HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-119 Council ResolutionLegacy Townhomes, page 6
*Council Membero'Donnelintroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 06 -119
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE
LEGACY TOWNHOMES.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a planned unit development — final plan approval
for property currently described to -wit:
Outlots B, C, and D; THE VILLAGE NO. 3, Anoka County, Minnesota.
; and
WHEREAS, the planned unit development — final plan approval request is based on the following
submittals:
1. Revised Legacy Townhome Architectural Plan Set received May 4, 2006.
2. Legacy Townhome Final Plat received July 18, 2006.
• and
WHEREAS, at their meeting on May 10, 2006; the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval
of the planned unit development — final plan subject to the conditions listed in the meeting minutes;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan meets the requirements of the City's
zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, and the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development
Guide subject to certain conditions of approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the
planned unit development — final plan for the Legacy Townhomes subject to the following conditions:
1. The developer will enter into a development agreement with the city prior to the issuance of any
building permits for the site.
2. Per the site development guidelines, a minimum 2 inch deep window trim or two inch recess must be
provided and sliding windows are prohibited.
3. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and prove to be in conformance with the requirements of the
LLTCDDG.
4. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review letter must be addressed to the satisfaction of city
III
staff, including the proper drainage and utility easements being shown on the final plat mylars.
5. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities,
must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits.
•
Legacy Townhomes, page 7
6. Homeowner's association documents must be submitted prior to the city releasing the plat for
recordation.
7. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate an appropriate
number of bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this parking area must be
reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site.
8. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated.
9. All ground and roof mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view with appropriate
landscaping materials or materials consistent with those used for construction of the main buildings.
10. The mailboxes proposed for the development must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the
issuance of building permits for the site. Such mailboxes shall be screened with complementary
materials to those of the main structures.
11. The six parking spaces shown on the site plan closest to Town Center Parkway and Village Drive
shall be eliminated and replaced with additional landscaping materials.
12. The appropriate access easements for the ponds will be granted to the city for maintenance purposes.
13. A conservation easement shall be granted to the city over a portion of Outlot B, The Village No. 3;
and signs shall be placed to visually delineate the wetland area.
• 14. The landscape plan shall be revised to include additional landscaping on the north side of the project
to provide a visual and noise barrier between the northernmost building and the freeway; and shall
be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator for conformance to the Environmental
Board's comments prior to installation.
Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July 2006.
u is ne Bartell, Ciyy Clerk
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of July, 2006.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Memberstoitz
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
O'Donnell, Stoltz, Reinert, Carlson, Bergeson
The following voted against same:
&hereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
AGENDA ITEM 6.B.ii
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Paul Bengtson
MEETING DATE: July 24, 2006
TOPIC: Resolution 06 -119
Planned Unit Development - Final Plan
Legacy Townhomes
BACKGROUND
Hartford Group Inc. has applied for a Planned Unit Development final plan for a portion of the townhome
property within the Legacy at Wood's Edge project located on the southeast quadrant of Interstate 35W and
Lake Drive. The final plan consists of the building plans for the units and the final plat of the first phase of
development that includes three buildings and a total of 21 units.
ANALYSIS
g rn
oveg
in Plans
This site is located within the Legacy at Woods Edge project and is therefore subject to the Lino Lakes Town
Center Design & Development Guide that was adopted by Ordinance 04 -04 as part of the original Planned Unit
Development for the site.
The proposed layout is significantly conforming to the original Legacy at Wood's Edge layout that is included
in the Development Guide. Some changes that have occurred through the grading and street projects the city
has undertaken have included the moving of the `Woods Edge' street west to allow homes to be built on the east
side of the site. Also, changes have arising due to the fact that previous plans only depicted back to back type
of units with tuck under parking. The applicant is now proposing a different product for a portion of the site.
The proposed townhomes are located in a Residential Land Use Area and will be located within a portion of Lot
15 (according to the land use plan of the Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide).
The Regulating plan of the development guide includes the required street framework, which is currently under
construction as part of the city's improvements in the area. This will include the pedestrian streetscape as part
of a future phase of construction. The plan also indicates that there is a 50% build -to line requirement for this
portion of the site; but no `Required Building Entries' nor any `Gateways' are indicated for the portion of the
residential site currently proposed for development.
Density and Diversity
•he standards require between 10 and 24 units per acre, not to exceed 190 units. The current proposal includes
98 units within 14 buildings. This would occur on 9.42 acres for a density of 10.4 units per acre. The future
development of the corner parcel should only increase that density figure.
