Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/25/2005 Council MinutesAPPROVED 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 4 5 DATE : April 25, 2005 6 TIME STARTED : 6:32 P.M. 7 TIME ENDED : 7:32 P.M. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmembers Carlson, Dahl, Reinert, Stoltz 9 and Mayor Bergeson 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Community Development Director, 13 Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Assistant City Administrator; Dan Tesch (part); 14 City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; and City Clerk, Ann Blair. 15 16 OPEN MIKE 17 18 Mayor Bergeson requested Councilmember Stoltz chair this portion of the meeting, as it pertained to 19 the West Shadow Lake Drive discussion, from which he is abstaining. 20 21 Councilmember Stoltz asked if there was anyone wishing to speak for the Open Mike portion of the 22 meeting. 23 •24 Pat Smith, 6922 West Shadow Lake, indicated he has been a resident since 1981. He noted he has a 25 past history working with the city on various committees, and stated the reason for his visit was the 26 road construction for West Shadow Lake. He stated he and his fellow neighbors have put together a 27 petition asking that the feasibility study be done. He indicated he understands there is a cost issue, 28 but the condition of the road is not going away, and is not getting better. He stated there has been a 29 lot of misinformation about the street and he thinks the only way to clarify it is to do the feasibility 30 study. He noted the City has a charter that directs how this type of project is done, and the project 31 cannot get to a referendum for a vote without the feasibility study. 32 33 Mr. Smith stated that 41 of the 61 homeowners affect signed the petition, noting he only had time to 34 go to 42 of the homes, and encountered only one homeowner who did not wish to sign the petition. 35 36 Mr. Smith indicated he and several neighbors reviewed the tape from the last meeting to see the 37 concerns, but stated that no matter what the cost, it is their tax dollars, and the study needs to be done. 38 He commented that back in the 90's when he was on the Charter Commission they tried to get street 39 improvements off the Charter and into the hands of the elected officials unsuccessfully. He asked 40 what the process would be to get the feasibility study revisited. 41 42 City Attorney Hawkins opined that the City Clerk would review the petition, and if adequate will 43 present it to the City Council for consideration at the next meeting. 44 45 Mr. Smith indicated after watching the tape of the last meeting it is a mystery as to why this did not 46 go forward. He stated it is in the best interest of the residents. He questioned why some dk 47 Councilmembers were opposed to the study. He stated the City Council needs to trigger the Mir 48 feasibility study to see how much it will cost, and the rest of the process will run its course. COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED 49 50 Councilmember Carlson commented that the question was asked two years ago on whether the Mayor 51 could or could not vote on this topic, so the opinion the Council just heard conflicts with previous 52 opinions. She reviewed previous Council meeting minutes in which the Mayor did participate. She 53 commented that when this issue came forward again she asked if anything different was being done to 54 help it pass, and noted she would consider the submission of a petition in future votes. She noted that 55 the need to change the Comprehensive Plan in this case is a factor for her, and she maintains that if 56 the Comprehensive Plan needs to change, it needs to go to the citizens for input, which has not been 57 done. 58 59 City Attorney Hawkins noted that his advice to the Mayor was that he should not vote on this issue. 60 He stated the Mayor has a property that would benefit from this improvement, and may have a 61 financial gain. 62 63 Councilmember Stoltz noted this is not a new position from Mayor Bergeson, and they do have a 64 written opinion from City Attorney Hawkins He stated that just prior to tonight's meeting Mayor 65 Bergeson informed him there were people in the audience from West Shadow Lake and he would 66 dismiss himself. He suggested they put this on the agenda as an information -only item to determine 67 what the next steps should be. 68 69 Councilmember Carlson opposed adding it to the agenda, as it is not the process, and she is not 70 prepared to have dialogue on this topic. She also expressed concern about some Councilmembers 71 having a document from the City Attorney that other Council Members do not have. •72 73 Councilmember Reinert stated he would support an informational item being added to the agenda. 74 75 Connie Dishdo, 7006 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated she has lived her since 1995. She indicated 76 this road poses a serious safety issue. She indicated that because of the trail system they are getting a 77 lot more traffic on West Shadow Lake, and when you have to go around the pedestrian and bike 78 traffic in your car it is dangerous. She stated everyone loves the trail system, but the road is used a lot 79 more than it used to be. 80 81 Carl Loewecke, 6375 Painted Turtle Road, indicated he agrees with the previous speaker. He stated 82 he lives in the area, and he and his family go down to West Shadow Lake Drive a lot. He indicated 83 there is always a lot of pedestrian and bike traffic, and it is a narrow road. 84 85 SETTING THE AGENDA 86 87 Mayor Bergeson noted a student from an American Government Class at Centennial High School 88 who was in attendance. 