HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/26/1998 Council Minutes•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : October 26, 1998
TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 11:47 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Bergeson, Dahl, Lyden, Neal, and Mayor Sullivan
MEMBERS ABSENT : None
Staff members present: Administration Director, Dan Tesch; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins;
Consulting Engineer, John Powell; Community Development Director, Brian Wessel; Planning
Coordinator, Mary Kay Wyland; Planning Consultant, Alan Brixius; Public Service Director,
Rick DeGardner; and City Clerk Marilyn Anderson
SETTING THE AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
CONSENT AGENDA
• Council Member Neal moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Council Member
Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Sullivan announced that the City received a $500 gift certificate for attendance at the
League of Minnesota Cities annual conference. The gift certificate will be used for a sound
system for the Parks and Recreation Department.
Mayor Sullivan stated there are Board openings within the Park, Environmental, and Planning &
Zoning Boards. Anyone interested in serving on one of these Boards should contact Dan Tesch
at City Hall.
Mayor Sullivan thanked Mr. Tesch for filling in for Mr. Pecchia in his absence.
ITEM
MINUTES:
October 12, 1998
DISBURSEMENTS:
ACTION
Approved
October 26, 1998
(Check No. 52755 - 52873, $790,709.31) Approved
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
October 9, 1998 SAC
($1,052.74) Approved
Mayor Sullivan reminded those present of the guidelines for audience participation in City
Council meetings, emphasizing the need for respectful dialog.
OPEN MIKE
No one appeared for open mike.
Mayor Sullivan outlined the agenda for the Comprehensive Plan. She asked for a show of hands
of those present to speak regarding the Comprehensive Plan. She stated the public hearing will
not be reopened, however, members of the audience would be able to speak about the Plan for a
period of no more than five (5) minutes.
CONSIDERATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (PLAN),
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -160, ALAN BRIXIUS
I. Introduction - Recognition - Mayor Sullivan thanked everyone present for their interest
in the Plan. She recognized and introduced those present who have been involved in the creation
of the Plan for the last two (2) years. She thanked them for all their hard work and effort.
II. Comments from Jamie Schaps - Chair of Planning & Zoning Board and Chair of
Comprehensive Plan Task Force - Mr. Schaps stated the Plan is a compilation of a consensus
of everyone involved and how they envision the City to be for the next 20 years. He stated there
were many, many meetings, a lot of time, many different people, and a lot of input into the Plan.
He thanked the City staff for all their help. He noted the Planning & Zoning Board
recommended approval of the plan on a 6-1 vote. He welcomed more comments regarding the
Plan but hoped there would be no more delays. He stated the Plan is an evolving document and
it is understood that there will be amendments in the next 20 years. He thanked the Council for
the opportunity to speak and Chair the Comprehensive Plan Task Force. He stated the strength
of the Plan is from the strength of the Task Force that the City selected.
III. City Attorney - Bill Hawkins - Mr. Hawkins stated the Plan resulted from an act of the
Legislature. All communities are required to develop a Plan. State Statute requires a community
review. The Plan must be submitted to the Metropolitan Council by the end of the year. In
addition, the Plan requires a 4/5ths vote from Council.
IV. Comprehensive Plan Amendment
A. Summary of Plan - Alan Brixius - Mr. Brixius presented a summary of the draft
Comprehensive Plan. He stated all issues were addressed during the two (2) year process.
B. Economic Development - Brian Wessel - Mr. Wessel stated the City tax base can be
broadened within the Policy Statement. The focus is year 2010 for Economic Development.
2
•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26,1998
Since the five (5) Year Plan has been put in place, the City has relocated 37 businesses. That
will generate an estimated $8 million in new taxes. Mr. Wessel stated he feels confident the City
can reach their goals.
C1. Environmental Board Comments - Mr. Wessel referred to a memo outlining the response
of Environmental Board members to Item #1 of the Lyden/Dahl Compromise Plan. The vote
was 3-2-2 regarding the issue of stopping all plat approvals for residential development projects
until the Environmental Inventory and Management Plan is completed. Three (3) members voted
no, it is not necessary to stop all plat approvals. Two (2) members voted no with qualifiers. Two
(2) members voted yes, it is necessary to stop all plat approvals until the Environmental
Inventory and Management Plan is complete.
Mr. Wessel stated the Environmental Inventory and Management Plan will be adopted as
addendum's to the Plan upon completion.
C. Response to Council Work Session Issues 10/19/98 - Alan Brixius - Mr. Brixius stated he
was requested to respond to the Lyden/Dahl proposal and look at a MUSA alternative. Mr.
Brixius reviewed the Lyden/Dahl proposal and commented on their issues.
1. An interim policy will be immediately adopted whereby no plat will be approved until
such time as the Environmental Inventory & Management Plan is completed and in place.
Recognizing the serious nature of the tax base imbalance, key business developments may
possibly be excepted from this policy if environmental concerns are satisfied by meeting a
list of conditions (to be defined). Mr. Brixius stated the Comprehensive Plan addressed the
issues of housing, economic development, diversity of land use, economic development
community facilities growth, management, and tax base. He stated the focus of the Lyden/Dahl
proposal is measured to stop growth.
2. The Comprehensive Plan under current consideration, when adopted, shall remain in
effect until the year 2020 AD. After its adoption, any proposed amendment must be
approved by a majority vote of the citizens. An ordinance to this effect will be adopted
concurrently with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Brixius stated this would require a
referendum for a text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. This takes decision making away
from the Council. It would require another process for any kind of consideration of a change in
land uses. It is another step that would delay the process and be expensive for City planning
decisions.
3. Inasmuch as the Comprehensive Plan Task Force has determined that no Hydra Soils
are buildable, an ordinance will be created treating all Hydra Soils in exactly the same
manner as wetlands are currently treated. This ordinance will be adopted at the time that
the Comprehensive Plan is adopted. Mr. Brixius had no comment.
4. There will be no expansion of the MUSA or additional "MUSA bank" until such time as
the City tax rate has remained at or below 20% for the preceding three (3) consecutive
years. Additionally, the City's tax base must also consist of 14% or more Commercial and
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Industrial (C & I) to qualify for MUSA expansion. When these conditions are met,
additional MUSA may be acquired only if approved by a majority vote of the residents. In
the event that we run out of MUSA and have not achieved these tax base and /or land use
benchmarks, additional MUSA may be obtained if approved by a majority vote of the
residents, but only for C&I land uses. If the above qualifying conditions are met but later a
backslide occurs, any additional residential MUSA are created under these conditions will
be "frozen", and cannot be further developed until the qualifying conditions are again met.
An ordinance to this effect will be adopted concurrently with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
Brixius stated Items 4, 6, and 8 utilize a goal of 20% tax rate and 14% C&I. The Plan adopted
those figures as objectives to be achieved by the year 2020 through a growth rate. The Plan is
also workable with some growth occurring to allow economic development and housing
expansion. The Lyden/ Dahl proposal would mandate these goals be reached before there is any
MUSA expansion or any use of multifamily -family, Single Family (R-1) or Single Family
Executive (R -X). It suggests a moderate growth rate of 70 unites per year with 35 being urban
and 35 being rural. Mr. Brixius stated he believes this is a self-fulfilling prophecy. With no
growth the City will not experience economic development, the tax base won't change, and the
local property tax rate will not be reduced.
5. A new zoning category will be created and termed "R1XX" or some such appropriate
term. The "R1XX" minimum lot size will be 17,000 square feet of upland, and must be in
the MUSA. There will be a 5% increase in minimum house size over the current R -1X
requirement. As an incentive to developers and landowners, to reduce future City road
maintenance costs, and for the sake of better environmental policy through "conservation
development" principles, "R1XX" zoning will restrict or completely eliminate storm
sewers, and will require narrower roads with ditches and without curbs or gutters.
Ordinances to this effect will be developed and adopted concurrently with the
Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Brixius stated the draft Plan incorporates both objectives.
6. There will be no rezoning for or approval of plats containing multifamily housing, R-1,
or R -1X, unless the City tax rate has remained at or below 20% for the preceding three (3)
consecutive years. If the above qualifying condition is met but later a backslide occurs, any
additional residential MUSA area created under these conditions will be "frozen", and
cannot be further developed until the qualifying conditions are again met. When the use of
this type of housing resumes, the zoning laws will be revised to reflect conservation
development principles as outlined above (but not limited to the above). An ordinance to
this effect will be drafted and adopted concurrently with the Comprehensive Plan.
Housing dedicated exclusively for seniors that is handicap accessible (one level living) can
be an exception to this requirement. Mr. Brixius stated this will prevent R-1 and R -1X lot
development. There is an issue of developmental rights. The denial and prevention of this
zoning does not recognize the value of single family housing. Single family housing has been
increasing since 1990 over pre-existing stock within the housing community taking a greater
share of the tax burden with new development.
7. The remainder of the current "MUSA Bank" (originally 150 acres) will be exclusively
used for C&I and residences with failing septic systems. A criteria will be established to
4
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
determine what constitutes a "failed septic system," and the determination thereof will be
overseen by an appropriate City body such as the City Inspector, the Environmental
Department, or an independent contracted entity specified by the City. An ordinance to
this effect will be drafted and adopted concurrently with the Comprehensive Plan, if not
sooner. Mr. Brixius had no comment.
8. The "moderate to low" growth rate of 70 homes per year will be adopted on an interim
basis, with a maximum of half of the total allowable (35 homes per year) within the MUSA.
The number of homes built each year will be regulated in two (2) ways: The number of
building permits issued shall not exceed 35 inside the MUSA, or 70 total; nor will the
number of homes or lots rezoned and/or platted exceed 35 inside the MUSA, or 70 total.
