fully in Chapters 6, 7 and 8. Land Use and Transportation The city's Land Use Plan was analyzed to determine compatibility with the local transportation system. Based on this analysis, improvements to the transportation system were identified to accommodate additional growth in Lino Lakes. These improvements are discussed in the Transportation Chapter of this plan. Development review will include analysis of the transportation system and transportation improvements may be required as part of the development permitting process. Utility Staging The provision of sewer and municipal water service will be a key factor to determine the timing of future growth. As part of the Comprehensive Plan process, the future land use plan was analyzed to determine future water supply and wastewater infrastructure needs to accommodate new growth. These systems will need to be expanded to accommodate future development in the community. Therefore, a staging plan was developed to identify the sequence and anticipated timing of water and sewer provision (Figure 3 -4). The staging area boundaries are based on the city's sewer districts, current development patterns, and land needed for forecasted development. The staging plan establishes the pattern, timing, and location of future growth to 2030 and beyond. • • • The Staging Plan reflects the City's three growth areas where regional interceptors are located, the northeast, northwest, and south growth areas. It is noted that the White Bear Interceptor is located 1/2 mile from the Lino Lakes border and is not shown on the Staging Plan. The Staging Plan identifies areas for growth from 2010 to 2020, 2020 to 2030, and post 2030. Each ten -year staging area is also sub - divided into five -year phases. To promote an efficient growth pattern, development outside of the current five -year phase will be limited to agriculture related uses and single family residential at a density of one unit per 10 acres. Therefore, during the time period associated with Stage 1A (2008 - 2015), development in Stages 1B, 2A, 2B and Stage 3 will be limited to agriculture uses or single family residential at one unit per 10 acres. The City will monitor growth by annually assessing market conditions and land capacity to determine when the next staging area should be opened for development. The staging plan cannot force development to occur. Rather, it prohibits urban growth from occurring outside areas planned for utility service. It should be clear that while there are legitimate reasons why cities should stage and time growth in an orderly and contiguous manner, there is nothing about adopting a staged growth plan that forces any private property owner to sell their land before they wish to do so. The staging plan provides several benefits to Lino Lakes, which are listed below: • A staging plan creates orderly logical growth pattern based on planned development patterns and availability of infrastructure. • Clearly defines timing at which land is potentially available for development. • Allows the City greater control over the pace and location of new development combined with providing necessary services when planned development occurs. • Provides greater ability to plan, budget and set goals for future development based on the Staging Plan. The staging boundaries were revised several times to ensure that an adequate supply of land was available to accommodate future development. The development of the staging plan was an iterative process of balancing land capacity with the 2030 growth forecasts. After preparation of the staging map, land use acreages and appropriate densities were used to calculate potential household and employment capacity of the land use plan. Assuming the minimum allowable density for each land use category, the plan has capacity to accommodate approximately 6-,200 6,400 new households by 2030. The Metropolitan Council is forecasting 4,600 new households by 2030. The 2030 household growth forecast is 2.6 28 percent less than the land use plan capacity. This additional capacity is intended to provide for flexibility. Flexibility is essential, as future development is dependent on many factors, including the willingness of property owners to sell or develop their properties. Additionally, because the city has access to five regional sewer interceptors, it is difficult to predict the pattern and rate of growth for different areas of the city. Therefore, additional land use capacity is provided to ensure that the growth forecasts can be accommodated in an efficient and cost - effective manner. The future land use plan also provides over 700 developable acres of commercial and industrial uses (including portions of mixed use districts) to accommodate the city's forecasted job growth of 4,080 new jobs by 2030. The staging plan and future land use plan were used to determine the number of acres in each land use category in five -year increments (Table 3 -5). This table provides a view of the city's planned growth by land use category in five year periods, allowing the City to better budget and plan for necessary infrastructure improvements. • • • Growth Management Policy In addition to the tools described above, the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee discussed the development of a revised Growth Management Policy for the city. The Growth Management Policy should provide a clear basis for efficient development staging as well as flexibility to respond to market conditions. The new policy must work in conjunction with the staging plan to establish the criteria for moving from one staging area to another. The ``4 } < Growth Management Policy will include the following elements: 1. The City will create a fully integrated Comprehensive Plan and keep it up to date with biannual reviews. The City will perform an intensive review at least once every five years to ensure the plan addresses changing needs and conditions. 2. The Comprehensive Plan will include a staging plan defining development staging areas sized to accommodate forecasted growth. 3. The City will monitor the ten -year staging areas and annually determine if adequate land remains available. 4. All development must be located within the current ten -year staging area unless a Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved that redefines the current ten -year staging area. 5. All development must be phased within each ten -year staging area in accordance with the staging plan unless the City Council determines, by resolution, to redefine the location of the current five -year phase. 6. Prior to reaching the time threshold for the next ten -year staging area, or five -year phase within a ten -year staging area, depicted on the staging plan, the City Council will determine by resolution if the next area is to be opened to development. The following criteria will be used to determine where and when to open up the next ten -year staging area, or five -year phase within a staging area, in accordance with the timing indicated on the staging plan: a. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and transportation improvements are required to support new development. If infrastructure is not available and cannot be made available in a timely manner to support expanding into the next ten -year staging area or five year phase within a staging area, the city may refrain from opening up the next staging area, or portions thereof. b. Different areas of the city can be considered independently. A decision to open one area of the city to development does not automatically open a different area of the city. Decisions to open new areas to development should dearly define and map the area being opened. c. This process does not require a comprehensive plan amendment because it is in accordance with the timing indicated on staging plan. 7. The following criteria will be used to determine if the city should allow a specific development project to occur early in a ten -year staging area, or five -year phase within a staging area, prior to the timing indicated on the staging plan. • • • a. The proposed development must be located within both the current and the next ten - year staging area, or five -year phase, or located adjacent to the current staging area. b. The proposed development must be master planned. Small, piecemeal developments do not justify redefining the ten -year staging area, or five -year phase. c. The proposed, master planned project must provide discernable public values. d. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and transportation improvements are required to support new development. e. There must be a commitment that the development will pay its proportionate share of infrastructure improvement costs associated with development. 8. All development must adhere to the Resource Management System Plan, including all its components, as this plan provides a conservation design framework for growth within the city. 9. Include standards in subsequent ordinance updates to ensure quality development that minimizes negative impacts on natural and cultural features of the community. 10. The City will plan to accommodate an annual average of 230 units per year over each 5 year phasing period not to exceed 345 units in any one year. At the end of the 5 year phasing period unallocated units will be averaged out over the next five year phase. Relationship to Met Council Development Framework In addition to guiding Lino Lakes' future growth, the land use plan also relates to growth and development in the region as a whole. As part of the seven -county metropolitan area, Lino Lakes must accommodate its share of the region's growth. The Comprehensive Plan must demonstrate the City's capacity to absorb this growth and that the regional infrastructure, including the transportation and sewer systems, will be used efficiently. The Metropolitan Council has developed objectives and policies for cities in the metropolitan area to ensure efficient use of the region's infrastructure, including the following policies: 1) Policy 1: Work with local communities to accommodate growth in a flexible, connected and efficient manner. 2) Policy 2: Plan and invest in multi -modal transportation choices, based on the full range of costs and benefits, to slow the growth of congestion and serve the region's economic needs. 3) Policy 3: Encourage expanded choices in housing location and types, and improved access to jobs and opportunities. 4) Policy 4: Work with local and regional partners to reclaim, conserve, protect and enhance the region's vital natural resources. The City has prepared a plan that responds to community goals and to the Met Council's strategies for developing communities, as outlined in the Regional Development Framework. Lino Lakes' Comprehensive Plan adequately addresses future needs of the community and the region through the following strategies: • • Chapter 4: Housing Plan Introduction The condition, affordability, and availability of housing affects the social and economic health of every city. As a developing community, Lino Lakes has an excellent opportunity to provide a variety of housing options to meet the needs of all its current and future residents throughout their lives. Through the Comprehensive Plan and Visioning processes, participants identified the need for a greater variety of housing options within the community, which currently consists mainly of single family detached homes. In response, the `- mpr_hcnsi _•_ Plan Advisory-Panel City developed a Land Use Plan that identifies areas for high density housing (7#e 4- 660 to 10.0 units /net acre, medium density housing (3.6 -66.9 4.0 to 5.9 units /net acre), low density housing (4753:5 1.6 to 3.9 units /net acre), and mixed use areas that will incorporate a mix of commercial areas with higher density housing options. This will accommodate a wider variety of housing types including senior housing, live /work units, and multi - family in a variety of styles from rental, condo and townhomes. Single family options will range from entry-level single family, move -up for growing families and "executive housing" to meet the needs of a changing population. This shift to provide a more diverse housing supply supports future economic development objectives by retaining existing residents and attracting new residents from all social and economic backgrounds, and is an essential component for sustainable growth. These areas will provide much needed housing options for the city's work force, young professionals, families, and senior residents. The purpose of the Housing Plan is to establish plans and programs to meet the existing and projected housing needs in Lino Lakes and to develop new strategies to promote the development of low and moderate income housing, which the City is required to provide for. The plan will guide the community to integrate housing into land use, transportation, economic and other decisions, as well as provide direction for the private sector to participate in the creation of affordable housing and life -cycle housing opportunities. This Housing Plan satisfies the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and stipulations of Chapter 473.859, Subd 2(c) and Subd 4 of the Minnesota State Statues. The plan will contain background information on current housing supply and related statistics, an assessment of current and future housing needs, and future housing strategies to meet these needs. Goals and Policies During the Visioning and Comprehensive Plan processes, participants developed new goals and strategies for housing development in the community. The complete set of goals and strategies, which provided a general guide for the development of this chapter, is listed in Chapter 3, Land Use Plan. Those that are particularly related to housing in Lino Lakes are presented below: Goal 3: Ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities. Rationale: Accessibility to the most attractive features of Lino Lakes is important to the citizens of our community. • • Based on its analysis, the Metropolitan Council's new affordable housing goal for Lino Lakes is to create 560 new affordable housing units between 2011 and 2020, which represents 35 percent of forecasted household growth. Based on the 2030 future land use map and the minimum proposed residential densities (i.e., 7 units per acre for high density and 8 units per acre for selected mixed use areas), the City has the capacity to accommodate the affordable housing goal. The level of affordability is important to understand when assessing the amount of current affordable housing and the price point for new units to meet this goal. According to Metropolitan Counci/ 2007 Affordability Limits, the area median income for the seven -county Minneapolis -St. Paul (MSP) area adjusted by HUD to be applicable to a family of four is $78,500 in 2007. Eighty percent of the median household income is $62,800; 60 percent is $47,100 and 50 percent is $39,250. Applying an interest rate on a 30 -year fixed -rate home loan of 6.2 percent for 2007 and other payment factors to the 80 percent area median income, yields an affordable purchase price of $206,800 in 2007. According to Anoka County Assessor's data there are 779 homesteads, or 13 percent of total 2007 households, that fall under this 80 percent purchase price limit in Lino Lakes. The price point for an affordable home at 60 percent of area median income drops to $152,000. There are currently only 82 existing homesteads, or 1 percent of total 2007 households, in Lino Lakes at or below $152,000 (Anoka County assessor's data /GIS). It is the new 60 percent measurement that will be required for the potential affordable housing units anticipated between 2011 -2020 in Lino Lakes. Achieving this new affordability goal will be very difficult without the funding tools that have in the past been offered by