HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-137 Council Resolution•
• CITY OF LINO LAKES
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 04-137
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE PROHIBITION ON CONSTRUCTING INFRASTRUCTURE
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT,
PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 12TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings:
1. Section 1010 -6 of the Lino Lakes subdivision ordinance states:
The construction of streets, facilities for sanitary sewer and water, and other
improvements beyond grading, wetland, and stormwater facilities shall not begin
until approval of a final plat.
2. Mr. Ed Vaughan, the developer of the proposed Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
Addition, has a permit from the Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources to build a
bridge to an island. This permit expires November 30, 2004. The DNR has informed
the developer that the permit will not be extended, and the bridge must be finished by
the expiration date.
3. The site is within the property described in attachment A.
4. The subdivision ordinance addresses variances in Section 1002 -5:
The City Council may approve variances from the requirements of this
Subdivision Ordinance. All variance requests from these subdivision
regulations shall comply with Section 2, Subd. 4 of the Lino Lakes Zoning
Ordinance, as may be amended.
5. Section 2, Subd. 4 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance lists criteria for variances,
stating that in considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking subsequent
action, the City shall make specific findings of fact.
6. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions
allowed by the official controls.
• The subdivision ordinance states that construction of streets, facilities for sanitary
sewer and water, and other improvements beyond grading, wetland, and
stormwater facilities shall not begin until approval of a fmal plat. If the bridge is
not built, there is no access to the island. Without access to the island, the use of
the land is questionable.
• 7. The plight of the landowner is due to physical circumstances unique to his property
not created by the land owner.
• The site is a natural island.
8. The hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the
property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Economic do not create._ the need_ for a - variance... - -- -The- issue -is -a
permit from the Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources, which is not controlled by
the City.
9. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege
that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the
same district.
• There is no known situation that would involve a permit from a state agency with
a deadline to build a bridge to an island.
That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
ordinance.
• • The project itself, once approved by the City Council, is deemed in keeping with
the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lino
Lakes hereby approves a variance to allow the construction of the bridge permitted by
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources permit number 2001 -6109 prior to the
approval of the final plat for Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of
2004.
ATTEST:
•
hi;"o
,
J. Ber eson a
Jo y or
- 59 -
Resolution 04 -137, page 2
•
•
ATTACHMENT A: LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 04 -137
Description of
PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 12TH ADDITION
Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka County, Minnesota,
EXCEPT that part of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE being in the West one
half of the Northwest one- quarter, Section 27, Township 31,. Range 22 Anoka County,
Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing. at the Southeast corner of the West one -half of said Northwest one -
quarter, Section 27; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West along the East
line of said West one -half, Northwest one quarter, Section 27 a distance of 57.73 feet
to the Southeast corner of said Outlot D for a point of beginning of the tract to be
described; thence North 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds West, along the East. line
of said Outlot D a distance of 910.02 feet; thence South 89 degrees 22 Minutes'49
seconds West, a distance of 580.47 feet; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 55 seconds
East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot -D_, a distance of 548.90 feet; thence
North 89 degrees 22 minutes 49' seconds East, parallel with the South line of said
Northwest one quarter, Section 27; a distance of 416.00 feet s- . - . . I . - -0 a
minutes 55 seconds East, parallel with the East line of said Outlot D a distance of 370.14 feet
to -the Northerly right -of -way line of C.S.A.H. No. 10 (Anoka County Right -of -Way Plat
No. 11); thence North 85 degrees 24' minutes 36 seconds East along said right -of -way
line a distance of 28.66 feet; thence continuing along said right -of -way line along a,
curve concave to the- North (which has a radius of 3879.72 feet, a delta angle of 02 degrees 00
minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 136.02 feet) a chord bearing and distance of
North 86 degrees 24 minutes 53 seconds East, 136.01 feet to the point of beginning.
And EXCEPT the North 1100 feet of Outlot D, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka
County, Minnesota.
And EXCEPT the South 400 feet of the North 1500 feet of the East 600 feet of Outlot D,
PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE, Anoka County, Minnesota.
- 60 - Resolution 04 -137, page 3
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To:
1500 Piper Jaffrey Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101 -2140
(651) 292 -4400
(651) 292 -0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
James Studenski, City Engineer Reference: Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th
Addition
Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
From: Scott A. Brink, P.E.
Date: September 17, 2004
The following documents have been received:
Comm. No. 12976 -002
Routing:
1. Construction plan set (half -size and full size) titled "Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition" prepared
by Loucks Associates, and received by the City of Lino Lakes on September 3, 2004. _Included
within the plan set are the following sheets: CO -1, C1 -1, C2 -1, C3 -1, C3 -2, C3 -3 C3 -4, C4 -1, C6 -1,
C8 -1, C9 -1, Bridge Typical Section and Quantities, and Bridge General Plan and Elevation.
• 2. Letter from the City of Lino Lakes to Ed Vaughan addressing Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EAW) items.
3. Responses to comments in Record of Decision pertaining to plat approval (responses provided by
Loucks Associates and received by the City of Lino Lakes September 3, 2004).
4. Letter from STS Consultants, Ltd. To Ed Vaughan dated September 3, 2004 addressing Noise,
Vibration and Pre - construction Building Survey in Conjunction with the Road and Bridge
Construction.
5. Letter from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to Ed Vaughan dated August 31, 2004
regarding DNR Permit No. 2001 -6109.
An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was previously prepared for this proposed development,
and comments provided. This review essentially acknowledges some of the remaining environmental review
issues while providing a more detailed technical review of the proposed infrastructure improvements
(utilities, roadway, grading, etc.).
General Comments
The following general comments are provided:
1. The proposed project area essentially extends from the end of an existing cu -de -sac (Ruffed Grouse
Road), which is approximately 1500 feet in length when measured from County Road 10. With an
An Employee Owned Company P; _ 6 1 _ ffirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
•
•
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Page 2 September 17, 2004
additional 1200 feet in length for the proposed improvements, this results in a dead end street roughly
0.5 miles long which significantly exceeds the City's minimum cul -de -sac length of 500 feet. This
may be a concern for emergency vehicle and fire access and maintenance, especially when
considering that the proposed bridge and new street will not meet City standards for width. Public
Safety (Police and Fire) are therefore reviewing the plan as well. In addition, the development will
be served from a long dead end (6 -inch diameter) watermain. As a result, adequacy for fire protection
(water circulation and pressure) is also being verified.
A main environmental concern is the noise and vibration from the pile driving (bridge construction)
activity. In addition to work activity allowed only during established hours by the City, temporary
noise walls around pumps will be required by the City. As stated in the August 17, 2004 letter to Ed
Vaughan from the City of Lino Lakes, the City will require a preconstruction survey and monitoring
program based upon specifications used by MnDot. The letter addresses specifics in more detail.
3. The proposed bridge design must address the visual /aesthetic concerns expressed by the City, and
shall be subject to the City's approval. The proposed structural bridge plan is also being reviewed
further and will be subject to further comments. The bridge must all meet also meet any further
applicable requirements of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Anoka County. Any
temporary fill or impacts to the wetland during the course of construction must also be addressed.
4. The Grading. Plan indicates that Soil Borings were conducted by STS on March 6, 2002, and a copy
of the boring logs has been attained. However, no report or set of recommendations from a
geotechnical engineer has been provided. The boring logs provided show a wide variation of silty
sands, silty and sandy clays, and peat throughout the project area. It is therefore expected that at least
some soil correction measures will be needed during the course of roadway and utility construction,
and construction of the housing units themselves. A report and recommendations from a
geotechnical engineer must therefore be provided to further verify the design of the supporting
infrastructure, including roadway and utility construction, building foundations, and bridge
construction. Groundwater levels and potential impacts on construction must also be known.
