Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-071 Council Resolution• Council Member Rafferty adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 11 -71 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT AND AN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT FEATURES FOR THE EAGLE BROOK CHURCH SITE WHEREAS, Eagle Brook Church wishes to expand its parking lot, and; WHEREAS, a site and building plan review was conducted administratively according to Section 2, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance, and the parking expansion was approved on May 20, 2011, and WHEREAS, the previous Site Improvement Performance Agreement did not include the new parking expansion, and WHEREAS, the previous Operation and Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Treatment Features did not include new stormwater facilities to be created with the parking expansion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lino Lakes City Council hereby approves a new Site Improvement Performance Agreement (ATTACHMENT A) and a new Operation and Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Treatment Features (ATTACHMENT B). Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27thday of June ATTEST: Ju e Bartell, Cit, Cler , 2011. Jeff Rein rt, ' ayor Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 27 tiday of June , 2011. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member o' Donnell and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Rafferty, O'Donnell, Roeser, Reinert The following voted against same: none (Absent - GailuP) Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 I STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser C. C. MEETING DATE: June 27, 2011 TOPIC: Resolution No. 11 -71: Approving Two Agreements With Eagle Brook Church Required for Parking Lot Expansion • Site Improvement Performance Agreement • Operation and Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Treatment Features ACTION: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Eagle Brook Church submitted a site plan application for expanding the parking lot on its site at 7775 20th Ave. The plan includes expanding the existing parking lot on the south side of the existing building. The parking expansion is not a new idea. It was discussed as being needed in the future for additional seating and included in the analysis conducted for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Therefore, the expansion will have no unforeseen environmental impacts. The increase in seating, which would require amending the conditional use permit, is not occurring at this time. Nonetheless, to ensure that all issues are covered at the necessary level of detail, the parking expansion was addressed with a site and building plan review. Site and building plan reviews are conducted administratively in accordance with Section 3, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff approval, with conditions, was granted on May 20. The conditions include the preparation of two documents. The City requires a site improvement performance agreement when a project requires a site plan review. This agreement ensures that fundamental work on the site is completed by requiring an escrow deposit. A new site improvement performance agreement has been prepared because the original agreement did not include the new parking expansion. In addition, a maintenance agreement for stormwater facilities often is needed on projects that create new stormwater facilities. Poorly functioning stormwater facilities pose flooding and water quality problems for other properties and water bodies. The parking expansion requires some additional stormwater facilities that were not included in the previous stormwater agreement. We have worked with Eagle Brook Church to prepare the two documents. Resolution No. 11 -71 approves both new documents. • • It is noteworthy that the new stormwater facilities agreement breaks new ground in interagency cooperation. In the past, develop projects often had two different agreements for stormwater management: one with the City and one with the Watershed District. This new document is a joint agreement between the property developer, the City, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. The two jurisdictions worked together with the church to reduce the number of legal documents required. This will not work for all projects, but it is a good prototype for developments that do not involve subdivisions or other additional complexities. OPTIONS 1. Approve Resolution No. 11 -71, approving the two agreements with Eagle Brook Church. 2. Return to staff with direction RECOMMENDATION Option 1 • ATTACHMENT A Site Improvement Performance Agreement • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of June, 2011, is by and between the City of Lino Lakes, whose address is 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and Eagle Brook Church of White Bear Lake, Minnesota, whose address is 7015 20th Avenue North, Centerville, MN, 55038, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ". WHEREAS, the Developer has received approval of Site Development Plans, (the "Plans ") by the City on the 15th day of June, 2011 pursuant to a site and building plan review; and WHEREAS, the plan review report is attached hereto as Exhibit A and the Plans listed in Exhibit A are incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the aforesaid approval includes a condition that prior to site work commencing, a new performance agreement with financial securities must be executed and the securities submitted to the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the Developer, its successors and assigns, agree to construct the improvements set forth in Exhibit A and the Plans on the site ( "the Property ") legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Eagle Brook Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties made herein, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO: Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 1 of 8 M • • I. DESIGNATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. A. Improvements on the project site to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "On -site Work ". B. Improvements off the project site to be installed at the Developer's expense by the Developer as hereinafter provided are hereinafter referred to as "Off -site Work ". C. Developer shall enter into an operation and maintenance agreement for the additional stormwater treatment facilities to be constructed on the site not included in the 2004 plans. II. ON -SITE WORK. A. On -Site Work. The On -Site Work shall consist of the improvements described in the approved Plans, to include any approved subsequent amendments, and shall be in compliance with all applicable statutes, codes and ordinances of the City. The Work includes all on -site exterior amenities as shown on the approved Plans and as required by the plan approval, such as, but not limited to: landscaping, private driveways, parking areas, storm drainage systems, curbing, lighting, site grading, tree preservation work and erosion control measures. Such improvements shall be completed in accordance with Section IV herein. B. Cost Estimates. The Developer shall provide the City with a written estimate of all applicable costs of the On -Site Work, itemized by type; the estimates shall be based upon the actual estimates provided by the contractors who are to do the Work. Said cost estimates shall be reviewed by the City, and the City shall establish the actual amount of the financial guarantee based on the estimates, acting reasonably. The description and estimated cost of Developer's On -site Work is as follows: Item Description of Improvements Estimated Cost 1 Earthwork/Site Clearing /Erosion Control $ 50,044 2 Sawcut Asphalt $ 1,000 3 Infiltration Basin Soil $ 30,000 4 Site Utilities $ 17,550 5 Asphalt Paving / Class V $ 161,460 6 Striping $ 1,850 7 Curb and Gutter $ 5,852 Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 2 of 8 • 8 Curb and Gutter at Connection to CB $ 1,014 9 Valley Gutter $ 1,044 10 Ribbon Curb $ 7,369 11 Concrete Spillway $ 375 12 Landscaping / Seeding $ 38,000 13 Erosion Control Blanket $ 2,750 14 Plantings in Existing Rain Gardens $ 17,900 15 Site Signage $ 250 16 Electrical $ 47,245 17 Asphalt Trenching and Patch for Electrical $ 2,000 18 SWPPP $ 400 Total Estimated Cost of Developer Improvements $ 386,103 Security Requirement (Total * 35 %) $ 135,136.05 C. Plans & Specifications. The Developer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements. Said plans and specifications shall be subject to review and approval by the City of Lino Lakes and Rice Creek Watershed District. D. Construction Observation. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the applicable City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may have one or more inspectors inspect the work on a full or part-time basis to assure that construction proceeds pursuant to the Plans and other applicable requirements. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City's inspectors, provided said instructions relate to compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and the Plans. E. Record Plans. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the improvements the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible mylar "Record" drawings, and two complete sets of paper copy "Record" drawings, all prepared in accordance with City standards. An electronic copy of the plans shall also be submitted in an AutoCAD DWG format. F. As -Built Survey. The Developer's engineer shall certify, in writing with an as -built survey, that all grading complies with the grading plan. The as -built survey must include, but is not limited to, proposed and final contours with adequate elevation shots to show conformance, property Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 3 of 8 irons (to be exposed in field), and the 100 -Year High Water Level (HWL) of all ponds, lakes, and wetland areas. III. OFF -SITE WORK A. Off -site Work. The Developer shall design and install, at the Developer's Expense, certain Off -site Work as follows: This parking expansion project includes no Off -site Work. IV. COMPLETION DATE. The activities authorized by site and building plan approval shall be initiated within six (6) months after the date of execution of this Agreement unless extension is granted by the City. If such activity is not completed within eighteen (18) months after commencement, the City may exercise any remedies as set forth in Section VII., unless an extension is granted by the City. V. GUARANTEE. A. The Developer will fully and faithfully comply with all terms and conditions of any and all contracts entered into by the Developer for the installation and construction of all Developer's Work and hereby guarantees the workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the City's final approval of the Developer's Work. Concurrently with the execution hereof by the Developer, the Developer will furnish to, and at all times thereafter maintain with the City, a cash deposit, certified check, or Irrevocable Letter of Credit, based on thirty - five (35 %) percent of the total estimated cost of Developer's Work. An Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be for the exclusive use and benefit of the City of Lino Lakes and shall state thereon that the same is issued to guarantee and assure performance by the Developer of all the terms and conditions of this Development Contract and construction of all required improvements in accordance with the ordinances and specifications of the City. The City reserves the right to draw, in whole or in part, on any portion of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as further provided in Section VII. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be automatically extended for additional periods of one year from present or future expiration dates unless thirty (30) days prior to such the City Clerk or Administrator is notified in writing by certified mail that the Letter of Credit will not be renewed. The Letter of Credit or other financial guarantee shall be released and returned within 90 days following the City's final approval of the Work. Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 4 of 8 VI. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS. A. The Developer agrees to establish a non - interest bearing escrow account with the City in an amount reasonably established by the City Engineer or his designee for the payment of all City fees and costs incurred by the City related to the Work, including, but not limited to, the following: 1 Total Estimated (Budget) Costs for Escrow Account for $5,400.00 Administration (Legal, Engineering, Planning, and Contract administration) 2 Existing project escrow as of April 30, 2011 $3,405.56 3 Additional escrow required $2,000.00 B. The City shall have a right to reimburse itself from the Escrow. Upon request, the City shall provide the Developer written notice and reasonably detailed invoices of the City's expenses charged to the escrow. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, then Developer and City shall review the costs required to complete the Work. In such case, Developer shall deposit additional sums with the City to pay for the agreed upon increase. If the escrow account drops below 10% of the original deposit amount, the City may require the submittal of an additional escrow deposit sufficient to cover any anticipated expenses. VII. REMEDIES FOR BREACH A. The City shall give written notice to the Developer of any default hereunder and not less than 30 days to cure any such default before proceeding to enforce such financial guarantee or before the City undertakes any work for which the City will be reimbursed through the financial guarantee. Within ten (10) days after such notice to it, the Developer shall notify the City in writing the manner in which the default will be cured and the time within which such default will be cured. If the Developer fails to provide a timely plan for curing the default in a manner satisfactory to the City, the City will proceed with the remedy it deems appropriate. B. At any time after the Completion Date and any extensions thereof, if any of the work is deemed incomplete, the City may proceed in any one or more of the following ways to enforce the undertakings herein set forth, and to collect any and all reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal, planning and litigation costs and expense. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City must first give Developer written notice and not less than 30 days to complete the Work. The enumeration Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 5 of 8 • of the remedies hereunder shall be in addition to any other remedies available to the City by law. 1. Specific Performance. The City may in writing direct the surety, if applicable, or the Developer to cause the Work to be undertaken and completed within a specified reasonable time. If the Developer fails to cause the Work to be done and completed in a manner and time reasonably acceptable to the City, the City may proceed to bring an action for specific performance to require work to be undertaken. 2. Completion by the City. The City, after first providing written notice, may enter the premises and proceed to have the Work done either by contract, by day labor or by regular City forces. The Developer may not question the manner of doing such work or the letting of any such contracts for the doing of any such work. Upon completion of such work, the Developer shall promptly pay the City the full cost thereof as aforesaid. 3. Deposit of Financial Guarantee. In the event the financial guarantee has been submitted in the form of a Letter of Credit, the City may draw on the Letter of Credit the sum equal to the estimated cost of completing the Work, plus the City's estimated expenses as defined herein at Article VI, but not exceeding the amount set forth on the Letter of Credit. The money shall be deemed to be held by the City in trust for the purpose of reimbursing the City for any costs incurred in completing the Work as hereinafter specified. Any funds remaining after completion of the project shall be promptly returned to the Developer. VIII. OCCUPATION OF PREMISES The church is already occupied and the parking expansion described by the approved Plans does not affect occupancy. IX. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR DEFENSE The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable costs incurred by the City in defense of enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees if the City prevails in such action. Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 6 of 8 • XI. VALIDITY If a portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase in this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect or void any of the other provisions of the Site Improvement Performance Agreement. XII. GENERAL A. Binding Effect. The terms and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Property and shall be deemed covenants running with the land. B. Notices. Whenever in this Agreement it shall be required or permitted that notice or demand be given or served by either party to this Agreement to or on the other party, such notice or demand shall be delivered personally or mailed by United States mail to the addresses hereinbefore set forth on Page 1 by certified mail (return receipt requested). Such notice or demand shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with the above. The addresses of the parties hereto are as set forth on Page 1 until changed by notices given as above. C. Incorporation by Reference. All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications and contracts for the improvements furnished and let pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this Agreement by reference as fully as if set out herein in full. D. Hours of Construction Activity. All construction activity shall be limited to the hours set out as follows: Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday and Legal Holidays No construction work allowed Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 7 of 8 IP EAGLE BROOK CHURCH OF WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA CITY OF LINO LAKES By Its EXEc Dig dF 4,9 82- 2- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) By Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk On this day of , 2011, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Jeff Reinert and Julieanne Bartell, to me known to be respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that they executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF Ali 0K61 On this % day of T 1,t' -t— , 2011, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared j-e;k=k7 t, L3k Decke>c of Eagle Brook Church of White Bear Lake, Minnesota, a Minnesot€ non- profit corporation (Developer), who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of the corporation . otary Public This instrument was drafted by: City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 4910147_4.DOC AMANDA L LEE Notary Public -State of Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2012 Eagle Brook Performance Agreement 2011 page 8 of 8 0 Exhibit A • • • DATE: May 20, 2011 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser TOPIC: BACKGROUND Site and Building Plan Review: Eagle Brook Church Parking Lot Expansion 7775 20th Ave. Eagle Brook Church submitted a site plan application for expanding the parking lot on its site at 7775 20th Ave. The plan includes expanding the existing parking lot on the south side of the existing building. A conditional use permit for the church was approved in 2004 with Resolution No. 04 -17. Potential environmental impacts were analyzed in an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) in 2002 before the church was approved in 2004. The parking expansion was not expected to occur until or unless additional seating was created within the church. This conditional use permit approval included the 2100 -seat worship space, but not the additional 700 seats. One of the conditions of approval was that the addition of more seating would require an amendment of the conditional use permit. None of the conditions addresses the parking expansion. Discussion of the parking expansion was related to putting in the additional seating within the building. The plans do not all include the expanded parking. A "construction plan" and the landscaping plan both include an area labeled "overflow parking area to be seeded ". However, the plans from the EAW show all the parking (expansion included). The drainage analysis and calculations prepared for the 2004 church project and reviewed by the City included the entire parking area, including the expansion. The parking expansion is not a new idea. It was discussed as being needed for additional seating and included in the EAW, so there will be no unforeseen environmental impacts. Since the parking will not affect any of the conditions of approval or create unforeseen impacts, an amendment to the conditional use permit is not needed. However, to ensure that all issues are addressed at the level of detail required for development projects, the parking expansion is being addressed with a site and building plan review. Site and • Eagle Brook Church Parking Expansion Site Plan Review page 2 building plan reviews are conducted administratively according to Section 3, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Zoning: According to the comprehensive plan approved in 2002 and currently in effect, the project site is guided for Low Density Sewered Residential land use. In addition to land use categories, the comprehensive plan designates growth areas for pre -2010 (stage 1) and 2010 -2020 (stage 2). The site is split between stage one and stage two areas. These growth areas pertain to when city utilities (water and sanitary sewer) may be made available for the area in question in order to support urban development. Since the project does not rely on city utilities, the growth areas are not immediately relevant to the church proposal. Location Existing Land Use Guided Land Use (Comp. Plan) Zoning Rural Site agriculture Low Density Sewered Resid. North rural residential Kural Rural South rural resid., agric. Low Density Sewered Resid. Rural East rural resid., agric. Medium Density Resid. Rural West Peltier Lake Low Dens. Sewered Resid., Public /Semi- Public Rural The comprehensive plan does not establish a separate land use category specifically for churches. Several but not all existing church properties on large parcels are designated as Public /Semi Public land use, as are parks and the City Hall location. The site is in a Rural zoning district. A church is a conditional use in this zone. A conditional use permit was approved in 2004 with Resolution 04 -17. Shoreland: Much of the large church site is within the shoreland overlay zone that covers land within 1000 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of Peltier Lake. However, only a very small part of the new parking area is within the 1000 ft. shoreland overlay. Potential impacts were analyzed in the EAW before the church was approved in 2004. The existing and proposed new parking areas are well beyond the 150 ft. setback from the OHWL. Parking: The 2004 plan provided for adequate parking, as indicated in the table below. It is possible that the church will expand its seating capacity and the EAW analysis included the potential expansion. If the hypothetical expansion of 700 seats occurs, it would require an additional 233 parking spaces under the zoning ordinance requirements. The plan accommodated this potential with a grassy area south of the western parking lot area. This is the area now proposed for expansion. • 1 • Eagle Brook Church Parking Expansion Site Plan Review page 3 Parking Analysis for 2004 Approval Potential Expansion Zoning Ordinance Parking Requirement Spaces Required Spaces Provided worship area: 2100 seats 1 space per 3 seats 700 other 1 per classroom, other 13 total 713 760 Additional Proposed 2009 229 new total 989 potential additional 700 seats 1 space per 3 seats 233 potential ordinance requirement 946 The 2002 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) assumed a significantly higher number of parking stalls than required by ordinance. The EAW included the following data in its analysis: Parking spaces added: Proposed Church Potential Expansion - Total 1,100 350 1,450 The parking expansion currently proposed includes 229 parking spaces. This is Less than the ordinance requirement would be for the hypothetical expansion of seating capacity, (which is not being proposed). It also is less than what was assumed for the EAW. Therefore, impacts of the current proposal are less than what was assumed in previous analyses. Future Parking Needs: Though the ordinance requirements are being met, the parking issue must be reviewed if additional church seating is proposed in the future. The ordinance requirements seem to be underestimating the actual parking needs for the church and its activities. If the parking expansion is needed now, without any additional seating, it is not clear how parking for an additional 700 persons would be accommodated on the site. That question should be addressed when and if a proposal for additional seating is submitted, which will require amendment of the conditional use permit according to the original approval conditions. Lighting: Lighting will be added for safety in the parking expansion area. The same fixtures and poles used in the existing parking areas must be used in the expansion area. Eagle Brook Church Parking Expansion Site Plan Review page 4 Access: The existing access points on 20th Ave. will not change with the parking expansion. Traffic: Expanding the paved parking area will not increase traffic generation. To the contrary, traffic drives the need for parking. In fact, parking is already occurring in the unpaved area that will be paved according to this application. Wetland: Wetlands exist on the church site, but the proposed construction will not impact wetlands. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) will review the site. All RCWD permit requirements must be met. Stormwater Management: The stormwater design includes collection of runoff by a series of swales, infiltration areas /rain gardens, and stormwater ponds, providing pretreatment of all runoff from the development. The parking expansion will be consistent with the design. The City Engineer's review is attached. Since the 2004 project approval, the Rice Creek Watershed District has adopted a new rule for development within Lino Lakes: Rule RMP -3. A Watershed review is necessary for the parking expansion. The Watershed District issued a Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) on July 16, 2009 (Permit 09 -048). County Ditch 72 is an underground drain tile. The ditch was rerouted in a new underground drain tile, around the development area, as part of the church project. Easements were placed over the relocated drain tile for Co. Ditch 72 and deeded to the Rice Creek Watershed District. The 2011 plans seem to show that the new pavement will encroach into this ditch easement. The City is leaving it to the Rice Creek Watershed District, the holder of the easement, to determine if this should be changed. The City routinely requires a stormwater facilities maintenance agreement on new building projects. Such an agreement was executed and recorded with the original church project. However, this parking expansion includes some new stormwater facilities, and so a new agreement is needed to cover the new facilities. It is likely that this agreement can include Rice Creek Watershed District requirements in order to have one agreement for both jurisdictions. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD REVIEW The Environmental Board reviewed the application on July 29. The Board's recommendations are attached. The recommendations are addressed by standard requirements, revised plans or the conditions of approval. • FINDINGS Eagle Brook Church Parking Expansion Site Plan Review page 5 1. The site is guided for residential uses and surrounded by land guided for residential or rural uses. Such uses include churches. The project will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with present and future land uses. 2. The site is zoned Rural. Churches are allowed as conditional uses in rural zoning districts. The City approved a conditional use permit for Eagle Brook Church in 2004 with Resolution 04 -17. 3. The parking lot expansion project will conform to performance standards. 4. Traffic generation will be within the capabilities of the transportation system and will not be affected by a parking lot expansion. 5. The church has its own onsite water facilities that meet applicable requirements and are not affected by the parking lot expansion project. 6. The church has its own onsite wastewater facilities that meet applicable requirements and are not affected by the parking lot expansion project. 7. No City capital expenditures are required for the parking lot expansion project. 8. No trees are being removed for the parking lot expansion project. 9. The potential parking expansion was included in plans analyzed by the 2002 Environmental Assessment Worksheet. 10. This site and building plan review was conducted administratively according to Section 2, Subd. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. 11. Additional stormwater management facilities are proposed with the parking expansion that were not included in previous plans. 12. This review is based on the following submittals: 1. Plan set including the following, dated 1/14/2011 and 11" x 17" hard copies received May 11, 2011: T100 Title Sheet C100 Alignment Plan & Tabulation C 1 O 1 Construction Plan C102 Grading & Storm Sewer Plan C103 Signing, Striping & Lighting Plan C104 Construction Details C105 Construction Details L100 Planting Plan L101 Planting Details 2. Project Narrative, June 12, 2009 • Eagle Brook Church Parking Expansion Site Plan Review page 6 APPROVAL AND CONDITIONS The site and building plan is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to site work commencing, a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District must be obtained 2. Prior to site work commencing, a new stormwater facilities maintenance agreement must be executed that covers the new stormwater facilities on the site that were not included in the 2004 plans. This agreement must be recorded against the property. 3. Prior to site work commencing, a new site improvement performance agreement with financial securities must be executed and the securities submitted to the City. 4. Existing trees planted as required for the church conditional use permit must be managed. The Church shall work with the City Environmental Specialist to address the health of these plantings. 5. The same lighting fixtures and poles used in the existing parking areas must be used in the expansion area. 6. Issues listed in the May 19, 2011 and August 5, 2009 memos by the City Engineer must be addressed to his satisfaction. 7. All requirements of the conditional use permit approved with Resolution No. 04 -17 continue to apply. ATTACHMENTS • May 19, 2011 review memo by City Engineer • August 5, 2009 review memo by City Engineer • July 29, 2009 recommendations of the Environmental Board • Plan set including the following, dated 1/14/2011, received May 11, 2011: T100 Title Sheet C100 Alignment Plan & Tabulation C101 Construction Plan C102 Grading & Storm Sewer Plan C103 Signing, Striping & Lighting Plan C104 Construction Details C105 Construction Details L100 Planting Plan L101 Planting Details • • • l I I� : t !LAS Memorandum DATE: inlay 19, 2011 TO Jeff Snnyser FROM James E. Studenski, City Engineer RE: Eagle gook Church — Parking Lot Expansion Review Below is the engineering review of the submitted documents for the Eagle Brook Church — Parking Lot Expansion. The plans for the Eagle Brook Parking Lot Expansion have not been approved please address the following items, Please contact me with any questions. The review is based on these submittals: 1. Memo to provide responses to City comments, prepared by SRF Consulting Group,. Inc. dated May 9, 2011. 2. Eagle Brook Church -- Parking Lot Expansion Plans (TO01— L101), signed January 14, 2011. 3. 2011 Eagle Brook Church Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement, undated. 4. Draft Site improvement Performance Agreement, dated April 13, 2011. Drainage and Storm Sewer 1. A copy of the Rice Creek Watershed District Permit must be provided prior to commencement of construction. Miscellaneous 1. The Site improvement Performance Agreement will have to be entered into between Eagle Brook Church and the City cif Lino Lakes prior to construction commencing. City security requirements will be tabulated using the construction estimate and provided to the applicant. 2. All other items on my August 5, 2009 memo have been addressed. 600 To Centel Patktvay, Lino Lakes Minnesota 55014-1182 Phone: 651 -982 -2400 • Fax: 651-982-20199 • Memorandum DATE: August 5, 2009 TO: Jeff Smyser FROM: James E. Studenski, City Engineer -L,,i J RE: Eagle Brook Church — Parking Lot Expansion Review Below is the engineering review of the submitted documents for the Eagle Brook Church — Parking Lot .Expansion. The plans for the Eagle Brook Parking Lot Expansion have not been approved please address the following items. Please contact me with any questions. The review is based on these submittals: 1. Rice Creek Watershed District CAPROC dated July 16, 2009. 2. Project Narrative, prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. dated June 12, 2009. 3. Ceoteohnical Report for Eagle Brook Church dated August 8, 2002. 4. Eagle Brook Church Parldng Lot Expansion Project Manual, dated June 26, 2009. 5. Eagle Brook Church — Phase i1 Parking Lot Expansion Plans, dated June 12, 2009. 6. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Eagle Brook Church — Parking Lot Expansion, dated May 2009. Drainage and Storm Sewer 1. Show the County Ditch 72 Easement. 2. Show the concrete wash location. Miscellaneous 1. No Importing or exporting of soils without permission of City Engineer 2. Show and describe protection measures to be taken to prevent compaction of infiltration basins. 3. The 25 inch base bituminous course on pavement detail A should be non- wearing material. 4. A new Maintenance of Stormwater Management Facilities Agreement must be submitted to RCWD. 5. Provide constructions cost estimate. 6. An agreement will have to be entered into between Eagle Brook Church and the City of Lino Lakes forthe conslrucfion. 7. Alt Rice Creek Watershed District comments on the July 16, 2009 CAPROC must be addressed. 600 Town Center Parkway, Lino Lakes, •dinnesoka 55014 -1182 Phones 651. 982.2400 • Fax: 651-982 -2499 or DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD 7/29/09 The Environmental Board recommends this project go forward with the following changes /additions that have been outlined below. - Increase and enhance screen/buffer to the south. Existing trees that were planted as per the CUP requirements are in decline and need to be managed. - Require that there will be no importing or exporting of soils without City permission -Add concrete wash out area to erosion control plan/SWPPP -Show document storage area on the SWPPP -Show and describe protection measures to be taken to prevent compaction to filtrate in filtration basins. - Lights per the original CUP — according to Lino Lakes lighting standards - Identify plowing areas in winter. (where will water drain when snow melts) and -mark drainage areas on the map -Work should be scheduled any time of year other than Blue Heron nesting times. -Change wording under National Heritage issues on Agenda Item 5A to state specific to this project. -the 10:00 rule for lighting must be upheld -Work should be scheduled at anytime other than the nesting times of the herons on Peltier Island. • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION CONSULTING GSOOP, INC. 21il I10623 SUP, 0ea = YaawpeUy 21174, TA. 700•71F110101 70.2 Ten 7112 •472-21311 RECEIVED MAY 11 2011 CITY OF LINO LIKES Py,• i2.®' 1..0200 L1 ~ P•� W Amu /..h 40101 PERISIONS +1100 Mint 5o tf j�Q O 13 O� mig W' a� �wF SHEET T100 Sumer 1 OP eg EAGLE PHASE II PARKING Lie .��' I�II•�_ C LOT EXPANSION O LAKES , MN �..r.. PROJECT �J LOCATION I•- 4J sianti •r . 