the Metropolitan Council and other agencies. Future Affordable Housing To provide eppertunities for affordable housing in the community, the City is taking the appropriate regulatory measures within the Comprehensive Plan by guiding areas for higher density housing and including policies to prerrrete integrate affordable housing in all residential land use districts. These regulatory measures represent one of the City's most effective tools to encourage for the development of affordable housing. To meet affordable housing goals, the City has planned for potential new growth with a variety of residential land use types and densities for to promote the development of life -cycle and affordable housing across the city. The city's future land use plan prevideG#ie opportunity-te can accommodate the goal of 560 High Density and Mixed Use units at a minimum density of 7 units per net acre by 2020;, which wi+f greatly increase- epportenities#er affordable-and 1iffe mete housing ire the amity. While the City is doing its part in creating a regulatory land use plan to guide areas for higher density housing, which is where most affordable housing will likely occur, barriers to development of affordable housing still exist in Lino Lakes and the region. Some of these barriers are beyond the City's control, including the following: • Steady increases in land prices and construction costs. • Physical limitations of land due to wetlands, poor access, poor soils that would increase the cost of land development or construction. • State, county and local tax structures. There are some significant barriers to construction of new affordable housing, and the above list includes just a few of these barriers. Despite these difficulties, the provision of affordable housing is an important effort that cities undertake. The most effective role Lino Lakes will have in the provision of affordable housing is its regulatory tools, including land use and zoning regulations that do not impede the construction of affordable housing. Many of these tools can be used to encourage developers. Flexibility, through the use of the Planned Unit Development LPUD) • • • process, may be provided to encourage the construction of affordable housing., tee# -as-relexing setback and - - - , ' : density;- er- reducingfees: Acknowledging the regional housing goals established by the Metropolitan Council does not commit the City of Lino Lakes to provide funding for housing. The City will continue to investigate means to pursue the goals in its comprehensive plan. However, this should not be interpreted as a commitment to use City funds to overcome the financial obstacles to life cycle and affordable housing. Housing Implementation Strategies and Recommendations The following Housing Action Plan identifies efforts Lino Lakes will pursue to create opportunities to maintain the existing housing stock, and to provide increased housing options for future residents. These strategies are based on goals and strategies for Community, Neighborhood and Residential development developed by the Citizen Vision Committee. The strategies are designed as a resource tool for specific measures the City can effectively undertake and enforce while others are designed as tools to encourage developers to incorporate affordable housing into future development. As future subdivisions are proposed, the City will use these resources and implement the strategies in working with developers to create new affordable housing opportunities. Many of these items are things the City itself can do, while others will occur through partnerships the City will seek to provide for and maintain housing quality and increase affordable housing opportunities. To ensure housing development is compatible with existing and adjacent land uses and provides accessibility to key community features and natural amenities (Goal 3), the City will: • Offer incentives to developers who provide for affordable housing units while conserving environmentally sensitive sites, such as density bonuses, expedited permitting processes, or reduced fees. • Pursue funding opportunities to increase the affordability of housing units within conservation subdivisions. • Pursue funding opportunities to incorporate green building techniques within affordable housing developments. • Encourage innovative low impact development to preserve open space or natural features. • Ensure that all new housing, including high density, adheres to the highest possible standards of planning, design and construction feasible. • Promote development of neighborhoods that incorporate housing in a range of densities and affordability limits in close proximity to shopping, services, daycare, and medical services. Safe access to parks and schools, and the ability to walk, bike or have access to transit should be part of the design. To improve the availability of affordable housing and enhance opportunities for senior housing (Goals 5 and 6), the City will: • Seek housing developers to work cooperatively with the City to construct affordable units. • Create an incentive based program or Residential Planned Unit Development Ordinance that includes density bonuses for construction of affordable housing. This allows an increase in density, beyond the underlying zoning, if the development includes affordable housing. 411 Existing Transit Service This section is a description of existing transit service in the City of Lino Lakes (Figure 6 -16). Lino Lakes is currently served by three transit service providers: • • Metro Transit • First Student • Anoka County Traveler (ACT) Metro Transit and First Student provide fixed -route transit service. ACT provides demand responsive services. Fixed Route Transit Service Fixed route transit service includes both local and express bus service that operates on a regular schedule and a follow a consistent route. Fixed -route transit service in Lino Lakes is provided by Metro Transit and by First Student under contract to the Metropolitan Council. Table 6 -6 shows the characteristics of the routes serving Lino Lakes. Table 6 -6: Characteristics of the Transit Routes Serving Lino Lakes Route Provider Type Cities Served M -F Hours Sat Hours Sun Hours Frequency 250 Metro Transit Express Lino Lakes, 95th Ave Park & Ride Minneapolis 5 AM - 9 AM 1 PM - 10 PM None None 5 -30 minutes 2S First Sett Express Shefeviewi St Paul &-SG -AM-- &G-PM 3:3GP4 5 : � -Aam 1 Nene Nene 30` es 262 First Student Express Lino Lakes, Blaine, St Paul 5:50 AM - 8:00 PM 4:00 PM - 6:15 PM None None 30 minutes 275 First Student Express Lino Lakes, White Bear Lake, St Paul 6:39.20 AM - 8:30 PP4AM 4:0010 PM - 6:00 PM None None 30 minutes Metro Transit operates only one route in the vicinity of Lino Lakes, Route 250, which provides frequent service to downtown Minneapolis and also provides three trips in the 'reverse commute' direction in the morning and four in the afternoon. First Student provides service to downtown St. Paul using three routes but less overall service. There are no 'reverse commute' runs from downtown St Paul. Route 250 not only provides service to downtown Minneapolis but also provides connections to the Hiawatha LRT line and Metro Transit's entire network of buses operating through the downtown area. Likewise, the First Student express buses provide connections to Metro Transit routes operating through downtown St Paul. 6 -39 140 nOT7 -I ST E Transit Service and Facilities City of Lino Lakes 2030 Comprehensive Plan Park & Ride Locations • 4,000 0 4;000 Feet C-=J Active Planned MUD Bus Service Surfs le Seaptare ease' Cnro Ai- Psrk 6 -40 Lakes Streams School Open Space: City Parks Gouny Parts tn© Lakes City Limns Figure 6-16 El! (_ L KES .kdy 22 2009 Pfellamool stiftbu6WV1] h1y). vv. �aUmarmatkeor we 6-16 Va rON.flRa • • • Express Routes Express service, which operates during peak periods, is designed to serve commuters who live in the suburban area and work in the Central