Grading
1. Because of the environmental sensitivity of the project site, custom grading of each lot must be
provided to minimize impacts to the existing topography. The Grading Plan notes should also
specify that all grading and disturbance work shall be confined to within the construction limits as
established on the plan and approved by the City in the field prior to activity. Erosion control and
tree protection measures must also be established prior to any work activity, including the delineation
of the preservation area on the north side of the island. The preservation area must be clearly shown
on the grading plan, shall be marked in the field by the Developer, and shall be field verified and
approved by the City prior to commencing any work activity.
2. Construction traffic and operations shall also be staged with the bridge construction to allow for
access to the site and minimize impacts to the natural area. Because the site essentially sits at the end
of a very long cul -de -sac, the neighborhood will experience regular intervals of construction traffic
' Phea. ant Hills Preserve 12th Addition Page 3 September 17, 2004
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
•
and activity. An existing condition assessment of Ruffed Grouse Road should be conducted, and the
Developer be responsible for any damage or repairs to the street upon completion of construction.
3. The proposed Grading Plan must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). It is
our understanding that RCWD reviewed a proposed plan in September of 2001, and the application
was tabled with conditions. A re- submittal or application to RCWD shall be submitted as required by
RCWD, and a copy of the permit and/or permit application must be provided to the City.
4. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the proposed plan and several
requirements of the DNR must be met with regards to construction of the bridge, and working within
the bounds of a public water. The Developer must successfully attain all permits and approvals
required of the DNR that are needed to construct the improvements as proposed, including re-
submittals for any applications that may have expired or been revised.
5. The plan intends to fill 2460 cu.yd. into the floodplain. Any flood plain filling must be approved by
the City of Lino Lakes, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources.
6 Overalls the plan appears to incorporate the balancing of the creation of water quality detention basins
with preservation as much as possible. Previous review comments expressed a desire for the
construction of iaiiiwaler gardens as possible to encourage infiltration for runoff. The Grading and
Drainage Plan provides a note stating that rain gardens are to be constructed as needed. Lots 1 -5 are
designated as custom graded with rainwater gardens, although no rain garden locations are actually
shown. The plans would therefore seem to suggest that rain gardens may or may not be constructed.
If it is desired to have rain gardens installed, it is recommended that they be shown on the grading
plan, or that the City review and approve the grading of each individual lot prior to the issuing of a
building permit.
Utilities
1. The site proposes to utilize existing sanitary sewer and water that currently terminate at the end of
Ruffed Grouse Road. This includes 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer and 6 -inch diameter watermain.
Prior to any construction, detailed utility construction plans (including plans and profiles) must be
provided in accordance with City requirements.
2. All utility system materials and installation methods shall follow City of Lino Lakes engineering
standards, and the requirements of the Standard Utilities Specifications of the City Engineers
Association of Minnesota. Notes are provided on the plans to that effect.
3. All trenches (including services) shall be backfilled and compacted and meet 100% maximum
Standard Proctor Density in the upper 3 -feet from finished road elevation, and 95% maximum
Standard Proctor Density below the upper 3 -feet.
• 4. Further details regarding the insulation of water and sewer must be provided.
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition Page 4 September 17, 2004
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Watermain
The following comments, specific to watermain are provided as follows:
1. Standard watermain details of the City of Lino Lakes shall be provided, including the following:
Hydrants Waterous Pacer WB -67; Valves - Mueller A2370 -20 or equal; Corp Stop Mueller H-
15000;- Curb Stop and Curb Box - Mueller- H-15 -154 Marge -2 Oraseal and Mueller H -1300 w/lvlpis.
Top. DIP pipe shall be Class 52.
2. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed Minnesota
Department of Health (MDH) Permit for watermain installation.
3. All watermain shall be tested, disinfected approved per the requirements of the City of Engineers
Association of Minnesota Standard Specifications and Minnesota Department of Health prior to
acceptance by the City.
4. With regards to the number and location of hydrants and valves, the plans shall be subject to the
review of the City Fire Cluef.- As_previoualy. mentioned, _th development -wi-11 be served from along
dead end (6 -inch diameter) watermain (Ruffed Grouse Road), and the pressure adequacy at the end of
the main is being ve ified.
Sanitary Sewer
1. The Developer shall provide to the City of Lino Lakes a copy of the completed MPCA Sanitary
Sewer Permit, including correspondence and approval of Metropolitan Council Environmental
Services (MCES).
2. The Utility Plans shall include notes providing for erosion and sedimentation control. The Developer
must provide a televised inspection of all sanitary sewer pipes upon completion of installation. Any
required cleaning of sediment from the sewer pipes after construction shall be the responsibility of
the Developer.
3. All sanitary sewers shall be tested and approved per the requirements of the City of Engineers
Association of Minnesota Standard Specifications prior to acceptance by the City.
4. All sanitary sewer services shall be PVC Schedule 40 or SDR 26.
5. The proposed lift station requires some additional information for review, including the following:
pump and motor specifications, gate valve specs, wet and dry well elevations and sizes, inlet and
force main pipe elevations, etc. If the lift station is intended to be owned and/or maintained by the
City of Lino Lakes, the station must meet all City requirements and shall be subject to the review and
approval of the City Utilities Superintendent.
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition Page 5 September 17, 2004
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Storm Sewer
The Standard Catch Basin detail shown shall be replaced by City of Lino Lakes standard Type 406 or Type
409 as appropriate.
Other
1. A Tree Preservation Plan has been submitted as required. The Plan shall be subject to further review
and approval of the City.
2. Provisions and coordination work for the extension of private utilities to the site (gas, electric,
communication, etc.) shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
3. It is suggested that the street entrance radius at the end of Ruffed Grouse Road be enlarged to provide
for a smoother turning movement on to the new street (i.e., incoming traffic is routed around the
center island area correctly) to mitigate potential vehicle conflicts.
4. Per the requirements of the City of Lino Lakes, basement floor elevations must be at least 4 -feet
above the normal water elevation and 2 -feet above the design flood level. The lowest building
opening must be a minimum of 1 -foot higher than the emergency overflow elevation.
According to the plan, the ordinary high water line of the surrounding wetland is 883.7. The
minimum basement floor elevations as shown on the plan (888.6 and greater) would therefore appear
to be adequate based on comparison to the ordinary high water mark. However, the 100 -year
elevation of the surrounding wetland (as shown on the plan) is 887.6. The minimum floor elevation
would therefore be required to be at least 889.6 for all units. In addition, the high water elevations of
Pond 1 and Pond 2 are 888.32 and 888.61 respectively. Therefore, proposed units adjacent to those
ponds must be at least 2 feet above those respective elevations. In addition to the pond and wetland
elevations, a geotechnical report must be provided in order to ascertain if there are any further
concerns with regards to groundwater elevations.
5. The proposed street serving the property (including the bridge) does not meet standard City
requirements for width and other design requirements such as curb and gutter. In addition, a
geotechnical recommendation is not available to confirm if the existing subgrade material is
adequate, or if it should be removed and replaced with a suitable granular base. It is therefore
expected that the street will be designated as a private street, and this must be clearly established in
an Agreement between the City and the Developer (including all subsequent and future property
owners). In addition, all roadway and bridge maintenance including snow plowing would not be the
responsibility of the City.
Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota
Page 6 September 17, 2004
6. In addition to erosion control requirements, all graded and disturbed areas must be seeded and
established as soon as possible. The City of Lino Lakes has adopted a specific seed specification for
environmentally sensitive areas. The Developer shall attain a copy of the seed specification from the
City and shall seed and restore all graded areas in accordance with the requirements of the City of
Lino Lakes.
7. The Grading Plan includes a note that addresses NPDES permitting requirements. The Developer
shall be aware of recent revisions in the law that has introduced further requirements with regards to
NPDES permitting, including the submittal of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to
the City of Lino Lakes.
