Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/12/2004 Council Minutes1 i2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 • 48 DATE TIME STARTED TIME ENDED MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT APPROVED CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES : April 12, 2004 . 6:38 P.M. . 8:18 P.M. : Councilmembers Carlson, Dahl, Reinert, and Mayor Bergeson : Councilmember Stoltz Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Director of Administration, Dan Tesch; City Clerk, Ann Blair; Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; City Planner, Jeff Smyser; and City Attorney, Barry Sullivan. OPEN MIKE No one was present for open mike. SETTING THE AGENDA Mayor Bergeson requested the addition of Item 3C — new resolution, Item 6Eii— revised resolution, and 6D1 and 2 — a Memo related to Park Dedication. He also noted one change to the Community Calendar. The agenda was approved as amended. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as submitted. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. ITEM ACTION A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES: i) April 12, 2004 (Check No. 70621 — 70750, $255,036.45) Approved ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14185 — 14203, $5,282.55) Approved B. Consider Resolution No. 04-45 Abating Special Assessments FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 There was none. • 2 3 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 4 5 A. Public Hearing, Consider SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 05-04, Amending 6 Liquor Code Relating to Strong Beer, Ann Blair 7 8 City Clerk Blair reported Section 700 of the City Code relating to Liquor and Beer Licensing was last 9 updated in 2002, and in reviewing the Code from some legislative changes, will be bringing forward 10 a recommendation for a few updates in this area. 11 12 City Clerk Blair stated the Council approved a wine and 3.2% beer license for Mansetti's Pizza at the 13 February 9, 2004 meeting. She stated that Minn. Stat. 340A.404, subd. 5 provides that a City may 14 allow the sale of strong beer at an on -sale establishment that already has a wine and a 3.2% beer 15 license without any additional license, subject to the condition that the receipts must be at least 60 16 percent attributable to sale of food. 17 18 City Clerk Blair stated she spoke with the City Attorney, who stated the Code as drafted does not 19 allow this, but that the City may clearly do so, so this was brought forward and received a first 20 reading. 21 22 City Clerk Blair requested the Council hold a public hearing on this item and consider a second 23 reading of Ordinance No. 05-04. 24 • 25 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. 26 27 There were no public comments. 28 29 Councilmember Dahl moved to close the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. Councilmember Reinert 30 seconded the motion. 31 32 Motion carried unanimously. 33 34 Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the SECOND READING and adopt Ordinance No. 05-04, 35 Amending the City Code, Section 700 of the Liquor Code, by adding the section relating to sale of 36 strong beer in conjunction with wine and 3.2 sales. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 37 38 Vote: 4 — 0. Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Councilmember Dahl voted yea. Councilmember 39 Reinert voted yea. Mayor Reinert voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz was absent. 40 41 Motion carried unanimously. 42 43 Ordinance No. 05-04 can be found in the City Clerk's office, and will become effective 30 days 44 following publication. 45 46 B. Consider Resolution No. 04-41 Authorizing Approval of Special Event Permit and 47 Cabaret License Application - Miller's on Main for August, 2004 event, Ann Blair • 48 2 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 City Clerk Blair explained Resolution No. 04-41 asks to authorize staff to issue a Special Event .2 Permit and a Cabaret License to Miller's on Main to conduct a second annual Street Dance to be held 3 on August 20 and 21, 2004. The application received by staff is complete. She stated the Council has 4 previously discussed this matter during the March 3, 2004 Council work session. 5 6 City Clerk Blair stated the most recent additions to the conditions include no smoking signs, no 7 pyrotechnics allowed, no parking within 20 feet of the tent, no open flames within 20 feet of tent, 8 generator to be located at least 20 feet from tent, clearance to property line needed to 20 feet, and 9 certificate of flame retardant for all panels of tent. 10 11 City Clerk Blair stated police want assurances that all music shall cease at midnight, entrance grounds 12 should be policed, and wrist bands shall be used. She stated the applicant has provided a map as 13 required, and that staff is recommending approval to go forward with this resolution, subject to 14 all the conditions as outlined in the staff report. 15 16 Councilmember Carlson asked if there would be a street dance both evenings, which was answered in 17 the affirmative by the applicant. 18 19 Councilmember Carlson commented the condition of the music ceasing at midnight was requested 20 because there were complaints about the noise last year. 21 22 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 04-41, Authorizing Approval of 23 Special Event Permit and Cabaret License Application, Miller's on Main, for August, 2004 event. 24 Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. • 25 26 Motion carried unanimously. 