Cities, primarily downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul. Most of these routes start at a park and ride and /or transit station and operate closed door to the downtown area. • Metro Transit Route 250 Route 250 is an express route that connects the 95th Avenue Transit Station in Blaine to downtown Minneapolis with 28 trips inbound in the morning peak period and 28 trips outbound in the afternoon peak period. Most of the trips originate and terminate at the 95th Avenue Transit Station at the intersection of 95th Avenue and I -35W, and operate closed door to downtown Minneapolis. Three of the runs in the morning begin at the park and ride at the intersection of Naples Street NE and Flowerfield Road in the City of Lexington. Five runs return to this location in the afternoon. Four runs in the morning and four in the afternoon serve a shared use park and ride at Saint Joseph's Church in Lino Lakes. Both of these route variations also serve the 95th Avenue park and ride. Although, only the buses that serve the St Joseph's Church park and ride actually enter the City, Route 250 represents the primary express transit service to downtown Minneapolis for residents of Lino Lakes. eutc 255 th 4L..-.... F.-: cxprcss fetfte �- P�atrFz„ps . 3-trips- -add terminate at the WcIIs buil n n t. t - - . • - - - ��nd e......- ales .d 1V ow1TS-Pael this .- ute epr. t ien er-some Z :fV Lakcs r s:ct5 c. and c ute to StnQQ-: is Tou, tc4Jn* Tcn}l i opc a} cd b First Student In • Metropolitan Council Route 262 Route 255 262 is an express route that connects the 95th Avenue Transit Station to downtown St Paul with three trips inbound in the morning and three trips outbound in the afternoon. All of the trips originate and terminate at the 95th Avenue Transit Station at the intersection of 95th Avenue and I -35W and operate closed door to Little Canada. From Little Canada to downtown St Paul, the bus stops at six intermediate stops along Rice Street. While not entering the City of Lino Lakes, this route is an option for some Lino Lakes residents who live in the southwestern part of the City and commute to St. Paul. This route is currently operated by First Student Inc. • Metropolitan Council Route 275 Route 275 is an express route that connects Lino Lakes and Centerville to downtown St Paul_ Three morning trips originate at Lino Park in Lino Lakes and one originates at St. Genevieve Church in Centerville. They operate closed door to downtown St. Paul with two intermediate stops. Three afternoon trips from St. Paul terminate at Lino park. with- # ee- d- in- thefnern-ing-afd three-trips outbound-Jf the afterneenT All of #he# at -4ie-St Catholic Church ear Ccntcrville Road -mod- operate closed -door t&downtown St Gaul, with -ewe ntcrmedi to steps- -rWhite Be-. Lake. This-rettteis- ettrrently -eperated-byfirsl:�ttrdent Inc. This route- -is- en- option -for-se-me -Line- Lakes . sid„nts who ive i the tern -part -e€# e€ity--and -car to to St.-Rs-4: This-route-is- 6-41 • • Local Routes Local service is designed for short trips within the community or to adjacent communities and is usually provided throughout the day. There is no regular route local bus service in the City of Lino Lakes. Demand Responsive Transit Service Dial -A -Ride Service The Anoka County Traveler offers transit service to all residents of Anoka County who can travel independently (or with a personal care attendant). Services include three fixed routes, operating in the southern part of the County, and dial -a -ride services, which provide connections to the entire County. None of the three fixed routes serve Lino Lakes. The Anoka County Traveler (ACT) Dial -a -Ride is a demand - responsive transit service serving Lino Lakes and other communities in Anoka County. Hours of service vary by community. The dial -a -ride service hours in Lino Lakes are from 5:15 a.m. to 6:45 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on the weekends. The Traveler Dial -a -Ride coordinates with the ACT fixed route service to ensure passengers the most efficient and affordable way to travel. The regular fare for Dial -a -Ride service is $3.25 per person; the peak hour fare is $4.25 per person. ACT uses vehicles that are handicap accessible and can hold up to 18 people. In 2006, ACT Dial -a -Ride provided just over 22,000 rides. ADA Complementary Service In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Metropolitan Council provides specialized, demand responsive service for persons who have disabilities that prevent them from using the regular route system. This service is provided in the same areas that regular route service is provided. In Anoka County, the Council contracts for these services with the Anoka County Traveler Dial - a -Ride service. Within the City of Lino Lakes, ADA complementary service is available from 5:15 a.m. to 6:45 p.m. during the week and from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on weekends. In 2006, ACT Dial -a -Ride provided almost 35,000 ADA rides. Other Services Privately Contracted Regular Routes The Metropolitan Council contracts for about five percent of the regular route service that is provided in the Metropolitan area through contracts with private and non - profit transit providers. Routes <; 262, and 275 described above are operated under contract to the Metropolitan Council by First Student. Community Based Urban Programs Throughout the region, ten small urban systems operate local transit service in their communities. Many of these services were originally formed to meet a specific mobility need for elderly or disabled, but are now open to the general public. Currently, the City of Lino Lakes does not offer this type of transit service. Community Based Rural Programs Throughout the region, eight rural systems provide a base level of transit service in areas that are not served by regular route service. These programs primarily serve the elderly and persons with disabilities but are open to the general public. As noted above, ACT provides these services for Anoka County, including the City of Lino Lakes. ACT is funded by Performance Based Funding (PBF) grants from the Metropolitan Council, revenue from contract services including the Metro Mobility ADA contract, County contributions, and donations. 6 -42 • • • The Anoka County Volunteer Transportation Program provides rides to and from medical, dental, and appointments with social services for seniors (60 +) and clients receiving services from Anoka County. This service relies on volunteer drivers. While the service is free, donations are encouraged. Medical and dental trips may be made throughout the metro area while appointments with social services must remain within Anoka County. This program is funded primarily through private grants and donations. Existing Transit Facilities This section is a description of existing transit facilities in the City of Lino Lakes (Figure 6 -16). Transit facilities include: • Passenger facilities — Physical infrastructure that is designed for use by passengers while waiting for or boarding buses. • Support facilities e Physical infrastructure that is designed to support the operation and maintenance of transit vehicles. • Transit Advantages -- Physical infrastructure that is designed to provide a travel time advantage for transit vehicles versus automobiles. Transit Passenger and Support Facilities Transit service cannot be provided without a variety of physical facilities. These include passenger facilities that provide an opportunity to board buses. They range from a simple bus stop to large transit centers. Transit support facilities are also essential components of a transit system. Transit vehicle storage and maintenance facilities are almost invisible to the public but critical to the operation of buses. The following park and ride facilities serve residents of Lino Lakes. • There is e are two active Park and Ride facility -- locations in Lino