Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/11/2002 Council MinutesCOUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES : February 11, 2002 . 6:30 P.M. . 7:45 P.M. : Carlson, Dahl, O'Donnell, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson : None Staff members present: Administration Director, Dan Tesch; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia (part); Public Works Director, Rick DeGarr • Community Development Director, Mike Grochala; City Engineer, John Powell; Jim Studens A; and Building Official, Pete Kluegel (part). SETTING THE AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the seconded the motion. Motion carried unani da, as presented. Councilmember Carlson ITEM ACTION DISBURSEMENTS: February 11, 200 64333, $995,048. Centennial Fire Dis w '`pit (Check No. 13049 - 13049, $50,79 5 Consider Request from St. Joseph Catholic Church for an Exemption From Lawful Gambling License Consider Request from Lions Club For Temporary Set-up License for One -day Event Approved Approved Approved Approved COUNCIL MINUTES OPEN MIKE FEBRUARY 11, 2002' City Engineer Powell introduced Mr. Jim Studenski, TKDA, noting he will be replacing Mr. Powell effective March 1, 2002. He stated that Mr. Studenski has been with TKDA for 11 years and is familiar with some of the projects that have been done in Lino Lakes. Mr. Studenski came forward and stated he has been employed by TKDA since 1988. He stated he has worked on projects within Lino Lakes as well as numerous neighboring cities. He stated he is looking forward to working with everyone in Lino Lakes. Mayor Bergeson welcomed Mr. Studenski to the City of Lino Lakes. No one was present for open mike. FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK There was no Finance Department report. ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, D There was no Administration Department report. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPO Annual Contract for Animal Control the City has had Otter Lake Animal Co City's relationship during this time wit to meet the needs of the citizens, 0 the provisions of the contract. C the contract is the same last year. S e- er Lake Animal Care — Chief Pecchia advised as the contract holder for the past six years. The ess has been very productive and the City was able Control Center, as well as the City, by utilizing ewed the minor fee changes noting the majority of Chief Pecchia requested the "ncil enew the contract for calendar year 2002. Councilmember O'Donnell msF ped to approve the request to enter into a renewal contract with the Otter Lake Animal Control Center, as presented. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Police Department Annual Report — Chief Pecchia presented the 2001 Department of Public Safety Annual Report noting the report does have a new format. Chief Pecchia thanked the members of the Police Department, citizens and City Council for their support. Councilmember Carlson referred to page 8 of the report and requested a copy of the Citizen Survey. Chief Pecchia advised a copy of the Citizen Survey could be made available to the Council. He stated 2 • COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 the survey would be used as a baseline for the City's five-year goal. The goals will be presented to the Council at a future meeting. Councilmember Carlson referred to pages 26 and 27 regarding the crime index rate. She stated the City is the second lowest in comparison with the other cities. She stated that information should go out in the newsletter or in the Quad Press. Chief Pecchia stated the information regarding the crime index rate can go out in the next newsletter. The copy of the report is also available in the citizen's library for residents to review. Councilmember Reinert moved to accept the Department of Public Safety 2001 Annual Report, as presented. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A copy of the Public Safety 2001 Annual Report can be found in en's library. Building Inspections Annual Report= Building Official Kl ed the 2001 Department of Building Inspections report noting 1,042 permits were issued to l value of $74,974,041. Councilmember Dahl moved to accept the Building Ins ect s� ns 2 i 01 Annual Report, as presented. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion. Mo 'ed unanimously. A copy of the Building Inspections 2001 Annual ' eport be found in the citizen's library. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT ' . ' T, RICK DEGARDNER ter, Consideration of Resolution No. 02 ; , A s o ing Special Election for Recreation Complex, Neighborhood Park Improvements ra'- s Referendum, Rick DeGardner — Public Services Director DeGardner advised at the 0 R 2, Park Board meeting, the Park Board members unanimously recommended to th � cil that an $8.6 million referendum be placed on the ballot for a special vote ..Saturday, 27, 2002, for the development of the recreation complex, neighborhood park impro The proposal is based on m years of planning and citizen input on how the City can best meet the recreation and leisure needs an desires of the community. Many Lino Lakes residents have expressed a desire for recreation facilities comparable to those in other communities. In March of 1997, the City Council unanimously passed a resolution supporting the Park Board's recommendation to pursue a referendum to enhance the leisure opportunities for residents such as trails, neighborhood