8. A certified as -built survey must be provided by the Developer's Engineer upon completion of grading
that certifies that all grading complies with the Grading Plan. This certification shall be required prior
to the issuance of any building permits.
9. Standard platted drainage and utility easements are provided along all property lines and wetland and
detention areas as required. Maintenance activities must be clearly defined in an agreement between
the City and the Developer and the eventual Owners and/or Association.
•
•
•
September 3, 2004
Mr. Ed Vaughan
1432 Pheasant Hills Drive
Lino Lakes, MN 55038
Re: Work plan for Noise, Vibration and Pre - construction building Survey in conjunction with theBridge
and Road Construction at Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition in Lino Lakes, Minnesota; STS
Project 98623 -B
Dear Mr. Vaughan:
The site of the proposed Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition is a ridge of higher and or "island" totally
encircled by a wetland. In order to construct this project, it will be necessary to build a bridge across the
wetland. Because of the depths of compressible organic soils at the bridge site, we have recommended
that the bridge should be supported on driven piles. Your consulting engineer for this project, Loucks and
Associates, Inc., has asked us to provide for the planned activities to monitor and control the potential
noise and vibration impacts to the adjacent residential neighborhood to the west, associated with the pile
driving during this construction. We will also comment on the planned pre - construction building survey of
structural conditions of these houses.
Pre - Construction Building Survey
Prior to the actual construction of any of the earthwork or pile driving for the bridge construction, STS
Consultants, Ltd. on behalf of the developer will conduct an on site observation of each of the residences
within 200 feet of the proposed construction. We anticipate that eight houses will be observed.
Permission to enter into the individual residences will be arranged with the home owner. The inspection
of the home will be conducted by an experienced building condition inspector from STS in conjunction
with a representative of the City of Lino Lakes and the home owner. Photographic, video and written
records of the interior and exterior of the residence will be made, with any existing cracks or distress to
the house detailed. If cracks are observed, crack monitoring gaugesdevices will be installed and
photographed as initial conditions and monitored during the construction. A representative of STS will
be available on site during the pile installation activities to receive communication from the residents and
further assess potential complaints of distress.
Noise
For this project, the use of steel pipe piles have been recommended for support of the bridge. The pile
driving hammer creates impulsive noise (series of repeated sounds) which would slightly exceed the
noise standards for a Noise 1 classification area, namely 60 to 65 decibels. Thus the pile driving should
be restricted to no earlier than 8 AM, and no later than 4 PM, with no pile driving on Saturdays and
Sundays. STS will monitor ambient sound levels within the neighborhood prior to start of construction to
determine a base level of background noise. During the pile driving operations, STS will monitor and
record noise levels intermittently adjacent to the pile driving equipment, at a distance of fifty (50) feet from
the equipment and at adjacent to the exterior of selected houses in the neighborhood, closest to the
construction. The letter from the City dated August 17, 2004, sets a sound level limit criteria of 90
decibels when measured at 50 feet from the equipment. If this sound level is exceeded, modifications to
the pile driving hammer, cushion block or fuel setting will be implemented to reduce the noise level. STS
will coordinate with the piling contractor and developer to verify implementation of any such modification,
and record retesting of the system.
Vibration
•
•
Company
STS Project #
Date
Page 2
With respect to vibration effects from pile driving, we have reviewed actual seismograph data taken
adjacent to pile driving operations. This material was provided to us courtesy of LH Bolduc Company and
Carl Bolander and Sons Company. The seismograph tests indicate that the frequency of the vibrations is
less than 2 cycles per second and the maximum particle velocity recorded, even as close as 15 to 20 feet
from the pile driver, is generally Tess than 1 inch per second. On this basis, there should be no damage
to the nearest house, which is 70 feet from one end of the bridge. It should be noted that the human body
is quite sensitive, and thus occupants of the house might feel some small vibrations, or some crockery
may rattle during the pile driving, but the effects on the structure should be none or negligible.
STS will provide a continuously recording seismograph to the site during all pile driving operations. We
will also establish pre - existing vibration levels in the neighborhood resulting from street traffic such as
garbage or delivery trucks. During construction, vibration levels (amplitude and frequency will be
recorded at the closest house to the pile driving operations and at any nearby home where a complaint is
made. If vibration levels exceed 1 inch /sec particle velocity, modifications to the pile driving will be
necessary. Records of vibration events will be submitted to the City upon completion of the piling
operations, or as any issues or complaints arise.
The pre- condition survey, and pre - construction noise and vibration studies can be initiated upon your
request The results of these surveys can be forwarded to the City if you desire. If we can be of further
service, please call us.
Sincerely,
STS CONSULTANTS, LTD.
James H. Overtoom, P.E.
Principal EngineerNice President
JHO/
cc: Mr. Jeff Shopek — Loucks and Associates, Inc.
C623B001.doc
CENTERVILLE
LAKE
oP
®® ®II!® M�E�pMpE�IM :e d� ®I® ® ®I
94 5 d� P ®e c; "" I'�iar -off re Am)
1•I1�3��a i ", W "�T1' mt ®IlllaoIRlJv '" i ®�11�
a�.�
SHADED AREA DENOTES
PARK LOCATION
MAP
-69-
imm-
OF
• •i • w
• ® • .s®
•
DETAIL OF PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN
LINO LAKES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Note: The island is intended to be Low Density Sewered Residential. A mapping glitch
superimposed the Rural area over the island in the existing maps. The map below shows the
project site as it should have been mapped.
. ■1 i: ,,,,,k`t--!1',.. ,..C.....',E ... ■ t.,,,,,a
*,,E1.. .1',.......Vit,,'_. ....I..3,......
'L. '■•■ " , r.'"--' '
r • 1 i ',
- 7 0 -
Birch Street
!ND
'EY
12
...IE NB ...IN NE
•
5 Line Of N. 1100 P1. Of Oullol 0, PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE -
NH9 °42'31 "E 1306.53
ORDINARY WGN WATER LINE
(6617)
E X C E'P
EDGE OF WOODS @ CATTAILS
AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF
— PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE
'O U N T Y C O N D E M N A T I O N
Nis >? 569 °22'45 "W 72
t "E" €t S 2004
(. Ct r Y F5j_ Levi,..;
-5. Line Of N. 1)00 IF 00 Oul/ol 0. PHE
easant Hills
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino lakes, Minnesota
I u.meroe.ehaverNe°w:
WETLAND
I Ise,wres.
Edge 01
- -Edge 01 Weflond
Lovcs
ASSOCIATES
Edge 0
ORDINARY
WATEP. LINE
(0617)
h
I saes ..
0, II laYer
uwaletan
a, Selma
Aninfnotl Re
EDGE OF TREES AT
TALL GRASSES
000113
0 00 120
SCALE IN FEET
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
WETLAND
Frown No:
911331
C1 -1
S2
•
S. Line 01 0. IMO Ft. 01 Outlet 0, PHEASANT HILLS PRESETWE—,..
Edge 01 de
111 ill.
110°1011 -III■■IZr
......•_ Sali -.11.111 -- Ilf\
441i Md.) !
,111. — ..1
Irv, mar' ^KI
1:i ,- , •,,
, .... , •
V \ \ • -'
/ '•
--',-- --.. .?,,...... •
''< / ,-,\
,,,,,,,, ,, N / 1.. ,
\ ': ,
F.. / \ ,' \
,,' ■
, ,,, \
\ i
/ •.; ■
V- ---- -- ''
, \ /
Outlot A
E X C E10 T.
UNTY
CONDEMNATION
AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF
— PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE
,
1 2(04
ern' °F 4:4 LAN-Pc,
Line 0/ N. 1100 0.
