Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/27/1980 Council MinutesMay 12, 1980 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular Council meeting held on May 27, 1980. Edna L. Sarver Clerk- Treasurer Council Minutes May 27, 1980 The regutair meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order at 7:35 P.M., by Mayor Gourley with all members present. Mr. Locher, Mr. Carley and Mr. Schumacher were also present. The minutes of May 12, 1980 were considered. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to approve the disbursements as presented. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Dean Allen had called and asked to be on the open Mike portion of the meeting but was not present. Mr. AI Ross had asked to speak. He presented his thoughts on the matter of this Council approving a back -up Engineering Firm. He felt that Carley Engineering had been more than an Engineering firm for this City. He asked that this matter of a backup Engineering firm be talked over with Carley Engineering. Mr. Clifford Ross, Sr. had asked to speak. Mayor Gourley cautioned the Council that Mr. Ross is speaking on a matter that is in litigation. Mr. Ross told the Council that he wants to repair a garage. He said Mr. Mobley would not allow the building to be repaired. It needs to be jacked up, a new support installed and a new roof put on. Mayor Gourley said the Council will take this matter up with the City Attorney in a closed session after this meeting. If a decision is made at this meeting, Mr. Ross will be notified. The plans and specifications for the City Hall Park Building were considered. Mr. Schumacher reported to the Council that the Park Board has approved these plans and had forwarded them to the Council. He also pointed out that at the present time, this City has applied for a LAWCON Grant for the development of the County Lakes Park and, if approved, the Park Fund will be used as the city's matching fund portion of that grant. Mr. McLean moved to table consideration of these plans until such time as the City has an answer on the Grant application. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Council Minuter May 27, 1980 0 J 0 101 Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of the fee schedule for heating permits as submitted by the Building Inspector was taken up as the next agenda item. Mr. Schumacher said he was not sure how this matter had been handled by the previous in- spector, but this is part of the State Building Code. It was generally felt that this had been a part of the building permit and this merely seperated this from that permit. Mr. Jaworski asked if the hot water system is not a part of the plumbing and Mr. Kluegel said it was not. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to approve this fee schedule. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. The matter of the Liquor License approvals will be on the June 9, 1980 agenda. Mr. McLean moved to table. Seconded by Mr. Kulasewicz. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gourley presented the following Resolution for Council consideration: WHEREAS, the city of the Lino Lakes has undertaken the task of developing a Comprehensive Land Use Plan pursuant to the Minnesota Land Planning Act, and, WHEREAS, said plan was to have been submitted to the Metropolitan Council by July 1, 1980, and, WHEREAS, all phases of said plan have been completed and submitted to the surrounding communities for their review on May 1, 1980, and,,. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Lino Lakes realizes that the surrounding communities will not have completed their review of said plan by July 1, 1980, and, WHEREAS, THE Council of the City of Lino Lakes therefore will not be able to take final action on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in order to meet the July 1, 1980 deadline for submission of the plan to Metropolitan Council, and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has adopted procedures for granting both short term and long term extensions to the July 1, 1980 deadline, BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes does hereby apply and appeal to the Metropolitan Council for an extension of the short term of six (6) months pursuant to the procedures adopted by the Metropolitan Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Lino Lakes will com- plete it's work and final approval will be made on the Comprehensive plan and that the plan will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council within the six (6) month extension periods. Mr. McLean moved to approve this Resolution, seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. An Ordinance granting Workers' Compensation coverage for public official's of City of Lino Lakes was read by Mayor Gourley. This ordinance brings the city 000102 Council Minutes May 27, 1980 into compliance with the law. Mr. Jaworski moved to approve this. Ordinance. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. This Ordinance will be number 74, and shall be effective from date of passage and publication. The Ordinance for the adoption of WPC -40 was presented by Mr. Locher "The rules and regulations that were adopted by the Council with the assistance of the Building Official and City Clerk- Treasurer" - changed to read as above. This Ordinance enforces the existing ordinances and these ordinance were not repealed. There is also a penalty section to this Ordinance - No. 53B, as is not required. Mr. Jaworski moved to adopt this Ordinance - No. 53B, as corrected. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. The Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 73 was called to order. This deals with the keeping of animals. This would repeal Ordinances #26 and 26A and brings this into line with Ordinance #56. This sets forth the difference between domestic animals and household animals for pets. There is an adjustment needed in the language dealing f with animals in a residential area. The discussion was opened up for comments from the audience. Mrs. Grace Turene asked to clarify a point on the acreage allowed in a residential areas. Mr. Robert Turene said he didn't understand the 10 acres requirement. Mayor Gourley said that under #56 it is necessary to have 10 acres. He did not agree with •the ten acre requirement, they would like to see this changed to 22 acres from 10 acres. Shelia Rehbein would ask that all restrictions on the number of animals be eliminated. Also, no restrictions on the size of the parcel on which the animals are kept - as long as they are cared for properly. Ginger - suggested that the 5 acres be kept. She questioned how this would affect the resale of her property if this ordinance is passed. Mayor Gourley said her situation would not change, as long as the operation was not changed or intensified. Terry Smith felt that 5 acres is sufficient for large animals, she also felt that the Counci has no right to restrict the number of animals. She felt that with five acres that the owner can properly care for a number of animals. Robert Smeed felt there should not be any restrictions. He felt that a horse could be kept on one acre. Mary Ann Eckert felt the proposed ordinance was too restrictive. She questioned the keeping of poultry. Mayor Gourley pointed out that the proposed ordinance is less restrictive than the one this is currently in force. Robert Gray questioned the restriction on the smaller animals. He felt that to restrict a person with five acres to one pair of rabbits is unfair. Council Minutes May 27, 1980 Reinhart, asked if this ordinance was proposed because of abuse of the five acre requirement. Mayor Gourley said, No, just to bring the ordinance re- quirements into line with the existing ordinances. Jerry Bolin felt that five acres was enough to support animals. Terry Smith asked the Council to give the residents an ordinance they can live with. Shelia Rehbine set forth the costs of maintaining their horses. Richard Halstad felt the way the ordinance is written there is no restrict - ions on the number and he felt there should be and suggested checking with the U of M for recommended acreage for animals. Mayor Gourley announced that this will be on the June 9, 1980 agenda at 7:45 P.M. 000103 Cindy Benier they raise cattle on their acreage all summer and sell them in the fall. She was concerned about the selling of the land for the present use. Mayor Gourley said the non- conforming pre- existing use would pass to the next owners as long as the use was not intensified. Dean Wiesner talked on the subject of breeding horses and has two animals at this time and are planning on expanding - how would a restrictive number affect this operation? Mayor Gourley reminded him of the Public Hearing on June 9, 1980. Mayor Gourley called a recess at this point. Meeting to reconvene at 8:55 P.M. The meeting was reconvened. Mayor Gourley noted that there are three requests under the Planning and Zoning report - Mr. Smeed and Mr. Turene for keeping of Horses and Mr. Suchy for keeping animals - he suggested these requests be tabled until the suggested ordinance is completed. He put this suggestion to the persons and affected and they agreed to the postponment. Mr. McLean moved to approve the tabling of these three items. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carrithd. unanimously. The Public Hearing on Wollan's Estates was called to order. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Schumacher to present the information on this request. Mr. Schumacher read the notice of publication. The application was for the rezoning from Commercial /Residential to Light Ind- ustrial. This is for the four lots facing Lake Drive. This should have been for a zoning of General Business. This is for the rezoning of the entire lots 24,25,26,and 27, of Wollan's Estates from Comm /Res to General Business. The park requirements for this !land has been taken care of for this property. Mayor Gourley asked for comments from the audience, there was none. Mr. McLean moved to approve this rezoning. Seconded by Mr..Kulaszewicz. Mr. Locher said the meets and bounds description will have to be used for the legal since this is not a filed plat. Legal descriptions that are not filed cannot be used, so in order to rezone this, the meets and bounds description of these lots must be used. 000104 Council Minutes May 27, 1980 Mayor, Gourley amended the motion to have the developer provide this dis- cription for the Attorney. This was accepted. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. 9:20 P.M. On considering the Restrictive Ordinance, Mr. Locher reported that he had problems in locating the exact State Statute. The Ordinance is not ready for consideration at this meeting but is to be on the June 9, 1980 agenda. The next item was the ponding areas in Sunset Oaks and there are some dis- crepancies. There are some ponding areas that are not included. This matter was discussed with Mr. Stanley. Mr. Locher disagreed with the term "Ponding area ". He felt that the situation may change and there would be another use of this land that would serve a different purpose. Mr. McLean moved to table consideration of these ponding areas until the June 9, 1980 meeting Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. The Public Hearing for the rezoning for. Rite -Way Waterproffing was called to order at 9:30 P.M. There was no representative present. Mr. Schumacher felt this rezoning is necessary for the financing of their project. There was no testtimony from the audience. Mr. Schumacher read the legal notice of publi- cation. Mr. Jaworski moved to continue this hearing to June 9, 1980 at 9,:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. The public hearing on the Street Lighting and Street Name Signs was called to order at 9:55 P.M. Mr, Locher read a copy of the Ordinance. Mr. Schumacher has researched several questions the Council had brought up at the last meeting. The $100.00 deductible is per occurance, regardless of how many poles are damaged. He had also checked the rate differential - the basic difference is installation costs. This accounts for the greater amount in the electricity cost. Mr. Schumacher felt this is a good deal for this City. Mr. Schumacher felt there must be close cooperation between the developer and NSP in order to have fixtures installed that would conform to NSP requirements. Mr. McLean moved to approve Ordinance No. 21C. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jaworski moved to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Time: 9:45 P.M. The petition from the land owners on Andall Street was considered. This is a petition for the upgrading of that street. This has been signed by all four owners. Mr. Carley said a feasibility study is necessary. Moved by Mr. Jaworski. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. McLean moved to accept this petition. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gourley asked if the owners should be notified. Mr. Carley said this information would be available for the June 9, 1980 meeting. This is to be Council Minutes May 27, 1980 under the Engineer report at the meeting and the Clerk is to notify all owners. Mr. Carley presented a progress report on the status of the installation of the utilities on Black Duck Drive. He pointed out the portion that is com- Ieted. Mr. Carley presented their finding on the study on the need for additional water supply in that area. It was felt a special meetings should be set to consider this. This meeting was scheduled for June 16, 1980 at 7:30 P.M. The matter of the East Birch Addition was briefly discussed. Mr. Locher will speak on the later. The Planning and Zoning Board Report was considered. The first item on the agenda was a variance for the transfer of a 5' parcel of land by Mr. Kock. This is to maintain the side yard setbacks for the addition to his garage. Mr. Schumacher presented the information and informed the Council that all materials required are present. Planning and Zoning had recommended approval of this variance. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to approve this variance. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. 000105 The long driveway variance for Mr. Schultz in Sunset Oaks and is necessitated by a drainage easement that goes across the front of the Lot. Mr. Schumacher presented the actions of the Planning and Zoning. They had recommended approval Mr. McLean moved to approve this driveway variance, with the stipulation that this driveway be maintained by the property owners tot the extent that it can be used by emergency vehicles. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski: Motion carried unanimously. The next item was a request by Mr. Richard Carlson to take two lots now facing Hodgson Road, split them and face both lots onto Linda Street. Planning and Zoning had recommended approval. Mr. McLean moved to approve tnis request. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Schumacher presented the request for the platting of Sunset Oaks 11. Mr. Short had been asked to review this plat and the Council persons had a copy of his recommendations. Mr. Short recommended thi$ parcel remain as Light Indust- rial. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended to the Council this platting be denied. Mr. Jaworski disagrees with this concept. He felt the residential development to the West of this area dictated that this not be held back for Industrial. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Stanley to present his reasons for desiring to plat this area as residential. Mr. Stanley felt the Industrial development in this area is too far in the future. He felt it is directly connected to the existing residential area via Marvy Street. He felt there is other lands in the City more suitable for Industrial zoning. There was discussion of the possibility of sewer in that area. Mr. Marvy felt that this would not affect development for industrial purposes. This area has also been platted so as to allow the splitting of the lots in the event sewers are intalled in this area. 000106 Council Minutes May 27, 1980 There was a question of the transportation problem industrial development could create in this area. It was also noted that the developers are entit- led to a public hearing on this plat. Mr. Jaworski moved to set a public hearing for the Sunset Oaks 11 plat for June 23, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. The driveway variance requested by Mr. Robert Gray was discussed. This is necessitated by a Water Works easement on the front of his property. All the necessary papers are in order. Planning and Zoning had recommended approval of this variance. This driveway will 330' long. Mr. Kluegel has inspected this property and found the front part of the lot quite low. Mr. Gray was informed that the maintenance of the driveway is his responsibility and must be kept in a condition to admit emergency vehicles. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to approve with the above stipulations. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried.unanimously. The special use permit application by Mr. Emly was considered. This is to have a repair shop at his residence on 62nd street just off Ware Road. Mr. Schumacher presented the actions of the Planning and Zoning Board. This is being used to repair farm equipment on a part time basis. Mr. Emly has a building that he is currently using - the only construction proposed is a cK. stockade type fence for screening purposes. There is to be no sign. The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended approval of this request. There was discussion on the missing information that should have been pre- sented with this request. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to table this matter until the end of the meeting since Mr. Emly was not present. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski;. Motion carried unanimously. The Scheunemann's Corners plat was considered next. Mr. Scheunemann had been requested to overlay the splitting of the lots when sewer is installed and to note the location of the streets that would be installed at that time. This layout was presented and discussed. There was discusssion of the street end- ing in a cul -de -sac. It was generally felt this street should not end in a cul- de -sac but should be extended to the property line in order for the lands to the East not to become landlocked. Also, the lands to the South. After some discussion on this matter, Mr. Scheuemann agreed to realigning the lots. Mr. McLean moved to set the public hearing on Scheunemann's Corners plat for June 23, 1980 at 8:30 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Emly had arrived so his request for a special use permit was considered. Mr. Emly pointed out the buildings on the drawing and locating the building proposed to be used for the repair shop. There will be some welding but no painting in this area. This is for his special costumers for heavy equipment. The status of 62nd. street was quest- ioned will this handle this type of traffic. -This is strictly a part -time business. The general feeling was this use does not fall under the home occupations and it was suggested that perhaps this should be rezoned, perhaps to General Business. Council Minutes . iO3107 May 27, 1980 Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to.grant this special use permit. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Mayor Gourley reminded the Council that all abutting property owners must be notified. Mrs. Elsenpeter withdrew her motion until the abutt- ing property owners are notified. Mr. Kulasewicz withdrew his second.i The Clerk is notify all property owners. This item is to be on the June 9, 1980 agenda. Mr. Emly asked that this be put on the June 23, 1980 agenda. Mr. Kulaszewicz so moved. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. The next item to be considered was a special use permit reuest by Mr. Sulander for outside storage. Mr. Sulander was not present. He had been told to be present at this meeting. This is the location on Lake Drive where all sorts of materials has been hauled in and dumped and there is no fencing at the pres- ent. Mr. Sulander is proposing to install a four to five foot fence to meet City Codes. Mr. Jaworski noted that ,there are questions; what is being stored? and does not have 2/3's of signatures. He suggested this either be turned down or tabled. The material being dumped is building materials. There was discussion on the requirement of the ordinance on an operation such as this. There was a question of whether a building is being planned at this location. There is no indication of whether this is being planned or not. The general consensus of the Council was this sort of operation is unacceptable. Mn. Jaworski asked, that if an expiration date is part of the special use permit wouldn't it then automatically be void at the end of that period. Mr. Locher agreed. Mr. McLean moved to deny this request. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jaworski moved that all this, material be removed within sixty (60) days. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. The next item to be considered was to set a public hearing for the rezoning of Lino Industrial Park. Planning and Zoning had recommended approval of this rezoning of Lots 1 through 6, Block 1, and Lots 1 & 2, Block 2. Mrs. Elsen- peter moved to set a Public Hearing for the rezoning of the above listed lots in Lino Industrial Park for June 23, 1980 at 9:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. The special use permit for Mr. Marcel LeRoux was considered. Mr. Schumacher gave a brief history of the mining operations that have ensued over the past year or so. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Mr. LeRoux present proof of proper frontage, a Letter of Credit to restore the street, $11,787.50) prepare plans for finished grades and existing grades, and plans for the restoration of the property. Also, there must be back payment for the material removed to date. This application had been denied at the last Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. LeRoux has presented the Letter of Credit and has lined up an Engineering firm to do the surveying and to do the topgraphy of the land. Mr. Gotwald had felt this would be a conflict of interest for him to set the elvations and then inspect them. Mayor Gourley disagreeded. The area that is being worked at the present time must be defined. If this is done, Mr. LeRoux will be permitted to operate in that area only until the topogs are completed. 000108 Council Minutes May 27, 1980 Mr. McLean felt that there would be an enviornmental impact on the lands to the South. He felt that any elevations established should be aware of this. There was also discussion of this being a commercial operation in a residen- tial area. Mayor Gourley felt this land was being prepared for development and in this light, some operation for the removal of the excess soil would fall under the special use permit provisions. Mr. Jaworski mgved to table this until all information is available. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Put this on the 6/9/80 agenda. The preliminary plat of Lakes Add. #6 was considered. This is platting a portion of the Outlots in Lakes Add. #2 as single family lots. There had been a question of a drainage easement on the rear of some of the lots - this has been removed. The Planning and Zoning Board has recommended approval of this and to set a public hearing. Mr. McLean moved to approve the preliminary plat and to set a public hearing for June 16, 198Q at 9:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried un- animously. The preliminary plat of Lakes Add. #7 was considered next. This is for North Northeast Realty to plat the outlots in Lakes Add. #2 into quads. Mr. Schumacher presented the actions of the Planning and Zoning Board's action on this matter. They had asked for some direction from this Council as to existence of the Special Use Permit. Is this valid? or is it void? Mr. Jaworski asked what would make this permit not valid? Mr. Schumacher pre- sented the requirements of Ordinance #56 as to the procedures concerning the issuance and revoking of special use permits. Mayor Gourley pointed out that no Council has ever held a public hearing to revoke any special use permits. This special use permit was issued for apartments and townhouses on)tjese out - lots. There was discussion on the previous discussions concerned with this special use permit. Mayor Gourley said he was aware of th4s preliminary plat and had researched the existence of the special use permit and presented the following Resolution: WHEREAS, Special Use Permit Number 27 was issued to Lakes Development Company on March 9, 1970, and WHEREAS, the said Special Use Permit was issued in accordance with all laws and ordinances in effect on that date, and, WHEREAS, subsequent public hearings were held through the year 1975 that reaffirmed the existence of the said Special Use Permit, and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 56 of the City of Lino Lakes states in Section 5.04 (A) that "Special Use Permits are issued for a Council Minutes May 27, 1980 particular use and not for a particular person or firm ", and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 56 in Section 5.04 (A) also states "Special Use Permits shall be considered administratively equivalent to a rezoning, and the same requirements and procedures shall apply ", and, WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 56 in Section 5.02 (C) and Minnesota State statue No. 462. 