When the City tax rate has remained below 20% for the preceding three (3) consecutive
years, and if the City's tax base consists of 14% or more C&I, a "moderate" growth rate of
100 homes per year may be considered, with 50 maximum inside the MUSA. Said growth
rate may possibly be subject to voter approval. If the above qualifying conditions are met
but later a backslide occurs, the growth rate will return to 70 homes per year until such
time as the qualifying conditions are again met. Mr. Brixius stated if the objective is
economic development, urban growth or rural growth will not make a difference. Both will have
the same impact on the community.
9. The rural land use will be expanded to encompass all land outside the current MUSA.
Protective and supportive measures will be conceived and employed to encourage farming
and agricultural operations and limit the encroachment of other land uses. Mr. Brixius
had no comment.
10. Cluster staging as it has been defined in the Plan be permissible only with the MUSA.
Clustered developments will be encouraged outside the MUSA, with a mandatory 50%
open space requirement. Said open spaces shall have permanent conservation easements
held by an entity such as the Minnesota Land Trust disallowing any future subdivision
and/or development. Mr. Brixius stated the stage cluster is an unique element. It allows the
property owner to do something with their property while holding the balance available for future
urban growth. This will only be applied to Phase 2 expansion areas. It allows for an orderly
staged progression of growth. The draft Plan is consistent to Council Member Lyden and Dahl's
objective, but is not limited to existing MUSA.
11. Hobby Farm zoning districts will be created with a minimum lot size of five (5) acres.
These subdivisions will require mandatory permanent conservation easements held by an
entity such as the Minnesota Land Trust disallowing any future subdivision and/or
development. Mr. Brixius indicated the issue is whether the City will extend utilities to planned
areas in the future. The draft Plan allows for development to occur. This density will result in
lots that are too large to assess and too small to subdivide.
12. Land use compatibility issues will be minimized by using greenways, hobby farms, and
• clustered subdivisions as buffers for permanent agricultural operations. Mr. Brixius stated
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
a number of policies were embraced to protect active farms. The question is how to define
permanent agriculture.
13. All references to the Metropolitan Council will be removed from the Lino Lakes
Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Brixius stated he does not necessarily agree but it can be done.
Mr. Brixius stated the final element is adjustments of MUSA. He reviewed a graph showing the
projected MUSA expansion for 1999 through 2009 at a 1.5 X land and 1.25 X land method. Mr.
Brixius stated all MUSA will be held in a MUSA reserve. The growth rate of the City can be
controlled by protecting the MUSA.
Mayor Sullivan told the audience that she would like to have a balanced discussion regarding
citizen input. She explained that she would acknowledge a speaker for the Plan and then a
speaker opposed to the Plan and would continue the alternate point of view until all the speakers
have make their comments.
Ms. Pat Rickaby, 59 North Road, came forward and stated the comments made on the CALL
flyer were incorrect. The City will set standards for high density. School Districts do need
growth to be maintained. The 147 figure is a slower growth rate. Changes to the Plan by
Council Members Lyden and Dahl will not slow the tax rate. The tax rate is currently high
because of road improvements. No commercial growth will not lower the tax rate. The
Economic Development Department was put in place to encourage Commercial/Industrial
development. Many citizens are in favor of more Commercial/Industrial development to help the
school district. Ms. Rickaby thanked the Comprehensive Plan Task Force for the courage to not
give in to special interest groups. She asked the Council to show the same courage and pass the
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Gerald Clausen, 6198 Baldwin Lake Drive, indicated he has lived in Lino Lakes since 1952.
He explained that in the 1960's things were slow. The Centennial School District gave away a
school. The City was quiet, tax rate smooth, and the City had a police department. Then
someone decided the City needed to grow. Development increased and the tax base increased
year after year. A new elementary and middle school were needed. Mr. Clausen said high
density causes more stuff on the roads, more police, more fireman, more snow plows, and too
many streets. He indicated he owns three (3) acres. Life is no longer the same in Lino Lakes.
Cluster homes add more problems and taxes. Mr. Clausen said industry is good. He stated he
likes having 3-5 acre lots. Mr. Clausen indicated he agrees with Council Members Dahl and
Lyden. He suggested letting the City sit still for awhile.
Council Member Dahl excused herself at 7:50 p.m.
Ms. Sharon Lane, 532 West 77th Street, stated she supports slower growth. The City survey
indicated citizens want to preserve rural open areas of the City. She stated she would like to see
a better tax rate. Lino Lakes is unique because of the two (2) major freeways. The City will
draw from commuters. She stated she made the deliberate decision to not comment on the Plan
at the Planning & Zoning meeting. She stated she has witnessed inappropriate behavior at other
6
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
City meetings and felt Council Member Dahl was treated unfairly at a public meeting. She stated
she decided to voice her opinion at the Council meeting because Mayor Sullivan is fair and she
would be treated with respect.
Council Member Dahl returned at 7:53 p.m.
Mr. Don Dunn, 6885 Black Duck Drive, stated the Plan is a good plan for the citizens of Lino
Lakes. The Plan meets all aspects of the citizens needs. It is balanced and has a smart growth
plan. Growth is going to happen. The choice is to manage growth smartly. Residential growth
of 147 units is a down turn from the up turn of commercial growth. He stated 147 units may not
support Commercial/Industrial growth. However, the Task Force is willing to try 147 units per
year. He stated citizens have to trust their elected officials. He indicated he was disappointed
that a Council Member stated you can not trust your elected officials. Lino Lakes is a city that
moves forward and responds to citizens needs. This Plan does that. The challenge is to put the
Plan into place. He stated he hoped to hear this evening that the Council had come together.
There has been plenty of time in the last two (2) years for all groups to come together. He stated
he hopes the five (5) officials will vote to approve the Plan. He commended the three (3) that
will vote to approve. He urged Council Members Dahl and Lyden to change their minds
regarding the Plan. It is a privilege to vote no. It is their duty to vote yes.
Ms. Donna Carlson, 6808 East Shadow Lake Drive, expressed concern regarding the plan for
every home to be inspected before selling. She asked what will happen if the seller can not
afford to have the home inspected. She stated the language regarding this issue has softened but
the intent has not changed. She stated the Transportation Plan needs to be changed to indicate
1998. She indicated a increase of 25% of rental property is extreme. The multiple family and
medium density aspects are extreme. The Council Members were elected because they offered
the voters something. One of the Council Members ran on the platform of low density. She
stated she has requested a copy of the letter to Anoka County regarding Birch Street three (3)
times and still have not seen it. The citizens have not been notified about this issue and have a
right to address it.
Mayor Sullivan stated staff did work with the County to make sure the study went through. The
County had already begun to act on this and a letter was sent from staff. The Councty indicated
they did not need a letter from the Council. Council Member Neal did note Ms. Carlson's
concern regarding this issue. He stated staff has drafted a letter that Mayor Sullivan will sign this
evening.
Mr. Art Hawkins, 6102 Centerville, read a statement indicating the most important aspect of the
Plan is the population growth. The average occupancy rates during the past 30 years is 3.3. If a
similar rate prevails during the next 20 years, the City's population could be almost double the
maximum predicted under the moderate growth scenario. He stated the numbers used to support
the moderate growth scenario have flaws that need correcting.
• Ms. Connie Grundhofer, 235 Linda Avenue, stated Lino Lakes is part of a special environment
that is being swallowed up. It should be used as an asset to be capitalized on. She suggested
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
tours of special areas. There are some environmental aspects that only exist in Lino Lakes. She
stated a study of the Environmental Inventory is needed. She expressed concern regarding
endangerment of flora and fauna because of building.
Mr. Mike Trehus, 675 Shadow Court, stated he was hopeful the Council could pull together.
Urban sprawl will not end in a line without boundaries. Urban sprawl will always phase into
rural areas. He encouraged large lots as a plan to curtail urban sprawl. He stated a detailed plan
does not mean a good plan. He stated the average home in Lakeville is $200,000 compared to
$145,000 in Lino Lakes. He asked how the City's fiscal responsibility can be maintained. He
stated there is an over abundance of MUSA. There will be an excess of buildable acres in the
MUSA in 2010. There will be enough MUSA to last 21 years. If there is an excess of MUSA
there will be lots of development pressure. There is no legal precedent to remain at 147 houses
per year. He asked how many wetland and hydric soil acres are in the MUSA. He stated 41% of
the population considers over population a serious issue. He stated the Plan is growth driven.
The Lyden/Dahl plan is people driven.
Mr. Jeff Joyer, 8174 Lake Drive, stated he owns a 5 acre parcel on Lake Drive south of the Main
Street and 79th Street intersection. He stated the parcel was previously zoned Commercial. He
asked that the parcel be changed to Commercial Zoning again. The property does adjoin five (5)
single family residences. The homes were built at the time the property was zoned Commercial.
Sewer is scheduled for next fall. He stated he had been assured by past Councils that serious
consideration would be given to Commercial Zoning if a specific plan was presented. He stated
the Planning & Zoning Board now has tighter controls for rezoning property.
Mr. Al Robinson, 8299 4th Avenue, stated he has lived here since 1938. He has owned his own
business for 42 years. He has served on the Planning & Zoning Board for 5 years. Mr. Robinson
stated he has watched taxes go up but he is not complaining. He stated he has reservations
regarding greenways. He added that he believes the Plan is a good plan. Nothing is perfect. The
economy is good right now but it will taper off. The number of homes built each year will
depend upon the economy and how well the homes sell. Growth was wanted for the City back in
the 1950's. Rooftops are needed for Commercial development. Commercial development will
help with the taxes. Mr. Robinson stated the flyer from CALL really burned him. There is no
listed time for meetings, no agenda, and he had no idea who they were. He stated this is garbage
and questioned why the group can not state who they are. If anyone wants to speak for the City
of Lino Lakes they should reveal who they are.