27 28 Resolution No. 04-41 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 29 30 C. Resolution No. 04-46, Appointing the Director of Administration the City's HIPAA 31 Complaint Authority. 32 33 Director of Administration Tesch explained that as a municipality, the City of Lino Lakes is required 34 to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The purpose of this act is to 35 insure the privacy and portability of individual employee's health insurance. In order to comply with 36 this act, the city must appoint an individual to serve as Privacy and Complaint Official. 37 38 Director of Administration Tesch stated it was their recommendation that the Director of 39 Administration be appointed as the Act relates to a Human Resource function. 40 41 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 04-46, Appointing the Director of 42 Administration the City's HIPAA Complaint Authority. Councilmember Reinert seconded the 43 motion. 44 45 Motion carried unanimously. 46 47 Resolution No. 04-46 can be found in the City Clerk's office. • 48 3 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA •2 3 There was none. 4 5 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER 6 7 There was none. 8 9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MIKE GROCHALA 10 11 A. Public Hearing, Consider FIRST READING of Ordinance 03-04, Vacating Drainage 12 and Utility Easements and Accepting New Easements, Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Brook 13 Peninsula, Jim Studenski 14 15 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m., and stated it is the recommendation of staff 16 that the public hearing be continued to the April 26th meeting. 17 18 Councilmember Dahl moved to continue the public hearing to the April 26, 2004 regular City Council 19 meeting. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. 20 21 Motion carried unanimously. 22 23 B. Public Hearing, Consider SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 06-04, Vacating 24 Drainage and Utility Easement, Lot 18, Block 4, D. Erickson, 2°d Addition, Jim • 25 Studenski 26 27 City Engineer Studenski explained that the Ordinance is to reduce the drainage and utility easement 28 across Lot 18, Block 4, Erickson's 2nd Addition, from 20 feet to 10 feet. He stated there haven't been 29 any drainage issues there. 30 31 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. 32 33 There were no public comments. 34 35 Councilmember Dahl moved to close the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. Councilmember Carlson 36 seconded the motion. 37 38 Motion carried unanimously. 39 40 Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the SECOND READING and adopt Ordinance No. 06-04, 41 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement, Lot 18, Block 4, D. Erickson, rd Addition, as outlined in 42 the staff report. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 43 44 Vote: 4 — 0. Councilmember Dahl voted yea. Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Councilmember 45 Reinert voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz was absent. 46 47 Motion carried unanimously. •48 4 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 Ordinance No. 06-04 can be found in the City Clerk's office, and will become effect 30 days from • 2 publication. 3 4 C. Public Hearing, Consider FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 07-04, Vacating Drainage 5 and Utility Easement, for property located at 125 Ash Street (Rice Creek Covenant 6 Church). Jeff Smyser 7 8 City Planner Smyser stated that Rice Creek Covenant Church has submitted an application to further 9 develop its current site at 125 Ash Street, and that the application includes several elements. He 10 stated the project was continued at the March Planning & Zoning meeting and will be considered 11 further at the April 14 Planning & Zoning meeting. 12 13 City Planner Smyser recommended to the Council that since the project has not been to the Planning 14 & Zoning Board yet, that the Council open the public hearing and then continue the matter to the May 15 10th meeting when the entire project will come to the City Council for consideration. 16 17 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. 18 19 Councilmember Reinert moved to continue the public hearing to the May 14, 2004 regular City 20 Council meeting. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 21 22 Motion carried unanimously. 23 24 D. Public Hearing, Consider FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 08-04, Vacating Drainage •25 and Utility Easement, Outlot A, Highland Meadows East, Jeff Smyser. 26 27 City Planner Smyser explained this Ordinance is a different project, but there is the same 28 recommendation as the previous item on the agenda. 29 30 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing at 6:59 p.m. 31 32 Councilmember Carlson moved to continue the public hearing to the May 14, 2004 regular City 33 Council meeting. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 34 35 Motion carried unanimously. 36 37 E. Century Farm North, Jeff Smyser 38 i. Consideration of Resolution No. 04-43, Approving Final Plat, Century Farm 39 North 2nd Addition, Jeff Smyser 40 41 City Planner Smyser stated the preliminary plan for Century Farm was approved on April 26, 2003, 42 and the final plat for phase one was approved in July of 2003. He stated what is before the Council 43 today is the final plat for the 2nd Addition, alternatively known as phase two. 44 45 City Planner Smyser announced that since the work session, they had received four options for the 46 color scheme, and they are satisfied that that condition of approval from the preliminary plat has been 47 fulfilled and meets requirements regarding the standards. •48 5 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 City Planner Smyser reported that they had discussed the proposed new height restrictions with •2 MnDOT Aeronautics, and that the new restrictions are more complete and more in line with 3 MnDOT's recommendations. 