,•
Outlet 0, PHE
easant Hills • •
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino lakes, Minnesota
ED VAUGHAN
1431Plieasi:st Hills Dike
MNSSOMI
LOUCKS
ASSOCIATES
rum • 0d* • lands*
urn., Awhile* • buisen*
Oda
•
270•11.ack -5vbe
Wm..* I.••••n
11.{.1=17E3100.8135
00■124•360
unnehr•Maptuam
Pg-24F-1 11°772g
\ 'S .. ■
. 1 1 ----- '
, ---)
---
,
i
SleniMsre•
r r • r -
I L _
132036
WETLAND
Outlot B
...a Mt LEGEND Pismo
- • -
NORTH
00 120
%MUM=
SCALE 10 FEET
Misname
5ITE LAYOUT
PLAN
911331
C?-1
•
•
heasant Hills I
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE
Outlot A
Li Rie4.m
lo-
a18€F0P- AESEAVA1IO0
/eI TBUCIIIM LIMITS Svs
erk
�g:
er
ED VAUGHAN
1432P102104 NM One
Lim lakes, MN SAM
LOUCKS
ASSOCIATES
• ~
MM.gn aeYrwn tnem�a.ts
Ono
4lmfeen4441
o A.M.
+,nA.e+gT�.vn
I CAM 4Inlem
REMOVE AND RECON5JROC,T,
40 CITY STANDARDS.
r,
/ \ \ \.
/
/ /
NORTH
,oeeersw..anl
00 120
E
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. TM ...too meI relar %1004 mnllec 44, pen lm
=rims e twits p•vlw.s vla a �a1 Pe e.P. nn vmeles..mnm. Iruex Pent
A cN- m
see «� we rope a wee 1» mlm. ar I e e ri eIrt. n i11 see m .ter
.1°." m Pr =5 neon-• l' „V prrmerlY "-ma
In n,r..lrrr�ltn pmeIme Pebm eek�� v.memrilb. lveerrnbv
4. Tm mama.. . 6! .m.. let me.. me mpn4*444 IMIk eon.
ilmicss much rf
spry m iMnNHmatymP, Ibgm me me 14
x e1.Y r ,YY .nvry mime. vl Itemapor.11.0 feenemm.
m- emrM sM' rA >mubemlYm smAllime m M Ise Ms9 �•m ne
t mpY emelP•wsD mre >nei ee I not ro wmm •m*PW nwna.
N M�•vrvsl 4ne4 er - MnWentlrrmr Iv 4neael emntMbn -eev vi r Nr
emrrmen s e Y nmvmnvs h ot mm M. emmlAmlen sae. 'mmOeY v
1, a e l le e r e emnang em e e h b n Menem melec4 Fey 540 Peei Lnirmee Poe
bvelbn p t prober. n tlpeW
er st.e as: i�Me ae�l p
a. Om. mn 44 4414 mnen cm. Innmmes NM be o14Mn. emu.. 54 min
MIOm me s emvmmWe vNn NPOES wmmH r Scene I uu. Be M- lemmep
PrvelOO. • .r emmu m me nl.a t n m e v ben ten.
m mlrmees me mPr Me ellmra m -
a. eU Iq InMn; vmlm ay. n .nPmame Im p ovmva m! mllrc
W. See Only pion end peem imago kr Partner de. rem., ere plump nw,
Q. v mnvmwr. . Fee. may not /Mew. M m pew. sees
.mtrm rot meets eansMeree m n•ee. Ie. each b.
1p, mammy a Ins •e se tan to ...nee Moms Ie In eFlmq r••e•y
LOWEST BASEMENT OPENING.1189.6
LOWEST BASE1AENT =808.6
DNR PROTECTED ELEVe=883.7
100 YP, ELEV =887.6
LOWEST BASEMENT OPENING =809.6
LOWEST BASEMENT =088.6
506 BORINGS DRILLLEO BY
515 CONSULTANTS
p! 3/6/2002
F0 — DENOTES A PLAT HOUSE PAD THAT WIlt AL ON CONSTRUCTION DF A
1W0 STORY, RAMBLER. SPLIT ENTRY. FOUR LEVEL AND MODIFIED TWO STORY
HOME5.
FBLO — DENOTES A NOOSE PAD WITH Feat FEET ELEVATION DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN THE FRONT HOUSE PAD AND REAR H0115E PAD. 1145 WALL
ACCOL400ATE TWO STORY LOOK —IRS, RAMBLER LDDR—OUTS. FOUR LEVEL.
1400■IE0 1W0 STORIES AND SLIT ENTRY WALKOUTS.
FBWO — DENOTES A HOUSE PM WITH E16H1 FEET ELEVATION 014FERENI1
BETWEEN 11E FRONT HOUSE PAD AND THE REM HOUSE PAO. 1045 WILL
ACC044000 E TWO 5TOR1 WALKOUTS. RAMBLER 04100415, POUR LEVEL
NAL0DUTS AN0 MOWED TWO STORIES.
SCALE IN FEET
- TAe..t . 2 tp
;;EP 0 2004 f
CITY OF, Lt, yet LAKE* i
I PmI®Mnals� � •.mn n., l
mom CIVIL LEGEND
SPOSIPPIT UAW.
n P W
AMI W
R
`e
014.6
SPIT 1[11.11011
5711171.1 50•11
SPPRAOP LOA
4
Amman
•
O
-» -
GRADING &
DRAINAGE PLAN
911331
O U N T Y C O N D E M N A11I O N
CUSTOM GRADED AREAS
LOTS 1 -5 WITH RAIN
\\ GARDENS
WETLAN
,100 YEAR FLOOD LINE
Edge Of etlond
Pheasant Hills •
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
dbevemperNene
ED VAUGHAN
1133 Phasml1NB Drive
Lino Lakes MN MOM
00010:0301 semae
loucKs
ASSOCIATES
/03010011. 5.. LO 3
.ms 00TeP _
:�
453
FB —. DENOTES A PLAT HOUSE P00 1HAT VAL. ALLOW CONSTRUCTION
OF A TWO STORY, RAMBLER. SPLIT ENTRY. FOUR LEVEL 0310
100DRIED TWO STORY HOLIES.
FB1.0 — DENOTES A HOUSE PAD WITH 10133 0E01 ELEVATION
D IFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FRONT 0005E PAD AND REAR HOUSE PAD.
1105 WILL ACCOHO0ATE 1010 STONY 1000 -01/15. RAMBLER
01115, FOUR LEVEL. 3000000 TWO STORIES ARI Sill ENTRY
1 4115.
• DENOTES A HOUSE PAD WITH EIGHT FEEL ELEVATION
ONCE BETWEEN THE FROM H005E PAD AND THE REAR HOUSE
01 THIS PALL ACCMODATE 100 STORY WALKOUTS. RAMBLER
U15. FOUR LEVEL WALKOUTS ANO MOODEO TWO STORIES.
GRADING. DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES
l�•an mlw » veer h the 00eelum Wm Iv erect NMI. and
0003 a 0003030. 00 . m 00An9. •.I wen n. tern, fives ewes
0etl w e�un a tome aeu 3x03 ee .nlvrW e�x One vmlrnelm unlP�Iw wtl w mM
n300 100 0000 3 0009
eI e• iwi wannmWN Ie anY."00;00 9 �N:e:I : e0e.;i naa.99 dv :,
• • Pwnhge em 491101..44 x03 rental
s le
rah °ohm neeevwY. Peeemml ellhme ant. sheP
l9 axwnanT. Troth mnbe ld= •Pen
aa� von 33 00ex penal,' .MS IM 003 r 20lm 00 Ieeelbe a44 lsmeme9 anl� be
91 ihe mire. 1. requirement
.aI mess an00 .0.03 end mI ha
0.00.., 11900401 nee. evee
met
M m w9q em
e. seNNts manures M. a nem We construe. Me. e Temper. Red Entrance
00.1 u m Pa.s aI .emel�e ii u� pe al em t. me project. En ,. Pete. 00 Ss.
9m an . e° E.3.3 el el In prefect o.e. Mellen el
S. Lecertes and Sed.entegm contra Memo. Snon be est... awed Per en.
Alentrances and tenaCPtmem Icite•eet.aa peek Red Per axenlmeteem.
rumba, by e ell,
rte er e ON sp peon. sod
N. se. u WIT men and Mom 00.03 0°190 la 10e15a m9a 11000x9 Ilse •term sees.
K el*. are as node. N eP/anwl4n pone
11 0 0 311 ea S 030x03 met ban rt... end P. peal. 93..,
1R E PRESERVATION
ZONE/CONS 11.1311133 0111.111
ROT
1500003:
OONR0 Caad:
VIA
P1000PLAIN FILL:
2400 Cu M.
50L BORINGS PRIMED BY
515 CON51A1 ANTS
ON 3/6/2002
51000.00:'
AIL
OVIL LEGEND PROPOSES
3(0.9
Steens MKT. 0 II
RPM. 112
112
nP000 00 nRN
SPOT UM.
�'�• —i
STOW SEM — > >�—
MOP if EMI@
MAME MALL
EMMEN, tea
TREE Surf /03x11121Iw 11011S
PIS la
Edge 01 Welland
ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE
(883.7)
MTV
LOWEST BASEMENT OPENING =889.6
LOWEST BASEMENT .4386.6
NORTH SCALE IN FEET
ONR PROTECTED ELEV =883.7
100 YR ELEV =BE7.E
LOWEST BASEMENT OPENING =889.6
LOWEST BASEMENT =006.8
1 51001100
GRADING &
DRAINAGE PLAN
0001 50.:
911331
C3.2
•
MIN DOR SILT
ta.■ FOR DETRE
C o UNT Y
CONDEMNATION
:-TE!"' 6 ZON
• .____
\
„r<
--
_-- „ «;-I -.‘ ■•,'_.-. :_,—\ _- _
-..,'”; .• -
__ '\ ----\ -:- - \.\ - '.-'-\ .-:-:: - \ \
, Y — - \' \
_, \ V — 1 \ \
\ ' \ 1 I 1 \v;r '\ \ )
, ) I
I
07)7T 661 FEM.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES.
1 AMC SOR COOMIONS AMWOR MLLPIG
row,,Fri.,. O-6.11g Oil.. TM TOP TIOM EMT Ms Or 1. UM-
PIRE MM. SM. 12 C01.170 10 Oft ..111. 0111,7n1g1RAIIRIALI.
e ennierme SIMS MSIALR SILT mixt PRIOR TO MOILOCI. ammo ernemrs
we smut M.A. SAID KM OLOA11. 0.1.110,
ntrIZIA TSTRIVS Tt:C"OrtrarlISML"7141...
T•E v.. ...ALL AS riMMICO sm Exop.E. 7a MUM"
7 1117 01110011*7 SMIRS SOM.. MS OPERATE. TO .1./. DIST)RMCD ARCA AT
S. 1:11141:117.IRCEI WAS SO 11010020 VOX MOM or r. 10P SOIL
r.r.1.47 11144,1)1= 14.7,1LITIC,11 ollislo 72 1.03.3 Or .1.11. or
arir.nrolsnolIV."firo otts"A "."'" u"" r'"‘"'
17La
OR
PLLOMMIE .10.1. 11,1
SEED
""Y'brkr.comoT
7 SOP 11.1.4,1% KATI 191110,..11.1 IMEAMILLY removoio 105
71( SEM OMILVE mom or A .P.ATI M MUSS MOM WE-
... Do 1st PR.
7. MEM. SMCCI COMIRLETti 7,11A,VEVELDPER SHALL MAN Too MEETS DI An DR-
.ERI AME MU.. M. ARC
1110 80 . (0(1105)711 017 71110710
RIP-RAPIP... Pa3.1 .01-rEZICILITI WILMS siNOCR 7MC MILI7T MOM"
11.1 MED. V170 APPLILAVLE at77 YA7017111C0 II1370ILT SIANBARDS
le. jiiiiilk0,076.113.0.113. SuAti. 1711,11,1 MI Or R■PlaT/013
It Mc PA1rS C.STROMM AS PART Cr C.... MOMMIN
mom CIVIL IDIOM wocem
136.111
mummer nee
emus
WO • WM
wit al
*I IR
pen.. mono.
NNE 77111100 oristmE
1.10/1
N. • Oro.
e. Pe—establish top.. disturbed [seas
171.°Z 'errnuirn" dbivrbed Isem
c. Mum.. posbio
"1.7"tel and mulch mos
0101740gr7*l0074 IA be comoleled MIM 10
artIrP,„°,1
"ErliTaF".
' 10.74.11V7.17.„
ORENNAM HIM (7ATER LOIS
(503.7)
8111 ((NU
CONSTRUCTION or A SILT EKE
SILT MACE .IIITMAKE 111055011
7.r.r:ar....477.1"p:JarrgarnorecUsspn"47.::=1
CAM ORM
ORS.COTION
(tn.)
MR OEMS
VIC
NORTH
0 00 120
SCALE 15 FEET
7 7777 ;4'17"
ROCKENTRMOC17 TO CONSTRUCTION SITE
easant Hills
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
ED VAUGHAN
ND Phnom Nth Dine
Lino Lakes, 00 55030
IoucKs
ASSOCIATES
Plamlo •
•
M...
.7
IssiadobtATZestrEmasAmeemels.
OvafilvEnno.
OMR
I Ow. Indo_
LIO ▪ Rest 0..flom
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
911331
I Nos
•
ORDINARY HIGH WATER LAM
(1383.7)
\
/
1 I ( S.
1
\\
\
( C c
:.„.,/ / ( ,' ) ' -,, •
-7 -- '
' -
, ‘•• 'A.. )
NI -1 (
' \ '
I .1
' /
)
, \
i i 1 1 1
„.-1,- --
-k -- ' 1 1 ill
' / /'
,,
, i
! —7
r; 7oim
TREE PRESERVATION GENERAL NOTES
CONTRAC7OR shob en see. coulee Ow cons1.1.n
ImIls NA... convect. st Nes reels. Ine
CONTRACTOR prelectIen cea. specific 1.111cent
Nees .....11en by
fv=141154"jrn"lii701 li:711;IiSiS•
Ism CIVIL MEMO nom
Tee CONTRACTOR ANA have Nees poinr en slIe el ell
11 en Dalt Is wounded soeslrueli.. Aye CONTRACTOR
17"r1W":"D7e7s:s"1.1:171.1=1:iii"rf 'Arron".0%ns reltree7";
Ofeclee _O. NAL 1. TRACTOR .. Anm.lely
unto, Me OMER. Oro AD 4. torn pontos! the CIO ENDO. son.
entl/eir elher
10008 PROTECTOR ZONE - XEEP OUT ,TREE PROTECTION
TYPICAL PLASTIC TAPE
(NTS/
TREE PREITECTION AREA
Ass.s.so nes • AA.
tnnt
134S700 GRADING AREA:
LOTS 1-5
EACH LOT PILL FE EXAMINED 10 mmesizr TREE ROADV
A PLAN DEMING TREE PRESERVATION WILL BE PRESE TED
WHEN BUILONG PERMIT 15 APPLIED FOR
7
1.
V
A
7
0
SPECIFICATIONS.