Mr. Raymond Stadum, 663 Andall Street, stated he is a member of CALL. Residents are
entitled to organize, campaign, dispute, and disagree. He stated he is more willing to support
realtors and developers. A moderate growth plan is viewed by many as immoderate to the tax
payer. He asked that no Plan be accepted without the Environmental Inventory. He mentioned
the autocratic displays of arrogance of members not elected who appear to have government
authority. Throughout efforts to achieve a consensus, elected officials have been attacked.
Certain Council Members have been accused of not being team players. Theirs is not the only
team. Council Members Lyden and Dahl are representative of a larger team.
8
•
•
s
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Mr. Nick Muntean, 405 Ash, asked why his property will be indicated as low density unsewered
when there are seven (7) sewer stub connections on his property. He stated he would like to
know one way or another so he can move on.
Mayor Sullivan recessed the meeting at 8:32 p.m.
The Council meeting reconvened at 9:02 p.m.
Mayor Sullivan stated the public hearing issues will be reviewed and Council will have a
discussion and take action on the Plan. She stated public input has ended on the subject. The
responsibility is now with the City Council. She thanked everyone for their comments. Council
Member Lyden stated the Plan is the most important thing for the City. He indicated everyone
should have an opportunity to speak regarding this issue.
D. Public Hearing Issues - Alan Brixius - Mr. Brixius gave a brief summary of the questions
and comments from the public hearing. He indicated some questions were answered at the
public hearing. Action was taken only on the Town Center Issue.
1. Art Hawkins asked that discrepancies between number of households and population
estimates as compared to number of homes per year be given some consideration. He also
questioned residential acreage indicated and open space acreage. Mr. Brixius stated that the
household estimates are taken from national, regional, and local demographers. The numbers are
projected based on 147 new homes. He said declining households will affect population growth.
Mayor Sullivan verified 7575 is the number regarding Mr. Hawkins questions.
2. Donna Carlson had several questions addressed by staff at the meeting. She also asked
when the letter supporting an overlay for Birch Street would be sent to the County. A letter
was sent to the County by John Powell on October 19, 1998. Mayor Sullivan will be signing
another letter this evening. Ms. Carlson has received a copy of the letter from John Powell.
Council Member Neal noted a new letter will be sent out this evening.
3. Connie Grundhofer asked when the findings would be available from the
Environmental Inventory and how it would ultimately be enforced. The Plan will be
supplemented by the Environmental Inventory and Management Plan.
Council Member Bergeson asked if the inventory has been completed. Mr. Wessel stated the
majority of the inventory is done. A plan now has to be developed.
Mayor Sullivan asked if there are any items identified from the inventory that are not currently
identified in the Plan. Mr. Wessel indicated he could not answer that. He stated the two (2)
consultants felt comfortable with the flexibility in the Plan to incorporate the Environmental
Inventory and Management Plan.
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
4. Pat Rickaby suggested mobile homes be included in housing maintenance program
adopted by the City. She questioned the number of units allowed under high density. She
also questioned the five (5) lots proposed at the sea plane base and could they be expanded.
The inclusion of mobile homes will be done. The five (5) lots were previously approved for the
sea plane base and future expansion can be incorporated into the Plan. Ms. Rickaby was also
advised that the implementation plan suggests revisiting the various Zoning Districts to
determine appropriate densities.
Council Member Neal referred to the multiply housing proposed for the Town Center and stated
that because there are no qualifications regarding high density housing, citizens believe it is low
income housing. Mr. Brixius indicated the homes behind Town Center have not been
specifically identified. There is no qualifier regarding the price of the homes. High density
housing does not necessarily mean low income housing.
Council Member Lyden indicated the Plan was derived from people and asked where the number
for specific housing came from. Mr. Brixius indicated the policies were adopted from the City.
They were reviewed and it was recommended that staff revisit specific goals. Mayor Sullivan
asked if the number can be removed from the Plan completely. Mr. Brixius stated the number is
one element of the Plan.
Mr. Wessel stated that in December, 1995, the City opted to participate in a Livable
Communities Plan. The Council made a commitment to those goals. There opportunity to
revisit the goals again in December. The goals can be amended. The current goals were set by
this Council last December, 1997. Council Member Lyden stated he voted no last December,
1997. He also indicated he did not remember 25% being acceptable to Council. Mr. Wessel
indicated that issue can be revisited. Mayor Sullivan stated the point is that Council does not care
for the current goals.
Council Member Lyden asked if the Council has the intention of not increasing those goals.
Mayor Sullivan stated that discussion has not been held yet.
Council Member Bergeson asked Mr. Brixius to comment about Item #4, regarding inspections.
Mr. Brixius explained the City has an older housing stock. The City would like to maintain that
housing stock. The issue is maintenance and upkeep. The idea for this comes from the need to
identify problems. The building code that is applied to a particular house will be the building
code that was in place at the time the house was built. An inspection will identify discrepancies
and allows for closure. There are modifications in the plan to make sure the seller does not have
to pay for the inspection. The plan will determine if a house is compliant and maintains house
value. Council Member Bergeson asked if repairs are included in the plan. Mr. Brixius stated the
repairs can be negotiated between the buyer and seller.
Council Member Lyden stated he is not in favor of additional layers of government. He asked
who is responsible if a mistake is made regarding the inspection. Mr. Brixius indicated the City
takes a risk every day with building permits.
10
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26,1998
Mayor Sullivan asked when the Environmental Inventory will be complete. Mr. Wessel
indicated the City will be able to implement the plan in approximately one year.
Mr. Brixius stated he agrees that mobile homes should be part of the maintenance program. He
stated language can be included in the Plan regarding expanding restrictions in the sea plane
base.
Council Member Neal asked if jet airplanes will be eliminated. Mr. Brixius stated jets can be
eliminated.
Mayor Sullivan stated the City needs a plan. She asked for a recommendation for the Housing
Maintenance Program. Mr. Brixius recommended that a Housing Maintenance Program be
established. He indicated he has provided copies of the program used in the City of New Hope.
He is not recommending drafting specific ordinances at this time.
Mayor Sullivan stated the question before Council is do we include mobile homes in the Housing
Maintenance Program and do we include language for the sea plane base.
5. Jerry Bauer asked if the east side of Lake Amelia could be served with sewer/water from
White Bear Town and shown as sewered residential on the plan. Mr. Brixius stated this
change would not follow the intent of the overall Plan in that it would not be an orderly
expansion of a zoning district.
6. Fritz Johnson stated that it is important to commercial and industrial growth to provide
diverse housing opportunities. There was no recommendation from Mr. Brixius regarding this
issue.
7. Ron Mickoli and Jeff Joyer requested commercial designation for a five (5) acre parcel
south of Vicki Lane and west of Lake Drive. Mr. Brixius went over a map detailing the parcel.
Single Family homes abut that property on three (3) sides. There is no direct access from Lake
Drive. It was determined this parcel is best used by designating it residential.
Mayor Sullivan stated with the new Comprehensive Plan everyone is starting with a new slate.
The property owner did have promises made to him. She asked where the commercial properties
are in relation to the parcel. Mr. Brixius referred to the map and pointed out the commercial
properties. Council Member Neal noted the City owns a piece of property similar to the parcel
that is zoned Commercial.
Mayor Sullivan asked about the land across the street. Mr. Brixius stated an extension of
commercial is being proposed. Commercial is consistent with the land use to the east but no to
the west.
Council Member Bergeson stated that immediately to the north there is a duplex. To the south is
a rental home. The owner of the home is hoping the property will become commercial. A
resident runs a hobby business out of his garage just south of that. From 79th Street north to
11
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Vicky Lane on the west side of Lake Drive is either commercial, vacant, or rental housing.
Across the street is designated mixed use, commercial, and residential. He stated he believes the
parcel should be given consideration for commercial designation. He noted the Comprehensive
Plan Task Force may not have been aware of the land uses in the area.
Mayor Sullivan stated the area is not in the Plan as commercial. If the land use is not
commercial it is not appropriate. The question is if it is appropriate to change.
Council Member Bergeson stated everything north of the parcel will become commercial. That
point may be enough weight to have a discussion regarding the change to commercial. Mr.
Brixius noted the Plan as drafted is subject to Council's modifications.
Council Member Lyden stated it is an issue of neighborhood businesses and the impact those
have on the community. Mr. Brixius said the Plan can limit neighborhood convenience
locations. Options do include architectural features, screening, lighting, and buffering. The
neighborhood businesses can be made to be compatible with the neighborhood.
Council Member Lyden stated neighborhood businesses can negatively impact neighborhoods.
Mr. Brixius agreed and stated the negative impact can be mitigated with proper controls.
Mayor Sullivan stated the access to Lake Drive is through the neighborhood. She stated that to
approve as separate land use issue is not appropriate. She suggested leaving the five (5) acre
parcel as shown. With new guidelines it can be considered in the future.
8. Peter Coyle suggested the zoning designation of the Town Center Area be revisited. The
Planning & Zoning Board did amend this section of the plan to "mixed use" in their
motion. Mr. Wessel stated staff does concur with his observation. Mixed use is an appropriate
designation. The amendment will be incorporated into the Plan.
9. Richard Dick of 8061 Lake Drive requested that his property remain Light Industrial -
it is proposed to be changed to commercial. Mr. Brixius stated the Comprehensive Plan Task
Force looked at Lake Drive north of County Road 14 (Main Street). Mr. Dick's parcel abuts the
central business district. Rather than have a residential use in this area, the parcel could be
incorporated to accommodate business growth. This should be given specific attention. Mr.
Brixius recommended leaving it commercial with that understanding.