1091,41 ... ,: ...a_ 4 111 ._4 *l 3 10 °� INDEX SHEET NO. SHEET DESCRIPTION y WA / °+ 1001 TITLE SHEET C100 ALIGNMENT PLAN AND TABULATION C101 CONSTRUCTION PLAN 5 C102 GRADING AND STORM SEWER PLAN C103 SIGNING, STRIPING, AND LIGHTING PLAN X C104 -0.05 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1100 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS . z; , r4 f3 nY + • UP ! �3 r�l kip t x, 'Al) • .: �7ay ni PI i L as._��� , � K \CIV4 %047 \4443 \Phase 2 \ Plan \Tale Sheet.deg • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION CONSULTING GSOOP, INC. 21il I10623 SUP, 0ea = YaawpeUy 21174, TA. 700•71F110101 70.2 Ten 7112 •472-21311 RECEIVED MAY 11 2011 CITY OF LINO LIKES Py,• i2.®' 1..0200 L1 ~ P•� W Amu /..h 40101 PERISIONS +1100 Mint 5o tf j�Q O 13 O� mig W' a� �wF SHEET T100 Sumer 1 OP at CONTROL POINTS, X 11 55920206 155546,49 COORDINATES BASED ON ANOKA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION 0 Ii KES 805 -1 P11815 STATION 007501 081505 501E5 000 0T 1 20+0.7.22 50' LT 25' RA0 C & 0 PC 20+03.22 70' LT C & G PF 20+03.22 25' LT C & 0 900 PT 2 21 +35.30 50' 47' 25' 850 C & 0 PC 21+.15.30 75' LT C & 0 PT 21 +35.30 25' LT C & 0 1100 PO 3 10+71.55 293.25' RT 1150.5' RAD 108 PC 20+11.10 375' .1 009 PT 21 +70.93 370' LT I:0@ 000 PT 4 19+44.08 52' LT 25' 900 C & G PC 19+44.08 27' LT C & 0 PT 19+94.79 49.79' LT C & 0 900 15 5 19+92.13 349.73' LT 25' 900 509 PC 19+92.33 374.73' 411 509 PT 19+81.22 351.03' ST 209 PT 5 19 +54.53 13204' LT 109 PT 7 19+71.55 100.03' LT 208 • P01812 GIVER ARE 10 FACE 01 CURB (C & G) OR 000E 01 9111MON005 (508) r0 EAGLE BROOK DRIVE • : 1. T.;. Il .TZ'iIM J 1.r .• ._ *_H: 1 Mil:u.1 I8Fi . �I �iC!Ytd�r�r��"r7�1C7, ii rl •.1 i1:F 1 • ; 1 I∎MI1:1&::' /:riifiYFi1'7 +N,:211. r-:4.:.I 7 ".�T X30:.+, -z'- "'ice.!• 1∎MI e1♦G> .. 1I .5�"' ..1.5 . 11 "* 11,. Tf∎ l�i1a © ®1•1111111■<ststllsFcz2"i'r<'11 ' an :1E,-,1 •r ➢FLCI 11■IIIistar 1.0 -:.<15 • r;:1[.5 • 1 INIIMEINNI ■111•11■=■1r■1■11MIM1TT = '1103 „,:. 1 1[sMIIMI •1••■r1111■1r■1J0=1: 11, SHEET C100 SHEET 2 OF 9 • f • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION ®CDNNULTINO GROUP, INC. 6W1. 1ZOLTMA MOP, INC. r1:32•.01.17 � rI 7 51. 7®- 476 -9184 RECEI X MAY 1 C'OF LIN w 14:„..w CM, 7Tm•A 1■••• 3..• 61N4/IU 11.099 75 *� 8 8 SHEET C101 SHEETS OP 9 ED 2011 LAKES LEGEND LEWD BORING *TREE POWER POLE •TELEPHONE PED • E1FL`iRICN. BOX LANE PROPERTY • • : / /' /' • y'�" 6,' `../ w• / ` ', .1 11 — `: _ _ il' �. 1 ii ,/,/ ( + e'l. . �: 1 .. ..._. "... I 1 ,+ ✓' . • T; ,1 ``A • • L -- i ^-- -t1 - -'- ; ® ; • I , ■ , ; 11 .- - __ ; 1, i i / r' ' -'.. ra's•. __- "cfo,,I , `. , t i -1 "` - ` �`'` •� -� \ JC .I � I I T1' , , I I CV�"\ I ` K 1- • . ' DONE AND REPLACE 8618 • � - / CURB & GUTTER ,i iI `N.I) K 11 -� I ; I , -51�.� v / II t i AM 6)I�I Oa I 0 1 ' -. OV AM 1.641ACE 8818 I ; / /// I 110U� , % //% / J i' II 1� ! % IXISf. OUGHT OF WAY - I ii / //, 9////, ,-,,y�.'.`.,�'f,T 1AC G / ' TACK COAT _ B. II21- / //j / / / MNOOT SPEC. 2357 I ,7� / / , I , 'r LP ∎re I I "• M II —PROPOSED RIGHT R OF WAY Y —SECTION - - -_ DIMING RENT OF WAY STROY SEWER -- SATRPY SEWER RRD BURRED I� 1 I ; BURIED TELEPHONE BURIED ELECTRICAL 9� PAVEMENT IIEENL A WITH REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT WITH PAVEMENT DETAIL A -- CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SAWdR BINNNOUS PAVEMENT ®B• CUSS 5 AGGREGATE BASE ORNE • 41 !t+" I j 3 - . $ nr, L41 m / j j , ,_'l • ENERN. NOTES: • CONSTRUCT PARKING ARDS USING PAVEMENT DETAIL A • 8 1L CURB CUTS IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND AT THE SPACING USIEO. WHERE CURB CUTS 230 LOCATED M FRONT PARKING STALLS, CENTER CURB CUT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STALL • NL�O8 EONS SHOWN 448E TO P400 OF CURB IM4E54 NOTEDO • 36009 STATE UW IS HEREBY REMINDED Or HE 10 CMR 319)005 7 441 04? VE FAOMIES IN THE AREA CONTACT MUST BE MAOE THROUGH GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL. • WHEN MATCHING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT N BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, T HE EGSTI G PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAWCUT AND TACK COAT APPLIED PR IOR TO PLACING NEW PAVEMENT • SEE GRADING PLAN FOR PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS. • • SEE LANDSCAPE PUNS FOR PIANISM IAYMIT AND BIOREIQ7RON BASIN MAILS • VERIFY AIL OURS CUT' LOCATIONS WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. • THE CONTRACTOR IS HEREBY REMINDED THAT NO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING OF SOILS MAY OCCUR WITHOUT TIE EXPRESSED CONSENT OF THE LINO LIKES CM ENGINEER. �A• vi 4 - ,• 3 6 ; i % / / /// % % / / /I/ • 1 I I� v, 1 1 C 1 11- I ,,III t 1 6818 C & 0 1 ) � W (3W LM si M 9 f R 'SET(' a 2R 8E0 'M RE • P + y z's,9 �i /// % //% ��/ A R C 1 F T.. O I . Pill'''. J RIBBON CURB i6 NWUC US NNT ON -SPWFCV2C3URSWNRE � C S 71 ®' B 8424 C & 0 G AGGREGATE BASE CLASS MNDOT SPEC. 2211 SUBORAGE PREPARATION IJ • MY EASEMENTDITCH 72 SEE ® MNODT SPEC. 2112 © DETAIL A • EBRD r! .� 4L YO U �I•_ - i- .may..,.., IT Y111 !✓•�J•�. , 0 + T -, ' 1 EAGLE BROOK 0IINE 0 I I l 0 NOTES: RET O CH COSTING CURB 0 HATCH E%ISi1N0 BITUMINOUS PAVEAENf ® CONSTRUCT B' DOVE TAE. AT ENDS OF CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER Q CONSTRUCT CURB cur AND SOIL APRON QD CONSTRUCT 0088 CUT AND CONC. APRON © CONSTRUCT ORNEWAY CROSS OUITER S 61961619 ( ppp • 1 R • x y tr \ / fl, �\ 560 , Aj ® I vI �; �,� �I 1; 6 I. r • '<;,•.%, .i+ ..,--- CCCMINTY DITCH 72 _ .. W,T,� / EASEMENT EXIST. RIGHT 0' * S / 41 WAY , ? (....1 , . # • .•• .. - - •••.. - . 0 B INTO mask AGGREGATE DRIVE C)13424 CURB & GLITTER /LONG EAGLE BROOK DRIVE S BID ® LANDSCAPING RAM GARDEN BBD OPTION 2 I1 ' i K1 \CIVA \047 \4443 \Phese 2 \PIAn \construction- plan,dMg • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION ®CDNNULTINO GROUP, INC. 6W1. 1ZOLTMA MOP, INC. r1:32•.01.17 � rI 7 51. 7®- 476 -9184 RECEI X MAY 1 C'OF LIN w 14:„..w CM, 7Tm•A 1■••• 3..• 61N4/IU 11.099 75 *� 8 8 SHEET C101 SHEETS OP 9 ED 2011 LAKES s • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION ElCONSULTING GROUP, INC. WP C ISULTWO GROUP. WC Ova Carlson P¢haT 19aa..PCW. mN Z. 1�u. 1C.9�- 4'I6 -WCB RECEIVED av112011 C F LINO LAKES ratans ` . O 3—. µ NAVm SHEET C102 CHET4 OF /'11111I�/_8)1 ' ,� / ' •��� / /�`�, 894 4,0' , `/ .4 4 L .. J Ilii �, Nil GENERAL NOTES: REFER TO SXEE15 L100 AND L101 FOR TYPICAL RAIN GARDEN DETAILS • WORN OUTAGE GRADING urns MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DINNER SEE SHEET C104 FOR DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AND STORM SEWER TABULATION • SUBGRADE SHAY. BE SHAPED AND COMPACTED S ACCORDANCE RATI MNDOT SPEC 2112 SU�RME PREPARATION. PLACE INLET PROTECTION AT PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUMMER ONCE THEY ARE INSTALLED. • CONSTRUCT BIORETENTON BASINS UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA W ORDER TO MINIMIZE MINIMIZE CLOGGING. • UNIT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC W PROPOSED BM- - RETENTDN AREAS W ORDER TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNOFALWNG SOILS. •NOTES: O CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION -' ' �' "4'�I 1 /AU/ II II i N v ' r, wm ; 4 Y �I - ��!��� A�, A � `, ` / r / t.. W4II - �, 4 O .7., ♦ I N ' Ywy• , A m �i � �1) ` ...147_2:17-0— P . - ---_ ii ', aTO • \-.*.„,„. // ` • ..` C,t, / /:(✓9� O 99' ,, �'I `' �� rl .. 94R �• , 9 � �. / co', \ F � i • .S . p.1 / .7,--, C T ' _ INIEECE TO mom IRE I ll I 8 A ••' ` �-` oaut 9�y %/ er / m V> 111 MERE ELINAnos /(7 `IJI �1'�v �li' Il4 I N 1 j mmwlN,rv, umis , ' _'/ ��� v+c > I eaammox vex a l PURIM q°A PG - i MAW 4 WORN �. PPE OV4' I '. ) r 0 G ' O � , •V iii { I �IIt� it ` L�F{�P 61I.! y' MONO ' A ce- m 4T N ; GGNL ,r na > > r ' '9S ,r , RIME MEM RE 1I1 it l Bona : 1`I P MORRO .11 'j C onrnr mS �m �/ \ 4 TI - '" I pT ' U� I NJ I. tI ENTRANCE SEE CONCRETE WASHOUT LOCATION. CONTAINERIZE ALL O CONCRETE WASH WATER AND DISPOSE OFF-SITE O INCLUDED W BID OPTION 1 I ® NCIUCEO W BID OPTION 2 y`II, /AS 1 �f I \ I LEGEND: X SPOT ELEVATION TO GUTTER USE OF CURB O995 I I B" CUSS 5 AGGREGATE GRASS AND FORE, SEED MIX FOR UPLAND AREAS AND SURROUNDING RESIORATIoN AREAS MPLY wnr CITY OF UNO LAKES STANDARD SSEEED SPECIFK:ARONS -_- - u h L ' COME �O3 �11rr,� _— - _�•_ - L, M I I i j I I I A�i J95 �'—" \ fig \ 9 SILT wcwNE SUM FENCE. TYPE EO ®, PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTNID CONTOUR '68 PROPOSED DROP INLET °,O DUSTING DROP INLET IN PROPOSED CATCH BASIN COSTING CATCH BASIN • PROPOSED APRON Q 005TRIa APRON a, INLET PROTECTION w SOIL BORING • * TREE ® WELL POLE m POWER TELEPHONE PDX a ELECTIGCAI. BOX Noon P .. 9ln:x aT asLUOn 'F'.: rte.- .�- ,�.r.•�. ' � �� - -�,' �. ...._,. )�_�� J. I'S a: V'. a aP �.� • =�•�� - ..- - _..,,....� .�..�.., .o 1 6 x - �.�+oi / ,I )* I C' .. f mRmucrox MEM .l -_ i {' F �� Ii• 4' TOPSWL ANA SEED MATCH F1a91ING 404200 INE -4' MIN.— — x : AW, i' - -PA -PAWING LOT PAVEMENT - - -� RIBBON CUR= a ^ _ - PROPERTY UNE — PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY — — — SECTION LIE _________ EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY •- -STROM SEWER — — SANITARY SEWER DRAINAGE DITCH TYPICAL SECTION A WATERMAN —. BURIED GAS BURIED ELE7°E"cTRN000 NOT TO SOARS O K:\ Civil \ 047\ 4443\ Phase 2 \Plan \groding- plon.dwg • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION ElCONSULTING GROUP, INC. WP C ISULTWO GROUP. WC Ova Carlson P¢haT 19aa..PCW. mN Z. 1�u. 1C.9�- 4'I6 -WCB RECEIVED av112011 C F LINO LAKES ratans ` . O 3—. µ NAVm SHEET C102 CHET4 OF • • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION RE CONSULTING Gaooe, INC. SWY ISS S NSSSY. dC Sulw Puifas YlvupDS. 