Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/22/1993 Council Minutes (2)1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNCIL MINUTES DATE : November 22, 1993 TIME .STARTED : 6:35 P.M. TIME ENDED ' : 8:37 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Reinert, Neal, Elliott. Bergeson MEMBERS ABSENT is Kuether Staff members present: City Engineer, Darrell Schneider; Consulting Engineer, Tim Hanson, SEH; Economic Development Authority Advisory Board Chairman, Brian Wessel; Planning Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; City Administrator, Randy Schumacher and Clerk -Treasurer Marilyn Anderson. There were no adjustments to the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Neal moved to approve the consent agenda as presented. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Council Member Neal questioned two (2) disbursement items on the November 22, 1993 Disbursement Listing. The first item concerned the uniform for the Chief of Police. Mr. Schumacher explained that the existing policy is that all full time officers receive a full clothing allowance and all newly hired officers receive a clothing allotment. The second item concerned clothing allowance for Parks Director, Marty Asleson. Mr. Schumacher will determine what this disbursement is for and the bill will not be paid until this information is available to the City Council. Voting on the motion, motion carried unanimously. ITEM DISPOSITION MINUTES: • Council Meeting, November 8, 1993 Approved PAGE 1 30 3n4 COUNCIL MEETING DISBURSEMENTS: November 22, 1993 Centennial Fire Department REGULAR AGENDA NOVEMBER 22, 1993 Approved Approved Anoka County Sheriff, Ken Wilkinson - Sheriff Wilkinson thanked the City Council for the opportunity to appear before them. He explained that each year he tries to touch base with each City Council within Anoka County in a continuing effort to maintain and strengthen effective communication between the Sheriff's office and each community. He explained that he wanted to use this opportunity to check on the County's effort in providing service to Lino Lakes and also get feedback on ways the Sheriff's office might be more effective. Sheriff Wilkinson noted that the working relationship between his office and the Lino Lakes Police Department continues to be an excellent relationship. He noted pleasure in the hiring of David Pecchia as Lino Lakes Chief of Police and explained that he has known Chief Pecchia for many years. Sheriff Wilkinson noted several examples of how the Sheriff's Department has worked with the Lino Lakes Police Department. Special services offered to the Lino Lakes Police Department include an investigative unit, a sexual assault unit and a drug enforcement unit. Sheriff Wilkinson explained the purpose of each unit and noted some examples of how these units assisted the Lino Lakes Police Department in the past year. He noted an upward trend in reported sexual assaults in Anoka County and noted that "hard core" drugs are being experienced as well. Other services provided by the Sheriff's Department include a crime lab processing unit, jail facility, canine unit, SWAT team, and the DARE program. Sheriff Wilkinson outlined briefly each program. Council Member Neal asked if the DARE program was supported by donations. Sheriff Wilkinson said no, the DARE program is provided to the City of Lino Lakes on a contract basis. The City pays about 1/2 the cost of a staff person and about 1/2 the cost of the books and materials given to school children. The balance of the program is funded from funds and materials confiscated from drug dealers. Council Member Neal noted that the children are really enthused with the'program. Council Member Bergeson noted a problem that exists for the City PAGE 2 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 of Lino Lakes and other surrounding communities. When an officer makes an arrest and must transport the person to the jail in the City of Anoka, Lino Lakes is sometimes without any patrolman at all, not even for emergencies. Officers from surrounding communities are asked to cover the City while our officer is away. Council Member Bergeson asked if there were any plans to construct a jail facility nearby. Sheriff Wilkinson noted another city has expressed the same concern and he will be looking into this matter. He asked that the City put this concern in a letter directed to the County Commissioner representing Lino Lakes. Council Member Neal noted that the Minnesota Correctional Facility on Lilac Street often has empty holding cells. He asked if the City could use this facility. Sheriff Wilkinson said he was not familiar with this situation but noted that the City could make separate arrangements with the state. The City Council thanked Sheriff Wilkinson for coming this evening. Robert Bening, 6788 East Shadow Lake Drive - Mr. Bening asked the City Council to consider an ordinance that would regulate the storage of boats and boat trailers in residential driveways. He noted that such storage is unsightly. Mr. Bening explained that the ordinance could be drafted in a similar manner as the motor home/recreational vehicle ordinance. Mayor Reinert asked that this matter be referred to the Planning and Zoning Board and asked that the entire area of recreational vehicle storage be addressed. Mr. Bening said he was only concerned about things stored in front of the house, not things stored along side or behind the house. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT Site Plan Review and Variance Request, 49 Club, 6007 Hodgson Road. - Mr. Wessel explained that the 49 Club has requested a site plan review and variance request to allow the construction of a solarium along a portion of the southern and eastern exterior walls of their building. Mr. David Nathe representing the co- owner of the business has prepared a long term program to upgrade the entire site.in phases. The EDAAB and the Planning and Zoning Board has review the proposals and recommend City Council approval of the requests. Ms. Wyland used the overhead projector to show the proposed improvements. She explained that the existing building is located nine (9) feet from the south property line. The setback PAGE 3 3 0'5 3!:? COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 requirement is 40 feet. However, this is a pre-existing, non- conforming use with a setback dictated by the recent improvement and widening of County Road J. The staff, the EDAAB and the Planning and Zoning Board have reviewed the request and recommend approval of the variance and site and plan review with the following stipulations: 1. A landscape buffer be provided along Highway #49, County Road J and the residential area to the west, this buffer shall include fencing and landscaping to separate the 49 Club parking areas from the driveway access to the 4-plex to the northwest of the 49 Club. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided listing species, size and type of plantings. 2. All trash handling equipment be contained in a closed container and screened from view of adjacent property and the street right-of-way. 3. All off-street parking areas conform to the minimum required 15 foot setback from public right-of-way. 4. The parking areas be stripped and handicapped parking designated. 5. The site plan identify the following: A. Off-street loading areas, B. Location of outdoor trash handling area, C. Off-street parking areas, D. Area of road right-of-way condemnation, E. All lighting of off-street parking areas indicating that the light will reflect away from adjoining property, F. Landscaped buffeted areas. 6. The City Engineer shall approve the site grading and drainage plan. 7. All signage shall meet the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance. 8. A Development Agreement shall be made part of this site plan review and approved financial guarantees posted with the City prior to issuance of any building permits. 9. A variance for front setback along County Road J be approved. The applicant has submitted a site plan which appears to contain PAGE 4 1 3O COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 all items requested except fencing and landscaping between the parking area and the access to the 4-plex. Council Member Bergeson asked if time limits were placed on any of the requirements. Ms. Wyland explained that time limits will be outlined in the Development Agreement. In addition, financial guarantees will be required for each process. The access to the 4-plex was discussed. Mayor Reinert explained that it was important that access to this unit be maintained for emergency vehicles. He asked what types of plantings and fencing would be required and noted that such things over time tend to be destroyed by vehicles and salt from snow removal equipment. Ms. Wyland explained that a plan will be prepared. Mayor Reinert felt concrete posts would be more effective in preventing damage to plantings. It was noted that plantings are being required along County Road J and Highway #49. Mayor Reinert felt these would also be destroyed by snowplows and salt. He asked what the purpose of the plantings was. Ms. Wyland explained to delineate driveways and for curb appeal. Mayor Reinert asked if other things could be done rather than what is proposed. It was noted that the plantings will make snow plowing in the parking lot difficult. Mr. Nathe suggested putting a sidewalk along the two streets. He noted nothing else will survive. Mr. Nathe noted that he would be losing a great number of parking spaces by placing the plantings as required. He explained that he did not like the plantings and fencing along the driveway to the 4-plex. Mr. Nathe suggested relocating the driveway further west along the line of evergreens. He also noted that there is a fire emergency driveway between the 49 Club and the building to the north. Council Member Bergeson felt that the City Council should not be talking about design items with the applicant, this matter should be returned to the Planning and Zoning Board for further consideration or approved as presented. Council Member Elliott asked if the option of moving the driveway to the west was discussed with the Planning and Zoning Board. Ms. Wyland said no. However, she noted that moving the driveway may be a good solution. She also noted that a professional opinion regarding what type of shrubs would be more likely to survive will be sought. Mr. Wessel noted that this plan is also on a tight timetable. He' also noted that the Anoka County ITighway Department has requested the plantings along County 'Road J. After further discussion regarding the driveway access to the 4 - PAGE 5 3n6 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 plex, Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the site plan review and variance with the conditions listed above and that a tenth condition be added requiring the applicant and staff to work out an appropriate driveway access to the 4-piex on the northwest corner of the property. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Site Plan Review and Minor Subdivision, Greenhaven Press, Inc., Apollo business Center - Mr. Wessel explained that Greenhaven Press, Inc. is a publishing company specializing in text books, periodicals and newspapers for distribution to schools, colleges, bookstores, etc. They are requesting a site plan review and minor subdivision to allow the construction of a 16,160 square foot building on 2.1 acres of land in the Apollo Business Center. Mr. Jim Winkels representing Greenhaven Press and Mr. David Nelson representing the landowner are both present this evening. Ms. Wyland explained that the staff, EDAAB and the Planning and Zoning Board have reviewed the request and have recommended approval with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of the minor subdivision. 2. Site plan revised to indicate handicapped parking. 3. The site plan revised to provide parking for Phase II of the development. 4. Trash handling areas are located on the site plan and properly screened from adjoining properties and any street right-of-way. 5. All exterior lighting is located on the plan and illustrated so as to reflect away from adjoining properties and any street right-of-way. 6. Any site signage comply with the City Sign Ordinance. 7. The City Engineer review and approve final drainage plan. 8. A Development Agreement and appropriate financial guarantees be signed and posted prior to issuance of any building permits. 9. An access agreement be drafted addressing the shared driveway access and recorded with both properties. Council Member Bergeson question Item No. 9, shared driveway. Ms. Wyland explained that because Apollo Drive is a county state PAGE 6 1 1 1 30`. COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 aid road, accesses are limited. Anoka County Highway Department has reviewed the access and will be granting a permit for the shared driveway. Council Member Elliott moved to approve the site plan review and minor subdivision with the nine (9) conditions listed above. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Consideration of Resolution No. 92 - 93 Supporting the Greenhaven Press, Inc. Proposal - Mr. Wessel explained that Greenhaven Press, Inc., a text book publisher, currently headquartered in San Diego with a distribution warehouse center in Shoreview plan to build as outlined in the previous agenda item. EDAAB has been working with the company to facilitate the move to Lino Lakes. Lino Lakes has been competing against five (5) other communities for this business. EDAAB requests the support of the City Council for Tax Increment Financing assistance as outlined in Resolution No. 92 - 93. Mr. Wessel read the resolution. Council Member Bergeson noted that if the City Council supports this resolution, no dollars will be spent from the General Fund. The dollars outlined in the resolution will come from additional taxes dollars generated by the improvement of that particular property. Council Member Bergeson moved to approve support for Greenhaven Press, Inc. as outlined in Resolution No. 92 - 93. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 92 - 93 can be found at the end of these minutes. Final Plat, Pheasant Hills Preserve, Fourth Addition - This subdivision is located north of Birch Street and just west of Centerville Road. This particular phase of the development is located on the eastern border of the plat and contains 22 R -1X lots. The preliminary plat for Pheasant Hills Preserve was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board and City Council in August, 1990. This request is for the final plat of the fourth addition. Staff has reviewed this request and recommends approval., A Development Agreement has been signed and financial guarantees are in place for all site improvements. Council Member Neal moved to approve the final plat of Pheasant Hills Preserve, Fourth Addition as presented. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. PAGE 7 31 +J COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING, ORDINANCE NO. 93 - 19 AMENDING THE LINO LAKES CITY CHARTER Mr. Wessel explained that the Charter Commission has approved an amendment to Chapter 8 of the City Charter. The City Council held the first reading on the amendment on November 8, 1990. Since that date, two (2) telephone calls have been received with questions for clarification. The residents were concerned about whether they would have to repetition if another project was planned and also if they would receive ample notification regarding another project. There have been no negative comments or questions. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Ordinance No. 93 - 19 and dispense with the reading. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 93 - 19 can be found at the end of these minutes. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT, LAKE DRIVE (COUNTY ROAD #23) AND HIGHWAY #49 INTERSECTION Mr. Hanson placed a drawing of the improvement on the easel and briefly explained the background on this proposed improvement. He also used the overhead projector to outline the location of the improvement and to describe what improvements are planned for the intersection. He noted that the improvement will be completed with the cooperation of Anoka County and MnDOT with Lino Lakes being the lead agency. Project costs contained in the feasibility report were outlined. A cooperative agreement will be completed between Anoka County, MnDOT and the City. Mr. Hanson noted that the City of Circle Pines is aware of the project but has made no commitment to their share of the costs. Mr. Hanson noted that there is just one (1) benefitting property owner, George Reiling. His property will be assessed its share of the costs. Right-of-way acquisition must be completed prior to obtaining state funding. There are on-going discussions with the owners of two (2) other parcels regarding right-of-way acquisition. The project schedule was outlined and Mr. Hanson noted that right -of -acquisition is a critical element in keeping the project on schedule. If the project proceeds as planned, the project will be under construction by the first of July, 1994. The bulk of the construction should be completed by the fall of 1994 with final cleanup, sodding and seeding completed in the spring of 1995. The cooperative agreement should be completed in PAGE 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 the next six (6) to eight (8) weeks. Robert Bening, 6788 East Shadow Lake Drive asked about the trail system for bikers and walkers. Mr. Hanson pointed out the location of the trail system and noted that there is no other place to construct the trail system due to the wetlands restrictions. Council Member Bergeson asked if closing the public hearing at this time mean that the project could not be modified. Mr. Hawkins said no. Council Member Elliott moved to close the public hearing at 8:07 P.M. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The City Council must follow the City Charter and wait 60 days before ordering the public hearing. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 91 - 93 ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LAKE DRIVE (COUNTY ROAD #23) AND HIGHWAY #49 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Mr. Schneider explained that SEH has suspended all work on this project. The feasibility report recommended initiating plan preparation by October 25, 1993. Since it is important to keep as close to the schedule as possible if the improvements are to be considered for funding by MnDOT in their fiscal year 1995 (July 1, 1994). Mr. Schneider recommended that plans and specifications be ordered at this time. He noted that MnDOT's encumbrance of funds is finalized upon their approval of construction plans so that the later the plans are submitted, the lower the chances are that funding will be available for fiscal year 1995. Mr. Schneider also noted that plan preparation is dependent upon permit requirements, particularly the mitigation of impacted wetlands, and the identification of wetland impacts is a function of the design process. This coordination between plan preparation and permitting is becoming considerably more time consuming and is one of the factors considered in the project schedule. The estimated project expenditures to prepare plans and specifications as indicated in the feasibility report is $94,000.00 through February, 1994. Council Member Bergeson asked what happens if the City spends the dollars for plan preparation, orders the project and the owner of PAGE 9 31 3t2 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 the benefitting property objects to the assessment. There is some potential that the courts may side with the landowner and allow a reduced assessment. Mr. Hawkins said that General Fund dollars cannot be used to fund any improvement project. However, MSA funds or some other City fund established for such a problem can be used. Council Member Bergeson asked that the staff outline specifically where the additional funding would come from in the event that the project cannot be fully assessed. Mr. Schumacher noted that there are Tax Increment Financing funds available as well as MSA funds. He explained that there are dollars available to fully fund the project if necessary. Council Member Elliott noted that this is not the first time assessments have been contested and staff has always prepared a contingency funding method. Mayor Reinert felt that if the City Council is committed to the improvement project, the City Council must move forward at this time. He noted that there will be a tax benefit and the safety aspect is of great concern. Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 91 - 93 Ordering Plans and Specifications for the Lake Drive (County Road #23) and Highway #49 Intersection improvement. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Bergeson asked that Mr. Schumacher prepare a report outlining the potential funding for this improvement in the event that assessments fall short of the amount required to complete the improvement. Resolution No. 91 - 93 can be found at the end of these minutes. ATTORNEY'S REPORT Mr. Hawkins did not have a report. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS Resolution No. 90 - 93 Amending the 1993 General Fund Budget - Mr. Schumacher explained that the auditors have recommended that the General Fund budget be amend to reflect the figures that are closer to the actual amounts. He noted that questions may be raised at the Truth in Taxation hearing regarding comparing certain figures to the proposed 1994 General Fund Budget therefore, it would be most appropriate to have the 1993 General PAGE 10 1 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 Fund Budget reflect the more accurate figures. Resolution No. 90 - 93 outlines the 1993 General Fund Budget adjustments. Council Member Elliott moved to adopt Resolution No. 90 - 93 Amending the 1993 General Fund Budget and dispense with the reading. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 90 - 93 can be found at the end of these minutes. Set Public Hearing for Community Development Block Grant Re- allocation of Funds - The public hearing was set for December 13, 1993, 6:50 P.M. Consideration of Report of the Recount of the November 2, 1993 Election, Mayor's Race - Minnesota Election Laws require that after a recount has been conducted, the City Clerk shall prepare a summary of the recount and present the summary to the Canvassing Board (City Council) along with all challenged ballots. The Canvassing Board then rules on the challenged ballots and incorporates their totals into the summary statement totals. The recount took place Tuesday, November 16, 1993 at 2:00 P.M. All voted ballots were examined and none were challenged. Mayor Reinert picked up one (1) more vote because a voter had marked an "X" in the oval instead of coloring the entire oval. The vote counting machine counted the ballot as a blank ballot. The Anoka County Elections Division personnel who attended the recount expressed great satisfaction with the accuracy of the voting equipment. They not only credited the accuracy to the equipment but also to the election judges who were well trained and handled all aspects of the election properly. The City Clerk recommended that the Canvassing Board approve the summary statement as presented. Council Member Neal moved to accept the summary report as presented. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The City Council commended the City Clerk and the election staff for their work. Centennial Fire District Commission Report - Mayor Reinert attended the Steering Committee meeting and explained that a quorum was. not present.• However, members present at the meeting recommended that each City Council approve the Centennial Fire District memo dated November 19, 1993 which recommends that the Retirment pension be increased from $1,200.00 per year of service PAGE 11 31.E 3 ;'4 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 to $2,000.00 per year with a renegotiation clause which is outlined in the memo. The members also recommended that the bid for the grass rigs be awarded to Toyne Fire Trunk. After some discussion, Council Member Neal moved to increase the pension from $1,200.00 per year to $2,000.00 per year. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Neal moved to authorize the purchase of two (2) new grass fire rigs from Toyne Fire Truck for $50,262.00. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 92 - 93 Authorizing Submission of the Grant Application and Execution of the Grant Agreement -Federal Police Hiring Supplement Program - Mr. Schumacher explained that Chief Pecchia has discussed with the City Council at budget work sessions the program for applying for a grant to fund three (3) new police officers for this City. He noted that the grant does not fund 100% of the cost for the three (3) officers and the City must set aside funding for the balance of the costs. Chief Pecchia is anxiously awaiting the opportunity to submit the grant since additional officers are needed in this community. Mr. Schumacher noted that the grant is a three (3) year grant and then the total cost of the three (3) officers will become the responsibility of the City. Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 92 - 93 Authorizing Submission of the Grant Application and Execution of the Grant Agreement - Federal Police Hiring Supplement Program. Council Member Elliott seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 92 - 93 can be found at the end of these minutes. Setting Date for Last City Council Meeting in 1993 - Mr. Schumacher asked the City Council to consider changing the last meeting of the year to December 20, 1993. He noted that the last week of the month is a short week and the date would have to be changed because the fourth Monday of the month is a holiday. Council.Member Elliott moved to set the last Council Meeting for 1993 as.recommended by -Mr. Schumacher. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Additional Budget Work Session - Mr. Schumacher asked if the City Council felt a need to meet one (1) more time before the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing. He noted that current information has already been sent to the City Council. PAGE 12 1 1 1 1 COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 Council Member Bergeson asked if the figures for the improvement to the park building had including blacktopping the parking lot. Mr. Schumacher said no. Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Schumacher to see if the additional dollars could be found in the 1993 budget so that the proposed 1994 budget would not have to be modified. Council Member Bergeson felt if the park building improvement is the only undecided item, there is no need for another budget work session. Mr. Schumacher asked all Council Members to call him if they have further questions on the 1994 General Fund Budget. Council Member Elliott moved to adjourn at 8:37 P.M. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on December 13, 1993. Marilyn (G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor PAGE 13 315 316 Council member Elliott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 90-93 AMENDING THE 1993 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, certain revenues and expenditures have or are expected to exceed: budgeted amounts and, WHEREAS, it has been recommended by the City Auditors to amend budget figures to reflect closer to actual figures and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the 1993 General Fund budget be amended accordingly (Please see attached schedule). Adopted by the City Council of Lino akes this 22nd day of November, 1993. Vernon F. Reinert - Mayor id &, ti90/Zi;'aaaef-YLJ Marilyn/ G.` Anderson, Clerk Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Neal and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: 1993 1993 1993 REVENUE BUDGET AMENDMENT 1993 AMENDED INCREASE/ BUDGET BUDGET DECREAgE 32120 GARBAGE REMOVAL 0 1,635 1,635 32210 BUILDING PERMITS 175,000 248,000 73,000 32211 PLAN INSPECTION 105,000 150,000 45,000 32230 PLUMBING PERMITS 18,000 26,000 8,000 32232 SEWER HOOKUP 16,000 25,000 9,000 32233 WATER HOOKUP 11,000 17,000 6,000 32234 SEPTIC PUMPING 200 2,200 2,000 32260 MECHANICAL PERMIT 9,000 12,000 3,000 33418 STATE AID FOR STREETS 14,000 84,000 70,000 33423 OTHER STATE REVENUE 70,000 0 (70,000) 33500 CIRLCE PINES GAS FRANCHISE 20,000 24,000 4,000 34107 ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 4,000 2,700 (1,300) 34108 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE 50,000 28,000 (22,000) 31206 POLICE STATE AID 42,000 47,253 5,253 34208 POLICE OTHERS 7,500 33,284 25,784 35101 COURT FINES 90,000 83,200 (6,800) 36210 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 50,000 45,000 (5,000) 39207 AERIAL MAPPING 9,000 15,800 6,800 TOTAL REVENUE INCREASE(DECREASE) 154,372 1 93SUMAMEND 1993 EXPENDITURES BUDGET AMENDMENT -Ii ADMINISTRATION SALARIES ADMINISTRATION PERA ADMINISTRATION SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED TOTAL ADMININSTRATION 1993 1993 AMENDED BUDGET BUDGET 185,425 207,780 8,757 9,421 15,648 16,165 21,162 22,626 ASSESSOR TOTAL ASSESSOR 30,000 31,463 MUNICIPAL ATTORNEY CRIMINAL ATTORNEY PLANNING AND ECON DEVELOPMENT GROWTH STUDY OTHER CONSULTANTS TOTAL CONSULTANTS 30,000 50,000 10,000 0 5,935 50,000 65,000 35,000 5,000 14,000 ENGINEERING SALARIES ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL ENGINEERING 74,500 100 78,500 2,215 GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS SALARIES GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PERA GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS SOCIAL SECURITY GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS SALES TAX GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 19,718 1,046 2,055 2,609 6,396 19,885 1,054 2,067 2,966 11,896 POLICE SALARIES POUCE OVERTIME POLICE OTHER SALARIES POLICE PERA POLICE SOCIAL SECURITY POLICE ICMA RETIREMENT POLICE HEALTH INSURANCE POLICE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE POLICE INSURANCE POLICE SALES TAX POLICE SMALL TOOLS POLICE SHOP FUELS POLICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE AUTO INSURANCE POLICE CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL POLICE 416,295 393,212 12,400 23,242 19,000 19,183 51,000 47,500 7,662 7,100 O 1,220 30,023 30,300 2,000 6,500 10,000 11,600 4,355 3,324 3,800 2,580 19,600 17,764 3,612 15,448 O 5,000 37,000 74,200 BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS BUILDING INSPECTIONS SALARIES OVERTIME SALARIES OTHER SALARIES PERA FICA HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE AND DISABILITY UNEMPLOYMENT COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTIONS 33,149 46,669 O 500 10,000 6,804 1,992 2,500 3,378 4,201 4,641 6,216 180 234 2,000 2,300 1,800 2,100 93SUMAMEND 1993 INCREASE/ DECREASE 22,355 664 517 1,464 25,000 1,463 1,463 20,000 15,000 25,000 5,000 8,065 73,065 4,000 2,115 6,115 167 8 12 357 5,500 6,044 (23,083) 10,842 183 (3,500) (562) 1,220 277 4,500 1,600 (1,031) (1,220) (1,836) 11,836 5,000 37;200 41,426 13,520 500 (3,196) 508 823 1,575 54 300 300 14,384 1993 1993 1993 EXPENDITURES BUDGET AMENDMENT 1993 AMENDED INCREASE/ BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACTED 2,000 3,000 1,000 TOTAL ANIMAL CONTROL 1 ,000 PUBLIC WORKS SALARIES 161,000 169,068 8,068 PUBLIC WORKS PERA 8,100 