10. Nick Muntean of 405 Ash Street (north/east corner of Ware and County Road J) asked
that his property be indicated as low-density sewered as sewer is available on Ware Road.
Mayor Sullivan asked why utilities are not included at 405 Ash Street if the stubs are there. Mr.
Brixius stated the City had to establish lines somewhere. He was not aware there were seven (7)
hookups on this property. The Comprehensive Plan Task Force believed that area is more rural.
Mr. Powell stated the utilities there are future service stubs which are frequently included with a
road construction project. The City does not want to disturb the right-of-way after new road
12
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
• construction so including service stubs during road construction will eliminate the need to disturb
the roadway in the future. He referred to a map which indicated where the stubs begin and end.
•
•
Council Member Bergeson stated the City does have an infill policy. It would not be
inconsistent if it had different zoning. If the stubs are there some planning for some residential
development is evident. However, it appears the property owner is requesting different zoning.
Mayor Sullivan stated the MUSA is expanding so the utilities are available. It makes sense to
add the other side of the street because it is already there. She stated she does not understand the
invisible line on the street. She asked if the tax base increases because the property is in MUSA
but not connected to services. Mr. Brixius stated the property is indicated as low density urban
residential. The MUSA will not be there until there is urban development. The property owner
is outside the MUSA and wants to be inside the MUSA.
Mayor Sullivan asked what would happen if the septic system fails. If this property is not in
MUSA but sanitary sewer is located adjacent to the property, why not put it in the MUSA. Mr.
Brixius stated that this has become an issue because the property owner has requested to be
placed in the MUSA. You can say that he is in the first stage. Mr. Brixius stated he was
unaware that stubs were already in place in front of this property. The decision to include this
property in the MUSA area has to be made by Council.
Mayor Sullivan asked if the property has to be subdivided to make utilities cost effective. Mr.
Brixius was unsure if it is cost effective or not.
Mayor Sullivan asked that if the Comprehensive Plan Task Force had known the stubs were there
would they have included it in the MUSA. Mr. Brixius stated the property owner could have
requested it. Council Member Lyden noted the property owner has a right to the pipe whether he
is in the MUSA or not. Mr. Brixius stated that if the City wants to pursue urban development on
this property, the area needs to be in MUSA.
Mayor Sullivan asked what has to change to put the property in the MUSA so that they can
connect to the sanitary sewer and municipal water systems. Mr. Brixius stated the property has
to be in the MUSA. The property owner has requested that his property be indicated as low
density urban municipal sewer serviced. This is a land use designation issue. The property
owner wants full range of access to hook up to the sanitary sewer.
Mayor Sullivan asked if the property is sold will the new owner have to hook up even thought
they are not in the MUSA. Mr. Brixius stated that unsewered properties can pursue access to
City utilities. The property can be added to MUSA in the future.
Mayor Sullivan asked how many areas like this are within the City. Mr. Powell stated there are
many. It is prudent to put in utility services before the road is upgraded. This will eliminate the
disturbance of the new roadway for extension of services.
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Council Member Bergeson stated if stubs are put in with an unequal number of driveways the
developers are almost required build on larger parcels. He stated he does not want houses on
only one side of the street. Zoning should not be changed to something that can not happen. The
property is not developable if it is not in conjunction with other properties.
Council Member Lyden stated R-1XX zoning is a possibility. Mr. Brixius stated that access a
from local street to Ware Road is needed regardless of lot size. Driveway access to Ware Road is
a concern. A buffer should be built to shield homes on Ware Road.
Mayor Sullivan stated she believe this is not an appropriate request at this time. Mr. Brixius
stated it is scheduled but not until 2010. Council Member Lyden stated the intent of Council
should be to allow the homeowner to hook up if he wants to. Mayor Sullivan stated that is a
separate issue for Council to consider.
11. Al Robinson asked for clarification of the greenway designation and expressed concern
at it becoming a "taking". Mr. Brixius stated that the greenways were conceptual on the plan
and would be further defined with completion of the environmental inventory.
12. Mr. Corson cautioned the City on making decisions based on unsuitable soils prior to
actual testing and possible correction. He also cautioned staff on the process of placing
property in a Land Trust as it relates to cost and timing. Mayor Sullivan stated the Land
Trust is open to a full range of options.
Mayor Sullivan noted the following issues: Including mobile homes in a Housing Maintenance
Program, Language to confine the sea plane base to its present "foot print", and the Commercial
property on Lake Drive south of Vicky Lane. Mr. Brixius noted modifications in planning
regarding Mr. Dick's property, 8061 Lake Drive. He felt reconsideration of the present
designation would open the property up for research. Mr. Wessel added mixed land use in The
Village has to be incorporated into the Plan.
Mayor Sullivan referred to the poll of the Environmental Board, and said two (2) members want
a moratorium, two (2) members do not want a moratorium with qualifications, three (3) members
stated the City can proceed without a moratorium. Council Member Lyden expressed concern
regarding the two (2) qualified no's. Mr. Wessel stated the two (2) members felt strongly that a
moratorium was not needed but future residential developers would need to be qualified for plat
approval. Mayor Sullivan noted developers have to go through the Environmental Board now.
Mr. Wessel stated that is correct. The current system is working well.
Council Member Lyden asked if the City could set up two (2) standards for currently working
developers and standards for other developers. Mayor Sullivan stated the issue is if a moratorium
should be placed on plat approval until the Environmental Inventory is complete. Council
Member Lyden stated the best practice would be to have the Environmental Inventory and
Management Plan in place before moving forward. The Council should choose the best practice.
V. ACTION ON RESOLUTION NO. 98 -160
14
•
s
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Mayor Sullivan stated Council Members have been instructed they have 10 minutes to make
their point before action is taken.
Council Member Bergeson thanked the Comprehensive Plan Task Force for all their work. He
stated there has been adequate input and everyone had an opportunity to speak at the public
hearing. Suggestions have been made to limit housing or require larger lots as a means to limit
urban sprawl. Urban sprawl is a problem for the entire metro area. Limiting the number of
houses actually contributes to urban sprawl. There is more agreement on long term population
goals than the number of houses. A citizen suggested the number of homes not be put in the
Plan but instead the population number for the year 2020 with mechanisms to control that
number. He stated he believes there is merit to that suggestion. Council Member Bergeson
stated the City issued permits in a free market situation that is determined by willing buyers and
sellers until now. This resulted in about 250 homes being built in the City per year. The Plan
calls for a 40% reduction in the amount of homes being built. The City appointed the Task Force
for a recommendation. They came to the conclusion that 147 is an acceptable number. He stated
it is very important to encourage commercial development. The City Policy and Comprehensive
Plan encourage that. If residential development is restricted too much commercial development
will be restricted also. He stated he does not want a mandatory linkage between the two (2). It
would be better to promote commercial and abide by residential guidelines. He said there could
be an economic development effort to make sure commercial fails by limiting housing. Council
Member Bergeson felt economic development could be torpedoed because it is linked to
residential development. The City needs everyone on board to encourage commercial
development. The Plan needs to be submitted to Metropolitan Council. It was the consensus of
the Task Force to move ahead with this Plan.
Council Member. Dahl stated she received many voice mail messages today. Ms. Mary Swanson
called expressing concern regarding the planned new McDonalds. Ms. Donna Carlson asked
about the housing code and the letter to the County regarding Birch Street. Ms. Sharon Lane's
concern has been resolved. Mr. Bob Fennidontah called and indicated he is in favor of slow
growth. He stated he can not get out on Highway 49 until after 8:00 p.m. He lives on Rohavic
Lane and was unable to attend tonight's meeting. He indicated slow change would be better for
the City. Council Member Dahl stated the City has enough MUSA for 7-10 years. Just because
the inner ring of cities is filled up, Lino Lakes should not feel it is the job or duty of Lino Lakes
to fulfill the Metropolitan Council objective to be up to a certain capacity. She stated open space
is very important to her. This City should not be required to grow at an unacceptable rate just to
fulfill the Metropolitan Council's objectives. She felt neither the Lyden/Dahl plan or the Task
Force plan is right or wrong. A compromise was attempted by negotiation. Council Member
Dahl stated she does not want the City topped out by 2020. If the Council can not reach a
consensus and more negotiations are not possible then the Plan should be taken to the voters.
She stated she believes the citizens of Lino Lakes are intelligent, in the know, and the Charter
provides the City protection from the road improvement assessments. She indicated she is for
slow growth and not adding additional MUSA. Every citizen has to live with this Plan. She
• stated at one time the citizens were not notified of the zoning plan and they should have been.
She stated she would like to go back to the table and negotiate.
15
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Council Member Lyden stated that experts will fill your head with information until your head
spins. He stated he has serious concerns about the Plan. He read page 13, Item 2, of the Plan
and stated the conclusion of that is the City of Lino Lakes will become the next Brooklyn Park.
The City stops at County Road J and the country begins. People came to this community for
open space. If they want urban living they will live in Minneapolis or St. Paul. The
communities of Afton, Lake Elmo, and Lino Lakes have reason not to change. Quality of life is
an issue. Economic dollars do not improve the quality of life. He stated he is not here to please
the Comprehensive Plan Task Force. He indicated he is listening to the people. He stated his
constituents voted him into office. According to the survey 28% of the citizens stated rural open
space is very important. It is very easy to build a city. It is much harder to preserve one. The
survey indicated 25% believe rural open space is a good thing. There will be 25% less
congestion if 25% more roads are not developed.. It doesn't have to be that way. He stated he
has an open space plan that will preserve open space. Regarding page 65 of the Plan, staging
means you fill a square. When that square is full you fill in the next square.
Council Member Neal stated he received two (2) phone calls. One was regarding Birch Street.
