Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01/31/2001 Env Bd Packet
City of Lino Lakes Environmental Board Meeting Lino Lakes City Hall January 31, 2001 6:30 PM Agenda 1. Call To Order/Pass Sign -In Sheet 6:30 PM 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Citizen Comments 5. Appointment of Chair/Vice Chair 6. Project Review 6:35 PM A. Ryan/Target Project Submittal (Item 1 -01) 6:35 - 6:55 B. Saddle Club Addition (Item 1 -02) 6:55 - 7:05 C. Summit Fire Protection/Minor Subdivision/Apollo Business District (Item 1 -03) 7:05 - 7:15 D. VFW Post 6583 /Apollo Drive (Item 1 -04) 7:15 - 7:25 E. 12th and Holly Drive /Subdivision Application Review (Item 1 -05) 7:25 - 7:35 F. ApitzBirch/Hodgson ( Item 1 -06) 7:35 - 7:45 7. Environmental Board Business 7:45 PM A. Minnesota DNR/Wildland Interface Project/Updates B. Development Concerns/Birch St. and Centerville Rd. C. Environmental Board Goals 2001 7:55 - 8:25 8. Program/Project Updates 8:25 PM A. Environmental 1. Aqua -Force Research Project 8:25 - 8:28 B. Solid Waste/Recycling Updates 8:28 - 8:30 9. Close Meeting and Confirm Next Meeting Date 8:30 PM 7:45 - 7:50 7:50 - 7 :55 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES DATE : January 3, 2001 TIME STARTED : 6:39 P.M. TIME ENDED : 10:18 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Amy Donlin, Connie Grundhofer, Rod Kukonen, Dave Mach, Theresa O'Connell, and Mike Trehus. MEMBERS ABSENT : Chair Scott Lanyon Staff members present: Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, City Engineer John Powell, and Economic Development Director Brian Wessel (part). CALL TO ORDER Chair Lanyon was not present, so Acting Chair Dave Mach pre and called the meeting to order at 6:39 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. November 29, 2000 — The following corr tions w quested: Page 2, 56 paragraph, "No other citizens h . • • ►y eats." Page 4, 18` paragraph, "Mr. Pa ount of runoff after the project would be less than before." Page 6, 3`d paragraph, "0 nell : ated all logos for Target stores have a lit logo (a red bullseye) including the billb• _' * n Hwy. 35 and asked if it is being proposed." Trehus moved to approve the November 29, 2000 meeting minutes as amended above. Kukonen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following items were added to the meeting agenda: • Introduce Board Member Connie Grundhofer • Discuss Public Safety Citizen's Academy January 11- February 22 — Mach • Discuss Tree Ordinance Update • Discuss Grant Applications in City - Asleson The agenda was approved as amended above. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 CITIZEN COMMENTS • Donlin read a letter written by Art Hawkins, a concerned resident, concerning growth of adjacent communities and their impact on open spaces. He requested action on the part of the Environmental Board in voicing the perspectives of the citizens of Lino Lakes in the issue of proposed changes to open spaces. He urged a comprehensive plan be formulated to bring the vision, the citywide survey, park plan and natural resources inventory, GIS system, the interface study, and committees together. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR/VICE CHAIR Trehus recommended that because Chair Lanyon was not present, the appointments be temporary for the night only. The Acting Chair was Dave Mach and the Acting Vice Chair was Mike Trehus. Regular appointments will be made at the January meeting. PROJECT REVIEW A. Dellwood LLCI N.E. Quadrant of 35W and Lake D that Mr. Payton had presented this project at the last and Zoning Board and City Council have discuss held. The project is going through the informal application. He then introduced Mr. Payton an Research and Development of Ryan Com ies wh concept. ' pdate — Wessel explained g. Since then, the Planning hborhood meeting has been ion p ess prior to a formal almquist the Vice President of working on the SuperTarget Mr. Palmquist explained that rec primary challenge to the projec were dealing with the issue be managed with lanes northern part of the prope in the first part of July. been a neighborhood meeting where the g the traffic needs. TKDA and Mr. Powell ental Board was assured that the traffic could o discussed, was adequate buffering on the ted an EAW would be done which would be finished Mr. Payton presented several maps and explained that the final topographic survey has been completed so more of the spatial relationships have come together. He indicated that there was a small group of tamarack trees, which could be protected by a retaining wall in the west. Asleson explained that the area has been disturbed more than once. He noted a 1953 topographic map that showed tamaracks throughout the area. The freeway went through in the 1960's and greatly impacted the tamaracks. Donlin inquired what plans Target had to address the tamarack trees in the area. Mr. Payton answered that the standing water is only intermittent for 48 hours in a 100 -year event. He noted that there is an aquatic bench planned, with canary grass plantings to reduce the presence of geese. He continued, they were waiting for the results of the soil reports to determine the size of the ponds. The maps presented showed them at the maximum possible size, but in all probability they would shrink. Target representatives were preparing to submit the plan to the City by January 15t. • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 Mr. Palmquist stated that they were working with staff on the site design and architecture using prototypes on the elevations of the Target site. Describing the site, they were planning some articulations, bench plaza areas, and various plantings in front of the store. There are also planned bays in 20 -foot increments. The whole project would be of similar colors and materials. He continued there would be two doors, with the employee . entrance in the center. As is typical, the eastern part would be the grocery, while the westem part would hold the discount store. There are plans to screen the truck docking, and to bury the utility lines so that more plantings could be located there. He assured the Board that they would have the elevations available next time. Trehus indicated the land in the southern entryway that the City owns was mentioned last time, and inquired what were the plans for the property adjacent to it. Mr. Palmquist answered that there would be no grading in the area, and there were plans for a retaining wall to protect the trees. The specifics would be answered when the tree survey is overlaid with the aerial photograph. Trehus pointed out that it looked like a lot of parking an shift to the west may enable them to make it appear Payton stated that the building was pushed as far t required parameters because of site geometry p Mr. Palmquist note that there were stall gr and indicated that the users could share p Donlin mentioned that it did not signage, and lighting would ne responded that there were further in the plan. trees, and suggested that a estled among the trees. Mr. ossible within the 644, and 910 parking spaces, , and advised that vegetation, billboards, sed more specifically. Mr. Palmquist uirements, and the lighting would be explained Donlin inquired about the ro nvironmental Board would play. Mr. Payton answered that they wanted to ow their recommendations. Wessel added that the proposal will be available at the January 31, 2001 meeting, and assured the Board that there several open issues remaining. Donlin commented that it appeared the typical standards that Target was used to implementing were played out in this plan concerning lighting and signage. Mr. Palmquist answered that there were many parties' interests to balance, that of the City, the community, the developer, and Target which can be met to provide goods and services and civic pride. Mach advised that environmentally speaking specific recommendations include: • Increase the number of native trees in groupings not standing alone and decrease the number of parking places. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 • Smaller form of Target, not Superstore. • Location not so near the highway. • Ponds should be fruitful; the water levels need to be controlled so that they could sustain diverse life. • The City needed to set land aside designated as open space for every development approved. Mr. Payton asked if this project would be used merely to change zoning, ordinances, and laws. Trehus assured him that Target would be welcome in the community, then inquired about the percentage of impervious surfaces. Mr. Payton stated that if a Target would be on site it would be a Superstore, because that is the primary means of expansion. Other regional locations would be Rochester, MN, Rogers, MN, Lakeville, MN, and Eau Claire, WI. The reason given was economic, because it increased the store's bottom line by 50 %. Mr. Palmquist stated that at the neighborhood mee out with 36 residents in attendance. There was n zoned commercial. Donlin commented that Vadnais Heights' yards, and questioned the reason there was to 140 invitations were sent e noted that the land was Mr. Payton inquired, short of no Asleson noted that growing large soils. sted Target with signs in their on in Lino Lakes. hat accommodations Target could make. be possible through the use of structural Donlin offered that the we F ds n ded to be more than a monoculture. Trehus added that the areas in a e west needed to be preserved. O'Connell suggested bringing the building south and changing the configurations to make the building more narrow to allow for more parking on the side. Mr. Payton indicated that people did not use side parking, and restated that the size and shape of the building are configurations that will not change. Mach asked about the possibility of removing a couple of the retail sites. Mr. Payton answered that Target needs a certain number of retailers and square footage to attract customers. He continued that there would be issues on Lake Drive even if Target would not be present, and Target would provide the funding and the tax base to initiate the upgrades needed. Mr. Palmquist assured the Board that the project would be. worked out with staff. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 Donlin indicated that with each development, residents' taxes have increased so the businesses should have to pay more. Wessel answered that Target would pay over one million dollars annually for taxes. The area was zoned commercial, and would provide tax relief for residents. He indicated that Powell could also address the issue. Wessel excused himself to bring Powell to the meeting at 8:48 p.m. Donlin addressed the lighting, and stated that there should be an attempt to minimize the glare. She expressed her dislike for the cream color chosen for the building. Mach urged the Target representatives to use their services to improve other areas of the City. Mr. Palmquist offered that if some wetlands were affected by the project, Target could contribute money for preserving trees or wetlands in the City. Donlin noted that there were three school districts in the City, and submitted that Target could contribute money for environmental education, specifically the Teachers of Vision program. Mr. Palmquist stated that the contribution would flow from a financial model. Donlin stated that there would be a need for upland :, =;tland mitigation. Wessel stated that the discussion would contin „and �:s e spe •= °ic recommendations from the Environmental Board were helpful. He in • c 0tir that the City Council would ultimately make the decision. Asleson stated the q ' ►n was how to mitigate environmental impact. Mach reiterated: • Move the building t • Avoid monocul • Reduce bounce in • Decrease the number o king spaces and increase plantlife Kukonen explained that one way to increase the plantlife would be through buffering. Mr. Palmquist asked if a model existed, so they could work from that and put it into an economic model. Donlin requested that minimal lighting be used, especially at night. Trehus agreed and asked if the lights would be turned off at night. Donlin inquired if the 38 -foot pole height was necessary, or if it could be reduced. Mr. Palmquist stated that if the pole height was reduced, there would be an increase in the number of lights. The Board was assured that the lights would be shoebox lights, to aim the light down, not out. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 Mr. Payton noted that in the site plan, the nighttime team leader would have all the lights off, except for a corridor of lights for the employees. After the employees left, all lights would be turned off except for security lights. Trehus said that there should be a vote on the recommendations that include the following as well as the recommendations previously stated by Mach: • Set aside property off site for open space. • Lighting issues were a major concern. • Maximize the green in groupings, rather than in straight lines. Mach moved to approve the recommendations of the Environmental Board. Trehus seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. CSAH 49 Update/John Powell — Powell explained that the City passed a resolution because it was concluded that a joint meeting between the cities was necessary. With a reduced speed limit the City supports it, then the project g ' es to Mn/DOT for reviewal. The County Commissioners set the speed limits. Typic the speed that 85 % -of the motorists travel determine plan calls for more linear areas for standing water peed studies are done and eed limit. In addition, the ponds at Hodgson Road. Mach asked if there was a map of the design. Po `r= stated that there was a map from County Road J to Lake Drive. Powell pointed out that with a high for adequate reaction time. A 10 narrower area for the road with Grundhofer inquired ab was being expanded to me concems. He noted that the r regional roadway. He indi t, there was a need for a straighter road would allow for more curves, and a cat for four lanes. Powell indicated that the road 'onal need, but there was some flexibility for local n the past was a state highway and changed to a er: that the pond adjacent to Fox Trace( ? ?) would not be eliminated in the expansion of Highway 49. • Grundhofer explained that the pond was a breeding area for three species of frogs. Powell indicated that the pond was landlocked and it stayed wet all year. Mach asked if an environmental impact report had been done. Powell responded that one was in process, and an archeological dig found the presence of hot chards. Donlin expressed the need for the EIS (Environmental Impact Survey). Grundhofer stated that the bridge was a breeding ground for birds, and asked if it was going to be affected. Powell answered that the widening of the bridge was essential. He • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 indicated that a water main was adjacent to the bridge. The bridge would hold the four lanes of traffic, a pedestrian way, and a median. Grundhofer responded that the median would present a problem and asked if the curbs could be made shallower to protect the animal crossing. Mach asked the distance of the proposed widening. Powell stated that by 2004 -2006, it would be from Lake Drive to the intersection of Target. The growth in traffic would be present and that signals would be placed at County Road J and Birch Street. The county would help pay for the lighting. At County Road J and Hodgson there would be a need for two twin lanes. Mach asked how they determined the need. Powell answered that the proposed growth rates determined the need. He noted that many times, the proposed rates have been exceeded. Mach inquired if the comprehensive plans of the cities had been reviewed. Powell responded that the roads needed to be constructed for 20 s, and regional impact and growth determined the need instead of individual citi ually the roads were obsolete by the time construction was finished. Trehus asked about the rationale for the need to d Highway 49. Grundhofer questioned the possibility of r expanding to a 4 -way. Powell answered that the County did a stud to kee o -lane road by controlling access. Technically, Main Street was the „ • ad Mn/DOT did not have jurisdiction. C. 12th and Holly — Asleson e n ,�t . standard subdivision approach is being planned. They could do • ; iltrati •; ` o ils, and the wetlands did have a good possibility of the rare ecosystem fo T ear school. The possibility of the rare ecosystem needed to be investigated, as well as .,.; •ly moving some of the pine trees in the pine plantation. He stated that the atershed district was considering properties to the north for a water holding area and the use of greenway has been discussed for this area in the past. Grundhofer recommended removing Lots 4 and 5, which would shorten the street. Asleson commented that the developer was trying to pay for infrastructure. He also mentioned that the greenways needed to be better defined. Mach commented that several driveways were proposed on 12th which was a through street. Asleson responded that there would be five because two lots would share a driveway. Grundhofer noted that the house on Lot 4 was a few feet from a wetland. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 Asleson s tated that the standard recommendations were applicable, in addition to concerns over Lots 4 and 5, and Lot 9 mitigation. Mach urged a balance of development with wetland mitigation. Asleson suggested that it would be good to address the water quality issues and encourage the use of natural plants with unique high quality rather than a monoculture. Grundhofer expressed concern over the pines in the southwest on Lots 9 and 10. Asleson responded that the pine trees on Lots 1, and 8 to 10 had several trees that were too large to move. He noted that pines are not native here, but are planted sometimes to enhance the winter scene. The project was going to the Planning and Zoning Board next. D. City Hall Park QWEST Communications Tower — Asleson introduced the format of the Project Tracking Form, then addressed the project stating that the proposed tower would hold the hockey light as well. The lease money would then go into the general fund. Kukonen asked if lights were required if the tower w in use in the future. Asleson stated that the dimensions were lights f 50 et, 1 oot tower, and a need for 25 x 25 square foot plot of land. Grundhofer stated that the pole would be put further back on the property. Asleson location of the pole nearby other Donlin suggested that ano Asleson answered that d recommended that it could be o "d that the goal was to keep the y present. ower could be used instead of erecting a new one. tower in the specified location. Mach asked if there was a pl was being done by Rick DeG future towers. Asleson responded that a tower study er. Donlin urged that the tower not be erected at the proposed location, due to a nearby eagle's nest and duck pass. Asleson stated that the area needed to be rezoned from Rural to Public /Semi - Public. Grundhofer stated that the citizens needed to be notified. Donlin inquired as to whether the DNR had studied the impact. She noted that the local hunt club recommended that the tower not be placed at the proposed location. Trehus concurred. Asleson stated that the location was chosen due to the communication radius necessary. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 Mach asked what process determined the proposed location of the tower. Asleson answered that the City chose the site. Donlin noted that there was a tower off Birch Street and Centerville, also off Birch Street and near the Saddle Club. She inquired if those locations were considered. Asleson explained that it needed to be 135 feet, and in the future either more towers or a taller tower would probably be necessary in a 3 -5 mile range. Trehus indicated that the water towers could hold the pole. Asleson mentioned that the water towers were probably too far away. Donlin inquired if the possibility of two towers on existing towers had been considered. O'Connell suggested that there might be interference with the telephone poles. Trehus stated that the Board recommended the tower not be built at that location. Asleson stated that Rick DeGardner from Public Works working on the project. He then inquired about the format of updates. Donlin ur t too much paper. Asleson agreed and decided to only hand out th presented to the City Council. The former mayo updates. age. '' ey points could then be ommended the format of the E. Behm's Park/Lot Creation — Asleson revi= d -`' background information. Nine years ago, an existing park was approv • : e cr 'on of parks for wetlands. It would be planted with native vegetation �� •,x g -,., . to a buffer against adjacent Kentucky Bluegrass and increase flit ark would be paid for by the development of 9 lots, although no houses esent. There would be a bituminous trail on its perimeter that would req r r > ' erio c burns. Trehus noted that the area was urchased in 1985 for development and only now plans were proposed. Asleson noted that trails were planned in the southwest section with native vegetation. He desired the Board's input on options for the area. He pointed out that a buffer strip had not been put in. O'Connell suggested that the wetland could extend up to the area, but not into it. Donlin submitted that if houses were present, residents would not want a periodic burn, and inquired about the DNR being apprehensive. She also asked about obtaining burn permits. Mach stated that a precedent should be set, and it would acquaint people with burns of native vegetation. He urged the City to notify residents before a burn took place. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 Asleson stated that no permit would be given if there were trees larger than 2- inches in diameter. Mach pointed out that it would bum at a low temperature. Asleson noted that the vegetation was not touched in the north and it provided a good opportunity for education. O'Connell reviewed that it was a public park for all to use, and yet the only parking would be located on the street. F. Saddle Club Project Update — It was noted that the project went to the Planning and Zoning Board with recommendations concerning lot size, so the applicant came back with a new proposal. Staff talked with the DNR who indicated that hydroelectricity it could be restored. Greenways do a number of things like creating buffers, open space and most importantly connections between ecosystems and open space areas for wildlife and people. Staff requested comments on the latest proposal, which would be passed on to the Planning and Zoning Board. The greenway needed to be preserved in the long term for the good of the public rough private or public means, it needed to be managed. Donlin asked the number of houses in the 1 were 40, which were more spread out than Trehus noted that the original lots were lots. Asleson stated that because they elements must take on long -t- - port Donlin expressed conce implied that stringen Asleson stated that Pere Club property was in MU leson stated that there detached townhomes shrank the ered conservation developments, the "conservation development" because it e applied, when there were none. ass needed a zoning variance, and part of the Saddle Donlin pointed out that Grant Township and other communities make it a requirement to follow the conservation models. Asleson noted that they have copies of the Surface Water Management Plan and the Conservation Planning Ordinance. He restated that he wanted recommendations from the Environmental Board concerning conservation and the greenway. Donlin stated that the traffic from the development would be about 400 trips/day. It would have a significant impact on traffic and the quality of life. Asleson urged the Board to narrow the scope to preserve the greenway. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 O'Connell indicated that the DNR study on greenway space could be used as a model. Trehus agreed that Saddle Club corresponded with the model. Donlin noted that historically, since 1992, the City has had a goal of a greenway project with a wetland border. Kukonen inquired how could it be approved with 50% of the property in MUSA. Asieson urged the Environmental Board to make a formal statement. He noted that most of the trees were on the greenway. The area may someday need boardwalks, if a trail is desirable through this area, because of the hydrologic conditions present. Mach suggested making the wetlands public property and to reduce the size of the lots. He continued that in the third plan, the lots went right through the wetlands. Donlin stated that it did not keep with the vision for the City and the City should not merely chose the least objectionable. She stated it should not violate the Greenway Project, had to be permanently conserved, and not p , ly held. Asleson identified that it could be put into a 1 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BUSINESS A. Minnesota DNR/Wildland Interface Pro M�' ``tem was tabled to the January 31, 2001 meeting. B. Development Concerns/Birch rville Rd. — This item was tabled to the January 31, 2001 meeting. PROGRAM /PROJECT UP A. Environmental Education — 's item was tabled to the January 31, 2001 meeting. B. Forestry Updates — This item was tabled to the January 31, 2001 meeting. C. Solid Waste / Recycling Updates — This item was tabled to the January 31, 2001 meeting. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Introduce Board member Grundhofer — It was indicated that Grundhofer had been a resident of Lino Lakes for 24 years and has been active in the local environmental issues. The Board members introduced themselves to Grundhofer. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 B. Public Safety Citizen's Academy — Mach introduced the program which would run from January 11- February 22, 2001. 0' Connell stated that she would like to attend. C. Tree Ordinance Update — This item was tabled to the January 31, 2001 meeting. Status of Grant Applications — Asleson noted that two grants were being applied for at the present time. The first was an acquisition grant, and he has been speaking with the present owner. He stated that there might not be enough time to meet the application deadline. The second is a matching grant CLOSE MEETING AND CONFIRM NEXT MEETING DATE It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on January 31, 2001. There being no further business, Kukonen moved to adjourn at 10:18 p.m. Donlin seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Transcribed by: Brigette Blesi TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 12 Name & Address Amy Donlin 6100 Centerville Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 H) 426 -6356 Rod Kukonen 647 Andall Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 780 -6384 W) 293 -3275 Scott Lanyon 6665 Sherman Lake Road Lino Lakes, MN 55038 H) 653 -3198 Teresa O'Connell 1000 Main Street Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651- 785 -2378 W) 612- 926 -9181 Mike Trehus 675 Shadow Court Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651 -486 -8995 Dave Mach 8225 Wood Duck Tr. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651- 784 -9688 W) 651- 297 -2686 Constance Grundhofer 235 Linda Avenue Lino Lakes, MN 55014 H) 651- 766 -9357 misclenviron ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD- 2001 3 YEAR TERMS Date Appointed Apr. 13, 1998 Jan., 2001 Apr. 13, 1998 Jan. 1, 2000 Term Expires Dec. 31, 2000 Dec. 31, 2003 Dec. 31, 1999 Dec. 31, 2002 Mar. 22, 1999 Dec. 31, 2001 Jan., 2000 May 22, 2000 May 22, 2000 Jan., 2001 Dec. 31, 2002 Dec. 31, 2001 (J.P.'s Term) Dec. 31, 2000 (Lori's Term) Dec. 31, 2003 Jan., 2001 Dec., 2003 AGENDA ITEM 1 -01 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: January 31, 2001 TOPIC: Ryan/Target Project BACKGROUND: The Environmental Board reviewed the project concept for Ryan/Target at the last two Environmental Board Meetings under the title of DellwoodLLC. Please find attached the project- tracking sheet. Please find enclosed the formal project submittal documents for Ryan/Target. The proposal dated January 16, 2001 was submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District on January 18, 2001. We have received no written response from the Rice Creek Watershed concerning the plan submittal. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) will need to be completed for this project. Please see Environmental Assessment Worksheet enclosed. The Permitting Process sheet submitted by the developer targets the draft EAW on 1/26/01. The EAW process itself takes much longer. See enclosed review timetable. A grading plan has been submitted. A tree inventory and preservation/restoration plan is enclosed. Please refer to enclosed project narrative. The sentence that the "City has requested" to the "City has suggested" that the remaining aspen and cottonwoods be removed from the site. The suggestion was made in order to facilitate the proposal to restore a Tamarack area to Tamarack species. The cottonwood/aspen encroached into the area after the 1960's highway construction destroyed the Tamaracks that had adapted to the site. Tamaracks are intolerant shade competition and best management would be to recreate the Tamarack prototype without the competition. Surface water infiltration proposals are indicated on the plan. The developer has been encouraged to be as creative as possible in keeping water on the site. The Rice Creek Watershed District will need to respond to the plan Landscape plan has been submitted and includes the proposal to use structural soils, tree planting around site, native grasses and forbs around drainage areas, and a proposal to restore the presently impacted Tamarack area with 109 Tamaracks. A lighting plan has been submitted. The lighting plan indicates conformance with the City code. The light does not exceed 1 foot - candle at the centerline of adjacent streets nor does it exceed .4 foot - candles on adjacent lots. Wetland mitigation area is yet to be determined. Preliminary wetland delineation completed. Must be substantiated in the spring. Data forms indicate that there are no significant ground -story vegetation types, and a few remnant Tamarack tree species. Neighborhood Meeting held and survey completed.. Two sign pylons proposed. The pylons are located on 35W frontage and at the south side of entry from Lake Drive. Dimensions: 35' by 16', H/O florescent lighting. Several recommendations were made at the December (January 3) meeting. • One recommendation was to reduce the building sizes. The developer reduced the size of the buildings on the south side of the development. • Building locations were not moved. • Pond modification was not changed. This very well could affect the plant materials that will grow on the site. Bio- retention ponds of similar slope on the Civic Complex site appear to support some mesic species in the bounce area of the ponds. Generally these ponds fill after a major rain event and are almost empty after a week of time. Buildings were not relocated. • Lighting appears to be contained to the site. • Grouping of plant materials in this type of parking situation becomes difficult. There is an attempt to break up the linear effect of plantings in the main island in front of Target. Environmental RECOMMENDATION: Staff; Surface water management/wetland mitigation needs to be resolved. Staff stays with the recommendation that wetland mitigation be addressed in the immediate area. Carefully review the EAW when completed. Environmental Board; Memo To: Lino Lakes Environmental Board From: Marty Asleson Date: 01/22/01 Re: Project Review /NE Quadrant Lake Dr and 35W/Update/Dec 2000 This project document will come back to you with updated information as meetings are scheduled. John Payton was present at the November Environmental Board Meeting and gave a general overview of the proposed site development. A time schedule for project process was developed by the developer and submitted with last month's report. A revised schedule is enclosed with this month's report. A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for December 20th. Mr. Payton will be attending the Environmental Board Meeting for December for update information. PROJECT #: 2000 -1.1 PROJECT: NE /Quad /DelwoodLLC DATE OF ORIGIN: 11/21/00 TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: • Discussions of this area started in May of 1998. Records attached. • Site Proposal includes large retail and several smaller retail stores. • There have been several meetings with the project representatives. • General overview to be given by Brian Wessel STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: • Surface water treatment imperative Information from the Environmental Inventory, specific site inventory and recommendations from AES, Tree Inventory from previous development proposal, as well as specific modals on surface water treatment, and information on structural soil use has been given to the developers. • Streetscape design and alternative transportation access need to be effective. • Page 1 • Very expensive commercial property • Developer has hired a reputable environmental consultant as part of their team. • Attraction of "Green Industry" • Greenway design Environmental Issues: The following identifies potential impacts to Environment. • large impervious surface /Lake water quality impact concerns. • oak woodland to south and miscellaneous recently- developed tree areas to north. • Several prairie and savanna areas previously identified by AES on freeway side. • Greenway consideration. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCES: Refer to the following references for information that may affect discussions related to this issue. Section 2 - Assessment of Needs • Completed by Brauer AES and presently being studied by consultants. Section 3 - Governing Polices • Creating a sustainable landscape requires a broader view that starts with the big picture or vision and moves into a physical plan and set of action steps to achieve that vision. The 20/20 Vision Plan established the philosophical vision for the community that was the starting point for this study. Public response to the study clearly reiterates the ideals defined in the 20/20 plan, which are as follows: " Sustenance of The natural environment of lino Lakes Through The protection and management of the wildlife, habitats, and other natural resources, and to pass on to future residents a community rich in These Section 5 - Administration • Adopt a conservation development approach to planning as the working model for community development. Example was established with the construction of the Civic Complex. • Page 2 .There have been no comments to date 1/22/011 • ive: vegetatio; upland mitigatio roper e e. !ssed for light± es bilit� yes of � mental edt cat ENVIRONkg0i issue Environmental Board Comments, December EB Meeting on January3 2001. • Move Building To The West(Target) • Avoid Mono-culture in pond areas by reducing slope(bounce)' • Decrease the number of parking spaces and increase plant life • Set aside property off -site for open space. • Lighting issues need attention. This is a major concern • Maximize green in groupings, rather than in straight lines. • Reduce the size• /footprint of buildings. Planning and Zonning: December 13, 2000. Mr. John Payton from Delwood LLC presented the site proposal the NE Quadrant of Lake Drive and 35 W. Brian Wessel introduced the intent of the meeting to be an open discussion of fundamental issues. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS: Please Refer to the Attached Schedule Revision Dated 12- 13 -00. • Page 3 PERMITTING PROCESS Lino Lakes - City Center Lake Drive & I -35W City Council Work Session Meeting — No. 1 Wed 11/22/00 Environmental Board Meeting — No. 1 Wed 11/29/00 City Planning Commission Meeting — No. 1 Wed 12/13/00 City Council Meeting No. 1 Mon 12/18/00 - Order Lake & Apollo Drive Improvement Feasibility Study Neighborhood Meeting Wed 12/20/00 Environmental Assessment Worksheet - Start EAW Documentation Preparation Thu 12/28/00 Indirect Source Permit - Start ISP Documentation Preparation Thu 12/28/00 Wetland Mitigation Start Plan Preparation Thu 12/28/00 City Council/Enviro Brd Work Session Meeting — No. 2 5:30 PM Wed 01/03/01 Rice Creek Watershed District — Meet with District Engineer Week of 01/1501 RePlat/Site Plan Application Submittal to City & WSD Mon 01/15/01 Rice Creek Watershed District Meeting - No. 1 Wed 01/24/01 Complete Draft/Draft EAW Mon 01/26/01 City Environmental Board Meeting - No. 2 Wed 01/31/01 City EDAC Commision Meeting - No. 1 Thu 02/01/01 City Park Board Meeting - No. 1 Mon 02/05/01 City Planning Commission Meeting — No. 2 Project Public Hearing Wed 02/14/01 City Council Work Session Meeting — No. 3 Wed 02/21/01 City Council Meeting No. 2 Mon 02/26/01 Complete ISP Documentation Preparation Wed 02/28/01 Submit ISP to MPCA Wed 02/28/01 City EDAC Commision Meeting - No. 2 Thu 03/01/01 CPR Meeting — Ryan/PTG Team @ Target Fri 03/02/01 City Park Board Meeting - No. 2 Mon 03/05/01 City Planning Commission Meeting — No. 3 Wed 03/14/01 - Recommend to Council — Preliminary Plat Approval City Council Meeting - No. 3 Mon 03/26/01 - Accept Draft EAW and Authorize EQB Monitor Publication ? ?? - Review Preliminary Plat ? ? ? ? ?? EQB Draft EAW Deadline for Submission Mon 03/26/01 City Environmental Board Meeting - No. 3 Wed 03/28/01 First Printing in EQB — Monitor — Start 30 Day Comment Period Mon 04/02/01 Offsite Wetland Bank Credit/Bank Confermation Mon 04/09/01 City Council Meeting No. 4 Mon 04/09/01 - Accept Draft EAW and Authorize EQB Monitor Publication ? ?? - Review Preliminary Plat ? ? ? ? ?? Rice Creek Watershed District Meeting - No. 2 Wed 04/25/01 EAW 30 Day Comment Period Ends Wed 05/02/01 - Prepare and Submit response to EAW Comments City Planning Commission Meeting — No. 4 Wed 05/09/01 - EAW Negative Declaration Recommendation City Environmental Board Meeting * Joint Mtg? — No. 4 Mon 05/14/01 - EAW Negative Declaration Recommendation City Council Meeting No. 5 * Joint Mtg? Mon 05/14/01 - EAW Negative Declaration - Approve Preliminary/Final Plat and Developer Agreement Rice Creek Watershed District Meeting - No. 3 Wed 05/30/01 Submit Plans to State Health Dept. — Sewer & Water Ext. Fri 06/15/01 Submit Grading Plans for Building Permit Fri 06/15/01 MPCA Approves ISP Mon 06/18/01 Install Silt Fence Mon 06/18/01 Prepare and Submit NPDES Permit Application Mon 06/18/01 Begin Site Grading Activities Wed 06120/01 * Special Joint Meeting for EB & CC improves Schedule 30+ Days Revised 1 -12 -01 Revised 2/99 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers: This form is available at www.mnplan.state.mn.us. EAW Guidelines will be available in Spring 1999 at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for — but should not complete — the fmal worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EAW is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30 -day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title 2. Proposer 3. RGU Contact person Contact person Title Title Address Address City, state, ZIP City, state, ZIP Phone Phone Fax Fax E -mail E -mail 4. Reason for EAW preparation (check one) EIS scoping Mandatory EAW Proposer volunteered Citizen petition RGU discretion If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number and subpart name 5. Project location County City/Township �A Section Township Range Attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project; • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); • Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. 6. Description a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? _Yes _No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? _Yes No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Project magnitude data Total project acreage Number of residential units: unattached attached maximum units per building Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): total square feet Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet): Office Manufacturing Retail Other industrial Warehouse Institutional Light industrial Agricultural Other commercial (specify) Building height If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings 8. Permits and approvals required. List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. Unit of Government Type of application Status 9. Land use. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. 10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Before After Before After Types 1 -8 wetlands Lawn/landscaping Wooded/forest Impervious surfaces Brush/Grassland Cropland Other (describe) TOTAL If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: 11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. b. Are any state- listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? _Yes _No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: . Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. • • 12. Physical impacts on water resources. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration — dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment — of any surface waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? _Yes _No If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI: Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. 13. Water use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? Yes No If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to determine. 14. Water - related land use management district. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100 -year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? _Yes _No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. 15. Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? Yes No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses. 16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: acres ; cubic yards . Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction. 17. Water quality: surface water runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans. b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters. 18. Water quality: wastewaters a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on -site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. 19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: minimum average to bedrock: minimum average Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. 20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. 21. Traffic. Parking spaces added . Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) Estimated total average daily traffic generated . Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system. 22. Vehicle - related air emissions. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EAW Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. 23. Stationary source air emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EAW Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone - depleting chemicals (chloro- fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. 24. Odors, noise and dust. Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? _Yes No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) 25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? _Yes _No Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _Yes No Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? _Yes _No Scenic views and vistas? _Yes No Other unique resources? _Yes No If yes, describe the resource and identify any project - related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. 26. Visual impacts. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense Lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks? Yes No If yes, explain. 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations. Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? _Yes _No. If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. 28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? _Yes No. If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW; see EAW Guidelines for details.) 29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). 30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. 31. Summary of issues. Do not complete this section if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EAW. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. RGU CERTIFICATION. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor. I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651- 296 -8253, or www.mnplan.state.mn.us vinmwuy N.vr,v,..n ..,. - r.r..,... -. -. _ - - - . , drawn 40 proposer. A petition remains valid for up to one year from • its filing are with the Environmental Quality Board. If the petition expires, the dtizens must file a new petition for review. Ilnpdu uie sdine yeuytaNui%. °Ica. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET PROCESS RGU determines EAW is necessary 30 CALENDAR DAYS EAW PREPARATION OD- Proposer submits EAW's completed data portions to RGU RGU promptly reviews Data submittal submittal for complete completeness; returns to proposer if incomplete VARIES PUBUC COMMENT PERIOD 1 Notice published in EQB Monitor 7 to 21 days after receipt of EAW; 30-day comment period begins continued * Can vary depending on RGU. -oil- 30-day comment period ends 1 TO 5 WORKING DAYS • EIS NEED DECISION -► RGU RGU completes RGU distributes EAW notifies EAW and to distribution list proposer approves it for distribution RGU decides if project 30 calendar day needs EIS, prepares judicial appeal findings of fact; and period beings responds to comments 3 WORKING DAYS TO 30 DAYS* 1 TO 5 WORKING DAYS 1 TO 5 WORKING DAYS RGU issues press release RGU distributes Notice published in EQB notice of Monitor? to 21 days dedsion after receipt of decision 7 TO 21 CALENDAR DAYS NOTES Time frames are diagramed as prescribed in the rules and should be considered minimum estimates. Day can mean either calendar or working day depending on the timeframe listed for a specific event. If the text lists 15 or fewer days, they are working days; calendar days are 16 or more days (4410.0200, subpart 12). Working days exclude Saturdays, Sundays and legal state holidays. How to count a period of time. The first day of any time period is not counted but the final day is counted (part 4410.0200, subpart 12). The last day of the time period ends with normal business hours, generally at 4:30 p.m. No time period can end on a Saturday, Sunday or legal state holiday. The 30 -day period for EAW comments begins on the biweekly publication date of the EQB Monitor; which is always on Monday. Thirty days from a Monday always falls on a Wednesday, so the comment periods end on Wednesday unless it is a legal holiday. • TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT Lino Lakes, Minnesota PROJECT NARRATIVE Prepared for YAN Ryan Companies US, Inc. By 44411m.". S I T EON RK39S TUDIO PARSONS TRANSPORTATION OSIOUP Dertos•Asslum • De Lam Caber, • Selina January 15, 2001 RECEIVED JAN 1 6 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES 04 j 1 PREFACE • This writing is the narrative portion of a submittal in connection with the applicant's ("APPLICANT"), Ryan Companies, US Inc., application (the "APPLICATION') for approval of development of the retail shopping center development ( "Lino Lakes Town Center ") a land parcel (the "PROPERTY"), described below and near the northeast corner of Lake Drive (Co. Rd. 23) and MnDOT Interstate 35W(I35W). The Application includes the following components: 1. Site Plan and Building Plan approval for construction of an 182,760 Sq. Ft. Super Target and eight (8) each retail buildings varying in size from 6,400 Sq. Ft. to 37,000 Sq. Ft. 2. Conditional Use Permit for Nursery Outdoor Sales and Display. 3. Site and Building Signage approval. 4. Preliminary Plat approval. 5. Parking Stall variance approval. 6. Lot area and Setback variance approval. The APPLICANT has retained the following consultants to assist in preparation and processing of the APPLICATION: Civil Engineers/Landscape Architects Parsons Transportation Group 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 332 -0421 Environmental Consultants Peterson Environmental Consultants 1355 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 100 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 686 -0151 Building Architects RSP Architects Ltd. 120 First Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 339 -0313 Land Surveyors Westwood Professional Services 3701 12th Street North Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 (320) 253 -9495 PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP artoa- Aschman • Oa taow. Cater. • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page - 1 - 01/15/01 i 1 1 YAN PROPOSAL/ SUMMARY APPLICANT is requesting development approvals to allow for the development of the PROPERTY with multiple users that will include a 182,760 square feet SuperTarget retail store and 150,198 square feet of flex -space retail shops for a total building area of 332,958 square feet. The existing property is zoned SC - Shopping Center. APPLICANT is not requesting the PROPERTY to be rezoned and that present SC zoning district meets developments intended usage. Surrounding Zoning is as follows: 1. Abutting to the East and North - R- Rural 2. Abutting to the South - SC - Shopping Center and LB - Light Business 3. Abutting to the West — NB — Neighborhood Business and GB — General Business Commercial — CA - Central Area APPLICANT is requesting site, building and sign plan review for the new SuperTarget store. The overall building architecture will be oriented toward some of the features already used to the south in the Village Center development as well as new features that will complement the site and provide screening and buffering to the rural neighborhoods to the north and east of the PROPERTY. The majority of site grading proposed is to facilitate the construction of the new retail buildings, modify drainage patterns, and provide for landscaped areas and islands. Storm water runoff will convey via the construction of new storm sewer lines under the proposed parking lot and outfall to new storm water ponds. A substantial number of new water infiltration methods have been incorporated in the preliminary plans to lower site total runoff volumes. The building and parking lot construction will require tree removal. The City Ordinance defines a significant tree as any hardwood deciduous tree 6" caliper or greater, any softwood deciduous tree of 8" caliper or greater, and any coniferous tree of 12' height or greater. See Exhibit D Significant Tree Survey. The tree survey logged 752 trees however 566 are "significant trees" as defined by ordinance. The proposed grading activities will require the removal of 437 significant trees. In addition, the City has requested that all Aspen and Cottonwood be removed from the site. The total tree removal count planned is 458 significant trees. The City does not have a tree mitigation /replacement guideline. The site grading activities will result in the removal of 14 Tamarack trees from the property (8 Tamarack will remain). Specific to this action, one - hundred and nine (109) Tamarack trees will be planted in the northwest and southeast areas of the site, surrounding and in the bio- retention basins. Some higher quality species will be added as well as coniferous trees to produce improved screening throughout the year. Landscaping has also been planned throughout the site. Planting islands will be incorporated into the parking lots and along drive aisles to provide for parking lot PARSDNS Barton- Asehman • Da Lauw, Cathay, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -2- 01/15/01 l J 3 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 i 1 1 YAN. definition. A variety of landscaping materials will be used to improve the aesthetics of the parking and drive areas. The site access points are planned via the extension of Apollo Drive at the southwest comer of the PROPERTY through the site and connecting to 77th Street and a secondary access point midway between the intersections of 77`h and Apollo on Lake Drive. The APPLICANT has requested the traffic and feasibility studies for roadway improvements to Lake Drive and the Apollo Drive extension. The City's Consultants and Engineer are conducting these studies and a portion of these costs associated with these studies is to be paid for by APPLICANT. The City, County, and APPLICANT will be working toward an agreement on cost shares associated with roadway improvements prior to final plat and building plan approval. Hours of operation for the retail center will be seven days of the week 6:00 AM to 12:00 PM. SuperTarget's typically have seasonal outdoor sales, such as, spring/summer lawn and garden sales and autumn/winter holiday outdoor display and Christmas tree sales, see site plan for location. Seasonal outdoor sales events .require a conditional use permit. A conditional use permit request for seasonal outdoor sales is also a part of this site and replatting approval application. The total square footage of retail space and total number of parking stalls has triggered state environmental reviews. The first is an EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) and the second is an ISP (Indirect Source Permit). APPLICANT is preparing both documents for review and approval by the City, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Environmental Quality Board. In addition, APPLICANT will be submitting an application requesting approval for grading activities within the Rice Creek Watershed District. APPLICANT is requesting a parking stall variance of 193 parking spaces for the 51/2 per 1,000 square feet or 21 parking spaces for the 5.0 per 1,000 square feet city requirements. APPLICANT is proposing to provide 1,644 parking stalls (1,613 hardsurfaced and 31 proof green spaces). Further site and building square footage refinements may bring parking stall counts closer to city requirements before submittal of final construction plans. APPLICANT is also requesting lot area and setback variances for the SC- Shopping Center District. Shopping Center zoning requires minimum lot areas of 3 acres, 50' building setbacks to city streets and does not allow for common walls or zero side yard setbacks at lot lines. In conclusion, APPLICANT believes that the proposed development is in the best interest of the City. The proposal will allow for the upgrading of an agricultural parcel to commercial /retail usage. Further, APPLICANT believes that the addition of new retail businesses along with the SuperTarget Store will be an asset to the community. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Barton- Asr:hman • De Laaw. Cathar, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -3- 01/15/01 • YAN BACKGROUND The site has historically remained undeveloped largely due to access and earthwork activities necessary to develop the site. A number of proposed projects in the past have eyed the parcel as one that would be a part of major redevelopment of the area. However, lack of public support and financial backing of the developers have caused the past - proposed projects to not be progressed. A Neighborhood Meeting was held December 20, 2000 at the Lino Lakes Senior Center, thirty- six (36) Lino Lakes residents attended. A survey form was offered to all attending to provide written states about their concerns toward the project. Exhibit G has all surveys returned to the APPLICANT at this time. THE PROPERTY Ss PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The PROPERTY is an irregular shaped parcel bound on three sides by abutting properties to the north, south and east. Lake Drive (County Road No. 23) is to the west. Right of Way dedication for widening of Lake and construction of Apollo Drives is planned, with actual amount of lands to be dedicated to be determined later. PROPERTY description is as follows: That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, and the Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 444.0 feet to the point of beginning of this description; thence East and parallel with said South line of Section 8 for 413.00 feet; thence Southwesterly and parallel with said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 209.00 feet; thence East and parallel with said South line of said Section for 812.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W to its intersection with the East line of said Section 8; thence North along said East line of Section 8 to the Northeast corner of South Half of Southeast Quarter of said Section 8; thence West along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter of Section 8 to its intersection with the Easterly right of way line of said Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 3 PARCELS: EXCEPTION NO. 1 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and that part of Lot 15 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota described jointly as follows: PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Barton- A:amen • De teem. Cachet, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -4- 01/15/01 CYAN BACKGROUND The site has historically remained undeveloped largely due to access and earthwork activities necessary to develop the site. A number of proposed projects in the past have eyed the parcel as one that would be a part of major redevelopment of the area. However, lack of public support and financial backing of the developers have caused the past- proposed projects to not be progressed. A Neighborhood Meeting was held December 20, 2000 at the Lino Lakes Senior Center, thirty- six (36) Lino Lakes residents attended. A survey form was offered to all attending to provide written states about their concerns toward the project. Exhibit G has all surveys returned to the APPLICANT at this time. THE PROPERTY as PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The PROPERTY is an irregular shaped parcel bound on three sides by abutting properties to the north, south and east. Lake Drive (County Road No. 23) is to the west. Right of Way dedication for widening of Lake and construction of Apollo Drives is planned, with actual amount of lands to be dedicated to be determined later. PROPERTY description is as follows: That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, and the Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 444.0 feet to the point of beginning of this description; thence East and parallel with said South line of Section 8 for 413.00 feet; thence Southwesterly and parallel with said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 209.00 feet; thence East and parallel with said South line of said Section for 812.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W to its intersection with the East line of said Section 8; thence North along said East line of Section 8 to the Northeast corner of South Half of Southeast Quarter of said Section 8; thence West along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter of Section 8 to its intersection with the Easterly right of way line of said Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; thence Southwesterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 3 PARCELS: EXCEPTION NO. 1 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and that part of Lot 15 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota described jointly as follows: PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bartan•Auhman • Da luuw. Cachet, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -4- 01/15/01 • • YAN Commencing at the Northeast comer of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8; thence West along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 1172.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing West, along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence South, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 233.00 feet; thence East deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence North, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 233.00 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. 2 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, distant 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast comer thereof; thence South at right angles, a distance of 201.00 feet; thence West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter and to the Easterly right of way line of Old State Trunk Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly on said Easterly right of way line to its intersection with the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence East on said North line to the point of beginning. EXCEPTION NO. 3 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West (assumed bearing), along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, a distance of 1380.70 feet, to the actual point of beginning of tract to be described; thence at right angle to the North line, South 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds West, 233.00 feet; thence at a right angle, North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West, 500.57 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of Anoka County Highway Right -of -Way Plat No. 17; thence Northeasterly, along said Easterly line of a curve whose radius is 5641.85 feet, a central angle of 00 degrees 21 minutes 52 seconds, a distance of 35.88 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the South line of the North 201.00 feet of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, parallel with North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, to a point of intersection, said point of intersection distance 1587.48 feet West of the Northeast comer of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, and 201.00 feet Southerly at a right I angle to said North line; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds East, on said right angle line, 201.00 feet, to the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, 206.78 feet; to the actual point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH 1 That part of Lot Fifteen (15), Auditor's Subdivision No.- 134, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, and the East line of old Highway No. 8 (now County State Aid Highway No. 23) as the same is now laid out and traveled; thence Northeasterly along the East line of said highway a distance of 235.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described; IP Town Center Narrative PARSONS Page -5- 1 TRANSPORTATION GROUP 01 / 15/ 01 Batton•Asehmaa • De Loom. Sather. • Steinman 1 J 1 3 1 1 1 EIYAN • thence continuing Northeasterly along said East line a distance of 209.00 feet; thence Easterly and parallel with the South line of said Section 8 a distance of 413.00 feet; thence Southwesterly and parallel with the East line of said highway a distance of 209.00 feet; thence Westerly and parallel with the South line of said Section 8 a distance of 413.00 feet to the point of beginning. The proposed development includes a SuperTarget store of approximately 130,700 sq. ft. of retail sales area, 16,900 sq. ft. of front service, food service, office and restroom area and 35,160 sq. ft. of stockroom area. The SuperTarget is situated on the eastern % portion of the PROPERTY. The development also includes eight (8) retail shop buildings of various sizes on the western %: portion of the site. Refer to the site and building plans for more specific information on location, building elevations, and floor plans. In addition, refer to Exhibit A — Design Standards for comparison of City Ordinance and Proposed building setbacks, floor area ratios and hard surface coverage. APPLICANT is requesting site and building plan approval for all retail shops north and west of the Apollo Drive extension. Description and graphics of the proposed site and building signage are submitted herewith the site and replatting application. Site utilities are proposed to connect into the existing city water and sanitary sewer mains. Proposed sanitary sewer connections are at two locations; one near the southwest comer of the parcel along Lake Drive and at Apollo Drive and the second at the secondary access point along Lake Drive. A new site water main with fire hydrants will be looped around the proposed buildings and tied into the city main near the two sanitary sewer connections stated above as well as connecting to the 77th Street water main. Refer to utility plans. Building down spouts and the majority of the parking lot storm water runoff is being planned to convey through a system of new storm sewer on site and connect to two new runoff and treatment pond located south central and northeastern on the site. Storm water runoff calculations are included in Exhibit F of this narrative for verification purposes. Planned earthwork will involve the excavation, filling, export and import of soil materials. On site balance, without import and export of materials cannot be achieved due to the extent of organic soil material on the site. APPLICANT has included in the preliminary site plans a sheet titled "Site Infiltration Plan". APPLICANT is intending to use BMP's (Best Management Practices) for storm water runoff that meet City and watershed district objectives. APPLICANT has incorporated structural soils in the planting beds to improve soils compressive strength as well as improve infiltration properties. Along the backs of curb and gutter section, where appropriate, infiltration trenches are planned to reduce storm water runoff. A bio -swale along the south side of 77th Street and north of SuperTarget will also be constructed. • In addition, bio - retention basins in the southeastern and northwestern corners of the site adds increased over all infiltration objectives through the installation of infiltration tubes in the basin ip bottoms. Infiltration tubes are also planned along the invert of the bio - swale. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bsrtongsnhmnn • Ds Lsuw. Csthsr. • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -6- 01/15/01 CYAN APPLICANT had a number of soil borings on the site. Refer to Exhibit H Soil Borings for additional information conceming site soil conditions. PROTECTION OF WETLAND RESOURCES AND WETLAND RESTORATION AND FLOODWAY IMPACTS A portion of the PROPERTY consists of jurisdictional wetland; some or all of which is regulated by the Rice Creek Watershed District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Rice Creek Watershed District serves as regulatory function with regard to wetlands on the property. The Watershed District serves as Local Government Unit ( "LGU") under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act ( "WCA "), which regulates the filling or draining of all non - public waters wetland. The jurisdictional boundaries of wetlands regulated under the WCA were delineated using the methodology described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ( "1987 Corps Manual "). The Corps of Engineers also regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into wetlands. (again as delineated using the 1987 Corps Manual). Wetlands on the property were delineated according to the 1987 Corps Manual by Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. ( "PEC ") in December of 2000 and documented in a wetland delineation report dated December 11, 2000. James L. Arndt, Ph.D., a licensed soil scientist in Minnesota performed the delineation. Refer to Exhibit E. There are approximately 4.87 acres of delineated wetlands on the PROPERTY. The Peterson report has labeled wetlands as Basin A (3.63 acres) and Basin B (1.24 acres). Due to the late season timing of the delineation a confirmation of the wetland boundary with the LGU and Corp has not occurred. APPLICANT will work with the City, County, Watershed District and Corp of Engineers as early as possible in the spring to confirm the wetland edge. All of Basin A wetlands will be impacted by the grading activities and by converting it to a site bio- retention basin. APPLICANT is pursuing an off -site wetland mitigation site or an existing wetland bank to be debited for the project. APPLICANT's planned construction of two (2) storm water ponds and creation of a bio- retention pond no impacts to floodways are contemplated. INTEGRATED BUILDING ARCITECTURE AND DESIGN COMPLEMENTARY TO LINO LAKES VILLAGE CENTER The architectural design has been derived from the context of the Village Center. Building massing and materials similar and compatible to the Village Center are planned. Buildings on the site have been laid out with view corridors in mind and address the public pedestrian paths with articulated entries and building corners. Public amenities such as plazas, gateways, picket fences and sidewalk patterns at major intersections are intended to promote a pedestrian path with varied points of interaction. Refer to Site Plans. PARSONSTo Center Narrative Page - 01/15/01 TRANSPORTATION GROUP Barten•pa¢hman • Oa Lem. Sather, • Steinman i 1 YAN Buildings on Lots 1, 2 & 3 are designed to promote multiple tenants. A sign band of stucco and brick will organize individual signs at a consistent height. Signs will be individual 36" letters internally illuminated. See building elevations for wall- mounted sign locations. Building facades have three recognizable elements of base, middle and cornice. Corners of the east elevation (storefront side) are highlighted with brick pitched roof forms that repeat a vernacular common throughout the Village Center. Standing seam metal roofs are limited to end corners for visual interest and focus. Painted aluminum storefronts incorporate transom windows, canvas awnings and varied sill heights to provide facade transparency that strengthens the relationship of the buildings to the street. Brick and stucco piers with wall- mounted lights are spaced equally along the facade to provide for flexibility tenant configurations. The sides and rear of the buildings are integral- colored, rock face concrete masonry. Colors and accent textures reinforce the basic design concept of base, middle and cornice. All metal cap flashing and service doors will be painted to match the storefront color. View corridors between these buildings are framed with a brick archway or highlighted with an outdoor plaza. The intent is to provide visual or pedestrian connection to the public sidewalks. The sidewalks along these buildings will be primarily concrete with a scored pattern. Intersections of roads or other sidewalks will be highlighted with decorative contrasting color and/or material. Planting areas will be located at the ends of the parking lanes to help screen cars and to visually soften the transition of sidewalk and roads. Buildings on Lots 4 & 5 are intended to be designed with similar concepts as outlined above. Elevation and floor plans for these two buildings have not been developed, however they will have similar and tie -in feature detail. Buildings on Lots 6, 7, and 8 are larger and intended to be single tenant uses. The building facades are stepped back from each other to give each tenant a separate storefront. Tenants will be allowed to incorporate their proprietary retail image into the main facade. This will be the focal point over and around the main entry. Brick piers will flank the proprietary entry. Signs will be wall mounted with individual 60" letters internally illuminated. See building elevations for wall- mounted sign locations. Building corners are highlighted with brick arches or pilasters. The brick will extend two thirds up the facade and will terminate with an accent cornice line. The main field on the sides and rear of the building are integral- colored, rock face concrete masonry. " Color and accent textures reinforce the basic design concept of base, middle and cornice. All metal cap flashing and service doors will be painted to match the storefront color. Sidewalks along these buildings will be primarily concrete with a scored pattern. Intersections of roads or other sidewalks will be highlighted with a decorative contrasting color and/or material. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bnttso•Asehmnn • De loses. Csthm. • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -8- 01/15/01 • CYAN The SuperTarget building will have material and building theme and to match above buildings within the development. Target also intends to install new wall- mounted signage. See building elevations for wall- mounted signs. EXTERIOR LIGHTING AND SIGNAGE As requested by City Staff, luminaries will be located in recessed or boxed fixtures to eliminate off -site direct views of the luminaries. Exterior lighting is designed to avoid glare on any neighboring residential parcel as demonstrated by the submitted lighting distribution plan. Lighting in the rear of the buildings will be limited to wall- mounted fixtures that will avoid direct spillover beyond the development's paved areas. Security lighting is also proposed in certain identified areas. An illumination plan has been submitted which depicts the projected foot -candle measurement on the Property. The following is a summary of the modifications the Applicant is proposing to deviate from the Applicant's standard lighting package to "soften" the site lighting plan as requested by the neighbors (see Exhibit G): 1. The pole mounted flat glass lenses in shoebox fixtures instead of the normal convex lens fixtures. This will lessen the glare from lamps being seen below the bottom plane of the fixture. 