Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-177 Council Resolution• • Council MemberReinert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 06 -177 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — FINAL PLAN FOR THE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS WHEREAS, on October 24, 2005 the City adopted Resolution 05 -161 approving a planned unit development final plan for the Lakewood Apartments. ;and WHEREAS, the City has received an application to amend the planned unit development — final plan approval for the Lakewood Apartments project on the parcel described as: Lot 1, Block 1, THE VILLAGE NO. 4 ; and WHEREAS, the amendment approval request is based on the following submittals: 1. Lakewood Apartments Elevations and Architectural Rendings, submitted October 5, 2006. ; and WHEREAS, at their meeting on October 11, 2006, the Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval of the planned unit development — final plan amendment. ;and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development — final plan amendment meets the requirements of the City's zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, the Lino Lakes Town Center Design and Development Guide, and the conditions of approval listed in Resolution 05 -161. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby approves the planned unit development — final plan amendment for the Lakewood Apartments subject to the following conditions: 1. This amendment shall only include changes to the color palate and the changes to the central architectural element of the building as indicated on the attached plans. 2. With the exception of condition number 10, which is satisfied by the revised elevations and architectural renderings submitted on October 5, 2006, the conditions of approval of Resolution 05 -161 shall continue to apply to this project. Passed by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23`' day of October 2006. John .. Bergeson, Mayor Speiser Acres Page 2 ATTEST: "s. Julie tell, City Cl rk Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 23rd day of October, 2006. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Membero'Donnelland upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Reinert, O'Donnell, Stoltz, Carlson, Bergeson The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. •