Another regarding Birch Street connecting to Hugo Road into Hugo. He stated Lake Drive
should be commercial. He noted the proposed commercial development on Centerville Road and
Birch Street. He stated jet planes will be here in the future at the sea plane base unless they are
specifically prohibited. He stated he is in favor of the Plan if the following is resolved: Birch
Street, Hugo Road, Lake Drive commercial, and Centerville Road/Birch Street commercial plan .
Mr. Brixius stated language for the sea plane base will be added. Birch Street will remain a two
(2) lane roadway. There will be no extension of Birch Street to the Hugo border. There is a plan
for a commercial area at Centerville Road and Birch Street. It is not scheduled until after the
year 2010.
Council Member Neal noted the City has no control over the proposed Hugo Road extension.
Mr. Powell stated the road is in Washington County. That is correct, however it would dead end
at Elmcrest Avenue. Lino Lakes controls Elmcrest Avenue to I -35E. There are no plans for a
Birch Street extension to I -35E.
Council Member Neal stated the Plan should be reviewed every one (1) or two (2) years. Mr.
Powell stated the Plan will be used as a guideline for Lino Lakes. The City can not control what
Hugo does. There is no current plan for another connecting road.
Council Member Lyden stated we are at the point where the issue is who will negotiate a
compromise Plan. He stated he approached the Comprehensive Plan Task Force in February and
March of 1998 with his concerns. He met with the representatives. He asked them to come up
with vehicles to improve the Plan. The Metropolitan Council indicated some parts of the Plan
can go to a citizen vote. Time is needed to explore that issue. He indicated he had brought new
ideas forward to reconcile and move forward. He stated he has met with Mayor Sullivan. He
stated he fears the City will not be able to move forward. Staff is going to send the Plan forward
16
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
• without a 4/5 vote which is illegal. He stated he hopes the Council can get the job done in time.
All parties need to be willing to negotiate.
•
Mayor Sullivan stated she is proud to be here and be a part of the first comprehensive Plan
overhaul. For the first time tonight the meeting included public response from the public hearing
input. Lino Lakes is the first City to care enough to preserve the environment and natural
resources with an Environmental Inventory Plan. Lino Lakes has been recognized by the DNR
as a trend setter. This is not the first time the City has included citizen input. Lino Lakes is #1
regarding working with citizens on the planning project process. This is the second part of the
City's strategic planning process. The first part was 2020. Vision 2020 identified growth
planning. Within growth planning citizens wanted commercial development and environmental
issues addressed first. The Comprehensive Plan does that. Lino Lakes citizens value their
community. The Plan is about so much more than what the Metropolitan Council wants. By
having 2020 Vision in place, the City has the vision to drive a unique Comprehensive Plan and
have a plan for growth. Every citizen that spoke should feel responsible for the success of the
Plan. The beginning of thought is in disagreement. Lino Lakes can be proud it is a community
committed to consensus and something everyone can live with. The City moves with actionable
accuracy. Mayor Sullivan stated she is not a supporter of the 147 housing figure. She stated it is
however a basis by which the City can move forward; The City is looking at a goal of 7,575 new
homes by 2020. That is an average of 147 per year. Home building could be more or less units
per year. The figure allows the City to be flexible keeping the goal in mind. If the City is not
getting commercial development more residential development can be allowed. Everything
indicates the City needs residential development to support commercial development. Most
citizens have agreed slower growth is the opportunity. She stated she has received calls from
people who want faster growth and calls from people who do not want additional commercial
growth. Part of listening is listening to all citizens and finding a consensus. In order to find
slower growth and quality of life the Cityhas to determine how slow is to slow in order to
accomplish other objectives. Residential development is not the only piece of moderate growth.
Moderate growth has a housing development goal of 7,575. The other issues are education,
commercial development, and everything else that has gone into the Plan for consideration. The
Plan can not be boiled down to the number of homes. The commercial development discussion
included clustering commercial development where there is destination commercial and
neighborhood commercial. Neighborhood commercial is not intended to draw additional traffic.
Destination commercial is intended to draw additional traffic and customers to the City that do
not necessarily live in the City. Because of this, corridors for I-35 have been identified.
Additional commercial development is required to have more buffering for the most benefit with
the least impact. The Plan includes what is believed to be the right amount of commercial
development. Certain locations have been identified for current development. The tax base
goals have been put in place. The goal is for commercial development to equal 10% in 2010 and
15% in 2020. The goal is for a 20% tax capacity rate in 2020. Great value has been put on open
space. The Plan addresses open space and aesthetic issues. Additional buffering and additional
setbacks addresses aesthetics. The Environmental Inventory Plan addresses open spaces. The
Environmental Inventory Plan has great value. It will be implemented into the Plan. The Plan
also includes many ideals of nature conservancy not only to preserve spots of open space but to
take care of the planning that goes on around the open space. The City does not want a negative
17
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
impact on space being preserved. The Plan recognizes the limit of hydric soils. This enabled
justification of saying no to the Metropolitan Council's goals. The City has identified the soils
are important. A wide variety of residential development is needed. The Plan looks at executive
homes, cluster development, multifamily housing, and single family housing. Diversity is
needed to maintain tax diversity as boomers move out of the City. The City needs to be careful
of accumulating more homes that can be sold to the next generation. A home priced at 180,000
is neutral to the tax base. Multifamily -family homes will bring 2-3 times the taxes that
residential development will bring. The City of Lino Lakes will never be like Roseville or
Brooklyn Park. Brooklyn Park has 6,000 multifamily -family homes. Lino Lakes is looking at
600 in three (3) locations throughout the City which will be adjacent to accesses out of the City.
She stated infill is the smartest use of urban services. Obtaining the densest use of lines will
preserve open space. The City can not control when people choose to sell their property. The
Plan identifies areas that it makes sense for future development.
Mayor Sullivan stated the City should develop new ordinances that can support the Plan and
address the issues that have been identified. Right now the City is looking at a land use plan.
The City needs to continue to recognize citizens needs. Further efforts to continue the process
include plans with options for areas without water and sanitary sewer and a failing septic system.
Additional support is needed regarding this issue. A review of the guidelines for the air parks in
conjunction with the air park owners is needed. FAA regulations do not cover safety issues of
residents. The issue of redevelopment and infrastructure failure needs to be addressed. Lino
Lake is not a new City and the residents who have lived here for a long time cannot be forgotten.
The City needs to continue collaboration with other entities to ensure mutual benefits and cost
savings. For the Plan to be successful, the City must improve compliance with regulations with
the new mind set that a group of policies drive the decision making.
Mayor Sullivan stated that as part of the motion she wanted to include a statement that within 90
days the City will have developed a clear cut schedule and implementation plan for compliance
with the Plan and reviews regarding the benchmarks and goals in the Plan.
Mayor Sullivan stated that now the City has a plan without a 4/5ths vote. The City Council was
elected to manage the City government for its citizens. The Council should make a decision with
an accurate portrayal of what is in the Plan and what is in the best interest of the City. There is
the issue of bringing the City together. When you become a Council Member, there should be no
private wars and private issues. If indeed there are negotiable items, they should be put on the
table now. The Comprehensive Plan Task Force looked at 13 items submitted by Council
Members Lyden and Dahl. Constructive negotiations on those items should be brought forward.
Council Member Lyden stated the City can not tell someone when to develop. He said the
difference in the two (2) plans is simple. Zoning will determine whether there are 40 homes on
40 acres or 80 homes on 40 acres with sewer and water. People who have moved to Lino Lakes
do not want Lino Lakes to become urbanize. Lino Lakes does not have to be an urban city.
Mayor Sullivan stated the Plan does not bring Lino Lakes an urban community. The Plan is far
from that.
18
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Council Member Bergeson stated the population has tripled in the last 20 years and the City has
not lost its character. It is better to live here now with the schools and parks. The Plan will not
change the character of the community because it has not changed in the last 20 years.
Council Member Lyden wondered how you can tell people that an additional of 1,500 acres of
MUSA in 10 years, and another 1,500 acres in 10 more years will not change the character of the
community. A point will be reached where this City is another Woodbury and asking for
additional taxes to save open space.
Council Member Neal moved to pass the draft Comprehensive Plan with reservations that
everything noted is straightened out by Mr. Brixius. Council Member Bergeson seconded the
motion.
Mayor Sullivan stated the Plan is a good plan representative of the City. Not everyone can be
satisfied. The Plan was built by the citizens of Lino Lakes.
Council Member Bergeson referred to an earlier discussion and asked if a mixed use designation
could be the solution to the 79th Street to Main Street on Lake Drive area. Mr. Brixius stated
there will be an ultimate concept plan for the Village area that will be reviewed. The sea plan
base will be reviewed. The City needs to be clear about the Joyer property on Lake Drive. A
performance use plan is better than a mixed use plan.
Council Member Bergeson moved to approve an amendment to designate the area of 79th Street
to Main Street, on the west side of Lake Drive, a performance zoning use. Council Member Neal
seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Lyden and Council Member Dahl
voting no.
Council Member Lyden stated he voted no to the amendment because it leaves the door open for
neighborhood businesses. There are many homes in that area. Council Member Neal noted the
survey indicated 500 cars per hour go by there already. Council Member Dahl stated she agrees
with Council Member Lyden. She indicated she would like to discuss the issue at a work
session. Mayor Sullivan stated she was disappointed that it was not discussed before the vote was
taken.
Council Member Bergeson stated the banking of MUSA is an important concept. The reason to
have more MUSA has to do with the infill policy. Banking MUSA and combining it with the
existing MUSA allows the City to implement its infill policy. A key part of that is banking
MUSA.
Council Member Lyden read from page 66 of the Plan noting a concern regarding uncontrolled
growth. He stated that the MUSA will be even more out of control if the City has more MUSA.