parks and development of a recreation complex. In November 2001, after months of discussion, the City Council authorized staff to move forward with a spring referendum. A "Referendum 2002" committee was formed and has met regularly over the past several months. The content of the proposed referendum is a result of a lot of research, discussion, and effort by City staff, the "Referendum 2002" Committee, and members of the Park Board. COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 Public Services Director DeGardner stated the referendum consists of three major components: development of a recreation complex, improvements to 16 neighborhood parks, and the construction of trails. Recreation Complex Development of a recreation complex has been a priority for the City since 1991 when the Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plan was developed. The plan indicated that the City's growth and increased number of structured sports participants might necessitate the development of a recreation complex. As a result, over the next 10 years the City evaluated potential sites, authorized negotiations for acquisition of land and subsequently, with the approval of the Environmental Board, Planning and Zoning Board, Park Board, and citizens of Lino Lakes, purchase �'n`m., . cres of land at the southeast corner of Birch Street and Centerville Road for $925,000. Along the way, City staff worked with Jeff Schoenbauer from master plan for the site. After a thorough review by member representatives of user groups, and Park Board members, ;fie following: • 5 Full Size Soccer/Football Fields • 4 Full Size Softball Fields • 3 Little League/Youth Baseball Fields • 2 Girl's Softball Fields • Skate Park Facility & Rink for In • 2 Tennis Courts • Full Size Basketball Court • Internal Trails • Playground Equipment • Multi-purpose B for Associates, to develop a eferendum 2002 Committee, ent plan includes the (both used for ice hockey in the winter) ns, Restrooms, Storage, and Warming House Area Public Services Director De dne noted a copy of the development plan of the recreation complex was included in the packets. Neighborhood Parks A successful bond referendum will provide significant dollars to develop new parks and enhance existing parks. Thirteen existing neighborhood parks will be enhanced with various amenities and three undeveloped parks will be completely developed per the approved master plans. An itemized list of the planned neighborhood parks was included in the packets. Meetings are scheduled the week of April 8 for residents who have a particular neighborhood park of interest to review and comment on the proposed improvements. 4 COUNCIL MINUTES Construction of Trails FEBRUARY 11, 2002 The third component of the bond referendum is establishing additional trails throughout the City. The purpose of the trail system is to provide functional pedestrian and bicycle linkages throughout the parks system. A copy of the proposed trails to be included in the referendum was also included in the packets. How to Obtain More Information In addition to the neighborhood meetings the week of April 8th, the "Referendum 2002" Committee is working on various ways for the residents of Lino lakes to obtain specific information related to this important bond referendum including: Video Presentation — The video presentation provides informatio • e history of the referendum, specific content of the referendum, and additional information suc as co only asked questions, tax impacts, etc. The video presentation will be run on Local Cab. 6, and at various community meetings. Informational Brochure — An informational brochure illR� a sent to all Lino Lakes residents the first week of April. The informational brochure will i X'. ecific components of the referendum, tax impacts, voter information, etc. Town Hall Meetings — Meetings are schedule `n; d April 23 at 6:30 p.m. to provide an opportunity for residents of Lino Lakes to re all o the information regarding the referendum and to ask questions. Both meetings will be all. Web Site (www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us - ` ferendum 2002" web site will provide a centralized place for residents to view all the i a io . 'ping to this important special election. The web site will also provide an oppo or r iden . " to make suggestions and/or comments pertaining to the upcoming referend The City • page, as identified above in parentheses, will provide a direct link to the "Refere `� " e e. Councilmember Reinert askek when information on the web site will be available. Public Services Director DeGardner advised information will be available on the web site February 22, 2002. The address is www.ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. He stated there will be a direct link to the referendum information on that web site. Mayor Bergeson requested the web site address also be put on the cable channel. Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 -14, as presented. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. Mayor Bergeson stated on behalf of the Council, he is glad to see the referendum moving forward. The City has had a contract on the land for the complex for quite some time and the referendum is the next step in the process. COUNCIL MINUTES Motion carried unanimously. FEBRUARY 11, 2002 Mayor Bergeson noted the special vote on the referendum is Saturday, April 27, 2002, 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Councilmember Dahl clarified that the City's web site is now running. The information regarding the referendum will not be available until February 22. Resolution No. 02 —14 can be found in the City Clerk's office. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT Resolution No. 02 — 06, Amendment to CUP, Gethsemane Chug Community Development Director Grochala advised the subject pope a conditional use within the R-3 District. ichael Grochala — zoned R-3. Churches are The Church is requesting a Conditional Use Permit amen property. The Section 2, Subdivision 2.B13 of the City enlargement, structural alteration, or intensification o use permit." struct a picnic shelter on the Ordinance states that, "any shall require an amended conditional Community Development Director Grochala p -s staff analysis noting the proposed picnic • shelter is classified as an accessory building ;s anticipated the picnic shelter would be used for the Church's annual Booya Festival, Vacatio ale • of classes, Youth Events, Church picnics, and reunions. Under the City Zoning Ordinance within an R-3 Zone, greater than maximum of one attache arage footage for accessory bui 4.D.8.f., accessory buildings for property located e -q er acres in size, are limited in number to a detached accessory structures. The maximum total square e for a lot of this size is limited to 2,020 sq. ft. There are currently two deta ed accessory buildings on the property: an 8' X 10' tool shed and a 24' X 30' detached garage. The c struction of the proposed picnic shelter would result in three detached accessory structures, one more than is allowed under City Ordinance. The total square footage of the existing two accessory buildings is 800 sq. ft. The proposed picnic shelter would measure 1,380 sq. ft. (30' X 46'), resulting in a total accessory square footage of 2,180 sq. ft. This is 160 sq. ft. more than is allowed under City Ordinance. Construction of the proposed picnic shelter would violate the City's Zoning Ordinance in terms of both number and size of accessory structures. Removing the 8' X 10" existing tool shed, and decreasing the size of the proposed picnic shelter by 80 sq. ft. are options to resolving this zoning issue. It should be noted that the City's Zoning Ordinance reaches a cap, or threshold level, of 2,020, sq. ft. for accessory buildings in ANY size lot of one and one-quarter acre or greater in an R-3 zone. 6 • COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 Therefore, even though the proposed site is approximately 5.2 acres in size, the proposed picnic shelter would not be allowed under City Zoning Ordinance, and would thus require approval of a variance for construction. A last issue of note is the roof material, a galvanized ribbed metal, noted on plans for the proposed picnic shelter. City Zoning Ordinance Section 3, Subd. 4.D.8.£4 states that accessory buildings should contain "no metal corrugated siding or roof, except upon tool sheds less than one hundred fifty (150) square feet in area," with 4.D.8.£6 going on to require that "roof and exterior color and material be compatible with the principal building (except for manufactured metal tool sheds)." The applicant has been made aware of these zoning regulations in discussions with staff, and has indicated that the roofing material could be changed to match that of the church. Community Development Director Grochala continued stating th request. In 1997, the Gethsemane United Methodist Church site Subdivision, and Comprehensive Plan.Amendment•in order to con requests were all approved at that time, subject to the followi 1. The subdivision include the formal dedicate the understanding that Parcels B and C dill construction of the street. s an outstanding issue with the nt a Rezoning, Minor sonage,_. The above On inspection of the records in preparation of thi was never fulfilled. Staff is recommending th the Conditional Use Permit amendment appr The purpose for requiring the dedicatio subdivision requirement that all lots sh Parcel B and Parcel C of the minor Coach Trail right-of-way, with financially responsible for the future t was found that the condition of approval f -way dedication be made as a condition of The condition of the mi . r subdivisi church and testimony rec proposed subdivision of P e Coach Trail right-of-way was to satisfy the their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street. not meet this requirement as originally proposed. proval was based on the information submitted by the fig and Zoning Board. The church had indicated that the ld be forthcoming. If not for this, the minor subdi ion would have been denied due to its nonconformance with the City's subdivision regulations. At a minimum the church would have been required to provide an improved city street extension with the appropriate cul-de-sac turnaround. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the church needs to fulfill this requirement in one of two ways: 1. Dedicate the right-of-way for Stage Coach Trail to the northern property line of Parcel B as originally proposed; or The Stage Coach Trail right-of-way be dedicated to the city commencing at the north line of the platted Stage Coach Trail right-of-way and extending northerly approximately 160 feet to COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 the center of a cul-de-sac turnaround with a minimum right-of-way radius of 60 feet. That the dedicated right-of-way be improved subject to the requirements of the City Engineer. The Planning and Zoning Board discussed the request at its January 9, 2002 regular meeting. The Board discussed possible ways to decrease the number and total square footage of accessory buildings. It was felt that by both eliminating the 8' X 10' tool shed and decreasing the footprint of the proposed picnic shelter (approximately one foot on each side) the proposed project could be brought in line with the City's Zoning Ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Board voted unanimously to recommend approval, with the following three conditions: 1. Elimination of the 8' X 10' tool shed (or attach it ; ® e existing garage) so that there will be no more than two detached accessory buildi the site once the proposed picnic shelter is constructed. 2. Decrease the size of the proposed picnic shelt as, of to exceed the total accessory square footage maximum of 2,020 sq.ft. citty's Zoning Ordinance. Dedicate and record the formerly apprQ :.k:. cation of the Stage Coach Trail right- of-way. Community Development Director Grochala a ,i _ . 4 is also recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment based o e fol owing conditions: • 1. Elimination of one exist is de" e• accessory structure so that there are no more than two detached accesso ur . on the site (including the proposed picnic shelter). 2. Decrease the size picnic shelter so as not to exceed the total accessory square fo .t maximum ,020 sq.ft. cited in the City's Zoning Ordinance. 3. Roof materi' ° ' ou be compatible with the principle church building (no metal corrugated ma rials). 4. A building permit must be obtained for construction of the proposed picnic shelter. 5. Issuance of the building permit will not be granted until the right-of-way for Stage Coach Trail extending to the north property line of Parcel B, as shown on Exhibit 3, is dedicated to the City. Councilmember Carlson asked what conditions the Church will favorably consider. Pastor Chad Gilbertson came forward and stated he does not believe the Church has any issues with the Staff conditions. He asked for clarification regarding the memo that was distributed at the work session regarding the Planning and Zoning comment indicating the road right-of-way would not be • COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 improved until development occurs and the northerly extension. He stated there seems to be contradictions regarding those two issues. Community Development Director Grochala referred to item #3 in the memo from the Planning and Zoning Board minutes from 1997. The comment was taken in the context that the plat was going to be submitted. The intent at that time was to acquire the right-of-way along the whole property. The City's transportation plan does call for the extension to the north. That extension is much more likely if the land is developed. However, with the acquired right-of-way, the City can extend the road if the City determines it should be developed. The question is the method of paying for that street. The 429 process could be used and the Church would have the right to petition against the improvements. City Engineer Powell noted the petition would be against the assessments for the improvements. The City currently has no plans to extend the road to the north, but h the right-of-way would keep the City's options open. Mayor Bergeson stated it is typically not the City's practice to orhood streets where the property owners do not want it. This roadway is a neighborh o' str t. City Engineer Powell stated the road is shown as a min and the City probably will not construct the road until property owner is needed for the funding. The pro property owners and assessing them for the impr ector. The issue is the funding source dequate funding and the support of the fun • ing includes identifying the benefiting Mayor Bergeson stated that under the City C mer the property owner does have the right to petition against the improvements. Mr. Steve Mattson, representative for e United Methodist Church, stated that maybe at some point the Church will want t •; ep n roperty and construct the road. He indicated the Church would want to work withat. Councilmember Reinert s it. The Church is the only the assessments unless there y the road is going to go in if the Church does not want rty er"that would be assessed and the Church can petition out of an amendment to the Charter. City Engineer Powell noted the last Charter amendment was approved in 1993. Councilmember Reinert stated that as far as the Church being concerned about the road being developed and the Church having to pay for it, that scenario does not apply in this case. Councilmember Carlson inquired as to what would happen if the property to the north develops and sewer and water is needed and they were willing to pay for the road. City Engineer Powell advised the City would then have a funding source and the road could be built at no cost to the Church. COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 Mayor Bergeson stated another possibility is that utilities could go through without a road being developed. Councilmember Carlson stated that is less likely because putting the utilities in with a road is more cost effective. Mayor Bergeson referred to the Church's concern regarding diminished use of the property because of the easement. The Church still has use of the easement unless the Church wants to