Lakes,,,wlii€11-4s--at St. Joseph Catholic Church;is located at 141 Elm Street. The capacity of this lot is listed as 12 spaces_;S -e which -are beingtrscd. This lot is served by Route 250. The other site, Lino Park on Lake Drive, has 20 spaces and is served by Route 275. • There is also an active Park and Ride at St Genevieve Church, 7087 Goiffon Road in Centerville. The capacity of this lot is 50 spaces with 38 spaces being used. This lot is served by Route 275. • Although not within the City limits, the most significant Park and Ride facility for residents of Lino Lakes is the Park and Ride at 95th Avenue and I -35W in Blaine. There are 1,011 spaces at this lot, currently the third largest park and ride in the region, 982 of which are being used. Plans are underway to increase the capacity of this Park and Ride. Route 250 provides service to this lot with buses departing for Minneapolis as often as 5 minutes apart during the peak hour. • Because of the limited amount of service in the City, the number and type of physical support facilities is also limited. Currently, there are no vehicle storage or maintenance facilities in the City of Lino Lakes nor are there any major layover facilities. Transit Advantages Transit Advantages is a term that describes physical features that provide a travel time advantage over automobiles using the same facility. These include bus -only shoulders, HOV lanes, and ramp -meter bypasses. Transit advantages improve the attractiveness of transit by allowing buses to move faster than automobiles making the same trip, effectively reducing the travel time for transit patrons relative to automobile users. BUS -ONLY SHOULDERS 6 -43 • • • Bus -Only Shoulders (BOS) allow buses to use the roadway shoulder to bypass automobiles that are in the general flow of traffic. They may only be used when the speed in the regular lanes drops to 30 mph or lower. BOS shoulders are useful in those areas where there is chronic peak period congestion and increase the attractiveness of peak hour express buses by allowing express buses to maintain a minimum speed through congested areas. Bus -only shoulders in both directions have been established on I -35W from 95th Avenue south to Minneapolis. The Route 250 express buses operated by Metro Transit to downtown Minneapolis utilize these bus -only shoulders. • Bus -only shoulders have been established on I -35E from TH 36 to downtown St Paul. Routes 255 and 2754 operated by First Student, utilizes these BOS lanes. High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes are roadway lanes reserved for cars with 2 or more people, motorcycles and transit vehicles. They provide a travel time incentive for people willing to carpool or use transit. At present, there are no HOV lanes in Lino Lakes or on routes to either downtown. Transit Programs This section is a description of existing transit programs in the City of Lino Lakes. Ride Matching Services Lino Lakes residents are eligible to participate in the regional car pool matching database managed by the Met Council. Carpool participants qualify for the regional guaranteed ride home program; may use High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes and meter bypass ramps; receive parking discounts in some circumstances; may participate in occasional promotional benefits. Van -Go Lino Lakes residents are also eligible to participate in the Van -GO! program, a regional vanpool program sponsored by the Metropolitan Council. Van -GO! vanpools are made up of 5 to 15 commuters picked up along the vanpool route or at an agreed upon location. Like buses and carpools, vanpools are eligible to use meter bypass lanes or ramps and HOV lanes. Travel Demand Management Travel Demand Management (TDM) services include programs that promote and support any alternative to commuting via single- occupant vehicle. It may include ride - matching, car -pool and van -pool services as previously described, both covers many other options as well. Transit promotions, employer - subsidized bus passes, flexible work hours, and telecommuting are just some of the possible strategies to reduce SOV use. Metro Transit provides a regional service through its Metro Commuter Services group, and four local Transportation Management Organizations provide further support and services, including two downtown organizations. The City and employers may use these services and programs free of charge in order to benefit employee' travel arrangements and budgets. Future Transit Demand According to the 2005 Metropolitan Council's Park - and -Ride Plan, the number of people in Lino Lakes currently utilizing transit to commute to work in downtown Minneapolis /St. Paul is expected to increase through 2030. Although the percentage of the Lino Lakes resident workforce utilizing transit services within the city is relatively small compared to future population projections, there are other park- and -ride facilities outside of city limits that may also draw a small portion of the Lino Lakes commuter workforce because of the higher bus frequencies and routes along with a greater number of downtown express buses they offer. 6 -44 • • • The information presented in Table 6 -7 and Table 6 -8 is based on data in the 2005 document. They show the number and percentage of Lino Lakes residents projected to services- commute to work in the Minneapolis and St. Paul downtown areas in 2010, 2020 and 2030. The tables also include projections of the number and percentage of those commuters who will use transit. As evident by the tables below, the majority of the workforce utilizing the transit services is commuting into Minneapolis. The 2005 Park - And -Ride Plan is based on 2000 census data. More recent Metropolitan Council modeling using2008 park and ride usage data indicates that the number of transit users increased in recent years. This would mean that current transit use is higher than was previously projected and in turn, future demand likely will be higher as well. Table 6 -8: Lino Lakes Transit Utilization to /from St. Paul 2010 2020 2030 Number of commuters from Lino 764 989 1107 Lakes to downtown Minneapolis Number of downtown commuters 129 160 238 using transit Percentage of downtown 6 Yp 7% Percentage of downtown 17% 16% 21% commuters using transit 8:1 sko Pcrccntagc nd- vol eef - ' ' ' ' - 9T-% 075-0/0 9 Rio - - • - - and-sePsoiees N wribcr of .. sidcnt.. g 129 169 238 Table 6 -8: Lino Lakes Transit Utilization to /from St. Paul Transit Improvement Strategies The regional transit goal for the Twin Cities metropolitan area is to double ridership by 2030. Transit needs and strategies for the metropolitan area as a whole were identified in the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework (2004) and Transportation Policy Plan (2004). The Council proposes three key transit strategies: 1. Respond to various future transit needs in the region's different transit markets. 6 -45 2010 2020 2030 Number of commuters from Lino 461 501 530 Lakes to downtown St. Paul Number of downtown commuters 27 33 44 using transit Percentage of downtown 6 Yp 7% 8% commuters using transit Pcrccntagc -and - of " - 97-1 8:1 sko 07 9/0 •• . s -We Nt er of ;t ng transit facilities .scrvicc3 2-7 44 Transit Improvement Strategies The regional transit goal for the Twin Cities metropolitan area is to double ridership by 2030. Transit needs and strategies for the metropolitan area as a whole were identified in the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework (2004) and Transportation Policy Plan (2004). The Council proposes three key transit strategies: 1. Respond to various future transit needs in the region's different transit markets. 