Mayor Sullivan stated that is another case of taking information out of context. The
Comprehensive Plan Task Force has worked to negotiate.
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26,1998
Mayor Sullivan stated that if there was an honest intent to come with a negotiated agreement the
CALL flyer would not have come out. The Council needs to be honest and confident that
standards are followed to go forward. Every Council Member made the choice whether or not to
follow those standards.
Council Member Lyden stated the citizens have the choice to believe and trust Mayor Sullivan.
It has been documented that staff has the intention to send the Plan forward without a 4/5 vote.
He stated the intent of Council to send the Plan without a 4/5 vote takes slow growth advocate
effectively out of the negotiation process. This would silence all slow growth voices.
Negotiations should not be held in public. He stated he is committed to get the Plan done on
time with a 4/5 vote. He indicated he is willing to move from point A to point B.
Mr. Hawkins stated it is not illegal to send the Plan to the Metropolitan Council without a 4/5
vote as long as it is clearly indicated the 4/5 vote was not received.
Council Member Bergeson asked if a 4/5 vote is not received, is the City prevented from
reconsidering the Plan at a future date. Mr. Hawkins stated there is not a time restriction
regarding a re -vote on the Plan.
Council Member Bergeson voted yes. Council Member Dahl voted no. Council Member Lyden
voted no. Council Member Neal voted yes. Mayor Sullivan voted yes.
Mayor Sullivan called for a recess at 11:13 p.m.
The City Council meeting reconvened at 11:20 p.m.
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT, RICK DEGARDNER
Consideration of Resolution No. 98 -158, Accepting Donation from Forest Lake Area
Athletic Association - Mr. DeGardner stated the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department
sought program sponsors for its First Annual Turkey Shoot to be held on November 14, 1998.
The event is a free holiday event for the families of Lino Lakes that consists of low-key
competition in a variety of athletic events for prizes.
The Forest Lake Area Athletic Association, as a program sponsor, has donated $100 to help defer
the costs of this event.
Mr. DeGardner stated the Council will be receiving a flyer regarding this event. He also
indicated volunteers are needed to help run the event on November 14th.
Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 98 - 158, as presented. Council Member
Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 98 - 158 can be found at the end of these minutes.
20
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
• COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, BRIAN WESSEL
Consideration of Resolution No. 98 - 159, Calling for Public Hearing to Establish Tax
Increment Financing District 1-9, Brian Wessel - Mr. Wessel stated that earlier this evening
the Economic development Authority authorized the preparation of a modified Plan for
Development District No. 1 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9
to provide financial assistance to three (3) companies that would like to locate in the Apollo
Business Center.
Once the City Council sets the hearing date for December 14, 1998, the Plan will be sent to
School District No. 12 and Anoka County for review and comment.
Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 98 - 159, as presented. Council Member
Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 98 - 159 can be found at the end of these minutes.
Consideration of Amended PDO, Behm's Century Farm Portion of Lino Air Park, Mary
Kay Wyland - Ms. Wyland stated that Mr. David Hunter, 263, Palomino Lake requested a
variance to construct a hangar larger than allowed by the Behm's Century Farm PDO. The staff
and the Planning & Zoning Board suggested that an amended PDO might be more appropriate
than a variance for an oversized building. Mr. Hunter has, therefore, made application for an
amended PDO.
The original PDO granted to the Air Park Lots in the Behm's Century Farms development
related specifically to hanger size and location. The recommendation at that time called out 10
requirements for hanger size and location including the statement that no commercial use will be
permitted. The maximum allowable size was 2,600 square feet. Ms. Wyland referred to a list of
those 10 items.
Mr. Hunter and the developer, Mr. Gary Uhde, are requesting an amendment to Item E of the
PDO that would allow a maximum area of 3,200 square feet in hanger size and increase the
height limit to 28'. This is equivalent to the maximum size allowed in the original air park. Mr.
Hunter needs the additional area as he will ultimately have two (2) airplanes which will not fit in
a 2,600 square foot hanger.
The property in question is Zoned R-1 with an average lot size (on the air park) of 32,357 square
feet. The original air park lots are Zoned Rural with an average lot size of 60,000 square feet.
The original PDO suggested a smaller accessory building size for the smaller air park lots. A
calculation of the lot area and building coverage has determined that adequate open space can be
maintained with a 3,200 square feet hanger and typical house pad. The Zoning Ordinance
requires a minimum 35% landscaped are with 65% available for parking and structures.
•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Ms. Wyland stated the average hanger size in the existing air park is approximately 2,650 square
feet. There is one hanger at 3,200 square feet, another planned for the near future and a possible
expansion of an existing hanger - all within the original park.
If the Council determines that an increased hanger size is appropriate, staff would suggest that
Article VI, Item 6.4E, of the Declaration of Convenants, Conditions and Restrictions for the
Century Farm Development dated April 5, 1996, be amended to read as follows:
E. Maximum hanger size is 3,200 square feet.
F. Maximum hanger height of 28 feet.
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on this item and recommended approval of
the amended PDO as recommended above.
Staff is recommending approval of the amendment to the PDO as stated.
Mayor Sullivan asked what other people at the Air Park think about the amendment. Ms.
Wyland stated the applicant and his neighbor are in favor of the amendment. A notice was sent
to all neighbors within 600'. No comments were received. The Air Park Association has no
objections to the amendment.
Mayor Sullivan asked what the FAA would say. Ms. Wyland stated the FAA does not get
involved with hanger size. The City of Blaine has hangers at 3,400 square feet. The hanger is
limited to three (3) planes regardless of size.
Council Member Lyden moved to approve amendment to the PDO as stated in the staff report.
Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of FIRST READING, Ordinance No. 09 - 98, Zoning Ordinance Text
Amendment Relating to Driveway Width, Mary Kay Wyland - Ms. Wyland stated that with
an increase in the construction of three (3) stall garages, staff has received numerous requests for
an amendment to the existing ordinance relating to driveway width. Frequently these requests
come to the attention of staff in the enforcement of the existing the code. Some property owners
pave the triangle area following receipt of their occupancy certificate while others pave the
driveway following issuance of occupancy if weather has not permitted driveway installation.
Ms. Wyland read the current ordinance regarding driveway width. The following is a list of
reasons provided in support of the proposed amendment to allow a wider driveway curb cut:
1. Three (3) care garages are typically 32 feet - 36 feet in width thus the request for a
wider driveway.
2. Driving over the triangle area/curbing kills the grass.
3. The placement of rock in the triangle area due to damaged sod may be unsightly
and spill out into the roadway.
4. The Ordinance allows a maximum of 65% impervious surface with 35% green
area on a residential property. The additional pavement would be approximately
22
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
42 square feet in area or a triangle 6 feet by 14 feet, a minimal impact on
impervious surface.
5. Enforcement issues relating to pavement following occupancy.
Concerns expressed in opposition to the following amendment:
1. Increase in impervious surface thus affecting run-off into the storm sewers.
2. Aesthetics - sea of concrete in front of residential properties.
3. Snow storage on cul-de-sac properties.
Staff has suggested an amendment that would provide for a maximum of 36 feet in width
excepting cul-de-sac properties where the 26 feet requirement would remain. The cul-de-sac
issue was raised due to both aesthetics and snow storage concerns and the amendment was
reworded following that discussion.
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on this issue at their September 9, 1998,
meeting. Following a discussion, a motion was made to deny the ordinance amendment on a
four (4) to three (3) vote.
Mr. Don Dunn, 6885 Black Duck Drive, came forward and stated he had voted against the
amendment at the Planning & Zoning meeting. He stated the amendment was rejected several
times for insufficient data. The City Engineer was not in favor of the amendment. Mr. Brixius
indicated no other City has a driveway width of 36 feet. On an R-1 lot the impervious surface
allotment is 45%. On an R -1X lot the impervious service would be 40%. He stated it will not
look good. He indicated he has a three (3) car driveway and has no problem with a 26' driveway
width. He stated the amendment will cause a lot of other problems. He indicated he hopes the
amendment is rejected.
Council Member Bergeson noted he does not usually vote to over turn the Planning & Zoning
Board's recommendations.
Council Member Bergeson moved to adopt the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 09 - 98, as
presented. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion.
Council Member Lyden stated this would be an avoidable issue if lots are an appropriate size.
Mayor Sullivan stated she believes the wider driveways are aesthetically unappealing. She stated
she is not in favor of the amendment.
Mr. Powell stated the original Ordinance did not have the exclusion of cul-de-sacs. He indicated
cul-de-sacs were his main concern. He stated he believes the decision at the Planning & Zoning
Board meeting would have been different with the exclusion of cul-de-sacs. The enforcement
issue is also a concern. A Certificate of Occupancy is typically issued before the driveway is
done. It is an enforcement nightmare for the Building Department.
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
Council Member Dahl asked for clarification regarding a mandate or option. Ms. Wyland
verified that that amendment provides an option for a wider driveway. Wider driveways will not
be mandated.
Mayor Sullivan asked for a roll call vote.
Council Member Bergeson voted yes. Council Member Dahl voted yes. Council Member
Lyden voted yes. Council Member Neal voted yes. Mayor Sullivan voted yes.
ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH
ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING, Delinquent Sewer and Water Utility Bills, Dan
Tesch- Mr. Tesch stated that each year the Utility Department experiences difficulty collecting
some quarterly sewer and water utility bills. Notification has been forwarded to those residents
having outstanding bills explaining the deadline for payment of those bills is November 1, 1998.
Most bills unpaid when a resident moves from the City are turned over to a collection agency,
and are collected in this manner. However, bills not collected by a collection agency and
delinquent bills of current residents are certified to Anoka County by resolution for collection
with the property taxes. The residents named in Resolution No. 98 - 161 have received the
required notification of this public hearing. Tonight they will have the opportunity to speak to
the City Council about their delinquent bills.