2. Applicant has eliminated the typical shielded wall packs from the northern drive's security lighting package, replacing the fixtures with shoebox style and flat glass lens. This change along the building's north, east and dock areas will have light only shining in a downward direction. The flat glass shoebox fixtures mounted on 6" arms at 20' above pavement will eliminate spillover light beyond the paved areas. Applicant's general site lighting criteria is as follows for the level of security specified: 1. Building front at curb 2. Entry drives 3. General Parking 4. Edges of Parking 5.0 foot - candles min. 2.0 foot - candles min. 2.0 foot - candles min. 1.0 foot - candles min. Proposed signage for the development is as follows: Super Target All letters and logos will be individual aluminum cans, internally illuminated. Proposed Sign 30" Pharmacy PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Barron- Asehman • De 4aw, Catper. • Steinman Specifications Prototype red face, trim and return. Location front elevation Square feet 56 sf Town Center Narrative Page -9- 01/15/01 12' Bullseye 60" TARGET 72" Super 8" underscore 48" Expect More Pay Less 35" Archer Farms 26" Market 24" Tenant sign TBD Buildings A, B, C, G, H Proposed Sign 36" Tenant Sign TBD Buildings D, E, F Proposed Sign 60" Tenant Sign TBD PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bartoa•Asehman • De lases, Sather. • Steinman Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype red face, trim and return. Prototype green face, trim and return. Prototype Red face, trim and return. TBD Specifications Individual letters, internally illuminated Specifications Individual letters, internally illuminated South (front) West elevation South (front) West elevation West entry on front elevation East entry on front elevation South (front) Location Signband above tenant entry(s) and corresponding street elevation Location Integrated with proprietary entry image. Building F west side elevation also. YAN. 489 sf 365sf combined 167 sf 143 sf combined 100 sf maximum per tenant Square feet 100 sf maximum per tenant, each side. Square feet 200 sf maximum each sign. Town Center Narrative Page - 10 - 01/15/01 Pylon Signs YAN The pylon signs will have an 8' base of split face CMU, same as used on the retail buildings exterior. Project signage and logo will be mounted to the base and be extemally illuminated. SuperTarget logo and sign will comprise the largest face, and three tenant signs of equal size will be mounted below. The armature surrounding the sign faces will be stucco to match the building architure. See the table below for sign square foot summary and Exhibit I for graphic. Proposed Sign 14' -8 "x 12' -0 "Super Target and Logo Three 3' -0 "x 12' -0" Tenant Sign TBD Specifications White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO flur. White Panaflex Internally illuminated with HO flur. Location Top of pylon (3) Three spaces below Target logo Square feet 177 sf per side. 108 sf each tenant, each side. SITE LANDSCAPING TO PROVIDE AN OVERALL ATTRACTIVE VISUAL IMAGE The landscape plans submitted with the site plan application combine natural and formal planting styles within the parking lot area. The objectives of the landscape plans will be to provide visual screening to of the parking lot and loading dock area, and provide shade and ornament to the parking lot area. Per the direction of the City, the plant pallet consists largely of plant materials that are unique to Minnesota and more native to Lino Lakes. In addition, plant materials were selected on their ability to survive the conditions of this development. The City Ordinance defines a significant tree as any hardwood deciduous tree 6" caliper or greater, any softwood deciduous tree of 8" caliper or greater, and any coniferous tree of 12' height or greater. See Exhibit D, Significant Tree Survey. The tree survey logged 752 trees however 566 are "significant trees" as defined by ordinance. The proposed grading activities will require the removal of 437 significant trees. In addition, the City has requested that all Aspen and Cottonwood be removed from the site. An additional twenty -one (21) "significant" Aspen and Cottonwood will be removed that would have been preserved during the grading process. The total tree removal count is then at 458 significant trees. Refer to Exhibit C — Tree Removal for more specifics on the common name of trees on site and those removed. The City does not have a tree mitigation /replacement guideline. In lieu of this requirement, the APPLICANT believes that the proposed landscaping plan meets the goals and objectives of the City's landscaping requirements. The site grading activities will result in the removal of 14 Tamarack trees from the property (8 Tamarack will remain). Specific to this action, one - hundred and nine (109) Tamarack trees will be planted in the northwest and southeast areas of the site, surrounding and in the bio- retention basins. The City Zoning Ordinance requires the use of planting strips at property lines. Per the request of the City, berms have not been incorporated into the planting strips to allow the treatment of PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bartoa•Aschmen • De UMW, Cathay, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -11 - 01/15/01 CYAN storm runoff in bio - swales. The APPLICANT will be proposing to meet and exceed all landscaping requirements. The perimeter of the property is landscaped with a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs. Landscaping will be incorporated throughout the site. Planted islands will also be incorporated into the parking lots and along drive aisles to provide for parking lot definition. A variety of landscaping materials the plant pallet consists largely of plant materials that are unique to Minnesota and more native to Lino Lakes to improve the aesthetics of the parking and drive areas. Minimum sizes for plant materials are as follows: Potted/Bare Root B &B Shade Trees: 2" dia. 2" dia Half Trees: 6 -7' ht. 1 %s" dia. Evergreen Trees: 3 -4' ht. Tall Shrubs: 3 -4' ht. 3-4' ht. Low Shrubs: 18 -24" ht. 18 -24" ht. Screening of the trailers and tractors parked in the loading docks will occur by the construction of a 65' -0" long by 15' -0" height masonry wall. SITE GRADING AND NEW WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PONDS Site grading will occur to facilitate construction of the SuperTarget Store and other retail shops, construction of parking lots, islands, structural soils planting beds; two water quality ponds, berms and swales for the creation of bio - swales and bio - retention basins. Existing site soil regime is of a naturally high infiltration media. Classified by the Soils Conservation Service as Zimmerman fine sand soils type and a Category A soils. Drainage calculations (see Exhibit F) for the predevelopment 100 -year event computed a total site runoff of only 1.54 cfs. In order to maintain the post - development runoff rates at the predevelopment rates two (2) ponds with storage above normal water level and a bio- retention basin are planned on the site. Pond 2 is centrally located on the southern property line. Pond 1 is near the northeast corner of the site and the bio- retention basin is in the southeast comer. Pond 2 capturing runoff from Apollo Drive and parking lot area west of Apollo is planned to have a National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) volume of 1.64 acre -ft and a wet storage capacity of 2.12 acre -ft and discharge to the bio- retention basin at a maximum of 10.32 cfs. Pond 1 capturing roof runoff from the SuperTarget and three major retail shops west of Apollo as well as parking and drive isles is planned to have a National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) volume of 5.26 acre -ft and a wet storage capacity of 6.12 acre -ft and discharge to the bio - retention basin at a maximum of 2.88 cfs. Drainage calculations are submitted with this narrative for verification purposes. (See Exhibit F) The bio- retention basin in the southeastern corner is an existing wetland (Basin A). This area is planned to have installed 40 vertical infiltration tubes, a berm, landscaping, and a pipe of 6 PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP earmn•Aschman • Da Laaw. Lather, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -12 - 01/15/01 1 1 1 • YAN inches in diameter discharging in to I35W Right of Way. Total dry storage volume of the bio- basin of 4.7 acre -ft and peak discharge of 1.72 cfs is planned. The bio- basin's storage depth will bounce for each of the various rainfall frequency events with maximum depth varying from 3.3 to 6.7 feet in depth. Due to these planned impacts to this wetland area, wetland regulations will not allow this area to continue to be classified as a wetland. Wetland mitigation offsite of Basin A is planned Per communications with city staff and DNR Area Hydrologist, Mr. Tom Hovey APPLICANT understands that the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation of the nearest lake (George Watch Lake) to the southeast of the site is 883.5 to 884.0 and has a high water elevation of 886.0. This brings the OHW into the northern` shoulder right -of -way of I34W and the floor of the bio- retention basin to the 886.0 elevation. APPLICANT will progress with Rice Creek Watershed District approval of the grading, drainage, and wetland impact/mitigation plan. The project will require approvals from the watershed district and city. SITE ACCESS AND TRAFFIC The site will gain access from two (2) planned locations long Lake Drive and one (1) location at 77th Street. Apollo Drive is planned to extend easterly into the site and turning north and connecting nearly mid -site at 77th Street. A secondary access point is planned along Lake Drive north of Apollo Drive. The City is conducting traffic and roadway feasibility studies for improvements necessary due to normal growth, other developments underway, and this APPLICATION. The City as to roadway widths, lane configurations, center islands, traffic signals and right -of -way requirements has not released preliminary design considerations. APPLICANT has provided all information it City as to projected traffic volumes and will continue to support the traffic and roadway study needs. PARKING VARIANCE REQUEST AND SITE CIRCULATION Parking requirements for the development are established per City Zoning Ordinance, Section 3 General Requirements, Subdivision 5 Off- street Parking. The site is zoned SC - Shopping Center and under Para. F - Number of Spaces Required item 16 states, "Shopping Centers. Five and one -half (5 V2) spaces per each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross leasable floor area (exclusive of common areas)." Para. F - Number of Spaces Required item 15 states "Retail Store and Service Establishment. At least one (1) off - street parking space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area." • APPLICANT is requesting a parking variance of 193 parking spaces for the 5 /2 per 1,000 square feet or 21 parking spaces for the 5.0 per 1,000 square feet requirements. APPLICANT is PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Button Aachmun • Ds Louw, Luther, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page -13- 01/15/01 1 1 1 1 YAN • proposing to provide 1,644 parking stalls (1,613 hardsurfaced and 31 proof green spaces). Further site and building square footage refinements may bring parking stall counts closer to city requirements before submittal of final construction plans. Site internal circulation will be obtained via the two access drives off of Lake Drive and the 77th Street access. Truck deliveries will be directed to enter at the Lake Drive access points. No long or short trucks will be directed to access the site from 77th Street. Trash containers are proposed to be fully contained within the building footprints. The SuperTarget has an external cardboard bailer /trash compactor in the loading dock area. This area will be screened from the residents to the north by landscaping and a split face modular block screen wall. Target will propose an outdoor seasonal sales area. Target typically will have spring/summer lawn and garden sales. Target does not foresee any parking stall issues due to the seasonal use of a 40' x 100' (22 parking stall) area in the parking lot for seasonal sales. The site plan submittal will identify the proposed location. Pedestrian traffic between retail centers will be addressed by the installation of sidewalk along the front of each retail center and wallcways will tie between shops and the SuperTarget Store. A regulatory sign package will be submitted for staff review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. UTILITIES City services are available to the site. Presently, a sanitary sewer main parallels Lake Drive on the east side of the right -of -way. Applicant intends to construct manholes over the existing main and branch easterly with new 8" diameter main at two locations; one near the southwest comer of the parcel at Apollo Drive and the second at the secondary access point along Lake Drive. Existing city water main is also readily available to the site A new 8" diameter site water main with fire hydrants will be looped around the proposed buildings. This new main will tie into the existing city main near the two sanitary sewer connections stated above along Lake Drive, as well as tie in to the 77`h Street water main. City Engineer was contacted to provide hydrant flow tests near the site to APPLICANTS engineer so that a determination on fire flow booster pumps will be needed for proposed building's fire protection sprinkler systems. Applicant will provide easements for the City over the new water and sewer mains. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP BartmrAachman • De tem. Lather, • Steinman • Town Center Narrative Page -14- 01/15/01 1. • • CYAN The following easements will be dedicated. a. Standard drainage and utility b. Cross access c. Ingress/Egress d. Right of Way EASEMENTS SITE ZONING VARIANCE APPLICANT believes the appropriate zoning of the site is SC - Shopping Center zoning district to accommodate a wide variety of retail and commercial oriented uses. This gives the city the best level of control over site activity. This development project is consistent with the purpose of the SC zoning ordinance to allow some flexibility in land redevelopment. APPLICANT is also requesting lot area and setback variances for the SC- Shopping Center District. Shopping Center zoning requires minimum lot areas of 3 acres, 50' building setbacks to city streets and does not allow for common walls or zero side yard setbacks at lot lines. Refer to the site plan and preliminary plat. SUBDIVISION APPLICANT is requesting preliminary plat approval. The preliminary plat addresses lot subdivision, right of way dedication, utility and drainage easements, and outlots. In accordance with City Zoning and Subdivision Regulations (Platting), APPLICANT intends to provide land contributions to meet parkland and ROW dedication requirements. (Refer to preliminary plat Outlots A, C, D, F, Apollo Drive and 77th Street Proposed ROW, and yet to be determined Lake Drive ROW dedication) Proposed ROW and Outlot contributions to the parkland and ROW requirements total 11.04 -acre of the total 41.86 -acre or 26% of development land area. APPLICANT will prepare all cross easements, ingress /egress easements and site maintenance agreements for all properties. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The APPLICANT is requesting a conditional use for outdoor seasonal sales on behalf of Target Corporation. SuperTarget stores typically have seasonal outdoor sales, such as, spring/sumrner lawn and garden sales and autumn/winter holiday outdoor display and Christmas tree sales, see site plan for location. Per city ordinance, seasonal outdoor sales events require a conditional use permit. The APPLICANT does not foresee any parking stall issues due to the seasonal use of a 40' x100' (22 parking stall) area in the parking lot for seasonal sales. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bartan- Aschmen • De Lem. Whet, • Steinman Town Center Narrative Page - 15 - 01/15/01 YAN• REQUEST APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS 1. Building materials and colors for all buildings to be submitted for staff review before the issuance of a building permit. 2. APPLICANT maintains the water quality ponds. 3. APPLICANT obtains Rice Creek Watershed District approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit 4. APPLICANT submits final drainage calculations to verify storm water runoff and catch basin numbers and locations prior to issuance of a grading permit 5. APPLICANT obtains appropriate demolition permits for building removal. 6. APPLICANT dedicates the following e asements: a. standard drainage and utility b. ingress and egress c. cross easements d. right of way dedications and easements 7. APPLICANT submits a grading bond before the issuance of a grading permit and landscape bond before the issuance of a building permit. 8. APPLICANT submits a site regulatory sign package for staff review and approval before the issuance of a building permit. 9. APPLICANT to petition for vacation of any obsolete utility easements PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Berton-Aschman • Da Lauw. Catbar. • St roman Town Center Narrative Page -16- 01/15/01 .4$ .0s .1 .•3 •4R .a .®. . •3t .3a .37 .417 .64 .63 .36 .33 .13 .M • • • .33 .1t .F.1 .13 . out .47 .61 .• .1A .0• .43 .33 .417 .33 .73 00 •011 043 AS `.TRY`' 053 .0 . .44 et" .t •73 ••• .33 .sa • .44 At •3. .4 .3, •t! • •4$ .• .33 .at • .33 .a3 .4t •3A .!A •R .t• .30 •M •4• • .34 .7 •w •• .4.1 .113 .1 .3 .33 .• •w ,3 • .00 .3 .3 .4 •3 •a •t •3 •1 .i4A2.45 • •t.. .3 •• .•3 • •113 .3 • A3 32 .IN 411 t3 .13 43 OW •f .121 •88 �..W .31 .e, .33 .3 .43 ..i •11 .13 .1• .L .A •s .4 •a .a >� _ •e .A .3 •4 •3 .3 .2 .s .1 .; .a • •a .8 .a .1 .0 .a4 .3 •'J' ..l •1A .1• . • •33 • elf 41 .2 .3 •411 •1 •a .A .4 •Y .i3 .ab .14 • • 2 .. .4 .4 .4 .3 .A .3 .3 •2 •s •1 •+ .t .r .3 .3 .A .3 .a .3 •1 .1 •3 .a .a •3 .40:1,112 .• .2 whim thiace •a ...whoa* .6 .11 Kt 13133 3-o0Cn0 .3 .3 .t *0 •4A •11 •1 .3 .3 .a •a •3 .4 .1 •1 1 .t1 .33 .13 .17 T 38 .a .0 .3 •a .2 .3 • .a •a •3 .1. • .1 .0 .3 •/ .! •• .• .a .a .1 .a .3 .1 .0 .s .• .3 .4 .:1 •1 .0 •1 • •A •a .3 ..II .4 1 .1 .1 .a .a. .a .1 .d .3 .3 .3 . .3 .3. 1 .1 .3 ., .t .1 .0 .1 1 .0 .• .0 .3 .• •0 1 .• .• .0 •0 .0 •0 • Al .0 •• .0 40 .3 •1 .0 .3 ./ .0 .0 .1 .0 .1 .1 .A .a .1 .a .3 .1 •• •0 .3 .0 .0 .• .0 EATIIRD AREA .0 .1 .3 .3 .t .3 .• .1 .8 . 1 .1 ►a .• .4 .1- .1 .4 .a .1. .4 .0 .0 .1 .• .• .t J. ■• •• .3 .! •0. .1 .0 .1 .1 .$ ./ .1 .1 .1 .• .• .• .1 .t .1 .0 .1 .0 .0 .0'. .•. .1- .• .• ..•0 .• . 1 .0 .• .1 .1 .• .0 .1 .0 .3 . • LUMµINAIRE SCH swam uso. MAE _ S'II•c - t -1 �3 outroo 44 113 2/, ag 2.52 fz 4= 20.2 M fc = 0 AtERA1 J fNIMUM 448 0 MAXIMUM/ WARN = 0 i 00' TOTAL NUMBER OF POIN S # 3308 CT 11sn 5tEA1 B• LDG FRT AVERAGE' is = 10.78 ) MUM fc = 20.1 • • I+I IMUM fc = 5 • AVERAGE/N iNIMUU aa 4.02 2.15 MAXIMUM /MINNUM / TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS = 56 130141810E ODICIMOON 1 0 oJ31123AS 100011 104 4001 ftAT MASS 4 CJAII 33)0037 104 4W! It 0Ir 11 w twos 115000 Tr_•• • le 0 447 0 0-0 0 1 Cua 2313► 4 ' 1311 43 l 01Y _ VAS 1 GENII 10003 144 4001 1000W 1114 407/ 4-4-C-0• MG al oust I ROUSED 181 NAM - 3900! 1111 4337 Met 3013., . .70 CM 2 W31125X ROWED 00 3 270 • 1 ilA31120t6 ow 2 0.30112044 2 cumin* 36000 13090 23300 ,..' UE a .753 0 0 0 0 O 0 115000 • .755 .755 440900 7ss 431000 tptNSUse4 11143T 11I4 TAPE 300 0 100 270 270 270 e a .755 .755 PLANE : AREA POINT SPACING LEFT -T0 -RIGHT = 25 ft POINT SPACING Top- TO- IOTTOu = 25 ft LOWER LEFTHANO CORNER OF PLANE: X =550 Y= 140 Z =0 UPPER RIGHTHAND CORNER OF PLANE: X =3031 Y= 1738 Z =0 UGHT METER IS NORMAL TO PLANE AVERAGE fc = 2.52 MAXIMUM fc = 20.2 MINIMUM fc = 0 AVERAGE/MINIMUM is 0 MAXIMUM /MINIMUM = 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS = 3308 NON to iissre awl= 2 0 t 0 s3Am a • 173 0 44 q t na1 • 7643 0 ° / =2.5 7447733 O 33 .33 3044 742.0 • 31 11„.•• Ca 01 - 1333 1441 •� • • 0 O 10J7 SINS i0 / 0 0 30 !� 09 7!S''017. MSS sa; as OMB .Ma C1� Mss 33 p 1707 1$ ° 0 • 1 u s 30, ° ° !12 N3 o m, o / Isou so ! isms ass 0 j� ▪ / 1312. 1313 0 0 0 3313 10 0 10311 NIS i� _ s130 • °° 3133 • a • s 07 !t* 3 1 12 a • 0 ▪ 42033 3 0 II rice Ira : ...- 6 >. 371• t I / N13 1�1R0/1tt aN 3 f S •1063. a / {i 3 311'73 t107a • a" o. t ••73 taoas 3x0 0 tt73 *130-3 e Ear a21>�J . a ° 0 t*3 343 0 10873 as O !4'0 740 43 tt/ 0 103 343 a • $1 WOO 13743 301 0 • a31►3 31604 33 31 I 0 • 0111 e IONS 41 1776 � 11 °03 • 1773 404.134 i Nall N 30 0 N NOM 41s7 N f0 0 740.1 e WOO t*��0 tb 00 0 q M • 110 0 •�Ot NU e0 41 SIO: i 3 • Sir /l 04 0 SINS Ms,0 • 11116 MS V SCUM •,tb 413 M • 0 1 00° 1413 0173 is f0 0 i 14•s ti573 MS N 1* 0 7=0 INS II 0 0 7383.1 las MIX 10S t3 0 0 1tOM 006 • • 16 3 O 32.1 036 0 22%!33 /�Ota •4 0 2;i 3655 0 1••! ` 0 0 ON 0 iffa 1• 00 00 1 3084 O lir 1su 7233 7133 al l 0 IN 0 1* 7 • 1•3 tu7542. 30 11Oi 0 O 0 14435 Q _ 44 tom, °0 0 MILS 1 nay "0 434as 20 3 0 3333 _f _i•_..S0 Sm 3112 3 O 1344.5 a 0 N3 1355 0 ral ads43 way° Nova 63 a 360006 61 62 MI JO 110 3 II 7711 72 3 74 t 74 VI t it tatJ . MOM Or MVO= •• 1 ADf 10101. ODOM OF Ipf MOO •• 11 At ROL 111I11174 or wawa - 45 01001. NV= OF 1017313111 22. 4 3-62 1004. NOW Of MN= • 1 4-6-0-0 1084. MIbEI1 Of t001a1o' - 4 14 1004. MOO U UNMO • • =OM 1017, I UNN OF MOM •• 31 NOR. AONA AND 42• COMM F1QOR APRIL ' 1 Soli IF .1 .3 61 .A . .1 •J .3 .1 .4 .1 .3 .1 .• .3 .3 .1 •a .. • 61 .J .1 .4 61 •4 .1 .1 .1 •3 .A .4 .J •• 63 •3 •J .1 •2 .2 42 .2 .4 .A Al •I .A •A •3 .4 • .1 •A .4 .3 .A .3 .1 .1 •I .4 .2 .2 .4 •2 62 .4 4 •a .2 .2 .a .a •4 .3 •3 .3 • .0 •• .a .4 .4 .1 •• •t .6 .0 .• .1 .4 .0 .4 .t .7 .0 .1 .0 •• .3 •4 .l .7 .7 .7 .3 L •1 •1 .9 .• .7 .4 .4 .5 •0 .• •4 .1 .0 .1 .0 .t .4 .. .• .7 .0 • .3 .0 .7 .5 •• .7 •1 •A .a •0 •• .0 .1 .0 •0 .7 • .3 .3 •43 •a4 •11 613 •U to .11 •u .t. .14 .N .42 >1 48 •17 .7 .44- or t .43 •17 .43 .17 •71 eel .0 .ra 5.4 .11 . N •4a .47 Z 0.1 7 Pp a Oa O Z o3.- a oaf I 15 1 111i. 1111 .41 . 7 3 .v .' .13 ..s .7112 .na •1fa .a344.1.7 .tom .14 947 .1144 N .11. 84 A • • 0 4 4 .a 3 6014 ^^.Y6 •M .111 .p• .L J •u r•w•••.14 carCi •w At It -ter) .72 .t# �:. F+' .1:1 F� a .47 .11 .4. .M .4• .41 .1 .71 .11 4 .14 .14 .31 •17 .14 .33 .14 ON •44 •41 A .• .. .•1 .N 42 • •p • .4.4 .37 .• • •12 .44 .43 .46 •u • .7a .0 .sa •13 ••• .22 •a• •• .0 .43 •7 4 •111 • .12 •, .O1 .14 •a• •11 •1•11 02 .11 12 � .0 2 . �µi •aw •71 •33 .22 .3. .741 IT 44 ••4 •W .4311 .71 •17 LL .tl .0 .44 .44 •11 •Y • 1 -:a 34 .11 .7t .4, •2 .2 •1 .1 • .34 047 .it .4 .11 .23 .46 .0 .t• ••• .3* .14 •al .6a .11 •4 .10 .34 .47 .14 .13 .b .37 .41 •i1 • .ar .42 .19 .01 •44 •a• ••a •41 .1 • II .32 .47 .44 •277 .42 .33 .1 .47 .q .43 .tl 11 .41 .9 .•4 .•• •sa .0 .64 44 .30 •4a •4. •34 •M .4 .24 14 •7 ._ .3 .40 •111 .a .3 14 • •:A •44.46 •44 .N 03 .11 .41 6411 • elf •N •14 ON .5 • M •4 •• .• •34 •07 .47 .aa .43 .14 .41 .0 .47 .41 .$1 017 .82 .3.1 .11 .3 .3 .ia .43 .43 • 9 •1 .M .Y .0 .M .Y •48 19 9 .1.7 10 .tl .20 •H •1a. .aa .1 .3 •_ • .4 .42 .31 .1 .17 .14 .44 •a •u •111 •I2 7 .04 Rk'4C5 913 .04 •111 .41 .1t ••• •33 •31 .41 .92 .0 •N •47 .W 0A •aa .• • tt .10 .13 647 .N •13 •44 .47 .Y XI 61111 •11 .42 .47 •67 .a .•• tl 43 :N •aa .0 .32 .4a •3a .Y •42 .44 •111 .1 •143 .40 .02 .4M .127 1 A3 32 ••• .0 .14 .a7 .34 .7• .as ••42 Ora •a •M .4• .jii•4T�/ .37 •11 •11 ._ .N •1• .14 .• .4 .2 .2 .1 • 4 .10 .30 .It a .4 •4 ..4 .4 •a ..a •• •2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 •2 •J .1 .4 •A 14 .1 or! .3 • :3 �•.a .J �> •2 .2 .2 04 .3 •3 •3 .1 .4 .4 .0 .1 .4 Al .1 .a .4 .1 .1 .J .1 .1 .0 .4 01 .2 91 .2 •J .1 .3 .4 .J .1 .4 .• 64 .2 •1 .a .4 .3 4 • � M[ .0 i .2 .2 •2 u met .4 •4 .4 .• �N - •• •1 113 tam• s 1.000131 .4 .4 .J .a .• •2 .2 . 6.2 .a .4 .4 .• .1 .1 •A •• .4 .3 .2. .4 .1 .4 .4 .1 .4 •1101/ mon 19 .a .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .1 •1 .3 •• .• .4 .4 ..;)•••<1 .a .2 .3 s� •• .A 61 .3 03 •1 .1 .1 .3 .1 .0 .• •• • •A .1 .a. .1 .4 .1 .1 .4 .t • .4 .7 .4 .7 .0 .• .4 .4 .0 •0 .4 .7 .4 •4 • • :' • 1774 ,u7 � • • • • MI 1771 1119 / • i 111 N " ! 01112 • 1410 N 34 00 N3 :A • • • • r w tnuutts 7° • 1709 111174 318 11 �a• N 993 1e. 9 1 2N 39 11 •soo• � INN 7w`Mi ens a MILS M 1p u I p N WI 114 I •1�• M ' 't4�7a mi 9 2�O1 91 N = 41223 446 N MOW 2131112 8 p NNW MS 4429 71 111 ICCI72 c J .4 1111102 .7 .7 .4 .4 .5 .0 EMIRS ARIA .• .• .• 2.82 fc • 20.2 fc - 0 A MUM OR 0 IAAXI MINIW1 = 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS f /3308 STATISTICAL 1 BLDG FRT / AVERAGE" fc = 10.78 yMbOM uM fc - 20.1 / MINIMUM fc = 5 AVERAGE /MINIMUM - 2.16 / / MAXIMUM/MINIMUM = 4.02 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS . 56 PLANE : AREA POINT SPACING LEFT -TO -RIGHT on 25 ft POINT SPACING MP-TO-BOTTOM - 25 ft LOWER LEFTHAND CORNER OF PLANE: X =560 Y -140 Z -0 UPPER RIGHTHAND CORNER OF PLAN: X-3031 Y- 1738 Z-0 LIGHT METER IS NORMAL TO PLANE AVERAGE fc - 2.52 MAXIMUM fc - 20.2 MINIMUM fc • 0 AVERAGE/MINIMUM = 0 MAXIMUM/MINIMUM - 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS - 3308 �p 4, IDQiu laaor •0 � Kam as mum 2oa- 7' • •22• L 7D 74 1II3��11ss las 74 ins um I 14735 UN! 20 Ms 1343 211 Was 1134112 >A MS 1� 10 • 3s • r • • • as 41• a• p so b 0 SO O • 20 x e7eaNar $ o r774° _I 94112 90 ;NU �• 991.0 7712 • a 3.1014 711.• • 11.77 • • 111a44�4 MN tg4 • ana 0• asu 11011211• WI •0 11211.• 3471 400 184 41132 • 1410 *7431 • 01013 7191 0 ION an 0 134 7 3 41.0 a1 • 470112 146 �4 • • • MI 4 • 344* • /120 • 191 •• 1 3337* 4M • 1611711139 911 1 11171 1911 �11s�.w30a*•o 11131110• •stu • • NIS 2062 4% 2247 W • 1717 huts 0 1141 w • • 1192 • woo 4 1777 1643 • lit03 t •. met 0 2�1 0 1364S 0 117/1 Ott, Irt / H 3. 110111 11211101 0 WW2= •• 1 At 84*. 74$W OF MOM= • 11 • 1.01. meat or Iowan • N It 7001. 112.01 ar 1101.01. 4 34/1004.11111112 •71•112/1013 • 11-11.6. VOL 14901 or I319616 . 4 Q soot 6aa101 to 1.411.1•• 1/9001 1001. OMEN OF 1001107 • 22 7001•[ 7pm IM! 00•0211911 MIN MUM • 1 NO O 60 1 SCALE NI • / / / / / / / 1 .3 L .4 .9 .3 .1 .. a .• .• .. •1 .a .1 .1 .a a .4 .4 . •f .4 .4 .J .4 .1 .J .3 .4 .1 .4 •4 .1 •a .1 .1 •1 .4 .a .4 • •• .• •1 .1 .J • .2 a .a .a .1 .3 • .. .4 .1 .4 .a .1 • .7 .a .1 •t •4 .1e .1 .4 •1 at • •4.4 .4 •1 .J .1 .a •a .1 .1 .3 .2 •3 .a •t .3 .3 12 .2 .a .1 .4 .1 .4 •1 .4 •a .3 U ..J_ .L _.r` .407_ at -t f-. 2= •3 .4 .3 .14 .11 .11' .33 •a .3 .t .7 .a .• .3 .3 •43 .43 .83 .13 .13 .1 .9 .1 .3 .a•.• a .3 .3 .3 70 BE BUILDING MOUNTED SHOEBOX FlX1URE •73 .13 14 .13 •31 641 .1I .14 64. A2 13 .3 .• .4 •4 .1 .1 .4 .4 ..4 a .3 .3 • .a .3 .4 .s •4 Lir -ice ;y -T -,rte- ,r -s- :�- / .11 .t a a .3 .9 .3 .3 .. .3 .a • .1 .1 a .3 •a •J .a .1 .4 •a .4 •1 •a .3 .4 .3 .4 .a .3 3 .4 , •4 •l .4 .2 .1 .2 •a .a .a .17 •1 • •3. .4 .4 .1 613 .3 •• .3 .3 .1 .le .lt .13 .1• .fs 3* •s • •1 .1f ell .37 .it .13 633 .Y .11 .27 • a1 7273 •311 • .0 14 . 1 .d .13 33 •14 34 .43 •.8 •u u •Y u .34 .1114 !a .17 .73 .7• .17 .14 6e4 • `-ID 31 ••7 .03 .0 •35 ,14 .Y .4• .L •f .24 .13 .L •n W .Y FETAL F 37;000 Kt FT. FFE.010D FETAL Q 6R600BO.FT FFEA100 •Y .tli .Mf •74 . • • .L •o• 4111 .74 •4s •37' .f1 .3 r. ..a 3.4 a .17 .3 .33 .42 •14 .34 •411 •1e 644 •73 .03 •31 •13 •43 of 6111 .33 .73 •11 .f1 .1s .31 .31 .19 •111 .fa .17 613 •3• .11 •N .14 •31 .a. •42 .33 .3 613 .3a •.• .fJ .13 .14 .7 .37 •1s •3e at .34 • l •o 634 .3 .0 eat •11 .ta •11 •17 .14 .17 .1 •17 .13 .11 .i1 •0t .ti •1s .1.1 .11 •1. •11 •14 •17 •13 .e .11 .•11 •Y •1i .a1 all •13 .47 .31 •117 .0,7 .1 • .13 34 .at •] .14 .37 as CS •1 f .a3 G •Y ✓ .3t .0 .13 .32 .fNT 48. .21 43 .2• .f N at ,e 14 M •43 .17 7 •4 •. 77 a .11 .III .2! 614 .43 •73 •u .•3 .43 .L7 . q5 .I ••1 LA . .f! .37 .•3 .41 T •3•t in .133 •1117 OUP •lie .13 .117 all •11 B :Er q u6 .w .w .011 .101 IC 41115 •5• •2i .4 1 13 .1.3 57 ail .h.. -+a•.J .0 C=1 11 .47 •.I A • d .44 .41 .1 .73 • it 114 M as .34 •Y •L .1/ .24 .33 - 631 .41 •Y •44 ••4 U .4 .0 .11 ' •17 •.4 .37 •44 041 •Y •41 Y .7• •.l .74 .31 .34 '4 .1U • ` des • u • 14 . 14 .14 •411 .74 .a1 • a .33 .03 .• i 12 .6. .141 •1113 .11 • .33 618 •l• •• •111 .M •7 . t2 .21 •13 an .774 ON • 7 • 11 . 13 all at • • •.4 .13 •a `z 43. .as .124 ..a .11 .37 .77 .w ..H •0.3 •44 • . 44 .tl .8 •a3 •at .33 .Y .11 .413 .40 •11 • .a, .ft .47 •11 •117 .34 .13 •31 •17 .13 eta •b d2 .33 .M .114 .31 all •11 .12 ••• 607 .17 .47 •113 .37 •14 .Y 014 ••4 .3 .14 .34 ".44 .44 .44 .34 .! ..tl .3 13 .I4 • sA2•4 .O •11 •3 .3 •1111 .1 .00 •Y .Y .14 .. •• .•1 •1.4 •Nf •11 • A3 32 .e /.•23•"134 •._. _ .W a1 •N .11 •4 .3. •33 614 .1.! •14 • 44 .11 4.4 .14 •I3 a.2 .11f •41 .1' • .42 .a •u •4? .af •4 .1• •.a a • • .7a .0 •12 • .14 •M •H .M .l• .N .11 .14 .41 .t .14 .3 •u •u .0 .17 .34 • .Y .41 „•i7 ...11-".* •a .a .a .a .• 641 •• a .3 .2 .2 •t .4 •4 •4 .a a • . 2 a .1 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 •2 .2 .s .41 .1. .a .3 .4 .3 •4 .1 .3 .3 .1 •• .4 .a •a •a .1 .a a .. . l .s •a .s .1 .a .4 .1 .3 .• .3 .3 .A .3 . 4 .4 .3 .a .a .1 .1. .l .1 .4 .1 a J • .• .3 •• .3 •t a •• •3 • t .s .3 •2 .a .. •• .7 .1 .a •1 .a •t .• .1 .3 .4 .1 .3 •a •, • .4 .1 •1 .4 .a .• .8 a .3 .• •e .3 .• .4 .4 .a .a a .4 .a .1 a •3 .3 •3 .• .. .3 .3 a .11 •3 .1 .• .3 . 1 a a a a •3 •a a •• a a .4 .3 •• .• .1 a a .• .t a • .8 .t •3 .1 .• .1 .3 .3 .3 a .• a .3 .0 .4 .1 a. •• • .1 a a a .• • •• •• •1 a Oa .3 a .t .• a a a a .3 .• a . .• .3 .3 .• • .• a a .• .3 a .3 .3 •11 .• .3 .• .8 .• .• .3 .4 •3 .1 .4 •• a a .3 .1 .t .9 ' a •• a a •• .• •• .3 .3 iE NOTED COMM ROADWAY >ARE . 3 .3 a .• .3 a a •3 .3 a a a mere Coopeallitattata Vann wmlm wets mamas 101101 A`a001. LINO LIKES. MN PULSE PRODUCTS " JR 0006746 113•4 1.. 0 6 1.40 01.04 -4601 SECUItl1Y LEVEL: 1 1312 0331143131011 W M% 130313 a1433141/O41 .3 a a .3 .3 UMINASRE SCH ' 1 .1 / J✓ •' .a a /r ., •• .3 a .4 •. .. .3 a •s .s .s .1. •1 .a •a .a •1 .1 •4 .3 a .• .I •1 a .3 .8 .5 •• vans AREA A 111 fc MUM fc MAXIMUM/MINI TOTAL NUMBEI STATIST1r1.AL Ai .Mp I AVERA6( MUM ((cc fc MINIMUM fc • AVERAGE/MPNJI i MAXIMUM/MINI TOTAL NUMBEI i WOOL Ma 010 MIME 012101P11oN' WallM:'1 -:_" 'T�Iif -w • -ANN NW a:.•.. .735 � tt!!*��1�>•Cwttei /.3iF�T.�4 _ �7T' F'.?_7:7E_0 1U1013 lif 115000 0 IIiia•�37t.�•.�u_ ti.7 i=7- tliit< .1 -111 . �><•. -112. ..,151.211Man Fa:>I6r't1111111 Elr?tom)' u llF:__�Ei-z]♦[ .. a>cIN l >_Nt_ �1r• -� u•� :t:_11a.��-- u:� ;�����Ik<r> �� •0-C •0 • art 3 01031 • ' 1 QM11203.3 400000 -273 32-C -0 0 x 100-20 K 2 G/01l98W 36� 0 t t - •00-07 NZ 0 ePi7151 ` N1 ZOO 750 0 0 0 0 000 0 150 PLANE : AREA POINT SPACIN POINT SPAIN LOWER LEflI4 X s 560 UPPER RIGHTI X . 3031 uGHT METER AVERAGE fc MAXIMUM fc MINIMUM fc AVERAGE/MIN1 MAXIMUM /MIN TOTAL NUMB! / / / / / / / / / / / / / .8 •/ // .3 .t/ .• L .1 .a .3 .• .1 / .4 .1 . .4 .� .3 .4 .1 •4 .A .1 .1 •J , .4 .4 •4 • 4 .• .4. . 3 .4 .1 • .5 •11 •" tt1281 .• . 17 .24 .if . 68 ` / / / / 1. a .a all .1 • a .la all .131 ' .54 •1R .13 .as .11 .a .74 .87 .S4 .• FETAL MOOBaFr. FFEO FETAL a W080.FT. PFE■IOQ FETAL H 81.200 90. FT. FFE49IQO 33 •a4 .aa•. .54 •41 .N **ACCENT 62 .13 .tA •13 p f 64 .13 .0 4 AG NP 3.41 .43 .al .83 •14 .43 .Y .lY .p• •14 .0 .•a .t .M 24 � '"C: :r / / TOTAL E 640090. FT. FFE11MLI .7a .1• •L .43 .W .t .81 .S. .14 .14 .1 •17 / / / / / .a •w .s •! .a •w .1 •a .3 .3 .l .. .711 an Al all • L .M all •7a .S• • .1t •u •811 .74 •43 lPIL 19 .0 •42 .17 .1t •L .13 .R4 .S4 .43 .41 .31 .1 .47 .a •• .It .44 ••• 680 .k .74 .ls .L •41 .p .L • .14 .33 .141 .14 .13 .aa .4s .34 .3 .1' .3 .11 .L .L •11 .L .11 •44 .112 • .i1 •tt .14 .1• OUP .L •1t •L •L •13 •11 .1 .L .L .11 •L .11 .L .43 •41 • ,alrr.i� •f1 Y 11.1 .11 03 •14 •14 a .t ' •431 .1 .44 AS .SS 644 •1 GNP as a al .L .1t .N •13 •47 UU`''� • •N 444 en •L a d .S •4a 714 .W .33 .41 •:::": (4;:::4) .3; . 401 434 •13 61114 617 •33 .41 al •17 • 4a .84 .Si •N .L. • / / Vii► .M((��,.r�n•f����T��..�a�'�#1.1k1 .>AS.Ji�at1 45 AI ot tetra en CZ) .31 .11 .N •111 •Y •U .M •41 •4! .74 .51 .31. .b •as .•S .S ..S .41 •14 .17 .1t .44 AS .83 .3 • .17 .14. .1 .e4 .14 .In .83 .4S •Y AS .14 .14 .1:R .42 d .M .43 .4 14 .S4 .14 •41 .4 . .21 .17 2rieb.0 •411 .111 .43 ..N .51 .32 .4 d .111 •M •L4 .1 11 .35 .43 .1 .1 .43 . • FETAL 9 BQFT PFE409O 11 .17 .3* .a .7 •V .33 .l .a .1 .11 .1R .111 •11 ••Y .t4 .37 .1 •s .1 .14 •Y .3 .4 ACCENT 40 •7L .•a .a 4111r : \6442681inolakes \DWG \lino— sit.dwg 1.. / .1 / / / / / / / / / .► .• .4 .4 •3 a .3 .3 .3 .3 .t .a •4 a .t •a .3 .a .4 a .3 .s all .3 .4 al .1 .4 . .s .2 .a .3 .4 .L .s • .a .4 .w .4 .4 .3 .4 .1 s .4 .1 .a .a _ •a a .a .1 •4 .J .4 .a .s .1 .s .4 .1 .4 .1 .1 .a .s .4 . •4 • •4 •a. •a •4 •4 .4 .t .3 .1 .3 a a .• •4 •• .1 .a .3 .4 a .3 .■ .t .4 .1 a a •1 .J . .4 .1 .a .a .4 a a a' 1 .4 .4 .4 a •4 . .J .a .1 .4 .J .3 •1 • a a .3 .1 a • a .4 .a • .1 .1 . .1 .3 .4 .1 .3 .4 .1 .f •1 .1 .8 .8 .1 d .9 d a .8 .8 .4 .5 .3 .3 .R .3 .3 .3 .S .3 .3 .4 •• .8 .t .5 A •• .1 .1 .5 .4 .3 .3 .4 .8 .3 .3 .8 .1 • .1 •1 .1 .• .3 .3 .3 .1 a .f .1 .1 .1 .1 .R .1 A a a A a .1 d .1 .1 .4 .3 .1 .1 .3 .R .• .R .8 d .1 A .t .1 .t .1 .t A .8 .3 .3 .4 .3 .t a .1 .4 .3 .1 d •4 .1 .• .3 .3 .4 •1 .t .R .3 .4 .3 .3 .1 .8 .R .• .3 .R .t •• .3 .3 d 8.11 a .R .1 .3 at .1 a .1 3 .R .1 .3 .3 .• .1 MEI UGHTING NOTES 1. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT TO BE ONE INCH PVC UNU3S OTHERWISE NOTED .5 a ..1 .• •t .3 •• •• •• .1 .3 .8 .3 .3 .• .• d .• a .1 • •4 .3 d .R .1 .4 •t .4 ON PLANS. 2. SITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDIHA1E FINAL PLACEMENTS OF CONDUIT WITH BUILDING CONTRACTOR. 3. LIGHT FOUNDATION TO BE CENTERED 3' -0' BEHIND CURB ALONG ALL ROADWAY AND PARKING LOT CURB UNES. (TYP) 4. LIGHT STANDARD 10 BE CENTERED IN PARKING LOT ISLANDS. (TYP) 5. FOOT CANDLE PRINTOUT PROVIDED BY COOPER LIGHTING. ALL UGHTS ARE METAL HALIDE FLAT LENS, SHOE BOX RXTURES. 6. ALL POLES ON 3' -0" HIGH CONCRETE BASE ABOVE GRADE. 7. FINAL SITE LUMEN PLAN TO BE UPDATED FOR FINAL POLE LOCATIONS. • .1 .1 .t .1 .1 .1 .3 .1 .1 ..a Cooper Whew Wan elom 1141 Imo NAMES. IAN t4t3Crs 134111:1 20311 2131 PULSE PRODUCTS '7a` Iti • ti R0006746 113 01•04-0401 SECURITY LEVEL! 1 ass octisonver 1671301 11401133 1117t141/211.1208 CITY OF LINO LASES - LAND USE APPLICATION CEEcx APPROPRIATE BOX FEE ESCROW DEPOSIT Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500 x Conditional Use Permit $ 35Q $ 350 Interim Use Permit $ 350 x Site Plan Review $ 500 • $ 500 x Subdivision: Preliminary Plat $ 1,250 $1,250 Preservation. Development 1,250 Punned Development Overlay 1,250 Minor Subdivision/ $ 250 Lot Split Rezoning $ 350 Vacation: drainage, street, utility $ 250 x Variance $ 250 250 Property Address PIN # o8 -3l-Z ;-1 j-Q120 Legal Description: Lot Block Mdition See Exhibit A attached hereto EXfstmg • Land Use Agricultural' Existing ZonIAg SC (Shopping Center) DESCRIPTION OP EQUEST• Conditional Use Permit for outdoor sales Site Plan Review; and Subdivision Preliminary Plat; Variance for parking Applicant: Owner (if different than applicant): Timm , Ryan Companies US, Inc. Aare address 900 Second Avenue South address Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3387 phone (612) 336 -1200 phone fa (612) 337 -5552 wettrq , r-rur No ivinessinV,fritgliqw 011111C111v000000 0 .,®p�oo(o EFigeitkzejinilill odacao� . 11 n n 11 11 N •1 • Er '�r111H111111'e�� 't'nYUtaf t• nliltl a1�f,[L -p!z n )emu ,.r. r� o ia*" u� t�r�u �. ' OOH -• �� a 1auf�� uF.. �.: u mn km li 11 MI LJINJ W a OLJ c^o =11 �� �i.1 aw. 1 a Arai IN rri if I o un`L*"" ,0 'ZLiI4L01tr! E ; Ally u o�fiain p-' % � s '.o.tC IMilin..6W--E. ZIP ,: 10.R Gccac o,at' FiT d ' 1 -,-..,,i. L,,,,e, _, , hirgall 2 Ella IL, . l .+. _¢ FZ Etarf as VI coca n N Ex b: 4- I LEGAL DESCRIP71ON PER ATLE COMMITMENT That port of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and Lot 15, Auditor's Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 8 Township 31 North, Range 22 West, Anoka County, Minnesota, and the Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway Nb. 8; thence Northeasterly along sold Easterly right • of way fine, of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 444.0 feet 'to the'po/nt of beginning of this description; thence East and parallel with said South line of Section 8 for 413.00 feet; thence Southwesterly and parallel with sold Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 for 209.00 feet; .thence East and parallel with said South line of sold Section for 812.00 feet, more or less, to its /ntersectlon with the Northwesterly right of woy line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 351.1; thence Northeasterly along sold Northwesterly right of way line of Minnesota Interstate Highway No. 35W to Its Intersection with the East line of sold Section 8; thence ' North along sold East line of Section 8 to the Northeast comer of South Half of'Southeast' Quarter of said Section 8; thence West along the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter of Section 8 to its Intersection with the Easterly right of way line of sold Old Minnesota Highway No. 8; " thence Southwesterly along said Easterly right of way line of Old Minnesota Highway No. 8 to the point of beginning. EXCEP71NG THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 3 PARCELS` EXCEPTION NO. 1 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 West, and- that part of Lot 15 of Auditor's Subdivision • No. • 134, • Anoka County, Minnesota described Jointly ors follows: Commencing of the Northeast comer of the South Half of the Southeost Quarter of Section 8; thence West along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast. Quorte , o distance of 1172.