HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/25/1989 Council Minutes (2)2941
COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called
to order by Mayor Benson at 7:15 P.M., Monday, September 25,
1989. Council members present: Mayor Benson, Neal, Reinert,
Bohjanen, Bisel. City Attorney Bill Hawkins, City
Administrator Randy Schumacher, Public Works Director Don
Volk, City Engineer Ron Stahlberg, City Planner John Miller,
and Administrative Assistant Daniel Tesch were also present.
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Work Session, September 11, 1989 - Mr. Bisel moved to approve
the minutes as presented. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion.
Motion carried with Mayor Benson abstaining.
Regular Council Meeting, September 11, 1989 - Mr. Reinert
moved to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Bisel
seconded the motion. Motion carried with Mayor Benson
abstaining.
CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF DISBURSEMENTS
September 25, 1989 -- Mr. Bohjanen moved to approve the
disbursements as presented. Mr. Reinert seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
OPEN MIKE
No one appeared under open Mike.
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF LINO LAKES AND THE CITY OF BLAINE FOR SUNSET ROAD
Mr. Bohjanen began the discussion by asking if this
agreement would remain in effect until such time that the
City of Lino Lakes would be able to service this area. Mr.
Stahlberg replied that the city would never be able to serve
this sectic, of the cit-. A joint powers agreement is the
best way to handle this type of arrangement.
Mr. Schumacher stated that the city has a policy of insuring
that all residents pay the same fee for utilities, regardless
of whether they hook -up with a neighboring community or not.
Mr. Schumacher suggested that staff meet with the City of
Blaine to arrange for this. Mayor Benson asked Mr.
Schumacher if that meant we should hold off on approving this
JPA tonight. Mr. Schumacher said yes. Mr. Reinert moved
that city staff meet with Blaine and bring this issue back at
its next meeting. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Motion
carried.
1
1
29
COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONE OF RESHANAU PARK ESTATES,
OCTOBER 23, 1989, 7:45 P.M.
Mr. Reinert moved to set a public hearing for the rezone of
Reshanau Park Estates for October 23, 1989 at 7:45 P.M. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Bisel. Motion carried.
SITE PLAN REVIEW, TAX INCREMENT FINANCE PLAN REVIEW,
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR MAIN STREET SHOPS (FORMERLY ROSS'
CORNER SHOPPES)
City Planner John Miller began his presentation by stating
that after 3 years of work, it appeared as though this
project was nearly ready to begin. He added that Mr. Jerry
Anderson of Marcor properties, and Mr. Dan Boxrud of SEH
were also present to speak.
Mr. Anderson placed a plan of the site behind the council for
viewing. He explained that the size of the site has doubled,
and that they have a purchase agreement for the property to
the east. The center now has 21,000 square feet, and parking
has increased to 4.9 stalls per 1,000 square feet of space.
Mr. Anderson continued that they have met Mr. Miller's
issues, and will be sodding the boulevard and installing
underground sprinklers. Mr. Bisel inquired about the
county's thoughts on this issue. Mr. Anderson replied that
the County had requested only 2 entrance /exits, but will not
oppose 3.
Mr. Anderson stated that they had met with the homeowners
directly to the east of the property, Mr. and Mrs. Patrick
Golden of 866 Main Street. Mr. and Mrs. Golden were
consulted as to the type of screening and landscaping they
would be comfortable with.
At this time Mr. Dan Boxrud with the engineering firm of SEH
was introduced to discuss drainage. Mr. Boxrud explained
that the drainage of this property was to the south. Mr.
Boxrud has also checked on the drainage of the First Star
Bank and was able to determine tat the wate_ table for this
area is at the bottom of the pond. He felt that if the
bottom of the pond were made deeper, this would solve the
drainage issue.
Mr. Ron Batty with the firm of Holmes and Graven discussed
the affect of this project on our Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) district 1 - -3. He informed the council that the laws
governing TIF projects has changed sl ightly, and now make
them a safer bet for cities. The new plan was described as a
"pay as you go" plan. No bonds are involved, and the
developer is given a portion of the :increment as it is
created. Therefore, if he does not pay his taxes, he will
296
COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
receive no increment. This reduces the risk to cities,
especially if development does not occur. The agreements are
fairly simple, and the city is able to recoup any costs
incurred in the first year.
Mayor Benson asked Mr. and Mrs. Golden if they were
comfortable with the screening arrangements? They replied
yes, and were happy that Mr. Anderson had visited them. They
had 2 concerns, I was the possibility of a gun shop going
into at the corner. Mr. and Mrs. Golden oppose hunting. The
second concern was the safety of the intersection. Mr.