Legacy Townhomes, page 2
t s mentioned previously, the district boundaries have seen minor adjustment due to the continuing road project,
ore detailed evaluation of the site, and the change in townhome product type.
The standards require that a variety of housing types is provided within the residential area, for the entire
townhome development the applicant is proposing a seven -plex townhome with two distinct facade treatments;
and in the future the portion of the site adjacent to the traffic circle will provide a distinctly different type of
building likely to include underground parking.
Building Massing and Placement
The grading plan shows that the developer has minimized grade changes to limit the use of retaining walls as
much as possible. For the majority of the buildings all grade changes will be done with sloping. All retaining
walls used are below the five foot requirement.
The buildings measure no greater than 39 feet in height from any grade level and entries for each unit are
accessible to either open space or public street.
The buildings are sited 15 feet from right of ways with patio /yard areas in front of each unit to maintain the
street presence and create the transition zone between private spaces of the homes and the public spaces.
The parking for each unit is provided with depressed grade parking on the first floor rear of each building unit
with landscaping in between each garage and for some driveways for additional parking.
•'he setbacks for this type of product are as follows:
Table 7. Residence and Garage Setbacks (measured from lot line unless otherwise noted)
Structure
Setbacks
Side Setbacks
(excluding Street - Facing
Sides)
[1, 3]
Street- facing Front and Side
Setbacks [1, 2]
Rear Setbacks
RESIDENCE SETBACKS
Attached residences
with individual unit
entrances
10' min. -15' max.,
or 5' if garage is alley - loaded.
15' min. from
centerline of
alley, or 15'
min. from rear
property line
when no alley
5' on each side of
structure, 0' between
attached units in one
structure,
GARAGE SETBACKS
Garages or parking lots
for duplexes,
townhomes, or other
attached units with
individual unit
entrances
Min.1'from dwelling facade for
every 2' of garage facade width.
[4]
No garage shall comprise more
than 50 percent of the width of the
total street- facing frontage for
each unit.
12' min. from
centerline of
alley, or 3' min.
from rear
property line if
no alley
5' on each side of
separate garage
structures, 0' between
attached garages in one
structure
OTES:
Ilk OTES:
Projections. Bay windows, fireplace elements, and balconies may extend into the front setback up to four feet, for a width not more than 10 feet.
The maximum extension of a projection into a side yard is 3 feet.
[2] Depressed Parking. Where a high water table prevents depressed parking, at -grade structured parking must be placed at the rear of the structure
with residential uses lining the front facade to finished grade.
Legacy Townhomes, page 3
Staff believes that all of these setbacks are being met, though the intention of some is a bit lost due to notations
and 4 being absent from the approved guidelines. Specifically, it is staffs belief that the setback of the garage
from dwelling facade is only applicable to garages that are on the front facade.
Architectural Standards
The Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guidelines (LLTCDDG) typically require a base,
middle, and top approach to the commercial architecture within the Legacy at Woods Edge project. However, it
does not require this within the residential architectural standards. So that approach will not be followed.
All units include windows within the doors, as well as surrounding the doorway for transparency and
daylighting. All doors (including the garage doors) are also panelized for further detail. Windows for the units
cover well over 25% of the front facades and on the main living floor of each unit the windows are within the
parlors and dining rooms. Staff has recommended a condition that will address the need for a recess of at least
two inches for all windows and doors. There is also a recommended condition prohibiting slider windows, as is
mandated by the design standards for the project.
The developer has provided a great deal of variation in the roof forms of the buildings including the changes in
heights and the addition of gabled dormers.
For the patio areas that are provided at the front of the units the applicant is proposing a decorative wrought iron
fencing that will be repeated on any retaining walls that might be necessary for grade changes. Staff would like
into see the developer wrap the corners of the buildings with the patio area to address the need to improve the
wilding sides that are visible at street corners.
Parking Requirements
The standards require two parking spaces per unit, which will be accommodated within the garages for each
unit. The guidelines do not require guest parking because of the on -site parking on the street frontages.
However, because of the location of some of the units the applicant has proposed to provide an additional 32
parking stalls which staff would like to see reduced by six so that the parking closest to Town Center Parkway
and Village Drive is eliminated in favor of additional green space and landscaping.
Open Space and Landscaping
Chapter 4 of the guidelines does not address landscaping, therefore staff will use some of the Chapter 3.6
standards to guide the landscaping of the site. We will work with the developer prior to the next meeting to
make sure appropriate materials and design are implemented. Specifically staff has a desire to further the
screening along the freeway to reduce the visibility and noise for the northern most townhome building.