89 90 Councilmember Stoltz moved to add a process question under New Business, Item 8B, to understand 91 what the next steps are in the process for considering a feasibility study for West Shadow Lake Drive. 92 Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. 93 94 Councilmember Dahl stated she is curious on how this has been done in the past. She indicated that 95 typically when a topic has been raised at open mike they have had that person come to a work session 96 for further discussion. 2 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED S97 98 Councilmember Reinert noted the item is not being added for discussion, but for information on the 99 process to determine the next steps for the residents here tonight. 100 101 Councilmember Carlson noted that adding this to the agenda may set a precedent for future issues 102 being added on the night they are brought up at open mike. 103 104 Councilmember Stoltz reaffirmed the item is meant as information from Staff on what the process 105 would be from here. He indicated that in light of the opposition, he would withdraw his motion and 106 suggest this be discussed at the next work session. Councilmember Reinert rescinded his second. 107 108 Councilmember Carlson noted her concern about the letter received from the City Attorney with an 109 opinion on Mayor Bergeson's participation in this discussion, and the fact that the Council did not 110 receive that opinion prior to the meeting. 111 112 Mayor Bergeson asked City Attorney Hawkins to read the letter, which he did. Mayor Bergeson 113 noted the conflict of interest was discussed at many meetings where this road improvement was 114 discussed. Councilmember Reinert and Councilmember Stoltz supported the fact that Mayor 115 Bergeson's participation, or lack thereof, was discussed many times. 116 117 Councilmember Dahl indicated she was of the opinion that the Mayor's lack of participation was by 118 choice, and not suggested by the City Attorney. 119 •120 The agenda was accepted as presented. 121 122 CONSENT AGENDA 123 124 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the 125 motion. 126 127 Motion carried unanimously. 128 129 ITEM ACTION 130 131 A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES: 132 133 i) April 25, 2005 (Check No. 73532 - 134 73627, $403,840.67). Approved 135 136 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14704 - 137 14720, $207,360.67) Approved 138 139 B. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF 140 MARCH 23, 2005 COUNCIL WORK SESSION Approved 141 142 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK . 143 144 There was none. 3 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED •145 146 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 147 148 A. Consideration of 2004-2005 L.E.L.S. (Sergeants) Contract, Dan Tesch 149 150 Assistant City Administrator Tesch summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends 151 approval of the contract. 152 153 Councilmember Stoltz moved to approve the 2004-2005 L.E.L.S. Contract as presented by Staff. 154 Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 155 156 Motion carried unanimously. 157 158 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA 159 160 There was none. 161 162 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER 163 164 There was none. 165 166 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 167 •168 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-57, Approving Development Contract (Site Grading 169 Only), Foxborough, Jim Studenski 170 171 City Engineer Studenski reviewed the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval of the 172 development contract. 173 174 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-57 approving Development Contract, Site 175 Grading Only, for Foxborough. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 176 177 Motion carried unanimously. 178 179 Resolution No. 05-57 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 180 181 B. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-58, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, 2005 182 Street Sealcoating Project, Jim Studenski 183 184 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 185 186 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-58 accepting bids and awarding contract to 187 Pearson Bros. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 188 189 Motion carried unanimously. 190 . 191 Resolution No. 05-58 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 192 4 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED •193 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-59, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, 2005 194 Overlay Project, Jim Studenski 195 196 City Engineer Studenski reviewed the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval of the 197 contract. 198 199 Councilmember Stoltz moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-59 accepting bids and awarding contract to 200 Universal Enterprises of Mid MN, Inc. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 201 202 Motion carried unanimously. 203 204 Resolution No. 05-59 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 205 206 D. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-60, Approving Change Order No. 2 & 3 and Final 207 Payment, Twilight Acres/Twilight Acres 2", Jim Studenski 208 209 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, stating Staff recommends approval. 210 211 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-60 approving Change Order No. 2 and 3 212 and Final Payment, Twilight Acres/Twilight Acres 2'. Councilmember Carlson seconded the 213 motion. 214 215 Motion carried unanimously. •216 217 Resolution No. 05-60 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 218 219 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 220 221 There was none. 222 223 NEW BUSINESS 224 225 A. Consideration of minutes of meetings: 226 i. Consideration of minutes of March 14, 2005 City Council Meeting 227 228 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the minutes of March 14, 2005. Councilmember Carlson 229 seconded the motion. 230 231 Motion carried. Vote: 4:0:1 Councilmember Dahl abstained. 232 233 ii. Consideration of minutes of March 28, 2005 City Council Meeting 234 235 iii. Consideration of minutes of March 29, 2005 Special Council Work Session 236 (AUAR) 237 238 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the minutes of March 28, 2005 City Council Meeting, and .239 March 29, 2005 Special Council Work Session. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 240 5 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED 241 Motion carried. Vote: 4:0:1 Councilmember Stoltz abstained. •242 243 COMMUNITY CALENDAR April 26, 2005 THROUGH May 9, 2005: 244 245 A) Wednesday, April 27, 2005, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting 246 B) Monday, May 2, 2005, 6:30 p.m., Park Board Meeting 247 C) Wednesday, May 4, 2005; 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session 248 D) Thursday, May 5, 2005, 7:00 a.m., EDAC Meeting 249 E) Saturday, May 7, 2005, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Lino Lakes Spring Recycling Day 250 251 F) Monday, May 9, 2005, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 252 253 ADJOURN 254 255 There being no further business, Councilmember Dahl moved to adjourn at 7:32 p.m. Councilmember 256 Reinert seconded the motion. 257 258 Motion carried unanimously. 259 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, June 13, 2005. •260 261 262 263 264 Ann Blair, City Clerk Joh : erge. • n, M a yor 265 266 Transcribed by: 267 Karen Bucklen 268 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 6 APPROVED 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES • 2 MINUTES 3 4 5 DATE : April 25, 2005 6 TIME STARTED : 6:32 P.M. 7 TIME ENDED : 7:32 P.M. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmembers Carlson, Dahl, Reinert, Stoltz 9 and Mayor Bergeson 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Community Development Director, 13 Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Assistant City Administrator; Dan Tesch (part); 14 City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; and City Clerk, Ann Blair. 15 16 OPEN MIKE 17 18 Mayor Bergeson requested Councilmember Stoltz chair this portion of the meeting, as it pertained to 19 the West Shadow Lake Drive discussion, from which he is abstaining. 20 21 Councilmember Stoltz asked if there was anyone wishing to speak for the Open Mike portion of the 22 meeting. 23 S 24 Pat Smith, 6922 West Shadow Lake, indicated he has been a resident since 1981. He noted he has a 25 past history working with the city on various committees, and stated the reason for his visit was the 26 road construction for West Shadow Lake. He stated he and his fellow neighbors have put together a 27 petition asking that the feasibility study be done. He indicated he understands there is a cost issue, 28 but the condition of the road is not going away, and is not getting better. He stated there has been a 29 lot of misinformation about the street and he thinks the only way to clarify it is to do the feasibility 30 study. He noted the City has a charter that directs how this type of project is done, and the project 31 cannot get to a referendum for a vote without the feasibility study. 32 33 Mr. Smith stated that 41 of the 61 homeowners affect signed the petition, noting he only had time to 34 go to 42 of the homes, and encountered only one homeowner who did not wish to sign the petition. 35 36 Mr. Smith indicated he and several neighbors reviewed the tape from the last meeting to see the 37 concerns, but stated that no matter what the cost, it is their tax dollars, and the study needs to be done. 38 He commented that back in the 90's when he was on the Charter Commission they tried to get street 39 improvements off the Charter and into the hands of the elected officials unsuccessfully. He asked 40 what the process would be to get the feasibility study revisited. 41 42 City Attorney Hawkins opined that the City Clerk would review the petition, and if adequate will 43 present it to the City Council for consideration at the next meeting. 