HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/21/1997 Council Minutes•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL APRIL 21, 1997
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE April 21, 1997
TIME STARTED 6:30 P.M.
TIME ENDED 7:32 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT Kuether, Lyden, Neal, Landers
MEMBERS ABSENT Bergeson
Staff members present: Todd Smith, Anoka County Assessor, and Marilyn Anderson,
Clerk -Treasurer.
Mr. Smith explained that the purpose of the meeting was to convene the annual Board of
Review. He noted that this meeting will deal with the valuation he has placed on each
parcel of land in Lino Lakes for the taxes payable in 1998.
Mr. Smith noted that Mr. Lyle Carpenter, who owns commercial property at 8009 Lake
Drive spoke to him prior to this meeting. Mr. Carpenter was concerned about the value
placed on this property. Mr. Smith will review the value as soon as the commercial
assessor is available to work with him.
Council Member Kuether said that she had a lot of residents calling her regarding the
increase in their property value. Mr. Smith explained that Anoka County has been
increasing property values in the entire County by 3% annually. This increase reflects the
increase in the cost of building materials.
Council Member Kuether noted that new construction is not the value that it once was.
She said that used housing is now the better value.
Council Member Lyden explained that his concern is creating a balance between
residential and commercial growth. He asked is there any sign of getting to this balance.
Mr. Smith said yes, in 1996 there was a reduction in residential and an increase in
commercial.
Council Member Kuether asked how does Lino Lakes compare with other cities in Anoka
County. Mr. Smith explained that Lino Lakes is somewhere in the middle.
Council Member Lyden said that he is still concerned about the Town Center program.
He said he feels that it would not survive unless there is a big anchor store. Mr. Smith
agreed with Council Member Lyden.
PAC&1
CITY COUNCIL APRIL 21, 1997
Mr. Smith explained the difference in tax gain by commercial property versus residential
property.
Mr. Smith said that he will provide a list of landowners who have questioned the value of
their property as well how the matter was handle.
Council Member Lyden asked how the 1997 concerned tax payers compare to the 1996
tax payers. Mr. Smith explained that there were fewer calls in 1997. However, it is very
close to average.
Don Patterson, 7101 Ivy Ridge Lane - Mr. Patterson said that he has been comparing
his property value with his neighbors and finds that his value is greater than anyone else.
Mr. Smith explained that the value is based upon how much of the dwelling is completed
on January 2nd. He noted that some of the town homes were not finished on January
2nd. therefore, they will have a lesser value. The taxes are based upon how much was
completed on January 2nd.
Francis Ramsden, 865 Main Street - Mr. Smith explained that Ms. Ramsden owns a
five (5) acre lot on the northeast quadrant of Lake Drive and Main Street. The lot is zoned
commercial. Ms. Ramsden's property taxes have increased dramatically in the past two
(2) or three (3) years. Mr. Smith said that this is due to the zoning of the property. He
explained that the taxes would be considerably lower if the lot was zoned residential. Mr.
Smith said that there is not much that he can do about the value of the property. He has
allowed Ms. Ramsden to claim a homestead credit, however, this still does not reduce the
taxes very much.
Mr. Smith noted that he has advised Ms. Ramsden to file for a refund from the State and
for another refund that is not used by many property owners.
Council Member Lyden noted that a few years ago, cities would freeze property taxes for
senior citizens. Mr. Smith said that there is currently a bill in the state legislature to
restore that provision, however it may not be enacted. Council Member Kuether said she
felt Ms. Ramsden's situation is a "terrible shame". Mr. Smith said that the bill has been
proposed for several years but does not get the attention it deserves.
Council Member Lyden asked Mr. Smith how this situation happens. Mr. Smith
explained that when a city creates a particular zoning for a particular property, the
assessor/appraiser looks at the property to determined what is the highest and best use of
the property. He said that this is his job and he can do nothing about reducing the value
because of the zoning. Mr. Smith said at this time the only way that the City Council can
help Ms. Ramsden, is to change her zoning from commercial zoning to residential
zoning. Council Member Kuether asked if the City Council could take Ms. Ramsden
property out of the commercial zoning or suspend that zoning. Council Member Lyden
felt that Ms. Ramsden should be taxed for the current use of the property not as zoned.
Mayor Landers said that there arc other people living along Lake Drive in the same
PAG[ 2
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL APRIL 21, 1997
position. If the City Council started taxing according to the current use, that would be
spot zoning. Council Member Lyden said he felt it was nice to have the commercial
zoning, however, the property should be taxed according to its use. Mr. Smith noted that
Ms. Ramsden can allow her property to go tax forfeit. She would have up to six (6) years
to redeem it.