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing West, along the North line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, o distance of 208.7 feet; thence South, 'deflecting to the left 90 degrees, o distance of 233.00 feet; thence East deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 208.7 feet; thence North, deflecting to the left 90 degrees, a distance of 233.00 feet to the point of beginning. £XCEP770N NO. 2 That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter, of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka County. Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at o point on the North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, distant 158Z48 feet West of the Northeast" corner thereof, thence South at right angles, a distance of 201.00 feet; thence West, parallel with the North line of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter and to the Easterly right of way line of Old State Trunk Highway No. 8; thence Northeasterly on. sold Easterly right of way line to Its Intersection with the North line of sold South Half of Southeast Quarter; thence East on sold North line to the point of beginning. EXCEP7ION NO. 3 t• r. That port of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing of the Northeast comer of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West (assumed bearing), along the North line of sold South Half of Southeast • Quarter, o distance of 1380.70 feet, to the octuo/ point of beginning of tract to be described; thence at right angle to the North line, South 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds West, 233.00 feet; thence at o right angle, North 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds West, 500.57 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of Anoko County Highway Right —of —Way Plot No. 17; thence Northeasterly, along said Easterly line of a curve whose radius Is 5641.85 feet; a central angle of 00 degrees 21 minutes 52 seconds, a distance of 35.88 feet, more or less, to Its intersection with the South line of the North 201.00 feet of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, thence South 89 degrees' 41 'minutes 23 seconds East parallel with North line of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, to o point of intersection, said point of intersection distance .1587.48 feet West of the Northeast corner of said South Half of Southeast Quarter, and 201.00 feet Southerly at a right angle to said North line; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 37 seconds East, on said right angle line, 201.00 feet, to the North line of said South Half of Southeast Ouorter,• thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 23 seconds East, 206.78 feet; to the actual point of beginning. Ryan Companies US, Inc. 700 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3387 612/336 -1200 corporate 612/337 -5552 fax January 12, 2001 VIA COURIER Mr. John H. Payton, PE Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55401 ►iI YAR Building Lasting RelatioSs RE: LAND USE APPLICATION — LINO LAKES RETAIL, LINO LAKES, MN Dear John: Enclosed please find the following for the above - referenced project: 1. An original City of Lino Lakes Land Use Application executed by Bill McHale, Executive Vice President of Ryan Companies US, Inc. (Applicant); 2. A facsimile copy of the Land Use Application executed by Glenn Rehbein (Owner); 3. Checks No's. 200285 and 200413 payable to the City of Lino Lakes in the amounts of $1,750.00 and $600.00, respectively, in payment of the Land Use Application fees; and 4. Check No. 200284 dated January 10, 2001, payable to the City of Lino Lakes in the amount of $20,000.00 as and for escrow costs. If you have any questions or need anything additional, please call. Sincerely, Q Debra A. Peterson Executive Assistant to Thomas P. Palmquist Enclosures cc: Jeffrey S. Johnson, Esq. (w/ copies enclosures) Tom Palmquist (w/ copies enclosures) Judy Hermanson (w/ copies enclosures) • G:IDEPT DEWCETAIL TOM P12001\ LE7TERSIPAYTON- LINOLAKES- LANDUSEAPP.DOGDAP Printed on a,ti•yxlyd Paper ;1.1 • 11,.,,1 ti ..,., n 1 I. ■ n. RSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401 FAX 612 - 339 -6760 612- 339 -0313 If P > Transmittal To: Jeff Smyser City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Project: Lino Lakes Retail Center Subject: Planning Submission Date: 1/16/01 Comm. No: 6396.021.00 File No: Copies of transmittal to: w /enclosure El file We Are Sending: El Enclosed Via: ❑ Mail ❑ Express Mall ❑ Under separate cover ❑ Federal Express ® Hand delivered ❑ UPS ❑ The Following: ❑ Transparencies Prints ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Specifications ❑ Shop drawings ❑ indicated below 0 0 Action Required: El For your review ❑ For your approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ Prints returned ❑ For distribution after loan to us ❑ Submit specified item ❑ Approved ❑ Revise and resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ No resubmittai required ❑ Rejected/Resubmit ❑ Copies Date Description 8 1/16/01 Plans, Elevations for Building A,B,C,D Super Target 1 1/16/01 11 "x17" reduction of above set Remarks: By: Bill Wittrock ,JAN , LOO' CITY OF LINO LAKES • • • PROTECT SUBMITTAL DATE : January 15, 2001 TO City of Lino Lakes Jeff Smyser, AICP, City Planner 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, MN 55014 -1182 FROM : John H. Payton, PE - Parsons RE: Lino Lakes Town Center Development The much awaited submittal. Attached are the following: 1. Ryan Cover Letter to John H. Payton, Dated January 12, 2001. 2. City of Lino Lakes Application with $1,750 and $600.00 Fee Attached. 3. City of Lino Lakes Escrow Deposit Check for $20,000. 4. 8 copies of Project Narrative 3. 8 Sets of Civil and Landscaping Plans - Full Size 4. 8 Sets of Boundary & Tree Survey - Full Size 5. 8 Sets of Building Elevations - Full Size 6. 8 Sets of Building Floor Plans - Full Size 7. 8 Sets of Civil and Landscaping Plans -11" x 17" 8. 8 Sets of Boundary & Tree Survey -11" x 17" 9. 1 Set of Building Elevations -11" x 17" 10. 1 Set of Building Floor Plans - 11" x 17" YAN. RECEIVED JAN 16 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES The Ryan development team is hoping that you will place Planning Commission meeting agenda. Ryan is planning for a July 1, 2001 start of earthwork with a date for the SuperTarget. I hope that all documents meet with your submittal requirements and expectations. this project on the Feruary 14th July 1, 2002 anticipated opening CC: Tom Palmquist, Ryan PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP Bsrton•Aschma • De law, CsWot, • Steinman rs SIT grWORKSJSTUDID TARGET iI wo d/f signs One sign Iocated on 1 -35 frontage with second sign at south side of entry from Route 23 TARGET FACES Background- ;white panaflex opy•:and..cofors.. -per tenant specifications- and artwork TEINT ;FACES. Bsickground -,: v►±hite panaflex Copy atid:°colgrs -per tenant specifications. :and artwork Target and tenant faces internally illuminated with H/O Fluorescent Lighting Aluminum column covers and reveals poirttedHight -tan w /suede finish'to inatch;.building architecture aria colors RoicKFace blocki; base :to Match Colprs. in buitding: architectur`e: Lino Lakes letters and accent bar To be 2° deep fabricated - aluminurn mounted flush to:.firstis.urface. Lino Lakes letters and - accent floodlighted from below. -Flood lighte by others. Poblocki & Sons ARCHITECTURAL SIC'NAGE C*SIGN - Er IGiip_ERUSG - EARRICAMORI 922 South 70th Street Milwaukee, WI 53214 tel: 414 -453 -4010 fax: 414 -453 -3070 NOTICE The ideas and designs contained ki this original and un ublbhed drawing are the property of PPOobblodd & San, Inc., and may not be used or reproduced in whole or in part without written permission horn Poblocki & Sons, Inc.l CUSTOMER Ryan Companies, US, Inc. 700 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Lino Lakes, MN AODRESB CWKMEp DATE APPPQJ L MIEBENWNE Richard Nattila Richard Nattila Januray15, 2001 1/811= 1' -0II DRARMBY DATE SCALE SHEET DRAWING NO. Preliminary Plans for Site, Grading, Sanitary Sewer, Water Main, Storm Sewer, Lighting, Landscaping, and Infiltration for Town Center Lino Lakes, Minnesota PREPARED BY: PARSONS SIT PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC. 111 Third Avenue 5oath. Sate 350 • Minneapolis. Minnesota 55401 USA Phone: (612)332 -0421 • Foe: (612)332 -6160 PREPARED FOR: 900SecoodAmmueStadh Ryan Companies 118, Inc. 7001oteans1imalClmae Irmompogs, MN, 6 1200 554025387 Tl 6137 -5552 IM LOCATION MAP 1111E SHEET T11PocRARIICAi SURVEY DRAFT PRELIMINARY PLAT ....._..._ ... PREWNARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PRELRRNARI' SIZE PUN PREUYIN/J1Y ORAOWG AND DRAINAGE PUN PRLiaeiuiRr uiwir PLAN PRFIIWNARY UGH6NG PUN PREiPaNARI'..LANUSC*PE PUN PRELi11NARY ^SIZE. Mi81RA11ON PUI/___.. —_ _.__ PROEC= I 6x404268 01/15/01 Lino Lakes Town Center PREUMINARY PLANS UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA TITLE SHEET W oc UO NMI OF MY PER DEW OF MEW OF WAY PER BOW 27 OF OEE= PACE 421 ANS r NSNINr 11 2 0' \ S „9 ((C E NFSA'M� cos 48 Hoene before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Ana 454 -0002 MN. Toll Free 1- 800 -252 -1166 77774i _ EET) 16� ^ Ns,,/ 709.25 Les In y 0 !TIT fro 3514 e to 812 N8972 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PROVIDED BY: W Westwood Professional Savings, Inc 00 10 n�Oeees/s�eselO ■ LEGEND F�as1REc — — — — RIONT -Or -RAY tIC PROPERTY UNEE o-- - «erg A/MWa.i s 0RY — » —d FLARED END EESIION •/RPRAP p o■ < -o s£�eriN/NAE ele, CONTOUR WE cDNTaw WE 0.� TREE a REGULATORY 8 O COMMUNICATION JUNCTION BOX V MI0RANT .01 POSER POLE 1172.00 S897.2'03 "E VTK /TY EASEMENT • 0 m 1 N8972 03 "W 709.25 1 J LOTS ORAW & NW UTIUTY EASEMENT OVER ALL OR ROUST A t 5�� 40 Si NWT No. 0-).5 391.01 N8972'02 "W OUILOT D 35 00- OUILOT E 808.43 (MEAS.) 31200* (DEED) N8972'02 "W 114 °51P' 1 116 Z PREUMINARY PLAT PREPARED BY: ,�. Waatarood Prof. oral Saedas. Inc. Ef..r<�sm ra.Ma- ti• O >L M 1 1 coo 48 lours WPM digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Two airs Aran 454 -0002 101. Tol Fns 1 -000- 252 -1166 0 3 4 z as B 0 1 • 0 n 1 11 4 NMI LEGEND SAS ON WY PROPERTY N01 INCWOCD N SEE SUSS .... WS 10 6E MOMS ... IRS 10 K P1 RISED wr■..w■....\ 110'E PIE7tl1YASOX RAE 4st sods. MI PRESERVED TREES IINewr I� a ►-f -- �r"T.T"r WII•Wm11..,:,� X� ,r - -f,.�■ _ter- --r�r� 1' It 'f."at•7 f7,7•. 'a i. ■ -sTam ■- .',.i "7. >i� • - r— t..' -- '+rte-+.. ^>•.�r_ 1 al! AOID fO.lL tir�.r�wr iYi rr.. Ly n T IC uai-`r.r->ar�r— ZrirZ ."-Tr i °L 1 ■G- ;T11MWI∎ 'i "'.mow:■ ( l\ -7 �-W Dr— - .-1'�1w. 'Z -fff 71"�7..'-'TZ J1 — '.T. -'1•.f 1■ _w --�...-.1- - '1.w Ziff e.—,.- ar 77. 1>•1■r>� Comm Iwo am. 1w. 1.. '"lr�;;�alr�r,�r-� -�. 'lr`�Yy '71�r 7.1f1 u,f*`�s\ r.. -mot• .r— , &- J 7_ Hr fir• _. �Ir _ -! — ar f F =Jf�.; ::: Tit arm-- a— r"�--r,� I „fr7 .�i l^TTr'�I ^arts -- ter- -11•/. +-s ... --':a —� a_ r f... "r. itt - I ■rte .. mow.- .?*T:�-. ->• ■;a NMI PINIM —_ f- Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWO ESBaM Mao 454 -0002 UN. Ton Free 1-800- 252 -1186 STREET) VACATED 77TH �S7REET z ▪ 11 IL 1 1 1111 • pig iiiik •.•..• SLUM= of M SITE DATA LOT BLOCK LOT Amos BUILDING S.F. RBBQUMB ummat PROM= P 1 1 14.17 182,760 1,006 - 910 1 2 1.34 11.006 61 62 2 2 1.49 13.346 74 72 3 2 1.5 13.348 74 85 4 2 1.16 • 8,400 36 34 5 2 1.41 8.400 36 34 6 2 3.05 37,000 204 150 7 2 2.33 31,500 174 134 8 2 2.79 31,200 172 132 TOTAL 29.27 332.958 1.837 1.645 OUOAT A 3.85 - - - OUILOT 6 1.49 - - - OUTLOT C 1.07 - - - O1ITLDT 0 1.03 - - - (MOT E 0.06 - - - OUTLOT F 0.49 GRAND TOTAL 37.26• 332,958 1,837 1.644 NOT INCLUDED: 4.6 ACRE APOLLO ORNE RIGHT OF WAY. — SITE NOTES • ALL 0/6610/6 SOON ARE 10 FACE CC 0.189 1MEM 1101) COMM • C015R6CWR SIM. FED VENT THE =MOM NO ELEVATIONS OF COSIBLO MARS AND 1OFOORAPIMC FEMME SUCH AS DORMS suns OWES AT THE PROPOSED ORREYW6. POOR 10 8E SENT OF 911E WHOM 144E COMPACTOR OVAL 0111110311Y MIST 11E fl6M6D! OF 61(6501645005 MOON 111011110. Rp1S. • 446601111 PA666 SOILS TILL BE PRODDED RID 001895 PER 654 COOPS 11(1 LOCOED ON SIZE MO OMAN PIM FOR OSISTR IC80M. • ALL OM MO OA1ER 10 BE COICRE1E 8612 UNLESS 1011 OTHERWISE • SPUR. PULL ODE 4Q PARMO 5081 6 D61M' (PUSS 6011 01011 E. • ALL SOP 160 vas. E SO was NOIm 014111160. • CONCRETE 0440446 10 SE 660*1FD FOR 41 ACCESS DRIVES ON TO PUBLIC 911001 PER COY SMOAIOS • REFER 10 DORMS PLAN FOR FOORJ66EE 6046 OUT. • 806096 OME181OPS 446) TO OUNCE OF 561586 FACE (ITP.) MESS OMERAR6E 0080. • VA REFERS 10160 ACCESSOM SOLE 144101 ROO,RS Ni 66 STALL NOB 116248 161. • 44170080 MALL - COLOR OF 0001811 BLOCK 10 BE SELECTED BY MEMO ARCH ECT 511606 COLOR AND 10.011E IROM 016 FOR APPROML. rr rr rrr rr rr r•r rr rrr rr BIM LEGEND D7-i9 74 1 WOET -OF -WAY ERE PROPERTY UE CMS UE USW FIXTURE 01110010e) 06416ENTAL UMT roam 6444 ACCESSIBLE 661MO P MMIIAN RAMPS 0 0. V! 120 180 61 FEE / / / / / S Calf 48 Hoare beto{e digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Me Area 454 -0002 IN. Tel Free 1 -800- 252 -1188 INN STOMA SEWER DATA ®®®® ®i1111 t eteel -C 1ir Alm mow at• j ■[ 3r .∎ lr l t d a t -w•el it :) : }J{ )• d .'a !:1∎1 >•1 =zit ll .! ?>•R d t `a• •r l.1.1 ll rct• r NNW.a r=Jeel •t �I li rY d •• T• l:Rlr It :TJ>a u Tc11•1 TENNI leeee� • mar --el s +. r- cd :.t• • -. — :! al a • i ,r _� 1.•r —.t ..... J >♦i r - - .arte•er"? a it a > :•c i -� rt•r �t-s >. L:dil; rli i.fFir_,.ry , IO• ®®®313 Art MEM f!• tee• T]r Ii 5" r 1 r IIIIM- •ra011•M• �eM�Nr e■ k;rar i•r .. „s.u. �c r .3., .a , ra 1eM��e� J• • -1 der ca. -4= ALL O e SAM IDofW se' MIR GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTWATOR • DOS UTIU SHALL AtO �p41 ES, 1 A5 �011flEt GRADES AT THE PROPOSED MOVENAYS PRIOR ID START EQOFF � ANY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NORFY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIA110NS FROM PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO COWACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE EAU: FOR ununr • Locators -- E454 -0002 48 HOURS P0400 TO EXCAVA110Ti\CONSTRU T ON. • REFER 10 511E PINT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • ME SITE GRADING OPERATIONS. WHEN COMPLETED SWILL RESULT 04 ALL AREAS BEING GRADED 10 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION'. THIS 'PLAN SUBGRADE ELEVATION' SHALL 00 DETERMINED BY CHECKING G SLAB moms ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. THE 'PLAN SUBORADE ELEVATION' ION THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE OEIERLINED BY GREOIONO THE PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIS, AND REFERRING TO PAVING PLAN FOR LOCATION AND UNITS OF VARIOUS PAVEMENT SECIOIS. • INSTALL SILT SACKS 84 ALL CATCH BASINS LOCATED YAM DISTURBED AREAS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE oTTT ITT M>R FX6STI.1G ,, - - - -- - -�.-L lbdli �Oi -MIT I1gE ;•- -- MART/ UK CURS kill LI 4. Z / C IMO • MAN o-- • 5 liANMCi/sM0tmmY STIR ISPOSIMASCAL COMM UNE .0 UIOTY FOIE • IHORMIT DAR YAM SOIL IORRS SILT SOME NIT BAIL • ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR 10 COMLIDICEIENT OF ORATING OPERATIONS AND BE IMRAANED UN4TI. ALL AREAS A4-1E7ED ON THE STE RAVE BEEN RESTORED. • ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE SURFACED 07TN CRASHED ROCK ACROSS FULL WIDTH FROM ENIRMNCE POINT 10 50 FEET 8416 CONSTRUCTION ZONE REFER TO RETAi.. • CONTRACTOR SRMi STRP 530030555P*140 31 1 I SUFFICERT DISTURBED. TOPSOIL 76 PRONIOE warm 4' DFPfRPI iC M 10 BE SODDED OR SEEDED. • CATCH BASINS AND UNWIRES 84 PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SURFED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTER SHALL BE SURFED 0.15 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFLECT SWIPED ELEVATIONS. • ALL ROOF DRAM LOCATIONS 10 BE VERIFIED WITH 0ECFMNICAL. • ALL SILT MICE 10 BE ORANGE IN COLOR. • HEAVI DUTY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED ON SLOPES 00 3 :1 OR STEEPER AND NEAR AREAS WHERE MATERIAL IS 10 BE STOCK FILED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 0 CC GU Z O SOLE N L I I � CONNECT 10 EXIST. WATER MAIN E.4 e 60 -"1 J L I EIGHT OF MY PEW EEO OF EAR? OF RV POP BOCK 2? OF OEEDS PACE 481 cal 48 Hours wren. digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T.ia Mks Mao 454 -0002 101. TM Frew 1 -800 -252 -1188 } ,' VALVE 1 -8.X61 TEE lr NYDReM 1-6' GAZE VALVE 11 -6'X8' TEE HYDRANT Tr ' 0 HYDRANTJ 1-r MALE VALVE 1 -8' GAZE VALVE 28'-8- DIP 28' -8' OF 1 -8'X5 NEE 1--8 7C8* TEE HYDRANT 1 -6• GATE VALVE 1 -8*M* CROSS 1- 8'X0' REDUCER i I TEMP 87.00080. PL PFRr000 RSTALH 8000 Mt FI' PFE4100 HYDRANT 1 -6' GATE VALVE 12'-8' DO 1 -6'x8' TEE COSTING RIM •91 104 918.0 +•894.4 SSWH 111 N■B96.5 SMAH 112 81.8067 RN•891.7 `S99C 113 HYDRANT VALVE 1-6' GALE NV�'BDO.4 12'-6' DIP 1 -0'x6• TEE - lth SSW 100 861.8143 DN •4186.0 SUM 101 121•907.0 NV 866.1 88101 102 NV668A 851111 103 881•906.7 66iwE66.6 mm UTILITY NOTES • COMRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISING MERTES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES. SUCH AS EXISTING GUTTER GRADES AT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS. PRIOR 10 START OF PAVING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PINS • CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT *GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' FOR U1RRY LOCATIONS - 454 -0002 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION \ \CO STRUCtgN. • • REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • ALL WATER MN. SANITARY SEWER MD STOMA SEWER CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO *STANDARD UTRJIY SPECWTCATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LNE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION' 1988 mow. AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF IW4NESOTA. i .■■••41 LEGEND _.. 10051110 0 . • • •••■43:, 10041-01-5.6 CBIE PROPERTY Lli CURB MM CASme=meTMAN110IE WAWA MMI MAIRMIE/SNRMY SEYD! O 01ULY POLE CD TM. 801010 .NM 8 MOW i 6A15 WANE • REFER TO MIMING PUN FEE STORM SEWER MOUE • ALL 5611066 D MATERIAL SHWl BE INSPECTED NM APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ALL REJECTED MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF SITE • ALL WATER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE (0.0?.) DUCTILE IRON PIPE CL 52 OI.ESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL 85 SOR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NORM • ALL MANHOLES N PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SOAPED 0.04'. • CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SERVICE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PINS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. • 7.5' MINIMUM COVER OVER WATER MAIN. i 0 J M MEET •• .4 A •fi a 4 01 •S •11 .1 81 al ell .1 ell ••• •■••••.. aP.._ a -• • -4 4 a a .• .9 .• •• 01 .0 •• .11 .2 .8 . a ea AO ••• 411 4. •• •• •11 AI .5 .2 • 01 • • .1 .111 .10 .0 ••• , •• . I . .... 00 ••• • •Q 16 me •• 014 •115 ••• .71 70 CIE butdrie iced Nii0011X4 FIXRNSS r 4tea e. •1111 .0 .3 ••• •11 .0 e0 .111 •J 4 .1 0 111 • LEI FETAL IP 87300 FT. FP2241110 FETNL 1420080.PT. PP.E.6130 ▪ a. Off 411 • .• • 41 In .4 •• 01. . . • . • . • •• •• .• •••• 114 kle-ToG •114 .a ea •• .1 GC:a 4=48 on .0 •• 00 • • ••• 0111 ••• ••• •• •• • .. A. ••° WACOENT461.8 1111 .110 223CCENT 62 •aa A2Acebresg4 • •. ••• 011 OW .01 .4 .0 . 16. .411 •17 .22 .24 .aa C=a .1 CP. • • GPO••• . . .. 00 ••• .11 ••• ••• .10 •1111 • 11Pit ••• .4 .44 . 0.7 .. on •10 00 .0 .0 ••• .54 08 ••• 00 4.11 44 AS .. Oka OA .4 0.1 . •84, .11 ••• . .. .111 .02 AS en .4 . eM ON 41 . .... A AP ••• . ••• ••• .. ••• •10 40 .0 . 011 011 elta *I .11 .. .115 .. .1111 eM . .111 0811 .0 .110 •• •• 01 . ae .. as ow • as at . Ail 01 .4 .1 051 OW ••• AO 04 a. .0 AI .40 .15 .84.0 . . 0 . ole au .•c:f5 1:::::).• •• Cat.) .a•c==•• es.?.cD.. OW 0A •I• 0111 . . ....... OS *OD .111 .10 .14 •• .4 .4 • .1 .10 a. ell 00 • Al ••• oVA ••• OS .0 en 0411 ••• .0 • .10 ••• 00 AA oal ••• •• _Al... 41=3 • ••=40 CZ) •••• .0 .15 .44 .41 .0 Al • •••• .01 .4 *SS All ••• AV on 04 051 6110 ••• .1 00 610 •41 0111 041 ••• ••• .80 a. 4t45.. . ft • 24= .r=r ter"CD ••• *OS .110 0 04 .4 e• .5 oaa • ▪ e• en e. Oa 40 • EA .• ▪ en •• ••• •411 00 ••• .4 •A .0 oll• e A. .42 .4. ••.• •42 •110 .0 •141 • 2 ••• .as ••• ... _ _ .... _ •• •., ... .. .s. 00 00 • .. 011 •811 as •a* ow •110 1111 11 .0 .0 .416 .12 •4 . •871 ••• .11 0.• •I1511 00 . •10 00 AS .111S on Oa .0 01 .. . •■• ••• . OM OA el/ •5111 ••• AO .10 ••• ••• .84 .10 00 ••• . 0111 ••• .88 AO ••• .85 018 oil .10 44 .82 .110 .1111 OS .1 0111 ••• •• AS .11 ••• .41 ••• . •• •• ••• •• ••• .0.1 • AD a. 3.. 33 ••• 04 .0 .01 00 e. 015 ••• .155 .114 . . .5 .4 .• • •• •• al e4 0.1 •10 oll• 01 40 ••• •54 AS ••• .10 ••• .5 .3 OW • al will •• . 00 ••• AIWA AM .. .5 ••• 41 eV AV 00 .44 • .4 .4 •• 4 .10 ••1 AO •115 .. .17 .... • OA . •0 .1 .11 .4 OA Oa eft OM AS .111 00 Alt .. ••• •10 .M1 • . •• . . ap 00 AS A Oa All 48 00 011 00 010 0/1 .0 .411 g A e• .41 •10 .. ••• A . .44 JP e• ••• AM .14 Ai •aa ••• •aa At at •120 .. • •sa • .. .aa .41 .55 ..42 Or G2 .2 •41 •111 .1/1 •114 ••• • .a .0 *I Of 00 el/ •• • •• •• .3 - .. .• .• .• 4 a ea .11 o• .3 4 o• ell .4 /1 0• .2 .8 4 .4 'fat .5 .• "' maim .1422.4.221 " • .2 44 ....,...*" "TO .• 1W"... WM* .11 on •• e• .4 .0 off Na en .2 .5 .2 .9 .8 .2 .2 .• .4 ACCENT 33 ACCENT 40 /.. / / .5 / / •• .• .8 .• MN LIGHTING NOTES • • • .1 .1 . 14 .11 .0 el ea .4 • 94 .• •• •• •• e• Al 0 /4 .11 e• •• ▪ 01 01 .11 Ell .8 .11 .• 0 0 0 o• • 0 4 •• .e 0 0 as 1. ALL UNDERGROUND con& TO BE ONE INCH PVC mums OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. 2. WE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL PIACENIEMS OF CONDUIT WITH BUILDING CONTRACTOR. 3. UGHT FOUNDATION TO BE CENTERED S-Cr 8911140 CURB ALONG ALL ROADWAY AND PARKING LOT CURB UNES. (TYP) 4. UGHT STANDARD TO BE CENTERED NJ PARKING LOT ISLANDS. (TYP) 5. FOOT CANDLE PRINTOUT PROVIDED BY COOPER LIGHTING. NJ. UGHTS ARE METAL HALIDE FLAT NS, SHOE BOX RXTURES. 6. ALL POLES ON r-cr HIGH CONCREIE BASE ABOVE GIME. 7. FINAL SITE LUNEN PLAN TO BE UPDATED FOR RNAL POLE LOCATIONS. 011 •• ea •• •A •• •• a/ .• ••• Ea .11 EEO .• .• .4 .4 .8 .4 .a .4 .a .a .4 .8 .5 .4 .1 .111 .4 ell .5 0 01 0 0 0 .4 .11 .11 .• .5 • .4 EMIRS ARM .* .4 242 20.2 ft 0 =CNN 0 MAI 88 0 TOTAL wheat OF POIN57 "4308 ••" ••" STAITSTICAL,..Efel ram FFIT ANNUS( 4. •• 10.78 •1‘41016U1A fa 20.1 MINIMUM fa 34 5 •••• A9ERA05NINTMU11 . 2.16 INXIA94IM5161U41 4.02 •••• •••• TOTAL NUMBER OF P06475 56 4. .4 •• . *A oa .11 •• 4 4 4 4 31 .11 al e• e• •• ▪ A 011 e• .11 •• •• . .• •• •• .11 .11 •• • .11 A •• al ell o• 01 o• .0 .1 0/ ell 4 4 .3 •11 e• 4 4 4 Wars mama sot WREN mac cam UNO MEN. IN PULSE PRODUCTS 88. .8 .88 728888888800r6746 SWE 104111.111 SECURRY LEVEU 1 11111112.122 1.22112 hem aaftsvoanco* =MI rillf==■11=1117111C:11 .:1121 • M 2.11NON MENNE EMMNIM MONS BIMINI W,..1•111EIMINIIIIIIMIG,401.1_131,1:21,_a_LN,12.71/1/1 1111"111111,11.= NICM11111ININMFM=Ti-a.C. CNNININE,2-11V-'_,4. -_, ...81 l5 ir.tal'=7111=4.1615,11MMES■ MIMI .7131,711F r.21',_,: .,,r.--Alo..■■■=cm 7=1C-MINME11■11111E: rmomr,u2 .1. acr,i.4.422-,TmilFmmo MANI:1=1111121111M1,_111,-.1.2,11S2,71111111 06 Xi= 11041-/ WIWI MI= INW7 LIMN /1/15 4 , 11.1=1:211Y:11. 111-1..L.T...1127JL-AMIIIIMINI taalarsZiANN elE=.1e,_,Ami E=11111 c:.2 [MIMI Ee_Wr '1,-,27,1,- ,,..--1-1-_-11111MININ CUNENE .7e."1-13 ,1-211._.- a_ _.2 ...2._.2-.2.11IIINE L=42111771111Et.7 N.-:2=11,11111M1 r==122,712.. =7,12211=2F t.. ...:4-4.1.12 INC= It-'1■111■1:2 • 1-_._2,17.11.7..T.7,1171rN71111211=IN 1,Mit 1=F7-7Aim M:M=E 111C. 011.::-.,11-11111111117.111, 2.L- mr4.2..rm.. .. 4111M EY:7.112 MANN -ffr EMI= . _...".1 1 '17:_t Fall= Fll_...M':At • /NMI "-'11N12,_=11,111NME 4:-.11= ''711_11■11 PLANE : ANA -- --- POINT SPACING LEFT-TO-RIGHT . 25 ft POINT SPACING TOP-TO-BOTTOM 25 ft LOWER LEFTHAND CORNER OF Pure X . 560 Y 140 Z-0 UPPER RIGHTHAND CORftER OF PUNE: X.3031 Y•1738 Z-0 UGHT HOER IS NORMAL TO PLANE AVERAGE 2.52 MA)31631 456 20.2 MINIMUM 0 AVEPAGEATINNSUM 0 IANOMIJIA/MININIUNI 0 TOTAL 13111BER OF PO41115 • 3306 OA IOW OM al MAW • 15 1M OWL 001101. 010011011• It WM 1044 t0001.• • 4 11. 2.• 0222 eseusaNse • 6tea84. a et 1•2•22 • • Re UR KW. CO AMMO • • seeel2 222 I••••• 2 MOMS • la MINK WO 04 41•611111 a IMAM= 1 SCALE NO z p4zz joi mm.rii1110 0 O 7 7�17I ►�; +lRil7I NI�jTA 6017 ,VS: 'Pi ° '�` F' wwTT soo III :P :� :►:G:J FETAL mAXIDBn PC 01.200 SC: W, PAEANA RIM! Z N ac 511 9 Ea !II n 1 a Lil L'a1 lP�Ir■ !P•1! . ■E .IWdUI *T-::: •-•-•1:1 •-•-•1:1 Jr. �r alar fib 4WY Sr#SDARD dill SIE FOR WETLAND AND POLO =MIL rioot an ■ec twillahn ■aPOI MIER Rat3:iBj! =rls7 ^y wi :.tw•p rr�1011 ww OLTAOWN W L rams - attosacm TANTIAGOID _21 li211sIr !Az SEISMS AND PO1W GIT jr, I.1 IMP v-._�•.� -in" — PLANT SCHEDULE DECIEIDODS TRESS / SHRUBS •k, „Jr: /A_yli2lya�� SUDS MIR MRS tTM1 ECM E.1tlIET: >11? alFii1-"1E•71 ?`A•,j17Y1 , ITIVIEN REAM RIM MAN LTIA11117E7.7YITIII_12,.. ;in.' f+Z�rW !7111'1; T •W ,^It•. ( 7;. , 1 'i 11111AN 1W,I1 E-7A lr il MR — 11• Z T ■ tIEI --MW IT a 1 tSTilIT MAI= ■i •E1a-7 -As'Y` cm magi Am NV: 1111 MIN 11,11MTITE.;XLAIG f7�l♦EZTf f^.,-;;nn�.wrzu - -. ti;WW#7<-AS:W-A 1Edi1 l ,. 1 TSIf- -A3E iii 17`7Evk7-.IirY� ;1• E7ERf3;i- 1iI=H..' 3tl.-' Gt1•1L„lalir; 1 11•I�t_! `' MAIM!? lE712.' .tliia ..:1'E WinEIFI♦ ��`�.�yK tl•1? .1E71:1_h.larYr;ATE ��� E:OW �3 ?.rP13•"� DffiERUOUS TINS / SHRUBS 41 1': N. '1: 1 NAME SIZE 11 111iF• f i'a1L13+L1 I.is..A. 1W'�f 5MMEIIi11i�l!i_ WARS MEE 11i:111BiiAIIt_L.:i IIIfjil= 71RP71;M_.1I i:1♦ AIR WANT SEM W.11.4117-11F, o■Px1111 immaimminimirb...1 .., r -Mill... 411 ,.>• EI iiE•: cE/ LLJ ..•'�'.4'ltd_,:.aaTin "Iii nitk - �'1♦E• �f. I MENNET MAIFT.1:TT'utltYt7a ENERGRSHN TREES CODE COIWON NAME :TIN NAME f.iitlfF..I E.li11111■R— NIB= W!•1:111111=1111! 1•�7R r SIZE ROOT REMARKS �1� aloe RIM= MIR ti- �tT PINS S RODUS MS LANDSCAPE NOTES • ALL PL 11 MMERIA NSUCH AS. SOD AND SEED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED • LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SIMU. SUBMIT A SHOP DRAWL G OF IRRIGATION PLMI TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL • ALL TREES ROAMED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CHIPPED AND STOCKPILED ON snE FOR ON OFF STIR USE WHERE SPECIFIED. REMAINING WOOD CHIPS SMALL BE DISPOSED • ALL DISTUFTBED LAWN AREAS 10 BE SODDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL name PARKING LOT I51.MIDS TO BE PLANTED WITH CITY STANDARD NATIVE WODGRASS ENDURE AND COVETED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL EXISTING ASPENS AND COTTONWOODS 70 BE CLEARED AND GRABBED. • ALL OVERSTORY AND UNDERSTORY TREF55 RANTED M SOD AREAS SHALL BE ATTACHED W/ A 4' DIA. MU= CRCLE TO A DEPTH OF 4' NRMULL • z 5 O_ O- Q G 5 0 CoN 48 Hers before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Arco 454 -0002 IM. Toe Free 1 -800 -252 -1166 TED 7 STREET) BON OfInAMONABOMBI IS BACK OF CUM 44141-114 - - - -41141-11-11414- FETAL r MOOD fa FT. FPEi00 IITALO 81800 OM Pt. FPE•110 IEM.H MAW 80.14C FPErINI.O , BETALE 11I18180.14E /;. mss: %e: %i= ltitt tttl Y�L � ri V ' i ii,' / i111�i j // ■ See* �1ee�eeUt�eelle�e��eeex,e�ee�!� la 4110111= iii1i11JiiI I I ti "• LtiiL i►i►, tr`'�Ni i; PRAT N0. 644268 0 PROJDN LINO LAKES TOWN CENTER MELT NAVE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN attikllOg Leming Ryan COMPtlaie' US►:Ina. 700latiai doed Caine 900 Sewed Aneas$au9t. Messievolis, 554024387 to potlsM M317-550 fa 191.0my WPS REVISIONS +,_ OWN , , C> QC CHEpcWSM DATE 1/15/01 1 wort togrr Tel PIM 2330110410/4 ON WPM MIXORR MIN MY MITT SUMMON QIOF11 IM NN! or 7318 scat OF Ie1tlOOOl MIL N0. Jed L Mead PARSONS a1 STUDIO PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP INC. 111 Third Avenue South, sotto 330 • 1n e , Irumeeete 85401 MA Phone: (812)332 -0421 • Ana (312)332 -8 02000 Westwood Professional Services. Inc. / • I v, A —�ni r•.v r,f vL Mai r 1172HH "°Y t1 i' -L "Nsprv. - - -- - -- - -- - r = c.:••••••• A rr-' sat: or rMrrwe ores or Roe ar rr Her woo as o• SCUM ANC M.■ • r. 77TH a1REET - >Z •_,•_l ;. 1• \ \ \ % , l.;:•1.; <�_. /- I . N \ 3 :i 1{fir Il ., V k V ( " i — I 1\ 1. / // .l,!!1rlJtj�f� ��I v nu, r .r 1 / / 1' / \ ' (/"iiii"1. % ir f • Ii(• 1 \ i ,,,s‘..., , i‘ , . .1 ) VII . .,- , ...,., iu901 ) ,,\ so- ►r fats (1.:274rit7 /7„ p II Sig m • VICII %TY MAP NO SCALE LEGEND - 4 •f1ARSD ENO seC1l l 4 • pi." *.Na; •• • POMe1 01ERr1EA0 ROMER ~GROUND. SAMAR? ST'GER -SI M SERER - IIEPINAC NmmGROUNO RN1EA1usr •t1.A.N- RlComs TREE UNE .. CLWIFINIOUS TREE XEaDnald TREE REiLMRI SIGN- RtAFFIC DROR - WL BOX CARLE TY ICY GUY HIRE POSER pal SANITARY MANHOLE SOIL GORING MAIMINOVS SURFACE • • / ------------------- - - - - -- - / // / // •/ f/ / • 8120! N89°012 Too 1 so- C. a') L N 1 C 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES GRAPHIC SCALE' 4- (TROQT) 1 Leh - 100 R • BENCH MARK: DISC STAMPED ((0280 J). LOCATED ON IHE SOUIHEAST CORNER OF MOOT AT IHE WIERSECApY OF WIERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 35W AND C:S.A.H Na 21 ELEV. - 9I&95 FT. (NAND 88) clwino sea Pnwed ion Ryan Companies US, Inc. Aflnassota 85402-3311 Dots 1-11-01 • 20005851 SSS11PT1.DWW Town Center Lbw Labul, lemmata TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY I. 2080 Westwood Proteselond Sonless. Inc. .r. A h-ivtnr c•.^, .r�.� e , r•3 -" j`-T sal. r a1-0o R/i KrrHlue _ eqs r r wawa - N- tiiB°f�.eia�n 2 t7,iE _ 1\ • VACA r - 777H TREET • k::ti T LEGAL DESCRInnuv PER ZI7LE COMI rx(Etir • ' fiat port of Ins South kdf of ohs &Wil asst 0 ,a tars .o% S.stkn• 8. • Townshp 31 Nor8, Range SS east and not 1.1 Auostpa Subalston'. . Na 134. Anoka Counts 4hnSata. Onaliad'a'labors Coran ai8g.a the htsrseation e1 the South lie of Mallon n 8, Township 31 North, Range 22 wash Moto' (Mats .MNunaotet and the l heterly% right • of Say le of Ofd Ukfnesoeo,14 hruy ta*theOco fl¢rtbbattall along sad: • Easterly right of ovate of ON Mneaoto Ilighwalia. a for sH 0 ' he to th. point .8' b.9kini+9 01.0M. ascription: that* East and . paralSouth att lel with wih Ea r w Owed.; d Mlnna.ota Highway N.. 8 fr.209.00 feet thence East and peeled ' • wRb said South Tins of era Fatten. kr 81200 feet more Or less. • to its intersection with MM named No. nigh( of ring line of NrMwatth t of wy line OfML assolo inteerstate� Wang N . said. . 35w to Rs interKetlon with M.. Eat 8ap of said Seethe a Mena North deny sold East Da of Seaton 8 to 8.. N orM.ost came or South Half of Spathaost. 0ur1r .,;old Smart. *. thence Hint along the North line of solid Smith 'Hoff of Southeast Quarter of Section 8 to Its btoractMn web .the Easterly * It .,way lino of sal !old "t.: - Mi Minnesota Highway :Is *. thence Southwsstrty along sold Easton" , • - rlplrt�•of ray line of iced Nsirneeoto MghrOy No. 8' to the point of \ • **"...•:‘; • i • VI. µo. /�/ 72114 N / / err r antra, �• ND•.3yW • EXCEpI1NC•1NEREfRQtf 71E EYtLLO1 J.PARCEMS" ' • • • that porter sor`uth.oer Oniorto, orti :sautn.o>hi i7uart.f'. seat* •, 6 Torun$,p 37 North, Range 22 thin and that pr! of Lot 15 of Auditors **anion Ns 136 Anako• COUntle•'1Rnemta id•rbed platy as knows • Comm cu Commenting at Um' or a/ the Sotith • Hat a the Southeast • Quarter of Section tic, -Mean 0bt deem M. North x+, a the South . Half of ea Southeast Quarter, o attestator'. 7'17200 foot to tla pant of beginning Mena Can NMt, rang the North 8. of oho • south Ralf of li/rSarRMbot .:0 tligaios'df 2067' f.01' Melton•• .••: ' South &teat to' the loft 90 ten alesta.b. of-23300'IKt ' •'" Manes Ease a to the Mt 90.dames a dbtana, of 2067 .. fat Mena Nartlr 4.1001 19 to'Me Isif 90 W9.194 `0.detenta a • . 1 23.100 fret to Me paktt•. bsgbiaklg. .. . ' • • EXCEPRON Na 2 _ - Mot pal of the South 88881 of -ela' 3butnaail'Ourtr.•. Section A • .. Tonna* M. Range 22 "Anoka Caunts M8Mtesotet .d wined as Maoris ' beginning at'0'painr m. 18. North to orriaddSainiiioj8af siw.M.att oasisr. distant 158748 kit Iwo 0216. t°cereter tnnrest thence South . ,right angle; a .7,700a dI i 00. foot; Shear Wart poraadt With the North 8910 of sell •South, Hd of.Yrs SauMaost . , •: Ou4Mr and Iola reeitjy tlgiip el..aa 8v ,,,,,a,„ ,Tnrnnk • . Highway Ns tt Minas NorthsosaMt• 4a "ard F, a way ' • • • • 8a to Re •lntsrgatton: with M.'. Mr8f 164, d1 aWd:Half of i .SouMsoat 0artr. •Mena Eat.on,s ld•,NrM,Mb. k Ma paint of • • <- / bevkrnita ./.• rwr�arG�IYrJ� nosu_(M{B�EAAp)�S) Ntil9°72•o2'W • ,\ `µ(RS' r r A it v LKr KayrK t ara ✓ • • • VICINITY MAP NO SCALE Cowen GUS ante • DECIDUOUS MIX 1171.446 eat- aGme/baalt ma D CAKE TV BOX GUY MR POSER Pas SAMIkRY etAre OLE .DIRINrDUS SOURCE LEGEND a a,aED ETD SECRON • STORM taw= M REONCPX sax dt. Na9Wt -ea- GAS etE - con-- MICR OIERNEACI -aw-__ - re- POOR UNDERGROUND SAMTARYSE,NR SmAM1 SOW 7EESP/MYR n.DERGRCO D -.+- wlVatAN -A- FDNCE UNE 0 SOL .Gres" NO7ES A 1) Mk survey was prepared using the Mk Considerate podded by did Republic Notional 700 Insurance Company Application Number .4 OR970928 C halo an effective date of .Mono 4, 2000, at 7:00 A.M. 2) Subject property appears to be classified as Zane C (not h a Rood tone) and also zone A (area of 100 -year flood base Rand elevations and Rood hazard factors not detonator!) elan scaled from Flood knswone* Rote • Map CanmunRy - Perna Number 270013 -00108 dotted May 17, ton J) Subject property contain, 7.749.271 So.F6 or 40.13 Acne. 4) Subject property is zoned Shopping Center District 3) Setbacks • ' R ad'ng: Street - 30 fist Front Yard - 50 Fat Roar Yard re J0 lest Side Yard = 10 foot Parking Setback lines gam gam a 0 sub Roar t �y Stda Yard 5 /at 8) Me underground utilities shorn have boon located from field sway hkrmatkn and erdsting d awhge. the surveyor makes no guarantees that the at8tles shorn comprise an such &data in the are., either h soma or abandoned the surveyor doss not warrant that that the underground stages Mown ore h thecaet location A didoted although hr does cw8 Mat they on located as accurately as pasha (a iQa on t abes8.. strata � not pb a ay kcated• Ms underground utilities s r r¢eNo. (677483). 7) Property subject to no right of access from • to interstate Highway No. SSW Right of access was (quisd by t8 Stab of Minnesota he oddenc.d by !�f No. 389138 8) Property subpet to right of way over part of premises parted to N.f. Cabot in Deed of Right of Noy Wed are Soak 27 e/ Deeds page 4491 and as antra on the County Auditor'. Mao. Tho second portion of this right of way adjoining sold marsh to the whet Ile. o/ the heist t and y Mien upon the hard and Sem rand of the Southwest Quarter a•SOcUon 9 fhb portion of the dem$tbn is attractant* and is not shown on Ms serves • 9) Prapaty sublet! to prima ditch over part of p entishe from tho promises to the South as Indicated on the County Auditor's Map. Unablo to definer actual location. 10) Bearings aro based on the south line of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 4 Tornan 31. Range 22 which is assumed to bear 389a12'02•E i V Westwood Professional Servkes, Inc. MrseM MINIIswEi1.7MM ''"''rr SUM are tea .ca■• seen r WSW VAC/MAXI Ryan Companies US, Inc. ERCEPIRMN•,t81 3;• •_.;n.,j•.; .,n:. .. •• Ana part Of the south. Hall 0178.. Southeast manner -of Salta A • hashes 3, Range 2Z Anoka Coants JBmesol. 'downed as knows • acetate*, ng 01 8.. NarLApi1. fan.4 it •bdd 8.64848* or swMiger • anrte thonae M ¢g:dsbree1 fI niktula 23.saeobdeldest (assumed beariaa , along tea Mho . sold South, tfalf a Southeast . • Oartr, o ones o1 !38870 •plot, ,ter aebid pant. of a bmpt to b.. d 6rd`.'Mytp ot'prgh .end►, 1e. the Math •. South 00 18,min'otos 3T • MSbt 23.1(0 fact' Mae. .7 right angle, Norte SO 'degas' 4T m &1uto," 2.3,S fonds 500y 3 7 fat mom r loss 70th gEastrry Rea of Anoka Canty �wo Right-of-Way Plot No. • l7• Mena Nrthwaba F alagEastrly ' line of a Chen those radius A 8611,85 Mot -o abetangle of 00 degas 21 amass J2 ..m88 d'da tapoo- 015588-.1. man r. less. to its intersection with the So,Mant of Mo North 201.08,', .fat of said 50.78. 89011 .1 Soulh.os1 Carta Mango South 89 digress ' N metes 23 ascend E¢at'parallel WM Nrth•lho'of said South • Hall of Southeast OuaR04 hi 0 point' of narration, said point a'. htersec8an distance 1587:48 fat NYat of the Northeast cane a sa/d South Half of Smtlaat Amble, and 207.00 fat South dy of o . right oral* to sold North the Mona North Q0 degrees 18 minute* 37 Eat. seconds Ea an saki Hat ono Am 201.00 het to the North Ras of said South Half of Southeast Quarter; thanes South 89 degas 41 maga 23 accede Eat 208.78 foot ,r0 the actual point of GRAPHIC SCALE 00 r r tr (MPIMT7 l Yoh - too 0. O Darr 1M ha Mewrwrt Oanoh. iawrr M errenwl • I certify to Ryan Companies US Ma; Donwood Lend Oosdopme nt UP ad CYd RepuOlk ' National 7itle insurance Company: and to their succaseare and assigns. that I hove swayed the property and easement desagtiane as ascribed is that certain Conwabnent • to hewn Applications No. A OR970928 G 58.4.7 a Oat* an* 4, 200* that this sawry was mode on the ground that sold legal desolation is correct coinage Quad accurate that this plat of survey le tan and creel in aE aspects Mot the sine,. dkneneions and locations of a8 of the boundaries of the proprq, bwt'dhg and other Improvements recorded and .drib/. unrecorded easements, streets. roods moans of publk mass • rights-of-was utilty Ibis and connections and mmiapat sot-book ales which affect • sold property art owMgo gaps, aosanetts, sfrats. roads NOM-of -was sett back Ina r av81. t; knpwwnenats Wen affect Hid property, which am not sham henna a1 that this plat . of survey and the survey on which it is bad were mode in accordance with the Minimum. Standard Deta7 Requirements for ALTA/ACSI Land MN Surveys jointly established and • Waned by A c d AC91 foe 1998 mats the accuracy r.qubarme nfs a on Urban S}uwy, os defined and in ag Rams-of Tale A thereof acept em 13 and !6 /� // / Doted •S 02000 Westwood. Profaaalond S r Iceti Inc. SEE DETAIL A ON SHEET..? OF 3 SHEETS SHEET INDEX Sheet 1 — Overall Site Plan Sheet 2 - Details (Showing Tree Identification Numbers Sheet 3 •— Tree Schedule GRAPHIC•SCALE It • w ' i • 02000 Westwood Prof...19 d Services. Ina. • GRAPHIC SCALE a r O D m (01 FiR) • l.WA.. 10 0. NOTE THE BASF MAP USED FAR MIS PUN IS A COPY OF A PORRAN Cr AN ALTA/ACSM SLIMY PREPARED BY IIESIMD00 PRcMTSSANAL SERVICES NO DATED I2 /15/00. .s11. WIOIES .nP E 1.004now.uo lac aovnae naar xu eor • • •1•1 •}0111 •w • pr .w ••• • DETAIL -:B •M1 , OM .A 77TH STREET w ••• -4 .1rr UMW xffIlt wale .w kv w .w Ca IOW. • w h •p11 •en -UM .1m maimi -RN •w 'Thom, • ow •an . w11.1 •a1 -.7A .an .pa .w �� .w,,ae apt• •a'a �1�1 pw ww 0.'