Hawkins replied that a gun shop is a permitted use in this
zone. Mayor Benson addressed the safety factor stating that
by building this center, there would be greater visibility at
the intersection. He added that we would eventually like to
see a light at this intersection. Mr. Stahlberg stated that
we do not yet qualify for a light under county standards at
this intersection. Dollars for traffic signals are also
scarce for the time being.
Mr. Bohjanen asked Mr. Jim Winkles of Marcor Properties if a
"sit down" restaurant were planned for this site. Mr.
Winkles stated that some interest has been shown, but
restaurants were very difficult to get off the ground. The
idea of a car wash was also raised, but it was stated this
would be a bad site for a car wash, and there was no room for
one anyway. There is no room for expansion at this site.
Mr. Bisel moved to approve the site plan for Main Street
Shops as specified by the Planning and Zoning Committee, and
recommended by Mr. John Miller. Mr. Neal seconded the
motion. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Bisel urged the
residents to work through the planner on this project.
Mr. Bohjanen moved to approve the Tax Increment Financing
Plan as prepared by Mr. Ron Batty by adopting Resolution #68-
89. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously. See the end of the minutes for this resolution.
Mr. Bisel moved to approve the developer's agreement as
prepared by Mr. Ron Batty guaranteeing construction and
schedules Marcor Pru_-erties for Main Street Shops. Mr.
Reinert seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Benson thanked the Goldens for coming to tonights
meeting.
MINOR SUJBDIVISION -- METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
Mr. Miller updated the council as to the situation regarding
this manor subdivision. The Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission is interested in purchasing a 12' x 30' parcel of
land located on North Road. This land is the site of a meter
1
1
1
297,.
COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
station . The Minnesota Department of Transportation
inadvertently transferred its interest in the land to the
adjacent property owners not knowing the station was there.
The MWCC has reached an agreement with the property owner to
buy back the site of the station. The planning and zoning
board has recommended approval. Mr. Bisel moved to approve
the variance and minor subdivision for the MWCC. Mr. Reinert
seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
SITE PLAN REVIEW - PRAISE OF HIS GLORIES MINISTRIES
Mr. Miller informed the Council of the request by Praise of
His Glories Ministries for construction of a prayer center
and garage at the east end of Holly Drive. Mr. Miller has
included the planning and zoning recommendations in his
packet to the council. Mayor Benson inquired as to whether
there was room for expansion at this site. Mr. Miller said
yes, but that he would never recommend expansion. Mr. Bisel
asked Ms. Barbara Walker of PHG Church to explain their
church. Ms. Walker explained that this was an Ecumenical
Church, and the site was to be a silent prayer retreat for
adults. They are presently located in Roseville, and are a
non - profit organization. A questions was raised as to the
traffic that this center would create. Ms. Walker replied,
2 -4 individuals on a daily basis, with 30 at 1 meeting a
month. Mr. Bisel moved to approve this site plan, with the
planner's recommendations for a change in the drain field.
Mr. Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY PLANNER'S REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING THE CITY
OF CENTERVILLE'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Mr. Miller explained that Metro Council requires that
adjoining cities be notified if a city is amending their
comprehensive plan. Mr. Miller noted that in Centerville's
Plan, on page 22, there is a proposal to annex a portion of
Lino Lakes that is just west of 35E. Mr. Miller met with a
representative of Metro Council who suggested that the city
take action to voice our opposition `o this plar. Mayor
Benson agreed that this would a good idea. Mr. Hawkins added
that it is virtually impossible for a city to annex a portion
of another city without that city's blessing. Mr. Bisel
voiced his concern that Centerville did not contact us with
regards to their proposed annexation. He felt it did not
make for good communications. Mr. Reinert moved to adopt
Resolution 79 -89 opposing Centerville's proposed annexation
per their draft Comprehensive Plan, and asked that it be
forwarded to Centerville. Mr. Bisel seconded the motion.
Motion passed unanimously.
COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
PROJECT STATUS REPORT - SECOND AVENUE-
Mr. Ron Stahlberg of TKDA presented on the overhead a cross
section of the building up of second avenue. Mr. Stahlberg
explained the various layers of geotextile fabric, granular
and common borrow that we need to placed on second avenue.