6 -45 1 • • meter bypasses. I -35W from Lino Lakes to downtown Minneapolis is one of the express bus corridors identified by the Council. Transitways The Metropolitan Council Transportation Policy Plan includes a proposal for adding several new transitways in the region. The Rush Line Corridor, which passes just east of Lino Lakes, is listed as a Tier II Corridor. Planning studies are underway to determine the best approach to providing enhanced transit service in this corridor. The Urban Partnership Agreements for accelerated federal funding of key transportation projects includes funding for the expansion of the I- 35W/95th Avenue park -and -ride. This will have a direct impact on commuters from the Lino Lakes area because this park and ride is the City's primary location for utilizing express bus service to downtown Minneapolis. The City remains concerned, however, that mobility in and around the inner suburbs and the urban core will be negatively impacted by lack of any further progress on transportation funding and capacity improvement projects. Lino Lakes recommends and supports an aggressive approach to transit expansion projects and funding mechanisms that will materially reduce congestion, improve urban mobility, and bolster our Minnesota economy and lifestyle. This approach is consistent with the following goals and strategies identified in the beginning of this transportation plan: • Goal 3, Policy 4 —"Develop mass transit options to serve growing transportation demands" • Goal 5, Policy 1 —"Plan for and develop park- and -ride opportunities that are adjacent to our arterial roadways" • Goal 5, Policy 3 —"In cooperation with Anoka County and other local units of government pursue state and federal funding for mass transit" • Goal 6, Policy 1 —"Support the planning and development of the established Rush Line transit corridor (rail and bus) from the central cities through Hugo" • Goal 6, Policy 2 —"Provide local transit opportunities to access the Rush Line corridor" • Goal 6, Policy 3 —"Continue to work with Metro Transit to provide and expand safe, affordable and efficient public transit" Park - and -Rides The Metropolitan Council's Regional Park - and -Ride Plan (2005) indicates that a new facility in the vicinity of I -35E and CSAH 14 should be considered, with an anticipated capacity of 696 -200-i spaces by 2030. Land Use Planning Land use planning, including trails and pedestrian amenities, play a crucial role in the success of transit in a community. Adequate and safe sidewalks, bus stops, shelters, and transfer or waiting facilities all are necessary components of a convenient and successful transit system. Mixed -use developments and other Transit Oriented Development (TOD) around developing and redeveloped areas are also key to future effective transit options. Recommendations The City of Lino Lakes benefits from the presence of a high - quality county-based provider, ACT, and Anoka County's active planning and management of future transit facilities and programs. The City should continue to be supportive and fully engaged in these programs and organizations to insure a high level of transit service in the City. As part of economic development activities, Lino Lakes should inform and enlist the cooperation of existing and new employers in TDM measures, including specifically transit promotion and transit 6 -41 • 410 • Table 7 -1. Summary Of Development Projections Through 2030 Dist. Sub -Dist. Residential Units Commercial / Industrial Existing Sewered ISIS Hook- ups Projected New Units Total Sewered Units - 2030 Projected New Employment 1A 310 26 122126 458462 55 1B 820 38 171180 1- 9291038 0 1C 22 432137 1-54159 45 1D 580 31 158166 769777 0 1E 7 5454 5861 0 1F 350 7 1-34142 491499 0 1G 60 0 60 0 1H 200 28 0 228 41 Sub -Total 2,260 219 768805 3,2173284 141 2A 0 8285 8785 0 2B 325 247 148158 720730 411 2C 0 0 0 0 2D 33 0 33 0 2E 150 32 6 188 20 2F 860 207 220 1 287 220 2G 125 0 4 129 0 2H 150 24 0 174 73 2I 100 30 4851018 1,2151148 37 23 0 124129 424129 0 Sub -Total , 710 573 1,6691620 3,9523903 761 3A 440 3 78 450451 686 3B 9 1,2131219 1,2521228 995 3C 19 333362 352381 0 3D 6 9097 96103 0 3E 0 0 0 0 3F 40 0 0 40 0 3G 2 174171 176173 35 Sub -Total 480 39 1,8171857 2,3662376 1,716 4A 17 256254 273271 54 4B 0 0 0 0 4C 0 0 0 0 4D 2 6064 6266 0 4E 75 0 75 0 Sub-Total 0 94 316318 440412 54 5A 0 0 0 1 408 5B 0 0 0 0 5C 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total 0 0 0 0 1,408 TOTAL , 450 925 4,600 9,975 4,080 Plus correctional facility (Sub - District 2E) assumed equivalent to 500 residential units TOTAL 4,950 10 475 4 080 • • • The third task involved providing guidance and information on future trunk sewers and lift stations that will be necessary to accommodate the City's anticipated growth and development. This included reviewing and updating the City's proposed land -use and staged development map, estimating the number of housing units and commercial /industrial properties in the future development sites, and providing solutions for the connection of new lateral sewers to the existing trunk sewer system. The general alignment of new trunk sewers and lift station locations was determined. Each lift station's general service area was identified. The final task was the preparation of a Plan document summarizing the findings of this investigation and formulating recommendations to the City Council. Lino Lakes Demographic Profile and Forecasts Background The community of Lino Lakes anticipates significant growth in upcoming years. Planning for growth poses significant opportunities and challenges for the community. The City's land use plan is an important tool to ensure that the City is adequately prepared to respond to these opportunities and challenges. The land use plan plays a key role in managing growth within the City. The land use plan builds on the plan vision, goals, and strategies to establish a policy framework in which future development will occur. The future land use map is also used to estimate the community's capacity to accommodate projected household and employment growth. Sewer, water, and transportation infrastructure plans are based on the forecasts and development information presented in the land use plan. Figure 7 -3 shows the existing sanitary sewer system and proposed future trunk sewers superimposed over the proposed Future Land Use Plan. Chapter 3: Land Use includes a more detailed discussion of land use and development trends. Past Growth Trends The population of Lino Lakes has grown from 8,807 in 1990 to 16,791 in 2000, an annual increase of 6.7 percent. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the 2005 population of Lino Lakes was 19,698 while the number of households was 5,729. These figures represent annual increases (since 1990) of 5.5 percent in population and 5.4 percent in the number of households. Forecasts Detailed forecasts of land use, population, and employment are included in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. These forecasts, broken out by sewer planning districts, are briefly summarized below. Existing development by district, as of 2008, is also summarized. District boundaries are shown on Figure 7 -2. Forecasts by Sewer Districts Sewer District 1 Sewer District 1 is located in the southwest corner of the City. A significant portion of District 1 is currently developed. As of 2008, District 1 contains approximately 2,260 sewered single family residential units and 350 un- sewered units. There are about 740 developable acres in District 1 currently designated as low density sewered residential, 82 acres designated as medium density residential, 21 acres designated as mixed use - residential, 12 acres designated mixed use - commercial, and 7 acres designated commercial. • The residential areas, including undeveloped lots in the existing subdivisions, are projected to accommodate about 779 805 new residential units by 2030. In addition, approximately 220 existing homes with on -site systems are projected to connect to the sewer system by 2030. The total number of sewered residences in District 1 would then be about 372 503,284 units in 2030. In addition, the commercial and mixed use areas will support