Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/06/1970 Council MinutesIII n n 3096 William Waldooh 3097 William Waldooh BILLS: June 22, 1970 (Continued) (3095) Northway Hdwe & Auto (3095) 1 1 JUNE 1970 PAYROLL: 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167, 1168 1169 1170 Supplies for Parks .$ 19.06 Supplies for Shop 2.58 1970 taxes paid.by Mr. Waldooh on 30 acre 157.94 parcel under contract by Village. Purchase of 1 additional acre of land out- =550.00 right from remainder of 30 acre parcel. Ralph M. L'Allier William I. Bohjanen Andrew J. Cardinal Henry H. Rosengren Ronald J. Jaworski June L. Emerton Edna L. Sarner Marvin B. Myhre Virgil F. Lundberg Richard S. Hauer William G. Anderson Lena Billik Chancy E. LeVesseur Albert Dupre (2/3 fees) Gunder B. Gunderson Roy H. Baoklin Robert A. Lundgren John R. Juleen Keith Beecher Imogene Secretan Minutes approved at the meeting, of July 13, 197 $ 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 .300.00 600.00 225.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 25.00 59.97 75.60 425.25 351.00 178.00 31.05 42.25 Clerk-Treasurer The special meeting of the Lino Lakes Village Council held on July 6, 1970, to consider the bids on the new municipal building was called to order at 8 ;07 p.m. by Mayor L'Allier with all members present. Also in attendance were Engineer Gotwald as well as Glenn Rehbein and John McLean of the Building Committee. The bids had been opened on June 29th at 11 o'clock a.m. by Engineer Gotwald, Trustee Rosengren and the Clerk. The affidavits of publication of the ad and the ad itself were read. Mr. Gotwald opened the bids and read them as follows: 1. Nordling Construction Co.: bid bond 5 %; bid amount -- $97,731; time- 4 to 5 mo. 2. Gladstone Improvement Co.: bid bond 5 %; bid amount-- $159,000;time- 6 mo. 3. Krueger Construction Co.: bid bond 5 %; bid amount -- $83,807; time- 6 mo. 4. Mattson Building'& Supply Co.: bid bond 5 %; bid amount -- $89,795; time- 135 days. 5. Metro - Metals, Inc.: bid bond 5 %; bid amount -- $1012,668.00; time 90 days. Mr. Gotwald had informed the company representatives present that he would tabulate the bids and would report on them to the Council at a special meeting July 6th at 8 p.m. The low bidder would be notified. 152 There was discussion on refunding the bid deposits. 1r. Bohjanen moved to refund the $25.00 deposit to all the firms which had taken bidding specs, except, that as noted in the advertisement, the deposit of the two lowest bidders would be held for 30 days. Seconded by**. Rosengren. Carried unanimously. Mr. Gotwald stated that the two lowest bidders were Krueger and Mattson; therefore these would be the only two to consider. Krueger had the lowest lump sum bid on a Butler building, but he had only submitted a bid proposal and no specs. There were several deductions which Mr. Gotwald felt were not legitimate since all the items were included in the specs. These included the use of 26 gauge metal rather than 24 gauge. Mr. Krueger had not mentioned the exact type of slab and footings, and had not included sidewalks. There was discussion. Mr. Gotwald discussed the use of the 24 gauge metal with Glenn Rehbein as well as the roof load requirement of. 401# /sq. in. He also noted that the Mattson bid had a more desirable completion time. Mr. Gotwald mentioned that none of the bidders had brought a 20 year guarantee, but that Mattson had a 5 year guarantee. He stressed that the building must be absolutely leakproof. Mr. Gotwald especially noted, the following items from the.Mattson bid: the panelling would be backed with sheetrock; a 1" layer of Styrofoam insulation between the floor and the outside wall; vinyl interior moldings, Kohler fixtures, coatraek, Formica countertops, boxed in exposed beams in the Clerk's office;,200 amp electric service and air conditioning. Not included were ceramics in the restrooms; however, the rooms would be finished up to that point; no trim that could not be made at the factory; no pipe protector posts. Also, there was not enough ,. room for the coffee bar in the furnace roam but a chunk of the Council chambers could be out out for it. Mr. Gotwald also read through the alternates and the deductions and additions. There was some discussion on, the matter of underground heating as opposed to regis- ters near the floor as well as on the matter of the canopy