4 5 City Planner Smyser stated that the park dedication has been resolved, and that there is 6 correspondence from the City Attorney stating they had supplied enough to satisfy the park 7 dedication. He stated the only thing outstanding is that there is a power line easement going through 8 the project, and one of the park trails to be dedicated is within that. He stated he has an easement 9 document that includes the park trail as an allowable use within there, so that has been resolved. 10 11 City Planner Smyser stated staff is recommending approval of the final plat with the attached 12 Resolution 04-43, and that does include a revision to the height restrictions that were originally 13 approved. 14 15 Councilmember Carlson asked whether the Air Park Association had made any response to the 16 changes, and City Planner Smyser indicated that the developer was working with the Air Park, but 17 that he had not been contacted by the Air Park. Councilmember Carlson stated she had spoke with a 18 board member from the Air Park over the weekend, who had stated to her that she wasn't aware of the 19 changes. 20 21 Councilmember Carlson asked if the power line easement went across the 8.1 acres of park 22 dedication, and City Planner Smyser indicated that the power line easement goes across the entire 23 plat. City Planner Smyser stated that the power line easement does cross part of the southern park 24 property. • 25 26 Councilmember Carlson asked how much of the 8.1 acres is under the power line easement. City 27 Planner Smyser stated he didn't have that data. Councilmember Carlson stated that this was 28 information that she had asked be in their report so she would have time to review it and come back 29 with any questions. 30 31 Councilmember Carlson asked how the amount of $51,183 per acre for the park dedication was 32 determined. City Planner Smyser told the Council that the park dedication was reviewed as part of 33 the preliminary plat review, and that the Parks Director, staff, and developer had agreed that this land 34 would be dedicated. He stated that the question of additional cash arose a year ago, and that was 35 calculated out based on the subdivision ordinance requirements. He stated that the developer had 36 challenged that, and the issue had gone back and forth between the City Attorney and the developer's 37 attorney for a number of months. City Planner Smyser stated the City Attorney had determined that 38 the land being dedicated would fulfill the park dedication, and that they could not really ask for more. 39 40 City Planner Smyser stated that according to court cases in the past, 10 percent of land is deemed 41 appropriate, and that is sort of the standard being used in the state of Minnesota. He stated that dollar 42 and cent calculations didn't really enter into it. 43 44 Councilmember Carlson commented that the court did not say it couldn't exceed 10 percent. City 45 Planner Smyser stated that that was correct. 46 47 Councilmember Carlson stated in 2001 an ordinance was passed setting the amount at $1,665 per • 48 unit, and that this has not been raised since 2001 through the Comprehensive Plan. She said they 6 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 were supposed to look at the fees annually, and specifically the park dedication fee. She stated that • 2 she and Councilmember Dahl have been repeatedly asking for this to be reviewed, and that it had not 3 been reviewed since 2001. 4 5 Councilmember Carlson asked City Planner Smyser whether staff's position was the same as the City 6 Attorney's position regarding the park dedication, and he answered that it was. 7 8 Councilmember Reinert stated that typically it is land or dollars or a combination of both, and what 9 they've ended up with is land this time. He stated he didn't see a problem with that. 10 11 Councilmember Carlson stated that they had moved away from the 10 percent to the formula of 12 $1,665 per unit. 13 14 Councilmember Reinert asked Councilmember Carlson why this issue hadn't been raised at the work 15 session. Councilmember Carlson replied that she hadn't received this information until she walked in 16 tonight. Councilmember Carlson stated if he wanted to send this back to a work sessions for further 17 discussion, she would be happy to do so. 18 19 Community Development Director Grochala gave an overview of the three methods of park 20 dedication. He stated the proposed land dedication satisfied the requirements within the city 21 subdivision ordinance of 10 percent, and that the $1,665 did not apply in this case. Community 22 Development Director Grochala also stated that in addition to the 8.1 acres, there were trails going 23 through the development that are being paid for by the developer, so that there was some overage in 24 that dedication requirement. • 25 26 Councilmember Dahl stated she had been fighting desperately for the park dedication to take place 27 per unit, and she stated they strongly need to look at the Woodbury park dedication ordinance which 28 states it's not limited to land or per unit, that it might be both, and it is up to the Council. She stated 29 it is definitely in need of revising to include something like that. She stated Woodbury has never 30 been challenged on it. 31 32 Councilmember Dahl asked when the existing house would be thrown in, whether it would be in 2004 33 with the lot inventory, or in 2005. City Planner Smyser stated that is yet to be determined. 