Following the public hearing, the Council will be asked to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 161.
Finance will continue to receive payment of delinquent bills until they are actually certified to
Anoka County. All bills paid before the certification date will be taken off of the delinquent list.
Mayor Sullivan opened the public hearing at 11:40 p.m. There were no public comments.
Council Member Bergeson moved to close the public hearing at 11:40 p.m. Council Member
Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of Resolution No. 98 -161, Authorizing Clerk -Treasurer to Certify
Delinquent Sewer and Water Utility Bills for Collection with the 1998 Property Taxes,
Collectable in 1999 - Mr. Tesch stated this resolution will authorize the Clerk -Treasurer to
certify delinquent sewer and water utility bills for collection with the 1998 property taxes.
Council Member Lyden moved to adopt Resolution No. 98 - 161, as presented. Council Member
Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 98 - 161 can be found at the end of these minutes.
Restructuring, Phases II, Salaries, Dan Tesch - Mr. Tesch stated that a Maintenance of Status
Quo order from the Bureau of Mediation Services prohibited the Council from acting on the
recommended salaries for the Environmental Specialist and Building Official/Inspector. The
order from the bureau was in place while a unit determination could be made regarding potential
24
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26, 1998
• AFSCME membership. The order has now been lifted, and the Council may proceed with the
approval of salaries for the two (2) positions.
•
S
The recommendations for the Building Official/Inspector and Environmental Specialist salary
ranges were made in consultation with Labor Relations Associates. Both employees will be at
Step 6.
Staff recommended approval of stated salaries.
Council Member Bergeson moved to approve salary recommendations for the Building
Official/Inspector and Environmental Specialist. Council Member Lyden seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Consideration of City Planner, Dan Tesch - Mr. Tesch stated the City is ready to make a
tentative offer of employment to Mr. Jeff Smyser for the position of City Planner. This offer is
contingent upon reference and background checks.
Mr. Smyser is currently the Assistant Zoning Administrator for McLeod County, and has both
public and private sector planning experience. Mr. Tesch stated the anticipated start date is
November 16, 1998.
Staff recommended approval of a tentative offer of employment to Mr. Smyser.
Mr. Wessel gave a brief description of Mr. Smyser's background. He stated Mr. Smyser is a
graduate of the University of Minnesota has his Masters Degree. He also has 10 years of
experience. Mr. Smyser was with a planning firm for four (4) years. Mr. Wessel indicated Mr.
Smyser is committed to public service.
Council Member Bergeson moved to approve a tentative offer of employment to Mr. Jeff Smyser
for the position of City Planner. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
Consideration of Minutes, October 7, 1998 (Council Member Bergeson was absent) -
Council Member Lyden moved to approve the October 7, 1998, minutes, as presented. Council
Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried with Council Member Bergeson abstaining.
COMMUNITY CALENDAR OCTOBER 27 THROUGH NOVEMBER 9,1998
Environmental Focus Committee, Thursday, October 29, 1998, 6:30 p.m.
Citizens Academy, Thursday, October 29, 1998, 7:00 p.m., Centennial Fire Station No. 2
25
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 26,1998
Environmental Focus Committee, Friday, October 30, 1998, 6:30 p.m.
Park Board, Monday, November 2, 1998, 6:30 p.m.
Mayor's Round Table, Monday, November 2, 1998, 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
General Election, Tuesday, November 3, 1998, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Council Work Session, Wednesday, November 4, 1998, 5:30 p.m.
Citizens Academy Graduation, Don Davis, State Commissioner of Public Safety will be
Guest Speaker, Thursday, November 5, 1998, 7:00 p.m.
Council Meeting, Monday, November 9, 1998, 6:30 p.m.
HOLIDAY, Veterans Day, Wednesday, November 11, 1998
Planning and Zoning Board, Thursday, November 12, 1998, 6:30 p.m. (Due to the holiday
it was delayed one day)
ADJOURN
There being no further business, Council Member Lyden moved to adjourn at 11:47 p.m.
Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, December 21,
1998.
�1.
Marilyn Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
Transcribed by:
Kim Points
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
26
mberl
ullivan, Mayor
• Council Member Neal introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption.
•
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 158
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE FOREST LAKE AREA
ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE LINO LAKES PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT'SFIRST ANNUAL FAMILY TURKEY SHOOT EVENT
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
The Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department is holding this annual
holiday event for the first time on November 14, 1998; and
The event is a free holiday event for the families of Lino Lakes; and
Participant teams, consisting of one child (ages 4-14) and one adult, will
compete in a variety of low-key athletic events for prizes; and
The Forest Lake Area Athletic Association was made aware of the desire
of the Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Department to conduct the Family
Turkey Shoot with the support of a program sponsor and has donated
$100.00 to the City to defer the costs of this event.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Lino Lakes hereby
accepts the donation of $100.00 to help fund the Family Turkey Shoot event and wishes
to express its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Forest Lake Area Athletic
Association for its donation.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this _ y of - 1998.
K
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member Lyden and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof. Bergeson, Dahl, Lyden, Neal, Sullivan.
n, Mayor
The following voted against same: none.
• Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Neal
adoption:
introduced the following resolution and moved its •
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 98-159
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO MODIFY DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TO MODIFY TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.
1-7 AND TO ESTABLISH TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-9
WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes Economic Development Authority (the "EDA")
intends to modify the program (The "Program") for Development District No. 1 (the
"District"), and to modify the Plan ("TIF District No. 1-7 Plan") and to establish Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1-9 ("TIF District No. 1-9") within the District; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (the "TIF
Act") and sections 469.124 through 469.134 (the "City Development District Act")
requires that the city council of the city of Lino Lakes (the "City") hold a public
hearing on the modification of the Program and modification of the TIF District No. 1-7
Plan, and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan ("TIF District No. 1-9 Plan")
for TIF District No. 1-9, following approval thereof by the EDA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The city clerk -treasurer is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for
publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the city
council to consider this matter on Monday, December 14, 1998 at 6:30 p.m.
in the council chambers at city hall. The notice shall be published in the
newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior to the public hearing.
•
•
• 2. The city clerk -treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent
School District No. 12 and Anoka County at least 30 days prior to the public
hearing and to invite their comments and on the modification of the Program
and the modification of the TIF District No. 1-7 Plan and the establishment of
TIF District No. 1-9.
3. The city staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take any and all
other actions necessary to bring this matter before the city council at the time
of the public hearing.
Dated: October 26, 1998
ATTEST:
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
e ly A. Sullivan, Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Dahl and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Dahl, Lyden, Neal, Sullivan.
and the following voted against same: none.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Council Member Lyden introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 161
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK -TREASURER TO
CERTIFY DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER UTILITY BILLS FOR
COLLECTION WITH THE 1998 PROPERTY TAXES, COLLECTABLE IN 1999
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Chapter 400, Section 401.29 and Chapter 402,
Section 402.14, Subd. 5, the Clerk -Treasurer has prepared a list of
residents who have delinquent water and sewer bills to be certified to the
Anoka County Auditor for collection with the 1998 property tax
statements, collectable in 1999, and
WHEREAS, notice of impending action was mailed to residents on October 15, 1998,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota that the City Council hereby levies the sums of money collectable in the year
1999 upon the attached list of properties in the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota.
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
talJA4
Ilvan, Mayor
Adopted by the City Council of Lino Lakes, M. esota this 2
day of October, 1998.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
Member Dahl and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Bergeson, Dahl, Lyden, Neal, Sullivan.
The following against same: none.
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
CITY OF LINO LAKES
1998 CERTIFICATION CONTROL LIST
Updated October 22, 1998
Cust #
101150
101250
103050
11035A
110520
110580
130010
200950.
201350
205650
206500
20745A
207550
207800
209150
20960A
213250
213900
214150
21555A
216450
216700
217950
220600
221450
223750
228290
228300
228559
228750
229700
230000
Owner Name
JACK FOBAIRE
TODD & LINH LOFGUIST
JEFFREY & COLLEEN MCKENZIE
JUANITA OLSON
SHANE GATZ
STEPHEN ROMAN
MICHAEL & ROSE MILLER
ROY MARTIN
SHAWN SCHULTZ
SEAN JOHNSON
MICHAEL GAYDOS
JANE F. GILLES
DOUG GRONE
DAVID PEDERSON
ANDREW CARVER
KEVIN & CONNIE SINNA
OTTO ALLENSON
STEPHANIE D. ELLIAS
DIANE KOSKELA
NANCY ADAMEK
MICHAEL KUJAWA
JAMES FUDALI
RONALD BECKER
SUSAN CULP
THOMAS BAREGI
BILL LEVERCOM
JOSEPH VANHESE.