44 45 Mr. Smith indicated after watching the tape of the last meeting it is a mystery as to why this did not 46 go forward. He stated it is in the best interest of the residents. He questioned why some `47 Councilmembers were opposed to the study. He stated the City Council needs to trigger the 48 feasibility study to see how much it will cost, and the rest of the process will run its course. COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED • 49 50 Councilmember Carlson commented that the question was asked two years ago on whether the Mayor 51 could or could not vote on this topic, so the opinion the Council just heard conflicts with previous 52 opinions. She reviewed previous Council meeting minutes in which the Mayor did participate. She 53 commented that when this issue came forward again she asked if anything different was being done to 54 help it pass, and noted she would consider the submission of a petition in future votes. She noted that 55 the need to change the Comprehensive Plan in this case is a factor for her, and she maintains that if 56 the Comprehensive Plan needs to change, it needs to go to the citizens for input, which has not been 57 done. 58 59 City Attorney Hawkins noted that his advice to the Mayor was that he should not vote on this issue. 60 He stated the Mayor has a property that would benefit from this improvement, and may have a 61 financial gain. 62 63 Councilmember Stoltz noted this is not a new position from Mayor Bergeson, and they do have a 64 written opinion from City Attorney Hawkins. He stated that just prior to tonight's meeting Mayor 65 Bergeson informed him there were people in the audience from West Shadow Lake and he would 66 dismiss himself. He suggested they put this on the agenda as an information -only item to determine 67 what the next steps should be. 68 69 Councilmember Carlson opposed adding it to the agenda, as it is not the process, and she is not 70 prepared to have dialogue on this topic. She also expressed concern about some Councilmembers 71 having a document from the City Attorney that other Council Members do not have. • 72 73 Councilmember Reinert stated he would support an informational item being added to the agenda. 74 75 Connie Dishdo, 7006 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated she has lived her since 1995. She indicated 76 this road poses a serious safety issue. She indicated that because of the trail system they are getting a 77 lot more traffic on West Shadow Lake, and when you have to go around the pedestrian and bike 78 traffic in your car it is dangerous. She stated everyone loves the trail system, but the road is used a lot 79 more than it used to be. 80 81 Carl Loewecke, 6375 Painted Turtle Road, indicated he agrees with the previous speaker. He stated 82 he lives in the area, and he and his family go down to West Shadow Lake Drive a lot. He indicated 83 there is always a lot of pedestrian and bike traffic, and it is a narrow road. 84 85 SETTING THE AGENDA 86 87 Mayor Bergeson noted a student from an American Government Class at Centennial High School 88 who was in attendance. 89 90 Councilmember Stoltz moved to add a process question under New Business, Item 8B, to understand 91 what the next steps are in the process for considering a feasibility study for West Shadow Lake Drive. 92 Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. 93 94 Councilmember Dahl stated she is curious on how this has been done in the past. She indicated that • 95 typically when a topic has been raised at open mike they have had that person come to a work session 96 for further discussion. 2 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED •97 98 Councilmember Reinert noted the item is not being added for discussion, but for information on the 99 process to determine the next steps for the residents here tonight. 100 101 Councilmember Carlson noted that adding this to the agenda may set a precedent for future issues 102 being added on the night they are brought up at open mike. 103 104 Councilmember Stoltz reaffirmed the item is meant as information from Staff on what the process 105 would be from here. He indicated that in light of the opposition, he would withdraw his motion and 106 suggest this be discussed at the next work session. Councilmember Reinert rescinded his second. 107 108 Councilmember Carlson noted her concern about the letter received from the City Attorney with an 109 opinion on Mayor Bergeson's participation in this discussion, and the fact that the Council did not 110 receive that opinion prior to the meeting. 111 112 Mayor Bergeson asked City Attorney Hawkins to read the letter, which he did. Mayor Bergeson 113 noted the conflict of interest was discussed at many meetings where this road improvement was 114 discussed. Councilmember Reinert and Councilmember Stoltz supported the fact that Mayor 115 Bergeson's participation, or lack thereof, was discussed many times. 116 117 Councilmember Dahl indicated she was of the opinion that the Mayor's lack of participation was by 118 choice, and not suggested by the City Attorney. 119 0120 The agenda was accepted as presented. 121 122 CONSENT AGENDA 123 124 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the 125 motion. 126 127 Motion carried unanimously. 128 129 ITEM ACTION 130 131 A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES: 132 133 i) April 25, 2005 (Check No. 73532 — 134 73627, $403,840.67). Approved 135 136 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14704 — 137 14720, $207,360.67) Approved 138 139 B. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF 140 MARCH 23, 2005 COUNCIL WORK SESSION Approved 141 142 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK •143 144 There was none. 3 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED •145 146 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 147 148 A. Consideration of 2004-2005 L.E.L.S. (Sergeants) Contract, Dan Tesch 149 150 Assistant City Administrator Tesch summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends 151 approval of the contract. 152 153 Councilmember Stoltz moved to approve the 2004-2005 L.E.L.S. Contract as presented by Staff. 154 Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 155 156 Motion carried unanimously. 157 158 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA 159 160 There was none. 161 162 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER 163 164 There was none. 165 166 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 167 • 168 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-57, Approving Development Contract (Site Grading 169 Only), Foxborough, Jim Studenski 170 171 City Engineer Studenski reviewed the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval of the 172 development contract. 173 174 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-57 approving Development Contract, Site 175 Grading Only, for Foxborough. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 176 177 Motion carried unanimously. 178 179 Resolution No. 05-57 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 180 181 B. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-58, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, 2005 182 Street Sealcoating Project, Jim Studenski 183 184 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 185 186 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-58 accepting bids and awarding contract to 187 Pearson Bros. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 188 189 Motion carried unanimously. 190 • 191 Resolution No. 05-58 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 192 4 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED • 193 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-59, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract, 2005 • 194 Overlay Project, Jim Studenski 195 196 City Engineer Studenski reviewed the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval of the 197 contract. 198 199 Councilmember Stoltz moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-59 accepting bids and awarding contract to 200 Universal Enterprises of Mid MN, Inc. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 201 202 Motion carried unanimously. 203 204 Resolution No. 05-59 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 205 206 D. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-60, Approving Change Order No. 2 & 3 and Final 207 Payment, Twilight Acres/Twilight Acres 2nd, Jim Studenski 208 209 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, stating Staff recommends approval. 210 211 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-60 approving Change Order No. 2 and 3 212 and Final Payment, Twilight Acres/Twilight Acres 2°d. Councilmember Carlson seconded the 213 motion. 214 215 Motion carried unanimously. 0216 217 Resolution No. 05-60 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 218 219 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 220 221 There was none. 222 223 NEW BUSINESS 224 225 A. Consideration of minutes of meetings: 226 i. Consideration of minutes of March 14, 2005 City Council Meeting 227 228 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the minutes of March 14, 2005. Councilmember Carlson 229 seconded the motion. 230 231 Motion carried. Vote: 4:0:1 Councilmember Dahl abstained. 232 233 ii. Consideration of minutes of March 28, 2005 City Council Meeting 234 235 iii. Consideration of minutes of March 29, 2005 Special Council Work Session 236 (AUAR) 237 238 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the minutes of March 28, 2005 City Council Meeting, and • 239 March 29, 2005 Special Council Work Session. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 240 5 COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 25, 2005 APPROVED •241 Motion carried. Vote: 4:0:1 Councilmember Stoltz abstained. 242 243 COMMUNITY CALENDAR April 26, 2005 THROUGH May 9, 2005: 244 245 A) Wednesday, April 27, 2005, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting 246 B) Monday, May 2, 2005, 6:30 p.m., Park Board Meeting 247 C) Wednesday, May 4, 2005; 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session 248 D) Thursday, May 5, 2005, 7:00 a.m., EDAC Meeting 249 E) Saturday, May 7, 2005, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Lino Lakes Spring Recycling Day 250 251 F) Monday, May 9, 2005, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 252 253 ADJOURN 254 255 There being no further business, Councilmember Dahl moved to adjourn at 7:32 p.m. Councilmember 256 Reinert seconded the motion. 257 258 Motion carried unanimously. 259 Ask260 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, June 13, 2005. W261 262 • 263 a 264 Ann Blair, ity Clerk 265 266 Transcribe1 by: 267 Karen Bucklen 268 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 6