construct something on the easement. There is no restriction on the general use of the property and easement. Mr. Mattson asked if the previous plats have been approved. Community Development Director Grochala stated plat approval [ separate process. The property tea. has not yet received preliminary plat approval and a proposed plat have to go through the entire City process. Mayor Bergeson added the Church could come in with a diff! d 'sign as long as it adhered to all City codes. Councilmember Reinert stated another scenario could, no plans for the road and the Church wanted to bu does have the ability to apply for an easement va determined the City does not need the easeme 0 years have passed and there are still ger structure on the property. The Church the Church can build on the easement if it is Community Development Director Groc m to he staff recommendation is basically the original recommendation with small changes in - ae for clarification. Councilmember Carlson referred t has approved other buildings tha allow the Church a large structure and the size of the picnic shelter. She stated the City llowed. She asked if the City should reconsider and the size of the property. Community Development tor och: la stated condition #2 can be left off of the approval but the Church would still have to g= hrough the variance process to allow a larger building. Councilmember Carlson stated if the Church wants to move quickly then the condition should not be removed. If the Church has the time the condition can be removed and the Church can apply for a variance. Mr. Mattson stated the Church would like to proceed as is and the Church is agreeable to all the conditions recommended by staff. Pastor Gilbertson expressed his gratitude to the Council and staff for all their help. He stated the outstanding issues point to the need for clear and concise language of what is really approved by the City. If the approval in 1997 had clear and concise language the Church would not have had to go through this process again. 10 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02 — 06, as presented. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. Mayor Bergeson clarified that the City is not requiring any improvements to the right-of-way as part of the approval. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 02 — 06 can be found in the City Clerk's office. Resolution No. 02 —13, Final Plat Approval, West Shadow Ponds, Jeff Smyser — Community Development Director Grochala advised the City Council appro e preliminary plat on August 13, 2001, with Resolution No. 01 — 113. The developer has submi ,r mal plat for approval. The City typically requires a number of things for a final plat . ese include: • Final plat must substantially conform to the appro 1 s 'w n ary plat. • Development agreement must be completed, in ; udrn_ financial securities. • Title must be reviewed by the City Attorney. • Conditions of approval must be met. The final plat conforms to the preliminary pl . t does have a development agreement. The title has been reviewed by the City Attorney. conditions of approval have been met or are included in the development agreement, • a ®o te. Councilmember O'Donnell stated th to preliminary plat approval for the determined by the City at a previ within the third "whereas" of the resolution referring He asked if West Shadow will be extended as Community Developmen stated West Shadow will be extended at the north end of the property as planned. Councilmember O'Donnell m ed to approve Resolution No. 02 —13, as presented. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 02 —13 can be found in the City Clerk's office. Development Regulations Task Force Appointments, Michael Grochala — Community Development Director Grochala advised as part of the Zoning/Subdivision Ordinance Update process, the Council established the Development Regulations Task Force (DRTF). The DRTF is comprised of two (2) members from the Planning and Zoning Board, Environmental Board, and the Economic Development Advisory Board. 11 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 At their respective meetings in January, the boards selected representatives for appointment, by the Council to the Task Force. The following board members were nominated: Environmental Board Planning and Zoning Board Amy Donlin Rod Kukonene Alternate: Nikki Schneider Jamie Schaps Michael Hyden Alternate: Sharon Lane EDAC Julie Jeffrey -Schwartz Bill Hicks Alternate: Fr The DRTF by-laws require that the City Council appoint me by the respective boards. Alternates were selected in the eve unable to fulfill the term of appointment. Alternates will Task Force members. Councilmember Carlson stated the Task Force alre meeting is scheduled. Community Development 2002. Councilmember Carlson stated the Coun approved when the Council appointme be added as the Chair of the DRTF. Councilmember Dahl moved to Councilmember O'Do 11 as the motion. Motion carried ask Force upon nomination appointed board member is all information submitted to the d one meeting and asked when the next stated the next meeting is February 21, tive is not listed on the staff report and was not de. She stated Councilmember O'Donnell needs to mbe to the Task Force, with the addition of an of the Task Force. Councilmember Reinert seconded the Resolution No. 02 —15, Joi Powers Agreement, Victor Gardens/City of Hugo, John Powell — City Engineer Powell advisede City Council discussed and approved a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for water services with the City of Hugo at the September 24, 2001, City Council meeting. The City of Hugo requested that the term of the agreement, as stated in Article IV, Item G, be extended from 48 months to 54 months. Staff has no objection to this change. The key components of the agreement remain unchanged: 1. The water service is for residential land uses only. 2. Water use is billed at the City's rates plus 10%, in accordance with the City policy. Lino Lakes will provide one bill to the City of Hugo; Hugo will bill the individual users. 