Additionally, staff would like to take the spaces that are reclaimed by eliminating the six parking spaces
indicated above and create nice landscape /plaza amenities.
The guidelines required 10% of the residential site to be developed as public accessible open space. The plans
appear to be providing this with the central park element and the large swath of open space adjacent to the
wetlands that is accessible via the street on the back side of the townhomes. The developer has submitted an
•xhibit that shows 21% of the site is being developed as public accessible open space.
Legacy Townhomes, page 4
i htin
Chapter 4 of the guidelines does not include lighting standards, but the photometric lighting plan submitted with
the application is in conformance with the minimum standards of Chapter 3.7 of the guidelines. The lighting
proposed for the townhome area is the standard lighting that is being used throughout the Legacy project area.
Engineering
Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), the city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project, has reviewed the plans
submitted by Hartford and has issued a letter that outlines all of their comments. The developer will be required
to satisfy these comments prior to the approval of any building permits for the site.
Final Plat
Planned Unit Development - Final Plan applications include a final plat for the site and Hartford has submitted a
final plat entitled Legacy Townhomes that includes the first phase of the project consisting of three buildings.
Short Elliot Hendrickson (S.E.H.), the city's consulting engineer on the Legacy project, has reviewed the final
plat and issued a letter that outlines all of their comments. The final plat does need some additional drainage
and utility easements added, and these will be required prior to the final plat mylars being signed and released
for recordation.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD
he Environmental Board reviewed this application at the March 29th regular meeting. Their comments are
attached to this report.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the following conditions:
1. The developer will enter into a development agreement with the city prior to the issuance of any
building permits for the site.
2. Per the site development guidelines, a minimum 2 inch deep window trim or two inch recess must be
provided and sliding windows are prohibited.
3. All lighting fixtures must be submitted and prove to be in conformance with the requirements of the
LLTCDDG.
4. Issues discussed in the S.E.H. engineering review letter must be addressed to the satisfaction of city
staff, including the proper drainage and utility easements being shown on the final plat mylars.
5. Operation and maintenance agreements for the site, including provisions for stormwater facilities,
must be submitted for review by city staff prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. Homeowner's association documents must be submitted prior to the city releasing the plat for
recordation.
7. The applicant shall provide a bicycle parking area sufficient in size to accommodate an appropriate
number of bicycles. The type of fixture provided and the location of this parking area must be
reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of building permits for the site.
•
•
Legacy Townhomes, page 5
8. All landscaped and sodded areas must be irrigated.
9. All ground and roof mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view with appropriate
landscaping materials or materials consistent with those used for construction of the main buildings.
10. The mailboxes proposed for the development must be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the
issuance of building permits for the site. Such mailboxes shall be screened with complementary
materials to those of the main structures.
11. The six parking spaces shown on the site plan closest to Town Center Parkway and Village Drive
shall be eliminated and replaced with additional landscaping materials.
12. The appropriate access easements for the ponds will be granted to the city for maintenance purposes.
13. A conservation easement shall be granted to the city over a portion of Outlot B, The Village No. 3;
and signs shall be placed to visually delineate the wetland area.
14. The landscape plan shall be revised to include additional landscaping on the north side of the project
to provide a visual and noise barrier between the northernmost building and the freeway; and shall
be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator for conformance to the Environmental
Board's comments prior to installation.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 06 -119
• 2. Engineering Comments dated April 24, 2006.
3. Environmental Board comments dated April 6, 2006.
4. Revised Legacy Townhome Architectural Plan Set received May 4, 2006.
5. Legacy Townhome Final Plat received July 18, 2006.
i
• SEH
April 24, 2006
Mr. Michael Grochala
Community Development Director
City of Lino Lakes
600 Town Center Parkway
Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182
Dear Mr. Grochala:
RECEIVED
APR 2 5 2006
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RE: Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Legacy Townhomes
Site Plan Review
SEH No. A- LINOL0305.12 SPCV
Identified below are our review comments for the proposed Legacy Townhomes site at Legacy at Woods
Edge, as prepared by Hartford Group. Plans for the proposed site were submitted to the City of Lino
Lakes for review on April 4, 2006.
Preliminary Site Plan (Sheet C2.0)
1. The detail call -outs on the plan sheet reference a detail sheet that was not provided in this submittal.
2.
The patio area fence on the easternmost unit of Building 7 has a fence post shown located in the
sidewalk. Sidewalk must maintain five feet of clear width; the fence should be realigned to remain
clear of the sidewalk.
3. No handicap accessible parking is shown for the internal site parking. The site parking should meet
ADA requirements.