.'' .,7u i •w .gp _... .. 7�q np. NW .Yp .W •lA Om *M▪ I wag a.' .Yn �I M aw y}� •w }1A� ap a• rr :WI. •aw w e r• st, A0 emi w• bagqe1lI "M•" app '°w• „„ WA • aww WM MVP �. q_!{i�f\15.....' ,mss ,qa aw 1w1 iM�T'•/ `fir ,�"q Lw"awr am .x11/1 • \ -T - . rl1 wLr ..s • i~ .ia •NM •w NNW anp .p71 MM vN}1 iW• .w •w •pA r•7 anM. 1p0 w ...11110 1 .11.1 i r7s r aw rm . rw r ana . •a11 w w 1aw1 • mg. a' inwi "r• .i ai "sd lt• ▪ rO w a u WIN •w. xtat • .w moo a wpw WSW.. Pa% 116 nw .0M r wrs . w „FIE .as • Ile tor •w .w -4 • iww �' aw▪ e ww apt '▪ P':w •w • KIM :mew" .la WOW •w .w .nm -PM w171 -4 .w .nw ez w ea W PM 16, NM 1}1a nW ,In w .i63 • nq a1 + afj>w 1111 INS It nw .ww1a' •w • p1 dim aw tirl w ow • .�, w1�l1 .•- 1141 AI lay FMII .1.1 M. .w tiw 1088.110 .los ▪ .w NOM, rn w '.pr w sv WWI _,�} .Ir1 uw 'TM .pw�r� .pet ..W1 ...UN SW %NV .w .w .••1 NW 'Mu mom .eve woo •w • *MII • •rr •WestriOad Professional Semites• MG' 117 wq�lks7ioi rwi.: Mir.rl..le - • • giva Ryan.; Co .parries .US; 'Inc. Lino Lakes Site / 72/20/00 2 CO 3 2051551 nes,mee.oac Tree Inventory Plan (Details) 00 34.4. noorcloc /VQO 000 R 2r•• 1!, A A 1 1 SOLOING A/e , 11 d 1 1 A A A A 14 lr.r 14 —.J i 1 A MANY twu..rna A 11 11 I II, i x q �x , wx Aor Aez 1■,-Ary a FLOOR PLAN w• • r •r JAN ? 6 2001 CITY O LINO LAKES irsaidlinf r JAN Y Z001 CITY QC 1 INr l 4yF5 Rfp RSP Architc-cts, Ltd. 120 First Ave. N. Minne.:pots. MN 55001 FAX 612.339.6760 511 612•339•0313 teaaArae 1 bvJey weft nat 111. plats Op.athost dart or type" vay pr •p.rvd by •• er wan y duvet daps tolee anal that I en • d.41 aaewve bba«t ado. thy bm or w Nato w en•..e• tbgbtra es Nat au. PnyJaa ran FiYAN:E: Ryan Companies US. Inc. v•nt., II.•d.a MI•••■•■1•• e._.....r._....,. _ ale.• LINO LAKES, MN RETAIL CENTER Ae,1.et NeA 6396.021.00 Demmer MJL / EL a.e►.aesr CLK / WW ate 15 JAN 2001 NOtle>E.,tr drys Pam ..d drewe Im.b landing serried brag., pptn,rd •ed.► aura x. pt. ?Marys l carrot b rmph* MW.w` c...Gwy npw•4 park seen anon nun per- d Gen or RIP Arena. Ltd 11.• .r. ay.•bl• ha Ir- an "rte And •At•tle by ee•1r eenWa•. comm. govoness — ...Paoe•MN Nettea ones pennon CepyleK breed. Ltd M.O. AI right.r•e.ed Mirk Dale PulertpUte BUILDINGS •A & B' BUILDING NBI • A MIRROR COPY FLOOR PLAN AE1.1 00 FRONT ELEVATION vs• • r -r 0 0 w.r 0 0 ' ' - TRASH ENCL SIDE ELEVATION TON' a PARAPET EL • ENV 41.6 TOP OP ROCP EL • ET-r TOP OP CORNICE EL • Eo• -r i PPy6N FLOOR EL • COW"' Ur•1• -0• 00 At SIDE ELEVATION 0 2•••• 0 20'•0` •w• -EP 0 0 METAL CAP TTOP PARAPET E Ei•0• REAR ELEVATION Irr • f-0` RA) 1SP Architects, Ltd. 120 F rst Ave. N. Minneapolis. MN 55001 FAX 612.339.6760 PH 612.339.0313 Crwll.•di I bobby erUly that t.4 plan aprina.NrL er report rA1 popover by r or mbar y sabot bobby slob anal that 1 am • dry It.wrd Mdrten{ odor Ur bar or tar Mate of Naeaaet.. Illgtbe• 111•9•b1U.n N. Dates PYgl.el fen 12YAN: Ryan Companies US. Inc. .•Il/laa iambi 1141..1•••11Nr. IN rr.ra .1•11•■• rr r7•. er.111•1 LINO LAKES, MN RETAIL CENTER Propel N. 6396.021.00 On.. Ey MJL / EL OreL.d ev CLK / WW Mal. 15 JAN 2001 /ChM tfe •rla•.ah aral drrbad Ion* babalg Si Colorer dada• germ, w ambit Career, as p.. • ..d tb.4�.d a•trawler*, . roved. In .Ma or is poi. MM. T••• -Ph pr. MOM or P MoNteam La! Two a•a evabrbb far bar ur.w.r rd •wtdbn by auras,....11 art wares, m•a, yea.h..a •8rbl•••rrd•h• Ina orrice pr.mna way r meadows ob.Oe. Nob.. Capyli Mp M•at••• Lid 211100. 01111* n•.*v Mari DAR Dwialption BUILDINGS "A & B• • TERIOR ELEVATIONS CITY OF LINO LAKES AE2.1 aft Floor plan w• • r -o• 4 1 nIfFS P R5F Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave. N MinneepsL, MN 55401 FAX 612.334.6750 PH 612.339.0313 A Ce a.yuM. 1 hedey ma•n01 that ea plot, apes eadee er repaid. era prepared W a• s. aner y dba.t howneoal eusanekbion ANNUM wider U 1w.. w P1 a firmest. tagedane R.gIWIU.n N. Data ProJ.et ron WANE- Ryan Companies US. Inc. a.Maa a &ma.y adaewMa. LINO LAKES, MN RETAIL CENTER ?woo. N. 6396.021.00 Da.. of MA / EL o.aee of CLK / WW Dal. 15 JAN 2001 M0h16. N. dea f. ran and d..rY.d hash Wallaby MI Idd.M drY'en graphic* ad baba thwart an M• emery ad 41.10{ b. V p W. alpaca1d . sawar.tIaj rdesedY dne er b pet. dire taboos balm p . .bM of MM Adaae. Ltd 1a.. ate WPIYble far I. ►.. maw. w•aYMisa by .b..* aarNab abb.. tar., Arran ••a agsW, vale. rd Nabs pwwnl ONy b aa.arda....a. Y4 Nabs. Gar raga 1!p Adam. Ltd WOO. AI ne•• ■•■••• Hark Dab. Dedetplaea BUILDING •C• FLOOR PLAN AE1.1 0 LIPS. 00 -4. TEAR` W4, FETAL CAP LW*. CORNICE Au211I/1 1 i 1 J • METAL CAP 00 34.•4• r 1 L r 1 r Lips. a 1 L ^ SIGN AREA L J FRONT ELEVATION P'ANTED METAL lg r I 1 L J TOP OP PARAPET 4, EL • I90'410. TOP OF ROOF 4, EL • 1TT -11• TOP OP CORNICE EL • RV /PM PINION FLOOR EL • 100' -0• VW • N -0• SIDE ELEVATION vs. • N.D. REAR ELEVATION UN • NO. 00 1 20•.0 e 20•40• SIDE ELEVATION IRO • T.O. cry NI r 1 .1 I .1 CPU CMU METAI. CAP META. sell•Pe1t `METAL DOIWSPCUT ■ 00 GAP 4 TOP OP PARAPET EL • R4 -N TOP OP CORNICE EL • RO.N TOP CF COIRACE E L • I9.0• PNIMI ■FLOOR E l— •IOW -le RE EI .; CITY OF LINO LAKES fp R S P Architect , , Ltd. 120 First Ave. N. Minneapolis. M.'! 55401 FOX 612.339.5760 PH 612.339.0313 'smoky artty Out E. plat MP.etn..nlq or report aro proposed by so or .Mr •'2 d••t . yrvylen and Sot I e.. duly Itow.d *Must war w YIN Of w cwt. of Pt .ta . Rglnw R.Erwuen N. Oita Fropa ran RYI ■ i)RielopEE Ryan Companies US. Inc. •••••• ...a i .••••••it.. LINO LAKES, MN RETAIL CENTER rt.Jiet M1. 6396.02t00 or.. Ey. MIL / EL O.at.e Eye CLK / WW n.t. 15 JAN 2001 ICMCF.11r..1g...n W dn.b.a heroin Inekno. tohdeal s..•E..g qw..d =daft thmel,e. pr.. •. ..l..- F M K rwr mpg. ems. I oops1RAA MOOS Of NW AeaseW IAA Awe an• aysnbl• f P.. W e.•t•..•M «A rson by Au* cMOF.Ye.r•• la e yards* .r erns. pMM•d .41 n .e re rW •e.. oath Oft Monica copilot NP Maanma IAA Ile. A l l 1. nowladl Mot Diu D.•aptliO BUILDING •C• • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AE2.1 Floor Plan I4 • I. -0. JAN 1 6 2C01 CITY OF LINO LAKES Rfp RSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave. N. Minneapolis. MN 55101 FAX 612.339.6750 P11 512.339.0313 Conuyede 1 heroin minify Owl Ike plan. •p•enfMMU.I or root Mee powered by as or rife r .y Oren aapavn•an •ad wok t as • okay Mammal A reNteet ow Oa I. Of ua wok at Parn.en. g *.gl_Veu_llw Data Project ten CYAN • • Ryan Companies US, Inc. a.ner a saran...l.e....b. aa�arr roia.ama. atia, in mammas LWO LAKES, MN RETAIL CENTER Propel Net 6396.021.00 Dim ep MJL / EL oared eye CLK / WW oats 15 JAN 2001 Nonce. nr done. a,.a r e..ew twat Irobalbe al ladalee drragr, ado pn.e., r geese Wont ara pn. Malay 1d ..lWM b la t daplleMW a aw•.wy aptara4 part 'Vow of arr.., p.• .row et 1.r *deed* Ltd 1Nm an available hr Inn Mad rs are aoln.nley4 14 r.••••■ aeon.. row Ye+armo► eya.da....wne r Mlles personal edy r ••••••••••••• wok W. real. C.ppnyll Inn. Anhtlasle LAO WOO. • Vim mono/. P1a k Pet. Docelptlee BUILDING "D• FLOOR PLAN AE1.1 FRONT ELEVATION Int• • 1' -0. IL" CM! cru • 40'40• 40'40• SIDE ELEVATION use . raw f a TOP Ole PARAPET • EL • 1331%0• TOP OF CORNICE EL • Nfie-0• RIIEM ROOF: EL .100'.0` TOP -- PARAPET EL. • 1331• -0" TOP OF pomace EL• b 0• PIWIS1 item, sr EL. • 100•-111P 0 METAL CAP 3r-r RAP BACK ELEVATION vs• • raw 0 1 JAN 1 6 2031 \_crrinr NO LAKES �fp R 5 P A r c h i t e c t s• Ltd. 120 First Ave. N. Minneapolis, MN 55.101 FAX 612.339.5755 PH 612.339.0313 H C.wyt rds t Swab, e.°et, t el Ill• plan •pedn oteoL ropers .e. 1•r.P•ree by se or soda, no dress wooer woolen and Ue11 an • duty Ileae..d Md.led, wear the 100 of the Kale .t t'..tet.e.. R.gb*,U.. N. Data PrOje.L fan CYAN • • ■ i,m ,e1= Ryan Companies US. Inc. ,.rely yrd•..•l.He• 1p. LINO LAKES, MN RETAIL CENTER P,.j.CL N. 6396.021.00 on..e, MIL /EL o odad s, CLK / WW al. 15 JAN 2001 ELTEL The abate. e.. .d d.eeeb.d twb rabdty MI WNW! drabs, yepnes. Robb *beet be pt. pleb/ eel swot be =pled. dpleetee ar eer.wtey blabbed. b stab w b pro: eel* berms wMtw pea leheen ef NP Md11nY Ltd Thee °eevadable R... W melee owl Armhole:. by obey ere"... edema- lerk ypreer..e eyeeb* yowlers end ebbs p••wM obi w wemrdMr wN W. Nett.. Caere' Mr i.* 311. LW 2•00.Al new heaved. MM Oita Description BUILDING yD• • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AE2.1 Ryan Companies US. Inc. • s MILII a MUM MS t O. • a mow our ILaMaaanr l b MINN MINIM •SiMIOi'aii -• a:�ml firl- &lerI RGET 1/1KE$ xM FLOOR PLAN Al C '•' �� C���� ��o vtbrI ICE �s EI V G.:,:+ I JAN 1CZ LINO LAKES RETAIL CENTER- LINO LAKES, MN Jailliatr, 21141 icr ITV op LINO LAKES } I'row ote." 1t * cowl-4.)A • .Since N Atppid.c PRHi!i Ryan Companies US. Inc. oi'{n tt .WA ta4d.cor %NM iNtu6�Rpt. G GC1.01C 'Md LINO LAKES RETAIL CENTER- LINO LAKES, MN 6 JANUARY, 7001 JAN 1 C 2A1 CITY OF LINO LAKES wM r.h,..S.. U.. sar.,rywI,sw bW111�t1,N�111�M AGENDA ITEM 1 - 02 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: January 31, 2001 TOPIC: Saddle Club BACKGROUND: See Project Trac Sheet OPTIONS: The Environmental Board and Staff have made the recommendations listed in the project trac sheet. Options are to: 1. Accept the proposal and forever loose a planned greenway and good site for future restoration. 2. Recommend denial of the proposal unless provisions are made for public greenway in the south area of the proposal (if and when MUSA is allocated). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends option 2. PROJECT #: 21 -5 PROJECT: Saddle Club Update DATE OF ORIGIN: TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: • DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT : CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES October 25, 2000 6:30 P.M. : 9:24 P.M. Maurene Davidson, Amy Donlin, Rod Kukonen, Dave Mach, and Mike Trehus. Chair Scott Lanyon and Theresa O'Connell. Staff members present: Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson • B. Saddle Club - Asleson explained the Saddle Club project was reviewed at the September 27, 2000 meeting. The developer has submitted a new sketch plan. He noted the colored map provided by the developer indicating the total site area, total upland, wetland, trees to remain, and those to be removed. He stated he reviewed this information in comparison to the GIS map and the developer has determined the number of lots he needs to make it work. Asleson reviewed the greenway alignment and mentioned the types of soils and vegetation found on this site. He stated this is a good area to consider for conservation development. Asleson pointed out the areas of wetland delineation and wetland vegetation. He also noted the areas of historic oak savanna and potential for trail locations. He advised this property is just 17ap ar &_ Pexpearrov_8oap5 XlrioO Alvo_AaxeQ outside the identified greenway expansion area, however, those characteristics are present on this site. Asleson explained this • site is half in MUSA and half out of MUSA and there have been two sketch plans to date. He stated it appears the DNR wants to take a different approach on how they look at developments, resources, and conservation development so, perhaps, this can be used as a model project. Vice Chair Davidson asked if this is a viable greenway corridor area. Asleson stated he believes it is although it may not follow the same alignment indicated on the map. Also, it would create the desired buffers. lkoss Fairbrother, representing the applicant, presented the revised site plan which depicts small lot development rather than extending the property lines into the wetland areas. He stated this smaller compact lot design promotes conservation development. Mr. Fairbrother noted this plan works around the existing wetlands and tree stands to strike a balance between what is appropriate to develop and what is reasonable to conserve. He stated they have maintained a maximum avoidance of the wetlands. Mr. Fairbrother presented a plan identifying wetlands, uplands, and areas to be developed for housing, noting the acreage and 111 percentages of areas to be developed and those to be conserved. He noted the smaller lots increase the area of conservation. He pointed out areas of viewsheds, potential trail alignment, and access points. Mr. Fairbrother addressed their intent to soften the hard surface areas and stated all areas not platted for housing would be deeded for a conservation easement. Vice Chair Davidson asked how wide the roads would be. Mr. Fairbrother stated the road width is negotiable, depending on what the City wants. Mach stated this plan is well thought out but he has found upland, which provides habituate, suffers with these projects. He stated if a conservation easement program is to be continued, diversity of habituate types needs to be considered to assure a diversity of wildlife is present. Asleson explained the blue areas depicted on the map do not identify areas of open water. Mach stated he would be willing to see some trees removed if it would save some upland and provide diverse nesting habitat and • Ilapxo_ &_Pezpear ov_BoapS_ Xtzi_oefilltvollaxeor animals. Asleson stated the GIS data for this site would be useful in identifying the upland and wetland elevations. Asleson asked about the number of lots and how it relates to the project. Mr. Fairbrother stated it would be a more appropriate to ask John Hill to address whether it is economically feasible. Ken Adolph, representing the applicant, explained that John Hill was unable to attend the meeting tonight. He stated they feel that 64 lots are needed to make this project financially feasible and if the lot number were to be reduced, they may return with a request for higher density, such as townhomes. Trehus stated he is disappointed in this proposal and it being represented as a conservation development. He stated he believes a conservation development results in tradeoffs with a lower density. He noted that 25 acres of upland would equal about 50 homes and he would not support more than 50 homes on this site. Trehus commented on the amount of impervious surface and stated he believes the entire concept of conservation development is being shifted, which he does not support. Kukonen asked about Option A for 49 lots. Mr. Fairbrother stated that is the large lot option which they proposed at an earlier meeting. However, that is now off the table at this point based on the comments made at the last meeting indicating a desire for smaller sized lots. Kukonen asked when the property will all be included in the MUSA. Asleson stated he is not aware of when MUSA will be expanded. Mr. Adolph stated at the last meeting, it was discussed that the MUSA was arbitrarily drawn through the middle of this property. He advised that Heritage Development has indicated they will develop the property in two phases and request the MUSA line be redrawn, possibly with tradeoffs in other areas. Mr. Adolph stated the single family area uses more of the upland area and the intent of the conservation development is to cluster the development with smaller lots. However, in the economic analysis, one larger sized lot does not equate to a smaller sized cluster lot. Asleson inquired regarding the price range of these homes. Mr. Adolph stated $160,000 to $180,000 is the base price plus options which could increase the price to $200,000. IlapicQ &1'expeanov _BoapS_ Xazt_o0_Axvo_Aaxeai Trehus asked how a consideration of townhomes was raised. Mr. Adolph stated more of the upland acreage could be retained and placed in the conservation easement with a higher density such as • townhomes. He reviewed the applicant's conversation from the last meeting indicating they did not want the conservation easement line to run through private homes which this revised site plan addresses. Trehus noted the number of lots also increased from 49 to 63. Mr. Adolph stated that is correct because one large lot does not equal one small lot. Mr. Fairbrother stated they propose 50 -foot buffers from all wetlands. Trehus asked if they are aware of the typical road right -of -way width in Lino Lakes. Mr. Adolph stated they are proposing a 50 -foot right -of -way. Trehus stated the requirement is for 60 feet and asked what the impact would be. Mr. Fairbrother noted this is a PUD so there would be some consideration for flexibility about road width and lot sizes. Mr. Adolph explained that providing a 60 -foot right -of -way would push the homes closer to the roadway. He suggested that a 50 -foot right -of -way is adequate for streets in this development. • Donlin stated she does not necessarily agree that smaller sized cluster lots with a conservation easement are of less value than a larger sized lot. She suggested less value would result in placing an additional 15 homes in this area due to added congestion. Donlin stated the quality of life would be better and the desired value could still be achieved if those additional 15 homes were removed. Mr. Adolph stated in this case, they are not considering a small sized lot to be of equal value to a larger sized lot. Donlin stated she realizes this is a PUD so consideration of higher density, etc. is given but she is not sure this high number of homes is a necessity. Mr. Adolph stated with this development, there will be a homeowners association to address outdoor maintenance. He stated it would provide the benefits of townhomes without having a partywall. Mr. Fairbrother stated the home size would be smaller which meets a market demand and need for those who are downsizing or empty nesters. IlapKQ &fie %pearzovBoap& XzrLoL/lzvo Aaxzi6 Vice Chair Davidson agreed with Donlin regarding the desirability for smaller lots if it contains the same amenities, viewsheds, and fewer houses. Asleson asked if lots of that type would sell in the marketplace. Mr. Adolph stated Mr. Hill would be able to answer that question. Donlin stated she appreciates the better viewsheds with this plan but she does not think it is fair to then add 15 units which creates more congestion. Mr. Fairbrother asked when the point of economics of the development and the conservation issues balance out. Vice Chair Davidson noted that Option C was discussed at the last meeting, not Option A. She asked if there is an option somewhere between Option A and Option C, to create fewer lots and more open spaces. Mach stated the role of the Board is to address the environmental aspects and while he agrees not much has been gained environmentally, he is sensitive to the economic issues. Asleson stated they bought the land to develop into houses and the question being asked is how few homes can be built and the project still work. He noted the developer has addressed issues of buffering and greenway. Asleson stated the developer will have to address the density and financial economics. He explained that 2.5- acre lots are not part of a conservation development, as they can be subdivided in the future. Vice Chair Davidson agreed and noted that large lots are also not conducive to wildlife corridors or contiguous areas. Trehus noted that with this plan the number of lots has been increased and the road right -of -way reduced, which is a win -win situation for the developer but not the City. He suggested there should be some tradeoffs for the City to benefit and asked if a formal application has been made. Mr. Adolph stated a formal application has not yet been made. Mach agreed that this type of development would be attractive to older couples and empty nesters so there would be a lower population. HapxQ &J'sxpsanov_Boap5- Xzrt_oO_Aivo Aaxs6 To increase viewsheds, Donlin suggested Lots 7, 34, 35, 46, 51, and 52 be removed. Trehus stated he would like to see the calculations on impervious surfaces. Mach asked if it is up to the association to address tree preservation. Asleson reviewed several tree preservation /protection options used by other communities and commented on the importance of assuring City input into those issues. The Environmental Board indicated a desire for a fewer number of lots and more upland preservation. • Heritage Development Submitted a new Concept Plan on December 13, 2000 to Planning and Zonning based on standard zoning subdivision development. Please refer to table in Jeff Smyser Report dated December 13, 2000. As you can see the parcel lot lines have been platted entirely through the greenway space areas previously considered. The area blanked out in the SW corner is an outlot. P &Z has asked for more open space and discussed trail issues. • Another . concept plan is currently being planned addressing "space issues. • A new site specific environmental inventory was prepared by the Department of. Natural Resources as part of the Wild Land Urban Interphase project. The inventory shows the area to the south as a mixture of upland and wet areas that are very conducive to the proposed greenway through this area. Because this area has been disturbed by soil disruption in the past, the vegetation consists of invasive reed carary grass and other invasive plants. However, this area also includes the banded soil water plant relationships that exist in the rich fen areas that are being found elseware. This site is worthy of preservation for public greenway purposes. STAFF COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATIONe December Environmental Board meeting on 01/03/01 • The Greenway through this area has been planned since 1992. • Reduce the lot sizes to stay out of the wetland area indicated on the original sketch plan. This greenway is an important Community issue • The Greenway is an important community issue and should be publicl owned. • See above built points. I7apx6 & Fe peariovJ3oapS_ XtrLoO_ltvo Aaxeo • • Visual Open Space • Greenway and spacial conections • Trail Issues Buffering Issues COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCES: Refer to the following references for information that may affect discussions related to this issue. Description Comment Section 2 - Assessment of Lino Lakes Needs Areas for Ecological Protection as the Underpinning of a Greenway System The inventorying and mapping of the areas exhibiting higher value . ecological resources provides the basic underpinning for a greenway system that forms a mosaic of interconnecting natural areas. This in turn can serve as the backdrop for community development and park and trail system planning decisions throughout the city. In this context, the inherent structure of the local ecology will be a principle factor behind the ultimate form that the city takes once development is complete. This planning principle is considered in greater detail in forthcoming sections of this manual. Section 3 - Governing Polices •. Action Step 3 - Establish Conceptual Plan for Greenway System Action Statement: Develop a plan for creating a city -wide greenway system that forms a network of interconnected natural areas. Discussion: As noted in the last section, inventorying and mapping the areas exhibiting higher ecological resource qualities Sis the basic underpinning for a greenway system that forms a mosaic of interconnecting natural areas. This in Ilapx6 &J'exppartov_BoapS- Xtr.ogllav&.Aaxeor 7 turn serves as the basic underpinning for future land development and park and trail system planning decisions throughout the city. Under this pretense, the inherent structure of the city's ecological resources will become a principle factor behind the ultimate form that the city takes once development is complete. Action Steps: 1) Establish and adopt the conceptual plan for an interconnected greenway system that serves to link key ecological communities together. 2) Utilize the greenway plan as the fundamental underpinning for land use decisions, which includes residential and commercial development as well as parks and trails. 3) Routinely update the greenway system plan as more detained information is gathered and inputted into the GIS system.... Section 4 — Environmental System Framework •.. This zone consists of largely upland areas considered under various natural vegetative cover types, such as oak savannas, mesic forests, and prairie remnants. This zone refers to areas of the city that fall outside the other two zones. Greenway Zones and Their Interrelationship with Community. Development As the above map illustrates, three zones are identified within the greenway system. The following considers each of these. Protected Zone: This zone largely consists of water bodies, wetlands and parks that are protected from development under current regulatory controls. Under protected status, no development will occur. High Ecological Value /Greenway Trail Corridor Zone: This zone consists of largely upland areas as defined under various natural vegetative cover types, such as oak savannas, mesic forests, and prairie remnants. The zone should be viewed as an area where ecological protection opportunities are very high and that protection of these values should be a foremost consideration in the development process. It is within this zone that protection strategies such as buffer systems, conservation easements, land trusts, and so forth can be • 17apxc &J'sxpsanov_BoapS XtrLoglltvo_laKeo used •to protect higher value natural resources. Also included in this zone are lineal corridors that link the higher quality natural areas together and provide space for the proposed city -wide greenway trail corridor. Currently, development in the high ecological value zone is allowed in accordance with development requirements as stipulated by city codes and ordinances. Beyond these regulatory requirements, the ecological values of these lands are not substantively protected. In addition, land ownership rights and economic development pressures preclude the possibility of arbitrarily limiting development in this zone. Given this, fostering a conservation approach to development is the most advantageous way of preserving the key ecological values in this zone while at the same time allowing development to proceed in an economically viable fashion. Ecological Enhancement Zone: This zone refers to areas of the city that fall outside the other two zones. Typically, this includes lands that are 411 defined under agriculture designation and thus do not currently exhibit high ecological value, but offer opportunities for significant ecological enhancements as part of future land use decisions. An example of this is transitioning some agriculture fields into prairie communities as part of a conservation development. Also included under this zone are areas already developed, such as a residential subdivision, where ecological enhancements are still possible, albeit perhaps on a more limited basis. The main objective of this zone is to articulate that the opportunities to expand the footprint of high quality natural areas, and thus the greenway system, within the city are very extensive and that sound ecological protection strategies should not be limited only to areas that currently exhibit higher ecological qualities. Quite to the contrary, under the mantra of a conservation development approach to planning, protecting and enhancing the ecological values of all lands should be considered whenever development occurs in •the community. Further, every attempt should be made to link these newly flapar &J'expeanovJ3oapS_ Xzr-ogLAzvo_laxeo- created natural areas to the larger greenway system as depicted on the wherever opportunity to do so exists. This linkage should be both in the map form of a natural landscape features as well as linear trail corridors that allow for human access and appreciation of these natural amenities... The inherent form of the ecological systems within the city offer a great deal of potential to serve as the backbone of a greenway system that links natural areas with parks, trail corridors, and development areas throughout the community. Realizing the Vision of a Greenway System As the mapping image in the last figure illustrates, the inherent form of the ecological systems within the city offer a great deal of potential to serve as the backbone of a greenway system that links natural areas with parks, trail corridors, and development areas throughout the community. There are, however, a few critical points that need to be made if this vision is to be realized. First, the city is going to have to approach community development in a decidedly different way than in the past if the areas that fall within the high ecological value zone and the ecological enhancement zone are to become substantive parts of the greenway system. Conventional land development practices, which respond to local zoning codes and ordinances, do not offer enough flexibility or incentives for developers to set aside lands for open space beyond that required through regulatory action, such as wetland ordinances and park dedications. Instead, a more ecologically sensitive approach to development will have to be adopted to achieve this end. Section 7 considers this issue in greater detail. The second point is that should these natural resource lands be set aside in a greenway system, the city and land owners will have a greater responsibility for their long -term stewardship. At the city level, this will require a fundamental evaluation of the organization structure at the staff and political levels and the recognition that adequate resources (man power and funding) will have to be directed at resource restoration and management programs I7apxo_ &_PEXpsanov _Boap5- XarLo0_Alvo_laxecr 10 if a •sustainable resource quality is to be achieved. Interrelationship of Greenways with Parks and Trails The conceptual idea of the greenway system as presented here is a natural outgrowth of the existing park and trail system plan for the city. The existing plan makes numerous references to the development of a greenway system for its natural values as well as providing the conduit for a city - wide linear trail corridor system. In many respects, the existing park and trail plan was part of the community visioning process that manifested itself in the 20/20 Vision Plan. The plan remains the basic underpinning for the park and trail system and should still be used as the basis for planning future parks and trails. Integrating the Greenway System with the Park and Trail System Plan The Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan and Development Guide for Lino 4 Lakes defines the overall plan for the city's parks and trails and establishes the parameters for its implementation. The plan remains the basic underpinning for the park and trail system and should still be used as the basis for planning future parks and trails As part of the planning process for this manual, the city -wide park and trail system plan was overlaid on the greenway system map shown in figure 4.2. This combination illustrates how the linear trail corridors and individual park locations can be effectively intertwined with the natural areas contained within the greenway system. Figure 4.4 illustrates this concept. As shown on the figure, the actual and conceptual location of existing and proposed trails are identified. The trails are broken down into two types, park trails and connector trails. Park trails refer to trails that are located in their own easement, in a greenway corridor outside of a road right -of -way, or in a •city/ regional park. Connector trails refer to trails that are typically 17ap ar &_Pszpsanov_Boap8_ Xcn_o6_ Alvo_ Awcsa 11 located in an existing road right -of -way. In the context of this study, the park trails are of greatest concern in that their ultimate location is intrinsically linked to the ultimate extent of the greenway system. In this sense, success toward establishing a greenway system will also mean greater success in establishing an interlinked system of park trails throughout the city. Flexibility of Implementing the Park and Trail System Plan As with the greenway system itself, it should be understood that a certain degree of flexibility in meeting the objectives set by the park and trail system plan is warranted. This could be considered in the same light as showing greater flexibility with respect to lot sizes, road widths, and setbacks in order to provide more open space and resource protection opportunities. This greater flexibility is not to suggest deviating from the principles of the plan, which must be adhered to if a balanced park and trail system is to be 411 achieved within the city. What is suggested is that the physical location and makeup of specific park and trail elements be considered on a case-by- case basis whereby the vision of the plan is still realized, but with greater flexibility as to how that actually occurs on the ground. The ultimate location of parks and trails and their physical size, orientation, and inter - connectiveness are all factors that need to be considered within the context of the overall greenway system and community development footprint. Site- specific natural resource characteristics and development opportunities and constraints will all play a role in how park and trail issues are ultimately resolved. Worth noting about the greenway and trail corridor systems is that once completed, the user experience will be that of a being in a largely uninterrupted natural setting the leads from one park setting to another. Section 5 - Administration .....One option for ensuring the protection of key ecological resources • 77apxQ &_PEzpsanov_Boap5 Xzn_ogLAivo Awcc6 12 • is public •purchase of the property. The city is fortunate to already have a significant portion of some of the most diverse ecological systems already protected by city and county parks. In some cases, it may be advantageous to purchase additional significant properties that can not be protected in any other way. However, given the land area already under public ownership, such as Rice Creek Regional Park Reserve, this will be more the exception than the rule. More realistically though, the public's willingness and capacity to purchase additional open space is at best uncertain. The value of the land in Lino Lakes has and will continue to escalate on into the future. The resources that are held near and dear now also tend to result in heftier land values. From a pragmatic standpoint, the route to protecting these valuable lands is by having them set aside through the private development planning process. It is this reality that underscores the need to give the conservation 0 development approach to planning so much attention in this handbook. It also underscores how important it is that the relationship between the city and the development community be heightened into a strong working partnership. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments made by the Board: • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION /POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was reached by the Board: FINAL VOTE COUNT: • Board Member Yes No Hapica_ &_Pexpearzov Boap5_ Xtrz_oO Azvo_laxecr 13 FINAL VOTE DATE: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION (IF NECESSARY): •.... pending .... DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION DATE: ....pending .... COUNCIL ACTION (IF NECESSARY): pending COUNCIL ACTION DATE: . ... pending .... PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STATUS: The related to actual implementation. resolved) during implementation, outcome. •.... pending .. following defines staff observations This includes issues raised (and general observations, and project PROJECT FINAL COMPLETION DATE: .... pending .... Hapax &_Psxpsanov_Boa, 14 Xtn_oO Aivo.jlarea • • IIIENVIRONMENTAL Coordinator Date Hapx6 &_Pezpeanov_Boap5_ Xaz -Loq$ ltvo_Aarcea 15 651 982 2499 JAN -16 -2001 09 29 CITY OF LINO LAKES Post -If Fax Note 7671 Date CoJpoot. From Co. Phone+► 1 -4gI- 1512 Pax* Phone* Fax" 651 982 2499 P.01/82 CITY OF LINO LADES — LAND USE APPLICATION CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX PEB Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500 Conditional Use Permit $ 350 Interim Use Permit $ 350 Site Plan Review $ 500 ,%Subdivision: Preliminary Plat $ 1,250 Preservation Development 1,250 Planned Development Overlay 1,250 Minor Subdivision/ $ 250 Lot Split Rezoning $ 350 Vacation: drainage, street, utility $ 250 Variance $ 250 ESCROW DEPOSIT Property Address 14 O 3 Po a-ur S -r . L I .J o (-PAL € S 1 ..14/10 PIN # Z S - 3 ( -2 2- 35-.QQQ I:egal Description: Lot Block Addition Existing Land Use A 4 Existing Zoning t2. -1 / A 4 . DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: -G a c, 9-ei L.