101 9 Iu. es-410 -8410 RECEIVE JMAY 11 2 IF LINO 1 b.. rueW eaW pa. Rand a anal. al/ Van saaaboo l7 ID L9 ID SHEET C103 MEET 9 0P9 11 KES LEGEND: . PROPOSE WM' POLE 4� COSTING LIGHT POLE -- - - - - -- Y CONDUIT FASTING BU RIED POWER %p.._• �: ' is • `' Xb /R, m x bb 1 + b AI i • ` - % a� � i .' / a� ._to?,..�y ' � ', t b •.: , ' %s b°be 0, 4r ' -„ .... • 4xbb r _ _ `; �: „A r� `Y .',./.%; b �` f `� bb A%-;'), •' �'; 4Y6 -` ''� bx am B6 .fi ' -, `a �f_�� :� �., a �- = =- �` � -- - di ;II; -*411? '-f`_- 24' II 6L L Yg / % : lia 0E0 it � t ^aoa i ® \ '\ I' Rg . , lip ;, � _ _ e}' `w. - -•N C i •% .• -�: `'4 bd �s as`4'� =y ., /?�, bb `fi %YiJ' ' Y N' N `'i N e ,,V ONI11T ;ma` y 0 41 Y ,\ Y ' ' 5 MINERAL NOTES: • PARKING LOT STRIPING 94ALL {YELLOW PLANT. • TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0' % 113.0'. • CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AU. EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS OR STRIPING THAT CONFlJf.T WITH THE PROPOSED STRPINO PLAN. • THE CONTRACTOR 6 HEREBY REAMED OF WS ALL LMUTIEST ET UNDER MAY�HAIAEE UJIES W T AREA fANfACf NUSf BE IMDE ,HR000N GOPHER STATE ONE -CAU. O CONNECT TO DOMING minim CIRCUIT 4.. YELLOW t — PAINT ;; , x • tl, +5 5 r 9 r a.< �, w ffal ■ EI y;" �I I 4�ss R ;';!'; ; • X. / , ,,,, , ik N Vin';', Y R '',/,>c( . ' _jj- 1 `�..1� mttq ' ,�, ft'.iy�i'tr �+» N �� il.i1' N 2" CONDUIT x. A ( { Jrwtr 1 +' — it , I _,V) CE EBRD�` \ \` • K \CIvI \047 \4443 \Phase 2 \ Ran \SILe Plan.dwg • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION RE CONSULTING Gaooe, INC. SWY ISS S NSSSY. dC Sulw Puifas YlvupDS. 101 9 Iu. es-410 -8410 RECEIVE JMAY 11 2 IF LINO 1 b.. rueW eaW pa. Rand a anal. al/ Van saaaboo l7 ID L9 ID SHEET C103 MEET 9 0P9 11 KES • • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION 01 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SWY SW RE88 GWW. DIG -a, Ip =7 TOL 788- 476 -8418 P98. 758- 670 -0845 RECEIVED MAY 11 2(11 CIIYOF LINO LAKES .0.,18105 n 118ID001 �✓ L raw^"' - -' «. w1 TIM MI MI 1■I MIME - -- MUM MI IMMOMI IM -- MI NEM 9 0 6 u SHEET C104 5HEE76 OF PLOWS FROM TOP OP CASTING (A) NIS ELM/ FROM APE SLOPE INV REV TO FLOWS TO COORDINATES DRAINAGE TABULATION S78. OR APRON INLET POINT 450. STN. OR APRON OUTLET NEW - STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION RC PIPE (DEMON 5050) PERFORATED PVC PIPE LENGTH OF PIPE INCLUDES: MP RAP ICI GWOE P0500 FOOTNOTES DESIGN (5) PAY HEIGHT CASTING ASSEMBLY (01 STEPS RE- WIRED L.R. BEND V41ERT. 11410112. CLASS 5 TYPE B X Y 15 CL 15' CL9 4' POINT NO PT FT FTIFT I FT UN FT TYPE LF. . APR LF. I APR LF. 1 APR CUYD EACH 200 894.35 08155 5.0575 590.35 207 557.52520 155,773.71 4521L 3.5 0.3250A 27 I I I 201 880.08 555,588.02 155.777.55 APRON I 1 I I 2.8 1 555 262 552.50 0.0530 891.52 203 557,312.48 155,456.55 PLUG I 1 181 1 •203 858.00 581.33 0.0030 890.77 EX25. 557,32637 155.828.18 40241 3.5 0 -11 ! 188 ID) 200 000.95 0.0545 890.03 EX MI 557.35056 T55,727.57 CONNECTION I 25 1 1 -665 N (411E1 305 00.65 883.30 557.357.38 135,340.38 40811(56') 5.1 0.3250. I I (7) 306 257 556,977.19 155655.96 PLUG i I 118 1 207 853.80 550.35 05075 880.08 251 556.595.12 195,75545 40211 3A 10-11 30 I 1 1 EX22 557,35353 155.81018 51061150 DI I STORM PIPE TOTALS 65 : 1 185 1 355 I 50 1 GENERAL NOTES 1. COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN T002IDOF APRON OR EIS) OF SAFETY APRON. 2. CENTER OF CASING OPENING AT 111 FOOT FROM FACE OF CUBE, NOTES: (A) TOP OF CASINO GIVEN TO CENTER OP GRATE. (E) CONNECT TO EXISTING I (B) REFER TO SP00Fi0A710N 5ECION334105 FOR STRUCTURE AND GRATE DESIGN STANDARD PLATES. (F) BUILti STRUCTURE OVER SWOSTING 44471CN SPANPW6. VEMFY EXISTING WERT ELEVAINRL (0) I0 LABTTHR66 JOINTS AT AP50N END. 11E040I8T5 SHALL BECONMDEREDINCIOEtrrAL TO PIPE CONSTRICTION. (0) CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE. 558807557350 5508 08990 «9V® owasse 1,10 0 5 904.0 MRS TOY LW A0 308 Mean 3 504.5 090.9 TW 040.0 WS CLOW 0653 .014,11,141A18013 EWER MIA Ka. 17,4 LILT MAWR WOW WPM sm « «NM IES f alaP01C01aW«nRP a [0R1T1 0 1h°seIET l&tra, ln «nn S a °ia \\ \ \\\ R1 1011,11411=i1=411.11 ®A ` 4nr1 08111 ew« 13j�.7 «Sa NS: -184,., �I9 N, °°'0816'.. Au. NN1 ail L,C a 1 II R riAldrra Prw9.a �oealln9 0 '.` II I,I !I Ir1,0 V��C, W 0' L #R I'7 {1 =_J iii R. II _ _ II ( ";aI E«9 rAt,m,°6 WTF°d1RlEo 011;11, 'a=i 1=11= 611.5 IJ--II 1' II II Iy1t111 -O „�80;�.aT« 'IN��B°6..n«,5 I 11 11 .111'x11=711=1 I1 =U 11 Oi 11 u li 1r! -11 1r a =Jr. 'S ,I= I N N IL m'-rP-= rf ©O�° 00 = 11= 11 II 11-11 =11 II=I[ =11 11. il- FO.,ti�„ =1.1 °Nm' 0 11 =11 11 =11 =11= - =11 �' � W 'm°L5 SWOT 111.118 SOMA TO A UMW f01"«Fntm ABATE 1051«08.1 BIORETENTION BASIN 2 TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) O: «a APE MINIM mtu 5mv 1/....M M OA 81310011013 oasts® 93°84 V rea - 4E8 AMMO YMIE9�m I ?I SUM SIN 4108 EWA 1[F) F 11- 111=11.' 1;, II II 1=11= 1 101 .= 11 1' IN J' II Ij II II I iM°tI°5 o -MTV NSMOLWPAVO Of mama 4 Len «m� e... e' arms mmSF 5°18 LIR LLT 84°1 G« « OM= • 5^o1Nao i= 11= 1I- 11 '1f'11JI=IIIiIIl�I=-.1 1 rr w-'= ©5 17751 R6I 1 N 11 u ' = . i FS 6=11.16"""°' II 11 11 11 =11 11 11 =11 11 I - 15+5:.,I„,!NAM 11=11=11=11=1E= =ll -' M =Ir. ROIE9lIlTE.7...1P 8(01 PM LEAATVAI Or ROMA= _ a"'S .114.1.1.1WN1s 11O lumavu © WEST BIORETENTION BASIN 3 TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION 01 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SWY SW RE88 GWW. DIG -a, Ip =7 TOL 788- 476 -8418 P98. 758- 670 -0845 RECEIVED MAY 11 2(11 CIIYOF LINO LAKES .0.,18105 n 118ID001 �✓ L raw^"' - -' «. w1 TIM MI MI 1■I MIME - -- MUM MI IMMOMI IM -- MI NEM 9 0 6 u SHEET C104 5HEE76 OF • • • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING XPANS ON EXPANSION NOWT (Typ.) • NO. 4 REINFORCING RODS (3) CANTWUOUS W CROSS GUTTER FROM EXPANSION 27 EBDR JOINT TO EXPANSION JOINT. z' BLVD. 1.0' 4 0 TOPSOIL do SEED - 05.,..7 + • - - ��_� JOINT JOINT _ B' (MIN.) )�� �—z.. qt ' �� \ CONRtACfX)N EXPAN510 gyp. —__ '�N © , �� EXISTING GROUNDUNE �Al CTRL CONSULTING SRI- GROUP, INC. I E ry BID OPTION 1 B624 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER c e 1.0' RIBBON CURB 0 CONSTRUCTION ON EAGLE BROOK DRIVE 15.011101151111101091.. Il1O. m°o...oCi1w. 15.111Z7 I�.r. t o ®' EAST & SOUTH EDGE OF PARKING LOT STA. 10 +20 TO STA. 19 +50 L B FROM O RECE:i IV MAY 11 2 CITY OF LINO CAENTERUNE OF EAGLE BROOK DRIVE. VARIABLE AGAINST EXISTING GUTTER. MINOUSUR GUTTER DETAIL FOR ORNEWAY ,/d O CURB UP CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER AND FILTRATION PER �, I PAVEMENT —� 1 � SHEETC11O4 FORR CONC. 0501E DETAILS 1-1/2" • • • O3 CONTINUOUS NO. 4 REINFORCEMENT BAR Tr I _I 1010 FGtXSLT Omen 10 . MIN. 1� r..... ..r.... er.wr�.�..y Iirw�..Nrw w r ....v.......1..1.= r..tuaM a t� 8" MW. AGGREGATE BASE CL B T- 3' MIN. MAW UM OF OPEN .. , . MOM= FILL SWUM 5011 50 ram 0L NTT AMT= 50.5010 m let Far WORK 5 FT. 101 1010 Tate. TTOP „ill R e fr. WIL. wan © DRIVEWAY CROSS GUTTER r 1100150 r ���� a 001100 PF50ILR50 F FL w 05000 artx wxFL COMM 5010 PC . NEW PARKING LOT ENTRANCE/DOT - t./ mown =nom sue. x mom 10111DFF P.011 .��� O 0 F 55 • i 6 5s F.n./a. 4� rF bI'1 � Iq e-1 m)tt I! r tx• OEM .1..a.50. l .. (war FIM) I STANDARD MACHWE SLICED (D 011050011.5 sax 1005050 4-10 550 15010 No 4-5 Non 50101000E 5050 TO BE AM BY 505 eons or Emma 1/011151.55110 009 5005000 a MACE 3100 50050 OM (00 ,5050005 SILT FENCE DETAILS 001001009. FI1. BOCK 150 000 OPM 105550 M010504 TO 51010011 MOM 1100 000 ROW �1�1� 11 __ _ __- 050151110 OF IMO MM. WIZ Of COARSE 0011. S ®' ( 110 GND. am 1 CONFORMING m SP EO. it]�apWIIZ 310 -11 0-1 0MG1ML D ROCK IOPG/F%7MPO�S'T TOR ® 0011t I --_ __- --_ �.= Al MUM AI ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE _ swots. .w... TOP OF CURB BACK UP OF CURB CUT 1:20 NM SLOPE CLASS 3 EROSION STABILIZATION MAT r (Mn /DOT SPEC. 3888) 1t • GUTTER UNE TOP OF CURB UP OF CURB R OPE VARIES / _ - -�_ __________ 1 A 0.0X SLO• Air TOP OF CURB BOTTOM UP OF CURB CUT GUTTER UNE UP OF CURB BACK UP OF CURB CUT R SLOPE VARIES Eg�pTTTET(4 CppNC. SWALE TO SEE CROSS GUTTER ON SHEET (705 FOR DEATILS V O p' e GUTTER LINE UP OF CURB d/ EAGLE BROOK CHURCH PARKING LOT DCPANSION LINO LADS, MN CONSIRUCIION DETAILS _i , IF y 0 O D I/ D• • D. D G _.,__ — —_ B' TOPSOIL AI CURD II -II' 11=11 =11:. IWil'' 4' CON( m ..:,;' u'�.: _ ..* p� • D. • 0 G • • ).D' 8618 CURB & GUTTER aJr L.o A S SELECT GRAN. BORROW 002105 0 8818 CURB & GUTTER SW, 2105 IN-SITU SOIL AND SOIL DETAIL (SECTION A -A) 8618 CURB CUT DETAIL © IN -SIN SOIL CURB AND CONCRETE DETAIL (SECTION A-A) SHEET C105 SHE5T7 OF 5 14L� s • • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION TN. W- axs -omo Tm x9e- axe -zue N5TALL METAL EDGER BETWEEN SOD AND PLANTINGS RECEIVED it MAY 11 2011 iTY OF LINO LAKES LEGEND: SOD - TYPE SALT RESISTANT .e,1 PER MN/DOT 3878 SHREDDED HARDw000 MULCH AREA 8 IORETENTIO NOTES: BIORETENTION BASIN 2 - PLANTING 1. SEE PLANTING SCHEDULE ON SHEET L101. 2. SEE PLANTING DETAILS ON SHEET 1101. 3. TREE LOCATIONS SHALL BE STAKED BY CONTRACTOR IN FIELD FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. PLACE 12" TOPSOIL IN MASS PLANING AREAS, EXCEPT AT BIORETENTION BASINS. 