Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/11/1995 Council Minutes1 1 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES DATE TIME STARTED .E TIME NDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT! • September 11, 1995 6:30 P.M. 7:03 P.M. Reinert, Kuether, Elliott, Bergeson Neal Staff members present: Acting City Attorney, Barry Sullivan; City Engineer, David Ahrens; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Finance Director, Mary Vaske; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk - Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. The Agenda was approved as presented. OPEN MIKE No one appeared under open mike. CONSIDERATION OF DISBURSEMENTS August 31, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. September 11, 1995 - Council Member Elliott moved to approve these disbursements as presented. Council Member-Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Centennial Fire District - Council Member Kuether moved to approve these minutes as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, BRIAN WESSEL Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 111 Calling for a Public Hearing on the Modification of the Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -7 - Mr. Wessel explained that the Economic Development Authority (EDA) authorized preparation of a modification of the Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District No. 1 -7 in the Apollo Business Park. The modification will provide PAGE 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 public assistance for Bill Fogerty and Custom Remodelers to build an office /warehouse facility. Once the City sets the public hearing for October 23, 1995 at 6:30 P.M., Anoka County and Centennial School District will receive copies of the proposed modification for review. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 111 calling a public hearing for October 23, 1995, 6:30 P.M. to hear comment on the modification of the Plan for TIF District No. 1 -7. Council Member Bergeson second the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 111 can be found at the end of these minutes. Consideration of Ordinance No. 16 - 95 Authorizing the Sale of City Property in the Apollo Business Park to Bill Fogerty and Custom Remodelers - Bill Fogerty and Custom Remodelers are purchasing a parcel of approximately three (3) acres in the City - owned portion of the Apollo Business Park for construction of an office /warehouse facility. According to Chapter XII, Section 12.05 of the Lino Lakes City Charter, an ordinance is required to authorize the sale of real property owned by the City. This business plans to start construction the first week of November. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt the first reading of Ordinance No. 16 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, DAVID AHRENS Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 109, Ordering the City Engineer to Prepare a Feasibility Report for an Elevated Storage Tank for the Clearwater Creek Area - Mr. Ahrens explained that staff is requesting the City Council to authorize the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility report investigating the installation of an elevated water storage facility between I35E and the Hugo /Lino Lakes boundary. The reason for this request is that with the possible substantial development in this corridor, an elevated storage tank is necessary to provide an adequate supply of water to the developments. The current Clearwater Creek development will be using a hydrostatic tank and it will only supply water for the planned 150 homes in that subdivision. The study will cost $950.00. Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 109. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 109 can be found at the end of these minutes. PAGE 2 1 1 1 1 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Consideration of Resolution No. 95 - 110 Ordering the City Engineer to Prepare a Feasibility Report for the Trunk Utility Services for Clearwater Creek Area - Mr. Ahrens explained that the possibility of future commercial and /or industrial developments in the Clearwater Creek development area between Main Street and Cedar Street in the near future will require sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer systems to be constructed. Staff is requesting authorization from Council to prepare a feasibility report investigating the construction of these utilities. The purpose for having the report prepared at this time, prior to any proposals for new development, is to provide the City with adequate information on how to best plan for the utility needs of any new developments. The City's consulting engineer has quoted a price of $1,150.00 to complete this study. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 110. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 110 can be found at the end of these minutes. Update on Grading Activities at New Developments - Mr. Ahrens presented a bi- weekly update on grading activities on newer developments in the City. The Trapper's Crossing subdivision has only a couple of minor items to complete. The first item is the grading of the slopes on a small portion of the project on the west side. There is some cleanup of siltation on the LaMotte side of the development. Mr. Ahrens will ask the consulting engineer on this project to address the remaining concerns. All the silt fences have been installed in the Clearwater Creek subdivision. Mr. Ahrens drove by the project today and noticed that there were hay bales on site. This usually means that seeding is taking place. At the last Council meeting, it was noted that there may be some problems with the Clearwater Creek flow and drainage.,,_`Mr. Ahrens notified the Rice Creek Watershed District of this concern and they have prepared a complete study or inventory of the creek from Bald Eagle Lake to Centerville Lake noting areas that are causing the water to backup and need improvement. This study was completed last week. A report