He added that he would be meeting with state officials for
funding, DNR for permits, and then seek approval from the
State Aid Engineer. We may also need to acquire some right -
of -way for this project. Mr. Bisel asked Mr. Stahlberg how
high above the ground would this sit. Three to four feet was
his reply. The road will be 44 feet wide. He added that it
will look just like fourth avenue when completed.
Mr. Bisel inquired as to time lines for this project. Two to
three months was the reply. Mr. Bisel asked if we were going
to be using our old borings from this area. Mr. Stahlberg
replied yes. Mr. Neal asked about easements. Mr. Stahlberg
replied that they were being done now.
Mr. Dale Tressler of Rustic Lane inquired how he would be
able to access his property due to the proposed improved
height of second avenue. He added that he felt the lots he
had were saleable. Mr. Stahlberg stated that the lots Mr.
Tressler owns are not saleable, unless he would acquire
additional property from the adjoining owner.
Mr. Jack Menkveld questioned how long the compacting material
would be on the road, and what residents would be able to do
in the mean time. Mr. Stahlberg replied that the compacting
material would be on the road for as long as 6 months, during
which time no one would be able to use the road. Mr. Neal
questioned what residents of the road would do for access.
Mr. Stahlberg replied that they would be able to use the
present road off to the side of the improved orie.
Mr. Bisel and Mr. Volk discussed possible additions of fill
or sheer planes; problems associated with running a road
through a swamp. Mayor Benson added that the County seems to
be doing a better job of putting roads through areas with
m- _r-ginal soils. Mr. Bisel moved to pro., ed with thi_.. project
that is to include submitting plans and obtaining permits.
Mr. Bisel added that this should have been completed 6 months
ago. Mr. Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
STATUS OF STREETS IN LAKEVIEW PLACE
Mr. Stahlberg informed the council that Braun Testing made
recommendations on the streets in Lakeview Place, and that
those recommendations were put into place. Mr. Bisel
stated that this should be done prior to October 15, 1989.
The council gave Mr. Stahlberg until the October 23rd
meeting. Staff informed the Council that Mr. Roessler was
1
29
COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
anxious for the return of his money. The Council said that
he would get his money when the job was completed. Mr. Volk
suggested that a portion be retained until after the 1 year
guarantee was completed. He would have a recommendation on
this at the October 23rd meeting.
One final item, Mr. Stahlberg informed the Council that Anoka
and Ramsey County would be rebuilding Ash Street in 1991.
The council agreed that this was good news.
GAMBLING ORDINANCE DISCUSSION
Mr. Hawkins explained that Mr. Schumacher had forwarded to
his office a copy of the Blaine gambling ordinance. Recent
legislation had allowed cities to require organizations
obtaining gambling licenses with a city to expend all or a
portion of those funds within the trade area of a city. Mr.
Reinert questioned the term trade area. Mr. Hawkins said
that was a term that needed to be defined by each
municipality. It could be our corporate boundaries. Mr.
Hawkins added that a recent Attorney General's opinion was
not favorable to this new ruling, but it is also not binding.
Mayor Benison requested that Mr. }Iawkins come back to the city
with options on the percentage of proceeds that a city should
require be expended, as well as a definition of a trade area.
Mr. Hawkins stated that this was a council policy decision.
Questions were raised as to the donating of funds to the
American Cancer Society etc..., organizations that are not
within our corporate limits.
Ms. Cheryl Grigel of the Multiple Sclerosis Society inquired
as to what National Societies were to do if all cities took
this stance. Mr. Bisel responded that when the VFW donates
proceeds back to the city in the form of emergency warning
sirens, all residents benefit.
Staff and Mr. Hawkins would be getting together to discuss
options for the gambling ordinance.
LIAISON REPORTS
Mr. (Veal :informed the Council that Mr. Marty Asleson had
joined the city as Parks Superintendent.
Mr. Bisel had nothing other than what was in the council
packet in the form of P &Z minutes.
COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR UTILITY
EXTENSIONS
Mr. Schumacher explained Mr. Bisel's reasons for proposing
this amendment. The underlying principle is that each
housing unit would pay a single, unit price for utility hook-
up fee versus a per foot fee. Therefore, if utilities run
past your property, and you have the potential for 2 or more
lots, you pay 1 unit fee per potential house. Mr. Hawkins
added that if your lot can support only 1 house, then you
would pay a single unit fee. He added that this is common
practice in many other cities. Mr. Bisel said that this
would help our bond consultant. Mr. Reinert stated that
property with the potential to have more lots under a
variance would have to be informed at that time that they may
be required to pay more than for a single house.