% M „a A a .( L Pr r Foe. Pcl -deps eta -cost_ AepcLo�/A - L L -c o L -A- e s. Applicant: 5 dle ChLb Owner (if different than applicant name 0. c)e, et- otran1"f of = Mrs. address Ltiz c -r co . R.D. c.A.IADA n44, SSII% p h o n e c, s- t- '-t 2 t- o O t -1 fax - tst12) name address phone fax EIV .5 1 JAN 6 2C01 CITY OF LINO LAKES G00%;;r AN- metal corn .— rim r >:. THE CONTRACTOR SHAM CONTACT AL . PUBLIC UTIU11ES FOR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES. CABLES. CONDUITS. PIPES. MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR. SADDLE CLUB PREPARED FOR. HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT INC. CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROJECT LOCATION R cR. Cedar cake • CR 1� SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS SOIL TESTING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55305 SHEET INDEX SHEET DESCRIPTION 1. coVER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PRELMINARY PLAT 4. GRADING. DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL 5. U11UTY 5. DETAILS 1 R60Y COOKY 1IW 7116 YWI, !� aR srROOKY 7W PIP K TIC at UI t 11Y 0O6CY ." INa ONO 1 K A OILY M OFII YOIafY1R164K COQR IR6Q 1R[ Vii f1 DC KM OF IRMFlOiA ROB Rili Ra ...I..9rty AMOK !R OAR / JAN y62 CITY OF LINO LA IONS S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 615 1 OF 6 SHEETS X 98.1.3 xf From as c 60 120 160 LEGEND DENOTES COMES CONTOUR DENOTES COMES SPOT 6818071011 ODOM DOBN9 NORM S05EA a• 6050 1 110-_ OD101ES MOM WOCRMNA IMPAIR k DOE VALVE a o DENOTES DURING WORT SEIM DENOTES Etam115 ME 1JE 0 DENOTES DUMP 11EE .. - •— • —• —•- DENO= COMES IMAM 1101MD1NT DEN71O COSMO FDO I MOTES COMES wawa • DCNAES SOIL USMO NM =WY WORN PERFORMED EY MEMO IMO SURVEYND a 001000111% 1 151-780-0112 101AW OO2CO011 PERFORMED Rn ANWO ODOOIMONS. Nc: i 951-540-au E I JANIG CITY OF LINO L. LAKES I 80011 623L PAGE 48 (106/66) 1 WNW COMP 10471115 PWI. 5P081041109. OR UNDER 10 DIRECT IRPOM MS PREPARED E1P1 1510.1 PM 4 WL7 PROM:80I11 01018 1 OQWE MVP aMSM,L wREEM J �+�yL'�e OAIE 1t_11_ro 20 Na �7t/' M INIE0 50 ONE r SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNING 501L 1E5RIO • ENURDNMENTAL SEANCES 10550 WAYZA7A BOULEVARD. SORE 1 MNNETONKA, MN 63305 (812) 546 -7601 FAO: 54S -508E .NClchoolknadameom (. OWNER /DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 450 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 651- 481 -0017 DATE JANUARY 15. 2001 PROJECT NAME /SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN EXISTING CONDITIONS S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61513 -006 SHEET 2 OF 6 SHEETS 5 60 120 155 LEGAL DESCRIPTION :E 1/4 OF SW S5 1/4 Or SEC110N 26, TOWN1MP 31. 604400021 ANOVA COUNT!. U554FSOTA LEGEND 0411 -- 0050540 COMM — — — — — — PROP05ED 540506E t MUT EA4040(0 PROPOSED TILL FA90/O(0 TYPICAL SET -BACK DETAIL TYPICAL ESMT. DETAIL, (one AND Doll7) I!1 ®m ., -..I m • E>_!I"_ EI•INEK •IMMEK1 Imo EMI= � TIt!FIN 1 a •1.•:Nt' Im EM11110LI1110L7 E7EM'EMMIIIIM=1 K ENIM I It_4I7 Et, Eill∎ME ®!}L mraliornI RIB Q ; T ED•WfiSTIFI Ell iL>♦ E=11•1111 ILA NIVIIMIMM11 IERE1 r•.r.FI•1D:Fl IILOCK 2 LNIMIC:I=E"',1 E7 = EMMINIIIIIF=IWMI • 7�— —sr. ®m TFtItTS7 *.*•TW.I E>_!I"_ 1AIKT±7 _ICJ E7MMMIiIIMTI7 7 K ENIM I It_4I7 EI■NEEIMIm ® Et'7 NIFiTM11 ILA MAIIM MITIMSIMIgl EumnIr'II =no Elm 10, iMKII E17•NIE� EIMIIMENCIDMIMECII •: IM ERIE IMEE7 E,LT*7 10505525 25.04 AREA TABULATIONS TOTAL SIZE MEA : 39.77 ACHE PROPOSED NONE Cr TM ME1 : 3.611 ACRE AREA MOM PLATTED 1013 : 36.25 ACRE TOTAL L015 : 40 MERASE LOT OE : 31 UNTI /� S.F. I RE 1 JA CITY 0 REVISIONS 50 MASON BOOK 025 PAGE 44 (106/56) I HEREBY 100107 11NT MIS PLAN. SF 10A1NM. a IMPORT WAS PREPARED 00 IC OR UNDER W DRECT SI0ERN904 AND 1155 1 NIA OULY RFMIERO PROFESSIOI4#. 0400601 MI ED ME SLUE OF RItlE5006 OM -1k13M11— RM. ID. / S i AEYl4E510 DAN SCHOEL.L & MADSON, INC. OWNER /DEVELOPER ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNING SOIL TES1016 • EMRONNEMAL SERVICES 10580 WAYZATA BUIREVARO. SURE 1 NSNETONKA, 164 6530E (512) 546 -7101 FAX: 544 -0055 WWWscheMmodson.CMR HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 460 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 661-481-0017 DATE: JANUARY 15. 2001 (PROJECT NAME/SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN PRELIMINARY PLAT S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61513 -006 SHEET 3 OF 6 SHEETS • R I' _J a - -30 umn0 EASOMM -- 00AON0E As UTL.ITY EASEMENT WOUND M.TERALON 603 SOFT. O2 ACRES 'VANCE COO OMENS (M) anon ••=G memo, CUL-DE-SAC EASEMENT • a - 2TL0D' 9TARAL Emmert AWN TD OM x eaz 892 1 ASPEN LA. G tI 1 1 OUTLOT 15 —J • 120 110 LEGEND 995 ORM CONTOUR -- --- 990 - -- -- PROMO COMM 4.ax PERCENT OF GRADE °RONNE AMCN — GC- sr ----- 00110- STORM SENO 44_• PROPOSED STORM MO N —•• —.• — •• — DINT OF COISDNCIION 0000000000o0O0 !!09011 CONTROL MT POKE X 060.3 PROPOSED SPOT OEM= X 9840.3 060110 SPOT SLORTT0N MERATO 00110MON NOW CONS0RUCI0N O4MNCE 010E ELEVATORS WO WALNOR SE XPUT ENTRY 1151-1 NM MONO LOWER WETLAND NOTES TOM. DEMO 45.1061090 • 11.343 S.F. TOT/IL %MUM 00100004 - 12,500 S.P. PUNA, NUE CREDO (NU0P OM) • 11,343 S.F. (.75 X MOSE SF. - 13560 SF.) 27.543 S.F. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL PERNALl01 SILT POOE MID ROCK Co494NJ0011 ORONOO 9461 EE INSTALLED PROM 10 OOISINOIION. 2. TIE C011RAC701 941ALL comma DRAINAGE 19945 PRIOR TO 9E NOON 3. RE CXNCOCIOR WALL GRAM SIR MD NSOLL 4{81710 . 4. IO COMMON RIME rem. 0000 MN EROSION CSII150. 0. WnON 190 WEDS OF 941E NONE NI OE4ISE0 MEMO MAUL E 37AERED 111111 SEED. SOD OR ROOT SCE. MEMO swl E N AMMONICE MIN MOOT SPEC. 2570. SEED NOUN STALL SE MOOT =UNE 300. ALL WWI ROOM PENTIUM SHALL SEE 10 -10-10 0040 IC)8. 05EE AATE�MTE OF PER 00. MO N A LOI ET DE NEWSROOM OF MOOT 3578. ALL MEAL TO E NO000 ON MOM 9461 COVERED MM MINIMUM OF POINT RCVS Of TOPSOIL. 0. ALL EROSION CONTROL LENURES SMALL E INSTALS/ AND MN4OUNED N ACCORDANCE Mm0140 1017 DISTRICT MO MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL ?ROM PWOA 7. INCLUDING' RE 6. ACO M A SRI N FRONT OF MT FENCES. WOO RE °UINRON OF THE COINTRUCRON. 0. Nff MESS SEDNENT N PROPOSED VANS NALL E ROWED ET THE 0. REMOVE ALL EROSION CONTROL UE150541 AFTER MORON S 10. NO MO 9DSI0E TINNED ONTO EM OO H It. IF APPTYE WO 600445 TN N TRUCK ALL CONSTRUCTOR* %E S. 12. awe MIACEM 54 07 N ACCAM,Ip! win. OW III _ I RE. JAN C REVISIONS Sr POISON SOCK 8231. PAGE 46 (106/88) ` 100 TN40 °" ^/14 94009240506 1 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ,VON ON 090299 N ,E OR WWN YY 094064 SUMMON 010 TINT 1 174 A OW R[06101FD IM1OIFSWpiLL ENGINEERS • NMIEITXS • PLANNING IRMO MOOR THE DON OF nE IMN4S]O. OIL TENNO • ENVMOSENTAL. SERVCLS 10580 MAYFATA NUEVAM. SURE 1 MTh ,•_„_55 Rm n0- 0NTETO4NA NI 35305 (312) 540 -7801 Mt 548 -5083 NE4E1N7! N: 809E 901,.NM04II110d455n.i5111 OWNER/DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 450 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 651- 451 -0017 iARV 15 2001 "PROJECT NAME/SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, MN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CITY OF 1 S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61513 -006 SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS c 2131 INO LAKES 0 00 120 TE0 r 9tORR � try • X.1602416111 • r n 5 wATF1MNN rswrAron 1t LEGEND 000040 STORM SERER PROPOSED WORM SERER 0051040 60 0101 PROPOSED 1101:1116011 SANITARY SEYIER PROPOSED SANITARY SERER PROPOSED 601061! W/ VANE PROPOSED ONE MILK FORCE TM CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. IEFM1 1O MIME 35 511E PUN FOR 16111.000 0665 MICRO IAIOUG 060451008. ARO W0010Pa. 2. OK URAY CONIRACIOR BULL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AO ELEVATIONS OF TIE MONO PIPE 515104 PRIOR 10 OOIQIRUCONO 50MCE COOECI•ss. ]. AL PPE CONNECTORS 10 0051140 WEARS STRUCTURES WW1 BE 1W1t-N-Z4. OR CITY AMMO EQUAL FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR SOCK STRUCTURES. CONSTRUCT M 060600 00061 TO TO PIPE SRI COIR AROUND PK 10 CLOSE OPENNE AND REPAIR STRUCTURE 10 01Y 6066506502.101 CONTRACTOR Mwl VERIFY TIDE OF seem-nom 1116 01Y 04/04101000 DEPARTMENT ENT AO CA0IE000 AA REMIND 01Y 0lNFtcnoss NEEDED 600 0111 =MAIM 4. =EU R STON/010N 60.. assn. 1 -1/Y BURONOUS WEAR COURSE 3-1/Y 61I4.40US ENSE COURSE r a 5 ADO. (atmi OOHED LIMESTONE) COMPACTED 9NIpDDE MD TI004 BACK FILL.. 5. POOR TO WITTY CONMRUWON IRE CONTRACTOR SHALL 650 veer D01040 %UIY 101010145 AO 0AM15. ANY OSCR0IPMOY 0110'04 PUNS AO new common MULL 01 REPORTED TO TIE OR1401 60E01UELY. WARNING 111 CNTRAMM 51W1 CENTACT ALL PUBLIC WURIR FOR LOCATORS OF AL 111001611011110 WIRER CROLDL 23$41= DUMP STRUCTURED BEFORE o01001140. M 40. 4E MULL REPPN 01 REPLACE TIE E DURING EN DMA= BG CONSTRUCTOR AT NO cos. TO MEL REVISIONS sr REVISION BOOK 6221 PAGE 46 (100/60) I UMW CITIFY TNT Ms PAL 9PECINCO0 14 OR REPORT WS PRPAR0 of IM 011 1065 W NEW S 0606.0ON AID 11 AT 1 AY A OILY MAIMED PWMOMM. `�wEayl jyE w.9 Or TE Q�N{al�w/yIESOD. DA100 u- 1T- no -6 KO No //+� r RMLW9T ar. 009 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 0401IEOIS • SURVEYORS • PUNNING SOIL 7610• • ENYW04MEN1A. SER0CES 10500 WAYZATA BOUIEYAAD. sun 1 1001ET00CA. 4/1 55305 (012) 5546 -7001 POOR 54E -0005 Ooa,N1e,101IDAen.00ln OWNER /DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 450 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 651 ■481 -0017 DATE: JANUARY 15. 2001 /PROJECT NAME/SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION LINO LAKES, YN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61513 -006 SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS C INO LAKES Y METAL OR r.2 W0oo FENCE POST OEOIE%RF WIN NET BACKING — 11� 0101EKILE TO OVERLAP THROUGH MOCK r W NOTE : -SILT FENCE SHOAL CONFORM TO WW1 7056. TYPE IL -FENCING 8YU BE P IC0 MONO CONTOURS OR AS ONECTE0 BY ENONEER. SILT FENCE 4/23/17 STANDARD OWING N0. 601 VARIES 1' T. r w..s wu R/W VARIES 16• ir —4' TOPSOIL & SOD (BY OTHERS) VARIES NAIL SLOPE 3'1 1MN. —1.5' -2350 TYPE LV 4 MT. WEARNG COURSE —TACK COAT —2' -2300 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 BR. NON — WEARING COURSE 5' AGGREGATE BASE. CL. 5 (PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRACO 24' SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 0& CURB TYPICAL SECTION (URBAN STREET /PERMANENT SECTION) REVISIONS n REYBRON B00K 522. PAGE 46 (105/68) R NOROY Minn, TNT ICS MAN. SPFLNCAUOI OR WPMT WAS PREPARED n NE OA MOP NY MOT =DENBO* we THAT 1 NN A PLY NEC PROE9gMRt ME WM 0 'Q �NEM A MLIOT R0. 50. RENEWED BR DATE SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. 0EC07EER5 • SURY(YOR3 • RAINING SCL TESRNO • OMRONYENfAL SFRNCES 10580 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SORE 1 NNNEI0NNti ABI 56305 (112) 541-7101 SAX: 544 -5055 WWWacheolInsadsom9MT OWNER /DEVELOPER HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 450 EAST COUNTY ROAD D ST PAUL, MN 051- 481 -0017 DATE. JANUARY 15. 2001 J y 2`291 O LAKES PROJECT NAME /SHEET TITLE SADDLE CLUB ADDITION 9 LINO LAKES, MN PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61513 -006 SHEET 6 OF 6 SHEETS AGENDA ITEM 1 - 03 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asieson DATE: Summit Fire Protection TOPIC: Site Plan and Minor Subdivision Application Review BACKGROUND: The site plan for this area was reviewed at the June 28, 2000 Environmental Board Meeting in conjunction with the Marmon Keystone project. Marmon Keystone is an approved project that is currently under construction and is located immediately to the East of the Summit Fire site proposal. Summit Fire is located on what is platted as parcel F. At the June 28,2000 meeting, existing excavated areas-that could serve as infiltration ponds were discussed. Pond 1 is the pond that is on the SW corner of this commercial development area and in the SW corner of this property. Virtually all of the surface water drainage for the Summit site will go to this pond #1. This is exactly what was discussed on June 28th. Project engineer John Johnson has created additional swails to slow and infiltrate the water from this site. Pond 1 will also take the water drainage from 2 acres on the parcel to the north. - As noted from the submitted infiltration checklist sheet, water from roofs will be directed into storm pipes feeding directly into two constructed infiltration basins. Curb and one catch basin in grass area will be directed to infiltration basins. Soil compaction is indicated to be 95% (engineering standard for settlement assurances). I have talked to John Johnson about this and John will write a spec for the vegetation growth areas that would reflect the soils are no higher in density than 1.7 grams per cubic centimeter. This is the limiting soil bulk density for plant growth in fine. sand soils. The landscape plan reflects the standard that seems to be acceptable in the business district. That is, irrigated turf in the front and native materials in the drainage areas. We have in the past asked for a maintenance contract to be signed with a company knowledgeable in native plant culture, for the areas that have these native plant areas. OPTIONS: • Change soil specs in growing areas to reflect less than the 1.7 G /cu cm. • Require native plant maintenance contract. • Require a few native flower gardens in front area. This is consistent with other commercial sites where native flowerbeds have been planned. RECOMMENDATION: Options listed above as well as recommendations of the Environmental Board. CITY OF LINO LAKES - LAND USE APPLICATION CHECK APPROPRIATEBOX FEE ESCROW DEPOSIT Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500 Conditional Use Permit $ 350 Interim Use Permit $ 350 Site Plan Review $ 500 Subdivision: Preliminary Plat $ 1,250 Preservation Development 1,250 Planned Development Overlay 1,250 Minor Subdivision/ $ 250 Lot Split Rezoning $ 350 Vacation: drainage, street, utility $ 250 Variance $ 250 $500 $250 Property Address PIN # Legal Description: Lot Block Addition Existing Land Use VACANT Existing Zoning INDUSTRIAL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION S: VQJLJ " RYAN COMPANIES Applicant: Owner (if different than applicant): SUMMIT FIRE PROTEC name FRANK ZELLEY name QUINTIN RUBALD address 700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE address 2788 CLEVELAND AVENUE 900 2n 5402 ROSEVILLE, MN phone (612) 336 -1200 phone (651) 639 -8780 :: fax .(6121 337 -5552 fax RE : E1VEtp JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES InIT.M5eIn�.eeecoaee IligN MP121:11:7"In •I0U1�, ` Deg ormi � p ►apJ� 8 ► :. • VAN =--W ccrill 111 I gm REM/ a ■ a =ov Ammon vrim•a, NSW niciwal Mar rl• .. fi,,,,, 9 `,A, -0n ga Maooaovoitgaila oo�.i�nO0000000ccO P Adigii alga Rya , y MIME; • D0 00 12111111-11811111111111 - -, �_p�jOQ o ? �o0a ate® r, gmeacnotimum II il ° 1:ricil' I OM t- rip wM 4 i pia* saltIngtra anNi 1 lin GE' 1 1 1• • 11 1 a Ryan Companies US, Inc. 700 International Centre • 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3387 612/336 -1200 phone 612/337 -5552 fax • MEMORANDUM CYAN Building Lasting Relationships TO: City of Lino Lakes FROM: Frank Zelley DATE: January 12, 2001 SUBJECT: Narrative for Summit Fire Protection Submission The above exhibits together with the Minor subdivision sketch are for the proposed Summit Fire Protection site in Apollo Business Center. The proposed project is for 30,076 sq. ft. office and warehouse building. Also shown is space for a future addition of up to 20,800 sq. ft. Sanitary sewer and water service is to be extended from the existing sewer and water mains constructed as part of the Marmon/Keystone site to the east. The water service will be stubbed across Apollo Court and split to serve both Summit Fire Protection site and the parcel to the north. Site access will be from Apollo Court, which is being constructed as part of the Marmon/Keystone project. Site drainage is into the existing Pond 1, which was excavated during the construction of Apollo Drive. The pond will be modified to add infiltration swales and provide an optional sand borrow area. The modified pond will also serve 2.0 acres of the parcel to the north. Application to RCWD was made on January 11, 2001. Copies of the Metro Land Surveying and Engineering' drainage calculations are attached. DECEIVED JAN 122001 CITY OF LINO LAKES Infiltration Checklist Summit Fire Protection Lino Lakes, MN Runoff Prevention 1. 37.7% of the site is impervious which is below the maximum of 80 %. Future development drainage impervious area will be58.5% 2. No streets as part of this project 3. One parking lot one sidewalk, N/A 4. Parking stalls are 9' the 18' 5. Joint shared parking is available. -b 6. Parking Waiver has 48 proposed parking stalls. 7.- Pervious,..: parking, no overflow parking projected. 8. Natural vegetation covenant N/A 9. No cul-de -sacs 10. Vegetated swales along the north drivewa ear the infiltration basin side of the site 11. Depressional storages in provided in the E orrp r the site --- ' PA-' ti, (.., 12. Compaction will be 100% for the first 3 eet under the building and parking lot for support the rest of the site will be cQZnpacted}to 95% ;; ,�� "' i 13. Soil suctut`ehoiiId not be disnipted 14. No driveways __.___. -� _.. Infiltration Systems 1 Depressional storage is provided in the sou t ela i corner of the site 2. Retention Pond at 900.30 elevation'post two 100yr back to back events, dead storage is 241,673 cu ft. storage provided in the southeast corner 3. Four curb inlet basins and one catch basin in-grass area, all storm structures outlet to infiltration basins. 4. No roads 5. S vales'near ponding areas will be- constructed directing water overland into infiltration basins. . 6. Roof drains will be directed into storm pipes feeding directly to the infiltration basins. 7. Depressed pervious areas are below the parking lot 8. Two infiltration basins. ? Maintenance - 1. Snow storage areas shall be at the end and south eastcomer of the parking lot a few stalls may be lost in the winter. 2. Sand will be hauled in from off site 3. Sweeping intervals will happen at least once a year 4. Swale maintenance will be the responsibility of the owner and will be monitor regularly: 5. Pond maintenance will be the reasonability of the owner and will be monitor regularly. 6. Routine inspections will be done by the owner 7. Sediment traps will be inspected and cleaned out by the owner. RECEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES METRO LAND SURVEYING T!IN C TIES OFFICE & ENGINEERING' 332 County Road D, Little Canada, W( 66117 Telephone: (812) 788 -0112 TAX: (812) 788 -0612 Emaal: surveyemetrols.com PINE C1TY OFFICE Route 4, Box 206, Pine City, MN. 66009 Telephone:: (320) 629 -3287 FAX: (320) 629 -0176 Email: metropc®ecenet.com JOB NO.: h a l — out CREW CHIEF: ®, DATE: ///0/ / 0/ SCALE: NOTES: Swim/7- riiZ ratyrgc..r,AN Lr�,►o 14,40s MN 1 .1 1111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 5 SSW" r,;.4 AllEHM1111101MITILE: 211111M 1111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 1111111111 1 1111 =Mr . •z .'111111111111111 11111 1 r-11111111111111 . 111 M rE2 C 74 • 11111111111111111111111111111 �1 -r PS, billINMEINIVE111111111 r2 ■ = E111271 111 • 11! "1111111 .--• -11111111110M1111.111 • I'- - MEIMMr iE'i_111 1 __1111•11_1 1111111111111111111111111 • 11111/21M ■ 1 • • JAN 1 2 Iiiiitif mummens- ■ _ • • • 1111111 MI i r 1 - mmilawnsursul 1 ■ ®111111111 11111111111MMIMMIMIEWM. II • • 1111111E11 �1■ • 1111111 �1/ 3�1 1I 1�11111111111i1 111 __11111111111 ilia __•111111111_ 1 Qr Web . Site: www.metrols.com • SHEET OF 3 SHEETS Jfr METRO JOB NO.: a•d/ CREW CHIEF: DATE: II(of0i LAND SURVEYING SCALE: • NOTES: S 1-/PUY'r f, eaarsiciwAl TEN arms OFFICE & ENGINEERING 392 County Road D, Uttle Canada, WI 56117 Teleph 812) 788 -0112 FAX: (812) 788 -0812 EEmmaa sarvey®metrols.com PINE CITY OFFICE Routh 4, Box 206, Piae City MN. 66089 Telephone: (320) 829 -9287 TAX: (320) 829 -0178 Erna 11: metropc ecenet.com av4 I Jernminirimm*miumnimhummilm Em AVOIMMOIMEMEMMONM7_ IMPRIMPERMIMINE enrirrmmEmem iiiiiIIIIIIIIIIillii NI AN A11117171MESIMINI 122 imaimu muro. IMPOMMM MMEMMEMMEMM fr3 4/ to N- Welk CI+o• unuu, •- nes +rnlo rwri r . Irf r nc C1•IFFTS METRO L ND SURVEYIN G TWIN CITIES OFFICE & INGINEERING • - 332 County Road D, Uttla Canada, MW 66117 Telephone: 612) 768 -0112 FAX: (612) 788 -0812 Em survey$u etrols.com PINE CITY OFFICE Route 4, Box 206, Pie Catty MW 66063 Telephone: (320) 620 -5287 TA (320) 829 -0178 Email metropc®eceneLcom. JOB NO.: ZD 71 vv I CREW CHIEF: DATE: (1(0 /0/ SCALE: NOTES: S 1ft1m,i f, jg faoro617 r,1 Sr? 4 linrainitr 4 a. u i r, 'PwN/7 1 1s. • D 7(. 711 ; Fri gorgim S V d8, LSD q.t'r 1 Or 2 Tex 414tgrj . 1 J £ • 1111.19.1-11% lac LAP 2,ft. • icro 0 si PTT- t-7L,e vAiPTO A0ZG4. _Tr �aPq :r-40047441 7•r. -S ogfiG'.0 srag EVSNr 7: 4 -, r� i7ty v. way h 1 Put f L v. t% r,S15 r• • 9 vTqD • 8 • • 9 PINUI 9crZ. yt.c, $.42v€ 14 f'Lory J L-A V Web. Site: www.metrols.com 0s, 7 w, L 25iN✓ m-P f s OeLou, ASage .57/#4' 7P,y • SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION Stage - Storage curves 400000 r - 350000 300000 250000 200000 - E. c 150000 _ 1 00000 ->>r 50000 0 IN NM NMI MPS= 1111E11 NMI mon ■ •.'ir r n ' itinviME x21111 v11A iiri1OLtaai liEll I RECEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LINO �- a • • summit fire area ft^2 344272 pond 1 . existing existing expansion existing existing proposed proposed pond- pond pond vol cumlative pond vol cumlative elev ft area ft"2 area W2 pond vol. pond vol. 883.5 0 0 0 0 884 2434 2434 609 609 885 3151 3151 2793 3401 886 3968 3968 3560 6961 887 4897 4897 4433 11393 888 5941 5941 5419 16812 889 7093 7093 6517 23329 890 . 8346 8346 7720 31049 891 9699 9699 9023 40071 892 11144 11144 10422 50493 893 12677 12677 11911 62403 893.5 0 17364 17364 0 7510 894.0 13875 8177 22052 3469 3469 9854 9854 895.0 22364 1703 24067 18120 21588 23060 32914 896.0 25757 6700 32457 24061 45649 28262 61176 897.0 28920 7624 36544 27339 72987 34501 95676 898.0 32373 8535 40908 30647 103634 38726 134402 899.0 36351 9251 45602 34362 137996 43255 177657 900.0 40533 9877 50410 38442 176438 48006 225663 901.0 45123 14533 59656 42828 219266 55033 280696 902.0 52343 27229 79572 48733 267999 69614 350310 volume - cu.ft. 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION - Stage - Storage curves elevation -♦- EX. STAGE - STORAGE --PROP STAGE - STORAGE RECEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES PERMIT NAME: RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT INFILTRATION WORKSHEET So ne I j naff PRoTTCT IoN PERMIT NO. • STEP 1: Determine impervious and pervious areas. • Note: Include all pervious and impervious areas located in any rights -of -way. (a) Total Site Area 2.O (b) Impervious Area Li. 246 ac (examples: roads, roofs, parking lots, ' gravel drives) (c) "Effective Pervious Area 0.15 / ac (not a — b) Undisturbed: 1.95 ac Disturbed: S. ZS 5 ac * Only use horizontal component of surface area which is subject to intermittent prolonged wetting. Do not include area of permanent pools of ponds or wetlands (see Stormwater Infiltration Guidance Design Parameters). Note: The effective arca available for infiltration must be capable of receiving the runoff from impervious surfaces. Pervious "islands" located above adjacent parking lot surfaces, for example, will not be credited. STEP 2: Demonstrate % imperviousness for the site [(b) + (a)] x 100 = 58.5— % (d) (d) MUST BE < 80% STEP 3: Determine runoff volume from impervious surfaces generated by median storm of 0.34 inches. 11 "216 (b) 0.9 x - 0.34 inches x lft 12 inches Impervious Coefficient Mpls -St. Paul Volume Area (ac) Median Storm Needed to be Rainfall Infiltrated (ac ft) 0.10 (e) STEP 4: Calculate volume capable of tieing infiltrated on site within 72 hours. Use infiltration rates listed on page 2 of Stormwater Infiltration Guidance Design Parameters. Saturated infiltration rate (if multiple on -site soil types, use most restrictive) for Type $ _ soils = a 2-5 (f) in/hr 1 ft 0! (c) x Q 2S 72 0.2-0 12 inches (a) Effective Infiltration Pervious) Rate Area (ac) Corresponding to Soil Type (in/hr) Hours STEP 5: Compare volume generated to volume infiltrated. O. 2.01 (g) MUST BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.10$ Volume Infiltrated in 72 Hours (ac ft) • RECE :yEO e). jP099 till001 CM)'Y OF LI O LAKES Arm - Mounted Premium Cutoff Use for car lots, street lighting or parking areas. Catalog Number JAN 12 2001 Example: KSF1 50S R2 J20 OS. LAK 09 PER G r Y r 3.03,,1 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 70W KSF1 70S R2 R3 R4SC 100W KSF1 100S R2 R3 R4SC 150W KSF1 150S R2 R3 R4SC 250W KSF2 250S R2 R3 R4SC 400W KSF2 4005 R2 R$ R4SC 1000W KSF3 1000S — R3 R4SC METAL HALIDE 100W KSF1 100M1 150W KSF1 150M2 175W KSF1 175M 200W KSF1 200M3 250W KSF1 250M2 320W KSF2 320M3 � 350W KSF2 350M3 400W KSF2 400M2.4 1000W KSF3 1000M R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R2 R3 R4SC R4W — R4W R5S — R5S R4W R5S R4W R5S R4W R5S — R5S6 NOTES: 1 Not available with 480V. 2 Maybe ordered with SCWA or LLRPSL 3 Must be ordered with SCWA or LLRPSL 4 Requires a ED -28 reduced jacket Tamp. 6 Requires a BT -37 reduced Jacket lamp. 6 Consult factory for availability in Canada. 7 Multi-tap ballast (120, 277, 347V). 8 Use 9" arm when mounting two luminaires at 90 °. 9 May be ordered as accessory. 10 PER option must be ordered with fixture. 11 Includes mounting arm. CANADIAN SHIPMENTS:Add CSAassuffix to catalog number. International -:Dail Sky Member 120 2086 2406 277 347 4806 TB7 AbOiles z (KSF1/KSF2, shipped included) SPO4 Square pole arm° SPO9 Square pole arm RP04 .Round pole arm° RPO9 Round pole arm WW04 Wood pole or wall' W W09 Wood pole or wall W804 Wall bracket WBO9 Wall bracket MB Mounting bracket L/ARM Less arm (when ordering KMA, DA12) (KSF3, shipped included) SP12 Square pole arm RP12 Round pole arm WW12 Wood pole or wall WB12 Wall bracket (Shipped separately)° KMA Mast arm adapter KTMB Twin mounting bar DA12P Degree arm (pole) DA12WB Degree arm (wall) rrtxs�,yu.�.t,7 OPTIONS (Shipped installed) SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V, n/a TB) - DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V, n/a TB) O,RS Quartz restrike system PER NEMA Twist -lock (no photocontrol) receptacle only EC Emergency circuit CR Corrosion - resistant finish LS Lamp support CSA Listed and labeled to comply with Ca- nadian Standards SCWA Super CWA pulse start ballast (TB std.) LLRPSL Low Toss reactor pulse start ballast (277V only) For optional Architectural Colon, see page 313. ACCESSORIES (Shipped separately) PE1 NEMA Twist -lock photocontrol (120, 208, 240V1t0 PE3 NEMA Twist-lock photocontrol (347V)10 PE4 NEMA Twist -lock photocontrol (480V)10 PE7 NEMA Twist -lock photocontrol (277V)1° SC Shorting cap for PER option KSFVG Vandal guard (KSF1/KSF2 only► KSFHS House side shield (KSF1 /KSF2 • R2, R3 only) ForTenon slipfitters, see pages314.320. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. DIMENSIONS Housing: KSF1 EPA:" 1.5 ft2 (.14 m2) Length: 22 (55.9) width: 18. 3/16(41.1) Depth: 7 -1/4 (18.4) Arm length: 4(10.2) Maxweight 39iba.(17.7kg) KSF2 2.0 tt2 (.28m2) 25-5/16(64.3) 18.1/2 (47.0) 8- 5/18(21.1) 4(10.2) 551bs.(24.9kg) KSF3 3.0 ft2 (.28 m2) 30.5/16 (77.0) 24. 5/18(61.8) 10-1/2(28.7) 12 (30.5) 851bs.(38.6kg) PAL/THONIA L/GH77Nc7 SKETCH AND DESCRWFION FOR: SUMMIT FIRE MINOR SUBDIVISION AT APOLLO BUSINESS PARK NC111N ISN1 or 114E -4-^ SOUNDS? QUARTER 4. _� c ; r N88'22'SYd --' 1 1 MO 33 30 �OI 1 411 eA.aoi / x:11 try.:: / "00 Ar to I Ban / ;I .r, "1 / . b1 v, 0 404.01' 104m;Tees e MA E • OlA�• J33 561.18' /` eee PARCEL G 0 .19102 .an. N8.12 area a 58100 q "N Y6. gsl • N1 11 (` \; 64 i; A ■ •.ier. ,` ♦ ♦'.: /� ♦` 1,.127 CVNTAsemerr 1 ;; oor r 4 s 1.4 or .0 554 • POINT B / N °L"'' ° °° 1 OZ:B• <� 0 "5, 5s'p° LAO PARCEL F 214.147 sSR. 4.92 ewes %' 1/` 4#1 T∎ R• v9 / 541 �A1A85 it w� / a.2 4'48. s 0 $ in tFa.$ 74111 m 0 8. PARCEL E T A $01'sr0s'S 46.00 H -r.,,,. S*IS / o.°w, 9% • t/ w o.1. Olt' hO g� Z. 9 / 019 . 61? 5 ,� .5�� a 1 i / 6 9 a.r ' 554 Oy .r /}1"ci ♦ lb - /'r N8822'57"E 2277.92' - -° 2099.x' -- -- MEET T Aar -. Nui ®+. 11111E833D51162.11r- LAND SURVEYING L Ei�BVO • Pr ltd potty Pen• 4 lath Ganda 911 55117 Telephone (6551)766 -0012 Fos (001)7N -OOt2 1 -hash oo5wYiMolnNmelm METRO • 0040113 IRON MONUMENT FOUND (UNLESS OTNERMASE MARKEO) • OENOTE5 IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED 17765 hemr0, artily that this swlm)t pro r apart was papered by m• under m AWet .6� .. . .t I on 5 duly L - - Land •• ' `7f �: M ♦ tote of rota avid P. Mon Oats: 1.7cenx No. 17765 PARCEL F NOR1NEA5T CORNER - - -•. Nat pal of M 5o•awt duet., of 5. 4.. 16 T...dds 31. Now 22. Mahe 014..11 055.ru ds1cri54 - se..nwe9 a the 11555512 er.r et r4 SoutMwl Cowls. tetra Nosh 00 Owen 22 ..Mrtr 37 wands Writ. eared •554 Pori W IWO M of will Sesa..e 0.rtor. 2043.55 feet sewn 5`..5 1 bow 37 minutes 03 •••••• Coal 5+637 heat s.uha Sods 55 •eiw 22 .hula 57 wands west. 7600 het hope S.5. 1 ••91e 37 swot. 03 4555*. tap. 1600 feel to • wort 1. N h•rnem•05 55.. n PPM i' ads • lc M 4.114 a1 •edm.org Owe. Sara 00 doyen 22 . hates 57 arch Wan 131.15 het amp. Loth 50 d•4e14 20 Phut. »wands West. 20119 het Pon NNW 00 415.e. 15 Phut.. 27 rans west. 225.00 feet to M west Met Wi fa.G.wt 0orlr. throe South 0 Mow 01 Photos 04 sawn% west. M N M 00 • al W 1ol.a a9M -eh.... PNl Na 1, Awn Drive 11.5ri4 r 9r• mooted Wt Wrest, Ne . Nra•ryny 41412 feet, said Rrh.nN.1p May yap • � r4 art Ie cos s2S00 Ml r IM Kraal., • NO. M 799.00 Net. • wad Pyle M 29 Mew 44 phut. 40 .1•11*. M • alma MOM serf N54* 55 doyen 12 Photos 43 womb Cast Pon Nora 30 aPM 20 Met.. b roods Cost. h.yw to IM Net Orv1•• • mho =La Net to M .IrmetUert W M.W9 descried Mt •1.15••12 et 125 5511y 05411.4 hit in hew Saab 1 4951. 37 minutes 03 whey taw, 3600 Mt Mee• Swaes•r 7y 15503 foe. dr9 • tesuwaii vw 4..em r W Nr9unt he.we • mho M 235.00 feel PHI a ewr.l wy. 0 35 4g44ea 02 .eat. 29 sma14N tree Sea 33 4.554.4 39 ..isles 31 swab Cast. tapwt N W lest Mg*N wee 70.31 Net to W NriMar.17 M say at. M are tsa•el5o Piece Nth M degrees 33 Phut. 31 wood. hest 70.34 Net M9ha Nra.atoF 155.03 Mt Pap • 1119/14101 era ammo* N Y.• Nrhest hMry a 144.• 44 23600 M and • antral o1gl• et 36 4.eww 52 minute. 20 wa54w Noce Ora 1 dupes 37 Photo. 03 woP•s Wog. toryent r M Net Norio. Pew 30.00 Net N W heat d ►.95.59 P rey F ..1 (Oe5.g..d Stay ta•...wt) A pr•eud WAWAWA/ fee •Wet *NNW W WNW W IN .. Poo undo W woes W fa9•5.5 dmi•4 Veep Oil pert d W Sr4.ep 9415 of Leh. 15. 7..4lhip 34, 559p, 22, Ards C..47. 0e44.r14 hens Nara •f W City et the Lakes Rl1.l- of-.ey mot Na 1 A• l% 0M1P. ewrip to W 1144454 .Nt t55o4 41riwd ea Mme C..•...M at the Nraes.t pant et soli Southeast 0444454 Wa... NNW M doer 22 minutes 57 swop. west. ••••• Opt.s yens the North M of NW Sw4re Warier • *54.1.• W 2099.0 Net Moos Sea / *.¢w 37 minutes 03 ..mad tot a 4.05.. M 54637 Net hence Saul 59 thanes 21 Phut.. 57 s.o.r West. 7600 het hemp Srth 1 *ye. 37 met. 03 very Cie. 18.00 hst aw4. Sw4. 99 apes 22 Phule 57 see•ds West. 13105 Net Menu Spa 50 doyen 20 .4ptes 29 Nerds pat 203.19 hat awese Spa 00 dhows 15 onhutes 27 whsha west. 14501 Net M We peal N twohnh t amp aw*W.s Sark 90 Now 19 minutes 27 search Waal. 109.02 het to M weal M d rid Southeast 0mten awes Sea 00 495!• 01 •5rrt. 9 l•••• Cast. deny at. weal 14ma 423.00 Net to the Nra.estw7 M of O.• City .f One Lehr i1l4.4 -d-.. plat Na 4. Apr. 04p. •eerily to M ...PPP pet 41rea5 awes 11r4..o trios 350.25 fee Pens said Nrawtary M and •1fry • wan- Nnsen4d sum snow N M N51..ea1 Mews . roars of 793.00 hat. • central angle el 25 doyen 49 annu5 57 eamSNS W • chap .4p. Mrs Perth 97 Now 10 mites 19 4155*. Cost i.e. Mai 53 Now 43 morale 59 woods hot 1442 het amps INN. 72 Now 17 .5414. 33 secants West. 3625 het Woos Nra 39 Neon 30 ..hut. 31 .ea..d. wol. 5.79 Net aw. S.W. 00 Nerve. 20 .4*4.. 25 wawa. W.I. 51.59 Net awn Nod.. 39 Moves 33 .wholes 30 swamis W1.1. 134.00 hot throne Nods S0 ••4w 00 Phllea 29 seep.*. Cost. 2041 hot Pon N4*. 07 Noses 33 Mutes 33 seers*. teal. 127.99 Net N M 1141.4 et M.955ey. PARCEL G Oat opt e1 W 55aw1 0.rt r et Sepia 16 T•..ei 31. Rag. 22. Mays Crnl4 U5•a4a 45501.4 - epononelnq et M N5Nee earner M at. Sa.awt atlas Oaha South 00 dew.. 22 Photos 37 rear W..l. 55.9.4 Many Won set II4M M ef r4 Srawl Ouster • *sto•p of 2099.0 Net to W newt of 9.dmW9 el W weed to Ye desrie• Woos Spa 01 Nye. 37 minutes 03 5ee.d. teal • Pater el 0637 feet thence Sara 55 dep... 22 5441• 57 hooch Peel. 70.00 set amp S 5. CO ow. 37 .Ywlw 62 maws Gal. 5.00 foot Mee. Worth 55 Now 22 Photos 57 aw5.ys West. 131.40 het acme Spa 50 Wyo. 20 photos 99 seam,. 941 203.15 soot awes Spa 00 4.ow MI Phot.. 27 seems Weal. 225.00 Net N M hest M of w 5.1MW emus tines Nerve 00 Mer 01 .Win 09 shah3. Gal. 559 NW .sat as 921.53 fool te M Ora M of and Sa•lhrd O.ort.: theme NrM M doyen 22 .huts 57 swords Ca1R alone said Nero as 55415 Mt N M sent et 459551.. ht. O-1 (04*.. 6 Why C•5rnwl) W A e•wad .113451 No p.ON 1441439.....4.13 popes.. over, .Inc. owl Nowa W fa•.ep d11eN.4 prat MglwYp W M N5airma caner el W Swaim Oat. of 5aka 16 Chop* 31. Nano 22. Map Conch Phr5St9 Nave North 59 doyen 22 phut. 57 .354. Cwt P54 W Nero M el sin Southeast Qmt5. 404.01 feet actor 5•11.11W7 to • pail en M Via M of seal Sarlhwe Omit Paint 39391 feet South...3 ran M N.r5•..l owner el said Srhwt Caste/. se mw..4 deal sill Wee yes Moe. Nrthoy to M paint of 049554.5. Pact' 0-2 pepped Raaswy £......l) • prpehd ewuent fir 554• .5.4•7 pogrom her. puler W across M Wm( 3000 fool d M MM. 59100 fen el ids Srl9wl 04414 el Sold. 19. T•5n45. 31. Rape 22, Awe. CoPt7. 16Wewt Pagel 0-3 (0.55.9.6 UONIy 55....4) A prpele pawner! IN public 4.5.5. W u1Wy wows. ewe. muds W hew he hest 5000 Mt of ids 559. 12100 MI et So45 15. Ta..SN 31, &woe 22. Poe Carty, la.wt. emit W Wit 3000 std of W tart. 59500 feel thereof. Paw 0-4 (7wwry Re54.esy Cas44..1) A Ng5r7 55.5'1 Nos NrN 154d.57 purposes. •1.5. ••• W aeons M %ahead Mono. d S.C. 18. Tos•sh. 31. R..ap 22. Mao Cawt4 YWwta armor as ca•rwo ti.9 at M Nr*0a9I Gym, d es4 Seuthent Oust, Woos South 55 Pupas 22 .autos 57 soma het em...4 seep ow" W win M el sad Srawl Omt5. 3059.0 Net three. Soh 01 dupw. 37 marries 03 1ecorN East. 5118.37 het to W wort of b 9551.94 amt. imam.9 Saud 01 dare 37 mauve 03 spends rest, 140.00 Not Nova Spun 60 dews. 22 shut. 57 seconds Weal 450.00 Net Mace North 01 agree 37 phut. 03 Leos West 140.05 Net aware Nora 5S *woos 22 phut. 57 mach East. 140.00 het 10 M seal .4 54¢550 Pavel o-5 (0.55.9• i Way Geaww8) • p9111.d osrpa.l hr NON 455.94 W .41143 pswwa .a. undo W woos W 54.044e1 Omlr et Sae.. 15. T...55 31. R•rq. 22. Min 0•(4 ••••15 herpoinc 11wAft a A Saai5O9 .5 5.. 37 4 03 f *0* tee. S5Shesel O.rtan Nance South N 22 ..h..t. 57 ..weds Wet. ea••es N•••• d•y W Noes M d .114 Southeast 0.4tr 3099.0 feel N M Nat et 437 feet Noun Sods 00 agrees 22 minutes 57 seconds Wee. 70.00 Wt three Noes 03 4gr 1t •••l• 14 wood. tae. 25018 het Naha Nra a7 0oye5 37 phut. 03 wand. Wee. 400.00 Ne te M NNW M et .•4 Sr... 554 Maas North 08 Ogees 22 motes 57 seconds Gel. 1.090 41.4 to W pall et NON*, PARCEL H 1551 .at el W Southeast Owl. et SWOP. t6 7a55N 31. limp; 22. More Cant". 15on.sala 4.151.4 a w.m.4e4.9 et W 1oraesll e5.64 d at. Sarawst Morten Nome South CO ••9ww• 22 whet.. 07 •.ro•e West. ✓ aped lumina 059 W 1Nri M •f m4 Ugliest Wager. 2099.55 lot Owen %OM 01 down 37 Photos 03 am5ds East. 0637 foot te 3 p554 to w herona114 Iowa op Point 'A', also 4.59 M pent el toyw5; therm. 5Mmra 58 a1 w 22 phut. 57 amen*. Wee. 7000 het thane. Saud 01 Ogee 37 wall.. 03 ..cape Cast. 58.00 het 41o.ee Soul.wt4ly. 15603 het 5ey • l4pwW1 eon can..P to a. NorMwt Mamie • r.44a et 23200 feel ••We of 35 degree. 02 wholes 28 meen4w pea Shah 39 Op.. 35 PWI.. 31 pew.*. teat. 5•••44 to ha amri54 cope. 70.31 feel te w wth..•to ty Met W Cty of 8.w 45.6 11I91.1 -01-.1y Pint Na 1. Apply 04... to W recorded We Om1.t Won Natl. 50 44*.. 20 'Wt. 29 meant Gel. 059 Wd Mrawlaly as 7000 Mt. to O. 1le.ame55 .4 . • M Mserted .. NN.. 0p4P5q at 51e.4u5y dssme54 owl 'A't hop Sash 45 Poo.. 37 'WI.. 03 won.. Eat. 40.00 Not Wen. SreaMOW 109.33 feet eery • 14195!40 erv5 hawses to M NaWwl nor et 10100 40 W a awW ayo 411 30 495.1. 02 phut.. 25 emend. Won Sea 39 *rime M .sales 31 swamis Est. 15yen1 to W Net descried caw. 7631 Not to .W N.5.mlay M W sa4 M IMre lermie New. N59. 30 4 ere.. 33 mW/m 34 seconds Met 7034 feet thence 5.5. .sly 10155 551 Mans • t59e.1y cone. caner. to M N 19.1.1 her./ • mhos of 11100 Ise re • 4*514 op• el 35 4prw 03 'hetes • em.p. Nome North 01 lewa• 37 5 4.. 03 soeaW West. 15955 to M N1. amvie. 44*. 