MONUMENT
h1012711
0 70 120
SCALE 114 FEET
CONSISTS IN A POST ARD 0 TREE PRESERvATION SIGN
TREE PRESERVATION SIGNS
NOUNTED OLISH NON WE TOP or TIC P0810
rATIEMED VIM NMREMOVADLC SERENA OR R.NETS
POST MAT S
SOLIARE
TREATED AILIOR OR GOER LITT APPROVED MATERIAL
POST INSTALLATION
11071140E0 TO m 1E100 DE FOUR FEET AMINE GRADE
SET AT LEAST 12 MRCS IN THE GROUND
INSTALLER AT VON LOT LIIE WHERE IT CROSSES A
10110 A MAXIM*, SPAC/NG Or 200
0001 107*00* 5(814*
10 ro.t0u 000410 (85100 VitV""'
TREE PRESERVATION MONUMENT
heasant Hills
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
1*00100000(000410070
20 VAUGHAN
1432 Ph000r4 041142.10
Moo lak44 AN 54032
Loucks
ASSOCIATES
riaa* • le.341,Ing
•
.amlls.1.11maka
1147130*17001100
Aleppyl
CA000... /
"Itge 11773,
":43r±er
ii.:Frietr7;'=r "Z:Ey
WAX
1,9■1+
C1:1 Sheam
kantmdan
lahomMi.
40.70404,4.04na
m mow,
1 51100 Tok.
TREE
PRESERVATION
PLAN
(70400 5,.,
911331
I sm..:
C3.4
OUNT Y
CONDEMNATION
,,
,
„ t •-■
■.- V
, -
WETLAND
44
—
.
t- ■ .
ti
.?-4)
.,,:. ..
, ,
a -
a.. ' ' ', / ' sE. 41'
,,`S7'ttk,‘ I -•• .
tk.,,AL . - -r----4%,.....`V.,
''''
...''... ....I24.:
, /,_ . ',.,,,Lc., la•C a, -'7, V ---,
.,■
,, \
- ' ''•
\ \ •.,
„
%
,i
lg.& _ \p, ..
'
4
PRESERVA3 •:--4, ...
■■%0 A , , • * s ' !-----„,' , 6 '',
' 4-,- -' rt - _;.- , ---,,.k.7"--/ '••• '
"
--, ' - *": ,,-,.-:,-'. :‘ -. '' , $ ',`,' t , 1 • 6.. , r -7 — . , . '- ', ' 4 ' '
i 1.' ,,
'-i se_ , ,' ;-• Ti- 1 / ,„; . CC .1v. "
•
' • ■ th,---,w.,--' .: ' ' *--
—____. ...-...
-----_____ si,,,,..„.y,--,.•
____ .4.--_,,,,,
_.......„
TREE PRESERVATION GENERAL NOTES
CONTRAC7OR shob en see. coulee Ow cons1.1.n
ImIls NA... convect. st Nes reels. Ine
CONTRACTOR prelectIen cea. specific 1.111cent
Nees .....11en by
fv=141154"jrn"lii701 li:711;IiSiS•
Ism CIVIL MEMO nom
Tee CONTRACTOR ANA have Nees poinr en slIe el ell
11 en Dalt Is wounded soeslrueli.. Aye CONTRACTOR
17"r1W":"D7e7s:s"1.1:171.1=1:iii"rf 'Arron".0%ns reltree7";
Ofeclee _O. NAL 1. TRACTOR .. Anm.lely
unto, Me OMER. Oro AD 4. torn pontos! the CIO ENDO. son.
entl/eir elher
10008 PROTECTOR ZONE - XEEP OUT ,TREE PROTECTION
TYPICAL PLASTIC TAPE
(NTS/
TREE PREITECTION AREA
Ass.s.so nes • AA.
tnnt
134S700 GRADING AREA:
LOTS 1-5
EACH LOT PILL FE EXAMINED 10 mmesizr TREE ROADV
A PLAN DEMING TREE PRESERVATION WILL BE PRESE TED
WHEN BUILONG PERMIT 15 APPLIED FOR
7
1.
V
A
7
0
SPECIFICATIONS.
MONUMENT
h1012711
0 70 120
SCALE 114 FEET
CONSISTS IN A POST ARD 0 TREE PRESERvATION SIGN
TREE PRESERVATION SIGNS
NOUNTED OLISH NON WE TOP or TIC P0810
rATIEMED VIM NMREMOVADLC SERENA OR R.NETS
POST MAT S
SOLIARE
TREATED AILIOR OR GOER LITT APPROVED MATERIAL
POST INSTALLATION
11071140E0 TO m 1E100 DE FOUR FEET AMINE GRADE
SET AT LEAST 12 MRCS IN THE GROUND
INSTALLER AT VON LOT LIIE WHERE IT CROSSES A
10110 A MAXIM*, SPAC/NG Or 200
0001 107*00* 5(814*
10 ro.t0u 000410 (85100 VitV""'
TREE PRESERVATION MONUMENT
heasant Hills
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
1*00100000(000410070
20 VAUGHAN
1432 Ph000r4 041142.10
Moo lak44 AN 54032
Loucks
ASSOCIATES
riaa* • le.341,Ing
•
.amlls.1.11maka
1147130*17001100
Aleppyl
CA000... /
"Itge 11773,
":43r±er
ii.:Frietr7;'=r "Z:Ey
WAX
1,9■1+
C1:1 Sheam
kantmdan
lahomMi.
40.70404,4.04na
m mow,
1 51100 Tok.
TREE
PRESERVATION
PLAN
(70400 5,.,
911331
I sm..:
C3.4
1
RE,C,EIVED
I ::;EP 2004
CITY OF 1 iN
Outlot A
.513. 3 ENTRY. INPIATEN
row NATETILM/5 IMOLA.
INP•C
• .4E
Sin
TENNANT 5
MATE VALVE
NH 4
;Fe 14.'41
,, T „
,-'-_-' \. '0,, /
,,. .x ---._
-- ,
/ `i,-
,
—
\ ,
/ \
.
\ ,
\ / ,
,
, . \ /
,'
, \
V- ---- —
■ e
1 1 .' . \ ,, /
.S li
1 , / . \ 1
1 1 / \
. . \ I
,
IC
UTILITY GENERAL NOTES
son.. leen.. elerm saver end notermeln .1411. shod lurnhhed env
se7 me 017*000040 o■ 1110 opeNnerobene. *77 .100 N.
WAN. specilitaNen 97 Ow SANnare Walton el *sm. (ESANT, 11199
adllIaN Ad TOPE toenectio. le emcee. men... JEN be mended .1111
trr...111,11T'.':,11::7.:M=1'17 st\ 00000 ""'"
2 Sae Pad C8-1 end Me awned edeolikolla. sped. v0512 dela. and WAIN
sere. Moth
.1 least 45
nol e• nod lenoeellne nub. 9t415..
5. A.LITemllz= and water Amnion Mad terminate at Me properly One on..
5 The matrix. Mal NEIN GOPHER STATE OK CALL al 051-454-01302 al leost
de hem pr.. ony ammo.. • underground mak.
00000007.0,41000*7010*0191*0*0.9010*0.00.1* the ...Yarn al Me ON-
E, tralhe contra! PINT be provided h. The contractor and Mae he retobroPed Pa
rmoimments el Me Emma. Wm.! el L.Ionn Nellie Centro, NeuTees (PINCI4)
V. eba IN 1.0,41,0.,. daehers and baggers ot
and Me DI Ned le •
AenetnTat trl .""
A. nen nenerrne• muel nave o relemeal al 7, lea al ea.,
crrn"
"..-
174.7
ME SINES
Serae, 5.er Pet 4" SerNee la ereopty
tfer11:'"' RCP CLASS 5 P3' diameter.
POLYETHYLENE Beet el ewe.
MN 2 INPVC
7C so-St •
did 52.50 MANTLE
EE PVC
Outlot B
NORTH
0 BO 120
SCALE IN FEET
SLEW. EXTEND TO MARIAM ARO LENITY EASPENT.
2 SP( PESTS C3.1 AND C3.3 POP PORN St•IER SESEN
Nam OPT MVP
oonnomon.mme
0
=Ea •
•
eme•Rvt •
>>
ETE —1-1 1—
1
heasant Hills „
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
NP •
ED VAUGHAN
1437 Phnom Drive
Lino Lake; MN 5503B
LOUCICS
ASSOCIATES
el.,mme • o■liendreeft •
Lerelaemenliens. • 1,...e1
•
Trial.....e.dedefoo
eme•pele.
NANdentoDUR3.1.3.5
foe •••••■•22
Nye.
1 Ihologinnal SWAIM
1 Umld v exertnii
ldereEmPeen
ET
INA.eceadann
CIT BeimalkfmeMn
C3.3 *Neva.
[Yr
cm N...
ole: 1
UTILITY
PLAN
911331
1 moo no •
C4.1
I x
' X
1
0.
1
'
,
10. Of WWI PKAPPIP INDEME
tfla OP P4 tr. n AM OPPIPAPAPIP PIUS PPLPS1771,, •
141.0,12.3,r UMW
\LS-
MP nso-
tsr,,o4==arts,u
's.'• °idiot A -It k •-=-, •
• ‘.;
T
E 5 C 1 1 0 N
•
.~a'a
NORTH
r
i ' r
100 200
SCALE IN FEET
5804744 "313.a3,---_,.s,
?
7— T -T•
P4 le. Par 170lal PRCIPLAW -■-.
•
a fit 2004
CTV O I.San.:—.S I
t
Ip
1
- _
; " I
sia.stn,. I
I • I
- somas —
EXCEPTION
P
.)>-= ,.....',;,—.„41.4„--_—.;ie.,..,‘!,•.,,,-„,t7---,...... -.,
i- A' .-.,-.:::.......r,f4;. -,k,, --::•<,;y,:"....,-., \
/' '1 ' 1 , 1 '-c`•-•'`, 'N'---::.- ----.. -•:-..•
'''. Ff.: V,' 'Z's_■-•..-- - 4•,:,z:•':-. •Z`'•:-.:•:•>: \
(.__--•:I'.--), --X '■.::;;','--:‘,-• ‘
ri,' ( , • , /-z------;(:--___.„- -- -,.<, \ \ ,
v. ',J.,..• ',...-7-----7/--------:-,:;•,',:,\ ,. ' ,•-•
■ , i: 1
,' \ ‘.-:->:'\\,:::, 112 I
--' 1 ' = , -
--- irLA•
.--) k -------/ • ,j
-• r.-2.`-.-;•:‹'
. . ,
1 L.....--,-;.; , ;.•„:z E:
2,F17,1
tc•
refs zotesud As Oak,/ —
CanZI. PIrlfrc 0 • Ifta
ZZ.',1r7CP °,41.tr'
SEI0222.451T 80001
easant Hills
Preserve
12th Addition
Lino Lakes, Minnesota
000000100003006.00 1
ED VAUGHAN
IlllObSl5010101IlSSjoS
1001ake5001550311
Loucks
ASSOCIATES
Ph., • 1.111piare.f
Pr.brarwa 4.Paamesol
PPP
•
Tteoltanktrilme•Me
ISIte•
1051000000100601
Pas PILMOLSIPIP
"mmlnrrhamr■praunno
WEILAND
SZIS.22,91f. 380.47
OuBot B
EXCEPTION
WEILAND
... -. ,
'7 '' -----
• X / 3---
'11 / /1 ----'' \
,/ X ,/
- 1 ,
1 /
•\ / i j ' I
----V
••• courouu
••.•• SPITT ELM
CORRENT ZONING: R-X EXECIMM)
PRITINTREO num. M-X MINGLE EMMY)
PROPOSED DIDLERIC SETBACNS,
MONT . 30 MET
SIDE 10 FEU
REIM 30 0207
580224020 309.80
269.2&111, MoN
mom ass s. sus a rer
40616.;30430100!!8
el
01"
51-
ssz r._
Mrg..18P.0211FT rrgre. taw or__
Clmt29.31 Rtrx
0—Assx. i or3F,A7.-
1110.V..7 ^
i 1,"16""MBA.PC,V.
Na2.41151" 302.40 1,129.J2
I Fin! 11
—
5
sup. termer
1 S
PRELIMINARY PLAT
91-1331
C6-1
4,
O^I
EDGE OF DECK
(TYP.)
NORTH
B.M. ELEV. 894.32
LOCATION: TOP OF COVER OF EXISTING MANHOLE AT
ENO OF EXISTING RUFFED GROUSE ROAD.
20' -0" ROADWAY
1 • -0"
70• -O' 1 f0• -O"
7' -O"
RAIL
-
LANE jl
C RUFFED
GROUSE ROAD & —.-
- - WORKING - UNE
6' -O"
LANE
6• -O"
CLUED
RAIL
• �__�`��
w rt-
p
TIMBER CURB
(Typ,)
FL FORCE SEWER
�— MAIN SYSTEM
9" MIN.
-2.0X
FE WATER MAIN �1
SYSTEM
1 PROP. FINISHED
PROFILE GRADE
-2_01T
LAMINATED
RAIL (TYP.)�
'r
;
ri
„,
•,__.
...
3" FORCE SEWER MAIN ® O8" WATER MAIN SYSTEM
SYSTEM W/ INSULATION W/ INSULATION
3 SPACES 8 6' -0" = 78' -0"
2 -0"
NOTE:
ABUTMENT PILES ARE TO BE 72" DIA C.I.F. CONCRETE PILING.
PIER PILES ARE TO BE 16" OM. C.I. P. CONCRETE PILING.
RECTANGULAR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS,
TRANSVERSE
SECTION THRU DECK
SCALE:
p• Y' 4
SCHEDULE OF QUANTITIES FOR
THE ENTIRE BRIDGE
ITEM NO.
2021.507
MOBILIZATION
ITEM
2401.501
STRUCTURAL
CONCRETE
(7443)
2401.507
STRUCTURAL
CONCRETE
(3143)
2401.512
BRIDGE
5749
CONCRETE
(37'33)
2401.541
REINFORCEMENT
BARS
2401.547
REINFORCEMENT
BARS
(EPDXY
0047ED)
2401.601
STRUCTURE
EXCAVATION
2401.601
SLOPE
PREPARATION
2402.590
ELA5TOMERIC
BEARING
PAD
TYPE 1
2402.597
EXPANSION
JOINT
DEVICE
TYPE 4.0
OUANRTY
UNIT
LUMP SUM
X (P)
CU. 7'0.
X (P)
CU YD.
6714 (P)
50. FT.
X (9)
POUND
X (P)
POUND
LUMP SUM
LUMP 5U14
40
EACH
44 (9)
LIN. FT.
3x12 TIMBER FASCIA
ON DECK, BETWEEN
R477 POC75 (71P )
3x12 TIMBER FASCIA
ON BEAMS BETWEEN
PIER CAPS (91P.)
SOUTH
0 ARCHITECTURAL TEXTURE TREATMENT AND COLOR SYSTEM SHALL BE
AS DETAILED BY LOUCKS & ASSOCIATES. SEE ABUTMENT AND PIER
SHEETS FOR PLACEMENT DETAILS.
() INCLUDES ALL TIMBER, HARDWARE AND STRUCTURAL STEEL REQUIRED
FOR RAILING.
() INCLUDES ALL TIMBER, HARDWARE AND STRUCTURAL STEEL REOUIRED
FOR TIMBER FASCIA.
'J INCLUDES ALL PIPE, CONNECTORS, INSULATION AN0 PIPE HANGERS
REOUIRED FOR FORCE SEWER MAIN SYSTEM.
0 INCLUDES ALL PIPE, CONNECTORS. INSULATION AND PPE HANGERS
REQUIRED FOR WATER MAIN SYSTEM.
ITEM NO,
ITEM
2402.595
BEARING
ASSEMBLY
2403.502
TREATED
TIMBER
071ANTITY
UNIT
EACH
2403.603
GLUED
LAMINATED
RAIL TYPE 1
O
X (P)
2405502
RECTANGULAR
PRESTRESSED
CONCRETE
BEANS
22'
1205 (P)
241 1.604
ARCHITECTURAL
TEXTURE
TREATMENT
2417.604
ARCHITECTURAL
COLOR
SYSTEM
0
x
2452.507
C.I.P.