4. The applicant may wish to consider adding a fence and gate along the east side of the public trail,
west of Building 9. This would direct the public away from the sidewalk in front of the Building 9
patio areas.
5. An access route to Pond 3 surfaced with either pavement or gravel must be provided from either
Village Drive near the lift station, or the drive between Buildings 9 and 10 down to the pond area.
Currently, no access path is shown.
Preliminary Enlargement Plans (Sheet C2.1)
1. The Community Park Enlargement Layout and Landscape Plan shown on this page has a call -out
stating "D412 curb around perimeter of tot lot ". A 4 -inch high curb bordering the bituminous path
will trap water on the path. The applicant needs to identify where this water will be directed to and
how it will be conveyed into the storm sewer system.
Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C3.0)
1. Proposed slopes cannot exceed 4:1. Edit grading note 7 to reflect this.
2. Proposed grading south of Buildings 9 and 10 is shown encroaching on the regional park. All grading
operations must remain within the site. The proposed grading needs to be revised to reflect this
constraint.
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110 -5196
SEH is an equal opportunity employer 1 www.sehinc.com I 651.490.2000 I 800.325.2055 1 651.490.2150 fax
•
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 24, 2006
Page 2
3. Proposed grading around Buildings 9 and 10 must be revised to incorporate an access route to Pond 3,
as stated previously. The proposed grading, as currently shown, will not allow vehicle access to
Pond 3
4. The sidewalk between Buildings 13 and 14 has a slope that is 20% or greater. Slopes on sidewalks
cannot exceed 5 %.
5. The sidewalk at the southwest corner of Building 7 has a slope of 10 %. Slopes on sidewalks cannot
exceed 5 %.
6. The grading between Building 1 and CBMH 110, as shown, appears to be flat. The rim elevation of
CBMH 110 could be lowered to provide positive drainage from the sidewalk to the catch_basin.
7. It appears retaining walls will be required for some of the buildings fronting Village Drive, Town
Center Parkway, and Woods Edge Boulevard.
8. Two rows of silt fence should be installed along the existing wetland, as additional protection at the
base of the proposed slope.
9. Emergency overflows should be identified for interior drive aisles. Slope stabilization in these areas
may be required.
10. Erosion control blanket is required where storm sewer outlets intersect pond slopes.
• Preliminary Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Plan (Sheet C4.0)
1. Note 10 on the plan sheet indicates that hydrants are to be located 5 feet behind back of curb. City
standards require hydrants to be located 4 feet behind back of curb.
2. Gate valves should be shown where required on the plans (hydrants, wet taps, etc.).
3. Show all water service lines coming off of Woods Edge Boulevard as beginning at the right -of -way
line. Stubs will be provided "by others" to the right -of -way line.
4. The hydrant leads between Buildings 11 and 12 and Buildings 13 and 14 shall be 6 -inch diameter
rather than the 8 -inch diameter as shown. All hydrant leads shall have 6 -inch diameter pipe.
5. Sanitary manhole 2 and CBMH 209 are located too close together to be constructed as shown.
6. The size of the water line on the west side of Building 14 is not labeled.
7. The westerly invert elevation for sanitary manhole MH -B in Woods Edge Boulevard shall be revised
to match the elevation of the north -south invert.
8. Show the sanitary sewer services off of Woods Edge Boulevard as connecting to stubs "by others" at
the right -of -way line.
9. The applicant should flatten the pipe grade from sanitary MH -A to MH 9 to minimum grade and
should steepen the pipe grade from MH 9 to MH 10 to increase cleanout velocities in the dead end
run of pipe. Having the dead end run of pipe, with its lower flows, at a slope greater than minimum
will aid in keeping the pipe cleanout velocities higher.
•
RECEIVED
APR 2 5 2006
CITY OF LINO LAKES
•
•
•
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 24, 2006
Page 3
10. The hydrant between Buildings 11 and 12 conflicts with a proposed
be moved to provide clear access to the hydrant.
11. Applicant shall provide locations of proposed sewer and water
Center Parkway, and Woods Edge Boulevard.
12. Sanitary manhole castings shall be Type R- 1642 -B.
light pole. One or the other must
services in Village Drive, Town
Preliminary Storm Sewer Plan (Sheet C4.1)
1. We recommend that CBMH 201 be moved northward so the storm sewer between CBMH 201 and
Woods Edge Boulevard is moved farther away from the northwest corner of Building 3. _
2. STMH 104 must be moved so that the storm pipe from CBMH 109 to STMH 104 will maintain a 10-
foot separation with the water main, as required by the Minnesota Department of Health.
3. The southwestern corner of the courtyard for the southernmost unit in Building 9 is shown as being
constructed over the existing storm sewer. Either the courtyard should be revised so that no
construction occurs above the storm sewer pipe or the storm sewer line must be relocated.
4. No details or quantities for rip -rap are given for FES 400.
5. STMH 401 is too shallow. The apparent 2.37 -foot build height would be exceeded by the sum of
pipe diameter + wall thickness + top slab thickness + casting height.
6. The applicant should consider adding stubs at STMH 104 and CBMH 105 for future storm design
flexibility on the western half of the site. Resize downstream storm sewer accordingly if stubs are
provided.
7. The storm sewer connection from CBMH 301 cannot be made as shown. Connection to the existing
storm sewer shall be made by utilizing a new structure at the point of connection.
8. Storm sewer pipe classes must be shown.
Preliminary Lighting Plan (Sheet C4.2)
1. An additional light pole shall be installed on the south end of the drive aisle between Buildings 9 and
10.
2. Proposed light poles are 2 feet shorter than City street lights but this may be appropriate for interior
residential areas.
3. Lighting levels in the drive aisles and parking areas are not continuous but are appropriate for
residential uses.
Preliminary Landscape Plan (Sheet C5.0)
1. Applicant shall verify plantings around Pond 3 will not interfere with the required pond access road.
2. Planting trees on top of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or water mains is not allowed.
3. Additional screening around the lift station site is recommended.
RECEIVED 1
APR 2 5 2006
CITY OF LINO LAKES
•
•
•
Mr. Michael Grochala
April 24, 2006
Page 4
Preliminary Plat (Sheet C7.0)
1. Drainage and utility easements (existing and proposed) must be shown on the plat.
2. Existing street right -of -way widths must be shown.
3. Village Drive shall be labeled on the plat.
4. Plat dimensions and bearings must be shown.
General Comments
1. There was no detail sheet included in the submittal, so we are unable to review details referenced in
the plan sheets.
Please call me at 651.490.2147 if you have questions.
Sincerely,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Robert L. Moberg, PE
Project Manager
nm
x:\ko \lino) \030512 \legacy townhome review.doc
c: Paul Bengtson, City of Lino Lakes
Aaron Archbold, Hartford Group, Inc.
RECEIVED
APR 2 5 2006
Cl'V OF LINO LAKES
•
•
•
Memo
Environmental
To: Paul Bengtson
From: Marty Asleson
Date: April 6, 2006
Re: March 29, 2006 Environmental Board Recommendations
The February 22, 2006 Environmental Board made the following recommendations
for the Legacy Townhomes:
Landscaping
• Several changes should be made to the plant schedule. Recommend changing Sunburst
Honeylocust to straight thornless Honeylocust. Sugar maples will not do well in the sandy
soils of Woods Edge. Red or Sunburst maples should be substituted for the Sugar maples.
Americanna /native (Redmond) Lindens should be substituted for the Cordata /non native
(Greenspire) Lindens. European larch should be changed to the native Eastern Larch.
Ponderosa pine should be changed to native White Pine or Red Pine. The area to the east
of impervious areas and bordering the basin area (trail location area) should be planted with
native Eastern Larch in the wet to mesic soils, and white oak with Red oak in the upland
areas.
• Conservation Easement areas should be planted with the City Native Seed mix
• Top soil note in the landscape plan. Should read "all areas disturbed by construction activities
except for native specified seed areas should have 4 inches of loam top soil thourghly
incorporated into the subsoil and seeded or sodded..." Again, where native plants are
specified, no topsoil shall be specified.
• Raingarden and infiltration basins...should read "shall receive the City specified native seed
mix."
• Under the Sodding Installation Notes, should read "4 inches of top soil should be thouroughly
incorporated into the subsoil." Areas to receive sod should not be fertilized with a 10 -10 -10
fertilizer. A starter fertilizer with "0" phospherous must be used.
• Page 1
•
•
•
• Under the seeding section of the notes, there should be no specification for top soil /organic
matter incorporation into the infiltration basin areas. In filtration basin areas should be seeded
with the City native seed mix and any changes approved by the City of Lino Lakes.
• Sodded Areas must be irrigated.
• Runoff shall be directed into the storm sewers or infiltration tans when applicable.
• Signs shall be placed at the edge of the wetlands.
• The landscape plan shall be reviewed by the City's Environmental Coordinator prior to
installation.