Mayor Benson felt that this was a good idea, but had some
bugs that needed to be worked out. The Council discussed how
this would work if it were presently being used with regard
to some current developments. Mr. Miller felt it was an
excellent idea, and should be pursued. Staff was directed to
meet with our attorney, and engineer and work the kinks out
of this proposal.
CLARIFICATION OF MUSA BOUNDARY (RUSTIC LANE)
Mr. Bisel felt that the city administrator should meet with
these residents again and inform them of the councils
proposed assessment policy change. This may affect their
decisions. Mayor Benson agreed saying this should be run
past them. Mr. Reinert felt we should wait until the policy
was more polished. Mr. Bisel moved that staff not meet with
residents at this time, but should work on the policy, and
notify residents that the council will be discussing this
item at the October 9th meeting. Mr. Reinert seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously.
RESO_.`_'TION 69 -89 AMENDING CDBG FUNDS TO ALL' W FOR A HOU';ING
STUDY
This resolution would the designation of a potion of our 1989
CDBG funds to allow for a housing study to be completed for
the city. This request was from Ms. JoAnn Wright, Community
Development Director from Anoka County. Mr. Bisel moved to
approve this resolution. Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously
SETTING A BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING FOR OCTOBER 31, 1989.
1
1
1
COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
Mr. Reinert moved to table this item until we hear from the
League of Minnesota Cities, or the Revenue Department with
direction for completing deadline. Mr. Bisel seconded the
motion, motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Benson commented at this time that he felt the plan
presented here tonight on Main Street Shops was well worth
the wait, and thanked staff and the council for their work
on this project.
GAMBLING LICENSE REQUEST — NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
SOCIETY
Mr. Reinert moved to table this item as the council was in
the process of reviewing its gambling ordinance. Mr. Hawkins
stated that if no action is taken tonight, it will be
approved.
Mr. Bohjanen asked Ms. Cheryl Grigel of the Multiple
Sclerosis Society why his name was listed on their membership
roster. Ms. Grigel replied that the Society considers any
one who donates to their cause to be a member. Mr. Bohjanen
stated that he was not a member, and suggested that in the
future, they check with people prior sending out information
with their names on it. Ms. Grigel stated that there were
153 registered members in this area.
Mr. Hawkins again stated that we can only disapprove this
request if they in some way do not comply with our ordinance.
The council was unable to disapprove, no action was taken.
CHARTER AMENDMENTS DISCUSSION
Mr. Schumacher stated that he put this item on the agenda as
it was going to the ballot in November, and was requesting
direction on how the council would like to handle the
amendments. The council and the charter commission both
approved the amendments. Mr. Reinert felt it was a good
idea, but add: `..hat perhaps it should be brought before the
Charter Commission prior to issuance. Mr. Bisel agreed and
added that he felt the issue was clouded by misinformation,
and the amendments were a good compromise. Mr. Reinert
approved the development of a flyer and directed it be
brought up before the charter commission prior to issuance.
Mr. Bohjanen seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
A motion was made by Mr. Bisel to adjourn at 9:50 P.M.. A
second was made by Mr. Reinert. Motion carried.
3 01
Jo
COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 1989
These minutes were considered and approved at a regular Council meeting held
on October 9, 1989.
()`
Mari
Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer
1
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 68 - 89
RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO.1 -3
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota,
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of Lino` "Lakes (City) approved the creation of Development
District No. 1 (District) and adopted a program (Program) for the District in
accordance with Minn. Stat. Sections 469.124 through 462.134 (Development
District Act) on , 198_.
1.02. The City has previously approved the creation of two tax increment
financing districts within the District and adopted plans for the TIF districts
pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sections 469.174 through 469.179 (TIF Act).
1.03. The City has determined to create a third tax increment financing
district within the District (TIF District No. 1 -3) in order to promote development
of an area of the City which is in need of redevelopment.
1.04. The City Council has authorized the preparation of a plan (Plan) for
TIF District No. 1 -3 which is contained in a document entitled Fax Increment
Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -3, City of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota," dated September 25, 1989.
1.05. Copies of the Plan have been forwarded to Independent School
District No. 831 and to Anoka County along with a notice of the public hearing as
required by the TIF Act.
1.06. The City's planning and zoning board has reviewed the Plan and on
, 1989, found the Plan to be consistent with the City's general plans
for development.
1.07. The City Council has fully reviewed the contents of the Plan and has
this date conducted a public hearing thereon at which the views of all interested
persons were h'eard.
Section 2. Findings; Tax Increment Financing District.