of the study is being prepared and will be submitted to the cities affected by Clearwater Creek. Rice Creek Watershed District will discuss all of the problems in the entire corridor with all of the cities. The senior housing development started last Friday. Silt fences are up on the north side of the property. Currently silt fences are not yet up on the east side, however, the grading is not at a PAGE 3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 point where grading would cause silting off of the site. Mr. Ahrens said he did not know the schedule for this project, however utility work is in process and should take two (2) to three (3) weeks. It appears that some of the building sites could be completed this year. Mr. Schumacher explained that he had talked to the builder late last week and he indicated all site preparation for the cottages and the single family houses would be completed this season as well as all the foundation work so that they can work during the winter. They are looking at occupancy in the first units by January, 1996. The Fina station has been completely removed and new underground storage, tanks are being installed. This report was for Council information and no Council action is required. ACTING CITY ATTORNEY, BARRY SULLIVAN SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 14 - 95, Conflict of Interest - Mr. Sullivan explained that this proposed ordinance originated from a petitioning process by residents of the City. After several meetings between the City Council and the petitioning residents, satisfactory language was determined and is included in the proposed ordinance. The FIRST READING of the proposed ordinance was approved at the last City Council meeting. If the SECOND READING of the proposed ordinance is approved, it will replace the current Conflict of Interest Ordinance. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the SECOND READING, of Ordinance No. 14 - 95 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Bergeson voting no. Ordinance No. 14 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. SECOND READING, Ordinance No. 15 - 95, Notification Requirements - Mr. Sullivan explained that this is the SECOND READING of an ordinance that went through the same process as Ordinance No. 14 - 95. The language of the ordinance is a result of being reviewed by the City Council, staff and the citizens who presented the petition. The FIRST READING was approved by the City Council at the last Council meeting. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 15 - 95. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 4 1 1 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Ordinance No. 15 - 95 can be found at the end of these minutes. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION SETTING THE LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF 1995, FOR MONDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1995, 6:30 P.M., RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher noted that normally Council meetings are held on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. Since the second Council meeting in December falls on Christmas, December 25, 1995, he proposed that the meeting be rescheduled to the third Monday in December which is the 18th. Council Member Kuether moved to reschedule the second Council meeting in December for December 18, 1995. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 107 ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 1996 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher noted that the Truth in Taxation legislation requires the City to adopt a proposed 1996 operating budget on or before September 15th, 1995. A proposed 1996 operating budget has been prepared proposing a zero tax increase. A day -long work session was held in which each department head met with the City Council to present their goals and needs for 1996. A work session was held last Wednesday to discuss details of some of the department proposals. During both of the budget work sessions, the City Council emphasized that they wanted a zero tax increase budget. The proposed preliminary 1996 budget indicates that there will not be a property tax increase. The department budgets within the 1996 proposed operating budget will be further reviewed by the City Council and staff between September 15, 1995 and November 25, 1995. Additional changes may be determined. Council Member Bergeson noted that although the proposed 1996 budget indicates a zero increase in taxes, that does not mean a homeowner will not have a tax increase. If the tax - payers property value increases or if another taxing entity such as the County or the School District increase their levies, there will be a tax increase. This means that there will be no tax increase due to additional City expenditures. Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 107 setting the 1996 Operating Budget of $4,051,593.00. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 107 can be found at the end of these minutes. PAGE 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 108 ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 1995 TAX LEVY, COLLECTABLE 1996, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that the Truth in Taxation legislation requires the City to adopt a proposed 1995 levy on or before September 15 of each year. Public hearings will be held to take public input on the proposed levy. The City Council does have the right to reduce the levy if the proposed budget is refined and reduced. The City Council does not have the right to increase the proposed levy. The proposed net levy is $2,624,043.00. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 95 - 108 setting the proposed 1995 levy, collectable 1996 as outlined in the resolution. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 95 - 108 can be found at the end of these minutes. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO SET THE TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING DATES, DECEMBER 7, 1995, 6:30 P.M. AND THE RECONVENING OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR DECEMBER 14, 1995, 6:30 P.M., RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that all government entities are required to hold Truth in Taxation hearings to receive public input on the proposed budget and levy. At the hearing, a presentation will be made outlining what is being proposed for department budgets and what is proposed for property taxes for the coming year. Mr. Schumacher recommended that the hearing dates be set as outlined above. Council Member Elliott moved to set the public hearings as proposed by Mr. Schumacher. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Kuether suggested that the Council work session be moved to December 7, 1995 instead of December 6, 1995. This request will be reviewed in November. CONSIDERATION OF A MOTION TO ADOPT THE FINAL 1995 LEVY COLLECTABLE, 1996 AND THE 1996 OPERATING BUDGET AT THE DECEMBER 18, 1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that earlier the City Council set December 18, 1995 as the final Council meeting of the year. He proposed that the final 1995 levy, collectable, 1996 and the 1996 operating budget be approved at that meeting. PAGE 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 Council Member Kuether moved to consider the final levy and 1995 operating budget at the December 18, 1995 City Council meeting. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A LETTER FROM MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE REGARDING THE CITY'S BOND RATING, RANDY SCHUMACHER Mr. Schumacher explained that over the past year staff has been working to increase the City's bond rating. The City has been in a growth mode for the past several years. The City's ability to establish a strong financial program is important. With this in mind, the City requested a Moody's evaluation for the purpose of upgrading its credit rating. With the assistance of the City's public finance advisors, City staff submitted the necessary information to Moody's rating committee outlining the financial strength of Lino Lakes. Two (2) weeks ago, the City received written notice that the City has been upgraded to a BAA1 credit rating. The most significant impact of this news is that there will be lower interest rate on the City's financing needs as well as an increase in the value of the City's outstanding bonds. Also, the Economic Development Authority (EDA) would receive the same rating if they decide to sell bonds. Mr. Schumacher commended Mary Vaske, Finance Director who worked with Springsted, Inc. putting together the necessary information to upgrade the bond rating. He also noted that there is the possibility of another bond upgrade in the near future. Mayor Reinert say that this is good news particularly since the City is in a growth mode. He noted that this speaks well of the management of the City. Mr. Schumacher explained that this City is relatively young and an upgrade at this point also speaks well of the management. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to be considered. NEW BUSINESS Consideration of Minutes, August 28, 1995 (Council Member Kuether was absent) - Council Member Elliott moved to approve the minutes as presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Kuether abstaining. Consideration of a Block Party Request for Heather Court, September 30, 1995 - Mrs. Anderson explained that a block party request for Heather Court, a cul -de -sac, had been received. This PAGE 7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 area has been holding block parties for several years. The Police Department, Fire Department and the Public Works Department have reviewed the request and have not indicated a problem with holding the party on the cul -de -sac. The Public Works Superintendent has noted that he is always apprehensive of any "people type" use of roadways because of the liability factor. Council Member Kuether moved to approve the block party request. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of League of Minnesota Cities Regional Meeting, Thursday, September 28, 1995 - This item is for informational purpose only. REMINDER, Joint Meeting with the City of Hugo, Thursday, September 14, 1995, 7:30 P.M. This item is for informational purpose only. Council Member Bergeson moved to adjourn at 7:03 P.M. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Aye. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular City Council meeting held on October 9, 1995. Marilyn G. Anderson, Vernon F. Reinert, Clerk - Treasurer Mayory PAGE 8 1 1 1 1 Council Member Kuether adoption: introduced the following ordinance and moved its CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 14 - 95 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 204 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE AND ADDING A NEW CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, ordains Section 1: Section 204 of the Lino Lakes City Code is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 2: The Lino Lakes City Code is amended by adding a chapter to read as follows: SECTION 204A. Conflict of Interest Section 204A.01 Procedures. Any elected official, city employee or agent appointed by the City Council, or any member of a committee or commission who has been appointed by the Council or Mayor, who, in the discharge of their official duties, would be required to take action or make a decision which could substantially affect the official's financial interest, or those of and associated business, unless the effect on the official is no greater than on any other members of the official's business classification, profession or occupation, shall take the following actions: Section 211.4A.02 Disclosure. Disclose to the Council or Chairperson, and other embers of the commission of which they are a member, their participation in the matter, prior to the time the matter is considered by the Council, committee, or commission. Section 204A.03 Removal of Influence. Remove themselves in the manner prescribed