approximately 140 new employees by 2030. Sewer District 2 Sewer District 2 is located in the northwest corner of the City. This area consists of a mixture of urban and rural land uses. District 2 currently contains about 1,710 sewered residential units, 1,085 un- sewered units, and 185 vacant Tots in existing developments. This District also contains about 1,220 developable acres designated as low density residential. There are also about 231 developable acres designated as medium density residential, 114 developable acres designated as high density residential, and 60 acres designated as mixed use residential. In total, these areas are projected to support approximately 1,6701,620 new residential units by 2030. In addition, District 2 includes the Lino Lakes Correctional Facility. The Correctional Facility houses approximately 1,200 residents, equivalent to about 500 single family residential units. In total, assuming approximately 570 existing un- sewered residential areas receive service, District 2 could contain the equivalent of about 4,4504,403 sewered residential units in 2030. District 2 also includes extensive existing commercial and industrial area, as well as approximately 108 developable acres designated commercial, 23 developable acres designated as industrial, and 16 acres designated mixed use - commercial. Projected new employment in the commercial, industrial and mixed use areas totals about 760 employees by 2030. Sewer District 3 Sewer District 3 is located on the east side of the City, generally east of Centerville. District 3 also includes sub - district 3F, two small developed areas totaling about 40 homes in the Lamotte Drive area and at the west end of Mound Trail on the north side of Centerville Lake. Sub - district 3F is served by an interconnection to the Centerville sanitary sewer system and by MCES lift station L- 4. Existing sewered areas of District 3 contain about 480 existing single family residences, and a few commercial properties. The District also includes about 100 unsewered residences. District 3 contains approximately 247 acres of developable land designated as low density residential; 207 developable acres designated medium density residential; 25 developable acres high density residential; and 302 developable acres designated as mixed use residential. In total, these areas are projected to support approximately 1,8501,857 new residential units by 2030. Assuming 40 existing unsewered residences receive service, total sewered residential development in District 3 is projected to be approximately 2,3702,376 units by 2030. District 3 also includes approximately 104 developable acres designated commercial, 122 acres designated industrial, and 67 acres designated mixed use - commercial. Total new employment in these areas is projected to be approximately 1,720 employees by 2030. Sewer District 4 Sewer District 4 is located in southeastern Lino Lakes, bordering on North Oaks and White Bear Township. There is no existing sewered development in District 4. There are about 140 existing non - sewered residences. District 4 contains approximately 597 developable acres designated low density residential, 48 acres medium density, 9 acres high density, and 20 acres mixed use residential. Most areas of District 4 will probably not be developed by 2030. Projected development by 2030 includes about 320 318 new residential units. In addition, 90 existing units are projected to receive service, resulting in about 440412 sewered units in District 4 by 2030. In addition, District 4 contains approximately 11 acres designated as mixed use commercial, which could support about 50 employees by 2030. • • • Tab 3. Summa of Projected Flows - 2015 1 All Flo in Millions o :lions Per Day (MGD) Dist.iib- Dist.T Average Daily Flow Peaki Factor "' Flow Res 'o tiai Non- Residential Total 0.089: 0.002 0.091 4.000 0.197 / " _ _ _ _ . . . 1 . • r;,. 0.03:" 4.001` 0.364 W alralk 1D 0.197 0.000 0.749 0.124 0.029 `,0.165 0.002 0.000 3 ' 0.644 1E , 0.000 0.000 s + 0, 0 0.000 1F - 12 0. 0.0 .000 F .00 0.448 1G '10 ,' .016 1 4.000 0.038 4.000 0.064 1H 0,152 Subtotal 0.6 • 0.6 V.' 0.651 1 3.300 2.145 2 2A 0.000 0.000 0:' ' / e .all 1,411 o' + 1 9 0.000 0.000 2B 0.182 0.041 3.800 0.847 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 4.000 0.036 2E 0.045 Y ° 0.004 i t ' • 4.000 0.196 2F 0.410` 0.034 ; 0. = ' 3.500 1.554 2G 0.016 0.004 0.02 " .. 4.000 0.080 211 0.03 • ° 0. $ ' % 0.042 4.000 0.168 2I 0. ,3' R,,..,., 0.131 3.900 0.511 23 o ;' 0 000 000 1 .000 0.000 Subtotal 1 1 .087 18 '00 2.938 3 3A 0 .098 0.027 ► 3 A 0.488 3B 0.13 0.048 0. 3.90; 0.702 3C 0.04. 0.000 0. ' , ' 4.001. 0.184 3D 0.00l 0.000 0.000 0.00r 0.000 �r 0. 0.000 0.000 0.000 ' 0.000 0' 1 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 G .' 00 0.000 0.000 0 00 . .000 r- ubtotal 0.287 0.075 0.362 `' 03 0.039 4. .! 11111 4 4A 4B . = 0.037 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.1 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 , , r 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 e • 0 f 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 Subtotal 0.058 0.002 0.060 4.000 0.240 5 5A 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 Total 6.722 7 -13 • • • Tab 4. Summa of Projected Flows -2020 All Flo in Millions or lions Per Day (MGD) Dist. ∎'a -Dist. Average Daily Flow _ Factor eak Flow Resi • " Non- Residential Total 1A 0.0 c 0.002 0.091 V 4.000 =' ,� 3.801: ' 0.364 0.749 1B 0.197 ' 0.000 0.197 1C 0.029 0.002 0.0 4. e' ' All 0.124 1D .165 0.000 0. -:; 3 `- AM 0.644 1E 1F - x,000 0.000 ► i(i0 0`•00 0.000 1111L 2 0. '6 000 AlgE 0.016 .000 0.448 1G i . 4.000 0.064 1H 0.0 0.0 0.038 4.000 0.152 Subtotal 0.6' 0.00, 0.650 sr! 3300 2.145 2 2A 0.022 1.1 I e • • : i J 0:; -` 0. ! 0 4.000 0.088 2B 0.198 0.041 3.800 0.908 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 '009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.045 0.004 ■ '? 49 4.000 0.196 2F 0.410 0.034 0. - a 3.500 1.554 2G 0.016 0.004 0.0 `� 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.04 4.000 0.168 2I 0.1 ' 0.sr. e. r -,0 0.141 ".. 3.900 0.550 23 0.0► 0.000 ; 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0 ; � 4 - 487 ; 0.966 3.200 3.091 3 3A _ '8 .:: 32 1.027 0.048 k 0.125 900 0488 3B '80 '0 1.036 3C `` 0.091 0.000 .. 4: o r 0.364 3D 0 000 ? = 0.000 0. 0.001 `. 0.000 3E • 0 000 - , 0.000 0.00► ` .,. 0.00 0.000 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.0011 0.044 0 t 0.000 0.000 0.000 .. 0.000 al 0.075 0.507 , 3.400 1.724 4 a .043 0.002 0.045 , ° °;A 00 10 0.180 4B ' .000 0.000 0.000 �_- 1 .000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 '! ..,_ 100 4D 0.010 0.000 0.010 1 =0 0' 4E I 0.021 0.000 0.021 . e i Subte i_A 0.074 0.002 0.076 4.000 0.30 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 • • • 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 Total 7.360 7 -14 • • • Cable 7 -5. Su of Projected Flows - 2025 All Flows in Million allons Per Day (MGD) Dist. S b-Dist. Average Daily Flow Pe • ing Factor ¥eak Flow Resi tial Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.089 " 0.002 0.091 4.000 ; = 0.364 1B 0.217 0.000 02 f 3.: ° 0.825 1C 0.044 0.002 0.► '• , 40 0.184 1D 0.171 0.000 1117 illiffair V_ a + 0.125 00 s .000 0.667 1E , 0.000 `` .': 5 0. ' 6 • 0.000 0.000 1F 1.000 3.900 0.488 1G t' 100 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.0 • • 1 0.038 • 4.000 0.152 Subtotal 0.69: 1 .'� 0.00 s 0.704 4 0. r , All '00 3.300 2.323 2 2A 0.022 4.000 0.088 2B 0.198 0.041 3.800 0.908 2C 0.000 L. _ o.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0009 , 0.000 1 1.009 '.055 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 0.004 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 / 0.034 ., IMO : ,71. 7 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 ;, 0.003: 4.000 0.168 2I 0.296 0.002 0.> 1 3.700 1.103 2] 0.01 . 