2.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable for the
sound and orderly development of the District and the City as a whole, and for the
protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, that
the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the City to provide public financial
assistance to the District.
2.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of'
the City, that the development proposed in the Plan could not reasonably be
expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is
necessary.
2.03. The land acquisition and other expenditures proposed to be financed
through tax increment financing are necessary to permit the City to realize the
full potential of the District in terms of development intensity, employment
opportunities and tax base.
2.04. The Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound
needs of the City as a whole, for the development of TIF District No. 1 -3 by
private enterprise.
2.05. The City Council has relied upon the opinions and recommendations of
its staff and planning and zoning board and the personal knowledge of the members
of the council in reaching its conclusions regarding the Plan and the establishment
of TIF District No. 1 -3.
2.06. Based upon an investigation and report by city staff and on file with
the city administrator, the City Council finds that TIF District No. 1 -3 is a
redevelopment tax increment financing district within the meaning of Section
469.174, subd. 10(a}{2) of the TIF Act.
Section 3. TIF District Established; Certification; Filing.
3.01. The Plan for TIF District No. 1 -3 is hereby approved and adopted. TIF
District No. 1 -3 is hereby established.
3.02. The geographic boundaries of TIF District No.1 -3 are as described in
the Plan, which is hereby adopted by reference.
3.03. The city clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy
of this resolution together with a certified copy of the Plan to the auditor of Anoka
County with a request that the orig=nn& tax capacity or the property within TIF
District No. 1 -3 be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 1 of the
TIF Act and to file a copy of the Plan with the Minnesota commissioner of revenue
as required by the TIF Act.
1
1
1
1
3.04. With respect to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F, the City elects TIF
District No. 1 -3 to be treated under the provisions of Section 469.177, Subd. 3(b) of
the TIF Act.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Lino Lakes
City Council this ;;>> day of _%. , 1989.
CITY OF LINO LAKES
ATTEST:
enjam Benson, Mayor
Marilyn G. A`nderson, City Clerk - Treasurer
LN140 -1
305
306
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 69 -89
A RESOLUTION - AMENDING THE DESIGNATION OF A PORTION OF LINO
LAKES 1989 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT FUNDS TO ACCOMMODATE A LOCAL HOUSING STUDY
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant Program is
a federal grant program administered through
Anoka County, and
WHEREAS, earlier in the year the Lino Lakes City Council
designated a portion of it's funds towards
economic development, and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Committee
authorized a study be conducted which would
determine housing needs and trends by which the
City Council could better serve the housing needs
of it's residents, and
WHEREAS,
the Anoka County Community Development Director
has requested the more specific designation of
Housing Study be applied to this project,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Lino Lakes City Council hereby changes the
designation of up to $7,680.00 of it's CDBG Economic
Development Funds to Housing Study Funds per the Anoka County
CDBG Office.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes :;icy Council this 25th day of
October, 1989.
7 G'f /J -t
lar1ilyn G. Anderson, Clerk Treasurer
enjam G. Benson, Mayor
1
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION #70 -89
A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO ANNEXATION GOALS APPEARING IN
THE CITY OF CENTERVILLE'S DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Centerville has prepared a draft
comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, adjacent municipalities are afforded by law the
right to review and comment on plan content as it affects
them; and
WHEREAS, the draft plan submitted to Lino Lakes for review
includes "Annexation Goals" and "Annexation Policies" that
:include annexation of approximately 110 acres of land within
the corporate limits of the City of Lino Lakes; and
WHEREAS, the land at issue includes the southwest quadrant of
the I -35E and County Road 14 diamond interchange; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is able to provide full
municipal services to the land including fire, police,
utilities, and planning; and
WHEREAS, landowners planning and engineering representatives
have contacted the City of Lino Lakes with :in the last 30 days
regarding development of the land; and
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes' Economic Development Committee has
determined that orderly development of the land adjacent to
the interchange is most likely to occur with only a single
unit of local government involved in the planning process;
and,
WHEREAS, the City of Centerville does not maintain the same
high - quality development standards followed by the Lino Lakes
Planning and Zoning Board and City Council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the City Council of the
City of Lino Lakes goes on public record as opposing any
annexation of city land to the City of Centerville and hereby
directs its administrative and planning staff to bring this
opposition to the a;:tention of the City of Centerville and to
all review agencies including the Twin Cities Metropolitan
Council.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 25th day of
September, 1989.
t1ar lyn G. Anderson i} i Benson
Cit Clerk Mayor
3O?