Mr. Smith said that he will get all the rules and regulations pertaining to special credits
and then meet with Ms. Ramsden and her daughter. He also noted that if the matter is not
solved, she can attend the Anoka County Board of Equalization in June. Council
Member Kuether asked for feedback regarding Ms. Ramsden's property.
Dean and Phyllis Richardson, 7129 Ivy Ridge Lane - Mr. Richardson asked why his
taxes are so high. Mr. Smith explained that this meeting is about the value that has been
placed on his property. His records indicate that the Richardson's have lived in their
home longer and the unit was further along towards completion than some of the other
units.
Mr. Smith explained that he will send the City Clerk a listing of all the property owners
who have contacted him asking him to review their property value.
Council Member Neal moved to adjourn at 7:32 p.m.. Council Member Lyden seconded
the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular Council meeting on
June 9, 1997.
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
I.: 3
L. Landers, Mayor
April 28, 1997
COUNTY OF ANOKA
TO: CITY OF LINO LAKES
Office of the County Assessor
Government Center
2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2281
612-323-5475 Fax: 612-323-5421
1. The following information is provided for your files and delineates
the outcome of the BOARD of REVIEW Proceedings of April 21, 1997.
2. The below individuals had their market values resolved before the
local board of reviews met.
PIN
03-31-22-23-0003
04-31-22-22-0071
05-31-22-31-0002
07-31-22-43-0049
07-31-22-11-0002
08-31-22-42-0018
09-31-22-23-0026
09-31-22-24-0018
09-31-22-13-0009
09-31-22-13-0004
09-31-22-11-0005
09-31-22-13-0002
10-31-22-22-0012
11-31-22-43-0009
11-31-22-34-0002
17-31-22-33-0010
18-31-22-33 ✓028
18-31-22-31-0010
18-31-22-31-0009
18-31-22-22-0012
18-31-22-22-0002
19-31-22-14-0140
19-31-22-11-0114
19-31-22-33-0046
19-31-22-14-0030
22-31-22-41-0037
26-31 22 44-0(_7.7
27-3L-22-2-0020
272E -'4 u007
001h
28-31- -_ 1)1i ,
31- 22 1 yin
31-22
_. 31
w:
NAME VALUE
Laraine Cardarelli 140,200
Carol Lindbeck 126,800
Steven Proulx
Jerome Krieger
Richard Petroske
Mary Taube
Darold Olson
Dan Anderson
Russell Thole
Brian Shepherd
Jerry Hanson
Brad Racutt
Tracy Toeffer
Robert Grill
Diana Degeer
Tracy Triemert
Carrie VanReese
Darrell Phillips
Cindy Huntington
Dave Beier
Chris Bernier
Nancy Adamek
Heinz Hackman
Linda Melcher
Carol Holleran
Joe Cameron
Judy Knabe
Kathy Cu r_1
Lea[ Pam -:
Mau 7 He a on
jr rh LHre
Nei
123,800
53,800
103,900
99,200
151,400
184,000
145,600
180,700
147,100
250,600
161, 500
136,800
160,300
104,700
117,400
111,400
116,900
163,100
124,500
116,400
L47, 100
97,400
156,400
97, 027)
124, 100
1; r1, 001)
HNN
ACTION TAKEN
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Reduced to $168,300
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
��ncae
1,111:1,
:'hanr4(
•
•
•
PIN
11-31-22-44-0012
18-31-22-32-0010
18-31-22-32-0016
19-31-22-11-0136
19-31-22-41-0005
21-31-22-43-0013
28-31-22-21-0008
29-31-22-41-0019
30-31-22-13-0012
30-31-22-24-0030
30-31-22-44-0002
31-31-22-31-0046
31-31-22-33-0004
31-31-22-42-0005
31-31-22-42-0017
31-31-22-43-0026
32-31-22-11-0059
32-31-22-12-0077
32-31-22-14-0009
34-31-22-11-0007
34-31-22-12-0008
34-31-22-42-0001
35-31-22-14-0001
36-31-22-13-0007
36-31-22-31-0006
36-31-22-34-0029
36-31-22-34-0030
36-31-22-41-0003
Commercial
04-31-22-33-0003
04-31-22-33-0005
04-31-22-33-0007
04-31-22-33-0008
04-31-22-33-0009
04-31-22-33-0034
Residential
19-31-22-14-0056
19-31-22-14-0042
19-31-22-23-0038
NAME
Larry Miller
Steven Nyhus
Steve Liese
John W. Stoulil
Robert Stanek
Donald Dunn
Steve Wells
Roberta Kuik
Ray Philpott
Roger Nelson
Marvin Lavalle
Judith Grundtner
Frank Crowley
Sherrie Hatton
Yvonne Guptill
Ken Zola
Todd Mendenhall
Michael Guthmueller
Dawn Kenny
Donald Opp
Kathryn Rolstad
Marion Gustafson
Fredick Gelbmann
Cheyenne Dailey
Julie Schwartz
James Berg
Tammy Adamson
Fred Chase
VALUE
144,700
136,900
105,000
102, 600
148,900
331,000
163,400
266,400
124, 100
163,100
254,500
186,400
92,300
134,800
170,800
141,100
146,800
192,000
152,500
143,200
152,300
98,000
166,000
110,400
447,200
295,300
283,700
244,000
(APPEARED AT BOARD OF REVIEW)
Lyle Carpenter
Francis Ramsden
Don Patterson
Deane Richardson
21,800
45,800
6,600
113,300
125,900
294,800
119,400
117,900
(REVIEWED AFTER BOARD OF REVIEW)
Tom Wanger
82,900
ACTION TAKEN
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Reduced to $179,200
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Reduced to $144,300
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Review
at later date
No Change
No Change
No Change
Reduced to $60,800
As of 4-28-97 these are all of the changes made.