Conservation Easement Recommendation
• The area to the east of impervious areas and bordering the basin area be placed in a
Conservation Easement with the City named as the easement holder. No top soil should
brought in for native seed areas.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
A copy of the mandatory Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) submitted to the MPCA for
approval should be submitted to the City of Lino Lakes Environmental for Review and Approval before any
construction activity proceedes. A copy of the final approved plan must be maintained on site with the
required weekly and post storm event inspection reports. The SWPPP site manager's name should be
submitted to the City with how to contact this person. The location of this site must be indicated on the
SWPPP. The SWPPP must indicate where rock entrances to the site construction area will be placed. The
rock entrance must be at least 50 feet in length. The rock must be 1.5 inches in diameter and maintained for
rock pore space. The SWPPP must indicate a "trigger point' for cleaning silt fence areas. Silt fences must be
cleaned when the fences becomel /3 full. The SWPPP must indicate specific plans and intentions for
dewatering on anticipated and unanticipated storm events. The plan must indicate procedures for dewatering
that would prevent turbid/floculant waters from leaving the site. The plan should also indicate a method to
control wind erosion off of the site. The SWPPP must show one, and only one area on the site where cement
trucks will clean their tanks. This area must be protected from the movement of cleaned materials from the
clean site. The SWPPP must indicate disposal of Cement Truck Cleaning materals after construction is
finished.
All storm water sewer inlets must be protected with a mechanical device such as the Royal Industries
Infra Safe device.
Lighting
All security lighting that may be installed on the Town Homes must meet City specifications.
• Page 2
•
....,/ ..- EXISTING
� � PDND4
j .rtes
r-
f --/-7 .."- / II
‹.
weoa I,wJ !6
VIM RI IA NAVIVA.
Kt F.001 aPOJ
EXISTING
WETU/N
Oauono arm IOJ(;)
EXISTMG
WETLAND
LAYOUT AND PAVING NOTE; •
010:0¢101 OF•PE 00961a
wave mu. svu. c new gem
LW MOW ODZASELL MOM AO
COM AO AT O. MOLE ID WC COLL
Num. 7E es am aim rpm wic
ON PAKT/OnSTOO AVOWS ORAO
00.74.1101 DIAL
commenm ALMON. NM 47•01•UlL MOLL OE WOO NW
10 NOVALLATOI FAO WOO NO I/WPM
1.1011M14010MAAI MOO=
AN 10 rAtiKINOWC
®
AVAIMMILE WOO.
OVAN AOODO•lt 001100
4 ,TI i !R__ —•� -g em® e_
--_- _ "� - _ _
I -
•
on o
jD3 , EXISTING
•/
HMO., /y �J WETLAND
LOBO
® MINIMS MOOR AMA
r=21 amass Ou
® me PAASIOIT
WeOPMFO .1•011O-SAL
00011110“. MOOT.
MOOED 00,106-012
MPS. asweAL
ONIGOC• /30.0.0S
1.00•0500 WORN OR
03002.7[ IND CU=
0101ANOCUL AD.
Locsnor
POT I
MOM
•
•
RECELV, ?
MAYVO 4,7006
... L AKEs
•
TYPICAL aEGnc EWAUSIOrt UNCUT PLAN (CAIPPYS n -nG)
TNPIGAL OUILONSE LWMmdDIT LMGSUnm PLNI (CCn*1 n -no)
IS IAA
calloNN
TIPICAL G MACE Acz 5 OGASCEIEIIT LANCR
AM LANDSCAPE PLAN (EInGPI� n-n5)
TYPICAL PAN'S LWN
is o
IMAM ACCESS oDM gInr LAYOUT
AND LANDSCAPE PLAIT (elauPlm nl-nA)
ESSOri
WNANTY PARR MMCHM UYWT NL LYOSGVE PLAN
,NndL am DEAF
•
POSTING
PONS/
r`
1. PAM MEMO VI MAMMON MIMS
MOM PO WM MONO WED PINS. OWL
MEAT Cf LOAM TO FOL MAMMY
NOCOMATO MD 11C MOM. OM IMOD CR
SCOW MPS WOW M MOST MONE-02-111M
WM. MOM LOW MO SOO MIN 72 MPS Of
A COWL CO MO RO NOM WM 011 VC
WANTS MC 0011101113N MO KAMM SW Of IC
NPR. =MAR 1.1.904 LINIMOWND
CMS. POOP WPM MIMES DOORS CAD
WOOS COMMONIO WALL CMS M TED PAO
PSIS Of IWO WO NOM TO WM MO
NORMA NT 11C 1.4103OM ARNIM MO 10
1 PEES NO ONUS WAIL IC MUD Of
mom ▪ opopp I -t?