width. Glenn Rehbein suggested that the wide canopies be left in the front but that a 2' overhang be sufficient over the garage doors and in the back. Mr. Gotwald stated that the wider canopies look better; that if the width overall was changed it would change the basic design. There was some discussion on the two companies. Mr. Cardinal moped that it be noted that the Council has reviewed the bidding specs from Mattson Building & Supply Co. along with the Engineer and the Building Committee and found the bid to conform to the requirements; that the original lump sum bid of $89,795 minus the following deductions: 1. $2103 for using 26 gauge instead of 24 gauge metal 2. 1592 for using 8" insulation instead of 3" 3. 2732, for using a floating slab grade beam which meets building code Total of $6427, giving a net bid of $83,368 after deductions; also leaving the bid open to later clarification if something should come up. Seconded by Mr. Bohjanen. Carried unanimously. The Krueger bid with a lump sum amount of $83,807 minus a deduction of $821 for use of 26 gauge metal instead of 24 gauge, leaves a net bid amount of $82,986. This is $382.00 less than the Mattson bid. However, Mr. Gotwald noted that we needed a com- plete set of specs in writing from Krueger for answers on several particular questions, namely; 1. floating slab with 16" grade beam 6. type of doors 2. sidewalks and front aprons 7. any or all of painting 3. insulation 8. type of plumbing fixtures 4. paneling and backing 9. heating & air conditioning 5. necessary counter tops & coat rack 10. light fixtures 1 1 1 W. Bohjanen moved to have W. Gotwald contact Lyle Krueger on the above items and to have W. Krueger come for an interview at a special meeting on Wednesday, July 8, at 8:00 p.m.; notices of the meeting to be waived. Also that the Attorney be contacted to attend. Seconded by Mr. Jeworski. Carried unanimously. The Building Committee gave the following approximate figures for addition items for the building and area: 1. .Well and sewer 2. Painting 3. Carpeting 4. Blacktopping 5. Sod and planting 6. Grading and filling hale 7. Air compressor,and welder 8. First interest payment Total $2000 750 1800 3000 .1000 1000 3000 6500 $19,050 This figure plus the bid would be nearly $100,000. It was felt that some items such as the blacktop and shop equipment could be cut somewhat for this year and put on the next budget. W. Gotwald felt that we had gotten good bids. The payment schedule was checked and it was found that the interest paymeht in 1971 was due on March 1st; after that semi - annual interest payments would be on March 1 and September 1, with the bond payment due on March 1st of each year. The Clerk was asked to check on the net amount left of the $100,000 bond. Samples of paneling, brick and building color will be admaitted after the contract was awarded. W. Cardinal moved to adjourn. at 9:37 p.m. Seconded -by W. Rosengren. All voted aye. Clerk- Treasurer Minutes corrected at the meeting of July 13, 1970 The special meeting of the Lino Lakes Village Council held on July 8, 1970, to meet with Lyle Krueger, d/b /a Krueger Construction Co., concerning his bid on the new municipal building was called to order at 8:08 p.m. by Mayor L'A]lier with all members present. W. Gotwald and W. Locher were also present. Mr..Cardinal moved to waive notice of this meeting as time was so short. Seconded by W. Bohjanen. ,Motion carried unanimously. W. L'Allier stated that the Council had gone over the bids on July 6th and had voted to return the deposits of all bidders except the two lowest which will be held for 30 days. W. Gotwald stated that Mr. Krueger had had the lowest lump sum,bid amount and that only one of the listed deductions was allowed, namely the $821 for the substitution of 26 gauge metal for 24 gauge. W. Bob Coyle of Balco Building Systems, which would supply the material for the Butler building, stated that the reason they suggested 26 gauge was that the only color Butler had in 24 gauge was parchment. He also stated that 99 -1/2% of their buildings are of 26 gauge material. The only reason the other company can supply 24 gauge is that they use a wider span on their beams, etc. W. Coyle felt that 26 gauge would be quite adequate for side wall deflection and durability. W. Gotwald noted that the net bid price using the one deduction would be $82,986.