Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/12/1991 Council Minutes (2)1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 1991 DATE November 12, 1991 TIME STARTED 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED 9:58 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Bisel, Bohjanen, Kuether, Neal, Reinert MEMBERS ABSENT : None Staff Members present: Administrative Assistant, Dan Tesch; Building Official, Peter Kluegel; Chief of Police, Dean Campbell; Engineer's, Dan Boxrud and Darrell Schneider; Planner, John Miller; Public Works Director, Don Volk; Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk - Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. Mayor Bisel congratulated the winners of the election held on Tuesday, November 5, 1991 and thanked the one quarter of the voters of Lino Lakes who braved the elements and voted in the election. He asked that Mrs. Elliott be sent copies of all materials that are currently being sent to the Council. ITEMS TO BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA: Mr. Schumacher asked that right -of -way acquisition for the Reshanau Trunk Sewer Improvement be added as Item No. E under New Business. He also asked that septic system improvement be added under Old Business as Item No. D. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Bohjanen moved to approve the consent agenda as presented. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. ITEM DISPOSITION MINUTES: Regular Council Session, October 24, 1991 Approved DISBURSEMENTS: October 31, 1991 Approved November 12, 1991 Approved Centennial Fire Department Approved PAGE 1 17 L. 173 COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR AGENDA OPEN MIKE No one appeared under Open Mike. PAY EQUITY UPDATE, DAN TESCH NOVEMBER 12, 1991 Mr. Tesch explained that he wanted to update the City Council regarding proposed new rules and where this City is regarding this matter. The new rules were included in the Council packets. The City has submitted its proposed Pay Equity plan to Labor Associates. They will prepare a preliminary evaluation of the plan and the evaluation will be discussed with the City Council. It is possible that this City is in compliance with all of the rules regarding the Pay Equity regulations. Mayor Bisel asked if many other states have pay equity regulations in place. Mr. Tesch explained that Minnesota is a leader in this area but many other states do have the program. Mayor Bisel thanked Mr. Tesch for his presentation. ENGINEER'S REPORT Resolution No. 104 -91 Ordering Preparation of a Report for Apollo Drive, Darrell Schneider - Mr. Schneider explained that this project has been discussed at two (2) Council work sessions. The Council has ordered an investigation of the possibility of State and County participation in the improvement. Mr. Schneider has met with the MnDOT engineer and has discussed the status of Trunk Highway 49. He has also met with the Anoka County engineer on three (3) occasions and with the Anoka County Highway Committee which was chaired by Margaret Langfeld. The County has expressed an interest in working with the City on this improvement. At this time the major issues have been identified. The most important issued is that the proposed route of Apollo Drive is not on the Lino Lakes MSA street system. The Council can designate this proposed street to the Lino Lakes MSA system. The Council would then eliminate a street that is proposed for a future date since the City MSA proposed street system is limited to a certain number of miles. Mr. Schneider explained the concerns regarding getting a MSA project implemented before the City is penalized for not using the funds available. Council Member Reinert asked if Anoka County expressed any interest in working with Lino Lakes on this proposed street and if they were willing to commit any money to the improvement. Mr. Schneider explained that the County is interested in the improvement and explained how Apollo Drive could be linked to PAGE 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 109th Street which is a County State Aid street. However, Mr. Schneider explained that if Anoka County participates in the improvement, they will expect the street to be constructed to their standards which is larger than that proposed by Lino Lakes. This type of street will encourage a larger amount of traffic. In addition, County State Aid funds would be used to construct the street and Lino Lakes would still be looking for a MSA improvement project so that this cities MSA funds would not be in jeopardy. Mr. Schneider used a map to indicate the location of the proposed Apollo Drive. He noted that the City of Blaine had attended the meetings with the Anoka County Highway Committee and was very interested in the improvement. Mr. Schneider noted that this is a program to develop county roads that parallel the freeways creating a secondary thoroughfare. Mr. Schneider indicated that the next step in this process would to be adopt Resolution No. 104 - 91 ordering a feasibility study which would cost about $15,000.00. This cost would be included in the project costs and be MSA reimbursable. If the street becomes a county road, the feasibility costs will be paid by County MSA funds. The City would be responsible for right -of -way costs such as curb, gutters and sidewalk costs. Council Member Bohjanen moved to adopt Resolution No. 104 - 91 and dispense with the reading. Council member Kuether seconded the motion. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Bohjanen © Kuether Neal © Reinert Abstained: none. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution NO. 104 - 91 can be found at the end of these minutes. FIRST READING, ORDINANCE NO. 14 - 91, SUMP PUMP AND DRAINTILE ORDINANCE, PETE KLUEGEL Mr. Kluegel explained that it has been determined that some residents are discharging water from drain tile into the municipal sewer system. This City is being charged by Metropolitan Waste Control for all water discharged into the sewer system. Therefore the City is paying for the treatment of water that need not be treated. Mr. Kluegel has consulted with the Public Works Director and has researched the method used by PAGE 3 174 175 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 other cities to avoid this situation. He recommended passage of Ordinance No. 14 - 91. Mr. Volk noted that is it currently illegal to discharge sump pump water into the Metro Waste system. He also noted that this water is clean and can be discharged by draintile onto the surrounding lawns. It is illegal to discharge the water onto a neighbors property. After further discussion, Council Member Reinert moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 14 - 91 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel © Bohjanen Neal © Reinert El Kuether El Abstained: none. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING, WARE ROAD IMPROVEMENT, DARRELL SCHNEIDER Mr. Schneider explained that this proposed project was initiated by a petition from more than 50% of the homeowners in the area affected by the improvement. A feasibility study was ordered by the Council on July 22, 1991 and the public hearing was set at the October 14, 1991 Council meeting. The purpose of the public hearing is to take comment from the affected property owners and then to start the 60 day waiting period required by the City Charter. No action can be taken this evening. Mr. Schneider used the overhead projector and outlined the proposed improvement. The estimated construction cost is $154,650.15. The area and unit charges would bring the total cost to $382,731.85. The estimated cost for a 100 foot lot would be $12,450.00 plus $3,825.00 for upgrading Ware Road. Mr. Schneider explained that the cost for upgrading Ware Road is being included at this time, however the actual upgrading of Ware Road may not occur for two (2) to three .(3) years. This would eliminate the need to go back to these same property owners for another assessment. Mr. Schneider explained that the assessments proposed for the property along Ware Road are comparable to the assessments in PineRidge Estates. Mr. Schneider noted that the Clerk has received letter of opposition to the improvement from James D. Rickard, 6361 Ware Road, Ronald E. Vrnak, 6357 Ware Road and Edward A. Wiener, Sr., 6359 Ware Road. PAGE 4 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 Council Member Neal asked if the proposed improvement had been handled in the normal manner. Mr. Schneider explained that a landowner in the area had questioned how sewer and water utilities could be extended along Ware Road. The landowner was advised to get a petition signed by his neighbors requesting the preparation of a feasibility study. A petition had been received by the staff with more than one half of the affected property owners signatures. However, the petition received by the staff was for the installation of sewer and water utilities, not a feasibility study. A feasibility study has been prepared and is being presented this evening. Mayor Bisel explained that the City Charter allows for the hearing to be held this evening. If an affected property owner does not want to be included in the improvement, he may sign a petition requesting to be removed from the original petition. If 51% of the affected property owners are in favor of the improvement, the improvement will be constructed and all affected property owners will be assessed. If 51% of the property owners do not want the improvement, the improvement will not be ordered by the City Council. Mayor Bisel opened the public hearing at 7:21 P.M. Fred Ranallo, 6366 Ware Road explained that it was his understanding that there were only 10 names on the petition and there are 22 parcels of property involved. This means that less than one half of the property owners want the improvement. Mr. Ranallo noted that this petition was suppose to be for just the study to determine the costs. He asked if the Council could at this point say yes or no to the petition. Mayor Bisel said no, the Council must wait 60 days to see if the affected property owners wish to petition against the improvement. He noted that the improvement cannot proceed unless at least 51% of the property owners petition for the improvement. There was confusion regarding how many signatures were needed on a petition to request a feasibility study and how many signatures were needed on a petition for the installation of utilities. The City Attorney explained that the City Charter requires the signatures of 25% of the affected property owners for a feasibility study and 51% of the affected property owners for the installation of the improvements. Mr. Louis LeTendre, 6350 Ware Road noted that some of the homes from PineRidge Estates face Ware Road. He asked if these properties would count in the total number of properties