34 Councilmember Dahl asked if they were approving that tonight, and City Planner Smyser said no, the 35 only thing they were approving is the final plat tonight. 36 37 Councilmember Dahl asked to be updated on the contribution toward a signal. 38 39 Community Development Director Grochala stated that issue predates the development that is being 40 discussed. He stated originally there was an estimate put together for the signal improvements of 41 approximately $91,000. The developer had put in place a letter of credit to cover that amount. While 42 he had secured 100 percent of the costs, there had been ongoing discussions about how much the 43 actual costs would be. He stated Mr. Uhde had offered the amount of $25,500 for those 44 improvements at that time, and that offer is still on the table. He also stated Mr. Uhde has 45 acknowledged that he is still willing to pay that amount towards the signals, and staff feels that is an 46 acceptable offer and request that the City Council accept that amount in fulfilling those original 47 obligations. • 48 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 Councilmember Dahl stated the Comprehensive Plan is supposed to be reviewed annually, and it • 2 hasn't been done, and she would like someone from staff to follow up on that. 3 4 Councilmember Dahl requested Mr. Uhde to address the Council. 5 6 Mr. Uhde addressed the Council, stating that they had been very proactive in trying to get an end to 7 this because they couldn't leave the letters of credit in place forever, so they were trying to get a 8 number that made sense. He stated there had been a traffic study, and the number of $7,000 or $8,000 9 was come up with for the increase in traffic caused by their development. He stated the original offer 10 was $14,000 or $15,000. He stated he had wanted to get the letter of credit released, so he had made 11 the offer of $25,500 and would have written a check that day, but he was asked not to, and he was 12 told there needed to be further research. He stated that in any event, he is willing to stand by that 13 offer today and would have the check to them tomorrow. 14 15 Councilmember Carlson stated she wanted to be sure that there are not any safety issues with the 16 airplanes from the people that would be landing and taking off with the planes, and she wanted to 17 hear from someone from the Air Park. 18 19 Mr. Dave Hunter, President of the Air Park Association, addressed the Council, saying that they were 20 comfortable with the redefinition of the restrictions in terms of heights of buildings. 21 22 Councilmember Carlson stated she is going to abstain from voting on the issue because of lack of 23 information that she had requested prior to the work session. 24 25 City Planner Smyser stated the developer would like approval so that he can start selling the lots and 26 building them. 27 28 City Attorney Sullivan stated there is a limit to the amount of dedications a city can require or extract 29 from developers. He stated that many cities have ordinances saying 10 percent or some flat fee. He 30 stated that it is supposed to be a proportionate amount. He stated he assumes when this was done a 31 year ago, that the city, staff, and Mr. Hawkins determined that this was a proportionate amount. 32 Councilmember Dahl asked if there were figures on how much the trails are going to cost to 33 construct. She also asked if they were going to be paved. 34 35 City Planner Smyser indicated that some of the trails are eight -foot asphalt and some are five-foot 36 sidewalks. 37 38 Councilmember Dahl stated there would be no money to put playground equipment on the park. 39 40 Councilmember Reinert stated that with 300 or 400 children that would be living there, they are going 41 to need a park. He stated it's either dollars or land, and in this case it's land. He stated there have 42 been many cases where they've gotten land and had to figure out later how to build the park. He 43 stated he was confused on what the issue is here. 44 45 City Planner Smyser told the Council that one of the problems the City has had historically is they've 46 been getting park land, but haven't had money to develop the park. He stated that most communities 47 don't get enough from developers for all of that and actually do use general fund monies or other 48 sources to augment what they get as park dedication from developers. City Planner Smyser reiterated 8 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 the City Attorney's position. He stated that the park dedication requirements should clearly be • 2 revisited, and they will probably end up increasing the per unit dedication requirement 3 4 Mr. Gary Uhde addressed the Council, stating that the additional trails and sidewalks had a value of 5 between $80,000 and $90,000, which would be in addition to the 8.1 acres of park. He also stated he 6 was giving them a total of 30 acres of open space. He said they had met with Mr. Rick DeGardner 7 and the Park Board numerous times, and they had been told they wanted land and not money. He 8 stated they were giving in excess of 8.1 acres, and that exceeds 10 percent. 9 10 Councilmember Dahl asked Mr. Uhde if the $80,000 to $90,000 is for half a mile of trail. Mr. Uhde 11 stated there was in excess of 2 1/2 miles of trails. 12 13 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 04-43, Approving Final Plat, Century Farm 14 North 2nd Addition. Chairman Bergeson seconded the motion. 