CONCRETE
PILING
DELIVERED
12"
X
2452.507
C.I.P.
CONCRETE
PILING
DELIVERED
16"
X
2452.508
C.I.P.
CONCRETE
PILING
DRIVEN
72"
2452.500
C.I.P.
CONCRETE
PILING
DRIVEN
76"
X
2452.519
C.I.F.
CONCRETE
TEST PILE
X FT. LONG
12"
X
2452.519
CAP.
CONCRETE
TEST PILE
X FT. LONG
16"
X
2503.601
FORCE
SEWER
MAN
SYSTEM
4
1
2504.601
WATER
MAIN
SYSTEM
2511.501
RANDOM
RIPRAP
CLASS If
X
M BOARD FT
LIN. FT.
LIN. FT.
50. 7'0.
50. YD.
LIN. FT.
LIN. FT.
LIN. 17.
UN. T1.
EACH
EACH
LUMP SUM
LUMP 5U
Cu. YD.
DESIGN D�
2002 A.A.S.H.T.O. DESIGN SPE
LOAD FACTOR DESIGN METHOD - H520 LOADING
INCLUDES 77 P5F DEAD LOAD ALLOWANCE FOR
FUTURE WEARING COURSE MODIFICATIONS.
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DESIGN STRESSES:
REINFORCED CONCRETE:
Fc = 4000 P57 n = 8
ty = 60000 951 REINFORCEMENT
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE:
Fc = 8500 P57 n = 1
is = 270000 P57 STRANDS
STRUCTURAL STEEL:
7y = 36000 951 SPEC. 3.306
DECK AREA = 6774 5.2.
OPERATING RATING = H5
DESIGN SPEED = 30 MPH
LIST OF SHEETS
610
TITLE
TYPICAL SECTION & OU491717ES
2 1 GENERAL PLAN & ELEVATION
\:I
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED
BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
NoT Fag
LTC NO 22737
Cp145T3R o�iONN
2004
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ERICKSON ENGINEERING
9330 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437
RUFFED GROUSE ROAD ANOKA COUNTY
PHEASANT HILLS
PRESERVE BRIDGE
LOCATED 0.3 MILES NORTH OF JET BIRCH 5T.
ON RUFFED GROUSE ROAD OVER A WETLAND
IN PHEASANT HILLS PRESERVE 12TH ADDITION.
6 -50' PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM SPANS
20 FT, ROADWAY, 0' SKEW
SPAN IDENTIFICATION NO. 507
TYPICAL SECTION & QUANTITIES
SEC. 28 TWP, 31 N R 22 W
CRY: LINO LAKES
COUNTY: ANOKA
DES.: TJW 1 ORN.1 NBB 7PR0,7. NO.
CHK.: RAB 1 CHK.: RAB (SHEET 7 OF 2 SHEETS
1
w
305'-2" OUT TO OUT OF DECK
2' 7"
50' -0" 50' -0" 50 –O" 50' -0"
J+'
—¢ 887.. W. ABUT.
w PT. F1c ^ .. a P _
i ¢ PIER I I
I N PT. aB" r. a a v " w I
—¢ PIER 2 %¢ PIER 3
/r o
/ a. PTT L "a w ., a w a _ (rrr W. PT. "O" a•�
I/
a
¢�
e
I —¢ PIER 4
//� Wa PT. ..E" c w I� `.
ld wlj_e_
I ¢ PIER 5 ¢ 887., E. ABUT.--,
W. Pi. 'Y° a W.PT^ .G.
A
_
lI
EXPANSION \
JOINT DEVICE, `GLUED LAMINATED RAIL (TYP.) ¢ RUFFED GOOSE ROAD
TYPE 4 0 & WORKING LINE
__ _ _ _
W. PT. "H' _ -- _ — _ — W. PT. ;1" W. PT. "K^ _ _ — – (j90
STA. 7 +85.95 �TA 2+ }5.95 �– STA. 2 +85.95 ).o
EL. 893.73 1 EL. 893.30 EL. 892.86 J
O
1
O]
I
\ W. PT. L o
`STA. S +J5.95 i
EL. 892.43 0
W"
3
'o
I
w N
Z
5
U
C'c'
1
Oti_
U
0p
I
I\ W. PT. M _ _ —'
I `STA. 3 +8595
EL. 897.99 —
t BRACKET
1
N'. PT. "N" W. PT. ^P" /
STA. 4 +35.95 STA. 4+85.95 J
EL. 891,59 EL 897.72
I
,
l
BEG.
STA
EL.
..\_ W. PT. ••R^ ^ .. .\ .. :�
OF DECK `TIM @ER
7 +83.36 & RAIL
893.75 MP.)
�W.6 P7. `5^ " T " PTT ^.. I W. PT .U.
84118021 `TIMBER FASCIA ON
SPACER DECK &BEAMS
(TYP.)
PLAN
e W. PTF .�N,. .. n W. Pi. ^X^ I a
W.4 PT. .V
ENO OF DECK
STA. 4 +86.53
EL. 891.10
: 00
I i^-'L
I
2' -0"
(TYP.)
s
I N�,p'.. v SCALE C� •
. .. Z£1
F MT or;
PROP. FINISHED
LOW MEMBER PROFILE GRADE
3 -0 GLUED LAMINATED RAIL (TYR.) EL. 888.7
(TYP.) –0.87N
� --
f-.E__.
_
1= "_'_I�1 —_ 1= = =.1= �f_.I_i_I�- 1=1=1= 1 _t =1=1= =I L... =� 1 —_f_=- t� =1= 1_L�M'
.:s.
SPAN 1 i;r
PIER
R
SPAN 2 SPAN 3
:.ei: . _. �.,'i:::
SPAN 4 i::+ SPAN 5 'rs SPAN 6
W. ABUT.
- --
TIMBER RAIL8057 (778.)
TIMBER FASCIA (TYP.)
1 PIER
100 YR. FLOOD
EL. 867.6
2
PIER
L APPROX. CHANNEL BOTTOM
. 7
EL 893.7
3 PIER
EXISTING GROIJNDLINE
_ ®¢ PROP. ROADWAY
4 PIER
—
e+Ar�i
i RANDOM WRAP
CLASS III AVG. E. ABUT.
5 3' -0" THICK
(TYP.)
6" GRANULAR FILTER RANDOM WRAP
INCLUDED IN PRICE CLASS 51 AVG.
BID FO RANDOM 7
ELEVATION RIPRAP• CLASS ID 6" THICK
SCALE, —
o' to' 20'
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
eETrrvrEO BY gtICT10N
THE 2000 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION"
SHALL GOVERN.
E Wow a La BENSON
'NOT
LTC NO 22737 2004
THE FIRST TWO DIGITS OF EACH BAR MARK INDICATE THE BAR
SIZE IN MILLIMETERS. BAPS MARKED WITH THE SUFFIX "E" SHALL
BE EPDXY COATED.
ENGINEER IN THE FIELD SHALL VERIFY PROPER POSITIONING OF
THE BRIDGE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. IF
THE BRIDGE POSITIONING 15 NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE SITE
WHEN STAKING 15 COMPLETED. THE SEALING ENGINEER SHALL BE
NOTIFIED.
IF STATIONING 75 CHANGED, THE REVISED PLANS SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER.
RUFFED GROUSE ROAD ANOKA COUNTY
PHEASANT HILLS
PRESERVE BRIDGE
GENERAL PLAN & ELEVATION
I A.
DES. TJW OR, N89 0.1. PR NO
CIC1.18., RAB C1477., RAB SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
1
•
•
•
•
IL`
•