HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-028 Council Resolution•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 03-28
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR
KEEFE ESTATES
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for preliminary plat approval for Keefe
Estates, and
WHEREAS, A public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on February
12, 2003, and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 05 -03 rezones the subject property to R -X, Rural
Executive/PDO, Planned Development Overlay District, and
WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the City's zoning
ordinance and subdivision ordinance subject to the conditions setforth herein,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby
approves the preliminary plat for Keefe Estates as depicted by the preliminary plat by
E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated February 5, 2003.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The proposed private road shall be improved to a minimum width of twenty (20) feet
and include a permanent cul -de -sac at its northern terminus. The roadway shall be
surfaced with gravel or a suitable material and meet a seven ton road design. The
roadway section shall be determined by the City Engineer to insure the adequacy of
the roadway to support emergency vehicles.
2. A Homeowners Association shall be established to insure the continued operation and
maintenance of the private roadway. The association agreement shall be subject to
the review and approval of the City Attorney prior to final plat approval.
3. All wetlands on the subject property shall be delineated and shown on the final plat.
4. Public drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated to the city and cover all
wetlands on the subject property.
5. An easement for public trail purposes shall be dedicated to the City extending from
Rolling Hills Drive to the north property line of the subject property pending further
review by City staff. A payment in lieu of parkland dedication shall be required if it
is determined that a trail corridor is not feasible.
•
6. The developer shall place a covenant over Lot 3, Block 1 restricting future
subdivision of the lot until such time as public sanitary sewer and water is available to
service the site in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Such covenant
shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney.
7. The developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City to insure
completion of necessary roadway improvements. Such agreement shall be entered
into in conjunction with final plat approval.
8. The Rezoning is approved.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 24th day of February, 2003
ATTEST:
Ann Blair, Ci j Clerk
. Ber_' son, ayor
•
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE
trbze►)
/a7. -Y/6
SW Omar of irr3.-41 +
Int
_Oh ow kw Simms*
en,r�I
��bYYaw}} w i rra sk/1.1ar by Ma Madalw Y gazebo .t /tot
skew w pr Mao Oawt7 Swan k.rww WOW /pwaaw, WW1
grwhwrra Tip 1.d Iyrwt r M waw t7. Mt nab 3 SWAM= MOH
SW ADP= Illow110 WAS
ploy wwYr0,... 7.a-. SyaarssorA1e'• ~r' ti Yin %isersA
- 7.Ir ~ow 1.r moor /6..7 7.w r Mrrr r soon h u rtr rr gra
- Amgen Own are SNOW owlwr - Qalwr le Y W Flo to err
Matra INCEINECCAfflaien21
P A•wrr st=ssariztrria=5
ray ..s.p.r Iambi dorlIod
Way • a. r.Ow /s 7.Y WaleW am NM sr
we rev air 7.a /rw ed Ma�/,rrlr rooze
Ire M ■ rlM raer rawer WWI •
,.Mora/ r 7.M 7.f so 7.r
WNW r 7.•'r war as i r WO wj 64ia
PA CIL i.I•r
rar:'•r
So W.. •WW /loamas Wo rave A fro OWN
•1.r arra
I FL`JrTfl
• Drat*. M r.rrrd rood
g
Dowess Sr moot 117 WSW h AS N7070
g 5.arr w WM.
76 1 7.91.4
7_7. 0.,171. 7.•W. Wort..
MXISTI CONDITIONS
0: JIM
6300
6300 ROLLING HILLS DRIVE
LINO LAKES, MN. 55II0
(612) 269 -1586
CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION
Hoer r
167.6 .fl6/i 17171/1
rowwi X187.• Mt
SdP.dd•ST'L
71aw•t ditch. *moment and
outbuilding locations from aerial
photo by Uodt wrd Corporation
dot d April 19115.
w7. bran. 0' *'tad'.
A7M.M
j�
it1
PARCEL B
435.111 R R
taw awes
t. N 131
•
'Cis � r,.ioi rrrrrNww I 1. i
_4...• r ISM •t 19.7. SSW r
oo ."..WW 1,
_"�
` PARCEL A
1.1x794775 .e. IL
.17 .a1.
wood Warr
. ow WOW
udwi
WWW in we la r@ 1.r 1•rwa -a-1*
DECK M WI b.1. rraiw- w.iF.wrr.d •t
5
ILA 1.r
WWI wiles
S O
4
Y r of r IMO awn,
���•..• risk 6 Q
I 7l lap. a.