LEROY METZ
THOMAS WANGER
DEAN BENTLEY
TODD VILLAFUERTE
DEBRA SIMONS
230300 DAVID ROWE
230600 RENE & MERRILEE OREJUELA
231060 HUD - LOAN #271,746,381.00
232150 PAUL CAMP
23345B PAUL LEGRAND
233600 MICHAEL HUEG
235500 LINDA LECLAIRE
240460 ROBERT NEAL
240590 ROBERT HANSON
30100A ELISSA LINDQUIST
302550 RESIDENT
304800 LY NIGHT VIDEO
30890( FREDRICKSEN
Street # Street Name
7269 HEATHER COURT
7275 HEATHER COURT
7280 MEADOW COURT
7625 BEHM LANE
7668 PALOMINO LANE
7681 PALOMINO LANE
7601 APPALOOSA LANE
7112 2ND AVENUE
7144 2ND AVENUE
185 GLADSTONE CIRCLE
151 GLENVIEW AVENUE
6918 GLENVIEW AVENUE
6920 GLENVIEW AVENUE
6932 GLENVIEW AVENUE
7144 GRAY HERON DRIVE
7171 GRAY HERON DRIVE
7146 IVY RIDGE COURT
7159 IVY RIDGE COURT
7169 IVY RIDGE COURT
7136 IVY RIDGE LANE
7111 MOURNING DOVE
7128 MOURNING DOVE
51 NORTH ROAD
175 RED CLOVER LANE
6824 RUSTIC LANE
7109 SNOW OWL LANE
7033 SUNRISE DRIVE
7034 SUNRISE DRIVE
7057 SUNRISE DRIVE
7084 SUNRISE DRIVE
7196 SUNRISE DRIVE
6816 SUNSET ROAD
6832 SUNSET ROAD
6940 SUNSET ROAD
7080 SUNSET ROAD.
175 ULMER DRIVE
7147 WHIPPOORWILL LANE
7152 WHIPPOORWILL LANE
17 ELM STREET
466 AQUA CIRCLE
459 AQUA CIRCLE
6220 BALDWIN LAKE ROAD
123 EGRET LANE
6011 HODGSON ROAD
6673 PELICAN PLACE
City State
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES MN
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
LINO LAKES
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
Zip
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
55014
Pin #
18-31-22-33-0027
18-31-22-33-0026
18-31-22-33-0018
07-31-22-43-0034
07-31-22-43-0013
07-31-22-43-0046
07-31-22-43-0067
19-31-22-12-0056
19-31-22-12-0052
1941-22-24-0117
19-31-22-31-0028
19-31-22-31-0043
19-31-22-31-0042
19-31-22-31-0039
19-31-22-11-0016
19-31-22-11-0027
19-31-22-11-0070
19-31-22-11-0075
19-31-22-11-0126
19-31-22-11-0140
19-31-22-21-0014
19-31-22-21-0020
19-31-22-33-0012
19-31-22-21-0091
19-31-22-34-0017
19-31-22-13-0048
19-31-22-23-0035
19-31-22-24-0092
19-31-22-23-0038
19-31-22-24-0033
19-31-22-21-0042
19-31-22-33-0009
19-31-22-33-0007
19-31-22-32-0026
19-31-22-23-0001
19-31-22-24-0062
19-31-22-11-0058
19-31-22-11-0040
18-31-22-33-0051
20-31-22-22-0012
31-31-22-32-0041
30-31-22-24-0029
31-31-22-43-0004
30-31-22-13-0015
Total
Balance Penalty Certified
618.07 30.00 648.07
98.90 30.00 128.90
78.25 30.00 108.25
175.29 30.00 205.29
116.61 30.00 146.61
455.06 30.00 485.06
194.38 30.00 224.38
453.51 30.00 483.51
702.69 30.00 732.69
649.28 30.00 679.28
602.72 30.00 632.72
87.49 30.00 117.49
133.13 30.00 163.13
118.46 30.00 148.46
392.81 30.00 422.81
615.07 30.00 645.07
264.41 30.00 294.41
74.62 30.00 104.62
95.64 30.00 125.64
80.97 30.00 110.97
159.21 30.00 189.21
103.79 30.00 133.79
577.78 30.00 607.78
155.95 30.00 185.95
33.94 30.00 63.94
105.30 30.00 135.30
203.03 30.00 233.03
41.56 30.00 71.56
250.16 30.00 280.16
133.13 30.00 163.13
225.65 30.00 255.65
604.54 30.00 634.54
281.83 30.00 311.83
55.15 30.00 85.15
274.72 30.00 304.72 FINAL BILL
210.97 30.00 240.97
240.24 30.00 270.24
138.02 30.00 168.02
128.24 30.00 158.24
266.02 30.00 296.02
168.00 30.00 198.00
98.85 30.00 128.85
647.55 30.00 677.55
97.94 30.00 1276
683.36 30.00 713
46 313700
47 401550
48 401750
49 403100
50 406200
51 409700
52 41005A
53 41155A
54 412100
55 412600
56 413650
57 416600
58 417150
59 420900
60 422100
61 425750
62 430450
63 434350
64 43535B
65 435900
66 437350
67 438450
68 503050
69 503140
70 50640A
71 508400
72 51040A
73 511050
74 514150
75 514550
76 517050
77 518500
78 519800
79 520800
80 601600
81 606400
82 611250
83 612630
84 707040
85 800050
86 80050B
87 801800
• • •
JAY BARNETT
KEITH MCLEAN
PHILLIP OWEN
JIM TITSWORTH
RICHARD SERENO
JIM MICHAUD
JAMES F. JACOBUS
ROBERT POLANCE
CHARLES P. LETHERT
BOB SCHNEIDER
HENRY ALT
JEFFREY & BONNIE JOHNSON
JOSE GARZA
GLEN OLSON
DAVID OLIVER
SUSAN TROJE
ELIZABETH SCHWIETERS
STEVEN BUDIG
JAMES & BEV MALLEY
RAYMOND GROSS
JEREMICH DAME
GENE PAGEL
ROBERT MATYKIEWICZ
JIM HEIDEMANN
SHANNON & LYNN COTHRON
D. MILBRANDT & DOUGLAS PALMER
JOY ANDERSEN
EUGENE WELSCH
PAUL NORDENSTROM
STEVE JACKSON
MICHAEL SCHEELE
HAL MARKLAND
GARY SCHILTZ
TIM CHILSTROM
BRAD CORNFORTH
ROBERT RANALLO
JAY THORSLAND
BRIAN HOKANSON
BRETT WILLIAMS
JOEL RICHARDSON
RODNEY SMITH
BILL BROWN
128 WOODRIDGE LANE
507 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
519 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
759 BEAVER CIRCLE
589 CHIPPEWA TRAIL
6347 ,DEERWOOD LANE
6368 DEERWOOD LANE
6495 DEERWOOD LANE
6391 FAWN LANE
6427 FAWN LANE
6498 FAWN LANE
773 FOX ROAD
437 HAWTHORNE ROAD
6465 HOKAH DRIVE
6558 HOKAH DRIVE
511 LINDEN LANE
617 PRAIRIE FLOWER ROAD
6469 TOMAHAWK COURT
6486 TOMAHAWK TRAIL
6422 TOTEM TRAIL
6498 WARE ROAD
6456 WEST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE
6674 BLACK DUCK DRIVE
6680 BLACK DUCK DRIVE
6542 BLACK DUCK DRIVE
6601 EAST SHADOW LAKE COURT
6774 EAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE
6816 EAST SHADOW LAKE DRIVE
1009 LANTERN LANE
1044 LANTERN LANE
6602 PHEASANT RUN
6566 PHEASANT RUN
6626 RED BIRCH COURT
1057 TAMARACK LANE
1229 CHOKECHERRY ROAD
6643 RUFFED GROUSE ROAD
6526 WHITE OAK ROAD
6601 WILD TURKEY TRAIL
6600 TELE LANE
1550 LAMOTTE CIRCLE
1578 LAMOTTE CIRCLE
6900 LAMOTTE DRIVE
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES LM 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55038
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55038
LINO LAKES MN 55014
LINO LAKES MN 55038
LINO LAKES MN 55038
LINO LAKES MN 55038
LINO LAKES MN 55038
31-31-22-31-0049
29-31-22-34-0073
29-31-22-34-0075
29-31-22-44-0074
29-31-22-34-0031
32-31-22-11-0024
32-31-22-11-0045
29-31-22-44-0072
32-31-22-11-0009
29-31-22-44-0031
2911-22-44-0012
32-31-22-11-0051
32-31-22-22-0010
29-31-22-33-0048
29-31-22-32-0034
32-31-22-21-0040
29-31-22-43-0032
29-31-22-34-0019
29-31-22-34-0083
29-31-22-33-0012
29-31-22-33-0053
29-31-22-43-0021
28-31-22-13-0002
28-31-22-13-0035
28-31-22-42-0058
28-31-22-24-0086
28-31-22-12-0006
21-31-22-43-0031
28-31-22-13-0049
28-31-22-13-0053
28-31-22-13-0031
28-31-22-42-0078
28-31-22-13-0128
28-31-22-42-0012
27-31-22-32-0015
28-31-22-14-0018
27-31-22-32-0068
28-31-22-14-0013
25-31-22-13-0037
22-31-22-41-0043
22-31-22-41-0036
22-31-22-41-0021
666.42
164.29
264.25
239.49
.264.25
453.55
107.05
72.82
90.75
509.76
586.73
125.50
534.92
229.64
264.25
180.40
446.98
50.00
198.00
264.25
264.25
737.18
576.72
500.57
280.06
520.01
55.45
429.69
40.96
209.25
676.71
511.45
819.07
529.56
709.03
135.56
637.24
153.62
68.21
269.87
55.00
55.00
25,840.05
30.00 696.42
30.00 194.29
30.00 294.25
30.00 269.49
30.00 294.25
30.00 483.55
30.00 137.05
30.00 102.82
30.00 120.75
30.00 539.76
30.00 616.73
30.00 155.50
30.00 564.92
30.00 259.64
30.00 294.25
30.00 210.40
30.00 476.98
30.00 80.00
30.00 228.00
30.00 294.25
30.00 294.25
30.00 767.18
30.00 606.72
30.00 530.57
30.00 310.06
30.00 550.01
30.00 85.45
30.00 459.69
30.00 70.96
30.00 239.25
30.00 706.71
30.00 541.45
30.00 849.07
30.00 559.56
30.00 739.03
30.00 165.56
30.00 667.24
30.00 183.62
30.00 98.21
30.00 299.87
30.00 85.00
30.00 85.00