SAtre os. mE AAA�wsa room O
09 [MAMMA M. COMM MOM
MOM MIMS PM MIN IP NM
rOCONNIATS M. RAM WIER. OW 221
SODDING INSTALLATION: —4,
NM M MOIL IMO ROI OF OZOS NOM NO
MRS AS Ammo DT TIC UMW. mama
NM 10 DOWL.1100
wpm Fro oco0 Wn.P11t %ulva. vm:R
3. Tom sow.. memo vim vs moo m
maw Ym moAV — IRRIGARON NDiES:- OMEN mo moms
I. zoos wryos lo.oss
2 DOPE snr WALL IC MOLY MOO
ACP WOOF. AC NOM FAST MA
1M0 M 11111.0 AM/ Al
OTT SOPS, SOD MO.
41— CONSERVATION NOT
1.11C consume MAL IC WIFM
ASO PROM 01-91F MEMO. 11
MIAOW IC IMAM MOM
1IC WOO.
7- 12 TOMMY 11C CIDOMME 1
MAwr+rt¢i
WOOMOWN COMM GISMO 11
NOT storm lox CMOTOMIN C
1 PM LOCMCM OW amino.
OWNIMPS MOM 11.2 CO ON
OTf ITS TO OMOIROCION MOW
MUM DORM MVO COSTIO
M MOW IF 119 LOOMS 00
N OT OMANI OSONO MAMMALS MI
MVO M 000.1012 MOO
OPEN. 31002.11 COMIT MOO
wNMAnER m VEOY1 ®
PRIOR m ANY MCA
RAW MOLL NC WO TM IP UNION IANOExA MOUNDS CREAM
DALS IF MO ROW NULL W MOO N TO INC Wv ROI RN SLOE OP BORNE NTRANlS M COSTS ASM
�'Bw EXSTNG TOMA AM
WETLAND NwT ▪ Om s NmNNW NOWT. wNS Im RN ARCM= OR FOLIOM TAT
1 CWMACm1 MALL CEO
SODDING MAINTENANCE PROPOS I ETCIRP22 SPORT
NW IMM MUMMY PL.S. DYAD. G
SNAP
COMO IMO 30 NO NSW RAM. MOMS 10
10M 10E WM IMAM 110 MOW 30 DP S. WL IA� RI
TMM LINES MAN OTNIUMWA POW. WW1 AS COMP 7D MOW mew. 10111NE Of WE MP MC ]. ALL All POMO MC Nam
S. CONTRALTO M TOP
pp w Amoco ow os 1 NW MOM O MONO WARM WASS MOP Of
NM. MAW OF 1
9 .049x MX ♦>Awsow wog IL CONNECTOR MAO MS
M ME &EF:MNG MIMIC •
_ IAN s cp. sow WPM
ED.
rz moos, AaRCATE ALL PPE ID 1
SOUPS CP ANTS. USE OOA
{4 —S®ING RECOIMENDARONS: FORSWEARS RIMMED n
ilk. wow L 06
1? W AND34 AS
EXISTING ® t'4 CONTRgLuRR L
WETLAND 111¢NLY RE*RESDNNE
11 COMP WRLS OM/
40 MIER PO POW MOT AND 10IIR AS MM OMR MN
ENE um NA
VALVES OR PULL BENS RIO
MO BMWS MOCKS TO MOM VC MOMS O
M MOM MOM MOM WO STAB... Of NW ME O)m M.Aw
11C MOO LABEL OR COLOR CCOE ALL W
IMONMOPIONS FOR NAME CMOS AP NOW M
WM MOON NAY 1--AM I. MO 11ASM WMOS AI A
IMP CF e-r WW2 20 OATS NMI PLA,001 UNTIL
MEMO To 011 CR IMPS WOOMOCIAMO
WO COMMIT MA MITINAME MONMOPIONS.
OS MEMO= WW0012
OOm
�NUN.N BWMAC --®.