12 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 3. The developer will pay for the extension of the water main to the Hugo border. Lino Lakes will pay for 50% of the meter cost. 4. The water users in Hugo that are connected to Lino Lakes water are required to adhere to any and all water system -related ordinances and policies in place in Lino Lakes. 5. The developer will be required to provide financial security for improvements within Lino Lakes consistent with current policy. The City of Hugo has approved the agreement. The water main extension and meter along Cedar Street will be installed this year. After a great deal of grading activity in the fall of 2001, the Victor Gardens project was slowed due to floodplain definition issues. These issues have now been resolved. The project will resume when site conditions allow. Councilmember Carlson inquired about the number of residential its he City will be supplying . water to through the City's services. City Engineer Powell ad ` a; w , ber of units is not as many as originally planned and will not be more than 350 units. T o' of ' t will also be phased so the last year of construction will be the highest number of units C ' upply the service to. Hugo is also planning to extend their water system to handle this su + ivision and other developments. Councilmember Carlson referred to page 9, Item effect and the expiration of the agreement. She reason the City determines to terminate the agr agreement. City Engineer Powell stated that if the that item will not be in effect. He refe terminated by either or both parties ding t e amount of time the agreement is in at item will still be in effect if for some oth parties choose to terminate the Lakes or Hugo choose to terminate the agreement E that list the reasons why the agreement can be Councilmember Carlson oved to a• ° esolution No. 02 —15, as presented. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the ed unanimously. Resolution No. 02 —15 can: Mound in the City Clerk's office. UNFINISHED BUSINESS October 8, 2001 Council Meeting Minutes — Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the October 8, 2001, Council Meeting Minutes, as presented. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. January 9, 2002, Work Session Meeting Minutes — Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the January 9, 2002, Work Session Meeting Minutes, as presented. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously with Councilmember O'Donnell abstaining. 13 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2002 January 14, 2002, Council Meeting Minutes - Councilmember Carlson requested the January 14, • 2002, Council Meeting Minutes be pulled from the agenda for more review time. January 23, 2002, Work Session Meeting Minutes - Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the January 23, 2002, Work Session Meeting Minutes, as presented. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. January 28, 2002, Council Meeting Minutes - Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the January 28, 2002, Council Meeting Minutes, as presented. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. January 30, 2002, Minutes of Joint Meeting with Hugo & Ce terville - Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the January 30, 2002, Minutes of Joint Meetin _ . _ h Hugo & Centerville, as presented. Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion. Mot's ' 'ed unanimously. January 30, 2002, Work Session Meeting Minutes - Counc January 30, 2002, Work Session Meeting Minutes, as presen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS - None COMMUNITY CALENDAR FEBRUARY 11HR "" GH FEBRUARY 25, 2002: Planning and Zoning Board Meeting, We a . a day, February 13, 2002, 6:30 p.m. City Hall Closed, President's Day H i{:' bruary 18, 2002 Council Work Session, Wednesd r 20, 2002, 5:30 p.m. AAs Development Regulatio Task Fo eeting, Thursday, February 21, 2002, 6:30 p.m. City Council Meeting, M e s . y, ruary 25, 2002, 6:30 p.m. City Engineer Powell advised bruary 25, 2002, will be his last Council meeting. Mayor Bergeson read information regarding a farewell reception for City Engineer Powell on Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Anyone wishing to attend should call Lisa at City Hall. Councilmember Reinert stated it has been a great pleasure to work with Mr. Powell and he will be missed by everyone at the City. einert moved to approve the cilmember O'Donnell 14 COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURN FEBRUARY 11, 2002 There being no further business, Councilmember Dahl moved to adjourn at 7:45 p.m. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, February 25, 2002. Ann Blair, C iJy Clerk Transcribed by: Kim Points TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. John BerPhbi ay or or 15