5. SEE BIORETENTION TYPICAL CROSS - SECTION ON SHEET 0104. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DRAWING DISCREPANCIES. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EMSTENCE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING ANC/ PROPOSED MIMES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL TO LOCATE PUBLIC UIIUTIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 8. ANY OBJECTS OR AREAS THAT ARE DAMAGED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS -HER WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED /RESTORED TO THEIR PRE - DAMAGED CONOTITON OR BETTER AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 9. PROJECT SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND AS HAZARD FREE AS POSSIBLE. REMOVE DEBRIS FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE 7140 LAYOUT OF IMPROVEMENTS ARO HAVE SUCH STAKING APPROVED BY 114E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 11. REPORT AU. LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR DIRECTION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 12. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL PREVAIL OVER DRAWING. 13. FURNISH AND INSTALL METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER WHERE PLANTING AREAS ABUT SOD OR MULCH AREAS. 14. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED CURB CUTS TO AVOID CONFUCT5 WITH IX15TIN0 TREES. K: \Civil\ 047\ 4443\ Phase 2 \Plan \Landscape- Plan.dwg ®GRASS AND FORE, SEED MIX FOR UPLAND AREAS AND SURROUNDING RESTORATION AREAS COMPLY WITH CITY OF UNO LAKES STANDARD EA SEED SPECIFICATIONS (41 HERBACEWSS PLUGS) 052 PLAN11N0 MIX + + + (4" HERBACEOUS PLUGS) ✓ PERENNIALS AND GRASSES SHRUBS ODOMING TREES SHEET L100 SHEETS OF9 • • GENERAL NOTES SEEUSPEgAL PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC PROJECT PIAN0IA.11001100 SJIEA�CiE pp���ET1OpN/YNW��7WGCPlANT TERNYAIRYE PLANING DETAILS BACKFAL SOIL AGE IN HEAW POSY POW SOBS. ppMCC1Upp�ALLA�LNNLL�I(4AYpNN�LQ�Eyp TRAEE N�pp��CyyAI k13 R RCS LARGER AN 3 DE P FERTLLIZFA: —MN/DOT 3881 i1/N /FAOT 3890 MA/DOT 3882 TYPE 6 UNLESS OTNERMSE SPECIFIED. COMPOST: MATERIAL PANTILE& PLAOJTINO ctIMPO PLARTI XRE NATIVE SOIL BALL2 Y STOCK O STOCK 1. SCARIFY SLOES 42 BOTTOM OF MOLE. 010 6 08 BANA 1100 iF 001050 S. SET RNR 00 W015TW02 MATIK SDI1,. IWTALL RANT SD T4E 111T*0 R TOE ROOT FLARE IS AT 00 11200718 AROVE. TXE FINISNPD IdDE. 4. YI ACE OP .810F ILA PLANT12 0DLE SEO B IMAE08 GKIFI YItN TNNE BAEI[ItLL SOIL SPECIFIED TU 111ININ 1PPROYIWTELY 2. OF TXE TOP DF THE R TMd RATER PLANT. REMOVE TNELtM 103 DF 115 MIRE GASKET 00 TNF 700 12 N001Z00TAL RU1G3 0NI00EV2 5 OREAT00. ALSO RE2VL ALL .F1,- AND MAILS FRU4 1/3 0 TX[ BALL. REMOVE 41 THE TOP TRINE. S.PLM6 716E 111120 A2 BACKFILL 01TN INE BACMFILL SOIL SPECIFtEO. S INTER TO 5005.E PLANTS NM PILL 00105. TAUTER 010NNW.0 11THN 2 ROIMS. OSE MLCN 001080 65 XOURS aF ECD1 MAT0012IWLE55 SOIL MA TIRE 1TSACE35[vE. CLEAR YACN ]• fRM TREE CONTAINER STOCK 1. MAINTAIN MOIST ROOTS UNTIL RANTING 2.SCAR8FY SIDES ASO BOTTOM OF HOLE. �C�99RAppBLRPEETTEPpEpMpp77ESEE NS,A�pCMD�N1 CE [RDNC 6RGUANfDkR` EATO R�Fq¢"n A a RESPECT S5LTATED DIMENSIONS BEFORE SCAUNG PLANT TYPES A 00040 AAPPAUUCATIONGALIM lietliVERurED BALLED & BUMAPPED TREES B ARE ROOT TREES BALLED & BURLAPPED SHRUBS B ARE ROOT OR CONTAINER SHRUBS 80008 SEE0LNGS PERENNIALS AND VINES 3 iTEK �F TRMg M �YE781Tp y ITO R A AND AMS A DENE5 OT IMppTON 50 -100 20 15 10 7 4 3.0N.T PRM6 BRARI65 IF 5MEN DuR[1c 12rN.ur12. 0.5I081 PLART *81 110 8 5111688 WT145 SOIL. [ipOX��ETALL PLANT 30 INE BOTTOM 00 iHF 0007 F 111141 al! SPPEIAY ARcrauT EVER.. BPL2 TN S tt BOCG I Y MACPtt 0801 6.11ATER TO SETTLE PLANTS 001 FILL 80105. 0. MATER THOROUGHLY 610810 2 HOURS B.PLACE8011.00RININ49NUNS00 TML SECOM MA�INO UREA SgIL Y5124NR' IS EXCESSIVE. 4RCN ]• FR00 TREE IRDNA. PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS SUBSIDENCE 00 DETERIORATION OF YULE* TRR0NIIOUI THAT T00NIIE04 801150FPTN 05R*01N1A1110* *1E4T BE REOUIR 0 TO PROVIDE THE MINOAN MULCH 2%10 SPEC1FI60 NNEN SU0010ENCE 00 1055 05 EXCESSIVE 00 MEN THE C20RKT00 S 2.107[005 NAVE C00TARIMA70 THE YRCN BITN 9011. TYPE N PLANE CHNi00 @ PLµT TO WAa1 LINE NOENIIF 00AR0011B TD YRCH LINE OEPTR G NICM YIN. MAX. D21.2 a YRCX YIN. YAM. EVERGREEN TREES 810050 J' YIN. 0" E•' 4" 6'•. DECIDUOUS TREES 1' Y[N. WA 1" 0" 0'• 6" EVERGREEN NNW VARIED 3' YIN. ]" 0" 0•• 0" DECIDUOUS 0X111195 ]' 4100. M/A 4" i" 1•' 6" VINES 2' YIN. N/A 0" 6 0" fi•' GROOM/COVERS AND PERENNIALS VARIES 2' YIN. 3" 4 • 3" 4' • MACHINE - TRANSPLANTED TREES 13" BEYOND EDGE OF ROLE 4 6 4.. 6" MULCH PLACEMENT DETAIL ROOT FL NOri00F & CRAFTED TREE 140* !Y \ O T9R1L1I 12T-R OUlDTTiTOUi ROOTS T BELL 1EE1 INTONED SOIL ELEVATION, ROOT FLAR[ ��L%.IEML PO TS 1 9qM INE FEEDER ROOTS Jl/1 007551 INSTALL RANTS N.NW A2 ED AFTER BAIOfILLING INE BOTTOM R INE ROOT F�LEMT�T,TOUREEfI 15 0Ui OF TMF SOIL PLANTING DEPTH DETAIL TREE STAKING DETAIL K: \Civil\047\4443 \Phase 2\ Plan \Landscope - Details- Plan.dwg EAGLE BROOK CHURCH PHASE 2 PLANT SCHEDULE WY COMMONIBOTAWCAL NAME QTY 812E ROOT REMARKS DECIDUOUS SHRUBS M AmoluNlRe, Monona 'Rogge - ... .. - . NEOEN BERVK.EBERRY 131 112 CUNT. PLANT 4.0.0 CS cam. settees load' - ISANSOOOWOOD 153 fl2 CONT. PIANT4'0.G RA Mum amen En91449 OROW LOW StNAAC 75 112 CON. PLANT 4'0.C. PERENNIALS AND GRASSES RG1 846 TOTAL PLANT 24.0.0. RANDOMLY WITHIN GROUPING 600*0 0 EoenfaWYm FRAGRANT GIANT HYSSOP NO 4' CON. 20% Ids YR1skWa BLUE aA06 B 1tl 212 4' CU NT. 25% Lobelia *9,80000...... D6UL CAR ROWER. 85 4' CONL 10% Sapinsblpn mllans NOIANORABS 110 4' CONE 20% ... LJRld6 p}T40st9*410. . ..__-.._...._. PRAWE ELAZIJOSTAR 65 4' CON. 1096 H50_DpE_19_I1WaMISYE iwlde5 COMMON0 127 4' CON. 1516 002 1052 TOTAL PI AN24. 0.C. RANDOMLY WITHIN GROUPING B1tl/e4p711.61kw0d ABCLEPIAS lUB6ROSA 05B 4' CUNT. 15% U81& Op1G41R 1E0bold' SOEIOLG BLAijOiOS148 210 4• CON 20% Astsrro2eaneflse Fpple Dams. M7iPLE0O61EASYER .. 105 4• CONT. 10% ScM[xby+Ilm sappaiom, ,,, ,_ LETTE BLIlE6TBM 210 4' CON. 20% PoNbaakla Mglda SDkmMm• GOLOS111R1� SLACK EYED SUSAN ]Bg 4• CUNT. 2876 ZWa awes GOLCEOIALE7.Rftifit ... . 106 4' CAN. 10% BS Rodbeckis inch SDWEXRm• GOLOSTURLI BLACKfiVED SUEAN 177 4' CONT. PLAN 1C ON CENTER E1l9910ben0N9469D INN Jae' lTl'iLE JOE PYE WEED - ..... 142 61 CONE PLAN 24" ON CENTER 619 oubM*2 Caesars Sunhat .._ RUTH _. ......... ....... cAESnas BROTHER nls 212 It COIN PLAN IB' ON CENTER SP ;PTO do6 beleml@pb PRAIRIE OROPSEED GR _ AS$ .. 918 81 CON. PLAN IC ON CENTER • EAGLE BROOK CHURCH LINO LAKES CAMPUS PARKING EXPANSION RE CONSULTING GRouw, INC. IN F 5WXOD4Tpc GROUP. wC O1 n• Cubic PuW, IacOeuRW, NN 06NT NL 705-610 -0010 Fez. TRS -670 -1102 RECEIVE[ MAY 11 20 CITY OF LINO ..seneiN °A��iui� .Y.1 P—. eu01 MIN w 51/ 4101 SHEET L101 SHEET 90F9 it AKES • ATTACHMENT B Operation and Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Treatment Features • • • OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT FEATURES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2011, by and between Eagle Brook Church of White Bear Lake, Minnesota, whose address is 7015 20th Avenue North, Centerville, MN, 55038, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner" of the Property described below; and the City of Lino Lakes, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ( "City ") and the Rice Creek Watershed District "District "). WHEREAS, the legal description of the property, hereinafter referred to as the "Property," is: Lot 1, Block 1, Eagle Brook Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota and, WHEREAS, the City and the District have required the Owner to provide onsite stormwater ponds and associated facilities to manage runoff on the above described Property and do all related grading, slope work, and restoration in compliance with approved plans. WHEREAS, in 2004, the Lino Lakes City Council approved a conditional use permit and preliminary plat for the project with Resolution 04 -17 and the final plat with Resolution 04 -54. WHEREAS, the facilities on or to be located on the Property to which the maintenance requirements in the Agreement apply are labeled on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A, and are legally described on Exhibit B, each incorporated herein (the "Facilities "). WHEREAS, the City and the District, in separate actions, approved a site and building plan for a parking lot expansion on the property in 2011, which included additional stormwater management facilities not included in the 2004 plans. WHEREAS, Owner desires to subject the Property to certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the District as a condition to issuance of District Permit #09 -048 and by the City for the mutual benefit of all parties to this Agreement. 2011 Eagle Brook Church Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement page 1 of 6 NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Owner assumes the full and sole responsibility for the condition, operation, repair, maintenance and management of the Facilities, at no cost to the City or the District, for the purpose of receiving, retaining, treating and transporting all storm water which may be collected within the Facilities. This Agreement expressly excludes Anoka County Ditch 72. 2. Neither the City nor the District shall under any circumstances be responsible for the on -going physical performance of any repairs, changes or alterations whatsoever to the Facilities nor shall they be liable for the cost thereof. 3. The Owner agrees, at no cost to the City or the District, to inspect the Facilities at least annually and also to regularly: (1) remove accumulated sediment from the Facilities to maintain dead storage volume equivalent to the volume approved by the City and the District, (2) maintain all native perennial vegetation and soil permeability in the Facilities area in a way which does not compromise the effectiveness of the infiltration Facilities, (3) maintain and trim all other shrubs and vegetation in the Facilities, (4) remove all litter and debris from the Facilities, (5) repair or replace any grass or other vegetation in the Facilities area disturbed by maintenance, (6) maintain the Facilities outlet structures, (7) take all other further steps which would be reasonably necessary for the purpose of maintaining the Facilities and their function as set forth in the approved plans; and (8) to submit to the District and the City annually a report listing inspection dates, the Facilities inspected, the condition of the Facilities, and any actions taken, including the dates of those actions. 4. The Owner agrees to indemnify, and hold harmless and defend the City and the District from all present and future claims that may arise from the construction and maintenance of the Facilities. 5. In the event that the City or the District believe that the Owner is not maintaining the Facilities in a fashion reasonably consistent with this Agreement, then either the City or the District may give written notice to the Owner detailing the deficiency in the manner in which the Owner is maintaining the Facilities. If, within 60 days after receipt of this notice, the deficiency described in the notice has not been corrected by the Owner, then either the City or the District may, without further notice, take any steps which it deems reasonably necessary in order to correct the deficiency; provided, however, that if the deficiency complained of in such notice is of such a nature that the same can be rectified or cured, but cannot with reasonable diligence be completed within said 60 -day period, then such deficiency shall be deemed to be rectified or cured if Owner shall, within said 60 -day period, commence to rectify and cure the same and shall thereafter complete such rectification and cure with all due diligence. If the Owner does not rectify or cure as provided herein, and the City or the District corrects the deficiency, the Owner agrees to reimburse the City or the District, as the case may be, within 30 days after receipt of invoice for all reasonable costs incurred, to include administrative overhead, by the City or the District in correcting the deficiency. If this invoice is not paid within 30 days of receipt, or the Owner has not commenced an action to contest the reasonableness of the invoice within sixty (60) days after receipt, then the Owner agrees that the City may assess the cost against the Property. In the event that it becomes necessary for the City to assess the actual cost of correcting the 2011 Eagle Brook Church Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement page 2 of 6 deficiency as provided herein, then the City is authorized to direct the County Assessor to certify this assessment against the Property described above, on its behalf or on behalf of the District, as the case may be, and the Owner waives any right to a public hearing and appeal of such assessment which it may have pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The City and the District shall use good faith efforts to coordinate with each other their respective rights and remedies described in this Paragraph 5. 6. That any notices required under this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by personal service at the following address: Eagle Brook Church of White Bear Lake, Minnesota 7015 20th Avenue North Centerville, MN, 55038 7. The plans reviewed with the site and building plan review include the following, prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc., dated January 14, 2011: T100 Title Sheet C100 Alignment Plan & Tabulation C101 Construction Plan C102 Grading & Storm Sewer Plan C103 Signing, Striping & Lighting Plan C104 Construction Details C105 Construction Details L100 Landscape Planting Plan L101 Landscape Planting Details FURTHER, IT IS AGREED that the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the parties hereto, their successors and assigns and all subsequent owners of the Property herein described. An executed copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Anoka County Recorder's Office and be made a part of and be binding upon the above described property. This instrument will be unlimited in duration without being re- recorded. This Agreement and the covenants and restrictions set forth herein are established for the benefit of the City and the District as public bodies and for the benefit of appurtenant public resources, and are not intended as "private covenants, conditions or restrictions" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 500.20. [Signatures on following page] 2011 Eagle Brook Church Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement page 3 of 6 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH OF WHITE BEAR LAKE, MINNESOTA CITY OF LINO LAKES By W#I �--� By Mayor Its EXEC.. 1D R OF oPERS ATTEST: By City Clerk RICE CREEK WATERHSHED DISTRICT By Its p2e e. 2011 Eagle Brook Church Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA On this day of , 2011, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Jeff Reinert and Julieanne Bartell, to me known to be respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that they executed the same on behalf of said City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF All 0 Vet On this a'?" day of tinytL. , 2011, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared , � e �,, j C r kce_ of Eagle Brook Church of White Bear Lake, Minnesota, a Minnesota non profit corporation, who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of the corporation. OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF #flt /A && On this 2. 3 day of j it c7 -� for said County, personally appeared Watershed District, a Minnesota political su behalf of the district. , 2011, before me, a Notary Public within and RA-C, of the Rice Creek division, who executed the foregoing instrument on Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 THERESA M. STASICA NOTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 31, 2015 2011 Eagle Brook Church Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement page 5 of 6 • CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION Reliance Trust Company ( "Trustee "), the holder of a Trust Indenture and Fixture Filing dated June 1, 2004, filed for record with the County Recorder of Anoka County, Minnesota, on June 23, 2004, as Document No. 1934708, and assigned to Trustee by instrument dated May 24, 2005, hereby consents to the attached Agreement and agrees that its rights in the property affected by the Agreement shall be subordinate thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Reliance Trust Company ( "Trustee "), has caused this Consent and Subordination to be executed this214 day of June, 2011. Reliance Trust Company By: Reliance Financial Corporation, as Agent STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF WASHINGTON hael F. Hron, Assistant Secretary The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this f► day of June 2011, by Michael F. Hron, the assistant secretary of Reliance Financial Corporation, a Georgia corporation, as agent of Reliance Trust Company, as trustee. 4922723_3.DOC brigoto nw `� .• •••• UR 'is _ S gS � Gs2 . `� 2011 Eagle Brook Church Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement page 6 of 6 F ic;, g EXHIBIT A - STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES . ..�,G. Inc ,EAGLE BROOK CHURCH Job A0799 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 618/2011 A EXHIBIT B EAGLE BROOK CHURCH EASEMENT ACQUISITION DESCRIPTION SRF No. 6799 AUGUST 11, 2010 PARCEL 1 EAGLE BROOK CHURCH OF WHITE BEAR LAKE P.I.N. 11- 31 -22 -41 -0004 A perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under, across and through the West 40.0 feet of the East 1210.0 feet of the South 180.0 feet of the North 945.0 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, EAGLE BROOK ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. Together with a perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under, across and through the West 50.0 feet of the East 880.0 feet of the South 420.0 feet of the North 1092.0 feet of said Lot 1. Together with a perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under, across and through the West 25.0 feet of the East 830.0 feet of the South 175.0 feet of the North 937.0 feet of said Lot 1. EXCEPT those parts thereof lying within the drainage and utility easements as dedicated in said EAGLE BROOK ADDITION.