My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/06/1975 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1975
>
11/06/1975 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2014 3:41:03 PM
Creation date
12/1/2014 2:09:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/06/1975
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCTOBER 23, 1975 <br />SOURCES OF INCOME (CONTINUED) <br />City Service $ 25,000.00 <br />Utility 18,000.00 <br />Cent. Cont. 20,000.00 <br />Levy Abate 405.81 <br />Total $333,240.93 <br />Assessed Valuation $9,306,089.00 <br />Personal Peroperty 858,882.00 <br />TOTAL $10,164,971.00 <br />ESTIMATED MILL RATE 14.76 <br />NOVEMBER 6, 1975 <br />The eight budger meeting was called to order at 8:15 P.M. by Mayor <br />Bohjanen on November 6, 1975. Council members present: McLean and Zelinka. <br />Absent: Marier and Jaworski. Newly elected Council members Schneider <br />and Karth were in the audience. <br />Mayor Bohjanen said this meeting had been called to consider the Lexington <br />Fire Contract and their method of arriving at the cost figures. Mr. <br />Benjy Munson, Lexington Fire Chief, was present to explain. <br />Mayor Bohjanen turned the meeting over to Mr. Munson. Mr. Munson went <br />through the formula that was used to compute the costs allocated to the <br />City of Lino Lakes for fire protection. <br />The number of calls for the past four years and the first 9 months of <br />1975 had been computed and averaged in order to arrive at the percentage <br />of cost to be allocated. It was found that 60.6% of the calls are for <br />Lino Lakes. The value of the equipment and buildings had been added on <br />a percentage basis. The assessed valuations had been totaled and averaged. <br />The operating costs, depreciation costs on equipment and buildings and a <br />10% administration costs had been added and multiplied by the percentage <br />of use. <br />Mr. McLean questioned the 10% administration costs. He felt this charge <br />had already been accounted for in the operating costs. After some <br />discussion on this, Mr. Munson agreed. Mr. McLean asked if the contract <br />could be adjusted to reflect this and Mr. Munson said that it could be. He <br />will re- compute the figures and get a copy back for the Council. Mr. <br />Zelinka computed the costs and found that the Contract for Fire Coverage <br />with the City of Lexington for 1976 would be $11,575.00. <br />Mr. McLean complinmented Mr. Munson on the formula. He felt this is a much <br />more efficient way of computing costs. <br />Mr. Munson said this is an accepted way �f computing cost by the Fire <br />Association. He said that the City of Lexington would like to talk to <br />the Council about a contract for a longer period of time than one year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.