required on the petition for the improvements. Mr. Schneider explained that these properties were not affected by this improvement since they receive their utilities from the street in PineRidge. These PAGE 5 176 171 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 properties did receive an assessment for the improvement of Ware Road. This money is set aside to be used when Ware Road is updated. Bill Gregor, 6353 Ware Road asked if people do not hook up will they be assessed. Mayor Bisel explained that about two (2) years ago the City offered an amendment to the City Charter that would allow people to do this. The amendment did not pass. If 51% of the people petition for the improvement, everyone will be assessed. Al Ross, 6356 Ware Road told the Council that he is against the project. Terry Byron, 6375 Ware Road said he was against the project. Barb Hadash, 6367 Ware Road said she was against the project. Marlou LeTendre, 6350 Ware Road said she was against the project. Fern Hoglund, 6363 Ware Road said she was against the project. Fred Ranallo, 6366 Ware Road asked if the project is turned down this evening, when can it go through the process again? Mr. Schneider explained that there would be a one (1) year waiting period. The process would start at the beginning with a petition from the affected property owners for a feasibility study. Council Member Bohjanen moved to close the public hearing at 7:37 P.M. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Hawkins explained that the 60 day waiting period begins this evening. If the affected landowners are against the project, they should start a petition stating they are against the improvement and give the petition to the City Clerk as soon as possible. There was further discussion regarding the process for starting an improvement project with several residents explaining that they were confused regarding the process. Mr. Greger said that it was his understanding the land owners signed the petition for sewer and water only. There was no mention of the street upgrading. Mr. Schneider explained that this was true. However, this is how PineRidge was handled and he felt that the landowners should be aware of all of the possible assessments at the beginning of the process. Landowners were told to contact the City Clerk to determine how many landowners signed the petition for the improvement. She PAGE 6 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING will provide a copy of the petition to them. PUBLIC HEARING, ORDINANCE NO. 15 - 91 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 01 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE NOVEMBER 12, 1991 Mr. Miller explained that Ordinance No. 01 known as the zoning ordinance has not been recodified since 1983. Several amendments have been passed and several changes and additions to the zoning districts have also been passed making the current document difficult to understand. In addition, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan has been amended and the changes in the Land Use Plan should be incorporated into the zoning ordinance. Mr. Miller noted thatthe draft revised zoning ordinance does not change any of the zoning districts but does eliminate one (1), the Suburban Residential District. The Design Review Board (DRB) along with Mr. Alan Irwin have worked extensively on the revision looking at every section to determine that all sections agree with what the City of Lino Lakes want to do. Local people who are members of the DRB and Mr. Irwin have prepared the draft before the Council this evening. Mr. Miller noted some of the changes included in the draft ordinance and explained that there is nothing in the draft ordinance that the Council has not seen at prior meetings. Mr. Miller was asked to prepare a comparison of the current ordinance to the draft ordinance. Mayor Bisel asked that all changes be highlighted. Council Member Reinert moved to continue the public hearing until December 9, 1991 to allow time for preparation of the comparison. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. Mr. Miller was asked to prepare a handout for the public so that the public could understand the changes that were being proposed. Council Member Reinert suggested that the public hearing could be further continued if there were additional questions from the public or the Council. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING TAUTGES /REDPATH AS CITY AUDITORS FOR 1992 Mr. Schumacher explained that due to the anticipated leave of absence of the City Accountant, he felt it was best to begin the annual audit ahead of schedule. The auditors have submitted a proposed contract schedule for either a one (1) year contract, two (2) year contract and a three (3) year contract. Mr. Schumacher recommended that the Council approve a one (1) year PAGE 7 178 17' COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 contract and look at a multi -year contract in 1992. Council Member Bohjanen moved to approve the City Administrator's recommendation for a one (1) year contract. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Council Member Reinert asked for the rationale behind a three (3) year contract and Mr. Schumacher explained that guaranteeing a three (3) contract would allow for lower costs the first year and the second year on a three (3) year contract. Voting on the motion, VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Bohjanen © Kuether Neal IEJ Reinert Abstained: none Motion carried. SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 05 - 91, PARK DEDICATION FEE Mr. Volk explained that this is the third time the Council has considered this ordinance. He noted that the Council has asked that the Park Board determine an index so that this matter would not come back to the Council as often as it has in the past. The Park Board did review the request but was unable to determine an index policy. The Park Board is recommending that the council accept the formula outlined in Ordinance No. 05 - 91 and the Park Board will review the formula on an annual basis and make recommendations to the Council when necessary. Park Dedication for commercial and industrial development was addressed. It was noted that the intent is to not require as much park dedication from warehousing types of businesses. Park usage is not as intense from these businesses. Mr. Volk noted that park dedication for industrial development is hard to address and is usually negotiated by the city council. Council Member Reinert asked how park trails enter into this ordinance. Mr. Volk explained that park trails are addressed in the subdivision ordinance. Council Member Kuether felt park dedication should include trails. Mr. Volk noted that the design of park trails does not reduce the number of lots in a subdivision because usually marginal land is used for the trail system. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the second reading of Ordinance No. 05 - 91 with the stipulation that this ordinance PAGE 8 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 not take effect on plats that have Council concept approval. Mayor Bisel seconded the motion. Council Member Reinert asked that the cutoff be'more firm. Council Member Kuether felt that this ordinance may hurt some sales that are in process in this City. Mr. Hawkins suggested that the cutoff be the date of the filing of the preliminary plat or within 60 days. Council Member Kuether changed her motion to read that this ordinance will be effective February 1, 1992. Mayor Bisel amended his second to the motion. Council Member Bohjanen expressed concern regarding the park dedication for commercial and industrial property. He felt that prospective commercial and industrial development may look at another city because of the park dedication. It was explained that there would be negotiation between the business and the city council and usually park dedication would be traded for another concession. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Neal Abstained: none Bohjanen Reinert Kuether Motion carried with Council Member Bohjanen noting his yea vote was given very hesitantly. AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO OBTAIN BIDS FOR SALE OF CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS Mr. Schumacher noted that in the preliminary 1992 Budget, $135,000.00 was set aside for the purchase of a Certificate of Indebtedness to be used for the purchase of capital outlay items such as a squad car, and other public works and fire capital outlay items. A three (3) year certificate was approved by the Council at that meeting. Mr. Schumacher asked for authorization for the City Attorney to obtain bids for the Certificate of Indebtedness. He noted that the City Council cannot take action on the bids until after the 1992 Budget is finalized. Mr. Hawkins explained that rates are very favorable at this time and the bids can be guaranteed for two (2) weeks to allow time for final action on the 1992 Budget. Council Member Bohjanen moved to authorize the City Attorney to obtain bids for the 1991 Certificate of Indebtedness. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. PAGE 9 180 181 COUNCIL MEETING VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Neal Bohjanen Reinert Abstained: none Motion carried unanimously. ATTORNEY'S REPORT Kuether NOVEMBER 12, 1991 Update, Oak Brook Peninsula - Mr. Hawkins explained that a settlement in this matter is very near. a draft of the settlement is being prepared and he asked that the City Council approve the following, agreements: 1) place two (2) children at play signs in the affected area; 2) prepare and implement a schedule of periodically inspecting the street and present this inspection report to the homeowners for any necessary repairs. Mr. Hawkins noted that the claims for damages against the City have been dismissed and the City will no longer have the benefit of the insurance company (Mr. Allen Hoff) as legal counsel. He noted that after November 15, 1991, if the matter is not settled, the City will incur the legal costs, not the insurance company. Mr. Hawkins asked for approval to enter into the settlement agreement as described above. Council Member Neal moved to authorize the City Attorney to enter into the agreement described above. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Bohjanen © Kuether Neal © Reinert Abstained: none, Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS Consideration of Vacancy on Charter Commission - Mr. Schumacher explained that Mr. Lyle Bye presented a resignation letter dated September 9, 1991 to Judge Gibbs. Mr. Bye's letter did not state his resignation date, but probably expected the date of the letter to be used as such. Mr. Hawkins asked if the Council wanted to recommend a replacement to Judge Gibbs for Mr. Bye's position. After discussion, the Clerk was asked to contact Mr. Bye and ask him to determine his date of resignation. If Mr. Bye's PAGE 10 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 resignation is effective September 9, 1991, the period for appointment by Judge Gibbs has passed and the City Council has the ability to appoint a replacement. This matter will be before the Council on November 25, 1991. Consider 1991 Budget Adjustments, Resolution No. 100 - 91 - Mr. Schumacher explained that this is a "house keeping" item. The resolution transfers certain budget items from one (1) area to another to make is easier to compare when working on the proposed 1992 Budget. Some items transferred include approved salary increases from salary reserve to the appropriate department and reductions in General Fund expenditures to reflect the $67,000.00 cut in state aid. Council Member Bohjanen moved to adopt Resolution No. 100 - 91. council Member Kuether seconded the motion. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Bohjanen © Kuether Neal © Reinert Abstained: none Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 100 - 91 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of a Towing Policy - Chief Campbell has prepared an informational letter to the Council explaining the current method used by the Police Department in determining which tow company is called for towing and impound service. Chief Campbell noted that this policy is reviewed each year and all concerns are discussed. Mr. Hawkins explained to the Council that approving a towing contract will give the City certain liabilities. He suggested that the City approve the criteria for a towing and impound service and then advertise and ask for proposals for this service. The Police Department can review each proposal and then call for service as needed. There was further discussion regarding whether or not this service should be under contract. It was noted that it now appears that one (1) towing company is getting preferential treatment. Chief Campbell was asked to prepare criteria for towing and impounding services and advertise for the service. The advertisement is to state that the City does not want to enter into a contract. PAGE 11 182 183 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1991 Defective Septic System Mr. Schumacher explained that a septic system on property located near city hall has failed and the owner of the property (a single parent) is financially unable to correct the system. She is unable to get a loan or other financial help and if something is not done to correct the health hazard at this home, the City may face liability because no action has been taken. The Building Official has been involved and has explained that the system should be corrected before the ground becomes frozen. Mr. Hawkins suggested that the City contract and make the correction to the septic system and then assess the costs to the property. He noted that at this point there is a health and safety issue on the property and under Nuisance Ordinance, the City does have the authority to make`the necessary corrections. Mr. Kluegel explained that the home owner has indicated that she would like the matter to be handled as outlined by Mr. Hawkins. He explained that if the former husband is still involved with the property, his consent will be needed. Mr. Kluegel asked for authorization to solicit bids to correct the septic system. Council Member Neal moved to authorize the staff to correct the septic system problem as outlined by Mr. Hawkins. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Bohjanen LJ Kuether Neal © Reinert Abstained: none Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS Consideration of a Gambling License, St. Joseph Catholic Church Thanksgiving Bingo - Mrs. Anderson explained that this is an annual event and will be held November 24, 1991. The Church is exempt from obtaining a license because they conduct very few gambling events. However, they are required to notify the City and State when they do plan events. This serves as the official notification to the City. Council Member Neal moved to approve the gambling license. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. VOTING ON THE MOTION: Bisel Bohjanen IJ Kuether PAGE 12 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING Neal Abstained: none Reinert Motion carried unanimously. NOVEMBER 12, 1991 Notice to Negotiate - 49ers - Mr. Schumacher explained that the 49ers Union is making 18 demands of the City for their new contract. He asked if the Council would like him to negotiate a new contract as he has in the past. It was the consensus of the Council that Mr. Schumacher continue to negotiate and keep the Council updated. Council Member Neal asked when the salaries on the nonunion personnel will be decided. Mr. Schumacher said this will be done before the end of December. Local Government Aid Update - Mr. Schumacher updated the Council regarding the North Metro Mayors Assn. committee action on determining a formula for distribution of the new trust fund that replaces Local Government Aid. He also referred to a recently completed study title LADD. This study recognizes that developing communities have a much greater need than fully developed communities. Mr. Schumacher noted that a committee has been formed by the legislature to determine the distribution of the trust fund. Their recommendation is not expected for a while. It is hoped that the legislature will "lean" toward growing cities. League of Minnesota Cities Policy Adoption Meeting - Mr. Schumacher explained that this is a reminder for the Council. If a Council Member wishes to attend this meeting, please notify Mrs. Anderson and she will make reservations. Easement Acquisition, Harold Lehmann - The Council adjourned at 9:25 P.M. to a closed door session regarding this matter since it is currently in litigation. The Council returned from the closed door session at 9:56 P.M. Council Member Neal moved to adjourned at 9:58 P.M. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected nd approved at the regular Council meeting held November 25 1991. rleJL Marily G. Anderson, Clerk Treasurer PAGE 13 184 185 Council member Bohjanen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NUMBER 100 -91 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1991 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO ACCOUNT FOR THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS. WHEREAS, Council approved $ 28,774.00 in salary increases to be disbursed as follows: ADMINISTRATION PLANNING -FULL TIME PLANNING -PART TIME POLICE -FULL TIME POLICE -PART TIME RECEPT BUILDING INSPECTIONS PUBLIC WORKS PARKS TOTAL 8,970.00 (6 employees) 1,782.00 (1 employee ) 234.00 (1 employee ) 4,314.00 (3 employees) 350.00 (2 employees) 1,275.00 (1 employee ) 6,303.00 (3 employees) 5,546.00 (2 employees) $ 28,774.00 WHEREAS, Council approved $ 9,950.00 in merits to be disbursed as follows: ADMINISTRATION POLICE BUILDING INSPECTIONS PUBLIC WORKS PARKS $ 3,400.00 (4 employees) 1,175.00 (2 employees) 975.00 (1 employee ) 2,850.00 (3 employees) 1,550.00 (2 employees) TOTAL 9,950.00 WHEREAS, an amount of $ 3,800.00 should be transferred out of the salary reserve into Administration contracted service to pay for contracted service for the City Finance Director per the White Bear Township /City of Lino Lakes Joint Powers Agreement. WHEREAS, a total amount of $ 42,524.00 will be amended out of the salary and personal reserve leaving a balance of $ 5,878.99 within the reserve. Whereas, the State of Minnesota cut City state aid by $ 67,985.00. The following represents areas that have been reduced /increased to reflect the state aid cut. 1 1 1 1 1 GENERAL FUND REVENUE BUDGET BUDGETED AMENDED State Aid 162,425.00 94,440.00 Refunds 34,975.00 41,005.00 (Centennial fire budget surplus) Police state aid 36,000.00 41,500.00 Interest 40,000.00 43,555.00 Building Permits 140,000.00 145,000.00 Total Revenue ch. 413,400.00 365,500.00 DIFFERENCE (67,985.00) 6,030.00 5,000.00 3,555.00 5,000.00 (48, 400.00) GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BUDGET Administration Overtime Other salaries Total Administration BUDGETED 3,000.00 4,000.00 7,000.00 Charter Commission Professional services 1,000.00 Police Department Unemployment 2,000.00 Shop Parts 7,500.00 Professional services 1,600.00 Total Police Department 11,100.00 Building Inspections Other salaries Travel Total Building Insp Animal Control Contract 4,500.00 1,325.00 5,825.00 6,000.00 Public Works Office supplies 3,420.00 Auto Insurance 5,000.00 Material for roads 93,900.00 Contracted Street Re 55,000.00 Total Public Works 157,320.00 Parks Department Unemployment 1,500.00 Supplies 15,000.00 Auto Insurance 2,000.00 Total Parks 18,500.00 Total state aid expenditure cuts AMENDED 2,000.00 500.00 2,500.00 0 0 5,700.00 1,000.00 6,700.00 2,500.00 325.00 2,825.00 2,000.00 2,420.00 4,000.00 75,900.00 51,000.00 133,320.00 0 10,000.00 1,000.00 11,000.00 DIFFERENCE (1,000.00) (3,500.00) (4,500.00) (1,000.00) (2,000.00) (1,800.00) L 600.00) (4,400.00) (2,000.00) (1,000.00) (3,000.00) (4,000.00) (1,000.00) (1,000.00) (18,000.00) (4,000.00) (24,000.00) (1,500.00) (5,000.00) (1,000.00) (7,500.00) 206,745.00 159,345.00 (48,400.00) 186 187 Whereas, the program for oak wilt control within the 1991 forestry budget has been discontinued because the cost share monies from the state were not allocated. Therefore the following should be amended to reflect the change. GENERAL FUND REVENUES BUDGET BUDGETED AMENDED DIFFERENCE Refunds 34,975.00 (oak wilt cost recovery) 25,975.00 (9,000.00) GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BUDGET Forestry Contracted services 11,975.00 2,975.00 (9,000.00) NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the general fund budget be amended accordingly. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Neal, Kuether, Bisel, Reinert, Bohjanen. The following voted against same:None. Passed the 12th day of Marly G. Anderson, Clerk - Treasurer Novejnber 1991. old L. 1BTise4 1Jayor 1 1 1 Council Member Bohjanen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 104 - 91 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OF APOLLO DRIVE WHEREAS: it is proposed to construct a municipal state aid street and storm sewer, to finance a portion of the cost with Municipal State Aid and County State Aid and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the Lino Lakes City Charter, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to Darrell Schneider, Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary was as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this 12th day of November, 1991. Harold L. Bise , or a� Cs a L lyn St. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Neal, Kuether, Bisel, Reinert, Bohjanen The following voted against same: None. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 188