0.000 0.0 0.000 0.000 Subtotal NW '' ®'' -888 1.137 3.100 3.525 3 3A Iffr ` -8 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B -: 4 90 0.048 k ,0.338 .600 1.217 3C pr k; 0.096 0.000 , ° e. 96 lit,, a "6 0. rtI0 0.011 000 0384 3D 0.026 0.000 10 1 7 4 . 0.104 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.01 0.000 0.044 3r 0 _ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 S 0 0.075 0.596 3.400 2.026 4 t +48 0.002 0.050 .. 4.000 , 0.200 •� 4B '.000 0.000 0.000 - .. 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.017 0.000 0.017 ' 00 068 4E , 0.021 0.000 0.021 4. < N :4 0; Sub 0.086 0.002 0.088 4.1 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.00 a . ` 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 Total 8.450 7 -15 • • • Table 7 -6. Sum of Projected Flows - 2030 All Flows in Millions of allons Per Day (MGD) Dist. -Dist. Average Daily Flow peak Pe• g Factor FW Flow Rest lal Non- Residential Total 1A T 0.089 0.002 0.091 4.000. 0.364 1B 0.217 0.000 0.21 ,„ 3.8 ` ` 0.825 1C 0.044 0.002 0.1 . w ` 0.184 1D 0.177 0.000 1 177 '00 0.690 1E -`0.016 0.000 016 ' .000 0.064 1F EL- ) 5 0. ie6 000 " +.125 3.900 0.488 1G 10 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.0 . 0.03: 4.000 0.152 Subtotal 0.72 0.0& V ` 0.7 `. 3.300 2.396 2 2A 0.022 _ 0.000 r 0. ' • A rAll Ir 100 4.000 0.088 2B 0.198 0.041 3.700 0.884 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 1.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 0.004 ' 55 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 0.034 : ,2 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 0.0 <7 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.01; , 0.' 4.000 0.168 2I 0.31: 0 .° 0,3 -' 3.600 1.152 23 0.0 :; a 00 0.0 4.000 0.136_ Subtotal �1 ' 5 188 g' 1.193 3.100 3.698 3 3A Frig ,098 0.027 '.125 I _ .900 0.488 3B "x.342 0.048 '.90 ": 600 1.404 3C r, ' 0.096 r • 0.000 : i:' 0 0.384 3D 0.026 ' 0.000 0. 4.f;' 0.104 3E : " 0.000 e ,..° 4 0.000 0.0I 0. _ 0.000 3F 0.000 0 .011 . 4.000 0.044 _ 1 0.001 0.049 4.000 1 0.196 11 0.697 3,300 ' 2.300 .075 0.002 0.077 ` .000 j 0.308 ° 4B L_ 0.000 0.000 0.000 1111L to .000,- + .000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 MIL -40 i - 110 4D ,'r 0.017 0.000 0.017 MX e, 8 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.01 0.08:,, Sub 0.113 0.002 0.115 4.00' 0.460 4.000 e 0.000 0.056 0.056 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 Total 9.078 7 -16 • • • TABLE 7 -3 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS - 2015 ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) Dist. Sub -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.199 0.000 0.199 3.800 0.756 1C 0.030 0.002 0.032 4.000 0.128 1D 0.167 0.000 0.167 3.900 0.651 1E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1F 0.114 0.000 0.114 4.000 0.456 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.652 0.006 0.658 3.300 2.171 2 2A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2B 0.185 0.041 0.226 3.800 0.859 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.045 0.004 0.049 4.000 0.196 2F 0.410 0.034 0.444 3.500 1.554 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.125 0.001 0.126 3.900 0.491 2J 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.829 0.087 0.916 3.200 2.931 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.129 0.048 0.177 3.900 0.690 3C 0.050 0.000 0.050 4.000 0.200 3D 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.288 0.075 0.363 3.600 1.307 4 4A 0.034 0.002 0.036 4.000 0.144 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 r 4D 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.055 0.002 0.057 4.000 0.228 5 5A 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 Total 6.733 7 -13 • • TABLE 7-4 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS -2020 ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) Dist. Sub -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.199 0.000 0.199 3.800 0.756 1C 0.030 0.002 0.032 4.000 0.128 1D 0.167 0.000 0.167 3.900 0.651 1 E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1F 0.114 0.000 0.114 4.000 0.456 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.652 0.006 0.658 3.300 2.171 2 2A 0.023 0.000 0.023 4.000 0.092 2B 0.198 0.041 0.239 3.800 0.908 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.045 0.004 0.049 4.000 0.196 2F 0.410 0.034 0.444 3.500 1.554 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.135 0.001 0.136 3.900 0.530 2J 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.875 0.087 0.962 3.200 3.078 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.227 0.048 0.275 3.700 1.018 3C 0.099 0.000 0.099 4.000 0.396 3D 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.435 0.075 0.510 3.400 1.734 4 4A 0.041 0.002 0.043 4.000 0.172 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.073 0.002 0.075 4.000 0.300 5 5A 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.024 0.024 4.000 0.096 Total 7.380 7 -14 • • • TABLE 7 -5. SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS - 2025 ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) Dist. Sub -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non- Residential Residential Total 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.220 0.000 0.220 3.800 0.836 1C 0.046 0.002 0.048 4.000 0.192 1D 0.173 0.000 0.173 3.900 0.675 1E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1F 0.128 0.000 0.128 3.900 0.499 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.709 0.006 0.715 3.300 2.360 2 2A 0.023 0.000 0.023 4.000 0.092 2B 0.201 0.041 0.242 3.800 0.920 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 0.004 0.055 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 0.034 0.452 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.276 0.002 0.278 3.700 1.029 2J 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 1.033 0.088 1.121 3.100 3.475 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.280 0.048 0.328 3.600 1.181 3C 0.104 0.000 0.104 4.000 0.416 3D 0.028 0.000 0.028 4.000 0.112 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 • 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.521 0.075 0.596 3.400 2.026 4 4A 0.046 0.002 0.048 4.000 0.192 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.018 0.000 0.018 4.000 0.072 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.085 0.002 0.087 4.000 0.348 5 5A 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 Total 8.433 7 -15 TABLE 7 -6. SUMMARY OF PROJECTED FLOWS -2030 • ALL FLOWS IN MILLIONS OF GALLONS PER DAY (MGD) • • Dist. Sub -Dist. Average Daily Flow Peaking Factor Peak Flow Residential Non- Residential Total 1 1A 0.090 0.002 0.092 4.000 0.368 1B 0.220 0.000 0.220 3.800 0.836 1C 0.046 0.002 0.048 4.000 0.192 10 0.179 0.000 0.179 3.900 0.698 1E 0.017 0.000 0.017 4.000 0.068 1F 0.128 0.000 0.128 3.900 0.499 1G 0.016 0.000 0.016 4.000 0.064 1H 0.036 0.002 0.038 4.000 0.152 Sub -Total 0.732 0.006 0.738 3.300 2.435 2 2A 0.023 0.000 0.023 4.000 0.092 2B 0.201 0.041 0.242 3.700 0.895 2C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2D 0.009 0.000 0.009 4.000 0.036 2E 0.051 0.004 0.055 4.000 0.220 2F 0.418 0.034 0.452 3.500 1.582 2G 0.016 0.004 0.020 4.000 0.080 2H 0.039 0.003 0.042 4.000 0.168 21 0.299 0.002 0.301 3.600 1.084 2J 0.035 0.000 0.035 4.000 0.140 Sub -Total 1.091 0.088 1.179 3.100 3.655 3 3A 0.098 0.027 0.125 3.900 0.488 3B 0.336 0.048 0.384 3.600 1.382 3C 0.104 0.000 0.104 4.000 0.416 3D 0.028 0.000 0.028 4.000 0.112 3E 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3F 0.011 0.000 0.011 4.000 0.044 3G 0.047 0.001 0.048 4.000 0.192 Sub -Total 0.624 0.076 0.700 3.300 2.310 4 4A 0.074 0.002 0.076 4.000 0.304 4B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4D 0.018 0.000 0.018 4.000 0.072 4E 0.021 0.000 0.021 4.000 0.084 Sub -Total 0.113 0.002 0.115 4.000 0.460 5 5A 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 5B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 5C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sub -Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4.000 0.224 Total 9.084 7 -1 6