If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to call me at 323-5483.
Sincerely,
-70-gr>2 IA/ .
Todd Smith
Appraiser
Anoka County
CITY OF LINO LAKES
1997 ASSESSMENT/PAYABLE 1998
Total Number of Taxable Parcels:
Total Number of Parcels including Exempt and Forfeit:
Total Taxable Market Value, 1997 Assessment:
New Construction, 1997 Assessment:
Parcels with New Construction:
Total Taxable Market Value, 1996 Assessment:
Net Growth '96 to '97 Including New Construction:
Net Growth '96 to '97 Excluding New Construction:
Total Market Value Including Exempt and Forfeit, 1997 Assessment:
Total Market Value Including Exempt and Forfeit, 1996 Assessment:
Type
Residential Single Family
Multiples (Duplex, etc.)
Patio Townhome
Quad Homes
Apartments
Condominiums
Commercial/Industrial
1997 ASSESSMENT - SALES RATIOS
# Sales
277
1
26
0
0
0
2
Median Ratio
94.4%
104.5%
94.5%
.0%
.0%
.0%
95.4%
5 •
,378
5,899
$616,107,600
$39,991,239
704 = 11.9% of Total
$542,634,500
+13.5%
+6.2%
$687.487,500
$594,423,200
Coefficient
5.0
.0
5.3
.0
.0
.0
2.4
1997 ASSESSMENT - COMPARABLE SALES RATIOS
(Residential Single Family)
Municipality
County of Anoka
Anoka
Blaine
Columbia Heights
Coon Rapids
Fridley
Centerville
Circle Pines
Ham Lake
Lexington
Lino Lakes
Spring Lake Park
1213012'97
# Sales
4,041
249
545
243
729
256
39
44
196
15
277
67
Median Ratio
94.4%
94.4%
94.4%
94.3%
94.4%
94.3%
94.4%
94.5%
94.4%
94.4%
94.4%
94.4%
Coefficient
5.4
5.9
4.6
7.1
4.8
5.8
5.3
4.0
5.7
5.2
5.0
4.8
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA
•3UNTY OF ANOKA
CERTIFICATE AS TO TAXES AND TAXABLE
PROPERTY IN CITY OF LINO LAKES
(HEREIN CALLED THE "TAXING DISTRICT")
I hereby certify that the TAXING DISTRICT is situated wholely in this County
and that:
CURRENT VALUATION - The market value and net tax capacities of all
taxable property in the TAXING DISTRICT in this county as assessed in
1993 for the purpose of computing the rates of taxes collectible in 1994,
are as follows:
Real Estate:
Residential Homestead (Non -Ag)
(Class la & lb)
•
Estimated Net
Market Value Tax Capacity
$ 321,475,000 $ 4,231,281
Agricultural (class 2 & 4b(3) 14,778,900 169,315
Commercial & Industrial (class 3,5) 11,532,400 448,074
Public Utility 176,500 8,120
Railroad Operating Property 0 0
All other Commercial & Industrial
Non -Homestead Residential
(Class 4a,4b,4c,4d & 4e)
Commercial & Residential Seasonal/Rec
(Class lc & 4c)
Other
Total Real Estate
12,576,100 290,064
0 0
$ 360,538,900 $ 5,146,854
Total Personal Property $ 7,828,200 $ 360,097
Total Real & Personal Property$ 368,367,100 $ 5,506,951
If applicable to the TAXING DISTRICT
Subtract: Captured tax capacity of tax increment dist. 256,841
10% of 200 KV Transmission lines 0
Fiscal Disparity Contrubution Value 251,282
Add:
Subtotal: Local tax rate determination value 4,998,828
Fiscal Disparity Distribution Value 1,221,693
Total Adjusted Taxable Net Tax Capacity 6,220,521
•BOND94.LINO.PG1