7 T � Ia- ra..Ir- . ._ '
1
23 24 25 26 27 28 �C, \
OT1'ER. ItANE NILI.5 \
DEER PASS TRAIL S
it-
'• fi . 4 W I
0.1/1 V a1. IYd
7..
29 w I hereto *OW thel OR ono nlh r Ir
1.y *eat apn17aw 1.d rat I on
• «v & d Registered Woo, wow
W. W.. or Lae /i1. of Mood*
twit raw
■ I MD • S* I1 .
ire Llod143TOM ANL Si
earcur
la. rlll.rI• wsfla15•+001�
•
Corm of trim;
fu 'st IL* II
gum
Omer at Nall.
ILL AV111.111t../ an r
•
•
GRAPHIC SCALE
Yip
WI
iw - Ira
MOWN
CLEARWATER CREEK 5TH ADDITION
f�'!R'If^t
V
G �1
G L !
: r - ��
PRELIMIN1,511 PLAT
KEEF6 ESTATES
House. dltck soMrnsnt and
outbuilding locations torn °Grid
pdoted April Corporation INS Corporation
• L. 0
FOR: JIM KEEFE
6300 ROLLJNG HILLS DRIVE
UNO LAKES, MN. 55110
(612) 269 -1566
Oft In at
w G..; Tor. assn
Man
1
(.4-‘
• "1
ei
o:
•
•
tenor
ftlIso
3-1 T i
24 1 126 I
I
5 27128
APLE HiI1.LS_
DEER PASS TRAIL
1021-7,,
29
- -5\
IN w ,116 AnL liri a
«IINir aollut
5—.
htOTF�
- etarr w a/o we da/1od.d by Nat It Malaga Y OGaanir r 1000
- ._**l.. w w w Ma Carly &Woo irWOes Mod 9yWr. Yet.
d Ng ettllet Pm arm Lot 12 Soak Give tot atmr
X621 A ffiw0r _ /D./1 Arm - =o wxYr as- ax* 122.4 712. 01• Its" r krrr IL -100=
- ta.d mesas' M .d Swig/ OM.rW 2. 2. 1.1 M 5261 by Et 2W t arm
I1'i ee,RA_n
- Tnsd one of Oat 1 _ 32A101 onr
- Nod ems of Lot 2 - 2323 oils
- Toga aw d tat 3 _ 1.110e ewes
Total one d 0u211 A _ 1J26 emu
Ka..rs.an-
0- a ri�
4 iw IW
DATA
Gore emplh .2 iamb — and wens oemaa.t _ 000* toot
- Told pewit/ .roe _ 37.47 oases.
- 3 prop.d Node t.d7 laii
- Prosy ...atilt, .gad RN G.wWe.
- Preprad Lobo _ Pleased l.2 tl.edepend PJL2.)
Edam and papioad balms 3.R.d d Felt _ SD rt
Poor _ 30 hal
-21-
road
tlrwa s.t Yskd by ws 10167*
5 /fteolea Oat 10408 111
a 0.. talnsd
Omar &Id war ... r .Okra
r..ra_.rwrCESSOM .rNEHICEI
M Wwrk.d.4'i:rw 1r�ir�i`ti�
t/1r.- YF�.drl r�Ik rl
l.�srrkkrywr r...orel..a.rr no. mr
r. roiiiirr�@arm..wr•
wrr'.isri ins~ err ew rrlra
00 alell AND U2111Y 24006/542 01 11152
DEAL EA DAING PROPOSED PAD ISZVATIONS AND POSSIBLE FUME GHOST PLAT
...e-
/Le
7X-w
./ •.
aonsu ion ° .row 11211 10411:1112-44-10
agar as a iamr-.lrlwohL ,
ue
ar
or
15wey 1 52 1 52 am% pr
or owe me impend by as r wilt
ar .ieae imperil= at LW / am
• dy 11op11roe tor/ Snow radar
211 M ore 2. Imo .7 wards.
Rd
O.1r s-r -100, 00,2, tt. 11178
NW NIB 14OHNG LAID h N
LAID 2un 1.111001TC61 AVMGM Milk E. elbsoiwIlmn J
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
P & Z MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
AGENDA ITEM 7C
Michael Grochala
February 24, 2003
D 3
Consider 15t Reading Ordinance No. --
Rezoning from R -X, Rural Executive to R -X,
Rural Executive/Planned Development Overlay
(PDO)
Consideration of Resolution No. 03 -28
Approving Preliminary Plat, Keefe Estates
VOTE REQUIRED: Rezoning — Simple Majority
Preliminary Plat — Simple Majority
REQUEST
The applicant, James Keefe, is requesting a rezoning of his property to Planned
Development Overlay District to allow for a rural cluster subdivision consisting of three
buildable lots. Each of the lots would be accessed from a proposed private roadway lying
within a proposed outlot.
BACKGROUND
In June of 2001 Mr. Keefe contacted City staff requesting information regarding the
potential subdivision of his property. Mr. Keefe was provided with the requirements of
the R -X, Rural Executive District. In September of 2001 Mr. Keefe met with the City
Council to discuss the potential options for subdividing his property. He expressed at the
time, in a letter dated September 19, 2001, that he would like to split off several 2.5 acre
parcels from his property due to the economic hardship he was currently experiencing.
The council expressed the need for additional information before a decision could be
made.
City staff prepared a memo to the City Council, dated September 28, 2001, identifying
issues with regard to the proposed subdivision and listing options to be explored,
including the potential for a clustered development using the Planned Development
Overlay District (PDO) requirements. The memo was distributed to Mr. Keefe.
On December 10, 2002 the City received an application from Mr. Keefe requesting minor
subdivision approval. In a letter, dated December 18, 2002, Mr. Keefe was informed that
his application was substantially incomplete and listed information that was necessary to
begin review of the request. Mr. Keefe submitted additional information on January 6,
2003.
On January 8, 2003, at the regular Planning and Zoning Board meeting, Mr. Keefe's
minor subdivision request was added to the board's agenda for discussion. The board
requested that staff work with the applicant to resolve issues and, if possible place the
item on the January 22, 2003 meeting agenda. Staff met with Mr. Keefe and his surveyor
on January 16, 2003 to discuss issues relating the proposal.
The minor subdivision request and associated variances were brought to the Planning and
Zoning Board on January 22, 2003. Staff's recommendation was to deny the Minor
Subdivision and Variance requests. The Planning and Zoning Board tabled the request
and recommended that the applicant proceed with a rezoning to Planned Development
Overlay (PDO) to facilitate the development.
A request for the rezoning to Planned Development Overlay District and Preliminary Plat
approval was brought to the Planning and Zoning Board on February 12, 2003. The
Planning and Zoning Board recommend approval with the conditions contained herein.
This report is based on the following attached exhibits:
1. Existing Conditions Survey dated January 21, 2003
2. Preliminary Plat dated February 5, 2003
3. Soil Borings dated January 4, 2003
4. Applicant's narrative dated February 5, 2003
ANALYSIS
City Code
Chapter 1001.8, Subdivision 6(1) states All lots shall abut for their full frontage on a
publicly dedicated street.
Chapter 302.03, Subdivision 1 (10) states that private streets shall not be permitted, nor
shall public improvements be approved for any private streets.
Section 5, Subdivision 2.B.1 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance establishes the
minimum lot size of 10 acres for lots within the R -X, Rural Executive District.
Section 3, Subdivision 3.B.2. of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that within
zoning districts with a minimum lot size requirement of ten (10) acres or more, up to
eighty (80) percent of the minimum lot area may be comprised of areas which are platted
2
as street rights -of -way, is below the 100 year flood elevation, or lies within city
watercourses, wetlands or waterbodies.
Section 5, Subdivision 2.B.2 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance establishes the
minimum lot width of 330 feet for lots within the R -X, Rural Executive District.
Section 9, Subdivision 4.A. of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance states that the intent of
the PDO District is to permit greater flexibility and, consequently, more creative and
imaginative design of the development of residential, commercial or industrial areas than
are generally possible under conventional zoning regulations. It is further intended to
promote more economical and efficient use of the land while providing a harmonious
variety of housing choices, a height level of urban amenities, and preservation of natural
scenic qualities of open space.
Article 9, Section 902.2.2.1 of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code states that Fire apparatus
access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet.
Article 9, Section 902.2.2.2 of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code states that Fire apparatus
access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all- weather driving capabilities.
Existing Conditions
The property being considered for development consists of two existing lots totaling
37.47 acres. An existing single family residence is located on a ten acre lot. The
remaining undeveloped lot consists of 27.47 acres.
The western half of the site is mostly wooded upland area with wetlands located in the
northwest corner. The eastern half of the property is primarily lowland with wetlands
being the predominate cover type.
Access to the site is limited to an existing 10 foot wide private driveway that extends into
the property from the northern terminus of Rolling Hills Drive.
Land Use
The City's comprehensive plan designates the west half of the property for Low Density,
sewered residential uses (Stage 2, 2010- 2020). The eastern half of the site is designated
for rural land uses. A conceptual greenway is also delineated over the eastern half of the
site. Surrounding proposed land uses include Low Density Sewered Residential to the
north and east, Low Density, Unsewered Residential to the south and Rural to the west.