8,466 366 PUBLIC WORKS SOCIAL SECURITY 14,260 14,992 732 PUBLIC WORKS HEALTH 19,680 21,000 1,320 PUBLIC WORKS LIFE 761 811 50 PUBLIC WORKS COMMUNICATIONS 2,700 3,500 800 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 11,336 PARKS SALARIES PARKS COMMUNICATIONS 110,238 110,891 653 1,650 4,500 2,850 TOTAL PARKS 3,503 LABOR CONTRACTS/SALARY ADJUSTMENT 50,000 21,036 (28,964) TOTAL OTHERS (28,964) TOTAL EXPENDITURE INCREASE(DECREASE) 154,372 93SUMAMEND 319 320 Council Member Neal moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 91 - 93 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LAKE DRIVE (COUNTY ROAD #23) AND HIGHWAY #49 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS: a resolution of the City Council adopted the 27th day of September, 1993, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvement of Lake Drive (County Road #23) and Highway #49 Intersection, WHEREAS: ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held on the 22nd day of November, 1993, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. Mr. Donald Christoffersen, SEH is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of the improvement. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of November, 1993. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Tla�ily G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Council Member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 92-93 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE GREENHA VEN PROPOSAL WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes will support a Tax Increment Financing subsidy for Greenhaven Press, Inc.; WHEREAS, Greenhaven Press, Inc. has selected a 2.1 acre site in the Apollo Business Center which is within Tax Increment Financing District 1-4; WHEREAS, the city will commit to actual and reasonable costs up to $80,000 in financial assistance to Greenhaven Press, Inc. for approximately 16,400 square feet of new construction, and up to an additional TIF subsidy of $30,000 should Phase II (16,400 square feet) be built within three years; WHEREAS, Greenhaven Press, Inc. will receive the financial assistance on a "pay as you go" basis; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will support the Tax Increment and financial assistance for Greenhaven Press, Inc. as outlined above. Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 22nd day of November, 1993 Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor Cr✓. Maril n G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott 'and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 32+ 322 Council Member Neal moved its adoption: introduced the following resolution and CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 93 - 93 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE GRANT APPLICATION AND EXECUTION OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT - FEDERAL POLICE HIRING SUPPLEMENT PROGRAM BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lino Lakes City Council authorizes application to the United States Department of Justice for funds under the Police Hiring Supplement Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lino Lakes Police Chief is authorized to act as the representative for the City of Lino Lakes in applying for said funds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes will proved matching funds as is required under the grant program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes will pay the full cost of salary and benefits for officers hired under the Police Hiring Supplemental Program at the end of the three (3) year grant period. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 22nd day of November, 1993. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor ATTEST: 7Zi '1-ArY , Mar%ilyn✓G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Elliott and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 1 1 1 1 Council Member Elliott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: CITY OF LINO LAKES COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 93 - 19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CHARTER AMENDING SECTION 8.02 AND ADDING SECTIONS 8.07, LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS: SPECIAL PROVISIONS The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes does ordain: Section 1. Chapter VIII, Section 8.02 Effective Charter Provisions is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 8.02 Effective Charter Provisions, Except as Provided in Section 8.07. Local improvements (the term"local improvements" shall mean a public improvement financed partly or wholly from special assessments) shall be carried out exclusively under the provision of this Charter. Section 2. Chapter VIII is amended by adding a section to read as follows: Section 8.07 Local Improvement; Special Provisions. Subdivision 1. Except as provided in subdivision 3, in the geographic areas of the City described in subdivision 2 the construction of local improvements, the levy of special assessment for the financing of those improvements must be conducted in accordance with procedures specified in state law. Subd. 2. Subdivision 1 geographic areas, each not described by official action taken prior to September 30, this ordinance). applies to land