IS. MVO OVERSTAY ON BM
ALLY ADASTND NAM
CONTROL ON PROP= VALVE
17. MITT PRESSURE REMO
B. ICE SCREENS O! ALL NL
P. SM . M
AC ACI
IE M OF COMPLETION TO
pA
CaWL NE NAYRNR
m ALL PPE S API GM i
E . ALL AUTOMIC IR C
®
1919 WAS GRAVEL MOW
SPENT S BEMS PERIMETER
22 SPACE BEMS. BOTTOM
STRUCOMC
MEE IAFEANICAI AND EEC
M MAmN W+TU. MOM. A
EXISTING
WETLAND
•
INE— mw soma s mer-Q Nam mn.W ne m
mum sea in As sasso.w one. Mx ow nw n NMAUww
•
•
•
•
r Au nag
Hi 177,77=
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 FRONT ELEVATION1
KYLE lor-ivr
C2 Al Bl Al Bl
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 REAR ELEVATION
WW1= 1•111
Al C1
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE E
COLE 10.1.a
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 1 SIDE E
cVC 1P •1v
•
•
•
•
0 •
•
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 FRONT ELEVATION1
C4
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 REAR ELEVATION
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE E
SEVEN (7) UNIT BUILDING 2 SIDE E
•
•
LEGAc •r TOU.N 0„«S I4I I WOODS EOa
KNOW ALL MEN BY RIESE PRE520110, Mat hooey Naabq. -LL, 100, a MWwwla IAnNW 03092)y camp.,, f.e owner of the 1,0Mny analbed
praper.Y situated in the My of 12., Lek. Stab of Minnesota. County of Anoka, to Mt
OMiot 2, 11■ MLLAOE N0. 3. Marto Caunly, Mbnmota.
Naas muses Me some to be . parad and platted as LEGACY TOMMNOMES AT WOOS EDGE and 4o hereby d.4lmte to MB puck far pablk use
farmer the de.. art utoNy ammmb a eNO.n a Ilde Mat
LEGACY NWGNOS -LL 1l,
In MMm .b•rmf 0.14 Lepary 0045.,. -LL U.C. a M0,10000 IMlbd llabMly company. M1m mue.E these pr.mb to be am. by Ib p.p.r
oma.r Mb _ 4uy M 2ML�
Joan 0 Brandt
Chief Manao.r
SPATE 07 MINNESOTA
COUNTY Or
Thor lapel. *sat .ae aeimMetloM hefore me Mb _ day of
Cede. MdMas-LL, 110, a MMrmta .2. athelty company,, an behalf of the mop.,
MyExpires CauntY. lamed.
200 by John C. Bret. m 4Ahf . , . . . . o ?
I hereby certify Mal 1 have surveyed and platb4 the popmty Macro.. Mks plat as LEGACY TOM1.1300 5 AT WOODS FWE: tiwl Mb Mon b a
correct ,.pfmsntal00 of 002 suhay. that all dl.lan 03 m correctly omen an Me Mat M ban and hun0,NIM1. of a bet MM 0l manumm�b .11
M a:r M iapM n202209blatm. cs:a sham .t wO02 Subd.a1 Wrw�k nth I .l be 4esbnMed other thou 10 30: c mnaa that are m a.L Nana.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
The fem.. Surge . Cara.. am oat... Mae me MM day of
Sumyx.
200 by Edo R akarWUa Land
Notvy Pu1k, County Mlaneeote
My Canon . Esp.
This plan Of tEOACY TU1WMl0MES AT WOCOS EWE am append bm M. City Cowed of LM. Loans. Mlmwmta at a mmtln5 Mermf M1.b Mb
ad Me 00300) Nl9M1eay En0M.er bare ben remb.d 63 the lClty o' 0,. 0 eprDW 30 dray pp m5. owed M am art cor mmh
and 100emmakatbn, as pr.. by Miumnta Statutes. Section 50002 Subd. 2.
By
Thu Mel ben Seen *eked orb Mae. MM _ day of
Lorry O. Moan
Anne Canary summer
RECEIVED
JUL 1 8 2006
CITY OF LINO LACES
• DENOTES FOUND IRON MWUMENI MASKED AS MASKED
All monuments r.oub.d by MFimota Statute. and not mho.
an Mb 5..L .5 be ml Man and yep of Me .cord. bate
M. MM, and ehdl be e04mm0 b a 1/2 intln by IB M.
can pipe marked by BL5 44122
For M. p.aaa.m M MM Mot Me .path *00 M Outlat D. THE
MU-AGE N0, 3. Am. County. Mimm.W I. assumed 02 her
a bearing of N5B73'4YW.
200_
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
M Ma 1
.13 50 rk
/
/
/
s
/
d'�.l jjjJJJSSS 83-ydp' a) Y'ti
.+J'�' 1ykrtg s �1
P .
�O
JA
O
DETAIL "A" (20.00.)
OUTLOT B
0s0, saw.,
5:
N89.33'45•W
-South 10e of 0utlot 0, THE VILLAGE N0. 3
E.
SArua\C61\03proj \0317022 \03170- 111116L- PLAT- 3T601e0 7/11/2006 165519 AM COT