4000 feel to he pail a Moshah9 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE ✓ e to 4- ten ( IK rca 1 Nab • NO R JOB NO. 613 -002 02000 t .X- Xuaento. LTD. vette PRAIRIE MIX i SUGGESTED PLANT SCHEDULE emM1'ONY mama00im T- y°▪ 'ewre ' O AVG. 2" DIA. O "a Ora' aV em1E mraa N CHOW MOW undo 010002011T =MO= AUDI- SCALE: 1" = 30' 0' LANDSCAPE NOTES IMES AWL 11r DIA. A. HT 6' wr oa. MO see asewom ALPINE eesewrs rararsuoaw 1,4 00000012 seam rose IOWA AIMP1i waoeur i eensuear reuse ass j0 AVG NT 18' • ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO SE SEEDED TO UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL TURF AREAS.SHALL BE IMPUTED TO BACK .OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO SEED MIX TABLES FOR RATE OF PLANTING. • REFER TO LANDSSAPE DETAIL SHEET FOR 'GENERAL PLANTING Nt(1ES, IRRIGATION NOTES AND PLANTING DETAILS. • LAEO E �U A WNO OF IRRIGATION PLAN TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR POND MIX Cdmmon Nome Coitode alma 000 mike/mid lthir England star Sweep alter Soy ▪ fanged SNOW Pm Meet trstol • r14 *Nib Joli-pm weed W Notes Mose. ine mom fowl Bin bluimear 44 gam awed MO* law M66 lKB gmal NM mom "PM fal Mee-eyed Beads Mien MIA • Mil groom ,oldered Nue vermin teemed Diverts root Cdden AlsoardeM Rata 30 be /eve (33 �kg/1a} Mmldkn Note •eP•rale � � and merrier gebe era root Mitredle. e y of them epode. mute p roman a trutmen a tot a marble Abe Cant 40 Hours before digging ,GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Arad 051 -454 -0002 MN. Toe Fns 1- 800 -252 -1166 Botedml done A of We 0.11 0.5 0.6 0.6 B0 0.2 0.4 10 6.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0..5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.1 10.0 11 35.0 1.0 10.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 5.0 3.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.4 Tote! 100.0 Afar?* Ward Anemone t=do Aetr nowie -ogees kW pima s Bran Demod e8 ranchos Eupabwbel mould= Rewla Wm* ikeerla Nikes Napa edentholdes drgWde -e red Leb Loakm do Meths theme Mono* Niko NA Pelham ■iyalom Pa Oat* 5drpu0 Scipm erode kldadote • Veradoa tin n *Mee= Dm aerie FORKS MIX Clmman Name Mt emootlrrkn WwddV Calorie ride dorm sate Itte-lreld, Mowry Ni04-eye, common kililinsten Neatens% Mori d coded GOMM, off ONo Verroi% ben Almandere olden Rate 5X of PraHs MI0. DisalptbrcbeNa1M lobs PRAIRIE MIX ammo: Name big oldaoats d rye Cmodian hot groan, deader grass, annual Rebelled Nome Aidepioe tube= AAkkrr akakMe Ater Weis to deulate Oleo oudithm t ammo elkintholdes Wirth may' RANG Omuta Rethaddo 0lkta rtg Stildnga Tlo lio Mien* *boo hastoto *bens *Math • Zee N modes Ad M prodded In mud **Me %MUMMA to be added to niatln pee Webers In SE IOmaota. • F (Table g F-1. F -7. s F -3) &Itch little Won tlrase Rate 30 Wore 63 ip/M} Seeding Method., l� Site PraparaMal t 1M d e *odd be prepared by Naip to a depth of laced Mee Mee 8) Fe'tiner t Conduct eel Ms% a required, fo1Nse per •oe. tad re moaideiM. The tatMar used should bee wmnrdal prods of dui release aenpkte tirtNur. C) Seed Imtdiatigi t Seed Mould be Malted with a seed *6 that el odarateiy meter the, types of . seed to be plaited and keep all seeds uniformly rebid defy the drilling (T sao -ids} 7 IS *0 should cod* 0 militant two Seel boxer o No waled bon and a box . Inge /Aufn adds, old 8 should be sped with dm Wow apenew and own* to compact the directly over the MI row* Maximum row spooky ihodd be 8 Inches Srwl and IM sheds Mould be drop -seeded onto the graced surface (eras the One seed 01.. tatge/11ufy ceded�ald be placed to Math a Ord depth df X to % itch. N 41 seeding should be done of a red mile to Wads drainage. Rates ?Rota are woaed M the mhhrw taladalfan fr the spwdAed rrbr. It t Die rite should bs 7 horuesd r riled following pes Paktrna 7 led site m�lnarrowiig to ensure o Om seed bed. Mulch 1 1he�ehmdd be ant doc-arI honed faeowby po**b using a weed ter mulch at a rate of 2.0 tons per axe. In Planting Season t Planting Beam k between Aprl 15 to July 20 and Siptsmbr 20 to Octhbr 20. Drment seeing from October 20 to November 15, *Nh o mmknun ed Memorable Of 50 B otadod Ness B outeloue ootI mido Esau@ cancan* Lam Ram NA NA Poniben *plum Sordhasbum nem IlafMs 5.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 30.0 50 20 12.0 12.0 Tab* 100.0 1 1 1 RECEDED JAN 1 2 2001 LC;TYLJ MI GENERAL NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY WRIT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND. BY CALUNG GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (454 -002) PRIOR TO STAKING PLANT LOCATIONS. 2. COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTAUATIONS WR'H OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 3. WHERE EXISTING TREES AND /OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUBS MASSINGS ARE FOUND ON SITE, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE DRAWING OR NOT, THEY; SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED AND /OR ARE IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED: ANY QUESTION REGARDING WHETHER PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN OR NOT SHAD_ BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL • 4. AU. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ARE to BE FERTIU`LED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD AND DAMAGED OR RUBBING BRANCHES. 5. B&B TREES AND SHRUBS ARE BALLED AND BURLARED. 6. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS 'APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND /OR QUOTATION. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SWILL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER, ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE TIE RESPONSIBBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 10. WARRANTY toR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR • FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE WITH ALL REPLACEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. • DECIDUJOUS FREE NOTE: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF • TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED IT 1S THE OR'S 'OPTION TO STAKE T HOWEVER. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE QUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 3. 0 120' INTERVALS (TYP.) 6" POLYPROPYLENE OR DE STATE E (40 MIL, 1 -1/2' TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH FLAGGING -.ONE PER WIRE ROOTBALL TO SR ON SUBGRADE MULCH - 4' bEEP SHREDDED BARK PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC. TOPSOIL SUBGRADE 2" X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLE SOD - PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 1. PLANTING BED PREPARATION: ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10'. AMENDMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED AFTER CULTIVATION. Z. BACKFILL SOIL: USE SOIL EXCAVATED FROM PLANTING HOLES AND PROVIDE AMENDMENTS. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS INCLUDING ROCKS LARGER THAN 3" DIAMETER. 5. FERTIUZATION: ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERIIUZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL OR OTHER SPECIFIED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. • 4. MULCH MATERIAL: AS SPECIFIED bN THE LANDSCAPE PLANS: MASS MULCH ALL PLANTING BEDS t0 3' DEPTH OVER FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES TO RECEIVE 6" DEEP SHREDDED HARbWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. • 5. TREE S'jAKING: R SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO STAKE AND /OR GUY THE TREES ACCORDING TO THE 'DETAILS. R IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBIUTY TO TAKE EVERY STEP NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE TREES AND SHRUBS IN AN UPRIGHT AND PLUMB CONDITION AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THE END OF THE PLANT GUARANTEE PERIOD ESPECIALLY WHERE VANDALISM, SOIL OR WIND CONDITIONS ARE A PROBLEM. 8. TREE WRAPPING: WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY. HEAVY WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DEdIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12 -1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5,-1. 1. RODENT PROTECTION: PROVIDE ON ALL TREES, EXCEPT SPRUCE UNLESS • OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 8 PLANTING PLAN: AU. PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED CAREFULLY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. RESPECT STATED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 9. EDGING- EDGING SHALL BE 4" P.V.C. COMMERCIAL GRADE EbGING WITH THREE (3) MEAL STAKES PER 20 FOOT SECTION. ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE EDGING BETWEEN MULCH AREA AND ANY ADJACENT TURF AREA. CONIFEROUS TREE NOTES: CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES, OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OE TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. IT IS THE CONT'RACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. • DOUBLE STRAND 14 GAOVIRE. 3' 0 120' INTERVALS (YP.) 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL. ) 1 -1/2" WIDE STRAP 8'-0" STEEL STAKE FLAGGING +- ONE PER WIRE ROOTBALL TO SR ON SUBGRADE MULCH - 4" DEEP SHREDDED BARK PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC. TOPSOIL BGRADE 2' X 2" X 24" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLE SOD Twin Arse U §1 -= .151 -00U1 IAN. toll l ree 1- 566 -- 252 -1166 NI PLANTING NOTES 1. NO PLANTING TO BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY AND ALL DIGGING. 3. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS. SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIAL ESTABLISHMENT. SURVIVAL. OR GUARANTEE, THEY SHALL BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION. OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS. MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. 5. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. 6. ONE SHRUB PER TYPE AND SIZE IN EACH PLANTING BED AND EVERY TREE SHALL BE CLEARLY NTI IDEFIED (COMMON OR LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL. NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE. 7. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD /SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB. ETC. 8. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL, TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GGRROODUND. 9. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. 10. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM- PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. MI IRRIGATION NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A SHOP DRAWING ILWSTRATING AN IRRIGATION PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO OR ER. • • 2. VERIFY EXISTING /PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LOCATION. 3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL SW__ /SEED AND PIANTING AREAS INDICATED ON PLAN SHALL BE 100X IRRIGATED. THE IRRIGATION SHALL INCLUDE THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN PROPERTY LINE AND BACK OF CURB WHERE NEW LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED. 4. R SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED /SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 5. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH•A WATERING/LAWN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDmONNSS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. NM SHRUB 11111 =i1ii, .:. = '= 1 {1 {fi =i 11_111 III = 111111.= lfllll= 111111 °IIIIII_°IIIIII_ = 111111°1 NOTE: HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP.) SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUBS TO SIT ON SUBGRADE MULCH - 4' DEEP SHREDDED BARK LANDSCAPE FABRIC. - SEE SPEC. PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC 4' P.V.C. EGGING REFER TO PLAN FOR GROUND COVER SUBGRADE CENTERING OF SHRUB IN BED TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSION FROM EDGE. RECO JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES r, 1 1 ity 2 5 I a Z O 0 z O 0. g a Id LANDSCAPE DETAI VN 0 I6 LD RYAN COMPANIES US,INC 1 Welty matt are to p% a•••••a% er M.1 ••• Mars. ay If r soar MI east WW2. e d It 1 em • wtt Re6waae /Mud war tre was d the awwd ►acres% 1 Ryan Companies US, Inc. TOO braandmY Cadre 900ScomdAve =Sou& 61200 h1N, 55402,3387 enporks 611/337,3332 in CYAN Building Lasting 1 2 2AN 2001 60 rALRA60 R JANMRr wa an 61E1/411N. ICS Sal WIT 1ce0 MAW 160 as IN Au. ORLGTR7Ni. D. V= ODINIAL20 MCA6 005067 TO NM AREAS AT RIK WOO R7cnW PRO 6OEWAK 71.0402 21 MOM =NOR DOOR STOOP TO ON TO ND& NTH NO WAN TU. RECkEi ED JAN 1 2 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA SITE PLAN w AI.i ®ma„rma..w,e. ..1058 -COO 1 RYAN COMPANIES US, INC. 1 tool away MIN Oft gantaan. pert ms -M nu N rdr tllr bed apinidoll it'd forma 1 Ryan Companion US, Inc. 700 k 1 cede 900 Second Avow Scat Mi®eepolls, MN, 53402-3387 6W3361100 cogpmde 6171337 4531 fa SAN 1168 1 CUSTOMER ENRVIEE ENTRANCE n 3M4'RT.2001 arr oa mrov. RECEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 GITYOFL,[ a k SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN • RAMP MMra47 MVO CORM vlddd. I 1 WEST ELEVATION vr -ra I TQa ACCIRW 0Q► 0 4 MLL'c1 sr cCN2EZTe Me. ItICIQd MOM- NAM WIC RAU, NOM) UAW ANARe -mom. °% 1RE ROT* c,'1ON 1 NOM =In IMMO �? OM51 came MAWAWC C 11erA1 O r SOUTH ELEVATION • r' ■919111 si .uu91r91119191 �� 111 uu91■ uu■ ii�� ��ruue ■ ■e1.e�� ■xey..,l� Ell y VW t -t7 4 EAST ELEVATION yr -Pa. 491Lre P J4T Ore Aran %AD ■91919191 1111-111 U m ... • Tee CP MN. 717/ AP ALCOQ en ` TOP CV R CEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 GIN Y OF Lla zO LAKES R NORTH ELEVATION vtr ace RYAN commas US, INC. 1 tang an* ao he i.% imMeili ar wet M• mom eY mar MY mg six MpnilIOn Me es 1 on a ely ROOM AMYHS enr CS 1es a Ms Sift M fsarm► aae Ray 1h Ryan Companies US, ID. 7001atentatiami Cadre 900 Sexed Meuse Bath 61100 35402 -3387 612437,5552 fix 1 7ANd gr. 26171 - CITY SIRdNRAL ISUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION LWO LAKES, M14NESOTA VI-- -- LJL PROPl7P.D RI III t-NW• Pr F1dAll..MG `V.I ®ranw!aorw�Mr 4 • • LZVAThN RC, CI MCP GP lairtif 1/2. .41.Mff j032 • n 41 **01'..-1 R IROT litre.Aff GAMIN PAM- 144022 6122044. NNW DAM SOUTRILEVAIEN r PAST ELZVATIO( /1/7 • I47 0 4/10?' ogar .1).0.5(11.0 403r$ .1.■Clalf *MS TM 17 PEW TICIP CP OP TC. Strg, RECEIVED JAN 1 2 2001 cal' OF LINO LAKES ELM/ATM_ RYAN COMPAN183 213. WC. 1 May Mash Vst rora 98*MM aim Ir. puma b, era ea oar ay Met ayinaan IN Ina I am a Oar fayalIal 011.2 war to Ira a/ alala Maalaaa. IRyon Companies US, Inc. g°,0 simrajZ:lameci*.Seein) MA III I I 12 2/411422.2001. cin 9U1407.4. I Inee PROTECTION / NE) 1 .A1CFG whoomerr A PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN. 340 RETENTION POND rask i MM 808.84 * NV.877.28 (((NNNNNEEENEE W) • .a a LEGEND 0 COSTING SANITARY SEVER MOUE • mom= *some PROPOSED WOMAN DUSTING MMES. PROPOSED SANITARY 'CL.EANOUS VALVE GRAPHIC SCALE 3 ( I?flT) I WAS _m n • .RECEIVED 1 LEGEND manna CONTOURS PROPOSED RiNT = PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS EXISTING ELEVATION SHOT PROPOSED IRAYNAGE ARROW OPTIOIML CONTOURS • VARIBLE . RIP RAP DITCH CHECK DETAIL 3.00 FT. 0.70 FT. 0.00 DITCH BOTTOM PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE IA N71[. -/ apK1.�TM ii.a i15p1N 7O N AL 1�T A E'Nm1EN teO 'au" SILT FENCE VATS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ammo psanas Na DRG ear NO SCALE SEDIMENT CONTROL BALES PROPEX 'SILT STOP' FABRIC OR • EQUAL— FASTEN TO STAKES NOTES ANCHOR WITH (2) -3/4' STEEL REHAB DRIVEN INTO GROUND (TYP.) REAR YARD STORM SEWER STRUCTURE PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING. INSTALL ELT FENCE IN LOCATIONS SHOWN OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER., ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE VAIL BE REQUIRED !WHERE LOCAL COMMONS REOUIE. ROUGH GRADING SHALL PROCEED ON AN AREA BY AREA BASS. 10 !ANIMATE UNCOMPLETED AREAS. AS EACH AREA OUTSIDE THE STREET IS STRAIGHT SET DISC WHIN 48 HOURS OF FINE GRMR NATIVE TOPSOIL. SEED. AND MULCH ANCHORED TATTH MAINTAIN AND REPNR SILT FENCES (INCLUDING REMOVAL CF ACCUMULATE) 90 UNTIL VEGETATION IS EST SEED TO BE W00T TYPE 500. MULCH TYPE 1 (2 TONS /ACRE). • RECEIVED 1 • + WELD CONDUCTIVITY • � r BELOW FLANGE LOCATION GEOTEXTD.E FABRIC. 1I1D0T 3733 TYPE 3 rejETE ••3/4• GALVANIZED . STEEL TIE THRUST 'MEGA LUG' • RERETAAIP ER AT JOINTS • SEE STA DWG. 203 4/24/97 CONCRETE BLOCK TYPICAL HYDRANT LAYOUT (VALVE IN BOULEVARD) ROCK VAL � AROUND 11111 1/3 C.Y. . 004. 1 DMPERVMUS • S2DLS) . • STANDARD DRAWING Na 201 • Imams P>PE COVER CAN DE RFOUCED root 4' TO l'-I• VLf.I INSTALLATION Or PERMEATED PVC DRAIN PER *GRANULAR EMT NO mamma PWC MAW' tam. NO VOOD SHALL SC USUD FOR ADJUSTING CASTING) WENT NO1TM IDLY. CAST OON CATCH IASIN FRAME D DIVER CADDIE PER SPECIFICATME. PRECAST IEDFONCED WNCRE1E EVE SECTION A PRECAST DAZE PER AST 1 0478 DLL ONi m8 DET EEN PIPE NE NAIDRE VALL vox CFIQ T IORTM !HERE SURFACE SILL IIE MIMED DOME CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 PLAN CONCRETE REACTION BACKING (FOR TEES AND CROSSES) • 4 NOD COVER FITTDIGS.WITH TETHYLDE PRRIDR TO PQJR 4I J P CONCRETE. 2100 P3.I. CITE 28 DAY STRENGTH 4/24/97 J STANDARD DRAWING 205 r 1/2' MORTAR ON OUTSIDE, BETWEEN RD4GS, CASTING L _ CATCH BASTA maw RDICIVE • SMOOTH ON INSIDE. BOLTS MAX. OF RIGS 1 • IC MORTAR ON INSIDE. MORTAR). WONSLAB JOINTS. 2 STRIPS PD4 DTA ce t111•1 1-EL�ii 11111KINU IMF-4=1 FI II11 PRECAST COIERETE•NNDaE SECTS NS VIII !HMS S U DZTS L L1I 1CANT IDEEPT AT OTFERVISE SPECIFIED. NO WO ZNALL DE USED NM AI.RRTON CAMT181 CODER Iowa 011.T. FEL OPE1DN6 DETTVEEN PIPE AND NA N= VALL .mom cower I28TAN. CAST VIM FRAIC D GRATE CARTED: PER CA1 C. . menu STEPS sou. se CAST 1804 ALtIUMN Q $1EEL 118FOlCED PLASTIC PER PEPFOIATED PIPE DRAIN PER 'GRANULAR =MUT NO POi0 A1ED PVC Mir DETAIL. PRECAST IMMURED) attotzre sue :LAD i COVER :LAD PER ADM COL PRECAST ICDFEREED E MDEN MARBLE SECTIONS POt NON C4TI. OR I' CONCRETE IIANOLE ADCK WITH 1/2' IOLTAIED 18TERR07L DaITC nonce situ at P828118 1110011 • mow PIPE LOVER CAN DE REDUCED POOL 4' TO 1.-6• VTTN INSTALMflOI Cr ATTN COL =ATM SWILL DE M NOTED to THE SPEt2Fomott. • CATCH BASIN /.MANHOLE,` TYPE 406 • ' • .# r 4/24/97 ELEVATION 2500 PSI CONCRETE 28 DAY STRENGTH . SECTION CONCRETE REACTION BACKING (FOR BENDS) J STANDARD DRAWING 206 VATERMAIN SIZE V GATE VALVE 1 I/2r WASHED ROCK ALL AROLAID. 112111/3 C.Y. MIL 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS 8•XWX16• CONC. BLOCK TIE RODS MN18T 3733 TYPE 3 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIN. 1 LAYER ATTACH TO TON OF BONNET GATE VALVE INSTALLATION RECEN AGENDA ITEM 01-4 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: January 31, 2001 TOPIC: VFW Land Sale BACKGROUND: The VFW owns land on the North side of Apollo Drive and West of Lake Drive. The parcel is immediately adjacent to, and West of Lakeland National Bank. The VFW wishes to sell 1.5 acres and have this area surveyed. Please see map. Issues: I see no issues at this time. There is an oak woodland to the west of the bank and businesses to the North. This wood land is present on the East side of the VFW parcel. When the Bank property was reviewed, the oak woodland was discussed because it may be necessary to build an access road through this area. The landscaping on the bank site was intended to extend this woodland twords Lake Drive between the bank and future uses to the North. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the VFW request to sell and survey the parcel. JAN -10 -2001 14:47 CITY OF LINO LAKES Application received Applicadon determined complete Review period extended on to Applicadon approved by qty Council on 651 982 2499 P.02/05 Applicadon incomplete lencr sent CITY OF LINO LAKES - LAND USE APPLICATION CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX FEE Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500 Conditional Use Permit $ 350 Interim Use Permit $ 350 Site Plan Review $ 500 �. Subdivision: Preliminary Plat $1,250 Preservation Development 1,250 Planned Development Overlay 1,250 X Minor Subdivision/ Lot Split Rezoning Vacation: drainage, street, utility Variance $ 250 $ 350 $ 250 $ 250 ESCROW DEPOSIT Property Address V f w ft2'PeR'rtr r Ape «o ,v, PIlV# KoK -ab 02. Jy - oc., Legal Description: Lot /6 Block Addition A C' D c T-c, tt. Existing Land Use OOe''' I-24'-9 Existing Zoning G E't'Ef c. t3vsretreP5 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: t 5 , IZ VeY .3-"O Set- L j. ,9c15 /-t c: TED Ol eCc -7r4 `J �'c. =�i rcy�!' - /9- fCCf�A1'1J ,r'4' Applicant: name 1/e i/ FPST 65-s- 3 address -7$'6Y , L4k E O/Z • G Leto 4-A Ke5' phone 78'4/- (73 /3 fax DGf.sky Tvca /US v °t.. C -11, (2- 77c) . -©(3r rbx -- 76'3.7/7 - T3 Owner (if different than applicant): name address phone fax po 5 T c ,17, (L. RCatiri- JAN 2Lai CITY OF LINO LAKES ... millraucumeL.4 AImmilminn Awrinrriapjali p 7AWALVIIIMEFUMMUIE1 2 147141 riA129 'Vora ....... ......... GEORGE WATCH ammo to In awn e;44 fl Era Elatitilitri. ICI [DIEN Out • mor ZEI IFIMUM le= "" " zn norm irz NI? t`T4.1`-' za Mirk ELM EiEr [Iamb clurrattrn ifotp _ 6-6 zi.nolEILB:: Dinkfiv/ naga CIEN112-WMt-I., ockpm 41 "Orir 4 =zoo 401 sied,tr" sr IR Eal Cal 12417 :as Q'0 Cd?iiminv cz E EMI Miff rillt WOW Aiiiii rifF - - -- Ho MI kaziff 1 sAluguirinsmgirm 00,54r-Alik o©oa®oe000v iV Aa m0om0�0�.M - lo0000omm0� , Inn 011110 o Boo" o�o��o tliglielF4111111111 lima% kin" � #! .1111 •A INIML Mill IMANitira, inomw sue_ ar)� /kw. / • • VFW Post 6583 Dean Johnson - Commander 7868 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Mobil 612 770 -0135 City of Lino Lakes City Council RE: Expansion of the VFW Post 6583, 7868 Lake Drive Lino Lakes, MN 55014 We at the VFW ask that the City Council consider an extension of time on the conditional use permit previously approved. Tentative construction date is summer of 2001. Sincerely, Dean Johnson Commander — Post 6583 1 • • AGENDA ITEM 1 -05 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: January 31, 2001 TOPIC: Land Holding /12th and Holly Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND: The Environmental Board reviewed a concept plan for this site at the December (January 3) meeting. Project Tracking Sheet is attached with recommendations. The wetland area on the North side of the parcel has no evidence of rare or unique species. Recommendations made at the Environmental Board meeting are listed on the attached Tracking Sheet. Letter of transmittal to Land Holding from Jeff Smyser is attached. OPTIONS: 1. Recommend Plat proposal for Land Holding be forwarded on with no change recommendations. 2. Recommend changes attached to Report consistent with recommendations of January3. 3. Recommend changes attached to Report 3 with new recommended changes from January 31. RECOMMENDATION: Pending.... PROJECT #: 21 -2... PROJECT: Land Holding /12th and Holly /Concept Plan DATE OF ORIGIN: November 5th, 2000 TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: • Directly West of Peregrine Pass. • Zoned R -1X, 8Ac, 14 Lots, 2.13 Units /Ac • Water Drainage to Wards Lake • Pine Plantation Trees STAFF COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: • • • Peregrine Pass required a variance. Zoned R -lx, this variance allowed staff to work with applicant on a conservation development PDO. Please see photography. Land Holding /12th and Holly site does not require a variance. Land Holding Intends to submit standard zoning Preliminary Plat to Boards in the near future . • A Conservation Development Ordinance would allow for Conservation Development planning in this (12th and Holly) type of site. I have enclosed a modal ordinance. I Zaprco_ &_Ps%psa zc o v_8o ap5_ XtrLogLAtvoltares:a FINAL VOTE DATE: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION (IF NECESSARY): • .. pending .. 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION DATE: . .. pending .. 17apx_ & _Pexpeazaov Boap5_ Xsn_ogLAtvo_Aaxeo 2 600 Town Center Parkway Phone: (651) 982 -2400 Fax: (651) 982-2499 Fax To: Jeff Bock From: Jeff Smyser (651)982 -2425 Company: Land Holding Group Pages: _2_ including cover Fax (651)762 Date: January 8, 2001 Phone: # & ! T / CC: John Powell, Mary Kay Wylan , arty Aslesen Dear Mr. Bock: Thank you for your work in responding to the City's concerns expressed in our meeting January 4t. I think the meeting was productive. We've discussed your latest sketch of the site on the northwest comer of 12th and Holly. We have the following comments: 1. We support eliminating the multiple driveway accesses by using one access road to serve most of the lots on the property. 2. A water loop will be needed. Using a lot line easement to 12th Ave. is acceptable. 3. Without information on grading, stormwater design, house styles, we can't comment on them. Note that ponding may result in the elimination of lots. 4. To reiterate a point of our meeting last week, you will need to discuss a tree preservation plan with Marty Aslesen. The tree plan must be part of the preliminary plat submittal. 5. We recognize that the wetland mitigation location will have to change from the original plan. The new Lots 6 and 14 are of particular interest. 6. The minimum lot width is 90 feet in the R -1X zone. Lot width is measured at the 30' setback, not at a variable house pad location. Lots 4 through 10 have substandard lot • • • • widths (with the possible exception of Lots 7 and 8). In the interest of traffic safety and access management, I can support some variances on lot dimensions. However, when seven (or maybe five) of 14 lots do not meet standards, this is a problem. You may need to eliminate lots. It is not an issue of density, it is a layout and design question. There are too many lots of substandard width. Gemini Estates is eight acres and has 10 lots. We suggest looking at a right angle turn in the road to provide full frontage for the lots, or possibly a T- shaped road. This might give you your lots as well as lot widths. It appears that there still may be enough upland to provide the minimum upland lot area of 12, 825 sf per lot. (Ponding is yet an issue.) These comments are offered with my standard caveat that this does not constitute a full or official City review. Please feel free to call with any questions at (651)982 -2425. Sincerel Je Sm'y s City Planner • Page 2 • 0'1!17/2001 10:12 6517620939 LAND HOLDING GROUP PAGE 02 JAN -17-2001 08:51 CITY OF LINO LAKES 651 982 2499 P.01/0? Application received Application determined complete Review pQiod extended on _ to Application approved by Ciry Council on Application incomplete lever sent CITY OF LINO LAKES - LAND USE APPLICATION CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX ,/ FEE ESCROW DEPOSIT Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500 Conditional Use Pcrmit $ 350 Interim Use Permit $ 350 Site Plan Review $ 500 Subdivision: Preliminary Plat $ 1,250 Preservation Development 1,250 Planned Development Overlay 1,250 Minor Subdivision/ $ 250 Lot Split Rezoning $ 350 Vacation: drainage, street, utility $ 250 Variance $ 250 Property Address /17/ A 1I7/ l 1 i/6 PIN# ?,$_- - 44Q°Q.� Legal Description: Lot 14 Block Addition Nib" Existing Land Use (5 I sic-,,E A4 i'1 Y Existing Zoning -1 th DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Svi D i Jl5 t a tJ / tJ 119 / 3 5 i y LoTS w�2:-.1x 270 t3 N3 CI Applicant: Owner (if different than applicant): name to, zoo name address ti address__,_ 1/,rzi b h ;ke NSSil phone ;71G; O 72 phone fax fax a • 01/17/2001 10:12 6517620939 LAND HOLDING GROUP JAN -17 -2001 08 :5i CITY OF LINO LAKES • • CIT? OF LINO LAKES -LAND USE APPLICATION PAGE 2 PAGE 03 651 962 2499 x.02/02 Your request will not be scheduled for public hearing or city review by city advisory bodies until all required information has been reviewed and found to be adequate by city staff. MN Statute 15.99 allows a 60-day review period for final action on an application, once that application is found to be complete, unless the City extends the review period and so notifies the applicant. To allow for full review that fits the City's meeting schedules, we may send a letter extending the review of this project for a second 60 days as allowed by state law NOTE: In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and Nlly understand the applicable provisions of the City Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation and hereby agree to pay ell statements received pertaining to additional application expense and city review. Signature e' Date 1/6/0 1 Application Deadline: Environmental Board Meeting Park Board Meeting Planning & Zoning Board Meeting City Council Meeting NOTE: Permits may also be required from the Watershed District, Anoka County, DNR, Corp of Engineers. Others TOTAL P.02 CENTERVILLE MN [MUM ma anifes. 4u26123"222.1 -504 e .Zr„ elk! cos„t> o 4. oota va•3P, ° 1 III ITU(' Y ' n' C00^ Gin u .n ,kluo COATI INMAN Awcov 1�0� ° 4 n i ARK inte n It '4'4 KAT lb 78111111 1111111 WV* kiv Ell maw 5 (kw- cult ICU' O _.� PAR NOR FOR: Circle Lex VFW Post #6583 7868 Lake Dr. Lino Lake, MN 55014 (651) 784 -9313 DR i &iN4 L. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION- That port of Lot 16, Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota. Tying within the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Ronge 22, except the North 693.00 feet and the West 660.00 feet thereof. Reserving and subject to o roadway easement over the southerly 33.00 feet thereof. PROPOSED LOT DESCRIPTION 6 /,6 Ad.) The East 412.07 feet of Lot 16, Auditors Subdivision No. 134, Anoka County, Minnesota, Tying within the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31, Range 22, lying south of the North 693.00 feet and north of the 100.00 foot rood easement for Apollo Drive os per Doc. No. 143411. '- Anoka Co. C.I.M. Southwest Corner Sec. 8, T.31, R. 22 100 0 North / /• 1 / CO '% It . Area north of Apollo Drive easement 129,544 sq. ft. 2.97 acres - - -S. line of the N. 693 feet N89 °06'02 "W 669.40 247.33 11 ,m 64,203.36 sq. o 1.47 acres (0 .c O ft. 11114 6.. 14 4 $441 It' *S4044'w•St • 1". cd 6:44-141:49(4;" 0 wite00.15 a, i4 $%4* • . ..4-A m - °3,13 ��Q ��f . c / � V' -1 � .g18.5� W 2g8,.N�/�0 i� ��t0g6 o No, 143411. _--- -- ---- 0 # ;:sefroc: pet �r- i �/ Safi .� �' / / / O OO / fp a• o / / 1O / s° / , / / / co O • / / m 178,653 sq. ft. 4.10 acres 1 `1 Area south of Apollo Drive easement 196,582 sq. ft. 4.51 acres Area south of Apollo Drive easement minus Lilac street i 4 • M LAC STREET (STATE TRUNK 1- 1GI -IWAY NO. 49) M GRAPHIC SCALE 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. S89"00 00" E 537.01 t:' L/_ ' &' NK HiGHWAY . M S. line of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 8, T.31, R.22 N 3 v A A 1 1 1 1 i L_ \a wO 121.88 Anoka Co. C.I.M. N89.00'00 -w -- S. 1/4 Corner Sec. 8, T.31, R. 22 o Denotes Iron Set 1—;-- Denotes Iron Found Bearings shown are / hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that l am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Min o a. Dated this /1 -,h day of Jr .a teary , 200 b. . License No. 5 34 ) 00292 on an assumed datum. • MCs.RUD 4 SONS, INC. LAND SURVEYORS slam LEXINGTON AVE. NO. CIRCLE PINES, MINNESOTA 55014 -3625 TEL 163-186-5556 FAX 1 - 1Sb -6mm1 • PREL.11if f tslARY PLAT FOR LAND HOLDING GROUP LC -G�JD: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The South 600 feet of the East 580.8 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Seation 28. Township 31. Range 22, Malta County. M1nne,oto. Subject to Holly DTlve . 12th Avenue and other mammoth' If on) Mk Berths sham an as a amesd Mow. - NQO %TM DeWS NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH 800 FEET OF 5E1/4 OF SEC.28 i S89'41'26 "W 75.73 '' 5; 0. ` MICE ON PROPERTY 1101 O Denotes bon aloe set .. - - 0_ _._..Wnat4►,Ygn_p1!4 found. di )aeRNd so s Osatee:eetulbg spot Wwttee Dsnoter salter •eeeer•-manlaio -... -� Dlrlates.hyket Denotes Weals emirate FED TOPOGRAPHY MO 1lRO\OC111 SUM= A 3 OMNf0ED .RY LO. IUD NO SONS maw 40.7004 Sri Y AKA 0 g N L__1__— rr -- #• A • NO et 1 INCH >• 50 FEET TOTAL AREA 8.00 Agee NUMBER OF LOTS 13 LOTS AVERAGE LOT AREA 0.47 Ave TOTAL AREA Of LOTS 880 Aar DENSITY. 1 82 Units/Mee RIGHT OF WAY AREA- 1 50 Ave ZONING R -1X SINGLE FAIRLY EXECUTI%E RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT MN. LOT AREA 12.828 SQFT. MININAI LOT WEt1H AT 40' SETBACIL GO feat 14191404 LOT DEPMH (DOUBLE FRONTAGE .LOTS) 135 het (140) MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT CONNER 116 bet BUILDING SETBACKS FOR R1 -X 2014640 FRONT 30 FT. (40 FT. FROM 12TH AVENUE) HOUSE SIDE 10 FT. GARAGE 5 rr. REAR 30 FT. A -` r/". ,Q Lj, ' Li,, /� DENOTES WETLAND TO BE \. r ♦. //////%/ FILLED Lod a� i . r DRMVAO( MID UIILt7Y EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ANTS •4 II I L +. S —74-- 5 ___L_J L__;__ DOMES MPRO1.'PRONOt=O POND AND 1 701.701 Ulf l000l[4 shwa CONTOURS L L. TWN 111.14 INV 906.78 RECEivpo L to -I MHO 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SCE 22 LOT LINES MC /0 FEET IN IOM AND ADJOINING STREET LANES ANC REAR LOT LINE . GAUSS OTHERWISE SNOW ON MS PLAT. I hereby certify that tbb survey, plan. or repent wee prepared by me or under my direct eupudulon and that I am a duly" alRe the St a of Strays aunder the loos Cele ReGIWatan 4- Job No. 0055981 JAN 16Z001 CITY OF LINO LAKES IR1F RFC Engineering, nc. g g� Consulting Engineers 13635 Johnson Street Ham Lake, MN 55304 763 - 862 -8000 * Fax 763 - 862 -8042 e -mail: RFCengr @attglobal.net TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 17, 2001 COPY TO: TO: Jeff Smyser City Planner City of Lino Lakes 600 Town Center Parkway Lino Lakes, Minnesota 55014 -1182 RE: Land Holding Group Holly Drive and 12th Avenue WE ARE SENDING YOU: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 01/17/01 Preliminary Drainage Calculations 1 01/16/01 1 -5 of 5 11x17 Preliminary Grading and Utility Plans THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS NOTED BELOW: FROM Thomas F. Hailey RECEIVED JAN 17 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH 000 FEET OF SE1 /4 OF SEC.26 r r r r Syr. — rr- -- rrrrr r—► rrrr .��rrr r ?v r r Y MLA w Vag: Q 000"-0 " 0000000 -000 0 0 0000000 °000 °00 -0 ° ° ° 00 -00 -00-0 N 0000 °0° 0 0 0 0 .— °o °o o 0 0 0 0 0000000 ° ° °^ /1 Iles ri" eJs —4' TOPSOL At SOO (EN sr I— SECTION T —1.5"-2350 TYPE LV 4 •T. KM= COURSE —TACK COAT 2" —2350 TYPE LV 2 OR 3 BIT. NON- -EARMO COURSE 5' AGGREGATE BABE. CL. 5 (PLACED ON APPROVED SUBORADE) 24' SELECT ORAMILAR BORROW TYPICAL SECTION (MRBiw STREET/PERMANENT sECT1OF0 >,z net 91+.96 ExisleloR 1rxVTa �— M a. DIP WAD mown Ex. 1r PIR am MP or am • D. 1r or Ow HOLLY DRIVE ME/�am mi alms FPO II 999 £ 906.7 CONCRETE SPILLWAY RFC -310H NOT TO SCALE 0 40' 86' 19.0.0 we 911 eft we OW et Lin Oin nr 0091 tr LAAnr dm demob. WA s N: —Int ww. ad �� veer w Mot FM lwrmpit.Y/ u.A. 1'W iIMYOt�i wwrrrrr+w*.+..rl.r eMolmi somMe SM. em *y.'8•t.��.wit�. *.limo wY . b"ri..lYl w*.lw �w ilt j i ri y tl.w we root fly:AY.Arar SAN 17 2.001 CITY OF LINO LAKES s= OW Mow r 99 r w Mediation* MOM ad pr w Owe ad 1. M, Iesor NwYwor wM4 wuN YMw vt pool r-R N*.PnMw. wad M NM l 1. �wiM��1w��l M • �.111ud��'�.�n.Y YrR Ri �Ldw �.�. M r�iwR eta Aped wise w•rR Yi �.�w► dro I.�r fr = s 1 '! At w=Y. i o"w. r1=d.temeww. '�w"`.r''`.i�'i 11: Oar V. Al mew *Ml.. M L. MOM le We d.Ywb••wYMMO maw A.rrw - MI r4 hot f IL It I tw..rirwwrdrrdemrw-M.rU . s + nwWMtoMeO Mr.rr x N Mel ddor OW NMt■w.l id I. ouptMw -..mow �w 11. .Ywr r li ar w�t/rr rNetrl+i t� w~.iT►.4Zi'•r w M. -r IL The Moir dell �Lr.+r dl the .irM 71. wr — b Mwdr r w meta u. w. 961 g Ist = tw w OWN all OW.% d MIL OM wr a MM. LEGEND — —adding Contour Proposed Canter Proposed Sanitary Sewer « Proposed Store, Saw —1—I— Proposed Watsende • Proposed Cateh Baia • Proposed Manhole • Proposed Value f Proposed Hydrant —— ��Oliah — •— •— •— •— Wslald Boundary — —Let Uns — O —P —Srt Falros ►.— - r •r • rr /ma Denotes Proposed Wetland Mitigation Area Denotes Wetland To Be FAled DATE 1 IEREBP CERTIFY WO DIS PLAN VS PREPARED Br LE OR UNDER W DKR SOONISI09 NO MHO 1 FM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL DONOR UNDER TO 1J9S OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA RFC ENGINEERING, INC. Consulting Engineers 13635 Johnson Street Hans Late, MN 55304 Telephone 763 -862 -8000 Fax 763 - 862 -8042 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN LAND HOLDING GROUP UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA DOW WWWWWW DATE: 01/19/01 J06 MJIBER 0101 SHEET: 1 of 5 DESIGN BY JOF DRAM BY: DOB CHECKED BY: JOF FILE: 23- 4-059 NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH SOO FEET CF SE1/4 OF SEC.28 l • . . .1..I•.Ir i I I I LOTS - I alb a LOT 9 _ MO "MD LOT7 LOT 6 LOT 10 !MI W w 1112.0 WAS MSS %7/ MIL SOK CMILE LOT LOT 2 I – - --,-- t- 1-- 1- 1 -1 -1- 1 -1--1 1- 1- 1CAIP...1.-1- 1- 1- 1- -1 -1 -1 EX. SW W PSI sow FRO 1ENM HOLLY DRIVE YMCA H � ILI� WOWS for Cr ca acv . 0*47 ewRlel IN g ad *cm., Ir�irylwien 4pow 4141•1 e•►w •ww ~is lb'' Lin. ON ti Alwrd e t & 1•116111611 WNW all= 44144 Ding pm. Nilo wok Pada* Ind la was is twwi�d + • _way y i I•ywii� Mr ii Vilna g wit •1 ask E▪ "_ .•�w w. +nbii tr*'aw`•+rogies ire" I: '� °airrerr:'w'�I Ili a Il r M I�r�. rictirw•wa"1144 = Y:Pr�.rl.: w belor.rm �. SIPA & •M�Osobsd �I M ho wm•Y maid o lgliswwmi er •�/•p••/ wA ,ail - w• al win • 11 1 .. M w M gl=1�•Iw•r ~•ir�a, . ~•Y NMMM •MMn tar t esilwar I NOS Wove ' '_04.. Iw._ - olio•'""' •r RECEIVED JAN 17 2001 CITY OF LINO LAKES — — — —Wang Conour Proposed contour Proposed Sanitary Sewer oc—Proposed Storm Sewer -i -I—Proposed Viatermaln • Proposed Manhole • Proposed Hydra,* �• —• —•—.— MUM Boundary LotUns ADIOS Denotes Proposed Wetland Mitigation Area Denotes Wetland To Be Filled EINE REVISION 1 HEREIN ORMMY ow 11IIS PUN ws PROMO Br NE DR MO IN D.Ea 911PERYI5ON NO ON I N. A OILY ROMEO PROTOCOL DlOIEER UNDER 111E Los Cr THE WOE or INN0501& ONE REC. 110. RFC ENGINEERING, INC. Consulting Engineers 13835 Johnson Street Hon Lake, MN 55304 Telephone 783- 882 -8000 Fax 763 -882 -8042 UTILITY PLAN LAND HOLDING GROUP UNO LAKES, MINNESOTA DNS 01010red DA1E: 01/10/01 JOB NUMBER: 0101 DESIGN Br: .IOF ORN N BY DBB CHECKED BY JOF SHEET: 2 of 5 FILE: 23 -4-060 t� 1 A ----, go% -1-0-.../ f•see•NOR t o•4atn'w'� R .100.00 Y X 7... " \ ou VlIlt `�, RE 1 JAN 1 ? 2a 925 925 924 920 915 WI m•MO WI O. •913.11 WI WA WIo. •4+ILIS 13.1? 915 910 —' 910 ' vil s3.► • 4+110s 905 a 905 900 Qg d !II 900 895 895 890 885 555 p§ E4t! pp� kv O g al 4^ ;a O �g al .- d —r, §i �13 n'iN 144 _NN 44 Ni- i$ NN 64 Nr. —2 +00 —1 +00 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 3+00 4+00 DATE REVISION HEREBY =SY IHAT TM PUN WM RFC ENGINEERING, INC ! Consulting Engineers 13635 Johnson street "°e Lake, MN 55304 662-8000 Telephone (763) Fox (763) 062 -0042 PROPOSED STREET PLAN AND PROFILE LAND HOLDING GROUP LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA vie NPOto01 wawa By AA R ° ' o, A G REGISTERED PROFESSORS El em uNB>R JOB NUMBER otot TI(u s or me suet or stscomx SHEET: 3 at 5 FILE: 23 -4-061 DAN PEG. NO DESIGN BY: JO, DRAWN BY: TPC CHECKED BY: Jt7 GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING EARTH FOUNDATION PIPE FOUNDATION DETAILS MOW BRIM w 101 GATE VALVE INSTALLATION swamp own Na 203 RR IaTYIMMN N IRDOROMICt MINI AWN C 2141. TAM S. ' OISEMADR mama sou comma' to ASIM C1 1. '61UE 1. GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING METHOD (FOR PVC PIPE) BIDDVW MEND ND 103 PWI PIM ow mums MD PRIOR 1D roua RPM ' SMSNIIN CONCRETE REACTION BACKING (FOR TEES AND CR055E5) WMWNN PRIM Na 205 SPECIAL FOUNDATION FOR STABILIZING OR DEWATERING OF TRENCH RAM SWAM MOO /ID. 105 SECTION CONCRETE REACTION BACKING (FOR POWS) 4/24/•7 MOW Imam wa 206 SEWN HAND unOMINI SEM= RAMC Wsl03s 3 111E 3 CONN= NACU WOW MOM MINIS Ds= airSTIVINIScres w r.Nn rrel nc Mik""smwaiderairif EEE snL mum. 211 4/44/117 raror Erg TYPICAL HYDRANT LAYOUT (VALVE IN ICAJUDO %D) RECEIVED NNW° PAW* 111. 201 JAN 17 2001 GITY OF LINO LAKES rNR NM4M• I.. WATER SERVICE DETAIL Via MORD IMAM N0. 207 DETAILS LAND HOLDING GROUP UNO LAKES, MN -- - NM Oh in cam Ira - .••w 4 of 5 111404611 MO MO OIL K MOa 100 MEMO MINE ®OR IN-1R OL% OW NM MOP IIML i OSAR A{ M wimmoOL items KOs MLL K 0111 OOL AtlMMMM O Mm 1010114111 PPM Msl ENO OOP KO MOON O P& K M MOWA M 1L MONLM -M, 1111111110 M 101, M ON TO K 0111011010 1000 OOP MOW K1NOO OMII= IWMa[ NIKM qli NM 1100, mom um 0.180 MOO= M LIIIOIM MR M 111101101610, A�L 1e sO . IM MO VOLL R IN11- Ms OE OE COAL UMEM mitzmwomme IOOfl IOtMIL 1 I M K II�M [NIL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 301 (PIPES 27' OR LESS) SWIM MIMS 301 V 1!011 OR View= R10$ raw MRN NIT WOW . 0101 11111101 1101E t T�p4NECOOWON 110 - RNO1111 MU SE MAWS MONS ION10I OR AS OW= Of DISOIt11t. +/O/T SILT FENCE SWIDAND MOW 601 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SWORD MONS ma 313 STABIUZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE RFC -326 NOT TD SCALE M WOO OPAL R OW ION MNM MOM% OW MOVE OIIL MR EON EON OM MIMM i MIN MIMEO PO MM01000IR PERMS MOMM MOPE IO[ 11001 i MOW MIR M NO EPA /ML —MONO IOC M WOOS sWL 011 -NS Mt- MMrL .MMM OWL R MOM MOM( • 1W-M NM WMR OW R MUM NOM cl v-r MOE /MIAMI OKOL POPOOPID war M1.M MO M- �wwO,w MWE M CATCH BASIN, TYPE 402 WOAD 402 LEO 1110 Pm M4 ELEVATION e IsmdM IMr1 i,wtMr.M d1.iI eww.AM 1.)11116 MM Me M OMnt♦� rr 11MA4, yMSwl� 1.Al1 --- O M MIME is a wrrlrOO AYn OM y.Iw a MM• amm1, aYM •w. r Mso amp GALVANIZED TRASH GUARD RFC -416A NOT TO SCALE 10/14100 MIL IMMI 11:551;711= 110 VOW POLL R MOP IOM MOM M OS (flOE 111 -M ONE MN Ns MRMR i 004 MOM M @Rtll01111Af. WPM NM moa cor mea wows OM OM 10011011 MML M 0111 PIMP 0R NM MOMOIWID NMI MONMBUMOM=OM1010i PP= M POI NMI WML maw MOMMMU COMM -111•1[ PM MOM 004 - r maim MOIRt MOM UM 1/r IONIYO MEM MINIM MOM NM= MMpi OVUM RM OaMN MAIM i 800001 NWT AM IIIMMIR 1110010. amm MIL WOMB awn M�ML R P1 11LONL YO 011001 MIML • Is1KIKYaTIZIEIl Mf MMPMM MR Nsr KML CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE, TYPE 406 STAMM awns 406 1010 WO RECEIVED JAN 17 2001 CITY OF 1_I140 LAKES F We* MP MOO 4 03. 01. [11111111131 MAMA =.— MI• MAMA MAMA = == NO - __ MAMA = __ — - MM ' NAM IMAM ' —M •AIM —M AIM AA M M-a woo counInnol AM _ M.MAMA _ - INN MN MA MA NM NM AAAMM AAnM a A. SEC. B-B 31 BAILLa..L ::MAMA_ MAMA— MAMA_ SEC. A —A N M M M NM ' —w • L IM/M O�M1• MM is"". —a a. MAMA. AIM • L 1. -��r m MIYw ArM O(�.e Nam sMwf. umald 11r(wwlr■r MM EZV:1M=1.1MM.~ wira Mme. ,Mae wi=Z. �r1I�rMMAA+ Om alma opal OIL RIPRAP AT METAL APRON OUTLETS RFC -3134C NOT TO SCALE —M r —r wMOS 110100 R 1lMM01- AL wl All se m 1:0111WMP. it 1 DETAILS LAND HOLDING GROUP UNO LAKES. MN -- _l— OMAN AMA et M. All , 510 .Mw wrw•w .-.w 5 of 5 AGENDA ITEM 1 - 06 STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: 1/31/01 TOPIC: Apitz Property Subdivision BACKGROUND: Mr. Rockey Goertz and Mr. Larry Grubbs are proposing to split 3.98 acres from 39.6 acre parcel and hold for future development. The balance of the 39 acres is planned for single family, multi family and some commercial. A sketch plan is tentatively scheduled for formal submittal in April. have enclosed the sketch plan. The purpose of this green sheet is to make recommendations on the submitted request for the minor subdivision. Enclosed you will find the minor subdivision proposal, and a couple of GIS prints of the soils and water relationships. Mr. Rockey Goertz will be at the meeting for discussion and your initial impressions of the proposed sketch plan to the north. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to approve the minor subdivision. However, there are many issues that need to be addressed. The future use is directly adjacent to a lake. There would be a desire to buffer this area. There is a major greenway connection proposed from the west that would be possible after the new bridge on 49 is built. This greenway would definitely have a trail in it so room is needed to keep this off the biologic edges. A closer look at the vegetation would be needed as soon as spring comes. INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TRACKING SHEET CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT #: 21 -7 PROJECT: Spirit Hills DATE OF ORIGIN: TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: Located In the present MUSA Immediately adjacent to a Natural Resources Lake Shore Land Overlay District Planned Greenway Through this area • STAFF COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: Sensitive Area Buffering needed Should be checked for rare and endangered Tree preservation plan needed • Ideal area for a PUD Environmental ISSUES: Water Quality Greenway/connectivness • Edge /buffering and rare and endangered I7apxo_& Pcpeariov_BoapB ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments • made by the Board: • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION /POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was reached by the Board: FINAL VOTE COUNT: Board Member Yes No FINAL VOTE DATE: IZap ca & PezpeazaovBoap& Xin oL Arvo Aaxeo Apitz Property View 1 rtr • V.11-1 •" 7.1r. 1111111,M. iiIIIH 71;,I 11111...■ 1M = l'..`14-■mor-4..mi tINI ...NM 11 0.2 iIIEE Ma: 0 Wilt 74 011.--Mre =111= ,,a 11•111111111 IIIII li.= OM ,1■1 OM Mll% NM MI Mi■ -..* MI MI MI NM MI — M MM a M = PNM 41=. 1e11, ra Ii" ..;= w 1111=1. im lo we a a ow , mu Nom pm PM NM miM 111 EH _ 1111MIMI .......m......- NMI MN P.-4 WPM= MUM NM MI Mb..1 .. 11111 =MI - .-- -u KV). ■•■4411." • --'1,-. - imll --;_-g'—=-D limo pm 1.9 =me ml PIM 1MI IC_ MOM MI MIMI= 4 Imm■I -.1 M "" II ,n‘MMIIVI', MI 'R '' re. _-.. ..- g 0.2 • 0.4 Miles Street Names.shp Greenways.shp Parcelapitz.shp Lakename Lake Shapes Flood Plane 0 100 500 Section Hydric Soils n 111111111111111111Y Street Names.shp Apitz Propet Soils Greenways.shp Lakename Parcelapitz.shp 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles • • • CITY OF LINO LAKES - LAND USE APPLICATION CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX FEE ESCROW DEPOSIT Comprehensive Plan Amendment $ 500 Conditional Use Permit $ 350 Interim Use Permit $ 350 Site Plan Review $ 500 Subdivision: Preliminary Plat $ 1,250 Preservation Development 1,250 Planned Development Overlay 1,250 Minor Subdivision/ 250 Lot Split Rezoning $ 350 Vacation: drainage, street, utility $ 250 Variance $ 250 Property Address ■ 't Z PIN # - • &la" Legal Description: Lot Block Addition rZ. \-3 G v. C; yS w�v Existing Land Use -� DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Existing Zoning R,_ „EN L., 1 JAN 1 6 i:4O1 tooK ;Q - (7)4 aA-e_ 3.S\ cxc�. Low Applicant: name Re)C1432 , C -_,�e (*Z address D C�� ¢�o.--t-t" SE- A) - i\\ phone Co Ca - qk fax 6:551- G14-41141 KES Owner (if different than applicant): name LaC fyyrt address USW ` SW e vtov• ? k e Q WOO (,S --1 • phone fax ce,c5 t -4Sq- ILtbC) Nelficiritrca:GR5,.7' 2 01111111K= W"Mal 1E4tAtitkr.? 11continta- MIEN MINIM g uuu. 03233 IMINIInpan.vm 0011-16T.11.4, jr.11 G111/12C:4"6.1= IlLa etar$ Ii31:11:1 2110E16 rom iw •2!"...11111111111p.. NCI 1"1:1111 WINES ea 1; . , n1131.115■2111• 11011M• Efiepr, NE3111086 1911211111!M111:10111 1•311111:1'1111KOI 91:111111:31'11011111:1 11:1111111111 IMP/ fir.INEN kr7.,1 1-,•F*,T-r-A,F,P;11 L4i4 *€*A '45Wit. tuna • •,04.iiin=4Ntr-rAln-14110.C.J.DJU-7-.- W COUNTY s I ANOKA E DRAWN REVISED REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. SEP. 1974 NOM 1978 MARINO SEP. 1981 DEC .1982 JI/LY1985 DEC. 1985 REVISED REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. JAN. 1987 MAY 1988 AUG. 1989 FEB. 1991 FEB. 1992 FEB. 1993 MAY 1994 REVISED REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. REV. NOV. 1994 JAN.1996 AO 1997 JULY 1998 NG. 1999 ev • - 4,04. 0 Oe O o' CA- 0. O 0 0 a M. of 1/4 Wilt 1/4 4 SHENANDOAH 3RD Carr Coil 1st S 1/4 Sin $.. SO. LXLIS morwire is• sr Soft LK ADDITION • • enter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30,' Decline oflighwayNo.49 and • southeasterly • Irene North 1 degree, 18 minutes, 49 second Exit, t ofbeginmmg of the line to be described; thence . ace South 9 08 •52 end. Wert mt f e e t , m o r e o r l e s s , to t h e into: seethe - rid line there tang, ring west and south of the following described. esc ibed lion 'Southeast Quartet; thence west along the south s intersection with the centerline of Highway No.49 described; thence north at right angles 538 feet;.., -line ofeaid Highway No.49 sad said line there .. • • • CoontytyRight -of -Way Plat. No.11. k / r J .•••••• /er'�'A �i ' ,.. .. 994., _1 0 i i :'" iii,. /�!it�ta ' •:::, it / %." t. • // 'j/ •� b� / I ' // // / ' • 1 1 j l 1 Ir / ( 9.7 • +\ 1 1 , ` 1 ii � \ ! I 1 893.0 - -� • • • —. • Q, /_. •�-J .96 -- -.• . r it9t+ rr. rt`;_ •• eree /'mss ' .. '.. • '^ --882 — t \ 881.9 • 1 x \`� ■ 0 A to 4t1 // fine otl` Sto HwJ. N,4..49 • PARCEL .11,91.7x \ • e92. \e„ ..-"Ore ' 1t r 17.4 4 ! r)•v 1lrAv rpm 2, 71 I e{ Mr ` 1 I vI a,• W \ �� f41 ' c t - At i 15450 ' .} 1 12;t*N • o' ( 1 27 • 1i N81,�'1418'w ' . �- 305 09 �Ar\34.$1 j 68`, _ N_891r41'w ■ 993.s f.� l.. --- -/ _gr.`\• 11.91 I -,_ w�: \ / n1 ; IF' N00'1549'E 1 al umNl 'EXCEPAON —1 ; EXCEPTION t I. 1' �m I a �: • oW 20&OO / t RICH S TREET :8 p.1 ss BI 7.97 i S.A.H: N0;10) t • • Come ' 1V88'22'50 "W _ ,! r line Bi . 0 a° z o N. r/w lino C.S.A,H. 10 17' AGENDA ITEM ``I R STAFF ORIGINATOR: Marty Asleson DATE: January 16, 2001 TOPIC: Metro Greenways Planning Grant Application FY 2001 BACKGROUND: A previous Metro Greenways Planning Grant was approved for 3/4 of the City of Lino Lakes in 2000. This grant was written through the Anoka County Soil Conservation District. The 2000 Grant was to take our existing inventory and classify according to the Minnesota Land Classification System. This is a new land classification system that standardizes land classification for cities, counties, and state govemment agencies. The Minnesota Land Classification System also allows an inventory to be taken to higher levels of definition, such as percentage of impervious soils, and woodland quality. The Inventory will be delivered in GIS. The Wild Land Urban Interface project with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources needs the SE portion of the City classified. This portion was excluded from the original project. The purpose of this proposal is to allow the Anoka County Soil Conservation District to underwrite a FY 2001 grant application for this inventory project. This idea was previously presented to the City Council. At that time it was unsure weather there would be any cost -share dollars involved. By working with the Soil Conservation District, the City is able to reduce the cost of this resource planning from $6,000 cost share to $2,600 cash and $1,400 in -kind in FY2002 budget. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the attached Metro Greenways Planning Grant Application FY2001 from Anoka Soil Conservation District and direct staff to write a letter of support for this project. This letter would include reference to the City's commitment to $2,600 cash and $1,400 in -kind to be budgeted in FY2002. 2. Do not approve the Grant. RECOMMENDATION: We are strongly encouraged to apply for these planning grant dollars from Metro Greenways. The most cost effective means to implement this grant would be to tap into Anoka County Resources for help. For these reasons I recommend Option 1. Metro Greenways Planning Grant Application FY 2001 Project Title: Lino Lakes Resource Inventory Lead Implementing Agency: Anoka Conservation District Lead Contact Name: Chris A. Lord, District Manager Phone: 763- 434 -2030 ext. 13 Fax: 763 - 434 -2094 Email: Anokaconservation @msn.com Address: 16015 Central Ave NE Suite 103 Ham Lake, MN 55304 Total Project Cost: $12,000 Amount of Funding Requested: $6,000 Project Summary Project Objectives The Anoka Conservation District (ACD), in cooperation with the City Lino Lakes, will delineate the landuse/landcover of the project area utilizing the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). We will then digitize this information utilizing ArcView software to produce an inventory that will allow us to identify existing and potential greenways. We will work with the city to do cursory greenwayplanning utilizing ArcView GIS, much as was done in for the East Bethel and Linwood Twp project. The City of Lino Lakes plans to solicit public opinion and input via public hearings, open house, and environmental committee. Project Location Anoka County: City of Lino Lakes: T31N, R22W all of Sections 1, 12, 13, 25, 27, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and part of Sections 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31 City of Centerville T31N, R22W all of Section 23 and part of Sections 24, 26 Also refer to Attachment #1: Project Area Map Project Size Centerville 989 acres Lino Lakes: 7,835 acres Total 8,824 acres Proposed Time Line: Start Date: January 2002 Completion Date: June 2002 Summary of Key Proposed Activities Refer to Attachment #2 — Work Plan Proposed Deliverables 1. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System inventory of identified area (digital format) 2. Identification of greenways and management priorities as described above 3. Interim report of activities 4. Final report as described above Adherence to Grant Program Criteria • The area selected completes an inventory for two municipalities in the seven county Metro area that have been shown to support rare wet meadow ecosystems with threatened and endangered species such as twisted yellow -eye grass (Xyris torta). While the area most likely to support these ecosystems is currently being inventoried under the Rice Creek Corridor Expansion Project greenway planning grant, it is important to complete the inventory for the entire municipality to facilitate planning. • The project area has several reports of special concem, threatened and endangered species. This includes twisted yellow -eyed grass (threatened), Blanding's turtle (threatened), and upland sandpiper (special concern). • This inventory is an offshoot of an inventory being completed within the same municipalities in 2000 and 2001. This project has financial support from the City of Lino Lakes and the Rice Creek Watershed District and favorable comment from Anoka County Parks and the City of Centerville. • The letters of support and contribution from local government entities are attached. • The match will be met through cash and in -kind contributions from the municipality, cash from the Rice Creek Watershed District, and in -kind contributions from the ACD. The ACD will primarily provide its in -kind match through redistribution of staff time (hired on soft money). Also, local government staff and officials will spend time preparing for and attending meetings, workshops, and public hearings. • The municipality has expressed a strong desire to incorporate the protection of natural communities into their planning. Identification of corridors and education/promotion to preserve high quality areas should result in finding landowners that would like to place easements on their property, enhance natural areas to provide corridor habitat or implement other conservation measures. The District's methodology is outlined in the Work Plan section of this application and resumes are attached. Project Partners Refer to work plan table in Attachment #2. Support • Refer to Attachment #3: Letters of support and/or financial committment are included from the City Lino Lakes, the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City of Centerville. • Refer to Attachment #4: Resolutions are attached from Anoka Conservation District, and letters of support from the City Lino Lakes and the Rice Creek Watershed District identify the type and amount of contribution. Application and/or Dissemination of Project Outputs Refer to Attachment #5 Budget Refer to Attachment #6 Other FY 2001 DNR Grants for Which We Are Applying Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 - RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT ANOKA COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT METRO GREENWAYS PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION FY 2001 WHEREAS, , The City of Lino Lakes regards the natural resources within the City as an asset and worthy of management; AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is presently cooperating with the Minnesota Department of Natural resources and The Anoka County Conservation District in efforts to inventory and standardize land resource classifications for 3/4 of the City; AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes has a need to perform the same resource inventory in the SE Corner of the City; AND WHEREAS, This new inventory will allow for higher detail, and standard language between surrounding cities, counties, and the State of Minnesota, AND WHEREAS, This inventory will allow for higher detail greenway planning, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the City of Lino Lakes wishes to enter into agreement with the Anoka County Conservation District to perform such resource inventory on 7,835 acres of land as described in ACD Metro Greenways Planning Grant Application FY 2001. 2. That the City of Lino Lakes will budget $2,002 in FY 2002 budget and provide $1,400 in kind contribution as part of this grant request to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this xocth day of x000000c, 2001. John J. Bergeson, Mayor Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: The following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on date. Ry -Chel Gaustead, CMC City Clerk METRO GREENWAYS PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM FY 2001 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS DEADLINE: 26 January 2001 • Please refer to the Metro Greenways Planning Grants brochure before completing this application. • Direct any pre - application questions to Sharon Pfeifer, Metro DNR (651- 772 - 7982). • Submit the completed application form and attachments in triplicate to: Metro Greenways Planning Grants Program Metro DNR, Attention: Sharon Pfeifer 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 1. ProjectTitle 2. Lead Implementing Agency 3. Lead Agency Contact (Name/Title) 4 Phone Fax Email 5 Address 6. Total Project Cost $ 7. Amount of Funding Requested (Cannot exceed 50% of #6) PROJECT SUMMARY 8. Project Objectives - Explain the overall project goal and list the major objectives of your project in fewer than 100 words. 9. Project Location (this information must be filled out) County(ies) Township(s) and Section(s) Municipality(ies) Required Attachment #1: 8.5X11" black and white map (for purposes of reproduction) clearly showing the project boundaries, nearby municipalities, major roads in the vicinity of the project area, scale, and directional orientation. 10. Project Size - Actual or Estimated (acres) 11. Proposed Time line: Start Date Completion Date NOTE: Applicants should plan to start no sooner than June 2001 12. Summary of Key Proposed Activities - Provide a one to two page draft work plan that identifies your time frame for carrying out key proposed project activities and responsible party for each key activity. Required Attachment #2: Work plan beginning June 2001 13. Proposed Deliverables (interim and final): An interim report is required. Briefly identify projected final products. 14. Adherence to Grant Program Criteria - Briefly, how does the project meet each of the selection criteria of this planning grant program (see brochure)? 15. Project Partners - List key partners involved with the applicant in project implementation. Partner Organization* Activity Lead Person(s) Responsibility on Activity(ies) Phone /Fax *Please attach one page resumes of individuals conducting natural resource inventories and land cover mapping. 16. Support - Please attach appropriate dated and signed resolution (see example provided) guaranteeing the amount and source of matching funds. Required Attachment #3: A minimum of two letters of support from partners (excluding consultants) must accompany this application. Required Attachment #4: Signed and dated resolution (example provided) 17. Application and /or Dissemination of Project Outputs Required Attachment #5: As explicitly as possible describe how the final products of this project will be stored (e.g., report, GIS), disseminated (e.g., publication, videos), and applied to future decisions about greenways or natural resource management. 18. Budget - 50:50 (minimum) match required Required Attachment #6: See budget format page 19. Are you or a project partner applying through the DNR for any of the following FY2001 grants? Conservation Partners? Community Environmental Partnership? Natural and Scenic Areas? MnReLeaf? Cooperative Trail Linkages? Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Amount $ No Amount $ No Amount $ Amount $ Yes No Amount $ 20. Who have you contacted at the DNR to receive technical information about the proposed project site? Staff person contacted When Council Member Reinert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 01 -18 RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT ANOKA COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT METRO GREENWAYS PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION FY 2001 WHEREAS, , The City of Lino Lakes regards the natural resources within the City as an asset and worthy of management; AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes is presently cooperating with the Minnesota Department of Natural resources and The Anoka County Conservation District in efforts to inventory and standardize land resource classifications for 3/4 of the City; AND WHEREAS, The City of Lino Lakes has a need to perform the same resource inventory in the SE Corner of the City; AND WHEREAS, This new inventory will allow for higher detail, and standard language between surrounding cities, counties, and the State of Minnesota, AND WHEREAS, This inventory will allow for higher detail greenway planning, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. That the City of Lino Lakes wishes to enter into agreement with the Anoka County Conservation District to perform such resource inventory on 7,835 acres of land as described in ACD Metro Greenways Planning Grant Application FY 2001. 2. That the City of Lino Lakes will budget $2,600 in FY 2002 budget and provide $1,400 in kind contribution as part of this grant request to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of January, 2001. (‘ r Ry -Chel Gaustad, CMC City Clerk iAtei ardieft) John J. Bergeson, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Dahl and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: A ALL The following voted against same: NONE Whereupon said resolution was duly passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the above is a correct copy of a resolution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council on date. C\ Ry -diel Gaustead, CMC City Clerk PROJECT #: 21 -8 PROJECT: Community Assistance Project (CAP) Application DATE OF ORIGIN: January 31,2001 TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: • University of Minnesota Program /Humphrey Institute, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs /coordinating all U of M Collages. • Graduate Research Level • Purpose of CAP: Provide applied research assistance to community -based groups outside of the Twin Cities metro area. • Goals of CAP: 1. Enhance the capacity of community - based groups in rural Minnesota to meet their goals by providing relevant applied research. 2. Provide faculty and students of with useful, rural community -based applied research and learning opportunities. • Self funding /no "match grant" • City of Lino Lakes Proposal: "Pond Water Quality Effects of the Introduction of Beneficial Bacteria" STAFF "COMMENTS /ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: • Possible need to provide a short -term workspace while conducting data. • Mileage reimbursement @ .30 to .35 per mile /subsidized by the Steve Kunde Co. • Two free Aqua Force units Hapxo_ &_Pexpeariov .Boap5- XtrLOO_ltvo_laIc&o Environmental ISSUES: • Surface water runoff • Pond water quality • Mechanical /biological treatment alternatives to improve pond water quality ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments made by the Board: • • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION /POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was reached by the Board: • • FINAL VOTE COUNT: Board Member Yes FINAL VOTE DATE: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION (IF NECESSARY): • ... pending .... DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION DATE: pending 17apico_ &_P psarzov_Boap5_ XzrLo0�lzvollazcsa Community Assistance Project Application Group /Organization: City of Lino Lakes Address: City /St. /Zip: Contact Person: Marty Asleson Local Supervisor: Marty Asleson Organization & Community Information la. Briefly describe your group The City of Lino Lakes comprises 34 square miles located on the edge of the 7 County Metropolitan area. Our city contains square miles of wetland and water resources. 2a. Overview of Situation The extensive watershed (Rice Creek), which lies within the city boundaries, coupled with the extensive development pressure seen within the last decade has raised concerns with regard to water quality degradation within developed areas and the discharge of these waters into the watershed. High nutrient levels associated with naturally occurring phosphorous and nitrogen along with increased surface runoff has resulted in the degradation of water quality. Point source treatment of these waters ie.: holding ponds, NERP ponds, golf course ponds, etc. will decrease the nutrient levels entering the watershed. 2b. Describe research goals & objectives To determine the effectiveness of using naturally occurring beneficial bacteria to reduce nutrient levels. To measure Phosphorous, Nitrogen, and BOD levels within various pond and runoff situations around the metropolitan area. The program, if approved, would solicit assistance and research areas from the City of Inver Grove Heights, Anoka County Parks, and several ponded areas on private property. 2c. Describe activities that will accomplish these goals, and proposed timeline. Research assistant will collect water samples and assist with placement and monitoring of beneficial bacteria generators. Samples will be collected weekly on treated ponds and from control ponds located within the general area. Proposed time from is from late May until September or October. 2d. What will the final product be? How will it be used? How will it impact your groups/communities efforts? The final product will be a report showing effectiveness of Bacteria. If positive results are identified the information will be reviewed with DNR water officials and could be implemented on problem areas or included in development recommendations within the city. The final product will positively impact source water where nutrients are added. 3a. Describe the responsibilities of the research assistant and the project supervisor. The research assistant will be responsible for performing water testing, tabulating data, and providing graphic and written reports of findings. The project supervisor will set timetables, follow reporting, and inform cooperators as to implementation. 3b. What additional support can your group provide? What additional support will be required for this project that your group cannot provide and how might it be obtained? Our group will provide cooperation from Anoka County Parks, Inver Grove Heights, and private citizens as well as workspace, mileage, and a product to be used in testing. Our group may need additional assistance and lab space from the U of M water testing facilities. Resulting information is only as good as testing procedures. 3c. What skills, experience, and qualifications will be required of the student? It would be helpful if the student could work independently, have a limnology background, and previous lab experience. Any past research experiences would be helpful but not required. Most importantly, the student must be well organized and an excellent record keeper. INDIVIDUAL PROJECT TRACKING SHEET CITY OF LINO LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT #: 21 -5 PROJECT: 2001 Goals DATE OF ORIGIN: TO: Environmental Board Members City of Lino Lakes FROM: Marty Asleson Environmental Coordinator OVERVIEW STATEMENTS: •Attached are the 1999 and 2000 goals. •Review past goals •Formulate 2001 goals STAFF COMMENTS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: •Urban Interface Program •Staff Time ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments made by the Board: • • ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ACTION/POSITION STATEMENT: The following consensus was reached by the Board: FINAL VOTE COUNT: flapxc &_Pe psanov_Boap8 Xira o Aivo Aaxsa ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD 2000 GOALS 1. Work with City staff and consultants to complete the Natural Resources Inventory and management plan process. Work with Council, staff and other boards to disseminate this information to the community and educate the community about its application and importance. Identify potential areas of controversy and discuss these with City staff, City Council, and stakeholders as needed. The intent of these discussions is to translate the recommendations in our Environmental Planning Handbook into a workable policy that is reflected in our City ordinances. 2. Utilize data in the ecological inventory to formulate a recommendation for a "green . infrastructure" in the City. The product would attempt to incorporate the City's lakes, wetlands, and other high -quality areas into a continuous network of open spaces that would preserve the ecological health of these areas and. maintain vital wildlife corridors. This proposal is intended to be a starting point for future discussions with all interested parties that should eventually result in the adoption of an open space plan for the City. 3. Prepare a set of standard recommendations on the environmental issues that are common to all development projects, and discuss these recommendations with City staff. Issues to be considered might include lighting, use of native vegetation, buffers, stormwater management, impervious surface, soil treatments, tree preservation, and open space issues. 4. In collaboration with City staff, devise a standard form for use by the Environmental Board to evaluate development projects. The form should incorporate the issues identified in goal number three (above). The intent of this form is to clearly communicate our priorities to developers, streamline our evaluation procedures, and to provide a format for clear communication with staff, P & Z and Council. 5. Encourage City Council and City staff to continue the process of educating developers on "conservation development" issues. Participate in discussions aimed at establishing standards and guidelines related to environmental issues. Encourage council and staff to hold periodic Developers Forums to communicate with developers and convey information about City objectives including environmental objectives. 6. Identify at least one environmental restoration project that requires participation of nearby residents and begin planning the project. This will require recruiting and education citizen volunteers and pursuing funding. The intent is to increase citizen ownership of the City's environmental vision and to provide a demonstration of the appeal of effective environmental practices. 7. Seek opportunities for continued education of the Environmental Board. 8. Continue efforts aimed at public education and awareness on environmental issues. Update and revise citizen packets. Encourage participation by schools and private landowners in wildlife habitat programs. Educate residents on issues of good land stewardship. • Potential `99 -'00 Goals for the Lino Lakes Environmental Board Submitted by Scott Lanyon July 28, 1999 1.) Hold an open house for all developers interested in building in Lino Lakes. Purpose would be to: • Demonstrate to developers that we are approachable. • Give developers insights about what our priorities are. • Give us the opportunity to let developers know what we expect of them. • Give developers an opportunity to voice their concerns. 2) Develop and adopt a form for the board to use in evaluating Development Projects. Purpose would be to: • Produce a form that city staff can distribute to all developers that will indicate our priorities and what we expect of developers. • Streamline our evaluation of projects. • Provide a format for clear communication with staff and Council 3) Finalize a set of standard recommendations regarding lighting, native plantings, on- sight infiltration, tree replacement, tilling of soil, buffers, conservation of ecotones, minimization of impervious surfaces... Purpose would be to: • Append these to the evaluation form such that we needn't reinvent these for each project. • Standardizing the language would make developers aware that we are treating everyone the same. 4) Using the report from our consultants, identify the set of ordinances we believe need to be changed and how. Make a formal recommendation to council that these ordinances be changed. Perhaps we should suggest that funds be allocated to ensure that these be rewritten in a timely fashion. 5) Identify tracts of land that need to be preserved in order to retain vital wildlife corridors. 6) Identify a project (ideally one that is nearly guaranteed to succeed) that requires citizen involvement. Purpose would be to: • Increase citizen ownership of an environmental vision for the city through personal involvement. • • Provide an example.of how• doing things in an environmentally aware. manner can be less expensive and more effective than many of our standard practices. GOALS 1) Prevent the board from becoming a "Rubber Stamp" board. A) Be involved earlier in the development process. 1) Before or during pre- application meeting B) Board members should be required to visit the site. II) Continue community awareness /education A) Continue education of a -board B) Public awareness /education 1) Update and revise citizen packets 2) Encourage participation in wildlife habitat programs for schools and Private landowners 3) Encourage reduction of mowed and chemical/fertilizer treatment areas of lawns. 4) Reduction of light pollution a) inform and educate residents b) stronger standards for businesses ;' :`‘ 6 ='' 1e owe r5 5) Stronger and more buffering for noise pollution III) Require a minimum of 60% dedication for open space in developments