within three (3) exceeding 430 acres, legally of the City Council of the City 1993 (See Exhibit A attached to Subd. 3. When construction of local improvements, the levy of special assessments for the financing of those improvements specially benefit a parcel of real property, in an area described in subdivision 2, on which a single family, owner occupied residentialunitexisted on September 30, 1993, the owner/occupant of such residential unit may file a petition with the City Clerk objecting to the special assessment to be levied against his/her parcel. Such petition 324 ORDINANCE NO. 93 - 19 Page -2- shall be filed with the City at or before the first public hearing to be held on the project. After the filing of such petition the City may not specially assess such owner's property for the improvements constructed unless the owner, at his/her option, in the future elects to connect to or use the improvements constructed by the City. Any notice of hearing mailed to such single family, owner occupied units shall include notice of the property owner's right to object to the assessments as granted in this paragraph. This exception terminates on the first day that an owner occupied residential unit no longer exists on the parcel of real property. Subd. 4. Proceedings for the construction of a local improvement in an area specified in subdivision 2 may not be combined or consolidated as a single improvement with local improvements in areas not specified in subdivision 2. Section 3. Save as above amended, said Lino Lakes Home Rule Charter shall stand as initially passed and as previously amended. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force effective January 22, 1994. If, by January 22, 1994, a petition requesting a referendum on this ordinance, signed by the number of registered voters of the City required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, Subdivision 7, is filed with the City Clerk -Treasurer, this ordinance will not be effective until approved by 51% of the voters voting on the question or its adoption at a special election called by the City Council for that purpose. Section 5. On the effective date of the ordinance, the City Clerk -Treasurer is authorized and directed to file copies of the ordinance with the Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, the Anoka County Recorder, and in the City Clerk -Treasurer's office together with the certificate required by Section 410.11 of the Act. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 22nd day of November , 1993. Vernon F. Reinert, Mayor 1 1 ORDINANCE NO. 93 - 19 Page -3- ATTEST: ,L1 Marilyn( Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council Member Bergeson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Elliott, Neal, Reinert. The following voted against same: None, Council Member Kuether was absent. Whereupon, said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 32f Legal Descriptions for Economic Development Districts Trunk Highway 49 and County State Aid Highway 23 Intersection --All of Government Lot 1, Section 30, T31 R22 30-31-22-21-0001 —That part of Lots 14, 15, 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 151 Tying south and east of State Trunk Highway 49 right-of-way. I -35E and Main Street Interchange Area --Northeast 1/4 of Section 24. - -That part of the southeast 1/4 of Section 24 lying north of Cedar Street. --East 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 24. --East 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 24. I -35W and Trunk Highway 49 Interchange Area - -North 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 18. - -That part of the south 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 18 Tying north of the Interstate 35W right-of-way. --That part of the southwest 1/4 of Section '17 lying west of the Trunk Highway 49 right-of-way. - -All of the northwest 1/4 of Section 17 with the exception of that part of the southeast 1/4 of said northwest 1/4 of Section 17 as follows: beginning at a point at the intersection of the south line of said southeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 with the east right-of-way line of Trunk Highway No. 49; thence northeasterly along said right-of-way line 938.14 feet (+ or -); thence southeasterly 672.39 (+ or -) feet to east line of said southeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4; thence south along said east line 588.5 (+ or -) feet to the south line of said southeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4; thence westerly along said south line 1021.59 feet (+ or -) to the point of beginning. - -The north 720 feet of that part of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 17 lying west of the Anoka County Park property. --That part of the north 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 17 Tying west of the Anoka county Park property. - -That part of the north 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 17 Tying west of the Anoka County Park property. - -The south 1/2 of southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 8. - -The southeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 8. - -The east 330 feet. ( + or -) of the northeast 1/4 of the southeast 1/4 of the • southwest 1/4 of Section 8.'`: