Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/09/1981 Council MinutesFebruary 25, 1981 There was comments from the audience suggesting several alternatives. Mr. Carley answered the questions and comments. Mr. Kulaszewicz moved that this matter be considered on the March 9, 1981 agenda at 7:45 P.M. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. McLean moved to adjourn. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected, and approved at a regular meeting held on March 9, 1981. ATTEST: Edna L. Sarner, Clerk- Treasurer F.Kenneth Gourley, Mayor March 9, 1981 The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order at 7:30 P.M., March 9, 1981, by Mayor Gourley with all members present except Mr. Kulaszewicz. Mr. Locher, Mr. Meister, and Mr. Schumacher were also present. On considering the minutes of February 23, 1981, Mr. Jaworski moved to approve, sec- onded by Mr. McLean. Mayor Gourley corrected the minutes as follows: on page two, in the Northwestern Bell discussion, the Council also discussed the possibility of either increasing the lot size to a conforming sewered lot configuration or decreasing it to a size that is just big enough to allow for the proper setbacks; on the Ostrom grant - is that a correct statement on the action of the Planning and Zoning that they recommended on a 4 to 1 vote that the Council amend Ord. #56? The general consen- sus of the Council members was that this is a correct statement; In the Public Hearing on the Schilling rezoning for Wollans Estates it should be noted that the Chair asked for comments from the audience and there were none. Mayor Gourley asked the maker of the motion and the one who seconded the motion to include the corrections and they accepted the additions. Motion carried unanimousl} On considering the February 25, 1981 minutes, Mr. McLean moved to approve as presented. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried with Mr. Jaworski abstaining. On considering the disbursements, Mayor Gourley questioned the expenditure of $150.00 from dedicated park funds for sandblasting - Mr. Schumacher explained this is for the work done on the buried tank that is being converted into a water tank and this is the park departments share of the costs. This was taken from dedicated funds since no provisions had been made in the budget for this work; there was a question on an escrow amount being returned - Mr. Schumacher explained this had been for the 1 1 1 March 9, 1981 25"z moving in of a building but no work or paper work had been done and this is a refund of his deposit; there was a question on the paper resale - Mr. Schumacher explained that the City purchases paper for the Xerox in conjunction with another office in order to get the best price on the paper and noted this is a reimbursable amount. Mr. McLean moved to approve the disbursements as presented. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Open Mike Mr. George Taylor requested a 90 day extension on his application for a special use permin in order to give him time for alternatives. Mr. McLean moved to table Council consideration of this matter for 90 days. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jack Menkveld appeared before the Council to discuss the streets in Forest Glenn. He said that two lots are sold and the persons are ready to start construction, he would like to post a bond for the graveling of this street only in order for these building permits to be issued. The Council questioned the completion date and Mr. Menkveld said this street should be completed in July. Mr. Meister had computed the costs. Mayor Gourley said this is a deviation from the ordinance in that the street must have the gravel base in before a bond will be accepted for the paving. Mr. McLean asked when the base could be in- stalled and Mr. Menkveld said as soon as the road restrictions are lifted. Mr. Jaworski noted that there are only State and County roads and these are 9 ton roads and there should be no problems hauling in gravel for the base. The consensus of the Council was that the existing policy of requiring the base to be in place before building permits are issued will stand. Once that is done then a bond must be posted for the paving of the Street. Mrs. Bernice Juleen representing the Lexington Park Lakeview area in the matter of the sewer proposal for that area. She asked if the Council has made a decision on the use of the Community Development Block Grant Funds and was told that this will be discussed later in the agenda. Mrs. Juleen presented a petition from that area opposing the sewers to the Clerk. Mayor Gourley moved that the Council not spend monies that might be received from the Community Development Block Grant Funds for sewers in the Lexington Park Lakeview area. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Robert DuFour III - Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Kluegel to explain this situation. Mr. DuFour is in the process of purchasing a parcel of land on Old Birch Street for the construction of a home. In the meantime, he has pulled a mobile home in on the parcel of land without permission. Mr. Kluegel said the family had been living in a chicken coop in Shoreview and the Doctor had told the family they must get their children out of the building. Mr. DuFour noted that he is a carpenter and plans to have the home completed before winter. Mayor Gourley noted that he had a note from a Council member of Shoreview attesting to the problem. He also noted there are two items before them 1) a request for a variance for the transfer of title of the property and 2) a special use permit for the parking of the mobile home on the property. March 9, 1981 Mr. McLean noted that the variance must go through Planning and Zoning - on the subject of the special use permit for the parking of the trailer, Mayor Gourley wondered if the 90 days special use permit for the parking of the trailer could not be considered under Ord. # 6Q subject to, 1) building plans submitted and a building permit issued before the next Council meeting, and 2) the 90 days for the trailer permit commence as of March 10, 1981, 3) the County Health Department inspect the premises for sanitary facilities. Mayor Gourley moved that a temporary permit for the parking of the trailer on the property represented by the Certificate of Survey be granted with the stipulations that the plans for the construction of a home be submitted and a building permit be issued by March 23, 1981, that the 90 day period commence on March 10, 1981, that any concerns of the County Health Department be complied with. Seconded by Mrs.Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. The application for the variance must go through the normal process. The Highway #49, sewer proposal that was on the agenda for 7:45 P.M. was discussed at this point in the meeting. Mr. Schumacher asked for a report on the petition that had been received in the office. The Clerk reported that 30% of the signa- tures were in favor of the sewer and 70% were against the sewer project. Mayor Gourley asked if these signatures represented 100% of the property along #49 and the Clerk said she did not know. Mr. Baker, who conducted the drive for the signatures, said the petition represented every person who wanted to sign. The trailer court, one home on 49, one on Laure didn't want to sign. ne and the Superette & Liquor Store Mr. Jaworski moved not to extend the sewer on Highway #49 as proposed but to make sewer available to Mr. Nathe through the Shoreview lines. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Jaworski to separate his motion for clarification. Mrs. Elsenpeter asked what he meant by "up Highway #49" - Mayor Gourley said the area discussed at the last meeting ended on the South side of the trailer park. Mr. Jaworski reworded his motion to read "not to extend sewers up Highway #49 ". Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gourley suggested that..the Engineer be authorized to proceed with this pro- ject. Mr. Jaworski moved to authorize the Engineer to do a feasibility study on the Nathe project. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. The 8:00 P.M. Hearing on the Supplemental Assessment roll on the Black Duck Project was called to order at 8:10 P.M. Mayor Gourley asked the Clerk to report on this. The Clerk said that all persons who own property in that area were notified by First Class Mail. Mayor Gourley asked the Attorney if this is proper or should the no- tices be sent by certified mail. Mr. Locher read the State Law pertaining to this matter and certified mail is not required. Mayor Gourley asked the Clerk to cer- tify the mailing list and make it a part of the record. The Clerk reported that the additional interest had been computed on each parcel of land and each owner had been mailed a complete list of the additional amount that would be assessed to each parcel of land that he owns. Mayor Gourley asked the Attorney if this seems complete and Mr. Locher said he had not checked the compu- tations, but it would appear everything had been done properly. 1 1 1 March 9, 1981 Mayor Gourley asked if therewas anyone in the audience who had come to speak on the assessments in the Black Duck project and there was none. Mr. Jaworski moved to levy the supplemental assessments and certify to the County. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jaworski moved to close the hearing at 8:20 P.M. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Bill Short was present to present additional work required by a letter from the Metropolitan Council in conjunction with the City's Comprehensive Plan. This letter asked for identification of the forested areas of the City and soil types to include gravel deposits; Historical sites and Unique Habitats; Enviornmen- tal Protection Policies; and a Description of the existing City Ordinances for enviornmental protection. This information he presented to the Council in the form of an extra chapter that will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council to be in- cluded in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Short if this Council would be in any violation if they heard this presentation before it was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board and Mr. Short felt that they would not since this action requires review by the Council before it is forwarded to the Metropolitan Council. This addition must have Planning and Zoning Board approval before this action can be taken and Mr. McLean felt it should be approved by that Board before the Council took any action. It was decided that since Mr. Short is present, the Council will hear this presentation. Mr. Short presented a map outlining the areas of forestation and noting the types of trees. He had also identified the areas of soil extraction Under item two, the areas of Historical sites was discussed to include he cemetaries and archaeoligical istes in the area. Mr. Short noted the existence of the Blue Heron Rookery on the North East side of Rice Lake and Mr. McLean noted that this area had been recognized in the process of establishing the limits of the Anoka County Chain of Lakes Park and at this point in time, the City has no control over that park. Mr. Short said the City still controls the lands on the lake and this could have an affect on the rookery. Mr. out that the island in Peltier Lake had been identified area. Mr. Jaworski pointed out that there County Road J and Centerville Road - pointed out the heavily wooded area that had not been noted on the map. West side of the McLean pointed as a wild life is a wild life management area at Mr. Hawkin's property. Mr. McLean in the South East corner of the City Mr. Short will include this. Mr. Short discussed the historical catagories that the County and State are interested in. There are several sites in the Chain of Lakes Park that have archaeological significance but did not want them identified on these maps in order to preserve the sites. March 9, 1981 The two sites that are recorded by the Anoka Historical Society are St. Joseph Catholic Church on Elm Street and the Lehmann Home on Birch Street. Mr. Short listed the cemetaries in the City and noted their locations on the map. Mr. Short went through the policies listed for the protection of enviornmental concerns of the City in the areas of wet lands, etc., This is a brief outline of what is contained in existing ordinances of the City that reinforces these policies. Mr. Short asked the Council if they have any additions to this - he would appreciate their comments. Mayor Gourley noted that it is the policy of the City to have pro - fessionals plan the development of the parks in order to preserve as much of the natural amenities of the land as possible. Since this chapter must have approval of the Planning adn Zoning Board, Mr. Short will present this information at the March 18, 1981 regular meeting of that Board. MR. BILL MOLIN - SCREENING Mr. Short had inspected the site of the concrete plant and had written a letter of recommendations for the planting of trees and shrubs to effect the desired screening. This matter had been forwarded to the Council by the Planning and Zoning Board with the recommendation that Mr. Molin provide a landscaping design and a bond to insure the completion of this before he will be issued an occupancy permit for the building addition now under construction. Although the recommendations in Mr. Short's letter is a basic plan the Council asked that these recommendations be put into a land- scape drawing noting the number, size, placement and types of trees and shrubs. Mr. Short said he has a copy of the site plan and the information in the letter and could very easily develop into a landscape plan. Mr. Jaworski asked if this could be ready for the March 23, 1981 meeting and Mr. Short said that it could. This plan would give the Council a basis for the amount of the bond that should be posted. Mr. McLean moved to table this until the Council has received a plan and an estimated cost figure on which to base the bond. This matter to be put on the March 23, 1981 agenda. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Mayor Gourley noted there are four applications in the Council members packets and they have a copy of the fifth one that he received over the weekend. There are two positions opne at this time - Mrs. Schwankl's, whose term expires in 1983 and Mr. Heath's whose termi expires 1981. Mr. Jaworski moved to appoint Larry Swistoski to complete Mr. 1 March 9, 1981 262 Heath's term of office. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. McLean moved to appoint Mr. Donald Marier to the term ending in 1983. Mayor Gourley called for a second three time, there was none, the motion died for lack of a second. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to appoint Mr. James Flannery to fill the vacancy left by Mrs. Schwankl. Mr. McLean asked the residential address of Mr. Flannery and was told 1381 Holly Drive. Motion was seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried with Mr. McLean voting, No. ENGINEER'S REPORT The Army Corps of Engineer Permit for Black Duck Drive was discussed by Mr. Meister. He pointed out the stipulations imposed by the Corps of Engineers. This would include the planting of trees and shrubs near the well house. The number of trees is not included, neither the spacing or size. This would be in the County Open Space - Mr. McLean felt the planting should be the responsibility of the County. Mr. McLean moved to authorize the signing of this application wiht the stipulation that the City will encourage the County to plant the treees and shrubs. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Mayor Gourley pointed out this is the responsibility of the City and should ask the Couty to cooperate with the City on this project. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gourley declared a consensus of the Council that they under- stood this is the responsibility of the City. ORDINANCE NO. 22B. This Ordinance deals with curbs and gutters - the type and installa- tion. There is to be concrete in areas with sewers or areas where sewers are planned. There was some minor language change in Section C, second line - the words 'or water are' is to be deleted and the word 'is' inserted. Mr. McLean moved to approve the ordinance with the above change. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Mayor Gourley asked if there was nay one in the sudience who wished to comment on this ordinance and there was none. Motion carried unanimously. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHENANDOAH II. Mr. Meister reported that he had reviewed these plans and specifications and found they meet all City requirements. The members of the Council had not seen these plans. Mr. Meister presented the maps and explained the various specifications. Mr. Schumacher pointed out that on this plat there is a street named "Fox Trail" and there is a street in the City already named 'Fox Tail'. This isjust for their information. Mr. Jaworski moved to accept Mr. Meister's recommendations and to approve the plans and specifications as presented. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. ATTORNEY'S REPORT ?6 4 March 9, 1981 J 'v Mr. Locher reported that he had received a notice in today's mail to appear in Judge Dablow's Court in Cambridge on Firday, March 13, 1981 for a hearing on a request to amend the findings or a motion for a new trial. Mayor Gourley was given a copy of this notice. OUTLOT A. Mr. Locher read the amendments to this deed allowing Mr. Rehbein to use this outlot as drainage /ponding area as deemed necessary and reserves the right to construct and establish contours for a ponding area thereon for a period of one year from this date, with the con- struction to be completed within the one year in compliance with the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed Board. The Council found no objections to this statement and Mr. Locher will present to Mr. Glenn Rehbein for his signature. DISCONNECTED SEWER HOOKUP - SHENANDOAH I. The various aspects of this problem was discussed. Mr. Locher had received a call from MWCC offering to reimburse the City of one -half of this costs in the amount of $900.00 but in receiving that money, the City would relieve the MWCC of any further responsibility for the damages. Mr. Locher recommended that the City reject this offer. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to approve this recommendation. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimouslu. Mayor Gourley moved to authorize the Attorney to continue to defend the City on Lakes Add. #7. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. • STREET NAME CHANGE IN ULMER'S RICE LAKE ADDITIONS. Mrs. Elsenpeter reported that she has checked this situation and would recommend that the portion of Rice Lake Drive in Ulmer's First Addition going East and West, and all of Rice Lake Drive in Ulmer's Third Addition be changed to Ulmer Drive. Mr. Locher was instructed to write an ordinance to this effect and this matter is to be on the March 23, 1981 agenda. PARK BOARD REPORT Mr. Schumacher presented the actions of the Park Board from their last regular meeting. There was discussion of tot lots. Last year the Council ha sed a Resolution stating that in Country Lakes Park the Board could spend $9000.00 for the development of portions of that park. The Park Board felt this development could be done through LAWCON Grants and they asked to use the allocated $9000.00 for develop- ment of tot lots in Sunrise Park and City Hall Park. Mayor Gourley reported that in the process of taking bids on the pro- posed improvement, the bids came in much higher than had been planned. Mr. Volk daid some of the basic work had been done by the Army Corps of Engineers and he felt that they will come back and don more work there but he has not called because the final plan for that Park is not completed. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to authorize the Park to change the allocation March 9, 1981 of $9000.00 to be spent in Country Lakes Park on a parking lot, drink- ing fountain and landscaping and to spend this money for tot lot equipment for Sunrise Park and City Hall Park . Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. LAWCON GRANT. Mr. Schumacher felt there is very lettle possibility of Federal funds but there will be some State Funds. He felt that the application submitted in 1980 would have been approved on the State level and he felt that it would be worth while to update this application and resubmit this year. The application would be in the amount of $100,000.00 and if it is approved the City would need to match with $50,000.00. Mr. McLean moved to authorize Mr. Schumacher to submit this application. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. SEWER PETITION - 77th STREET NORTH Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to accept the petition and table for verification of signatures and front footage. Seconded by Mr. MCLean. Motion carried unanimously. USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS. Mr. Schumacher reported on the amount that will be available to the City. The figure of approximately $47,000.00 to be used for low and moderate income families, will be allocated to this City. This is the result of actions of a committee appointed to review all applications received from the five Cities of Circle Pines, Lexington, Spring Lake Park, Lino Lakes and Centerville. No one application was approved - the money is to be allocated per an existing formula. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to use this money to assist the qualifying residents who live along Lake Drive to pay for the proposed sewer for that area. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Mr. McLean questioned the allocation of this money to a project that has not been approved - if this project is not accepted, does the City then lose these funds? Mr. Schumacher said, Yes. Mr. McLean suggested having an alternative proposeal. There was discussion of the possibility of using this money for the development of a park - the criteria that must be met in order to qualify for this use - and the monies that already have been allocated for the updating of the parks. Mrs. Elsenpeter felt that, even though the Lake Drive proposal has not been approved, this petition is based on a solid base in that the majority of the frontage is owned by the petitioners. Mrs. Elsenpeter said the amount remaining from the Lake Drive porposal could be used for housing rehabilitation. Mr. Schumacher pointed out that if the Lake Drive sewer project fails, then the City will lose the funds. 2,66 March 9, 1981 Mrs. Elsenpeter asked, if y the 18th of March does this City have to have awarded the bids for the Lake Drive Sewer project? Mr. Schumacher said he wasn't sure, but he would check it out with the Consultant. On voting on the motion, the motion passed with Mr. MCLean voting, No. 1981 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Mr. Schumacher pointed out under the Fire Department there are no allocations. There is an extensive Fire Fighting Service Study he would like them to review before this is considered. The proposed street improvements were discussed with Mr. Volk making note of the fact that the cost figures are his estimates and he did not know how accurate they are. Mr. Schumacher felt that the Council should take time to review this material and ste a time for discussion. Mr. McLean felt that a special meeting should be set for consideration of this program, and the Fire Service Study. The Council will study these two documents and set a special meeting at the next Council meeting for their consideration. SALARY ADJUSTEMENTS The first one to be considered was the Aministrator's. Mayor Gourley reported that the Ways and Means Committee had met for over two hours and thisis the recommendation that had come out of that meeting. Mr. McLean questioned the objectives in that they were not specific. Mr. McLean suggested that he meet with Mr. Schumacher and with his cooperation, develop the specific areas, then develop the salary in- crease at the same time. After some discussion, and since the salary increase is retroactive, Mr. Jaworski moved to table until the items discussed are cleared. Mr. McLean seconded. Aye. Mayor Gourely said he refused to call a special meeting on this sence the three other Council members had already met. Mr. Jaworski moved to adopt the salary increase propsoed for the Clerk - Treasurer. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. The Clerk asked what the proposal was? The Clerk was asked if she had a copy of the proposal and she said she did not. Mayor Gourley asked Mr. Schumacher if he had given her a copy and he said, No. Mrs. Elsenpeter said it was her understanding that the City Administrator was to go over this with the Clerk before they made a decision. Mr. Schumacher said he did go over it with the Clerk. Mayor Gourley moved to table this until the Clerk has received a copy of the proposal. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried. The next salary to be considered was that of the Assessor. Mayor Gourley felt that the records should be kept in the City Hall and a certain amount of work should be done in the City offices. He would recommend that those records be kept in City Hall and that some arrangements be made for a certain amount of time be spent at City Hall. He said he would not recommend what percentage of her time should be spent at the office - this would be an tiem that would have to worked out with the Assessor. March 9, 1981 2b Mr. McLean moved to approve the salary adjustment for the Assessor of $893.00 per month, with teh stipulation that the Assessor's date information be retained at the City Hall and that her activities be centered at the City Hall rather than out of her home. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. The Police Clerk's salary adjustment was considered. Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to approve the Police Clerk's salary adjustment to $993.00 per month. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Mr. McLean asked what percentage this adjustment represents and was tod, 10 %. Motion carried unanimously. WET LANDS MAP Mr. McLean asked if a decision has to be made by a certain date and Mr. Schumacher said the amendments must be submitted by a certain date. This decision must be made by June 1, 1981. Mayor Gourley asked this matter be put on the agenda of the first meeting in May. STREET LIGHTING REQUESTS. These are requestes submitted some time ago and should be cleared. Mr. Schumacher said the budget cannot absorb these requests at this time. One request is for Sunset Oaks for 3 lights and one is for Pine Haven for 3 lights. The general consensus of the Council was to table these requests until July or August. ORDINANCE #72 - MORATORIUM Mayor Gourley noted that this ordinance expires on March 10, 1981 and he asked what the Council wished to do about this ordinance - allow to expire or to renew? Mr. McLean moved to renew Ordinance #72 for another year. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Mayor Gourley asked if this is sufficient? and Mr. Locher said, Yes, this will need to be published. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION AMENDING SEWER SERVICE DISTRICT #1. Mayor Gourley asked if Lakes Add. #6 and #7 are included in the agree- ment that the City is operating under at the present time? Mr. Schumacher felt these plats would not be approved until after the Comprehensive Plan and been approved. Mayor Gourley just wanted to be sure this Resolution did not infer the Council was picking and choosing on what plats may or may not be developed. Mr. McLean moved to adopt the following Resolution #81 -4. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION 81 -4 RESOLUTION TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL IDENTIFYING DEVELOPMENT TO BE SERVICED IN URBAN DISTRICT #1 WHEREAS, in 1979, the Metropolitan Council allowed Lino Lakes additional interim sewer service in Urban Service District #1, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council limited Lino Lakes to a maximum of three hundred (300) residential connections in this Urban Service District, and ,,08 March 9, 1981 J V WHEREAS, Lino Lakes is presently using only fifty per cent (50 %) of the allocated connections in this district, and WHEREAS, Lino Lakes has identified specific locations in Urban Service District #1 for potential residential connections. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that: 1. The Shenandoah Second Addition residential plat be added to the approved interim plan for future sewer connections to the existing system. 2. With this inclusion, the Lino Lakes City Council warrants the above stated maximum number of services in Urban Service Area #1 until the Metropolitan Council has had sufficient time, pursuant to State Law, to review the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Lino Lakes shall enforce the Metropolitan Council's request con- cerning sewer connections by restricting building permits (not to exceed 300 sewered connections) in Urban Service District #1, thus assuring the Council that Lino Lakes shall control future sewer connections in this area. Passed by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 9th day of March, 1981. Mr. Schumacher asked for direction from the Council as to the salaries that have not been approved- how is this to be handled? Mr. McLean said he would like to meet with Mr. Schumacher - Mayor Gourley suggested that he and Mr. Kulaszewicz present a proposal of their own. Mr. McLean said he would work with Mr. Schumacher on this. As to the Clerk's salary, Mayor Gourley said to put that porposal on the next agenda. Mr. Jaworski moved to adjourn at 11:30 P.M. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Aye. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council meeting held on March 23, 1981. 44g- Edna L. March 23, 1981 arner, Clerk- Treasurer The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order at 7:30 P.M., March 23, 1981 by Mayor Gourley with all Council members pre- sent. Mr. Locher and Mr. Schumacher were also present. Mr. Jaworski moved to approve the minutes of March 9, 1981 as presented, Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously. On considering the disbursements, there were no questions. The dis- bursements were approved as presented. 1 1