3
• Zoning
The property is currently zoned R -X, Rural Executive. Adjacent zoning includes R -X to
the west, south and east, and R -1 -PDO to the north (Clearwater Creek).
Lot Area
The proposed subdivision would create three parcels and an outlot from the existing two
that are currently owned by the applicant. The proposed lot sizes are as follows:
Lot 1, Block 1:
Lot 2, Block 1:
Lot 3, Block 1:
Outlot A:
Lot Width
32.08 acres
2.35 acres (2.14 acres of upland)
1.99 acres (all upland)
1.05 acres
The proposed lot widths of both Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 are approximately 180 feet.
•
Utilities
The City's Comprehensive Plan designates the western half of the site as Low Density,
Sewered Residential. The Plan further designates this area as a Stage 2, 2010 -2020
growth area.
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main were stubbed out within Flora Court (Clearwater Creek
3`d Addition), northwest of the site to service Stage 2 (2010 -2020) development. Through
review of existing topographic mapping it does appear possible to service this property as
well as adjacent properties to the west in the future.
It should be noted, however, that the proposed Plat, if approved, would not eliminate the
possibility of servicing adjacent properties to the west or south.
Access
The property is currently serviced by a gravel private driveway, measuring approximately
10 feet in width. The driveway accesses the terminus of Rolling Hills Drive. One other
existing residential lot utilizes the driveway, however, it appears that there are no
easements currently in place.
As with all subdivisions in the City, publicly dedicated right -of -way is required as well as
the improvement of such to City standards. These standards typically include a paved
bituminous surface with a minimum width of 32 feet. While the width requirement has
fluctuated on a case by case basis pursuant to City Council approval, all roads, including
private roads allowed within Planned Development Overlay Districts have been required
to include bituminous paving.
The applicant is proposing to maintain the existing roadway as a private road operated
and maintained by a Homeowner's Association. The private roadway will lie within
what is proposed as Outlot A. The creation of Outlot A, for this purpose, will need to be
evaluated by the City Attomey.
The applicant originally proposed to widen the existing driveway to 20 feet using Class 5
gravel. The proposed improvements are intended to keep traffic to a minimum and
maintain the existing rural character of the property. However, the applicant
subsequently submitted a proposal, at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting, that the
existing driveway be upgraded to the minimum width of Rolling Hills Drive noting that
this street did not currently meet City standards. His request included an addendum to
the association agreement that would require upgrading the private drive within six
months of the City upgrading Rolling Hills Drive.
20 feet is the minimum required width for an access road to accommodate emergency
vehicles as set forth in the 1997 Uniform Fire Code. Staff is in the process of evaluating
the existing roadway widths servicing the proposed development. However, it should be
noted that the existing widths of streets should not be a determining factor in evaluating
requirements for new improvements.
The applicant is also proposing to upgrade the roadway with Class 5 gravel or recycled
materials to a minimum depth of 4 inches over new areas and two inches over existing.
Staff will need to further evaluate the proposed gravel base to determine the adequacy of
the road to support, at a minimum, emergency service vehicles. Bituminous surfacing of
the roadway is preferred.
Easements
Public drainage and utility easements are provided on the preliminary plat being 10 feet
in width and adjoining all lot lines as required by City Ordinance. Additional drainage
and utility easements will need to be dedicated to cover all existing wetlands on the site.
Sewage Treatment
Soil borings provided by the applicant indicate the ability of the newly created Lots 2 and
3, Block 1 to accommodate two standard mound systems on each lot.
Park Dedication/Open Space
The City's Park Board has not had an opportunity to review the request. However, the
City's 1992 Park Plan and Development Guide identifies a proposed trail corridor from
Cedar Street, through what is now the Clearwater Creek subdivision, and extending
southerly to link up with Otter Lake Road.
5
Provision of a trail corridor along the eastern half of the proposed subdivision would
provide for the continuation of the trail system, existing within Clearwater Creek, and
provide access to the Clearwater Creek neighborhood park for residents located to the
south of the Clearwater Creek Development. Such access would allow the City to
maximize its investment in the park by expanding it's service area to include a greater
number of area residents. Additionally, as stated in the Park Plan, the continuation of this
trail along existing wetlands, drainageways, and wooded areas, within an area designated .
as proposed Greenway, represents an excellent opportunity to use the linear trail corridor
concept to its fullest potential.
However, given the amount of wetlands on the site, staff will need to evaluate the ability
to construct a trail through this area. Upon submission of the required wetland
delineation staff will be able to make this determination. In the event that trail
construction is not practical a payment in lieu of parkland dedication will be required.