by the Council, or the Chairperson of the committee or commission of which they are a member, from any consideration or influence over the action and decision in question. Section 204A.04 Representation of Interested Party. Not appear before the Council or committee or commission of which they are a Ordinance No. 14 - 95 Page --2- member, on their own behalf, or as a representative for any other person, firm, corporation, partnership, or association, operated either for profit or non - profit. Section 204A.05. City Employment. No member of the City Council shall accept any employment, except as a council member, with the City of Lino Lakes. Section 204A.06. Removal from Office. Any officer, employee, agent, or member of a committee or commission who intentionally violates the provisions of this section can be removed as an officer, employee, agent, or member of a committee or commission by a majority action of the entire City Council, after a hearing held by the Council, pursuant to written charges, and at least ten (10) days personal notice, or in the event the individual cannot be served after due diligence, by ten (10) days published notice, or both. Section 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication by the Lino Lakes City Council. Passed this l I th day of September, 1995. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor 27/; / Syr .. Marilyn G. nderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Elliott, Kuether, Reinert. The following voted against same: Bergeson. Council Member Neal was absent. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 1 1 1 1 Council Member Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 15 - 95 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING LINO LAKES CITY CODE BY MODIFYING THE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS ON REZONING AND METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARY CHANGES The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, ordains: Section 1: Section 5, Subdivision 3(2) of the Lino Lakes City Code is amended to read as follows: which Section 5, Subdivision 3(2): Property owners or occupants within 600 feet of any property proposed for zoning district amendment (rezoning) shall be notified in writing, although failure by any property owner to receive notification shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided that proof of an attempt at notification has been made. Notification shall be by first -class mail. Such notification shall include the Affidavit of Mailing completed by the City and a list of all persons who have been notified pursuant to this Section. In the case of rezoning shoreland, as defined by Lino Lakes Ordinance, all property owners or occupants of property, abut the shoreline, shall be notified in writing of any property proposed for any zoning district amendment (rezoning), even though their property may be beyond the 600 feet previously contemplated in this section. Section 2: Section 5, Subdivision 3(7) of the Lino Lakes City Code is amended to read as follows: Section 5, Subdivision 3(7): Notice for the purpose, time and place of such public hearing shall be published twice in the official newspaper of the City and mailed to the appropriate property owners at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. A clear and concise map of the proposed zoning district amendment shall be included in all mailings. Section 3: Section 5, of the Lino Lakes City Code is amended to add the following section as follows: Ordinance No. 15 - 95 Page -2- Section 5, Subdivision 3 (10): Property owners or occupants within 600 feet of any proposed changes to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (hereinafter MUSA) boundaries shall be notified in writing, although failure by any property owner to receive such notification shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided that proof of an attempt at notification has been made. Notification shall be by first -class mail. Such notification shall include the Affidavit of Mailing completed by the City and a list of all persons who have been notified pursuant to this section. Notice for the purpose, time and place of the action to change a MUSA boundary shall be published twice in the official newspaper of the City and mailed to the appropriate property owners at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. A clear and concise map of the proposed changes shall be included in the mailing. Section 4: Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption and publication by the Lino Lakes City Council. Passed this 11th day of September, 1995 by the Lino Lakes City Council. Marilyn J Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor The motion for adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Neal was absent. Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 1 1 1 1 Council member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NUMBER 95 -107 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 1996 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES. WHEREAS, Pursuant to State Statute, the Lino Lakes City Council is required to adopt a resolution setting out proposed revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the following General Fund operating budget be adopted on a preliminary basis for 1996. 1996 PROPOSED GENERAL FUND BUDGET REVENUES: Property Taxes $2,328,302.00 Intergovernmental Revenue 670,204.00 Business Licenses and Permits 17,242.00 Non Business Licenses and Permits 360,890.00 Charges for Services 22,600.00 Public Safety 105,680.00 Municipal Fines 90,000.00 Investments 50,000.00 Miscellaneous 100,900.00 Non - Revenue Receipts 305,775.00 TOTAL PROPOSED - GENERAL FUND REVENUES $4,05L593.00 EXPENDITURES: Mayor and Council $56,085.00 Elections 10,440.00 Administration 285,037.00 Cable TV 5,770.00 Finance 212,367.00 Legal Consultants 112,000.00 Economic Development 134,834.00 Engineering/Planning 281,971.00 Expenditures continued: Planning and Zoning Board 9,190.00 Government Buildings 193,903.00 Charter Commission 4,250.00 Police 1,050,596.00 Fire 273,000.00 Building Inspections 101,815.00 Streets 530,044.00 Solid Waste Abatement 46,975.00 Fleet Management 153,653.00 Parks 298,072.00 Recreation 106,622.00 Park Board 6,005.00 Forestry 98,064.00 Others 80,900.00 TOTAL PROPOSED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $4,051.593.00 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this l lth day of September 1995. Marilyn Anderson, Clerk - Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, tether, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Neal was absent. Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: 1 1 1 1 Council member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CITY OF LINO LAKES NO. 95 -108 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE PROPOSED 1995 TAX LEVY, COLLECTABLE IN 1996. WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is in need of certain funds to pay expenditures for General Fund operating costs anticipated in the year 1996, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is in need of certain funds to pay expenses towards Certificate of Indebtedness obligations, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is in need of certain funds to pay expenses towards the Public Project Revenue Bonds, and WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is not restricted by levy limitations imposed by the State of Minnesota. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby does levy on a proposed basis the following upon taxable property in said City of Lino Lakes, to -wit: 1. Total amount levied in the year 1995 to be spread for taxes due and payable in the year 1996 including Homestead and Agriculture Credit Aid (HACA) is the total sum of $3,040,000.00. 2. The total amount above levied is for the following purposed: GENERAL OPERATING General Bonded Debt Public Project Revenue Bonds Equipment Certificates of 1992 Equipment Certificates of 1994 Equipment Certificates of 1995 Total General Obligation Bonded Debt TOTAL LEVIES $2,685,794.00 104,055.00 54,679.00 82,688.00 112,784.00 3.54,206.00 $3.040.000,00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes City Council that the general fund operating budget and special levies for Equipment Certificates and the Public Project Revenue Bonds as reviewed by the City Council represents the basis for this levy. Individual department budgets are subject to preliminary approval by the City Council and shall be authorized by separate action before September 15, 1995. LET IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED that the total levy will be certified to the County of Anoka less the certified amount of HCAC for payable 1996. Total Levy Less Total HACA $3,040,000.00 (415,957.00) Total Levy less HACA 2,624,043.00 Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 1 lth day of September, 1995. " 11--Y,: Marilyn G. �L -j ft Z,Ljt4A- derson, Clerk - Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Neal was absent. Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: 1 1 1 Council Member Kuether introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 -109 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT FOR STORAGE FOR WATER SYSTEM (ELEVATED WATER STORAGE FACILITY) WHEREAS: it is proposed to construct an elevated water storage facility and to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the Lino Lakes City Charter, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary was as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this day of ,1995. Vernon Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clefk- Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Neal was absent. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 Council Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 110 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OF CLEARWATER CREEK TRUNK UTILITY SERVICES WHEREAS: it is proposed to construct sanitary sewer, water and storm water systems from Cedar Street to Main Street and to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and the Lino Lakes City Charter, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this day of , 1995. Vernon Reinert, Mayor Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer The motion for the adoptiefl of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergesa & d upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Neal was absent. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 1 Member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 95 -111 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -7 WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA ") intends to modify the plan (the "Plan ") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 -7 ( "TIF District No. 1 -7 "); and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF Act ") requires that the city council of the city of Lino Lakes (the "City ") hold a public hearing on the modified Plan for TIF District No. 1 -7, following approval thereof by the EDA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota as follows: 1. The city clerk- treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the city council to consider this matter on October 23, 1995, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior to the public hearing. 2. The city clerk- treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent School District No. 12 and Anoka County at least 30 days prior to the public hearing and to invite their comments on the modified Plan. 3. The city staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any and all other actions necessary to bring this matter before the city council at the time of the public hearing. Dated: September 11, 1995 Vernon Reinert, Mayor Randall Schumacher, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kuether and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Kuether, Reinert. and the following voted against same: None, Council Member Neal was absent. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 1