15 16 Councilmember Dahl stated she was in agreement with the $25,500 to settle the stoplight issue as 17 long as it went in the mail tomorrow. She also stated she was going to vote no because of the 18 information coming forward that she did not have prior to this evening. 19 20 Councilmember Reinert stated it would be $49,000 per acre, and $49,000 times 8.1 acres equals 21 $396,900. He stated if you add that to the $90,000 for the trails, it equals $486,900. He stated if they 22 did not take the land, they are looking at $1,650 per household, which would equal $412,500. He 23 said this equation is not taking into consideration the 13.9 acres of open space that has also been 24 dedicated. He also reiterated that the City Attorney has indicated the amount of the dedication is IF25 sufficient. He stated he didn't understand the reason for misunderstanding or not having enough 26 information. 27 28 Councilmember Dahl stated that a park with no equipment on it is not going to work out either. She 29 stated she would have preferred four acres and having something on it. Councilmember Dahl asked 30 the City Attorney if the vote were two yes, one no, and one abstention, how that would work. 31 32 City Attorney Sullivan replied there would be three affirmative votes required to pass it. 33 34 Councilmember Dahl asked whether it would help to take this back to work session. 35 36 Mayor Bergeson asked City Planner Smyser if there were any legal time limits on this issue. 37 38 City Planner Smyser replied there were no deadline problems with the application at this point in 39 time. 40 41 Councilmember Carlson indicated she would probably vote no, and would prefer to send it back to a 42 work session. 43 44 City Planner Smyser stated it is not an ordinance; it's a resolution. 45 46 Councilmember Carlson indicated a better option would be to withdraw the motion and to make a 47 motion to send it back. 48 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED 1 Councilmember Dahl asked if the maker and seconder of the motion would consider taking back the • 2 motion and the second and take this item back to work session. 3 4 Mayor Bergeson stated he thinks Councilmember Reinert made a compelling case for the adequacy of 5 the park dedication. He stated he was surprised the developer was not asking for renegotiation. He 6 stated he thinks staff did an excellent job of negotiating for the City, and he thinks the item should be 7 approved. 8 9 Mayor Bergeson also stated no one has stated the amount for the traffic light is inadequate, so he 10 doesn't believe that is an issue. 11 12 Councilmember Carlson asked if the issue doesn't pass, if it would come back to Council in two 13 weeks, and City Planner Smyser indicated it would. 14 15 Councilmember Reinert indicated he thought it was a win-win situation. He stated he didn't see the 16 point of going back to a work session, and he would like to see this go to a vote this evening. 17 18 Mayor Bergeson asked if there was additional discussion before the vote. 19 20 The motion failed, with a vote of 2-2 (Reinert and Bergeson voted aye. Carlson and Dahl voted nay 21 22 ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 04-47, Approving Development Contract 23 Century Farm North 2nd Addition, Jim Studenski •24 25 City Engineer Studenski stated that since the first motion failed, this item may as well be tabled since 26 nothing could be done without the final plat approval. 27 28 Councilmember Carlson moved to table Resolution No. 04-47, Approving Development Contract 29 Century Farm North 2' Addition. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 30 31 Mayor Bergeson stated he thought it was unfortunate to table this item, but that under the 32 circumstances he didn't believe they could consider it with the failure of the first motion. 33 34 Motion carried unanimously. 35 36 Resolution No. 04-47 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 37 38 F. Consideration of Resolution No. 04-44, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, 62nd 39 Street Improvement Project, Jim Studenski 40 41 City Engineer Studenski stated that Arnt Construction was now the low bidder and that their bid was 42 significantly under the engineers' estimate. He stated the total amount for the project is $930,219.38. 43 He also stated Arnt Construction has done a lot of work for the City, and the City is very comfortable 44 with their work. He stated staff is recommending going forward with this resolution. 45 46 Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 04-44, Accepting Bids and Awarding 47 Contract, 62nd Street Improvement Project. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. • 48 10 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 12, 2004 APPROVED • 1 Motion carried unanimously. 2 3 Resolution No. 04-44 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 4 5 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 6 7 There was none. 8 9 NEW BUSINESS 10 11 There was none. 12 13 COMMUNITY CALENDAR APRIL 13, 2004 THROUGH APRIL 26, 2004: 14 15 A) Wednesday, April 14, 2004, 6:30 p.m., Planning & Zoning Board Meeting 16 B) Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session 17 18 C) Monday, April 26, 2004, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 19 20 D) Monday, April 26, 2004, 6:00 p.m., Annual Board of Review 21 22 ADJOURN MP23 24 There being no further business, Councilmember Carlson moved to adjourn at 8:18 p.m. 25 Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. 26 27 Motion carried unanimously. 28 29 30 31 32• 33 Ann Blair, Clerk 34 35 36 37 38 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, June 28, 2004. Transcribed by: Sheree L. Theobald TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.