The PDO requirements include a provision that thirty -five (35 %) of the total project area
shall be preserved as open space. Based on the size of the entire site (37.47 acres)
approximately 13 acres of open space should be provided. The applicant has noted in the
PDO narrative that the PDO is intended, in part, to provide for and preserve the wetlands
and open space for the surrounding properties.
Open Space may be provided for either by conveyance of property to the City or a non-
profit corporation or by establishment of a restrictive covenant running with the land for
the benefit of residents of the planned development.
The public drainage and utility easements that are required around all wetlands on the site
should adequately satisfy this requirement.
Ghost Plat
The applicant has provided a Ghost Plat identifying how Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, could be
subdivided in the future with the extension of public utilities. The plat demonstrates the
potential to divide the two lots to create eight lots meeting the R -1X, Single Family
Executive District lot requirements by extending a cul -de -sac into the property from the
west.
Future Subdivision
The intent of the PDO is to allow for the resubdivision of the property by, in part,
providing flexibility in the minimum lot size requirements. As noted previously upon the
subdivision of the property, as proposed, the overall density of the development (1 unit
per 12.49 acres) is consistent with the 1 unit per 10 acre requirement set forth in both the
City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
However, since the proposed Lot 1, Block 1 is approximately 32.08 acres it could
technically be subdivided in the future and satisfy the 10 acre lot minimum. Staff is of
6
•
the opinion that this would be inconsistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan and
zoning ordinance and would recommend that a covenant be place on Lot 3, Block 1, that
restricts future subdivision until such time as sanitary sewer and water is available to
service the site in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
OPINION
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed rezoning to Planned Development Overlay
District and associated subdivision are consistent with the policies and requirements of
the Lino Lakes Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance.
The proposed development, subject to the requirements of approval, will allow for the
subdivision of the subject property while maintaining rural residential densities,
preserving open space, and facilitating the implementation of the City's Park plan.
With regards to the rezoning the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that the Planning and
Zoning Board shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. Its
judgement shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan.
Comment: The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan. The Plan provides for rural clustered subdivisions. The overall density of
the development (1 unit per 12.49 acres) is consistent with the minimum rural
development density of 1 per 10 acres as specified in the plan. The proposal also
allows for future sewered residential development.
2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the
area.
Comment: The proposed use will be compatible with both present and future land
uses. The proposed subdivision is compatible with existing rural residential uses
and does not prevent possible future sewered residential development.
3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein.
Comment: The proposed subdivision, in conjunction with the conditions of
preliminary plat approval, will conform to the performance standards contained
with the zoning ordinance.
4. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the City's service capacity.
Comment: The proposed use will not overburden the City's service capacity.
7
5. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property.
Comment: Trip generation from the addition of two residential lots is within the
capabilities of existing streets serving the property.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing and reviewed the request at it's
February 12, 2003, regular meeting. The Board recommended approval of the rezoning
and preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report with the
following modifications:
1. That the private drive be a minimum of 20 feet in width and meet a seven ton
gravel road design.
2. That staff continue to evaluate the feasibility and need for the trail easement and
continue to work with the applicant on this issue.
RECOMMENDATION
A. Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning.
B. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions:
1. The proposed private road shall be improved to a minimum width of
twenty (20) feet and include a permanent cul -de -sac at its northern
terminus. The roadway shall be surfaced with gravel or a suitable material
and meet a seven ton road design. The roadway section shall be
determined by the City Engineer to insure the adequacy of the roadway to
support emergency vehicles.
2. A Homeowners Association shall be established to insure the continued
operation and maintenance of the private roadway. The association
agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attomey
prior to final plat approval.
3. All wetlands on the subject property shall be delineated and shown on the
final plat.
4. Public drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated to the city and
cover all wetlands on the subject property.
5. An easement for public trail purposes shall be dedicated to the City
extending from Rolling Hills Drive to the north property line of the subject
property pending further review by City staff. A payment in lieu of
8
parkland dedication shall be required if it is determined that a trail corridor
is not feasible.
6. The developer shall place a covenant over Lot 3, Block 1 restricting future
subdivision of the lot until such time as public sanitary sewer and water is
available to service the site in conformance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Such covenant shall be subject to review and
approval by the City Attorney.
7. The developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City to
insure completion of necessary roadway improvements. Such agreement
shall be entered into in conjunction with final plat approval.
8. The Rezoning is approved.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Ordinance No. 05 -03
2. Resolution No. 03 -28
3. Existing Conditions Survey dated January 21, 2003
4. Preliminary Plat dated February 5, 2003
9