357, subdivision No. 3 calls for a public hearing to be held on any rezoning. and, WHEREAS, no Council of the City of Lino Lakes has ever held a public hearing to revoke the said Special Use Permit. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that Special Use Permit No. 27 issued to Lakes Development Company on March 9, 1970 does survive under all Ordinances and regulations existing at this time in the City of Lino Lakes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the developer may proceed to present plans for development of the lands covered by said Special Use Permit before the Planning Commission of the City of Lino Lakes, Mr. McLean asked Mr. Locher if there were any problems with this Resolution and Mr. Locher said, No, as long as all Special Use Permits were treated equally. There was discussion from the audience to include Mr. Cody and Mr. Benson, both who objected to the use of the lands for the construction ,of Quads. Mayor,Gorirley pointed out that the issue here Is not,the use.of the land,but the survival gf,the special use permit. This special permi.t.was considered on a, request from the,Planning and,Zoning Board before,they would,preceed with the plat that had been,presented to them There was discussion on the many facets of the provisions of the Ordinance in regard to the issuance of Special Use Permits and the revoking of said Permits. Mri Kulaszewilcz moved to approve this Resolution as presented. iSeconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration . of the financial report for the ,Month of April was next on the agenda. ;Mr, Schumacher presented the financial report and discussed the quest- ion from the Council. Mr. Schumacher told the Council that he felt this report would be much more accurate at the end of six months - it hard to project a realistic figure on a month to month basis. He explained that, even though some oil the monthly figures are over the anticipated amount for the month, the expenditures are not over budget. Mr. Jaworski moved to table consideration of the purchase of a chipper. Second- ed by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. The requests from St. Josephs's Church fora special permit for Beer and Bingo at their annual event in August Mr Locher.said that within the past.year a law has been passed that sayis there must be someone in charge of the bingo and there must also be a $10,000.00 bond., This must be a designated person to .keep 110 Council Minutes May 27, 1980 the bingo records and report. Mr. Locher will inform the Clerk what is needed from the Church. Mr. Jaworski moved to table. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gourley had, some communications. from Milner Carley Which will be copied for all Council Members. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to adjourn at 1:00 A.M. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular Council Meeting held on June 9, 1980, Edna L. Sarrier Clerk -- Treasurer Council Minutes June 9, 1980 The regular meeting of theiLino Lakes City Council was called to order at 7:30 P.M., June 9, 1980, by Mayor Gourley, Council members present; Elsenpeter, Jaworski, Kulaszewicz, McLean. Absent: none. Mr. Locher, Mr. Meister, and Mr. Schumacher were also present. The;minutesrof the May 27, 1980 were approved as written. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to approve the disbursements as listed. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Under the Open Mike portion, Mr. Robert Sulander had asked to speak in reference to his request for outside storage. Mr. Sulander had appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission for review of this request. That Board had re- commended approval. The Council had denied this request at the May 27, 1980 meeting and had allowed Mr. Sulander 60 days to remove the materials now at that location. Mr. Sulander told the Council that it would be impossible for him to remove that material within that time. He asked if there was any way he could get an ex- tension to this time limit. The ,amount of mater,ials,now.there was questioned, and -it is quite a lot, also the minimum timeihe would need .to remove this material. .Mr. Sulander said the Status (:)f the market would determine,the removal. Mayor Gourley pointed out that Mr. Sulander was not denied this request because he was not present, but because this type of operation was un acceptable. Mr. Jaworski felt that if 60 days is not sufficient time, Mr. Sulander could appear before the Council and request a time extension for the removal. The consensus of the Council was that Mr. Sulander should follow this procedure. The next person to speak was Mr. Al Ross. He gave some background on the existing ordinance dealing with the keeping of animals. He felt the five acres, should remain in the ordinance. He also felt the Planning and Zoning Board should have ail the necessary information on the requests presented to them before they forward a recommendation to the Council. He felt this is